Metabolism and drug interactions of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in transplant patients: are the statins mechanistically similar?

The potential for drug interactions with statin therapy in Ireland

BACKGROUND

Seven percent of acute hospital admissions result from adverse drug reactions, of which 25% are due to drug interactions. Adverse effects of statin drugs occur in 3% of patients, mainly due to co-prescribing with other lipid-lowering agents or agents that alter their metabolism.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate co-prescribing of the frequently-used statin medications with interacting drugs.

METHODS

Data from the General Medical Services (GMS) scheme of the Eastern Health Board from January to December 1998 were used in this study. Using the coding index for statins, co-prescribing was identified when concomitant medications were administered under the same GMS claim number.

RESULTS

Of 7,602 patients prescribed statins, co-prescribing of simvastatin, atorvastatin and fluvastatin with competing substrates or inhibitors of their metabolism occurred in 32, 26 and 13.4% of prescriptions issued. Thirty-four per cent of patients on simvastatin, 28% on atorvastatin and 16% on fluvastatin were prescribed medications with drug interaction potential.

CONCLUSION

Co-prescribing of statins with competing substrates or inhibitors of their metabolism occurred in up to one-third of prescriptions issued. When statins are co-prescribed with recognised inhibitors of drug metabolism, pravastatin, which does not undergo significant hepatic metabolism, is the statin of choice.

Fluvastatin: effects beyond cholesterol lowering

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a major therapeutic challenge in the Western world, and strategies aimed at cholesterol lowering form the mainstay of treatment. Fluvastatin is an established 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor ("statin") for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Its efficacy and safety have been established in numerous clinical trials. Emerging evidence now indicates that treatment with fluvastatin slows the progression of atherosclerotic CHD and reduces the incidence of cardiovascular morbimortality in the secondary prevention setting. This effect of fluvastatin cannot be explained by cholesterol lowering alone; nonlipid-related mechanisms (so-called "pleiotropic effects") undoubtedly contribute to a certain extent, and are probably linked to modulation of the mevalonate pathway. This review discusses the experimental evidence regarding the antiatherosclerotic and antithrombotic effects of fluvastatin that may contribute to its beneficial action on disease progression and clinical events. Such effects include decreased expression of adhesion molecules in monocytes and leucocyte-endothelium adherence responses, immunomodulation, prevention of low-density lipoprotein oxidation, inhibition of cholesterol esterification and accumulation, along with effects on smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. Pleiotropic actions aimed at plaque stabilization (eg, decreased secretion of matrix metalloproteinases by macrophages), together with effects on platelet activity, tissue factor expression, and endothelial function, may contribute to an antithrombotic effect of fluvastatin. Taken together, the results of these studies indicate that the effects of fluvastatin, at therapeutic doses, may extend beyond cholesterol lowering.

Efficacy and safety of pravastatin vs simvastatin after cardiac transplantation

Prior studies of cardiac transplant recipients have shown that pravastatin reduces 12-month rejection and mortality after cardiac transplantation and simvastatin reduces 4-year mortality, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, and intimal thickening. In a 12-month observational study, cardiac transplant recipients received open-label pravastatin 40 mg (n = 42) or simvastatin 20 mg daily (n = 45) on an alternating basis from the time of transplantation. Lipid levels, safety, and post-transplant outcomes were compared. We found no significant differences in total LDL or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, linearized infection or rejection rates, liver function tests, or immunosuppressant dosages between groups at 1, 3, 6, or 12 months. Rhabdomyolysis or myositis occurred only in patients on simvastatin (n = 6, 13.3%) with no episodes for patients on pravastatin (p = 0. 032). Survival at 12 months on an actual treatment basis was 97.6% for patients on pravastatin and 83.7% for those on simvastatin (p = 0.078). Immunosuppression-related deaths occurred in only 2.4% (1 patient) on pravastatin vs 15.6% (n = 7) on simvastatin (p = 0.06). Pravastatin and simvastatin resulted in comparable lipid profiles. Pravastatin use was however free from the high rates of rhabdomyolysis and myositis seen with simvastatin use. Pravastatin was additionally associated with a trend toward superior survival, attributable to fewer immunosuppression-related deaths. For safety and pharmacokinetic reasons, pravastatin should be considered the statin of choice after heart transplantation.

Management of selected lipid abnormalities. Hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), in thyroid and renal diseases, and post-transplantation

Although the focus in treating lipid disorders is on reducing LDL cholesterol levels, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and Lp(a) are all independent risk factors that can be used clinically to assess cardiovascular risk. Decisions to initiate drug therapy for LDL cholesterol reduction may be influenced by levels of these other lipoprotein fractions. Data supporting intervention to modify these factors is less abundant than for LDL cholesterol reduction, but in certain circumstances drug therapy targeted at triglycerides or HDL cholesterol may be appropriate. Patients with nephrotic syndrome and end-stage renal disease are at particularly high risk for the development of cardiovascular disease and should be treated aggressively for lipid disorders. Finally, solid organ transplant recipients are almost always hyperlipidemic, and appropriate therapy could reduce cardiovascular events.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic consequences and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition

Drug interactions occur when the efficacy or toxicity of a medication is changed by administration of another substance. Pharmacokinetic interactions often occur as a result of a change in drug metabolism. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 oxidises a broad spectrum of drugs by a number of metabolic processes. The location of CYP3A4 in the small bowel and liver permits an effect on both presystemic and systemic drug disposition. Some interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors may also involve inhibition of P-glycoprotein. Clinically important CYP3A4 inhibitors include itraconazole, ketoconazole, clarithromycin, erythromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir and grapefruit juice. Torsades de pointes, a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia associated with QT prolongation, can occur when these inhibitors are coadministered with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride or pimozide. Rhabdomyolysis has been associated with the coadministration of some 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ('statins') and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Symptomatic hypotension may occur when CYP3A4 inhibitors are given with some dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, as well with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil. Excessive sedation can result from concomitant administration of benzodiazepine (midazolam, triazolam, alprazolam or diazepam) or nonbenzodiazepine (zopiclone and buspirone) hypnosedatives with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Ataxia can occur with carbamazepine, and ergotism with ergotamine, following the addition of a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Beneficial drug interactions can occur. Administration of a CYP3A4 inhibitor with cyclosporin may allow reduction of the dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant. Certain HIV protease inhibitors, e.g. saquinavir, have low oral bioavailability that can be profoundly increased by the addition of ritonavir. The clinical importance of any drug interaction depends on factors that are drug-, patient- and administration-related. Generally, a doubling or more in plasma drug concentration has the potential for enhanced adverse or beneficial drug response. Less pronounced pharmacokinetic interactions may still be clinically important for drugs with a steep concentration-response relationship or narrow therapeutic index. In most cases, the extent of drug interaction varies markedly among individuals; this is likely to be dependent on interindividual differences in CYP3A4 tissue content, pre-existing medical conditions and, possibly, age. Interactions may occur under single dose conditions or only at steady state. The pharmacodynamic consequences may or may not closely follow pharmacokinetic changes. Drug interactions may be most apparent when patients are stabilised on the affected drug and the CYP3A4 inhibitor is then added to the regimen. Temporal relationships between the administration of the drug and CYP3A4 inhibitor may be important in determining the extent of the interaction.

New insights into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of statins

The beneficial effects of statins are assumed to result from their ability to reduce cholesterol biosynthesis. However, because mevalonic acid is the precursor not only of cholesterol, but also of many nonsteroidal isoprenoid compounds, inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase may result in pleiotropic effects. It has been shown that several statins decrease smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation and that sera from fluvastatin-treated patients interfere with its proliferation. Cholesterol accumulation in macrophages can be inhibited by different statins, while both fluvastatin and simvastatin inhibit secretion of metalloproteinases by human monocyte-derived macrophages. The antiatherosclerotic effects of statins may be achieved by modifying hypercholesterolemia and the arterial wall environment as well. Although statins rarely have severe adverse effects, interactions with other drugs deserve attention. Simvastatin, lovastatin, cerivastatin, and atorvastatin are biotransformed in the liver primarily by cytochrome P450-3A4, and are susceptible to drug interactions when co-administered with potential inhibitors of this enzyme. Indeed, pharmacokinetic interactions (e.g., increased bioavailability), myositis, and rhabdomyolysis have been reported following concurrent use of simvastatin or lovastatin and cyclosporine A, mibefradil, or nefazodone. In contrast, fluvastatin (mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450-2C9) and pravastatin (eliminated by other metabolic routes) are less subject to this interaction. Nevertheless, a 5- to 23-fold increase in pravastatin bioavailability has been reported in the presence of cyclosporine A. In summary, statins may have direct effects on the arterial wall, which may contribute to their antiatherosclerotic actions. Furthermore, some statins may have lower adverse drug interaction potential than others, which is an important determinant of safety during long-term therapy.

Fluvastatin in combination with cyclosporin in renal transplant recipients: a review of clinical and safety experience

Cardiovascular disease remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have undergone renal transplantation, with one of the main risk factors being post-transplantation hyperlipidaemia. To date, however, optimal management of elevated lipid levels in such patients has been hindered by the lack of both effective and safe treatments, coupled with concerns over probable interactions with immunosuppressive therapy, particularly cyclosporin. Numerous studies confirm that the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, such as fluvastatin, are effective lipid-lowering agents in renal transplant recipients, supporting findings in other patients' groups. Moreover, based on investigations of metabolic profile and clinical observation, fluvastatin (at dosages of up to 80 mg/day) is well tolerated in renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin. In clinical trials to date, no instances of rhabdomyolysis have been observed during co-administration of fluvastatin and cyclosporin. The potential of fluvastatin for improving survival in renal transplant recipients, in terms of both cardiovascular mortality and graft rejection, is currently being investigated in two ongoing studies: ALERT (Assessment of Lescol [fluvastatin] in Renal Transplantation) and SOLAR (Study of Lescol [fluvastatin] in Acute Rejection). The results of these landmark studies should confirm the safe utility of fluvastatin in the renal transplantation setting.

Concomitant use of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors and simvastatin

The long-term safety profile of simvastatin, established over 10 years of clinical use, is excellent. The principal adverse effect of all inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutarate co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, myopathy, is infrequent. Simvastatin is a substrate for cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). CYP3A4 inhibitors can elevate the plasma concentration of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity derived from simvastatin. Clinical experience has shown that concomitant use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 increase the risk for myopathy. Evaluation of data from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance allows assessment of whether concomitant use of weaker CYP3A4 inhibitors, as represented by calcium channel blockers, has any effect on the risk of myopathy. Cases of myopathy in long-term clinical megatrials and in analyses of postmarketing adverse event reports have been surveyed. In megatrials with simvastatin, the overall incidence of myopathy was 0.025%. The proportion of patients developing myopathy who were taking a calcium channel blocker with simvastatin (1 of 3) was similar to the proportion of patients taking a calcium channel blocker overall. Among marketed-use adverse event reports, concomitant medication with a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor was more frequent among reports of myopathy than among reports of nonmusculoskeletal adverse events. No excess use of calcium channel blockers among myopathy reports was observed. We conclude that the overall risk of myopathy during treatment with simvastatin is very low. Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, especially cyclosporine, significantly increase the risk. There is no evidence that weaker CYP3A4 inhibitors such as calcium channel blockers increase the risk.

["Clinically significant" new drug interactions]

The concomitant intake of drugs with the potential to cause drug interactions is frequent. In contrast, adverse effects due to drug interactions account for only a small fraction of all adverse effects. A reproducible evaluation of the clinical relevance of drug interactions is lacking. We now can accurately define the potential of a drug to cause interactions, primarily by comparative investigations within a drug class. Whether or not the selection of the drug based on this information is useful for the patient is unknown. Therefore, usually it is to be recommended to abandon therapeutically reasonable drug combinations with a risk for interactions only if equivalent therapeutic options are available. Several actual examples on interactions with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, mibefradil, sildenafil, protease inhibitors and with grapefruit juice are discussed.