Natural History, Risk Factors, and Impact of Subclinical Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Chronic allograft nephropathy: what have we learned from protocol biopsies?

Chronic allograft nephropathy, characterized by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, is still a major cause of graft loss after kidney transplantation. The complex pathophysiology of chronic allograft nephropathy is still poorly understood, and could be clarified by a more systematic performance of implantation and protocol biopsies of the renal allograft. This review highlights the contribution of implantation and protocol biopsies to our current knowledge of the complex interaction of multiple processes, ultimately leading to the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in the transplanted kidney. In addition, the safety and the limitations of protocol biopsies are discussed, as well as potential future directions for clinical practice and clinical research.

Chronic allograft nephropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite dramatic declines in acute rejection and early graft failure, long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation have improved little during the past 25 years. Most late allograft failure is attributed to chronic allograft nephropathy, but this is a clinicopathological description and not a diagnosis, and its pathogenesis and treatment are largely unknown.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest that acute rejection during the first few months, and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity thereafter, may both contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy. There is also accumulating evidence that injury from antibody-mediated rejection may play an important pathogenic role in at least some patients with chronic allograft nephropathy, particularly those with transplant glomerulopathy. Therapeutic measures, including protocols to reduce calcineurin inhibitor exposure, remain largely unproven.

SUMMARY

Understanding why so many kidney allografts fail, despite effective preventive measures for early acute rejection, is one of the most important areas of research in kidney transplantation today.

Long-term outcome of early steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation in African American recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy

Generally chronic steroid therapy is standard care for African American (AA) kidney recipients because of their higher incidence of rejections and lower long-term graft survival. This prospective study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal (ESW) in AA recipients. A total of 206 recipients were studied; 103 AA and 103 non-AA recipients monitored by serial surveillance biopsies from 1 to 60 months posttransplantation to evaluate subclinical acute rejections (SCAR) and chronic allograft injury (CAI). Biopsy-proven clinical acute rejections (BPAR) and SCAR were treated. Primary end point was BPAR and secondary end points were 5-year SCAR, CAI and survival. Incidences of BPAR was 16% versus 14% (p = 1.0), prevalence of CAI due to hypertension was 48% versus 30% (p = 0.05) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy was 47% versus 32% (p = 0.05) and the mean serum creatinine levels were 2.1 versus 1.8 mg/dL (p = 0.05) at 5-years in AA versus non-AA recipients. The incidence of SCAR was 23% versus 11% at 1 month (p = 0.04), 12% versus 3% at 3 years (p = 0.04) and 10% versus 1% at 5 years (p = 0.04) in AA and non-AA recipients, respectively. Five-year patient survivals were 81% and 88% (p = 0.09) and graft survivals were 71% and 73%(p = 0.19) in AA and non-AA groups, respectively. After early steroid withdrawal AA kidney recipients have significantly lower renal function and higher SCAR and CAI but 5-year graft survival are comparable to non-AA recipients.

Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result

Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival can be achieved with cyclosporine and tacrolimus (CNI)-based immunosuppressive protocols that incorporate antiproliferative immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. However, despite short-term success, long-term attrition of graft function and side effects of immunosuppressive agents continue to be significant problems, leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may contribute to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Metabolic, cosmetic, and neuropsychiatric complications of steroids affect quality of life after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs or steroids altogether. In this report we review studies that address either CNI or steroid minimization strategies and discuss their risks versus benefits. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion the use of CNIs and steroids as part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI and steroid minimization strategies needs to be further validated in controlled clinical trials with adequate long-term follow-up.

Calcineurin-inhibitor avoidance in elderly renal allograft recipients using ATG and basiliximab combined with mycophenolate mofetil

In old recipients of renal allografts from old donors, benefits of calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) are curtailed by nephrotoxicity. Intending to improve the outcome of these recipients, we analyzed a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. Kidney allograft recipients with low immunological risk (panel reactive antibodies <30%) were eligible for this study. Immunosuppression induction included ATG (4 mg/kg, day 0), basiliximab (20 mg, day 0 + 4) and steroids, followed by MMF (TL 2-6 microg/ml) and steroid maintenance treatment. Patient and graft survival rates respectively were 89.3% and 85.4% (12 months), and 86.6% and 76.8% (24 months). Delayed graft function occurred in 44.6%. S-creatinine at 12 months was 1.85 +/- 0.94 mg/dl. Thirty patients (53.6%) showed biopsy-proven rejections (6x Banff 3, 13x Banff 4I and 16x Banff 4II), 77% of which were steroid-sensitive, 23% required antibody treatment. After 12 months, 83% of the patients had an MMF-based immunosuppression, 43% were CNI-free. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections occurred in 28, tissue-invasive disease in three patients. Despite acceptable renal graft survival and function in some of patients with marginal organs, high incidences of rejections and CMV infections suggest the feasibility of CNI-avoidance using an MMF-based protocol only in carefully selected patients.

The utility of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies on renal allograft function: a randomized controlled study

Identification of pathological events in the renal allograft using protocol biopsies at predetermined time intervals may yield useful information and improve outcomes. We examined the influence of decisions taken on the basis of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies findings on 1-year renal allograft function in a prospective randomized study. Out of 102 living-donor allograft recipients, 52 were randomized to undergo protocol biopsies and 50 controls had only indicated biopsies. All acute rejection (AR) episodes (clinical and subclinical) were treated. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dose adjustments were made on clinical judgment. Baseline recipient and donor characteristics, immunosuppressive drug usage, HLA matches and 2-h cyclosporine levels were similar in both groups. At 1 and 3 months, protocol biopsies revealed borderline (BL) changes in 11.5% and 14% patients, AR in 17.3% and 12% and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in 3.8% and 10%. The incidence of clinically evident AR episodes was similar in the two groups, but biopsy group had lower serum creatinine at 6 months (p = 0.0003) and 1 year (p < 0.0001). The renal functions were similar in those with normal histology and BL changes. Protocol biopsies are helpful in detecting subclinical histological changes in the graft and improving short-term renal allograft function.

Immunephenotype of glomerular and interstitial infiltrating cells in protocol renal allograft biopsies and histological diagnosis

Patients with a protocol renal allograft biopsy simultaneously displaying interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and subclinical rejection (SCR) have a shortened graft survival than patients with a normal biopsy, or with a biopsy only displaying IF/TA or SCR. The poor outcome of these patients could be related with a more severe inflammation. We evaluate the immunophenotype of infiltrating cells in these diagnostic categories. Nonexhausted paraffin blocks from protocol biopsies done during the first year were stained with anti-CD45, CD3, CD20, CD68 and CD15 monoclonal antibodies. Glomerular and interstitial positive cells were counted. C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries was evaluated. Histological diagnoses were: normal (n = 80), SCR (n = 17), IF/TA (n = 42) and IF/TA + SCR (n = 17). Only interstitial CD20 positive cells were significantly increased in patients displaying IF/TA + SCR; normal (137 +/- 117), SCR (202 +/- 145), IF/TA (208 +/- 151) and IF/TA + SCR (307 +/- 180 cells/mm(2)), p < 0.01. The proportion of biopsies displaying C4d deposition was not different among groups. The upper tertile of CD20 positive interstitial cells was associated with a decreased death-censored graft survival (relative risk: 3.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-7.35; p = 0.015). These data suggest that B-cell interstitial infiltrates are associated with histological damage and outcome, but do not distinguish whether these infiltrates were the cause or the consequence of chronic tubulo-interstitial damage.

Renal function in patients with cadaveric kidney transplants treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine

INTRODUCTION

Renal function predicts graft survival in kidney transplant patients. This study compared the 2-year evolution of renal function in patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone.

METHODS

We studied 1558 cadaveric renal transplant recipients from 14 Spanish hospitals between January 2000 and December 2002. Of these, 1168 were treated with tacrolimus and 390 with cyclosporine. The primary efficacy endpoint was long-term renal function. Renal function was measured by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by creatinine clearance calculated from the Cockcroft-Gault formula. This report summarizes the 2-year results.

RESULTS

At 24 months the tacrolimus group showed significantly better serum creatinine (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs 1.8 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and GFR (60.5 +/- 20.9 mL/min vs 47.9 +/- 10.0, P < .001) than the cyclosporine group. Additionally, recipients with ideal graft donors (23.5 +/- 2.8 vs 24.0 +/- 2.9 years) had a better serum creatinine at 2 years (1.23 +/- 0.2 vs 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that tacrolimus was an independent factor associated with better renal function: odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.2 to 2.2), P < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a renal transplant treated with tacrolimus in combination with MMF and prednisone displayed better renal function at 2 years than those who received cyclosporine.

Lack of benefit of early protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients receiving TAC and MMF: a randomized study

We conducted a randomized, multicenter study to determine whether treatment of subclinical rejection with increased corticosteroids resulted in beneficial outcomes in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone. One hundred and twenty-one patients were randomized to biopsies at 0,1,2,3 and 6 months (Biopsy arm), and 119 to biopsies at 0 and 6 months only (Control arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the prevalence of the sum of the interstitial and tubular scores (ci + ct)> 2 (Banff) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included clinical and subclinical rejection and renal function. At 6 months, 34.8% of the Biopsy and 20.5% of the Control arm patients had a ci + ct score >or= 2 (p = 0.07). Between months 0 and 6, clinical rejection episodes were 12 in 10 Biopsy arm patients and 8 in 8 Control arm patients (p = 0.44). Overall prevalence of subclinical rejection in the Biopsy arm was 4.6%. Creatinine clearance at 6 months was 72.9 +/- 21.7 in the Biopsy and 68.90 mL/min +/- 18.35 mL/min in the Control arm patients (p = 0.18). In conclusion, we found no benefit to the procurement of early protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients receiving TAC, MMF and prednisone, at least in the short term. This is likely due to their low prevalence of subclinical rejection.

Timing and value of protocol biopsies in well-matched kidney transplant recipients – a clinical and histopathologic analysis

The role and timing of protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation are controversial. We changed our protocol biopsy policy and compared the predictive value of biopsies at different time-points. Protocol biopsies at 6 months (n = 45) were obtained during 2001-2004, and at 3 and 12 months from 2004 (n = 41). Donor biopsy was available from 70 patients. Histopathologic changes were described with chronic allograft damage index (CADI) and Banff 1997. Follow-up was for 18 months. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was present in 12%, 51%, and 34% and borderline or subclinical rejection in 9.8%, 8.9%, and 7.3% of patients at 3, 6, and 12 months. CAN at 6 and 12 months was associated with reduced graft function (P = 0.001). Semiquantitative CADI scores at all time-points significantly correlated with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 18 months. Strongest correlation existed with CADI at 12 months (P < 0.001). Change in CADI between 0-6 and 0-12 months, but not between 0-3 and 3-12 months, correlated with GFR at 18 months (P = 0.03, P = 0.01). Subclinical rejections were rare and chronic changes mild at 3 months. In our well-matched population, the predictive value of a biopsy at 3 months was inferior to biopsies at 6 or 12 months, both of which were effective in predicting long-term graft function.

Diagnosis of renal allograft subclinical rejection by urine protein fingerprint analysis

AIMS

This study aimed to find new biomarkers and establish urine protein fingerprint model for diagnosis of renal allograft subclinical rejection (SCR).

METHODS

A total of 73 urine samples were analyzed by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) combined with bioinformatics tools.

RESULTS

Firstly, 22 urine samples from recipients of stable graft function proved by protocol biopsies and 27 from subclinical rejection gruop were analyzed by SELDI-TOF-MS and Zhejiang University Cancer Institute-ProteinChip Data Analysis System (ZUCI-PDAS). The diagnostic pattern comprised of 4 biomarkers could differentiate SCR group from stable group with sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 81.8%. The remaining 14 samples from stable group and 10 samples from SCR were analyzed on the second day as an independent test set. The independent tests yielded a specificity of 71.4% and sensitivity of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine protein fingerprint analysis by SELDI-TOF-MS combined with bioinformatics can help to discover new biomarkers and provide a non-invasive tool to diagnosis of SCR.

Subclinical Rejection in the Initial Postoperative Period in Small Intestinal Transplantation: A Negative Influence on Graft Survival

BACKGROUND

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is a known entity in various solid organ transplants but not in intestinal transplantation.

METHODS

The purpose of this study is to characterize the presence and effect of SCR in small intestinal transplantation (Itx). A total of 151 patients who underwent Itx and maintained a functioning graft for at least 3 months after Itx were investigated. The clinicopathological characteristics associated with a SCR episode within 3 months after Itx were analyzed. Cox regression with the landmark method (the landmark time being 3 months after Itx) was used for the analyses of overall graft survival and cause-specific hazard rate of SCR.

RESULTS

A total of 2744 small intestinal transplant biopsies within 3 months after Itx were available for retrospective evaluation; 171 cases (6.2%) were determined as SCR and 78 patients (51.7%) experienced SCR episode within 3 months after Itx. Adult patients were associated with a significantly higher occurrence of a SCR episode (P=0.001). Overall graft survival at 5 years posttransplant for patients experiencing SCR within 3 months posttransplant and for patients without SCR was 37.2% and 60.2%, respectively (P=0.009). Cause-specific hazard rate analysis showed that a SCR episode was associated with a significantly higher hazard rate of death due to infection (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

A SCR episode in the initial postoperative period of Itx is a significant factor for unfavorable graft prognosis, likely representing alloimmune injury ultimately resulting in patient morbidity due to infection.

To Biopsy or Not to Biopsy? Should We Screen the Histology of Stable Renal Grafts?

Chronic allograft dysfunction is currently the main cause of late allograft failure. Recent encouraging evidence suggests that it may be possible to delay the development of graft damages if adequate management is initiated early in the course of the disease. These observations have renewed interest in the performance of protocol biopsies as routine follow-up procedure for the screening of renal transplants. In the present review, we summarize the available data from the literature to determine the pros and cons of protocol renal allograft biopsies. On the basis of this evidence, we discuss the ethical concerns raised by this procedure.

Tacrolimus exposure and evolution of renal allograft histology in the first year after transplantation

Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and is characterized by a large inter-individual variability in bioavailability. The impact of tacrolimus exposure on subclinical evolution of graft histology has not been studied in renal recipients. This analysis included 239 protocol biopsies (obtained at implantation, 3 and 12 months) of 120 consecutive kidney recipients treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. Biopsies were scored according to the Banff 2001 criteria and a chronicity score was calculated. Prospective pharmacokinetic data were included in the analysis (5544 tacrolimus predose blood concentrations and tacrolimus AUC(0-12) at 3 and 12 months). Higher donor age and higher number of human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) mismatches were independent predictors of subclinical acute rejection at 3 months, present in 8.7% of patients. The number of HLA-DR mismatches was independently associated with biopsy-proven clinical acute rejection. Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes and low mean tacrolimus exposure were independently associated with higher increase in chronicity scores between 3 and 12 months after transplantation. This observational study suggests that rejection phenomena and immune-mediated mechanisms remain important in the early progression of chronic allograft pathology. Tacrolimus doses or systemic exposure were not associated with lesions of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, suggesting that other factors determine susceptibility to tacrolimus nephrotoxicity.

Kidney transplantation with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression: 5-year results of a randomized prospective trial compared to calcineurin inhibitor drugs

BACKGROUND

We report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized prospective trial in primary adult renal allograft recipients, designed to evaluate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression on kidney transplant function.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients were randomized to either sirolimus (n=31) or cyclosporine (n=30) after basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. Sirolimus was concentration controlled at 10-12 ng/mL for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

After 5 years, sirolimus-MMF-steroids compared to cyclosporine-MMF-steroids provides similar patient survival (87.1 vs. 90%, P=0.681), acute rejection rates (12.9 vs. 23.3%, P=0.22), total cholesterol (209.1 vs. 204.3 mg/dL, P=0.973), urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.398 vs. 0.478 mg/dL, P=0.72), and overall medical and surgical morbidity (P=NS). Although unadjusted patient survival was similar, sirolimus based CNI-free patients had longer death censored graft survival (96.4 vs. 76.7%, P=0.0265), higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (66.7 vs. 50.7 cc/min, P=0.0075), and fewer graft losses from chronic allograft nephropathy. The Banff chronic scores at two years were strong predictors of 5-year GFR. At 5 years, there were six de novo (three solid organ, three skin) cancers in the CNI group and only two de novo (one skin, one leukemia, no solid organ) cancers in the sirolimus group (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of low to moderate risk patients demonstrates that excellent 5-year kidney transplant outcomes can be achieved without CNI drugs, when therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus is employed. The application of CNI drug avoidance protocols to high-risk recipients (retransplants, highly sensitized, etc.), extrarenal allograft recipients, or alternative drug regimens such as steroid or MMF elimination should be subjected to controlled trials.

Surveillance renal transplant biopsies and subclinical rejection at three months post-transplant in pediatric recipients

Subclinical acute rejection (SCR) has been increasingly recognized in adult renal transplant recipients with the advent of surveillance biopsies. However, in children, surveillance biopsies are not routinely performed at most centers. Therefore, the incidence, predisposing factors, treatment, and clinical outcomes of SCR remain unclear in children. From August 2004 to December 2005, we performed 36 protocol biopsies at three months post-transplantation. All patients had received induction therapy with basiliximab and were maintained on prednisone, MMF, and tacrolimus. Sixteen cases of SCR were detected by biopsy (44%). Age, gender, race, donor source, or serum creatinine did not discriminate between children with SCR and those with normal biopsies. All cases of SCR were treated with high doses of methylprednisolone. At one yr post-transplant, renal function was similar in children with SCR to those with normal surveillance biopsies (p = 0.62). Because of the high incidence of SCR, the maintenance dose of MMF was increased by 50% in 20 children transplanted after December 2005. This resulted in a significant decline in the incidence of SCR from 44 to 15% (p < 0.05). However, the incidence of polyomavirus (BK) viremia also increased significantly in these children (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of SCR was found on surveillance biopsies at three months post-transplant and could not be predicted by age, gender, race, donor source, or serum creatinine. The occurrence of SCR declined significantly by increasing the dose of MMF, but resulted in an increase in BK viremia. We conclude that surveillance biopsies provide valuable information in the management of pediatric renal transplant recipients. Increasing immunosuppression to avoid SCR should be weighed against the risk for infection.

Subclinical peritubular capillaritis at 3 months is associated with chronic rejection at 1 year

BACKGROUND

Peritubular capillaritis has been associated with chronic rejection, but the characteristics of subclinical lesions in peritubular capillaries are unknown.

METHODS

Fifty-three renal allograft recipients underwent a protocol biopsy at both 3 and 12 months after transplantation. Subclinical chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) at 1 year was diagnosed when three or more of five criteria were present: basement membrane multilayering of peritubular capillaries (MLPTC), transplant glomerulopathy, increase in intimal fibrosis between 3 and 12 months, C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries, and the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies.

RESULTS

Six (11.3%) patients met the criteria of CAMR. MLPTC was the most sensitive (83.3%) and specific (89.1%) histological criterion (P=0.0008). Five patients had peritubular capillaritis at their 3-month biopsy. They all developed MLPTC at 1 year (P<0.0001). Three of the patients with early peritubular capillaritis met the criteria of CAMR at 1 year (P=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Through early detection of subclinical peritubular capillaritis, renal allograft recipients who are at risk for development of MLPTC might be identified. Larger series are needed to confirm these preliminary findings, but this report suggests peritubular capillaritis as an early detection marker for patients at risk for CAMR.

Lymphoid cell proliferation in renal transplants: biologic and diagnostic implications

It is unclear whether alloreaction develops in peripheral lymphoid organs and effector cells being recruited to the target organs, or the entire process of alloreaction can happen within the transplanted kidneys. Interstitial inflammatory cell (IIC) proliferation was evaluated by MIB-1 antigen immunostain and the rate expressed as positive cells/1000 cells. This rate was higher in acute cell-mediated rejection (ACR) (25.7, n = 14) compared with normal kidney (0.4, n = 8), acute tubular necrosis (1.2, n = 8), chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN, 2.4, n = 20), and native kidneys with diverse diseases (9.2, n = 63); but was comparable to that in CAN with significant IIC (20.6, n = 16). 10.1% and 8.3% of T lymphocytes underwent proliferation in ACR with or without CAN, whereas only rare B lymphocytes or macrophages showed this change (<1.2%), regardless of diagnostic categories. All biopsies diagnosed as ACR in conjunction with a high rate of MIB-1 + IIC and 9/12 biopsies with CAN and significant IIC in which ACR was diagnosed due to a high rate of MIB-1 + IIC, responded to anti-rejection therapy. Proliferation of IIC involves predominantly T lymphocytes. These observations provide support for the concept of in situ alloimmunization, and facilitate the diagnosis of ACR.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) revolutionized kidney transplantation (KTx). Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival could be achieved with CNI-based (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) immunosuppressive protocols. However, despite short-term success, long-term graft attrition continues to be a significant problem, thus leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may be contributing to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Therefore, newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs altogether. Protocols exploring these options have gained greater attention over the last few years. Herein, we review studies addressing either CNI withdrawal or CNI avoidance strategies as well as discuss the risks versus benefits of these protocols. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion, the use of CNIs as a part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI withdrawal and avoidance strategies need to be further validated in controlled clinical trials.

Protocol biopsies in renal transplantation: prognostic value of structural monitoring

The natural history of renal allograft damage has been characterized in serial protocol biopsies. The prevalence of subclinical rejection (SCR) is maximal during the first months and it is associated with the progression of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and a decreased graft survival. IF/TA rapidly progress during the first months and constitutes an independent predictor of graft survival. IF/TA associated with transplant vasculopathy, SCR, or transplant glomerulopathy implies a poorer prognosis than IF/TA without additional lesions. These observations suggest that protocol biopsies could be considered a surrogate of graft survival. Preliminary data suggest that the predictive value of protocol biopsies is not inferior to acute rejection or renal function. Additionally, protocol biopsies have been employed as a secondary efficacy variable in clinical trials. This strategy has been useful to demonstrate a decrease in the progression of IF/TA in some calcineurin-free regimens. Quantification of renal damage is associated with graft survival suggesting that quantitative parameters might improve the predictive value of protocol biopsies. Validation of protocol biopsies as a surrogate of graft survival is actively pursued, as the utility of classical surrogates of graft outcome such as acute rejection has become less useful because of its decreased prevalence with actual immunosuppression.

Immunophenotype of infiltrating cells in protocol renal allograft biopsies from tacrolimus-versus cyclosporine-treated patients

The prevalence of subclinical rejection is lower in patients receiving tacrolimus than in patients treated with cyclosporine. However, it is not known whether this difference is related to the modulation of a specific cell immunophenotype. We perform a two case-one control study in patients treated with tacrolimus (n=44) or cyclosporine (n=22) with a protocol biopsy performed at 4 to 6 months. Immunophenotype of infiltrating cells was evaluated with monoclonal antibodies directed against CD45 (all leukocytes), CD3 (T lymphocytes), CD68 (monocytes/macrophages), and CD20 (B lymphocytes) and expressed as interstitial positive cells/mm(2). The number of interstitial CD45 (290+/-209 vs. 696+/-560; P<0.01), CD3 (121+/-84 vs. 208+/-104; P<0.01), and CD68 (155+/-232 vs. 242+/-280; P<0.05) but not CD20 (137+/-119 vs. 197+/-154) positive cells was lower in tacrolimus-treated patients. T lymphocytes and macrophages interstitial infiltration was reduced in tacrolimus treated patients evaluated with protocol biopsies in comparison to cyclosporine-treated patients.

Why hasn't eliminating acute rejection improved graft survival?

Although patients with end-stage renal disease can be maintained with dialysis therapy, the superiority of patient survival with renal transplantation makes transplantation the preferred method of renal replacement. Potent immunosuppressive therapies, particularly calcineurin inhibitors, have greatly reduced the incidence of acute rejection. However, long-term allograft survival remains limited. We discuss the impact of acute rejection on long-term allograft survival and discuss other factors leading to late allograft loss, including calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, chronic allograft nephropathy, and BK virus nephropathy, as well as donor and recipient factors associated with long-term allograft loss.

Stable Kidney Function in the Second Decade After Kidney Transplantation While on Cyclosporine-Based Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols in kidney transplantation over the past 20 years. However, in some recipients, the adverse effects of CNIs contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy and death with function--the two leading causes of late graft loss. Other recipients maintain stable graft function.

METHODS

We studied the impact of continuing CNI-based immunosuppression in the second decade after kidney transplantation. From 1984 through 1996, a total of 1,263 patients underwent a primary kidney transplant at the University of Minnesota and received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Antibody induction was used only in deceased donor recipients.

RESULTS

The actuarial 20-year patient survival rate was 38%; graft survival, 30%; and death-censored graft survival, 60%. The annual mean serum creatinine level for recipients whose grafts survived > or =1 year remained stable, although recipients with a history of > or =1 acute rejection episode had a higher serum creatinine level vs. recipients who were rejection-free. The annual mean calculated creatinine clearance was also stable over time. In addition, for recipients who were acute rejection-free, chronic allograft nephropathy/chronic rejection was only responsible for 9% of graft losses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that some kidney transplant recipients tolerate long-term CNI-based immunosuppression with stable creatinine levels. Identifying certain recipients' predisposition to CNI toxicity and individualizing immunosuppressive therapy may be important in order to improve long-term kidney function, while simultaneously preserving low short-term acute rejection rates.

Subclinical acute antibody-mediated rejection in positive crossmatch renal allografts

Subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been described in renal allograft recipients with stable serum creatinine (SCr), however whether this leads to development of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains unknown. We retrospectively reviewed data from 83 patients who received HLA-incompatible renal allografts following desensitization to remove donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Ten patients had an allograft biopsy showing subclinical AMR [stable SCr, neutrophil margination in peritubular capillaries (PTC), diffuse PTC C4d, positive DSA] during the first year post-transplantation; 3 patients were treated with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. Three patients had a subsequent rise in SCr and an associated biopsy with AMR; 5 others showed diagnostic or possible subclinical AMR on a later protocol biopsy. One graft was lost, while remaining patients have normal or mildly elevated SCr 8-45 months post-transplantation. However, the mean increase in CAN score (cg + ci + ct + cv) from those biopsies showing subclinical AMR to follow-up biopsies 335 +/- 248 (SD) days later was significantly greater (3.5 +/- 2.5 versus 1.0 +/- 2.0, p = 0.01) than that in 24 recipients of HLA-incompatible grafts with no AMR over a similar interval (360 +/- 117 days), suggesting that subclinical AMR may contribute to development of CAN.

Low incidence of adverse events in outpatient pediatric renal allograft biopsies

In 1999, our center implemented a policy of outpatient protocol biopsies as standard practice for the clinical management of pediatric renal allograft recipients. In order to determine the safety of this procedure, we conducted a retrospective chart audit of all outpatient renal allograft biopsies performed at our center. Biopsies were performed under conscious (midazolam) or procedural (propofol/fentanyl) sedation. Localization of the lower pole of the renal allograft was achieved with renal ultrasound. Using a Biopty gun with a 16-gauge needle, two cores were obtained. Patients were discharged four h post-biopsy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay (LOS), specimen adequacy (per Banff criteria) and major and minor adverse events were recorded in a central database. Data were expressed as mean +/- SD. From June 1999 to July 2004, we performed 162 biopsies in 43 pediatric renal allograft recipients. Most patients underwent extraperitoneal transplantation (42/43, 97.7%) and were greater than five yr of age at biopsy (129/131 biopsies, 98.5%). The majority of these procedures (131/162, 80.9%) were conducted in the outpatient department, with 113 of 131 (86.3%) being obtained for protocol (n = 89) and one-month follow-up acute rejection therapy (n = 24) indications. Patients underwent 3.7 +/- 2.7 biopsies (range = 1-11). Specimen adequacy was achieved in 119 of 124 (96.0%) of documented cases. The overall incidence of adverse events was 12 of 131 (9.2%) biopsies, all of which were minor in severity. Macroscopic hematuria was the most common minor adverse event, occurring after 11 of 131 (8.4%) biopsies. While macroscopic hematuria prolonged LOS (adverse events vs. no adverse events: 23.0 +/- 26.0 vs. 8.6 +/- 4.1 h, p = 0), none of these episodes required major surgical or radiographic interventions. We conclude that in patients greater than five yr of age with extraperitoneal renal allografts, outpatient protocol biopsies using a 16-gauge needle are sufficiently safe to justify their inclusion in the routine clinical management of pediatric renal allograft recipients and in pediatric clinical trials.

The current role of calcineurin inhibitors in posttransplant immunosuppression?

It is important to determine when to use and when to avoid calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). CNIs are associated with kidney dysfunction in some, but not all, transplant recipients. CNI-sparing protocols have their own drug-specific limitations. Two major clinical series suggest the benefit of routine CNI-sparing approaches, but our review suggests weaknesses in both. Ongoing studies are needed to determine which subgroups of recipients will benefit from CNIs.

Developing a tool for noninvasive monitoring of renal allografts

Renal transplantation has emerged as the therapy of choice for many patients with end-stage renal disease. One of the major goals is to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the individual needs of every patient at every time point post transplant, balancing the risk for rejection and over-immunosuppression. Such individualized treatment will require assays that can detect harmful processes in the allograft early and that can be measured repeatedly. In this review, advantages and disadvantages of current assays to monitor renal allografts noninvasively and how proteomic technology might contribute to the development of novel biomarkers to improve patient management will be discussed.

The aetiology and pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy

Renal transplantation is the ultimate form of renal replacement therapy, and is the treatment of choice for many patients with end-stage renal failure. The advent of calcineurin inhibitor based immunosuppression resulted in the 1-year renal allograft failure rate dropping from around 50% twenty years ago to less than 10% in more recent times. Despite a massive improvement in renal allograft survival in the first year following transplantation 10-year graft survival can be as low as 50%. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is recognised as the main cause of renal allograft failure following the first year after transplantation. The diagnosis of CAN can only be made histologically. Typically biopsy specimens in grafts with CAN demonstrate an overall fibrotic appearance effecting the vascular endothelium, renal tubules, interstitium, and glomerulus. The risk factors for CAN are divided into alloimmune and alloimmune independent. Alloimmune dependent factors include acute cellular rejection, severity of rejection, subclinical rejection and HLA mismatch. Alloimmune independent factors such as delayed graft function, donor age, Cytomegalovirus infection, donor/recipient co-morbidity and of course calcineurin inhibitor toxicity are important in the development of CAN. The pathogenesis of CAN is complex, multifactorial, and unfortunately incompletely understood. There are a number of pivotal steps in the initiation and propagation of the fibrosis seen in biopsy specimens from kidneys with CAN. Endothelial activation in response to one or more of the aforementioned risk factors stimulates leukocyte activation and recruitment. Recruited leukocytes subsequently infiltrate through the endothelium and induce key effector cells to secrete excessive and abnormal extracellular matrix (ECM). Enhanced deposition of ECM is a histological hallmark of CAN. This paper aims to present a concise yet accurate and up-to-date review of the literature concerning the aetiological factors and pathological processes which are present in the generation of CAN.

Assessing relative risks of infection and rejection: a meta-analysis using an immune function assay

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of immunosuppressants is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. A simple whole blood assay that has U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance directly assesses the net state of immune function of allograft recipients for better individualization of therapy. A meta-analysis of 504 solid organ transplant recipients (heart, kidney, kidney-pancreas, liver and small bowel) from 10 U.S. centers was performed using the Cylex ImmuKnow assay.

METHODS

Blood samples were taken from recipients at various times posttransplant and compared with clinical course (stable, rejection, infection). In this analysis, 39 biopsy-proven cellular rejections and 66 diagnosed infections occurred. Odds ratios of infection or rejection were calculated based on measured immune response values.

RESULTS

A recipient with an immune response value of 25 ng/ml adenosine triphosphate (ATP) was 12 times (95% confidence of 4 to 36) more likely to develop an infection than a recipient with a stronger immune response. Similarly, a recipient with an immune response of 700 ng/ml ATP was 30 times (95% confidence of 8 to 112) more likely to develop a cellular rejection than a recipient with a lower immune response value. Of note is the intersection of odds ratio curves for infection and rejection in the moderate immune response zone (280 ng/ml ATP). This intersection of risk curves provides an immunological target of immune function for solid organ recipients.

CONCLUSION

These data show that the Cylex ImmuKnow assay has a high negative predictive value and provides a target immunological response zone for minimizing risk and managing patients to stability.

Paired kidney analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion-based therapy in Chinese cadaveric renal transplant recipients

Few studies used paired kidneys for comparison between tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplantation. Most of the published data used whole blood trough levels for drug monitoring. However, the use of limited sampling strategy and abbreviated formula to estimate the 12-h area under concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12)) allowed better prediction of drug exposure. Sixty-six first cadaveric renal transplant recipients receiving paired kidneys were randomized to receive either tacrolimus-based (n = 33) or cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral)-based therapies (n = 33). Abbreviated AUC(0-12) was used for drug monitoring and dose titration. Mean follow-up duration was 2.8 +/- 2 years. The patient and graft survival were comparable. Fewer incidence of acute rejection was observed in tacrolimus group (15% vs. 27.3%) though the difference was not significant (P = 0.23). The absolute value and the rate of decline of creatinine clearance were both significantly better in tacrolimus-treated patients. Prevalence of hypertension, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, infection, and malignancy were similar in both groups. Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (11/33 vs. 4/33) and gum hypertrophy (6/33 vs. 1/33) was more common in cyclosporine-treated patients (P = 0.04 in both parameters). This was the first prospective, randomized study with paired kidney analysis showing the renal function was significantly better in tacrolimus-treated patients than in cyclosporine-treated patients.

The significance of subclinical rejection and the value of protocol biopsies

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is diagnosed by protocol histology with a maximal prevalence occurring early after transplantation, falling to low levels by 1 year. Needle-core biopsy is safe, and the histology obtained fairly reflects subclinical immune activity. Several studies have consistently shown that SCR is associated with chronic tubulointerstitial damage, subsequent renal dysfunction and reduced graft survival. SCR is effectively treated by pulse corticosteroid therapy, although increased baseline immunosuppression may be necessary. A single randomized clinical trial of biopsy and corticosteroid therapy demonstrated significantly improved early structural and functional outcomes, and a (nonsignificant) 17% risk reduction in 4-year graft survival. Three possible approaches include: no protocol biopsies (usually accompanied by powerful immunosuppression); biopsies only in high-risk recipients (who may be difficult to reliably predict) or universal screening protocol biopsy (comprehensive but limited by cost and resource utilization). The appropriate screening methodology for a transplant unit is both a clinical and an economic decision; influenced by the SCR prevalence and potential gains of treatment, against costs and resource utilization. Further trials to quantify the cost-benefit balance in a typical, heterogeneous recipient population using modern immunosuppression are required.

Preservation of Renal Function and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

An update is given about some factors leading to loss of renal allograft, especially in relation to the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporine. We discuss both immunological, such as suboptimal immunosuppression, acute rejection, and noncompliance, as well as nonimmunological factor's such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic toxic effects of immunosuppressants, older donors, and delayed graft function.

Treatment of subclinical rejection diagnosed by protocol biopsy of kidney transplants

BACKGROUND

Subclinical rejection (SCR) causes chronic allograft damage, which may be prevented by antirejection therapy.

METHODS

A pilot study of the effect of routine treatment of SCR was performed in 88 recipients of either a kidney (n=59) or combined kidney-pancreas transplant (n=29) undergoing protocol biopsy (PBX) surveillance at 1 and 3 months, using calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroid therapy.

RESULTS

SCR was seen in 46.6% (41/88 patients), as 30 borderline and 11 acute SCR. From 279 transplant biopsies, the prevalence of SCR was 25% (22/88) at 1 month, 10.2% (9/88) at 3 months, and 8.3% (2/24) at 12 months PBX. Treatment included bolus intravenous or oral corticosteroids (n=20) and augmented immunosuppression, either by conversion to tacrolimus (n=6) or increased doses of maintenance therapy (n=14), whereas OKT3 was used in one case of subclinical vascular rejection. Borderline episodes were not treated in 12 patients. In biopsies taken to assess therapeutic response, persistent SCR was present in 46.1% (6/13). Treatment of SCR at 1 month was followed by lower acute Banff sum scores at 3 months PBX (P<0.01-0.0001). Early chronic damage was already present in the 1 month PBX, associated with SCR (P<0.0005 versus without SCR), although by 3 months these differences were lost. Rates of opportunistic infections and BK nephropathy were not increased by SCR treatment.

CONCLUSION

Early chronic allograft damage was associated with SCR and therapy appeared to ameliorate further immune-mediated injury, although the efficacy of corticosteroids alone may be inadequate. A controlled trial of therapy for SCR is warranted.

Acute Rejection Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Steroid-Avoidance Immunosuppression Receiving Induction With Either Antithymocyte Globulin or Basiliximab

Immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids, usually with induction therapy, is safe in kidney transplant recipients. In 89 patients, we induced immunosuppression with basiliximab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (17 and 72 patients, respectively). Selection criteria for basiliximab were age (>or=65 years), history (malignancy; chronic infection), and type 1 diabetes mellitus (eligible for pancreas transplant). Steroids were administered through posttransplantation day 4 (five doses); maintenance immunosuppression was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. At last follow-up (average, 286 days), most patients were steroid-free (antithymocyte globulin, 90%; basiliximab, 88%). Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 4, and 12 months posttransplantation. The overall risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 12%. At 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection-free survival was 93% for antithymocyte globulin, 65% for basiliximab (P<.001). Median time to biopsy-proven acute rejection was 27 and 71 days, respectively. The low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with steroid-avoidance immunosuppression may be further reduced with antithymocyte globulin.

Chronic allograft nephropathy: current concepts and future directions

The paradigm that chronic rejection causes all progressive late allograft failure has been replaced by a hypothesis of cumulative damage, where a series of time-dependent immune and nonimmune mechanisms injure the kidney and lead to chronic interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, representing a final common pathway of injury and its consequent fibrotic healing response. Allograft damage is common, progressive, time-dependent, clinically important and modified by immunosuppression. Early after transplantation, tubulointerstitial damage is predominantly related to ischemia reperfusion injury, acute tubular necrosis, acute and subclinical rejection and/or calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, superimposed on preexisting donor disease. Later, cellular inflammation lessens and is replaced by microvascular and glomerular injury from calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, hypertension, immune-mediated fibrointimal vascular hyperplasia, transplant glomerulopathy and capillary injury, polyoma virus and/or recurrent glomerulonephritis. Additional mechanisms of injury include internal architectural disruption of the kidney, cortical ischemia, persistent chronic inflammation, replicative senescence, cytokine excess and fibrosis induced by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Current understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology and evolution of pathological changes are detailed. An approach to histological assessment of the individual failing graft are presented and a series of postulates are defined for future studies of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Subclinical rejection associated with chronic allograft nephropathy in protocol biopsies as a risk factor for late graft loss

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies is associated with graft loss while the association between subclinical rejection (SCR) and outcome has yielded contradictory results. We analyze the predictive value of SCR and/or CAN in protocol biopsies on death-censored graft survival. Since 1988, a protocol biopsy was done during the first 6 months in stable grafts with serum creatinine <300 micromol/L and proteinuria <1 g/day. Biopsies were evaluated according to Banff criteria. Borderline changes and acute rejection were grouped as SCR. CAN was defined as presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Mean follow-up was 91 +/- 46 months. Sufficient tissue was obtained in 435 transplants. Biopsies were classified as normal (n = 186), SCR (n = 74), CAN (n = 110) and SCR with CAN (n = 65). Presence of SCR with CAN was associated with old donors, percentage of panel reactive antibodies and presence of acute rejection before protocol biopsy. Cox regression analysis showed that SCR with CAN (relative risk [RR]: 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-3.12; p = 0.02) and hepatitis C virus (RR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.38-3.75; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of graft survival. In protocol biopsies, the detrimental effect of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy on long-term graft survival is modulated by SCR.

Longitudinal analysis of chronic allograft nephropathy: clinicopathologic correlations

BACKGROUND

Loss of the allograft from chronic allograft nephropathy and death of the patient from vascular, malignant, or infective disease are the major problems in renal transplantation today. Protocol biopsy of the long-term kidney has provided new data with which to develop strategies for prevention and treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy.

METHODS

Two series of long-term protocol biopsies are reviewed. In the first, renal biopsies were obtained at time 0, and at 3 months and 12 months, and the recipients of the renal allografts were followed up for up to 15 years. In the second, the kidneys of recipients of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants were biopsied annually for 10 years, and the results correlated with clinical events.

RESULTS

Chronic allograft nephropathy is caused by acute and chronic immune-mediated damage, as well as by chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Both immune and nonimmune mechanisms exacerbate pre-existing donor disease and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Established interstitial fibrosis and arteriolar hyalinosis lead to progressive glomerular sclerosis and eventual loss of the graft.

CONCLUSION

Protocol biopsies have shown that clinical parameters of renal function underestimate the severity of chronic graft damage. Strategies for preventing or treating chronic renal allograft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss must better control rejection and simultaneously avoid nephrotoxicity.

Immunosuppressive treatment and progression of histologic lesions in kidney allografts

Renal transplantation is the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although short-term results are excellent, long-term graft survival has not improved substantially in recent times. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and death with a functioning graft are the most important causes of graft loss. Recent evidence shows that nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors contributes to CAN, and the introduction of non-nephrotoxic drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may provide new immunosuppressive strategies to improve long-term results after renal transplantation. MMF decreases the risk of developing chronic allograft failure and is useful for treating established CAN, because it has a beneficial effect on allograft fibrosis. Treatment with sirolimus (SRL), a basic immunosuppressive drug given in association with MMF, may offer better renal function, decrease the prevalence of CAN, and downregulate expression of genes responsible for the progression of CAN than treatment with cyclosporine A (CsA). SRL also permits an early elimination of CsA from SRL-CsA-steroid regimens and shows better renal function and improved renal histology without risk of rejection. Notably, this approach improves graft survival at 4 years. Further multicenter studies are needed to determine whether both approaches produce similar results by comparing immunosuppression caused by SRL-based and tacrolimus (TAC)-based treatments. Because TAC is the most commonly used anticalcineurin drug, it is important to compare the effects of steroid-TAC-SRL treatment with and without elimination of TAC. Finally, although caution is needed, the use of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive treatment may change the natural history of CAN.

Ten Years of Treatment With Tacrolimus Is Related to an Excellent Renal Function, Allowing Monotherapy in a Large Proportion of Cases: Unicentric Results of the Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine A European Multicentric Study in Kidney Transplant Patients

Tacrolimus (Tac) is the most frequently used base inmunosuppressant for transplantation in Spain and the United States. However, long-term data on its use in renal transplant patients are lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze the 10-year outcome of patients from our institution treated with Tac or cyclosporine (CsA) who were included in the European Multicenter Study of kidney transplantation (1993 to 1994). This trial compared the efficacy and safety of steroids + Tac + azathioprine versus steroids + CsA + azathioprine at 1 year, showing a significantly lower acute rejection rate in Tac patients, with no differences in graft or patient survival. In our long-term analysis, we included patients with a functioning graft after the first year: 15 patients on Tac and 11 on CsA. In the "intent-to-treat" (ITT) analysis, patient survival was 14/15 (93%) versus 9/11 (82%) and death noncensored graft survival was 10/15 (67%) versus 8/11 (73%) in Tac and CsA, respectively. Analyzing patients "into treatment" (TT), death/noncensored graft survival was 11/16 (69%) versus 6/9 (67%), respectively. Serum creatinine tended to be lower in Tac group (ITT 1.26 +/- 0.42 vs 1.63 +/- 1.16 mg/dL, P = NS; TT 1.23 +/- 0.4 vs 1.86 +/- 1.28 mg/dL, P = NS). However, in the TT analysis, Tac patients exhibited a significantly better creatinine clearance (89.3 +/- 40 vs 46.8 +/- 21 mL/min, P = .037) and lower systolic blood pressure (125 +/- 5 vs 140 +/- 12 mm Hg, P = .007) at 10 years. No other significant differences were observed in blood pressure, lipid profile, or glucose metabolism. Outstandingly, Tac monotherapy was the most frequently used regimen after 10 years: ITT 6/9 (67%) versus 1/8 (12.5%), P = .05, TT 7/10 (70%) versus 0/6 (0%), P = .011. Patients under Tac monotherapy exhibited an excellent graft function (serum creatinine 1.08 +/- 0.14 mg/dL) and negative proteinuria, with Tac trough levels of 7.9 +/- 1.3 ng/mL. In summary, our results suggest that Tac-based immunosuppression provides an excellent kidney function 10 years after transplantation and allows monotherapy in a high percentage of kidney transplant patients.

Chronic allograft nephropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic allograft nephropathy is the major cause of late renal allograft loss. This disease is heterogeneous and the diagnosis is nonspecific, with both immune and nonimmune causes. Increasingly, we are able to recognize specific contributors to the disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Further understanding of chronic allograft nephropathy comes from a large study detailing the natural history of the disease, from protocol biopsies revealing subclinical cellular rejection, and from studies using C4d staining to distinguish antibody-mediated chronic rejection from nonspecific causes. Also made more clear are nonimmune mechanisms of chronic allograft nephropathy, such as the effect of decreased dosing of calcineurin inhibitors, and the concept of senescence as a mechanism of the disease.

SUMMARY

Chronic allograft nephropathy is a heterogeneous disease with immune and nonimmune causes. Some features recognizable by histology and detected by other laboratory tests can help to categorize specific causes of the disease in particular cases. In addition, recent studies have contributed to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of the disease. In order to advance our understanding, we must be able to distinguish the various recognizable causes of chronic allograft dysfunction. Further research is warranted on the subset of the disease with indeterminate cause.

Costimulation blockade with belatacept in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is the standard of care for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although maintenance immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors yields excellent one-year survival, it is associated over the long term with high rates of death and graft loss, owing in part to the adverse renal, cardiovascular, and metabolic effects of these agents. The use of potentially less toxic agents, such as belatacept, a selective blocker of T-cell activation, may improve outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly assigned renal-transplant recipients to receive an intensive or a less-intensive regimen of belatacept or cyclosporine. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. The primary objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of belatacept over cyclosporine in the incidence of acute rejection at six months (with an upper bound of the 95 percent confidence interval around the treatment difference of less than 20 percent).

RESULTS

At six months, the incidence of acute rejection was similar among the groups: 7 percent for intensive belatacept, 6 percent for less-intensive belatacept, and 8 percent for cyclosporine. At 12 months, the glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher with both intensive and less-intensive belatacept than it was with cyclosporine (66.3, 62.1, and 53.5 ml per minute per 1.73 m2, respectively), and chronic allograft nephropathy was less common with both regimens of belatacept than with cyclosporine (29 percent, 20 percent, and 44 percent, respectively). Lipid levels and blood-pressure values were similar or slightly lower in the belatacept groups, despite the greater use of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications in the cyclosporine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept, an investigational selective costimulation blocker, did not appear to be inferior to cyclosporine as a means of preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation. Belatacept may preserve the glomerular filtration rate and reduce the rate of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Pre-transplant IFN-gamma ELISPOTs are associated with post-transplant renal function in African American renal transplant recipients

Final crossmatch testing is routinely used to assess the risk of antibody-mediated graft injury/rejection post-transplant. Analogously, we postulated that quantitative measurements of anti-donor effector/memory T cells pre-transplant would independently assess post-transplant risk. To address this hypothesis, we determined the frequencies of pre-transplant, donor-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spots (ELISPOTs) and correlated the results with post-transplant outcomes in 37 African American recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants treated with tacrolimus- and sirolimus-based immunosuppression. A positive ELISPOT test (>25 spots/300,000 cells) was detected in 14 (38%) of 37 patients. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 50% (7/14) in ELISPOT-positive versus 17% (4/23) in ELISPOT-negative patients (p=0.036). Calculated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD) at 12 months was 37+/-16 mL/min in ELISPOT-positive versus 55+/-20 mL/min in ELISPOT-negative patients (p=0.01). ELISPOT status remained a correlate of allograft function at 12 months by linear regression analysis (p=0.001), independent of rejection and other contributing variables. Pre-transplant donor-directed IFN-gamma ELISPOT assessment of anti-donor cellular immunity may function as a 'cellular crossmatch' and independently correlates with renal allograft function in African Americans receiving tacrolimus- and sirolimus-based immunosuppression.