1
|
Garcia-Sumalla A, Subtil JC, de la Serna C, Maisterra S, Aparicio JR, Bojorquez AE, Montañes RL, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gornals JB. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1900-E1908. [PMID: 33269327 PMCID: PMC7695512 DOI: 10.1055/a-1288-0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Traditionally in the case of a vascular interposition, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been contraindicated. A transvascular route (TV) is feasible and probably a safe alternative approach in selected patients, but data are scarce. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-TV-FNA in thoracic and abdominal lesions. Secondary aims included evaluation of the clinical impact and technical aspects. Patients and methods A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with inclusion of all consecutive patients that underwent EUS-TV-FNA from July 2007 to January 2020. Feasibility, cytopathology, procedure details, and safety were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with incidents, cytopathological diagnosis, and clinical impact. Results Data were collected from a total of 49 cases and 50 EUS-TV-FNAs. The aorta (n = 19) and portal system (n = 17) were the most frequently punctured. The most frequent lesions were mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 13) and pancreatic tumors (n = 11). The diagnostic yield was 86 %, and there were nondiagnostic samples in seven cases. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88 % (95 %CI,0.74-0.96), 100 % (95 %CI,0.59-1), and 90 % (95 %CI,0.78-0.96), respectively. Only three incidents were detected: two mural hematomas and a self-limited bleeding of gastroduodenal artery. In most patients, there was a significant impact on clinical management (88 %). Arterial vessel and ASA-III had a trend with incidents (both, P < 0.08). Rapid on-site evlauation was found to be an independent predictor for obtaining a conclusive sample (OR 6.2; 95 %CI, 1.06-36.73, P < 0.04). Conclusions EUS-TV-FNA is feasible, seems to be safe, and can be recommended when no other targets are available, and the information obtained would impact on the clinical plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Garcia-Sumalla
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jose C. Subtil
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Complejo Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carlos de la Serna
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Sandra Maisterra
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jose Ramon Aparicio
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Rafael Leon Montañes
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Disease, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan B. Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain,Health Science Department, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mosquera-Klinger G, de la Serna C. Reply: "Percutaneously guided or ultrasound-guided splenic punctures are safe procedures with a high diagnostic performance". Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2020; 112:817-818. [PMID: 32954774 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7419/2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
We appreciate the interest shown in our article "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for splenomegaly and focal splenic lesion: is it safe, effective and necessary?", as well as the academic discussion raised by gastroenterology-ultrasound experts in the letter to the editor. In the discussion of our article, we mention that EUS-FNA is necessary and/or the first option in splenomegaly and/or small focal splenic lesions where percutaneous biopsy are limited, when difficulty accessing the focal splenic lesions, in obese patients and in those with ascites, recent abdominal surgery or a poor acoustic window.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nam K, Kim DU, Lee TH, Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Bolkhir A, Castro LA, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, de la Serna C, Perez-Miranda M, Lee JG, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Park DH. Patient perception and preference of EUS-guided drainage over percutaneous drainage when endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage fails: An international multicenter survey. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7:48-55. [PMID: 29451169 PMCID: PMC5838728 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_100_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a feasible procedure when ERCP fails, as is percutaneous transhepatic BD (PTBD). However, little is known about patient perception and preference of EUS-BD and PTBD. Patients and Methods: An international multicenter survey was conducted in seven tertiary referral centers. In total, 327 patients, scheduled to undergo ERCP for suspected malignant biliary obstruction, were enrolled in the study. Patients received decision aids with visual representation regarding the techniques, benefits, and adverse events (AEs) of EUS-BD and PTBD. Patients were then asked the choice between the two simulated scenarios (EUS-BD or PTBD) after failed ERCP, the reasons for their preference, and whether altering AE rates would influence their prior choice. Results: In total, 313 patients (95.7%) responded to the questionnaire and 251 patients (80.2%) preferred EUS-BD. The preference of EUS-BD was 85.7% (186/217) with EUS-BD expertise, compared to 67.7% (65/96) without EUS-BD expertise (P < 0.001). The main reason for choosing EUS-BD was the possibility of internal drainage (78.1%). In multivariate analysis, the availability of EUS-BD expertise was the single independent factor that influenced patient preference (odds ratio: 3.168; 95% of confidence interval, 1.714–5.856; P < 0.001). The preference of EUS-BD increased as AE rates decreased (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In this simulated scenario, approximately 80% of patients preferred EUS-BD over PTBD after failed ERCP. However, preference of EUS-BD declined as its AE rates increased. Further technical innovations and improved proficiency in EUS-BD for reducing AEs may encourage the use of this procedure as a routine clinical practice when ERCP fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwangwoo Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea
| | - Dong Uk Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Biomedical Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ahmed Bolkhir
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lara Aguilera Castro
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IRYCIS, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IRYCIS, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos de la Serna
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rio Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rio Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain
| | - John G Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Sang Soo Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong-Wan Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Koo Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Myung-Hwan Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Do Hyun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Baron TH, Pérez-Miranda M, Sánchez-Yagüe A, Gornals J, Gonzalez-Huix F, de la Serna C, Gonzalez Martin JA, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Marra-Lopez C, Castellot A, Alberca F, Fernandez-Urien I, Aparicio JR, Legaz ML, Sendino O, Loras C, Subtil JC, Nerin J, Perez-Carreras M, Diaz-Tasende J, Perez G, Repiso A, Vilella A, Dolz C, Alvarez A, Rodriguez S, Esteban JM, Juzgado D, Albillos A. Evaluation of the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of fully covered self-expandable metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: results of a Spanish nationwide registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84:450-457.e2. [PMID: 26970012 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Initial reports suggest that fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) may be better suited for drainage of dense pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), such as walled-off pancreatic necrosis. The primary aim was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of FCSEMSs for drainage of different types of PFCs in a large cohort. The secondary aim was to investigate which type of FCSEMS is superior. METHODS This was a retrospective, noncomparative review of a nationwide database involving all hospitals in Spain performing EUS-guided PFC drainage. From April 2008 to August 2013, all patients undergoing PFC drainage with an FCSEMS were included in a database. The main outcome measurements were technical success, short-term (2 weeks) and long-term (6 months) effectiveness, adverse events, and need for surgery. RESULTS The study included 211 patients (pseudocyst/walled-off pancreatic necrosis, 53%/47%). The FCSEMSs used were straight biliary (66%) or lumen-apposing (34%). Technical success was achieved in 97% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 93%-99%). Short-term- and long-term clinical success was obtained in 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%) and 85% (95% CI, 79%-89%) of patients, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 21% of patients (95% CI, 16%-27%): infection (11%), bleeding (7%), and stent migration and/or perforation (3%). By multivariate analysis, patient age (>58 years) and previous failed drainage were the most important factors associated with negative outcome. CONCLUSIONS An FCSEMS is effective and safe for PFC drainage. Older patients with a history of unsuccessful drainage are more likely to fail EUS-guided drainage. The type of FCSEMS does not seem to influence patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Division, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain; Gastroenterology Division, University Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Manuel Pérez-Miranda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Andres Sánchez-Yagüe
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain; Gastroenterology Department, Vithas Xanit Internacional Hospital, Benalmadena, Spain
| | - Joan Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Disease Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Carlos de la Serna
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Juan Angel Gonzalez Martin
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Division, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Z Gimeno-Garcia
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - Carlos Marra-Lopez
- Gastroenterology Department, Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Ana Castellot
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Fernando Alberca
- Gastroenterology Department, Unidad de Gestión Clínica Digestivo, Hospital Clinico Universitario de la Arrixava, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | - Maria Luisa Legaz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General La Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Spain
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Loras
- Gastroenterology Department, Servei Aparell Digestiu-Unitat d'Endoscòpia, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Jose Carlos Subtil
- Gastroenterology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Nerin
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Lozano Blesa," Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Mercedes Perez-Carreras
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Servicio de Medicina de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Diaz-Tasende
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Servicio de Medicina de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gustavo Perez
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Alejandro Repiso
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain
| | - Angels Vilella
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department. Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Carlos Dolz
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department. Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Alberto Alvarez
- Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Santiago Rodriguez
- Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain
| | | | - Diego Juzgado
- Gastroenterology Division, University Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Agustin Albillos
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Division, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tyberg A, Perez-Miranda M, Sanchez-Ocaña R, Peñas I, de la Serna C, Shah J, Binmoeller K, Gaidhane M, Grimm I, Baron T, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a multicenter, international experience. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E276-81. [PMID: 27004243 PMCID: PMC4798937 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical gastrojejunostomy and enteral self-expanding metal stents are efficacious for the management of gastric outlet obstruction but limited by high complication rates and short-term efficacy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) is a novel alternative option. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who underwent EUS-GJ between March 2014 and September 2015 as part of a prospective multicenter registry at four academic centers in two countries were included. Technical success was defined as successful placement of a gastrojejunal lumen-apposing metal stent. Clinical success was defined as the ability of the patient to tolerate an oral diet. Post-procedural adverse events were recorded. RESULTS The study included 26 patients, of whom 11 (42 %) were male. Technical success was achieved in 24 patients (92 %). Clinical success was achieved in 22 patients (85 %). Of the 4 patients in whom clinical success was not achieved, 2 had persistent nausea and vomiting despite a patent EUS-GJ and required enteral feeding for nutrition, 1 died before the initiation of an oral diet, and 1 underwent surgery for suspected perforation. Adverse events, including peritonitis, bleeding, and surgery, occurred in 3 patients (11.5 %). CONCLUSION EUS-GJ is an emerging procedure that has efficacy and safety comparable with those of current therapies and should hold a place as a new minimally invasive option for patients with gastric outlet obstruction. Clinical trial identification number: NCT01522573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Tyberg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ramon Sanchez-Ocaña
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Irene Peñas
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Carlos de la Serna
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Janak Shah
- Paul May and Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kenneth Binmoeller
- Paul May and Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Monica Gaidhane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ian Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
García-Cano J, Pérez-Miranda M, Pérez-Roldán F, González-Carro P, González-Huix F, Rodríguez-Ramos C, Naranjo A, González-Martín JÁ, de la Serna C. ERCP during pregnancy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012; 104:53-8. [PMID: 22372797 DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000200002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS ERCP during pregnancy is always challenging for the entire team performing the endoscopic intervention. In this study techniques and different interventional aspects used at several centres about the clinical experience on ERCP in pregnant women are analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS the practice on ERCP in pregnant women in six centres during a period of ten years is reported. RESULTS eleven patients were included in the study. Mean age was 30.6 years. Indication for ERCP was always symptomatic common bile duct stone (CBDS) disease. Before the procedure abdominal ultrasound was performed at all times and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in four occasions. Conscious sedation by means of midazolam and fentanyl or meperidine was applied. Sphincterotomes and guidewires were used for bilary cannulation. Sometimes, rapid exchange platforms with short-length guidewires controlled by the same endoscopist were employed. Biliary cannulation was confirmed in 9 occasions by bile aspiration. In five procedures, a mean of 30 seconds of fluoroscopy was used, both to verify cannulation and to corroborate complete CBDS clearance. These patients had the pelvic zone protected with a lead shield and radiation dose was measured. Ten biliary sphincterotomies were performed followed by CBDS extraction. Two plastic stents were inserted. Relief of biliary obstruction was attained in all circumstances. Only one patient had hyperamylasemia after ERCP. All pregnant women had healthy foetuses with normal deliveries. CONCLUSIONS with experience, ERCP appears to be a safe technique during pregnancy. With simple measures fluoroscopic time can be diminished or even abolished. It seems that ERCP during pregnancy is underused in our working areas, although it has shown to be a useful technique for relieving biliary obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús García-Cano
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, Cuenca, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Perez-Miranda M, de la Serna C, Diez-Redondo P, Vila JJ. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography as a salvage drainage procedure for obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2:212-22. [PMID: 21160936 PMCID: PMC2998937 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i6.212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2010] [Revised: 05/25/2010] [Accepted: 06/01/2010] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound allows transmural access to the bile or pancreatic ducts and subsequent contrast injection to provide ductal drainage under fluoroscopy using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based techniques. Differing patient specifics and operator techniques result in six possible variant approaches to this procedure, known as endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography (ESCP). ESCP has been in clinical use for a decade now, with over 300 cases reported. It has become established as a salvage procedure after failed ERCP in the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Its role in the management of clinically severe chronic/relapsing pancreatitis remains under scrutiny. This review aims to clarify the concepts underlying the use of ESCP and to provide technical tips and a detailed step-by-step procedural description.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Manuel Perez-Miranda, Carlos de la Serna, Pilar Diez-Redondo, Endoscopy Unit. Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid 47012, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|