Survival in patients with HIV infection and viral hepatitis B or C: a cohort study

Liver fibrosis in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B extensively exposed to antiretroviral therapy with anti-HBV activity

PURPOSE

The extent and predictors of liver fibrosis were examined in a HIV/HBVcoinfected cohort with extensive exposure to anti-HBV active HAART.

METHOD

Liver fibrosis was measured using transient elastography.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients of a median age of 43 were included in the study. All but 2 patients had received anti-HBV drugs for a median time of 40 months in the context of HAART. F0-F1 METAVIR fibrosis scores (minimal or no fibrosis) as measured by elastography were found in 21 (57%) patients. AST levels were significantly lower among F0-F1 patients (33 IU/L) compared to F2-F4 patients (48 IU/L) (p = .01). ALT levels were also lower in F0-F1 patients (38 IU/L) than in F2-F4 patients (54 IU/L) (p = .05).

CONCLUSION

In this HIV/HBV-coinfected cohort, with extensive HAART exposure including anti-HBV agents, more than half of the patients had no or minimal liver fibrosis. Higher transaminase levels were recognized in patients with higher degree of fibrosis.

Therapy of hepatitis C in patients with HIV infection

Hepatitis C is found in approximately a third of patients infected with HIV. Therapy of hepatitis C in HIV patients is very important from several view points. First, hepatitis C in the setting of immunosuppression may progress faster, although recent data show that mortality from liver disease was decreased in highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV/hepatitis C coinfection is associated with more frequent elevation in liver tests (drug-induced liver injury) during highly active antiretroviral therapy, and in some studies, hepatitis C has been associated with lower CD4+ recoveries. The therapeutic standard of care is a combination of peginterferon and ribavirin at a fixed dose, 800 mg/day, although higher ribavirin doses may further improve virologic outcomes. In patients that do not respond virologically, maintenance therapy with peginterferon monotherapy is a potential avenue to stem the advance of liver fibrosis, although controlled data in coinfected patients are needed to issue formal recommendations.

Hepatitis C in HIV-positive patients--treatment and liver disease outcomes

Many human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected persons are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, liver disease from HCV has become an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The current guidelines recommend that human immunodeficiency virus and HCV coinfected patients be evaluated and treated for HCV if there are no major contraindications to treatment. Coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon-a and ribavirin have sustained virologic responses (SVRs) of 27% to 40% which for a variety of reasons are lower than those reported in HCV mono-infected patients. Understanding that most patients will not achieve SVRs, strategies to evaluate for the role of maintenance interferon in delaying complications of liver disease are being evaluated. In patients who have failed prior treatment, cannot tolerate treatment, or who have contraindications to HCV treatment, the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy with careful monitoring for hepatotoxicity and aggressive counseling on alcohol and substance abuse may slow down fibrosis progression. As the data on liver transplantation in coinfected patients accumulate, patients with end stage liver disease should be referred early for evaluation in a transplant center. As new drugs for HCV are being developed, it will be of utmost importance to include coinfected patients earlier in the process on new drug trials and therapeutic strategies.

Improvements in Parameters of End-Stage Liver Disease in Patients with HIV/HBV-related Cirrhosis Treated with Tenofovir

Background

Mortality related to end-stage liver disease is increasing in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients and effective treatment options are limited. Tenofovir is now widely used in HIV/HBV coinfection and results in significant HBV suppression, in both patients with and patients without lamivudine resistance. The safety and efficacy of tenofovir in HIV/HBV cirrhosis has not been previously described.

Methods

Seven cirrhotic HIV/HBV patients treated with tenofovir were identified within the HIV clinic. Parameters of hepatic function, CD4+ T-cell counts, HBV DNA levels and Child-Pugh Class (C-P-C) were determined before and after addition of tenofovir. All patients had prior lamivudine experience with a median baseline HBV DNA of 6.23x107 copies/ml.

Results

Four of seven patients were C-P-C -A and hepatitis ‘e’ antigen (HBeAG) was positive in 4/7 patients. After a median duration of tenofovir of 28 months, all laboratory parameters improved, with significant changes in albumin and prothrombin (PT) (median pre-/post-tenofovir: alanine aminotransferase 63/39; bilirubin 26/18; albumin 39/44, P=0.028; PT 17.5/15, P=0.018). All three patients with C-P-C -B or -C improved to C-P-C -A, which for one patient enabled removal from the liver transplant waiting list. Three patients lost HBeAG with two anti-HBe seroconversions. Median HBV DNA was suppressed to <35 copies/ml.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that tenofovir can produce HBV viral suppression, HBeAg seroconversion and improvement in markers of hepatic function in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis. The potential reversal of end-stage liver disease may provide an important survival benefit in this population.

Pretreatment assessment and predictors of hepatitis C virus treatment in US veterans coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) cares for many human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients. VA treatment recommendations indicate that all HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergo evaluation for HCV treatment and list pretreatment assessment tests. We compared clinical practice with these recommendations. We identified 377 HIV/HCV-coinfected veterans who began HCV therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin and 4135 HIV/HCV-coinfected veterans who did not but were in VA care at the same facilities during the same period. We compared laboratory and clinical characteristics of the two groups and estimated multivariate logistic regression models of receipt of HCV treatment. Overall, patients had high rates of receipt of tests necessary for HCV pretreatment assessment. Patients starting HCV treatment had higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lower creatinine, higher CD4 counts and lower HIV viral loads than patients not starting HCV treatment. In the multivariate model, positive predictors of starting HCV treatment included being non-Hispanic whites, having higher ALTs, lower creatinines, higher HCV viral loads, higher CD4 counts, undetectable HIV viral loads and receiving HIV antiretrovirals. A history of chronic mental illness and a history of hard drug use were negative predictors. Most HIV/HCV-coinfected patients received the necessary HCV pretreatment assessments, although rates of screening for hepatitis A and B immunity can be improved. Having well-controlled HIV disease is by far the most important modifiable factor affecting the receipt of HCV treatment. More research is needed to determine if the observed racial differences in starting HCV treatment reflect biological differences, provider behaviour or patient preference.

Reduction in liver-related hospital admissions and deaths in HIV-infected patients since the year 2002

Since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), complications of chronic liver disease (CLD) have emerged as one of the leading causes of hospital admission and death among HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. The impact of CLD on hospital admissions and deaths in HIV-infected patients attended at one reference HIV hospital in Madrid during the last 9 years was analysed. All clinical charts from January 1996 to December 2004 were retrospectively examined. Demographics, discharge diagnosis, complications during inhospital stay and causes of death were recorded. A total of 2527 hospital admissions in 2008 distinct HIV-infected persons were recorded. Overall, 84% were iv drug users; mean age was 37 years and the mean CD4 count was 224 cells/muL. Both mean age and CD4 count significantly increased during the study period (P < 0.01). Overall, 42% of hospitalized patients were on antiretroviral therapy. Decompensated CLD was the cause of admission and/or developed during hospitalization in 345 patients (14%). Admissions caused by decompensated CLD increased significantly from 9.1% (30/329) in 1996 to 26% (78/294) in 2002. A significant steady decline occurred since then, being 11% (29/253) in the year 2004. Similarly, inhospital liver-related deaths were 9% (5/54) in 1996, peaked to 59% (10/17) in 2001 and declined to 20% (3/15) in the year 2004. Chronic hepatitis C was responsible for admissions and/or deaths in 73.5% of CLD cases. In conclusion, the rate of liver-related hospital admissions and deaths among HIV-infected patients peaked in the year 2002 and has steadily declined since then. A slower progression to liver cirrhosis in patients on HAART, avoidance of hepatotoxic antiretroviral drugs and more frequent use of anti-HCV therapy in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients could account for this benefit.

Antiretroviral Therapy Based on Protease Inhibitors as a Protective Factor against Liver Fibrosis Progression in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Cohort studies have shown that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can improve liver-related mortality in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. A reduction in the accelerated liver fibrosis progression observed in HIV infection induced by HAART could explain these findings. A few studies have assessed the impact of HAART on liver fibrosis, but with contradictory results. Therefore, we evaluated the associations between the use of different antiretroviral drug classes and HAART combinations, and liver fibrosis in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C. Six hundred and eighty-three HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, who underwent a liver biopsy and who had not received anti-HCV treatment were included. Age at HCV infection <23 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=0.3-0.9, P=0.05) and protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART versus no use of HAART (AOR=0.5, 95% CI=0.3-0.9, P=0.01) were negatively associated with advanced fibrosis (≥F3). PI-based HAART versus no use of HAART (AOR=0.4, 95% CI=0.2-0.7, P=0.001) was negatively associated with fibrosis progression rate ≥0.2 units/year and independently of age at HCV infection and CD4+ T-cell counts. Fifteen (17%) patients treated only with PIs and zidovudine plus lamivudine showed ≥F3, compared with 65 (37%) patients without HAART ( P=0.001). Forty (31%) patients on PI and stavudine plus lamivudine showed ≥F3 ( P=0.3, when compared with patients with no HAART). The use of PI-based HAART in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is associated with less severe fibrosis and slower progression of fibrosis. The nucleoside analogue backbone in a HAART regimen may influence this association.

Antiretroviral medication considerations for individuals coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus

There is great need to treat HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected individuals with both antiretroviral and anti-HCV pharmacotherapy. However, treatment for HIV may lead to hepatotoxicity, and there are potential interactions and synergistic effects between antiretrovirals and anti-HCV medications. The ideal antiretroviral therapy options for coinfected patients, in the setting of anti-HCV treatment, are unclear and present important challenges to clinicians. We review the current data on the use of antiretrovirals in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients and offer evidence-based recommendations on optimal selection and dosing of antiretroviral agents for this population.

Virological outcome of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in HIV-coinfected patients receiving anti-HBV active antiretroviral therapy

The immune suppression caused by HIV infection accelerates the course of liver disease caused by chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We assessed the outcome of HIV/HBV-coinfected patients exposed to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including anti-HBV active drugs. Baseline and follow-up plasma HBVDNA and HIV-RNA levels, HBV serological markers, and CD4 counts were longitudinally evaluated in all HBsAg(+) individuals with HIV infection on regular follow-up at an urban HIV reference clinic. Out of 79 HBsAg(+) chronic carriers identified, 39 (50%) were HBeAg(+). Lamivudine (3TC) alone had been received by 37% of patients, while 3TC plus tenofovir (concomitantly or consecutively) had been taken by 58% of them. The median follow-up was of 52 months. Loss of HBeAg or HBsAg occurred in 28% (10/36) and 13% (10/75) of patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels [OR 4.58 (95% CI 1.25-16.78); p = 0.02] and greater CD4 gains on HAART [OR 1.003 (95% CI 1.000-1.006); p = 0.03] were associated with undetectable serum HBV-DNA at the end of follow-up. Anti-HBV active HAART makes it possible to achieve HBsAg clearance, anti-HBe seroconversion, and suppression of HBV replication in a substantial proportion of HBV/HIV-coinfected patients, particularly in those with complete HIV suppression and greater immune recovery. Thus, HBV/HIV-coinfected patients might benefit from an earlier introduction of HAART.

[HIV and HCV coinfection]

Chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected individuals. Coinfected patients present an accelerated course toward cirrhosis and an enhanced risk of liver toxicity associated with the use of antiretroviral agents. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV1 patients is less efficacious than in HCV-monoinfected individuals and requires particular expertise.

Severe liver disease associated with prolonged exposure to antiretroviral drugs

BACKGROUND

Liver damage is frequently seen in HIV-positive subjects, often resulting from coinfection with hepatitis B and/or C viruses (HCV), alcohol abuse, etc. However, the etiology of liver disease still remains unknown for a small subset of individuals.

METHODS

Cryptogenic liver disease (CLD) was defined as persistently elevated aminotransferases levels in the absence of hepatitis C and/or B viruses replication and of other common causes of liver disease (alcohol, medications, etc). We identified cases initially meeting this definition by examining all HIV-positive subjects attended during the year 2004 in 2 large HIV clinics in Spain. Their clinical charts were retrospectively reviewed, and their assessment completed when needed to rule out other less frequent causes of liver disease. The stage of liver fibrosis was assessed by liver biopsy and/or elastography. To assess which factors could be associated with CLD, HIV-positive controls were chosen and matched by age, gender, and CD4 status.

RESULTS

CLD was diagnosed in 17 (0.5%) out of 3200 HIV-positive patients. Their mean age was 43 years, 82.4% were male, and 76% had acquired HIV through homosexual relationships. The mean time from HIV diagnosis was >15 years, and all patients had been exposed to antiretroviral therapy. Nevirapine, stavudine, and didanosine were the drugs more frequently used by this subset of patients. None of them had liver function test abnormalities before initiating antiretroviral therapy. Advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4 Metavir scores) was recognized in 10 (58.8%) individuals, and 9 (52.9%) had developed symptomatic liver complications, including ascites (8), portal thrombosis (6), variceal bleeding (5), and encephalopathy (2). In the case-control analysis, prolonged didanosine exposure was the only independent predictor of developing CLD in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

CLD is an uncommon condition in HIV-positive individuals and might be associated with prolonged didanosine exposure. It may evolve causing severe liver complications, with variceal bleeding and portal thrombosis being particularly frequent.

Impact of Lamivudine on the Risk of Liver-Related Death in 2,041 Hbsag- and HIV-Positive Individuals: Results from An Inter-Cohort Analysis

Background

The impact of lamivudine (3TC) as part of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) on the risk of liver-related death (LRD) in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients has not been extensively studied.

Methods

We performed an analysis involving HIV/HBV-coinfected patients in 13 cohorts who initiated cART. The end–point was LRD – that is, death with concomitant decompensated liver disease (DLD) or hepatocellular carcinoma – as the main cause. Incidence rates of LRD after initiation of cART were expressed as number of events per 100 person–years of follow–up (PYFU). A Poisson regression model adjusted for cohort, gender, mode of HIV transmission, CD4+ T-cell count at cART initiation, liver disease pre–cART, duration of 3TC before cART, and hepatitis C virus was used to assess the association between use of 3TC and risk of LRD.

Results

We analysed 2,041 patients. Follow–up after starting cART was 7,648 PYFU (5,569 spent on 3TC-containing regimens) with a median per person of 48 months (range: 2–91). Of the total, 217 subjects died; 57 deaths were liver-related resulting in a rate of 7.5 per 1,000 PYFU [95% confidence intervals (CI): 5.6–9.7]. The relative risk of LRD per extra year of 3TC use was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.59–0.90, P=0.004).

Conclusion

The use of 3TC was associated with a reduced risk of LRD over 4 years of follow–up. This study supports the current view that the use of 3TC as part of cART should be considered in patients who are tested positive for HBsAg.

HIV-related liver disease: infections versus drugs

HIV-infected individuals have myriad causes of hepatotoxicity that range from mild hepatitis to significant liver failure with its associated morbidity and mortality, especially in the setting of chronic viral hepatitis (HCV and HBV). Immune restoration by HAART therapy can contribute liver-related toxicity in HIV-coinfected patients. Clinicians need to be aware of this problem and individualize management in this challenging clinical scenario. Avoidance of potentially hepatotoxic agents or close monitoring during treatment of HIV may prevent liver failure in patients who have HIV. Furthermore, vaccination against hepatitis A virus and HBV in nonimmune HIV individuals may prevent acquisition of hepatitis A virus and HBV infections in patients who have HIV. Finally, treatment of HIV, and, if appropriate, treatment of those who are coinfected with HCV and HBV with close monitoring, may improve the outcome of patients who have HIV and are at risk fo r significant hepatotoxicity during treatment from immune restoration or hypersensitivity reactions.

Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection on Response to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy and Outcome in HIV-Infected Individuals: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients may decrease the effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral therapy. We determined the impact of HCV infection on response to highly active antiretroviral therapy and outcome among Danish patients with HIV-1 infection.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included all adult Danish HIV-1-infected patients who started highly active antiretroviral therapy from 1 January 1995 to 1 January 2004. Patients were classified as HCV positive (positive HCV serological test and/or HCV PCR results [443 patients [16%]]), HCV negative (consistent negative HCV serological test results [2183 patients [80%]]) and HCV-U (never tested for HCV [108 patients [4%]]). The study end points were viral load, CD4+ cell count, and mortality.

RESULTS

Compared with the HCV-negative group, overall mortality was significantly higher in the HCV-positive group (mortality rate ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.0), as was liver disease-related mortality (mortality rate ratio, 16; 95% CI, 7.2-33). Furthermore, patients in the HCV-positive group had a higher risk of dying with a prothrombin time <0.3, from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related disease, and if they had a history of alcohol abuse. Although we observed no difference in viral load between the HCV-positive and HCV-negative groups, the HCV-positive group had a marginally lower absolute CD4+ cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-HCV-coinfected patients are compromised in their response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. Overall mortality, as well as mortality from liver-related and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related causes, is significantly increased in this patient group.

Effect of hepatitis C infection on progression of HIV disease and early response to initial antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES

To describe the effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) on the progression of HIV disease and on early changes in the CD4 cell count and HIV viral load after HAART initiation.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were from a longitudinal medical records review project conducted in over 100 US medical clinics from 1998 to 2004. We analysed data from HIV-infected patients who received antiretroviral therapy (ART), calculated adjusted hazard ratios describing the hazard of death or progression to an AIDS-defining opportunistic illness (AIDS-OI) associated with prevalent HCV infection, and estimated the change in CD4 cell count and HIV viral load after HAART initiation, stratified by HCV status.

RESULTS

A total of 10 481 HIV-infected individuals were followed for a median of 1.9 years; 19% had HCV. HCV infection was not associated with progression to AIDS-OI or death after controlling for important confounding conditions. Factors significantly confounding the risk of both death and diagnosis of an AIDS-OI were alcoholism, drug-induced hepatitis, and the type of ART prescribed. Acute and chronic hepatitis B infection confounded the risk of AIDS-OI diagnosis. During the 12 months after starting HAART, proportional increases in CD4 cell counts did not differ between HCV-infected and HCV-uninfected individuals. Likewise, the short-term change in viral load did not differ.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, HCV did not increase the risk of death or AIDS-OI, and did not affect the early immunological or virological response to initial HAART. Clinicians should evaluate patients with HCV for other, manageable problems, including alcoholism and other viral hepatitis.

Multiple viral infections

Individuals at risk of HIV are concomitantly at risk of acquiring parenterally or sexually transmitted viruses. Multiple hepatitis co-infection (HBV+HCV; HBV+HDV; HBV+HDV+HCV) has not been systematically sought after in the large cohorts of HIV-infected patients, but has been reported in 0.4% to more than 50% of patients. HIV-infected patients with multiple hepatitis have a higher rate of liver-related morbidity and mortality than patients with HIV infection alone or with a single hepatitis co-infection. The degree of immunodepression is an important factor in liver disease progression. Since GBV-C virus is transmitted parenterally or by sexual contact, a high prevalence was found in chronic hepatitis C and in HIV-infected patients. Patients with multiple hepatitis have been excluded from randomised therapeutic trials of viral hepatitis in HIV-infected and HIV-negative patients. Thus, the therapeutic approach is based on the results of a small series and empirically oriented toward the prevailing infection. HIV-infected patients should be tested for hepatitis B, C and D systematically and hepatitis B vaccination should be considered for those with HCV co-infection and absence of HBV markers. Studies are needed to assess treatment strategies.

Prevention of viral hepatitis in HIV co-infection

Co-infection of HIV-positive patients with hepatitis viruses worsens the long-term prognosis and this is summative for each new infection in any individual. Vaccination against hepatitis A or B may be effective but response rates are reduced in HIV infected patients. Improvement in response can be induced through extra doses, higher doses and HAART-induced increase in the CD4 count. Hepatitis B and C may also be prevented through counselling about safer sex, particularly condom use. In intravenous drug users, harm reduction, counselling and the use of needle/syringe exchange schemes may be helpful.

Natural history of chronic hepatitis B in co-infected patients

HIV co-infection influences the course and natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection by impairing the quantity and quality of the innate and adaptive immune response. The rates of spontaneous resolution after acute infection and spontaneous anti-HBe and anti-HBs seroconversions are decreased, and levels of HBV replication are increased in HIV-infected patients. A more rapid progression of liver fibrosis and a higher rate of cirrhosis decompensation (but not hepatocellular carcinoma) have been demonstrated in co-infected patients. The risk of HBV-associated end-stage liver disease and liver-related mortality may be increased by HIV co-infection. Antiretroviral therapy may trigger spontaneous anti-HBe and anti-HBs seroconversion and/or a better immune control of HBV replication by restoring adaptive immunity, but can also increase hepatitis flares. Reactivation of chronic hepatitis B has been observed after suspension of anti-retrovirals with anti-HBV activity or after occurrence of HBV resistance to lamivudine. Future research should focus on: the impact of HIV-induced changes in innate and adaptive immune response and modifications induced by anti-retroviral therapy that may impact on progression of advanced chronic hepatitis B; the association between HBV genotype and clinical course of disease; and the role of occult HBV infection as a co-factor with other causes of liver injury.

Results of a Study of Prolonging Treatment with Pegylated Interferon-α2A plus Ribavirin in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Patients with No Early Virological Response

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of an extended treatment period in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients without early virological response (EVR).

Methods

Patients received pegylated interferon (peg-INF)-α2a 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 800 mg/d for 12 weeks. Patients achieving EVR at week 12 continued under therapy for an additional 12 or 36 weeks depending on genotype. Patients without EVR were randomized to complete the standard treatment or treatment lasting 72 weeks (extension arm).

Results

One hundred and ten patients were included (mean age 38.7 years, mean weight 68 kg, 74% males, 74% on highly active antiretroviral therapy, mean CD4+ T-cell count 564 cells/mm3). Fifty-one patients harboured genotype 1, 44 genotype 2/3, and 15 genotype 4. Fifty-three had an HCV load >800,000 IU/ml. Premature interruptions occurred in 32.7%. EVR was achieved in 63.6% (51% in genotype 1, 88.6% in genotype 2/3, 33.3% in genotype 4). End-of-treatment response was 52.7% (47.2% in genotype 1, 68.2% in genotype 2/3, 26.7% in genotype 4). Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 41.8% (37.3% in genotype 1, 54.6% in genotype 2/3, 20% in genotype 4). Only one patient allocated to the extended arm achieved SVR. The rate of drop-outs in the extension arm was 68%. The negative predictive value of EVR was 97.5%.

Conclusions

This study shows no benefit of extending therapy in patients without EVR at week 12. Measures to improve adherence to HCV antiviral therapy should be considered when new approaches based on extended periods of treatment are investigated.

Outcome of patients with hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus infections referred for liver transplantation

The outcome of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) referred for liver transplantation (LT) is unknown. A high frequency of lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) HBV infection may increase the risk of liver-related death pre-transplantation and prophylaxis failure post-transplantation. We evaluated the association of LAM-R HBV on pre-transplant survival and post-transplant outcomes in 35 consecutive HIV-HBV coinfected patients referred for LT between July 2000 and September 2002. At the time of referral, the median CD4 count was 273/mm, MELD was 14, and LAM-R HBV infection was present in 67%. Among these referred patients, 26% were listed, 29% not listed due to relative/absolute contraindications; 26% not listed as too early for LT; 9% not listed as too sick for LT; and 11% died during transplant evaluation. Of the 9 listed patients, 4 remained listed, 1 died 18 months post-referral, and 4 were transplanted (11% of total) 3 to 40 months after listing. Of 17 evaluated but not listed patients, 5 died (p=0.38 compared to listed group) and all deaths were liver-related. All the HBV-HIV coinfected patients, who were transplanted, are HBsAg negative and have undetectable HBV DNA levels on prophylactic therapy using hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) plus lamivudine, with and without tenofovir or adefovir, with median 33.1 months follow-up. Late referral and the presence of LAM-R HBV pre-transplantation are common in referred HIV-HBV patients. In HIV-HBV coinfected patients undergoing LT, HBV recurrence is successfully prevented with combination prophylaxis using HBIG and antivirals.

Role of individualization of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy duration in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals*

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of pegylated interferon and ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients, prescribed for the same duration and at the same dosage as that used in HCV monoinfection studies.

DESIGN

It was an open-label, single-centre, prospective study.

METHODS

Forty-five patients coinfected with HIV and HCV with CD4 counts >200 cells/microL were treated with pegylated interferon-alpha2b 1.5 microg/kg/week and ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day for 24-48 weeks depending on HCV genotype. Safety and tolerability were assessed weekly for the first month and monthly thereafter. Virological response was assessed at weeks 4, 12 and 24 and at the end of treatment and 12 and 24 weeks post completion of treatment. The primary endpoint was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks post completion of treatment [sustained virological response (SVR)].

RESULTS

The majority of patients were male and had been injecting drug users. Sixty per cent were on antiretroviral therapy. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 53% had an SVR (genotype 1, 19% and genotype 2/3, 75%). All patients who had undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 of HCV treatment [very early virological response (VEVR)] had a SVR. On multivariate analysis only HCV genotype predicted SVR. Adverse events occurred frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that 24 weeks of HCV treatment may be adequate for HIV-infected individuals coinfected with HCV genotype 2 or 3. VEVR can predict SVR in this group and may be used to guide the subgroup of genotype 2/3 individuals who will respond to 24 weeks of treatment.

Optimizing management strategies in special patient populations

Chronic hepatitis B infection presents a number of challenges to clinicians. There are additional considerations when defining management strategies for individuals with advanced liver disease, or coinfection, or those at high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment of decompensated cirrhosis is particularly important. Evidence suggests that suppression of viral replication through nucleos(t)ide analog therapy leads to longer time to transplantation, improved liver function, and improved survival times. The use of interferon in patients with decompensated hepatitis B is associated with serious complications and is currently contraindicated for these patients by the AASLD Practice Guidelines. Hepatitis B coinfection is often associated with more extensive disease. In patients with HBV/HCV coinfection, one disease is usually dominant and consequently should be the focus of therapy. HIV/HBV coinfection increases the risk of progressive liver disease. Therapeutic agents active against both viruses should be utilized at the correct dose to limit the development of resistance. Agents specific for HBV, e.g., entecavir, enable hepatitis to be treated while avoiding the risk of HIV resistance developing. Dual infection with HBV and HDV is particularly challenging. Nucleos(t)ide analogs are ineffective in treating HDV infection, and there is limited data concerning the efficacy of interferon in this setting. The association between chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is well established. In patients at high risk of HCC, screening regimes may be effective. Furthermore, there is an increasing body of evidence indicating that effective suppression of viral replication may be associated with a reduced risk of HCC.

An Update in the Management of Hepatitis B/HIV Coinfection

With growing numbers of hepatitis B virus (HBV)/ HIVcoinfected patients and the complexity of treating both diseases together, new treatment options and guidelines are available. This article reviews treatment and management options for HBV/HIV-coinfected patients.

Do Type and Duration of Antiretroviral Therapy Attenuate Liver Fibrosis in HIV--Hepatitis C Virus--Coinfected Patients?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether type and duration of therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection attenuates liver fibrosis in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection.

METHODS

Patients with HCV monoinfection (group 1) and HIV-HCV coinfection were retrospectively selected; the latter patients were classified into the following 3 groups: group 2, patients who received no therapy or only nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); group 3, those who received highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); and group 4, those who initially received NRTIs followed by HAART. Fibrosis stage (scale, 0-6) and necroinflammatory score (scale, 0-18) were assessed according to the Ishak system. Data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-one patients (296 HCV-monoinfected patients and 85 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients) were recruited. The durations of HIV therapy before liver biopsy was performed for groups 2, 3, and 4 were 3.8 +/- 2.8, 3.3 +/- 1.8, and 6.6 +/- 2.2 years. The time from HIV diagnosis to HAART initiation was shorter for group 3 than for group 4 (9.1 +/- 7.3 vs. 34.1 +/- 13.1 months; P < .0001). Groups 1 and 3 had similar fibrosis stages (3.1 +/- 2 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.4), rates of fibrosis progression (0.13 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.11 per year), and necroinflammatory scores (6.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 6.1 +/- 2.0). Groups 2 and 4 had significantly more-advanced liver disease, as determined by fibrosis stage (4.6 +/- 1.8 vs. 4.3 +/- 2.0; P < .0009), rate of fibrosis progression (0.24 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.20 +/- 0.10 per year; P < .0001), and prevalence of cirrhosis (68% vs. 55%; P < .006), compared with group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

HIC-HCV-coinfected subjects who receive HAART as their sole form of therapy have liver histology findings comparable to those for HCV-monoinfected patients. A similar degree of benefit is not observed for HIV-HCV-coinfected patients who receive no therapy, NRTIs, or HAART after NRTIs, despite having a longer duration of therapy.

Survival and prognostic factors of HIV-infected patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease

OBJECTIVE

To find the survival and the predictors of death of HIV-infected patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD).

DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study set in the infectious diseases units of four tertiary care public hospitals in Andalucía, Spain. From a multicentric cohort of 2664 HIV/HCV-co-infected patients, all consecutive patients with HCV-related cirrhosis who presented with the first hepatic decompensation from January 1997 to June 2004 were followed-up and 153 patients were included. The survival and the demographic, HIV-related and liver-related factors associated with death were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety-five (62%) patients died during the follow-up. In 79 (85%) individuals, the cause of death was liver related. The median survival time was 13 months. Independent predictors of survival were Child score [hazard ratio (HR), 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.37; P = 0.001], CD4+ cell count at decompensation lower than 100 cells/microl (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.52-4.06; P < 0.001) and hepatic encephalopathy as the first hepatic decompensation (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.41-4.27; P = 0.001). HAART was prescribed to 101 (66%) patients. The cumulative probability of survival in patients under HAART was 60% at 1 year and 40% at 3 years, versus 38 and 18%, respectively, in patients not treated with HAART (P < 0.0001). The HR (95% CI) of death in patients on HAART was 0.5 (0.3-0.9), (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The survival of HIV/HCV-co-infected patients with ESLD is extremely poor. Immunosuppression and markers of severe liver disease predict liver-related mortality in these patients. HAART seems to be associated with a reduced liver-related mortality.

Risks of Non-Accidental Mortality by Baseline CD4+ T-Cell Strata in Hepatitis-C-Positive and -Negative Individuals Initiating Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Background

Patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV experience higher mortality rates than patients infected with HIV alone. We designed a study to determine whether risks for later mortality are similar for HCV-positive and HCV-negative individuals when subjects are stratified on the basis of baseline CD4+ T-cell counts.

Methods

Antiretroviral-naive individuals, who initiated highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) between 1996 and 2002 were included in the study. HCV-positive and HCV-negative individuals were stratified separately by baseline CD4+ T-cell counts of 50 cell/μl increments. Cox-proportional hazards regression was used to model the effect of these strata with other variables on survival.

Results

CD4+ T-cell strata below 200 cells/μl, but not above, imparted an increased relative hazard (RH) of mortality for both HCV-positive and HCV-negative individuals. Among HCV-positive individuals, after adjustment for baseline age, HIV RNA levels, history of injection drug use and adherence to therapy, only CD4+ T-cell strata of <50 cells/μl (RH=4.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.72–7.76) and 50–199 cells/μl (RH=2.49; 95% CI 1.63–3.81) were significantly associated with increased mortality when compared with those initiating therapy at cell counts >500 cells/μl. The same baseline CD4+ T-cell strata were found for HCV-negative individuals.

Conclusion

In a within-groups analysis, the baseline CD4+ T-cell strata that are associated with increased RHs for mortality are the same for HCV-positive and HCV-negative individuals initiating HAART. However, a between-groups analysis reveals a higher absolute mortality risk for HCV-positive individuals.

Influence of viral hepatitis on HIV infection

The natural history of HBV is known to be complicated by HIV-co-infection. In contrast, the effect of HBV on the outcome of patients infected with HIV-1 is controversial. Some cohort studies from the pre-HAART era described a more rapid progression to AIDS in patients carrying antibodies to the core-antigen or having chronic HBV infection, but post-HAART studies did not detect any impact of HBV co-infection on HIV-disease progression. Similarly, studies assessing the impact of HCV on progression of HIV-disease delivered conflicting results. In the Swiss cohort study, the presence of HCV was independently associated with an increased risk of progression to AIDS and death. Subsequent studies, however, did not find any difference in survival. Most interestingly, the EuroSIDA cohort analysis found no difference between HCV-positive and HCV-negative HIV-patients starting HAART in the time needed to decrease viral loads to less than 400 copies as well as in the time needed to increase CD4-counts by 50%. In summary, there are no major differences in HIV-related mortality between hepatitis B or C co-infected individuals and patients infected with HIV alone, particularly if antiretroviral treatment is given. There is, however, an increased risk of liver disease related morbidity and mortality as well as more hepatoxicity under antiretroviral treatment regimens.

Double hepatitis B virus infection in a patient with HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfection and 'anti-HBc alone' as serological pattern

Reported here is a case of double hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in an HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patient with antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen as the only serological marker (anti-HBc alone). Two different HBV genotypes were identified in this patient. A search of the medical literature indicated this report is the first to describe a multiple silent HBV infection in an HIV/HCV-coinfected-patient. The elevated incidence of the anti-HBc alone pattern in HIV-positive patients and the increasing number of silent HBV infections detected in those patients demonstrate the need to carefully examine HIV-positive patients for occult HBV infection. In addition, it appears necessary to thoroughly study such patients in order to evaluate the impact of mixed HBV infection and triple HIV/HCV/HBV infection on morbidity.

Is there evidence for an increase in the death rate from liver-related disease in patients with HIV?

BACKGROUND

Increases in deaths due to liver-related disease (LRD) among HIV-infected individuals have been reported although the influence of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) on LRD is controversial.

AIMS

To determine changes over time in the death rate from LRD and if longer exposure to cART was associated with an increased death rate from LRD in 10 937 patients from EuroSIDA, an observational longitudinal cohort study.

RESULTS

A total of 184 (1.7%) died from LRD during 52 236 person-years of follow-up (PYFU). The death rate from LRD declined from 6.9 per 1000 PYFU before 1995 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.9-9.9] to 2.6 at/after 2004 (95% CI, 1.6-4.0). When the current CD4 cell count and other factors were taken into account, there was a 13% increase in the death rate from LRD per year (95% CI, 5-20%, P = 0.0008). In patients who had started cART, there was a 12% increase in the death rate from LRD per additional year exposure to cART (95% CI, 4-20%, P = 0.022) after adjustment for current CD4 cell count and other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Death rates from LRD appeared to decrease across Europe. However after adjustment for the current CD4 cell count, and therefore increases in CD4 cell counts in patients taking cART, there was a significant increase over time in death rates from LRD. In patients with similar CD4 cell counts, longer exposure to cART was associated with an increased death rate from LRD. This may be due to direct liver toxicity of antiretrovirals, progression of liver disease due to hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus over time as patients survive longer, or some other factor.

Complications in treating chronic hepatitis B in patients with HIV

The management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) poses specific problems in the presence of HIV infection, as therapeutic approaches have to consider both HBV and HIV. There are currently four drugs approved for the treatment of chronic HBV: IFN-alpha, lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir. Furthermore, the dual antiviral activity against HIV and HBV of antiretrovirals such as tenofovir and emtricitabine broadens the armamentarium against HBV in the HIV-coinfected population. Nucleotide analogues adefovir and tenofovir have the advantage of a higher genetic barrier for resistance when compared with the nucleoside analogues lamivudine and emtricitabine. Fortunately, the two families do not share resistance mutations, allowing salvage therapy and the consideration of combination therapy for drug-naive individuals. Although response to IFN-alpha is poorer in HBV/HIV-coinfected patients compared with HBV-monoinfected individuals, the more potent pegylated forms of IFN-alpha have brought new hopes.

New paradigms in the management of HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is currently one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals, mainly in hemophiliacs and intravenous drug users. The bidirectional interferences between hepatitis C virus and HIV have clinical consequences and complicate the management of coinfected individuals.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is an increased rate of liver complications among coinfected patients due to the decrease in opportunistic infections resulting from the use of potent antiretroviral therapy and accelerated progression to liver cirrhosis in the HIV setting. Conversely, the risk of hepatotoxicity of antiretrovirals is higher in the presence of chronic hepatitis C. While the standard therapy for hepatitis C in HIV is the combination of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin, overall treatment responses are lower in HIV-coinfected than in hepatitis C virus-monoinfected patients. Moreover, interactions between ribavirin and HIV drugs (i.e. didanosine, zidovudine) are associated with higher risks of side effects.

SUMMARY

Given the accelerated progression to end-stage liver disease in coinfected patients, treatment of hepatitis C should be a priority. While hepatitis C therapy should not be denied in the absence of contraindication, it should be re-assessed at week 12 and therapy continued only in patients showing more than 2 log drops in viremia, to avoid side effects. Most recent data suggest that adequate selection of candidates, expert management of side effects, and prescription of appropriate ribavirin doses (in genotypes 1-4) and extending treatment (in genotypes 2-3) all might allow response rates in coinfected patients to approach those seen in hepatitis C virus-monoinfected individuals.

Baseline Factors associated with Haematological Toxicity that Leads to a Dosage Reduction of Pegylated Interferon-α2a and Ribavirin in HIV- and HCV-Coinfected Patients on HCV Antiviral Therapy

Objective

To assess the baseline factors associated with haematological toxicity that lead to ribavirin or pegylated interferon (peginterferon) dosage reductions in hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus (HCV/HIV)-coinfected patients.

Design

Multicentre, prospective, observational study.

Setting

Eleven hospitals in Spain during the period 2002–2003.

Subjects and methods

One-hundred and forty-two HIV/HCV-coinfected patients received peginterferon-α2a plus ribavirin. Baseline characteristics and haematological parameters were recorded at baseline, week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48. Cox's regression model was used to study the factors associated with the appearance of a haemoglobin level below 10g/dl (haemoglobin-endpoint), a neutrophil count below 750/mm3 (neutrophil-endpoint) and a platelet count below 50,000/mm3 (platelet-endpoint).

Results

Nineteen patients (13.4%) reached the haemoglobin-endpoint, 22.5% the neutrophil-endpoint and 7% the platelet-endpoint. Mean time of follow-up was 8 months (±3.5). A baseline haemoglobin level below 14g/dl [hazard ratio (HR): 3.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46–9.06] and treatment with zidovudine (HR: 3.25; 95% CI: 1.31–8.11) were the independent factors associated with the appearance of the haemoglobin-endpoint. A baseline neutrophil below 2050/mm3 (HR: 3.59; 95% CI: 1.77–7.28) and baseline weight <60 kg (HR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.04–4.56) were independently associated with the appearance of the neutrophil-endpoint. Baseline platelet count (x1000/mm3 decrease) (HR: 1.074; 95% CI: 1.04-1.11) was independently associated with the appearance of the platelet-endpoint.

Conclusions

Baseline factors allow the identification of a subset of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who are prone to experience haematological toxicity during HCV antiviral therapy.

Managing hepatitis B coinfection in HIV-infected patients

Since viral hepatitis is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in HIV, it is critical to recognize and treat these patients appropriately. Hepatitis B infection is particularly difficult to manage as it changes with shifts in immune status. Inactive infection may flare up with restoration of CD4 cell count. In addition, many drugs used to treat HIV are also active against hepatitis B. Thus, patients may require therapy for both diseases or only for hepatitis B. The practicing physician must be aware of which drug to use with antiretrovirals and which can be used for hepatitis B alone. Current therapies for HIV that have hepatitis B activity include lamivudine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Therapies for hepatitis B without HIV activity are adefovir and entecavir. The major advances in the past year include emerging data on epidemiology, occult infection, genotypes, and newer therapies. Long-term management of hepatitis B includes monitoring for hepatocellular carcinoma. Two recent consensus conferences have provided excellent reviews of management of coinfection .

Management of patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus and HIV

The management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses specific problems in the presence of HIV co-infection, since therapeutic approaches have to consider both HBV and HIV infections. There are currently four drugs approved for the treatment of chronic HBV infection (interferon alpha, lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir); the dual antiviral activity of tenofovir and emtricitabine broadens the armamentarium against HBV in HBV/HIV co-infected patients. Nucleotide analogues--eg, adefovir and tenofovir--have the advantage of a higher genetic barrier to the development of resistance compared with nucleoside analogues--eg, lamivudine and emtricitabine. Fortunately, the two families do not share resistance mutations, allowing salvage therapy and the possibility of combination therapy for drug-naive individuals. Although response to interferon alpha is poorer in HBV/HIV co-infected patients compared with HIV-negative individuals, especially in hepatitis B e antigen-negative HBV infection, the more potent pegylated forms of interferon alpha have brought new hope.

Hepatitis B and HIV: prevalence, AIDS progression, response to highly active antiretroviral therapy and increased mortality in the EuroSIDA cohort

BACKGROUND

Whether hepatitis B (HBV) coinfection affects outcome in HIV-1-infected patients remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of HBV (assessed as HBsAg) coinfection and its possible impact on progression to AIDS, all-cause deaths, liver-related deaths and response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the EuroSIDA cohort.

METHODS

Data on 9802 patients in 72 European HIV centres were analysed. Incidence rates of AIDS, global mortality and liver-related mortality, time to 25% CD4 cell count increase and time to viral load < 400 copies/ml after starting HAART were calculated and compared between HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients.

RESULTS

HBsAg was found in 498 (8.7%) patients. The incidence of new AIDS diagnosis was similar in HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients (3.3 and 3.4/100 person-years, respectively) even after adjustment for potential confounders: the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-1.19; P = 0.61]. The incidences of all-cause and liver-related mortalities were significantly higher in HBsAg-positive subjects (3.7 and 0.7/100 person-years, respectively) compared with HBsAg-negative subjects (2.6 and 0.2/100 person-years, respectively). The adjusted IRR values were 1.53 for global (95% CI, 1.23-1.90; P = 0.0001) and 3.58 for liver-related (95% CI, 2.09-6.16; P < 0.0001) mortality. HBsAg status did not influence viral or immunological responses among the 1679 patients starting HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HBV coinfection was 9% in the EuroSIDA cohort. Chronic HBV infection significantly increased liver-related mortality in HIV-1-infected patients but did not impact on progression to AIDS or on viral and immunological responses to HAART.