151
|
Jinhuan Y, Yi W, Yuanwen Z, Delin M, Xiaotian C, Yan W, Liming D, Haitao Y, Lijun W, Tuo D, Kaiyu C, Jiawei H, Chongming Z, Daojie W, Bin J, Gang C. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Early-Stage Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Mastering the Learning Curve: A Multicenter Data-Based Matched Study. Front Oncol 2022; 11:742544. [PMID: 35070961 PMCID: PMC8777042 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.742544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is the only widely accepted curative method for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, little is known about the efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection for ICC, especially in patients with early-stage disease. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term effects of laparoscopy and open surgery for the treatment of ICC. METHODS Data from 1,084 patients treated at three hospitals from January 2011 to December 2018 were selected and analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the long-term outcomes (overall survival and recurrence-free survival) and short-term outcomes (perioperative outcomes) of all-stage and early-stage patients. RESULTS After matching, 244 patients (122 vs. 122) in the all-stage group and 65 patients (27 vs. 38) in the early-stage group were included. The baseline of the two groups was balanced, and no significant differences were found in sex or age. The short-term results of the laparoscopic group were better than those of the open group, including less blood loss [blood loss ≥400 ml 27 (22.1%) vs. 6 (4.92%), p<0.001 for all-stage, 12 (31.6%) vs. 2 (7.41%), p=0.042 for early stage), shorter surgery [200 (141; 249) min vs. 125 (115; 222) min, p=0.025 for early stage] and shorter hospital stay [11.0 (9.00; 16.0) days vs. 9.00 (7.00; 12.0) days, p=0.001 for all stage, 11.0 (8.50; 17.8) days vs. 9.00 (6.50; 11.0) days, p=0.011 for early stage]. Regarding long-term outcomes, no significant differences were found for all-stage patients, while there were significant differences observed for the early-stage group (p=0.013 for OS, p=0.014 for RFS). For the early-stage patients, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of the OLR group were 84.2, 65.8, and 41.1%, respectively, and those of the LLR group were 100, 90.9, and 90.9%, respectively. The RFS rates of the OLR group were 84.2, 66.7, and 41.7%, respectively, and those of the LLR group were and 92.3, 92.3, and 92.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients treated with laparoscopy seemed to have better short-term outcomes, such as less blood loss, shorter operation duration, and shorter hospital stay, than patients undergoing open surgery. Based on the long-term results, laparoscopic treatment for early ICC may have certain advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Jinhuan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wang Yi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zheng Yuanwen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Ma Delin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Chen Xiaotian
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wang Yan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Deng Liming
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yu Haitao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wu Lijun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Deng Tuo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Chen Kaiyu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Hu Jiawei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zheng Chongming
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wang Daojie
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Jin Bin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Chen Gang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Barba GL, Solaini L, Radi G, Mirarchi MT, D'Acapito F, Gardini A, Cucchetti A, Ercolani G. First 100 minimally invasive liver resections in a new tertiary referral centre for liver surgery. J Minim Access Surg 2022; 18:51-57. [PMID: 35017393 PMCID: PMC8830570 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_310_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the last decades, there has been an exponential diffusion of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate our initial experience of 100 patients undergoing MILS resection comparing their outcomes with the standard open procedures. Materials and Methods One hundred consecutive MILS from 2016 to 2019 were included. Clinicopathological data were reviewed to evaluate outcomes. Standard open resections were used as the control group and compared exploiting propensity score matching. Results In total, 290 patients were included. The rate of MILS has been constantly increasing throughout years, representing the 48% in 2019. Of 100 (34.5%) MILS patients, 85 could be matched. After matching, the MILS conversion rate was 5.8% (n = 5). The post-operative complication rates were higher in the open group (45.9% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.004). Post-operative blood transfusions were less common in the MILS group (4.7% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.021). Biliary leak occurred in 2 (2.4) MILS versus 13 (15.3) open. The median comprehensive complication index was higher in the open group (8.7 [0-28.6] vs. 0 [0-10.4], P = 0.0009). The post-operative length of hospital stay was shorter after MILS (median 6 [5-8] vs 8 [7-13] days, P < 0.0001). Conclusions The rate of MILS has been significantly increasing throughout the years. The benefits of MILS over the traditional open approach were confirmed. The main advantages include lower rates of post-operative complications, blood transfusions, bile leaks and a significantly decreased hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliano La Barba
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgia Radi
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio D'Acapito
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Andrea Gardini
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Colasanti M, Berardi G, Mariano G, Ferretti S, Meniconi RL, Guglielmo N, Ettorre GM. Laparoscopic Left Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2984. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11275-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
154
|
Wu TH, Wang YC, Hung HC, Lee JC, Wu CY, Cheng CH, Lee CF, Wu TJ, Chou HS, Chan KM, Lee WC. Preferred Treatment with Curative Intent for Left Lateral Segment Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma under the Era of Minimal Invasive Surgery. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12010079. [PMID: 35055394 PMCID: PMC8779404 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurring at the left lateral segment (LLS) is relatively susceptible to treatment with curative intent in terms of tumor location. However, outcomes might vary depending on the selection of treatment modalities. This study aimed to analyze patients who had undergone curative treatment for early HCC at LLS. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 179 patients who underwent curative treatment for early HCC at LLS was performed. Patients were grouped based on treatment modalities, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liver resection (LR). The long-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. Additionally, the impact of the LR approach on patient outcomes was analyzed. Results: Among these patients, 60 received RFA and 119 underwent LR as primary treatment with curative intent. During follow-up, a significantly higher incidence of HCC recurrence was observed in the RFA group (37/60, 61.7%) than in the LR group (45/119, 37.8%) (p = 0.0025). The median time of HCC recurrence was 10.8 (range: 1.1–60.9 months) and 17.6 (range: 2.4–94.8 months) months in the RFA and LR groups, respectively. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that liver cirrhosis, multiple tumors, and RFA treatment were significant risk factors for HCC recurrence. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival rates in the RFA and LR groups were 96.4%, 92.2%, and 71.5% versus 97.3%, 93.6%, and 87.7%, respectively. (p = 0.047). Moreover, outcomes related to LR were comparable between laparoscopic and conventional open methods. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year recurrence free survival rates in the laparoscopic (n = 37) and conventional open (n = 82) LR groups were 94.1%, 82.0%, and 66.9% versus 86.1%, 74.6%, and 53.1%, respectively. (p = 0.506) Conclusion: Early HCC at LLS had satisfactory outcomes after curative treatment, in which LR seems to have a superior outcome, as compared to RFA treatment. Moreover, laparoscopic LR could be considered a preferential option in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Han Wu
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Yu-Chao Wang
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Hao-Chien Hung
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Jin-Chiao Lee
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Chia-Ying Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan;
| | - Chih-Hsien Cheng
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Chen-Fang Lee
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Ting-Jung Wu
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Hong-Shiue Chou
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| | - Kun-Ming Chan
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-3-3281200 (ext. 3366); Fax: +886-3-3285818
| | - Wei-Chen Lee
- Department of General Surgery and Chang Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; (T.-H.W.); (Y.-C.W.); (H.-C.H.); (J.-C.L.); (C.-H.C.); (C.-F.L.); (T.-J.W.); (H.-S.C.); (W.-C.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Marino R, Olthof PB, Shi HJ, Tran KTC, Ijzermans JNM, Terkivatan T. Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery: A Snapshot from a Major Dutch HPB and Transplant Center. World J Surg 2022; 46:3090-3099. [PMID: 36161353 PMCID: PMC9636118 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06754-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has been progressively adopted on a nationwide scale. The aim of this study is to investigate MILS implementation in a high-volume Dutch hepato-pancreato-biliary and transplant center, which is considered a moderate to low-volume center from a European standpoint. METHODS All patients who underwent MILS at Erasmus Medical Center between April 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' surgical outcomes were compared after stratification according to resections' difficulty and liver cirrhosis. RESULTS A total of 212 cases were included. Major liver resections were performed in 24 patients (11%), while minor resections were performed in 188 patients (89%). Among those, 177 (94%) resections were classified as technically minor and 11 (6%) as technically major. Major morbidity was reported in 14/177 patients (8%) after technically minor resections and in 3/24 patients (13%) after major resections. Anatomically and technically major resections had higher intraoperative blood losses (425 (0-2100) vs. 240 (50-110) vs. 100 (0-2400) mL; p-value < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (6 (3-25) vs. 5 (2-9) vs. 3 (1-44); p-value < 0.001) when compared with the technically minor counterpart. Perioperative outcomes were similar when comparing cirrhotic MILS with the non-cirrhotic cohort. CONCLUSION MILS program implementation can lead to encouraging surgical outcomes even in low- to moderate-volume centers. Although low procedural volume might be predictive of impaired outcomes, long-standing experience in the HPB and liver transplant field could mitigate low-case volume effects on surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Marino
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy ,Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B. Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hong J. Shi
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Khe T. C. Tran
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan N. M. Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Türkan Terkivatan
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Rotellar F, Ciria R, Wakabayashi G, Suh KS, Cherqui D. World Survey on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy: A Global Snapshot of Current Practices in 2370 Cases. Transplantation 2022; 106:96-105. [PMID: 33586922 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Having little evidence on the real extent of the minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH), a world survey was conducted aiming to picture the spread of MIDH and to identify geographical, institutional, and individual differences. METHODS A web-based survey was created with 5 sections (general, institutional, surgeon's experience, technical, and spread and dissemination), comprising up to a total of 47 questions. A thorough search was carried out to identify all possible centers and surgeons performing MIDH. RESULTS A global MIDH experience of 2370 cases was collected: 1587 right hepatectomies (RHs; 48.9% pure laparoscopic), 471 left lateral sectionectomies (LLS; 81.1% pure laparoscopic), and 366 left hepatectomies (LHs; 77.6% laparoscopic-assisted). LLS and adult MIDH conversion rates were 5.4% and 3.9%, respectively. Median blood loss was 250 mL (100-600), 100 mL (50-250), and 150 mL (50-500) for RH, LLS, and LH, respectively. Intra- and postoperative transfusion rates were 0.5%, 0%, and 0.3%; and 1.3%, 1.6%, and 0% for RH, LLS, and LH, respectively. Geographically, Asia accounts up to 1730 cases (73% of the global experience, 49.6% pure lap), of which 1374 cases are RH; Europe and Middle East-395 cases-stands out for its experience in left lateral sectionectomy: 289 cases (93% pure lap). Finally, America accounts for 245 cases, using a laparoscopic-assisted technique in 72.6% of the cases (178). CONCLUSIONS This world survey provides evidence and data on the global spread of MIDH and anticipates how in a near future a large-scale adoption of these techniques may be observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- AP-HP, Hepatobiliary Center, Paul Brousse Hospital, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Conticchio M, Delvecchio A, Ratti F, Gelli M, Anelli FM, Laurent A, Vitali GC, Magistri P, Assirati G, Felli E, Wakabayashi T, Pessaux P, Piardi T, Di Benedetto F, de'Angelis N, Javier Briceno DF, Rampoldi AG, Adam R, Cherqui D, Aldrighetti L, Memeo R. Laparoscopic surgery versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm in the elderly: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:79-86. [PMID: 34167892 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represented potential treatments for patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 3 cm. As the aging population soared, our study aimed to examine the advantage/drawback balance for these treatments, which should be reassessed in elderly patients. METHODS A multicentric retrospective study compared 184 elderly patients (aged >70 years) (86 patients underwent LLR and 98 had RFA) with single ≤3 cm HCC, observed from January 2009 to January 2019. RESULTS After propensity score matching (PSM), the estimated 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 96.5 and 87.9% for the LLR group, and 94.6 and 68.1% for the RFA group (p = 0.001) respectively. The estimated 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 92.5 and 67.4% for the LLR group, and 68.5 and 36.9% for the RFA group (p = 0.001). Patients with HCC of anterolateral segments were more often treated with laparoscopic resection (47 vs. 36, p = 0.04). The median operative time in the resection group was 205 min and 25 min in the RFA group (p = 0.01). Length of hospital stay was 5 days in the resection group and 3 days in the RFA group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Despite a longer length of hospital stay and operative time, LLR guarantees a comparable postoperative course and a better overall and disease-free survival in elderly patients with single HCC (≤3 cm), located in anterolateral segments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Conticchio
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Delvecchio
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Département de Chirurgie Viscérale, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - Ferdinando M Anelli
- Unit of Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery, Hospital University Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre hospitalier universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Giulio C Vitali
- Service of Abdominal Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giacomo Assirati
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre hospitalier universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | | | | | - René Adam
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hépatobiliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hépatobiliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Riccardo Memeo
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
He K, Pan Y, Wang H, Zhu J, Qiu B, Luo Y, Xia Q. Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Hepatectomy With/Without Fluorescence-Assisted Technology and Conventional Open Procedure: A Retrospective Study in Mainland China. Front Surg 2021; 8:771250. [PMID: 34966776 PMCID: PMC8710496 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.771250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The application of laparoscopy in donor liver acquisition for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become increasingly popular in the past decade. Indole cyanide green (ICG) fluorescence technique is a new adjuvant method in surgery. The purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgery in living donor left lateral hepatectomy, and to evaluate the application of ICG in laparoscopy. Methods: Donors received LDLT for left lateral lobe resection from November 2016 to November 2020 were selected and divided into pure laparoscopy donor hepatectomy (PLDH) group, fluorescence-assisted pure laparoscopy donor hepatectomy (FAPLDH) group and open donor hepatectomy (ODH) group. We compared perioperative data and prognosis of donors and recipients. Quality of life were evaluated by SF-36 questionnaires. Results: The operation time of PLDH group (169.29 ± 26.68 min) was longer than FAPLDH group (154.34 ± 18.40 min) and ODH group (146.08 ± 25.39 min, p = 0.001). The blood loss was minimum in FAPLDH group (39.48 ± 10.46 mL), compared with PLDH group (52.44 ± 18.44 mL) and ODH group (108.80 ± 36.82 mL, p=0.001). The post-operative hospital stay was longer in PLDH group (5.30 ± 0.98 days) than FAPLDH group (4.81 ± 1.03 days) and ODH group (4.64 ± 1.20 days; p = 0.001). Quality of life of donors undergoing laparoscopic surgery was better. Conclusion: Laparoscopic approaches for LDLT contribute to less blood loss, better cosmetic satisfaction. The fluorescence technique can further reduce bleeding and shorten operation time. In terms of quality of life, laparoscopic surgery is better than open surgery. Laparoscopy procedure for living-donor procurement with/without fluorescence-assist can be performed as safely as open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang He
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yixiao Pan
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianjun Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bijun Qiu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Luo
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Xia
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Hendi M, Lv J, Cai XJ. Current status of laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27826. [PMID: 34918631 PMCID: PMC8677975 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) was first introduced in the 1990s and has now become widely accepted for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is considered a safe and effective approach for liver disease. However, the role of laparoscopic hepatectomy in HCC with cirrhosis remains controversial and needs to be further assessed, and the present literature review aimed to review the surgical and oncological outcomes of Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH). According to Hong and colleagues laparoscopic resection for liver cirrhosis is a very safe and feasible procedure for both ideal cases and select patients with high risk factors [29]. The presence of only 1 of these factors does not represent an absolute contraindication for LH. METHODS AND RESULTS We selected 23 studies involving about 1363 HCC patients treated with LH. 364 (27%) patients experienced major resections. The mean operative time was 244.9 minutes, the mean blood loss was 308.1 mL and blood transfusions were required in only 4.9% of patients. There were only 2 (0.21%) postoperative deaths and overall morbidity was 9.9%. Tumor recurrence ranged from 6 to 25 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year disease free Survival (DFS) rates ranged from 71.9% to 99%, 50.3% to 91.2%, and 19% to 82% respectively. Overall survival rates ranged from 88% to 100%, 73.4% to 94.5%, and 52.6% to 94.5% respectively. CONCLUSIONS In our summery LH is lower risk and safer than conventional open liver surgery and is just as efficacious. Also, the LH approach decreased blood-loss, operation time, postoperative morbidity and had a lower conversion rate compared to other procedures whether open or robotic. Finally, LH may serve as a promising alternative to open procedures.
Collapse
|
160
|
Machado MAC, Lobo-Filho MM, Mattos BH, Ardengh AO, Makdissi FF. ROBOTIC LIVER RESECTION. REPORT OF THE FIRST 50 CASES. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2021; 58:514-519. [PMID: 34909859 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery has gained growing acceptance in recent years, expanding to liver resection. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to report the experience with our first fifty robotic liver resections. METHODS This was a single-cohort, retrospective study. From May 2018 to December 2020, 50 consecutive patients underwent robotic liver resection in a single center. All patients with indication for minimally invasive liver resection underwent robotic hepatectomy. The indication for the use of minimally invasive technique followed practical guidelines based on the second international laparoscopic liver consensus conference. RESULTS The proportion of robotic liver resection was 58.8% of all liver resections. Thirty women and 20 men with median age of 61 years underwent robotic liver resection. Forty-two patients were operated on for malignant diseases. Major liver resection was performed in 16 (32%) patients. Intrahepatic Glissonian approach was used in 28 patients for anatomical resection. In sixteen patients, the robotic liver resection was a redo hepatectomy. In 10 patients, previous liver resection was an open resection and in six it was minimally invasive resection. Simultaneous colon resection was done in three patients. One patient was converted to open resection. Two patients received blood transfusion. Four (8%) patients presented postoperative complications. No 90-day mortality was observed. CONCLUSION The use of the robot for liver surgery allowed to perform increasingly difficult procedures with similar outcomes of less difficult liver resections.
Collapse
|
161
|
Patrone R, Izzo F, Palaia R, Granata V, Nasti G, Ottaiano A, Pasta G, Belli A. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:2203-2215. [PMID: 35070052 PMCID: PMC8713325 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.2203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and is characterized by an aggressive behavior and a dismal prognosis. Radical surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment. Despite the increasing acceptance of laparoscopic liver resection for surgical treatment of malignant liver diseases, its use for ICC is not commonly performed. In fact, to achieve surgical free margins a major resection and/or vascular and/or biliary reconstructions is often needed, as well as an associated lymph node dissection.
AIM To review and summarize the current evidences on the minimally invasive resection of ICC.
METHODS A systematic review of the literature based on the criteria predetermined by the investigators was performed from the 1st of January 2009 up to the 1st of January 2021 in 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases). All retrospective and prospective studies reporting on the comparative outcomes of open vs minimally invasive treatment of ICC were included. An evaluation of manuscripts quality was achieved using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS After a systematic search 9 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the all 3012 included patients, 2450 were operated by an open approach and 562 by a minimally invasive (laparoscopic) approach. Baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes and oncological outcomes were collected and analyzed, highlighting values with a statistical significant difference between patients treated with open or laparoscopic approach. Shorter hospital stay and lower intraoperative blood losses were reported by some Authors in minimally invasive surgery, on the contrary, in the open group there was a higher number of lymphadenectomies and a higher percentage of major hepatectomies.
CONCLUSION Minimally invasive resection of ICC has some short-term benefits and it is safe and feasible only in selected centers with a high experience in laparoscopic approach for liver surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, actually, was considered mainly in patients with a tumor with a diameter < 5 cm, without invasion of main biliary duct or main vessel and no vascular or biliary reconstructions were planned. Further studies are needed to elucidate its impact on long term oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Patrone
- PhD ICTH, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80100, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Raffaele Palaia
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Nasti
- SSD-Innovative Therapies for Abdominal Metastases, Clinical and Experimental Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- SSD-Innovative Therapies for Abdominal Metastases, Clinical and Experimental Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Gilda Pasta
- Division of Anesthesia, Pain medicine and Supportive Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Giannone F, Felli E, Cherkaoui Z, Mascagni P, Pessaux P. Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246268. [PMID: 34944887 PMCID: PMC8699460 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence makes surgical resection easier and safer, and, at the same time, can improve oncological results. The robotic system fits perfectly with these more or less diffused technologies, and it seems that this benefit is mutual. In liver surgery, robotic systems help surgeons to localize tumors and improve surgical results with well-defined preoperative planning or increased intraoperative detection. Furthermore, they can balance the absence of tactile feedback and help recognize intrahepatic biliary or vascular structures during parenchymal transection. Some of these systems are well known and are already widely diffused in open and laparoscopic hepatectomies, such as indocyanine green fluorescence or ultrasound-guided resections, whereas other tools, such as Augmented Reality, are far from being standardized because of the high complexity and elevated costs. In this paper, we review all the experiences in the literature on the use of artificial intelligence systems in robotic liver resections, describing all their practical applications and their weaknesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Giannone
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Zineb Cherkaoui
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
| | - Pietro Mascagni
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-369-550-552
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Abu-Zaydeh O, Sawaied M, Berger Y, Mahamid A, Goldberg N, Sadot E, Haddad R. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Is Superior to Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Posterosuperior Segments. Front Surg 2021; 8:746427. [PMID: 34901138 PMCID: PMC8654808 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) of colorectal metastasis located in posterosuperior segments (1, 4A, 7 and 8) are challenging and highly demanding. The aim of our study is to determine the safety and feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in the resections of the posterosuperior lesions and to compare the peri-operative, short-term and long-term outcomes with the open liver resection (OLR) approach. Methods and Results: A retrospective study of patients who underwent either HALS or OLR for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver between 2008 and 2018 in two university affiliated medical centers. Results: A total of 187 patients were identified, of whom 78 underwent HALS and 109 underwent OLR. There was no difference between the HALS and OLR with regard to preoperative factors (age, primary CRC tumor location, number and anatomical distribution of liver metastasis, pre-operative neo-adjuvant treatment, operative time, blood transfusion rate, and resection margins positivity). On the other hand, HALS compared to OLR had a significantly shorter mean hospital stay (4 vs. 6 days; P = 0.003), and a lower total complications rate (25 vs. 47% P = 0.006). Both groups had no 30-day mortality. Also, patients who underwent HALS vs. OLR had similar liver metastases recurrence (55 vs. 51%. P = 0.65) and 5-year survival (47 vs. 45%. P = 0.72). Conclusions: HALS for mCRC located in posterosuperior liver segments is safe and feasible and it is a preferable approach due to its lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay while not compromising survival and disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muneer Sawaied
- Department of Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yael Berger
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ahmad Mahamid
- Department of Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.,The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Natalia Goldberg
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.,Department of Radiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Eran Sadot
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Riad Haddad
- Department of Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.,The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Owen ML, Beal EW. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Patient Selection and Special Considerations. Hepat Med 2021; 13:137-143. [PMID: 35221734 PMCID: PMC8866996 DOI: 10.2147/hmer.s319027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive primary hepatic malignancy. Unfortunately, despite advancements in diagnosis, staging and management, mortality is high. Surgery remains the only curative treatment, but many patients present with advanced, unresectable disease. For patients able to undergo surgical resection, overall survival is improved, but remains low, with high rates of disease recurrence. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, are increasingly used in surgical resection for ICC. These approaches variably demonstrate faster recovery times, less blood loss, decreased postoperative pain and fewer postoperative complications, with adequate oncologic resections. This review examines patient selection and special considerations for MIS for ICC. Patient selection is critical and includes evaluation of a patient’s anatomic and oncologic resectability, as well as comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MacKenzie L Owen
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eliza W Beal
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
- Correspondence: Eliza W Beal The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 410 W. 10th Ave, Suite 836, Columbus, OH, USATel +1 614 293-8000Fax +1 614 293-4653 Email
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Comment on "Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Preoperatively Estimate Post-hepatectomy Liver Dysfunction Risk and Long-term Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma": A "Minimally Invasive" Step Forward. Ann Surg 2021; 274:e790-e791. [PMID: 33086327 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
166
|
D'Silva M, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY. Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Gallbladder Cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:854-859. [PMID: 34842448 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In recent decades, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been gradually adopted at high-volume centers, particularly for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis. However, LLR in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a controversial issue, and there are few studies of LLR for GBC. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open liver resection for GBC. Materials and Methods: All patients admitted with stage II or III GBC requiring liver resection, together with cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with thickness of the resected liver specimen >2 cm in pathology reports were included. Results: A total of 56 patients with stage II or III GBC were included in this study; 23 (41.1%) underwent laparoscopic surgery and 33 (58.9%) underwent open surgery. Propensity score matching was performed using a 1:1 matching scheme. After matching, 12 patients were included in each group. The preoperative characteristics of both groups were similar, as were the operative times (laparoscopic versus open group: 237.5 minutes versus 272.5 minutes, respectively; P = .319) and blood loss (300 mL versus 275 mL, respectively; P = .307). The laparoscopic group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the open surgery group (4.5 days versus 8 days, respectively; P = .012). There were no major complications in either group. There was no difference between the groups in the number of lymph nodes harvested at surgery (P = .910). There were no differences between the two groups in disease-free (P = .503) or overall (P = .719) survival. Conclusion: LLR extended to GBC provides outcomes similar to those of open surgery. With increasing experience, LLR can be a viable alternative to open surgery for GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
The Applications of 3D Imaging and Indocyanine Green Dye Fluorescence in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122169. [PMID: 34943406 PMCID: PMC8700092 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resections have gained widespread popularity among hepatobiliary surgeons and is nowadays performed for both standard and more complex hepatectomies. Given the increased technical challenges, preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance is pivotal in laparoscopic surgery to safely carry out complex and oncologically safe hepatectomies. Modern tools can help both preoperatively and intraoperatively and allow surgeons to perform more precise hepatectomies. Preoperative 3D reconstructions and printing as well as augmented reality can increase the knowledge of the specific anatomy of the case and therefore plan the surgery accordingly and tailor the procedure on the patient. Furthermore, the indocyanine green retention dye is an increasingly used tool that can nowadays improve the precision during laparoscopic hepatectomies, especially when considering anatomical resection. The use of preoperative modern imaging and intraoperative indocyanine green dye are key to successfully perform complex hepatectomies such as laparoscopic parenchymal sparing liver resections. In this narrative review, we discuss the aspects of preoperative and intraoperative tools that are nowadays increasingly used in experienced hepatobiliary centers.
Collapse
|
168
|
Sucandy I, Jacoby H, Crespo K, Syblis C, App S, Ignatius J, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. A Single Institution's Experience With Robotic Minor and Major Hepatectomy. Am Surg 2021:31348211047500. [PMID: 34798777 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211047500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver resection is gradually becoming the preferred technique to treat liver tumors due its salutary benefits when compared with traditional "open" method. While robotic technology improves surgeon dexterity to better perform complex operations, outcomes of robotic hepatectomy have not been adequately studied. We therefore describe our institutional experience with robotic minor and major hepatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively study all patients undergoing robotic hepatectomy from 2016 to 2020. RESULTS A total of 220 patients underwent robotic hepatectomy. 138 (63%) were major hepatectomies while 82 (37%) were minor hepatectomies. Median age was 63 (62 ± 13) years, 118 (54%) were female. 168 patients had neoplastic disease and 52 patients had benign disease. Lesion size in patients who had undergone minor hepatectomy was 2 (3 ± 2.5) cm, compared to 5 (5 ± 3.0) cm in patients who undergone major hepatectomy (P < .001). 97% of patients underwent R0 resections while none of the patients had R2 resection. Operative duration was 226 (260 ± 122.7) vs 282 (299 ± 118.7) minutes (P ≤ .05); estimated blood loss was 100 (163 ± 259.2) vs 200 (251 ± 246.7) mL (P ≤ .05) for minor and major hepatectomy, respectively. One patient had intraoperative bleeding requiring "open" conversion. Nine (4%) patients had experienced notable postoperative complications and 2 (1%) patients died postoperatively. Length of stay was 3 (5 ± 4.6) vs 4 (5 ± 2.8) days for minor vs major hepatectomy (P = .84). Reoperation and readmission rate for minor vs major hepatectomy was 1% vs 3% (P = .65) and 9% vs 10% (P = .81), respectively. DISCUSSION Robotic major hepatectomy is safe, feasible, and efficacious with excellent postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, 4422AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Harel Jacoby
- Digestive Health Institute, 4422AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- Digestive Health Institute, 4422AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Cameron Syblis
- Digestive Health Institute, 4422AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Samantha App
- Digestive Health Institute, 4422AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joshua Ignatius
- Digestive Health Institute, 4422AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sharona Ross
- Digestive Health Institute, 4422AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
169
|
Wang X, Chen A, Fu Q, Cai C. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Lateral Hepatectomy and Open Left Lateral Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:749285. [PMID: 34869557 PMCID: PMC8635008 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.749285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones, also known as hepatolithiasis, refers to any intrahepatic stones of the left and right hepatic ducts. It is a benign biliary tract disease with a high recurrence rate, with many complications, and difficulty in radical cure. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (LLLH) and open left lateral hepatectomy (OLLH) for IHD stones. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, WangFang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the comparison of LLLH and OLLH in the treatment of hepatolithiasis. Standard mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% CI were calculated using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model according to the heterogeneity between studies. Results: From January 01, 2001 to May 30, 2021, 1,056 articles were retrieved, but only 13 articles were finally included for the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to the OLLH group, LLLH resulted in smaller surgical incision, less intraoperative blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer postoperative complications (surgical incision: SMD = -3.76, 95% CI: -5.40, -2.12; intraoperative blood loss: SMD = -0.95, 95% CI: -1.69, -0.21; length of hospital stay: SMD = -1.56, 95% CI: -2.37, -0.75; postoperative complications: OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.78). Conclusions: In the treatment of hepatolithiasis, compared with OLLH, LLLH has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, smaller incisions, less postoperative complications, shorter hospital stay, shorter time to first postoperative exhaust, and postoperative ambulation, and rapid postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoji Wang
- Department of Liver and Gallbladder Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Ai Chen
- Department of Liver and Gallbladder Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Qiurong Fu
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Chunping Cai
- Department of Liver and Gallbladder Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Yoshikawa T, Hokuto D, Yasuda S, Kamitani N, Matsuo Y, Sho M. Restrictive Pulmonary Dysfunction May Increase Blood Loss During Liver Resection. Am Surg 2021; 87:1886-1892. [PMID: 34772294 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211060425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restrictive pulmonary dysfunction (RPD) is a risk factor for perioperative complications during gastrointestinal surgery. We hypothesized that high airway pressure due to RPD results in increased intraoperative blood loss during liver surgery. Thus, we investigated the effects of RPD on perioperative outcomes for liver resection. METHODS This study included 496 patients who underwent curative liver resection at our hospital between April 2009 and April 2020. Perioperative outcomes for the RPD and control groups were compared. Restrictive pulmonary dysfunction was defined as % vital capacity <80%. RESULTS Forty-one patients (8.3%) had RPD. No significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood losses (440 mL vs 320 mL, P = .340), overall complication rates (29.3% vs 31.2%, P = .797), or pulmonary complication rates (4.9% vs 9.0%, P = .286) between the RPD and control groups. In the 256 patients who underwent anatomical liver resection, 18 patients (7.0%) had RPD. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the RPD group (925 mL vs 456 mL, P = .013), but no differences in the overall complication rates (44.4% vs 37.3%, P = .528) or pulmonary complication rates (11.1% vs 10.5%, P = .589) between the two groups were detected. A multivariate analysis showed that RPD was an independent risk factor for intraoperative blood loss ≥500 mL during anatomical liver resection (odds ratio 4.132; 95% confidence interval 1.135-15.045; P = .031). DISCUSSION Restrictive pulmonary dysfunction may be a risk factor for intraoperative blood loss during anatomical liver resection, which requires exposure of the main hepatic vein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daisuke Hokuto
- Department of Surgery, 12967Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, 12967Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Naoki Kamitani
- Department of Surgery, 12967Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Yasuko Matsuo
- Department of Surgery, 12967Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, 12967Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn NL, Wu E, Lin JD, Zhao JJ, Tan AYH, Hui Y, Kam JH, Goh BKP. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 109:21-29. [PMID: 34757385 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The exact role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying liver cirrhosis (LC) is not well defined. In this meta-analysis, both long- and short-term outcomes following LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) were analysed. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched systematically for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies reporting outcomes of LLR versus OLR of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). This was analysed using one-stage (individual participant data meta-analysis) and two-stage (aggregate data meta-analysis) approaches. Secondary outcomes were operation duration, blood loss, blood transfusion, Pringle manoeuvre utilization, overall and major complications, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 90-day mortality and R0 resection rates. RESULTS Eleven studies comprising 1618 patients (690 LLR versus 928 OLR) were included for analysis. In the one-stage meta-analysis, an approximately 18.7 per cent lower hazard rate (HR) of death in the LLR group (random effects: HR 0.81, 95 per cent confidence interval [C.I.] 0.68 to 0.96; P = 0.018) was observed. Two-stage meta-analysis resulted in a pooled HR of 0.84 (95 per cent C.I. 0.74 to 0.96; P = 0.01) in the overall LLR cohort. This indicated a 16-26 per cent reduction in the HR of death for patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent LLR. For secondary outcomes, LLR was associated with less blood loss (mean difference [MD] -99 ml, 95 per cent C.I. -182 to -16 ml), reduced overall complications (odds ratio 0.49, 95 per cent C.I. 0.37 to 0.66) and major complications (odds ratio 0.45, 95 per cent C.I. 0.26 to 0.79), and shorter LOHS (MD -3.22 days, 95 per cent C.I. -4.38 to -2.06 days). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic resection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis is associated with improved survival and perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tousif Kabir
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Zoe Z Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Eric Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | | | | | - Alvin Y H Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yong Hui
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Juinn H Kam
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Chiow AKH, Fuks D, Choi GH, Syn N, Sucandy I, Marino MV, Prieto M, Chong CC, Lee JH, Efanov M, Kingham TP, Choi SH, Sutcliffe RP, Troisi RI, Pratschke J, Cheung TT, Wang X, Liu R, D'Hondt M, Chan CY, Tang CN, Han HS, Goh BKP. International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1513-1520. [PMID: 34750608 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) is a technically challenging procedure. This study was designed to determine outcomes following robotic RPS (R-RPS) and laparoscopic RPS (L-RPS). METHODS An international multicentre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing R-RPS versus those who had purely L-RPS at 21 centres from 2010 to 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analysed retrospectively from a central database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, with analysis of 1 : 2 and 1 : 1 matched cohorts. RESULTS Three-hundred and forty patients, including 96 who underwent R-RPS and 244 who had L-RPS, met the study criteria and were included. The median operating time was 295 minutes and there were 25 (7.4 per cent) open conversions. Ninety-seven (28.5 per cent) patients had cirrhosis and 56 (16.5 per cent) patients required blood transfusion. Overall postoperative morbidity rate was 22.1 per cent and major morbidity rate was 6.8 per cent. The median postoperative stay was 6 days. After 1 : 1 matching of 88 R-RPS and L-RPS patients, median (i.q.r.) blood loss (200 (100-400) versus 450 (200-900) ml, respectively; P < 0.001), major blood loss (> 500 ml; P = 0.001), need for intraoperative blood transfusion (10.2 versus 23.9 per cent, respectively; P = 0.014), and open conversion rate (2.3 versus 11.4 per cent, respectively; P = 0.016) were lower in the R-RPS group. Similar results were found in the 1 : 2 matched groups (66 R-RPS versus 132 L-RPS patients). CONCLUSION R-RPS and L-RPS can be performed in expert centres with good outcomes in well selected patients. R-RPS was associated with reduced blood loss and lower open conversion rates than L-RPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy and Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Charing C Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Walter SD, Rychtář J, Taylor D, Balakrishnan N. Estimation of standard deviations and inverse-variance weights from an observed range. Stat Med 2021; 41:242-257. [PMID: 34747027 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
A variety of methods have been proposed to estimate a standard deviation, when only a sample range has been observed or reported. This problem occurs in the interpretation of individual clinical studies that are incompletely reported, and also in their incorporation into meta-analyses. The methods differ with respect to their focus being either on the standard deviation in the underlying population or on the particular sample in hand, a distinction that has not been widely recognized. In this article, we contrast and compare various estimators of these two quantities with respect to bias and mean squared error, for normally distributed data. We show that unbiased estimators are available for either quantity, and recommend our preferred methods. We also propose a Taylor series method to obtain inverse-variance weights, for samples where only the sample range is available; this method yields very little bias, even for quite small samples. In contrast, the naïve approach of simply taking the inverse of an estimated variance is shown to be substantially biased, and can place unduly large weight on small samples, such as small clinical trials in a meta-analysis. Accordingly, this naïve (but commonly used) method is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen D Walter
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Rychtář
- Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Dewey Taylor
- Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
174
|
Peng Y, Liu F, Xu H, Guo S, Wei Y, Li B. Does laparoscopic hepatectomy offer benefits for patients with COPD? A propensity score analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1708-1715. [PMID: 33975796 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, it remains unclear whether laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is safe and feasible for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus, we compared the perioperative outcomes of LH versus open hepatectomy (OH) in this special cohort of patients. METHODS Between February 2014 and October 2020, 162 patients who underwent hepatectomy met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study. Perioperative data were compared between the two groups by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS After PSM, 55 patients with well-balanced baseline data were included in each group. Intraoperative blood loss, overall postoperative complications, and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) were significantly lower in the LH group than in the OH group (P < 0.001, P = 0.047, and P = 0.020 after PSM, respectively). However, major complications, early readmission, and early mortality were comparable between the two groups. According to multivariate analysis, high stage of COPD, preoperative tobacco use, and long operative time were independent risk factors for PPCs, whereas treatment with LH was a protective factor. CONCLUSION LH is safe and feasible for selected patients with COPD when performed by experienced surgeons, and it has superior perioperative outcomes (especially regarding PPCs) when compared to OH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufu Peng
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hongwei Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Suqi Guo
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Goh BK, Wang Z, Koh YX, Lim KI. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection
in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2021. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The introduction of laparoscopic surgery has changed abdominal surgery. We evaluated
the evolution and changing trends associated with adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and
the experience of a surgeon without prior LLR experience.
Methods: A retrospective review of 310 patients who underwent LLR performed by a single surgeon
from 2011 to 2020 was conducted. Exclusion criteria were patients who underwent laparoscopic liver
surgeries such as excision biopsy, local ablation, drainage of abscesses and deroofing of liver cysts.
There were 300 cases and the cohort was divided into 5 groups of 60 patients.
Results: There were 288 patients who underwent a totally minimally invasive approach, including
28 robotic-assisted procedures. Open conversion occurred for 13 (4.3%) patients; the conversion rate
decreased significantly from 10% in the initial period to 3.3% subsequently. There were 83 (27.7%)
major resections and 131 (43.7%) resections were performed for tumours in the difficult
posterosuperior location. There were 152 (50.7%) patients with previous abdominal surgery, including
52 (17.3%) repeat liver resections for recurrent tumours, and 60 patients had other concomitant
operations. According to the Iwate criteria, 135 (44.7%) were graded as high/expert difficulty. Major
morbidity (>grade 3a) occurred in 12 (4.0%) patients and there was no 30-day mortality. Comparison
across the 5 patient groups demonstrated a significant trend towards older patients, higher American
Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, increasing frequency of LLR with previous abdominal
surgery, increasing frequency of portal hypertension and huge tumours, decreasing blood loss and
decreasing transfusion rate across the study period. Surgeon experience (≤60 cases) and Institut
Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) high grade resections were independent predictors of open conversion.
Open conversion was associated with worse perioperative outcomes such as increased blood loss,
transfusion rate, morbidity and length of stay.
Conclusion: LLR can be safely adopted for resections of all difficulty grades, including major resections
and for tumours located in the difficult posterosuperior segments, with a low open conversion rate.
Keywords: Laparoscopic hepatectomy, laparoscopic liver resection, robotic hepatectomy, robotic liver
resection, Singapore
Collapse
|
176
|
Haney CM, Studier-Fischer A, Probst P, Fan C, Müller PC, Golriz M, Diener MK, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP, Mehrabi A, Nickel F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1467-1481. [PMID: 33820689 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been based on non-randomized studies and reviews of these. Aim of this study was to evaluate if the randomized evidence comparing LLR to open liver resection (OLR) supports these findings. METHODS A prospectively registered (reviewregistry866) systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines comparing LLR to OLR for benign and malignant diseases was performed via Medline, Web of Science, CENTRAL up to 31.12.2020. The main outcome was postoperative complications. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0, certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS The search yielded 2080 results. 13 RCTs assessing mostly minor liver resections with 1457 patients were included. There were reduced odds of experiencing any complication (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0·42 [0·30, 0·58]) and severe complications (OR[CI]: 0·51 [0·31, 0·84]) for patients undergoing LLR. LOS was shorter (Mean difference (MD) [CI]: -2·90 [-3·88, -1·92] days), blood loss was lower (MD: [CI]: -115·41 [-146·08, -84·75] ml), and functional recovery was better for LLR. All other outcomes showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS LLR shows significant postoperative benefits. RCTs assessing long-term outcomes and major resections are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelán M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Studier-Fischer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Study Center of the German Surgical Society, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolyn Fan
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Dogeas E, Tohme S, Geller DA. Laparoscopic liver resection: Global diffusion and learning curve. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2021; 50:736-738. [PMID: 34755166 DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Epameinondas Dogeas
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
178
|
The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection utilising a difficulty score. Radiol Oncol 2021; 56:111-118. [PMID: 34492748 PMCID: PMC8884855 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of a single surgeon. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of liver resections was conducted. 171 patients undergoing pure LLRs between April 2008 and April 2021 were analysed. The Halls difficulty score (HDS) for theoretical predictions of intraoperative complications (IOC) during LLR was applied. IOC was defined as blood loss over 775 mL, unintentional damage to the surrounding structures, and conversion to an open approach. Theoretical association between HDS and the predicted probability of IOC was utilised to objectify the shape of the learning curve. RESULTS The obtained learning curve has resulted from thirteen years of surgical effort of a single surgeon. It consists of an absolute and a relative part in the mathematical description of the additive function described by the logarithmic function (absolute complexity) and fifth-degree regression curve (relative complexity). The obtained learning curve determines the functional dependency of the learning outcome versus time and indicates several local extreme values (peaks and valleys) in the learning process until proficiency is achieved. CONCLUSIONS This learning curve indicates an ongoing learning process for LLR. The proposed mathematical model can be applied for any surgical procedure with an existing difficulty score and a known theoretically predicted association between the difficulty score and given outcome (for example, IOC).
Collapse
|
179
|
Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing redo liver resections for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a European multi-center study. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:3374-3381. [PMID: 34462867 PMCID: PMC9001231 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08655-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic redo resections for colorectal metastases are poorly investigated. This study aims to explore long-term results after second, third, and fourth resections. Material and methods Prospectively updated databases of primary and redo laparoscopic liver resections in six European HPB centers were analyzed. Procedure-related overall survival after first, second, third, and fourth resections were evaluated. Furthermore, patients without liver recurrence after first liver resection were compared to those with one redo, two or three redo, and patients with palliative treatment for liver recurrence after first laparoscopic liver surgery. Survival was calculated both from the date of the first liver resection and from the date of the actual liver resection. In total, 837 laparoscopic primary and redo liver resections performed in 762 patients were included (630 primary, 172 first redo, 29 second redo, and 6 third redo). Patients were bunched into four groups: Group 1—without hepatic recurrence after primary liver resection (n = 441); Group 2—with liver recurrence who underwent only one laparoscopic redo resection (n = 154); Group 3—with liver recurrence who underwent two laparoscopic redo resections (n = 29); Group 4—with liver recurrence who have not been found suitable for redo resections (n = 138). Results No significant difference has been found between the groups in terms of baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes. Rate of positive resection margin was higher in the group with palliative recurrence (group 4). Five-year survival calculated from the first liver resection was 67%, 62%, 84%, and 7% for group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Procedure-specific 5-year overall survival was 50% after primary laparoscopic liver resection, 52% after the 1st reoperation, 52% after the 2nd, and 40% after the 3rd reoperation made laparoscopic. Conclusions Multiple redo recurrences can be performed laparoscopically with good long-term results. Liver recurrence does not aggravate prognosis as long as the patient is suitable for reoperation.
Collapse
|
180
|
Kabir T, Syn N, Koh YX, Teo JY, Chung AY, Chan CY, Goh BKP. Impact of tumor size on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:169-176. [PMID: 34420824 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We performed this study in order to investigate the impact of tumour size on the difficulty of MILR, as well as to elucidate the optimal tumour size cut-off/s to distinguish between 'easy' and 'difficult' MILRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is retrospective review of 603 consecutive patients who underwent MILR between 2006 and 2019 of which 461 met the study inclusion criteria. We first conducted an exploratory analysis to visualize the associations between tumor size and various surrogates of laparoscopic difficulty in order to determine to optimal tumor size cutoff for stratification. Visual inspection of flexible spline-based models as well as quantitative evidence determined that perioperative outcomes differed between patients with tumor size of 30-69 mm and tumours ≥70 mm. These cutoffs were used for further downstream analyses. RESULTS The cohort of 461 patients was divided into 3 groups based on tumour diameter size. Patients with larger tumours experienced longer operating times ((PGroup 2 vs 1<0.001, PGroup 3 vs 1<0.001, PGroup 3 vs 2<0.001), higher blood loss (PGroup 2 vs 1<0.001, PGroup 3 vs 1<0.001, PGroup 3 vs 2<0.001), as well as significantly longer hospital stay (PGroup 2 vs 1<0.001, PGroup 3 vs 1<0.001, PGroup 3 vs 2<0.001). There was a monotonic trend towards increasing blood transfusion rates (P = 0.006), overall morbidity (P = 0.029) and 90-day mortality rates (P = 0.047) with increasing tumour size. CONCLUSION Although tumour size of 30 mm serves as an optimal cut-off for predicting difficult resections as per the Iwate criteria, a trichotomy (<30 mm, 30-69 mm, ≥70 mm) may provide additional granularity. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tousif Kabir
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Lanari J, Russolillo N, Cipriani F, Aghayan D, Zimmitti G, Efanov M, Alseidi A, Mocchegiani F, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Rotellar F, Fuks D, D'Hondt M, Vivarelli M, Edwin B, Aldrighetti LA, Ferrero A, Cillo U, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Assessment of Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e212064. [PMID: 34076671 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure that captures the most desirable surgical outcomes as a single indicator, yet to date TO has not been defined and assessed in the field of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR). Objective To obtain international agreement on the definition of TO in liver surgery (TOLS) and to assess the incidence of TO in LLR and OLR in a large international multicenter database using a propensity-score matched analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for all liver diseases between January 2011 and October 2019 were analyzed using a large international multicenter liver surgical database. An international survey was conducted among all members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) to reach agreement on the definition of TOLS. The rate of TOLS was assessed for LLR and OLR before and after propensity-score matching. Factors associated with achieving TOLS were investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures Textbook outcome, with TOLS defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents of grade 2 or higher, postoperative bile leak grade B or C, severe postoperative complications, readmission within 30 days after discharge, in-hospital mortality, and the presence of R0 resection margin. Results A total of 8188 patients (4559 LLR; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-73 years]; 2529 were male [55.8%] and 3629 OLR; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-71 years]; 2204 were male [60.7%]) were included in the analysis of whom 69.1% achieved TOLS; 74.8% for LLR and 61.9% for OLR (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III, previous abdominal surgery, histological diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases (odds ratio [OR], 0.656 [95% CI, 0.457-0.940]; P = .02), cholangiocarcinoma, non-CRLM, a tumor size of 30 mm or more, minor resection of posterior/superior segments (OR, 0.716 [95% CI, 0.577-0.887]; P = .002), anatomically major resection (OR, 0.579 [95% CI, 0.418-0.803]; P = .001), and nonanatomical resection (OR, 0.612 [95% CI, 0.476-0.788]; P < .001) were associated with a worse TOLS rate after LLR. For OLR, only histological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (OR, 0.360 [95% CI, 0.214-0.607]; P < .001) and a tumor size of 30 mm or more (30-50 mm = OR, 0.718 [95% CI, 0.565-0.911]; P = .01; 50.1-100 mm = OR, 0.729 [95% CI, 0.554-0.960]; P = .02; >10 cm = OR, 0.550 [95% CI, 0.366-0.826]; P = .004) were associated with a worse TOLS rate. Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter study, TOLS was found to be a useful tool for assessing patient-level hospital performance and may have utility in optimizing patient outcomes after LLR and OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Davit Aghayan
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Luca A Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Lapisatepun W, Hong SK, Hong K, Han ES, Lee JM, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Influence of Large Grafts Weighing ≥ 1000 g on Outcome of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1980-1988. [PMID: 33104954 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04837-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depending on a transplant center's level of experience, utilization of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) may be limited due to graft size or anatomical variations. Here, we aimed to evaluate the influence of large hepatic grafts (≥ 1000 g) when performing PLDRH in both donors and recipients of such grafts. METHODS Medical records of living donors who underwent either PLDRH from November 2015 to August 2019 or open conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) from January 2010 to August 2019 and those of the graft recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Donors were separated into three groups: PLDRH graft ≥ 1000 g (n = 10; study group), PLDRH graft < 1000 g (n = 280; control-I group), and CDRH graft ≥ 1000 g (n = 24; control-II group). RESULTS Total operative duration (P = 0.017) and warm ischemia time (P < 0.001) were significantly longer in the study than in the control-I and control-II groups, respectively. ΔAlanine aminotransferase% was significantly lower in the study than in the control-I group (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in minor complication incidence between the study and control-I (P = 0.068) and control-II (P = 0.618) donors. There were no major complications in the study and control-II donors, whereas six control-I donors (2.1%) experienced a major complication (P = 1.000). Length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the study than in the control-II group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in early and late major complication incidence for recipients between the study and control-I and control-II groups. CONCLUSIONS PLDRH for grafts weighing ≥ 1000 g appears to be safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons in a well-equipped center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Worakitti Lapisatepun
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
| | - Kwangpyo Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Sasaki K, Aucejo FN, Nair A, Fujiki M, Diago Uso T, Quintini C, Miller CM, Hashimoto K, Kwon CHD. Seamless Introduction of a Purely Laparoscopic Full-Lobe Living Donor Hepatectomy Program in a North American Center. Liver Transpl 2021; 27:1203-1206. [PMID: 33629504 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunari Sasaki
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Federico N Aucejo
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Amit Nair
- Department of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Teresa Diago Uso
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Cristiano Quintini
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Charles M Miller
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Koji Hashimoto
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Choon Hyuck David Kwon
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Elfrink AKE, Haring MPD, de Meijer VE, Ijzermans JNM, Swijnenburg RJ, Braat AE, Erdmann JI, Terkivatan T, Te Riele WW, van den Boezem PB, Coolsen MME, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, de Wilde RF, Kok NFM, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection of benign liver tumours in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1230-1243. [PMID: 33478819 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) of benign liver tumour (BLT) are scarce. This study aimed to provide a nationwide overview of postoperative outcomes after LLR and OLR of BLT. METHODS This was a nationwide retrospective study including all patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma, haemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare 30-day overall and major morbidity and 30-day mortality after OLR and LLR. RESULTS In total, 415 patients underwent BLT resection of whom 230 (55.4%) underwent LLR. PSM for OLR and LLR resulted in 250 matched patients. Median (IQR) length of stay was shorter after LLR than OLR (4 versus 6 days, 5.0-8.0, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day overall morbidity was lower after LLR than OLR (12.0% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.043). LLR was associated with reduced 30-day overall morbidity in multivariable analysis (aOR:0.46, CI:0.22-0.95, p = 0.043). Both 30-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality were not different. CONCLUSIONS LLR for BLT is associated with shorter hospital stay and reduced overall morbidity and is preferred if technically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur K E Elfrink
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden; Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen.
| | - Martijn P D Haring
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Dutch Benign Liver Tumour Group
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Dutch Benign Liver Tumour Group
| | - Jan N M Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam; Dutch Benign Liver Tumour Group
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - Andries E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Dutch Benign Liver Tumour Group
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam; Dutch Benign Liver Tumour Group
| | | | - Wouter W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marielle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht; Dutch Benign Liver Tumour Group
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede
| | | | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | | | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Schneider C, Allam M, Stoyanov D, Hawkes DJ, Gurusamy K, Davidson BR. Performance of image guided navigation in laparoscopic liver surgery - A systematic review. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101637. [PMID: 34358880 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to open surgery, minimally invasive liver resection has improved short term outcomes. It is however technically more challenging. Navigated image guidance systems (IGS) are being developed to overcome these challenges. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of their current capabilities and limitations. METHODS Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched using free text terms and corresponding controlled vocabulary. Titles and abstracts of retrieved articles were screened for inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the retrieved data it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis. Therefore results are presented in tabulated and narrative format. RESULTS Out of 2015 articles, 17 pre-clinical and 33 clinical papers met inclusion criteria. Data from 24 articles that reported on accuracy indicates that in recent years navigation accuracy has been in the range of 8-15 mm. Due to discrepancies in evaluation methods it is difficult to compare accuracy metrics between different systems. Surgeon feedback suggests that current state of the art IGS may be useful as a supplementary navigation tool, especially in small liver lesions that are difficult to locate. They are however not able to reliably localise all relevant anatomical structures. Only one article investigated IGS impact on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Further improvements in navigation accuracy are needed to enable reliable visualisation of tumour margins with the precision required for oncological resections. To enhance comparability between different IGS it is crucial to find a consensus on the assessment of navigation accuracy as a minimum reporting standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schneider
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK.
| | - M Allam
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK; General surgery Department, Tanta University, Egypt
| | - D Stoyanov
- Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK
| | - D J Hawkes
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK; Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Surgical and Interventional Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
| | - K Gurusamy
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK
| | - B R Davidson
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Learning process of laparoscopic liver resection and postoperative outcomes: chronological analysis of single-center 15-years' experience. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:3398-3406. [PMID: 34312730 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08660-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited studies have reported the actual learning process of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). This study aimed to chronologically evaluate our 15 years' experience of LLR. METHODS All consecutive LLRs between 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The time period was divided into three groups; first (2006-2010), second (2011-2015), and third (2016-2020) period. The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of overall (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) or major (grade ≥ IIIa) postoperative complications within 30 days. Using the IWATE criteria (four difficulty levels based on six indices), LLR was categorized as basic (< 7 points) and advanced (≥ 7 points) one. All analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS During the study period, a total of 382 LLRs were gradually performed (first period, n = 54; second period, n = 114, and third period, n = 214). Low incidences of overall and major complications were maintained (9.3, 10.5, and 7.0%, p = 0.514, and 1.9, 2.6, and 2.3%, p = 1.000). Meanwhile, pure LLRs (i.e., LLRs without hand-assisted or hybrid approach) and advanced LLRs were increasingly performed in 25 (46.3%), 71 (62.3%), and 205 (95.8%) patients (p < 0.001) and 3 (5.6%), 18 (15.8%), and 58 (27.1%) patients (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that stepwise approach from basic to advanced procedures and use of hand-assisted or hybrid approach during the early phases for starting LLR practice may allow for maintaining low morbidity in specialized center.
Collapse
|
187
|
Sun Q, Zhang X, Gong X, Hu Z, Zhang Q, He W, Chang X, Hu Z, Chen Y. Survival analysis between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on reconstructed time-to-event data. Hepatol Int 2021; 15:1215-1235. [PMID: 34258665 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-021-10219-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has been widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is generally believed that the long-term outcomes of LH are not inferior to open hepatectomy (OH). However, the quality of evidence is low. The purpose of this study was to reconstruct time-to-event data for meta-analysis based on Kaplan-Meier curves from propensity-score matched studies and compare survival rates following LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS All published propensity-score matched studies reported in English that compared LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma with Kaplan-Meier curves were screened. Patients' survival information was reconstructed with the aid of a computer vision program. Different models (fixed-effects model for two-stage survival analysis and Cox regression for one-stage survival analysis) were performed for sensitivity analysis. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, two specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients by types of resection, cirrhosis status. RESULTS Time-to-event data were extracted from 45 propensity-score matched studies (N = 8905). According to the time-to-event data and the reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves, the cumulative overall survival rate was 49.0% and 50.9% in the LH and OH cohorts, respectively, a log-rank test did not demonstrate statistical significance (p > 0.05). The cumulative recurrence-free survival (RFS) probability was both close to 0.0%. The median RFS time was 49.1 (95% CI 46.1 ~ 51.7) and 44.3 (95% CI 41 ~ 46.1) months. The difference in disease status was statistically significant by the Log-rank test (p < 0.05). Using the random-effects model of two-stage analysis, the minor hepatectomy subgroup (HR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.09, 1.55], I2 = 6.2%, p = 0.383) and the shared fragile model of one-stage analysis (HR = 1.44 95% CI [1.23, 1.69], p < 0.001) suggested that LH could significantly prolong RFS of patients compared with OH. This result was consistent with sensitivity analysis using different models. CONCLUSION This study was the first reconstructed time-to-event data based on a high-quality propensity-score matching study to compare the survival outcomes of LH and OH in the treatment of HCC. Results suggested that LH can improve RFS in patients with HCC undergoing minor hepatectomy and may also benefit long-term RFS in overall patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Sun
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xiangda Zhang
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Xueyi Gong
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Zhipeng Hu
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Qiao Zhang
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Weiming He
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xiaojian Chang
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Zemin Hu
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yajin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Kinoshita M, Shinkawa H, Kabata D, Tanaka S, Takemura S, Amano R, Kimura K, Ohira G, Nishio K, Kubo S. Impact of Advancing Age on the Status and Risk of Postoperative Infections After Liver Resection. World J Surg 2021; 45:3386-3394. [PMID: 34244815 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06236-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the recently increasing number of elderly patients undergoing liver resection, the impact of advancing age on postoperative infections (PIs) incidence and risk remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of advancing age on PIs incidence and status. METHODS This retrospective study included 744 patients undergoing liver resection without biliary reconstruction or combined resection of other organs. Multivariable analysis with a restricted cubic spline was used to evaluate the impact of advancing age on PIs and to determine its association with PIs risk in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic liver resection (OLR and LLR, respectively). RESULTS Multivariable analysis demonstrated that advancing age was significantly associated with increased PIs risk (P = 0.017). The spline curve showed that the odds ratio for PIs sharply increased starting approximately at 65 years of age. Unadjusted restricted cubic splines assessing the subcategories of PIs demonstrated that advancing age was associated with increased risks of organ/space surgical site infection and sepsis (P = 0,064 and 0.048, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed that LLR was associated with the lower PIs risk compared with OLR (P = 0.025), whereas the lower PIs risk with LLR was not significantly obscured by advancing age (P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS Advancing age was associated with increased risk of PIs, including organ/space surgical site infections and sepsis, after liver resection especially in patients aged ≥ 65 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Kinoshita
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Hiroji Shinkawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
| | - Daijiro Kabata
- Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Shogo Tanaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Shigekazu Takemura
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Amano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Kimura
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Go Ohira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Kohei Nishio
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Shoji Kubo
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Görgec B, Fichtinger RS, Ratti F, Aghayan D, Van der Poel MJ, Al-Jarrah R, Armstrong T, Cipriani F, Fretland ÅA, Suhool A, Bemelmans M, Bosscha K, Braat AE, De Boer MT, Dejong CHC, Doornebosch PG, Draaisma WA, Gerhards MF, Gobardhan PD, Hagendoorn J, Kazemier G, Klaase J, Leclercq WKG, Liem MS, Lips DJ, Marsman HA, Mieog JSD, Molenaar QI, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Nota CL, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Slooter GD, Stommel MWJ, Swijnenburg RJ, Tanis PJ, Te Riele WW, Terkivatan T, Van den Tol PMP, Van den Boezem PB, Van der Hoeven JA, Vermaas M, Edwin B, Aldrighetti LA, Van Dam RM, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Comparing practice and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection between high-volume expert centres and nationwide low-to-medium volume centres. Br J Surg 2021; 108:983-990. [PMID: 34195799 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on excellent outcomes from high-volume centres, laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly being adopted into nationwide practice which typically includes low-medium volume centres. It is unknown how the use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection compare between high-volume centres and low-medium volume centres. This study aimed to compare use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection in three leading European high-volume centres and nationwide practice in the Netherlands. METHOD An international, retrospective multicentre cohort study including data from three European high-volume centres (Oslo, Southampton and Milan) and all 20 centres in the Netherlands performing laparoscopic liver resection (low-medium volume practice) from January 2011 to December 2016. A high-volume centre is defined as a centre performing >50 laparoscopic liver resections per year. Patients were retrospectively stratified into low, moderate- and high-risk Southampton difficulty score groups. RESULTS A total of 2425 patients were included (1540 high-volume; 885 low-medium volume). The median annual proportion of laparoscopic liver resection was 42.9 per cent in high-volume centres and 7.2 per cent in low-medium volume centres. Patients in the high-volume centres had a lower conversion rate (7.4 versus 13.1 per cent; P < 0.001) with less intraoperative incidents (9.3 versus 14.6 per cent; P = 0.002) as compared to low-medium volume centres. Whereas postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups, a lower reintervention rate (5.1 versus 7.2 per cent; P = 0.034) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (3 versus 5 days; P < 0.001) were observed in the high-volume centres as compared to the low-medium volume centres. In each Southampton difficulty score group, the conversion rate was lower and hospital stay shorter in high-volume centres. The rate of intraoperative incidents did not differ in the low-risk group, whilst in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups this rate was lower in high-volume centres (absolute difference 6.7 and 14.2 per cent; all P < 0.004). CONCLUSION High-volume expert centres had a sixfold higher use of laparoscopic liver resection, less conversions, and shorter hospital stay, as compared to a nationwide low-medium volume practice. Stratification into Southampton difficulty score risk groups identified some differences but largely outcomes appeared better for high-volume centres in each risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - R S Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - F Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - D Aghayan
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - M J Van der Poel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Al-Jarrah
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - T Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - F Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Å A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Suhool
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - M Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - A E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M T De Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - C H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - W A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - M F Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - D J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - H A Marsman
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J S D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Q I Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - C L Nota
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - A M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - G D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - R J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - T Terkivatan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P M P Van den Tol
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P B Van den Boezem
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J A Van der Hoeven
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - L A Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - R M Van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany.,GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Swaid F, Sucandy I, Tohme S, Marsh JW, Bartlett DL, Tsung A, Geller DA. Changes in Performance of More Than 1000 Minimally Invasive Liver Resections. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:986-988. [PMID: 32857161 PMCID: PMC7450397 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Forat Swaid
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Samer Tohme
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James W Marsh
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - David L Bartlett
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Allan Tsung
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - David A Geller
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
He L, Li W, Zhou D, Wang L, Hou H, Geng X. Comparative analysis of vascular bulldog clamps used in laparoscopic liver resection. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e26074. [PMID: 34114991 PMCID: PMC8202581 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000026074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
To compare the clinical effect of Bulldog clamps with traditional Pringle for vascular occlusion during laparoscopic hepatectomy.One hundred ten patients were retrospectively investigated in this research from December 2014 to January 2019 in the second hospital of Anhui Medical University, who underwent laparoscopic liver resection using Bulldog (modified group, n = 54) and cotton tourniquet (traditional group, n = 56) for blocking the liver inflow-blood. Intraoperative blood loss, duration of the operation time, clamping time, postoperative outcomes were analyzed.All the operations were accomplished successfully without conversion to laparotomy, perioperative period clinical date was calculated. Intraoperative operative time, blood loss and resection sections had no statistical significance, but the clamping time (36.2 ± 5.6 vs 277.3 ± 88.4 s, P < .001) was significantly shorter in the bulldog group. Albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and serum total bilirubin had no statistical differences in postoperative day (POD) 1and 3, but POD 5 alanine aminotransferase (71.0 ± 46.8vs 105.8 ± 61.7IU/L P = .018) and aspartate aminotransferase (72.8 ± 39.7 vs 100.2 ± 16.7 IU/L P = .028). The postoperative hospital stays (7.02 ± 1.56 vs 8.50 ± 2.35 days P = .026) in bulldog group were lower than cotton group and differences had statistical significance. The C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the traditional group than in the modified group on POD 3 (46.3 ± 19.2 vs 57.7 ± 23.9 mg/L P = .019), and POD5 (13.3 ± 4.2 vs 17.5 ± 7.3 mg/L P = .001). There were 8 postoperative complications occurred in cotton group, while there was 5 in Bulldog group, all patients with complications were discharged after adequate drainage and symptomatic treatment.Bulldog is an effectively performed approach for vascular occlusion during laparoscopic hepatectomy than traditional Pringle maneuver.
Collapse
|
192
|
Ivanecz A, Plahuta I, Magdalenić T, Ilijevec B, Mencinger M, Peruš I, Potrč S. Evaluation of the Iwate Model for Predicting the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Does Tumor Size Matter? J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1451-1460. [PMID: 32495139 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04657-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to externally validate the Iwate scoring model and its prognostic value for predicting the risks of intra- and postoperative complications of laparoscopic liver resection. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent pure laparoscopic liver resection between 2008 and 2019 at a single tertiary center were included. The Iwate scores were calculated according to the original proposition (four difficulty levels based on six indices). Intra- and postoperative complications were compared across difficulty levels. Fitting the obtained data to the cumulative density function of the Weibull distribution and a linear function provided the mean risk curves for intra- and postoperative complications, respectively. RESULTS The difficulty levels of 142 laparoscopic liver resections were scored as low, intermediate, advanced, and expert level in 41 (28.9%), 53 (37.3%), 32 (22.5%), and 16 (11.3%) patients, respectively. Intraoperative complications were detected in 26 (18.3%) patients and its rates (2.4%, 7.5%, 34.3%, and 62.5%) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels (P ˂ 0.001). Major postoperative complications occurred in 21 (14.8%) patients and its rates (4.8%, 5.6%, 28.1%, 43.7%; P ˂ 0.001) showed the same trend as for intraoperative complications. Then, the mean risk curves of both complications were obtained. Due to outliers, a new threshold for a tumor size index was proposed at 38 mm. The repeated analysis showed improved results. CONCLUSIONS The Iwate scoring model predicts the probability of complications across difficulty levels. Our proposed tumor size threshold (38 mm) improves the quality of the prediction. The model is upgraded by a probability of complications for every difficulty score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
| | - Irena Plahuta
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Tomislav Magdalenić
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Bojan Ilijevec
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Matej Mencinger
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.,Center of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Maribor, Mladinska 3, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.,Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, Jadranska 19, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Iztok Peruš
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.,Faculty of Natural Science and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 12, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Stojan Potrč
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Goh BKP, Syn N, Koh YX, Teo JY, Cheow PC, Jeyaraj PR, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, Chan CY. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 1:1 matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:560-571. [PMID: 34061361 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for nonrecurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Review of 204 MILR and 755 OLR without previous LR performed between 2005 and 2018. 1:1 coarsened exact matching (CEM) and 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) were performed. RESULTS Overall, 190 MILR were well-matched with 190 OLR by PSM and 86 MILR with 86 OLR by CEM according to patient baseline characteristics. After PSM and CEM, MILR was associated with a significantly longer operation time [230 min (interquartile range [IQR], 145-330) vs. 160 min (IQR, 125-210), p < .001] [215 min (IQR, 135-295) vs. 153.5 min (120-180), p < .001], shorter postoperative stay [4 days (IQR, 3-6) vs. 6 days (IQR, 5-8), p = .001)] [4 days (IQR, 3-5) vs. 6 days (IQR, 5-7), p = .004] and lower postoperative morbidity [40 (21%) vs. 67 (35.5%), p = .003] [16 (18.6%) vs. 27 (31.4%), p = .036] compared to OLR. MILR was also associated with a significantly longer median time to recurrence (70 vs. 40.3 months, p = .014) compared to OLR after PSM but not CEM. There was no significant difference in terms of overall survival and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION MILR is associated with superior short-term postoperative outcomes and with at least equivalent long-term oncological outcomes compared to OLR for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Prema R Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Pierce K H Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - London L P J Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Montaña-Brown N, Ramalhinho J, Allam M, Davidson B, Hu Y, Clarkson MJ. Vessel segmentation for automatic registration of untracked laparoscopic ultrasound to CT of the liver. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 16:1151-1160. [PMID: 34046826 PMCID: PMC8260404 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02400-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Registration of Laparoscopic Ultrasound (LUS) to a pre-operative scan such as Computed Tomography (CT) using blood vessel information has been proposed as a method to enable image-guidance for laparoscopic liver resection. Currently, there are solutions for this problem that can potentially enable clinical translation by bypassing the need for a manual initialisation and tracking information. However, no reliable framework for the segmentation of vessels in 2D untracked LUS images has been presented. Methods: We propose the use of 2D UNet for the segmentation of liver vessels in 2D LUS images. We integrate these results in a previously developed registration method, and show the feasibility of a fully automatic initialisation to the LUS to CT registration problem without a tracking device. Results: We validate our segmentation using LUS data from 6 patients. We test multiple models by placing patient datasets into different combinations of training, testing and hold-out, and obtain mean Dice scores ranging from 0.543 to 0.706. Using these segmentations, we obtain registration accuracies between 6.3 and 16.6 mm in 50% of cases. Conclusions: We demonstrate the first instance of deep learning (DL) for the segmentation of liver vessels in LUS. Our results show the feasibility of UNet in detecting multiple vessel instances in 2D LUS images, and potentially automating a LUS to CT registration pipeline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Montaña-Brown
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK. .,Centre For Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
| | - João Ramalhinho
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK. .,Centre For Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Moustafa Allam
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brian Davidson
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Yipeng Hu
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Centre For Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew J Clarkson
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Centre For Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Aghayan DL, Kazaryan AM, Fretland ÅA, Røsok B, Barkhatov L, Lassen K, Edwin B. Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery: 20-year experience of a Norwegian high-volume referral center. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2818-2826. [PMID: 34036419 PMCID: PMC9001574 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08570-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver surgery has evolved to become a standard surgical approach in many specialized centers worldwide. In this study we present the evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery at a single high-volume referral center since its introduction in 1998. METHODS Patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) between August 1998 and December 2018 at the Oslo University Hospital were analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between three time periods: early (1998 to 2004), middle (2005 to 2012) and recent (2013-2018). RESULTS Up to December 2020, 1533 LLRs have been performed. A total of 1232 procedures were examined (early period, n = 62; middle period, n = 367 and recent period, n = 803). Colorectal liver metastasis was the main indication for surgery (68%). The rates of conversion to laparotomy and hand-assisted laparoscopy were 3.2% and 1.4%. The median operative time and blood loss were 130 min [interquartile range (IQR), 85-190] and 220 ml (IQR, 50-600), respectively. The total postoperative complications rate was 20.3% and the 30-day mortality was 0.3%. The median postoperative stay was two (IQR, 2-4) days. When comparing perioperative outcomes between the three time periods, shorter operation time (median, from 182 to 120 min, p < 0.001), less blood loss (median, from 550 to 200 ml, p = 0.023), decreased rate of conversions to laparotomy (from 8 to 3%) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (median, from 3 to 2 days, p < 0.001) was observed in the later periods, while the number of more complex liver resections had increased. CONCLUSION During the last two decades, the indications, the number of patients and the complexity of laparoscopic liver procedures have expanded significantly. Initially being an experimental approach, laparoscopic liver surgery is now safely implemented across our unit and has become the method of choice for surgical treatment of most liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
| | - Airazat M Kazaryan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
- Department of Faculty Surgery, №2I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Røsok
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leonid Barkhatov
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kristoffer Lassen
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:770-776. [PMID: 33023824 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various difficulty scoring systems (DSS) have been formulated to grade the complexity of laparoscopic hepatectomies (LH). This study aims to externally validate and compare 4 contemporary DSS including the Iwate, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM), Southampton and Hasegawa DSS in predicting the intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes after LH. METHODS Retrospective review of 548 consecutive patients who underwent LH of which 455 met the study inclusion criteria. Outcomes measures of technical difficulty included operation time, Pringles maneuver, blood loss and blood transfusion rate. Postoperative outcomes measured included morbidity, major morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS There was a statistically significant progressive increase in blood loss, blood transfusion rate, operation time and postoperative stay associated with all 4 DSS. There was also good calibration with respect to blood loss, operation time, Pringles maneuver, open conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, postoperative major morbidity and postoperative stay for all 4 DSS. The Southampton score demonstrated the poorest calibration in terms of operation time and discrimination in terms of application of Pringles maneuver and major morbidity amongst all 4 systems. CONCLUSION All 4 DSS significantly correlated with outcome measures associated with intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes. The Southampton DSS was the poorest system in our cohort of patients.
Collapse
|
197
|
Guilbaud T, Fuks D, Berdah S, Birnbaum DJ, Beyer Berjot L. Development of a novel educational tool to assess skills in laparoscopic liver surgery using the Delphi methodology: the laparoscopic liver skills scale (LLSS). Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2321-2333. [PMID: 33871719 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08507-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No specific performance assessment scales have been reported in laparoscopic liver resection. This study aimed at developing an objective scale specific for the assessment of technical skills for wedge resection in anterior segments (WRAS) and left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). METHODS A laparoscopic liver skills scale (LLSS) was developed using a hierarchical task analysis. A Delphi method obtained consensus among five international experts on relevant steps that should be included into the LLSS for assessment of operative performances. The consensus was predefined using Cronbach's alpha > 0.80. RESULTS A semi-structured review extracted 15 essential subtasks for full laparoscopic WRAS and LLS for evaluation in the Delphi survey. Two rounds of the survey were conducted. Three over 15 subtasks did not reach the predefined level of consensus. Based on the expert's comments, 13 subtasks were reformulated, 4 subtasks were added, and a revised skills scale was developed. After the 2nd round survey (Cronbach's alpha 0.84), 19 subtasks were adopted. The LLSS was composed of three main parts: patient positioning and intraoperative preparation (task 1 to 8), the core part of the WRAS and LLS procedure (tasks 9 to 14), and completion of procedure (task 15 to 19). CONCLUSIONS The LLSS was developed for measuring the skill set for the education of safe and secure laparoscopic WRAS and LLS procedures in a dedicated training program. After validation, this scale could be also used as an assessment tool in the operating room and extrapolated as an operative roadmap to other complex procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Théophile Guilbaud
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. .,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Berdah
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - David Jérémie Birnbaum
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Laura Beyer Berjot
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Cillo U, D'Amico FE, Furlanetto A, Perin L, Gringeri E. Robotic hepatectomy and biliary reconstruction for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a pioneer western case series. Updates Surg 2021; 73:999-1006. [PMID: 33861401 PMCID: PMC8184707 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01041-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Open surgery is the standard of care for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). With the aim of oncologic radicality, it requires a complex major hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. The postoperative course is consequently often complicated, with severe morbidity and mortality rates of up to 27.5–54% and 18%, respectively. Robotic liver surgery is emerging as a safe, minimally-invasive technique with huge potential for pCCA management. After the first case described by Giulianotti in 2010, here we present the first western series of robot-assisted liver resections with biliary reconstruction for pCCA with the aim to preliminarily assess the feasibility and repeatability of the procedure. At our high-volume teaching hospital center dedicated to HPB surgery, 128 pCCA patients have been surgically treated in the last 15 years whereas more than 800 laparoscopic liver resections have been performed. Since the Da Vinci Xi Robotic platform was introduced in late 2018, 6 major robotic liver resections with biliary reconstruction have been performed, 4 of which were for pCCA. All 4 cases involved a left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy. The median operating time was 840 min, with a median blood loss of 700 ml. One case was converted to open surgery during the reconstruction due to a short mesentery preventing the hepatico-jejunostomy. None of the patients experienced major complications, while minor complications occurred in 3 out of 4 cases. One biliary leak was managed conservatively. The median postoperative stay was 9 days. Negative biliary margins were achieved in 3 of the 4 cases. An included video clip shows the most relevant technical details. This preliminary series demonstrates that robot-assisted liver resection for pCCA is feasible. We speculate that the da Vinci platform has a relevant potential in pCCA surgery with particular reference to the multi-duct biliary reconstruction. Further studies are needed to better clarify the role of this high-cost technology in the minimally-invasive treatment of pCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, 2° Piano Policlinico, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
| | - Francesco Enrico D'Amico
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, 2° Piano Policlinico, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Furlanetto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, 2° Piano Policlinico, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Luca Perin
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, 2° Piano Policlinico, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Enrico Gringeri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, 2° Piano Policlinico, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Huang X, Chen Y, Shi X. Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for tumors located in right posterior segment: A single institution study. Asian J Surg 2021; 45:110-116. [PMID: 33863627 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECT With the gradual advancement of laparoscopic technology, surgeries can be successfully performed with the help of laparoscopy increasingly. This study initially explored the difference between laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) and open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS)of liver in our center, discussed the effectiveness, benefits and safety of LRPS and introduce some surgical techniques in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyze 96 cases of liver tumor located in the right posterior lobe of liver in our institution from January 2015 to January 2018. There were 46 cases performed the LRPS surgery and 50 cases performed the ORPS surgery. Through analysis of the perioperative outcomes of these two groups by a case control study, we compare the differences between these two groups. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the LRPS and ORPS group in demographic and baseline characteristics before surgery. Patients in the LRPS group were significantly superior to ORPS in terms of postoperative liver function recovery, postoperative inflammatory factor level, pain sensation (3.03 ± 0.79 vs 4.58 ± 1.25), abdominal incision length (6.25 ± 2.34 vs 32.15 ± 3.21), carrying abdominal drainage tube time (3.26 ± 0.77 vs 4.83 ± 0.76), recovery of bowel function time (1.6 ± 0.61 VS 3.05 ± 0.85)and postoperative hospital stay (5.73 ± 0.99 vs 7.16 ± 0.95) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with the traditional ORPS, LRPS has the advantages of minor injury, faster recovery and mild inflammatory reaction. The LRPS is safe and feasible, and it should be gradually promoted in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Huang
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, 1th Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, PR China.
| | - Yongwei Chen
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, 1th Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, PR China.
| | - Xianjie Shi
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, 1th Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Parenchymal Sparing Anatomical Liver Resections With Full Laparoscopic Approach: Description of Technique and Short-term Results. Ann Surg 2021; 273:785-791. [PMID: 31460879 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe laparoscopic anatomical parenchymal sparing liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and report the short-term outcomes. BACKGROUND Anatomical resections (ARs) have better oncological outcomes compared to partial resections in patients with HCC, and some suggest should be performed also for CRLM as micrometastasis occurs through the intrahepatic structures. Furthermore, remnant liver ischemia after partial resections has been associated with worse oncological outcomes. Few experiences on laparoscopic anatomical resections have been reported and no data on limited AR exist. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 86 patients undergoing full laparoscopic anatomical parenchymal sparing resections with preoperative surgical simulation and standardized procedures. RESULTS A total of 55 patients had HCC, whereas 31 had CRLM with a median of 1 lesion and a size of 30 mm. During preoperative three-dimensional (3D) simulation, a median resection volume of 120 mL was planned. Sixteen anatomical subsegmentectomies, 56 segmentectomies, and 14 sectionectomies were performed. Concordance between preoperative 3D simulation and intraoperative resection was 98.7%. Two patients were converted, and 7 patients experienced complications. Subsegmentectomies had comparable blood loss (166 mL, P = 0.59), but longer operative time (426 min, P = 0.01) than segmentectomies (blood loss 222 mL; operative time 355 min) and sectionectomies (blood loss 120 mL; operative time 295 min). R0 resection and margin width remained comparable among groups. CONCLUSIONS A precise preoperative planning and a standardized surgical technique allow to pursue the oncological quality of AR enhancing the safety of the parenchyma sparing principle, reducing surgical stress through a laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
|