The problems of pain and its detection among geriatric nursing home residents

Assessment of pain in the cognitively impaired older adult in long-term care

This study's objectives were twofold: to identify pain assessment methods used by caregivers of cognitively impaired older adults in long-term care, and to identify medications ordered and administered to them. Over 60% of RNs, with fewer LPNs and CNAs, used formal pain assessment tools. Patient records identified that 77.5% of cognitively impaired patients had a regularly ordered pain medication and 91% had a PRN pain medication order. Thirty percent of patients received at least one PRN medication in a 1-week period. No one diagnosis was significantly associated with a greater tendency for PRN pain medications to be administered, with cancer a possible exception. Eighty-two percent of cognitively impaired patients had a PRN order for acetaminophen. Using minimum data set (MDS) criteria, this study found that patients with greater communication impairments received fewer pain medications.

A comparison of five pain assessment scales for nursing home residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment

The aim of the study was to compare five different pain assessment scales for use with people with different levels of cognitive impairment who resided in nursing homes. The verbal rating scale, horizontal numeric rating scale, Faces pictorial scale, color analogue scale and mechanical visual analogue scale were presented in random order to 113 residents. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. The use of the verbal rating scale was the most successful with this group, completed by 80.5% overall, and 36% of those with severe cognitive impairment. Repeated explanation improved completion rates for all the scales. Consistency between scores on the five scales was good for those with none to moderate cognitive impairment and poor for those severely impaired. This study showed no difference in pain scores according to cognitive status.

Pain Intensity Assessment in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

To determine: (1) the psychometric properties and utility of 5 types of commonly used pain rating scales when used with younger and older adults, (2) factors related to failure to successfully use a pain rating scale, (3) pain rating scale preference, and (4) factors impacting scale preference.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental design was used to gather data from a sample of 86 younger (age 25-55) and 89 older (age 65-94) adult volunteer subjects. Responses of subjects to experimentally induced thermal stimuli were measured with the following pain intensity rating scales: vertical visual analog scale (VAS), 21-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), 11-point Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNS), and Faces Pain Scale (FPS).

RESULTS

All 5 pain scales were effective in discriminating different levels of pain sensation; however the VDS was most sensitive and reliable. Failure rates for pain scale completion were minimal, except for the VAS. Although age did not impact failure to properly use this pain intensity rating scale, but rather those conditions more commonly associated with advanced age, including cognitive and psychomotor impairment did. The scale most preferred to represent pain intensity in both cohorts of subjects was the NRS, followed by the VDS. Scale preference was not related to cognitive status, educational level, age, race, or sex.

CONCLUSION

Although all 5 of the pain intensity rating scales were psychometrically sound when used with either age group, failures, internal consistency reliability, construct validity, scale sensitivity, and preference suggest that the VDS is the scale of choice for assessing pain intensity among older adults, including those with mild to moderate cognitive impairment.

Old and Given up for Dying? Palliative Care Units in Nursing Homes

The palliative unit at Bergen Red Cross Nursing Home opened in June 2000. In a prospective study, the authors investigated 196 patients admitted to the palliative care unit and 286 patients on the long-term wards. In Norway, 40% of the population dies in nursing homes. It is essential to develop good standards of palliative care for these patients. Palliative care units in nursing homes can provide excellent palliative care if they are given the competence and resources that are needed. Our patients on the long-term ward receive a high standard of palliative care, influenced by the competence and teaching programs of the palliative unit. This article aims to describe the challenges and tasks that should be focused on to ensure that old patients, no matter what their age or diagnosis, preserve their dignity and receive good palliative care during the final phase of their lives.

The Abbey pain scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementia

The need for a specialized clinical regimen for patients with dementia who require palliative care has only recently been recognized. Structured approaches to palliative care are not well developed. The recognition and treatment of pain is an important part of this management risk. However, pain is consistently underdiagnosed and undertreated in this population. A factor contributing to this has been a lack of appropriate tools to help recognize and document pain. This study sought to develop and validate an easy-to-use pain scale for use in residential aged care homes. The tool was developed with residents with end- or late-stage dementia who were unable to articulate their needs, identified by the registered nurses who knew them. Results showed that following pain-relief intervention the average pain score recorded using the scale fell by more than half. A paired Student's t-test showed the reduction to be highly significant (P<0.001). Validity and internal reliability, assessed by calculating Gamma and Cronbach's alpha, were found to be satisfactory. Qualitative evidence gathered from users of the scale indicated that it was considered a useful clinical device that could be completed within one minute. Further analysis of the use of the scale in clinical settings, testing of inter-rater reliability and examination of the limitations found in this study will commence early in 2004.

Hospice enrollment and pain assessment and management in nursing homes

This study compared pain assessment and management in the last 48 hours of life for hospice and nonhospice nursing home residents. Included were 209 hospice and 172 nonhospice residents in 28 nursing homes in six geographic areas. Hospice patients were considered short-stay (seven days or less) (n=51), or longer-stay (over seven days) (n=158). Of residents not in a hospital or a coma (n=265), 33% of nonhospice residents, 6% of short-stay and 7% of longer-stay hospice residents had no documented pain assessment (P<0.05). For those with pain documented (n=93), longer-stay hospice residents, compared to nonhospice residents, had a significantly greater likelihood of having received an opioid (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.4; 95% CI 1.3, 21.7), and an opioid at least twice a day (AOR 2.7; 95% CI 0.9, 7.7; P=0.07). Study results suggest that hospice enrollment improves pain assessment and management for nursing home residents; they also document the need for continued improvement of pain management in nursing homes.

Pain intensity assessment: a comparison of selected pain intensity scales for use in cognitively intact and cognitively impaired African American older adults

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of selected pain intensity scales including the Faces Pain Scale (FPS), the Verbal Description Scale, the Numeric Rating Scale, and the Iowa Pain Thermometer to assess pain in cognitively impaired minority older adults. A descriptive correlational design was used, and a convenience sample of 57 volunteers age 58 and older residing in the South was recruited for this study. The sample consisted of 8 males and 49 females with a mean age of 76. Fifty-nine percent of the sample completed an 11th grade education or less, and 59% completed high school or college. Seventy-seven percent (n = 44) of the sample scored 24 or less on the mental status exam, indicating some degree of cognitive impairment. The remaining 23% (n = 13) were cognitively intact. All of the participants were able to use each of the scales to rate their pain. Concurrent validity of the scales was supported with Spearman rank correlation coefficients ranging from.74 to.83 in the cognitively impaired group and.81 to.96 in the cognitively intact group. Test-retest reliability at a 2-week interval was acceptable in the cognitively intact group (Spearman rank correlations ranged from.73 to.83) and to a lesser degree in the cognitively impaired group (correlations ranged from.52 to.79). When asked about scale preference, both the cognitively impaired and the intact group indicated a preference for the FPS. Findings from this study suggest that cognitive impairment did not inhibit older minority participants' ability to use a variety of pain intensity scales. Additionally, options should be provided that address individual needs of older adults considering specific cognitive level and disability, education, gender, ethnicity, and cultural influences concerning perceptions of the various pain intensity scales.

An evaluation of clinical tools to measure pain in older people with cognitive impairment

Pain in older people with cognitive impairment is often untreated or under-treated despite the fact that the likelihood of having pain increases with advanced age. One reason that pain is poorly managed in older people is that it is not detected. Assessing pain is an integral part of clinical practice and is required for effective pain management. However, systematically measuring pain intensity and location with standardized tools in older people has not been well studied. This article will summarize tools used to assess pain in older people, inducing self-report scales measuring pain intensity, the presence or absence of pain, pain location and pain behaviour scales. Identifying the advantages and disadvantages of these clinical assessment tools has implications for nursing practice, research and education.

Family members' perceptions of pain and distress related to analgesics and psychotropic drugs, and quality of care of elderly nursing home residents

The aims of the present study were: (1) to describe family members' perceptions of nursing homes residents' pain and distress in relation to analgesics and psychotropic drugs; and (2) to compare whether background variables, dementia, help/support, prescribing of analgesics and psychotropic drugs, and quality of care vary between subgroups of residents. Two hundred and thirty-two family members of elderly people in 10 Swedish nursing homes participated in the study. The participants responded to a questionnaire including background variables, pain and distress variables, and the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. Data on drug prescribing was obtained from the medical records. The head nurse on each ward noted whether or not the resident had a documented or known diagnosis of dementia. The results showed that a high frequency of elderly nursing home residents were estimated as having physical pain and worry. A large number of the residents were prescribed psychotropic drugs. In addition, some of the residents with moderate or severe physical pain were not prescribed any analgesics. The residents were divided into three subgroups based on scores of physical discomfort, physical pain and worry. Subgroup comparisons differed with regard to sex, help/support, drugs and quality of care. Staff have a responsibility to assess the residents' pain and distress since this will form a basis for better pain and distress management. Other suggestions for improving quality of care are the provision of better information to the family members and the residents, meaningful occupation, less task-oriented care, and care that involves residents.

Nursing home physician educational intervention improves end-of-life outcomes

CONTEXT

Nursing homes are the setting for one of five deaths in the United States. Unfortunately these deaths are often accompanied by pain and symptoms of discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if an educational intervention designed for nursing home physicians improves the quality of dying for nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Prospective measurement of changes in end-of-life medical care indicators.

INTERVENTION

Half-day adult educational outreach program, including audit and feedback, targeted at opinion leaders, and quality improvement suggestions.

SETTING

Five geographically diverse Maryland skilled nursing facilities with a total of 654 beds.

PARTICIPANTS

The terminal care delivered by 61 physicians who cared for 203 dying residents in the 5 facilities was reviewed. An intervention was targeted to medical directors and those physicians with the majority of patients. Twelve physicians participated in the educational program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Chart documentation of recognition of possible death, presence of advance directives, pain control, analgesics used, dyspnea control, control of uncomfortable symptoms during the dying process, documented hygiene, documented bereavement support, and total patient comfort.

RESULTS

The four nursing facilities that completed the intervention all had significant improvements in end-of-life care outcomes (p < 0.001, chi2). No statistically significant changes were found in any measure in the cohort nursing facility that did not complete the intervention. When we compared residents with hospice services to those without, we found significant increases in documentation of better hygiene, bereavement support, and total patient comfort (p < 0.001, chi2 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

Important terminal care outcomes can be significantly improved by targeting key nursing home physicians with an adult educational program that includes audit and feedback, and quality improvement suggestions.

Prescription and dosage of analgesic medication in relation to resident behaviors in the nursing home

OBJECTIVES

To examine correlates of analgesic medication prescription and administration in communicative, cognitively impaired nursing home residents. Residents' behaviors were assessed using computer-assisted real-time observations as potential adjunctive indicators of pain.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study over a 4-week period.

SETTING

Five nursing homes in the greater Birmingham, Alabama, area.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-two residents (mean age +/- standard deviation = 83.86 +/- 8.55) with a mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 13.81 +/- 6.34.

MEASUREMENTS

Data were obtained via chart review, resident assessments, questionnaire completion by certified nursing assistants familiar with residents' care, and direct observation of residents' daily behaviors.

RESULTS

Receipt of analgesic medication was related to self-report of pain (F2,89 = 9.89, P =.0001), MMSE (F2,88 = 3.98, P =.022), and time spent inactive (F2,89 = 3.04, P =.053). Residents who received analgesic medication reported greater intensity of pain than other residents. Residents who received analgesics had higher MMSE scores than those who did not receive analgesics. Residents who received analgesics spent less time being inactive than those not prescribed analgesics. Receipt of higher dosage of opioid analgesic medication was associated with more time spent with others in verbal interaction (r =.22, P =.03).

CONCLUSION

This study refines the methodology of measuring analgesic medication dosage and its effect on resident behavior. Analgesic prescription and administration patterns are related to time residents spend being inactive. Results suggest that opioid analgesics may hold particular promise in alleviating pain, as indicated by resident behaviors.

Older people in persistent pain: nursing and paramedical staff perceptions and pain management

BACKGROUND

Persistent pain is a common problem for older people. Knowledge about how nursing and paramedical staff perceive these people and what they do to relieve the pain seems scarce.

AIM

To explore nursing and paramedical staff perceptions of older people in persistent pain and their day-to-day management of pain.

METHODS

Interviews in Swedish with 52 nursing auxiliaries, Registered Nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists were collected from February to May 2000. The analysis was based on their stories (n = 150) about older people in persistent pain who received help in their own homes or in special accommodation. A typology of staff perceptions of pain in older people was developed. Activities to manage pain were examined using content analysis.

RESULTS

Respondents perceived the pain as real, exaggerated, trivial, care-related, endured, concealed, self-caused or inarticulate. Older people perceived as exaggerating the pain, those with care-related and self-caused pain evoked frustration in the staff, while those perceived as enduring their pain evoked satisfaction. Various strategies to manage pain were used: no activity, medication, mediating contacts, distracting activities, physical therapies, mobility, work in a gentle way, rest or relieving pressure on body part, and communication concerning pain. The activities differed between the types, as well as between staff with different professional backgrounds.

CONCLUSION

Care and treatment provided by staff should be based on older people's needs rather than on staff attitudes and preferences. The typology revealed that staff perceived older people in pain as a heterogeneous group and that their perceptions affected the pain-relieving activities that were offered. It seems urgent to address how to handle pain in older people who never complain and those who complain a great deal, as well as how to handle pain in people with impaired communicative ability. Reflective discussions on feelings related to different individuals are needed.

The assessment and management of pain among older people in care homes: current status and future directions

Pain is highlighted as a significant, yet neglected problem among older people, particularly in long-term care settings. The effects of inadequate assessment and treatment of pain among older people may lead to multiple problems. Problems arise due to cognitive impairment of clients and inadequate assessment by healthcare professionals. Analgesics are under-used and there is a need for improved education of both healthcare professionals and older people regarding attitudes to pain and ageing. Research is needed into the prevalence of pain among older people in United Kingdom (UK) care homes, how best to further educate healthcare professionals regarding pain management and how to enable older people to be facilitative partners in this process.

Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly (PADE): reliability and validity of a new measure

OBJECTIVES

To establish the reliability and validity of a measure to assess pain in individuals with advanced dementia.

DESIGN

Sixty-five residents of long-term care facilities were assessed using a new rating tool, the Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly (PADE), in two separate studies: (1) Residents were assessed simultaneously by two different raters, at Time 1 and 2, to establish interrater reliability, stability, and internal consistency. (2) Validity was established by assessing the correlation between an agitation scale and the PADE; by comparing groups with pain as a significant clinical factor (as assessed by an independent rater) versus not a significant factor, and by assessing individuals receiving versus not receiving psychoactive medications.

SETTING

Four different long-term care facilities, three skilled nursing facilities, and a locked dementia assisted-living facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five residents of long-term care facilities with advanced levels of dementia in Study 1, and 40 residents with similar level of dementia in Study 2; 42% of the total sample were rated as having significant painful conditions.

MEASUREMENTS

For Study 1, the PADE was administered; for Study 2, the PADE and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) were administered.

RESULTS

Reliability coefficients were adequate (interrater = 0.54-0.95; stability = 0.70-0.98; and internal consistency = 0.24-0.88). Validity coefficients were likewise encouraging, with the PADE demonstrating the expected relationship with a measure of agitation. The PADE also differentiated between groups that were independently judged to suffer clinically problematic pain versus those who were not.

CONCLUSION

The PADE is a reliable and valid tool to assess pain in dementing elderly residents of long-term care facilities.

Needs of the dying in nursing homes

OBJECTIVE

To describe the palliative care needs of dying nursing home residents during the last 3 months of life.

METHODS

Nurses, aides, and family members completed structured interviews after all deaths of residents in two nursing homes during a 1-year study period. For each resident who died, family and staff caregivers answered parallel questions on the presence of physical and emotional symptoms, unmet needs for treatment of these symptoms, and the quality of the dying experience.

RESULTS

Of 259 eligible respondents 176 completed interviews (68%). Decedents' average age was 82, and 90% died in the nursing home rather than in a hospital. Most deaths were preceded by orders to withhold resuscitation (79%) and other treatments (39%). The most common physical symptoms were pain (86%), problems with personal cleanliness (81%), dyspnea (75%), incontinence (59%), and fatigue (52%). Depressed mood (44%), anxiety (31%), and loneliness (21%) were common emotional symptoms. Respondents believed residents needed more treatment than they received for emotional symptoms (30%), personal cleanliness (23%) and pain (19%). Fifty-eight percent of respondents believed the resident experienced a "good death," as they would have wanted it to be.

CONCLUSIONS

Dying nursing home residents need improved emotional and spiritual care, help with personal cleanliness, and treatment for pain. Efforts to improve end-of-life care in nursing homes should combine traditional palliative care services with increased attention to emotional symptoms and personal care services.

Attitudinal barriers to effective treatment of persistent pain in nursing home residents

OBJECTIVES

To systematically explore nursing home (NH) resident and staff attitudes that serve as barriers to detection and management of persistent pain.

DESIGN

Survey.

SETTING

Six community-based and one Veterans Affairs long-term care facility

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-five NH nurses, 75 certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and 75 communicative NH residents who reported some pain or discomfort "every day or almost every day."

MEASUREMENTS

Three structured pain attitudes questionnaires (one each for NH residents, CNAs, and nurses) that incorporated constructs gleaned from a comprehensive literature review were designed. One-week test-retest reliability was calculated on a subsample of 25 residents, 19 CNAs, and 26 nurses. Attitudinal differences between the three groups were evaluated using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).

RESULTS

Of 12 constructs evaluated, 10 had fair to excellent reliability indices (residents 0.46-0.80; CNAs 0.57-0.76; nurses 0.62-0.94). Of these 10 reliable constructs, MANOVA indicated significant overall attitude differences between the three groups. Follow-up analyses indicated that attitudes endorsed most strongly by residents were that chronic pain does not change, belief in external pathology over pain reports, fear of addiction, and fear of dependence. CNAs attitudes endorsed most strongly were lack of time and complaints unheard. The nurse attitude endorsed most strongly was complaints unheard.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, if residents' fears regarding addiction, worsening dependence, and the immutable nature of persistent pain were quelled, and if CNAs could feel that adequate time is available for pain assessment, perhaps improved pain management in the NH would result.

Medicines management in care homes for older people: the nurse's role

Increasing attention is being paid to the inappropriate use of medicines in UK care homes for older people. While polypharmacy may sometimes be necessary, older people can be particularly sensitive to the effects of medicines due to physiological chances, while the effect of a mixture of medicines is often unknown. The harmful consequences of inappropriate prescribing for older people unnecessarily add to overall health-care expenditure and the workload of staff. Community nurses can play an important role in attenuating some of these problems while enhancing the quality of life of older people in care homes. The growing population of older people and burgeoning health-care expenditure on medicines demands that greater attention is given to medicine management among older people so that the efficacy of therapeutic regimes are maximized.

Needs Assessment in Postgraduate Medical Education: A Review

Although the concept of needs assessment in continuing medical education is well accepted, there is limited information on needs assessment in postgraduate medical education. We discuss the learning needs of postgraduate trainees and review the various methods of needs assessment such as: questionnaire surveys, interviews, focus groups, chart audits, chart-stimulated recall, standardized patients, and environmental scans in the context of post graduate medical education.

Living with persistent pain: experiences of older people receiving home care

BACKGROUND

Although the topic of pain among older people has received increasing interest, little is still known about how pain is experienced or handled by those who no longer manage independently but depend on professionals for help with daily living. Developing pain management for older people requires such knowledge.

AIM

To explore sense of self, sense of pain, daily living with pain, sense of others and ways of handling pain in older people with persistent pain.

METHODS

Interviews with 90 older people receiving home care from nursing auxiliaries in their own homes or in sheltered accommodation were collected from January to June 2000. A typology of older people in persistent pain was developed. Activities for handling pain were examined using content analysis.

FINDINGS

Respondents' experiences of themselves and their pain varied. Two groups of older people, considered as 'competent and proud' and 'confident and serene', expressed satisfaction in spite of pain, while the groups 'misunderstood and disappointed' and 'resigned and sad' expressed dissatisfaction. The most common strategies used were medication, rest, mobility, distracting activities and talking about pain. Respondents chose strategies by balancing the advantages of the activities against the disadvantages these brought for their daily living.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that characteristics of the older people, such as their way of experiencing themselves, how pain affects their daily life and how they perceive effects and side-effects of pain management are areas that need to be identified when staff assess pain and plan pain management. Caring for older people in pain could be improved by listening to and believing their complaints, evaluating effects and side-effects from medications and nonpharmacological pain management and by emphasising the importance of common everyday activities such as mobility and distraction to relieve pain.

Refusing analgesics: using continuous improvement to improve pain management on a surgical ward

Despite advances in pain control many patients experience moderate to severe pain whilst in hospital. Contributory factors include inadequate assessment and documentation of pain, as well as patient and professional misconceptions. A 28-bedded surgical ward in a District General Hospital in the South of England was the setting for the project. A small preliminary audit of pain on this ward indicated that some patients experienced postoperative pain, which was not effectively controlled. A 'continuous improvement' framework was used to increase understanding of the problem and identify an aim for the project, which was to reduce the number of patients refusing analgesics when offered by nurses. An audit to ascertain how many patients refused analgesia revealed that, of 133 patients offered, 93 (70%) refused. Using the 'Model for Improvement' (Langley et al., 1996) a number of changes were introduced, including a patient information sheet, regular documented pain assessment and an innovative staff education programme. To evaluate if the changes in practice had been successful, further audit data were collected from 167 patients. Sixty-three (44%) accepted analgesics, indicating a significant decrease in the number refusing (P = 0.005). This small project demonstrated that continuous improvement methodology can improve the management of pain and quality of care for patients. Such an approach brings practitioner and patient into meaningful understanding and offers solutions which are realistic, achievable and sustainable over time. Despite finite resources and increased pressure on staff it is possible to motivate people when they feel they have ownership and change is meaningful. Continuous improvement methods offer an exciting, feasible, patient-centred approach to improving care.

Management of pain in older people within the nursing home: a preliminary study

The provision of continuing care for older people has largely shifted from the hospital setting to the community, and nursing homes increasingly provide support for older people, many of whom exhibit multiple pathology and complex health and social care needs. However, the quality of pain management within this setting has been identified as an issue of concern. It has been estimated that approximately two-thirds of people aged 65 years and over experience chronic pain, and that the prevalence of chronic pain in nursing home residents is between 45% and 80%. However, there exist a number of barriers to the identification and management of chronic pain among older people resident in nursing homes, including sensory impairments in older people themselves and educational deficits among professionals. Such barriers need to be overcome if pain management is to be improved. The present study involved administering a pre-piloted postal questionnaire to the managers of 121 nursing homes within a geographically defined area. Sixty-eight (56%) were completed and returned. The questionnaire broadly covered the following: prevalence of chronic pain and use of interventions; assessment and management strategies; education and training; and communication barriers. Overall, 37% of nursing home residents were identified as experiencing chronic non-malignant pain (pain lasting longer than 3 months not caused by cancer) and 2% were reported as experiencing chronic malignant pain (pain lasting for more than 3 months caused by cancer). Paracetamol was identified as the most 'often' used analgesia for both pain modalities. Sixty-nine per cent of nursing homes did not have a written policy regarding pain management and 75% did not use a standardised pain assessment tool. Forty-four per cent of nursing homes provided education or training sessions for qualified staff and 34% provided this for care assistants. Forty per cent of qualified staff and 85% of care assistants had no specialist knowledge regarding the management of pain in older people. The present study confirms the need for the development of effective pain management strategies underpinned by appropriate training and education in order to meet the particular needs of older people.

Analyses of nursing home residents in hospice care using the minimum data set

OBJECTIVE

To present comprehensive profiles of residents in hospice care at admission to the nursing home using the Minimum Data Set (MDS).

DESIGN AND SETTING

We analysed 40,622 MDS admission assessments for nursing home residents in hospice care. The MDS contains resident-focused data on pain, cognitive patterns, physical function, disease diagnoses, medications, nutrition, and specific treatments received.

RESULTS

About four in five recently admitted hospice residents had 'do not resuscitate' orders and only 27% had a living will. Over 70% of recently admitted hospice residents experienced pain, with almost one half experiencing daily pain. Over one half of those hospice residents in pain experienced moderate pain and almost one third experienced horrible or excruciating pain. About 57% of recently admitted hospice patients had cancer, 21 % had congestive heart failure, 20% had emphysema/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 18% had depression. About one in two recently admitted hospice residents exhibited at least moderate impairment in cognitive function.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to improve pain management, advanced directives, and mental health services for residents dying in nursing homes.

Experience and assessment of pain in individuals with cognitive impairments

The authors review the literature on pain experience and pain assessment in people with cognitive impairments, focusing on individuals with dementia and mental retardation. The impact of cognitive impairments on pain sensation is not well understood, although some observations have been published. For example, research suggests that pain experience can be influenced by neuropathological processes in the brain and memory impairments. Reporting of pain decreases as cognitive impairment increases. In addition, poor verbal skills lead to difficulties in communicating pain. Pain assessment depends primarily on one's ability to describe the dimensions of pain. Individuals with limited ability to report pain can use pain assessment methods that rely on simple cognitive tasks. For individuals who have no ability to report pain, an outside observer must describe the discomfort experienced by interpreting the patient's body language. The authors conclude that further research is needed to develop valid and reliable assessment methods for people with cognitive impairments.

Managing pain in older persons who receive home-help for their daily living. Perceptions by older persons and care providers

Pain is a common problem for older persons who need professional help for their daily living. In this study 94 older persons (75+) in persistent pain were compared with 52 care providers concerning the pain management methods they had used/administered during the previous week and how helpful they perceived these methods to be. Interviews were based on 16 items from the original version of the pain management inventory (PMI). Both groups perceived prescribed medication, rest and distraction as the most frequently utilized methods. Specific methods such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or bracing/splinting or bandaging the affected body part were seldom employed, although most users perceived these methods as helpful. Care providers perceived most methods for managing pain as more effective than older persons did. The results imply that care providers need skills in a variety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods to manage pain and a need to evaluate effectiveness of the methods in a systematic way.

Pain in Older Subacute Care Patients: Associations with Clinical Status and Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between patient pain levels and clinical status and treatment in older adults.

DESIGN

A correlational study involving patient and nurse ratings of pain and retrospective review of clinical records.

SETTING

A subacute care inpatient facility.

PATIENTS

Seventy-five older adults (mean age: 75.9 years) who met entry criteria for pain, age, and mental status.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients and nurses made independent ratings of pain over a 7-day period. Clinical data included measures of mental status, depression, behavioral signs of discomfort, functional independence, and analgesic medication use.

RESULTS

Nurse ratings of patient pain were uncorrelated with patient ratings and underestimated pain relative to patient reports. Nurse ratings correlated with levels of behavioral discomfort and with doses of opioid medication. Patient ratings were associated with functional limitations, depression, and behavioral signs of discomfort, but were minimally related to administration of opioids or other pain medication. Patient mental status did not appreciably moderate these relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support a growing literature indicating deficiencies in pain assessment of older patients and suggest inappropriate administration of analgesic medications for these patients. More systematic assessment of pain, including the use of instruments with established psychometric properties for older patients, may improve pain control and enhance functional rehabilitation in this group.

Pain reports by older hospice cancer patients and family caregivers: the role of cognitive functioning

PURPOSE

Prior research in nursing homes has shown that cognitive impairment may reduce self-reported pain, but this relation has not been systematically explored among hospice patients. The assessment and treatment of pain is a primary goal of hospice care, and both disease processes and the use of opioid analgesics may lead to cognitive impairment among hospice patients. However, little is known about how cognitive functioning may impact the self-report of pain or the report of care recipient pain by family caregivers.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We explored the associations between pain, cognitive functioning, and gender among cancer patients and their family caregivers (N = 176 dyads) during in-home hospice care. This was a cross-sectional, correlational study.

RESULTS

Contrary to expectation, care recipients with cognitive impairment reported more intense pain than care recipients with intact cognitive functioning. However, cognitive impairment among care recipients had no impact on the pain report of family caregivers. Care recipient cognitive impairment was related to greater discrepancy in the pain reports of caregivers and care recipients. No gender differences in pain intensity report were found.

IMPLICATIONS

Measurement issues and implications for assessing self-reported pain among hospice cancer patients with impaired cognitive functioning and the report of care recipient pain by family caregivers are discussed. Specifically, hospice staff must educate family caregivers regarding the potential impact of care recipient cognitive impairment on pain reports in order to facilitate accurate pain assessment and management.

Palliative care of the chronically critically ill patient

Evidence is accumulating that distressing physical and emotional symptoms are prevalent among patients with critical illness, including those requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, and that suffering is underestimated and undertreated by caregivers. Although patients and their families rank communication as a preeminent concern, it remains deficient in process and content, even when the illness requires weeks of critical care. Strategies are available to improve symptom management and communication about appropriate goals of care. For the CCI, whose risks of death, disability, and suffering are so high, it is essential that excellent palliative care be provided along with restorative treatment in an integrated way.

Prevalence of pain among nursing home residents in rural New South Wales

OBJECTIVE

To measure the prevalence of pain among residents of rural and regional nursing homes in northern New South Wales and to describe the procedures used for pain management.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey using interviews and audit of medical records.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

917 nursing home residents in 15 nursing homes within a northern NSW area health service in 1998-1999.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of residents experiencing pain at the time of interview; sites of pain and magnitude of pain problem; diagnoses relevant to pain; analgesic prescribing patterns; non-pharmacological treatments for pain; and the extent of pain documentation in nursing records.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pain present at interview was 27.8% (95% CI, 21.8%-33.8%). Women reported pain more often than men (31% v 21%; chi(2)(2) = 5.38; P = 0.02), but pain was not significantly associated with age, length of stay, or diagnoses of arthritis or dementia. Common sites for pain were the limbs, joints and back; 22% of residents reporting pain had no record of analgesic medication, and 16% had had no form of pain treatment ordered. Agreement between the nursing record and the residents' pain symptoms was borderline poor/fair (kappa, 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pain is high among nursing home residents in rural NSW who are able to communicate their pain. Descriptive data suggest that pain management activities could be substantially improved.

Inappropriate medication prescribing in residential care/assisted living facilities

OBJECTIVES

To identify the extent to which inappropriately prescribed medications (IPMs) are administered to older patients in residential care/assisted living (RC/AL) facilities and to describe facility and resident factors associated with receipt of one or more IPMs.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of a stratified, representative sample of 193 facilities in four states.

SETTING

We identified representative geographic regions within Florida, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Maryland and drew from within them a stratified random sample of 193 RC/AL facilities. Three subtypes of facilities were included in the sample: small homes (<16 beds), larger "new-model" homes, and larger "traditional" homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Within each larger home, a random sample of residents aged 65 and older was approached for consent; in smaller homes all residents were approached. The overall enrollment rate was 92%; 2,078 residents were enrolled.

MEASUREMENTS

Questionnaires and on-site observations were used to gather data on facility administration and staffing and resident characteristics. All prescription and nonprescription medications taken at least 4 of the 7 days before data collection were taken from medication administration records and coded for analysis. IPM designation was based on modification of a list developed by Beers et al. and currently used by nursing home surveyors.

RESULTS

The majority of RC/AL patients were taking five or more medications; 16.0% of these patients were receiving IPMs. The most common IPMs were oxybutynin, propoxyphene, diphenhydramine, ticlopidine, doxepin, and dipyridamole. In multivariate analyses, using generalized estimating equations, IPM use was associated with the number of medications received, smaller facility bed size, moderate licensed practical nurse turnover, absence of dementia, low monthly fees, and absence of weekly physician visits.

CONCLUSIONS

IPMs remain a problem in long-term care, but rates in these RC/AL settings compare favorably with those reported for other frail older populations, suggesting that use of medications with severe adverse effects may be waning. Regular physician facility visits may improve prescribing, as will attention to high-risk groups such as individuals on multiple medications.

Pain in cognitively impaired nursing home residents: how well are physicians diagnosing it?

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the reliability and validity of geriatricians' assessments of pain in cognitively impaired nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

A large suburban nursing home.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-nine nursing home residents participated in the study. Of these, 31 had mild/moderate cognitive impairment (average Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) = 16.04) and 48 were severely cognitively impaired (average MMSE = 1.91). More than 80% of the participants were female, and the average age was 87.

MEASUREMENTS

Two geriatricians from outside the nursing home examined laboratory results, performed a physical examination, and completed a detailed assessment of pain. The personal geriatricians of 42 of the participants also completed the same assessment.

RESULTS

Intergeriatrician agreement rates were statistically significant and moderate in magnitude. When examined by subgroup, the correlations were significant only for those with mild/moderate impairment. Some of the geriatricians' ratings of pain correlated significantly with residents' self-reports. All relationships were weaker in the severely cognitively impaired group. Ratings of greater pain were significantly correlated with higher cognitive functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The results validate geriatricians' evaluations of pain during a medical examination for moderately impaired persons and question their ability to evaluate pain in the severely cognitively impaired. There is a need for increased awareness of pain in this population and a need for improved methodologies to identify it.

Symptom assessment in cancer patients

Patients with cancer suffer from a multitude of symptoms. Effective treatment strategies are available for a number of the common symptoms. A major reason for inadequate symptom relief is lack of effective symptom assessment. Accurate assessment of symptoms is necessary before any treatment can be undertaken. Although there are many complexities involved in the assessment of symptoms, simple, effective tools are available for identification and scoring of symptoms in clinical practice. This review describes recent advances in the study of symptom assessment in cancer patients. Several common symptoms are presented individually, followed by an overview of efforts addressing the assessment of multiple symptoms. Also, new tools in the evaluation of symptoms, including computer-based questionnaires, are discussed.

Assessing differences in care needs and service utilization in geriatric palliative care patients

Little is known of the palliative care needs and experiences of older adults. This study explored whether these needs differed from those of younger patients. We performed a retrospective data analysis of 1184 palliative care consultations in a major teaching hospital. There were statistically significant differences across age groups in patient demographic and clinical characteristics, advance care planning, and service utilization. Patients over age 80 had a reduced prevalence of cancer, a higher prevalence of dementia and incapacity, more frequent decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments, and fewer interventions for symptom management. The palliative care needs of older adults appear to be substantially different from those of younger patients. Dementia and incapacity profoundly influence decision-making, requiring more time and communication with patients and families.

The role of hospice care in the nursing home setting

The last days of life for a substantial proportion of dying older adults are spent in nursing homes. Considering this, the provision of Medicare hospice care in nursing homes would appear to be an equitable use of Medicare expenditures as well as a valid investment in improving the quality of life for dying nursing home residents. However, government concerns regarding possible abuse of the hospice benefit in nursing homes, as well as suggestion that the payment for the benefit in nursing homes may be excessive, has perhaps slowed the adoption of hospice services into the nursing home setting. Currently, access to hospice care in nursing homes is inequitable across facilities, and across geographic areas. In nursing homes where hospice is available and present, however, recent research documents superior outcomes for residents enrolled in hospice, and perhaps for nonhospice residents. Still, more research is needed, particularly research focusing on the government costs associated with the provision of hospice care in nursing homes. If subsequent research continues to support the "added value" of hospice care in nursing homes and at the same or less total costs, the issue of foremost concern becomes how equitable access to Medicare hospice care in nursing homes can be achieved. Access may be increased to some extent by changing government policies, and conflicting regulations and interpretive guidelines, so they support and encourage the nursing home/hospice collaboration.

Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life?

OBJECTIVES

To compare analgesic management of daily pain for dying nursing home residents enrolled and not enrolled in Medicare hospice.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative cohort study.

SETTING

Over 800 nursing homes in Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, New York, and South Dakota.

PARTICIPANTS

A subset of residents with daily pain near the end of life taken from a matched cohort of hospice (2,644) and nonhospice (7,929) nursing home residents who had at least two resident assessments (Minimum Data Sets (MDSs)) completed, their last between 1992 and 1996, and who died before April 1997. The daily pain subset consisted of 709 hospice and 1,326 nonhospice residents.

MEASUREMENTS

Detailed drug use data contained on the last MDS before death were used to examine analgesic management of daily pain. Guidelines from the American Medical Directors Association (AMDA) were used to identify analgesics not recommended for use in managing chronic pain in long-term care settings. The study outcome, regular treatment of daily pain, examined whether patients received any analgesic, other than those not recommended by AMDA, at least twice a day for each day of documented daily pain (i.e., 7 days before date of last MDS).

RESULTS

Fifteen percent of hospice residents and 23% of nonhospice residents in daily pain received no analgesics (odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.45-0.74). A lower proportion of hospice residents (21%) than of nonhospice residents (29%) received analgesics not recommended by AMDA (OR = 0.65, 95% CI =0.52-0.80). Overall, acetaminophen (not in combination with other drugs) was used most frequently for nonhospice residents (25% of 1,673 prescriptions), whereas morphine derivatives were used most frequently for hospice residents (30% of 1,058 prescriptions). Fifty-one percent of hospice residents and 33% of nonhospice residents received regular treatment for daily pain. Controlling for clinical confounders, hospice residents were twice as likely as nonhospice residents to receive regular treatment for daily pain (adjusted odds ratio = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.68-2.56).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that analgesic management of daily pain is better for nursing home residents enrolled in hospice than for those not enrolled in hospice.The prescribing practices portrayed by this study reveal that many dying nursing home residents in daily pain are receiving no analgesic treatment or are receiving analgesic treatment inconsistent with AMDA and other pain management guidelines. Improving the analgesic management of pain in nursing homes is essential if high-quality end-of-life care in nursing homes is to be achieved.

Nurses' attitudes to palliative care in nursing homes in Western Australia

Nursing homes are one of the care settings in Western Australia where older people may spend their final years. Residents should be able to receive palliative care where appropriate, but this type of care is not always available at some nursing homes in the state. This study investigated nurses' attitudes to palliative care in nursing homes by examining their cognitive, affective and behavioural information. A sample of 228 nurses working in nursing homes completed a questionnaire, using a free response methodology. Results showed that participants had either a positive or negative attitude to palliative care. Cognitive and affective information significantly and independently predicted the attitudes of nurse, whereas knowledge of palliative care did not contribute significantly to these attitudes. Nurses currently working in palliative care were more positively disposed towards such care, but this disappeared when they ceased working in the area. There is an emphasis on education in the literature which does not take into account the beliefs and emotions of the nurse. Therefore, there is a need to consider these in undergraduate and postgraduate training for nurses. Current experience is also important in palliative care education. The results obtained from nurses in this study should be incorporated into policy for introducing palliative care into nursing homes and used to provide support and assistance to nurses working in this field.

Chronic pain: challenges and assessment strategies

Older adults are a rapidly growing segment of the world population, and long-term care will continue to be a major concern for most health care institutions in this century. Pain management remains at the forefront of long-term care issues, with older patients more subject than younger patients to chronic disease states that predispose them to pain. Assessment and management of chronic pain, however, are impeded by a lack of patient and caregiver education regarding pain, widespread misconceptions about pain in older patients, and special concerns and cautions for appropriate analgesic use in this population. This is the first of a two-part series highlighting issues and strategies related to pain assessment in older adults.

Nursing staff members' perceptions of pain indicators in persons with severe dementia

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to (1) identify behaviors that occur in noncommunicative nursing home residents that are perceived by nurses to be indicators of pain, (2) determine factors affecting the differentiation of pain behaviors from similar behaviors due to other causes, and (3) assess nurses' perceptions of the prevalence and importance of specific indicators of pain as well as barriers to the detection of pain in this population.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Seventy-two staff members of three nursing homes were interviewed and surveyed about specific behaviors associated with pain. Focus groups were conducted with staff to validate pain indicators and investigate perceptions of their own ability to identify pain.

RESULTS

Nursing staff members agreed on a core group of behaviors that they perceive as pain indicators in elderly persons suffering from dementia. These indicators include specific physical repetitive movements, vocal repetitive behaviors, physical signs of pain, and changes in behavior from the norm for that person. The nursing staff members' level of familiarity with the residents was reported to have a significant effect on staff members' ability to identify and differentiate pain behaviors from other behaviors of impaired residents. Barriers to the detection of pain pertain to staff issues, resident behaviors, and resident-staff relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

The study of pain among the noncommunicative elderly and, in particular, the development of a tool that can be used to assess their pain may greatly improve the quality of life of the estimated 20% to 35% of nursing home residents who cannot adequately express their needs.

Pain assessment and management in cognitively impaired nursing home residents: association of certified nursing assistant pain report, Minimum Data Set pain report, and analgesic medication use

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose of this preliminary study was to investigate the associations between certified nursing assistant (CNA) report of pain, Minimum Data Set (MDS) report of pain, and analgesic medication use in cognitively impaired nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Correlational study.

SETTING

Three nursing homes in the greater Birmingham, Alabama area.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-seven cognitively impaired nursing home residents with a mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 11.1.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain was assessed using a three-item proxy pain questionnaire (PPQ), developed by the researchers and administered to the residents' primary CNA. MDS and analgesic medication data corresponding with the time of PPQ data collection were gathered from medical records. Cognitive status was measured with the MMSE.

RESULTS

The PPQ elicited substantially higher estimates of pain prevalence than the MDS (48% versus 20%), and the PPQ and the MDS were not well correlated (pain frequency: r=.19, P=.18; pain intensity: r=.22, P=.11). The PPQ was also more strongly associated with analgesic medication use than the MDS. Cognitive status was significantly associated with pain report on the PPQ but not on the MDS. Test-retest reliability coefficients for the three items of the PPQ were excellent, ranging from.84 to.87 (P </=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The CNA-generated PPQ was a more sensitive measure of pain than the MDS for this sample. Although the MDS represents an important step toward systematic and standardized assessment of pain, more emphasis should be placed on multimodal assessment, including CNAs' perceptions and observations about pain experienced by cognitively impaired nursing home residents.