Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure devices for recurrent stroke: A systemic review and network metaanalysis

Background:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure devices have not been conducted. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to identify the efficacy and safety of occluder devices.

Methods:

From 1st January, 2000 to 1st May, 2018, we searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for RCTs about percutaneous closure devices (such as STARFlex, GORE, and Amplatzer) and medical therapy for cryptogenic cerebral ischemic patients with PFO. The occurrence rate of recurrent stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF), major vascular complication (MVC), headache, transient ischemic attack, and bleeding were compared with the frequentist and Bayesian methods using R statistics.

Results:

We included 3747 patients from six RCTs. The GORE and Amplatzer occluders were found to be significantly associated with a decreased risk of recurrent stroke [relative risk (RR): 0.37 and 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17–0.81, 0.29–0.83, respectively]. Moreover, STARFlex was correlated to an increased risk of postoperative AF and MVCs (RR: 11.66 and 7.63; 95% CI: 4.87–21.91, 2.34–24.88).

Conclusions:

Among the three devices, the GORE and Amplatzer occluders are found to be the most effective in preventing secondary stroke in patients with PFO. Meanwhile, STARFlex is the least recommended device because it cannot decrease the risk of recurrent stroke and is the most likely to cause adverse events.

Patent foramen ovale

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common anatomical cause of an interatrial shunt. It is usually asymptomatic but may cause paradoxical embolism, manifesting as stroke, myocardial infarction or visceral/peripheral ischaemia. PFO is a risk factor for stroke and may be associated with migraine with aura. New evidence suggests PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in a highly selected population of stroke survivors: those aged 60 years or younger with a cryptogenic stroke syndrome, a large right-to-left shunt, an atrial septal aneurysm and no evidence of atrial fibrillation. They benefit from percutaneous PFO closure in addition to antiplatelet therapy, rather than antiplatelet therapy alone. Current evidence does not support PFO closure in the treatment of migraine.

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: State of the Art

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common abnormality affecting between 20% and 34% of the adult population. For most people, it is a benign finding; however, in some people, the PFO can open widely to enable paradoxical embolus to transit from the venous to arterial circulation, which is associated with stroke and systemic embolisation. Percutaneous closure of the PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke has been undertaken for a number of years, and a number of purpose-specific septal occluders have been marketed. Recent randomised control trials have demonstrated that closure of PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke is associated with reduced rates of recurrent stroke. After a brief overview of the anatomy of a PFO, this article considers the evidence for PFO closure in cryptogenic stroke. The article also addresses other potential indications for closure, including systemic arterial embolisation, decompression sickness, platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome and migraine with aura. The article lays out the pre-procedural investigations and preparation for the procedure. Finally, the article gives an overview of the procedure itself, including discussion of closure devices.

Light anti-thrombotic regimen for prevention of device thrombosis and/or thrombotic complications after interatrial shunts device-based closure

AIMS

The optimal antiplatelet therapy after atrial septal defect (ASD) or patent foramen ovale device closure (PFO) remain to be established. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of 6-month 100 mg Aspirin (ASA) regimen in the very long-term follow up after intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) -aided interatrial shunt closure in a large retrospective cohort.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective analysis which included medical and instrumental data of 789 consecutive patients referred to our institution over a 15 years period due interatrial shunt catheter-based closure.

RESULTS

Finally, 734 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 46.1 ± 14.6 years, 398 females): ASD and PFO closure were successfully performed in 281 and 453 patients, respectively. Over the follow-up period, no major bleeding events were observed while the rate of minor bleeding events was 0.9%. Tolerance problems were detected in 3.4% of cases (n==28). In 11 patients (1.5%) an abnormal complete blood count was detected and monitored up to normalization. On a mean follow -up of 10.3 ± 3.0 years (range 1-15), 10 patients (1.36%) had a persistent moderate shunt 12 months after closure and maintained Aspirin 100 mg life-long, whereas the remaining 724 suspended the treatment after 6 months. Device thrombosis in ASD and PFO groups were 0% and 0.2%, respectively. A cerebral ischemic event occurred in 0.4% of the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen of 100 mg of ASA for six months after ASD/PFO closure appeared to be both safe and effective in preventing device thrombosis and major bleedings.

Increased Risk of Perioperative Ischemic Stroke in Patients Who Undergo Noncardiac Surgery with Preexisting Atrial Septal Defect or Patent Foramen Ovale

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether a preoperative diagnosis of atrial septal defect (ASD) or patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with perioperative stroke in noncardiac surgery and their outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

United States hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults patients (≥18 years old) who underwent major noncardiac surgery from 2010 to 2015 were identified using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Readmission Database.

INTERVENTIONS

Preoperative diagnosis of ASD or patent foramen ovale.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among the 19,659,161 hospitalizations for major noncardiac surgery analyzed, 12,248 (0.06%) had a preoperative diagnosis of ASD/PFO. Perioperative ischemic stroke occurred in 723 (5.9%) of patients with ASD/PFO and 373,291 (0.02%) of those without ASD/PFO (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.9-20.0). Amongst the different types of noncardiac surgeries, obstetric, endocrine, and skin and burn surgery were associated with higher risk of stroke in patients with pre-existing ASD/PFO. Moreover, patients with ASD/PFO also had an increased in-hospital mortality (aOR, 4.6, 95% CI: 3.6-6.0), 30-day readmission (aOR, 1.2, 95% CI: 1.04-1.38), and 30-day stroke (aOR, 7.2, 95% CI: 3.1-16.6). After adjusting for atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke remained significantly high in the ASD/PFO group (aOR: 23.7, 95%CI 19.4-28.9), as well as in-hospital mortality (aOR: 5.6, 95% CI 4.1-7.7), 30-day readmission (aOR: 1.19, 95%CI 1.0-1.4), and 30-day stroke (aOR: 9.3, 95% CI 3.7-23.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Among adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery, pre-existing ASD/PFO is associated with increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke, in-hospital mortality, 30-day stroke, and 30-day readmission after surgery.

Examining the evidence for PFO closure and novel oral anticoagulants for treatment of cryptogenic stroke

Introduction: There has been considerable study assessing the treatment of cryptogenic stroke (CS) recently. This review examines the role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in CS, while also discussing the evidence for alternative medical therapies in disease treatment.Areas covered: PFO closure for treatment of CS has been assessed in 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This review summarizes the background, results and limitations of these trials. Methodological and treatment-related differences in RCTs provide potential explanations for the discordance in outcomes observed between older (CLOSURE, PC, RESPECT-Early) and newer PFO closure trials (RESPECT-Late, CLOSE, REDUCE, DEFENSE-PFO). With regards to medical therapy for CS, two RCTs (NAVIGATE ESUS and RE-SPECT ESUS) did not show any benefit in recurrent stroke prevention with the use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared with aspirin. Marked differences in baseline characteristics and rates of recurrent stroke between PFO closure and NOAC trials underlie the heterogeneous nature of CS.Expert commentary: In young patients with CS, PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent stroke, with newer RCTs emphasizing the importance of identifying those with 'high-risk' PFO and the need for continued antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, treatment for CS should not be uniform but directed at disease-specific pathologies.

Updates in the Management of Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a common neurological disorder and may present with visual symptoms. A thorough workup is warranted to determine the underlying cause of stroke to optimize secondary prevention. Despite a full workup, a high-risk mechanism may not be identified. Optimal treatment in this patient population has been the subject of recent research, particularly with regard to low-risk stroke mechanisms such as patent foramen ovale (PFO).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Using PubMed and published stroke guidelines, an evidence-based literature review was performed.

RESULTS

In this review, we compare cryptogenic stroke with the newer concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source, summarize the most common causes presumed to underlie these strokes, and review the evidence for optimal antithrombotic management. We also review recent clinical trials demonstrating a benefit for percutaneous closure of PFO for secondary stroke prevention in select patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke management is based on evaluation of individual patient-risk factors. Evaluation and treatment is ideally directed by a vascular neurologist to ensure optimal secondary prevention, especially in cases where an underlying etiology is not identified on initial workup.

Ischemic stroke and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in pregnancy

Maternal ischemic stroke and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) are dreaded complications of pregnancy and major contributors to maternal disability and mortality. This chapter summarizes the incidence and risk factors for maternal arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) and CVST and discusses the pathophysiology of maternal AIS and CVST. The diagnosis, treatment, and secondary preventive strategies for maternal stroke are also reviewed. Special populations at high risk of maternal stroke, including women with moyamoya disease, sickle cell disease, HIV, thrombophilia, and genetic cerebrovascular disorders, are highlighted.

Patent Foramen Ovale, the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy Alone or Anticoagulant Therapy Alone Versus Device Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of the Literature and Current Recommendations

Cryptogenic stroke and its relation to the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a long-debated topic. Recent clinical trials have unequivocally established the relationship between cryptogenic strokes and paradoxical embolism across the PFO. This slit-like communication exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after birth. PFO may persist as a narrow channel of communication between the right and left atria in approximately 25-27% of adults. In this review, we examine the clinical relevance of the PFO with analysis of the latest trials evaluating catheter-based closure of PFO's for cryptogenic stroke. We also review the current evidence examining the use of antiplatelet medications versus anticoagulants for stroke prevention in those patients with PFO who do not qualify for closure per current guidelines.

Reprint of : Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with otherwise unexplained ischaemic stroke: Expert consensus of the French Neurovascular Society and the French Society of Cardiology

BACKGROUND

Unlike previous randomized clinical trials (RCTs), recent trials and meta-analyses have shown that transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces stroke recurrence risk in young and middle-aged adults with an otherwise unexplained PFO-associated ischaemic stroke.

AIM

To produce an expert consensus on the role of transcatheter PFO closure and antithrombotic drugs for secondary stroke prevention in patients with PFO-associated ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

Five neurologists and five cardiologists with extensive experience in the relevant field were nominated by the French Neurovascular Society and the French Society of Cardiology to make recommendations based on evidence from RCTs and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

The experts recommend that any decision concerning treatment of patients with PFO-associated ischaemic stroke should be taken after neurological and cardiological evaluation, bringing together the necessary neurovascular, echocardiography and interventional cardiology expertise. Transcatheter PFO closure is recommended in patients fulfilling all the following criteria: age 16-60 years; recent (≤6 months) ischaemic stroke; PFO associated with atrial septal aneurysm (>10mm) or with a right-to-left shunt>20 microbubbles or with a diameter≥2mm; PFO felt to be the most likely cause of stroke after thorough aetiological evaluation by a stroke specialist. Long-term oral anticoagulation may be considered in the event of contraindication to or patient refusal of PFO closure, in the absence of a high bleeding risk. After PFO closure, dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin (75mg/day) and clopidogrel (75mg/day) is recommended for 3 months, followed by monotherapy with aspirin or clopidogrel for≥5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a big step forward that will benefit many patients has been taken with recent trials, many questions remain unanswered. Pending results from further studies, decision-making regarding management of patients with PFO-associated ischaemic stroke should be based on a close coordination between neurologists/stroke specialists and cardiologists.

Antithrombotic Management of Ischemic Stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ischemic stroke describes a condition in which inadequate blood flow leads to lack of oxygenation to the brain tissue and ensuing neuronal death. There are multiple causes of ischemic stroke, each of which may indicate different antithrombotic management strategies. The goal of this review is to provide information about antithrombotic therapies for secondary stroke prevention based on etiology of stroke.

RECENT FINDINGS

New studies of existing antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies have demonstrated varied efficacies of treatments based on the underlying risk factor of ischemic stroke. Understanding the optimal therapies for secondary stroke prevention can enhance care of stroke patients and lower the incidence of recurrent cerebrovascular ischemia.

Stroke in the Young: a Global Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to evaluate the epidemiology, racial and gender disparity, etiology, and treatment of stroke in the younger population.

RECENT FINDINGS

The younger age group without vascular risk factors exhibits an increased prevalence of cardio-embolism in context of patent foramen ovale/atrial septal aneurysm strokes, from other determined etiology of non-atherosclerotic vasculopathy including dissection, inherited or acquired thrombophilia, and other unusual causes of stroke. Ethnic disparities also exist in certain populations. The prevalence of stroke in the young is increasing due to several factors. Since stroke is often disabling, this trend poses an enormous threat to socioeconomic stability especially in developing countries. In young patients with an absence of conventional vascular risk factors and negative preliminary stroke work-up, clinicians must consider less common causes of stroke in this population. There is prime opportunity for future investigations as there is currently a lack of evidence-based management guidelines for these uncommon etiologies based on research completed to date.

Cardiac diagnostic work-up of ischaemic stroke

Cardioembolic sources account for 20-30% of ischaemic strokes and are important to identify considering their prognostic and therapeutic implications. During the past years, new developments have been made in the cardiac diagnostic evaluation and management of patients with ischaemic stroke, especially regarding strokes of unknown aetiology. These recent advances have had a major impact on our understanding of embolic strokes, their diagnostic work-up, and clinical management. Herein, we propose a cardiac diagnostic work-up scheme for patients with ischaemic stroke from definite cardioembolic sources and embolic strokes of undetermined source.

Role of PFO Closure in Ischemic Stroke Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent advancements in the management of acute ischemic stroke patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO).

RECENT FINDINGS

One significant recent development was publication of long-term follow-up data from the RESPECT trial demonstrating evidence in favor of PFO closure over medical management. This data subsequently led to FDA approval for AMPLATZER™ septal occluder in the treatment of patients aged 18 to 60 years with both PFO and no other determined etiology for ischemic stroke, otherwise referred to as embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several subsequent closure trial results have recently been published, which also demonstrated benefit of PFO closure over medical management for ischemic stroke risk reduction in select patients. Based on the results of the more recently published REDUCE trial, the FDA granted approval for the GORE™ septal occluder. There is current, well-established evidence that PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention is effective in select cases.

Antithrombotic Treatment in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale

Background and Purpose—

It is unclear whether treatment with anticoagulants or antiplatelets is the optimal strategy in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack of undetermined cause and patent foramen ovale that is not percutaneously closed. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment in this population.

Methods—

We searched PubMed until July 16, 2019 for trials comparing anticoagulants and antiplatelet treatment in patients with stroke/transient ischemic attack and medically treated patent foramen ovale using the terms: “cryptogenic or embolic stroke of undetermined source” and “stroke or cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack” and “patent foramen ovale or patent foramen ovale or paradoxical embolism” and “trial or study” and “antithrombotic or anticoagulant or antiplatelet.” The outcomes assessed were stroke recurrence, major bleeding, and the composite end point of stroke recurrence or major bleeding. We used 3 random-effects models: (1) a reference model based on the inverse variance method with the Sidik and Jonkman heterogeneity estimator; (2) a strict model, implementing the Hartung and Knapp method; and (3) a commonly used Bayesian model with a prior that assumes moderate to large between-study variance.

Results—

Among 112 articles identified in the literature search, 5 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis (1720 patients, mean follow-up 2.3±0.5 years). Stroke recurrence occurred at a rate of 1.73 per 100 patient-years in anticoagulant-assigned patients and 2.39 in antiplatelet-assigned patients (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.32–1.48 for the Sidik and Jonkman estimator). Major bleeding occurred at a rate of 1.16 per 100 patient-years in anticoagulant-assigned patients and 0.68 in antiplatelet-assigned patients (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.72–3.59 for the Sidik and Jonkman estimator). The composite outcome occurred in 52 anticoagulant-assigned and 54 antiplatelet-assigned patients (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65–1.70 for the Sidik and Jonkman estimator).

Conclusions—

We cannot exclude a large reduction of stroke recurrence in anticoagulant-assigned patients compared with antiplatelet-assigned, without significant differences in major bleeding. An adequately powered randomized controlled trial of a non–vitamin K antagonist versus aspirin is warranted.

Patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The objective of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure compared with medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS).

Background

The role of PFO closure in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with prior CS has been controversial.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and the clinical trial registry maintained at clinicaltrials.gov for randomized control trials that compared device closure with medical management and reported on subsequent stroke and adverse events. Event rates were compared using a forest plot of relative risk using a random-effects model assuming interstudy heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 6 studies (n = 3747) were included in the final analysis. Mean follow-up ranged from 2 to 5.9 years. Pooled analysis revealed that device closure compared to medical management was associated with a significant reduction in stroke (risk ratio [RR] = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20–0.83, I² = 51%, P = 0.01). There was, however, a significant increase in atrial fibrillation with device therapy (RR = 5.29, 95% CI = 2.32–12.06, I² = 38%, P < 0.0001). No effect was observed on major bleeding (P = 0.50) or mortality (P = 0.42) with device therapy. Subgroup analyses showed that device closure significantly reduced the incidence of the composite primary end point among patients who had large shunt sizes (RR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.18–0.68, I² = 27%, P = 0.002). The presence/absence of atrial septal aneurysm (P = 0.52) had no effect on the outcome.

Conclusion

PFO closure is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of stroke compared to medical management. However, it causes an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.

Endovascular closure of patent foramen ovale: a critical appraisal of published trials

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of cryptogenic stroke patients with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is controversial. A critical review of these studies is presented.

METHODS

A description of all trials comparing medical and endovascular treatment with closing devices is given. Additional pertinent studies are discussed to help construct a rational basis for treatment decisions.

RESULTS

Initial negative trials evaluating PFO closure were followed by positive studies published in 2017 and 2018. All trials evaluated young patients (up to 60 years). Methodological problems are present in all trials including their open label construction. Most positive trials developed strategies to increase the percentage of patients with interatrial septal aneurysms or hypermobility and large right-to-left shunts. Even in these positive trials, large numbers of patients need to be treated to avoid one stroke. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 2-6% and other adverse effects related to the procedure and to the devices occurred in a substantial number of patients. Incomplete occlusion of the PFO is also frequent. Anticoagulant treatment has not been adequately studied as a therapeutic option.

CONCLUSION

Young patients with cryptogenic strokes seem to benefit from endovascular closure of a PFO in the presence of a large right-to-left shunt or an associated atrial septum aneurysm. For most other patients, a highly-individualized decision must be made, taking into account the low risk of recurrence in patients with a cryptogenic stroke attributable to a PFO, the high numbers needed to treat and the risks related to the procedure.

Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

Background and Purpose- The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations in a single document for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke. The intended audiences are prehospital care providers, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators. These guidelines supersede the 2013 Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) Guidelines and are an update of the 2018 AIS Guidelines. Methods- Members of the writing group were appointed by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statements Oversight Committee, representing various areas of medical expertise. Members were not allowed to participate in discussions or to vote on topics relevant to their relations with industry. An update of the 2013 AIS Guidelines was originally published in January 2018. This guideline was approved by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee and the AHA Executive Committee. In April 2018, a revision to these guidelines, deleting some recommendations, was published online by the AHA. The writing group was asked review the original document and revise if appropriate. In June 2018, the writing group submitted a document with minor changes and with inclusion of important newly published randomized controlled trials with >100 participants and clinical outcomes at least 90 days after AIS. The document was sent to 14 peer reviewers. The writing group evaluated the peer reviewers' comments and revised when appropriate. The current final document was approved by all members of the writing group except when relationships with industry precluded members from voting and by the governing bodies of the AHA. These guidelines use the American College of Cardiology/AHA 2015 Class of Recommendations and Level of Evidence and the new AHA guidelines format. Results- These guidelines detail prehospital care, urgent and emergency evaluation and treatment with intravenous and intra-arterial therapies, and in-hospital management, including secondary prevention measures that are appropriately instituted within the first 2 weeks. The guidelines support the overarching concept of stroke systems of care in both the prehospital and hospital settings. Conclusions- These guidelines provide general recommendations based on the currently available evidence to guide clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke. In many instances, however, only limited data exist demonstrating the urgent need for continued research on treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Ischemic stroke in young adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the clinical approach to the young adult stroke patient is similar to that of an older adult, several important differences exist. The purpose of this article is to concisely review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods and current treatment options for the young adult ischemic stroke patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence clearly indicates that the incidence ischemic stroke in young adults is on the rise. A variety of factors are implicated, including an increased burden of classic and emerging vascular risk factors, and improved stroke detection, among other causes. Improved awareness, prevention and successful treatment of the young adult stroke patient is of great importance, particularly given the major long-term socioeconomic impact strokes have on the patient, their family and society at large.

SUMMARY

In this review, we focus on the latest epidemiologic, diagnostic and treatment paradigms to improve physician awareness and optimize outcomes in young adult ischemic stroke patients. An overview of the clinical presentations of various stroke syndromes is described, emphasizing key causes physicians should consider, as well as providing recommendations regarding evaluation and treatment. Important causes including dissection and inflammatory and noninflammatory vasculopathies are emphasized. The diagnoses of cerebral venous thromboses, cardioembolic stroke and paradoxical emboli are also discussed. The effects of established and emerging risk factors on large and small vessel disease, as well as genetic contributions, are also highlighted.

Recurrent Stroke Reduction with Patent Foramen Ovale Closure versus Medical Therapy Based on Patent Foramen Ovale Characteristics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke remains a matter of debate. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PFO closure versus medical therapy (MT) based on PFO characteristics. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the primary end points of stroke. After systematic search, six RCTs (3,747 patients) with 1,889 patients randomized to PFO closure and 1,858 patients randomized to the MT group were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, PFO closure was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent stroke compared to MT [RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.20-0.83]. While there were no differences in mortality or major bleeding between the two groups, risk of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation was higher in the PFO closure group compared to MT [RR 5.29; 95% CI 2.32-12.06]. Further, risk reduction in stroke with PFO closure was significant in patients with high-risk PFO characteristics [RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.87] but not in low-risk patients [RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.29-1.84]. In conclusion, among patients with cryptogenic stroke, PFO closure is associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared to MT. Additionally, the benefit of PFO closure might be dependent on certain PFO characteristics.

Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: Randomized Trial Update

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in about one-quarter of all adults, but the prevalence increases to approximately half of those with a history of a so-called cryptogenic stroke. The true efficacy of PFO closure for prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism has been debated for years, as the early 3 randomized trials did not show a statistically significant benefit of PFO closure over standard-of-care medical therapy. However, 3 recent randomized trials along with the long-term follow-up data from the largest early trial demonstrated superiority of device closure for secondary stroke prevention.

Effect of coexisting vascular disease on long-term risk of recurrent events after TIA or stroke

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients with TIA or ischemic stroke with coexisting cardiovascular disease (i.e., history of coronary or peripheral artery disease) are still at high risk of recurrent ischemic events despite current secondary prevention guidelines.

METHODS

In a population-based study in Oxfordshire, UK (Oxford Vascular Study), we studied consecutive patients with TIA or ischemic stroke for 2002-2014. Patients were treated according to current secondary prevention guidelines and we determined risks of coronary events, recurrent ischemic stroke, and major bleeding stratified by the presence of coexisting cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Among 2,555 patients (9,148 patient-years of follow-up), those (n = 640; 25.0%) with coexisting cardiovascular disease (449 coronary only; 103 peripheral only; 88 both) were at higher 10-year risk of coronary events than those without (22.8%, 95% confidence interval 17.4-27.9; vs 7.1%, 5.3-8.8; p < 0.001; age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.07, 2.24-4.21) and of recurrent ischemic stroke (31.5%, 25.1-37.4; vs 23.4%, 20.5-26.2; p = 0.0049; age- and sex-adjusted HR 1.23, 0.99-1.53), despite similar rates of use of antithrombotic and lipid-lowering medication. However, in patients with noncardioembolic TIA/stroke, risk of extracranial bleeds was also higher in those with coexisting cardiovascular disease, particularly in patients aged <75 years (8.1%, 2.8-13.0; vs 3.4%, 1.6-5.3; p = 0.0050; age- and sex-adjusted HR 2.71, 1.16-6.30), although risk of intracerebral hemorrhage was not increased (age- and sex-adjusted HR 0.36, 0.04-2.99).

CONCLUSIONS

As in older studies, patients with TIA/stroke with coexisting cardiovascular disease remain at high risk of recurrent ischemic events despite current management. More intensive lipid-lowering might therefore be justified, but benefit from increased antithrombotic treatment might be offset by the higher risk of extracranial bleeding.

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with otherwise unexplained ischaemic stroke: Expert consensus of the French Neurovascular Society and the French Society of Cardiology

BACKGROUND

Unlike previous randomized clinical trials (RCTs), recent trials and meta-analyses have shown that transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces stroke recurrence risk in young and middle-aged adults with an otherwise unexplained PFO-associated ischaemic stroke.

AIM

To produce an expert consensus on the role of transcatheter PFO closure and antithrombotic drugs for secondary stroke prevention in patients with PFO-associated ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

Five neurologists and five cardiologists with extensive experience in the relevant field were nominated by the French Neurovascular Society and the French Society of Cardiology to make recommendations based on evidence from RCTs and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

The experts recommend that any decision concerning treatment of patients with PFO-associated ischaemic stroke should be taken after neurological and cardiological evaluation, bringing together the necessary neurovascular, echocardiography and interventional cardiology expertise. Transcatheter PFO closure is recommended in patients fulfilling all the following criteria: age 16-60 years; recent (≤6 months) ischaemic stroke; PFO associated with atrial septal aneurysm (>10mm) or with a right-to-left shunt>20 microbubbles or with a diameter≥2mm; PFO felt to be the most likely cause of stroke after thorough aetiological evaluation by a stroke specialist. Long-term oral anticoagulation may be considered in the event of contraindication to or patient refusal of PFO closure, in the absence of a high bleeding risk. After PFO closure, dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin (75mg/day) and clopidogrel (75mg/day) is recommended for 3 months, followed by monotherapy with aspirin or clopidogrel for≥5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a big step forward that will benefit many patients has been taken with recent trials, many questions remain unanswered. Pending results from further studies, decision-making regarding management of patients with PFO-associated ischaemic stroke should be based on a close coordination between neurologists/stroke specialists and cardiologists.

Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale

Nearly one-half of patients with cryptogenic stroke have a patent foramen ovale (PFO). The dilemma of whether to close these PFOs percutaneously, in an effort to reduce the risk of recurrent paradoxical embolism, has been a matter of ongoing debate for more than a decade. Early randomized clinical trials failed to demonstrate a significant benefit of percutaneous PFO closure for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in an intention-to-treat analysis. The long-term follow-up data from the RESPECT trial and 2 new randomized trials (CLOSE and REDUCE) have clarified these findings. They showed that with good patient selection, transcatheter PFO closure significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stroke compared with medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with no increased risk of serious adverse events or influence on major bleeding.

Management of Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: An Update

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common benign finding in healthy subjects, but its prevalence is higher in patients with stroke of unclear cause (cryptogenic stroke). PFO is believed to be associated with stroke through paradoxical embolism, and certain clinical and anatomical criteria seem to increase the likelihood of a PFO to be pathological. Recent trials have shown that closure of PFO, especially if associated with an atrial septal aneurysm and/or a large interatrial shunt, may reduce the risk of recurrent stroke as compared to medical treatment. However, it remains challenging to risk stratify patients with suspected PFO-related stroke and to decide if device closure is indicated. We sought to review contemporary evidence and to conclude an evidence-based strategy to prevent recurrence of PFO-related stroke.

Embolic stroke of undetermined source correlates to atrial fibrosis without atrial fibrillation

Objective

To examine the hypothesis that atrial fibrosis and associated atrial cardiopathy may be in the causal pathway of cardioembolic stroke independently of atrial fibrillation (AF) by comparing atrial fibrosis burden between patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), patients with AF, and healthy controls.

Methods

We used late-gadolinium-enhancement MRI to compare atrial fibrosis in 10 patients with ESUS against 10 controls (no stroke, no AF) and 10 patients with AF. Fibrosis was compared between groups, controlling for stroke risk factors.

Results

Mean age was 51 ± 15 years, and 43% of participants were female. Patients with ESUS had more atrial fibrosis than controls (16.8 ± 5.7% vs 10.6 ± 5.7%, p = 0.019) and similar fibrosis compared to patients with AF (17.8 ± 4.8%, p = 0.65). Odds ratios of ESUS per quartile of fibrosis were 3.22 (95% CI [CI] 1.11–9.32, p = 0.031, unadjusted) and 3.17 (95% CI 1.05–9.52, p = 0.041, CHA2DVASc score adjusted). Patients with >12% fibrosis had a higher percentage of ESUS (77.8% vs 27.3%, p = 0.02), and patients with >20% fibrosis had the highest proportion of ESUS (4 of 5).

Conclusions

Patients with ESUS exhibit similar atrial fibrosis compared to patients with AF and more fibrosis than healthy controls. Fibrosis is associated with ESUS after controlling for stroke risk factors, supporting the hypothesis that fibrosis is in the causal pathway of cardioembolic stroke independently of AF. Prospective studies are needed to assess the role of anticoagulation in primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with high atrial fibrosis.

Patent foramen ovale and embolic cryptogenic stroke

The paper considers the actual problem of cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO). It highlights the issues of pathogenesis and role of paradoxical embolism in the development of cerebral circulation disorders. The features of clinical manifestations and neuroimaging pattern of stroke in the presence of PFO are described. Ultrasound diagnostic techniques used to verify a cardiac anomaly are characterized. Approaches to establishing a cause-and-effect relationship between the presence of PFO and the development of stroke are presented. The current possibilities of secondary prevention in this category of patients, in particular the results of studies of percutaneous PFO occlusion, are discussed.

Closing the gap on patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke

Introduction: The treatment options for prevention of recurrent of cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) have been intensely debated in the recent decades. The suggested options were percutaneous closure of PFO versus medical therapy. However, up to these date there is a controversy regarding the indication of percutaneous closure. Multiple meta-analysis and recent randomized control trials showed the benefit of PFO closure when compared with medical therapy alone. Areas covered: The article reviews the prevalence, physiology, diagnosis and treatment options of PFO after cryptogenic stroke. Furthermore, it will discuss the results of randomized control trials that compared the PFO closure to medical therapy. Expert opinion: The association between PFO and unexplained cryptogenic stroke has been well established in the multiple studies. The diagnosis and management of PFO might be challenging in some cases. Although multiple studies showed that PFO closure is associated with lower rates of recurrent stroke in patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke, the indication and patient selection for this intervention are not well established yet in the guidelines.

Long-term transesophageal echocardiography after patent foramen ovale closure by BioSTAR and Amplatzer patent foramen ovale occluders

OBJECTIVES

To compare transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) findings after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure by BioSTAR (NMT Medical Inc, Boston, MA) and Amplatzer PFO occluders (Abbott Vascular, Plymouth, MN).

BACKGROUND

PFO closure with a biodegradable device represents an attractive alternative to permanent devices. Long-term effectiveness and morphology after biodegradation remain unknown.

METHODS

Between February 2008 and June 2014, 49 patients received BioSTAR and 48 Amplatzer PFO occluder. TOE was performed after closure, at 6 months and beyond 2 years.

RESULTS

PFO features were comparable between the groups. Immediate effective closure (<5 bubbles on Valsalva) was obtained in 96% by BioSTAR and 88% by Amplatzer PFO occluder (p = .16). Except for transient fever after BioSTAR (10.8 vs. 0%; p = .08), there was no adverse events. TOE at 6 months revealed comparable effective closure (93 vs. 89%; p = .74), all devices in correct position and no thrombus/pericardial effusion. In the BioSTAR group, a peri-device left-to-right color Doppler shunt was documented in one patient (2.2%), protrusion of the nitinol framework strut(s) into the atrial cavity in two patients (4.3%), and both events in one patient (2.2%). TOE beyond 2 years showed comparable effective closure (92 vs. 96%; p = 1.00) and again BioSTAR-associated peri-device left-to-right shunt and metal framework strut(s) protrusion. There was no stroke or peripheral embolization in either group while TIA was numerically greater in BioSTAR patients (6.8 vs. 2.5%; p = .61).

CONCLUSION

BioSTAR provided similar PFO closure rate as Amplatzer PFO occluder. As yet unreported BioSTAR-associated peri-device left-to-right shunt and metal framework strut(s) protrusion may have practical implications for further development of biodegradable devices.

Identification of High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale Associated With Cryptogenic Stroke: Development of a Scoring System

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has become an effective therapeutic strategy for cryptogenic stroke (CS). The identification of high-risk PFO is essential, but the data are limited. This study aimed to clarify the factors related to CS and to develop a score for high-risk PFO.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 57 patients with prior CS and 50 without CS who were scheduled for transcatheter closure. PFO characteristics were evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. Based on factors related to CS, we estimated the risk score.

RESULTS

Patients with CS had a greater frequency of large-size PFO (≥2 mm in height), long-tunnel PFO (≥10 mm in length), atrial septal aneurysm, hypermobile interatrial septum, prominent Eustachian valve or Chiari's network, the large right-to-left shunt at rest and during Valsalva maneuver, and low-angle PFO (≤10° of PFO angle from inferior vena cava), compared with patients without CS. Multivariate analysis showed that long-tunnel PFO, the presence of hypermobile interatrial septum, the presence of prominent Eustachian valve or Chiari's network, the large right-to-left shunt during Valsalva maneuver, and low-angle PFO were independently related to CS. When the score was estimated based on 1 point for each factor, the proportion of CS was markedly elevated with a score of ≥2 points. The probability of CS was markedly different between scores of ≤1 or ≥2 points.

CONCLUSIONS

PFO risk can be assessed with a score based on high-risk features. The presence of two or more high-risk PFO features is associated with CS.

The cardiac diagnostic work-up in stroke patients-A subanalysis of the Find-AFRANDOMISED trial

Background

The cardiac diagnostic workup of stroke patients, especially the value of echocardiography and enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring, is still a matter of debate. We aimed to analyse the impact of pathologies detected by echocardiography and ECG monitoring on therapeutic decisions and prognosis.

Methods

Find-AF_RANDOMISED was a prospective multicenter study which randomised 398 acute ischemic stroke patients ≥ 60 years to enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring or usual stroke unit care. This substudy compared therapeutic consequences of echocardiography and routine Holter-ECG or enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring, respectively, and prognosis of patients with or without pathologic findings in echocardiography or Holter-ECG monitoring.

Results

50.3% received enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring and 49.7% routine ECG monitoring. 82.9% underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 38.9% transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and 25.6% both procedures. 14/89 TEE pathologies and 1/90 TTE pathology led to a change in therapy, resulting in a number needed to change decision (NNCD) of 12 and 330 (p < 0.001), respectively. In comparison, enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring found atrial fibrillation (AF) in 27 of 200 patients, and routine ECG monitoring in twelve of 198 patients, leading to therapeutic changes in all patients (NNCD 8 and 17, respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Most changes in therapeutic decisions were triggered by enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring, which should therefore play a more prominent role in future guidelines. Echocardiography identifies a patient group at high cardiovascular risk, but rarely result in therapeutic changes. Whether this patient group requires further cardiovascular workup remains unknown. This should be further investigated by interdisciplinary neurocardiologic teams and in appropriate future trials.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01855035

Who benefits from percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale vs medical therapy for stroke prevention? In-depth and updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

A few randomized clinical trials (RCT) and their meta-analyses have found patent foramen ovale closure (PFOC) to be beneficial in prevention of stroke compared to medical therapy. Whether the benefit is extended across all groups of patients remains unclear.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PFOC vs medical therapy in different groups of patients presenting with stroke, we performed this meta-analysis of RCTs.

METHODS

Electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL and ProQuest Central and manual search were performed from inception through September 2018 for RCTs. Ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), a composite of IS, TIA and systemic embolism (SE), mortality, major bleeding, atrial fibrillation (AF) and procedural complications were the major outcomes. Random-effects model was used to perform analyses.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs including 3560 patients showed that the PFOC, compared to medical therapy reduced the risk of IS [odds ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.78; P = 0.01] and the composite of IS, TIA and SE [0.55 (0.32-0.93); P = 0.02] and increased the AF risk [4.79 (2.35-9.77); P < 0.0001]. No statistical difference was observed in the risk of TIA [0.86 (0.54-1.38); P = 0.54], mortality [0.74 (0.28-1.93); P = 0.53] and major bleeding [0.81 (0.42-1.56); P = 0.53] between two strategies. Subgroup analyses showed that compared to medical therapy, PFOC reduced the risk of stroke in persons who were males, ≤ 45 years of age and had large shunt or atrial septal aneurysm.

CONCLUSION

In certain groups of patients presenting with stroke, PFOC is beneficial in preventing future stroke compared to medical therapy.