Multiple signal input and output domains of the 160-kilodalton nuclear receptor coactivator proteins

Novel glucocorticoid receptor coactivator effector mechanisms

Glucocorticoids regulate numerous distinct physiological processes, most of which rely on the ability of the hormone-bound glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to change the expression of target genes in a cell- and promoter-dependent manner. The transcriptional activity of GR depends on coactivators that regulate transcription by remodeling chromatin or by facilitating the recruitment of the basal transcriptional machinery. Coactivators are often part of multiprotein complexes that are not specific for GR but also mediate the activity of other nuclear receptors (NRs) and unrelated transcription factors. Surprisingly, recent results reveal that the activity of coactivators might contribute to the receptor, promoter and cell specificity of NR action. The emerging picture shows coactivators as flexible, but precise, coordinators of complex and dynamic networks, in which transcriptional regulation by GR and other NRs is linked to other signaling pathways.

Oct-1 preferentially interacts with androgen receptor in a DNA-dependent manner that facilitates recruitment of SRC-1

Gene regulation by steroid hormone receptors depends on the particular character of the DNA response element, the array of neighboring transcription factors, and recruitment of coactivators that interface with the transcriptional machinery. We are studying these complex interactions for the androgen-dependent enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. This enhancer has, in addition to multiple androgen receptor (AR)-binding sites, a central region (FPIV) with a binding site for the ubiquitous transcription factor Oct-1 that appears crucial for hormonal regulation in vivo. To examine the role of Oct-1 in androgen-specific gene activation, we tested the interaction of Oct-1 with AR versus glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in vivo and in vitro. Oct-1 coimmunoprecipitated from cell lysates with both AR and GR, but significant association with AR required both proteins to be DNA-bound. This was confirmed by sensitivity of the protein association to treatment with ethidium bromide or micrococcal nuclease. Addition of DNA to micrococcal nuclease-treated samples restored interaction, even when binding sites were on separate DNA molecules, suggesting association was due to direct protein-protein interaction and not indirect tethering via the DNA. AR/GR chimeras revealed that interaction of the N and C termini of AR was required to communicate the DNA-bound state that enhances interaction with Oct-1. Protease digestion assays of hormone-bound receptors revealed further conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of AR, but not GR, upon DNA binding. Furthermore, these conformational changes led to increased interaction with the coactivator SRC-1, via the NID 4 domain, suggesting DNA binding facilitates recruitment of SRC-1 by the AR-Oct-1 complex. Altogether, these results suggest that the precise arrangement of binding sites in the Slp enhancer ensures proper hormonal response by imposing differential interactions between receptors and Oct-1, which in turn contributes to SRC-1 recruitment to the promoter.

The androgen receptor (AR) amino-terminus imposes androgen-specific regulation of AR gene expression via an exonic enhancer

Androgen and glucocorticoid receptor (AR, GR), two closely related members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, can recognize a similar cis-acting DNA sequence, or hormone response element (HRE). Despite this apparent commonality, these receptors regulate distinct target genes in vivo. The AR gene itself is regulated by AR but not GR in a variety of cell types, including osteoblast-like cells, as shown here. To understand this specificity, we first identified the DNA sequences responsible for androgen-mediated up-regulation of AR messenger RNA. A 6.5-kb region encompassing exon D, intron 4, and exon E of the AR gene contains four exonic HREs and exhibits cell type-specific, AR-mediated transcriptional enhancement when placed upstream of a heterologous promoter and reporter gene. A 350-bp fragment consisting of just exons D and E exhibits the same cell- and androgen-specificity as the 6.5-kb region, as well as the native AR gene. Consistent with a role for the exonic HREs, androgen regulation via this intragenic enhancer requires the HREs as well as a functional receptor DNA binding domain. A panel of AR/GR chimeric receptors was used to test which AR domains (amino-terminal, DNA binding or ligand binding) confer androgen-specific regulation of the 350-bp enhancer. Only chimeric receptors containing the amino-terminus of AR induced reporter gene activity from the AR gene enhancer. Further, a constitutively active AR consisting of only the AR amino-terminus and DNA binding domain (AA phi) retained the capacity to activate the internal responsive region, unlike a constitutively active chimera harboring the GR amino-terminus and AR DNA binding domain (GA phi). Thus, the AR amino terminus is the sole determinant for androgen-specific regulation of the AR gene internal enhancer. These findings support a model in which the amino termini of ARs bound to HREs within the AR gene interact with an exclusive auxiliary factor(s) to elicit androgen-specific regulation of AR messenger RNA. This is the first example of androgen-specific response in which the necessary and sufficient distinguishing capacity resides within the AR amino terminus.

Synergistic enhancement of nuclear receptor function by p160 coactivators and two coactivators with protein methyltransferase activities

Nuclear receptors (NRs) activate gene transcription by binding to specific enhancer elements and recruiting coactivators of the p160 family to promoters of target genes. The p160 coactivators in turn enhance transcription by recruiting secondary coactivators, including histone acetyltransferases such as CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300/CBP-associated factor (p/CAF), as well as the recently identified protein methyltransferase, coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1). In the current study, protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1), another arginine-specific protein methyltransferase that shares a region of high homology with CARM1, was also found to act as a coactivator for NRs. PRMT1, like CARM1, bound to the C-terminal AD2 activation domain of p160 coactivators and thereby enhanced the activity of NRs in transient transfection assays. The shape of the graphs of reporter gene activity versus the amounts of CARM1 or PRMT1 expression vector indicated a cooperative relationship between coactivator concentration and activity. Moreover, CARM1 and PRMT1 acted in a synergistic manner to enhance reporter gene activation by both hormone-dependent and orphan NRs. The synergy was most evident at low levels of transfected NR expression vectors, where activation of reporter genes was almost completely dependent on the presence of NR and all three exogenously supplied coactivators, i.e. GRIP1, CARM1, and PRMT1. In contrast, with the higher levels of NR expression vectors typically used in transient transfection assays, NR activity was much less dependent on the combination of coactivators, suggesting that target gene activation occurs by different mechanisms at high versus low cellular concentrations of NR. Because multiple coactivators are presumably required to mediate transcriptional activation of native genes in vivo, the low-NR conditions may provide a more physiologically relevant assay for coactivator function.

Analysis of the steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1)-CREB binding protein interaction interface and its importance for the function of SRC1

The transcriptional activity of nuclear receptors is mediated by coactivator proteins, including steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1) and its homologues and the general coactivators CREB binding protein (CBP) and p300. SRC1 contains an activation domain (AD1) which functions via recruitment of CBP and and p300. In this study, we have used yeast two-hybrid and in vitro interaction-peptide inhibition experiments to map the AD1 domain of SRC1 to a 35-residue sequence potentially containing two alpha-helices. We also define a 72-amino-acid sequence in CBP necessary for SRC1 binding, designated the SRC1 interaction domain (SID). We show that in contrast to SRC1, direct binding of CBP to the estrogen receptor is weak, suggesting that SRC1 functions primarily as an adaptor to recruit CBP and p300. In support of this, we show that the ability of SRC1 to enhance ligand-dependent nuclear receptor activity in transiently transfected cells is dependent upon the integrity of the AD1 region. In contrast, the putative histone acetyltransferase domain, the Per-Arnt-Sim basic helix-loop-helix domain, the glutamine-rich domain, and AD2 can each be removed without loss of ligand-induced activity. Remarkably, a construct corresponding to residues 631 to 970, which contains only the LXXLL motifs and the AD1 region of SRC1, retained strong coactivator activity in our assays.

Synergistic, p160 coactivator-dependent enhancement of estrogen receptor function by CARM1 and p300

Members of the p160 coactivator family (steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1), and activator of thyroid and retinoic acid receptors (ACTR)) mediate transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors. After being recruited to the promoter by nuclear receptors, the p160 coactivator transmits the activating signal via two C-terminal activation domains, AD1 and AD2. AD1 is a binding site for the related coactivators cAMP-response element binding protein binding protein (CBP) and p300, whereas AD2 binds to another coactivator, coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1), a protein-arginine methyltransferase. The current study explored the cooperative functional and mechanistic relationships among GRIP1, CARM1, and p300 in transient transfection assays, where they enhanced the ability of the estrogen receptor (ER) to activate transcription of a reporter gene. The coactivator functions of p300 and CARM1 depended on the co-expression of GRIP1. Simultaneous co-expression of all three coactivators caused a synergistic enhancement of ER function. Deletion of the AD1 domain of GRIP1 abolished the ability of p300 to potentiate ER activity but had no effect on CARM1-mediated stimulation. In contrast, when the AD2 domain of GRIP1 was deleted, p300 still stimulated ER function through the mutant GRIP1, but CARM1 failed to do so. Thus, both binding of p300 to AD1 and binding of CARM1 to AD2 are required for their respective coactivator functions and for their synergy. Furthermore, CARM1 and p300 function independently through different activating domains of GRIP1, and their synergy suggests that they enhance transcription by different, complementary mechanisms.

Specific structural motifs determine TRAP220 interactions with nuclear hormone receptors

The TRAP coactivator complex is a large, multisubunit complex of nuclear proteins which associates with nuclear hormone receptors (NRs) in the presence of cognate ligand and stimulates NR-mediated transcription. A single subunit, TRAP220, is thought to target the entire complex to a liganded receptor through a domain containing two of the signature LXXLL motifs shown previously in other types of coactivator proteins to be essential for mediating NR binding. In this work, we demonstrate that each of the two LXXLL-containing regions, termed receptor binding domains 1 and 2 (RBD-1 and RBD-2), is differentially preferred by specific NRs. The retinoid X receptor (RXR) displays a weak yet specific activation function 2 (AF2)-dependent preference for RBD-1, while the thyroid hormone receptor (TR), vitamin D(3) receptor (VDR), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor all exhibit a strong AF2-dependent preference for RBD-2. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we show that preference for RBD-2 is due to the presence of basic-polar residues on the amino-terminal end of the core LXXLL motif. Furthermore, we show that the presence and proper spacing of both RBD-1 and RBD-2 are required for an optimal association of TRAP220 with RXR-TR or RXR-VDR heterodimers bound to DNA and for TRAP220 coactivator function. On the basis of these results, we suggest that a single molecule of TRAP220 can interact with both subunits of a DNA-bound NR heterodimer.

A new family of nuclear receptor coregulators that integrate nuclear receptor signaling through CREB-binding protein

We describe the cloning and characterization of a new family of nuclear receptor coregulators (NRCs) which modulate the function of nuclear hormone receptors in a ligand-dependent manner. NRCs are expressed as alternatively spliced isoforms which may exhibit different intrinsic activities and receptor specificities. The NRCs are organized into several modular structures and contain a single functional LXXLL motif which associates with members of the steroid hormone and thyroid hormone/retinoid receptor subfamilies with high affinity. Human NRC (hNRC) harbors a potent N-terminal activation domain (AD1), which is as active as the herpesvirus VP16 activation domain, and a second activation domain (AD2) which overlaps with the receptor-interacting LXXLL region. The C-terminal region of hNRC appears to function as an inhibitory domain which influences the overall transcriptional activity of the protein. Our results suggest that NRC binds to liganded receptors as a dimer and this association leads to a structural change in NRC resulting in activation. hNRC binds CREB-binding protein (CBP) with high affinity in vivo, suggesting that hNRC may be an important functional component of a CBP complex involved in mediating the transcriptional effects of nuclear hormone receptors.

The role of coactivators and corepressors in the biology and mechanism of action of steroid hormone receptors

Steroid hormone receptors are members of a superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. As such they have a DNA binding domain that recognizes specific target gene sequences along with separate transcriptional activation domains. What sets steroid hormone receptors (and other nuclear hormone receptors) apart from other families of sequence specific transcriptional activators is the presence of a ligand binding domain (LBD) that acts as a molecular switch to turn on transcriptional activity when a hormonal ligand induces a conformational change in the receptor. Upon binding hormone, steroid receptors recruit a novel coactivator protein complex with an essential role in receptor-mediated transcriptional activation. Coactivators function as adaptors in a signaling pathway that transmits transcriptional responses from the DNA bound receptor to the basal transcriptional machinery. Hormone agonists induce a conformational change in the carboxyl-terminal transcriptional activation domain, AF-2, that creates a new protein interaction site on the surface of the LBD that is recognized by LXXLL motifs in the p160 family of coactivators. In contrast, steroid antagonists such as the antiestrogen tamoxifen for the estrogen receptor induce an alternate conformation in AF-2 that occludes the coactivator binding site and recruits corepressors that can actively silence steroid responsive genes. Thus, the cellular availability of coactivators and corepressors is an important determinant in the biological response to both steroid hormone agonists and antagonists. This paper provides an update on the properties and mechanism of action of nuclear receptor coactivators, the nature of the coactivator-binding site, and the structural and mechanistic basis for ligand-dependent binding of coactivators to receptors.

AIB1 is a conduit for kinase-mediated growth factor signaling to the estrogen receptor

Growth factor modulation of estrogen receptor (ER) activity plays an important role in both normal estrogen physiology and the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Growth factors are known to stimulate the ligand-independent activity of ER through the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the direct phosphorylation of ER. We found that the transcriptional activity of AIB1, a ligand-dependent ER coactivator and a gene amplified preferentially in ER-positive breast cancers, is enhanced by MAPK phosphorylation. We demonstrate that AIB1 is a phosphoprotein in vivo and can be phosphorylated in vitro by MAPK. Finally, we observed that MAPK activation of AIB1 stimulates the recruitment of p300 and associated histone acetyltransferase activity. These results suggest that the ability of growth factors to modulate estrogen action may be mediated through MAPK activation of the nuclear receptor coactivator AIB1.

The 26S proteasome is required for estrogen receptor-alpha and coactivator turnover and for efficient estrogen receptor-alpha transactivation

Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) is downregulated in the presence of its cognate ligand, estradiol (E2), through the ubiquitin proteasome pathway. Here, we show that ubiquitin proteasome function is required for ER alpha to serve as a transcriptional activator. Deletion of the last 61 amino acids of ER alpha, including residues that form helix 12, abolishes ligand-mediated downregulation of the receptor as do point mutations in the ligand binding domain that impair coactivator binding. In addition, coactivators also are subject to degradation by the 26S proteasome, but their intrinsic transcriptional activity is not affected. These data provide evidence that protein interactions with ER alpha coactivator binding surfaces are important for ligand-mediated receptor down-regulation and suggest that receptor and coactivator turnover contributes to ER alpha transcriptional activity.

Differential expression and regional distribution of steroid receptor coactivators SRC-1 and SRC-2 in brain and pituitary

Members of the p160 family of steroid receptor coactivator proteins mediate the stimulatory effects on gene transcription brought about by nuclear receptors, which comprise all steroid receptors. Using in situ hybridization we have examined the neuroanatomical distribution of the messenger RNAs (mRNAs) for two functionally distinct splice variants of Steroid Receptor Coactivator 1 (SRC-1/NCoA-1) and of Steroid Receptor Coactivator 2 (SRC-2/NCoA-2/GRIP-1/TIF-2). Transcripts encoding these coactivators show highly differential expression patterns. SRC-2 mRNA is expressed at very low levels in brain, but shows expression in the anterior pituitary. SRC-la and le mRNA are expressed in many brain areas, including hippocampus, amygdala, hypothalamus, basal ganglia, and isocortex. Striking differences between SRC-1a and le expression were observed in several brain nuclei. Relative levels of SRC-1a mRNA were much higher in anterior pituitary, and the arcuate, paraventricular and ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, the locus coeruleus and the trigeminal motor nucleus, all important targets of steroid hormones in the brain. SRC-le mRNA showed modest elevation of relative expression in the caudal nucleus accumbens (shell), basolateral amygdala, and some thalamic nuclei. The differential and uneven neuroanatomical distribution of these coactivators may underlie diversity and cell-specificity of steroid receptor mediated signals in the brain.

Differences in DNA binding characteristics of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors can determine hormone-specific responses

The basis for specificity of gene regulation by steroid hormone receptors remains an important problem in the study of steroid hormone action. One possible mechanism for steroid specificity is the difference in DNA binding characteristics of the receptors, although they share a high homology in their DNA-binding domains. Indeed, the androgen-specific expression of, for example, the probasin (PB) gene can be explained by the presence of an androgen response element (ARE) in its promoter (PB-ARE-2), specifically recognized by the androgen and not by the glucocorticoid receptor. Three residues in the DNA-binding domain of the AR were identified as main determinants for its high affinity for the PB-ARE-2. In addition, the direct repeat nature of this ARE seems to prohibit high affinity binding by the glucocorticoid receptor. This is confirmed by the fact that several imperfect direct repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' core recognition sequence are recognized by the androgen receptor and not by the glucocorticoid receptor. Up to now, only differences between the androgen and glucocorticoid receptor in the transcription activation functions were invoked to explain the specificity of their genomic actions. In the present study, we describe the influence of the DNA-binding domain on the specificity of androgen action. The novelty of our working hypothesis resides in the demonstration of the capacity of the AR-DNA-binding domain to recognize elements with a direct repeat structure.

The SRC family of nuclear receptor coactivators

Nuclear hormone receptors are ligand-dependent transcription factors that regulate genes critical to such biological processes as development, reproduction, and homeostasis. Interestingly, these receptors can function as molecular switches, alternating between states of transcriptional repression and activation, depending on the absence or presence of cognate hormone, respectively. In the absence of hormone, several nuclear receptors actively repress transcription of target genes via interactions with the nuclear receptor corepressors SMRT and NCoR. Upon binding of hormone, these corepressors dissociate away from the DNA-bound receptor, which subsequently recruits a nuclear receptor coactivator (NCoA) complex. Prominent among these coactivators is the SRC (steroid receptor coactivator) family, which consists of SRC-1, TIF2/GRIP1, and RAC3/ACTR/pCIP/AIB-1. These cofactors interact with nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner and enhance transcriptional activation by the receptor via histone acetylation/methylation and recruitment of additional cofactors such as CBP/p300. This review focuses on the mechanism of action of SRC coactivators in terms of interactions with receptors and activation of transcription. Specifically, the roles of the highly conserved LXXLL motifs in mediating SRC function will be detailed. Additionally, potential diversity among SRC family members, as well as several recently cloned SRC-associated cofactors, will be discussed.

Mouse Zac1, a transcriptional coactivator and repressor for nuclear receptors

Transcriptional activation by nuclear hormone receptors is mediated by the 160-kDa family of nuclear receptor coactivators. These coactivators associate with DNA-bound nuclear receptors and transmit activating signals to the transcription machinery through two activation domains. In screening for mammalian proteins that bind the C-terminal activation domain of the nuclear receptor coactivator GRIP1, we identified a new variant of mouse Zac1 which we call mZac1b. Zac1 was previously discovered as a putative transcriptional activator involved in regulation of apoptosis and the cell cycle. In yeast two-hybrid assays and in vitro, mZac1b bound to GRIP1, to CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 (which are coactivators for nuclear receptors and other transcriptional activators), and to nuclear receptors themselves in a hormone-independent manner. In transient-transfection assays mZac1b exhibited a transcriptional activation activity when fused with the Gal4 DNA binding domain, and it enhanced transcriptional activation by the Gal4 DNA binding domain fused to GRIP1 or CBP fragments. More importantly, mZac1b was a powerful coactivator for the hormone-dependent activity of nuclear receptors, including androgen, estrogen, glucocorticoid, and thyroid hormone receptors. However, with some reporter genes and in some cell lines mZac1b acted as a repressor rather than a coactivator of nuclear receptor activity. Thus, mZac1b can interact with nuclear receptors and their coactivators and play both positive and negative roles in regulating nuclear receptor function.

Differential mechanisms of nuclear receptor regulation by receptor-associated coactivator 3

Steroid and nuclear receptor coactivators (NCoAs) have been implicated in the regulation of nuclear receptor function by enhancing ligand-dependent transcriptional activation of target gene expression. We have previously isolated receptor-associated coactivator 3 (RAC3), which belongs to the steroid receptor coactivator family. In this study, we investigated the differential mechanisms by which RAC3 interacts with and modulates the transcriptional activity of different nuclear receptors. We found that the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and estrogen receptor beta interact with different alpha-helical LXXLL motifs of RAC3. Peptides corresponding to these motifs have diverse affinities for the VDR and estrogen receptor beta, and mutation of specific motifs differentially impairs the ability of RAC3 to interact with these receptors in vitro. Consequently, these mutations inhibit the enhancement of transcriptional activation by these receptors in vivo. Furthermore, we found that the activation function-2 (AF-2) domain of the retinoid X receptor interferes with RAC3 binding to a DNA-bound VDR/retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimer, whereas the VDR AF-2 domain is required for this interaction. These results suggest a receptor-specific binding preference for the different LXXLL motifs of RAC3, which may provide flexibility for RAC3 to differentially regulate the function of different nuclear receptors.

Modulation of transcriptional activation and coactivator interaction by a splicing variation in the F domain of nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha1

Transcription factors, such as nuclear receptors, often exist in various forms that are generated by highly conserved splicing events. Whereas the functional significance of these splicing variants is often not known, it is known that nuclear receptors activate transcription through interaction with coactivators. The parameters, other than ligands, that might modulate those interactions, however, are not well characterized, nor is the role of splicing variants. In this study, transient transfection, yeast two-hybrid, and GST pulldown assays are used to show not only that nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha1 (HNF4alpha1, NR2A1) interacts with GRIP1, and other coactivators, in the absence of ligand but also that the uncommonly large F domain in the C terminus of the receptor inhibits that interaction. In vitro, the F domain was found to obscure an AF-2-independent binding site for GRIP1 that did not map to nuclear receptor boxes II or III. The results also show that a natural splicing variant containing a 10-amino-acid insert in the middle of the F domain (HNF4alpha2) abrogates that inhibition in vivo and in vitro. A series of protease digestion assays indicates that there may be structural differences between HNF4alpha1 and HNF4alpha2 in the F domain as well as in the ligand binding domain (LBD). The data also suggest that there is a direct physical contact between the F domain and the LBD of HNF4alpha1 and -alpha2 and that that contact is different in the HNF4alpha1 and HNF4alpha2 isoforms. Finally, we propose a model in which the F domain of HNF4alpha1 acts as a negative regulatory region for transactivation and in which the alpha2 insert ameliorates the negative effect of the F domain. A conserved repressor sequence in the F domains of HNF4alpha1 and -alpha2 suggests that this model may be relevant to other nuclear receptors as well.