151
|
Joseph JP, Potretzke TA, Packiam V, Sharma V, Toussi A, Miest TS, Juvet T, Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Welle CL, Atwell TD, Leibovich BC, Tollefson MK, Potretzke AM. Percutaneous Image-guided Core Needle Biopsy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2019; 135:95-100. [PMID: 31655078 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better understand the safety and diagnostic yield of percutaneous core-needle biopsy (PCNB) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS Of 444 patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC between 2009 and 2017 at our institution, 42 who had PCNB prior to RNU were identified for analysis. Endpoints included safety, diagnostic yield, and concordance with RNU pathology. PCNB specimens were deemed histologically concordant with RNU specimens for cases when cytologic evaluation of biopsy specimen and corresponding pathologic evaluation of RNU specimen both made a histologic diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma. RESULTS Median tumor size was 3.8 cm (1.2-10.2 cm). All lesions arose from the pelvicalyceal system. CT-guidance was utilized in 52% (n = 22), and ultrasound-guidance in 48% (n = 20). Relative to RNU pathology, 95% of PCNBs demonstrated histologic concordance. Histologic grade was provided in 69% (n = 29) of PCNBs, with a 90% (n = 26) concordance with surgical pathology. Grades 1-2 and 3 complications occurred in 14.3% (n = 6) and 2.4% (n = 1), respectively. At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 1.2-97.1 months) after biopsy, no cases of radiographic tract seeding were identified. CONCLUSION In our cohort of 42 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC, PCNB appeared a safe diagnostic tool with high histologic yield and grade concordance. With greater than 2 years of follow-up, no cases of tract seeding were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amir Toussi
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
152
|
Wu ZS, Ding W, Cai J, Bashir G, Li YQ, Wu S. Communication Of Cancer Cells And Lymphatic Vessels In Cancer: Focus On Bladder Cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:8161-8177. [PMID: 31632067 PMCID: PMC6781639 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s219111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide and causes the highest lifetime treatment costs per patient. Bladder cancer is most likely to metastasize through lymphatic ducts, and once the lymph nodes are involved, the prognosis is poorly and finitely improved by current modalities. The underlying metastatic mechanism for bladder cancer is thus becoming a research focus to date. To identify relevant published data, an online search of the PubMed/Medline archives was performed to locate original articles and review articles regarding lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in urinary bladder cancer (UBC), and was limited to articles in English published between 1998 and 2018. A further search of the clinical trials.gov search engine was conducted to identify both trials with results available and those with results not yet available. Herein, we summarized the unique mechanisms and biomarkers involved in the malignant progression of bladder cancer as well as their emerging roles in therapeutics, and that current data suggests that lymphangiogenesis and lymph node invasion are important prognostic factors for UBC. The growing knowledge about their roles in bladder cancers provides the basis for novel therapeutic strategies. In addition, more basic and clinical research needs to be conducted in order to identify further accurate predictive molecules and relevant mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhang-song Wu
- Medical College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Urological Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Shenzhen following Precision Medical Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wa Ding
- Medical College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Shenzhen following Precision Medical Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiajia Cai
- Shenzhen following Precision Medical Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Medical College, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan232001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ghassan Bashir
- Shenzhen following Precision Medical Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu-qing Li
- Department of Urological Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Shenzhen following Precision Medical Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Song Wu
- Medical College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Urological Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Shenzhen following Precision Medical Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518000, People’s Republic of China
- Medical College, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan232001, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2019; 28 Suppl 1:R34-R47. [PMID: 31610873 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2016 and 2018, with regards to the diagnosis, the options of treatment and the follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate the different studies with levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare disease is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low-risk diseases: unifocal tumour, possible complete resection low-grade and lack of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended in order to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence. An adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment of UTUC.
Collapse
|
154
|
Al-Balushi K, Martin N, Loubon H, Baboudjian M, Michel F, Sichez PC, Martin T, Di-Crocco E, Gaillet S, Delaporte V, Akiki A, Faure A, Karsenty G, Lechevallier E, Boissier R. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51:1735-1741. [PMID: 31317310 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02230-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reusable flexible-ureteroscopes (fURS) require personnel and budget for processing and repairing, whereas single-use fURS were recently developed. After exclusive reusable fURS since 2011, we experienced high repair costs and single-use fURS were therefore introduced in mid-2017. We aimed to evaluate economic and practical advantages and disadvantages of reusable versus single-use fURS. MATERIALS AND METHODS First, we evaluated the incidence of breakage and repairs of reusable fURS in 2017. We assessed the overall operational costs of reusable fURS including purchase, processing, and repairing in our institution from 2011 to 2017. Following our experience, we created a model to compare operation costs/procedure of single-use fURS with reusable fURS depending on repair costs. RESULTS In 2017, repair costs of reusable fURS increased by 345% compared with the period 2011-2016, causing: a median unavailability per reusable fURS of 200 days/year (100-249), median number of functioning fURS 0/5-3/5 per operating day, while unavailability of reusable fURS had become the first reason for cancellation of procedure. Since it was introduced, single-use fURS accounted for 59% of the flexible ureteroscopy activity. Taking into account the costs of processing, maintenance and repair, in 2011-2016 versus 2017, the single-use fURS was cost-effective compared with the reusable fURS until the 22nd procedure versus the 73rd procedure, respectively. CONCLUSIONS After years of exclusive reusable fURS, the rising incidence of breakage not only increased maintenance costs but also hampered daily activity owing to unavailability of the devices. The introduction of single-use with reusable fURS provided substantial help to maintain our activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid Al-Balushi
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Nathalie Martin
- APHM, Conception University Hospital, Central Pharmacy, Marseille, France
| | - Hélène Loubon
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Floriane Michel
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Pierre-Clément Sichez
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Thomas Martin
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Eugénie Di-Crocco
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Sarah Gaillet
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Veronique Delaporte
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Akram Akiki
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Alice Faure
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, APHM, Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Gilles Karsenty
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lechevallier
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Romain Boissier
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Freund JE, Faber DJ, Bus MT, van Leeuwen TG, de Bruin DM. Grading upper tract urothelial carcinoma with the attenuation coefficient of in-vivo optical coherence tomography. Lasers Surg Med 2019; 51:399-406. [PMID: 30919487 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With catheter based optical coherence tomography (OCT), high resolution images of the upper urinary tract can be obtained, thereby facilitating the detection of upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). We hypothesized that the attenuation coefficient of the OCT signal (μOCT ) is related to the histopathologic grade of the tumor. OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to define the μOCT cut-off for discriminating high grade and low grade papillary UTUC. METHODS For this post-hoc analysis, data from OCT imaging of papillary UTUC was obtained from patients during ureterorenoscopy. OCT images and raw data were simultaneously analyzed with in-house developed software. The μOCT determined in papillary UTUCs and corresponding histopathologic grading from either biopsies or radical resection specimens were compared. RESULTS Thirty-five papillary UTUC from 35 patients were included. μOCT analysis was feasible in all cases. The median μOCT was 3.3 mm-1 (IQR 2.7-3.7 mm-1 ) for low-grade UTUC and 4.9 mm-1 (IQR 4.3-6.1 mm-1 ) for high-grade UTUC (P = 0.004). ROC analysis yielded a μOCT cut-off value of >4.0 mm-1 (AUC = 0.85, P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 94% for high-grade papillary UTUC. CONCLUSIONS This study proposes a μOCT cut-off of 4.0 mm-1 for quantitative grading of UTUC with ureterorenoscopic OCT imaging. The promising diagnostic accuracy calculations justify further studies to validate the proposed cut-off value. Implementation of the software for the μOCT analysis in OCT systems may allow for μOCT assessment at real time during ureterorenoscopy. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:399-406, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Erik Freund
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Faber
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mieke T Bus
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton G van Leeuwen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel M de Bruin
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Endocavitary treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis of the current literature. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:430-436. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
157
|
Yang HY, Yang CC, Wu CY, Wang LJ, Lu KL. Aristolochic Acid and Immunotherapy for Urothelial Carcinoma: Directions for unmet Needs. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20133162. [PMID: 31261684 PMCID: PMC6650931 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20133162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) and upper tracts (UTUC) used to share management with similar principles. However, their genetic and epigenetic differences along with different responses to immunotherapy were recently identified, which are reminiscent of their distinct etiologies. Different from the variety of environmental factors relating to UCB, UTUC is best known for its close relationship with exposure to aristolochic acid (AA). AA is believed to cause its carcinogenicity through forming DNA adducts of deoxyadenosine-aristolactam, as well as A:T → T:A transversions in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. Since recent findings suggested that cancers with higher somatic mutations are associated with better treatment responses upon immune checkpoint blockade, UTUC and AA-related biomarkers reasonably serve as good candidates, as well as a potential prognostic predictor for the flourishing immunotherapy. This review covers the current state of the literature on the clinical response of UTUC and UCB receiving immunotherapy and points out directions for refinement regarding patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huang-Yu Yang
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
| | - Chih-Chao Yang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yi Wu
- Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Li-Jen Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Lin Lu
- Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Glybochko PV, Enikeev D, Rouprêt M, Fajkovic H, Seebacher V, Shariat SF. Risk stratification of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A Review of the Current Literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:503-513. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1621753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran, Iran
| | - Petr V. Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Veronika Seebacher
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Jung H, Giusti G, Fajkovic H, Herrmann T, Jones R, Straub M, Baard J, Osther PJS, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018: aspects of treatment. World J Urol 2019; 37:2279-2287. [PMID: 31123852 PMCID: PMC6825640 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02811-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide an overview of treatment modalities for management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods In accordance with the standards for a scoping review, data presentation and discussion at the Consultation on UTUC in Stockholm, 6–7 September 2018, consensus was reached on the latest and most important treatment recommendations for UTUC. Using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, publications were selected based on quality, clinical relevance, and level of evidence. Results Kidney-sparing surgery should be attempted for low-grade UTUC. Radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is first option for high-grade disease. Post-operative bladder instillation of chemotherapy should be offered after RNU to reduce intravesical recurrence rate. Identification of tumor grade and stage is crucial when selecting treatment. Ureteroscopic management of low-grade and non-invasive UTUC achieves disease-free survival similar to that offered by radical nephroureterectomy but seems to be a risk factor for intravesical recurrence. Lymphadenectomy appears important for high-risk disease, although the therapeutic benefit needs further validation. There is little evidence supporting use of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) and mitomycin C as monotherapy and adjuvant treatment in UTUC. A randomized clinical trial has indicated that platin-based chemotherapy for invasive UTUC improves disease-free survival, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered standard care for ≥ T2 N0–3M0 disease. Conclusions Risk stratification assessment is feasible and mandatory in UTUC. Identification of tumor grade and stage is essential for optimal treatment selection. Kidney-sparing surgery should be offered in low-risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in high-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Jung
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Herrmann
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland UK
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Aragon-Ching JB, Choudhury A, Margulis V, Yu EY. Formidable Scenarios in Urothelial and Variant Cancers of the Urinary Tract. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:262-275. [PMID: 31099661 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the field of bladder and upper tract cancers provide opportunities for multidisciplinary care. Urothelial cancers make up the majority of the histologic subtype of bladder and upper tract cancers. Although the existence of variant histology, nonurothelial cancers, and urethral cancers is rare, these cancers pose a challenging clinical dilemma given the lack of well-defined consensus treatment guidelines. This review focuses on key issues of treatment: cisplatin ineligibility with emphasis on the definition, nuances of chemotherapy and frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, use of radiation in bladder-preservation strategies, upper tract urothelial cancer management, and highlights of urothelial variants and nonurothelial tumors and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- 2 The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- 3 The Univeristy of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Evan Y Yu
- 4 University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Robotic radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional experience. World J Urol 2019; 37:2303-2311. [PMID: 31062121 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02790-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a multi-institutional experience on robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS Data were prospectively collected from patients with non-metastatic UTUC undergoing robotic SU or RNU at three referral centers between 2015 and 2018. Transperitoneal, single-docking robotic RNU followed established principles. Bladder cuff excision (BCE) was performed with robotic or open approach. Techniques for SU included: ureteral resection and primary uretero-ureterostomy; partial pyelectomy and modified pyeloplasty; ureteral resection with BCE and direct- or psoas hitch-ureteroneocystostomy. We retrospectively evaluated the technical feasibility, and peri-operative and oncologic outcomes after robotic RNU/SU. RESULTS 81 patients were included. No case required conversion to open surgery. Early major (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2) complications were reported in six (7.4%) patients (two after SU, four after RNU). Three patients experienced late major complications (one after SU, two after RNU). Median ΔeGFR at 3 months was - 1 ml/min/1.73 m2 after SU and - 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 after RNU. Positive surgical margins were recorded in five patients (one after SU, four after RNU). Median follow-up was 21 months and 22 months in the SU and RNU groups, respectively. Three (20%) patients had ipsilateral upper tract recurrence after SU, while five (7.5%) developed metastases after RNU. No case of port-site metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis was reported. At last follow-up, 67 (82.7%) patients were alive without evidence of disease. CONCLUSION Robotic SU and RNU are technically feasible and achieved promising peri-operative and oncologic outcomes in selected patients with non-metastatic UTUC.
Collapse
|
162
|
|
163
|
Bellini MI, Gopal JP, Hill P, Nicol D, Gibbons N. Urothelial carcinoma arising from the transplanted kidney: A single-center experience and literature review. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13559. [PMID: 30942927 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a malignancy predominantly arising in the bladder. Upper tract UC (UUC) is uncommon, accounting only for 5-10% of the cases. High incidence of neoplasms is associated with immunosuppressive therapy; thus, UCs of the transplanted grafts often lead to a more aggressive treatment, in order to withdraw completely the immunosuppression. It significantly affects the patient quality of life, meaning return to dialysis, along with the worse life expectancy. We present our single-institution experience of this rare malignancy in two mid-age kidney transplant recipients, with UCs successfully treated with radical nephroureterectomy: G3 pT3 N0 + G3 pT1 N0 in the first patient and G3 pT2 N0 in the second one. We also review the previous literature focusing on stage of presentation and treatment for the affected kidney transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Peter Hill
- Renal Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - David Nicol
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research London, London, UK
| | - Norma Gibbons
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Diagnostic ureteroscopy prior to nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma is associated with a high risk of bladder recurrence despite technical precautions to avoid tumor spillage. World J Urol 2019; 38:159-165. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02768-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
165
|
Hasan MN, Rouprêt M, Keeley F, Cracco C, Jones R, Straub M, Traxer O, Osther PJS, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of risk stratification: long-term results and follow-up. World J Urol 2019; 37:2289-2296. [PMID: 30944969 PMCID: PMC6825637 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02739-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To summarize current knowledge on upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) regarding risk stratification, long-term results, and follow-up. Methods A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase. Consensus was reached through discussions at Consultation on UTUC, September 2018, Stockholm. Results To optimize oncological outcome considering both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), it is essential to identify pre- and postoperative prognostic factors. In low-risk UTUC, kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) offer equivalent CSS, whereas RNU may result in poorer OS due to nephron loss. For more aggressive tumours, undergrading can lead to insufficient treatment. The strongest prognostic factors are tumour stage and grade. Determining grade is best achieved by ureterorenoscopy (URS) with focal samples, biopsy and cytology. Staging is more difficult but can be indirectly achieved by multiphase computed tomography urography (CTU) or tumour grade determined by cytology and histopathology. Patients treated with KSS should be monitored closely with regular follow-ups (URS and CTU). Conclusion KSS should be offered in low-risk UTUC when feasible, whereas RNU is the treatment of choice in organ-confined high-risk UTUC. Intravesical recurrence (IVR) is common after RNU, but a single postoperative dose of mitomycin instillation decreases IVR. Endourological management has high local and bladder recurrence rates; however, its effect on CSS or overall survival OS is unclear. RNU is associated with significant risk of chronic kidney disease. Careful selection of patients and risk stratification are mandatory, and patients should be followed according to strict protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mudhar N Hasan
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Francis Keeley
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Cecilia Cracco
- Department of Urology, Cottolengo Hospital of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Abrate A, Sessa F, Sebastianelli A, Preto M, Olivero A, Varca V, Benelli A, Campi R, Sessa M, Pavone C, Serretta V, Vella M, Brunocilla E, Serni S, Trombetta C, Terrone C, Gregori A, Lissiani A, Gontero P, Schiavina R, Gacci M, Simonato A. Segmental resection of distal ureter with termino-terminal ureteric anastomosis vs bladder cuff removal and ureteric re-implantation for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results of a multicentre study. BJU Int 2019; 124:116-123. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Abrate
- Section of Urology; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Minimally-Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation; Careggi Hospital; University of Florence; Florence Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Department of Minimally-Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation; Careggi Hospital; University of Florence; Florence Italy
| | - Mirko Preto
- Division of Urology; Department of Surgical Science; AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Molinette; University of Turin; Turin Italy
| | - Alberto Olivero
- Department of Urology; IRCCS AOU San Martino; University of Genoa; Genoa Italy
| | - Virginia Varca
- Department of Urology; ASST Rhodense, G. Salvini Hospital; Garbagnate Milanese, Milan Italy
| | - Andrea Benelli
- Department of Urology; ASST Rhodense, G. Salvini Hospital; Garbagnate Milanese, Milan Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Minimally-Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation; Careggi Hospital; University of Florence; Florence Italy
| | - Maurizio Sessa
- Department of Experimental Medicine; University of Campania ‘L. Vanvitelli’; Naples Italy
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Carlo Pavone
- Section of Urology; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Vincenzo Serretta
- Section of Urology; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Marco Vella
- Section of Urology; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Urology; St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Minimally-Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation; Careggi Hospital; University of Florence; Florence Italy
| | | | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology; IRCCS AOU San Martino; University of Genoa; Genoa Italy
| | - Andrea Gregori
- Department of Urology; ASST Rhodense, G. Salvini Hospital; Garbagnate Milanese, Milan Italy
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology; Department of Surgical Science; AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Molinette; University of Turin; Turin Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Urology; St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Department of Minimally-Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation; Careggi Hospital; University of Florence; Florence Italy
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Section of Urology; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Korn SM, Hübner NA, Seitz C, Shariat SF, Fajkovic H. Role of lasers in urology. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2019; 18:295-303. [PMID: 30640321 DOI: 10.1039/c8pp00409a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Laser technology has long been a standard treatment for many diseases. In particular, laser treatment is considered the standard of care in various urological diseases. While originally primarily restricted to stone treatment, lasers have since evolved to play an important role even in the treatment of malignant diseases. In this review, we take a closer look at the history of lasers in urology and some implications for treatments today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan M Korn
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nicolai A Hübner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.,Institute of Urology and Andrology, Karl Landsteiner Society, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.,Institute of Urology and Andrology, Karl Landsteiner Society, Krems an der Donau, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria. .,Institute of Urology and Andrology, Karl Landsteiner Society, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Freund JE, Liem EIML, Savci-Heijink CD, Baard J, Kamphuis GM, de la Rosette JJMCH, de Bruin DM. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: validation of the proposed criteria and proposal of a scoring system for real-time tumor grading. World J Urol 2019; 37:2155-2164. [PMID: 30684035 PMCID: PMC6763512 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02646-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a fluorescence-based fiber-optic imaging technique with the potential for intraoperative grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This study aims to (1) investigate the prevalence of the previously proposed CLE criteria for bladder cancer in papillary UTUC, (2) estimate the diagnostic value of CLE for UTUC grading and (3) propose a scoring system for a more quantifiable approach of CLE-based grading of UTUC. Materials and methods Ureteroscopic CLE was performed in patients with UTUC. Following CLE imaging, co-localized biopsies were taken for histopathologic comparison. Postoperatively, two blinded raters assessed the CLE images. Results Fifty-three papillary UTUCs (34 low grade and 19 high grade) were imaged with CLE in 36 patients. All the previously described CLE criteria were identifiable in varying proportions. After excluding 10 non-diagnostic recordings (5 low grade and 5 high grade) due to insufficient image quality, the histopathologic grade was correctly identified with CLE in 26 low-grade UTUCs (90%) and in 12 high-grade UTUCs (86%). The most prevalent CLE criteria with the highest diagnostic potential were cellular organization, morphology and cohesiveness of cells. A scoring system was proposed with these criteria, which yielded similar diagnostic accuracies. Conclusions Based on the previously proposed criteria, CLE enables accurate grading of papillary UTUC at a non-diagnostic rate of 19%. The most prevalent CLE criteria with the highest diagnostic potential for grading of papillary UTUC are cellular organization, morphology and cohesiveness of cells. The proposed scoring system may simplify the assessment of CLE images for UTUC grading but external validation is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Freund
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - E I M L Liem
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C D Savci-Heijink
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G M Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J M C H de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D M de Bruin
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
MicroRNA Expression Profiles in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Differentiate Tumor Grade, Stage, and Survival: Implications for Clinical Decision-Making. Urology 2019; 123:93-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
170
|
Huang Y, Wei J, Fang Y, Chen Z, Cen J, Feng Z, Lu J, Liang Y, Luo J, Chen W. Prognostic value of AIB1 and EIF5A2 in intravesical recurrence after surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:6997-7011. [PMID: 30588104 PMCID: PMC6298448 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s185392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic effect of amplified in AIB1 and EIF5A2 expression on postoperative intravesical recurrence for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and improve postoperative risk stratification and prediction of intravesical chemotherapy benefit. Materials and methods We evaluated immunohistochemical expression of AIB1 and EIF5A2 in 109 UTUC patients to determine the predictive significance in intravesical recurrence. A prognostic model was developed based on univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Intravesical recurrence occurred in 18 out of the 109 (16.5%) patients during the follow-up period. Significant associations of high expression of AIB1 and EIF5A2 with shortened bladder recurrence interval (median: 24 months vs 46 months, P=0.021; 28 months vs 39 months, P=0.002) were demonstrated. In different subsets of UTUC patients, high expression of AIB1 was a prognostic indicator in high grade (P=0.006) and pT2–4 (P=0.007), and high expression of EIF5A2 for high grade (P=0.014), pT2–4 (P=0.002) and pN0 (P=0.009). Moreover, in multivariate analysis, AIB1 and EIF5A2 expression (P=0.034 and 0.022, respectively) together with pN stage (P=0.009) provided significant independent predictors for intravesical recurrence after surgery for UTUC. Surgical approach with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) was an informative factor toward good oncologic outcomes for intravesical recurrence (P=0.056). Based on a prognostic model with these factors, patients with UTUC were classified into the low-risk group and the high-risk group. In a subset analysis, the patients in the high-risk group were found to have a favorable response to intravesical chemotherapy (P=0.047). A nomogram based on the multivariate analysis was developed to predict intravesical recurrence accurately and guide postoperative intravesical instillations. The concordance index (c-index) of this model was 0.806. Conclusion High expression of AIB1 and EIF5A2 were independent predictors for intravesical recurrence after RNU and might be able to predict which patients benefit from postoperative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China, .,Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jinhuan Wei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Yong Fang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Zhenhua Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Junjie Cen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Zihao Feng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Yanping Liang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Junhang Luo
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China,
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Jia Z, Gong YQ, Zhang CJ, Bao ZQ, Li XS, Hao H, Xiong GY, Zhang L, Fang D, He ZS, Zhou LQ. Segmental ureterectomy can be performed safely in patients with urothelial carcinoma of distal ureter. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 13:E202-E209. [PMID: 30472983 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to compare oncological outcomes by surgery type (segmental ureterectomy [SU] vs. radical nephroureterectomy [RNU]) in a large cohort of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) of the distal ureter. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 219 patients with UTUC of the distal ureter among 931 patients with UTUC who underwent SU and RNU. Clinicopathological outcomes were evaluated. Cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (RFS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), contralateral recurrence-free survival, and distal metastasis-free survival were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression, estimating hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS A total of 179 (81.7%) patients underwent RNU and 40 (18.3%) underwent SU: 85 males (47.5%) with RNU and 17 (42.5%) with SU (p=0.568). The median age with RNU and SU was 71 years (range 31-86) and 70 years (range 46-90), respectively (p=0.499). The T stage of the two groups did not differ (p=0.122), nor did mean tumour length (3.35±2.62 vs. 3.25±2.14; p=0.953), grade (p=0.075), tumour necrosis (p=0.634), or followup time (months) (58.1±8.1 vs. 63.7±3.4; p=0.462). The two groups did not differ in CSS (p=0.358) or OS (p=0.206), and surgery type did not predict CSS (HR 0.862; 95% CI 0.469-1.585; p=0.633) or OS (HR 0.764; 95% CI 0.419-1.392; p=0.379). Local RFS was higher with RNU than SU (96.2% vs. 86.0%; p=0.02), but the groups did not differ in IVRFS (p=0.661), contralateral RFS (p=0.183), or distant metastasis-free survival (p=0.078). On multivariate analysis, SU was associated with local RFS (HR 5.069; 95% CI 1.029-24.968; p=0.046) and distant metastasis-free survival (HR 6.497; 95% CI 1.196-35.283; p=0.03). Local RFS was lower with SU than RNU for patients with pT3-4 stage (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS Long-term oncological outcomes were equivalent with SU and RNU in patients with UTUC of the distal ureter. SU affected local recurrence survival, especially with advanced tumour stage, and distant metastasis survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Jia
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan-Qing Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Cui-Jian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng-Qing Bao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Song Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Han Hao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Geng-Yan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Song He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Qun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Shao IH, Chang YH, Pang ST. Recent advances in upper tract urothelial carcinomas: From bench to clinics. Int J Urol 2018; 26:148-159. [PMID: 30372791 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma in the upper tract is rare and often discussed separately. Many established risk factors were identified for the disease, including genetic and external risk factors. Radiographic survey, endoscopic examination and urine cytology remained the most important diagnostic modalities. In localized upper tract urothelial carcinomas, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision are the gold standard for large, high-grade and suspected invasive tumors of the renal pelvis and proximal ureter, whereas kidney-sparing surgeries should be considered in patients with low-risk disease. Advances in technology have given endoscopic surgery an important role, not only in diagnosis, but also in treatment. Although platinum-based combination chemotherapy is efficacious in advanced or metastatic disease, current established chemotherapy regimens are toxic and lack a sustained response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have led to a new era of treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinomas. The remarkable results achieved thus far show that immunotherapy will likely be the future treatment paradigm. The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other agents is another inspiring avenue to explore that could benefit even more patients. With respect to the high incidence rate and different clinical appearance of upper tract urothelial carcinomas in Taiwan, a possible correlation exists between exposure to certain external risk factors, such as arsenic in drinking water and aristolochic acid in Chinese herbal medicine. As more gene sequencing differences between upper tract urothelial carcinomas and various disease causes are detailed, this has warranted the era of individualized screening and treatment for the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Hung Shao
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Hsu Chang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - See-Tong Pang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Rouprêt M, Xylinas E, Colin P, Houédé N, Compérat E, Audenet F, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Pignot G, Brunelle S, Roumiguié M, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S32-S45. [PMID: 30318333 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.07.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, université Paris Descartes, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59042 Lille, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie Médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, 75010 Paris, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Linares-Espinós E, Hernández V, Domínguez-Escrig J, Fernández-Pello S, Hevia V, Mayor J, Padilla-Fernández B, Ribal M. Methodology of a systematic review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2018.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
175
|
Linares-Espinós E, Hernández V, Domínguez-Escrig JL, Fernández-Pello S, Hevia V, Mayor J, Padilla-Fernández B, Ribal MJ. Methodology of a systematic review. Actas Urol Esp 2018; 42:499-506. [PMID: 29731270 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The objective of evidence-based medicine is to employ the best scientific information available to apply to clinical practice. Understanding and interpreting the scientific evidence involves understanding the available levels of evidence, where systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials are at the top of the levels-of-evidence pyramid. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE The review process should be well developed and planned to reduce biases and eliminate irrelevant and low-quality studies. The steps for implementing a systematic review include (i) correctly formulating the clinical question to answer (PICO), (ii) developing a protocol (inclusion and exclusion criteria), (iii) performing a detailed and broad literature search and (iv) screening the abstracts of the studies identified in the search and subsequently of the selected complete texts (PRISMA). SYNTHESIS OF THE EVIDENCE Once the studies have been selected, we need to (v) extract the necessary data into a form designed in the protocol to summarise the included studies, (vi) assess the biases of each study, identifying the quality of the available evidence, and (vii) develop tables and text that synthesise the evidence. CONCLUSIONS A systematic review involves a critical and reproducible summary of the results of the available publications on a particular topic or clinical question. To improve scientific writing, the methodology is shown in a structured manner to implement a systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - V Hernández
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | | | | | - V Hevia
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España
| | - J Mayor
- Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España
| | | | - M J Ribal
- Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, España; EAU Guidelines Office Board Member
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Treatment utilization and overall survival in patients receiving radical nephroureterectomy versus endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: evaluation of updated treatment guidelines. World J Urol 2018; 37:1157-1164. [PMID: 30267197 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2506-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), select patients may benefit from endoscopic treatment (ET). European Association of Urology guidelines recommend ET for patients with low-risk (LR) disease: unifocal, < 2 cm, low-grade lesions without local invasion. To inform the utility of ET, we compare the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving ET and RNU using current and previous guidelines of LR disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with non-metastatic, cT1 or less UTUC diagnosed in 2004-2012 were collected from the National Cancer Database. OS was analyzed with inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazard regression. Analyses were conducted for LR disease under updated (size < 2 cm) and previous guidelines (size < 1 cm). RESULTS Patients who were older, healthier, and treated at an academic facility had higher odds of receiving ET. In 851 identified patients with LR disease, RNU was associated with increased OS compared with ET (p = 0.006); however, there was no difference between ET and RNU (p = 0.79, n = 202) under the previous guidelines (size < 1 cm). In, otherwise, LR patients, the largest tumor size with no difference between ET and RNU was ≤ 1.5 cm (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS RNU is associated with improved survival when compared with ET in the management of LR UTUC using current guidelines with a size threshold of < 2 cm. In appropriately selected LR patients, we find no difference between RNU and ET up to a tumor size of ≤ 1.5 cm. However, in the absence of prospective studies, the usage of ET is best left up to clinician discretion.
Collapse
|
177
|
An Analysis of Staging and Treatment Trends for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in the National Cancer Database. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16:e743-e750. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Revised: 01/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
178
|
Freifeld Y, Krabbe LM, Clinton TN, Woldu SL, Margulis V. Therapeutic strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:765-774. [PMID: 29848133 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1481395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many controversies exist regarding the appropriate management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), including staging, surgical management, use of systemic therapy, and prevention of bladder recurrence. Due to the rarity of this condition, high-level evidence is often lacking and in many cases guidelines are extrapolated from existing evidence on urothelial bladder cancer. Areas covered: This review paper summarizes the evidence on proper diagnosis and staging, surgical techniques, prevention of bladder recurrences, the use of local or systemic treatments in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings as well as special consideration for hereditary UTUC. Expert commentary: UTUC is a rare malignancy and slow progress is being made in the acquisition of high-quality evidence in this field. Treatments that facilitate preservation of the kidney are being explored such as advanced endoscopic techniques or partial resection of ureteral disease with seemingly acceptable oncological results. Further prospective evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval Freifeld
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA.,b Department of Urology , University of Muenster Medical Center , Muenster , Germany
| | - Timothy N Clinton
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Comparison of Radical Nephroureterectomy and Partial Ureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:2793172. [PMID: 29854736 PMCID: PMC5944270 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2793172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the oncological and renal outcomes of partial ureterectomy (PU) versus radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). UTUC patients' clinical information was reviewed, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and kidney function were collected. The mean follow-up period was 59 (6-135) months in the RNU group and 34.5 (5-135) months in the PU group. The mean operation time in the PU group was 141 (64-340) min, which is significantly shorter than the RNU group (P < 0.01). Regarding kidney function at one year or two years after operation, the PU group had significantly improved mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels and a remarkably decreased constitution of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) III or higher group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the RNU group and the PU group (P > 0.05). Multifactor Cox regression analysis indicated that age and the preoperative CKD stages were independent risk factors for poor kidney functions of UTUC patients. Compared to patients in RNU group, patients in PU have no significant difference in survival time but have shorter operation time, shorter hospital stay, and improved kidney functions.
Collapse
|
180
|
Risk factors for bladder cancer recurrence survival in patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 104:451-458. [PMID: 29737959 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to investigate the predictive factors for bladder cancer recurrence survival (BCRS) in patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We selected patients with UTUC who underwent segmental ureterectomy (Su) or nephroureterectomy (Nu) from 2004 to 2013 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with a history of intravesical therapy for bladder cancer and bladder cancer prior to the diagnosis of UTUC were excluded. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards model to compare overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and BCRS. RESULTS In a cohort of 1,454 patients, 169 (11.6%) had low-grade tumors and 1,285 (88.4%) had high-grade tumors; 239 (16.4%) underwent Su and 1,215 (83.6%) underwent Nu. We found that T4 grade (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.216; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.197-12.087) and ureteral tumors (HR = 1.764; 95% CI, 1.173-2.652) were predictors of shorter BCRS, whereas Nu (HR = 0.608; 95% CI, 0.388-0.953) predicted longer BCRS. Five-year BCRS rates were low-grade tumors: 94.1%, high-grade tumors: 85.4% (p = 0.038); plus Su: 82.9%, and Nu: 87.6% (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Use of Su should be more selective for high-grade tumors, as it correlates with shorter BCRS. Tumors located in the ureter are associated with shorter BCRS than those located in the renal pelvis.
Collapse
|
181
|
van Doeveren T, van Leeuwen PJ, Aben KKH, van der Aa M, Barendrecht M, Boevé ER, Cornel EB, van der Heijden AG, Hendricksen K, Hirdes W, Kooistra A, Kroon B, Leliveld AM, Meijer RP, van Melick H, Merks B, de Reijke TM, de Vries P, Wymenga LFA, Wijsman B, Boormans JL. Reduce bladder cancer recurrence in patients treated for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: The REBACARE-trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018; 9:121-129. [PMID: 29696234 PMCID: PMC5898538 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Following radical nephro-ureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT), the reported bladder recurrence rate of urothelial carcinoma is 22–47%. A single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy within 10 days following nephro-ureterectomy has the potential to decrease the risk of a bladder recurrence significantly. Despite recommendation by the European Association of Urology guideline to administer a single instillation postoperatively, the compliance rate is low because the risk of extravasation of chemotherapy. Aim To reduce the risk of bladder cancer recurrence by a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin immediately (within 3 h) before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy. Methods Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with a (suspicion of a) urothelial carcinoma of the UUT undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy will be eligible and will receive a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin within 3 h before surgery. In total, 170 patients will be included in this prospective, observational study. Follow-up will be according to current guidelines. Results The primary endpoint is the bladder cancer recurrence rate up to two years after surgery. Secondary endpoints are: a) the compliance rate; b) oncological outcome; c) possible side-effects; d) the quality of life; e) the calculation of costs of a single neoadjuvant instillation with Mitomycin and f) molecular characterization of UUT tumors and intravesical recurrences. Conclusions A single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy may reduce the risk of a bladder recurrence in patients treated for UUT urothelial carcinoma and will circumvent the disadvantages of current therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T van Doeveren
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J van Leeuwen
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K K H Aben
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, The Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M van der Aa
- Spaarne Medical Center, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | | | - E R Boevé
- Fransiscus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E B Cornel
- Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | | | - K Hendricksen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Hirdes
- Isala Medical Center, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - A Kooistra
- Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - B Kroon
- Rijnstate Medical Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - A M Leliveld
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R P Meijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H van Melick
- Sint Antonius Medical Center, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - B Merks
- Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | | | - P de Vries
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - B Wijsman
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Medical Center, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - J L Boormans
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Yoshida T, Taguchi M, Inoue T, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Thulium laser ablation facilitates retrograde intra-renal surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2018; 25:379-380. [PMID: 29323434 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Yoshida
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Kori Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Taguchi
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Kori Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takaaki Inoue
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadashi Matsuda
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Lee BH, Zabor EC, Tennenbaum D, Furberg H, Benfante N, Coleman JA, Jaimes EA, Russo P. Renal function recovery after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2017; 36:257-263. [PMID: 29209771 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2139-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand the longitudinal renal function trends in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) recovery. METHODS 147 patients were available for analysis. Longitudinal eGFR trends were assessed by plotting each patient's eGFR measurements over time. The patient population was dichotomized using eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 versus ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Cumulative incidence and competing risk regression analysis were used to estimate recovery of postoperative eGFR to the preoperative level and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with eGFR recovery. RESULTS Median age was 68.7 years and median preoperative eGFR was 55.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. 63.6% were male and 95.8% were white. The cumulative incidence of eGFR recovery was significantly higher in patients with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.01), with recovery rates at 2 years of 56.6% vs. 27.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative hydronephrosis (HR 1.80) and preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.87) were associated with increased chance of eGFR recovery. CONCLUSION Over half of patients with preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 achieved eGFR recovery within the first 3 years after RNU, and hydronephrosis was a significant predictor of recovery. These findings should be considered when counseling patients regarding chronic kidney disease progression after RNU and timing of perioperative chemotherapy for high risk tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron H Lee
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Emily C Zabor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Daniel Tennenbaum
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Helena Furberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Edgar A Jaimes
- Department of Medicine, Renal Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Paul Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Grande P, Rouprêt M. UTUC in 2017: Emerging evidence on treating upper tract urothelial cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2017; 15:73-74. [PMID: 29182602 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Grande
- Service d'Urologie, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hospital La Pitié-Salpétrière, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; and at the University Paris Sorbonne, Faculty of Medicine Pierre and Marie Curie, 91-105 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; and at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Sciences and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Service d'Urologie, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hospital La Pitié-Salpétrière, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; and at the University Paris Sorbonne, Faculty of Medicine Pierre and Marie Curie, 91-105 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester RJ, Burger M, Cowan NC, Gontero P, Van Rhijn BWG, Mostafid AH, Palou J, Shariat SF. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update. Eur Urol 2017; 73:111-122. [PMID: 28867446 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 553] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer; urothelial carcinomas; upper urinary tract, carcinoma; renal pelvis; ureter; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; ureteroscopy; nephroureterectomy; adjuvant treatment; instillation; recurrence; risk factors; and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations (ie, grade A). However, the results of recent multicentre studies are now available, and there is a growing number of retrospective articles in UTUC. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification, as well as for radical and conservative treatment; prognostic factors are also discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after radical nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumours and two functional kidneys. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis; appropriate diagnosis and management is most important. We present recommendations based on current evidence for optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Rouprêt
- AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpétrière, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France; UPMC University Paris 06, GRC5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Paris, France.
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, UPMC Paris VI, Paris, France
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Nigel C Cowan
- Department of Radiology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Bas W G Van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Villa L, Haddad M, Capitanio U, Somani BK, Cloutier J, Doizi S, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Traxer O. Which Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Can be Safely Treated with Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium:YAG Laser Photoablation? Long-Term Results from a High Volume Institution. J Urol 2017; 199:66-73. [PMID: 28818526 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We tested the effects of tumor size, distribution and grade on progression-free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with flexible ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Included in analysis were data on 92 consecutive patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation from 2003 to 2015 at a single tertiary care referral center. Stringent followup was offered according to EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines. Progression during followup was defined by tumor upgrading, distant metastases and/or a relapsing tumor that could not be completely removed with a conservative approach. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the rate of disease progression according to tumor size (1 or less cm vs greater than 1 cm), tumor distribution (unifocal vs multifocal) and tumor grade (low vs high). Cox regression analysis was done to test the impact of clinical and pathological characteristics on the rate of progression-free survival. RESULTS At a median followup of 52 months (IQR 27.8-76.4) the progression-free survival rate was 68% vs 72% in patients with a tumor size of 1 or less vs greater than 1 cm (p = 0.9), 72% vs 69% in patients with unifocal vs multifocal lesions (p = 0.6) and 75% vs 52% in patients with a low vs a high grade tumor (p = 0.03). On multivariable Cox regression analysis tumor grade at first treatment was the only independent predictor of disease progression (HR 5.16, 95% CI 1.19-22.26, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS High tumor grade independently decreased progression-free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. Tumor size greater than 1 cm and multifocality did not increase the risk of disease progression in patients treated conservatively with Ho:YAG laser photoablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Villa
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France; Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattieu Haddad
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Cloutier
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Steeve Doizi
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Olivier Traxer
- Group Recherche Clinique Lithiase No. 20, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Andrada AO, García IL, Fúnez FA, Canet FD, Ruiz GD, Dos Santos VG, Revilla FJB. Conservative treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma: Long-term results. Can Urol Assoc J 2017; 11:E291-E296. [PMID: 28761590 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We sought to assess the long-term results of conservative treatment for upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC) with regard to tumour recurrence and preservation of renal unit. METHODS From October 1987 to January 2014, 65 patients (median age 68 years) were diagnosed with UUTC and underwent endoscopic and open surgical techniques. Thirteen patients had bilateral disease and one had a single kidney. The primary approach was endoscopic in 37 reno-ureteral units (20 percutaneous resections, 17 ureteroscopies ). Open surgery was performed in 19 cases. A total of 20 patients received mitomycin C. RESULTS Superficial stage pTa or T1 was noted in 37 patients, infiltrating stage pT2 and pT3 in seven and inverted papilloma in one. The stage of the tumour was impossible to classify in 20. With a median followup of 75.12 months (interquartile range [IQR] 144.71-17.41), the kidney preservation, recurrence, specific survival, and global survival rates were 78.5% (51/65), 40.0% (26/65), 92.3% (60/65), and 69.2% (45/65), respectively. From the patients who had recurrence, 15 were salvaged with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The bladder tumour recurrence rate after the surgery was 30.76% (20/65). At the end of the followup, five patients had died of UUTC progression and 16 from other causes. Postoperative complications included one case of fistula, one case of stricture, and one case of nephrectomy due to bleeding. CONCLUSIONS In selected cases, conservative management is a safe and feasible alternative to RNU, with the advantage of renal unit preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inés Laso García
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Gemma Duque Ruiz
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
188
|
Campbell MT, Shah AY, Matin SF, Siefker-Radtke AO. Optimizing management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:492-498. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
189
|
Seisen T, Krasnow RE, Bellmunt J, Rouprêt M, Leow JJ, Lipsitz SR, Vetterlein MW, Preston MA, Hanna N, Kibel AS, Sun M, Choueiri TK, Trinh QD, Chang SL. Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Positive Regional Lymph Node Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:852-860. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.4141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is limited evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Against this backdrop, we hypothesized that such treatment is associated with overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node disease. Patients and Methods Within the National Cancer Database (2004 to 2012), we identified 3,253 individuals who received AC or observation after RNU for pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UTUC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) –adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare OS of patients in the two treatment groups. In addition, we performed exploratory analyses of treatment effect according to age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, pathologic stage (pT3/T4N0, pT3/T4Nx and pTanyN+), and surgical margin status. Results Overall, 762 (23.42%) and 2,491 (76.58%) patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UTUC received AC and observation, respectively, after RNU. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median OS was significantly longer for AC versus observation (47.41 [interquartile range,19.88 to 112.39] v 35.78 [interquartile range, 14.09 to 99.22] months; P < .001). The 5-year IPTW-adjusted rates of OS for AC versus observation were 43.90% and 35.85%, respectively. In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, AC was associated with a significant OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.88]; P < .001). This benefit was consistent across all subgroups examined (all P < .05), and no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed (all Pinteraction > .05). Conclusion We report an OS benefit in patients who received AC versus observation after RNU for pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UTUC. Although our results are limited by the usual biases related to the observational study design, we believe that the present findings should be considered when advising post-RNU management of advanced UTUC, pending level I evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Seisen
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Ross E. Krasnow
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Jeffrey J. Leow
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Stuart R. Lipsitz
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Malte W. Vetterlein
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Mark A. Preston
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Nawar Hanna
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Maxine Sun
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Steven L. Chang
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Zareba P, Rosenzweig B, Winer AG, Coleman JA. Association between lymph node yield and survival among patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract. Cancer 2017; 123:1741-1750. [PMID: 28152158 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies examining the value of lymph node (LN) dissection (LND) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UTUC) have produced conflicting results. The objective of the current study was to assess the relationship between LN yield and survival among patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with non-metastatic UTUC who were treated with RNU between 2004 and 2012. The association between LN yield and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, with adjustment for patient, tumor, and facility characteristics. RESULTS Of the 14,472 patients, 2926 (20%) underwent LND. The median yield was 2 LNs (interquartile range 1-6 LNs). Among the entire cohort and the LN-negative (pN0) subgroup, a higher LN yield was associated with lower all-cause mortality (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 0.94 per 5 LNs removed, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.89-1.00 [P = .034] for the entire cohort and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94 [P = .001] for the pN0 subgroup). Among patients with positive LNs (pN+), there was no association noted between LN yield and OS; however, positive and negative LN counts were found to be independent predictors of OS (HR 1.27 per 5 positive LNs, 95% CI 1.16-1.39 [P<.001] and HR 0.90 per 5 negative LNs, 95% CI 0.82-1.00 [P = .049]). CONCLUSIONS In this large, contemporary cohort of patients with UTUC, LND was found to be used infrequently despite evidence that a higher LN yield is associated with lower all-cause mortality. Cancer 2017;123:1741-1750. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Zareba
- Urology Service, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Barak Rosenzweig
- Urology Service, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew G Winer
- Urology Service, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Urology Service, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Leow JJ, Chong KT, Chang SL, Bellmunt J. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a different disease entity in terms of management. ESMO Open 2017; 1:e000126. [PMID: 28848663 PMCID: PMC5419214 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) consist of 5%–10% of all urothelial carcinomas, the rest being urothelial carcinomas of the bladder (UCB). There is increasing evidence to show that UTUC is a distinct disease entity from UCB based on phenotypical and genotypical (genetic and epigenetic) differences. This may account for why the natural history of UTUC is different from that of UCB, with >60% of UTUCs and only 15%–25% of UCB presenting with invasion at diagnosis. Management of UTUC is thus different from UCB in a variety of ways, ranging from surgical management, postoperative instillation therapy, postoperative surveillance and medical management (neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy). This review paper aims to highlight these differences with an emphasis on the distinct management of UTUC, along with the latest updates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital,; Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School,.
| | | | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School,; Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Luo HL, Chen YT, Cheng YT, Chiang PH. Re: Thomas Seisen, Benoit Peyronnet, Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig, et al. Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2016;70:1052-68: Preoperative Bladder Cancer History and Chronic Kidney Disease Are Associated with Occult Renal Pelvis Cancer in Preoperative Solitary Ureteral Cancer. Eur Urol 2016; 71:e109-e110. [PMID: 27687822 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lun Luo
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen Ta Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan Tso Cheng
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Po Hui Chiang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Khene ZE, Mathieu R, Kammerer-Jacquet SF, Seisen T, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Peyronnet B, Bensalah K. Risk stratification for kidney sparing procedure in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5:711-719. [PMID: 27785428 PMCID: PMC5071190 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.09.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk stratification for kidney sparing procedures (KSP) to treat upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a major issue. A non-systematic Medline/PubMed literature search was performed using the terms “upper tract urothelial carcinoma” with different combinations of keywords to review the current knowledge on this topic. Original articles, reviews and editorials in English language were selected based on their clinical relevance. Available techniques for KSP include segmental ureterectomy and endoscopic resection through a percutaneous or flexible ureteroscopic access. These approaches were traditionally restricted to patients with imperative indications. Current recommendations suggest that selected patients with normal contralateral kidney should also be candidates for such treatments. Modern imaging and endoscopy have improved to accurately stage and grade the tumor while various prognostic clinical factors and biomarkers have been proposed to identify tumor with aggressive features and worse outcomes. Several predictive models using different combinations of such baseline characteristics may help clinicians in clinical decision making. However, risk-adapted based approach that has been proposed in recent guidelines to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from KSP only relies on few clinical and pathological factors. Despite growing understanding of the disease, treatment of UTUC remains challenging. Further efforts and collaborative multicenter studies are mandatory to improve risk stratification to decide and promote optimal KSP in UTUC. These efforts should focus on the integration of promising biomarkers and predictive tools in clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Solène-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France;; Department of Pathology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France; ; GRC 5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, University Institute of Oncology, UMPC University Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France; ; GRC 5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, University Institute of Oncology, UMPC University Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; ; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; ; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; ; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Seisen T, Babjuk M, Rouprêt M. Reply to Hao Lun Luo, Yen Ta Chen, Yuan Tso Cheng, and Po Hui Chiang's Letter to the Editor re: Re: Thomas Seisen, Benoit Peyronnet, Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig, et al. Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2016;70:1052-68: The Key Role of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2016; 71:e111-e112. [PMID: 27666997 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Seisen
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris 6, Paris, France.
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris 6, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|