Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: risk assessment for secondary therapy

Poorer outcome in Polynesian patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive conformational radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To compare freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) of French Polynesian (FP) and Native European (NE) prostate cancer patients after definitive conformal radiotherapy (RT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were reviewed from medical records of 152 consecutive patients (46 FP and 106 NE) with clinically localised prostate cancer treated with definitive RT. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used in 22% of cases. Definition for biochemical failure was a rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. The median follow-up was 34 months.

RESULTS

In comparison to NE patients, FP patients were younger (p=0.002) with a higher low-risk proportion (p=0.06). Probability of 5-year FFBF was 77% in the NE cohort and 58.0% in the FP cohort (p=0.017). Univariate analysis showed that FP ethnicity was associated with worse prognosis in high-risk tumours (p=0.004). Cox multivariate analysis showed that factors associated with FFBF were risk category (p<0.017), and FP origin (p=0.03), independently of ADT and radiation dose.

CONCLUSION

FP ethnicity was an independent prognostic factor for biochemical relapse after definitive conformal RT for prostate cancer.

Bone-marker levels in patients with prostate cancer: potential correlations with outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The skeleton is typically the first site of metastasis in patients with prostate cancer, and bone metastases can result in severe bone pain and potentially debilitating fractures. Although bone scans are a reliable means of assessing osteoblastic lesions, tools for monitoring early changes in bone health are lacking. Biochemical markers of bone turnover might fulfill this unmet need.

RECENT FINDINGS

Correlative studies have suggested that bone-marker levels may have utility in assessing disease progression and response to bone-directed therapy. Elevated levels of the markers, N-telopeptide of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, are associated with higher rates of death and skeletal-related events in the bone metastasis setting. Marker levels also correlate with response to zoledronic acid treatment, and similar data with the investigational agent, denosumab, are emerging.

SUMMARY

Changes in bone-marker levels reflect alterations in skeletal homeostasis and can provide important insights into bone disease progression and response to bone-directed therapy in patients with prostate cancer. More mature data from currently ongoing clinical trials will provide further insight on the utility of marker assessments as an adjunct to established monitoring methods in prostate cancer.

Serum early prostate cancer antigen (EPCA) level and its association with disease progression in prostate cancer in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Early prostate cancer antigen (EPCA) has been shown a prostate cancer (PCa)-associated nuclear matrix protein, however, its serum status and prognostic power in PCa are unknown. The goals of this study are to measure serum EPCA levels in a cohort of patients with PCa prior to the treatment, and to evaluate the clinical value of serum EPCA.

METHODS

Pretreatment serum EPCA levels were determined with an ELISA in 77 patients with clinically localized PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and 51 patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease who received primary androgen deprivation therapy, and were correlated with clinicopathological variables and disease progression. Serum EPCA levels were also examined in 40 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Pretreatment mean serum EPCA levels were significantly higher in PCa patients than in controls (16.84 ± 7.60 ng/ml vs. 4.12 ± 2.05 ng/ml, P<0.001). Patients with locally advanced and metastatic PCa had significantly higher serum EPCA level than those with clinically localized PCa (22.93 ± 5.28 ng/ml and 29.41 ± 8.47 ng/ml vs. 15.17 ± 6.03 ng/ml, P = 0.014 and P<0.001, respectively). Significantly elevated EPCA level was also found in metastatic PCa compared with locally advanced disease (P < 0.001). Increased serum EPCA levels were significantly and positively correlated with Gleason score and clinical stage, but not with PSA levels and age. On multivariate analysis, pretreatment serum EPCA level held the most significantly predictive value for the biochemical recurrence and androgen-independent progression among pretreatment variables (HR = 4.860, P<0.001 and HR = 5.418, P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum EPCA level is markedly elevated in PCa. Pretreatment serum EPCA level correlates significantly with the poor prognosis, showing prediction potential for PCa progression.

Effect of statin use on biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

•To determine the relationship between statin use and biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

•A retrospective analysis was performed on 3198 RP patients between 1990 and 2008. •Exclusion criteria were neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy, follow-up <2 years, and insufficient pathological or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) data. •Statin use was determined from the patient's record. Clinical and pathological variables were compared between statin users and non-users. •Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of statin use on BCR.

RESULTS

•A total of 1261 patients fit criteria for analysis. There were 281 (22%) statin users. Mean age was 60 years and median follow-up was 36 months (mean 43 months). •Statin users had a lower median preoperative PSA (6.4) compared with non-users (7.1) (P < 0.05). In all, 80% of statin users had a pathological Gleason sum ≥7 compared with 67% of non-users (P < 0.05). •On multivariate analysis, statin use was an independent predictor of BCR (hazard ratio 1.54, P < 0.05). Statin users had a lower 5-year BCR-free survival compared with non-users (75% vs 84%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

•Statin users are at an increased risk for BCR following RP. This finding may be due to the reduction in preoperative PSA potentially delaying diagnosis and/or masking aggressive disease. •Further studies are necessary to elucidate the impact of statin medications following prostate cancer therapy.

[Prostate-specific antigen for treatment monitoring]

Today, most incident prostate cancer cases are diagnosed in early and thus potentially curable stages because of the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Treatment monitoring is another important aspect of the tumor marker PSA. In this article, contemporary recommendations for the use of PSA in treatment monitoring are discussed in the settings of active surveillance, radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy.

An update on the changing indications for androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Quality of life has become increasingly more important for men diagnosed with prostate cancer. In light of this and the recognized risks of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the guidelines and use of ADT have changed significantly over the last few years. This paper reviews the current recommendations and the future perspectives regarding ADT. The benefits of ADT are evident neoadjuvantly and adjuvantly in patients treated with external beam radiation therapy for intermediate- and high-risk disease, in patients who have undergone prostatectomy with lymph node involvement, in high-risk patients after definitive therapy, and in patients who have developed progression or metastasis. Finally, this paper reviews the risks and benefits of each of these scenarios and the risks of androgen deprivation in general, and it delineates the areas where ADT was previously recommended, but where evidence is lacking for its additional benefit.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover and clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Disrupted skeletal homeostasis is common in patients with prostate cancer. Low bone density is common at diagnosis, and fracture risk is further elevated by the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy. Later in the disease course, bone metastases can result in skeletal morbidity. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels can provide important insights into overall disease progression, convenient, noninvasive tools for monitoring skeletal health are lacking. Biochemical markers released into serum and urine as a result of bone turnover might fulfill this unmet need. The objectives of this article are to assess current evidence examining the potential utility of bone turnover markers for monitoring skeletal health, bone disease progression, and response to antiresorptive therapies in the prostate cancer setting.

METHODS

Published articles and abstracts from major oncology or urology congresses pertaining to the use of bone turnover markers to monitor skeletal health and disease progression were identified and assessed for relevance and methodologic stringency.

RESULTS

Several randomized trials and correlative studies support the utility of bone marker level changes to assess disease progression in the metastatic setting, bone health during hormonal therapy, and response to bisphosphonate therapy. The available data support potential associations between levels of the collagen type I telopeptides (NTX and CTX) and the severity of metastatic bone disease as well as outcomes during antiresorptive therapy. Evidence linking bone marker level changes with early diagnosis of skeletal metastases is emerging. Although several markers have shown promising results in correlative studies, results from ongoing prospective trials are needed to establish the role of bone markers in this setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone marker levels reflect ongoing skeletal metabolism and can provide important insights into bone health and response to bisphosphonate therapy in patients with prostate cancer. The data supporting a role for bone markers to monitor skeletal disease progression and response to zoledronic acid therapy are especially strong. Bone marker assessments may complement established diagnostic and monitoring paradigms in prostate cancer.

Update on the management of prostate cancer with goserelin acetate: patient perspectives

The guidelines for the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have changed significantly over the last 5 years. This paper reviews the current recommendations and documents the reasons for these changes, in a review of the world's literature on ADT over the last 5 years. Special emphasis on randomized controlled trials and high-impact journals was included in the Medline search and review. One hundred articles on this topic written in the last 5 years were reviewed. Fifty-nine contained nonindustry-biased findings in major-impact journals and were available in English. The benefits of ADT are evident in several areas, including neoadjuvantly and adjuvantly in patients treated with external beam radiation therapy for intermediate- and high-risk disease; in patients who have undergone prostatectomy and who are found to have lymph node involvement on surgical resection; in high-risk patients after definitive therapy; and in patients who have developed symptomatic local progression or metastasis. This paper reviews the risks and benefits in each of these scenarios and the risks of androgen deprivation in general, and delineates the areas where ADT was previously recommended, but has been found to no longer be of benefit.

Clinical significance and treatment of biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy are the established and definitive interventions for clinically localized prostate cancer. These treatment modalities are yet subject to failure observed first by biochemical recurrence, defined by increases in the serum PSA level. We investigated the significance of biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy and the available salvage therapy options for cancer recurrence.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, and applicable studies addressing biochemical recurrence and salvage options after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy were reviewed.

RESULTS

After radical prostatectomy, a detectable serum PSA level indicates biochemical recurrence. Whether to administer salvage therapy locally or systemically depends largely on prognostic factors including PSA doubling time, Gleason's score, pathologic stage, and the time interval between radical prostatectomy and biochemical recurrence. Early initiation of salvage therapy has been shown to significantly impact on cancer outcomes. After external beam radiation therapy, no single PSA level can define biochemical recurrence. Instead, it has been defined by increases in the PSA level above the nadir. Following radiation therapy, PSA doubling time and Gleason score play important roles in determining the need for local versus systemic salvage therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

After the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence, it is critical to perform a timely clinical assessment using the prognostic factors mentioned above. Prompt initiation of salvage therapy may prevent subsequent clinical progression and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: when is it indicated?

Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly used treatment option in the United States for men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Up to 30% of these patients, particularly those with adverse pathological risk factors, will develop a biochemical recurrence within 10 years. Patients with a biochemical recurrence have a higher rate of local recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Current accepted treatment options include salvage radiation therapy, hormone therapy, or a combination of both, depending on whether the disease recurrence is biochemical, local, or systemic. The role of adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) after prostatectomy in patients with adverse pathological risk factors prior to biochemical or clinical recurrence is unclear. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated that ART significantly improves multiple patient outcomes, including overall and cancer-specific survival, without major untoward effects. The evidence in support of using ART is evolving with the long-term follow-up of several long-term prospective trials. The decision to use ART should be based on the patient's pathological characteristics, clinical status, side effects, and open communication between the patient and provider.

Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

The prognostic meaning of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (USPSA) level after prostatectomy remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an undetectable USPSA level obtained after surgery is a predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

From the Urologic Oncology Database at the University of California San Francisco, 525 men were identified who had a USPSA measurement 1-3 mo postoperatively with at least 2 yr of follow-up. All preoperative and pathologic criteria were recorded.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients were stratified based on their initial USPSA level. We defined an undetectable USPSA level at ≤0.05 ng/ml. Recurrence was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≥0.2 ng/ml or secondary treatment.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We found that 456 patients (87%) had undetectable USPSA and 69 patients (13%) had detectable USPSA immediately postprostatectomy. A 5-yr recurrence-free rate of 86% was found in the undetectable USPSA group compared with 67% in the detectable USPSA group (p<0.01). For patients with pT3 disease, men with an undetectable USPSA had a 5-yr BCR-free survival rate of 78% compared with 40% for men with a detectable USPSA (p<0.01). A multivariable analysis confirmed that patients with an undetectable USPSA were 67% less likely to recur (hazard ratio: 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.55). As the detection level of PSA is lowered, the false-positive rate of BCR necessarily increases. A limitation of the study is its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

An undetectable USPSA after radical prostatectomy is a prognostic indicator of BCR-free survival at 5 yr and may aid in predicting outcome in higher risk patients.

Tumour growth fraction measured by immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 is an independent prognostic factor in preoperative prostate biopsies with small-volume or low-grade prostate cancer

Accurate prognostic parameters in prostate biopsies are needed to better counsel individual patients with prostate cancer. We evaluated the prognostic impact of morphologic and immunohistochemical parameters in preoperative prostate cancer biopsies. A consecutive series of prostate biopsies of 279 men (72% with clinical stage T1c and 23% with T2) who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy was prospectively analysed for Gleason score, number and percentage of positive cores (NPC, PPC), total percentage of biopsy tissue with tumour (TPT), maximum tumour percentage per core (MTP), and expression of Ki67, Bcl-2 and p53. All biopsy features were significantly associated with at least one feature of the radical prostatectomy specimen. pT stage was independently predicted by PSA, seminal vesicle invasion by Ki67 LI, positive margins by PSA and MTP, large tumour diameter by PSA and PPC, and Gleason score by biopsy Gleason score, MTP, and Ki67 LI, respectively. Biopsy Gleason score, NPC (1 vs. >1), TPT (<7 vs. >or=7%), and Ki67 LI (<10 vs. >or=10%) were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (p < 0.01, each). KI67 LI was the only independent prognostic factor in case of a low TPT (<7%) or low Gleason score (<7), the hazard ratio being 6.76 and 6.44, respectively. In summary, preoperative Gleason score, NPC, TPT and Ki67 LI significantly predict the risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy, and Ki67 is an independent prognosticator in biopsies with low-volume or low-grade prostate cancer. Analysis of Ki67 LI in these biopsies may help to better identify patients with clinically insignificant prostate cancer.

The probability of Gleason score upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy can be accurately predicted

The objective of this study was to test the external validity of a previously developed nomogram for the prediction of Gleason score upgrading (GSU) between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP). The study population consisted of 973 assessable patients treated with RP at a tertiary care institution. The accuracy of the nomogram was quantified with the receiver operating characteristics curve-derived area under the curve. The performance characteristics (predicted vs observed rate of GSU) were tested within a calibration plot. Overall, GSU was recorded in 39.8% (n = 387) of patients at RP. Of patients with GSU, 70 (18.1%), 23 (5.9%) and 32 (8.3%), respectively, had extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node invasion. The accuracy of the nomogram was 74.9% (confidence interval 72.1-77.6%). The model tended to underestimate the observed rate of GSU and the discordance between the predicted and observed rate of GSU ranged from -7 to +10%. The current tool represents the most accurate method of predicting GSU between biopsy and RP. Nonetheless it is not perfect and its performance characteristics should be known prior to its use in clinical decision-making.

Chemokine markers predict biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Stratifying patients who have a high risk of prostate cancer recurrence following prostatectomy can potentiate the use of adjuvant therapy at an early stage. Inflammation has emerged as a mediator of prostate cancer metastatic progression. We hypothesized that chemokines can be biomarkers for distinguishing patients with high risk for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a nested case-control study, 82 subjects developed biochemical recurrence within 5 years of prostatectomy. Prostate tissues from 98 age-matched subjects who were recurrence-free following prostatectomy in the same period were the controls. A high-throughput lectin-based enrichment of prostate tissue enabled multiplex ELISA to identify the expression of three chemokines to discriminate the two patient populations.

RESULTS

The expression of CX3CL1 and IL-15 in prostate tissue was associated with 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival following prostatectomy. However, the expression of chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4) was associated with biochemical recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression model combining preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, surgical margin, and seminal vesicle status with the three chemokines doubled the specificity of prediction at 90% sensitivity compared with use of the clinicopathologic variables alone (P < 0.0001). Survival analysis yielded a nomogram that supported the use of CX3CL1, IL-15, and CCL4 in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival after prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Each of the three chemokines can serve as independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. However, the combination of chemokine biomarkers plus clinicopathologic variables discriminated prostatectomy subjects for the probability of biochemical recurrence significantly better than clinicopathologic variables alone.

Sooner or later? Outcome analysis of 431 prostate cancer patients treated with postoperative or salvage radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and salvage RT (SART) using a three-dimensional conformal two-dynamic arc (3D-ART) or 3D six-field technique in 431 prostate cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of the 431 patients, 258 underwent PORT (started <6 months after radical prostatectomy) and 173 underwent SART because of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. The median patient age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, and Gleason score was 66 years, 9.4 ng/mL, and 7, respectively. The median radiation dose was 70 Gy in 35 fractions for both PORT and SART. The 3D six-field and 3D-ART techniques were used in 25.1% and 74.9% of patients, respectively. Biochemical failure was defined as a post-RT prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 0.1 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity included rectal events (PORT, 44.2% and 0.8% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3, respectively; SART, 42.2% and 1.2% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3, respectively) and urinary events (PORT, 51.2% and 2.3% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3-4, respectively; SART, 37.6% and 0% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3, respectively). Late toxicity also included rectal events (PORT, 14.7% and 0.8% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3-4, respectively; SART, 15.0% and 0.6% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3, respectively) and urinary events (PORT, 28.3% and 3.7% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3-4, respectively; SART, 19.3% and 0.6% Grade 1-2 and Grade 3, respectively). After a median follow-up of 48 months, failure-free survival, including biochemical and clinical failure, was significantly longer in the PORT patients (79.8% vs. 60.5%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that a prostate-specific antigen level postoperatively but before RT of >/=0.2 ng/mL (p < 0.001), Gleason score >6 (p = 0.025) and use of preoperative androgen deprivation (p = 0.002) correlated significantly with shorter failure-free survival. Multivariate analysis showed that PORT and the 3D-ART technique correlated with greater late urinary toxicity.

CONCLUSION

PORT and early referral for SART offer better disease control after radical prostatectomy. The greater urinary toxicity occurring after PORT and 3D-ART requires further investigation to improve the therapeutic index.

Improved prediction of disease relapse after radical prostatectomy through a panel of preoperative blood-based biomarkers

PURPOSE

The preoperative blood levels of biomarkers may allow accurate identification of patients who are likely to fail radical prostatectomy as a first-line therapy for localized prostate cancer, thereby allowing more efficient delivery of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the added value of biomarkers relative to established predictors of biochemical recurrence, such as clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The preoperative plasma levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), endoglin, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and uPA receptor were measured with the use of commercially available enzyme immunoassays in 423 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Multivariable models were used to explore the gain in the predictive accuracy of the models. This predictive accuracy was quantified by the concordance index statistic and was validated with 200 bootstrap resamples.

RESULTS

In standard multivariable analyses, TGF-beta1 (P < 0.001), sIL-6R (P < 0.001), IL-6 (P < 0.001), VCAM-1 (P < 0.001), VEGF (P = 0.008), endoglin (P = 0.002), and uPA (P < 0.001) were associated with biochemical recurrence. The multivariable model containing standard clinical variables alone had an accuracy of 71.6%. The addition of TGF-beta1, sIL-6R, IL-6, VCAM-1, VEGF, endoglin, and uPA increased the predictive accuracy by 15% to 86.6% (P < 0.001) and showed excellent calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram based on these biomarkers improves the accuracy of standard predictive models and could help counsel patients about their risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Prostate cancer

In developed countries, prostate cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer, and the third most common cause of death from cancer in men. Apart from age and ethnic origin, a positive family history is probably the strongest known risk factor. Clinically, prostate cancer is diagnosed as local or advanced, and treatments range from surveillance to radical local treatment or androgen-deprivation treatment. Androgen deprivation reduces symptoms in about 70-80% of patients with advanced prostate cancer, but most tumours relapse within 2 years to an incurable androgen-independent state. The recorded incidence of prostate cancer has substantially increased in the past two decades, probably because of the introduction of screening with prostate-specific antigen, the use of improved biopsy techniques for diagnosis, and increased public awareness. Trends in mortality from the disease are less clearcut. Mortality changes are not of the same magnitude as the changes in incidence, and in some countries mortality has been stable or even decreased. The disparity between reported incidence and mortality rates leads to the probable conclusion that only a small proportion of diagnosed low-risk prostate cancers will progress to life-threatening disease during the lifetime of the patient.

Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

Commonly used definitions for high-risk prostate cancer identify men at increased risk of PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP). We assessed how accurately these definitions identify patients likely to receive secondary cancer therapy, experience metastatic progression, or die of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 5960 men with clinically localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who underwent RP, we identified eight different high-risk subsets, each comprising 4-40% of the study population. Estimates of freedom from radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and metastatic progression after surgery were generated for each high-risk cohort with the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with a Cox proportional hazards regression. The cumulative incidence and HR for prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were estimated with competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

Each of the studied high-risk criteria was associated with increased hazard of secondary cancer therapy (HR=1.3-5.2, p<0.05) and metastatic progression (HR=2.1-6.9, p<0.05). However, depending on the definition, the probability of freedom from additional therapy 10 yr after surgery ranged from 35% to 76%. The 10-yr cumulative incidence of PCSM in high-risk patients ranged from 3% to 11% (HR=3.2-10.4, p<0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly used definitions for high-risk prostate cancer identify men at increased risk of secondary cancer therapy, metastatic progression, and PCSM following RP. However, a substantial proportion of high-risk patients remain free from additional therapy or metastatic disease many years after surgery. The risk of PCSM within 10 yr of treatment is remarkably low, even for patients at the highest risk of recurrent disease.

Laparoscopic Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: Description of the Surgical Technique and Initial Results

OBJECTIVE

In patients with prostate cancer, extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) yields a higher number of lymph node metastases (LNM) than standard pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) of the obturator fossa only. We describe our laparoscopic technique of extended lymph node dissection and provide the number and locations of positive lymph nodes from our experience.

METHODS

In a total of 35 selected patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, laparoscopic ePLND was performed prior to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The template included the genitofemoral nerve up to the bifurcation of the common iliac artery and down to the epigastric artery. In the "split and roll" technique the internal and external iliac arteries including the bifurcation and the external iliac vein were completely mobilized. After freeing the obturator nerve, the entire lymph node package was released from the pelvic side wall.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 90min/patient. The complications were two temporary and reversible neurapraxias (ischiatic nerve and obturator nerve), one deep vein thrombosis, and two lymphoceles. One lymphocele healed conservatively; the second was marsupialized laparoscopically. Eleven (31.4%) patients had lymph node metastases; their mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 20.3+/-7.0 ng/ml (range: 5.2-39.7 ng/ml) and their median Gleason sum in biopsy was 7 (range: 6-8). Mean size of the LNM was 3.1+/-1.0 mm (range: 0.2-8). In 5 of the 11 patients with LNM these were detected exclusively outside the obturator fossa. LNM were in the obturator fossa only in two (one bilateral), around the external iliac artery only in two, around the internal iliac artery only in two, and around the external iliac artery and internal iliac only in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ePLND can be combined with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Standardization of the technique facilitates surgery to a great extent. e-PLND detects LNM in a significant number of patients. The majority of LNM are outside the obturator fossa. The transperitoneal approach allows a wide exposure and is the most important factor to enable successful ePLND.

Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling

OBJECTIVES

New biomarkers are being developed to identify individuals at risk for cancer, detect disease earlier, determine prognosis, detect recurrence, predict response to particular agents, and monitor response to treatment. This article attempts to address some of the challenges facing the research and medical communities in the delivery of new biomarkers for individualized medicine.

METHODS

A variety of issues and barriers can affect the transfer of clinical tests from research to clinical practice. Differences in sample collection, handling or storage, and profiling techniques may influence the protein profile obtained by any method.

RESULTS

Standard procedures and quality check schemes are necessary because there is a lack of definition to guarantee reproducibility of new procedures. From technical and economic viewpoints, the assay has to be sufficiently robust to be completed in community-based hospitals. Although traditionally cancer patients were treated with drugs of low toxicity or of high tolerance regardless of their efficacy in a given patient if the benefits of that drug are proven in both experimental and clinical conditions, recent advances have provided opportunities to adapt "tailored" treatment modalities. The evolving trend is the usage of patterns of markers instead of a single marker. Further challenges in biomarker development are in finding the relevant markers that have the right degree of specificity and sensitivity and a reliable test to measure the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Discovery, testing, and validation of clinically appropriate and commercially useful tumor markers should permit individualization of therapy.

Evidence-based radiation oncology: Definitive, adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer

The standard treatment options based on the risk category (stage, Gleason score, PSA) for localized prostate cancer include surgery, radiotherapy and watchful waiting. The literature does not provide clear-cut evidence for the superiority of surgery over radiotherapy, whereas both approaches differ in their side effects. The definitive external beam irradiation is frequently employed in stage T1b-T1c, T2 and T3 tumors. There is a pretty strong evidence that intermediate- and high-risk patients benefit from dose escalation. The latter requires reduction of the irradiated normal tissue (using 3-dimensional conformal approach, intensity modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, etc.). Recent data suggest that prostate cancer may benefit from hypofractionation due to relatively low alpha/beta ratio; these findings warrant confirmation though. The role of whole pelvis irradiation is still controversial. Numerous randomized trials demonstrated a clinical benefit in terms of biochemical control, local and distant control, and overall survival from the addition of androgen suppression to external beam radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk patients. These studies typically included locally advanced (T3-T4) and poor-prognosis (Gleason score >7 and/or PSA >20 ng/mL) tumors and employed neoadjuvant/concomitant/adjuvant androgen suppression rather than only adjuvant setting. The ongoing trials will hopefully further define the role of endocrine treatment in more favorable risk patients and in the setting of the dose escalated radiotherapy. Brachytherapy (BRT) with permanent implants may be offered to low-risk patients (cT1-T2a, Gleason score <7, or 3+4, PSA <or=10 ng/mL), with prostate volume of <or=50 ml, no previous transurethral prostate resection and a good urinary function. Some recent data suggest a benefit from combining external beam irradiation and BRT for intermediate-risk patients. EBRT after radical prostatectomy improves disease-free survival and biochemical and local control rates in patients with positive surgical margins or pT3 tumors. Salvage radiotherapy may be considered at the time of biochemical failure in previously non-irradiated patients.

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics after failure of primary prostate cancer therapy: a valuable prognostic factor

Evaluation of: Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA et al.: Death in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: prostate-specific antigen doubling time subgroups and their associated contributions to all-cause mortality. J. Clin. Oncol. 25(13), 1765–1771 (2007). In this article by Freedland and colleagues, prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSAdt) is shown as a strong prognostic factor for subsequent death. Those with fast doubling times (< 3–6 months) have a relatively short disease course, with a median survival of 6.5 years, whereas those with slow doubling times (≥15 months) have relatively indolent disease with prostate cancer-specific mortality rates of under 5% after 10 years. Prostate cancer is the most common cause of death for those with a PSAdt of less than 15 months. These patients may be selected for consideration of early secondary intervention and experimental management, although there is no clear evidence that earlier, as opposed to later, intervention leads to an overall survival gain, and quality of life may be adversely affected by intervention. The intelligent use of PSAdt allows the selection of those in whom early intervention may be avoided.