Oxidation phenotype--a major determinant of metoprolol metabolism and response

Metoprolol oxidation by rat liver microsomes. Inhibition by debrisoquine and other drugs

The oxidative metabolism of metoprolol has been shown to display genetic polymorphism of the debrisoquine-type. The use of in vitro inhibition studies has been proposed as a means of defining whether one or more forms of cytochrome P-450 are involved in the monogenically-controlled metabolism of two substrates. We have, therefore, tested the ability of debrisoquine and other substrates to inhibit the oxidation of metoprolol by rat liver microsomes. Debrisoquine and guanoxan were potent competitive inhibitors of the alpha-hydroxylation and O-desmethylation of metoprolol as well as its metabolism by all routes (measured by substrate disappearance). Cimetidine and ranitidine, drugs which are known to impair the clearance of metoprolol in man, showed an inhibitory action comparable to that of debrisoquine in rat liver microsomes. Antipyrine, a compound whose metabolism is not impaired in poor metabolisers of debrisoquine, was found to be only a weak inhibitor of the metabolism of metoprolol. These findings suggest that the oxidation of metoprolol is linked closely to that of debrisoquine, cimetidine and ranitidine but not to that of antipyrine in the rat.

Sparteine oxidation is practically abolished in quinidine-treated patients

In eight patients a sparteine-test was carried out immediately before and after 1 week of treatment with quinidine 600-800 mg day-1. Before treatment one patient was classified as a poor metaboliser (metabolic ratio: greater than or equal to 20), and seven patients as extensive metabolisers. During quinidine treatment, the formation of sparteine metabolites (2- and 5-dehydrosparteine) was practically abolished. Patients initially classified as extensive metabolisers thus exhibited the phenotype of poor metabolisers during quinidine treatment.

A simple borohydride/GC method for measuring sparteine metabolites in man

A simple borohydride/GC method was developed for phenotyping sparteine oxidation in man. The major metabolites of sparteine found in human urine, 2- and 5-dehydrosparteine, were converted quantitatively back to sparteine by sodium borohydride reduction. The amount of sparteine metabolites can be estimated from the difference of sparteine concentrations between the borohydride-treated and untreated urine samples. The coefficient of variation of this assay was estimated from repeated analyses to be +/- 3% within a day (intra-assay) and +/- 8% between days (inter-assay).

Debrisoquine polymorphism and the metabolism and action of metoprolol, timolol, propranolol and atenolol

The contribution of debrisoquine polymorphism to the metabolism and action of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) varies widely between drugs. Oxidation phenotype is a major determinant of the metabolism, pharmacokinetics and some of the pharmacological actions of metoprolol, bufuralol and timolol. The poor metabolizer phenotype is associated with an increased area under the plasma drug concentration vs. time curve, a prolongation of elimination half-life and a more intense and sustained beta-blockade. The stereoselective metabolism of metoprolol also displays phenotypic differences, which should be taken into account when interpreting plasma concentration vs. response relationships. Studies in vivo and in vitro have identified some of the metabolic pathways which are subject to this defect, namely the alpha-hydroxylation and the O-demethylation of metoprolol and the 1'-hydroxylation of bufuralol. In contrast, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol, which is also extensively oxidized, are not related to debrisoquine polymorphism, although 4'-hydroxypropranolol formation is deficient in the poor metabolizer phenotype. The disposition of atenolol, which is almost completely eliminated unchanged by renal and faecal excretion, is independent of oxidation phenotype. If standard doses of some beta-blockers are used in poor metabolizers, these patients may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require lower and less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris.

The genetic polymorphism of sparteine metabolism

The formation of the two major metabolites of the antiarrhythmic and oxytocic drug sparteine (2- and 5-dehydrosparteine) exhibits a genetic polymorphism. Two phenotypes, extensive (EM) and poor metabolizers (PM) are observed in the population. The frequency of the PM phenotype in various populations (Caucasian and Japanese) ranges from 2.3 to 9%. The metabolism of sparteine is determined by two allelic genes at a single gene locus. PM subjects are homozygous for an autosomal recessive gene. The metabolism of sparteine is predominantly under genetic control as treatment with drugs such as antipyrine and rifampicin known to induce oxidative drug metabolism elicited only marginal changes in sparteine metabolism. The formation of 2-dehydrosparteine in human liver microsomes from EM and PM subjects showed a more than 40-fold difference in Km between EM and PM subjects. However, Vmax-values were almost identical in both groups. These data indicate that the basis of the differences in oxidative capacity between EM and PM subjects is more likely to be due to a variant isozyme with defective catalytic properties than to a decreased amount of the isozyme.

Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders

During the intervening years since metoprolol was first reviewed in the Journal (1977), it has become widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina pectoris. Although much data have accumulated, its precise mechanisms of action in these diseases remain largely uncertain. Optimum treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris with metoprolol is achieved through dose titration within the therapeutic range. It has been clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is at least as effective as other beta-blockers, diuretics and certain calcium antagonists in the majority of patients. Although a twice daily dosage regimen is normally used, satisfactory control can be maintained in many patients with single daily doses of conventional or, more frequently, slow release formulations. Addition of a diuretic may improve the overall response rate in hypertension. Several controlled trials have studied the effects of metoprolol administered during the acute phase and after myocardial infarction. In early intervention trials a reduction in total mortality was achieved in one moderately large trial of prolonged treatment, but in another, which excluded patients already being treated with beta-blockers or certain calcium antagonists and where treatment was only short term, mortality was significantly reduced only in 'high risk' patients. Overall results with metoprolol have not demonstrated that early intervention treatment in all patients produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality. Thus, the use of metoprolol during the early stages of myocardial infarction is controversial, largely because of the requirement to treat all patients to save a small number at 'high risk'. This blanket coverage approach to treatment may be more justified during the post-infarction follow-up phase since it has been shown that metoprolol slightly, but significantly, reduces the mortality rate for periods of up to 3 years. Metoprolol is generally well tolerated and its beta 1-selectivity may facilitate its administration to certain patients (e.g. asthmatics and diabetics) in whom non-selective beta-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary fatigue, dizziness and headache are among the most frequently reported side effects. After a decade of use, metoprolol is well established as a first choice drug in mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina, and is beneficial in post-infarction patients. Further study is needed in less well established areas of treatment such as cardiac arrhythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive cardiomegaly.

Differential effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on imipramine demethylation and desmethylimipramine hydroxylation by human liver microsomes

The effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on the demethylation of imipramine (IMI) and on the hydroxylation of desmethylimipramine (DMI) was studied in microsomes from four human livers. Cimetidine inhibited both demethylation of IMI and 2-hydroxylation of DMI, whilst the effect of ranitidine was not statistically significant. 2-hydroxylation of DMI is probably mediated by debrisoquine hydroxylase, a cytochrome P-450 isozyme that is monogenically controlled. The results suggest that cimetidine inhibits this enzyme.

The polymorphic oxidation of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations

Wide variability in response to some drugs such as debrisoquine can be attributed largely to genetic polymorphism of their oxidative metabolism. Most beta-blockers undergo extensive oxidation. Anecdotal reports of high plasma concentrations of certain beta-blockers in poor metabolisers (PMs) of debrisoquine have claimed that the oxidation of these drugs is under polymorphic control. Subsequently, controlled studies have shown that debrisoquine oxidation phenotype is a major determinant of the metabolism, pharmacokinetics and some of the pharmacological actions of metoprolol, bufuralol, timolol and bopindolol. The poor metaboliser phenotype is associated with increased plasma drug concentrations, a prolongation of elimination half-life and more intense and sustained beta-blockade. Phenotypic differences have also been observed in the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of metoprolol and bufuralol. In vivo and in vitro studies have identified some of the metabolic pathways which are subject to the defect, viz. alpha-hydroxylation and O-demethylation of metoprolol and 1'- and possibly 4- and 6-hydroxylation of bufuralol. In contrast, the overall pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol, which is also extensively oxidised, are not related to debrisoquine polymorphism, although 4'-hydroxypropranolol formation is lower in poor metabolisers. As anticipated, the disposition of atenolol which is eliminated predominantly unchanged by the kidney and in the faeces, is unrelated to debrisoquine phenotype. The clinical significance of impaired elimination of beta-blockers is not clear. If standard doses of beta-blockers are used in poor metabolisers, these subjects may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris.

Metoprolol metabolism and debrisoquine oxidation polymorphism--population and family studies

The metabolism of metoprolol was studied in 143 unselected hypertensive patients and in 10 families. The log10 metoprolol to alpha-hydroxymetoprolol urinary ratio was bimodally distributed and was correlated with the debrisoquine oxidation phenotype (rs = 0.81, P less than 0.001). The results of the pedigree study were compatible with poor hydroxylation of metoprolol being inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. The major urinary metabolite of metoprolol metabolism was H117-04, the end-product of O-dealkylation. The distribution of the log10 metoprolol to H117-04 (M/H117-04) urinary ratio was unimodal. However, there was a significant correlation between this ratio and the debrisoquine oxidation phenotype (rs = 0.68, P less than 0.001) and poor metabolisers of debrisoquine (PMs) were concentrated at the upper end of the range of M/H117-04 values. These results indicate that both the alpha-hydroxylation and O-dealkylation of metoprolol are under polymorphic control of the debrisoquine type. Plasma concentrations of metoprolol were about three times higher in PMs than in extensive metabolisers of debrisoquine (EMs) at 3 h after dosing. In a sub-group of 24 subjects, all seven PMs but only two EMs showed more than a 10% reduction in post-exercise heart rate at 24 h after dosing.

Ecogenetics of Parkinson's disease: 4-hydroxylation of debrisoquine

It is postulated that Parkinson's disease is the result of environmental factors acting on genetically susceptible individuals against a background of normal ageing. Many potentially neurotoxic xenobiotics are detoxified by hepatic cytochrome P450. The function of one such system was studied in forty patients with Parkinson's disease and forty normal control subjects. Significantly more parkinsonian than control subjects had partially or totally defective 4-hydroxylation of debrisoquine. Poor metabolisers of debrisoquine tended to have had earlier onset of disease.

Comparison of two slow-release formulations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients

We have compared the beta-adrenoceptor blocking and antihypertensive effects of chronic once daily treatment with conventional metoprolol 200 mg, two 'long-acting' formulations of metoprolol 200 mg and atenolol 100 mg in a cross-over study in 12 hypertensive patients concurrently receiving diuretic therapy. The peak effects of all compounds were similar, with significant reductions in exercise heart rate and blood pressure. Twenty-four hours after dosing only atenolol treatment was consistently associated with a reduction in both exercise heart rate (P less than 0.001) and blood pressure (P less than 0.02) when compared with placebo. Once daily treatment of hypertension with metoprolol, even in 'long-acting' formulations, cannot be recommended because of waning antihypertensive effect which would be missed at routine clinic attendance. Metoprolol should be prescribed twice daily in hypertension. So-called long-acting formulations do not always confer benefits over conventional dose forms.

The genetic control of phenformin 4-hydroxylation

Previously published results of phenformin 4-hydroxylation in 195 unrelated white British volunteers and 87 family members of 27 randomly selected probands have been subjected to genetic analysis. The results clearly show that about 9% of this population has a genetically determined defect in carrying out this oxidation reaction. The character for the defect is inherited in a Mendelian autosomal recessive fashion. The polymorphism shows a substantial degree of dominance.

Inhibition of desmethylimipramine 2-hydroxylation by drugs in human liver microsomes

The 2-hydroxylation of desmethylimipramine (DMI) correlates strongly with the 4-hydroxylation of debrisoquine (D) both in human volunteers and in vitro comparing human liver microsomes from different individuals. D competitively inhibits the 2-hydroxylation of DMI in vitro suggesting that DMI is hydroxylated by the 'debrisoquine hydroxylase' which is under monogenic control in man. We have characterized the effect of drugs on the hydroxylation of DMI in human liver microsomes by measuring the formation of 2-OH-DMI with HPLC using fluorescence detection. Amitriptyline, nortriptyline and metoprolol inhibited the hydroxylation of DMI competitively indicating interaction with the catalytical site for DMI 2-hydroxylation. Antipyrine and amylobarbitone at concentrations similar to their Km-values for metabolism did not inhibit DMI-hydroxylation. Thus, for these compounds there was a good correspondence between the drugs' capacity to inhibit DMI 2-hydroxylation competitively in vitro and their apparent metabolism by the 'debrisoquine hydroxylase' in vivo in man. Thioridazine, chlorpromazine, quinidine and quinine also inhibited DMI-hydroxylation competitively. Thioridazine was an unusually potent inhibitor (apparent inhibition constant Ki = 0.75 microM). Quinidine was also an unusually potent inhibitor (Ki = 0.27 microM) and much more efficient than its isomer quinine (Ki = 12 microM). Theophylline could inhibit DMI hydroxylation but with atypical kinetics. We suggest that this simple DMI in vitro test as well as earlier described inhibition tests with debrisoquine, sparteine and bufuralol can be used to screen if drugs interact with the 'debrisoquine hydroxylase' in human liver.

Genetically determined variability in acetylation and oxidation. Therapeutic implications

The clinical significance of two separate genetic polymorphisms which alter drug metabolism, acetylation and oxidation is discussed, and methods of phenotyping for both acetylator and polymorphic oxidation status are reviewed. Particular reference is made to the dapsone method, which provides a simple means of distinguishing fast and slow - and possibly intermediate - acetylators, and to the sparteine method which allows a clear separation of oxidation phenotypes. Although acetylation polymorphism has been known for some time, definite indications for phenotyping are few. It is doubtful whether acetylator phenotype makes a significant difference to the outcome in most isoniazid treatment regimens, and peripheral neuropathy from isoniazid in slow acetylators is easily overcome by pyridoxine administration. However, in comparison with rapid acetylators, slow acetylators receiving isoniazid have an increased susceptibility to phenytoin toxicity, and perhaps also to carbamazepine toxicity. It is also possible that rapid acetylators receiving isoniazid attain higher serum fluoride concentrations from enflurane and similar anaesthetics than do similarly treated slow acetylators. Thus, when drug interactions of these types are suspected, phenotyping for acetylator status may be advisable. If routine monitoring of serum procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide concentrations is practised, phenotyping of subjects prior to therapy with these agents should not be necessary. Although acetylator phenotype influences serum concentrations of hydralazine, when this drug is given in combination with other drugs acetylator phenotype has not been shown to influence the therapeutic response. Slow acetylator phenotype along with female gender and the presence of HLA-DR antigens appear to be risk factors in the development of hydralazine-induced systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Determination of acetylator phenotype may therefore help determine susceptibility to this adverse reaction. In the case of sulphasalazine, adult slow acetylators require a lower daily dose of the drug than fast acetylators in order to maintain ulcerative colitis in remission without significant side effects. It is therefore advisable to determine acetylator phenotype prior to sulphasalazine therapy. Work on the association of acetylation polymorphism with various disease states is also reviewed. It is possible that a higher incidence of bladder cancer is associated with slow acetylation phenotype - especially in individuals exposed to high levels of arylamines. The question as to whether idiopathic SLE is more common in slow acetylators remains unresolved. There appears to be no difference between fa

Oxidation phenotype and the metabolism and action of beta-blockers

Variability in response to some drugs such as debrisoquine can be attributed to genetic polymorphism of their oxidative metabolism. Most beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) are extensively metabolised via oxidative routes. Anecdotal reports of high plasma concentrations of certain beta-blockers in poor metabolisers of debrisoquine (PM) have claimed that their oxidation is under polymorphic control. Controlled studies have shown that debrisoquine oxidation phenotype is a major determinant of the metabolism, pharmacokinetics and some of the pharmacological actions of metoprolol, bufuralol and timolol. The PM phenotype is associated with an increased drug bioavailability, a prolongation of elimination half-life and more intense and sustained beta-blockade. Phenotypic differences were also noted in the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of metoprolol. In vivo and in vitro work has identified some of the metabolic pathways which are subject to the defect, namely, the alpha-hydroxylation and the O-dealkylation of metoprolol and the 1'-hydroxylation of bufuralol. In contrast, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol which is also extensively oxidised, are not related to debrisoquine polymorphism, although 4'-hydroxypropranolol formation is lowered in PM subjects. The clinical significance of impaired elimination of beta-blockers is unclear. If standard doses of beta-blockers are used in PM subjects, they may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require lower and less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris.

Timolol and atenolol: relationships between oxidation phenotype, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of atenolol and timolol were studied in six extensive and four poor metabolisers of debrisoquine. There was a significant correlation between the debrisoquine to 4-hydroxydebrisoquine ratio and the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) for timolol (rs = 0.75, P less than 0.02). The mean of the AUC values for timolol was significantly greater in the poor metabolisers than in the extensive metabolisers (P less than 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the debrisoquine to 4-hydroxydebrisoquine ratio and beta-adrenoceptor blockade 24 h after dosing with timolol (rs = 0.66, P less than 0.05). The mean degree of beta-adrenoceptor blockade was significantly greater in the poor metabolisers than in the extensive metabolisers 24 h after dosing with timolol (P less than 0.01). There was no relation between the debrisoquine to 4-hydroxydebrisoquine ratio and the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of atenolol.

Effect of oxidative polymorphism (debrisoquine/sparteine type) on hepatic first-pass metabolism of bufuralol

Bufuralol is a beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug whose oxidative metabolism is under the same genetic control as debrisoquine and sparteine. The pharmacokinetics of bufuralol were studied in 10 healthy subjects (7 extensive and 3 poor metabolizers of debrisoquine) after oral and intravenous administration. In extensive metabolizers the systemic availability of bufuralol was 43%. Poor metabolizers were characterized by a considerable increase in systemic availability due to a corresponding decrease in hepatic first-pass metabolism. After oral administration of bufuralol non-linear kinetics may occur.

Polymorphic metabolism of metoprolol: clinical studies

After a single 200 mg oral dose of metoprolol tartrate the mean metoprolol AUC was found to be six-fold higher in poor metabolizers (PMs) of debrisoquine than in extensive metabolizers (EMs). This was associated with impaired metabolic clearance via alpha-hydroxylation and O-dealkylation. A population study (n = 143) has shown a bimodal distribution in the ratio of metoprolol: alpha-hydroxymetoprolol recovered in urine which was correlated highly with the debrisoquine metabolic ratio. Nine per cent of the population were PMs. Plasma metoprolol concentrations three hours after a 100 mg oral dose of metoprolol were greater than 200 ng/ml in PMs but were lower than this in most EMs. This dose of metoprolol given once daily provided a clinically significant reduction (16%) in exercise heart rate in PMs after 24 hours. EMs require conventional doses (100 mg b.d.) to achieve the same degree of beta-blockade. Preliminary data from family studies support the view that the defect in metoprolol oxidation is inherited. In 12 hypertensive patients who were EMs we compared the beta-blocking activity and antihypertensive effect of chronic treatment with metoprolol 200 mg once daily (conventional and long-acting formulations), with those of atenolol 100 mg once daily and placebo. The effects of all active preparations were similar at 3.5 hours but atenolol was superior to all metoprolol formulations at 24 hours after dosing. It is concluded that for the majority of patients metoprolol should be prescribed twice daily when using currently available dosage forms. Relationships between oxidation phenotype and side-effects should be examined.

Polymorphic metabolism of the beta-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs and its clinical relevance

Although beta-blockers are structurally closely related, there are marked differences in the extent of metabolism, related mainly to relative lipophilicity. Lipophilic beta-blockers are metabolized by C-oxidative pathways and glucuronidation. Metabolism of lipophilic beta-blockers is important in determining pharmacokinetics, formation of active metabolites, stereoselectivity and isomer preference, and interphenotypic variation. The oxidative clearance of metoprolol, timolol and bufuralol is regulated/influenced by the debrisoquine hydroxylation gene locus. The metabolism of these lipophilic beta-blockers thus exhibits polymorphic characteristics, there being significant interphenotype differences in pharmacokinetics (bioavailability, peak plasma level, plasma terminal t1/2) between the poor and extensive metabolizers of debrisoquine. There are similar interphenotype differences in beta-blocker pharmacodynamics in terms of beta-blockade. A number of adverse effects of lipophilic beta-blockers have been hypothesized to predominate in the poor metabolizer phenotype including unacceptable bradycardia, loss of cardioselectivity, greater CNS side-effects, and interactions with drugs metabolized by the same polymorphic systems. However, objective evidence for this is lacking.

Investigation of drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract of man. III. Metoprolol in the colon

The colonic absorption of metoprolol was indirectly evaluated by measuring drug appearance in plasma following intravenous, jejunal or colonic infusion in six healthy volunteers. Plasma concentrations of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol and urinary excretion of the main metabolites were also measured. Plasma profiles of metoprolol after colonic and jejunal perfusion were similar, and the relative bioavailabilities of the drug from these two regions of the gut were not significantly different. The concentrations of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol, the major metabolite in plasma, were similar after jejunal and colonic perfusion, but higher than those observed after intravenous administration. The percentage of the dose recovered in urine over 24 h as two metabolites was not significantly influenced by the route of administration.

Interactions and non-interactions with ranitidine

At present, there are two H2-receptor antagonists available for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease - cimetidine and ranitidine. Cimetidine is well known to interact with a number of concurrently administered drugs. Like cimetidine, ranitidine binds to cytochrome P-450 in the liver where it appears to exert an inhibitory effect, but to a lesser extent than cimetidine. Both H2-receptor antagonists may also reduce hepatic blood flow. Several drugs which are known to interact with cimetidine have been found not to interact significantly with ranitidine, including propranolol, lignocaine, phenytoin and diazepam. However, significant pharmacokinetic interactions between ranitidine and several other drugs have been established. These interactions may be attributed variously to an effect of ranitidine on hepatic metabolism or to an effect on the absorption of concomitantly administered drugs. For example, the bioavailability of midazolam is significantly increased due to the influence of ranitidine on gastric pH and thus on absorption of midazolam, leading to an increased soporific effect of this benzodiazepine; an effect of ranitidine on oxidative liver metabolism also appears to be a contributory factor in this interaction. Conversely, ranitidine distinctly reduced protein-bound cobalamin absorption from a mean of 7.66% prior to ranitidine administration to 0.84% during treatment with ranitidine 300 mg daily. A significant pharmacokinetic interaction has also been demonstrated between ranitidine and procainamide: the AUC of procainamide increased and the renal clearance fell significantly from a mean of 378 to 309 ml/min with ranitidine co-administration. However, this interaction is due to a different mechanism. In this case, ranitidine appears to compete with procainamide for the common renal proximal tubular secretion site. The reported interactions of ranitidine with warfarin, metoprolol, nifedipine, theophylline and fentanyl appear to be due to inhibition of cytochrome P-450. In a clinical study, warfarin clearance was significantly reduced from 66.7 to 48.7 ml/min by ranitidine, and by cimetidine to 42.9 ml/min. Similarly, the elimination half-lives of metoprolol and nifedipine were distinctly prolonged and the AUCs significantly increased by ranitidine. However, the latter pharmacokinetic interactions appear unlikely to be of clinical significance since the clinical effects of metoprolol and nifedipine were unaffected by ranitidine treatment. In therapeutic concentrations, ranitidine inhibited the disappearance of fentanyl from an in vitro microsomal preparation, indicating that it inhibits microsomal drug metabolism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

High affinity of quinidine for a stereoselective microsomal binding site as determined by a radioreceptor assay

The techniques of the radioreceptor binding assay were applied to detect stereoselective binding of quinidine and quinine to a site on human liver microsomes. Binding of 3H-dihydroquinidine was 50% inhibited by 20-100 nM quinidine, while its enantiomer quinine did not displace the 3H-ligand at concentrations up to 500 nM. This stereoselectivity agreed with the affinity values measured by functional enzyme assays of cytochrome P450 activity using sparteine or debrisoquine as substrates.

Simultaneous determination of metoprolol and metabolites in urine by capillary column gas chromatography as oxazolidineone and trimethylsilyl derivatives

A method for the determination of metoprolol and its main metabolites in urine is presented. The method comprises derivatization of the aminopropanol side-chain with phosgene at alkaline pH and isolation in an organic phase at acidic pH. After trimethylsilylation, separation and quantification are performed by capillary column gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. The reaction is performed at pH 12 with 60 microliters of 2 M phosgene in toluene added in three portions. Diethyl ether--dichloromethane is used as extraction medium and bis(trimethylsilyl) acetamide as silylating agent. With spiked samples linear standard curves were obtained for metoprolol and three of its main metabolites with a detection limit varying between 4 and 20 mumol/l of urine. The method was applied to urine samples from a normal individual who had taken 292 mumol of metoprolol as tartrate.

The relationship between debrisoquine oxidation phenotype and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol (80 mg by mouth) were studied in seven extensive and four poor metabolisers of debrisoquine. Evidence for impairment of the 4'-hydroxylation of propranolol was found in poor metabolisers. However, no significant difference was detected in the oral clearance of unchanged drug between the two groups of debrisoquine oxidation phenotypes. Poor metabolisers of debrisoquine did not experience more intense or more prolonged beta-adrenoceptor blockade than extensive metabolisers of debrisoquine.

Polymorphic metabolism of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists

Most beta-adrenoceptor blockers undergo extensive oxidative metabolism. The evidence for polymorphism of the debrisoquine type is reviewed. The AUC and half-life of metoprolol were considerably greater in poor metabolisers (PM) of debrisoquine than in extensive metabolisers (EM). Metoprolol alpha-hydroxylation is impaired and O-dealkylation must also be affected. Polymorphism in the former route has been demonstrated in a population of 143 patients to be directly related to debrisoquine phenotype. Bufuralol AUC and half-life are much higher in PM than EM subjects. Hydroxylation at the 1 and 4 positions are affected. Genetic polymorphism for 1-hydroxylation has been shown in family and population studies. Propranolol 4-hydroxylation is defective in PM subjects of debrisoquine but propranolol AUC is not related to phenotype, presumably because other major pathways are unaffected. Oxidation phenotype correlates well with intensity and duration of beta-adrenoceptor blockade after metoprolol, PM subjects requiring only once-daily dosing. However, in EM subjects twice-daily dosing is required even if slow release preparations are used, since plasma metoprolol concentrations may remain negligible 24 h after dosing. The beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects of propranolol and bufuralol are unlikely to be influenced by oxidation status. Anecdotal reports of toxicity arising in PM subjects taking metoprolol or propranolol need to be substantiated. However, vomiting after the administration of bufuralol often occurs in poor metabolisers. Metabolic interactions with drugs sharing the same enzyme system are discussed. Debrisoquine and bufuralol competitively inhibit each other's metabolism in vitro. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Species differences in oxidative drug metabolism: some basic considerations

Perhaps one of the single most important developments in the past 20 years in the understanding of chemical toxicity has been the realisation of the importance of metabolic transformation in this process. It is now widely appreciated that the toxic effects of many chemicals is a function of their metabolism rather than the substance itself. Of central interest to the toxicologist therefore is an understanding of the metabolism of a toxic chemical and the significance of this in the toxic process. The metabolic process itself however can be highly variable both between and within animal species. For this reason the toxicologist may have to consider both species and strain differences in metabolism when attempting to extrapolate findings to man in the safety evaluation process. For the past twenty years, work on species differences in metabolism has been largely of a descriptive nature and the cataloguing of differences. However, developments in the last few years in the understanding of the genetic diversity of species, including man, in terms of biotransformation and the nature and substrate preferences of the various multiple forms of the drug-metabolizing enzymes now give a better insight into the nature of species differences of metabolism. Furthermore, an understanding of this problem tempers expectations in terms of what may be hoped for in the extrapolation from other species. For example, the search for a species that metabolizes like man will be seen to be ill-conceived and ill-advised. The presentation deals with some of the fundamental aspects of species and strain differences in oxidative metabolism in particular and the implications that this has for the toxicologist in the safety evaluation process.

Prediction of metabolic drug interactions involving beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs

There is evidence, from human and animal studies, that drug-metabolising enzymes exist in multiple forms, the individual enzymes having selective, but not specific, substrate requirements. Consequently drug interactions may arise when two drugs bind to the same enzyme. The degree of enzyme inhibition will be partly dependent on the relative affinities of the drugs for the enzyme and on their rates of turnover. The decrease in drug clearance produced by enzyme inhibition is dependent on the fraction of the drug normally metabolised by the inhibited pathway(s). Cimetidine, a P-450 enzyme inhibitor, increases the systemic bioavailability of propranolol and labetalol, which undergo extensive metabolism, but does not affect the clearance of atenolol, which is excreted largely unchanged. In this situation, both the extent and type of biotransformation are important. Thus, cimetidine has no effect on the clearance of penbutolol, even though the drug is eliminated almost entirely by biotransformation. The major metabolite is penbutolol glucuronide, and it has been shown recently that cimetidine does not inhibit glucuronylation. Beta-adrenoceptor blockers also act as enzyme inhibitors themselves. For example, antipyrine clearance is decreased by propranolol and to a lesser extent by metoprolol, whereas atenolol has no effect. It has been suggested, therefore, that there is a relationship between the lipid-solubility of beta-adrenoceptor blockers and their ability to inhibit drug metabolism. The clearance of lipophilic beta-adrenoceptor blockers is dependent on hepatic enzyme activity, and is therefore sensitive to enzyme induction. For drugs with high hepatic clearance and subsequent high presystemic elimination, a moderate increase in the extraction ratio will produce a marked decrease in systemic bioavailability. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

First-pass elimination. Basic concepts and clinical consequences

First-pass elimination takes place when a drug is metabolised between its site of administration and the site of sampling for measurement of drug concentration. Clinically, first-pass metabolism is important when the fraction of the dose administered that escapes metabolism is small and variable. The liver is usually assumed to be the major site of first-pass metabolism of a drug administered orally, but other potential sites are the gastrointestinal tract, blood, vascular endothelium, lungs, and the arm from which venous samples are taken. Bioavailability, defined as the ratio of the areas under the blood concentration-time curves, after extra- and intravascular drug administration (corrected for dosage if necessary), is often used as a measure of the extent of first-pass metabolism. When several sites of first-pass metabolism are in series, the bioavailability is the product of the fractions of drug entering the tissue that escape loss at each site. The extent of first-pass metabolism in the liver and intestinal wall depends on a number of physiological factors. The major factors are enzyme activity, plasma protein and blood cell binding, and gastrointestinal motility. Models that describe the dependence of bioavailability on changes in these physiological variables have been developed for drugs subject to first-pass metabolism only in the liver. Two that have been applied widely are the 'well-stirred' and 'parallel tube' models. Discrimination between the 2 models may be performed under linear conditions in which all pharmacokinetic parameters are independent of concentration and time. The predictions of the models are similar when bioavailability is large but differ dramatically when bioavailability is small. The 'parallel tube' model always predicts a much greater change in bioavailability than the 'well-stirred' model for a given change in drug-metabolising enzyme activity, blood flow, or fraction of drug unbound. Many clinically important drugs undergo considerable first-pass metabolism after an oral dose. Drugs in this category include alprenolol, amitriptyline, dihydroergotamine, 5-fluorouracil, hydralazine, isoprenaline (isoproterenol), lignocaine (lidocaine), lorcainide, pethidine (meperidine), mercaptopurine, metoprolol, morphine, neostigmine, nifedipine, pentazocine and propranolol. One major therapeutic implication of extensive first-pass metabolism is that much larger oral doses than intravenous doses are required to achieve equivalent plasma concentrations. For some drugs, extensive first-pass metabolism precludes their use as oral agents (e. g. lignocaine, naloxone and glyceryl trinitrate).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Physiological factors affecting drug toxicity

Physiological factors that affect the fate of drugs in the body and thereby have effects on their pharmacology and toxicology involve the systems that control absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The main factors are disease, genetics, and age. Nutritional status, sex, hormonal status (e.g., the effects of pregnancy), and circadian rhythm have important influences. Maternal toxicity will affect the fetus. The absorption and excretion of drugs are frequently reduced by diseases. Excretion is reduced by impaired renal function, often found in the elderly, which may increase the toxic response. Distribution is affected by body weight and build, for example, the proportion of fat. The disposition of many drugs has been shown to be significantly influenced by circadian rhythms such that therapeutic doses may exhibit toxicity if administered at an inappropriate time of day. Metabolism is modified by environmental influences including previous food and drug experience, and various factors such as age, sex, and disease. Intersubject variations in drug disposition can be very great with possibly severe consequences for the individual; in this regard, knowledge of genetic polymorphism in drug metabolizing enzymes is rapidly increasing. The toxicology of a drug may be profoundly affected by a particular disease state, for example, the administration of a drug that might be a tumor promoter when a cancerous or precancerous condition exists. These effects are illustrated with examples from the literature and recent studies undertaken in the Bureau of Drug Research.

Importance of metabolites in antiarrhythmic therapy

The presence of metabolites with pharmacologic activity can produce unanticipated drug efficacy or toxicity. This is particularly true during treatment with drugs that have narrow therapeutic-toxic ratios, such as the antiarrhythmic agents. The presence of active metabolites can often be inferred from variability in the relation between pharmacologic effect and steady-state plasma concentrations of the parent drug. Moreover, metabolites may ordinarily be unimportant but can accumulate to therapeutic (or toxic) levels in disease states such as congestive heart failure, renal failure and hepatic failure. Further characterization of the contribution of such metabolites during treatment requires direct evaluation of their pharmacology in vitro, in animal models and, if indicated, in man. Procainamide and its active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide provide the best and most complete example of this sequence of observations. Other drugs, including quinidine, disopyramide, verapamil and the investigational agents encainide and lorcainide, have active metabolites for which pharmacologic activity is less well-defined. Further studies in this area will help reduce the frequency of antiarrhythmic drug adverse effects, make successful therapy more frequent, and perhaps allow insights into structure-activity relations.

Lack of evidence for polymorphism in metoprolol metabolism

The claim for polymorphism in the metabolism of metoprolol is based on a logical fallacy. A frequency distribution of metoprolol AUC data is presented and, although highly skewed, no evidence of more than a single population is apparent. Plasma and urine metoprolol and metabolite data are also presented to support this.