Venetoclax in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 17p deletion: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study

Co-Stimulatory versus Cell Death Aspects of Agonistic CD40 Monoclonal Antibody Selicrelumab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Simple Summary

Previous observations have shown that CD40 activation of CLL cells via coculture with CD40L-expressing fibroblasts increases sensitivity to cell death by CD20 mAbs rituximab and obinutuzumab. We studied the activity of the fully human-agonistic CD40 mAb selicrelumab in primary CLL cells in relation to cell activation, induced pro-survival profile and sensitization for cell death by aCD20 mAbs. We found that the pro-survival effect of selicrelumab is minimal, while cell death by combined selicrelumab plus anti-CD20 antibody treatment is maintained. Thus, further investigation of applying selicrelumab combined with anti-CD20 mAbs in a therapeutic setting might be considered.

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a common form of leukemia with a heterogeneous clinical course that remains incurable due to the development of therapy resistance. In lymph node proliferation centers, signals from the microenvironment such as CD40 ligation through interaction with follicular T helper cells shield CLL cells from apoptosis. Previous observations have shown that, despite CD40-induced changes in apoptotic mediators resulting in cell survival, CD40 activation also increases sensitivity to cell death by CD20 mAbs rituximab and obinutuzumab. To further investigate these observations, we here studied the activity of the fully human agonistic CD40 mAb selicrelumab in primary CLL cells in relation to cell activation, induced pro-survival profile, and sensitization for cell death by aCD20 mAbs, in vitro. Methods: CLL cells from peripheral blood were isolated by the Ficoll density method. The expression of activation markers and cytokine production following CD40 stimulation was quantified by flow cytometry and ELISA. The anti-apoptotic profile of CLL induced by stimulation was evaluated by the expression of BCL-2 proteins with Western blot, and resistance to venetoclax with flow cytometry. Cell death induced by the combination of selicrelumab and aCD20 mAbs was quantified by flow cytometry. Results: CLL cells treated with selicrelumab upregulated co-stimulatory molecules such as CD86, TNF-α and death receptor CD95/Fas. In contrast to the CD40 ligand-transfected NIH3T3 cells, induction of resistance to venetoclax by selicrelumab was very moderate. Importantly, selicrelumab stimulation positively sensitized CLL cells to CD20-induced cell death, comparable to CD40 ligand-transfected NIH3T3 cells. Conclusions: Taken together, these novel insights into selicrelumab-stimulatory effects in CLL may be considered for developing new therapeutic strategies, particularly in combination with obinutuzumab.

A retrospective observational study to evaluate the clinical outcomes and routine management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with idelalisib and rituximab in the UK and Ireland (RETRO-idel)

Idelalisib (IDL) is an oral first‐in‐class phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor approved for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) alongside rituximab (R) since 2014. However, little data exist on routine practice. The RETRO‐idel was a protocol‐led, retrospective study of 110 patients [n = 27 front‐line (1L)] who received IDL‐R. The primary end‐point was clinical overall response rate (ORR). The median (range) follow‐up of the whole cohort was 30·2 (0·1–51·9) months. The median (range) age was 72 (48–89) years. Tumour protein p53‐disruption was common [100% 1L, 32·5% relapsed/refractory (R/R)]. The best ORR (intention‐to‐treat) was 88·2% (1L 96·3%, R/R 85·5%). Overall, the median event‐free survival (mEFS) was 20·3 months and time‐to‐next treatment was 29·2 months. The mEFS for 1L patients was 18·7 months and R/R patients was 21·7 months. The 3‐year overall survival was 56·1% (95% confidence interval 45·7–65·3). IDL was discontinued in 87·3% (n = 96). More patients discontinued due to adverse events in the front‐line setting (1L 63·0% vs. R/R 44·6%) and due to progressive disease in R/R patients (20·5% vs. 3·7% in 1L). Lower respiratory tract infection/pneumonia were reported in 34·5% (Grade ≥3, 19·1%), diarrhoea in 30·9% (Grade ≥3, 6·4%), and colitis in 9·1% (Grade ≥3, 5·5%). Overall, these data describe clear efficacy for IDL‐R in routine practice. No new safety signals were identified, although careful management of known toxicities is required.

Metabolic perturbations sensitize triple-negative breast cancers to apoptosis induced by BH3 mimetics

Cancer cells have differential metabolic dependencies compared to their nonmalignant counterparts. However, few metabolism-targeting compounds have been successful in clinical trials. Here, we investigated the metabolic vulnerabilities of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), particularly those metabolic perturbations that increased mitochondrial apoptotic priming and sensitivity to BH3 mimetics (drugs that antagonize antiapoptotic proteins). We used high-throughput dynamic BH3 profiling (HT-DBP) to screen a library of metabolism-perturbing small molecules, which revealed inhibitors of the enzyme nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) as top candidates. In some TNBC cells but not in nonmalignant cells, NAMPT inhibitors increased overall apoptotic priming and induced dependencies on specific antiapoptotic BCL-2 family members. Treatment of TNBC cells with NAMPT inhibitors sensitized them to subsequent treatment with BH3 mimetics. The combination of a NAMPT inhibitor (FK866) and an MCL-1 antagonist (S63845) reduced tumor growth in a TNBC patient-derived xenograft model in vivo. We found that NAMPT inhibition reduced NAD⁺ concentrations below a critical threshold that resulted in depletion of adenine, which was the metabolic trigger that primed TNBC cells for apoptosis. These findings demonstrate a close interaction between metabolic and mitochondrial apoptotic signaling pathways and reveal that exploitation of a tumor-specific metabolic vulnerability can sensitize some TNBC to BH3 mimetics.

Durable Remissions Following Combined Targeted Therapy in Patients with CLL Harboring TP53 Deletions and/or Mutations

Fifty-one of 189 evaluable patients from three prospective phase-II trials evaluating a sequential targeted treatment (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02345863, NCT02401503, NCT02689141) had high-risk CLL with a deletion 17p, TP53 mutation or both. Twenty-seven patients started treatment with bendamustine debulking prior to the induction and maintenance treatment, which was ibrutinib/ofatumumab (IO) in 21 patients, ibrutinib/obinutuzumab (IG) in 13 and venetoclax/obinutuzumab (AG) in 17 patients. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate after eight months of induction treatment, which were 81%, 100% and 94% for IO, IG and AG, respectively. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was undetectable in peripheral blood (uMRD; <10-4 by flow cytometry) in 0%, 23% and 82% of patients, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 45 months. Seventeen patients discontinued maintenance treatment due to undetectable MRD, nine of them progressed and two died without progression (median PFS: 28 months after discontinuation of treatment), while six patients remained in remission after a median observation time of 46 (range 6-47) months after discontinuation of treatment. Thus, MRD-guided fix-duration therapies combining obinutuzumab with venetoclax or ibrutinib can induce deep and durable remissions in CLL patients with high-risk genetic lesions, which can persist after treatment discontinuation.

Chemogenomics for drug discovery: clinical molecules from open access chemical probes

In recent years chemical probes have proved valuable tools for the validation of disease-modifying targets, facilitating investigation of target function, safety, and translation. Whilst probes and drugs often differ in their properties, there is a belief that chemical probes are useful for translational studies and can accelerate the drug discovery process by providing a starting point for small molecule drugs. This review seeks to describe clinical candidates that have been inspired by, or derived from, chemical probes, and the process behind their development. By focusing primarily on examples of probes developed by the Structural Genomics Consortium, we examine a variety of epigenetic modulators along with other classes of probe.

Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives

Due to the advantages in efficacy and safety compared with traditional chemotherapy drugs, targeted therapeutic drugs have become mainstream cancer treatments. Since the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib was approved to enter the market by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001, an increasing number of small-molecule targeted drugs have been developed for the treatment of malignancies. By December 2020, 89 small-molecule targeted antitumor drugs have been approved by the US FDA and the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China. Despite great progress, small-molecule targeted anti-cancer drugs still face many challenges, such as a low response rate and drug resistance. To better promote the development of targeted anti-cancer drugs, we conducted a comprehensive review of small-molecule targeted anti-cancer drugs according to the target classification. We present all the approved drugs as well as important drug candidates in clinical trials for each target, discuss the current challenges, and provide insights and perspectives for the research and development of anti-cancer drugs.

The Ongoing Unmet Needs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: TP53 Disruption, Richter, and Beyond

Despite recent success in regard to targeted therapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), patients with TP53 disruption (including deletion and/or mutation) continue to have poor outcomes compared with other patients with CLL. In this article, a review of common TP53 mutations in CLL, and recent trials using novel targeted agents in CLL patients with TP53 disruption, is provided with the goal of emphasizing the need to continuously focus on this area of research. In addition, limited but available data on double refractory CLL to BTK inhibitor and BCL-2 inhibitor, and on Richter syndrome, are reviewed.

Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia After Discontinuation of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) ibrutinib and acalabrutinib have led to durable responses for patients with both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Many patients, however, ultimately discontinue BTKis due to toxicity or progressive CLL. This article reviews the two most common reasons for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib discontinuation, including adverse events as well as CLL progression. The data for specific CLL-directed therapies following BTKi discontinuation, including venetoclax, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, cellular therapies, and ongoing clinical trials, are reviewed. An evidence-based sequencing algorithm for treatment of CLL following BTKi discontinuation is proposed.

Genomics of Resistance to Targeted Therapies

Targeting BCR and BCL-2 signaling is a widely used therapeutic strategy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. C481S mutation decreases the covalent binding affinity of ibrutinib to BTK, resulting in reversible rather than irreversible inhibition. In addition to BTK, mutations in PLCG2 have been demonstrated to mediate acquired ibrutinib resistance. Venetoclax, a highly selective BCL2 inhibitor, has high affinity to the BH3-binding grove of BCL2. Mutation in BCL2 (Gly101Val) decreases the affinity of BCL2 for venetoclax and confers acquired resistance in cell lines and primary patient cells. This review discusses the common mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Review of Venetoclax in CLL, AML and Multiple Myeloma

Venetoclax is a highly selective and effective B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, which is able to reinstate the apoptotic potential of cancer cells. With its full repertoire yet to be explored, it has changed the therapeutic landscape in haematological malignancies, and most particularly chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and multiple myeloma (MM). In CLL, it has shown remarkable efficacy both as monotherapy and in combination therapy. Based on data from MURANO and CLL14 studies, fixed-duration combination therapy of venetoclax with anti-CD20 antibody is now the standard of care in numerous countries. In AML, although of limited efficacy as a single agent, venetoclax combination therapy has demonstrated encouraging outcomes including rapid, durable responses and acceptable toxicity, particularly in the older, unfit patient population. Multiple myeloma with translocation (t)(11;14) harbours high BCL-2/ myeloid cell leukaemia sequence-1 (MCL-1) and BCL-2/BCL-XL ratio and is, therefore, particularly suited for venetoclax-based therapy. Despite a wide ranging and evolving clinical role in these diseases, venetoclax treatment is not curative and, over time, clonal evolution and disease relapse appear to be the norm. While a variety of distinct resistance mechanisms have been identified, frequently emerging in a sub-clonal pattern, the full picture is yet to be characterised. Further illumination of the complex interplay of various factors is needed to pave the way for rational combination therapies aimed at circumventing resistance and improving durability of disease control. Serial molecular studies can aid in identification of new prognostically significant and/or targetable mutations.

Frontline Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL): Targeted Therapy vs. Chemoimmunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) have expanded significantly in the last few years, including the use of new classes of oral small molecular inhibitors targeting the B cell receptor signaling pathway or the apoptosis machinery. Targeted therapy with or without immunotherapy has quickly emerged as a new standard for frontline treatment of CLL/SLL, though the previous standard chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) remains a treatment option. In this review, we present data from key clinical trials to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with different frontline treatment approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

We reviewed recently published and presented clinical trials on frontline CLL/SLL treatment, with particular focus on the comparison of CIT vs. targeted therapies, including inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) or of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. Various BTK inhibitors as continuous treatment with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have compared favorably to the conventional CITs in previously untreated CLL/SLL patients of various ages and comorbidities. Fixed duration treatment with the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax combined with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies also showed superiority in clinical outcomes compared to CIT. Subgroup analysis interestingly showed that IgHV-mutated CLL/SLL might still derive similar benefits from CIT. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating combined targeted therapies of venetoclax plus a BTK inhibitor to try to further improve the efficacy while limiting the duration of treatment. Targeted therapies are becoming the new standard of care for frontline treatment of CLL/SLL although conventional CIT remains an option group of fit patients with low risk features. Novel strategies are being studied using targeted therapy combinations to optimize the depth of response in a time-limited fashion.

Current Treatment Options in CLL

After impressive developments in recent years with the rise of new targeted agents, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) only plays a minor role in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Inhibitors of the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), such as ibrutinib or more recently acalabrutinib, are highly effective, even in poor-risk or chemo-refractory patients. Venetoclax, an inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic BCL2 protein and, to a lesser extent, phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) delta inhibitors, add to the armamentarium of targeted agents for the treatment of CLL. Furthermore, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are used very successfully either alone or in combination with BTK, BCL2 or PI3K inhibitors. Despite these advances, there is still an ongoing pursuit for new therapeutic approaches in the treatment of CLL. An even bigger challenge poses the determination of the optimal combination and sequence of those drugs. Here, we give an overview of current treatment options in CLL, weighing the advantages and disadvantages of each approach in the light of different clinical settings.

Targeting Bcl-2 for cancer therapy

Apoptosis deficiency is one of the most important features observed in neoplastic diseases. The Bcl-2 family is composed of a subset of proteins that act as decisive apoptosis regulators. Research and clinical studies have both demonstrated that the hyperactivation of Bcl-2-related anti-apoptotic effects correlates with cancer occurrence, progression and prognosis, also having a role in facilitating the radio- and chemoresistance of various malignancies. Therefore, targeting Bcl-2 inactivation has provided some compelling therapeutic advantages by enhancing apoptotic sensitivity or reversing drug resistance. Therefore, this pharmacological route turned into one of the most promising routes for cancer treatment. This review discusses some of the well-defined and emerging roles of Bcl-2 as well as its potential clinical value in cancer therapeutics.

Should Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease Be the Goal of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy?

With the advent of highly effective novel therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, conventional response assessment is not able to sensitively capture depth of response. To achieve a more precise assessment of response, minimal residual disease has been introduced to more accurately classify and quantify treatment outcomes. It is now considered a strong predictor of outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, although its interpretation depends on the therapeutic context. This review discusses available methods of minimal residual disease measurement. It summarizes minimal residual disease data from pivotal clinical trials and discusses potential implications for future studies and minimal residual disease-based clinical strategies.

Undetectable peripheral blood MRD should be the goal of venetoclax in CLL, but attainment plateaus after 24 months

The highly selective BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax achieves deep responses in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD). We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with CLL treated with venetoclax to investigate the performance of peripheral blood (PB) compared with bone marrow (BM) assessment of MRD; the kinetics, clinicopathological associations, and longer-term outcomes of uMRD attainment and recrudescence; and the ability of venetoclax dose escalation to deepen responses. Among 16 patients who achieved PB uMRD and had contemporaneous BM assessments, 13 (81%) had confirmed BM uMRD, and patients with PB uMRD had outcomes at least as favorable as those with BM uMRD for time to progression, overall survival, and MRD recrudescence. Excluding 2 patients lacking earlier assessment, the median time to PB uMRD was 18 (range, 5-26) months, with 90% of instances achieved by 24 months. There was no new PB uMRD attainment after 24 months without treatment intensification. The dominant association with earlier attainment of uMRD was concurrent rituximab (P = .012). Complex karyotype was associated with inferior uMRD attainment after 12 months of therapy (P = .015), and patients attaining uMRD whose disease harbored TP53 abnormalities demonstrated a trend toward earlier recrudescence (P = .089). Of patients who received venetoclax dose escalations, 4 (27%) of 15 achieved improvements in response. For patients with R/R CLL receiving venetoclax, PB uMRD commonly correlates with BM uMRD and is associated with a comparable longer-term prognosis. Concurrent rituximab augments uMRD attainment, but dose escalation and further treatment beyond 24 months infrequently deepen responses.

Venetoclax response is enhanced by selective inhibitor of nuclear export compounds in hematologic malignancies

The selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compounds selinexor (KPT-330) and eltanexor (KPT-8602) are from a novel class of small molecules that target exportin-1 (XPO1 [CRM1]), an essential nucleo-cytoplasmic transport protein responsible for the nuclear export of major tumor suppressor proteins and growth regulators such as p53, p21, and p27. XPO1 also affects the translation of messenger RNAs for critical oncogenes, including MYC, BCL2, MCL1, and BCL6, by blocking the export of the translation initiation factor eIF4E. Early trials with venetoclax (ABT-199), a potent, selective inhibitor of BCL2, have revealed responses across a variety of hematologic malignancies. However, many tumors are not responsive to venetoclax. We used models of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to determine in vitro and in vivo responses to treatment with venetoclax and SINE compounds combined. Cotreatment with venetoclax and SINE compounds demonstrated loss of viability in multiple cell lines. Further in vitro analyses showed that this enhanced cell death was the result of an increase in apoptosis that led to a loss of clonogenicity in methylcellulose assays, coinciding with activation of p53 and loss of MCL1. Treatment with SINE compounds and venetoclax combined led to a reduction in tumor growth in both AML and DLBCL xenografts. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue sections revealed that the reduction in tumor cells was partly the result of an induction of apoptosis. The enhanced effects of this combination were validated in primary AML and DLBCL patient cells. Our studies reveal synergy with SINE compounds and venetoclax in aggressive hematologic malignancies and provide a rationale for pursuing this approach in a clinical trial.

Dual dependence on BCL2 and MCL1 in T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia

Treatment of relapsed refractory T-PLL with venetoclax monotherapy results in only transient and minor clinical responses. In vitro analyses pre- and postvenetoclax indicate dual dependence on BCL2 and MCL1; combined BCL2 and MCL1 inhibition are synergistic.

Unmasking BCL-2 Addiction in Synovial Sarcoma by Overcoming Low NOXA

Simple Summary

Synovial sarcoma is a soft-tissue sarcoma that lacks effective systemic therapy and carries poor prognosis due to frequent late local recurrence and metastases. The cancer is known to be driven in part by increased expression of the pro-survival protein BCL-2. Surprisingly, synovial sarcoma proved resistant to BCL-2 inhibitors in pre-clinical trials. We identified increased activity of a second pro-survival protein, MCL-1, as responsible for this resistance. We showed that co-targeting both BCL-2 and MCL-1 proves to be an effective therapeutic approach both in cell culture and animal models of synovial sarcoma, supporting translation into clinical trials.

Abstract

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is frequently diagnosed in teenagers and young adults and continues to be treated with polychemotherapy with variable success. The SS18-SSX gene fusion is pathognomonic for the disease, and high expression of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 pathologically supports the diagnosis. As the oncogenic SS18-SSX fusion gene itself is not druggable, BCL-2 inhibitor-based therapies are an appealing therapeutic opportunity. Venetoclax, an FDA-approved BCL-2 inhibitor that is revolutionizing care in some BCL-2-expressing hematological cancers, affords an intriguing therapeutic possibility to treat SS. In addition, there are now dozens of venetoclax-based combination therapies in clinical trials in hematological cancers, attributing to the limited toxicity of venetoclax. However, preclinical studies of venetoclax in SS have demonstrated an unexpected ineffectiveness. In this study, we analyzed the response of SS to venetoclax and the underlying BCL-2 family biology in an effort to understand venetoclax treatment failure and find a therapeutic strategy to sensitize SS to venetoclax. We found remarkably depressed levels of the endogenous MCL-1 inhibitor, NOXA, in SS compared to other sarcomas. Expressing NOXA led to sensitization to venetoclax, as did the addition of the MCL-1 BH3 mimetic, S63845. Importantly, the venetoclax/S63845 combination induced tumor regressions in SS patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. As a very close analog of S63845 (S64315) is now in clinical trials with venetoclax in AML (NCT03672695), the combination of MCL-1 BH3 mimetics and venetoclax should be considered for SS patients as a new therapy.

Low-burden TP53 mutations in CLL: Clinical impact and clonal evolution within the context of different treatment options

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with TP53 mutations experience chemo-refractory disease and are therefore indicated for targeted therapy. However, the significance of low-burden TP53 mutations with <10% variant allele frequency (VAF) remains a matter of debate. Here we describe clonal evolution scenarios of low-burden TP53 mutations and analyzed their clinical impact in a "real-world" CLL cohort. TP53 status was assessed by targeted NGS in 511 patients entering first-line treatment with chemo/immunotherapy and 159 relapsed patients treated with targeted agents. Within the pre-therapy cohort, 16% of patients carried low-burden TP53 mutations (0.1-10% VAF). While their presence did not significantly shorten event-free survival after first-line therapy, it affected overall survival (OS). For a subgroup with TP53 mutations of 1-10% VAF, the impact on OS was only observed in patients with unmutated IGHV that had not received targeted therapy, as patients benefited from switching to targeted agents regardless of initial TP53 mutational status. Analysis of the clonal evolution of low-burden TP53 mutations showed that the highest expansion rates were associated with FCR in both first and second-line treatment (median VAF increase 14.8x and 11.8x, respectively) in contrast to treatment with less intense chemo/immunotherapy regimens (1.6x) and without treatment (0.8x). In the relapsed cohort, 33% of patients carried low-burden TP53 mutations, which did not expand significantly upon targeted treatment (median VAF change 1x). Sporadic cases of TP53-mut clonal shifts were connected with the development of resistance-associated mutations. Altogether, our data support the incorporation of low-burden TP53 variants in clinical decision-making.

Expression of BCL2 alternative proteins and association with outcome in CLL patients treated with venetoclax

Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, is highly effective for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and dependence on alternative proteins may result in resistance to BCL-2 inhibition. Patients with CLL treated with venetoclax as monotherapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 05/2012 and 01/2016 were included and pretreatment bone marrow was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for BCL-W, BCL-XL, BCL2-A1 and MCL-1. Twenty-seven patients were included. BCL-W + and BCL-2A1+ was found in 15% and 7% of the patients, respectively. Both BCL-XL and MCL-1 were negative in all samples. A higher CR and longer PFS rates were observed in patients with BCL-W+ (p = .60, p = .46), BCL-2A1+ (p = .60, p = .29), and either BCL-W + or BCL-2A1+ (p = .33, p = .20), though not statistically significant. Pretreatment IHC expression of BCL-2 alternative proteins does not predict response to venetoclax in CLL, but may be a surrogate for an indolent biology. Sensitive techniques are needed to explore anti-apoptotic pathways.

Intrinsically Connected: Therapeutically Targeting the Cathepsin Proteases and the Bcl-2 Family of Protein Substrates as Co-regulators of Apoptosis

Taken with the growing importance of cathepsin-mediated substrate proteolysis in tumor biology and progression, the focus and emphasis placed on therapeutic design and development is coming into fruition. Underpinning this approach is the invariable progression from the direction of fully characterizing cathepsin protease members and their substrate targets, towards targeting such an interaction with tangible therapeutics. The two groups of such substrates that have gained much attention over the years are the pro- and anti- apoptotic protein intermediates from the extrinsic and intrinsic signaling arms of the apoptosis pathway. As proteins that are central to determining cellular fate, some of them present themselves as very favorable candidates for therapeutic targeting. However, considering that both anti- and pro- apoptotic signaling intermediates have been reported to be downstream substrates for certain activated cathepsin proteases, therapeutic targeting approaches based on greater selectivity do need to be given greater consideration. Herein, we review the relationships shared by the cathepsin proteases and the Bcl-2 homology domain proteins, in the context of how the topical approach of adopting 'BH3-mimetics' can be explored further in modulating the relationship between the anti- and pro- apoptotic signaling intermediates from the intrinsic apoptosis pathway and their upstream cathepsin protease regulators. Based on this, we highlight important future considerations for improved therapeutic design.

Current and future treatment strategies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Treatment decisions for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are dependent on symptoms and classification into high-, medium-, or low-risk categories. The prognosis for CLL hinges, in part, on the presence or absence of less-favorable genetic aberrations, including del(17p), del(11q), TP53 dysfunction, and IGHV mutations, as these markers are associated with worse treatment response. Promising results from multiple clinical trials show emerging therapies targeting Burton tyrosine kinase, B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2, and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta result in better outcomes and prolonged progression-free survival for patients both with and without certain high-risk aberrations. Favorable outcomes using these novel oral targeted therapies, either alone or in combination with other treatments such as anti-CD20 antibodies, has led to their use almost entirely supplanting chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of CLL. In this narrative review, we summarize the current clinical evidence for the use of targeted mono- and combination therapies for CLL, discuss new and next-generation treatment approaches currently in development, and provide insight into areas of unmet need for the treatment of patients with CLL.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma co-opts BCL-XL and autophagy to escape apoptosis

Escape from programmed cell death is a hallmark of cancer. In this study, we investigated the anti-apoptotic mechanisms and explored the therapeutic potential of BCL-2 homology domain-3 (BH3) mimetics in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a lethal thoracic malignancy with an extreme dearth of treatment options. By implementing integrated analysis of functional genomic data of MPM cells and quantitative proteomics of patients’ tumors, we identified BCL-X_L as an anti-apoptotic driver that is overexpressed and confers an oncogenic dependency in MPM. MPM cells harboring genetic alterations that inactivate the NF2/LATS1/2 signaling are associated with increased sensitivity to A-1155463, a BCL-X_L-selective BH3 mimetic. Importantly, BCL-X_L inhibition elicits protective autophagy, and concomitant blockade of BCL-X_L and autophagic machinery with A-1155463 and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved autophagy inhibitor, synergistically enhances anti-MPM effects in vitro and in vivo. Together, our work delineates the molecular basis underlying resistance to apoptosis and uncovers an evasive mechanism that limits response to BH3 mimetics in MPM, suggesting a novel strategy to target this aggressive disease.

Resistance to venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia

Despite the success of the combination of venetoclax with the hypomethylating agents (HMA) decitabine or azacitidine in inducing remission in older, previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), resistance - primary or secondary - still constitutes a significant roadblock in the quest to prolong the duration of response. Here we review the proposed and proven mechanisms of resistance to venetoclax monotherapy, HMA monotherapy, and the doublet of venetoclax and HMA for the treatment of AML. We approach the mechanisms of resistance to HMAs and venetoclax in the light of the agents' mechanisms of action. We briefly describe potential therapeutic strategies to circumvent resistance to this promising combination, including alternative scheduling or the addition of other agents to the HMA and venetoclax backbone. Understanding the mechanisms of action and evolving resistance in AML remains a priority in order to maximize the benefit from novel drugs and combinations, identify new therapeutic targets, define potential prognostic markers, and avoid treatment failure.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Malignant Lymphoma Prior to Immunosuppressive Treatment

Hepatitis B reactivation is a common complication in lymphoma patients under immunosuppressive treatment with potentially serious and life-threating consequences. In this review, we discuss the basis of chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the definition and risk factors for HBV reactivation. We overview the management of HBV reactivation based on virological status and immunosuppressive regimen risk stratification. We also highlight and update information about the HBV reactivation in lymphoma patients under novel agent treatment, including newer monoclonal antibodies, small molecule inhibitors, and even chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy.

Oral PI3K-δ,γ Inhibitor for the Management of People with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Narrative Review on Duvelisib

The development of highly effective targeted therapies has led to a new treatment paradigm in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Despite these advances, many patients will eventually require alternative treatment strategies due to the emergence of tolerability issues or resistance to these novel agents. Duvelisib is a first-in-class, potent oral agent with dual inhibitor activity against the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3Kδ and PI3Kγ), which are specific to the hematopoietic system. Dysregulation of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway has been implicated in cancer cell growth, survival and metabolism and has been the subject of cancer drug development in recent years. Duvelisib demonstrated activity in CLL/SLL in early trials, leading to further evaluation in the Phase 3 DUO trial that compared duvelisib against ofatumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. This trial led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of adult patients with CLL/SLL after at least two prior lines of therapy. The major reason for therapy discontinuation is the development of serious adverse events, which include severe infections and diarrhea/colitis, precluding its widespread use. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating duvelisib in combination strategies and with alternate dosing schedules in patients with CLL/SLL. With close monitoring, duvelisib can be a promising drug for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL. This review summarizes the relevant clinical data from recent clinical advances in CLL and aims to interpret the duvelisib trials while exploring strategies to improve its use and adverse event management in the era of novel targeted agents.

Susceptibility of multiple myeloma to B-cell lymphoma 2 family inhibitors

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a biologically complex hematological disorder defined by the clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells producing excessive monoclonal immunoglobulin that interacts with components of the bone marrow microenvironment, resulting in the major clinical features of MM. Despite the development of numerous protocols to treat MM patients, this cancer remains currently incurable; due in part to the emergence of resistant clones, highlighting the unmet need for innovative therapeutic approaches. Accumulating evidence suggests that the survival of MM molecular subgroups depends on the expression profiles of specific subsets of anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma (BCL)-2 family members. This review summarizes the mechanisms underlying the anti-myeloma activities of the potent BCL-2 family protein inhibitors, individually or in combination with conventional therapeutic options, and provides an overview of the strong rationale to clinically investigate such interventions for MM therapy.

Novel Agents in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: New Combination Therapies and Strategies to Overcome Resistance

Simple Summary

Nowadays, many patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are treated with so-called novel agents, including BTK inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors. As CLL is a chronic disease, most patients will relapse on or after treatment with these drugs and various mechanisms behind this resistance to novel agents have been described. In this review, we present the current evidence on resistance to novel agents, discuss approaches to prevent its development and provide guidance on the treatment of patients who have already acquired resistance.

Abstract

The approval of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib and acalabrutinib and the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax have revolutionized the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While these novel agents alone or in combination induce long lasting and deep remissions in most patients with CLL, their use may be associated with the development of clinical resistance. In this review, we elucidate the genetic basis of acquired resistance to BTK and Bcl-2 inhibition and present evidence on resistance mechanisms that are not linked to single genomic alterations affecting these target proteins. Strategies to prevent resistance to novel agents are discussed in this review with a special focus on new combination therapies.

Targeting BCL-2 in Cancer: Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives

Simple Summary

Apoptosis, a programmed form of cell death, represents the main mechanism by which cells die. Such phenomenon is highly regulated by the BCL-2 family of proteins, which includes both pro-apoptotic and pro-survival proteins. The decision whether cells live or die is tightly controlled by a balance between these two classes of proteins. Notably, the pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins are frequently overexpressed in cancer cells dysregulating this balance in favor of survival and also rendering cells more resistant to therapeutic interventions. In this review, we outlined the most important steps in the development of targeting the BCL-2 survival proteins, which laid the ground for the discovery and the development of the selective BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax as a therapeutic drug in hematological malignancies. The limitations and future directions are also discussed.

Abstract

The major form of cell death in normal as well as malignant cells is apoptosis, which is a programmed process highly regulated by the BCL-2 family of proteins. This includes the antiapoptotic proteins (BCL-2, BCL-XL, MCL-1, BCLW, and BFL-1) and the proapoptotic proteins, which can be divided into two groups: the effectors (BAX, BAK, and BOK) and the BH3-only proteins (BIM, BAD, NOXA, PUMA, BID, BIK, HRK). Notably, the BCL-2 antiapoptotic proteins are often overexpressed in malignant cells. While this offers survival advantages to malignant cells and strengthens their drug resistance capacity, it also offers opportunities for novel targeted therapies that selectively kill such cells. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the extensive preclinical and clinical studies targeting BCL-2 proteins with various BCL-2 proteins inhibitors with emphasis on venetoclax as a single agent, as well as in combination with other therapeutic agents. This review also discusses recent advances, challenges focusing on drug resistance, and future perspectives for effective targeting the Bcl-2 family of proteins in cancer.

Apoptotic Blocks in Primary Non-Hodgkin B Cell Lymphomas Identified by BH3 Profiling

Simple Summary

The BCL2 protein is expressed in many non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) as well as associated leukemias, e.g., chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). It functions as a cell survival protein that reduces that ability of a cell to undergo mitochondrial apoptosis. However, the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is mainly effective in CLL, despite the expression of its protein target in NHL. We hypothesized that other mechanisms are inhibiting apoptosis in NHL: defects in pro-apoptotic signaling and/or the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins other than BCL2. Our study makes use of a technique known as BH3 profiling, which is a functional assay that determines the apoptotic competency of cells on primary NHL samples. By determining how cells in NHL avoid apoptosis upon exposure to venetoclax, we can identify patients who may benefit from additional therapies and potentially improve the response of drugs currently undergoing clinical trials for NHL.

Abstract

To determine causes of apoptotic resistance, we analyzed 124 primary B cell NHL samples using BH3 profiling, a technique that measures the mitochondrial permeabilization upon exposure to synthetic BH3 peptides. Our cohort included samples from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), follicular lymphoma (FL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), high-grade B cell lymphoma with translocations in MYC and BCL2 (HGBL-DH), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). While a large number of our samples displayed appropriate responses to apoptosis-inducing peptides, pro-apoptotic functional defects, implicating BAX, BAK, BIM or BID, were seen in 32.4% of high-grade NHLs (12/37) and in 3.4% of low-grade NHLs (3/87, p < 0.0001). The inhibition of single anti-apoptotic proteins induced apoptosis in only a few samples, however, the dual inhibition of BCL2 and MCL1 was effective in 83% of samples, indicating MCL1 was the most common cause of lack of response to the BCL2 inhibitor, venetoclax. We then profiled Toledo and OCI-Ly8 high-grade lymphoma cell lines to determine which drugs could reduce MCL1 expression and potentiate venetoclax responses. Doxorubicin and vincristine decreased levels of MCL1 and increased venetoclax-induced apoptosis (all p < 0.05). Overall, in primary NHLs expressing BCL2 that have no defects in pro-apoptotic signaling, a poor response to venetoclax is primarily due to the presence of MCL1, which may be overcome by combining venetoclax with doxorubicin and vincristine-based chemotherapy or with other anti-microtubule inhibitors.

Venetoclax as a therapeutic option for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the evidence so far

INTRODUCTION

Venetoclax, an oral, BCL-2 inhibitor, is approved by the FDA for treatment of CLL in all lines of therapy. Data from landmark studies, including the CLL14 and MURANO trials, demonstrated marked improvement in clinical outcomes compared to chemoimmunotherapy when venetoclax was used in combination with CD20 monoclonal antibodies for fixed treatment duration.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the mechanism of action of venetoclax and discusses how curtailing the BCL signaling pathway undermines CLL pathophysiology. The authors also give their clinical experience with the drug, with emphasis on assessing and managing the risk of venetoclax-associated tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).

EXPERT OPINION

Venetoclax has positioned itself as one of the primary treatment options for CLL, given the consistent efficacy and deep remissions it has elicited across multiple settings of the disease with a time-limited schedule. Accurate TLS risk evaluation and stringent adherence to the dose-escalation protocols will help optimize patient outcomes. Finally, we expect that current and future studies will (1) ascertain the ideal treatment duration using the minimal residual disease state as a guide and (2) help us understand the optimal role of venetoclax in combination or in sequence with other novel targeted therapies in the treatment of CLL.

Managing chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 2020: an update on recent clinical advances with a focus on BTK and BCL-2 inhibitors

The therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) underwent a paradigm shift in 2014 with the approval of ibrutinib, which binds covalently to the C481 residue of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and irreversibly inhibits it. A number of large, phase 3 trials conducted in both the frontline and the relapsed/refractory settings resulted in the approval of ibrutinib for all CLL. Indeed, the role of chemoimmunotherapy in CLL is fast dwindling. The limitations of ibrutinib, e.g. the development of resistance-conferring C481 BTK mutations and the toxicity issues of atrial fibrillation and bleeding, in particular, have also become apparent with longer-term follow-up. This has spurred the development of second-generation, irreversible inhibitors with greater selectivity for BTK and third-generation, reversible BTK inhibitors to address C481 site mutations. The last 3 years have also witnessed enormous growth in the therapeutic role of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) antagonist venetoclax, initially approved (in 2016) only for patients with relapsed, 17p-deleted CLL. Venetoclax, in combination with CD20 antibodies, is currently approved for both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients, regardless of genomic subtype. Robust results have also been reported for ibrutinib plus venetoclax, and "triple" combinations of a BTK inhibitor, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab are now being pursued. The major questions facing the field at present are how best to select patients for BTK inhibitor monotherapy versus venetoclax/obinutuzumab upfront, what to do after failure of both BTK inhibitor(s) and venetoclax, and the ideal way to integrate measurable residual disease data into decisions regarding treatment choice, duration, and discontinuation.

Immune Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has been first described in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has led to a worldwide pandemic ever since. Initial clinical data imply that cancer patients are particularly at risk for a severe course of SARS-CoV-2. In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), infections are a main contributor to morbidity and mortality driven by an impaired immune system. Treatment initiation is likely to induce immune modulation that further increases the risk for severe infections. This article aims to give an overview on pathogenesis and risk of infectious complications in patients with CLL. In this context, we discuss current data of SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with CLL and how the pandemic impacts their management.

Prognostic and predictive impact of genetic markers in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab and venetoclax

Genetic parameters are established prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy, but are less well studied with novel compounds. We assessed immunoglobulin heavy variable chain (IGHV) mutation status, common genomic aberrations, and gene mutations in 421 untreated patients within the CLL14 trial (NCT02242942), comparing obinutuzumab+chlorambucil (GClb) vs obinutuzumab+venetoclax (VenG). The incidences of genomic aberrations considering the hierarchical model were del(17p) 7%, del(11q) 18%, +12 18%, and del(13q) 35%, whereas IGHV was unmutated in 60% of patients. NOTCH1 mutations were most common (23%), followed by SF3B1 (16%), ATM (13%), and TP53 (10%). Although the overall response rate (ORR) for GClb was lower in patients with del(17p), del(11q), mutated TP53, ATM, and BIRC3, none of these parameters reduced complete remission (CR) rate and ORR with VenG. At a median follow-up of 28 months, del(17p) and mutated TP53 were the only abnormalities with an effect on progression-free survival (PFS) for both treatment groups: GClb (hazard ratio [HR], 4.6 [P < .01]; HR, 2.7 [P < .01], respectively) and VenG (HR, 4.4 [P < .01]; HR, 3.1 [P < .01], respectively). No other factors affected outcome with VenG, whereas for GClb del(11q), BIRC3, NOTCH1, and unmutated IGHV were associated with shorter PFS. Multivariable analysis identified del(17p), del(11q), unmutated IGHV, and mutated TP53, BIRC3, and SF3B1 as independent prognostic factors for PFS with GClb, whereas for VenG, only del(17p) was significant. VenG was superior to GClb across most genetic subgroups. Patients with adverse genetic markers had the strongest benefit from VenG, particularly subjects with unmutated IGHV, which was identified as a predictive factor in a multivariable treatment-interaction analysis.

BTK inhibitor therapy is effective in patients with CLL resistant to venetoclax

Highly active BTK inhibitors (BTKis) and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax have transformed the therapeutic landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Results of prospective clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of venetoclax to salvage patients with disease progression on BTKis, but data on BTKi therapy after disease progression on venetoclax are limited, especially regarding durability of benefit. We retrospectively evaluated the records of 23 consecutive patients with relapsed/refractory CLL who received a BTKi (ibrutinib, n = 21; zanubrutinib, n = 2) after stopping venetoclax because of progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival after BTKi initiation were 34 months (range, <1 to 49) and 42 months (range, 2-49), respectively. Prior remission duration ≥24 months and attainment of complete remission or undetectable measurable residual disease on venetoclax were associated with longer PFS after BTKi salvage (P = .044 and P = .029, respectively). BTKi therapy achieved durable benefit for patients with the BCL2 Gly101Val venetoclax resistance mutation (estimated 24-month PFS, 69%). At a median survivor follow-up of 33 months (range, 2-53), 11 patients remained on BTKi and 12 had stopped therapy because of disease progression (n = 8) or toxicity (n = 4). Our findings indicate that BTKi therapy can provide durable CLL control after disease progression on venetoclax.

Double remission of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and secondary acute myeloid leukemia after venetoclax monotherapy: A case report

RATIONALE

The abnormal expression of B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family members is often associated with the progression of the disease. Bcl-2 inhibitors (eg, venetoclax) were first reported to inhibit the proliferation of malignant lymphocytes and have a significant effect on patients with chronic lymphoblastic leukemia, but research on myeloid tumors is relatively delayed. Venetoclax was approved in 2018 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who were not suitable for high-dose chemotherapy. The approval of venetoclax is an advance in the treatment of hematological tumors.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here we report a 64-year-old male with an increased white blood cell (WBC) count (39.0 × 109/L) and lymphocyte count (30.6 × 109/L) on physical examination in July 2014. The patients were diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) through bone marrow (BM) smears and immunophenotyping without any cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. Chlorambucil was prescribed, WBC was stable between 15 × 109/L and 25 × 109/L in the past 6 years. He came to the hospital again in May 2020 and complained of fatigue for 2 weeks. WBC (16.7 × 109/L) and lymphocyte (14.76 × 109/L) counts were increased, hemoglobin (HGB) and platelet (PLT) were decreased in peripheral blood, which indicated the progression of the disease.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed as secondary AML after CLL based on the clinical and laboratory findings.

INTERVENTIONS

He achieved a morphological complete remission in both AML and CLL without any adverse reactions after one course of venetoclax monotherapy.

OUTCOMES

He received standard daunorubicin and cytarabine combined with venetoclax as consolidation therapy and is now ready for allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

LESSONS

Our case presents a challenge to traditional treatment. New drugs such as venetoclax have shown outstanding effects in this respect. High expression of Bcl-2 can identify the responders of venetoclax. These findings should be validated in future clinical trials. We fully believe that in the near future, the comprehensive use of targeted drugs with different mechanisms will not only improve the quality of life of patients, but also completely change the prognosis of patients with recurrent and refractory hematological malignancies.

Therapeutic Options for Patients with TP53 Deficient Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Narrative Review

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which is the most common type of leukemia in western countries in adults, is characterized by heterogeneity in clinical course, prognosis and response to the treatment. Although, in recent years a number of factors with probable prognostic value in CLL have been identified (eg NOTCH1, SF3B1 and BIRC-3 mutations, or evaluation of microRNA expression), TP53 aberrations are still the most important single factors of poor prognosis. It was found that approximately 30% of all TP53 defects are mutations lacking 17p13 deletion, whereas sole 17p13 deletion with the absence of TP53 mutation consists of 10% of all TP53 defects. The detection of del(17)(p13) and/or TP53 mutation is not a criterion itself for starting antileukemic therapy, but it is associated with an aggressive course of the disease and poor response to the standard chemoimmunotherapy. Treatment of patients with CLL harbouring TP53-deficiency requires drugs that promote cell death independently of TP53. Novel and smarter therapies revolutionize the treatment of del(17p) and/or aberrant TP53 CLL, but development of alternative therapeutic approaches still remains an issue of critical importance.

Advanced Practice Perspectives on Preventing and Managing Tumor Lysis Syndrome and Neutropenia in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and neutropenia are significant toxicities in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Both TLS and neutropenia can lead to potentially life-threatening complications for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia undergoing antineoplastic therapy. This article focuses on diligent risk assessment, prophylaxis, early identification, monitoring, patient education, and prompt intervention for TLS and neutropenia. These are all necessary steps to reduce life-threatening complications. Guidelines are available for risk assessments for both TLS and neutropenia. Once risk is established, prophylaxis and monitoring recommendations can be found in available guidelines. There are no established guidelines or widely used decision-making standards for the treatment of clinical TLS. General management strategies are well documented in the literature, with some degree of customization to each individual patient. If fever occurs in the setting of neutropenia, there are well-established guidelines for management, including guidance on anti-infective agents and use of growth factors. In addition, awareness and proper actions regarding TLS and neutropenia are key to preventing treatment delays, dose reductions, or treatment discontinuation. Adequate planning for TLS and neutropenia is critical to optimize patient outcomes.

Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial

Effective treatment options are limited for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. Adults age ≥18 years with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled in this international phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients (N = 211) were randomized 2:1 to venetoclax (n = 143) or placebo (n = 68) in 28-day cycles, plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) on days 1 to 10. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included response rate, transfusion independence, and event-free survival. Median age was 76 years (range, 36-93 years), 38% had secondary AML, and 20% had received prior hypomethylating agent treatment. Planned primary analysis showed a 25% reduction in risk of death with venetoclax plus LDAC vs LDAC alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.07; P = .11), although not statistically significant; median OS was 7.2 vs 4.1 months, respectively. Unplanned analysis with additional 6-month follow-up demonstrated median OS of 8.4 months for the venetoclax arm (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98; P = .04). Complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery rates were 48% and 13% for venetoclax plus LDAC and LDAC alone, respectively. Key grade ≥3 adverse events (venetoclax vs LDAC alone) were febrile neutropenia (32% vs 29%), neutropenia (47% vs 16%), and thrombocytopenia (45% vs 37%). Venetoclax plus LDAC demonstrates clinically meaningful improvement in remission rate and OS vs LDAC alone, with a manageable safety profile. Results confirm venetoclax plus LDAC as an important frontline treatment for AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03069352.

Integrated Mechanistic Model of Minimal Residual Disease Kinetics With Venetoclax Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important emerging clinical end point in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The objective of this research was to develop an integrated mechanistic model to evaluate the impact of venetoclax-rituximab combination therapy on MRD kinetics. Using data from 435 patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, an integrated model was developed and validated that accounted for venetoclax dosing and pharmacokinetics, rituximab treatment, absolute lymphocyte count, and blood and bone marrow (BM) MRD data. Simulations of venetoclax-rituximab (six cycles) combination predicted the proportion (90% confidence interval) of patients with BM MRD below 10-4 to be 57% (54-61%) and 63% (59-67%) at 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. Continued venetoclax treatment to 48 months only increased the predicted rate of negative BM MRD to 66% (63-70%). These results indicate that treatment with venetoclax-rituximab combination for a finite 2-year period would nearly maximize the rate of negative BM MRD (< 10-4 ). Preliminary clinical data agree with these predictions and more long-term follow-up data are awaited to confirm the same.

Bendamustine, followed by ofatumumab and ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL2-BIO): primary endpoint analysis of a multicenter, open-label phase-II trial

The introduction of targeted agents has revolutionized the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia but only few patients achieve a complete remission and minimal residual disease negativity with ibrutinib monotherapy. This multicenter, investigator-initiated, phase II study is evaluating sequential treatment with two cycles of bendamustine debulking for patients with a higher tumor load, followed by ofatumumab and ibrutinib induction and maintenance treatment. An all-comer population, irrespective of prior treatment, physical fitness and genetic factors, was included. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed overall response rate at the end of induction treatment. Of 66 patients enrolled, one patient with early treatment discontinuation was excluded from the efficacy analysis as predefined by the protocol. Thirty-nine patients (60%) were treatment-naïve and 26 patients (40%) had relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 21 patients (32%) had a del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation and 45 patients (69%) had unmutated IGHV status. At the end of the induction, 60 of 65 patients (92%) responded and nine (14%) achieved minimal residual disease negativity (<10^-4) in peripheral blood. No unexpected or cumulative toxicities occurred. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, according to the Common Toxicity Criteria, were neutropenia, anemia, infusion-related reactions, and diarrhea. This sequential treatment of bendamustine debulking, followed by ofatumumab and ibrutinib was well tolerated without unexpected safety signals and showed a good efficacy with an overall response rate of 92%. Ongoing maintenance treatment aims at deeper responses with minimal residual disease negativity. However, ibrutinib should still be used as a single agent outside clinical trials. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02689141.

Real-world outcomes following venetoclax therapy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or Richter syndrome: a FILO study of the French compassionate use cohort

The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is transforming the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), given its high efficacy in relapsed/refractory CLL as observed in both early-phase and randomized clinical trials. The present study aimed to determine whether venetoclax is effective and well tolerated in patients with CLL or Richter's syndrome (RS) in a real-world setting and to highlight factors impacting survival. Data from a venetoclax French compassionate use program were collected for 67 patients (60 with CLL and 7 with RS). Most patients presented adverse genetic features, such as TP53 disruption (74%) or complex karyotype (58%). Tumor lysis syndrome was observed in 14 (22%) patients, and 16 (24%) patients were hospitalized for grade III/IV infection. In the CLL cohort, ORR was 75 %, 1-year PFS was 61% (95% CI = 47-72%) and 1-year OS 70% (95% CI = 56-80%). No impact of TP53 disruption was noted while complex karyotype was identified as a predictor of both inferior PFS (HR = 3.46; 95% CI = 1-12; log-rank p = 0.03) and OS (HR = 3.2; 95% CI = 0.9-11.4, log-rank p = 0.047). Among the seven patients with RS, two achieved an objective response to venetoclax; however, the median OS was only 1.1 month. The well-balanced safety/efficacy profile of venetoclax is confirmed in this real-world setting. Complex karyotype should be evaluated as a predictive factor of survival for patients treated by venetoclax.

Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia with Concomitant Extensive Chronic Graft versus Host Disease after Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Successfully Treated with Oral Venetoclax

A middle-aged gentleman who was diagnosed with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), Rai stage IV, Binet C with del(17p) and del(13q) underwent allogeneic haematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical sister. The patient developed extensive skin, oral, and liver chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) required tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone. At seventh month after allo-HSCT, the patient presented with systemic symptoms, right cervical lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, marked pancytopaenia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Bone marrow study, immunophenotyping (IP), chromosome analysis, and PET-CT scan confirmed relapsed CLL with no evidence of Richter's transformation or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Withdrawal of immunosuppressant (IS) worsened cutaneous and liver GVHD. Chemotherapy was not a suitable treatment option in view of immunodeficiency. The patient underwent extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) therapy eventually for extensive chronic GVHD, and the IS were gradually tapered to the minimal effective dose. The relapsed CLL was treated successfully with oral venetoclax accessible via a compassionate drug program. This case highlights challenges in managing relapsed CLL and loss of graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effect despite extensive chronic GVHD. Venetoclax is an effective and well-tolerated oral novel agent for relapsed CLL after allo-HSCT.

Development of molecular intervention strategies for B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

There are many genetic mutations involved in B-cell lymphomagenesis. These mutations contribute to the prognosis of B-cell lymphomas and can be used for and targeted for intervention.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of targeted gene therapies for B-cell lymphoma that were newly approved or are under clinical development. These include, TP53 mutations and related pathways, such as BTK inhibitors, MDM2/4 inhibitors, and XPO1 inhibitors; new drugs targeting EZH2 mutations through competitive inhibition, such as tazemetostat and GSK126; BCL-2-targeted therapeutics, including venetoclax and ABT-263; BTK, IRAK 1/4, HCK, and myddosome complex that targets the MYD88 mutation and the related pathways. In addition, we have also discussed gene mutations that have been reported as potential therapeutic targets, such as TNFAIP3, CARD11.

EXPERT OPINION

The mechanisms underlying the role of several genetic mutations in lymphomagenesis have been reported, and several studies have designed and developed drugs targeting these mutations. Many of these drugs have been approved for clinical use, while several are still under clinical development. Recent studies have identified additional genetic mutations and gene targets for BCL-2 treatment; however, effective molecular interventions targeting these new targets are yet to be developed.

Impact of Oral Targeted Therapy on the Economic Burden of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Canada

Background: Continuous oral targeted therapy (OTT) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) represents an effective therapy but also a major economic burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to estimate future direct costs, along with the prevalence, of CLL in the era of continuous OTT in Canada. Methods: The economic burden of OTT was modelled and compared to chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), for CLL treatment. The burden was assessed/projected from 2011 to 2025. For the OTT scenario, CIT was considered the standard of care before 2015, while OTT was considered standard of care for patients with either unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable (IGHV) or del(17p)/TP53 mutations starting in 2015 and, from 2020 onwards, for all first-line treatments except for patients with mutated IGHV. A Markov model was developed including four health states: watchful-waiting, first-line treatment, relapse and death. Costs of therapy, follow-up/monitoring and adverse events were included. Key clinical parameters were extracted from pivotal clinical trials. Results: As incidence rates and rate of survival are increasing, the prevalence of CLL in Canada is projected to increase 1.8-fold, from 8301 patients in 2011 to 14,654 by 2025. Correspondingly, the total annual costs of CLL management are predicted to increase 15.7-fold, from $60.8 million to $957.5 million during that same period. Conclusions: Although OTT enhances survival for patients with CLL, it is nonetheless associated with an important economic burden due to the projected vast increase in costs from 2011 to 2025. Changes in clinical strategies, such as implementation of a fixed OTT treatment duration, could help alleviate financial burden.