GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms

Partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. Chaperonin binds a reversibly oxidized form derived from the native protein

The mammalian mitochondrial enzyme, rhodanese, can form stable complexes with the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL if it is either refolded from 8 M urea in the presence of chaperonin or is simply added to the chaperonin as the folded conformer at 37 degreesC. In the presence of GroEL, the kinetic profile of the inactivation of native rhodanese followed a single exponential decay. Initially, the inactivation rates showed a dependence on the chaperonin concentration but reached a constant maximum value as the GroEL concentration increased. Over the same time period, in the absence of GroEL, native rhodanese showed only a small decline in activity. The addition of a non-denaturing concentration of urea accelerated the inactivation and partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. These results suggest that the GroEL chaperonin may facilitate protein unfolding indirectly by interacting with intermediates that exist in equilibrium with native rhodanese. The activity of GroEL-bound rhodanese can be completely recovered upon addition of GroES and ATP. The reactivation kinetics and commitment rates for GroEL-rhodanese complexes prepared from either unfolded or native rhodanese were identical. However, when rhodanese was allowed to inactivate spontaneously in the absence of GroEL, no recovery of activity was observed upon addition of GroEL, GroES, and ATP. Interestingly, the partitioning of rhodanese and its subsequent inactivation did not occur when native rhodanese and GroEL were incubated under anaerobic conditions. Thus, our results strongly suggest that the inactive intermediate that partitions onto GroEL is the reversibly oxidized form of rhodanese.

GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity

The chaperonin GroEL is an oligomeric double ring structure that, together with the cochaperonin GroES, assists protein folding. Biochemical analyses indicate that folding occurs in a cis ternary complex in which substrate is sequestered within the GroEL central cavity underneath GroES. Recently, however, studies of GroEL "minichaperones" containing only the apical substrate binding subdomain have questioned the functional importance of substrate encapsulation within GroEL-GroES complexes. Minichaperones were reported to assist folding despite the fact that they are monomeric and therefore cannot form a central cavity. Here we compare directly the folding activity of minichaperones with that of the full GroEL-GroES system. In agreement with earlier studies, minichaperones assist folding of some proteins. However, this effect is observed only under conditions where substantial spontaneous folding is also observed and is indistinguishable from that resulting from addition of the nonchaperone protein alpha-casein. By contrast, the full GroE system efficiently promotes folding of several substrates under conditions where essentially no spontaneous folding is observed. These data argue that the full GroEL folding activity requires the intact GroEL-GroES complex, and in light of previous studies, underscore the importance of substrate encapsulation for providing a folding environment distinct from the bulk solution.

Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding

Recent structural and biochemical investigations have come together to allow a better understanding of the mechanism of chaperonin (GroEL, Hsp60)-mediated protein folding, the final step in the accurate expression of genetic information. Major, asymmetric conformational changes in the GroEL double toroid accompany binding of ATP and the cochaperonin GroES. When a nonnative polypeptide, bound to one of the GroEL rings, is encapsulated by GroES to form a cis ternary complex, these changes drive the polypeptide into the sequestered cavity and initiate its folding. ATP hydrolysis in the cis ring primes release of the products, and ATP binding in the trans ring then disrupts the cis complex. This process allows the polypeptide to achieve its final native state, if folding was completed, or to recycle to another chaperonin molecule, if the folding process did not result in a form committed to the native state.

Changing the nature of the initial chaperonin capture complex influences the substrate folding efficiency

For the chaperonin substrates, rhodanese, malate dehydrogenase (MDH), and glutamine synthetase (GS), the folding efficiencies, and the lifetimes of folding intermediates were measured with either the nucleotide-free GroEL or the activated ATP.GroEL.GroES chaperonin complex. With both nucleotide-free and activated complex, the folding efficiency of rhodanese and MDH remained high over a large range of GroEL to substrate concentration ratios (up to 1:1). In contrast, the folding efficiency of GS began to decline at ratios lower than 8:1. At ratios where the refolding yields were initially the same, only a relatively small increase (1.6-fold) in misfolding kinetics of MDH was observed with either the nucleotide-free or activated chaperonin complex. For rhodanese, no change was detected with either chaperonin complex. In contrast, GS lost its ability to interact with the chaperonin system at an accelerated rate (8-fold increase) when the activated complex instead of the nucleotide-free complex was used to rescue the protein from misfolding. Our data demonstrate that the differences in the refolding yields are related to the intrinsic folding kinetics of the protein substrates. We suggest that the early kinetic events at the substrate level ultimately govern successful chaperonin-substrate interactions and play a crucial role in dictating polypeptide flux through the chaperonin system. Our results also indicate that an accurate assessment of the transient properties of folding intermediates that dictate the initial chaperonin-substrate interactions requires the use of the activated complex as the interacting chaperonin species.

In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones

Fragments encompassing the apical domain of GroEL, called minichaperones, facilitate the refolding of several proteins in vitro without requiring GroES, ATP, or the cage-like structure of multimeric GroEL. We have identified the smallest minichaperone that is active in vitro in chaperoning the refolding of rhodanese and cyclophilin A: GroEL(193-335). This finding raises the question of whether the minichaperones are active under more stringent conditions in vivo. The smallest minichaperones complement two temperature-sensitive Escherichia coli groEL alleles, EL44 and EL673, at 43 degreesC. Although they cannot replace GroEL in cells in which the chromosomal groEL gene has been deleted by P1 transduction, GroEL(193-335) enhances the colony-forming ability of such cells when limiting amounts of GroEL are expressed from a tightly regulated plasmid. Surprisingly, we found that overexpression of GroEL prevents plaque formation by bacteriophage lambda and inhibits replication of the lambda origin-dependent plasmid, Lorist6. The minichaperones also inhibit Lorist6 replication, but less markedly. The complex quaternary structure of GroEL, its central cavity, and the structural allosteric changes that take place on the binding of nucleotides and GroES are not essential for all of its functions in vivo.

Chaperonins

The molecular chaperones are a diverse set of protein families required for the correct folding, transport and degradation of other proteins in vivo. There has been great progress in understanding the structure and mechanism of action of the chaperonin family, exemplified by Escherichia coli GroEL. The chaperonins are large, double-ring oligomeric proteins that act as containers for the folding of other protein subunits. Together with its co-protein GroES, GroEL binds non-native polypeptides and facilitates their refolding in an ATP-dependent manner. The action of the ATPase cycle causes the substrate-binding surface of GroEL to alternate in character between hydrophobic (binding/unfolding) and hydrophilic (release/folding). ATP binding initiates a series of dramatic conformational changes that bury the substrate-binding sites, lowering the affinity for non-native polypeptide. In the presence of ATP, GroES binds to GroEL, forming a large chamber that encapsulates substrate proteins for folding. For proteins whose folding is absolutely dependent on the full GroE system, ATP binding (but not hydrolysis) in the encapsulating ring is needed to initiate protein folding. Similarly, ATP binding, but not hydrolysis, in the opposite GroEL ring is needed to release GroES, thus opening the chamber. If the released substrate protein is still not correctly folded, it will go through another round of interaction with GroEL.

Prefoldin, a chaperone that delivers unfolded proteins to cytosolic chaperonin

We describe the discovery of a heterohexameric chaperone protein, prefoldin, based on its ability to capture unfolded actin. Prefoldin binds specifically to cytosolic chaperonin (c-cpn) and transfers target proteins to it. Deletion of the gene encoding a prefoldin subunit in S. cerevisiae results in a phenotype similar to those found when c-cpn is mutated, namely impaired functions of the actin and tubulin-based cytoskeleton. Consistent with prefoldin having a general role in chaperonin-mediated folding, we identify homologs in archaea, which have a class II chaperonin but contain neither actin nor tubulin. We show that by directing target proteins to chaperonin, prefoldin promotes folding in an environment in which there are many competing pathways for nonnative proteins.

An activator target in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme

Expression of protein-coding genes in eukaryotes involves the recruitment, by transcriptional activator proteins, of a transcription initiation apparatus consisting of greater than 50 polypeptides. Recent genetic and biochemical evidence in yeast suggests that a subset of these proteins, called SRB proteins, are likely targets for transcriptional activators. We demonstrate here, through affinity chromatography, photo-cross-linking, and surface plasmon resonance experiments, that the GAL4 activator interacts directly with the SRB4 subunit of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. The GAL4 activation domain binds to two essential segments of SRB4. The physiological relevance of this interaction is confirmed by mutations in SRB4, which occur within its GAL4-binding domain and which restore activation in vivo by a GAL4 derivative bearing a mutant activation domain.

Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings

The ATPase cycle of GroE chaperonins has been examined by transient kinetics to dissect partial reactions in complexes where GroEL is asymmetrically loaded with nucleotides. The occupation of one heptameric ring by ADP does not inhibit the loading of the other with ATP nor does it prevent the consequent structural rearrangement to the "open" state. However, ADP binding completely inhibits ATP hydrolysis in the asymmetric complex, i.e. ATP cannot by hydrolysed when ADP is bound to the other ring. This non-competitive inhibition of the ATPase by ADP is consistent with a ring-switching, or "two-stroke", mechanism of the type: ATP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ADP, i.e. with respect to the GroEL rings, ATP turns over in an alternating fashion. When the ATP-stabilized, "open" state is challenged with hexokinase and glucose, to quench the free ATP, the open state relaxes slowly (0.44 s-1) back to the apo (or closed) conformation. This rate, however, is three times faster than the hydrolytic step, showing that bound ATP is not committed to hydrolysis. When GroES is bound to the GroEL:ATP complex and the system is quenched in the same way, approximately half of the bound ATP undergoes hydrolysis on the chaperonin complex showing that the co-protein increases the degree of commitment. Thus, non-competitive inhibition of ATP hydrolysis, combined with the ability of the co-protein to block ligand exchange between rings has the effect of imposing a reciprocating cycle of reactions with ATP hydrolysing, and GroES binding, on each of the GroEL rings in turn. Taken together, these data imply that the dominant, productive steady state reaction in vivo is: GroEL:ATP:GroES --> GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL for a hemi-cycle, and that significant inhibi tion of hydrolysis may arise through the formation of a dead-end ADP:GroEL:ATP:GroES complex.

Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homolog of CCT

We have determined to 2.6 A resolution the crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal group II chaperonin from T. acidophilum. The hexadecameric homolog of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT/TRiC shows an (alphabeta)4(alphabeta)4 subunit assembly. Domain folds are homologous to GroEL but form a novel type of inter-ring contact. The domain arrangement resembles the GroEL-GroES cis-ring. Parts of the apical domains form a lid creating a closed conformation. The lid substitutes for a GroES-like cochaperonin that is absent in the CCT/TRiC system. The central cavity has a polar surface implicated in protein folding. Binding of the transition state analog Mg-ADP-AIF3 suggests that the closed conformation corresponds to the ATP form.

Chaperonins

Molecular chaperones are essential to all living organisms. Their key role consists of mediating protein folding within the cell. Recent functional studies have provided more detailed information about the function and regulation of the chaperone network. Highlights of the past year include the crystal structure determinations of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES complex and of their isolated peptide-binding domains.

Comparison of the conformational state and in vitro refolding of yeast chaperonin protein cpn10 with bacterial GroES

Gel filtration studies demonstrate that the heptameric complex of yeast cpn10 (pI around 8.8) reversibly disassembles into monomers when lowering the pH to 4.5, whereas its secondary structure is retained as demonstrated by circular dichroism. Monomeric yeast cpn10 does not bind to GroEL in the presence of nucleotides, whereas under identical conditions E. coli cpn10 (GroES), having a strong sequence homology to the yeast form but a pI of 5.2, shows no pH-dependent dissociation and is able to complex with GroEL at both pH 7.5 and 4.5. Using circular dichroism it is shown that, unlike E. coli cpn10, yeast cpn10 is not able to refold spontaneously after first being fully unfolded in 8 M urea. However, refolding of yeast cpn10 to a complex that can be recognised by GroEL depends on the presence of a lipid-water interface with a specificity for negatively charged lipids. We suggest that the requirements for refolding of yeast cpn10 are related to its post-translational transport and subcellular localization.

Directionality of polypeptide transfer in the mitochondrial pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding

Protein folding in mitochondria depends on the functional cooperation of the Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone systems, at least for a subset of mitochondrial polypeptides. As suggested previously, Hsp70 and Hsp60 act sequentially. However, recent proposals that the chaperonin Hsp60 functions by releasing substrate protein in an unfolded state would predict a lateral partitioning of folding intermediates between chaperone systems. Firefly luciferase, carrying a mitochondrial targeting signal, was used as a model protein to analyze the degree of coupling and the directionality of substrate transfer between the Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperones. In vitro, Hsp60 binds unfolded luciferase with high affinity but is unable to promote its folding, whereas the Hsp70 system assists the folding of luciferase efficiently. Upon import into yeast mitochondria, luciferase interacted first with Hsp70. Surprisingly, most of the protein subsequently accumulated in a complex with Hsp60 and never reached the native state. Import into mitochondria that lack a functional Hsp60 did not result in increased folding, but in the aggregation of luciferase. Thus, in intact organelles the two chaperone systems do not function independently in de novo folding of aggregation-sensitive proteins but rather act in an ordered pathway with substrate transfer predominantly in the direction from Hsp70 to Hsp60.

The chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT) displays a single-ring mediated disassembly and reassembly cycle

The chaperonin-containing TCP-1 (CCT) assists in the folding of actins and tubulins in eukaryotic cells. CCT is composed of 8 subunit species encoded by separate genes. CCT purifies as a single hetero-oligomeric protein complex of 950 kDa through multiple chromatographic and antibody affinity procedures. The CCT 16-mer contains 7 polypeptide species in equimolar amounts (CCTalpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon, zeta, eta), together with another subunit (CCTtheta) which is around half-molar. Here we show, by in vitro translation of CCT subunit mRNAs in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, that none of the CCT subunit proteins are themselves folded by CCT. However, the newly translated CCT subunits can incorporate into the endogenous CCT complex present in the lysate via a mechanism involving a nucleotide-dependent disassembly reaction to produce single-rings and then a reassembly reaction whereby free CCT subunits assemble onto these single-rings. This cycling behaviour is an inherent property of the CCT chaperonin complex and provides a powerful method for introducing single amino acid residue changes into this 8578 residue protein complex.

Structural aspects of GroEL function

The chaperonin GroEL and its cofactor GroES facilitate protein folding in an ATP-regulated manner. The recently solved crystal structure of the GroEL.GroES.(ADP)7 complex shows that the lining of the cavity in the polypeptide acceptor state is hydrophobic, whereas in the protein-release state it becomes hydrophilic. Other highlights of the past year include the visualization of the allosteric states of GroEL with respect to ATP using cryo-electron microscopy, and an X-ray crystallographic analysis of the interaction between the apical domain of GroEL and a peptide.

Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL

The remarkable ability of the chaperonin GroEL to recognise a diverse range of non-native states of proteins constitutes one of the most fascinating molecular recognition events in protein chemistry. Recent structural studies have revealed a possible model for substrate binding by GroEL and a high-resolution image of the GroEL-GroES folding machinery has provided important new insights into our understanding of the mechanism of action of this chaperonin. Studies with a variety of model substrates reveal that the binding of substrate proteins to GroEL is not just a passive event, but can result in significant changes in the structure and stability of the bound polypeptide. The potential impact of this on the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding is not fully understood, but provides exciting scope for further experiment.

Conditions for nucleotide-dependent GroES-GroEL interactions. GroEL14(groES7)2 is favored by an asymmetric distribution of nucleotides

A still unresolved question regarding the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding involves the stoichiometry of the GroEL-GroES complex. This is important, because the activities of the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL are modulated by the cochaperonin GroES. In this report, the binding of GroES to highly purified GroEL in the presence of ATP, ADP, and the nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue, 5'-adenylyl beta,gamma-imidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP), was investigated by using the fluorescence anisotropy of succinimidyl-1-pyrenebutyrate-labeled GroES. In the presence of Mg2+-ATP and high [KCl] (10 mM), two GroES7 rings bind per one GroEL14. In contrast, in the presence of ADP or AMP-PNP only one molecule of oligomeric GroES can be tightly bound by GroEL. With AMP-PNP, binding of a small amount (<20%) of a second GroES can be detected. In the presence of ADP alone, a second GroES ring can bind to GroEL weakly and with negative cooperativity. Strikingly, addition of AMP-PNP to the solution containing preformed GroEL14(GroES7) complexes formed in the presence of ADP results in an increase in the fluorescence anisotropy. Analysis of this effect indicates that 2 mol of GroES oligomer can be bound in the presence of mixed nucleotides. A similar conclusion follows from studies in which ADP is added to an GroEL14 (GroES7) complex formed in the presence of AMP-PNP. This is the first demonstration of an asymmetric distribution of nucleotides bound on the 1:2 GroEL14 (GroES7)2 complex. The relation of the observed phenomena to the proposed mechanism of the GroEL function is discussed.

Multiple cycles of global unfolding of GroEL-bound cyclophilin A evidenced by NMR

GroE, the chaperonin system of Escherichia coli, prevents the aggregation of partially folded or misfolded proteins by complexing them in a form competent for subsequent folding to the native state. We examined the exchange of amide protons of cyclophilin A (CypA) interacting with GroEL, using NMR spectroscopy. We have applied labeling pulses in H2O to the deuterated GroEL-CypA-complex. When ATP and GroES were added after the labeling pulse, refolding of CypA could be accelerated to rates comparable to the amide proton exchange. This allowed the calculation of protection factors (PF) for the backbone amide protons in the GroEL-bound substrate protein. A set of highly protected protons in the native state (PF 10(5) to 10(7)) was observed to be much less protected (PF 10(2) to 10(4)) in complex with GroEL and, in contrast to the native structure, the protection factors were found to be quite uniform along the sequence suggesting that CypA with native-like structure undergoes multiple cycles of unfolding while bound to GroEL, which are faster than unfolding in free solution. Because of the small sequence dependence of the protection factors, unfolding must be global, and in this way the chaperone appears to resolve off-pathway intermediates and to support protein folding by annealing. Although in the complex with GroEL native-like states still predominate over globally unfolded states, this equilibrium is shifted 10(2) to 10(4)-fold toward the unfolded state when compared to CypA in free solution. Repeated global unfolding may be a key step in achieving a high yield of correctly folded proteins.

Molecular chaperones: avoiding the crowd

The involvement of two types of molecular chaperone in folding newly synthesized proteins can be rationalized in terms of the crowded nature of the intracellular environment. Recent work sheds light on how these chaperones recognise their substrates and protect them from the problems of macromolecular crowding.

Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL is a double-ring structure with a central cavity in each ring that provides an environment for the efficient folding of proteins when capped by the co-chaperone GroES in the presence of adenine nucleotides. Productive folding of the substrate rhodanese has been observed in cis ternary complexes, where GroES and polypeptide are bound to the same ring, formed with either ATP, ADP or non-hydrolysable ATP analogues, suggesting that the specific requirement for ATP is confined to an action in the trans ring that evicts GroES and polypeptide from the cis side. We show here, however, that for the folding of malate dehydrogenase and Rubisco there is also an absolute requirement for ATP in the cis ring, as ADP and AMP-PNP are unable to promote folding. We investigated the specific roles of binding and hydrolysis of ATP in the cis and trans rings using mutant forms of GroEL that bind ATP but are defective in its hydrolysis. Binding of ATP and GroES in cis initiated productive folding inside a highly stable GroEL-ATP-GroES complex. To discharge GroES and polypeptide, ATP hydrolysis in the cis ring was required to form a GroEL-ADP-GroES complex with decreased stability, priming the cis complex for release by ATP binding (without hydrolysis) in the trans ring. These observations offer an explanation of why GroEL functions as a double-ring complex.

The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

Chaperonins assist protein folding with the consumption of ATP. They exist as multi-subunit protein assemblies comprising rings of subunits stacked back to back. In Escherichia coli, asymmetric intermediates of GroEL are formed with the co-chaperonin GroES and nucleotides bound only to one of the seven-subunit rings (the cis ring) and not to the opposing ring (the trans ring). The structure of the GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 complex reveals how large en bloc movements of the cis ring's intermediate and apical domains enable bound GroES to stabilize a folding chamber with ADP confined to the cis ring. Elevation and twist of the apical domains double the volume of the central cavity and bury hydrophobic peptide-binding residues in the interface with GroES, as well as between GroEL subunits, leaving a hydrophilic cavity lining that is conducive to protein folding. An inward tilt of the cis equatorial domain causes an outward tilt in the trans ring that opposes the binding of a second GroES. When combined with new functional results, this negative allosteric mechanism suggests a model for an ATP-driven folding cycle that requires a double toroid.

In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system

The quantitative contribution of chaperonin GroEL to protein folding in E. coli was analyzed. A diverse set of newly synthesized polypeptides, predominantly between 10-55 kDa, interacts with GroEL, accounting for 10%-15% of all cytoplasmic protein under normal growth conditions, and for 30% or more upon exposure to heat stress. Most proteins leave GroEL rapidly within 10-30 s. We distinguish three classes of substrate proteins: (I) proteins with a chaperonin-independent folding pathway; (II) proteins, more than 50% of total, with an intermediate chaperonin dependence for which normally only a small fraction transits GroEL; and (III) a set of highly chaperonin-dependent proteins, many of which dissociate slowly from GroEL and probably require sequestration of aggregation-sensitive intermediates within the GroEL cavity for successful folding.

The chaperonin cycle cannot substitute for prolyl isomerase activity, but GroEL alone promotes productive folding of a cyclophilin-sensitive substrate to a cyclophilin-resistant form

The chaperonin GroEL and the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase cyclophilin are major representatives of two distinct cellular systems that help proteins to adopt their native three-dimensional structure: molecular chaperones and folding catalysts. Little is known about whether and how these proteins cooperate in protein folding. In this study, we have examined the action of GroEL and cyclophilin on a substrate protein in two distinct prolyl isomerization states. Our results indicate that: (i) GroEL binds the same substrate in different prolyl isomerization states. (ii) GroEL-ES does not promote prolyl isomerizations, but even retards isomerizations. (iii) Cyclophilin cannot promote the correct isomerization of prolyl bonds of a GroEL-bound substrate, but acts sequentially after release of the substrate from GroEL. (iv) A denatured substrate with all-native prolyl bonds is delayed in folding by cyclophilin due to isomerization to non-native prolyl bonds; a substrate that has proceeded in folding beyond a stage where it can be bound by GroEL is still sensitive to cyclophilin. (v) If a denatured cyclophilin-sensitive substrate is first bound to GroEL, however, productive folding to a cyclophilin-resistant form can be promoted, even without GroES. We conclude that GroEL and cyclophilin act sequentially and exert complementary functions in protein folding.

GroEL provides a folding pathway with lower apparent activation energy compared to spontaneous refolding of human carbonic anhydrase II

The kinetics of the refolding of the enzyme, human carbonic anhydrase II (HCA II), at different temperatures, together with the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL, has been studied. The Arrhenius plots for the spontaneous, GroEL-assisted, and GroEL/ES-assisted refolding of HCA II show that the apparent activation energy (E(a)) is lower in the presence of the chaperonin GroEL alone than for the spontaneous reaction, whereas the apparent activation energy for the GroEL/ES-assisted reaction is almost the same as for the spontaneous reaction (85, 46, and 72 kJ/mol, for the spontaneous, GroEL, and GroEL/ES-assisted reactions, respectively).

Chaperonin-mediated folding in the eukaryotic cytosol proceeds through rounds of release of native and nonnative forms

The eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin, CCT, plays an essential role in mediating ATP-dependent folding of actin and tubulin. There is debate about whether it mediates folding through a single round of association followed by release of native forms, or through cycles of binding and full release in which only a fraction of released molecules reaches native form in any cycle. We examine the fate of newly synthesized substrate proteins bound to CCT in reticulocyte lysate or intact Xenopus oocytes. When a chaperonin "trap," able to bind but not release substrate protein, is introduced, production of the native state is strongly inhibited, associated with transfer to trap. While predominantly nonnative forms of actin, tubulin, and a newly identified substrate, G(alpha)-transducin, are released from CCT, a small fraction reaches native form with each round of release, inaccessible to trap. This overall mechanism resembles that of the bacterial chaperonin, GroEL.

GroE modulates kinetic partitioning of folding intermediates between alternative states to maximize the yield of biologically active protein

The central issue of chaperone function is the mechanism whereby partitioning of folding polypeptides along the productive pathway may be maximized, while non-productive folding pathways are minimized. We have found that the GroE chaperone is capable of accelerating the rate of the productive pathway of bacterial luciferase alphabeta heterodimer formation. At intermediate temperatures at which the productive pathway and non-productive pathways leading to dimerization-incompetent monomeric forms of the subunits coexist, GroE enhances the yield of native enzyme while minimizing the yield of misfolded protein. These results suggest that GroE releases the subunits in forms capable of achieving the native structure faster than the forms initially bound by the chaperone. At higher temperatures, at which the native enzyme is stable but the dimerization reaction is diminished, GroE is unable to force the productive folding reaction to occur. However, the chaperone decreases the rate of formation of the heterodimerization-incompetent species, thereby enhancing the final yield of active enzyme when the temperature is reduced to the permissive range. Our results suggest a mechanism by which the chaperone functions to maximize the yield of the biologically active form of the protein while maintaining or even accelerating the essential rapid kinetics of folding reactions.

Mechanism of protein remodeling by ClpA chaperone

ClpA, a newly discovered ATP-dependent molecular chaperone, remodels bacteriophage P1 RepA dimers into monomers, thereby activating the latent specific DNA binding activity of RepA. We investigated the mechanism of the chaperone activity of ClpA by dissociating the reaction into several steps and determining the role of nucleotide in each step. In the presence of ATP or a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog, the initial step is the self-assembly of ClpA and its association with inactive RepA dimers. ClpA-RepA complexes form rapidly and at 0 degrees C but are relatively unstable. The next step is the conversion of unstable ClpA-RepA complexes into stable complexes in a time- and temperature-dependent reaction. The transition to stable ClpA-RepA complexes requires binding of ATP, but not ATP hydrolysis, because nonhydrolyzable ATP analogs satisfy the nucleotide requirement. The stable complexes contain approximately 1 mol of RepA dimer per mol of ClpA hexamer and are committed to activating RepA. In the last step of the reaction, active RepA is released upon exchange of ATP with the nonhydrolyzable ATP analog and ATP hydrolysis. Importantly, we discovered that one cycle of RepA binding to ClpA followed by ATP-dependent release is sufficient to convert inactive RepA to its active form.

Chaperonin-mediated folding of green fluorescent protein

Chaperonin-mediated folding of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was examined by real-time monitoring of recovery of fluorescence and by gel filtration high-performance liquid chromatography. Acid-denatured GFP can fold spontaneously upon dilution into the neutral buffer. When Escherichia coli GroEL/ES was present, folding of GFP was arrested. Folding was resumed by subsequent addition of 100 microM or 1 mM ATP, and native GFP was regenerated to 100% yield. When folding was resumed by 10 microM ATP (1.4 mol/mol GroEL subunit), about 60% of GFP recovered native structure, and one-half of them (30%) was found to be still bound to GroEL/ES, indicating the occurrence of folding in the central cavity of the GroEL ring underneath GroES (cis-folding). Because the overall rates of GroEL/ES-, ATP-mediated GFP folding were all similar to that of spontaneous folding, it was concluded that cis-folding proceeded as fast as spontaneous folding. The GroEL/ES-bound native GFP was observed only when both GroES and ATP (but not ADP) were present in the folding mixture. Holo-chaperonin from Thermus thermophilus, which was purified as a cpn60/10 complex, exhibited the similar cis-folding. Consistently, ATP-dependent exchange of cpn10 in the holo-chaperonin with free cpn10 was observed.

GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases

Using stopped-flow fluorescence techniques, we have examined both the refolding and unfolding reactions of four structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases (murine DHFR, wild-type E. coli DHFR, and two E. coli DHFR mutants) in the presence and absence of the molecular chaperonin GroEL. We show that GroEL binds the unfolded conformation of each DHFR with second order rate constants greater than 3 x 10(7) M(-1)s(-1) at 22 degrees C. Once bound to GroEL, the proteins refold with rate constants similar to those for folding in the absence of GroEL. The overall rate of formation of native enzyme is decreased by the stability of the complex between GroEL and the last folding intermediate. For wild-type E. coli DHFR, complex formation is transient while for the others, a stable complex is formed. The stable complexes are the same regardless of whether they are formed from the unfolded or folded DHFR. When complex formation is initiated from the native conformation, GroEL binds to a pre-existing non-native conformation, presumably a late folding intermediate, rather than to the native state, thus shifting the conformational equilibrium toward the non-native species by mass action. The model presented here for the interaction of these four proteins with GroEL quantitatively describes the difference between the formation of a transient complex and a stable complex as defined by the rate constants for release and rebinding to GroEL relative to the rate constant for the last folding step. Due to this kinetic partitioning, three different mechanisms can be proposed for the formation of stable complexes between GroEL and either murine DHFR or the two E. coli DHFR mutants. These data show that productive folding of GroEL-bound proteins can occur in the absence of nucleotides or the co-chaperonin GroES and suggest that transient complex formation may be the functional role of GroEL under normal conditions.

GroES binding regulates GroEL chaperonin activity under heat shock

Chaperonins GroEL14 and GroES7 are heat-shock proteins implicated in the molecular response to stress. Protein fluorescence, crosslinking and kinetic analysis revealed that the bond between the two otherwise thermoresistant oligomers is regulated by temperature. As temperature increased, the affinity of GroES7 and the release of bound proteins from the chaperonin concomitantly decreased. After heat shock, GroES7 rebinding to GroEL14 and GroEL14GroES7 particles correlated with the restoration of optimal protein folding/release activity. Chaperonins thus behave as a molecular thermometer which can inhibit the release of aggregation-prone proteins during heat shock and restore protein folding and release after heat shock.

A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition

A monomeric peptide fragment of GroEL, consisting of residues 191-376, is a mini-chaperone with a functional chaperoning activity. We have solved the crystal structure at 1.7 A resolution of GroEL(191-376) with a 17-residue N-terminal tag. The N-terminal tag of one molecule binds in the active site of a neighboring molecule in the crystal. This appears to mimic the binding of a peptide substrate molecule. Seven substrate residues are bound in a relatively extended conformation. Interactions between the substrate and the active site are predominantly hydrophobic, but there are also four hydrogen bonds between the main chain of the substrate and side chains of the active site. Although the preferred conformation of a bound substrate is essentially extended, the flexibility of the active site may allow it to accommodate the binding of exposed hydrophobic surfaces in general, such as molten globule-type structures. GroEL can therefore help unfold proteins by binding to a hydrophobic region and exert a binding pressure toward the fully unfolded state, thus acting as an "unfoldase." The structure of the mini-chaperone is very similar to that of residues 191-376 in intact GroEL, so we can build it into GroEL and reconstruct how a peptide can bind to the tetradecamer. A ring of connected binding sites is noted that can explain many aspects of substrate binding and activity.

GroEL-mediated protein folding

I. Architecture of GroEL and GroES and the reaction pathway A. Architecture of the chaperonins B. Reaction pathway of GroEL-GroES-mediated folding II. Polypeptide binding A. A parallel network of chaperones binding polypeptides in vivo B. Polypeptide binding in vitro 1. Role of hydrophobicity in recognition 2. Homologous proteins with differing recognition-differences in primary structure versus effects on folding pathway 3. Conformations recognized by GroEL a. Refolding studies b. Binding of metastable intermediates c. Conformations while stably bound at GroEL 4. Binding constants and rates of association 5. Conformational changes in the substrate protein associated with binding by GroEL a. Observations b. Kinetic versus thermodynamic action of GroEL in mediating unfolding c. Crossing the energy landscape in the presence of GroEL III. ATP binding and hydrolysis-driving the reaction cycle IV. GroEL-GroES-polypeptide ternary complexes-the folding-active cis complex A. Cis and trans ternary complexes B. Symmetric complexes C. The folding-active intermediate of a chaperonin reaction-cis ternary complex D. The role of the cis space in the folding reaction E. Folding governed by a "timer" mechanism F. Release of nonnative polypeptides during the GroEL-GroES reaction G. Release of both native and nonnative forms under physiologic conditions H. A role for ATP binding, as well as hydrolysis, in the folding cycle V. Concluding remarks.

Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction

Mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mMDH) folds more rapidly in the presence of GroEL, GroES and ATP than it does unassisted. The increase in folding rate as a function of the concentration of GroEL-ES reaches a maximum at a stoichiometry which is approximately equimolar (mMDH subunits:GroEL oligomer) and with an apparent dissociation constant K' for the GroE acceptor state of at least 1 x 10(-8) M. However, even at chaperonin concentrations which are 4000 x K', i.e. at negligible concentrations of free mMDH, the observed folding rate of the substrate remains at its optimum, showing not only that folding occurs in the chaperonin-mMDH complex but also that this rate is uninhibited by any interactions with sites on GroEL. Despite the ability of mMDH to fold on the chaperonin, trapping experiments show that its dwell time on the complex is only 20 seconds. This correlates with both the rate of ATP turnover and the dwell time of GroES on the complex and is only approximately 5% of the time taken for the substrate to commit to the folded state. The results imply that ATP drives the chaperonin complex through a cycle of three functional states: (1) an acceptor complex in which the unfolded substrate is bound tightly; (2) an encapsulation state in which it is sequestered but direct protein-protein contact is lost so that folding can proceed unhindered; and (3) an ejector state which forces dissociation of the substrate whether folded or not.

Identification of amino acid residues at nucleotide-binding sites of chaperonin GroEL/GroES and cpn10 by photoaffinity labeling with 2-azido-adenosine 5'-triphosphate

Although the chaperonin GroEL/GroES complex binds and hydrolyzes ATP, its structure is unlike other known ATPases. In order to better characterize its nucleotide binding sites, we have photolabeled the complex with the affinity analog 2-azido-ATP. Three residues of GroEL, Pro137, Cys138 and Thr468, are labeled by the probe. The location of these residues in the GroEL crystal structure [Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hedge, R., Boisvert, D., Joachimiak, A., Horwich, A. & Sigler, P. (1994) Nature 371, 578-586: Boisvert, D. C., Wang, J., Otwinowski, Z., Horwich, A. L. & Sigler, P. B. (1996) Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 170-177] suggests that 2-azido-ATP binds to an alternative conformer of GroEL in the presence of GroES. The labeled site appears to be located at the GroEL/GroEL subunit interface since modification of Pro137 and Cys138 is most readily explained by attack of a probe molecule bound to the adjacent GroEL subunit. Labeling of the co-chaperonin, GroES, is clearly demonstrated on gels and the covalent tethering of nucleotide allows detection of a GroES dimer in the presence of SDS. However, no stable peptide derivative of GroES could be purified for sequencing. In contrast, the GroES homolog, yeast cpn10, does give a stable derivative. The modified amino acid is identified as the conserved Pro13, which corresponds to Pro5 in Escherichia coli GroES.

The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding

The cylindrical chaperonin GroEL and its cofactor GroES mediate ATP-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Recent studies in vitro demonstrated that GroES binding to GroEL causes the displacement of unfolded polypeptide into the central volume of the GroEL cavity for folding in a sequestrated environment. Resulting native protein leaves GroEL upon GroES release, whereas incompletely folded polypeptide can be recaptured for structural rearrangement followed by another folding trial. Additionally, each cycle of GroES binding and dissociation is associated with the release of nonnative polypeptide into the bulk solution. Here we show that this loss of substrate from GroEL is prevented when the folding reaction is carried out in the presence of macromolecular crowding agents, such as Ficoll and dextran, or in a dense cytosolic solution. Thus, the release of nonnative polypeptide is not an essential feature of the productive chaperonin mechanism. Our results argue that conditions of excluded volume, thought to prevail in the bacterial cytosol, increase the capacity of the chaperonin to retain nonnative polypeptide throughout successive reaction cycles. We propose that the leakiness of the chaperonin system under physiological conditions is adjusted such that E. coli proteins are likely to complete folding without partitioning between different GroEL complexes. Polypeptides that are unable to fold on GroEL eventually will be transferred to other chaperones or the degradation machinery.

Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL binds nonnative proteins in its central channel through hydrophobic interactions and initiates productive folding in this space underneath bound co-chaperone, GroES, in the presence of ATP. The questions of where along the folding pathway a protein is recognized by GroEL, and how much structure is present in a bound substrate have remained subjects of discussion, with some experiments suggesting that bound forms are fully unfolded and others suggesting that bound species are partially structured. Here we have studied a substrate protein, human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), observing in stopped-flow fluorescence experiments that it can rapidly bind to GroEL at various stages of folding. We have also analyzed the structure of the GroEL-bound protein using hydrogen-deuterium exchange and NMR spectroscopy. The pattern and magnitude of amide proton protection indicate that the central parallel beta-sheet found in native DHFR is present in a moderately stable state in GroEL-bound DHFR. Considering that the strands are derived from distant parts of the primary structure, this suggests that a native-like global topology is also present. We conclude that significant native-like structure is present in protein-folding intermediates bound to GroEL.

Molecular chaperones and mitochondrial protein folding

Precursor proteins destined for the mitochondrial matrix traverse inner and outer organelle membranes in an extended conformation. Translocation events are therefore integrally coupled to the processes of protein unfolding in the cytosol and protein refolding in the matrix. To successfully import proteins from the cytoplasm into mitochondria, cells have recruited a variety of molecular chaperone systems and folding catalysts. Within the organelles, mitochondrial Hsp70 (mt-Hsp70) is a major player in this process and exerts multiple functions. First, mt-Hsp70 binds together with cohort proteins to incoming polypeptide chains, thus conferring unidirectionality on the translocation process, and then assists in their refolding. A subset of imported proteins requires additional assistance by chaperonins of the Hsp60/Hsp10 family. Protein folding occurs within the cavity of these cylindrical complexes. A productive interaction of precursor proteins with molecular chaperones in the matrix is not only crucial for correct refolding and assembly, but also for processing of presequences, intramitochondrial sorting, and degradation of proteins. This review focuses on the role of mt-Hsp70 and Hsp60/Hsp10 in protein folding in the mitochondrial matrix and discusses recent findings on their molecular mechanism of action.

Chaperone-assisted protein folding

Molecular chaperones of the Hsp70 and chaperonin families are basic constituents of the cellular machinery that mediates protein folding. Recent functional and structural studies corroborate existing models for the mechanism of these components. Highlights of the past year include the X-ray crystallographic analysis of the peptide-binding domain of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 homolog, DnaK, the direct demonstration of protein folding in the central cavity of the chaperonin GroEL, and the visualization of conformational changes in GroEL during the chaperonin folding cycle.

Role of the amino terminal domain in GroES oligomerization

Digestions of the GroES oligomer with trypsin, chymotrypsin and Glu-C protease from Staphylococcus aureus V8 (V8) have helped to locate three regions in the GroES sequence that are sensitive to limited proteolysis and have provided information of the GroES domains involved in monomer-monomer and GroEL interaction. The removal of the first 20 or 27 amino acids of the N-terminal region of each GroES monomer by trypsin or chymotrypsin respectively, abolish the oligomerization of the GroES complex and its binding to GroEL. The V8-treatment of GroES promotes the breakage of the peptide bond between Glu18 and Thr19 but not the liberation of the N-terminal fragment from the GroES oligomer, which is capable of forming with GroEL a complex active in protein folding. It is deduced from these results that the N-terminal region of the GroES monomer is involved in monomer-monomer interaction, providing experimental evidence that relates some biochemical properties of GroES with its three-dimensional structure at atomic resolution.

The role of molecular chaperones in mitochondrial protein import and folding

Molecular chaperones play a critical role in many cellular processes. This review concentrates on their role in targeting of proteins to the mitochondria and the subsequent folding of the imported protein. It also reviews the role of molecular chaperons in protein degradation, a process that not only regulates the turnover of proteins but also eliminates proteins that have folded incorrectly or have aggregated as a result of cell stress. Finally, the role of molecular chaperones, in particular to mitochondrial chaperonins, in disease is reviewed. In support of the endosymbiont theory on the origin of mitochondria, the chaperones of the mitochondrial compartment show a high degree of similarity to bacterial molecular chaperones. Thus, studies of protein folding in bacteria such as Escherichia coli have proved to be instructive in understanding the process in the eukaryotic cell. As in bacteria, the molecular chaperone genes of eukaryotes are activated by a variety of stresses. The regulation of stress genes involved in mitochondrial chaperone function is reviewed and major unsolved questions regarding the regulation, function, and involvement in disease of the molecular chaperones are identified.