Resection margins in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Implications for radiation therapy

Localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: the rationale for preoperative chemoradiation

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. In spite of advancements in surgical treatment, nearly 80% of patients thought to have localized pancreatic cancer die of recurrent or metastatic disease when treated with surgery alone. Therefore, efforts to alter the patterns of recurrence and improve survival for patients with pancreatic cancer currently focus on the delivery of systemic therapy and irradiation before or after surgery. Postoperative adjuvant therapy appears to improve median survival. However, more than one-fourth of patients do not complete planned adjuvant therapy due to surgical complications or a delay in postoperative recovery of performance status. Utilizing a preoperative (neoadjuvant) approach, overall treatment time is reduced, a greater proportion of patients receive all components of therapy, and patients with rapidly progressive disease are spared the side effects of surgery as metastatic disease may be found at restaging following chemoradiation (prior to surgery). This paper examines the factors pertinent to clinical trial design for resectable pancreatic cancer, and carefully reviews the existing data supporting adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for potentially resectable disease.

En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: is it worthwhile?

The benefit of radical surgical resection of contiguously involved structures for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine patient outcome after extended pancreatic resection for locally advanced tumors and to determine if any subset of extended resection affected outcome. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, who underwent extirpative pancreatic surgery between 1987 and 2000. Of the 116 patients, 37 (32%) required resection of surrounding structures (group I), and 79 patients (68%) underwent standard pancreatic resections (group II). In all cases, all macroscopic disease was excised. In group I a total of 46 contiguously involved structures were resected: vascular in 25 patients (54%), mesocolon in 16 (35%) (colic vessels in 3, colon in 13), adrenal in three (7%), liver in one (2%), stomach in one (2%) (for a tumor in the tail of the pancreas), and multiple structures in four. Excision of regional blood vessels included the superior mesenteric vein and/or portal vein in 16, hepatic artery in five, and celiac axis in four. No differences between groups I and II were detected for any of the following parameters: age, sex, history of previous operation, estimated blood loss, or hospital stay. For the entire cohort the morbidity and mortality were 38% and 1.7%, respectively, and these rates were similar in the two groups. Adjuvant therapy was administered to more than 90% of patients in both groups. However, patients in group I were more likely to have received neoadjuvant therapy (76% vs. 42%, P = 0.001). Total pancreatectomy and distal pancreatectomy were more often performed in group I (P = 0.005). Additionally, the median operative time was longer (8.5 hours compared to 6.9 hours (P = 0.0004)). Both groups had similar rates of microscopically positive margins and involved lymph nodes, as well as total number of lymph nodes removed. The median survival was 26 months for patients in group I and 16 months for patients in group II (P = 0.08). The median disease-free survival for groups I and II was 16 months and 14 months, respectively (P = 0.88). In comparing patients in group I, who underwent vascular resection vs. mesocolon (colon or middle colic vessels) resection, the median survival was 26 months and 19 months, respectively (P = 0.12). We were unable to detect a difference in outcome for patients with locally advanced cancers requiring extended pancreatic resections compared to patients with standard resections. En bloc resection of involved surrounding structures, to completely extirpate all macroscopic disease, may be of benefit in selected patients with locally advanced disease, particularly when combined with preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies of pancreatic cancer: a review

The survival of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer is dismal. Few patients on initial presentation are suitable for surgical resection. This has prompted clinical studies with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy designed either to increase the number of patients eligible for surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) or to prolong the survival of patients who had undergone surgery (adjuvant therapy). None of these studies may at this time be considered definitive. Wherever possible, patients felt eligible for neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy should be entered on clinical trials. Where this is not possible, clinicians should exercise their best judgment in offering this type of treatment to pancreatic cancer patients under their care.

[Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: does pylorus preservation change morbidity and prognosis?]

STUDY AIM

To evaluate the influence of a pylorus-preserving on the morbidity and prognosis of patient with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of pancreas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1985 and 1999, 183 patients were operated on for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Among them, 63 patients (40 men, mean age 63 years, range 41-77 years) had curative resection and were included in this retrospective study. They were classified according to the type of resection. In the group I, the procedure included a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 35). In the group II, the procedure included polar inferior gastrectomy (n = 28). The prognosis was compared. Parameters for comparison were rate of local recurrence, rate of metastatic evolution and duration of survival.

RESULTS

The operative length and mortality rate (group I: 0%, group II: 3%), general (p = 0.37) and specific morbidity (p = 0.30), frequency of delayed gastric emptying were similar in the 2 groups (group I: 20%, group II: 35%, p = 0.88). The duration of naso-gastic aspiration was shorter in the group I (6 days vs 8, p = 0.01). The prognosis was the same in the 2 groups (metastasis: group I: 39%, group II: 56%, p = 0.12, local recurrence: group I: 58%, group II: 43%, p = 0.09, mean survival: group I: 18 months, group II: 19 months, p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy could be performed for patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas and does not compromise survival.

Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of resection margins on survival for patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated within the context of the adjuvant European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer-1 (ESPAC-1) study.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor long-term survival rate of only 10% to 15% after resection. Patients with positive microscopic resection margins (R1) have a worse survival, but it is not known how they fare in adjuvant studies.

METHODS

ESPAC-1, the largest randomized adjuvant study of resectable pancreatic cancer ever performed, set out to look at the roles of chemoradiation and chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified prospectively by resection margin status.

RESULTS

Of 541 patients with a median follow-up of 10 months, 101 (19%) had R1 resections. Resection margin status was confirmed as an influential prognostic factor, with a median survival of 10.9 months for R1 versus 16.9 months months for patients with R0 margins. Resection margin status remained an independent factor in a Cox proportional hazards model only in the absence of tumor grade and nodal status. There was a survival benefit for chemotherapy but not chemoradiation, irrespective of R0/R1 status. The median survival was 19.7 months with chemotherapy versus 14.0 months without. For patients with R0 margins, chemotherapy produced longer survival compared with to no chemotherapy. This difference was less apparent for the smaller subgroup of R1 patients, but there was no significant heterogeneity between the R0 and R1 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection margin-positive pancreatic tumors represent a biologically more aggressive cancer; these patients benefit from resection and adjuvant chemotherapy but not chemoradiation. The magnitude of benefit for chemotherapy treatment is reduced for patients with R1 margins versus those with R0 margins. Patients with R1 tumors should be included in future trials of adjuvant treatments and randomization and analysis should be stratified by this significant prognostic factor.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) assessed the roles of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in a randomised study.

METHODS

After resection, patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (20 Gy in ten daily fractions over 2 weeks with 500 mg/m(2) fluorouracil intravenously on days 1-3, repeated after 2 weeks) or chemotherapy (intravenous fluorouracil 425 mg/m(2) and folinic acid 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, monthly for 6 months). Clinicians could randomise patients into a two-by-two factorial design (observation, chemoradiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or both) or into one of the main treatment comparisons (chemoradiotherapy versus no chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was death, and all analyses were by intention to treat. Findings 541 eligible patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomised: 285 in the two-by-two factorial design (70 chemoradiotherapy, 74 chemotherapy, 72 both, 69 observation); a further 68 patients were randomly assigned chemoradiotherapy or no chemoradiotherapy and 188 chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the 227 (42%) patients still alive was 10 months (range 0-62). Overall results showed no benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (median survival 15.5 months in 175 patients with chemoradiotherapy vs 16.1 months in 178 patients without; hazard ratio 1.18 [95% CI 0.90-1.55], p=0.24). There was evidence of a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (median survival 19.7 months in 238 patients with chemotherapy vs 14.0 months in 235 patients without; hazard ratio 0.66 [0.52-0.83], p=0.0005). Interpretation This study showed no survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy but revealed a potential benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy, justifying further randomised controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Staging of pancreatic cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is used at many institutions for treatment of localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Accurate staging before neoadjuvant therapy identifies patients with distant metastatic disease, and restaging after neoadjuvant therapy selects patients for laparotomy and attempted resection. The aims of this study were to (1) determine the utility of staging laparoscopy in candidates for neoadjuvant therapy and (2) evaluate the accuracy of restaging CT following chemoradiation. Staging laparoscopy was performed in 98 patients with radiographically potentially resectable (no evidence of arterial abutment or venous occlusion) or locally advanced (arterial abutment or venous occlusion) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Unsuspected distant metastasis was identified in 8 (18%) of 45 patients with potentially resectable tumors and 13 (24%) of 55 patients with locally advanced tumors by CT. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and restaging CT were completed in a total of 103 patients. Thirty-three patients with potentially resectable tumors by restaging CT underwent surgical exploration and resections were performed in 27 (82%). Eleven (22%) of 49 patients with locally advanced tumors by restaging CT were resected, with negative margins in 55%; the tumors in these 11 patients had been considered locally advanced because of arterial involvement on restaging CT. Staging laparoscopy is useful for the exclusion of patients with unsuspected metastatic disease from aggressive neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols. Following neoadjuvant chemoradiation, restaging CT guides the selection of patients for laparotomy but may overestimate unresectability to a greater extent than does prechemoradiation CT.

Long term survival after pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the long term survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection and to assess the association of clinical, pathological, and treatment features with survival.

METHODS

Between January, 1990, and December, 1998, 125 patients underwent a pancreaticoduodenal or partial pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at our institution. The records of these patients were reviewed for demographics, tumor characteristics including size, histological grade, margin status, lymph node status, surgical TNM staging, and postoperative adjuvant therapy. The primary outcome variable analyzed was survival.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients had complete follow-up and were included in the final analysis. The median survival after surgery was 16 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-yr survival rates for all 116 patients were 60%, 23%, 19%, and 11%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-yr survival rates for patients who received adjuvant therapy were 69%, 28%, 23%, and 18% compared with 20% and 0% in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-yr survival rates for patients with negative lymph nodes were 73%, 38%, 26%, and 22% compared with survival rates of 52%, 14%, 14%, and 9% in patients with positive lymph nodes (p = 0.01). In multivariate analyses, adjuvant therapy was the only feature found to be strongly associated with survival (hazards ratio = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.15-0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall 5- and 7-yr survival rates of 19% and 11% in our study further validate that surgical resection in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma can result in long term survival, particularly when performed in association with adjuvant chemoradiation.

Is pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesentericoportal venous resection safe and worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

Whether or not superior mesentericoportal venous resection (SM-PVR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is safe and worthwhile has not been fully confirmed. The aim of the present study was to investigate results of this surgical procedure performed for pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms.

METHODS

As a first analysis, postoperative morbidity and mortality after PD with (n = 31) or without SM-PVR (n = 119) were investigated in 150 patients with pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms. As a second analysis, rates of margin-negative resection and survival after SM-PVR (n = 21) and without SM-PVR (n = 66) were compared in 87 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. In these patients undergoing SM-PVR (n = 21), survival rate was investigated in patients who did (n = 13) and did not (n = 8) undergo a margin-negative resection.

RESULTS

In the first analysis, duration of surgery and volume of blood transfused perioperatively were higher in patients undergoing SM-PVR. However, mortality, morbidity rates, and mean hospital stay did not differ between patients who did undergo SM-PVR (31 patients, 3.2%, 48.4%, and 22.2 days, respectively) and who did not (119 patients, 2.5%, 47.1%, 25.9 days, respectively). No postoperative death occurred in the recent part of the present study, since 1994, in patients undergoing SM-PVR. In the second analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, rates of margin-negative resection and 2-year survival did not significantly differ between patients who did and did not undergo SM-PVR (62% and 22%, respectively, versus 73% and 24%). In patients undergoing SM-PVR, survival rate was significantly higher for patients undergoing a margin-negative resection (n = 13) than for patients undergoing a macroscopic or microscopic margin-positive resection (n = 8, 2-year survival = 57.1% versus 0%, P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

PD combined with SM-PVR can be performed safely. This surgical procedure is followed by a promising survival rate and can be recommended in order to obtain a margin-negative resection; however, candidates for SM-PVR should be carefully selected.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

The outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer has been grim. There have been major advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, leading to a dramatic reduction in post-operative mortality from the development of high volume specialized centres. This stimulated the study of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in pancreatic cancer including chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Initial protocols have been based on the original but rather small GITSG study first reported in 1985. There have been two large European trials totalling over 600 patients (EORTC and ESPAC-1) that do not support the use of chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy. A second major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial (541 patients randomized) was some but not conclusive evidence for a survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. A third major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial was that the quality of life was not affected by the use of adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone. The ESPAC-3 trial aims to assess the definitive use of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial of 990 patients.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: current treatment approaches and future challenges

The past several decades have witnessed advances in the management of pancreatic cancer; however, much remains to be accomplished. Emerging techniques in the fields of surgery, RT, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy offer hope for greater locoregional control, survival, and quality of life for these patients.

Gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil for nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Gemcitabine has been shown to be an active agent in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This study was conducted to prospectively examine the tolerance and early efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Twenty-three patients, median age 64 years, were treated with combined modality therapy. Nine patients underwent tumor resection before chemoradiation; 14 patients with locally unresectable tumors received definitive chemoradiation. Radiotherapy utilized four fields to the tumor and lymphatics to 45 Gy, plus a lateral boost to 50.4 Gy. Concurrent 5-FU 500 mg/m(2)/day was administered on days 1-3 and 29-31, followed by 4 months of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2)/week for 3 weeks (fourth week break). Adjuvant gemcitabine was well tolerated. Eighty-three percent of the patients completed three to four cycles. The primary dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia, which was observed in 10 patients (43%). Nonhematologic toxicities were reported in five patients (22%). There were no cases of gemcitabine-induced radiation recall and there have been no deaths attributed to treatment toxicity. Median follow-up for the 23 patients was 12 months (range, 5-50); the actuarial median survival was 13 months. This report confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be safely administered.

The analysis of resectability and survival in pancreatic cancer patients with vascular invasion

One of the major limitations of curative resection in patients with pancreatic cancer is local tumor extension to the mesenteric vessels. Thus, the purposes of our study were to assess the clinical value of contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) in predicting the resectability and survival of patients with pancreatic cancer with suspicious vascular invasion and to assess the influence of curative resection on the survival of these patients. We enrolled 40 patients with pancreatic cancer who were suspected of having an involvement of the adjacent large vessels and who subsequently underwent operation with curative intent in the study. Resectability and survival were correlated with CT findings such as segment length, degree of encasement, and type and number of vessels involved. The survival rate was compared between the curative and palliative resection groups, and survival rate was compared between the resected and unresected groups. Of the 40 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, 14 had curative resections and 26 had palliative resections. The probability of curative resection was higher in patients with segment lengths less than 2 cm, as compared with segment lengths more than 2 cm. However, there was no difference in survival between the two groups. There were no differences in resectability and survival according to the degree of encasement and type and number of vessels involved. There was no difference in survival between the curative and palliative resection groups. There was no difference in survival between the resected and unresected groups. A survival benefit was not achieved by curative resection in patients with pancreatic cancer with vascular invasion. Therefore, it would be better to avoid aggressive surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer with vascular invasion.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: treatment variables and survival duration

BACKGROUND

For patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer, the poor outcome associated with resection alone and the survival advantage demonstrated for combined-modality therapy have stimulated interest in preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of different preoperative chemoradiotherapy schedules, intraoperative radiation therapy, patient factors. and histopathologic variables on survival duration and patterns of treatment failure in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

METHODS

Data on 132 consecutive patients who received preoperative chemoradiation followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head between June 1990 and June 1999 were retrieved from a prospective pancreatic tumor database. Patients received either 45.0 or 50.4 Gy radiation at 1.8 Gy per fraction in 28 fractions or 30.0 Gy at 3.0 Gy per fraction in 10 fractions with concomitant infusional chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine). If restaging studies demonstrated no evidence of disease progression, patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. All patients were evaluated with serial postoperative computed tomography scans to document first sites of tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

The overall median survival from the time of tissue diagnosis was 21 months (range 19-26, 95%CI). At last follow-up, 41 patients (31%) were alive with no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease. The survival duration was superior for women (P = .04) and for patients with no evidence of lymph node metastasis (P = .03). There was no difference in survival duration associated with patient age, dose of preoperative radiation therapy, the delivery of intraoperative radiotherapy, tumor grade, tumor size, retroperitoneal margin status, or the histologic grade of chemoradiation treatment effect.

CONCLUSION

This analysis supports prior studies which suggest that the survival duration of patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is maximized by the combination of chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Furthermore, there was no difference in survival duration between patients who received the less toxic rapid-fractionation chemoradiotherapy schedule (30 Gy, 2 weeks) and those who received standard-fractionation chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy, 5.5 weeks). Short-course rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy, when performed on accurately staged patients, maximizes survival duration and is associated with a low incidence of local tumor recurrence.

Effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on surgical margin status of resected adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas

We examined the effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on the ability to obtain pathologically negative resection margins in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Between 1987 and 2000, 100 patients underwent Whipple resection with curative intent for primary adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Pathologic assessment of six margins (proximal and distal superior mesenteric artery, proximal and distal superior mesenteric vein, pancreas, retroperitoneum, common bile duct, and hepatic artery) was undertaken by either frozen section (pancreas and common duct) or permanent section. A margin was considered positive if tumor was present less than 1 mm from the inked specimen. Margins noted to be positive on frozen section were resected whenever possible. Of the 100 patients treated, 47 (47%) underwent postoperative radiation and chemotherapy (group I) and 53 (53%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (group II) with either 5-fluorouracil (32 patients) or gemcitabine (21 patients). Patient demographics and operative parameters were similar in the two groups, with the exception of preoperative tumor size (CT scan), which was greater in group II (P < 0.001), and number of previous operations, which was greater in group II (P < 0.0001). Statistical analysis of the number of negative surgical margins clear of tumor was performed using Fisher's exact test. All patients (100%) had six margins assessed for microscopic involvement with tumor. In the preoperative therapy group, 5 (7.5%) of 53 patients had more than one positive margin, whereas 21 (44.7%) of 47 patients without preoperative therapy had more than one margin with disease extension (P < 0.001). Additionally, only 11 (25.6%) of the 47 patients without preoperative therapy had six negative margins vs. 27 (50.9%) of 53 in the group receiving preoperative therapy (P = 0.013). Survival analysis reveals a significant increase in survival in margin-negative patients (P = 0.02). Similarly, a strong trend toward improved disease-free and overall survival is seen in patients with a single positive margin vs. multiple margins. Overall, we find a negative impact on survival with an increasing number of positive margins (P = 0.025, hazard ratio 1.3). When stratified for individual margin status, survival was decreased in patients with positive superior mesenteric artery (P = 0.06) and vein (P = 0.04) margins. However, this has not yet resulted in a significant increase in disease-free or overall survival for patients receiving preoperative therapy (P = 0.07).

Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, laparoscopy has emerged as a popular method of detecting extrapancreatic metastatic disease in patients presumed to have localized pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The English language literature on laparoscopic staging of pancreatic cancer was reviewed. Interpretation of this literature on staging laparoscopy is difficult because (1) there has been inconsistent use of high-quality computed tomography (CT) in prospective studies, (2) many studies have included patients with locally advanced disease, and (3) the R0/R1/R2 resection rates among patients staged by laparoscopy have not been reported, making it impossible to correlate laparoscopic findings with the R0 resection rate. Laparoscopy may prevent unnecessary laparotomy in a proportion of CT-staged patients presumed to have resectable pancreatic cancer. However, routine laparoscopy is performed on patients judged to have resectable disease by high-quality CT, this fraction of patients is between 4 and 13 per cent.

CONCLUSION

When state-of-the-art CT is available, the routine use of staging laparoscopy may not be easily justified from the data in the recent literature. Selective use of laparoscopy may be more appropriate and will probably be a more cost-effective staging approach. Criteria are presented for the selective use of laparoscopy in the staging of patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Preoperative chemoradiation for marginally resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Only 10% to 20% of patients with pancreatic cancer are considered candidates for curative resection at the time of diagnosis. We postulated that preoperative chemoradiation therapy might promote tumor regression, eradicate nodal metastases, and allow for definitive surgical resection in marginally resectable patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a preoperative chemoradiation therapy regimen on tumor response, resectability, and local control among patients with marginally resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and to report potential treatment-related toxicity. Patients with marginally resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (defined as portal vein, superior mesenteric vein, or artery involvement) were eligible for this protocol. Patients received 50.4 to 56 Gy in 1.8 to 2.0 Gy/day fractions with concurrent protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/m2/day). Reevaluation for surgical resection occurred 4 to 6 weeks after therapy. Fifteen patients (9 men and 6 women) completed preoperative chemoradiation without interruption. One patient required a reduction in the dosage of 5-fluorouracil because of stomatitis. Acute toxicity from chemoradiation consisted of grade 1 or 2 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, palmar and plantar erythrodysesthesia, and hematologic suppression. CA 19-9 levels declined in all nine of the patients with elevated pretreatment levels. Nine of the 15 patients underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy, and all had uninvolved surgical margins. Two of these patients had a complete pathologic response, and two had microscopic involvement of a single lymph node. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the median survival for resected patients was 30 months, whereas in the unresected group median survival was 8 months. Six of the nine patients who underwent resection remain alive and disease free with follow-up of 12, 30, 30, 34, 39, and 72 months, respectively. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy is well tolerated. It may downstage tumors, sterilize regional lymph nodes, and improve resectability in patients with marginally resectable pancreatic cancer. Greater patient accrual and longer follow-up are needed to more accurately assess its future role in therapy.

Analysis of the clinical benefit of intraoperative radiotherapy in patients undergoing macroscopically curative resection for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following macroscopically curative resection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer who had undergone potentially curative total or regional pancreatectomy between 1980 and 1997 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 138 patients, 98 had a pathologically negative surgical margin and the remaining 40 patients had a positive surgical margin. The usual EBRT dose was 45-55 Gy with a daily fraction of 1.5-2.0 Gy. The median IORT dose was 25 Gy in a single fraction.

RESULTS

The 2-year cause-specific survival rate of patients with pathologically negative surgical margins was 19%, and that of patients with positive margins was 4% (p < 0.005). Although the median survival time (MST) of patients with negative margins treated with IORT and EBRT was significantly longer than that of those treated with operation alone (17 vs. 11 months), no significant difference in survival curves was observed. In patients with positive surgical margins in peripancreatic soft tissue, the difference between the survival curve of patients treated with surgery alone and that of those treated with surgery and radiation therapy was borderline significant (p < 0.10). Patients receiving intraarterial or intraportal infusion chemotherapy had significantly improved survival rates compared with those who did not receive it (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although the MST was longer in patients with negative margins receiving IORT and EBRT than in those receiving no radiation, improved long-term survival by IORT and/or EBRT was not suggested. In patients with positive margins, our results obtained by IORT/EBRT were encouraging. Randomized studies with much higher patient numbers are necessary to define the role of IORT in curatively resected pancreatic cancer.

Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators

This large-volume, single-institution review examines factors influencing long-term survival after resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, uncinate process, body, or tail of the pancreas. Between January 1984 and July 1999 inclusive, 616 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas underwent surgical resection. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Both univariate and multivariate models were used to determine the factors influencing survival. Of the 616 patients, 526 (85%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas, 52 (9%) underwent distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail, and 38 (6%) underwent total pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma extensively involving the gland. The mean age of the patients was 64.3 years, with 54% being male and 91% being white. The overall perioperative mortality rate was 2.3%, whereas the incidence of postoperative complications was 30%. The median postoperative length of stay was 11 days. The mean tumor diameter was 3.2 cm, with 72% of patients having positive lymph nodes, 30% having positive resection margins, and 36% having poorly differentiated tumors. Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for left-sided lesions had larger tumors (4.7 vs. 3.1 cm, P < 0.0001), but fewer node-positive resections (59% vs. 73%, P = 0.03) and fewer poorly differentiated tumors (29% vs. 36%, P < 0.001), as compared to those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for right-sided lesions. The overall survival of the entire cohort was 63% at 1 year and 17% at 5 years, with a median survival of 17 months. For right-sided lesions the 1- and 5-year survival rates were 64% and 17%, respectively, compared to 50% and 15% for left-sided lesions. Factors shown to have favorable independent prognostic significance by multivariate analysis were negative resection margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64, confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 0.82, P = 0.0004), tumor diameter less than 3 cm (HR = 0.72, CI = 0.57 to 0.90, P = 0.004), estimated blood loss less than 750 ml (HR = 0.75, CI = 0.58 to 0.96, P = 0.02), well/moderate tumor differentiation (HR = 0.71, CI = 0.56 to 0.90, P = 0.005), and postoperative chemoradiation (HR = 0.50, CI = 0.39 to 0.64, P < 0.0001). Tumor location in head, neck, or uncinate process approached significance in the final multivariate model (HR = 0.60, CI = 0.35 to 1.0, P = 0.06). Pancreatic resection remains the only hope for long-term survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Completeness of resection and tumor characteristics including tumor size and degree of differentiation are important independent prognostic indicators. Adjuvant chemoradiation is a strong predictor of outcome and likely decreases the independent significance of tumor location and nodal status.

[Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer: curative resections]

Curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma can only be performed in 10% of patients. This review article reports resectability rates and criteria, results of pancreatic resection and prognostic factors. Lymph node and/or vascular involvement and retroperitoneal tissue invasion constitute very poor prognostic factors; however, lymph node involvement limited to the first draining nodes and limited invasion of the mesenteric-portal vein do not constitute contraindications to surgical resection. Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy is still the reference procedure and its postoperative mortality has greatly decreased. The risk of pancreatic fistula mainly depends on the friability of the pancreatic stump. Median survival rate after tumour resection is usually limited between 12 and 18 months. Five-year actuarial survival rate is no more than 5%, but after curative resection (RO), it may be as high as 20 to 25% in recent surgical series. Concomitant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy-radiotherapy, currently under evaluation, may increase resection and survival rates.

Neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy in advanced primarilynon-resectable carcinomas of the pancreas

AIM

To investigate the feasibility of neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (RCT) in the treatment of primarily non-resectable pancreas carcinoma the parameters tumour regression, possibility of subsequent resection and tolerability were examined.

METHOD

Between 1995 and 1997, 27 patients with locally inoperable (assessed by CT criteria) pancreatic carcinoma received radio-chemotherapy for 5 weeks comprising irradiation (55.8 Gy) and chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 1000 mg/m(2)/day; 120 h continuous infusion) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2)i.v.-bolus, day 2 and day 30) during the first and fifth week of radiotherapy. Two target volumes were irradiated with fractionated doses of 1.8 Gy up to a total of 50.4 Gy. Radiation was applied once a day five times a week and target volume 1 was irradiated with the same fractionated dose, and an additional boost of 5.4 Gy to make an overall total of 55.8 Gy.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent explorative laparotomy, 10 of these were resected (eight Whipple's procedures, two distal pancreatic resections), while six could not be resected due to peritoneal carcinosis (n=3), local irresectability (n=2) and liver cirrhosis (n=1). A further nine patients were found to have unresectable tumours on CT and did not undergo surgery after restaging (five of these patients were staged as <<locally irresectable>>, three patients had distant metastases and one patient refused surgery). In two patients RCT was abandoned because of progression of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The study protocol described is feasible without significant acute toxicity and when used the resectability rate was improved; the survival rate, however, was not improved. Additional intra-arterial or intraportal application of such drugs as mitomycin C or cisplatin may be necessary.

Factors influencing survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent reports have demonstrated improvement in the 5-year actuarial survival for patients with resected ductal adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors favoring long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Between 1974 and 1995, 75 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our department.

RESULTS

Overall postoperative mortality rate was 5. 3% and morbidity was 24%. Median survival following resection was 17 months. Estimated 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 68%, 46.7%, and 18.7%, respectively. Five-year survival was greater for node-negative than for node-positive patients (41.7% vs. 7.8%, P < 0. 001) and for smaller (<3 cm) than for larger tumors (33.3% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.006). The 5-year survival in patients with negative margins (n = 60) was 23.3%, whereas no patient with positive margins (n = 15) survived at 13 months (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis, performed by the Cox proportional hazards model, indicated that margin status, lymph node metastasis, tumor size, and poor histological differentiation were independent predictors of poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year survival for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas was 18.7%. Survival was greater in the group of patients with negative lymph nodes, tumor size <3 cm, and negative margin status.

Treatment of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with combined radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined treatment modality including systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin, cisplatin and external beam radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Systemic chemotherapy consisted of FU 400 mg m(-2) and leucovorin 20 mg m(-2) both given as intravenous bolus injection on days 1-4, plus cisplatin 20 mg m(-2) administered as 90-min infusion on days 1-4. Treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks x 6 unless prior evidence of progressive disease. Radiation therapy using megavolt irradiation of > or = 6 MV photons with a 3- or 4-field technique was delivered during the second and third chemotherapy course, that was reduced in dose by 25%. Between October 1994 and July 1996, a total of 38 patients were entered onto this trial, all of whom were assessable for toxicity and survival. Eighteen of these (47%) had objective remissions to combined radiochemotherapy, including four CR (11%), 13 (34%) had stable disease and seven patients (18%) showed tumour progression during treatment. The median progression-free interval of the entire study population was 10 months (range 3-32), and median overall survival was 14.0 months (range 3-45+ months); 53% of all patients were alive at 12 months, and 18% of patients were alive at 24 months respectively. Severe haematological side-effects comprised neutropenia in 18%, thrombocytopenia in 8% and anaemia in 11%. The most frequent non-haematological side-effects were nausea/vomiting (WHO grade 3: 18%), and diarrhoea (grade 3: 13%). This combined radiochemotherapy regimen was tolerable and effective in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Since therapeutic results, in fact, compare favourably with other series, including surgical treatment of potentially resectable tumours, further evaluation of combined treatment modalities in the neoadjuvant setting seems warranted.

A multispecialty approach to the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer

This article reviews recent developments in pancreatic cancer research and offers a multispecialty perspective on the diagnosis and management of this challenging disease. Current findings in the molecular biology of the disease and their implications for management are examined, as well as development in diagnostic techniques, including helical computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP), and, particularly, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Surgical management, the role of adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, and the critical importance of accurate preoperative imaging are also addressed in this review. Palliative techniques, including endoscopic stenting for malignant obstructive jaundice and chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic disease, are discussed, and results of recent clinical trials in pancreatic cancer are summarized. Finally, future directions for research are identified.

Detection of extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cytokeratin 19 staining and K-ras mutation

BACKGROUND

Neural invasion is known to be one of the aggressive characteristics of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, there have been no systematic studies on intraoperative examination of neural invasion of pancreatic carcinomas after wide dissection of the retroperitoneum, particularly at the surgical margin.

METHODS

We performed intraoperative immunostaining on the frozen sections of several excised plexus specimens, using peroxidase-labeled anti-cytokeratin 19 antibody in 17 cases of resectable pancreatic carcinoma. Postoperatively, we also tried to detect occult micrometastasis by direct sequencing of the K-ras gene in the same samples.

RESULTS

Intraoperative staining for cytokeratin 19 was positive in 4 of 17 (23.5%) cases. Patients with margin-positive neural invasion had significantly worse prognosis than patients who were margin negative (P < 0.05). One patient had micrometastasis in the nerve plexus, revealed by K-ras mutation, whereas neither cytokeratin 19 staining nor postoperative pathological investigation detected involvement of the analyzed portion. In the four patients margin-positive for cytokeratin 19 staining, the diagnosis of neural invasion by cytokeratin 19 staining was in agreement with the K-ras gene analysis.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative staining for cytokeratin 19 is useful for detecting pancreatic cancer involvement of the neural plexus margin. The results can be also utilized as a prognostic indicator during the follow-up period.

Adenocarcinoma of the Head of the Pancreas: Effects of Surgical and Nonsurgical Therapy on Survival—A Ten-Year Experience

A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas from 1989 to 1998 was performed. Excluded were cancers in the body and tail, cystic neoplasms, ampullary tumors, and cancers of the duodenum and bile ducts. One hundred forty-five patients were reviewed, and 43 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Data collected included the stage, lymph node status, surgical margins, adjuvant therapies, and survival. Statistical analysis was performed with Cox's Proportional Hazards Analysis and Log-Rank Life Table Analysis. The surgical population had a 21 per cent 3-year survival rate and a 7 per cent operative mortality rate. Median survival was: 1) the resection group versus no resection was 13.5 versus 3.1 months; 2) adjuvant therapy versus no therapy after resection was 16.1 versus 5.1 months; and 3) chemoradiation therapy versus no therapy for unresectable disease was 5.3 versus 1.8 months. The presence of positive surgical margins was found in 33 per cent of the surgical specimens and carried an increased mortality hazard ratio of 3.1. Patients with negative lymph nodes had a 15 per cent 5-year survival, versus 0 per cent with positive nodes. Seventy-three per cent of those resected had a T2 lesion, and 46 per cent of patients presented with metastatic disease. Surgical resection and adjuvant therapy significantly improves survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. All patients who underwent resection as part of their therapy showed extended survival compared with chemoradiation therapy alone. Adjuvant chemoradiation improved survival when compared with surgery alone. Multimodality treatment in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas provides the best treatment option. However, better adjuvant therapies are needed.

A Mortality-Free Decade of Pancreatoduodenectomy: Is Quality Independent of Quantity?

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for periampullary cancer is a procedure of high morbidity and poor long-term survival. Superior clinical outcome has been described in high-volume institutions or for surgeons with a high case load. All patients undergoing pancreatectomy at the City of Hope National Medical Center (Duarte, CA) between 1987 and 1998 were analyzed retrospectively for postoperative outcome, and correlating or predictive clinicopathological factors were identified. Fifty-four patients underwent pancreatectomy [PD, n = 43; pylorus-preserving PD, n = 8; total pancreatectomy, n = 3]. There were 26 males and 28 females, with a median age of 63 years (range, 19–86). Fifty patients had a malignant diagnosis, and four patients had a benign diagnosis. Nine surgical oncologists performed an average of six pancreatectomies (range, 2–8). There was no perioperative death. Postoperative complications occurred in 30 patients, and infections predominated (n = 17). The median hospital stay was 16.5 days. The median postoperative actuarial survival by cancer site was 56 months (ampullary/bile duct), 32.5 months (duodenal), 22.5 months (pancreatic), and 23.2 months (others). In this 11-year single institutional experience, PD and total pancreatectomy have been performed without lethal complication. In the setting of an exclusive oncology practice, operative mortality rates and survival outcome can be generated that compare favorably to large center experiences. Quality of outcome after pancreatectomy can be independent of quantity.

Resected pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy with or without 5-fluorouracil: treatment results and patterns of failure

There are relatively little data regarding patterns of recurrence after curative resection and postoperative radiotherapy with or without 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for patients with adenocarcinonima of the pancreas. Between 1978 and 1997, 41 patients underwent postoperative radiotherapy (RT) at Loyola-Hines Department of Radiotherapy. Of the 38 evaluable patients, 30 had RT + 5-FU and 8 had RT alone. Twenty-nine patients (76.3%) had a Whipple's resection, seven (18.4%) had distal pancreatectomy, and two (5.2%) had total pancreatectomy. Thirty-three (86.8%) of the 38 patients received > or =4,500 cGy to the tumor bed. Median survival for all patients was 21 months. The median survivals for patients who received RT + 5-FU and RT alone were 26 months and 5.5 months (p = 0.004). The most common site of failure was the liver, as seen in 79.2% of all recurrences. The peritoneum, other distant sites (lungs, bone, distant lymph nodes), and locoregional tumor bed were components of failure in 33.3%, 29.2%, and 25.0%, respectively. Locoregional failure alone was found in only one patient. Our median survival with postoperative RT + 5-FU is consistent with results reported by the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group and Mayo Clinic. Although patients who had RT + 5-FU had a better median survival than those who received RT alone, our RT-alone group had an inferior survival outcome compared to other published reports and may represent patient selection bias. Efforts in controlling this disease should be directed to prevention of intraabdominal relapse.

[Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas: management and therapeutic hopes]

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic carcinoma is a major public health concern, as it kills more than 6,000 people each year in France.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

The main risk factor demonstrated by concordant case-control studies is cigarette smoking. Pancreatic carcinoma is generally diagnosed at an advanced stage. Results of radical surgery are still poor. In most of the reported series, less than 25% of the patients survive at five years.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Postoperative radiochemotherapy slightly increases the hope of cure. In locally advanced tumors, radiochemotherapy, sometimes preoperative, allows some patients to survive more than two years. Though results of palliative chemotherapy remain very poor, some clinical benefit has been observed in randomized trials comparing this treatment with the currently best supportive treatment.

Intensified adjuvant therapy for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma: survival results and observations regarding patterns of failure, radiotherapy dose and CA19-9 levels

PURPOSE

Primary endpoints were 1. To determine if, in the context of postoperative adjuvant therapy of pancreatic and nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma, continuous infusion (C.I.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (Lv), combined with continuous-course external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to liver (23.4-27.0 Gy), regional lymph nodes (50.4-54.0 Gy) and tumor bed (50.4-57.6 Gy), followed by 4 months of C.I. 5-FU/Lv without EBRT could be given with acceptable toxicity. 2. To determine an estimate of disease-free and overall survival (DFS, OS) with this treatment in this context. Secondary endpoints were 1. To observe the effects of therapy at two different dose levels of irradiation, and 2. To observe for correlations among DFS, OS and CA 19-9 levels during therapy.

METHODS

Patients received C.I. 5-FU 200 mg/m2 and Lv 5 mg/m2 Monday through Friday during EBRT, and 4 cycles of the same chemotherapy without EBRT were planned for each 2 weeks of 4, beginning 1 month following the completion of EBRT. Therapy was to begin within 10 weeks of surgery and patients were monitored for disease recurrence, toxicity, and CA 19-9 levels before the start of EBRT/5-FU/Lv, before each cycle of C.I. 5-FU/Lv, and periodically after the completion of therapy. There were two EBRT dosage groups: Low EBRT, 23.4 Gy to the whole liver, 50.4 Gy to regional nodes and 50.4 Gy to the tumor bed; High EBRT, 27.0 Gy to the whole liver, 54.0 Gy to regional nodes, and 57.6 Gy to the tumor bed.

RESULTS

29 patients were enrolled and treated (23 with pancreatic cancer, and 6 with nonpancreatic periampullary cancer). Of these, 18 had tumor sizes > or = 3 cm and 23 had at least one histologically involved lymph node; 6 had histologically positive resection margins. Mean time to start of EBRT/5-FU/Lv was 53 +/- 2 days following surgery. The first 18 patients were in the Low EBRT Group and the last 11 in the High EBRT Group. Toxicity was moderate and manageable, including a possible case of late radiation hepatitis. Median DFS was 8.3 months (pancreatic cancer patients 8.5 months) and OS was 14.1 months (pancreatic cancer patients 15.9 months). Among patients with pancreatic cancer, results were similar for the Low and High EBRT Groups (DFS: 8.3 vs. 8.6 months; OS: 14.4 vs. 16.9 months, respectively). With a mean follow up of 2.6 +/- 0.3 years for the surviving patients and a minimal follow-up of 2.5 years, 27 of 29 pts have relapsed and 25 pts have died. A rise in CA 19-9 levels preceded clinical relapse by 9.1 +/- 1.5 months. Time to first relapse by site showed inverse correlation with dose of radiotherapy to that site: peritoneal (5 +/- 1 month), hepatic (7 +/- 0.9 months), regional nodes/tumor bed (9.6 +/- 1.8 months). Mean postresection CA 19-9 level was 63.3 +/- 16.2 U/ml. Postresection CA 19-9 values did not correlate with survival, margin status, or with the identification of metastatic carcinoma in resected lymph nodes. However, among patients with histologically involved nodes in the resected specimen, postresection CA 19-9 values did correlate with the number of positive nodes identified (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although toxicity was acceptable, survival results were not improved over those seen with standard adjuvant treatment. Most patients relapsed before the planned chemotherapy cycles were completed, or within 100 days thereof, suggesting disease resistance to C.I. 5-FU/Lv as used in this study. Although this regimen is not recommended for further study, the doses of EBRT utilized may be suitable for evaluation with other chemotherapy combinations. Postoperative CA 19-9 levels did not correlate with survival, but did correlate with the number of histologically involved lymph nodes found in the resected specimen among node-positive patients. Moreover, rising CA 19-9 levels anticipated ultimate clinical failure by 9 months.

Major vascular resection as part of pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: radiologic, intraoperative, and pathologic analysis

Intraoperative assessment is inaccurate in defining the relationship of a pancreatic head neoplasm to adjacent vascular structures. We evaluated the ability of preoperative contrast-enhanced CT to predict the need for vascular resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy and examined the resected vessels for histologic evidence of tumor invasion. During a 7-year period, 63 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with en bloc resection of adjacent vascular structures for a presumed pancreatic head malignancy. Clinical, radiologic, operative, and pathologic data were reviewed and analyzed. Fifty-six patients underwent resection of the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence, three patients required inferior vena cava resection, and the hepatic artery was resected and reconstructed in eight patients. The operative mortality rate was 1.6%, and the overall complication rate was 22%. CT predicted the need for resection of the superior mesenteric or portal veins in 84% of patients. Pathologic analysis revealed tumor invasion of the vein wall in 71% of resected specimens. Tumor invasion of vascular structures adjacent to the pancreas can be predicted with preoperative CT and should alert the surgeon that vascular resection may be required. Histologic evidence of tumor cell infiltration of vessel walls was present in the majority of the resected specimens.

Pancreatic cancer: can we screen? How should we stage?

Pancreatic cancer remains a deadly disease, with few patients surviving 5 years following diagnosis. Surgical resection remains the only treatment associated with the potential for cure; however, most patients have locally advanced or metastatic disease at presentation and thus are not surgical candidates. Advances in imaging technologies, biochemistry, and molecular genetics have raised hopes of improving the outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through earlier and more accurate diagnosis. As our knowledge of the genetics of pancreatic cancer has increased, the possibility of screening to identify patients at risk to develop the disease also holds promise. This review focuses on the utility of current modalities to screen for pancreatic cancer as well as the most accurate and expedient methods to stage the disease.

The prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and intrapancreatic perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer after curative resection

To investigate the prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer, a retrospective analysis of 193 patients who underwent curative resection was conducted. Of the 193 patients, 38 (20%) survived for more than 5 years, the 5-year survival rates for stages I, II, II, and IV disease being 41%, 17%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. According to a multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis, intrapancreatic perineural invasion, and portal vein invasion were significant prognostic factors. Subsequently, a subgroup analysis concerning nodal metastasis and intrapancreatic perineural invasion was performed in 126 patients with records of these histological findings. In the group of patients without nodal metastasis, the 5-year survival rate for those without perineural invasion was 75%, whereas that for those with perineural invasion was 29%, the difference in survival of these subgroups being significant (P < 0.02). In the group of patients with nodal metastasis, the 5-year survival rate for those without perineural invasion was 17%, while that for those with perineural invasion was 10%. The most favorable 5-year survival of 89% was observed in the subgroup of patients with stage I disease without perineural invasion. Thus, pancreatic adenocarcinoma categorized by the combination of these independent types of biological behavior showed 5-year survival rates ranging from very high to low, indicating that these two factors play an important role in the prognosis of this disease.

La Radioterapia Intraoperatoria Nel Trattamento Integrato Del Carcinoma Pancreatico

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease either for the high incidence of distant metastases or for the frequent local recidive also after potentially curative resection. For this reason new multimodality approaches have to be investigated. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) permits to administer a high dose to the tumor or to the retropancreatic tissues and to the regional lymphnodes. Literature data suggest it is possible a better local control and pheraps a better survival than the surgery alone or the palliative treatments by the use of schedules with IORT. Anyway they are retrospective data and IORT is an investigational method which has to be indagate in the combined modality approaches to this disease.

Role of nodal involvement and the periductal soft-tissue margin in middle and distal bile duct cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pattern of middle (Bm) and distal (Bi) bile duct cancers in an attempt to optimize surgical treatment.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Lymph node involvement and neural plexus invasion are the prognostic factors most amenable to surgery in Bm and Bi disease. However, a detailed analysis of these factors has not been conducted.

METHODS

Fifty patients with Bm and Bi disease (Bm 14 patients, Bi 36 patients) were examined histopathologically. A precise determination was made of lymph node involvement and neural plexus invasion. Important prognostic factors were examined by clinicopathologic study to apply these findings to surgical management.

RESULTS

Frequencies of nodal involvement for Bm and Bi disease were 57% and 71%, respectively. The inferior periductal and superior pancreaticoduodenal lymph nodes were most commonly involved. Neural plexus invasion occurred in 20% of patients, particularly involving the plexus in the hepatoduodenal ligament and pancreatic head. Tumor was present at the surgical margin in 50% and 14% of patients with Bm and Bi disease, respectively. Five-year survival rates were 65% in the absence of nodal metastasis and 21% with nodal metastasis. A significant correlation existed between absence of tumor at the surgical margin and survival. A Cox proportional hazard model projected absence of tumor at the surgical margin, followed by nodal involvement, as the strongest prognostic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of tumor at the surgical margin and nodal involvement are important independent prognostic factors in Bm and Bi disease. Skeletonization of the hepatoduodenal ligament, including portal vein resection, is necessary for patients with Bm disease, and a wide nodal dissection is essential in all patients.

Preoperative chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

Improved resectability is a major theoretical benefit of preoperative chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer. Since 1994, patients at Duke University Medical Center with locally advanced pancreatic cancer have been treated with multimodality preoperative therapy. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with preoperative therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and determine if an aggressive neoadjuvant regimen would not only downstage these tumors pathologically but also improve the odds of complete surgical resection.

METHODS

The charts of 25 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation at Duke University Medical Center with biopsy-proven, locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were reviewed. Tumors were defined as locally advanced based on radiographic or intraoperative evidence of disease that abuts the superior mesenteric artery or vein (n = 22) or involves lymph nodes that are within the proposed radiation field (n = 3). All 25 patients received external beam radiotherapy (median dose 4500 cGy) in daily fractions of 180 cGy over 5 weeks. All patients concurrently received 5-fluorouracil (FU), and many also received mitomycin C or cisplatin, or both. Patients were given a 3- to 4-week break before a restaging computed tomographic (CT) scan was performed. Three patients were not restaged: one died from metastatic disease; one was reclassified as having a neuroendocrine tumor; and one was lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

On restaging after neoadjuvant therapy, 64% of patients had stable or decreased primary tumor size. Radiographically, two patients appeared potentially resectable, and seven others developed evidence of metastatic disease. Eight patients underwent exploration, but only five could be resected. Of the five patients resected, only one had negative margins and negative lymph nodes. This patient had significant pancreatitis on initial exploration. After neoadjuvant therapy, he had a complete response radiographically, and there was no residual cancer in his resection specimen. Pathologic examination of the other resection specimens suggested that despite significant tumor fibrosis, malignant cells persist even at the periphery of the lesions.

CONCLUSION

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation has many theoretical advantages in managing pancreatic malignancy, true pathologic downstaging of locally advanced lesions into tumors that can be removed with negative nodes and margins appears to be a rare event with currently used therapeutic regimens.

[Pancreatectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for potentially resectable exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas]

The last of the therapeutic modalities proposed for exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas which appears to be potentially resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has many prerequisites: validation of the diagnosis, determination of resectability with a high degree of confidence and palliation of biliary obstruction when present. This rather complex strategy does not seem to have major deleterious effects on the operative procedure or the postoperative course. Only multicentric protocols will, in the near future, give an answer to the question of secondary toxic effects and improvement of survival of this new therapeutic strategy.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: back to the future

PURPOSE

The role of adjuvant therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer, resected with curative intent, remains controversial. This editorial review updates the status of adjuvant therapy in this context and introduces the first North American co-operative group study in this arena in roughly 20 years.

RESULTS

To the extent that there has been a "standard" of care in this context, it has been defined in large part by the early work of the Gastrointestinal Study Group (GITSG). Their trial was activated in the mid 1970's using split course radiation therapy and bolus 5-FU. In the intervening 20 + years the morbidity/mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDD) has been dramatically reduced; concurrently, understanding of prognostic factors impacting on outcomes for resected patients has been significantly enhanced. In major centers the mortality of PDD is roughly 1% and survival has been shown to correlate with a number of factors including tumor size, nodal involvement, and margin status. With currently available techniques doses of continuous course radiation therapy in the range of 50-55 Gy to sites of pancreatic tumor resection and adjacent lymph node regions have been given in a number of trials with acceptable morbidity. 5-FU sequencing and administration have been advanced and gemcitabine, an agent with clear radiosensitizing properties, has been approved for use against pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Following PDD increasing numbers of physiologically intact patients are confronting the survival statistics associated with resected pancreatic cancer. Their interest in improved therapeutic outcomes, combined with the noted improvements in radiation and chemotherapeutic management, has set the stage for renewed and intensified study. Accordingly, the intergroup mechanism of the Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program (CTEP) of the NCI has designed, approved, and activated a modern Phase III, adjuvant protocol incorporating recently gained knowledge in this management context. Prospective randomization will be utilized to compare gemcitabine and 5-FU as single agents before and after chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU. Successful and timely completion of this newly activated intergroup study, RTOG 97-04, will establish a current, cooperative group experience, data base, and standard in the context of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and serve to provide momentum for further studies.

Survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

BACKGROUND

The survival of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without en bloc resection of the superior mesenteric-portal vein (SMPV) confluence for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head was compared.

METHODS

To be considered for surgery, patients were required to fulfil the following computed tomography criteria for resectability: (1) absence of extrapancreatic disease, (2) no evidence of tumour extension to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or coeliac axis, and (3) a patent SMPV confluence. Tumour adherence to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) or SMPV confluence was assessed at operation and en bloc venous resection was performed when necessary to achieve complete tumour extirpation.

RESULTS

Seventy-five consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 44 without venous resection and 31 with en bloc resection of the SMPV confluence. There were no perioperative deaths in either group; late (more than 6 months) occlusion of the reconstructed SMPV confluence contributed to the death of two patients. Median survival in the 31 patients who required venous resection at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy was 22 months, and that for the 44 control patients was 20 months (P = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head who require venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for isolated tumour extension to the SMV or SMPV confluence (in the absence of tumour extension to the SMA or coeliac axis) have a duration of survival no different from that of patients who undergo standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. These data suggest that venous involvement is a function of tumour location rather than an indicator of aggressive tumour biology.

Prediction of resectability of pancreatic malignancy by computed tomography

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in predicting resectability of pancreatic malignancy has been questioned recently and alternative methods have been recommended.

METHODS

To determine the accuracy of CT for predicting resectability and its influence on survival, a standard protocol for performing CT and reporting the results was developed and then compared retrospectively with the ability of one surgeon to perform a resection during 1989-1994. Postoperative survival was determined.

RESULTS

Of 88 consecutive patients 35 (40 per cent) had CT-resectable disease and 53 (60 per cent) had CT-irresectable disease. Twenty-one patients were excluded because of advanced disease or poor performance status. Of the remaining 67 patients, 47 (70 per cent) had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 20 (30 per cent) had ampullary adenocarcinoma, of whom 32 had a resection, 32 had a palliative bypass and three had only a staging laparoscopy. The sensitivity and specificity for computed tomographic prediction of resectability were 72 and 80 per cent respectively. The positive predictive value was 77 per cent and the negative predictive value 76 per cent. There were seven false-positive and nine false-negative findings. Survival was more dependent on whether or not resection was performed than on computed tomographic predictability of resection.

CONCLUSION

CT was reasonably accurate in predicting resectability but cannot be relied on entirely, requiring an improvement in staging methods for pancreatic malignancy.