Palliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approach

Biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the endoscopic versus percutaneous approach

BACKGROUND

For palliative treatment of the obstructive jaundice associated with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) has been performed. PTBD is preferred as an initial procedure. Little is known about the better option for patients with obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable HCC.

METHODS

Sixty patients who had received ERBD or PTBD for the palliative treatment of obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable HCC between January 2006 and May 2010 were included in this retrospective study. Successful drainage, drainage patency, and the overall survival of patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that the overall frequency of successful drainage was higher in the ERBD group (22/29, 75.9%) than in the PTBD group (15/31, 48.4%) (P=0.029); but multivariate analysis showed marginal significance (P=0.057). The duration of drainage patency was longer in the ERBD group than in the PTBD group (82 vs 37 days, respectively, P=0.020). Regardless of what procedure was performed, the median survival time of patients who had a successful drainage was much longer than that of the patients who did not have a successful drainage (143 vs 38 days, respectively, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Besides PTBD, ERBD may be used as the initial treatment option to improve obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable HCC if there is a longer duration of drainage patency after a successful drainage.

Endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage for Klatskin tumors?

PURPOSE

Controversy exists regarding the preferred biliary drainage technique in patients with Klatskin tumors because few comparative studies exist. This study compared outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (N = 129) with Klatskin tumors treated with initial EBD or PTBD were identified, and their clinical histories were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the time to therapeutic success (TTS), defined as the time between the first drainage and a total bilirubin measurement of 40 μmol/L or lower.

RESULTS

EBD was the first biliary decompression procedure performed in 87 patients; PTBD was performed first in 42. Technical success rates (78% with EBD vs 98% with PTBD; P = .004) and therapeutic success rates (49% vs 79%, respectively; P = .002) were significantly lower in the EBD group than in the PTBD group. Forty-four patients in the EBD group (51%) subsequently underwent PTBD before therapeutic success was achieved or antitumoral treatment was started. Median TTSs were 61 days in the EBD group and 44 days in the PTBD group, and multivariate analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.99; P = .045). In patients treated with surgery or chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy, median times to treatment were 76 and 68 days in the EBD and PTBD groups, respectively (P = .76). Cholangitis occurred in 25% and 21% of patients in the EBD and PTBD groups, respectively (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

PTBD should be seriously considered for biliary decompression when treating patients with Klatskin tumor.

Diagnosis and cure experience of hepatolithiasis-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in 66 patients

BACKGROUND

The management of hepatolithiasis combined with intrahepatic cholangicarcinoma (IHHCC) remains a challenge due to poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to summarize our diagnosis and cure experience of IHHCC over the recent 10 years.

METHODS

From January 1996 to January 2006, 66 patients with IHHCC were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of the 66 patients, 52 underwent surgical resection (radical resection in 38 and palliative in 14) and 8 patients abdominal exploration, while the other 6 cases received endoscopic retrograde biliary internal drainage and stent implantation. In this series, correct diagnosis of advanced stage was made during operation in 8 cases (8/60, 13.3%) and all of them (underwent unnecessary abdominal exploration, among them the positive rate of CA19-9 was 100%, and the positive rate of CEA was 87.6% (7/8), incidence rate of ascites was 100% and short-term significant weight loss was 100%, with median overall survival of only 4 months.

CONCLUSION

Radical resection is mandatory for IHHCC patient to achieve long-term survival, the CT and MR imaging features of IHHCC being concentric enhancement. Patients with IHHCC have significant higher CA199 and significant higher CEA and short-term significant weight loss and ascites should be considered with advanced stage of IHHCC and unnecessary non-therapeutic laparotomies should be avoided.

Placement of metallic biliary endoprostheses in complex hilar tumours

PURPOSE

To assess the technical success, clinical success and complications after 1 month of percutaneous biliary drainage with the placement of several metallic endoprostheses in complex hilar liver tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study, on a homogenous target population of 68 consecutive patients, who underwent multiple percutaneous biliary drainage for complex hilar tumour (Bismuth type II, III and IV) between August 1998 and August 2010. Patients benefiting from previous endoscopic drainage were excluded from the study. The clinical data, biological data, imaging and interventional radiology procedures were studied.

RESULTS

The rate of success of the technique was 98.5% and the clinical rate of success was 84% after 1 week and 93% after 1 month. The rate of minor and major complications was 25 and 13% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Multiple percutaneous biliary drainage in complex hilar tumour is a safe and effective first intention procedure.

Current management of cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatobiliary malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma and remains among the most difficult management problems faced by surgeons. Curative surgery is achieved in only 25% to 30% of patients. Local tumor extent, such as portal vein invasion and hepatic lobar atrophy, does not preclude resection. Long-term survival has been seen only in patients who underwent extensive liver resections, suggesting that bile-duct excision alone is less effective. The majority of patients have unresectable disease, with 20% to 30% incidence of distant metastasis at presentation. Unresectable patients should be referred for nonsurgical biliary decompression, and in potential curative resection candidates the use of biliary stents should be reduced. Liver transplantation provides the option of wide resection margins, expanding the indication of surgical intervention for selected patients who otherwise are not surgical candidates due to lack of functional hepatic reserve.

Targeted drug regulation on methylation of p53-BAX mitochondrial apoptosis pathway affects the growth of cholangiocarcinoma cells

OBJECTIVE

To study the mechanism of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (DAC; a methylation inhibitor) on growth of the human cholangiocarcinoma QBC939 cell line.

METHODS

A colourimetric assay was used to detect growth of QBC939 cells treated with DAC (0.1-100 μmol/l) over 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Cell morphology was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The cell cycle and apoptosis were analysed by flow cytometry. Hypermethylation of the promoters of the p53-BAX mitochondrial apoptosis genes cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) and PYD and CARD domain containing (PYCARD) was detected by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, with and without DAC treatment.

RESULTS

DAC inhibited QBC939 cell growth with a half maximal inhibitory concentration of 5 μmol/l at 72 h. After DAC treatment, apoptosis was observed by TEM. Flow cytometric analysis of propidium iodide-positive cells demonstrated increased apoptosis of DAC-treated QBC939 cells (43.04%) compared with untreated cells (4.31%). DAC treatment resulted in demethylation of the gene promoters of CDKN2A and DAPK1 in QBC939 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

DAC induces apoptosis of QBC939 cells by reactivation of hypermethylated p53-BAX mitchondrial apoptosis genes in cholangiocarcinoma cells.

Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic biliary stent drainage is effective in the palliative treatment of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCA). However, no randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) and the plastic stent (PS) in patients with unresectable complex HCA is available.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the successful drainage rates of endoscopic SEMSs and PSs.

DESIGN

A single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospital in KhonKaen, Thailand.

PATIENTS

One hundred eight patients with unresectable complex, Bismuth type II-IV HCA.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with unilateral SEMS or PS insertion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Successful drainage rate.

LIMITATIONS

Diagnosis of HCA was made by clinical presentations, imaging studies, and clinical outcome during follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred eight patients were randomly allocated to the SEMS and PS groups. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the successful drainage rate in the SEMS group was higher than in the PS group (70.4% vs 46.3%, P = .011). The median survival times were 126 and 49 days, respectively, in the SEMS and PS groups. The overall survival rates of the patients in both groups were statistically different by log-rank test (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biliary drainage with the SEMS provides better adequacy of drainage and longer survival compared with the PS in patients with unresectable complex HCA.

Metal stents for hilar lesions

Strictures at the hilum are caused by varied conditions and don't usually become symptomatic until obstructing the bile ducts, thus posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to physicians. ERCP is the method of choice for tissue diagnosis and decompression. MRCP or MRI with dedicated liver protocol provides a unique ability to visualize anatomy and promote procedure planning. In patients with unresectable tumor, endoscopic biliary stenting is a palliative approach. Percutaneous or EUS-guided approach is reserved for endoscopic failure. Various new modalities such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and Photodynamic therapy have emerged but their superiority needs to be confirmed with Randomized Control studies.

Clinical benefit of radiation therapy and metallic stenting for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma

AIM: To determine the efficacy of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT), in patients with non-resected locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS: We analyzed 64 patients with locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma, including 25 who underwent resection (17 curative and 8 non-curative), 28 treated with radiotherapy, and 11 who received best supportive care (BSC). The radiotherapy group received EBRT (50 Gy, 30 fractions), with 11 receiving an additional 24 Gy (4 fractions) ILBT by iridium-192 with remote after loading. ILBT was performed using percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) route. Uncovered metallic stents (UMS) were inserted into non-resected patients with obstructive jaundice, with the exception of four patients who received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage only. UMS were placed endoscopically or percutaneously, depending on the initial drainage procedure. The primary endpoints were patient death or stent occlusion. Survival time of patients in the radiotherapy group was compared with that of patients in the resection and BSC groups. Stent patency was compared in the radiotherapy and BSC groups.

RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in patient characteristics were found among the resection, radiotherapy, and BSC groups. Three patients in the radiotherapy group and one in the BSC group did not receive UMS insertion but received PTBD alone; cholangitis occurred after endoscopic stenting, and patients were treated with PTBD. A total of 16 patients were administered additional systemic chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil-based regimen in 9, S-1 in 6, and gemcitabine in 1). Overall survival varied significantly among groups, with median survival times of 48.7 mo in the surgery group, 22.1 mo in the radiotherapy group, and 5.7 mo in the BSC group. Patients who underwent curative resection survived significantly longer than those who were not candidates for surgery (P = 0.0076). Cumulative survival in the radiotherapy group was significantly longer than in the BSC group (P = 0.0031), but did not differ significantly from those in the non-resection group. Furthermore, the median survival time of patients in the radiotherapy group who were considered for possible resection (excluding the seven patients who were not candidates for surgery due to comorbid disease or age) was 25.9 mo. Stent patency was evaluated only in the 24 patients who received a metallic stent. Stent patency was significantly longer in the radiotherapy than in the BSC group (P = 0.0165). Biliary drainage was not eliminated in any patient. To determine the efficacy of ILBT, we compared survival time and stent patency in the EBRT alone and EBRT plus ILBT groups. However, we found no significant difference in survival time between groups or for stent patencies. Hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcers were observed in 5 patients (17.9%), three in the EBRT plus ILBT group and two in the EBRT alone group. Ulcers occurred 5 mo, 7 mo, 8 mo, 16 mo, and 29 mo following radiotherapy. All patients required hospitalization, but blood transfusions were unnecessary. All 5 patients recovered following the administration of anti-ulcer medication.

CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy improved patient prognosis and the patency of uncovered metallic stents in patients with locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma, but ILBT provided no additional benefits.

Evidence-based decompression in malignant biliary obstruction

As recent advances in chemotherapy and surgical treatment have improved outcomes in patients with biliary cancers, the search for an optimal strategy for relief of their obstructive jaundice has become even more important. Without satisfactory relief of biliary obstruction, many patients would be ineligible for treatment. We review all prospective randomized trials and recent retrospective non-randomized studies for evidence that would support such a strategy. For distal malignant biliary obstruction, an optimal strategy would be insertion of metallic stents either endoscopically or percutaneously. Evidence shows that a metallic stent inserted percutaneously has better outcomes than plastic stents inserted endoscopically. For malignant hilar obstruction, percutaneous biliary drainage with or without metallic stents is preferred.

To stent or not to stent: an evidence-based approach to palliative procedures at the end of life

Patients near the end of life often undergo invasive procedures, such as biliary stenting for obstructive jaundice, with the intent of relieving symptoms. We describe a case in which the medical team and a patient and family are considering a second palliative biliary stent despite the patient's limited life expectancy. We review available evidence to inform the decision, focusing on the specific question of whether the benefits of palliative biliary stents in patients with advanced cancer outweigh the risks. We then apply the evidence to the issue of how the primary and/or palliative care team and the interventionist communicate with patients and their families about the risks and benefits of palliative procedures. Review of the evidence found several prospective case series without control groups that measured patient-centered outcomes. Studies had high attrition rates, results for improvements in symptoms and quality of life were mixed, and rates of complications and short-term mortality were high. In conclusion, the limited evidence does not support that the benefits of palliative biliary stents in this population outweigh the risks. We propose that primary care teams consider and discuss the larger picture of the goals of care with patients and families when considering offering these procedures, as well as benefits and potential harms, and consider involving palliative care services early, before consultation with an interventionist.

Advancements in biliary stenting

Endoscopic therapy is essential in the management of malignant and benign biliary strictures. With new advancements in biliary stent technology and the many controversies surrounding biliary stenting, managing biliary strictures is not always straightforward. The purpose of this article is to review the major issues surrounding biliary stenting, summarize current treatment strategies, discuss advancements in stent technologies, and describe emerging indications of biliary stents.

Photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare primary malignancy of the biliary tract with a dismal prognosis. Curative resection can only be applied to a small proportion of early diagnosed patients. Palliative biliary drainage by either percutaneous or endoscopic insertion of endoprostheses improves quality-of-life by reducing pruritis, cholangitis, and pain, but has been reported to improve survival time only slightly. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a relatively new local, minimally invasive palliative strategy for unresectable CC. PDT uses a photosensitive molecule that accumulates in proliferating tissue such as tumors. Activation of the photosensitizer by use of light of a specific wavelength generates reactive oxygen species leading to selective tumor-cell death. After initial feasibility studies and promising prospective phase II studies, results from two prospective randomized controlled trials comparing PDT after endoprostheses insertion with endoprostheses alone for patients with unresectable CC have been published. One study resulted in dramatically prolonged median survival in the PDT group (493 days) compared with the non-PDT group (98 days) (P < 0.0001), and significantly improved performance status (PS) in the PDT group. A second study with high baseline patients' PS confirmed the benefit of PDT for survival (630 days in the PDT group compared with 210 days for endoprostheses alone, P < 0.01). The procedures were generally well tolerated. PDT has also been reported to have a favorable outcome as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for CC. Although accumulated data and local expertise are limited, PDT can be regarded as a standard palliative therapy for unresectable CC.

Endoscopic management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma has a poor prognosis and surgery remains the only curative option. However, few patients are diagnosed at a curable stage and palliative therapies are, therefore, mandatory. Endoscopy could have a useful role in the work-up of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who are unsuitable for surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography provides an opportunity to collect specimens for cytological or histological diagnosis, yet is often nondiagnostic. Other techniques, including fluorescence in situ hybridization, confocal laser endomicroscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography, are now improving the accuracy of tissue diagnosis. This Review presents an overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopic procedures in the management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The use of such procedures in guiding the therapeutic management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma is discussed, and the relative success of endoscopic stenting as the main palliative therapy for obstructive jaundice (a common complication of hilar cholangiocarcinoma) is described. The potential role of photodynamic therapy as a palliative treatment for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma is also outlined.

Correlation between promoter methylation of p14(ARF), TMS1/ASC, and DAPK, and p53 mutation with prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma

Background

To study the methylation status of genes that play a role in the p53-Bax mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and its clinical significance in cholangiocarcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Out of 36 cases cholangiocarcinoma patients from April 2000 to May 2005 were collected.Promoter hypermethylation of DAPK, p14^ARF, and ASC were detected by methylation-specific PCR on cholangiocarcinoma and normal adjacent tissues samples. Mutation of the p53 gene was examined by automated sequencing. Correlation between methylation of these genes and/or p53 mutation status with clinical characteristics of patients was investigated by statistical analysis.

Results

We found 66.7% of 36 cholangiocarcinoma patients had methylation of at least one of the tumor suppressor genes analyzed. p53 gene mutation was found in 22 of 36 patients (61.1%). Combined p53 mutation and DAPK, p14^ARF, and/or ASC methylation was detected in 14 cases (38.9%). There were statistically significant differences in the extent of pathologic biology, differentiation, and invasion between patients with combined p53 mutation and DAPK, p14^ARF, and/or ASC methylation compared to those without (P < 0.05). The survival rate of patients with combined DAPK, p14^ARF, and ASC methylation and p53 mutation was poorer than other patients (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our study indicates that methylation of DAPK, p14^ARF, and ASC in cholangiocarcinoma is a common event. Furthermore, p53 mutation combined with DAPK, p14^ARF, and/or ASC methylation correlates with malignancy and poor prognosis.

One-step percutaneous transhepatic insertion of a balloon-expanding metallic stent for obstructive jaundice

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of one-step percutaneous transhepatic insertion of the Express LD stent, a balloon-expanding stainless steel stent used for the management of distal artery stenosis in the treatment of obstructive jaundice caused by various inoperable malignancies.

METHODS

Seventy-one consecutive patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction who underwent Express LD stent placement between 2007 and 2010 at our institute were reviewed.

RESULTS

Mean stent patency was 165 ± 144 days and mean patient survival was 180 ± 156 days, while the cumulative stent patency rate and patient survival rate at 6 and 12 months were 79% and 65%, and 38% and 16%, respectively. Stents were successfully placed in all cases without any stent migration or misplacement. Stent failure occurred in 14 patients (20%), and 16 complications were observed, including 12 cholangitis (17%), two cholecysitis (3%), and two pancreatitis (3%). Y-configuration stenting for hilar bile duct obstruction was the only independent prognostic factor for stent failure.

CONCLUSIONS

One-step percutaneous transhepatic insertion of the Express LD stent is effective and safe for the management of obstructive jaundice caused by inoperable malignancies.

Expandable metal stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Most patients with malignant hilar stenoses are candidates for palliation. For this purpose, biliary drainage plays a major role in improving liver function and managing or avoiding cholangitis. Endoscopic interventions are less invasive than the percutaneous approach and should be considered as the first-line drainage procedures in most cases. Transhepatic interventions should be reserved for endoscopic failures or performed as a complementary approach in a combined procedure. After successful endoscopic access to biliary obstruction, implantation of self-expandable metal stents offers advantages over plastic endoprostheses in terms of stent patency and number of reinterventions.

Covered versus uncovered self-expandable nitinol stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction: results from a randomized, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Covered biliary metal stents have been developed to prevent tumor ingrowth. Previous comparative studies are limited and often include few patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare differences in stent patency, patient survival, and complication rates between covered and uncovered nitinol stents in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

DESIGN

Randomized, multicenter trial conducted between January 2006 and October 2008.

SETTING

Ten sites serving a total catchment area of approximately 2.8 million inhabitants.

PATIENTS

A total of 400 patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction.

INTERVENTIONS

ERCP with insertion of covered or uncovered metal stent. Follow-up conducted monthly for symptoms indicating stent obstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Time to stent failure, survival time, and complication rate.

RESULTS

The patient survival times were 116 days (interquartile range 242 days) and 174 days (interquartile range 284 days) in the covered and uncovered stent groups, respectively (P = .320). The first quartile stent patency time was 154 days in the covered stent group and 199 days in the uncovered stent group (P = .326). There was no difference in the incidence of pancreatitis or cholecystitis between the 2 groups. Stent migration occurred in 6 patients (3%) in the covered group and in no patients in the uncovered group (P = .030).

LIMITATIONS

Randomization was not blinded.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in stent patency time, patient survival time, or complication rates between covered and uncovered nitinol metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction. However, covered stents migrated significantly more often compared with uncovered stents, and tumor ingrowth was more frequent in uncovered stents.

Drainage and bypass procedures for palliation of malignant diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract

Malignant diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract are common and often diagnosed at a point when the opportunity for curative surgical resection has passed. Symptoms of luminal obstruction include nausea, vomiting, weight loss, pain, pruritus and jaundice. The median survival of patients who cannot be cured surgically is extremely short, with a duration of only a few months. Effective palliative techniques with a low morbidity and associated mortality are required. The length of hospital stay, rapid recovery and reduction in recurrent symptoms are important factors for patients and doctors to consider when planning treatment. Traditionally, surgical techniques were used, but in the last 20 years the availability of both endoscopic and interventional radiological procedures has increased. Furthermore, advances in technology such as the development of self-expanding metal stents and covered stent designs have provided more therapeutic options for the endoscopist and radiologist. Here we discuss the available treatments for the palliation of gastric outlet and biliary tract obstruction and the evidence for the respective approaches.

Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography as a salvage drainage procedure for obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts

Endoscopic ultrasound allows transmural access to the bile or pancreatic ducts and subsequent contrast injection to provide ductal drainage under fluoroscopy using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based techniques. Differing patient specifics and operator techniques result in six possible variant approaches to this procedure, known as endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography (ESCP). ESCP has been in clinical use for a decade now, with over 300 cases reported. It has become established as a salvage procedure after failed ERCP in the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Its role in the management of clinically severe chronic/relapsing pancreatitis remains under scrutiny. This review aims to clarify the concepts underlying the use of ESCP and to provide technical tips and a detailed step-by-step procedural description.

Surgical treatment and prognostic analysis of 93 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore the surgical treatment and prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 93 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma that were treated surgically at our hospital from June 1999 to June 2005. Prognostic factors were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two cases were treated with curative resection, 21 with palliative resection, and 9 with nonoperative drainage. Eleven cases underwent palliative drainage operations. The median survive time was 31 months in the curative resection group, 13.7 months in the palliative resection group, and 11 months in the nonoperative drainage group. Patient age, serum total bilirubin, clinical type of Bismuth-Corlette, tumor differentiation, and lymph node metastases were important factors for predicting the prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection was the main treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and curative resection was the best way to obtain better prognosis. Age, preoperative serum total bilirubin, bismuth clinical type, tumor histopathological grading, and lymph node metastases were considered to have a significant effect on prognosis.

Endoscopic and percutaneous preoperative biliary drainage in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists over the preferred technique of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) requiring major liver resection. The current study compared outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with resectable HCCA.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen consecutive patients were explored for HCCA between 2001 and July 2008 and assigned by initial PBD procedure to either EBD or PTBD.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 101 (88%) underwent PBD; 90 patients underwent EBD as primary procedure, and 11 PTBD. The technical success rate of initial drainage was 81% in the EBD versus 100% in the PTBD group (P = 0.20). Stent dislocation was similar in the EBD and PTBD groups (23% vs. 20%, P = 0.70). Infectious complications were significantly more common in the endoscopic group (48% vs. 9%, P < 0.05). Patients in the EBD group underwent more drainage procedures (2.8 vs. 1.4, P < 0.01) and had a significantly longer drainage period until laparotomy (mean 15 weeks vs. 11 weeks in the PTBD group; P < 0.05). In 30 patients, EBD was converted to PTBD due to failure of the endoscopic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative percutaneous drainage could outperform endoscopic stent placement in patients with resectable HCCA, showing fewer infectious complications, using less procedures.

Natural History and Prognostic Factors of Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma without Surgery, Chemotherapy, or Radiotherapy: A Large-Scale Observational Study

Background/Aims

We aimed to evaluate survival time and prognostic factors in patients with advanced unresectable cholangiocarcinoma who have not received surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy.

Methods

A total of 1,377 patients, who were diagnosed with primary cholangiocarcinoma between 1996 and 2002, were reviewed retrospectively according to the following inclusion criteria: histologically proven primary adenocarcinoma arising from the bile-duct epithelium, advanced unresectable stages, no severe comorbidity that can affect survival time, and no history of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy.

Results

Of the 1,377 cases reviewed, 330 patients complied with the inclusion criteria and were thus eligible to participate in this study; 203 had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 127 had hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The overall survival time of the entire cohort (n=330) was median 3.9 months (range; 0.2 to 67.1). The survival time was significantly shorter in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group (3.0±5.3 months) than in the hilar cholangiocarcinoma group (5.9±10.1 months; Kaplan-Meier survival analysis). Multivariate analysis revealed that distant metastasis was a poor prognostic factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (p< 0.001), baseline serum albumin >3.0 g/dL was a favorable prognostic factor (p=0.02), and baseline serum carcinoembryonic antigen level >30 ng/mL was a poor prognostic factor for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (p=0.01).

Conclusions

The median survival of advanced unresectable cholangiocarcinoma is dismal.

Usefulness of slimmer and open-cell-design stents for endoscopic bilateral stenting and endoscopic revision in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (with video)

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic bilateral metal stenting using a "stent-in-stent" method is currently used to treat patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, this method has limited application in cases of tight strictures or endoscopic revision in case of tumor recurrence, especially on the first stent (initial Y stent placed) side.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of bilateral metal stenting with the use of a slimmer (7F), open-cell-design stent.

DESIGN

Prospective, uncontrolled, single center.

SETTING

Tertiary referral university hospital.

PATIENTS

This study involved 34 patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Bismuth type II-IV).

INTERVENTION

Endoscopic bilateral metal stenting using a stent-in-stent method was performed. First, a Y stent with a central, wide-open mesh was inserted, then a Zilver stent, with a preloaded delivery system that is slimmer (7F) than those (7.5-8.5F) of conventional stents, was placed into the contralateral hepatic duct through the central portion of the Y stent. The Zilver stent has an open-cell design, and it can be dilated easily. Thus, revision with bilateral plastic stents was tried in cases of stent obstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Technical success, functional success, complications, and revision method.

RESULTS

Technical success (bilateral stenting using Y and Zilver stents) was achieved in 29 of 34 (85.3%) patients. Functional success was noted in 29 of the 29 (100.0%) patients who received bilateral stenting. Early complications such as pancreatitis and cholecystitis occurred in 3 (10.3%) patients. Late complications occurred in 11 (37.9%) patients. Cholecystitis, which occurred in 2 patients, was managed by percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. Stent obstruction by tumor ingrowth or overgrowth occurred in 9 of 29 (31.0%) patients. These patients were managed by placement of bilateral plastic stents (4 of 9), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (4 of 9), and a combined method (1 of 9). Of the 5 patients in whom endoscopic revision was attempted, 4 (80%) were managed endoscopically with bilateral plastic stents.

LIMITATIONS

Small number of patients, uncontrolled study.

CONCLUSION

A slimmer (7F), open-cell-design stent is effective in endoscopic bilateral stenting for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma and endoscopic revision in case of tumor recurrence.

Inflammation and carcinogenesis of the biliary tract: update on endoscopic treatment

Both diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma are suboptimal. From the former standpoint, fluorescence in situ hybridization, direct cholangioscopy, endocystoscopy, and optical coherence tomography are just a few of the myriad technologies being studied or employed to improve diagnostic yield. From the latter standpoint, most series suggest that fewer than 1 third of patients are resectable for cure, although liver transplantation has increasingly been used in a subset of cholangiocarcinoma patients with extrahepatic disease. Palliation has included chemotherapy which is of dubious value in most series. Instead, a majority of therapies have addressed mechanisms to improve biliary drainage to delay and preclude hepatic failure and minimize the risk of cholangitis. Although the latter has been accomplished with surgery and attempted with external beam irradiation and brachytherapy, percutaneous and/or endoscopic drainage are the most commonly employed methods in widespread use. There are prospective, randomized studies that suggest that bilateral stenting is associated with improved outcomes in bifurcation lesions if plastic stents are placed, that percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is more successful than endoscopic stenting in Klatskin tumors, that self-expandable biliary stents have prolonged patency compared with plastic prostheses, and that, if approached with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging guidance to preclude contamination of the contralateral undrained system, outcomes are comparable in patients treated with unilateral as opposed to bilateral self-expandable metal stents. There is a single prospective, randomized study suggesting that patients treated with endoscopic or percutaneous stenting in conjunction with photodynamic therapy have prolonged survival compared with stent placement alone.

Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009

Several advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) have occurred in the last decades. A multidisciplinary approach to this disease is therefore recommended. CC is a relatively rare tumor and the main risk factors are: chronic inflammation, genetic predisposition and congenital abnormalities of the biliary tree. While the incidence of intra-hepatic CC is increasing, the incidence of extra-hepatic CC is trending down. The only curative treatment for CC is surgical resection with negative margins. Liver transplantation has been proposed only for selected patients with hilar CC that cannot be resected who have no metastatic disease after a period of neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy. Magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, positron emission tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography scans are the most frequently used modalities for diagnosis and tumor staging. Adjuvant therapy, palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been relatively ineffective for inoperable CC. For most of these patients biliary stenting provides effective palliation. Photodynamic therapy is an emerging palliative treatment that seems to provide pain relief, improve biliary patency and increase survival. The clinical utility of other emerging therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial chemoinfusion and high intensity intraductal ultrasound needs further study.