Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1996-1997 respiratory season. The Laboratory Investigator Group

Protective effect of trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ampicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a murine sepsis model

Trovafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone that has potent microbiological activity against the pneumococcus, including penicillin-resistant strains. To evaluate the protective effect of trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ampicillin against penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, an intraperitoneal, immunocompetent mouse model of sepsis was used. The minimum lethal dose (MLD) for each isolate was determined in duplicate. A single sc dose of each antibiotic was administered over a wide range of doses 1 h after the ip inoculation of the test isolate at the MLD. The assessment of the protective dose for 50% of the population (PD50) for each antimicrobial/bacteria combination was performed in triplicate and the PD50 value was calculated at the end of 5 days. Results showed that trovafloxacin provided PD50 values that were significantly lower than those of ciprofloxacin for all isolates. For the penicillin-susceptible and -intermediate isolates, the PD50 values of ampicillin were significantly lower than those for either of the fluoroquinolones studied; however, trovafloxacin was statistically superior to both ciprofloxacin and ampicillin against the penicillin-resistant strain. Therefore, regardless of penicillin susceptibility, trovafloxacin has potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae and may be a viable alternative for the treatment of penicillin-resistant isolates.

Randomized, double-blind study of short-course (5 day) grepafloxacin versus 10 day clarithromycin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

The efficacy and safety of grepafloxacin were compared with clarithromycin in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial of 805 patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). Patients were randomized to receive grepafloxacin 400 mg od for either 5 (n = 273) or 10 days (n = 268) or clarithromycin 250 mg bd for 10 days (n = 261). Patients were assessed pre-treatment, 3-5 days during treatment, 1-3 days post-treatment and at follow-up (21-28 days post-treatment). The clinical success rates for the evaluable patients were 91% in the 5 day grepafloxacin group, 95% in the 10 day grepafloxacin group and 86% in the clarithromycin group. At follow-up, respective rates were 72%, 81% and 73%. A total of 513 pathogens were isolated from the pre-treatment sputum specimens of 400 (49%) patients. The primary pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (36% of isolates), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (27%), Moraxella catarrhalis (12%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11%) and Staphylococcus aureus (3%). Pathogens were eradicated or presumed eradicated at post-treatment in 85%, 91% and 58% of evaluable patients treated with grepafloxacin for 5 days, grepafloxacin 10 days and clarithromycin 10 days, respectively. The eradication rates in both grepafloxacin groups were significantly greater than the clarithromycin group (P<0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and incidence of drug-related adverse events in each group was comparable. This study demonstrates that both a 5 and a 10 day regimen of grepafloxacin 400 mg od are as clinically and bacteriologically effective as in the treatment of ABECB clarithromycin 250 mg bd. for 10 days.

Emergence of drug resistance. Impact on bacterial meningitis

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged among the three major bacterial pathogens causing meningitis. Chloramphenicol resistance in the meningococcus recently has been described, and although intermediate penicillin resistance is common in some countries, the clinical importance of penicillin resistance in the meningococcus has yet to be established. Beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae are relatively common, and chloramphenicol resistance is emerging. Third-generation cephalosporins are required to treat meningitis caused by these resistant strains. Pneumococcus resistance to penicillin and to chloramphenicol is widespread, and resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is found in many parts of the world. Correct management of these strains includes the addition of vancomycin or rifampin to therapy with third-generation cephalosporins.

Drug-resistant pathogens in community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia

Antimicrobial resistance has been a problem since the early days of the antibiotic era, but in recent years, this resistance has increased in the hospital and is being recognized more in the community setting. Respiratory pathogens such as S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, for example, have developed resistance to traditional antimicrobial therapy, often over a very short period of time. This increase in resistance patterns requires physicians to closely monitor antimicrobial resistance in their community and to appreciate that some antimicrobial resistance mechanisms may result in resistance for a complete class of antibiotics or different classes of antibiotics with similar mechanisms of action.

Antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia

This article takes a broad perspective of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The arguments and data that support or refute the current approaches to initial antimicrobial treatment of CAP as outlined in the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Disease Society of America documents are provided. The complex issues involved in the decision of how to properly treat CAP are addressed.

Susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to 10 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1997 U.S. Surveillance study

The susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae (1,476 strains) and untypeable Haemophilus influenzae (1,676 strains) to various oral beta-lactam, macrolide-azalide, and fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents were determined by broth microdilution. Organisms were isolated from specimens obtained from outpatients in six geographic regions of the United States. MIC data were interpreted according to pharmacodynamically derived breakpoints applicable to the oral agents tested. Among H. influenzae strains, 41.6% were beta-lactamase positive. Virtually all H. influenzae strains were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate (98%), cefixime (100%), and ciprofloxacin (100%), while 78% were susceptible to cefuroxime, 57% were susceptible to amoxicillin, 14% were susceptible to cefprozil, 9% were susceptible to loracarbef, 2% were susceptible to cefaclor, and 0% were susceptible to azithromycin and clarithromycin. Among S. pneumoniae isolates, 49.6% were penicillin susceptible, 17.9% were intermediate, and 32.5% were penicillin resistant, with penicillin MICs for 50 and 90% of the isolates tested of 0.12 and 4 microg/ml, respectively. Overall, 94% of S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, 69% were susceptible to azithromycin and clarithromycin, 63% were susceptible to cefprozil and cefuroxime, 52% were susceptible to cefixime, 22% were susceptible to cefaclor, and 11% were susceptible to loracarbef. Although ciprofloxacin has marginal activity against S. pneumoniae, no high-level fluoroquinolone-resistant strains were found. Significant cross-resistance was found between penicillin and macrolides-azalides among S. pneumoniae isolates, with 5% of the penicillin-susceptible strains being macrolide-azalide resistant, compared with 37% of the intermediate isolates and 66% of the resistant isolates. Resistance was highest in S. pneumoniae isolates from patients younger than 10 years of age, middle ear and paranasal sinus specimens, and the southern half of the United States. With the continuing rise in resistance, judicious use of oral antimicrobial agents is necessary in all age groups.

Activities of trovafloxacin compared with those of other fluoroquinolones against purified topoisomerases and gyrA and grlA mutants of Staphylococcus aureus

Frequencies of mutation to resistance with trovafloxacin and four other quinolones were determined with quinolone-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 by a direct plating method. First-step mutants were selected less frequently with trovafloxacin (1.1 x 10(-10) at 2 to 4x the MIC) than with levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin (3.0 x 10(-7) to 3.0 x 10(-8) at 2 to 4x the MIC). Mutants with a change in GrlA (Ser80-->Phe or Tyr) were most commonly selected with trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or pefloxacin. First-step mutants were difficult to select with sparfloxacin; however, second-step mutants with mutations in gyrA were easily selected when a preexisting mutation in grlA was present. Against 29 S. aureus clinical isolates with known mutations in gyrA and/or grlA, trovafloxacin was the most active quinolone tested (MIC at which 50% of isolates are inhibited [MIC(50)] and MIC(90), 1 and 4 microg/ml, respectively); in comparison, MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s were 32 and 128, 16 and 32, 8 and 32, and 128 and 256 microg/ml for ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and pefloxacin, respectively. Strains with a mutation in grlA only were generally susceptible to all of the quinolones tested. For mutants with changes in both grlA and gyrA MICs were higher and were generally above the susceptibility breakpoint for ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and pefloxacin. Addition of reserpine (20 microg/ml) lowered the MICs only of ciprofloxacin fourfold or more for 18 of 29 clinical strains. Topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase genes were cloned from S. aureus RN4220 and from two mutants with changes in GrlA (Ser80-->Phe and Glu84-->Lys). The enzymes were overexpressed in Escherichia coli GI724, purified, and used in DNA catalytic and cleavage assays that measured the relative potency of each quinolone. Trovafloxacin was at least five times more potent than ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, or pefloxacin in stimulating topoisomerase IV-mediated DNA cleavage. While all of the quinolones were less potent in cleavage assays with the altered topoisomerase IV, trovafloxacin retained its greater potency relative to those of the other quinolones tested. The greater intrinsic potency of trovafloxacin against the lethal topoisomerase IV target in S. aureus contributes to its improved potency against clinical strains of S. aureus that are resistant to other quinolones.

Therapy for pneumococcal infection at the millennium: doubts and certainties

Rapidly burgeoning worldwide multiple drug-resistant pneumococcal serotypes pose an urgent demand for new management approaches. Perhaps modern intensive care methods may have alternatives to offer. Indeed, standard assessments such as the admission APACHE II score may overestimate individual risk of death in severe CAP, and mortality can be reduced. However, among those at highest risk for mortality in the early phase of invasive disease, the conclusions reached 2-3 decades ago, that it is questionable whether a more effective drug than penicillin can be developed, and that a reduction in the number of deaths consequent to this infection can be accomplished only by widespread immunoprophylactic measures, remain inescapable. Clearly, as discussed elsewhere in this supplement, the continuing validity of these 20-year-old conclusions and the global prevalence of DRSP demand the development and marketing of new conjugate vaccines, although more widespread use of the existing 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine among high-risk populations is essential in the interim. With respect to resistance selection pressures, antibiotic prescription control may provide the answer. However, patient expectations of antibiotic therapy for trivial respiratory infection is high and, in the United Kingdom, 75% of previously healthy adults will receive it; those who do not will usually consult another physician in an effort to secure such therapy. Thus, without the intervention of government or managed care organizations, self-regulation in prescribing is unlikely. The evidence for beta-lactam treatment failure in meningitis has led to alternative approaches, with vancomycin as the primary agent. Penicillins may remain effective for otitis media, but oral cephalosporins are suspect. Data on pediatric pneumococcal pneumonia continue to suggest use of beta-lactams, at least for disease caused by strains with intermediate penicillin sensitivity. Pallares et al concluded that penicillins and cephalosporins remain the drugs of choice for severe pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. Others who share this conclusion often cite that study as evidence. However, in the case of penicillins, the mortality rate was 6% higher in a subgroup selected for monomicrobial infection and reduced risk factors for mortality when penicillin-resistant infection was present, and the overall mortality was 14% higher with penicillin-resistant strains (taking into account "all comers"). Those who depend on the findings of evidence-based medicine may accept the premise that penicillins and cephalosporins remain the drugs of choice, and agree with Goldstein and Garau that it would indeed be a mistake to adopt alternative therapies. Others may consider the deaths of 6 of 100 patients who were not in the highest-risk group too high a price to pay for statistical significance and may be skeptical of the continued use of beta-lactam therapy on higher-risk patients. In addition, the persistent selection pressure applied by continued use of beta-lactams offers a powerful population-based argument for alternatives. As DRSP continues to spread and resistant strains with penicillin MIC >2 mg/L become more prevalent, new agents such as the azabicyclo-methoxyquinolone, moxifloxacin, and perhaps grepafloxacin, but not the more toxic sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin, will undoubtedly flourish as treatments for CAP. By that time, the results of clinical studies on ketolides and oxazolidinones could offer further choices.

Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones in Canada. Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolones are now recommended for the treatment of respiratory tract infections due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, particularly when the isolates are resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics. Although pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones have been identified, their prevalence has not been determined in a defined population.

METHODS

We performed susceptibility testing on 7551 isolates of S. pneumoniae obtained from surveillance in Canada in 1988 and from 1993 to 1998. Pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (defined as a minimal inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin of at least 4 microg per milliliter) were further characterized. We also examined antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in Canadian retail pharmacies.

RESULTS

Between 1988 and 1997, fluoroquinolone prescriptions increased from 0.8 to 5.5 per 100 persons per year. The prevalence of pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones increased from 0 percent in 1993 to 1.7 percent in 1997 and 1998 (P=0.01). Among adults, the prevalence increased from 1.5 percent in 1993 and 1994 combined to 2.9 percent in 1997 and 1998 combined. The prevalence was higher in isolates from older patients (2.6 percent among those 65 years of age or older vs. 1.0 percent among those 15 to 64 years of age, P<0.001) and among those from Ontario (1.5 percent, vs. 0.4 percent among those from the rest of Canada; P< 0.001). Fluoroquinolone use was greatest among the elderly and in Ontario. The 75 isolates (17 serotypes) of pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones were submitted by 40 laboratories in eight provinces. Reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones was associated with resistance to penicillin.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones is increasing in Canada, probably as a result of selective pressure from the increased use of fluoroquinolones.

Formula to help select rational antimicrobial therapy (FRAT): its application to community- and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections

The selection of antimicrobial agents is guided by the use of formularies which often constrain prescribing options. There are several factors which influence the inclusion of specific agents. Two of the most important factors are microbial etiology of a disease and the incidence of antibiotic resistance. Various surveillance programs have highlighted the regional differences in antimicrobial susceptibility/resistance among various pathogens. This simple formula enables individual physicians, pharmacy and therapeutic committees and managed care formulary managers to harness local etiology and susceptibility information. In this paper the formula is applied to community- and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections.

The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin

In addition to erythromycin, macrolides now available in the United States include azithromycin and clarithromycin. These two new macrolides are more chemically stable and better tolerated than erythromycin, and they have a broader antimicrobial spectrum than erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Haemophilus influenzae, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis. All three macrolides have excellent activity against the atypical respiratory pathogens (C. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species) and the Legionella species. Azithromycin and clarithromycin have pharmacokinetics that allow shorter dosing schedules because of prolonged tissue levels. Both azithromycin and clarithromycin are active agents for MAC prophylaxis in patients with late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), although azithromycin may be the preferable agent because of fewer drug-drug interactions. Clarithromycin is the most active MAC antimicrobial agent and should be part of any drug regimen for treating active MAC disease in patients with or without AIDS. Although both azithromycin and clarithromycin are well tolerated by children, azithromycin has the advantage of shorter treatment regimens and improved tolerance, potentially improving compliance in the treatment of respiratory tract and skin or soft tissue infections. Intravenously administered azithromycin has been approved for treatment of adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases. An area of concern is the increasing macrolide resistance that is being reported with some of the common pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A streptococci, and H. influenzae. The emergence of macrolide resistance with these common pathogens may limit the clinical usefulness of this class of antimicrobial agents in the future.

Differences between the activity of penicillin, amoxycillin, and co-amoxyclav against 5,252 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates tested in the Alexander Project 1992-1996

A number of published studies have shown that the MICs of amoxycillin and/or co-amoxyclav are lower than those of ampicillin and/or penicillin for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Other published studies have concluded that the activities of amoxycillin and co-amoxyclav are comparable with that of penicillin for S. pneumoniae. A collection of 5252 S. pneumoniae isolates obtained during a 5 year period (1992-1996) was analysed to determine differences between the MICs of penicillin, amoxycillin and co-amoxyclav. Among the isolates analysed, 3788 (72%) were penicillin-susceptible, 615 (12%) were penicillin-intermediate and 849 (16%) were penicillin-resistant. Differences between the agents were assessed by examination of MIC distribution functions and simultaneous 95% CIs. In addition, penicillin-intermediate and -resistant isolates were analysed to determine the number and percentage of isolates which had an amoxycillin and co-amoxyclav MIC less than, equal to, or greater than the penicillin MIC. Results showed that the amoxycillin and co-amoxyclav MIC90s were one two-fold dilution lower than those of penicillin for all isolates collected between 1992-1993 and 1994-1996. Simultaneous 95% CIs showed that the mean differences between MICs of amoxycillin and penicillin, and between MICs of co-amoxyclav and penicillin, were less than zero. The majority of the penicillin-intermediate and penicillin-resistant isolates had an amoxycillin and co-amoxyclav MIC less than the penicillin MIC. In conclusion, amoxycillin and co-amoxyclav MICs were shown to be lower than the penicillin MICs for the S. pneumoniae isolates analysed in this study.

Treating acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in patients unresponsive to previous therapy: sparfloxacin versus clarithromycin

The optimal antibiotic therapy for patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) who have failed to respond to previous oral antimicrobial therapy is not known; however, newer macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibiotics may be appropriate. This multicenter, randomized, double-masked, double-dummy study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sparfloxacin with those of clarithromycin in the treatment of ABECB. In 43 centers in the United States, 298 patients (52% male; age range, 19 to 92 years) were randomly allocated to receive a 400-mg loading dose of sparfloxacin, followed by 200 mg once daily, or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, for a total of 10 days. Signs and symptoms of ABECB were assessed at each of 4 visits, including a follow-up visit approximately 1 month after the completion of therapy. Efficacy was determined on the basis of the clinical and bacteriologic response rates in the clinically assessable population. Tolerability was assessed on the basis of patient reports, clinical evaluations, and laboratory tests. Of the 266 clinically assessable patients, 109 (85.2%) of 128 patients receiving sparfloxacin and 115 (83.3%) of 138 patients receiving clarithromycin had a clinically successful outcome (cure or improvement). The bacteriologic success rate (eradication of pathogen) was 88.9% (64 of 72 isolates) in the sparfloxacin group and 84.7% (83 of 98 isolates) in the clarithromycin group. Adverse events possibly or probably related to study drug included photosensitivity in 12 (8.3%) and rash in 6 (4.1%) of 145 patients in the sparfloxacin group, and diarrhea in 10 (6.5%), taste perversion in 9 (5.9%), and nausea in 8 (5.2%) of 153 patients in the clarithromycin group. Thus sparfloxacin was as well tolerated and as effective as clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with ABECB unresponsive to previous oral antimicrobial therapy. The overall rate of adverse events was comparable for the 2 study drugs, but the types of events differed.

Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: rational antibiotic choices

Increasingly, Streptococcus pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to penicillin is becoming a healthcare concern, not only because of the high prevalence of infections caused by this pathogen but also because of the rate at which resistance has progressed. The incidence of penicillin resistance in strains of S. pneumoniae approaches 40% in some areas of the United States, and the incidence of high-level resistance has increased by 60-fold during the past 10 years. With the exception of meningitis and otitis media, there is no conclusive evidence that the acquisition of resistance by S. pneumoniae to beta-lactam antibiotics incurs greater morbidity and mortality in infections caused by this pathogen. However, if the current trends of resistance patterns continue, one can expect the morbidity and mortality to increase. The mechanism of beta-lactam resistance of S. pneumoniae involves genetic mutations which alter penicillin-binding protein structure, resulting in a decreased affinity for all beta-lactam antibiotics. In the treatment of infections caused by S. pneumoniae, it should not be assumed that nonsusceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics correlates with clinical ineffectiveness of these agents. On the contrary, the recommended therapy for nonmeningeal pneumococcal infections (e.g., pneumonia, sepsis, acute otitis media) includes a beta-lactam antibiotic: penicillin G, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone. Recommended therapy for meningitis is cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, with the addition of vancomycin until susceptibility is known. These agents are recommended because of their ability to achieve serum/tissue concentrations greater than the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of these agents against penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and most penicillin-resistant strains (e.g., penicillin G, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and cefuroxime), or their ability to provide adequate concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (e.g., cefotaxime, ceftriaxone).

Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among multiply resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Hong Kong

The MICs of 17 antimicrobial agents for 181 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains were determined by the E-test. Overall, 69.1% were penicillin resistant (MIC > 0.06 microgram/ml). Resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC > 2 microgram/ml), levofloxacin (MIC > 2 microgram/ml), or trovafloxacin (MIC > 1 microgram/ml) was found in 12.1, 5.5, or 2.2% of the strains, respectively. These high rates of resistance raise concerns for the future.

Managing community-acquired pneumonia. Factors to consider in outpatient care

Most patients with community-acquired pneumonia are treated as outpatients, and choice of therapy is usually empirical because the etiologic agent is unknown. Therapy should include coverage for both typical and atypical organisms. In geographic areas with highly resistant S pneumoniae, one of the newer fluoroquinolones should be considered, since resistance to penicillin is associated with cross-resistance to macrolides and tetracyclines. Once-daily dosing should be given strong preference because more frequent dosing results in poor compliance, which may lead to inadequate therapy and increased resistance. At present, the duration of therapy should probably be no less than 7 days. Patients should be categorized for mortality risk with objective scoring methods, and the need for hospitalization should be decided accordingly. Greater use of observational and intermediate-care beds is encouraged, as is improved utilization of pneumococcal vaccine.

Pneumococcal Pneumonia

Pneumococcal pneumonia accounts for about one-sixth to two-thirds of all cases of community-acquired pneumonia. Its high frequency of occurrence worldwide and the high number of deaths associated with it--especially with bacteremic (invasive) disease--mark its importance. Invasive disease is associated with case-fatality rates of 15% to 25% among elderly adults. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) first appeared in the 1970s, and its increased incidence in the late 1980s signaled its emerging importance. In individual patients in whom PRSP infection is suspected, the clinician must follow guidelines for empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia until microbiological test results are known. When a diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia is established, the clinician should change to a regimen that targets the pneumococcus. Adults at highest risk for death from pneumococcal pneumonia include immunocompetent persons with underlying chronic diseases, immunocompromised persons, elderly persons, and unvaccinated residents of nursing homes and other chronic care facilities. Safe and effective, polyvalent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine should be used in persons 2 years of age and older who are at increased risk for serious pneumococcal pneumonia and in all persons 65 years of age and older.

Overview of resistance in the 1990s

The tremendous therapeutic advantage afforded by antibiotics is being threatened by the emergence of increasingly resistant strains of microbes. Selective pressure favoring resistant strains arises from misuse and overuse of antimicrobials (notably extended-spectrum cephalosporins), increased numbers of immunocompromised hosts, lapses in infection control, increased use of invasive procedures and devices, and the widespread use of antibiotics in agriculture and animal husbandry. Outside the hospital, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae is of greatest concern; recent reports also indicate the appearance of outpatient methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. MRSA is a significant problem in the hospital, as are vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, oxacillin-resistant S aureus, and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Owing to the high rate of antibiotic use and other risk factors, a person is more likely to acquire an antibiotic-resistant infection in the ICU than anywhere else, either inside or outside the hospital. Responsible antibiotic use and stringent infection-control policies are needed to discourage the development of resistant strains.

Ketolide treatment of Haemophilus influenzae experimental pneumonia

The MICs of HMR 3004 and HMR 3647 at which 90% of beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae isolates were inhibited were 4 and 2 micrograms/ml, respectively. Both HMR 3004 and HMR 3647 were active against beta-lactamase-producing H. influenzae in a murine model of experimental pneumonia. As assessed by pulmonary clearance of H. influenzae, HMR 3004 was more effective (P < 0.05) than was azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, pristinamycin, or HMR 3647 in this model.

Comparative in vitro activities of amoxicillin-clavulanate against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria isolated from antral puncture specimens from patients with sinusitis

By an agar dilution method, the antimicrobial susceptibilities of antral sinus puncture isolates were studied. Pneumococci were generally susceptible to amoxicillin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, but 17% of pneumococcal isolates were resistant to cefuroxime. Haemophilus influenzae isolates were resistant to amoxicillin and clarithromycin. beta-Lactamase production occurred in 69% of Prevotella species. One-third of Peptostreptococcus magnus isolates were resistant to azithromycin and clarithromycin. Cefuroxime had limited activity against Prevotella species and P. magnus. Levofloxacin was active against most isolates except peptostreptococci. Amoxicillin-clavulanate was active against all isolates, with the MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited being < or = 1 microgram/ml.

An emergency department-based pneumococcal vaccination program could save money and lives

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Pneumococcal vaccination (PV) rates for eligible emergency department patients are less than 25%. This study determines the potential effect of an ED-based pneumococcal vaccination program in preventing pneumococcal bacteremia (PB) in high-risk patients.

METHODS

In a retrospective observational study, hospital records of 188 consecutive adults (>/=18 years old) with PB were reviewed to determine how many were treated in the ED from 1 to 72 months before their admission for bacteremia. Potential cost savings and mortality reductions from an ED-based PV program were calculated assuming PV prevents 65% of bacteremic episodes. A retrospective review of 10,650 ED charts determined the percentage of patients with PV indications and the relative frequency of indications.

RESULTS

One hundred four (55%) of the 188 patients with PB were seen in the ED less than or equal to 72 months before their admission for PB, and 91 (88%) of the 104 had indications for PV. These 91 patients had been evaluated in the ED an average of 3.4 times per patient during this 72-month period. Nine patients (10%) died before discharge. Mean hospital stay for the 82 survivors was 11.2 days. Of 10,650 ED charts reviewed, 2,011 (19%) had documented PV indications. Most prevalent PV indications were age 65 years or older (851 patients, 42%), diabetes mellitus (697, 35%), malignancy (248, 12%), chronic renal failure (228, 11%), and immunosuppression (221, 11%). Estimated cost savings ranged from $168,940 to $427,380.

CONCLUSION

ED-based PV programs would result in considerable cost savings and decreased mortality.

Activities of newer fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates including those with mutations in the gyrA, parC, and parE loci

Resistance to fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae has been attributed primarily to specific mutations in the genes for DNA gyrase (gyrA and gyrB) and topoisomerase IV (parC and parE). Resistance to some FQs can result from a single mutation in one or more of the genes encoding these essential enzymes. A group of 160 clinical isolates of pneumococci was examined in this study, including 36 ofloxacin-resistant isolates (MICs, > or = 8 micrograms/ml) recovered from patients in North America, France, and Belgium. The susceptibilities of all isolates to clinafloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and trovafloxacin were examined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth microdilution and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods. Among the ofloxacin-resistant strains, 32 of 36 were also categorized as resistant to levofloxacin, 35 were resistant to sparfloxacin, 29 were resistant to grepafloxacin, and 19 were resistant to trovafloxacin. In vitro susceptibility to clinafloxacin appeared to be least affected by resistance to the other FQs. Eight isolates with high- and low-level resistance to the newer FQs were selected for DNA sequence analysis of the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE. The DNA and the inferred amino acid sequences of the resistant strains were compared with the analogous sequences of reference strain S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 and FQ-susceptible laboratory strain R6. Reduced susceptibilities to grepafloxacin and sparfloxacin (MICs, 1 to 2 micrograms/ml) and trovafloxacin (MICs, 0.5 to 1 microgram/ml) were associated with either a mutation in parC that led to a single amino acid substitution (Ser-79 to Phe or Tyr) or double mutations that involved the genes for both GyrA (Ser-81 to Phe) and ParE (Asp-435 to Asn). High-level resistance to all of the compounds except clinafloxacin was associated with two or more amino acid substitutions involving both GyrA (Ser-81 to Phe) and ParC (Ser-79 to Phe or Ser-80 to Pro and Asp-83 to Tyr). No mutations were observed in the gyrB sequences of resistant strains. These data indicate that mutations in pneumococcal gyrA, parC, and parE genes all contribute to decreased susceptibility to the newer FQs, and genetic analysis of the QRDR of a single gene, either gyrA or parC, is not predictive of pneumococcal resistance to these agents.

Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 as a quality control isolate for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae with haemophilus test medium

Current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) susceptibility guidelines for quality control testing with Haemophilus influenzae do not include a beta-lactamase-producing strain that could detect the deterioration of the beta-lactamase inhibitor components of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam. The objective of the study was to determine if comparable quality control results for Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, a beta-lactamase-producing strain, would be produced for the three beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor agents with Haemophilus test medium and Mueller-Hinton medium. The criteria used in this study to determine if Haemophilus test medium was acceptable for quality control testing of E. coli ATCC 35218 was that 100% of the results obtained with an antimicrobial agent-methodology combination needed to be within the acceptable NCCLS ranges established with Mueller-Hinton medium. The MIC testing results obtained by the broth microdilution and E-test methods with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and piperacillin-tazobactam were all within the NCCLS ranges; however, the results obtained with ampicillin-sulbactam by both methods were not within the NCCLS ranges. Acceptable results were obtained by the disk diffusion methodology with ampicillin-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam but not with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. When performing susceptibility testing with H. influenzae with the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitors, in addition to quality control testing with H. influenzae ATCC 49247, testing of E. coli ATCC 35218 on Haemophilus test medium is an effective way to monitor the beta-lactamase inhibitors in some antimicrobial agent-methodology combinations.

Molecular and cellular biology of pneumococcal infection

The complete pneumococcal genome sequence was released in November, 1997. This advance has been combined with new understanding of physiology and pathogenesis including characterization of a family of surface proteins adducted to choline, regulation of virulence, and the regulon for natural DNA transformation. These developments in our understanding of molecular and cellular biology of pneumococcal infection will allow the development of new vaccines and antibiotics against this community acquired pathogen.

Antimicrobial resistance in community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens

Antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory pathogens has become a significant problem. However, there remain multiple treatment options, including the newer macrolides, third-generation cephalosporins, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotics, and the newer fluoroquinolones.

Efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin compared with clarithromycin in the treatment of acute sinusitis in adults: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized study. The Canadian Sinusitis Study Group

Adult patients with acute sinusitis (n = 236) were randomized in a double-blind study to levofloxacin 500 mg orally once daily (n = 119) or clarithromycin 500 mg orally twice daily (n = 117) for 10-14 days. Between 2 and 5 days after therapy participants were evaluated as cured (no symptoms), improved (symptoms improved, no further therapy required), or failed (further therapy required). Clinical response rates (cured plus improved) for clinically evaluable patients were 93.9% for levofloxacin (n = 98) and 93.5% for clarithromycin (n = 93). The proportion of patients evaluated as cured was higher in the levofloxacin (40.8%) than in the clarithromycin arm (29.0%) and individual symptoms showed higher rates of resolution. Of patients receiving levofloxacin and clarithromycin, 22.5% and 39.3%, respectively, experienced adverse events related or possibly related to the study therapy. This study showed that, in the treatment of acute sinusitis, daily levofloxacin therapy is as effective as twice-daily clarithromycin therapy with more complete clearing of symptoms and a more tolerable side-effect profile.

In vitro activity of grepafloxacin and 25 other antimicrobial agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae: correlation with penicillin resistance

Strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the United States that were susceptible, intermediately resistant, or highly resistant to penicillin were tested for susceptibility to 26 antimicrobial agents that have been used or considered for the treatment of patients with pneumococcal infections. The drugs tested included penicillins, one penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, cephalosporins, macrolides, a lincosamide, fluoroquinolones, and four miscellaneous drugs (vancomycin, rifampin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole). The activities of the penicillins and macrolide agents were similar, but the activities within the cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone classes were often dissimilar. For the fluoroquinolones, the order of in vitro activity, from most to least active, was grepafloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin. Increased resistance to penicillin in the pneumococcal isolates studied correlated with increased resistance to other penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides, clindamycin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole but did not correlate with increased resistance to the fluoroquinolones, rifampin, or vancomycin. These findings may be helpful to health professionals selecting empiric therapy for respiratory tract infections involving S. pneumoniae.

Levofloxacin: a therapeutic review

This therapeutic review discusses the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, in vitro activity, drug interactions, and adverse effects of levofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic. Particular emphasis is placed on the clinical efficacy of levofloxacin and its place in therapy. Compared with ciprofloxacin and the earlier quinolone agents, levofloxacin has an improved pharmacokinetic profile that allows convenient once-daily dosing in either an oral or parenteral formulation. Levofloxacin has enhanced activity against gram-positive aerobic organisms, including penicillin-resistant pneumococci. In published comparative trials involving commonly used treatment regimens, levofloxacin had equivalent if not greater activity in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, acute bacterial sinusitis, acute pyelonephritis, and complicated urinary tract infection. Levofloxacin is well tolerated and induces minimal adverse drug reactions. Based on the above attributes, it may be reasonable to include levofloxacin on the hospital formulary in place of older quinolones. More recently released quinolones such as trovafloxacin exhibit similar advantages; however, until direct comparative trials between levofloxacin and these newer agents are conducted, it is difficult to advocate one agent over another. Regardless of which quinolone is the primary agent on the formulary, it is imperative that this class of antimicrobial drugs be used with discretion to minimize the development of resistance.

Comparative antimicrobial activity of trovafloxacin tested against 3049 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from the 1997-1998 respiratory infection season

Trovafloxacin is a new fluorinated naphthyridone having expanded activity against Gram-positive and anaerobic pathogens compared with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin or ofloxacin. A multicenter in vitro trial (201 sites) was initiated in late 1997 to study the comparative activity of trovafloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae strains during the recently completed respiratory disease season. Each laboratory was asked to test 20 to 30 recent isolates (3049 strains) by the Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) method with observed phenotypes with elevated trovafloxacin results (MIC, > 1 microgram/mL) confirmed by the monitor laboratory (University of Iowa College of Medicine). Approximately one-third (34.0%) of isolates were penicillin nonsusceptible (12.8% high-level resistance at > or = 2 micrograms/mL). Also 20.4% and 4.5% of strains were resistant to macrolides (erythromycin) and ceftriaxone, respectively. The macrolide resistance rate was lowered to 16.8% when the adverse effect of CO2 incubation was considered. Only 0.3% of S. pneumoniae were vancomycin-nonsusceptible using the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards breakpoint (< or = 1 microgram/mL) with nearly all results were at 1.5 micrograms/mL. Trovafloxacin (MIC50 and MIC90, 0.094 and 0.19 microgram/mL, respectively) was eight fold more potent than levofloxacin (MIC90, 0.75 and 1.5 micrograms/mL), and fewer strains (0.10%) were discovered with high-level resistance (MIC, > or = 8 micrograms/mL). The four resistant isolates from different states had alterations in both par C and gyr A. Trovafloxacin had the best potency observed against contemporary pneumococcal isolates, and has a spectrum (> 99.8% susceptible) for an orally administered agent that was comparable to the tested parenteral glycopeptide, vancomycin (> 99.7%). Blood and spinal-fluid culture isolates were generally more susceptible to penicillin (74.4 to 75.6%), other beta-lactams, and erythromycin (84.4%); throat and sputum isolates were significantly more resistant (p < 0.01). Increases in resistance among S. pneumoniae strains to beta-lactams and erythromycin were documented in all geographic regions monitored, other resistances also continue to evolve, and high-level fluoroquinolone resistance remains very rare.

In vivo activities of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae: application to breakpoint determinations

The in vivo activities of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate against 17 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae with penicillin MICs of 0.12-8.0 mg/liter were assessed in a cyclophosphamide-induced neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Renal impairment was produced by administration of uranyl nitrate to prolong the amoxicillin half-life in the mice from 21 to 65 min, simulating human pharmacokinetics. Two hours after thigh infection with 10(5) to 10(6) CFU, groups of mice were treated with 7 mg of amoxicillin per kg of body weight alone or combined with clavulanate (ratio, 4:1) every 8 h for 1 and 4 days. There was an excellent correlation between the MIC of amoxicillin (0.03 to 5.6 mg/liter) and (i) the change in log10 CFU/thigh at 24 h and (ii) survival after 4 days of therapy. Organisms for which MICs were 2 mg/liter or less were killed at 1.4 to 4.2 and 1.6 to 4.1 log10 CFU/thigh at 24 h by amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. The four strains for which MICs were >4 mg/liter grew 0.2 to 2.6 and 0.6 to 2. 3 logs at 24 h despite therapy with amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. Infection was uniformly fatal by 72 h in untreated mice. Amoxicillin therapy resulted in no mortality with organisms for which MICs were 1 mg/liter or less, 20 to 40% mortality with organisms for which MICs were 2 mg/liter, and 80 to 100% mortality with organisms for which MICs were 4.0-5.6 mg/liter. Lower and higher doses (0.5, 2, and 20 mg/kg) of amoxicillin were studied against organisms for which MICs were near the breakpoint. These studies demonstrate that a reduction of 1 log10 or greater in CFU/thigh at 24 h is consistently observed when amoxicillin levels exceed the MIC for 25 to 30% of the dosing interval. These studies would support amoxicillin (and amoxicillin-clavulanate) MIC breakpoints of 1 mg/liter for susceptible, 2 mg/liter for intermediate, and 4 mg/liter for resistant strains of S. pneumoniae.

Etiology, susceptibility, and treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of complicated chronic bronchitis in the primary care setting: ciprofloxacin 750 mg b.i.d. versus clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. Bronchitis Study Group

Although controversial, antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) appears beneficial in patients with a history of repeated infections, those who have comorbid illnesses, and those with marked airway obstruction. In a community-based, open, randomized trial, the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP) 750 mg and clarithromycin (CLA) 500 mg, each given twice daily for 10 days, were compared in 2180 patients with AECB (1083 CIP, 1097 CLA). Patients were >40 years of age and had complicated/severe AECB episodes defined as at least three episodes within the past year, at least three comorbid conditions, previous failed antibiotic treatment for AECB within the previous 2 to 4 weeks, or community susceptibility data indicating a high number of resistant pathogens. Significant bacterial isolates (>10(5) colony-forming units per milliliter) from homogenized sputa were identified. Susceptibility to a range of antimicrobials was determined by the microbroth dilution technique. The majority of patients were white (83%) and were current or previous smokers (81%). Mean patient age was 62 years. A history of at least three AECB episodes in the previous year was reported by 54% of CIP-treated patients and 53% of CLA-treated patients. Of 777 primary isolates positively identified and cultured from 673 patients, the bacterial pathogens isolated and their incidence included Haemophilus species, 28%; Moraxella catarrhalis, 18%; Enterobacteriaceae, 18%; Staphylococcus aureus, 17%; Streptococcus pneumoniae, 7%; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4%. Beta-lactamase production was found in 38% of Haemophilus influenzae, 10% of Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and 85% of M catarrhalis isolates. Thirty-four percent of S pneumoniae isolates were resistant to penicillin (minimum inhibitory concentration > or =0.12 mg/L). Among the 673 patients who were valid for clinical assessment and had a pretherapy pathogen isolated, clinical success and overall bacteriologic eradication rates at the end of therapy were 93% and 98% for CIP versus 90% and 96% for CLA. The differences between CIP and CLA did not reach statistical significance. Superinfections were reported significantly more frequently in CLA-treated (3%) versus CIP-treated patients (1%). Eradication rates for specific organisms for CIP and CLA, respectively, were Haemophilus species, 99% and 93%; M catarrhalis, 99% and 100%; S pneumoniae, 91% and 92%; and Enterobacteriaceae, 100% and 95%. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 12% of CIP-treated patients and 10% of CLA-treated patients. CIP 750 mg b.i.d. had a higher (but not statistically significant) clinical and bacteriologic cure rate than CLA 500 mg b.i.d. in the treatment of patients with bacteriologically proven complicated/severe AECB. The causative bacterial pathogens of AECB appear to be evolving, with a predominance of gram-negative and other resistant organisms observed. Thus antibiotic therapy for at-risk patients with AECB should include agents that have activity against gram-negative pathogens.

Resistance issues and treatment implications: pneumococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and gram-negative rods

During the last decade there has been an unexpectedly rapid evolution of antimicrobial resistance in the respiratory pathogens for community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia. In order to choose the most optimal therapy for their patients, it is essential that physicians be aware of the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance and their implications on the effectiveness of the various antimicrobials.

Multicenter comparative trial of ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis in a primary care setting. Rhinosinusitis Investigation Group

In a primary care setting, the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP) 500 mg b.i.d. were compared with those of cefuroxime axetil (CA) 250 mg b.i.d., each given for 10 days, in a nationwide, open, prospective, randomized trial of 1414 adults with acute sinusitis. Patients were enrolled if they had clinically documented acute sinusitis (ie, rhinosinusitis) (<4 weeks' duration), based on the 1997 American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery criteria of either two major or one major and two minor symptoms. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response (resolution or failure) at the posttherapy assessment on study days 14 through 26. The most common presenting major signs and symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis were facial congestion, nasal drainage/purulence, facial pain/pressure, and nasal obstruction/blockage. The minor symptom, headache, was more common and severe than was nasal obstruction/blockage. A total of 1219 patients were clinically evaluable. Clinical resolution was observed in 559 of 613 (91.2%) CIP-treated patients and 546 of 606 (90. 1%) CA-treated patients. The two regimens were statistically equivalent (95% confidence interval, -2.16% to 4.71%). There were 80 drug-related adverse events reported in the CIP-treated patients and 81 drug-related adverse events reported in the CA-treated patients. The main adverse events were nausea (n = 18) and diarrhea (n = 7) in patients treated with CIP and diarrhea (n = 14), nausea (n = 12), headache (n = 7), and vaginitis (n = 7) in those treated with CA. CIP 500 mg b.i.d. was found to be statistically equivalent to CA 250 mg b.i.d. in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis.

Pneumonia in the patient with HIV infection

The lower respiratory tract has always been a major site of complications in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. In the era before Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis (PCP) this organism accounted for more than 70% of initial AIDS-defining diagnoses and was by far the most common identifiable cause of mortality. Even in the era of prophylaxis, PCP continues to be the most common AIDS-defining diagnosis and the most common identifiable cause of death. Despite the historic emphasis on PCP, bacterial pneumonia seems to be at least as common or more common. A substantial spectrum of other opportunistic pathogens are also commonly encountered in these patients. This article reviews pneumonia in patients with HIV infection.

Levofloxacin. Its use in infections of the respiratory tract, skin, soft tissues and urinary tract

Levofloxacin, the optically pure levorotatory isomer of ofloxacin, is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. Like other fluoroquinolones, it acts on bacterial topoisomerase and has activity against a broad range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Levofloxacin also appears to have improved activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae compared with ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Levofloxacin distributes well and achieves high levels in excess of plasma concentrations in many tissues (e.g., lung, skin, prostate). High oral bioavailability allows switching from intravenous to oral therapy without dosage adjustment. In patients with mild to severe community-acquired pneumonia receiving treatment for 7 to 14 days, oral levofloxacin was similar in efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin was superior to intravenous ceftriaxone and/or oral cefuroxime axetil. With levofloxacin use, clinical success (clinical cure or improvement) rates were 87 to 96% and bacteriological eradication rates were 87 to 100%. In the 5- to 10-day treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, oral levofloxacin was similar in efficacy to oral cefuroxime axetil or cefaclor. Levofloxacin resulted in clinical success in 78 to 94.6% of patients and bacteriological eradication in 77 to 97%. Oral levofloxacin was also similar in efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or oral clarithromycin in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis treated for 7 to 14 days. Equivalence between 7- to 10-day therapy with oral levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin was seen in patients with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. Clinical success was seen in 97.8 and 96.1% of levofloxacin recipients and bacteriological eradication in 97.5 and 93.2%. Complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis, responded similarly well to oral levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin for 10 days or lomefloxacin for 14 days. Clinical success and bacteriological eradication rates with levofloxacin occurred in 92 to 93.3% and 93.6 to 94.7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin can be administered in a once-daily regimen as an alternative to other fluoroquinolones in the treatment of infections of the urinary tract, skin and soft tissues. Its more interesting use is as an alternative to established treatments of respiratory tract infections. S. pneumoniae appears to be more susceptible to levofloxacin than to ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Other newer fluoroquinolone agents that also have enhanced in vitro antipneumococcal activity may not share the well established tolerability profile of levofloxacin, which also appears to improve on that of some older fluoroquinolones.

Value of noninvasive studies in community-acquired pneumonia

Noninvasive diagnostic studies, i.e., sputum gram stain, sputum culture, blood culture and antigen detection assays will assist the clinician in the selection of initial antimicrobial therapy in some patients. These tests may be even more valuable in adjusting treatment regimens to prevent the use of broad spectrum antimicrobial agents as routine therapy.

Bacterial resistance: a worldwide problem

The therapeutic crisis produced by emerging antimicrobial resistances has compromised the chemotherapy of hospitalized patients with serious infections. For the most prevalent resistance problems, meropenem, a new carbapenem, appears to provide a potency and spectrum for: 1) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae; 2) Bush-Jacoby-Merdeiros group 1 enzyme-producing ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, and some Serratia spp.; 3) ceftazidime- and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and 4) some Streptococcus spp. with elevated penicillin MICs. Documented in vitro study results using 1997 gram-negative blood stream infection isolates indicate a wider spectrum and a two- to fourfold greater potency for meropenem compared with imipenem. This was especially true for P. aeruginosa where 93.4% of strains were susceptible to meropenem (84.1% for imipenem). Also among over 30,000 reported in vitro meropenem results from the United States and Europe, 90.6% of gram-positive cocci and 99.1% of anaerobes were inhibited at < or = 4 microg/ml. Over 90% of ceftazidime-resistant blood stream infection strains were meropenem susceptible, a rate greater than those of imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin. As the clinical utility of many contemporary antimicrobial agents is challenged by emerging resistance, the carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem) appear positioned for a greater role in the treatment of infections in hospitalized patients.

Newer oral antimicrobials for resistant respiratory tract pathogens. Which show the most promise?

As antimicrobial resistance to tried-and-true drugs continues to build, an arsenal of new drugs aimed at resistant respiratory tract pathogens is needed. Penicillin is now ineffective against several common pathogens, including many pneumococcal organisms. Newer antimicrobials, including macrolides, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones, have been developed to take its place. The authors of this article present a progress report of the fight against respiratory tract infection and an assessment of the most promising newer agents for use against multidrug-resistant pathogens.