A comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with warfarin sodium for prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after hip or knee implantation

Low-molecular-weight heparins are essentially the same for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism

The pharmacodynamic properties of low-molecular-weight heparins differ. Data from randomized clinical trials show that despite these differences, the agents have similar efficacy and safety profiles in preventing and treating new and recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients who underwent general surgery or total hip or knee replacement. Dalteparin, enoxaparin, or tinzaparin, when administered at the dosages used in the reviewed clinical trials, are essentially indistinguishable.

The relationship of the factor V Leiden mutation or the deletion-deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme to postoperative thromboembolic events following total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although all patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty are subjected to similar risk factors that predispose to thromboembolism, only a subset of patients develop this complication. The objective of this study was to determine whether a specific genetic profile is associated with a higher risk of developing a postoperative thromboembolic complication. Specifically, we examined if the Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation or the deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene increased a patient's risk for postoperative thromboembolic events. The FVL mutation has been associated with an increased risk of idiopathic thromboembolism and the deletion polymorphism of the ACE gene has been associated with increased vascular tone, attenuated fibrinolysis and increased platelet aggregation.

METHODS

The presence of these genetic profiles was determined for 38 patients who had a postoperative symptomatic pulmonary embolus or proximal deep venous thrombosis and 241 control patients without thrombosis using molecular biological techniques.

RESULTS

The Factor V Leiden mutation was present in none of the 38 experimental patients and in 3% or 8 of the 241 controls (p = 0.26). Similarly there was no difference detected in the distribution of polymorphisms for the ACE gene with the deletion-deletion genotype present in 36% or 13 of the 38 experimental patients and in 31% or 74 of the 241 controls (p = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that neither of these potentially hypercoaguable states are associated with an increased risk of symptomatic thromboembolic events following total hip or knee arthroplasty in patients receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.

Developing a novel antithrombotic in the academic environment

In recent years, academic research institutions have increasingly sought to commercialize their discoveries, providing the opportunity to raise venture capital and benefit financially from their developments. In the last 6 years, Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Center, affiliated with McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, has set up two companies, Vascular Therapeutics and Osteokine, to commercialize its discoveries in thrombosis and osteoporosis. Epidemiological evidence shows a continuing socioeconomic burden of both of these disorders, thereby offering opportunities for new drug development. Key areas in the field of thrombosis include novel parenteral anticoagulants to replace heparin as adjunctive therapy in acute coronary syndromes, safer and more practical oral anticoagulants that do not require monitoring to replace coumarins, and oral antiplatelet drugs for use in combination with aspirin. Since their creation, Vascular Therapeutics and Osteokine have attracted major funding and developed several patentable compounds that show clinical and commercial promise.

A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is common in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Because of the rarity of the most serious outcomes, most randomized controlled trials lack the power to analyze these outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed for agents used in DVT prophylaxis in TKA employing a Medline literature search. Study inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic agents in elective TKA with mandatory screening for DVT by venography. Fourteen studies (3,482 patients) met inclusion criteria. For total DVT, all agents except dextran and aspirin protected significantly better than placebo (P < .0001). For proximal DVT rates, low-molecular-weight heparin was significantly better than warfarin (P = .0002). There was a trend that aspirin was better than warfarin (P = .0106). No significant difference was found for symptomatic pulmonary embolism, fatal pulmonary embolism, major hemorrhage, or total mortality.

Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. Enoxaparin Clinical Trial Group

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement are at risk for venous thromboembolic complications for up to twelve weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prolonged post-hospital regimen of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in this patient population.

METHODS

Following elective total hip or knee replacement, 968 patients received subcutaneous enoxaparin (30 mg twice daily) for seven to ten days, and 873 were then randomized to receive three weeks of double-blind outpatient treatment with either enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) or a placebo. The primary efficacy end point was the prevalence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism or symptomatic pulmonary embolism during the double-blind phase of treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 873 randomized patients, 435 underwent elective total hip replacement and 438 underwent elective total knee replacement. Enoxaparin was superior to the placebo in reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients treated with hip replacement: 8.0% (eighteen) of the 224 patients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with 23.2% (forty-nine) of the 211 patients treated with the placebo (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 6.55; relative risk reduction, 65.5%). Enoxaparin had no significant benefit in the patients treated with knee replacement: thirty-eight (17.5%) of the 217 patients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with forty-six (20.8%) of the 221 patients treated with the placebo (p = 0.380; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 2.02; relative risk reduction, 15.9%). Symptomatic pulmonary embolism developed in three patients, one with a hip replacement and two with a knee replacement; all had received the placebo. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hemorrhagic episodes or other types of toxicity between the enoxaparin and placebo-treated groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonging enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis following hip replacement for a total of four weeks provided therapeutic benefit, by reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism, without compromising safety. A similar benefit was not observed in patients treated with knee replacement.

Anticoagulant pharmacodynamics of tinzaparin following 175 iu/kg subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers

Tinzaparin, a sodium salt of a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) produced via heparinase digestion, is used for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism in conjunction with warfarin for the prevention of DVT in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery, and as an anticoagulant in hemodialysis circuits. Its average molecular weight ranges between 5500 and 7500 daltons (Da); the percentage of chains with molecular weight lower than 2000 Da is not more than 10% in the marketed tinzaparin formulation. While this fraction is generally considered pharmacologically inactive, this has never been evaluated in vivo. The importance of the < 2000 Da fraction on the anticoagulant pharmacodynamics of tinzaparin assessed by anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity was studied in a two-way crossover trial. In this trial, 30 healthy volunteers received a single 175 IU/kg subcutaneous administration of tinzaparin containing approximately 3.5% of the < 2000 Da fraction and a tinzaparin-like LMWH containing 18.3% of the < 2000 Da fraction. The anti-Xa/anti-IIa ratios of the drug substances were comparable at 1.5 and 1.7 for tinzaparin and the tinzaparin-like LMWH, respectively. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated. Mean maximum plasma anti-Xa activity (A(max)) was approximately 0.818 IU/ml at 4 h following tinzaparin injection. Mean maximum plasma anti-IIa activity was 0.308 IU/ml at 5 h postdose. Intersubject variation was lower (< 18% for both anti-Xa and anti-IIa metrics) than in previous fixed-dose administration studies. There was no correlation between anti-Xa or anti-IIa AUC or A(max) and bodyweight in the present study supporting the weight-adjusted dosing regimen. Individual anti-Xa and anti-IIa profiles following the single 175 IU/kg subcutaneous administration of the tinzaparin-like LMWH were similar to that obtained with tinzaparin. Based on average equivalence criteria, the two LMWH preparations were determined to be bioequivalent using either anti-Xa or anti-IIa activity as biomarkers. The calculated intrasubject variabilities were low (< 14% for anti-Xa activity and < 18% for anti-IIa activity) yielding little evidence for a significant Subject x Formulation interaction. In summary, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity following a single subcutaneous administration of tinzaparin 175 IU/kg to healthy volunteers yielded activity consistent with targeted therapeutic levels derived from previous trials in adult DVT patients. Weight-based dosing for the treatment of DVT appears rational based on the reduction in anti-Xa and anti-IIa variability consistent with the recommendation derived from earlier fixed-dose pharmacokinetic studies. Furthermore, differences in the percentage of molecules in the < 2000 Da molecular weight fraction of tinzaparin do not translate into differences in anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity in vivo.

Low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis: preoperative versus postoperative initiation in patients undergoing elective hip surgery

Administration of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis in elective hip implant patients commonly begins 12 h preoperatively in European practices to optimize effectiveness, and 12 to 24 h postoperatively in North American practices to optimize safety. A meta-analysis comparing these two treatment regimes revealed that preoperative initiation demonstrated greater efficacy and superior safety for patients (10.0% rate of total deep-vein thrombosis vs. 15.3%, P = .023). In addition to the pre/postsurgical debate, proximity of initiation of low-molecular-weight heparin in relation to surgery is an issue of critical importance. Recent studies revealed that beginning therapy immediately within 2 h preoperatively or 6 h postoperatively dramatically decreased the risk of venous thrombosis. An investigation of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis initiated 2 h before elective hip surgery or approximately 6 h after surgery compared with warfarin sodium revealed that total and proximal deep-vein thrombosis rates were reduced in patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin compared with warfarin. The frequencies of deep-vein thrombosis for patients receiving preoperative and postoperative dalteparin vs. warfarin for all deep-vein thrombosis were 36 of 337 (10.7%, P < .001) and 44 of 336 (13.1%, P < .001) vs. 81 of 338 (24.0%); and for proximal deep-vein thrombosis were 3 of 354 (0.8%, P = .035) and 3 of 358 (0.8%, P = .033) vs. 11 of 363 (3.0%). Relative risk reductions for the dalteparin groups vs. warfarin ranged from 45% to 72%. In this case, low-molecular-weight heparin administered in close proximity to surgery provided superior efficacy over warfarin. Major bleeding was significantly increased with the preoperative regimen but not the postoperative regimen.

Predictors of rehospitalization for symptomatic venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that symptomatic venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty most commonly develops after the patient is discharged from the hospital. Risk factors associated with these symptomatic thromboembolic events are not well defined.

METHODS

Using administrative data from the California Medicare records for 1993 through 1996, we identified 297 patients 65 years of age or older who were rehospitalized for thromboembolism within three months after total hip arthroplasty. We compared demographic, surgical, and medical variables potentially associated with the development of thromboembolism in these patients and 592 unmatched controls.

RESULTS

A total of 89.6 percent of patients with thromboembolism and 93.8 percent of control patients were treated with pneumatic compression, warfarin, enoxaparin, or unfractionated heparin, alone or in combination. In addition, 22.2 percent and 29.7 percent, respectively, received warfarin after discharge. A body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 25 or greater was associated with rehospitalization for thromboembolism, with an odds ratio of 2.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 3.4). In a multivariate model, the only prophylactic regimens associated with a reduced risk of thromboembolism were pneumatic compression in patients with body-mass indexes of less than 25 (odds ratio, 0.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6) and warfarin treatment after discharge (odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty, a body-mass index of 25 or greater was associated with subsequent hospitalization for thromboembolism. Pneumatic compression in patients with a body-mass index of less than 25 and prophylaxis with warfarin after discharge were independently protective against thromboembolism.

Changes of hemostatic molecular markers after gynecological surgery

The authors evaluated the hemostatic abnormalities occurring in the postoperative period of eight patients with malignant tumors and compared them with those occurring in the postoperative period of eight patients with benign tumors. Two of the patients with malignant tumor presented pulmonary embolism after operation. Plasma fibrinogen and fibrin degradation product levels in patients with malignant tumors were already high before operation and further increased significantly after operation. The plasma levels of D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and free-tissue factor pathway inhibitor were increased in both groups after operation, but they were higher in patients with malignant tumors than in patients with benign tumors. The plasma levels of protein C and antithrombin were significantly decreased in both groups after operation. but they were significantly lower in patients with malignant tumors than in those with benign tumors. The decreased activity of protein C or antithrombin may be not only a risk factor of thrombotic disease, such as pulmonary embolism, but also the cause of thrombosis. In patients with malignant tumors, the operation time was significantly longer than that in patients with benign tumors. This long operative period might cause vascular endothelial cell injury which is reflected by the plasma levels of free-tissue factor pathway inhibitor, antithrombin, and protein C.

Is color-flow duplex a good diagnostic test for detection of isolated calf vein thrombosis in high-risk patients?

Color-flow duplex scanning (CDS) is a good diagnostic test for lower extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This report aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CDS in detecting isolated calf DVT in two in-hospital populations. A total of 166 patients had routine DVT testing with both CDS and venography: 99 total joint arthroplasty patients and 67 symptomatic in-hospital patients. Isolated calf DVT was noted in 34% of arthroplasty patients and 12% of symptomatic in-hospital patients. Peroneal DVT was most common. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of CDS in detecting isolated calf DVT in the symptomatic in-hospital group was 39% (16%-62%), 98% (94%-99%), 88% (65%-99%), and 81% (71%-91%), respectively. In the arthroplasty patients these values were 13% (3%-23%), 92% (85%-99%), 60% (30%-90%), and 55% (45%-65%), respectively. CDS has a low sensitivity in detecting isolated calf DVT among hospitalized patients and cannot be deemed an effective tool for identifying clots limited to only one or two tibial vessels.

A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis following elective total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although several agents have been shown to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease, there is no clear preference for thromboembolic prophylaxis in elective total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to define the efficacy and safety of the agents that are currently used for prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis -- namely, low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, aspirin, low-dose heparin, and pneumatic compression.

METHODS

A Medline search identified all randomized, controlled trials, published from January 1966 to May 1998, that compared the use of one of the prophylactic agents with the use of any other agent or a placebo in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. For a study to be included in our analysis, bilateral venography had to have been performed to confirm the presence or absence of deep venous thrombosis. Fifty-two studies, in which 10,929 patients had been enrolled, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The rates of distal, proximal, and total (distal and proximal) deep venous thrombosis; symptomatic and fatal pulmonary embolism; minor and major wound-bleeding complications; major non-wound bleeding complications; and total mortality were determined for each agent in each study. The absolute risk of each outcome was determined by dividing the number of events by the number of patients at risk. A general linear model with random effects was used to calculate the 95 percent confidence interval of risk. A crosstabs of study by outcome was performed to test homogeneity (ability to combine studies). The risk of each outcome was compared among agents and between each agent and the placebo.

RESULTS

With prophylaxis, the risk of total (proximal and distal) deep venous thrombosis ranged from 17.7 percent (low-molecular-weight heparin) to 31.1 percent (low-dose heparin); the risk with prophylaxis with any agent was significantly lower than the risk with the placebo (48.5 percent) (p < 0.0001). The risk of proximal deep venous thrombosis was lowest with warfarin (6.3 percent) and low-molecular-weight heparin (7.7 percent), and again the risk with any prophylactic agent was significantly lower than the risk with the placebo (25.8 percent) (p < 0.0001). Compared with the risk with the placebo (1.51 percent), only warfarin (0.16 percent), pneumatic compression (0.26 percent), and low-molecular-weight heparin (0.36 percent) were associated with a significantly lower risk of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. There were no significant differences among agents with regard to the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism or of mortality with any cause. The risk of minor wound-bleeding was significantly higher with low-molecular-weight heparin (8.9 percent) and low-dose heparin (7.6 percent) than it was with the placebo (2.2 percent) (p < 0.05). Compared with the risk with the placebo (0.28 percent), only low-dose heparin was associated with a significantly higher risk of major wound-bleeding (2.56 percent) and total major bleeding (3.46 percent) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The best prophylactic agent in terms of both efficacy and safety was warfarin, followed by pneumatic compression, and the least effective and safe was low-dose heparin. Warfarin provided the lowest risk of both proximal deep venous thrombosis and symptomatic pulmonary embolism. However, there were no identifiable significant differences in the rates of fatal pulmonary embolism or death among the agents. Significant risks of minor and major bleeding complications were observed with greater frequency with certain prophylactic agents, particularly low-molecular-weight heparin (minor bleeding) and low-dose heparin (both major and minor bleeding).

New therapeutic options in deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis

Joint replacement surgery is complicated by a high rate of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current thromboprophylactic approaches reduce the rate of VTE, but the incidence remains as high as 20% to 50%. Recombinant hirudins, such as desirudin and lepirudin, function by directly inhibiting thrombin, and are a new development in antithrombotic therapy. In two multicenter studies, desirudin was found to be superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total hip alloplasty. A further trial of more than 2,000 patients undergoing elective hip replacement compared the thromboprophylactic efficacy of desirudin versus the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin. Desirudin was more effective than LMWH in providing effective prophylaxis, and maintained superiority in patients with additional risk. Desirudin was shown to be equally safe and did not require laboratory monitoring. Desirudin (15 mg twice daily) is an efficient therapy for DVT prevention in hip alloplasty patients at additional risk.

Oral anticoagulant therapy: efficacy, safety and the low-dose controversy

The issue of optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism is still unresolved. However, recent data suggest that short (6 weeks to 3 months), intermediate (3- 6 months) or indefinite-term anticoagulant therapy should be adopted on the basis of the classification of patients into low-, intermediate- and high-recurrence-risk groups, respectively. Oral anticoagulants have been shown to effectively prevent cardioembolic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Recent data seem to suggest that their safety can be ameliorated with adequate risk stratification on the basis of clinical and echocardiographic features. After unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, oral anticoagulant therapy (INR range 2-3) combined with aspirin has been shown to be advantageous over aspirin alone, although at the cost of a slight increase in bleeding. Bleeding complications are major drawbacks of oral anticoagulant therapy thus limiting their generalized adoption in recognized indications. To sharply reduce the bleeding risk and need of laboratory control, the low- or fixed-dose oral anticoagulant approach has been evaluated. In primary prevention and in low or low-to-moderate thrombotic risk, minidose warfarin treatment has been shown to be advantageous. In secondary prevention, and in patients at high risk for recurrent venous or arterial thrombotic events, standard range (INR 2-3) or higher level of anticoagulation is needed.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin and warfarin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty

Of 263 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty, 122 received adjusted low-dose warfarin and 141 received enoxaparin as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Three patients in the warfarin group and 3 in the enoxaparin group developed ultrasound-detectable DVT (P > .05). Although the amount of perioperative blood transfused was equivalent in both groups, the overall hemoglobin drop was greater (P < .005) in the enoxaparin group (2.9 g/dL) as compared with the warfarin group (2.3 g/dL). Five patients (4.6%) in the warfarin group and 16 (11.3%) in the enoxaparin group had bleeding complications (P < .05). Our data support earlier published reports suggesting that reductions, if any, in the incidence of DVT associated with enoxaparin are offset by a significant increase in bleeding complications as compared with adjusted-dose warfarin. We continue to use adjusted-dose warfarin as primary thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

The Essence Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Unstable Angina and Non-Q-Wave MI: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Comparing Enoxaparin and Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin: Methods and Design

Antithrombotic therapy reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with unstable angina. The primary aim of the ESSENCE trial is to evaluate the efficacy of enoxaparin (low molecular weight heparin) versus unfractionated heparin, plus aspirin, in patients with rest angina or non-Q-wave infarction. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 3180 patients comparing enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg sc bid, with unfractionated heparin via continuous iv infusion to maintain the aPTT at 2 x control. Patients within 24 hours of the onset of acute myocardial ischemia without ST elevation are eligible, and trial therapy is administered for a minimum of 48 hours to a maximum of 8 days. Primary endpoints analyzed are death, myocardial infarction (MI), or recurrent angina at 14 days. Currently 3019 patients have been randomized in 10 countries. The mean age is 64 years, 33% are female, and 46% have had a prior MI. The overall event rates at 14 days are 1.7% mortality, 5.9% subsequent MI, and 17% recurrent angina. The composite triple endpoint rate is 23.6%. Recruitment should be complete by June 1996. The methods and design of the study are presented in this article.

Dosing practices of physicians for anticoagulation with warfarin during inpatient rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the percentage of international normalized ratios (INRs) maintained within the therapeutic range for patients receiving chronic anticoagulation treatment with warfarin during inpatient rehabilitation.

DESIGN

A consecutive, 4-month, retrospective chart review of all patients receiving oral anticoagulation treatment was conducted in a large academic rehabilitation center. The percentage of INRs within and out of the therapeutic range, frequency of blood samples, length of therapy, and warfarin dose prescribed by physicians were calculated. A total of 181 patients receiving chronic anticoagulation treatment were identified. A total of 3,709 blood samples were analyzed. In 74 patients, the primary physician recommended a therapeutic range (Group 1). In the remaining 107 patients, no therapeutic range was specified, and a target INR range of 2.0-3.0 was assumed (Group 2).

RESULTS

In Group 1, the INRs were in the recommended range in 38.2% of all blood samples. In Group 2, 37.6% of all blood drawn was within an INR range of 2.0-3.0. Statistical analysis showed that no better accuracy was obtained when the INR range was predefined by a physician (Group 1) or assumed to be in the 2.0-3.0 range (Group 2; P = 0.839).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite frequent physician monitoring, this study demonstrates the difficulty in maintaining INRs within therapeutic ranges for patients receiving oral anticoagulation. An overall tendency for underdosing is observed. Improvement is necessary, given the high morbidity and mortality associated with insufficient anticoagulation in rehabilitation inpatients.

Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are increasingly being utilised as anticoagulants in healthcare settings. These agents offer several advantages over standard unfractionated heparin. Indications for LMWHs include deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis treatment, use in coronary procedures associated with a high risk for bleeding, and in acute coronary syndromes. Prior to being added to formularies, LMWHs should be evaluated for efficacy, safety and economic benefits over other anticoagulants. Institutions should be prepared to conduct their own economic assessments in the absence of readily available studies. There is clear evidence that LMWHs are cost saving or are at least cost effective as thromboprophylactic agents in major orthopaedic surgery. The economic benefits of LMWHs in other surgical situations is less clear. Consistent evidence from several countries indicate that LMWHs are cost saving as anticoagulants for the initial treatment of DVT. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and economics of LMWHs in other conditions besides hip and knee arthroplasty and general surgery.

Cost analyses of extended prophylaxis with enoxaparin after hip arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolic complications occur in 50% to 70% of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty if no prophylactic regimen is used. Because enoxaparin and warfarin are useful for extended outpatient prophylaxis, the objective of this study was to determine which of these agents is most cost effective in preventing venous thromboembolic complications. A decision tree analysis was developed to simulate a hypothetical cohort of patients with total hip arthroplasty. The analysis considered home health care services to perform monitoring and compliance verification. Accounting for prophylactic failures and treatment complications, results showed that enoxaparin maintained a cost effective advantage over warfarin for extended prophylaxis in the time after discharge and total hip arthroplasty ranging from 19 to 31 days after the patient was discharged from the hospital. The duration of cost effectiveness of enoxaparin was reduced to 14 to 17 days when home care services were excluded. These results indicated that approximately 3 weeks of outpatient therapy with enoxaparin is cost effective. With the cornerstone of managed care being cost efficiency in the provision of quality care, this conclusion warrants the development of integrated care strategies for the patient having orthopaedic surgery to achieve cost effective patient management.

Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

There is now ample evidence to indicate that certain low-molecular-weight heparins given subcutaneously can replace continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. The low-molecular-weight heparins have a predictably high absorption rate when given subcutaneously and a prolonged duration of action, permitting them to be given by a once or twice daily injection for the prevention or treatment of venous thrombosis. Furthermore, treatment does not require laboratory monitoring, thus eliminating the need for continuous IV infusion and permitting the early discharge of patients with venous thromboembolism. This should eventually lead to the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism. Studies to date indicate that low-molecular-weight heparin is more cost-effective than unfractionated heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism and the cost effectiveness will be increased by out-of-hospital treatment. At the present time, the findings associated with any individual low-molecular-weight heparin preparation cannot be extrapolated to different low-molecular-weight heparins, and therefore each must be evaluated in separate clinical trials. The information to date is that low-molecular-weight heparin is safer and more effective than continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. The decreased mortality rate seen in two clinical trials, particularly in patients with metastatic cancer, was quite unexpected. This requires further confirmation in larger prospective randomized trials.

Bleeding Complications to Long-Term Oral Anticoagulant Therapy

Objective: To evaluate the incidence of bleeding complications in recent randomized trials on oral anticoagetlant treatment for prevention of arterial thromboembolism. Data sources: International publications on studies of prevention. of arterial thromboembolism by oral anticoagulant therapy. Study selection and data extraction: Randomized trials an oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation, recent myocardial infarction, and prosthetic heart valves were selected. For comparison older nonrandomized studies were studied. Background: Oral anticoagulant drugs are recommended for primary prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, recent myocardial infarction, and prosthetic heart valves. Still many physicians hesitate to prescribe anticoagulant drugs, presumably for fear of bleeding complications. Results: In six recent trials of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation, the highest annual incidence of fatal and major bleeding was 0.8% and 2.0%, respectively. In patients treated with warfarin after a recent myocardial infarction, the incidence of fatal and major bleeding was 0.2% and 0.5% per year, respectively. The annual incidence of fatal and major bleeding in patients with prosthetic heart valves on warfarin treatment was found to be 1.4% and 5.2%, respectively. The mean incidence of fatal and major bleeding in patients on warfarin in these eight trials was 0.5% and 1.7% per year, respectively. The mean incidence of fatal and major bleeds in patients on placebo was 0.1% and 0.7% per year, respectively. In three randomized trials evaluating aspirin versus warfarin, the respective mean incidences of fatal and major bleeding during aspirin treatment were 0.2% and 0.8% per year. A remarkable decrease in the incidence of major bleeding complications to oral anticoagulant therapy is revealed by these trials as compared to previous studies. Reasons for this decline may be less intensive anticoagulant regimes, better control of anticoagulant therapy due to the introduction of the international normalized ratio, and careful pretreatment evaluation of risk factors for bleeding. In alI prospective trials of oral anticoagulation, the risk of bleeding was more than over-weighed by the beneficial effect on the incidence of stroke and peripheral thromboemboli.

New-generation anticoagulants: the low molecular weight heparins

Heparin has been the mainstay of acute anticoagulation therapy for decades. Within the past 20 years, several different heparin fractions-collectively known as low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs)-have been evaluated in various medical and surgical settings in which anticoagulation is routinely warranted. The LMWHs are efficacious, safe, cost-effective, and easier to administer and monitor than standard, unfractionated heparin. As LMWH use becomes more widespread, emergency physicians will use these new agents instead of unfractionated heparin for unstable angina, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, or thromboembolic disease. This review focuses on the pharmacologic properties of unfractionated heparin and LMWH, associated complications, and the use of these agents in acute ischemic coronary syndromes, thromboembolic disease, and other selected clinical situations.

Low Molecular Weight Heparin: An Evaluation of Current and Potential Clinical Utility in Surgery

Heparin, a mixture of glycosaminoglycans of various sizes, is a potent natural anticoagulant. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) contain only the polymers of smaller size, which appear to possess most of the antithrombotic potential. Pharmacological differences between the two suggest a number of advantages with LMWH therapy. Our objective was to establish the utility of LMWHs in comparison to the current practice of anticoagulation in surgical patients. Articles were obtained through MEDLINE and CURRENT CONTENTS queries. The searches were limited to English and French-language articles and included published overviews containing relevant individual trials. We examined the current literature, consisting of 1,730 published reports from 1979-1998, regarding the biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology, and clinical applications of LMWH in comparison with current therapy. Studies were selected based on their relevance to LMWHs, the size and methods of trials, and their application to clinical care. Peer-reviewed published data were critically evaluated by independent extraction by several authors. Established rules for levels of evidence were used to objectively evaluate the strength of evidence supporting recommendations in each clinical area. LMWHs provide superior anticoagulation in the prophylaxis of DVT following orthopedic, general, and trauma surgery. Further studies should establish which other patients may benefit from such prophylaxis. Current evidence does not support the use of LMWHs in patients with mechanical heart valves or those on mechanical cardiac support devices; however, it may have a role in the maintenance of vascular graft patency. Further studies should examine the role of LMWHs in transplant atherosclerosis, and in patients requiring long-term anticoagulation at high risk for bleeding with warfarin therapy. The economic implications of LMWH administration remain unclear. On the basis of the information presented in this review, LMWHs are promising new agents in prophylaxis and treatment of both arterial and venous thrombosis. In the near future, LMWHs are likely to supplant UFH and perhaps warfarin in many applications.http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00547/bibs/8n4p203.html</hea

Graduated compression stockings in the prevention of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Surveys still show a wide variation in routine use of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis despite its established place in current patient management. This article reviews the mechanism of action, efficacy and complications of stockings in preventing DVT.

METHODS

Relevant publications indexed in Medline (1966-1998) and the Cochrane database were identified. Appropriate articles identified from the reference lists of the above searches were also selected and reviewed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Graduated compression stockings reduce the overall cross-sectional area of the limb, increase the linear velocity of venous flow, reduce venous wall distension and improve valvular function. Fifteen randomized controlled trials of graduated compression stockings alone were reviewed. Stockings reduced the relative risk of DVT by 64 per cent in general surgical patients and 57 per cent following total hip replacement. The effect of stockings was enhanced by combination with pharmacological agents such as heparin; the combination is recommended in patients at moderate or high risk of DVT. Knee-length stockings are as effective and should replace above-knee stockings. Complications are rare and avoidable.

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis in joint replacement surgery

Joint replacement surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures in the United States. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is very high in patients not receiving prophylaxis for the prevention of this postoperative complication. In this article, the current modalities for prophylaxis are reviewed with respect to their safety and efficacy. Recommendations that have been substantiated by evidence-based information are provided.

Bleeding complications with enoxaparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis

The safest and most efficacious method of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis remains controversial. With the use of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, becoming ubiquitous in many institutions, we specifically examined bleeding complications related to its use. A case-control study was conducted on consecutive patients receiving enoxaparin prophylaxis after primary or revision total knee or total hip arthroplasty or hip hemiarthroplasty. Matched controls receiving no pharmacologic anticoagulation were identified. Patient and operative characteristics, hematologic values, and timing of enoxaparin dosing were analyzed as related to major and minor bleeding complications. A total of 152 procedures with enoxaparin and an equal number of control cases were included for a total of 304 patients. The enoxaparin group had a 23.7% total complication rate compared to 16.5% for the control group (P = .11). The power of the test was .35 and indicated that approximately 970 patients would need to be reviewed to have at least an 80% chance of finding a statistically significant difference. Major complications occurred in 5 patients (3.3%) in the enoxaparin group and 2 (1.3%) in the control group (P = .25, power = .21). Minor complications in the enoxaparin group were slightly higher but not significant at 20.4% versus 15.1% in the control group (P = .23). There were significantly fewer minor complications in the enoxaparin group after primary single-joint procedures (16.50%) than all other procedures (32.4%). Patients receiving the first dose of enoxaparin 10 hours or more postoperatively had significantly fewer complications (P = .05). The postoperative hematocrit drop was significantly greater for the enoxaparin group for all procedures (P = .003) as well as for primary single procedures (P = .0005). The postoperative transfusion requirement was significantly greater after primary single procedures (P = .02) in the enoxaparin group. One patient with an epidural catheter and receiving enoxaparin postoperatively developed an epidural hematoma. Although there were not significantly more complications with enoxaparin, there was evidence of significantly increased postoperative bleeding. The low-power analysis reveals that a large number of patients (970-1,700) are required to show a statistically significant difference in bleeding complications between the 2 groups. To minimize complications, a short period to allow initial hemiostasis postoperatively is recommended, as is preferential use of enoxaparin for primary single-joint replacements. Enoxaparin used in conjunction with an indwelling epidural catheter is not recommended.

The incidence of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a specific hypotensive epidural anesthesia protocol

We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures performed by 3 attending surgeons on the Arthroplasty Service at our institution from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1993. All surgery was performed under a specific hypotensive epidural anesthesia protocol. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia at our institution provides a lower level of hypotension (mean arterial pressure of 50-60 mmHg) as compared to hypotensive anesthesia used more generally around the world (mean arterial pressure >70 mmHg). For each patient, hospital and postdischarge office records for a minimum of 3 months after surgery were reviewed for the type of postoperative screening test, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). Overall, 2,592 primary unilateral THAs were performed with 78.6% (2,037 of 2,592) of patients receiving a venogram. Our protocol for thromboembolic disease prophylaxis in these patients included aspirin postoperatively as well as antithromboembolic disease stockings and early ambulation (24-48 hours postoperatively). The 555 patients who did not receive venography were managed with a different protocol that included warfarin postoperatively as well as antithromboembolic disease stockings and early ambulation. This high-risk group consisted of patients who received warfarin preoperatively (ie, cardiac valve) or patients with a history of DVT who were to receive warfarin postoperatively, regardless of venography result. Overall, DVT was diagnosed in 10.3% (210 of 2,037) of patients who had a venogram. Of these patients who had venography, 2.3% (46 of 2,037) had an isolated proximal DVT; 6.0% (123 of 2,037), a distal DVT; and 2.0% (41 of 2,037), both a proximal and a distal DVT. Of the 87 cases of proximal DVT identified, 60.9% (53 of 87) were femoral DVT; 18.4% (16 of 87), popliteal DVT; and 20.7% (18 of 87), both femoral and popliteal DVT. Of the 164 distal DVT, 68.3% (112 of 164) were major calf DVT and 31.7% (52 of 164) were minor calf DVT. The overall incidence of major venous thrombosis (sum of proximal and major calf thrombi) was 9.8% (199 of 2,037) in patients who had venography. Ventilation-perfusion scanning was used selectively in patients symptomatic for PE. Overall, symptomatic PE was diagnosed by ventilation-perfusion scan in 1.0% (26 of 2,592) of patients, with 0.58% (15 of 2,592) of patients having an in-hospital PE. Of the 15 patients who had an in-hospital PE, 11 patients had a venogram, and only 3 of 11 were positive. Late symptomatic PE was defined from discharge (mean, 7 +/- 2 days) to 3 months after discharge from the hospital and occurred in 0.42% (11 of 2,592) of patients. One of the 11 late symptomatic PEs was fatal. In the overall study, this represents 0.04% (1 of 2,592) fatal PE. Of the 11 patients with a late symptomatic PE, 10 had venograms in the hospital, and all 10 were negative for DVT. Overall, in the patients with a positive venogram, the incidence of symptomatic PE was 1.4% (3 of 210), whereas in the patients with a negative venogram, the incidence of symptomatic PE was 0.44% (8 of 1,827). At our institution, patients who undergo primary THA performed with hypotensive epidural anesthesia, postoperative aspirin, antithromboembolic disease stockings, and early ambulation have a low risk for thromboembolic disease.

Diagnosis and treatment of nephrotic syndrome

Prompt diagnosis is essential in the planning of effective treatment for the underlying diseases responsible for nephrotic syndrome. In this review, the typical clinical and laboratory features that facilitate diagnosis of these disorders are discussed. The distinction between systemic diseases, involving the kidney, and primary glomerular diseases is emphasised. These clinical and pathological distinctions influence prognosis, and form the basis of therapy to treat the underlying disorders. Our discussion focuses on diagnosis and specific treatment of these diseases, as well as therapy of the clinical consequences of nephrotic syndrome per se.

Reduction of hemorrhage after knee arthroplasty using cryo-based fibrin sealant

The spray application of cryo-based fibrin sealant was evaluated for reducing hemorrhage in a complex, anticoagulated canine model of knee joint arthroplasty. Nine heparinized dogs underwent bilateral knee arthroplasty under tourniquet control with each animal having 3 mL of fibrin sealant sprayed onto one joint and the other joint serving as control. The fibrin sealant significantly reduced total and incremental bleeding as compared to the control side (P < .05). In addition, the hemostatic effectiveness of the fibrin sealant increased as bleeding propensity increased (P < .05). This study suggests that fibrin sealant may reduce bleeding from orthopedic joint replacement in human patients undergoing routine operations as well as those receiving forms of anticoagulation to reduce the incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus.

Efficacy of prophylaxis against thromboembolism with intermittent pneumatic compression after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolism is a common and important complication after total hip arthroplasty. A variety of pharmacological and mechanical measures have been proposed for prophylaxis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as prophylaxis against thromboembolism following total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The prospective study involved a consecutive series of 425 patients in whom a total of 502 (324 primary and 178 revision) total hip arthroplasties had been performed by two surgeons. The patients were managed intraoperatively and postoperatively with use of thigh-high elastic compression stockings and thigh-high intermittent pneumatic compression sleeves. Experienced vascular technologists performed venous duplex ultrasonography on both lower extremities of all patients at a mean of six days (range, two to fifteen days) postoperatively. All patients were followed for at least one year in order to detect late thromboembolism.

RESULTS

An asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis was noted on the scans made after twenty-three (4.6 percent) of the 502 procedures. Nineteen (3.8 percent) of the arthroplasties were followed by the development of a proximal thrombosis and four (0.8 percent), a distal thrombosis. Nineteen of the thromboses were ipsilateral (eighteen were proximal and one, distal), and four were contralateral (one was proximal and three, distal). No symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis developed in the hospital. In addition, three (two proximal and one distal) symptomatic ipsilateral deep-vein thromboses (a prevalence of 0.6 percent) developed three to twenty-three weeks after postoperative scans revealed negative findings and the patients were discharged from the hospital. Three symptomatic pulmonary embolisms (a prevalence of 0.6 percent) were confirmed by ventilation-perfusion scanning while the patients were in the hospital. There were no symptomatic pulmonary embolisms after discharge, and there were no fatal pulmonary embolisms. With the numbers available, we were unable to detect an association between deep-vein thrombosis and age (p = 0.76), gender (p = 0.13), body-mass index (p = 0.12), type of arthroplasty (primary or revision) (p = 0.12), operative approach (p = 0.37), duration of the operation (p = 0.21), type of anesthesia (general or regional) (p = 0.51), units of blood transfused (autologous, p = 0.79; homologous, p = 0.57), blood type (p = 0.18), or the presence of a so-called classic risk factor for the development of thrombosis (p = 0.22). Five arthroplasties (1.0 percent) were followed by the development of a wound hematoma, but only one hematoma necessitated operative drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intraoperative and postoperative thigh-high intermittent pneumatic compression, combined with duplex ultrasonography performed by experienced vascular technologists, is effective for prophylaxis against thromboembolism after both primary and revision total hip arthroplasties. The low prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis (4.6 percent) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (0.6 percent) is comparable with that associated with pharmacological prophylaxis.

Early development of deep-vein thrombosis following hip fracture surgery: the role of venous wall thickening detected by B-mode ultrasonography

Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) remains the most frequent complication following hip surgery. This study was designed in order to evaluate the development of DVT after hip fracture surgery, and to determine if venous wall thickening detected before surgery predisposes patients to postoperative DVT. Systematic ultrasound examinations were performed on 100 consecutive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery on the day preceding the operation, and then postoperatively on days 2, 5 and 10. A total of 12 proximal, 28 distal deep-vein and four saphenous vein thromboses were detected. Of the DVT, 19 (43%) were detected at day 2. Five out of eight patients with venous wall thickening had a previous history of DVT. Venous wall thickening was positively correlated with proximal DVT development (62.5% versus 8% incidence in the group of patients with and without venous wall thickening respectively; p<0.001, relative risk = 7.8). This study highlights the high frequency of early major thromboembolic events following hip fracture surgery. It is considered that patients with a previous history of venous thromboembolic disease should undergo B-mode ultrasonographic examination before hip fracture surgery. Patients in whom venous wall thickening is detected should have repeated postoperative ultrasonographic examinations enabling early detection of DVT.

Occurrence of thrombosis and haemorrhage, relationship with anti-Xa, anti-IIa activities, and D-dimer plasma levels in patients receiving a low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin or tinzaparin, to prevent deep vein thrombosis after hip surgery

Studies in experimental animal models and in patients receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent thromboembolic events after surgery have not demonstrated a clear relationship between anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities in plasma and either bleeding or prevention of thrombosis. The relationship between these clinical outcomes and ex vivo anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and D-dimers were evaluated in 440 patients undergoing total hip replacement and given prophylaxis once daily with a LMWH (tinzaparin or enoxaparin) in a multicentre double-blind randomized study. 221 patients received 4500 anti-Xa IU of tinzaparin; 219 patients received 40 mg (4000 anti-Xa IU) of enoxaparin. Both regimens were administered subcutaneously once daily. Blood samples for anti-IIa, anti-Xa, D-dimers levels and APTT were taken at baseline, on day 1, day 5 and on the day of discharge (days 8-14) and clinical assessments were performed dafly until day 14. All patients had bilateral venography between days 8 and 14. All coagulation tests were performed in central laboratories. A significant correlation was observed between anti-IIa activity and anti-Xa activity and the dose of each LMWH injected. The anti-Xa activity was significantly higher with enoxaparin and the anti-IIa activity was significantly higher with tinzaparin. No clear relationship between these two activities and the clinical outcomes was observed. This was also true with regards to APTT. Before and after surgery, D-dimers were significantly higher in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) than in those without DVT but had no predictive value. Interestingly, a significant post-operative increase of D-dimers persisted in both groups of patients during the whole observation period, possibly suggesting that a longer duration of prophylactic treatment may be appropriate.

An open-label, randomized study to compare the safety and efficacy of perioperative epoetin alfa with preoperative autologous blood donation in total joint arthroplasty

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of perioperative recombinant human erythropoietin (Epoetin alfa) with the safety and efficacy of preoperative autologous donation (PAD) in total joint arthroplasty. A total of 490 patients scheduled for total joint (i.e., hip or knee) surgery and having hemoglobin (Hb) levels > or = 11 to < or = 13 g/dL were randomized to receive weekly doses of subcutaneous Epoetin alfa on preoperative Days -21, -14, and -7, and on the day of surgery, or to participate in a PAD program. The mean baseline Hb level in both groups was 12.3+/-0.6 g/dL, increasing to 13.8 g/dL in the Epoetin alfa-treated group and decreasing to 11.1 g/dL in the PAD group before or on the day of surgery. In the PAD group, 156/219 (71.2%) patients were transfused with autologous blood, and 42/219 (19.2%) patients were transfused with allogeneic blood. A smaller proportion, 27/209 (12.9%) patients, in the Epoetin alfa-treated group were transfused with allogeneic blood (P = .078 compared with the PAD group). Moreover, patients in the PAD group received a total of 325 units of blood (79 allogeneic units and 246 autologous units) compared with patients in the Epoetin alfa group who received a total of 54 units of blood. The mean postoperative Hb level was 11.0 g/dL in the Epoetin alfa-treated group and 9.2 g/dL in the PAD group. Compared with the PAD arm, mean Hb levels measured preoperatively, postoperatively on Day 1, and at discharge visits were significantly greater in the Epoetin alfa-treated arm (P < .0001 ).

Integrated analysis of thrombotic/vascular event occurrence in epoetin alfa-treated patients undergoing major, elective orthopedic surgery

Data from four prospective, multicenter, randomized studies involving 869 major, elective orthopedic surgery patients were examined by means of a retrospective integrated analysis to evaluate whether perioperative Epoetin alfa use was associated with the occurrence of thrombotic/vascular events. The incidence of thrombotic/vascular events was similar between 619 patients treated with Epoetin alfa and 250 patients receiving placebo (7.4% versus 8.0%, respectively). Regression analyses identified age, cardiac history, hypertension, and cardiac medications, but not Epoetin alfa, as risk factors for thrombotic/vascular events. The analysis did not implicate an increase in the rate of rise in hematocrit or maximum hematocrit obtained prior to surgery as contributors to thrombotic events. Thus, Epoetin alfa, which enhances preoperative erythropoiesis and increases hematocrit, did not affect the probability of thrombotic/vascular events.

Low molecular weight heparins: current use and indications

Thromboembolic complications are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in postoperative patients. For many years, unfractionated heparin has been used successfully in primary and secondary prophylaxis of these complications. In recent times, however, the usefulness of LMWHs has caught the attention of clinicians because of improved bioavailability, predictable anticoagulation, ease of administration, and the lack of need for monitoring anticoagulation. In clinical situations, LMWHs have been tested and proved to be safe and equipotent or supe rior when compared with unfractionated heparin or warfarin (Table 5). It is clear from clinical trials that LMWHs are superior in primary prophylaxis of DVT in orthopaedic surgical procedures, treatment of unstable angina, and in patients with multiple traumas. LMWHs were also tested and found to be an acceptable alternative to unfractionated heparin in both the primary prophylaxis of DVT in high risk general surgical procedures and in the treatment of patients with DVT and pulmonary embolism. However, the role of LMWHs in ischemic heart diseases, valvular heart diseases, postcoronary angioplasty, and vascular surgery remains to be proved. The major impact of LMWHs would be in allowing clinicians to treat PE and DVT in an outpatient setting, which would directly impact medical economics. LMWHs are associated with similar complications as unfractionated heparin is, but the complications occur less frequently. Currently, the main limitation in using LMWHs in place of unfractionated heparin or warfarin is its cost. However, taking into account the cost incurred by hospitalization and longterm monitoring of anticoagulation in patients treated with unfractionated heparin, certain trials have proved the cost of LMWHs to be the same or less than the cost of unfractionated heparin overall. We envision that LMWHs will be widely used in the future and will bring welcomed change in the treatment of thromboembolic diseases.

Low-molecular-weight heparins

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are a new group of parenteral anticoagulants. They represent a major clinical advance in anticoagulation since the identification of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in 1922 and the introduction of the synthetic coumarin derivative, warfarin, in 1948. Their predictable pharmacokinetics, increased bioavailability, and longer plasma half-life allow for once- or twice-daily dosing and eliminate the need for routine laboratory monitoring. This simplified administration stands to alter the clinical practice of anticoagulation. This review high-lights recent clinical trials and focuses on studies comparing LMWH with the other two major anticoagulants: UFH and coumadin.