1
|
|
2
|
Gumbs AA, Rodriguez-Rivera AM, Hoffman JP. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery of the entire gland: initial experience. MINERVA CHIR 2011; 66:269-280. [PMID: 21873961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Many pancreatic cancer surgeons have been slow to adopt minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) due a lack of formalized minimally invasive training and the perceived difficulty in dissecting pancreatic tumors and tissue away from the superior mesenteric vessels and consequent concerns for adequacy of oncologic margins and lymph node retrieval. A review of the first 29 MIPS procedures for malignant and premalignant tumors of the pancreas with the aid of a sterilizeable robotically-controlled camera holder was undertaken. As opposed to other robots currently available, this device allows for hand-assistance by the operating surgeon. Fourteen minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies (MIDP) (10 laparoscopic, 3 hand-assisted, 1 converted to open), 13 MIPDs (6 laparoscopic, 5 hand-assisted, 2 converted to open), and 2 laparoscopic central pancreatectomies have been performed. Seventeen (59%) of these patients were treated for cancer. Of these, 11 underwent a MIPD and 6 a MIDP. There were postoperative complications in seven patients (24%) at 30 days. Thirty and 90 day mortality was 3%. A sterilizeable robotically-controlled laparoscope holder that enables the operating surgeon to remain in contact with the patient and have the option of a hand-assisted approach may be particularly helpful for minimally invasive approaches to malignant and premalignant pancreatic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Gumbs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Summit Medical Group, Berkeley Heights, NJ, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tejani MA, Cai KQ, Zhu F, Dubyk C, Chun YS, Cohen SJ, Hoffman JP, Burtness B. ERCC1 and RRM1 expression in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e14606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
4
|
Wang D, Zhang Q, Blanke CD, Demetri GD, Heinrich MC, Watson JC, Hoffman JP, Okuno SH, Kane JM, vonMehren M, Eisenberg BL. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): Long-term follow-up results of RTOG 0132. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.10057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
5
|
Li D, Moughan J, Crane CH, Hoffman JP, Regine W, Abrams RA, Safran H, Freedman GM, Guha C, Abbruzzese JL. Association of RecQ1 A159C polymorphism with overall survival of patients with resected pancreatic cancer: A replication study in RTOG 9704. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
156 Background: To confirm whether a previously observed association between a DNA repair gene and clinical outcome of resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation is reproducible in another patient population. Methods: We evaluated the RecQ1 A159C variant (rs13035) in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who were enrolled on the RTOG 9704 trial of 5FU-based chemoradiation preceded and followed by 5-FU or gemcitabine. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue sections and genotype was determined using the Taqman method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine if there is a correlation between genotype and overall survival (OS). Models were built using the stepwise selection procedure. The following variables were included in the model: genotype, treatment arm, age, gender, race, nodal involvement, tumor diameter, and surgical margin status. Results: A total of 154 out of 451 eligible patients were evaluated for the RecQ1genotype. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics and overall survival time between patients who were and were not evaluated for the RecQ1genotype. In the 154 evaluated patients, the genotype distribution followed the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, i.e. 37% had genotype AA, 43% AC, and 20% CC. The RecQ1 variant AC/CC genotype carriers were more likely to be node positive compared to the AA carrier (p=0.03). The median survival times (95% C.I.) for AA, AC, and CC carriers were 1.72 (1.36, 2.17), 1.57 (1.18, 1.80), and 1.18 (0.86, 1.75) years, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients with the AC/CC genotypes were more likely to die than patients with AA genotype (HR=1.54, 95% C.I. = [1.07, 2.23], p=0.022). This effect is more definitive for patients on the 5-FU arm (n=82) (HR=1.64, 95% C.I. = [0.99, 2.70], p=0.055) than for patients on the gemcitabine arm (n=72, HR=1.46, 95% C.I. = [0.81, 2.63], p=0.21). Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that the RecQ1 A159C genotype is a prognostic or predictive factor for resectable pancreatic cancer patients who are treated with adjuvant chemoradiation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Li
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - J. Moughan
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - C. H. Crane
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - J. P. Hoffman
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - W. Regine
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - R. A. Abrams
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - H. Safran
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - G. M. Freedman
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - C. Guha
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - J. L. Abbruzzese
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Siripurapu V, Watson JC, Chun YS, Gumbs A, Hoffman JP. Preoperative or postoperative therapy for resectable gallbladder cancer? A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a single institution. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
309 Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract. Less than 30% present at an early stage where surgical resection is curative. We examine a cohort of patients with GBC toward determining if preoperative and postoperative treatment of locally advanced GBC demonstrate any differing results in complications or survival. Methods: A retrospective review of patients seen at FCCC with GBC from Jan 1991 to Nov 2008 was performed. Demographics, clinical stage, surgical procedure, AJCC 7th stage, details of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment and complications of surgery were analyzed. Results: Fifty-one patients with GBC were identified. Of these, 66% had their GBC found incidentally, 77% had stage 2 or greater cancers, and 35 patients needed liver resection with portal lymphadenectomy. 13 patients had an extrahepatic bile duct resection. 10 patients had extended resections including pancreatoduodenectomy (5) or colectomy (5), while 6 had cholecystectomy alone. 25% (n=13) of the population had preoperative chemoradiation only, 30 % (n=15) had postoperative chemoradiation only, while 15% (n=8) received maintenance chemotherapy only. 10% (n=5) had preoperative and postoperative therapy, while twenty percent of the group (n=10) had surgery only. 49% had recurrences (n=25), with 48% percent of these being local-regional. Median survival was 30 months for the whole group, with 54.6 month median survival for the 41 patients without extended resection. No significant difference in survival was seen comparing preoperative therapy versus postoperative treatment (p=0.13). Five-year survival is 47% for those with minor hepatic resection compared to 25% for those with combined hepatic and colon or pancreatic resection. Conclusions: We present a retrospective view of patients treated in our center, the majority of whom received either preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy, both of which had good median survival and acceptable morbidity and mortality. Given the poor survival and high recurrence rate for stage II and greater cancers, we suggest that preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy for these cases may be equally effective. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Y. S. Chun
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - A. Gumbs
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siripurapu V, Watson JC, Hoffman JP. Use of perioperative therapy in gastric cancer: A retrospective comparison of ECF and chemoradiation. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
112 Background: Gastric Cancer (GC) remains a major cause of cancer related morbidity and mortality in Western Countries with five year survival rates between 30%-40%. Preoperative therapy has been championed by groups extrapolating data from the Intergroup 0116 and the MAGIC trials, with a view to enhancing completion of therapy and improving survival in locally advanced tumors. Methods: Patients with preoperative treatment of GC were reviewed from our tumor registry. Stages were assigned by AJCC 7th edition. A comparison between the ECF regimen and non-ECF chemoradiation regimens was performed to view patterns of pathologic complete response (pCR), recurrence, toxicity and overall survival. Results: Forty-two patients were identified and stratified into two groups; Group 1 ECF treatment arm (n = 16) compared to group 2 non-ECF chemo-radiation arm (n = 26). No statistical difference was noted in age, ethnicity or stage stratification. All of Group 1 received their chemotherapy regimen after 2005. In contrast, 60% of Group 2 patients received their treatment pre-2005. Only 56% the ECF group completed their treatment course (19% received other postoperative therapy). Seventy percent of group 2 received adjuvant chemotherapy. A grade 2 or higher toxicity was noted in 16% of Group 1 compared to 60% in Group 2 (p = 0.035). Seven complications were noted in the group 1 compared to 10 in group 2 (p = NS). The differentiation of tumor between groups was not significant (p = 0.97). Length of stay was significant (Group 1:9 days, Group 2:12 days, p = 0.02). More nodes were retrieved from group 1 versus group 2 (20.2 versus 15.2, p = 0.03). Group 1 had 3 recurrences (19%) while Group 2 had 11 recurrences (42%, p = 0.94). In both groups 80% of recurrences were distant. Group 1 had a 19% pCR versus 23% in group 2 (p = 0.79). Two-year survival was 70% in both groups, with a median survival of 51 months for group 2. Median survival was not reached for group 1. Conclusions: No difference was noted in pCR, recurrences, or survival between these two regimens. If this can be confirmed in larger, prospective, randomized trials, use of radiation and its potential morbidity may be avoided. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chun YS, Cooper HS, Watson JC, Hoffman JP. Significance of pathologic response to preoperative therapy in pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.4067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
9
|
Abrams RA, Winter KA, Regine WF, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Konski AA, Benson AB, Macdonald JS, Rich TA, Willett CG. Correlation of RTOG 9704 (adjuvant therapy (rx) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (pan ca)) radiation therapy quality assurance scores (RTQASc) with survival (S). J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.4523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4523 Background: RTOG 9704 demonstrated a marginal S advantage (p=0.054) in multivariate analysis (MVA) of Gemcitabine (G) over 5FU before and after 5FU+RT for patients (pts) with pan ca resected for cure from the pan head but not from non-head sites (ASCO 2006, ASTRO 2006). This analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of RTQASc on S, S by treatment (rx) arm, and toxicity by rx arm. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, randomized, phase III trial of the RTOG, ECOG, and SWOG. RTQASc was graded as per protocol (PP) or less than (<) PP. Using prospectively defined guidelines, <PP scores were variation acceptable (VA), variation unacceptable (VU), or incomplete/not evaluable (I/NE). I/NE pts were excluded from further analysis. Toxicities were scored by CTC, v 2.0. S is expressed as median S in yrs. Results: 416 pts had RTQASc of PP (216, 52%) or <PP (200, 48%; 42% VA, 6% VU). Frequency of PP and <PP did not differ by rx arm (PP = 55% on 5FU arm and 48% on G arm). Looking at PP vs <PP frequency of Grade 3+ Heme and Non- Heme toxicity did not vary significantly on the 5FU arm but did show a trend of < toxicity for PP pts on the G arm ( Table ). In contrast, S was increased for all (head, non-head) PP pts (median S 1.74 vs 1.47 yrs, p=0.019) and, in MVA, score of PP significantly impacted on S (p=0.02) but rx arm did not. PP and <PP S curves began to diverge at 14–15 months post surgery. For head pts, in MVA, RTQASc (PP superior to <PP) and rx arm (G superior to 5FU) both correlated with S (p=0.04, p=0.03, respectively). On the G arm PP pts had S of 1.89 yrs, significantly > than S of VA (1.41yrs) and VU (1.37yrs) pts. Conclusions: In this study prospectively defined RTQASc significantly correlated with S and effect of rx arm on S and showed a weaker effect on toxicity (G arm only). Timing of appearance of RTQASc effect on S implies effect on tumor control. In this context failure to consider RTQASc may confound observed outcomes and confuse correct understanding of the importance of RT. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. A. Abrams
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - K. A. Winter
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - W. F. Regine
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - H. Safran
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - J. P. Hoffman
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - A. A. Konski
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - A. B. Benson
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - J. S. Macdonald
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - T. A. Rich
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - C. G. Willett
- Rush Univ Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, Castine, ME; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arciero CA, Salem RR, Lacy J, Sigurdson ER, Hoffman JP, Watson JC, Joseph N, Cooper HS, Meropol NJ, Burtness B. Hepatic metastasectomy following FOLFOX therapy in patients with colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.13523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
13523 Background: Advances in systemic therapy for metastatic colon cancer may render patients (pts) candidates for hepatic metastasectomy (HM) with curative intent. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with HM following oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Methods: Pts were identified from the records of 5 surgeons who performed HM at two institutions. Pts were included if FOLFOX (bolus 5-FU/leucovorin d1 or d 1 + 2, followed by 46 hour 5-FU infusion; oxaliplatin 85–130mg/m2 d 1 q 14 d) chemotherapy had been given for > 1 cycle prior to HM and complete resection of hepatic metastases was achieved. Data on radiographic (RECIST) and pathologic response and outcome were collected. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual cancer. Near pCR was defined as residual mucin in the liver, without residual cancer cells, or necrosis with atypical glands. Results: Thirty-six pts were identified. Males 21/36, median age 55 (range 37–77), rectum/rectosigmoid primary 5 (13.9%), adenocarcinoma 100%, synchronous metastases or metastases within 6 months (m) of primary diagnosis 24/32 (75%), median cycles of FOLFOX = 7 (range 2 to >30), bevacizumab (B) 9 (25%). Mean number of hepatic lesions pre-chemotherapy 1.9 (range 1–7), tumor size 1 to >10cm. Radiographic responses to pre-operative FOLFOX included partial response (PR) 9/30 (30%), CR 2/30 (6.7%), progressive disease 3/30 (10%), stable disease 16/30 (53.5%). Operations included right (R) hepatectomy 12, extended (ext) R hepatectomy 3, partial R hepatectomy 2, left (L) hepatectomy 3, partial L hepatectomy 1, ext L hepatectomy 1, trisegmentectomy 2, caudate lobectomy 1, multiple wedge resections ± radiofrequency ablation 7. pCR 2 (5.6%); near pCR 3 (8.3%). At a median follow up of 12.9 m from HM, 9/36 (25%) recurred; liver only (3), portal lymph nodes (1), other extrahepatic sites (5). One pt died at 18.3 m. Conclusions: HM after FOLFOX chemotherapy, with or without B, results in a high progression-free and overall survival at 12.9 m. This retrospectively identified population included pts with conventionally adverse prognostic features including rectal cancers, synchronous metastases, large lesions and/or high lesion number. Prospective studies of the utility of pre-HM chemotherapy are warranted. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. A. Arciero
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - R. R. Salem
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - J. Lacy
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - E. R. Sigurdson
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - J. P. Hoffman
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - J. C. Watson
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - N. Joseph
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - H. S. Cooper
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - N. J. Meropol
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - B. Burtness
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Regine WF, Winter KW, Abrams R, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Konski A, Benson AB, MacDonald JS, Willett CG, Rich TA. RTOG 9704 a phase III study of adjuvant pre and post chemoradiation (CRT) 5-FU vs. gemcitabine (G) for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.4007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4007 Background: RTOG 9704 was designed to determine if the addition of G to postoperative adjuvant 5-FU CRT improved survival for patients(pts) with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: In this Intergroup trial involving RTOG, ECOG and SWOG, pts post gross total resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (path stage T1 - 4, N0 - 1, M0) were randomized to receive pre and post CRT 5-FU vs pre and post CRT G. 5-FU = continuous (CI) at 250 mg/m2/day. G = 1000 mg/m2 IV weekly. Both were given over 3 weeks pre and 12 weeks post - CRT. CRT = 50.4 Gy 1.8 Gy/fx/day with CI 5-FU, 250 mg/m2/day during RT for all pts. Pts were stratified by nodal status (uninvolved vs involved), primary tumor diameter ( < 3 cm vs ≥ 3 cm) and surgical margins (negative vs positive vs unknown). Survival was the primary endpoint with an original targeted accrual of 330 pts. Rapid enrollment allowed study amendment for increased targeted accrual to add survival among pts with lesions of the pancreatic head as a primary, prospective endpoint. Results: From 7/98 - 7/02, 538 pts were entered; 442 were eligible and analyzable. Major reasons for patient ineligibility were serum not sent for CA-19–9 analysis (n=22) and treatment starting > 8 weeks post surgery (n=19). Treatment arms were well balanced except for T-stage (T3/4 > for G, p=0.013). Pts with pancreatic head tumors(n=380) experienced significantly improved survival, with median and 3-year survival of 18.8 months and 31% respectively for the G arm vs. 16.7 months and 21% for the 5-FU arm (p=0.047; HR=0.79, CI=0.63–0.99). When analysis was inclusive of pts with body/tail tumors(n=442) no significant difference in survival was found (p=0.20). No significant difference in non-hematologic grade ≥ 3 toxicity was seen. The grade 4 hematologic toxicity rate was 14% in the G arm and 2% in the 5-FU arm (p<0.0001) without difference in febrile neutropenia/infection. The ability to complete chemotherapy (86%, 5-FU vs. 90%, G) and RT (85%, 5-FU vs. 88%, G) as per study was similar. Conclusions: The addition of G to postoperative adjuvant 5-FU CRT significantly improves survival in pts with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. F. Regine
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - K. W. Winter
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - R. Abrams
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - H. Safran
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - J. P. Hoffman
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - A. Konski
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - A. B. Benson
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - J. S. MacDonald
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - C. G. Willett
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - T. A. Rich
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Care Center, New York, NY; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sasson AR, Fowble B, Hanlon AL, Torosian MH, Freedman G, Boraas M, Sigurdson ER, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL, Patchefsky A. Lobular carcinoma in situ increases the risk of local recurrence in selected patients with stages I and II breast carcinoma treated with conservative surgery and radiation. Cancer 2001; 91:1862-9. [PMID: 11346867 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010515)91:10<1862::aid-cncr1207>3.0.co;2-#] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a known risk factor for the development of invasive breast carcinoma. However, little is known regarding the impact of LCIS in association with an invasive carcinoma on the risk of an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients who are treated with conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of LCIS on the local recurrence rate in patients with early stage breast carcinoma after breast-conserving therapy. METHODS Between 1979 and 1995, 1274 patients with Stage I or Stage II invasive breast carcinoma were treated with CS and RT. The median follow-up time was 6.3 years. RESULTS LCIS was present in 65 of 1274 patients (5%) in the study population. LCIS was more likely to be associated with an invasive lobular carcinoma (30 of 59 patients; 51%) than with invasive ductal carcinoma (26 of 1125 patients; 2%). Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) occurred in 57 of 1209 patients (5%) without LCIS compared with 10 of 65 patients (15%) with LCIS (P = 0.001). The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of IBTR was 6% in women without LCIS compared with 29% in women with LCIS (P = 0.0003). In both groups, the majority of recurrences were invasive. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of IBTR in patients who received tamoxifen was 8% when LCIS was present compared with 6% when LCIS was absent (P = 0.46). Subsets of patients in which the presence of LCIS was associated with an increased risk of breast recurrence included tumor size < 2 cm (T1), age < 50 years, invasive ductal carcinoma, negative lymph node status, and the absence of any adjuvant systemic treatment (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) (P < 0.001). LCIS margin status, invasive lobular carcinoma histology, T2 tumor size, and positive axillary lymph nodes were not associated with an increased risk of breast recurrence in these women. CONCLUSIONS The authors conclude that the presence of LCIS significantly increases the risk of an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in certain subsets of patients who are treated with breast-conserving therapy. The risk of local recurrence appears to be modified by the use of tamoxifen. Further studies are needed to address this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Sasson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chao C, Torosian MH, Boraas MC, Sigurdson ER, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL, Fowble B. Local recurrence of breast cancer in the stereotactic core needle biopsy site: case reports and review of the literature. Breast J 2001; 7:124-7. [PMID: 11328321 DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007002124.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Early mammographic detection of nonpalpable breast lesions has led to the increasing use of stereotactic core biopsies for tissue diagnosis. Tumor seeding the needle tract is a theorectical concern; the incidence and clinical significance of this potential complication are unknown. We report three cases of subcutaneous breast cancer recurrence at the stereotactic biopsy site after definitive treatment of the primary breast tumor. Two cases were clinically evident and relevant; the third was detected in the preclinical, microscopic state. All three patients underwent multiple passes during stereotactic large-core biopsies (14 gauge needle) followed by modified radical mastectomy. Two patients developed a subcutaneous recurrence at the site of the previous biopsy 12 and 17 months later; one had excision of the skin and dermis at the time of mastectomy revealing tumor cells locally. In summary, clinically relevant recurrence from tumor cells seeding the needle tract is reported in two patients after definitive surgical therapy (without adjuvant radiation therapy). Often, the biopsy site is outside the boundaries of surgical resection. Since the core needle biopsy exit site represents a potential area of malignant seeding and subsequent tumor recurrence, we recommend excising the stereotactic core biopsy tract at the time of definitive surgical resection of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chao
- Departments of Surgery and Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pingpank JF, Hoffman JP, Ross EA, Cooper HS, Meropol NJ, Freedman G, Pinover WH, LeVoyer TE, Sasson AR, Eisenberg BL. Effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on surgical margin status of resected adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 2001; 5:121-30. [PMID: 11331473 DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)80023-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
We examined the effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on the ability to obtain pathologically negative resection margins in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Between 1987 and 2000, 100 patients underwent Whipple resection with curative intent for primary adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Pathologic assessment of six margins (proximal and distal superior mesenteric artery, proximal and distal superior mesenteric vein, pancreas, retroperitoneum, common bile duct, and hepatic artery) was undertaken by either frozen section (pancreas and common duct) or permanent section. A margin was considered positive if tumor was present less than 1 mm from the inked specimen. Margins noted to be positive on frozen section were resected whenever possible. Of the 100 patients treated, 47 (47%) underwent postoperative radiation and chemotherapy (group I) and 53 (53%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (group II) with either 5-fluorouracil (32 patients) or gemcitabine (21 patients). Patient demographics and operative parameters were similar in the two groups, with the exception of preoperative tumor size (CT scan), which was greater in group II (P < 0.001), and number of previous operations, which was greater in group II (P < 0.0001). Statistical analysis of the number of negative surgical margins clear of tumor was performed using Fisher's exact test. All patients (100%) had six margins assessed for microscopic involvement with tumor. In the preoperative therapy group, 5 (7.5%) of 53 patients had more than one positive margin, whereas 21 (44.7%) of 47 patients without preoperative therapy had more than one margin with disease extension (P < 0.001). Additionally, only 11 (25.6%) of the 47 patients without preoperative therapy had six negative margins vs. 27 (50.9%) of 53 in the group receiving preoperative therapy (P = 0.013). Survival analysis reveals a significant increase in survival in margin-negative patients (P = 0.02). Similarly, a strong trend toward improved disease-free and overall survival is seen in patients with a single positive margin vs. multiple margins. Overall, we find a negative impact on survival with an increasing number of positive margins (P = 0.025, hazard ratio 1.3). When stratified for individual margin status, survival was decreased in patients with positive superior mesenteric artery (P = 0.06) and vein (P = 0.04) margins. However, this has not yet resulted in a significant increase in disease-free or overall survival for patients receiving preoperative therapy (P = 0.07).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Pingpank
- Department of Suregery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sasson AR, Hoffman JP, Ross E, Meropol NJ, Szarka CE, Freedman G, Pinover W, Pingpank JF, Eisenberg BL. Trimodality therapy for advanced gallbladder cancer. Am Surg 2001; 67:277-83; discussion 284. [PMID: 11270889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical extirpation for stage III, stage IV, or recurrent carcinoma of the gallbladder. Between 1991 and 1999 ten patients underwent surgical resection for advanced gallbladder cancer. All patients received adjuvant therapy either pre- or postoperatively. Radiotherapy was used in all patients and chemotherapy in 90 per cent of patients. Two patients subsequently underwent resection for locally recurrent disease. An additional patient with stage II disease initially was also treated surgically for a local recurrence. Surgical management involved cholecystectomy and resection of various amounts of liver surrounding the gallbladder bed and regional lymphadenectomy. Contiguously involved structures were resected en bloc. Resection of recurrent disease included excision of all gross tumor. The median overall survival excluding the one 30-day mortality was 53.6 months (range 8-73 months). Four patients have survived 4 or more years, and currently four patients are alive and disease free at 73, 49, 33, and 8 months. Median disease-free interval after each resection of recurrent disease was 13.8 months (range 4-28 months). We conclude that trimodality therapy in selected patients with stage III, IV, or recurrent carcinoma of the gallbladder is possible and may result in prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Sasson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gilson G, Schmit P, Thix J, Hoffman JP, Humbel RL. Prolactin results for samples containing macroprolactin are method and sample dependent. Clin Chem 2001; 47:331-3. [PMID: 11159783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Gilson
- Laboratoire de Biochimie et d'Immunopathologie, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, rue Barblé 4, 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Langer CJ, Hoffman JP, Ottery FD. Clinical significance of weight loss in cancer patients: rationale for the use of anabolic agents in the treatment of cancer-related cachexia. Nutrition 2001; 17:S1-20. [PMID: 11428126 DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(01)80001-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C J Langer
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa., USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hoffman JP. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region. Ann Surg 2000; 232:726-7. [PMID: 11066156 PMCID: PMC1421238 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In developing countries vaccination against measles virus (MV) is generally administered at 9 months of age, although it is well-documented that protection of most infants by passively acquired maternal MV antibodies is waning before immunization is given. The purpose of this study was to investigate the decay of maternally derived MV antibodies in Nigerian infants as well as to compare a German and Nigerian cohort of paired mothers and newborns regarding the placental transfer efficiency of MV-specific IgG and total IgG antibodies. METHODS MV-specific IgG antibodies were measured with a commercially available MV-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, a recombinant hemagglutinin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as well as a neutralization assay. Total IgG values were determined with a standard immunoturbidimetric test. RESULTS Anti-MV IgG titers were twice as high in German newborns as in Nigerian newborns. An increased concentration of immunoglobulins transferred via the placenta was found only in the German cohort. High concentrations of total maternal IgG reduced the concentration of MV-specific as well as total IgG that crossed the placenta. Furthermore only 17% of the 4-month-old Nigerian infants were still protected against measles. Antibodies had a biologic half-life of 33 days and a biochemical half-life of 48 days. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that the decay of passively acquired MV antibodies occurred even more rapidly than expected resulting in susceptibility to MV in most of the 4-month-old infants in Nigeria. Furthermore transfer of maternal anti-MV IgG and total IgG antibodies to the newborn was more efficient in the German cohort compared with the Nigerian group. These findings suggest the use of alternative vaccination strategies in developing countries to possibly reduce the window of susceptibility against measles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H K Hartter
- Department of Immunology, Laboratoire National de Santé, Luxembourg
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chao C, Goldberg M, Hoffman JP. Surgical salvage therapy: abdominoperineal resection for recurrent anal carcinoma, metastasectomy of recurrent colorectal cancer, and esophagectomy after combined chemoradiation. Curr Opin Oncol 2000; 12:353-6. [PMID: 10888421 DOI: 10.1097/00001622-200007000-00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
This review highlights the advances in the salvage surgical therapies for recurrent disease after definitive therapy of anal carcinoma, colorectal cancer, including liver metastasectomy, and esophageal carcinoma treated primarily with chemoradiation. New diagnostic modalities, advances in neoadjuvant therapies for unresectable liver metastases, and, in addition, the importance of adjuvant hepatic arterial chemotherapy after curative liver resections are reviewed. Although chemoradiation is not the standard of care for esophageal cancer, salvage esophagectomy after such treatment is discussed. Definitive chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus has altered the role of surgical intervention to a salvage option instead of primary treatment. Although this is not yet the case for esophageal carcinoma, recent improved chemoradiation regimens have been reported by the French and Japanese, who use surgery for nonresponders. For recurrent colorectal carcinoma, including liver-only metastases, patients can be rendered disease free after surgical extirpation with evidence of improved survival. Appropriate surveillance in these patients may identify subsets of patients with disease amenable to resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chao
- The Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chao C, Hoffman JP, Ross EA, Torosian MH, Eisenberg BL. Pancreatic carcinoma deemed unresectable at exploration may be resected for cure: an institutional experience. Am Surg 2000; 66:378-85; discussion 386. [PMID: 10776876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Only a minority of patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) have disease amenable to curative resection. Between April 1987 and March 1999, 40 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma deemed unresectable at exploration at other institutions were considered for neoadjuvant treatments and then re-evaluated for possible re-exploration. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), among three groups: Group A, 22 previously unresectable patients who were subsequently successfully resected, 20 after induction therapy; Group B, 31 patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy before their only operation; and Group C, 33 patients who were primarily resected, 27 of whom were then treated with adjuvant therapy. Of those resectable from Group A, 5 required portal venorrhaphy and 3 had hepatic artery reconstruction. Eighteen of the 40 patients were unresectable because of progression of disease with a mean OS of 8 months; 12 were assessed at second laparotomy; 6 were excluded from second operation on the basis of preoperative imaging studies. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences in OS among the three groups: OS in Group A was 34 months; Group B, 21; and Group C, 13 (P = 0.15). Margin status was comparable in all three groups (P = 0.52). As expected, nodal positivity was greatest in Group C (P = 0.001). There were no operative mortalities in Group A, and the morbidity rate was comparable with that of Groups B and C. Upon re-evaluation, many tumors (54%) previously deemed "unresectable" were surgically extirpated for cure with a median survival comparable with that of patients who did not undergo previous exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chao
- Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Freedman GM, Fowble BL, Nicolaou N, Sigurdson ER, Torosian MH, Boraas MC, Hoffman JP. Should internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer be a target for the radiation oncologist? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46:805-14. [PMID: 10705000 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00481-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The elective treatment of internal mammary lymph nodes (++IMNs) in breast cancer is controversial. Previous randomized trials have not shown a benefit to the extended radical mastectomy or elective IMN irradiation overall, but a survival benefit has been suggested by some for subgroups of patients with medial tumors and positive axillary lymph nodes. The advent of effective systemic chemotherapy and potential for serious cardiac morbidity have also been factors leading to the decreased use of IMN irradiation during the past decade. The recent publishing of positive trials testing postmastectomy radiation that had included regional IMN irradiation has renewed interest in their elective treatment. The purpose of this study is to critically review historical and new data regarding IMNs in breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The historical incidence of occult IMN positivity in operable breast cancer is reviewed, and the new information provided by sentinel lymph node studies also discussed. The results of published randomized prospective trials testing the value of elective IMN dissection and/or radiation are analyzed. The data regarding patterns of failure following elective IMN treatment is studied to determine its impact on local-regional control, distant metastases, and survival. A conclusion is drawn regarding the merits of elective IMN treatment based on this review of the literature. RESULTS Although controversial, the existing data from prospective, randomized trials of IMN treatment do not seem to support their elective dissection or irradiation. While it has not been shown to contribute to a survival benefit, the IMN irradiation increases the risk of cardiac toxicity that has effaced the value of radiation of the chest wall in reducing breast cancer deaths in previous randomized studies and meta-analyses. Sentinel lymph node mapping provides an opportunity to further evaluate the IMN chain in early stage breast cancer. Biopsy of "hot" nodes may be considered in the future to select patients who are most likely to benefit from additional regional therapy to these nodes. CONCLUSIONS Irradiation of the IMN chain in conjunction with the chest wall and supraclavicular region should be considered only for those with pathologically proven IMNs with the goal of improving tumor regional control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA 19111, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Coia LR, Minsky BD, Berkey BA, John MJ, Haller D, Landry J, Pisansky TM, Willett CG, Hoffman JP, Owen JB, Hanks GE. Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:455-62. [PMID: 10653860 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2000.18.3.455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A Patterns of Care Study examined the records of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) treated with radiation in 1992 through 1994 to determine the national practice processes of care and outcomes and to compare the results with those of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS A national survey of 63 institutions was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell (62%) or adenocarcinoma (37%) of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary or adjuvant treatment. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Fifteen percent of patients had clinical stage (CS) I disease, 40% had CS II disease, and 30% had CS III disease. Twenty-six percent of patients underwent esophagectomy. Seventy-five percent of patients received chemotherapy; 84% of these received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). RESULTS Significant variables for overall survival in multivariate analysis include the use of esophagectomy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.62), the use of chemotherapy (RR = 0.63), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than 80 (RR = 0.61), CS I or II disease (RR = 0.66), and facility type (RR = 0.72). Age, sex, and histology were not significant. Preoperative CRT resulted in a nonsignificantly higher 2-year survival rate compared with definitive CRT alone (63% v 39%; P =.11), whereas 2-year survival by planned treatment rather than treatment given was 47.7% for preoperative CRT and 35.4% for definitive CRT (P =.23). Definitive CRT compared with definitive RT alone resulted in significantly higher 2-year survival (39% v 20.6%; P =.027) and lower 2-year local regional failure (30% v 57.9%; P =. 0031). CONCLUSION This study confirms the value of CRT in EC treatment. It indicates that the results obtained in practice settings nationwide are similar to those obtained in clinical trials and that KPS and the 1983 clinical staging system are useful prognostic indicators. The suggested value of esophagectomy and superiority of preoperative CRT over CRT alone in this study should be tested in a randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Coia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ 08755, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Russell AH, Harris J, Rosenberg PJ, Sause WT, Fisher BJ, Hoffman JP, Kraybill WG, Byhardt RW. Anal sphincter conservation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum: long-term results of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 89-02. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46:313-22. [PMID: 10661337 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00440-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the outcome of a multi-institutional, national cooperative group study attempting functional preservation of the anorectum for patients with limited, distal rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between September 21, 1989 and November 1, 1992, a Phase II trial of sphincter-sparing therapy was conducted for patients with clinically mobile rectal cancers located below the pelvic peritoneal reflection. Protocol treatment was designed for patients who were, in the judgement of their attending surgeon, unsuitable for anal sphincter conservation in the context of anterior resection, and would have required abdominoperineal resection (APR) as conventional surgical therapy. Primary cancers were estimated to be 4 cm or less in largest clinical diameter, and occupied 40% or less of the rectal circumference. Chest radiography and computerized axial tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis excluded patients with overt lymphatic or hematogenous metastases. Protocol surgery was intended to remove the primary cancer by en-bloc, transmural excision of an ellipse of rectal wall by transanal, transcoccygeal, or trans-sacral technique, while conserving the anal sphincter. Based on tumor size, T classification, grade, and adequacy of surgical margins, patients were allocated to one of three treatment assignments: observation, or adjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and one of two different dose levels of local-regional radiation. After completion of protocol therapy, patients were observed with follow-up that included periodic general physical and rectal examination, determinations of CEA, abdominopelvic CT, chest radiography, and surveillance endoscopy. Sixty-five eligible and analyzable patients were registered. RESULTS With minimum follow-up of 5 years and median follow-up of 6.1 years, 11 patients have failed: 3 patients recurred local-regionally only, 3 patients had distant failure alone, and 5 patients manifested local-regional and distant failure. Eight patients died of intercurrent illness. Local-regional failure correlated with T-category revealed: T1 1/27 (4%), T2 4/25 (16%), and T3 3/13 (23%). Local-regional failure escalated with percentage involvement of the rectal circumference: 2/31 (6%) among patients with cancers involving 20% or less of the rectal circumference, and 6/34 (18%) among patients with cancers involving 21-40% of the circumference. Distant dissemination rose with T-category with 1/27 (4%) T1, 3/25 (12%) T2, and 4/13 (31%) T3 patients manifesting hematogenous spread. Eight patients (12%) required temporary or permanent colostomy. Five of 8 patients with local-regional recurrence achieved local-regional control with management including surgery, although 4 of these patients subsequently developed distant dissemination. Three patients (5%) had persistent, uncontrolled, local disease. Actuarial freedom from pelvic relapse at 5 years is 88% based on the entire study population, and 86% for the less favorable patients treated with adjuvant radiation and 5-FU. CONCLUSION Conservative, sphincter-sparing therapy is a feasible alternative treatment for selected patients with limited cancer involving the middle and lower rectum. Risk of both local and distant failure appears to escalate with increasing T-category (depth of invasion). Results achieved in the multi-institutional, cooperative group setting approximate results reported from single institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Russell
- Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Le Voyer TE, Hoffman JP, Cooper H, Ross E, Sigurdson E, Eisenberg B. Local excision and chemoradiation for low rectal T1 and T2 cancers is an effective treatment. Am Surg 1999; 65:625-30; discussion 630-1. [PMID: 10399970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Lesions located in the distal third of the rectum are usually treated with abdominoperineal resection or a low anterior resection with a coloanal anastomosis. However, in a select group of patients with favorable histology and a low probability of lymphatic spread, sphincter-sparing procedures will afford long-term disease-free survival and cure without the need for extensive, complicated surgery. We performed a 10-year retrospective review, including pathologic examination of specimens by a single pathologist, in an attempt to identify factors associated with a decreased disease-free survival. Thirty-five patients (median age, 71 years; range, 48-88) with low rectal carcinomas were treated with full-thickness disc excision (with or without chemoradiation), with curative intent. Median follow-up was 46 months (range, 8-120). There were 15 T1, 16 T2, and 4 T3 lesions. Tumors with poor histologic factors or greater than T1 received adjuvant radiation (with or without 5-fluorouracil). Four patients developed a local failure at a median of 21.5 months (range, 9-30) and were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection. The 5-year cancer-specific survival was 91 per cent. Negative margins approached statistical significance (P < 0.07) in influencing local control. We conclude that, when combined with chemoradiation for lesions deeper than submucosa or with adverse histologic factors, local resection of rectal cancer is an effective treatment in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E Le Voyer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Voyer TEL, Hoffman JP, Cooper H, Ross E, Sigurdson E, Eisenberg B. Local Excision and Chemoradiation for Low Rectal T 1 and T 2 Cancers Is an Effective Treatment. Am Surg 1999. [DOI: 10.1177/000313489906500705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Lesions located in the distal third of the rectum are usually treated with abdominoperineal resection or a low anterior resection with a coloanal anastomosis. However, in a select group of patients with favorable histology and a low probability of lymphatic spread, sphincter-sparing procedures will afford long-term disease-free survival and cure without the need for extensive, complicated surgery. We performed a 10-year retrospective review, including pathologic examination of specimens by a single pathologist, in an attempt to identify factors associated with a decreased disease-free survival. Thirty-five patients (median age, 71 years; range, 48–88) with low rectal carcinomas were treated with full-thickness disc excision (with or without chemoradiation), with curative intent Median follow-up was 46 months (range, 8–120). There were 15 T1, 16 T2, and 4 T3 lesions. Tumors with poor histologic factors or greater than T1 received adjuvant radiation (with or without 5-fluorouracil). Four patients developed a local failure at a median of 21.5 months (range, 9–30) and were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection. The 5-year cancer-specific survival was 91 per cent. Negative margins approached statistical significance (P < 0.07) in influencing local control. We conclude that, when combined with chemoradiation for lesions deeper than submucosa or with adverse histologic factors, local resection of rectal cancer is an effective treatment in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - H. Cooper
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - E. Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - E. Sigurdson
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - B. Eisenberg
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Coia LR, Minsky BD, John MJ, Haller DG, Landry J, Pisansky TM, Willett CG, Hoffman JP, Berkey BA, Owen JB, Hanks GE. The evaluation and treatment of patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study. Cancer 1999; 85:2499-505. [PMID: 10375094 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990615)85:12<2499::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-t] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the first time, a Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted in 1992-1994 to determine the national practice standards in evaluating and treating patients with esophageal carcinoma and to determine the degree to which clinical trials have been incorporated into national practice. METHODS A national survey of 61 institutions using 2-stage cluster sampling was conducted, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management of their disease. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Chi-square tests for significant differences between academic and nonacademic institutions for a particular variable were performed. RESULTS The median age of patients was 66.7 years (range, 26-89 years); 76.5% were male and 23.5% were female. Karnofsky performance status was > or = 80 for 88.3% of patients. Squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 61.5% and adenocarcinoma in 36.8%. Fifteen percent were Clinical Stage (CS) I, 39.5% CS II, and 29.5% CS III. Evaluative procedures included endoscopy (>93%), computed tomography (CT) of the chest (86%), CT of the abdomen (75%), esophagography (68.5%), and endoscopic ultrasound (3.5%). Endoscopic ultrasound and CT of the chest were performed significantly more frequently at academic than nonacademic facilities (6.1% vs. 1.0% and 91.9% vs. 81.3%, respectively). Three-quarters of all patients received chemotherapy and RT and 62.5% received concurrent chemotherapy and RT as part of their treatment. Treatments included chemotherapy plus RT (54.0%), RT alone (20.3%), preoperative chemotherapy + RT (13.3%), postoperative chemotherapy + RT (7.7%), postoperative RT (3.5%), and preoperative RT (1.2%). The chemotherapeutic agents most frequently used were 5-fluorouracil (84%), cisplatin (64%), and mitomycin (9%); academic instututions used cisplatin significantly more often and mitomycin significantly less often than nonacademic institutions. Brachytherapy was used in 8.5% of cases. The median total dose of external beam radiation was 50.4 gray and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 gray. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes the national benchmarks for the evaluation and treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma at radiation facilities in the U.S. It also indicates that the majority of patients given RT as a component of treatment for esophageal carcinoma receive chemoradiation rather than RT alone, as supported by clinical trials. Although some differences in the evaluation of esophageal carcinoma were noted between academic and nonacademic facilities, there was no difference in the frequency of use of chemoradiation versus RT by facility type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Coia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Community Medical Center, Toms River, New Jersey 08755, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hoffman JP, Pendurthi TK, Johnson DE. Management of exocrine carcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer Treat Res 1999; 98:65-82. [PMID: 10326665 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4977-2_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J P Hoffman
- Temple University School of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hoffman JP, Cooper HS, Young NA, Pendurthi TK. Preoperative chemotherapy of chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and ampulla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1999; 5:251-4. [PMID: 9880771 DOI: 10.1007/s005340050042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Much has been written about preoperative strategies in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, yet there has been very little comment concerning other periampullary malignancies. This review discusses current issues relevant to the further development of preoperative adjuvant treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A small series of patients with ampullary adenocarcinomas treated with preoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, 7701 Burholme Ave., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fowble B, Hanlon AL, Patchefsky A, Freedman G, Hoffman JP, Sigurdson ER, Goldstein LJ. The presence of proliferative breast disease with atypia does not significantly influence outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42:105-15. [PMID: 9747827 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00181-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the influence of the benign background breast-tissue change of atypical hyperplasia (AH) on outcome in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four hundred and sixty women with Stage I--II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation from 1982-1994 had pathologic assessment of their background adjacent benign breast tissue. The median follow-up was 5.6 years (range 0.1-15). The median age was 55 years (range 24-88). Of these, 23% had positive axillary nodes; 25% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF or CAF) with (9%) or without (17%) tamoxifen. Of the total, 24% received adjuvant tamoxifen alone. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 131 patients with atypical hyperplasia (ductal, 99 patients; lobular, 20 pts; and type not specified, 12 pts), and 329 patients with no proliferative changes or proliferative changes without atypia. RESULT A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for method of detection, primary tumor size, presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), pathologic nodal status, region(s) treated with radiation, and type of adjuvant therapy. Patients with atypical hyperplasia (AH) had smaller primary tumors (T1 80% vs. 70%) more often detected solely by mammography (51% vs. 36%) with negative axillary nodes (87% vs. 73%) and radiation treatment to the breast only (93% vs. 78%). LCIS was observed in 9% of the patients with AH and 3% of those without AH. Patients with AH more often received tamoxifen alone (32% vs. 21%), rather than chemotherapy (15% vs. 29%). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for race, age, menopausal status, family history, histology, histologic subtype DCIS when present, the presence or absence of an extensive intraductal component, final margin status, estrogen or progesterone receptor status, use of re-excision, or total radiation dose to the primary. The 5- and 10-year actuarial ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates were 2% and 12% for patients with AH and 4% and 8% for those without AH (p=0.44). Younger women or those with a positive family history of breast cancer with AH did not have an increased rate of breast failure when compared to similar patients without AH. There were no significant differences in the 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of distant metastases (AH 5- and 10-year 7% and 7%, no AH 5- and 10-year 8% and 16%,p=0.31), regional node recurrence (AH 1% and 1%, no AH 1% and 1%,p=0.71), contralateral breast cancer (AH 3% and 3%, no AH 3% and 8%,p=0.71), overall survival (AH 95% and 86%, no AH 95% and 89%, p=0.79), or cause-specific survival (AH 98% and 95%, no AH 96% and 91%,p=0.27). Subset analysis for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, distant metastases, overall, and cause-specific survival for T1 vs. T2 tumors and path node-negative vs. path node-positive patients revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION AH was not associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or contralateral breast cancer in this study of patients with invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. Therefore, the presence of proliferative changes with atypia in background benign breast tissue should not be a contraindication to breast-conservation therapy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Breast/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma in Situ/drug therapy
- Carcinoma in Situ/pathology
- Carcinoma in Situ/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma in Situ/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Cisplatin/administration & dosage
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage
- Doxorubicin/administration & dosage
- Estrogen Replacement Therapy
- Female
- Fluorouracil/administration & dosage
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Hyperplasia/pathology
- Methotrexate/administration & dosage
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Staging
- Precancerous Conditions/drug therapy
- Precancerous Conditions/pathology
- Precancerous Conditions/radiotherapy
- Precancerous Conditions/surgery
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Survival Analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Fowble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Movsas B, Hanlon AL, Lanciano R, Scher RM, Weiner LM, Sigurdson ER, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL, Cooper HS, Provins S, Coia LR. Phase I dose escalating trial of hyperfractionated pre-operative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42:43-50. [PMID: 9747818 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00172-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the acute toxicity, post-operative complications, pathologic response and extent of downstaging to high dose pre-operative radiation using a hyperfractionated radiation boost and concurrent chemotherapy in a prospective Phase I trial. MATERIALS & METHODS To be eligible for this study, patients had to have adenocarcinoma of the rectum less than 12 cm from the anal verge with either Stage T4 or T3 but greater than 4 cm or greater than 40% of the bowel circumference. All patients received 45 Gy pelvic radiation (1.8 Gy per fraction). Subsequent radiation was given to the region of the gross tumor with a 2 cm margin. This "boost" treatment was given at 1.2 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 54.6 Gy for Level I, 57 Gy for Level II, and 61.8 Gy for Level III. 5-FU was given at 1g/m2 over 24 hours for a four day infusion during the first and sixth weeks of radiation, with the second course concurrent with the hyperfractionated radiation. Surgical resection was carried out 4-6 weeks following completion of chemoradiation (in curative cases) and additional adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 5-FU and Leucovorin was given for an additional 4 monthly cycles Days 1 through 5 beginning four weeks post surgery. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients, age 40-82 (median 61), completed the initial course of chemoradiation and are included in the analysis of toxicity. The median follow-up is 27 months (range 8-68). Eleven patients were treated to a dose of 54.6 Gy, nine patients to 57 Gy, and seven patients to 61.8 Gy. Twenty-one patients had T3 tumors, and six patients T4 tumors. Grade III acute toxicity from chemoradiation included proctitis (5 patients), dermatitis (9), diarrhea (five), leukopenia (1), cardiac (1). Grade IV toxicities included one patient with diarrhea (on dose Level I) and one patient (on dose Level III) with cardiac toxicity (unrelated to radiation). Surgical resection consisted of abdominal perineal resection in 16 and low anterior resection in 7. Four patients did not undergo a curative resection; three initially presented with metastases and one developed metastasis during the pre-operative regimen. Post-operative complications included pelvic or perineal abscess in two (on dose Levels I & II), and delayed wound healing in two (one of whom, on dose Level III, developed perineal wound dehiscence requiring surgical reconstruction). Of the 23 patients who had a curative resection, four manifested pathologic complete responses (17.4%). Thirteen of 23 patients (57%) had evidence of pathologic downstaging and only 1/23 patients (on dose Level I) had a positive resection margin. Of these 23 patients (with a minimum follow-up of 8 months), the patient with positive margins was the only one who developed a local failure (Fisher's Exact p=.04). The 3-year actuarial OS, DFS and LC rates are 82%, 72% and 96%, respectively. Twelve of 13 patients (92% at 3 years) > or = 61 years vs. 5/10 patients (45% at 3 years) < 61 years remained disease-free (log-rank p=0.017). CONCLUSION This regimen of high dose pre-operative chemoradiation employing a hyperfractionated radiation boost is feasible and tolerable and results in significant downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer. The vast majority of patients (96%) achieved negative margins, which appears to be a prerequisite for local control (p= 0.04). Older age (> or =61 years) was a significant predictor for improved DFS. This regimen (at dose Level III, 61.8 Gy) is currently being tested in a Phase II setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pendurthi TK, Hoffman JP, Ross E, Johnson DE, Eisenberg BL. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiation for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 1998; 64:686-92. [PMID: 9655283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Two groups of patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with either preoperative chemoradiation (preop CTRT) or postoperative chemoradiation (postop CTRT) were retrospectively analyzed for various treatment-related parameters. Between November 1986 and October 1996, a total of 70 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled into preop CTRT protocols at our institution. Twenty-five patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with curative intent. After the closure of the preop CTRT protocols, we had the opportunity to perform 23 pancreatic resections without preop CTRT. After surgery, these patients were advised to undergo CTRT. These two groups of patients were therefore selected consecutively, dependent only on the time of referral and no other bias. These two cohorts of patients are compared for various intraoperative parameters, length of hospital stay, pathologic findings, time to recurrence, and survival. Mean age was 65 and 66 years in the preop and postop CTRT groups, respectively. Sex distribution was almost equal. Treatment breaks resulting in greater than 1 week delay in the radiotherapy occurred in 2 (8%) of 25 patients in the preop CTRT group (myelotoxicity in 1 case and biliary sepsis in 1 case), whereas no treatment breaks >1 week occurred in those receiving postop CTRT. Eleven patients in preop CTRT had grade 3 or 4 toxicity, whereas none was noted in those with postop CTRT. There was one postoperative death in the preop CTRT group and none in the postop CTRT group. Mean time to the start of CTRT was 45 days (range, 20-66 days) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Delay of >60 days to the onset of CTRT occurred in 2 (22%) patients and was attributable to patient delays in time to recover from surgery or patient noncompliance. Furthermore, 5 of 23 patients (22%) in the postop CTRT group did not receive treatment for various reasons. Average estimated operative blood loss was 1933 mL (median 1550) and 1060 mL (median 1000) for preop and postop CTRT groups, respectively. Mean length of operation was 488 minutes (median 480) and 486 minutes (median 480). Median length of postoperative stay was 22 and 20 days (ranges, 9-144 and 10-38). Pathological findings in the resected specimens showed significantly fewer involved nodes in the preop CTRT group (28 vs 87%; P = 0.0006), whereas similar numbers of nodes/patient were counted in each group (14 vs 22, P = 0.11). More negative resection margins were observed in the preop CTRT group (28 vs 56%; P = not significant). A significantly greater amount of fibrosis replacing the tumor was observed in the preop CTRT group (70 vs 40%; P = 0.0001). There were no significant survival differences observed (median 20 months vs 25 months; P = 0.48), in follow-up that ranged from 4 to 76 months (median 44 months for surviving patients) for the preop group and 4 to 40 months (median 16 months for surviving patients) for those with postop CTRT. Local failure either alone or as a component of distant failure occurred in 16 per cent (4 of 25 patients) with preop CTRT and 16.6 per cent (3 of 18) with postop CTRT. Analysis of differences between those treated with preoperative and postoperative CTRT demonstrates similarity in toxicity and effects. However, 22 per cent of patients intended for postoperative therapy did not receive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T K Pendurthi
- Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Freedman GM, Fowble BL, Hanlon AL, Myint MA, Hoffman JP, Sigurdson ER, Eisenberg BL, Goldstein LJ, Fein DA. A close or positive margin after mastectomy is not an indication for chest wall irradiation except in women aged fifty or younger. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41:599-605. [PMID: 9635708 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00103-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indications for postmastectomy radiation include primary tumor size > or = 5 cm and/or > or = 4 positive axillary nodes. In clinical practice, patients with a close or positive margin after mastectomy are also often treated with postmastectomy radiation. However, there is little data regarding the risk of a chest wall recurrence in patients with close or positive margins who otherwise would be considered low risk (tumor size <5 cm and/or 0-3 positive nodes). To address this issue, we assessed the risk of a chest wall recurrence in women with Stage I-II breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and were found to have primary tumor size <5 cm and 0-3 positive nodes with a close or positive deep margin. METHODS AND MATERIALS The pathologic reports from 789 patients treated by mastectomy between 1985 and 1994 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 136 (17%) had tumor within 1 cm of the deep resection margin. The study population consists of 34 of these patients with close or positive margins whose primary tumor size was <5 cm with 0-3 positive axillary nodes and who received no postoperative radiation. The median age was 43 years (range 29-76). Of these, 44% had T1 tumors and 56% T2 tumors. Pathologic axillary nodal status was negative in 65% and positive in 35%. The median number of positive nodes was 1. The deep margin was positive in 2 patients, < or = 2 mm in 17 patients, 2.1-4 mm in 7 patients and 4.1-6 mm in 8 patients. Of the 34 patients, 67% received adjuvant chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen and 21% received tamoxifen alone. The median follow-up was 59 months (range 7-143). RESULTS There were 5 chest wall recurrences at a median interval of 26 months (range 7-127). One was an isolated first failure, one occurred concurrent with an axillary recurrence, and three were associated with distant metastases. The 5- and 8-year cumulative incidences of a chest wall recurrence were 9% and 18%. Patient age correlated with the cumulative incidence of chest wall recurrence at 8 years; age < or = 50 years had a rate of 28% vs. 0% for age >50 (p = 0.04). There was no correlation with chest wall failure and number of positive nodes, ER status, lymphovascular invasion, location of primary, grade, family history, or type of tumor close to the margin. Of 5 chest wall failures, 4 were in patients who had received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen. Chest wall failures occurred in 1 patient with a positive deep margin, 3 patients with margins within 2 mm, and 1 patient with a margin of 5 mm. The estimated cumulative incidence probability of chest wall recurrence at 8 years by margin proximity was 24% < or = 2 mm vs. 7% 2.1-6 mm (p = 0.36), and by clinical size 24% for T2 tumors vs. 7% for T1 (p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS A close or positive margin is uncommon (< or = 5%) after mastectomy in patients with tumor size <5 cm and 0-3 positive axillary nodes but, when present, it appears to be in a younger patient population. The subgroup of patients aged 50 or younger with clinical T1-T2 tumor size and 0-3 positive nodes who have a close (< or = 5 mm) or positive mastectomy margin are at high risk (28% at 8 years) for chest wall recurrence regardless of adjuvant systemic therapy and, therefore, should be considered for postmastectomy radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pelton JJ, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL. Comparison of liver function tests after hepatic lobectomy and hepatic wedge resection. Am Surg 1998; 64:408-14. [PMID: 9585773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Prior studies have suggested that changes in liver function tests may vary with the postoperative time interval and may be related to the extent of hepatic resection. This study describes characteristic profiles in parenchymal liver enzymes and other serum liver function tests over a 4-week course comparing anatomic to nonanatomic hepatic resections. The records of 48 patients undergoing successful major hepatic resection during a 3-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Of these 48 patients, 28 underwent formal anatomic resection (hepatic lobectomy), and 20 underwent nonanatomic resections (wedge resection). Routine postoperative management in lobectomy patients included drawing liver function tests and enzymes daily for the first week, then at approximately 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. These tests included: prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time, total serum bilirubin, total protein (TP), aspartate transaminase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase, albumin (A), and glucose. Patients undergoing wedge resections had these values checked less frequently, approximately 3 to 5 days, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks postoperatively. Profiles of these values were plotted over the 4-week postoperative time course for each group of patients. Patients undergoing hepatic lobectomy showed a characteristic laboratory value profile. PT elevated within 48 hours to a mean high of 16.0 seconds, then returned to normal by postoperative day 4. Partial thromboplastin time levels remained normal throughout the entire perioperative course. Total bilirubin rose slightly, to a mean high of 2.6 mg/100 cc, then returned to normal by postoperative day (POD) 14. Parenchymal liver enzymes aspartate transaminase and LDH rose abruptly to very high levels, then returned abruptly to normal (by POD 5). TP and A both fell to approximately 50 per cent of normal, gradually rising to normal by POD 14. Glucose rose to a mean high of 199 mg/100 cc within the first 5 days, then returned to normal by POD 7. Alkaline phosphatase remained normal initially, then showed a progressive rise to a high of 288 mg/100 cc on POD 14. Patients undergoing wedge resections did not show the same changes in total serum bilirubin, but showed similar trends in all other tests, although the magnitude of these changes was smaller. TP and A levels fell acutely after resection, then began a slow rise toward normal by POD 21. TP and A profiles were similar for both lobectomy patients and those undergoing wedge resection. The only tests that may have altered clinical management were the PT and total bilirubin. Patients undergoing major hepatic resection have characteristic postoperative profiles of liver enzymes and liver function tests. These laboratory profiles differ with the extent of hepatic resection. The profiles reflect changes in volume status, parenchymal liver destruction, transient hepatic insufficiency, and postoperative hepatic regeneration. However, except possibly for PT and bilirubin, the routine use of these tests is not recommended, given that the results do not alter clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Pelton
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hoffman JP, Pendurthi TK, Ross E, Yeung RS. Preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45:634-7. [PMID: 9684108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Since preoperative radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy (CTRT) was first performed in 1986 for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, there have been several reported experiences with varying drugs and radiotherapy regimens. We describe those experiences and contrast them to a series of patients treated at our institution with resectional surgery before CTRT. Finally, the current role of preoperative CTRT in the therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 1911, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hoffman JP, Lipsitz S, Pisansky T, Weese JL, Solin L, Benson AB. Phase II trial of preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy for patients with localized, resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:317-23. [PMID: 9440759 DOI: 10.1200/jco.1998.16.1.317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 273] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A prospective, multiinstitutional trial was initiated in 1991 to examine the tolerance to and efficacy of a program of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) and surgical resection for patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-three patients were assessable for analysis, with a median follow-up of 52 months for survivors. Radiation therapy (RT) totaling 5,040 cGy in 180 cGy fractions with mitomycin 10 mg/m2 day 2 and fluorouracil (5-FU) 1,000 mg/m2/d continuous infusion days 2 through 5 and 29 through 32 were given as preoperative adjuvant therapy. Twelve patients did not proceed to surgery (one death, one toxicity, three local progression, six distant metastases, one intercurrent illness), whereas 41 patients underwent surgery. Of these, 17 patients did not have resection (11, hepatic and/or peritoneal metastases and six local extension that precluded resection). Twenty-four patients had tumor resection (19 Whipple, four total pancreatectomy, one distal pancreatectomy). RESULTS Treatment toxicity was primarily hematologic, although a comparable number suffered biliary tract complications, either from obstruction or cholangitis as a result of an occluded stent or the primary tumor. There was one postoperative death. Median survival for the entire group and for the 24 patients with resection was 9.7 and 15.7 months. This survival rate reflected the advanced state of most resected cancers (positive peritoneal cytology, three patients; margins within 2 mm, 13 patients; involved lymph nodes, four patients; and need for superior mesenteric vein (SMV) resection, four patients). Tumor progression was most frequent at metastatic sites. CONCLUSION This preoperative CTRT protocol was feasible and safe in a cooperative group setting. Entry of patients with advanced tumors probably accounted for the suboptimal resectability and survival results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Hoffman
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, and Graduate Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hoffman JP, Sigurdson ER, Eisenberg BL. Use of saline-filled tissue expanders to protect the small bowel from radiation. Oncology (Williston Park) 1998; 12:51-4; discussion 54, 60, 62, passim. [PMID: 9474587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 7 years, 58 saline-filled tissues expanders (TEs) have been temporarily placed in 57 patients. The indications for TE placement were: small bowel exclusion from external-beam radiation therapy (N = 25), interstitial RT (N = 16), or both (N = 13) when there was insufficient omentum to provide adequate exclusion. Of the 57 patients, 24 had primary tumors (4 colon, 4 endometrial, and 11 rectal cancer; 3 sarcomas, 1 schwannoma; and 1 vaginal cancer). The remaining 33 patients (58%) had recurrent cancers (3 anal, 8 colon, and 16 rectal cancers; and 6 sarcomas), of whom 26 (79%) had received prior RT. Of the 58 TEs, 15 were placed superior to the iliac vessels and 43 were placed in the pelvis. Complications included post-withdrawal enterocutaneous fistulae in four patients, TE deflation in three patients, and TE extrusion in one patient. Improvements in TE design and removal techniques have reduced the incidence of these complications. When no native tissue is available for small bowel exclusion, the saline-filled TE is a safe, effective substitute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
The principles involved in selecting patients for local excision of rectal cancers, as well as the various techniques and principles for local resection, are detailed in this article. The assessment of the current role of this technique awaits further maturation of data from phase II clinical trials. The addition of chemotherapy and radiation therapy may allow treatment of more advanced rectal cancers by these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Montgomery RC, Hoffman JP, Riley LB, Rogatko A, Ridge JA, Eisenberg BL. Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4:551-6. [PMID: 9367020 DOI: 10.1007/bf02305535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CA 19-9 levels are useful for the diagnosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, interest has recently turned toward its use as a prognostic indicator. The purpose of this study is to determine whether postoperative CA 19-9 levels predict disease-free survival (DFS) and median survival (MS) in patients after resection. METHODS Between 1988 and 1996, 40 patients underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and were evaluated with postoperative CA 19-9 assays. Eight patients had low preoperative levels of CA 19-9 (< 2) and were excluded. RESULTS CA 19-9 levels are good predictors of DFS and MS. Patients whose postoperative CA 19-9 values normalized by 3 to 6 months (< 37 U/ml) had longer DFS (24 vs. 10 months, p < 0.04) and MS (34 vs. 13 months, p < 0.04). Patients with postoperative CA 19-9 values less than 180 U/ml at 1 to 3 months had a similar DFS (19 vs. 5 months, p < 0.0009) and MS (34 vs. 13 months, p < 0.0001) compared to patients with normal values at 3 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative measurements of CA 19-9 were the best predictors of DFS and MS. Values < 180 U/ml at 3 months were as predictive as normal values by 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Consequently, CA 19-9 levels should be obtained for use as a stratification parameter in phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R C Montgomery
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Johnson DE, Pendurthi TK, Balshem AM, Ross E, Litwin S, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP. Implications of fine-needle aspiration in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Am Surg 1997; 63:675-9; discussion 679-80. [PMID: 9247432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
A 9-year experience with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma was reviewed to determine whether this procedure is associated with positive peritoneal cytology, peritoneal recurrences, or decreased survival in patients who had pancreatic resection with curative intent. Forty-one patients underwent pancreatic resection for primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma from July 1987 to February 1996. Nine patients had open biopsies prior to definitive resection and were excluded from this study. Of the remaining 32 patients, 21 (66%) had preoperative computed tomography-guided or fluoroscopically guided FNA biopsy of the pancreas for diagnosis. FNA confirmed the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in 17 of 21 patients (80%). Fifteen of 21 FNA biopsies were performed in patients who went on to receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Twenty-eight of 32 patients (87%) had peritoneal washings at the time of laparotomy. Five patients had suspicious or positive washings (18%), and 23 patients had negative washings (82%). Three of 18 patients (16.7%) who had both FNA and peritoneal washings and 2 of 10 patients (20%) who had no FNA but had peritoneal washings had positive or suspicious peritoneal cytology. Eight of 32 patients ultimately failed in the peritoneum. Six of 21 patients (28%) who had prior FNA and 2 of 11 (18%) who had no prior FNA failed in the peritoneum. Although the number of patients is small, none of these differences proved to be statistically significant. No difference in median survival was observed between the FNA and no FNA groups. We conclude that FNA is a safe and useful tool to confirm the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer when patients are to be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fowble B, Hanlon AL, Fein DA, Hoffman JP, Sigurdson ER, Patchefsky A, Kessler H. Results of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38:949-57. [PMID: 9276359 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00153-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial. In particular, there is little data for outcome with radiation in a group of patients comparable to those treated with local excision and surveillance (mammographic calcifications < or = 2.5 cm, negative resection margins, negative postbiopsy mammogram). This study reports outcome of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected DCIS with an emphasis on results in patients considered candidates for excision alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1983 to 1992, 110 women with mammographically detected DCIS (77% calcifications +/- mass) and no prior history of breast cancer underwent needle localization and biopsy with (55%) or without a reexcision and radiation. Final margins of resection were negative in 62%, positive 7%, close 11%, and unknown 20%. The median patient age was 56 years. The most common histologic subtype was comedo (54%), followed by cribriform (22%). The median pathologic tumor size was 8 mm (range 2 mm to 5 cm). Forty-seven percent of patients with calcifications only had a negative postbiopsy mammogram prior to radiation. Radiation consisted of treatment to the entire breast (median 50.00 Gy) and a boost to the primary site (97%) for a median total dose of 60.40 Gy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 5.3 years, three patients developed a recurrence in the treated breast. The median interval to recurrence was 8.8 years and all were invasive cancers. Two (67%) occurred outside the initial quadrant. The 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of recurrence were 1 and 15%. Cause-specific survival was 100% at 5 and 10 years. Contralateral breast cancer developed in two patients. There were too few failures for statistical significance to be achieved with any of the following factors: patient age, family history, race, mammographic findings, location primary, pathologic size, histologic subtype, reexcision, or final margin status. However, young age, positive or close margins, and the presence of a mass without calcifications had a trend for an increased risk of recurrence. There were no recurrences in the subset of 16 patients who would be candidates for surveillance by Lagios' criteria. CONCLUSION For selected patients, conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected DCIS results in a low risk of recurrence in the treated breast and 100% 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival. Improved mammographic and pathologic evaluation results in better patient selection and reduces the risk of the subsequent appearance of DCIS in the biopsy site. The identification of risk factors for an ipsilateral invasive breast recurrence is evolving.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma in Situ/pathology
- Carcinoma in Situ/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma in Situ/secondary
- Carcinoma in Situ/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/secondary
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Fowble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The diagnostic and therapeutic significance of axillary dissection has been questioned. We sought to define a subgroup of patients with early-stage breast cancer who are at low risk for positive axillary nodes. METHODS Between 1970 and 1995, 1,598 women with stage I and II breast cancer underwent level I-II axillary dissection with a minimum of 10 nodes removed. The following factors were examined in univariate analysis for predicting positive nodes: race, method of detection, location of the primary tumor, age, menopausal status, obesity, ER status, PR status, pathologic tumor size, lymphatic vascular invasion, tumor grade, and histology. RESULTS Four hundred and forty-five of the 1,598 patients (27.8%) had histologically positive axillary nodes. Significant factors in univariate analysis for positive nodes included: tumor size, lymphatic vascular invasion, grade, method of detection, primary tumor location, and age. The only group of women with a 0% risk of axillary nodes were those in whom the pathologic tumor size was < or = 5 mm and mammographically detected. A 5-10% risk of positive axillary nodes was identified in women with (1) pathologic tumor size 6-10 mm, mammographically detected, and age < or = 40 years, and (2) tubular carcinoma < or = 10 mm. Tumors detected on physical examination with or without mammography and women < or = 40 years had a significantly increased risk of nodes. In multivariate analysis lymphatic vascular invasion (P < 0.001), method of detection (P = 0.026), location (P = 0.01), and pathologic tumor size (P = 0.002) were significant predictors of positive axillary lymphadenopathy. CONCLUSIONS The decision to forego an axillary dissection should be considered in (1) tumors mammographically detected and < or = 5 mm (2) mammographically detected, pathologic size 6-10 mm, age > 40 and (3) tubular carcinoma < or = 10 mm. All other groups had a > 10% risk of nodes and may benefit from axillary dissection.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Axilla
- Breast Neoplasms/chemistry
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/chemistry
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Lobular/chemistry
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery
- Female
- Humans
- Lymph Node Excision
- Lymph Nodes/pathology
- Lymphatic Metastasis
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Risk
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Fein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yeh KA, Fortunato L, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL. Cryosurgical ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinomas. Am Surg 1997; 63:63-8. [PMID: 8985074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection remains the only curative therapy for hepatic metastases from colon and rectal carcinoma. Many patients will be unresectable or have close microscopic margins. Cryoablation may improve local control and survival in those cases. From February 1992 to May 1995, patients with metastatic colon and rectal carcinoma who underwent cryoablation of surgical margins following hepatic resection or cryoablation of hepatic metastases were reviewed with attention to patient and tumor characteristics, clinical course, local control, and survival. Twenty-four patients (10 female, 14 male) with a mean age of 63 years (range, 34-84 years) underwent cryosurgical ablation for hepatic metastases. Twelve were for central lesions and 12 for gross or microscopically positive resection margins. Surgery was performed with curative intent for 21 and for palliation in 3 patients. The mean hospital stay was 8.4 days (range, 5-15 days). Complications included three cases of parenchymal cracking and a single bile leak. Two of 14 patients who developed pleural effusions required treatment. Perioperative mortality was 8.3 per cent (2 of 24): one myocardial infarction and one cerebrovascular accident. Four of 21 treated for cure had hepatic recurrence, and six had only extrahepatic recurrence. Median time to recurrence was 9.5 months. With median follow-up of 19 months, mean actuarial disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates are as follows. Those with central lesions (n = 12) had a mean OS rate of 31 months and a mean DFS rate of 23 months. Those with close resection margins (n = 12) had a mean OS rate of 31 months and a median DFS rate of 19.5 months. Total patients (n = 24) had a mean OS rate of 32.7 months and a mean DFS rate of 23.5 months. We conclude that cryoablation of unresectable hepatic metastases or close resection margins is safe and may allow for improved survival in selected patients with metastatic colon and rectal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Yeh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hoffman JP, Johnson DE, Pendurthi TK. Surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 1996; 10:9-12. [PMID: 8884801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer requires the expertise of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and surgical oncologists. The surgeon's role in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer extends beyond the performance of surgical resection and bypass procedures to include diagnosis, staging (including determination of resectability), and therapy (both curative and palliative). If a lesion is deemed resectable, the surgeon's goal is to achieve clear pathologic margins in order to optimize the patient's chances for cure. The surgeon also plays a key role in the palliation of disease in patients with unresectable lesions. Biliary and duodenal bypass, endoscopic stenting, laparoscopy, and celiac ganglion injection may be needed to maximize a patient's remaining quality of life. In addition, the surgical oncologist should be involved in clinical trials testing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoradiotherapies that may lead to the development of more effective therapies for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Hoffman
- Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of chemotherapy (CTX) in the treatment of localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas must be enhanced if current results are to be surpassed. It is postulated that histologic response to various chemotherapeutic agents may offer an assessable endpoint intermediate to and perhaps as or more meaningful than survival analysis. METHODS A history of trials assessing the value of adjuvant preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) is provided. Experiences with histologic assessment of treatment response are reviewed. RESULTS There has been no clear benefit from adjuvant CTX, either when delivered with RT or as postoperative maintenance. Imaging tests were much less sensitive than histologic grading in determining responses (7% vs. 71% partial responses) of patients with resected pancreatic cancers previously treated with RT/CTX. This suggests that standard imaging assessments of pancreatic carcinoma response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy may be inaccurate. CONCLUSIONS Preresectional delivery of chemotherapeutic agents with RT allows response rates to be quantified histologically. This method of response analysis, being much more sensitive than analysis by computed tomographic scanning, may allow the more rapid development of improved chemotherapeutic programs for this malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hoffman JP. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1996; 224:109-10. [PMID: 8678612 PMCID: PMC1235262 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199607000-00024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
47
|
Fowble B, Fein DA, Hanlon AL, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP, Sigurdson ER, Daly MB, Goldstein LJ. The impact of tamoxifen on breast recurrence, cosmesis, complications, and survival in estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 35:669-77. [PMID: 8690632 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(96)00185-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of tamoxifen on breast recurrence, cosmesis, complications, overall and cause-specific survival in women with Stage I-II breast cancer and estrogen receptor positive tumors undergoing conservative surgery and radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1982 to 1991, 491 women with estrogen receptor positive Stage I-II breast cancer underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and radiation. The median age of patient population was 60 years with 21% < 50 years of age. The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range 0.1 to 12.8). Sixty-nine percent had T1 tumors and 83% had histologically negative axillary nodes. Re-excision was performed in 49% and the final margin of resection was negative in 64%. One hundred fifty-four patients received tamoxifen and 337 patients received no adjuvant therapy. None of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the two groups for age, race, clinical tumor size, histology, the use of re-excision, or median total dose to the primary. Patients who received tamoxifen were more often axillary node positive (44% tamoxifen vs. 5% no tamoxifen), and, therefore, a greater percentage received treatment to the breast and regional nodes. The tamoxifen patients less often had unknown margins of resection (9% tamoxifen vs. 22% no tamoxifen). The 5-year actuarial breast recurrence rate was 4% for the tamoxifen patients compared to 7% for patients not receiving tamoxifen (p = 0.21). Tamoxifen resulted in a modest decrease in the 5-year actuarial risk of a breast recurrence in axillary node-negative patients, in those with unknown or close margins of resection, and in those who underwent a single excision. Axillary node-positive patients had a clinically significant decrease in the 5-year actuarial breast recurrence rate (21 vs. 4%; p = 0.08). The 5-year actuarial rate of distant metastasis was not significantly decreased by the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen in all patients or pathologic node-negative patients. Pathologically node-positive patients had a significant decrease in distant metastasis (35 vs. 11%; p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in cause-specific survival for patients receiving tamoxifen when compared to observation (95% no tamoxifen vs. 89% tamoxifen; p = 0.24). Similar findings were noted for pathologically node-negative patients. However, axillary node-positive patients receiving tamoxifen had an improvement in 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival (90% tamoxifen vs. 70% no tamoxifen; p = 0.10). Cosmesis (physician assessment) was good to excellent in 85% of the tamoxifen patients compared to 88% of the patients who did not receive tamoxifen. CONCLUSION The addition of tamoxifen to conservative surgery and radiation in women with Stage I-II breast cancer and estrogen receptor positive tumors resulted in a modest but not statistically significant decrease in the 5-year actuarial risk of a breast recurrence. Tamoxifen significantly decreased the 5-year actuarial risk of distant metastasis in axillary node-positive patients and there was a trend towards improvement in cause-specific survival that was not statistically significant. Tamoxifen did not decrease the 5-year actuarial rate of distant metastasis in axillary node negative, patients and in this group, there was no improvement in cause-specific survival. Tamoxifen did not have an adverse effect on cosmesis or complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Fowble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
A significant risk of hepatic injury remains using reported methods of intraoperative retrograde transhepatic stenting (IRTS). Our hypothesis was that we could minimize this risk by: (1) using a pliable sheath to create a stent tract that follows the curve of the biliary tree, (2) decreasing the stent diameter, and (3) avoiding the hepatic hilum. We evaluated the safety of a novel technique of intraoperative stenting employing these three concepts. Twenty-four patients underwent IRTS between 1992 and 1995 at our institution after potentially curative resection (one bypass). Malignant disease was present in 22 of 24 patients. Bile ducts were normal caliber in all patients. There was no operative mortality and 38% operative morbidity, all readily treated. All complications were due to stent dislodgment. There were no deaths. This novel atraumatic method of IRTS has acceptable morbidity and mortality. Complications due to stent insertion are minimal. The technique compares favorably with previous methods of IRTS and offers a viable alternative to the surgeon when a transhepatic stent is required. Anchoring the stent securely to the skin is essential to prevent catheter dislodgement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Sauter
- Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fein DA, Fowble BL, Hanlon AL, Hoffman JP, Sigurdson ER, Eisenberg BL. Does the placement of surgical clips within the excision cavity influence local control for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 34:1009-17. [PMID: 8600083 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02258-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A number of authors have demonstrated the importance of using surgical clips to define the tumor bed in the treatment planning of early-stage breast cancer. The clips have been useful in delineating the borders of the tangential fields, especially for very medial and very lateral lesions as the boost volume. If surgical clips better define the tumor bed, then a reduction in true or marginal recurrences should be appreciated. We sought to compare the incidence of breast recurrence in women with and without surgical clips, controlling for other recognized prognostic factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1980 and 1992, 1364 women with clinical Stage I or II invasive breast cancer underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and definitive irradiation. Median follow-up was 60 months. Median age was 55 years. Seventy-one percent of patients were path NO, 22% had one to three nodes, and 7% had > than four nodes. Sixty-one percent were ER positive and 44% PR positive. Margin status was negative in 62%, positive in 10%, close in 9%, and unknown in 19%. Fifty-seven percent of women underwent a reexcision. Adjuvant chemotherapy + tamoxifen was administered in 29%, and tamoxifen alone in 17%. Surgical clips were placed in the excision cavity in 556 patients, while the other 808 did not have clips placed. All patients had a boost of the tumor bed. Patients had their boost planned with CT scanning or stereo shift radiographs. No significant differences between the two groups were noted for median age, T stage, nodal status, race, ER/PR receptor status, region irradiated, or tumor location. Patients without clips had negative margins less often, a higher rate of unknown or positive margins and more often received no adjuvant therapy compared to patients with surgical clips. RESULTS Twenty-five and 27 patients with and without surgical clips, respectively, developed a true or marginal recurrence in the treated breast. The actuarial probability of a breast recurrence was 2% at 5 years and 5% at 10 years for patients without clips compared to 5 and 11%, respectively, for patients with clips (p=0.01). Comparing the breast recurrence rates for patients with and without clips there was no significant difference for the following factors: chemotherapy, tamoxifen, negative, positive or close margins, reexcision, N1, and central or inner primary. Increased rates of breast recurrence were noted for patients with clips for the following variables: no adjuvant treatment (p < 0.001), unknown margins (p < 0.001), a single excision (p = 0.003), path NO (p = 0.001), and outer location (p= 0.02). A forward stepwise multivariate analysis for all 1364 patients was performed using the aforementioned variables as well as the presence or absence of surgical clips and the primary surgeon. The surgeon (p = 0.03) and no adjuvant treatment (p = 0.01) significantly influenced breast recurrence. For patients with surgical clips the 10 year isolated breast recurrence rate was 21% for a single surgeon vs. 6% in the remainder of the group (p = 0.01). For patients with clips, this surgeon had unknown margins in 48% of cases compared to 10% overall (p = 0.001). Excluding this surgeon from analysis the isolated breast recurrence for patients with clips was 6 vs. 5% for patients without clips (p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS Overall, there was a significant difference in the 10-year breast recurrence rate favoring women without clips despite more adverse prognostic factors. There was no difference in the breast recurrence rate for patients with or without surgical clips if careful attention to margin status was addressed. Failure to ink the surgical specimen resulting in unknown margins cannot be compensated for with the placement of .
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Multivariate Analysis
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
- Neoplasm Staging
- Neoplasm, Residual
- Prostheses and Implants
- Reoperation
- Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
- Time Factors
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Fein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Lymphocytes were isolated from breast seroma fluids and used to study the mechanism of activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes and possible role of immunological potentiation following surgery in breast cancer patients. Single or serial samples were obtained from patients who had undergone mastectomy or lumpectomy with axillary node dissection. Lymphocytes were activated with rIL-2 (interleukin-2) and their cytotoxic activity was studied against Daudi and K562 cells and against a breast tumor line (SKBr-3). All of the patients (21/21) responded to IL-2 stimulation by significant activation of cytotoxic activity. The unstimulated cytotoxic activity of these cells against NK targets was low with less than 10% specific release in cytotoxicity assays. In simultaneous experiments, autologous seroma fluid was included during activation of lymphocytes to study possible regulatory molecules that may be present. In 17/21 patients, the presence of their seroma fluid, during the activation period, enhanced or did not effect the cytotoxic potential of their lymphocytes; inhibition was observed when seroma fluids from 4/21 patients were included. Analysis of the cytotoxic population derived from combined IL-2 and seroma treatments indicates the presence of cells with increased expression of CD56, and CD2, as well as in some cases CD16 expression. Cytotoxic lymphocytes derived from IL-2 and seroma treatments appeared to be more effective killers. Modulation of CD2 expression with seroma alone appeared to result in the generation of this highly cytotoxic population. This study demonstrates the role of CD2 expression in the effectiveness of LAK cell killing and also potential benefit of an immunotherapeutic approach to the postoperative treatment of carcinoma of the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gercel-Taylor
- Department of OB/GYN, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|