Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer

The role of molecular heterogeneity targeting resistance mechanisms to lung cancer therapies

Introduction: The treatment scenario of lung cancer is rapidly evolving through time. In parallel, growing evidence is accumulating on different mechanisms of treatment resistance. Inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity define the spatial and temporal tumor clonal evolution, that is at the basis of tumor progression and resistance to anticancer treatments.Areas covered: This review summarizes the available evidence on molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer, from diagnosis to the occurrence of treatment resistance. The application of novel molecular diagnostic methods to detect molecular heterogeneity, and the implications of understanding heterogeneity for drug development strategies are discussed, with focus on clinical relevance and impact on patients' survival.Expert opinion: The current knowledge of molecular heterogeneity allows to identify different molecular subgroups of patients within the same conventional tumor type. Deeper understanding of heterogeneity determinants and the possibility to comprehensively investigate tumor molecular patterns will lead to the development of personalized treatment approaches, with the final goal to overcome resistance and prolong survival in lung cancer patients.

Molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of complex ALK rearrangements identified by next-generation sequencing in non-small cell lung cancers

Background

Complex kinase rearrangement, a mutational process involving one or two chromosomes with clustered rearrangement breakpoints, interferes with the accurate detection of kinase fusions by DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). We investigated the characteristics of complex ALK rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancers using multiple molecular tests.

Methods

Samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients were analyzed by targeted-capture DNA-based NGS with probes tilling the selected intronic regions of fusion partner genes, RNA-based NGS, RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Results

In a large cohort of 6576 non-small cell lung cancer patients, 343 (5.2%) cases harboring ALK rearrangements were identified. Fourteen cases with complex ALK rearrangements were identified by DNA-based NGS and classified into three types by integrating various genomic features, including intergenic (n = 3), intragenic (n = 5) and “bridge joint” rearrangements (n = 6). All thirteen cases with sufficient samples actually expressed canonical EML4-ALK fusion transcripts confirmed by RNA-based NGS. Besides, positive ALK IHC was detected in 13 of 13 cases, and 9 of 11 cases were positive in FISH testing. Patients with complex ALK rearrangements who received ALK inhibitors treatment (n = 6), showed no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) compared with patients with canonical ALK fusions n = 36, P = 0.9291).

Conclusions

This study firstly reveals the molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of complex ALK rearrangements in NSCLC, sensitive to ALK inhibitors treatment, and highlights the importance of utilizing probes tilling the selected intronic regions of fusion partner genes in DNA-based NGS for accurate fusion detection. RNA and protein level assay may be critical in validating the function of complex ALK rearrangements in clinical practice for optimal treatment decision.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-021-02982-4.

Update on recent key publications in lung oncology: picking up speed

INTRODUCTION

As incidence rates for lung cancer are still very high and lung cancer remains the most deadly cancer since the turn of the millennium, efforts have been made to find new approaches in cancer research. This systematic review highlights how therapeutic options were extended and how the development of new drugs has picked up speed during the last 20 years.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library and the European Union Trial Register and 443 records were identified. Our inclusion criteria constituted completed phase I, II and III studies investigating drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Overall, 127 articles were analysed.

RESULTS

During the 5 year interval from 2015 to 2020, significantly more drugs were approved after phase III, and occasionally after phase II, trials than between 2000 and 2005 (p=0.002). Furthermore, there was a significant time difference (p=0.00001) indicating an increasingly briefer time interval between the publication of phase I and phase III results in the last few years.

DISCUSSION

Due to novel therapeutic approaches, numerous new drugs in lung oncology were approved. This has improved symptoms and prognoses in patients with advanced lung cancer. However, faster approval could make it difficult to scrutinise new options regarding safety and efficacy with sufficient diligence.

Recruitment, outcomes, and toxicity trends in phase I oncology trials: Six-year experience in a large institution

Background

With the rapid influx of novel anti‐cancer agents, phase I clinical trials in oncology are evolving. Historically, response rates on early phase trials have been modest with the clinical benefit and ethics of enrolment debated. However, there is a paucity of real‐world data in this setting.

Aim

To better understand the changing landscape of phase I oncology trials, we performed a retrospective review at our institution to examine patient and trial characteristics, screening outcomes, and treatment outcomes.

Methods and results

We analyzed all consecutive adult patients with advanced solid organ malignancies who were screened across phase I trials from January 2013 to December 2018 at a single institution. During this period, 242 patients were assessed for 28 different trials. Median age was 64 years (range 30–89) with an equal sex distribution. Among 257 screening visits, the overall screen failure rate was 18%, resulting in 212 patients being enrolled onto a study. Twenty‐six trials (93%) involved immunotherapeutic agents or molecular targeted agents either alone or in combination, with only two trials of cytotoxic agents (7%). Twenty‐two (13.4%) of the 209 treated patients experienced a total of 33 grade 3 or higher treatment‐related adverse events. There was one treatment‐related death (0.5%). Of 190 response‐evaluable patients, 7 (4%) had a complete response, 34 (18%) a partial response, and 59 (31%) experienced stable disease for a disease control rate of 53%. The median overall survival for our cohort was 8.0 (95% CI: 6.8–9.2) months.

Conclusion

The profile of phase I trials at our institution are consistent with the changing early drug development landscape. Response rates and overall survival in our cohort are superior to historically reported rates and comparable to contemporaneous studies. Severe treatment‐related toxicity was relatively uncommon, and treatment‐related mortality was rare.

Precision therapy with anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor ceritinib in ALK-rearranged anaplastic large cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

More than 80% of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) patients harbor the (nucleophosmin) NPM1-ALK fusion gene t(2;5) chromosomal translocation. We evaluated the preclinical and clinical efficacy of ceritinib treatment of this aggressive lymphoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the effects of ceritinib treatment in NPM1-ALK+ T-cell lymphoma cell lines in vitro and on tumor size and survival advantage in vivo utilizing tumor xenografts. We treated an NPM1-ALK+ ALCL patient with ceritinib. We reviewed all hematologic malignancies profiled by a large hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay for ALK alterations.

RESULTS

In our in vitro experiments, ceritinib inhibited constitutive activation of the fusion kinase NPM1-ALK and downstream effector molecules STAT3, AKT, and ERK1/2, and induced apoptosis of these lymphoma cell lines. Cell cycle analysis following ceritinib treatment showed G0/G1 arrest with a concomitant decrease in the percentage of cells in S and G2/M phases. Further, treatment with ceritinib in the NPM1-ALK+ ALCL xenograft model resulted in tumor regression and improved survival. Of 19 272 patients with hematopoietic diseases sequenced, 58 patients (0.30%) harbored ALK fusions that include histiocytic disorders, multiple myeloma, B-cell neoplasms, Castleman's disease, and juvenile xanthogranuloma. A multiple relapsed NPM1-ALK+ ALCL patient treated with ceritinib achieved complete remission with ongoing clinical benefit to date, 5 years after initiation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This ceritinib translational study in NPM1-ALK+ ALCL provides a strong rationale for a prospective study of ceritinib in ALK+ T-cell lymphomas and other ALK+ hematologic malignancies.

Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer

BACKGROUND

The overwhelming majority of dose-escalation clinical trials use methods that seek a maximum tolerable dose, including rule-based methods like the 3+3, and model-based methods like CRM and EWOC. These methods assume that the incidences of efficacy and toxicity always increase as dose is increased. This assumption is widely accepted with cytotoxic therapies. In recent decades, however, the search for novel cancer treatments has broadened, increasingly focusing on inhibitors and antibodies. The rationale that higher doses are always associated with superior efficacy is less clear for these types of therapies.

METHODS

We extracted dose-level efficacy and toxicity outcomes from 115 manuscripts reporting dose-finding clinical trials in cancer between 2008 and 2014. We analysed the outcomes from each manuscript using flexible non-linear regression models to investigate the evidence supporting the monotonic efficacy and toxicity assumptions.

RESULTS

We found that the monotonic toxicity assumption was well-supported across most treatment classes and disease areas. In contrast, we found very little evidence supporting the monotonic efficacy assumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Our conclusion is that dose-escalation trials routinely use methods whose assumptions are violated by the outcomes observed. As a consequence, dose-finding trials risk recommending unjustifiably high doses that may be harmful to patients. We recommend that trialists consider experimental designs that allow toxicity and efficacy outcomes to jointly determine the doses given to patients and recommended for further study.

Actionability of on-target ALK Resistance Mutations in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Local Experience and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) gene fusions respond well to ALK inhibitors but commonly develop on-target resistance mutations. The objective of this study is to collect clinical evidence for subsequent treatment with ALK inhibitors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Local experience with on-target ALK resistance mutations and review of the literature identified 387 patients with ALK inhibitor resistance mutations. Clinical benefit of mutation-inhibitor combinations was assessed based on reported response, progression-free survival and duration of treatment. Furthermore, this clinical evidence was compared to previously reported in vitro sensitivity of mutations to the inhibitors.

RESULTS

Of the pooled population of 387 patients in this analysis, 239 (62%) received at least 1 additional line of ALK inhibition after developing on-target resistance to ALK inhibitor therapy. Clinical benefit was reported for 177 (68%) patients, but differed for each mutation-inhibitor combination. Agreement between in vitro predicted sensitivity of 6 published models and observed clinical benefit ranged from 64% to 87%. The observed clinical evidence for highest probability of response in the context of specific on-target ALK inhibitor resistance mutations is presented.

CONCLUSION

Molecular diagnostics performed on tissue samples that are refractive to ALK inhibitor therapy can reveal new options for targeted therapy for NSCLC patients. Our comprehensive overview of clinical evidence of drug actionability of ALK on-target resistance mechanisms may serve as a practical guide to select the most optimal drug for individual patients.

Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer

RATIONALE

Recent studies have discovered several unique tumor response subgroups outside of response classification by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST), such as mixed response and oligometastasis. These subtypes have a distinctive property, lesion heterogeneity defined as diversity of tumor growth profiles in RECIST target lesions. Furthermore, many cancer clinical trials have been activated to evaluate various treatment options for heterogeneity-related subgroups (e.g., 29 trials so far listed in clinicaltrials.gov for cancer patients with oligometastasis). Some of the trials have shown survival benefit by tailored treatment strategies. This evidence presents the unmet need to incorporate lesion heterogeneity to improve RECIST response classification.

METHOD

An approach for Lesion Heterogeneity Classification (LeHeC) was developed using a contemporary statistical approach to assess target lesion variation, characterize patient treatment response, and translate informative evidence to improving treatment strategy. A mixed effect linear model was used to determine lesion heterogeneity. Further analysis was conducted to classify various types of lesion variation and incorporate with RECIST to enhance response classification. A study cohort of 110 target lesions from 36 lung cancer patients was used for evaluation.

RESULTS

Due to small sample size issue, the result was exploratory in nature. By analyzing RECIST target lesion data, the LeHeC approach detected a high prevalence (n = 21; 58%) of lesion heterogeneity. Subgroup classification revealed several informative distinct subsets in a descending order of lesion heterogeneity: mix of progression and regression (n = 7), mix of progression and stability (n = 9), mix of regression and stability (n = 5), and non-heterogeneity (n = 15). Evaluation for association of lesion heterogeneity and RECIST best response classification showed lesion heterogeneity commonly occurred in each response group (stable disease: 16/27; 59%; partial response: 3/5; 60%; progression disease: 2/4; 50%). Survival analysis showed a differential trend of overall survival between heterogeneity and non-heterogeneity in RECIST response groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate lesion heterogeneity, an underappreciated metric, for RECIST application in oncology clinical trials. Results indicated lesion heterogeneity is not an uncommon event. The LeHeC approach could enhance RECIST response classification by utilizing granular lesion level discovery of heterogeneity.

Allosteric Inhibitors of SHP2: An Updated Patent Review (2015-2020)

Srchomology-2-domain-containing PTP 2 (SHP2) is a nonreceptor phosphatase encoded by the PTPN11 gene. Over expression of SHP2 is associated with various human diseases, such as Noonan syndrome, LEOPARD syndrome, and cancers. To overcome the shortcomings of existing orthosteric inhibitors, novel inhibitors targeting the allosteric site of SHP2 with high selectivity and low toxicity are under development. This paper reviews allosteric inhibitors of SHP2 published in patents from 2015 to 2020. The molecules are classified according to the chemical structure of the central core. SHP2 has long been considered as an 'undruggable' protein. Fortunately, a critical breakthrough was made by researchers from Novartis AG Ltd., who identified SHP099 as a highly potent, selective, soluble, and orally bioavailable SHP2 allosteric inhibitor. Currently, there are several allosteric inhibitors of SHP2 in clinical development. However, drug resistance is still a major challenge. The combination of SHP2 allosteric inhibitors and immunotherapy drugs or molecular targeted drugs is emerging as a promising therapeutic strategy against drug resistance.

Treatment of brain metastases in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Brain metastases are quite frequent in patients with ALK-translocated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): they are often not amenable to surgical resection and are generally treated with radiotherapy (RT). This however causes severe late toxic side effects that may become invalidating considering the relatively long survival provided by recent medical treatment with target therapies. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that ALK-inhibitors (crizotinib, alectinib, brigatinib) show excellent activity also against brain metastases. It is therefore reasonable, in asymptomatic patients, to start treatment with specific inhibitors: RT will be used at the time of tumor progression or when symptoms appear. This sequence provides the best quality of life for patients.

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant ceritinib of a crizotinib-resistant, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement: A case report

The treatment of stage IIIB non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is complicated, the best strategy is chosen individually and surgery is usually not recommended. A 50‐year‐old female was diagnosed with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma (stage IIIB, T2bN3M0). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis revealed an ALK rearrangement. Crizotinib was administered and progression was seen after five months. The patient then received ceritinib with a palliative intent, which led to downstaging (IIIA[N2]) with a radiological and metabolic response. Right lower lobe lobectomy was performed at 12 months post‐surgery, and the patient is still disease‐free according to the last computed tomography (CT) scan. The unintended downstaging from ceritinib provided a chance for resection in our patient who had ALK‐positive stage IIIB NSCLC after the failure of first‐line crizotinib, indicating potential usage of ceritinib in the neoadjuvant setting. Future perspective trials are warranted to investigate the role of ceritinib in earlier stages as a primary drug.

Suppression of tumor-associated neutrophils by lorlatinib attenuates pancreatic cancer growth and improves treatment with immune checkpoint blockade

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients have a 5-year survival rate of only 8% largely due to late diagnosis and insufficient therapeutic options. Neutrophils are among the most abundant immune cell type within the PDAC tumor microenvironment (TME), and are associated with a poor clinical prognosis. However, despite recent advances in understanding neutrophil biology in cancer, therapies targeting tumor-associated neutrophils are lacking. Here, we demonstrate, using pre-clinical mouse models of PDAC, that lorlatinib attenuates PDAC progression by suppressing neutrophil development and mobilization, and by modulating tumor-promoting neutrophil functions within the TME. When combined, lorlatinib also improves the response to anti-PD-1 blockade resulting in more activated CD8 + T cells in PDAC tumors. In summary, this study identifies an effect of lorlatinib in modulating tumor-associated neutrophils, and demonstrates the potential of lorlatinib to treat PDAC.

An Arm and a Leg: The Rising Cost of Cancer Drugs and Impact on Access

Increasing cancer drug prices present global challenges to treatment access and cancer outcomes. Substantial variability exists in drug pricing across countries. In countries without universal health care, patients are responsible for treatment costs. Low- or middle-income countries are heavily impacted, with limited patient access to novel cancer treatments. Financial toxicity is seen across cancer types, countries, and health care systems. Those at highest risk include younger patients, new immigrants, visible minority groups, and those without private health coverage. Currently, cancer drug pricing does not correlate with value or clinical benefit. Value-based pricing of oncology drugs may incentivize development of higher-value medicines and eliminate excess spending on drugs that yield little benefit. Generics and biosimilars in oncology can also improve affordability and patient access, offering dramatic reductions in drug spending while maintaining patient benefit. Oncologists can promote value-based care by following evidence-based clinical guidelines that avoid low-value treatments. Researchers can also engage in value-based research that critically explores optimal cancer drug dosing, schedules, and treatment duration and defines patient populations most likely to benefit (e.g., through biomarker selection). Cancer Groundshot proposes that we improve outcomes for today's patients with cancer, including broader global access for high-value treatments, promotion of affordable cancer control strategies, and reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality through low-cost prevention and screening initiatives. Moving forward, major oncology societies recommend promoting uniform global access to essential cancer medicines and avoiding financial harm for patients as key principles in addressing the affordability of cancer drugs.

Real-world treatment outcomes with brigatinib in patients with pretreated ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The next-generation ALK inhibitor brigatinib is approved for use in patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve ALK-positive advanced NSCLC and in patients previously treated with crizotinib. A phase II trial showed that brigatinib is active in patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) who had progressed on prior crizotinib (response rate 56 %, median PFS 16.7 months, median OS 34.1 months). We report final data from the UVEA-Brig study of brigatinib in ALK inhibitor-pretreated ALK-positive mNSCLC in clinical practice.

METHODS

UVEA-Brig was a retrospective chart review of patients treated with brigatinib in Italy, Norway, Spain and the UK in an expanded access program. Adults with ALK-positive mNSCLC, including those with brain lesions, resistant to or intolerant of ≥1 prior ALK inhibitor and ECOG performance status ≤3 were eligible. Patients received brigatinib 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg. The objectives were to describe patient characteristics, clinical disease presentation, treatment regimens used and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Data for 104 patients (male: 43 %; median age: 53 [29-80] years; ECOG performance status 0/1/2/3: 41/41/10/5 %; brain/CNS metastases: 63 %) were analyzed. Patients had received a median of 2 (1-6) lines of systemic therapy prior to brigatinib (37.5 % received ≥3) and a median of 1 (1-5) lines of prior ALK inhibitor-containing therapy (crizotinib 83.6 %; ceritinib 50.0 %; alectinib 6.7 %; lorlatinib 4.8 %). At the time of analysis, 77 patients had discontinued brigatinib. Overall, the response rate was 39.8 %, median PFS was 11.3 (95 % CI:8.6-12.9) months and median OS was 23.3 (95 % CI: 16.0-NR) months. Four patients discontinued brigatinib treatment due to adverse events. 53 patients received systemic therapy after brigatinib, 42 with an ALK inhibitor (lorlatinib, n = 34).

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data indicate the activity and tolerability of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive mNSCLC who were more heavily pretreated than patients included in clinical trials.

[A Case of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Three ALK Inhibitors and Chemotherapy]

The echinoderm microtubule associated protein-like 4 (EML4) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) were fractured and fused to become EML4-ALK. Most of these EML4-ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients respond well to the ALK inhibitor. Many patients can benefit from drug target therapy for a long time, and some patients can achieve long-term survival of more than 7 years under the optimized treatment mode. This patient has lung adenocarcinoma positive for EML4-ALK fusion gene, but the treatment outcome is obviously different from that of other patients with lung cancer positive for EML4-ALK fusion gene. After the first to third generations of ALK inhibitor targeted therapy and chemotherapy, the disease progresses rapidly, the drug resistance time is short, the survival time is short, and the benefit is limited. The patient received targeted therapy of Crizotinib, Ceritinib and Lorlatinib successively from July 15, 2019, followed by two chemotherapy courses of Bevacizumab combined with Pemetrexed and Carboplatin. The patient died on September 10, 2020, with a survival of 15 months. At the same time, the treatment showed common adverse reactions of ALK inhibitors. This paper analyzed the therapeutic effect and treatment dilemma of this patient, and provided an exploration direction for the treatment of patients with EML4-ALK fusion gene positive lung cancer.
.

Combining Radiation Therapy with ALK Inhibitors in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Clinical and Preclinical Overview

Over the past years, the identification of genetic alterations in oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has significantly and favorably transformed the outcome of patients who can benefit from targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Among these genetic alterations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements were discovered in 2007 and are present in 3-5% of patients with NSCLC. In addition, radiotherapy remains one of the cornerstones of NSCLC treatment. Moreover, improvements in the field of radiotherapy with the use of hypofractionated or ablative stereotactic radiotherapy have led to a better outcome for localized or oligometastatic NSCLC. To date, the effects of the combination of ALK inhibitors and radiotherapy are unclear in terms of safety and efficacy but could potently improve treatment. In this manuscript, we provide a clinical and preclinical overview of combining radiation therapy with ALK inhibitors in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

ALK-positive lung cancer in a patient with recurrent brain metastases and meningeal dissemination who achieved long-term survival of more than seven years with sequential treatment of five ALK-inhibitors: A case report

The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene‐positive (ALK+) non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is high, ranging from approximately 20%–70%. Although ALK inhibitors (ALKis) are generally effective for CNS metastases in patients with ALK+ NSCLC, relapse with CNS metastases is frequently observed. A 37‐year‐old woman with a high level of carcinoembryonic antigen was diagnosed with right lung adenocarcinoma (pathological stage IIIA) and underwent right lower lobectomy. Despite the administration of postoperative chemotherapy, her carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level remained elevated. Although crizotinib was administered due to the positivity for ALK fusion, brain metastases appeared at 19.0 months after the start of treatment. Treatment with alectinib following crizotinib resulted in the complete disappearance of brain metastases. However, brain metastases relapsed, and meningeal dissemination appeared at 38.3 months after the start of treatment with alectinib. Although ceritinib, brigatinib, and alectinib rechallenge were attempted, the CNS lesions worsened. Lorlatinib was then administered, resulting in the normalization of the CEA level (4.5 ng/ml) 4.1 months after the start of lorlatinib. The brain metastases and meningeal dissemination almost disappeared. The overall time from the start of crizotinib to lorlatinib is 89.5 months at present, and the patient continues to be treated with lorlatinib without relapse. Lorlatinib was effective in this case with brain metastases and meningeal dissemination after resistance to first‐ and second‐generation ALKis. Appropriate sequential treatment with first‐, second‐ and third‐generation ALKis can lead to a long‐term survival in ALK+ patients with brain metastases and meningeal dissemination.

ALTA-2: Phase II study of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on alectinib or ceritinib

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved outcomes in ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, almost all patients eventually develop progressive disease on first-line ALK TKIs (e.g., crizotinib, alectinib and ceritinib). Brigatinib, a second-generation ALK TKI, may show efficacy in alectinib- and ceritinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC. We describe the rationale and design of ALTA-2, a Phase II study of brigatinib in patients with locally advanced/metastatic ALK+ NSCLC and documented progressive disease on alectinib or ceritinib. The primary end point is confirmed objective response rate per independent review committee using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points include duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety and health-related quality of life.

Deciphering the key heterocyclic scaffolds in targeting microtubules, kinases and carbonic anhydrases for cancer drug development

Heterocyclic scaffolds are widely utilized for drug design by taking into account the molecular structure of therapeutic targets that are related to a broad spectrum of ailments, including tumors. Such compounds display various covalent and non-covalent interactions with the specific residues of the target proteins while causing their inhibition. There is a substantial number of heterocyclic compounds approved for cancer treatment, and these compounds function by interacting with different therapeutic targets involved in tumorogenesis. In this review, we trace and emphasize the privileged heterocyclic pharmacophores that have immense potency against several essential chemotherapeutic tumor targets: microtubules, kinases and carbonic anhydrases. Potent compounds currently undergoing pre-clinical and clinical studies have also been assessed for ascertaining the effective class of chemical scaffolds that have significant therapeutic potential against multiple malignancies. In addition, we also describe briefly the role of heterocyclic compounds in various chemotherapy regimens. The optimized molecular hybridization of delineated motifs may result in the discovery of more active anticancer therapeutics and circumvent the development of resistance by specific targets in the future.

Proteomic analysis of tyrosine phosphorylation induced by exogenous expression of oncogenic kinase fusions identified in lung adenocarcinoma

Kinase fusions are considered oncogenic drivers in numerous types of cancer. In lung adenocarcinoma 5-10% of patients harbor kinase fusions. The most frequently detected kinase fusion involves the Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and Echinoderm Microtubule-associated protein-Like 4 (EML4). In addition, oncogenic kinase fusions involving the tyrosine kinases RET and ROS1 are found in smaller subsets of patients. In this study, we employed quantitative mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics to define the cellular tyrosine phosphorylation patterns induced by different oncogenic kinase fusions identified in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. We show that exogenous expression of the kinase fusions in HEK 293T cells leads to widespread tyrosine phosphorylation. Direct comparison of different kinase fusions demonstrates that the kinase part and not the fusion partner primarily defines the phosphorylation pattern. The tyrosine phosphorylation patterns differed between ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions, suggesting that oncogenic signaling induced by these kinases involves the modulation of different cellular processes.

Targeted drug delivery strategies for precision medicines

Progress in the field of precision medicine has changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Precision medicine is propelled by technologies that enable molecular profiling, genomic analysis, and optimized drug design to tailor treatments for individual patients. Although precision medicines have resulted in some clinical successes, the use of many potential therapeutics has been hindered by pharmacological issues, including toxicities and drug resistance. Drug delivery materials and approaches have now advanced to a point where they can enable the modulation of a drug's pharmacological parameters without compromising the desired effect on molecular targets. Specifically, they can modulate a drug's pharmacokinetics, stability, absorption, and exposure to tumours and healthy tissues, and facilitate the administration of synergistic drug combinations. This Review highlights recent progress in precision therapeutics and drug delivery, and identifies opportunities for strategies to improve the therapeutic index of cancer drugs, and consequently, clinical outcomes.

Near-complete response to low-dose ceritinib in recurrent infantile inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour

Background

Infantile inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is rare and the majority are driven by anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements. Previous literature on the use of ALK inhibitors in paediatric IMTs is extremely limited with no published literature on the use in infants. Crizotinib and ceritinib are two ALK inhibitors which are available and have been used in IMTs; however, ceritinib is much more affordable in the low- and middle-income country (LMIC) setting than crizotinib.

Case

An 11-month-old child, who had undergone surgery for mesenteric IMT at the age of 3 months, had an unresectable recurrence with soft tissue deposits in the subdiaphragmatic location abutting the spleen and paravesical location. As surgery would have entailed splenectomy and partial cystectomy, she was treated with low-dose ceritinib (300 mg/m2/day) with which she had a near-complete response without any toxicity.

Discussion and conclusion

This is the first report of the use of ceritinib at a lower dose for infantile IMT having immense practical applications for the low- and middle-income setting.

A retrospective study of alectinib versus ceritinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion in whom crizotinib treatment failed

Background

Crizotinib is the approved treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion. Failure of crizotinib treatment frequently involves drug intolerance or resistance. Comparison of using second-generation ALK inhibitors in this setting remains lacking.

Methods

Sixty-five ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients receiving second-generation ALK inhibitors following treatment failure of crizotinib were retrospectively analyzed for the therapeutic efficacy.

Results

Forty-three (66.2%) and 22 (33.8%) patients received alectinib and ceritinib, respectively. Comparing alectinib to ceritinib treatment: the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (61.0% [95% confidence interval, 47.1 to 78.9%] vs. 54.5% [95% CI, 37.3 to 79.9%]); the hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.31–1.17; p = 0.135). Multivariate Cox regression showed ECOG PS (0–1 vs. 2–3 HR 0.09 [95% CI, 0.02–0.33]; p < 0.001) and cause of crizotinib treatment failure (resistance vs. intolerance HR 2.75 [95% CI, 1.26–5.99]; p = 0.011) were the independent predictors for the PFS of second-generation ALK inhibitors. Treatment of alectinib, compared to ceritinib, was associated with a lower incidence of CNS progression (cause-specific HR, 0.10; 95% CI 0.01–0.78; p = 0.029) and a higher efficacy in patients whose cause of crizotinib treatment failure was intolerance (HR 0.29 [95% CI, 0.08–1.06]; p = 0.050). The most commonly noted adverse events were elevated AST/ALT in 10 (23.3%) patients treated with alectinib and diarrhea in 8 (36.4%) patients treated with ceritinib.

Conclusion

Second-generation ALK inhibitors in crizotinib-treated patients showed a satifactory efficacy. Alectinib treatment demonstrated a CNS protection activity and a higher PFS in selected patients failing crizotinib treatment.

The Fusion Gene Landscape in Taiwanese Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Human cancer genomes show a variety of alterations, such as single base changes, deletions, insertions, copy number changes, and gene fusions. Analyzing fusion gene transcripts may yield a novel and effective approach for selecting cancer treatments. However, few comprehensive analyses of gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have been performed. Here, we characterized the fusion gene landscape of NSCLC in a case study of Taiwanese lung cancer patients. We concluded that some fusion genes likely play driver roles in carcinogenesis, while others act as passengers. We demonstrated that by using RNA-sequencing to detect gene fusion events, putative therapeutic drug targets could be identified, potentially leading to more precise therapies for NSCLC.

Abstract

Background: Analyzing fusion gene transcripts may yield an effective approach for selecting cancer treatments. However, few comprehensive analyses of fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have been performed. Methods: We enrolled 54 patients with NSCLC, and performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq). STAR (Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference)-Fusion was used to identify fusions. Results: Of the 218 fusions discovered, 24 had been reported and the rest were novel. Three fusions had the highest occurrence rates. After integrating our gene expression and fusion data, we found that samples harboring fusions containing ASXL1, CACNA1A, EEF1A1, and RET also exhibited increased expression of these genes. We then searched for mutations and fusions in cancer driver genes in each sample and found that nine patients carried both mutations and fusions in cancer driver genes. Furthermore, we found a trend for mutual exclusivity between gene fusions and mutations in the same gene, with the exception of DMD, and we found that EGFR mutations are associated with the number of fusion genes. Finally, we identified kinase gene fusions, and potentially druggable fusions, which may play roles in lung cancer therapy. Conclusion: The clinical use of RNA-Seq for detecting driver fusion genes may play an important role in the treatment of lung cancer.

Predictability of Severe Adverse Events in Phase 3 Trials from Safety Information on Phase 1 Trials in Oncology Drug Development

PURPOSE

Safety information obtained in phase 1 trials is becoming increasingly important with the recent changes in the development strategy of oncology drugs, including the skipping of phase 2 or 3 trials before regulatory approval. This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors for severe adverse events (AEs) in phase 3 trials based on phase 1 trial data.

METHODS

The data on phase 1 and phase 3 trials applied for their marketing approval of the newly approved anticancer drugs in Japan were used for analysis. Regression analyses were performed to investigate factors related to the predictability of the occurrence of severe AEs in phase 3 trials based on phase 1 trial data.

RESULTS

Thirty-two drugs (80 phase 1 trials and 40 phase 3 trials) were selected for the analyses. As a result of multivariate regression analyses, immune therapy agents (P = 0.009) and a pair of monotherapy in the phase 1 trials and combination therapy in the phase 3 trials (P = 0.017) were associated with low predictability of severe AEs in the phase 3 trials; signal inhibitor agents (P = 0.002) and large number of subjects in phase 1 trials (P = 0.008) were associated with high predictability. A significant relationship between the actual number of subjects in phase 1 trials and the predictability of severe AEs was observed when trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors were excluded (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These results should be effectively utilized for the strategic design of early-stage oncology drug development.

Inertial Microfluidics Enabling Clinical Research

Fast and accurate interrogation of complex samples containing diseased cells or pathogens is important to make informed decisions on clinical and public health issues. Inertial microfluidics has been increasingly employed for such investigations to isolate target bioparticles from liquid samples with size and/or deformability-based manipulation. This phenomenon is especially useful for the clinic, owing to its rapid, label-free nature of target enrichment that enables further downstream assays. Inertial microfluidics leverages the principle of inertial focusing, which relies on the balance of inertial and viscous forces on particles to align them into size-dependent laminar streamlines. Several distinct microfluidic channel geometries (e.g., straight, curved, spiral, contraction-expansion array) have been optimized to achieve inertial focusing for a variety of purposes, including particle purification and enrichment, solution exchange, and particle alignment for on-chip assays. In this review, we will discuss how inertial microfluidics technology has contributed to improving accuracy of various assays to provide clinically relevant information. This comprehensive review expands upon studies examining both endogenous and exogenous targets from real-world samples, highlights notable hybrid devices with dual functions, and comments on the evolving outlook of the field.

Risk of thromboembolism in patients with ALK- and EGFR-mutant lung cancer: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Thromboembolism (TE) is common in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with worse outcomes. Recent advances in the understanding of NSCLC have led to the identification of molecular subtypes such as anaplastic lymphocyte kinase (ALK) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The association of these subtypes with risk of TE has not been fully explored.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive NSCLC patients seen at the Cleveland Clinic from July 2002 through July 2017 for whom molecular classification and follow-up were available. TE events included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), visceral vein thrombosis (VVT), and arterial events. TE-free survival and overall survival rates for each of the molecular subtypes (wild-type, ALK-mutant, and EGFR-mutant) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the endpoints TE and overall survival. TE was analyzed as a conditional, time-dependent covariate to assess its impact with respect to overall survival.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 461 patients. Approximately half were females (n = 263, 57%) and 58% (n = 270) were older than 65 years. TE occurred in 98 of 461 patients (21.3%) during a median follow-up of 33.1 months. The highest cumulative rates of TE were observed in patients with ALK-mutant NSCLC (N = 20/46, 43.5%) followed by patients with EGFR-mutant cancers (N = 35/165, 21.2%) and wild-type cancers (N = 43/250, 17.2%) P < .05. Cumulative incidence of TE at 6 months of follow-up was 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0%-26.4%) for ALK-mutant cancers, 8.8% (95% CI: 4.4%-13.2%) for EGFR-mutant cancers, and 9.2% (95% CI: 5.4%-12.9%) for wild-type cancers. Patients who experienced TE had worse overall survival (all patients: hazard ratio = 2.8 95% CI 2.1-3.6, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ALK-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma have the highest rate of TE. TE is associated with worse survival across molecular subtypes. These findings should be taken into consideration in decision-making regarding thromboprophylaxis.

BRAF V600E mutation as a novel mechanism of acquired resistance to ALK inhibition in ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EML4-ALK rearrangements respond well to multiple ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the tumor will invariably progress due to acquired resistance. Comprehensive genomic profiling appears to be a promising strategy to reveal the underlying molecular mechanisms of ALK-TKIs resistance.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A patient with right lung adenocarcinoma harboring an ALK rearrangement received targeted therapy with multiple ALK-TKIs. He sought for follow-up treatment after his disease progressed again.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient had a tumor diagnosed with stage I (T1bN0M0) lung adenocarcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

Due to the surgical contraindication, the patient did not undergo surgical resection. Instead, he received crizotinib as the first-line therapy with the progression-free survival of 20 months. Then he switched to alectinib treatment, however the disease rapidly progressed again.

OUTCOMES

Next-generation sequencing was performed and revealed that 7 somatic mutations were identified. Among them, 2 mutations, ALK I1171T and BRAF V600E, may be responsible for the resistance of this patient to ALK-TKIs. BRAF V600E mutation may explain the patient's resistance to lorlatinib.

LESSONS

We present a case of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma with acquired resistance to ALK inhibition, in which the BRAF V600E mutation is a novel resistance mechanism. This provides evidence that BRAF V600E mutation is one mechanism of ALK-TKI resistance.

Predictive molecular pathology of lung cancer in Germany with focus on gene fusion testing: Methods and quality assurance

Predictive molecular testing has become an important part of the diagnosis of any patient with lung cancer. Using reliable methods to ensure timely and accurate results is inevitable for guiding treatment decisions. In the past few years, parallel sequencing has been established for mutation testing, and its use is currently broadened for the detection of other genetic alterations, such as gene fusion and copy number variations. In addition, conventional methods such as immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization are still being used, either for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue or for cytological specimens. For the development and broad implementation of such complex technologies, interdisciplinary and regional networks are needed. The Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) has served as a model of centralized testing and decentralized treatment of patients and incorporates all German comprehensive cancer centers. Internal quality control, laboratory accreditation, and participation in external quality assessment is mandatory for the delivery of reliable results. Here, we provide a summary of current technologies used to identify patients who have lung cancer with gene fusions, briefly describe the structures of NGM and the national NGM (nNGM), and provide recommendations for quality assurance.

Establishment and characterization of NCC-SS4-C1: a novel patient-derived cell line of synovial sarcoma

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is defined as a monomorphic blue spindle cell sarcoma showing variable epithelial differentiation, and is characterized by a specific fusion gene, SS18-SSX. Although SS is rare, it accounts for approximately 8% of all soft tissue sarcomas, which occupies a significant proportion of soft tissue tumors. The prognosis of SS is unfavorable, with 5-year survival rate of 50-60%, and only a few anti-cancer agents are recommended for its treatment. Thus, we need to urgently establish novel treatment methods. Patient-derived cell lines are essential tools in basic research and pre-clinical studies. However, there are only 4 publicly available SS cell lines. Therefore, we established a novel SS cell line, NCC-SS4-C1, using surgically resected tumor tissues of a patient with SS. The cell line maintained the characteristic fusion gene, SS18-SSX1, and copy number alteration, in concordance with the original tumor. The cells also exhibited moderate cell proliferation, invasion ability, and spheroid formation ability. Moreover, a drug-screening test using 4 SS cell lines, including NCC-SS4-C1, demonstrated the significant anti-proliferative effects of ALK and HDAC inhibitors. Thus, we concluded that the NCC-SS4-C1 cell line is a useful tool for basic and pre-clinical studies of SS.

RET Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis Is a Sensitive but Highly Unspecific Screening Method for RET Fusions in Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

RET gene fusions are established oncogenic drivers in 1% of NSCLC. Accurate detection of advanced patients with RET fusions is essential to ensure optimal therapy choice. We investigated the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a diagnostic test for detecting functional RET fusions.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and November 2019, a total of 4873 patients with NSCLC were routinely screened for RET fusions using either FISH (n = 2858) or targeted RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) (n = 2015). If sufficient material was available, positive cases were analyzed by both methods (n = 39) and multiple FISH assays (n = 17). In an independent cohort of 520 patients with NSCLC, whole-genome sequencing data were investigated for disruptive structural variations and functional fusions in the RET and compared with ALK and ROS1 loci.

RESULTS

FISH analysis revealed RET rearrangement in 48 of 2858 cases; of 30 rearranged cases double tested with NGS, only nine had a functional RET fusion. RNA NGS yielded RET fusions in 14 of 2015 cases; all nine cases double tested by FISH had RET locus rearrangement. Of these 18 verified RET fusion cases, 16 had a split signal and two a complex rearrangement by FISH. By whole-genome sequencing, the prevalence of functional fusions compared with all disruptive events was lower in the RET (4 of 9, 44%) than the ALK (27 of 34, 79%) and ROS1 (9 of 12, 75%) loci.

CONCLUSIONS

FISH is a sensitive but unspecific technique for RET screening, always requiring a confirmation using an orthogonal technique, owing to frequently occurring RET rearrangements not resulting in functional fusions in NSCLC.

Impact of EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement on the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

The impact of activating alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutation/anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] translocation) in prognosticating patients with brain metastasis (BM) is not well defined. This study was sought to identify this impact in NSCLC patients with BM accounting for the known validated variables.

METHODS

Among 1078 NSCLC-BM patients diagnosed/treated between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2015, three hundred and forty-eight with known EGFR/ALK status were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the time of BM.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients had either ALK (n = 23) alterations or EGFR (n = 68) mutation and 257 were wild type (WT; negative actionable mutations/alterations). Median age of EGFR/ALK+ NSCLC BM patients was 60 years (range 29.8-82.6 y) and ~50% (n = 44) had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score >80. Median number of BM was 2 (1 to ≥99). The median OS for the ALK/EGFR+ NSCLC BM was 19.9 versus 10.1 months for the WT (P = 0.028). The number of BM in the EGFR/ALK+ group did not impact OS (BM = 1 with 21.1 months vs 2-3 with 19.1 months and >3 with 23.7 months, P = 0.74), whereas fewer BM in the WT cohort had significantly better OS (BM = 1 with 13.8 mo, 2-3 with 11.0 mo and >3 with 8.1 mo; P = 0.006) with the adjustment of age, KPS, symptoms from BM and synchronicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Number of BM does not impact outcomes in the EGFR/ALK+ NSCLC patients, implying that targeted therapy along with surgery and/or radiation may improve OS irrespective of the number of BM. Number of BM, extracranial metastasis (ECM), and KPS independently affected OS/PFS in WT NSCLC BM, which was consistent with the known literature.

Response Rates and Durations of Response for Biomarker-Based Cancer Drugs in Nonrandomized Versus Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Many new targeted cancer drugs have received FDA approval based on durable responses in nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs). The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the response rates (RRs) and durations of response (DoRs) of targeted cancer drugs observed in non-RCTs are consistent when these drugs are tested in RCTs.

METHODS

We used the FDA's Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labeling to identify cancer drugs that were approved based on changes in biomarker endpoints through December 2017. We then identified the non-RCTs and RCTs for these drugs for the given indications and extracted the RRs and DoRs. We compared the RRs and median DoR in non-RCTs versus RCTs using the ratio of RRs and the ratio of DoRs, defined as the RRs (or DoRs) in non-RCTs divided by the RRs (or DoRs) in RCTs. The ratio of RRs or DoRs was pooled across the trial pairs using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 21 drug-indication pairs selected, both non-RCTs and RCTs were available for 19. The RRs and DoRs in non-RCTs were greater than those in RCTs in 63% and 87% of cases, respectively. The pooled ratio of RRs was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.95-1.20), and the pooled ratio of DoRs was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03-1.33). RRs and DoRs derived from non-RCTs were also poor surrogates for overall survival derived from RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The RRs were not different between non-RCTs and RCTs of cancer drugs approved based on changes to a biomarker, but the DoRs in non-RCTs were significantly higher than in RCTs. Caution must be exercised when approving or prescribing targeted drugs based on data on durable responses derived from non-RCTs, because the responses could be overestimates and poor predictors of survival benefit.

Pembrolizumab plus allogeneic NK cells in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUNDThe anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab is clinically active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition to T cells, human natural killer (NK) cells, reported to have the potential to prolong the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC, also express PD-1. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab plus allogeneic NK cells in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.METHODSIn total, 109 enrolled patients with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1% or higher were randomly allocated to group A (n = 55 patients given pembrolizumab plus NK cells) or group B (n = 54 patients given pembrolizumab alone). The patients received i.v. pembrolizumab (10 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks and continued treatment until the occurrence of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. The patients in group A continuously received 2 cycles of NK cell therapy as 1 course of treatment.RESULTSIn our study, patients in group A had longer survival than did patients in group B (median overall survival [OS]: 15.5 months vs. 13.3 months; median progression-free survival [PFS]: 6.5 months vs. 4.3 months; P < 0.05). In group A patients with a TPS of 50% or higher, the median OS and PFS was significantly longer. Moreover, the patients in group A treated with multiple courses of NK cell infusion had better OS (18.5 months) than did those who received a single course of NK cell infusion (13.5 months).CONCLUSIONPembrolizumab plus NK cell therapy yielded improved survival benefits in patients with previously treated PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02843204.FUNDINGThis work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) - Guangdong Joint Foundation of China (no. U1601225); the NSFC (no. 81671965); the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory Construction Project of China (no. 2017B030314034); and the Key Scientific and Technological Program of Guangzhou City (no. 201607020016).

Druggable targets meet oncogenic drivers: opportunities and limitations of target-based classification of tumors and the role of Molecular Tumor Boards

The therapeutic landscape of cancer is changing rapidly due to the growing number of approved drugs capable of targeting specific genetic alterations. This aspect, together with the development of noninvasive methods for the assessment of somatic mutations in the peripheral blood of patients, generated a growing interest toward a new tumor-agnostic classification system based on ‘predictive’ biomarkers. The current review article discusses this emerging alternative approach to the classification of cancer and its implications for the selection of treatments. It is suggested that different types of cancers sharing the same molecular profiles could benefit from the same targeted drugs. Although recent clinical trials have demonstrated that this approach cannot be generalized, there are also specific examples that demonstrate the clinical utility of this alternative vision. In this rapidly evolving scenario, a multidisciplinary approach managed by institutional Molecular Tumor Boards is fundamental to interpret the biological and clinical relevance of genetic alterations and the complexity of their relationship with treatment response.

•

The identification of oncogenic drivers offers the opportunity to develop target-specific drugs.

•

The inhibition of crucial pathways realizes the principle of druggable target to exploit cancer vulnerability.

•

The approval of new anticancer agents based on target-based concept represents a paradigm shift in cancer therapy.

•

However, only few drugs have been approved so far on an agnostic basis and the concept of biomarker cannot be generalized.

•

Tumor Molecular Boards will have an increasing role in the identification of new therapeutic options in selected patients.

How to select the best upfront therapy for metastatic disease? Focus on ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors have demonstrated robust clinical activity in patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancers. The echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like (EML)-ALK translocation was first discovered in 2007 and 4 years later, crizotinib, a first-generation ALK inhibitor was approved. Since then, subsequent generations of ALK inhibitors have demonstrated superior efficacy and better CNS activity compared to crizotinib. Alectinib and brigatinib, both second-generation ALK inhibitors have been compared directly to crizotinib in the first-line setting and has demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) and intracranial response. Ceritinib, another second-generation ALK inhibitor has been shown to be superior to chemotherapy in ALK-rearranged disease with good CNS activity. Initial responses to ALK inhibitors are not always durable and resistance can occur as on-target or off-target alterations. Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in the treatment naïve setting and in resistance to crizotinib and second-generation ALK inhibitors. Lorlatinib has also shown improved PFS in patients harboring EML4-ALK variant 3, which is associated with the development of ALK resistance mutations, specifically G1202R. Another new ALK inhibitor, ensartinib, has demonstrated efficacy in the first-line setting and in alectinib refractory disease. Additional studies are underway examining mechanisms of resistance and best treatment options post resistance.

Recurrent hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state after re-administration of dose-reduced ceritinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor

Ceritinib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor with clinical activity in crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer and in treatment-naïve ALK-positive disease. Hyperglycemia is a known adverse event, but the mechanism by which ceritinib causes hyperglycemia is unknown, and whether ceritinib causes hyperglycemic emergencies is unclear. Here, we report the case of a patient with a hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS) recurrence after the re-administration of dose-reduced ceritinib. A 78-year-old man with type 2 diabetes diagnosed as having advanced lung adenocarcinoma had been treated with alogliptin (25 mg/day) for the diabetes and with ceritinib for the lung cancer. After 28 days of ceritinib administration, he was admitted to our hospital due to HHS. His blood glucose level improved with insulin therapy after discontinuation of the ceritinib. He then received re-administration with a decreased ceritinib dose while maintaining the insulin treatment to control his blood glucose, but his HHS recurred. We discontinued the ceritinib for other side effects and noticed the HHS disappeared. Our findings suggest that ceritinib can cause HHS and that HHS may recur even after dose reductions.

Therapeutic Sequencing in ALK+ NSCLC

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ALK⁺ NSCLC) is a model disease for the use of targeted pharmaceuticals in thoracic oncology. Due to higher systemic and intracranial efficacy, the second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) alectinib and brigatinib have irrevocably displaced crizotinib as standard first-line treatment, based on the results of the ALEX and ALTA-1L trials. Besides, lorlatinib and brigatinib are the preferred second-line therapies for progression under second-generation TKI and crizotinib, respectively, based on the results of several phase II studies. Tissue or liquid rebiopsies at the time of disease progression, even though not mandated by the approval status of any ALK inhibitor, are gaining importance for individualization and optimization of patient management. Of particular interest are cases with off-target resistance, for example MET, HER2 or KRAS alterations, which require special therapeutic maneuvers, e.g., inclusion in early clinical trials or off-label administration of respectively targeted drugs. On the other hand, up to approximately half of the patients failing TKI, develop anatomically restricted progression, which can be initially tackled with local ablative measures without switch of systemic therapy. Among the overall biologically favorable ALK⁺ tumors, with a mean tumor mutational burden uniquely below 3 mutations per Mb and the longest survival among NSCLC currently, presence of the EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 and/or TP53 mutations identify high-risk cases with earlier treatment failure and a need for more aggressive surveillance and treatment strategies. The potential clinical utility of longitudinal ctDNA assays for earlier detection of disease progression and improved guidance of therapy in these patients is a currently a matter of intense investigation. Major pharmaceutical challenges for the field are the development of more potent, fourth-generation TKI and effective immuno-oncological interventions, especially ALK-directed cell therapies, which will be essential for further improving survival and achieving cure of ALK⁺ tumors.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in adult renal cell carcinoma with lung metastasis: a case report and literature review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is rare, and the genetic profiles of the tumor have not been elucidated. Here, we report a case with recurrent papillary RCC and lung metastasis after nephrectomy for nearly 7 years. The patient first received sunitinib, whereas the drug toxicity was intolerable. Combined Immunohistology (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the patient has an ALK rearrangement, and the patient then was treated with crizotinib. The patient had good tolerance, and a partial response in the target lesions was achieved. In order to further understand the benefit of crizotinib in ALK-rearranged RCC, the patient was detected with whole exome sequencing (WES) to study her genetic profiles. Compared those of RCC cases without ALK rearrangement (nALK-RCC), the patient and nine RCC cases with ALK rearrangement (ALK-RCC) revealed unique genetic characteristics: 1) The common mutations that occurred in RCC were not found in ALK-RCC.; 2) A total of 11 co-existing mutations in ALK-RCC were found, and they occurred in nALK-RCC at a relatively low frequency. DNMT3A mutations were concurrent with ALK fusions in our case. These findings indicated a different genetic alteration pattern of ALK-RCC from nALK-RCC. Our case demonstrated the efficacy of crizotinib in an RCC patient with ALK rearrangement.

Identification of novel ALK rearrangements in gynecologic clear cell carcinoma

Clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) of the gynecologic tract are aggressive tumors with high resistance rate to conventional platinum-based chemotherapies. Currently, the molecular features of these tumors remain largely unknown and there is no targeted therapy available. The aim of our study was to identify anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations, a potential molecular target for therapy. Ninety-seven patients with gynecologic CCC (62 ovarian, 27 uterine corpus and 8 uterine cervical) were screened for ALK rearrangement and ALK copy number gain using an ALK break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization probe. The genomic landscape of all cases with ALK rearrangements and 10 random cases with ALK copy number gain was queried using a hybrid capture-based DNA next-generation sequencing assay and an Illumina Fusion RNA assay. Findings were then correlated with ALK immunohistochemistry (clone D5F3) expression. ALK rearrangement was detected in 5% (5/97) and ALK copy number gain in 79% (77/97) of gynecologic CCCs. Next-generation sequencing in ALK-rearranged CCCs identified a novel BABAM2-ALK fusion in one case. ALK translocation partners were not identified in the remaining cases. Our findings show that ALK fusion, which is targetable in other cancers, may be a pathogenetic mechanism in a small number of gynecologic CCCs.

Brigatinib and lorlatinib: their effect on ALK inhibitors in NSCLC focusing on resistant mutations and central nervous system metastases

Major issues in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma are acquired resistance against anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors and control of central nervous system metastasis. The development of these inhibitors has changed therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Brigatinib and lorlatinib were designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and to inhibit resistant mutations against anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. We review the clinical data supporting treatment of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma with brigatinib and lorlatinib. Brigatinib has shown promising antitumour activity, including substantial activity against central nervous system metastases, in crizotinib-treated (ALTA trial) patients and crizotinib-naïve (ALTA-1L trial) patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. In addition, brigatinib improved progression-free survival compared with crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Lorlatinib has demonstrated clinical antitumour activity against both intracranial and extracranial lesions in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase- or c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Ongoing trials and further studies of these agents' biological and clinical properties would provide insight into the optimal therapeutic strategy for administering them to achieve the best survival benefit.

Effect of ceritinib on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered CYP3A and 2C9 substrates: a phase I, multicenter, drug-drug interaction study in patients with ALK + advanced tumors

Purpose

Ceritinib is an ALK receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved as first- and second-line treatment in adult patients with ALK + metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study investigated the drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential of ceritinib when coadministered with midazolam and warfarin as probe substrates for CYP3A and CYP2C9 activity, respectively.

Methods

This was a phase I, multicenter, open-label, single sequence, crossover DDI study in 33 adult patients with ALK + NSCLC or other advanced tumors. A single dose of a cocktail consisting of midazolam and warfarin was administered with and without concomitant administration of ceritinib. The primary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and warfarin. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) of ceritinib 750 mg once daily.

Results

Ceritinib inhibited CYP3A-mediated metabolism of midazolam, resulting in a markedly increased AUC (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval]) by 5.4-fold (4.6, 6.3). Ceritinib also led to an increase in the AUC of S-warfarin by 54% (36%, 75%). The pharmacokinetics and safety profile of ceritinib in this study are consistent with previous reports and no new safety signals were reported. Among the 19 patients with NSCLC, efficacy (ORR: 42.1% and DCR: 63.2%) was similar to that reported previously in studies of pretreated patients with ALK + NSCLC.

Conclusion

Ceritinib is a strong CYP3A inhibitor and a weak CYP2C9 inhibitor. These findings should be reflected as actionable clinical recommendations in the prescribing information for ceritinib with regards to concomitant medications whose pharmacokinetics may be altered by ceritinib.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-020-04180-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Discovery of a PROTAC targeting ALK with in vivo activity

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) was involved in the development of various cancer types. Although several ALK inhibitors have been advanced to clinical trials, the emergence of drug resistance has limited the clinical application of them. To overcome the drug resistance, proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) could be an alternative strategy. In this study, a series of ALK degraders were designed and synthesized. The degraders were developed through the conjugation of LDK378 and CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase ligands. Among all the molecules, compound B3 showed potent selective inhibitory activity to ALK and can decrease the cellular levels of ALK fusion proteins in a concentration- and time-dependent manner in H3122 cell line. Meanwhile, B3 showed improved anticancer activity in vitro comparing with LDK378 and the antiproliferative activity to xenograft tumor model was acceptable. All the results demonstrated that ALK degrader B3 with in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer activities was valuable for further investigation.

MRI radiomic signature predicts intracranial progression-free survival in patients with brain metastases of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Intracranial progression is considered an important cause of treatment failure in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Recent advances in targeted therapy and radiomics have generated considerable interest for the exploration of prognostic imaging biomarkers to predict the clinical course. Here, we developed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic signature that can stratify survival and intracranial progression.

Methods

We analyzed 87 brain metastatic lesions in 24 ALK-positive NSCLC patients undergoing ALK-inhibitor ensartinib therapy and divided them into training (n=61) and validation (n=26) sets. Radiomic features were extracted and screened from contrast-enhanced MR images. Combined with these selected features, the Rad-score was calculated with multivariate logistic regression. The predictive model and Rad-score performance were assessed in the training set and validated in the validation set; decision curve analysis was performed with the combined training and validation sets to estimate Rad-score’s patient-stratification ability.

Results

The prediction model constructed with nine selected radiomic features could predict intracranial progression within 51 weeks (AUC =0.84 and 0.85 in the training and validation sets, respectively), while clinical and regular MRI characteristics were independent of progression (P>0.05). The decision-curve analysis showed that the radiomic prediction model was clinically useful. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the progression-free survival (PFS) difference between the high- and low-risk groups distinguished by the Rad-score was significant (P=0.017).

Conclusions

Radiomics may provide prognostic information and improve pretreatment risk stratification in ALK-positive NSCLC patients with brain metastases undergoing ensartinib treatment, allowing follow-up and treatment to be tailored to the patient’s individual risk profile.

Aberrant role of ALK in tau proteinopathy through autophagosomal dysregulation

Proteinopathy in neurodegenerative diseases is typically characterized by deteriorating activity of specific protein aggregates. In tauopathies, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), tau protein abnormally accumulates and induces dysfunction of the affected neurons. Despite active identification of tau modifications responsible for tau aggregation, a critical modulator inducing tau proteinopathy by affecting its protein degradation flux is not known. Here, we report that anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a receptor tyrosine kinase, is crucial for the tau-mediated AD pathology. ALK caused abnormal accumulation of highly phosphorylated tau in the somatodendritic region of neurons through its tyrosine kinase activity. ALK-induced LC3-positive axon swelling and loss of spine density, leading to tau-dependent neuronal degeneration. Notably, ALK activation in neurons impaired Stx17-dependent autophagosome maturation and this defect was reversed by a dominant-negative Grb2. In a Drosophila melanogaster model, transgenic flies neuronally expressing active Drosophila Alk exhibited the aggravated tau rough eye phenotype with retinal degeneration and shortened lifespan. In contrast, expression of kinase-dead Alk blocked these phenotypes. Consistent with the previous RNAseq analysis showing upregulation of ALK expression in AD [1], ALK levels were significantly elevated in the brains of AD patients showing autophagosomal defects. Injection of an ALK.Fc-lentivirus exacerbated memory impairment in 3xTg-AD mice. Conversely, pharmacologic inhibition of ALK activity with inhibitors reversed the memory impairment and tau accumulation in both 3xTg-AD and tauC3 (caspase-cleaved tau) transgenic mice. Together, we propose that aberrantly activated ALK is a bona fide mediator of tau proteinopathy that disrupts autophagosome maturation and causes tau accumulation and aggregation, leading to neuronal dysfunction in AD.

Treatment Sequencing for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancer cases and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed with advanced disease and require systemic treatment. Despite emerging advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the prognosis of stage IV patients remains poor. However, the discovery of oncogenic driver mutations including mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and others, characterize a subset of patients with the opportunity of targeted therapies. Fusions between the ALK and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) are present in ∼ 3-5% of patients with NSCLC. Several first-, second-, and third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed in the last decade and have tremendously changed treatment options and outcomes of ALK-positive NSCLC patients. With increasing treatment options, treatment sequence decisions have become more and more complex. ALK-mutations, fusion variants, or activation of by-pass pathways result in treatment resistance during the course of treatment in nearly all patients. Mutation-guided treatment sequencing can lead to better outcomes, and re-biopsy or liquid-biopsy should be performed whenever possible in case of disease progression in ALK-rearranged patients. In the future, combinational treatment of ALK TKIs with other pathway-inhibitors might further improve patients' treatment options and outcomes. Here, we review the data for currently available ALK TKIs, discuss approaches of treatment sequencing, and give an outlook on emerging developments.

Brigatinib Dose Rationale in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Exposure-Response Analyses of Pivotal ALTA Study

Brigatinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. Approval was based on results from a randomized, dose‐ranging phase II study (ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113 (ALTA)). Despite an apparent dose–response relationship for efficacy in ALTA, an exposure–response relationship was not discernable using static models driven by time‐averaged exposure. However, exposure–response modeling using daily time‐varying area under the concentration curve as the predictor in time‐to‐event models predicted that increasing the dose of brigatinib (range, 30 mg once daily (q.d.) to 240 mg q.d.) would result in clinically meaningful improvements in progression‐free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS, and overall survival. Grade ≥ 2 rash and amylase elevation were predicted to significantly increase with brigatinib exposure. These results provided support for a favorable benefit‐risk profile with the approved dosing regimen (180 mg q.d. with 7‐day lead‐in at 90 mg) versus 90 mg q.d.

Treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: First line, maintenance and second line - Indian consensus statement update

The management of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is becoming increasingly complex with the identification of driver mutations/rearrangements and development/availability of appropriate targeted therapies. In 2017, an expert group of medical oncologists with expertise in treating lung cancer used data from published literature and experience to arrive at practical consensus recommendations on treatment of advanced NSCLC for use by the community oncologists. This was published subsequently in the Indian Journal of Cancer with a plan to be updated annually. The present document is an update to the 2017 document.

Safety and Antitumor Activity of Repeated ASP3026 Administration in Japanese Patients with Solid Tumors: A Phase I Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangements (ALKr) resulting in EML4-ALK proteins occur in a subset of solid tumors and are targeted by ALK inhibitors. Given the development of drug resistance to ALK inhibitors, ALK inhibitors with different kinase selectivity are required.

METHODS

This phase I, non-randomized, open-label study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of ASP3026, a second-generation ALK inhibitor, in Japanese patients with solid tumors. Between 1 June 2011 and 20 January 2014, 29 patients received different daily doses of ASP3026 in the escalation (25 mg, n = 3; 50 mg, n = 3; 75 mg, n = 3; 125 mg, n = 4; 200 mg, n = 3; or 325 mg, n = 7) and expansion (200 mg, n = 6) cohorts.

RESULTS

Three patients had DLTs at the 325-mg dose: cataract exacerbation, increased aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase, and impaired hepatic function (all Grade 3 severity). Thus, the maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg. The treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was 100%; the most common events were nausea (n = 8, 27.6%), decreased appetite (n = 10, 34.5%), and fatigue (n = 9, 31.0%) of mild or moderate severity. Six patients were positive for ALK protein and three had ALKr. Two patients achieved partial responses: one with Ewing sarcoma (75-mg dose group) and one with an ALKr-positive inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (125-mg dose group).

CONCLUSION

ASP3026 at a 200-mg dose may provide therapeutic benefit for patients with solid tumors, with a tolerable safety profile.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01401504 on July 25, 2011.