151
|
Larsson SC, Michaëlsson K, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization in the bone field. Bone 2019; 126:51-58. [PMID: 30321669 PMCID: PMC6697532 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Identification of causative risk factors amenable for modification is essential for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Observational studies have identified associations between several potentially modifiable risk factors and osteoporosis. However, observational studies are susceptible to confounding, reverse causation bias, and measurement error, all of which limit their ability to provide causal estimates of the effect of exposures on outcomes, thereby reducing their ability to inform prevention and treatment strategies against bone loss and fractures. In addition, not all risk factors are suitable for an analysis in a randomized clinical trial. Mendelian randomization is a genetic epidemiological method that exploits genetic variants as unbiased proxies for modifiable exposures (e.g., biomarkers, adiposity measures, dietary factors, and behaviors) to determine the causal relationships between exposures and health outcomes. This technique has been used to provide evidence of causal associations of serum estradiol concentrations, smoking, body mass index, and type 2 diabetes with bone mineral density and the lack of associations of serum thyroid stimulating hormone, urate, C-reactive protein, and 25‑hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with bone mineral density in generally healthy populations. This review will briefly explain the concept of Mendelian randomization, the advantages and potential limitations of this study design, and give examples of how Mendelian randomization has been used to investigate questions relevant to osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna C Larsson
- Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Karl Michaëlsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stephen Burgess
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Trajanoska K, Rivadeneira F. The genetic architecture of osteoporosis and fracture risk. Bone 2019; 126:2-10. [PMID: 30980960 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis and fracture risk are common complex diseases, caused by an interaction of numerous disease susceptibility genes and environmental factors. With the advances in genomic technologies, large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been performed which have broadened our understanding of the genetic architecture and biological mechanisms of complex disease. Currently, more than ~90 loci have been found associated with DXA derived bone mineral density (BMD), over ~500 loci with heel estimated BMD and several others with other less widely available bone parameters such as bone geometry, shape, and microarchitecture. Notably, several of the pathways identified by the GWAS efforts correspond to pathways that are currently targeted for the treatment of osteoporosis. Overall, tremendous progress in the field of the genetics of osteoporosis has been achieved with the discovery of WNT16, EN1, DAAM2, and GPC6 among others. Assessment of the function and biological mechanisms of the remaining genes may further untangle the complex genetic landscape of osteoporosis and fracture risk. With this review we aimed to provide a general overview of the existing GWAS studies on osteoporosis traits and fracture risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Trajanoska
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Su Y, Kwok TCY, Cummings SR, Yip BHK, Cawthon PM. Can Classification and Regression Tree Analysis Help Identify Clinically Meaningful Risk Groups for Hip Fracture Prediction in Older American Men (The MrOS Cohort Study)? JBMR Plus 2019; 3:e10207. [PMID: 31687643 PMCID: PMC6820460 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the WHO fracture risk algorithm (FRAX) is used to predict fracture, the utility of some simple machine‐learning methods, such as classification and regression trees (CARTs) should be evaluated to determine their efficacy in fracture prediction. Follow‐up time for the hip fracture analyses of 5977 community‐dwelling American men aged ≥65 years old was truncated to 10 years. There were 172 (2.9%) men who had an incident nontraumatic hip fracture. The CARTs were developed using hip BMD and common clinical risk factors as follows: model 1 = using classification with continuous variables of age, total hip BMD, and femoral neck BMD, or together with common clinical risk factors; and model 2 = using classification with continuous variables of age, total hip BMD, femoral neck BMD, FRAX score, osteoporosis by T‐score at the hip, and common clinical risk factors. The predictive performance of risk models derived from CARTs was compared with the basic classification of FRAX at 3% (basic model). From model 1, discriminators selected by CART were total hip BMD, age, and femoral neck BMD; no other clinical risk factors were selected. From model 2, discriminators selected by CART were FRAX score, femoral neck BMD, and age. Compared with the basic model using only a high‐risk group by FRAX ≥3%, no significantly improved predictive performance was demonstrated by model 1 or model 2 as identified by CART with the area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve for each model of 0.714 (95% CI, 0.676 to 0.751) or 0.726 (95% CI, 0.690 to 0.762) versus 0.703 (95% CI, 0.667 to 0.740), respectively. The improved overall net reclassification improvement index was 0.02 (95% CI, –0.04 to 0.08) and 0.05 (95% CI, –0.01 to 0.10), respectively. Although a FRAX category is a good clinical indicator for hip fracture risk, a simple classification by age and BMD may provide an alternative way to estimate a clinical risk level of 3.0%. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Su
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong China
| | - Timothy C Y Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong China.,Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong China
| | - Steven R Cummings
- California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute San Francisco CA USA.,University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA USA
| | - Benjamin H K Yip
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong China
| | - Peggy M Cawthon
- California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute San Francisco CA USA.,University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Cerani A, Zhou S, Forgetta V, Morris JA, Trajanoska K, Rivadeneira F, Larsson SC, Michaëlsson K, Richards JB. Genetic predisposition to increased serum calcium, bone mineral density, and fracture risk in individuals with normal calcium levels: mendelian randomisation study. BMJ 2019; 366:l4410. [PMID: 31371314 PMCID: PMC6669416 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if genetically increased serum calcium levels are associated with improved bone mineral density and a reduction in osteoporotic fractures. DESIGN Mendelian randomisation study. SETTING Cohorts used included: the UK Biobank cohort, providing genotypic and estimated bone mineral density data; 25 cohorts from UK, USA, Europe, and China, providing genotypic and fracture data; and 17 cohorts from Europe, providing genotypic and serum calcium data (summary level statistics). PARTICIPANTS A genome-wide association meta-analysis of serum calcium levels in up to 61 079 individuals was used to identify genetic determinants of serum calcium levels. The UK Biobank study was used to assess the association of genetic predisposition to increased serum calcium with estimated bone mineral density derived from heel ultrasound in 426 824 individuals who had, on average, calcium levels in the normal range. A fracture genome-wide association meta-analysis comprising 24 cohorts and the UK Biobank including a total of 76 549 cases and 470 164 controls, who, on average, also had calcium levels in the normal range was then performed. RESULTS A standard deviation increase in genetically derived serum calcium (0.13 mmol/L or 0.51 mg/dL) was not associated with increased estimated bone mineral density (0.003 g/cm2, 95% confidence interval -0.059 to 0.066; P=0.92) or a reduced risk of fractures (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.15; P=0.85) in inverse-variance weighted mendelian randomisation analyses. Sensitivity analyses did not provide evidence of pleiotropic effects. CONCLUSIONS Genetic predisposition to increased serum calcium levels in individuals with normal calcium levels is not associated with an increase in estimated bone mineral density and does not provide clinically relevant protection against fracture. Whether such predisposition mimics the effect of short term calcium supplementation is not known. Given that the same genetically derived increase in serum calcium is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, widespread calcium supplementation in the general population could provide more risk than benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustin Cerani
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Suite H-413, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Sirui Zhou
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Suite H-413, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Vincenzo Forgetta
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - John A Morris
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Katerina Trajanoska
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Susanna C Larsson
- Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karl Michaëlsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - J Brent Richards
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Suite H-413, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E2, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Hsu YH, Estrada K, Evangelou E, Ackert-Bicknell C, Akesson K, Beck T, Brown SJ, Capellini T, Carbone L, Cauley J, Cheung CL, Cummings SR, Czerwinski S, Demissie S, Econs M, Evans D, Farber C, Gautvik K, Harris T, Kammerer C, Kemp J, Koller DL, Kung A, Lawlor D, Lee M, Lorentzon M, McGuigan F, Medina-Gomez C, Mitchell B, Newman A, Nielson C, Ohlsson C, Peacock M, Reppe S, Richards JB, Robbins J, Sigurdsson G, Spector TD, Stefansson K, Streeten E, Styrkarsdottir U, Tobias J, Trajanoska K, Uitterlinden A, Vandenput L, Wilson SG, Yerges-Armstrong L, Young M, Zillikens C, Rivadeneira F, Kiel DP, Karasik D. Meta-Analysis of Genomewide Association Studies Reveals Genetic Variants for Hip Bone Geometry. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34:1284-1296. [PMID: 30888730 PMCID: PMC6650334 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Hip geometry is an important predictor of fracture. We performed a meta-analysis of GWAS studies in adults to identify genetic variants that are associated with proximal femur geometry phenotypes. We analyzed four phenotypes: (i) femoral neck length; (ii) neck-shaft angle; (iii) femoral neck width, and (iv) femoral neck section modulus, estimated from DXA scans using algorithms of hip structure analysis. In the Discovery stage, 10 cohort studies were included in the fixed-effect meta-analysis, with up to 18,719 men and women ages 16 to 93 years. Association analyses were performed with ∼2.5 million polymorphisms under an additive model adjusted for age, body mass index, and height. Replication analyses of meta-GWAS significant loci (at adjusted genomewide significance [GWS], threshold p ≤ 2.6 × 10-8 ) were performed in seven additional cohorts in silico. We looked up SNPs associated in our analysis, for association with height, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture. In meta-analysis (combined Discovery and Replication stages), GWS associations were found at 5p15 (IRX1 and ADAMTS16); 5q35 near FGFR4; at 12p11 (in CCDC91); 11q13 (near LRP5 and PPP6R3 (rs7102273)). Several hip geometry signals overlapped with BMD, including LRP5 (chr. 11). Chr. 11 SNP rs7102273 was associated with any-type fracture (p = 7.5 × 10-5 ). We used bone transcriptome data and discovered several significant eQTLs, including rs7102273 and PPP6R3 expression (p = 0.0007), and rs6556301 (intergenic, chr.5 near FGFR4) and PDLIM7 expression (p = 0.005). In conclusion, we found associations between several genes and hip geometry measures that explained 12% to 22% of heritability at different sites. The results provide a defined set of genes related to biological pathways relevant to BMD and etiology of bone fragility. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Hsiang Hsu
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA
| | - Karol Estrada
- Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evangelos Evangelou
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina 45110, Greece
| | - Cheryl Ackert-Bicknell
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kristina Akesson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
- Department of Orthopedics, Skåne University Hospital, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Thomas Beck
- Beck Radiological Innovations, Baltimore, MD
| | - Suzanne J Brown
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Terence Capellini
- Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | - Laura Carbone
- Department of Medicine at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Jane Cauley
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ching-Lung Cheung
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Steven R Cummings
- California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Serkalem Demissie
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Econs
- Department of Medicine and Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Daniel Evans
- California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | - Charles Farber
- Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Kaare Gautvik
- Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Unger-Vetlesen Institute, and University of Oslo, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tamara Harris
- Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Intramural Research Program, NIA, Bethesda, MD
| | - Candace Kammerer
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - John Kemp
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Daniel L Koller
- Department of Medicine and Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Annie Kung
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Debbie Lawlor
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Miryoung Lee
- University of Texas, School of Public Health at Bronwsville, TX
| | - Mattias Lorentzon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fiona McGuigan
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | | | - Braxton Mitchell
- Program in Personalized and Genomic Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center - Veterans Administration Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anne Newman
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Claes Ohlsson
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Munro Peacock
- Department of Medicine and Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Sjur Reppe
- Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Unger-Vetlesen Institute, and University of Oslo, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo University Hospital, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Brent Richards
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - John Robbins
- Department of Medicine, University California at Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Timothy D Spector
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Campus, London, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Streeten
- Program in Personalized and Genomic Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center - Veterans Administration Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - André Uitterlinden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Vandenput
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Scott G Wilson
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Campus, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | | | - Mariel Young
- Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | - Carola Zillikens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas P Kiel
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA
| | - David Karasik
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Styrkarsdottir U, Stefansson OA, Gunnarsdottir K, Thorleifsson G, Lund SH, Stefansdottir L, Juliusson K, Agustsdottir AB, Zink F, Halldorsson GH, Ivarsdottir EV, Benonisdottir S, Jonsson H, Gylfason A, Norland K, Trajanoska K, Boer CG, Southam L, Leung JCS, Tang NLS, Kwok TCY, Lee JSW, Ho SC, Byrjalsen I, Center JR, Lee SH, Koh JM, Lohmander LS, Ho-Pham LT, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Woo J, Leung PC, Loughlin J, Zeggini E, Christiansen C, Rivadeneira F, van Meurs J, Uitterlinden AG, Mogensen B, Jonsson H, Ingvarsson T, Sigurdsson G, Benediktsson R, Sulem P, Jonsdottir I, Masson G, Holm H, Norddahl GL, Thorsteinsdottir U, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson K. GWAS of bone size yields twelve loci that also affect height, BMD, osteoarthritis or fractures. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2054. [PMID: 31053729 PMCID: PMC6499783 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09860-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone area is one measure of bone size that is easily derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. In a GWA study of DXA bone area of the hip and lumbar spine (N ≥ 28,954), we find thirteen independent association signals at twelve loci that replicate in samples of European and East Asian descent (N = 13,608 - 21,277). Eight DXA area loci associate with osteoarthritis, including rs143384 in GDF5 and a missense variant in COL11A1 (rs3753841). The strongest DXA area association is with rs11614913[T] in the microRNA MIR196A2 gene that associates with lumbar spine area (P = 2.3 × 10-42, β = -0.090) and confers risk of hip fracture (P = 1.0 × 10-8, OR = 1.11). We demonstrate that the risk allele is less efficient in repressing miR-196a-5p target genes. We also show that the DXA area measure contributes to the risk of hip fracture independent of bone density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sigrun H Lund
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
| | | | | | | | - Florian Zink
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Katerina Trajanoska
- Department of Epidemiology, ErasmusMC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, ErasmusMC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cindy G Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, ErasmusMC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lorraine Southam
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Jason C S Leung
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Nelson L S Tang
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Chemical Pathology and Laboratory for Genetics of Disease Susceptibility, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences,, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, 518000, China
| | - Timothy C Y Kwok
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jenny S W Lee
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Medicine, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital and Tai Po Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Suzanne C Ho
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Jacqueline R Center
- Bone Biology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
- School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Seung Hun Lee
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jung-Min Koh
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - L Stefan Lohmander
- Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, SE-22 100, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lan T Ho-Pham
- Bone and Muscle Research Lab, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam
| | - Tuan V Nguyen
- Bone Biology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - John A Eisman
- Bone Biology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
- School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
- Clinical Translation and Advanced Education, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Jean Woo
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ping-C Leung
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - John Loughlin
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Eleftheria Zeggini
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK
- Institute of Translational Genomics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764, München, Germany
| | | | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Epidemiology, ErasmusMC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, ErasmusMC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce van Meurs
- Department of Internal Medicine, ErasmusMC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Brynjolfur Mogensen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Department of Emergengy Medicine, Landspitali, The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Research Institute in Emergency Medicine, Landspitali, The National University Hospital of Iceland, and University of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Helgi Jonsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Department of Medicine, Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Thorvaldur Ingvarsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akureyri Hospital, 600, Akureyri, Iceland
- Institution of Health Science, University of Akureyri, 600, Akureyri, Iceland
| | - Gunnar Sigurdsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Research Service Center, Reykjavik, 201, Iceland
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Landspitali, The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Rafn Benediktsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Landspitali, The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Ingileif Jonsdottir
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Department of Immunology, Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Gisli Masson
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
| | - Hilma Holm
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
| | | | - Unnur Thorsteinsdottir
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
| | - Daniel F Gudbjartsson
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 107, Iceland
| | - Kari Stefansson
- deCODE genetics/Amgen Inc., Reykjavik, 101, Iceland.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Ikedo A, Kido K, Ato S, Sato K, Lee J, Fujita S, Imai Y. The effects of resistance training on bone mineral density and bone quality in type 2 diabetic rats. Physiol Rep 2019; 7:e14046. [PMID: 30916457 PMCID: PMC6436184 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Resistance training (RT) has been known to be effective in maintaining and improving bone strength, which is based on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality. However, it is not clear whether RT is effective in improving bone strength in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), who have a high risk of fracture. Therefore, we tested the effects of a 6-week RT regimen using percutaneous electrical stimulation in T2DM model rats, male Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF), and its control, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO). After 6 weeks of RT, tibial BMD in RT legs was significantly higher than that in control (CON) legs in both groups. In diaphyseal cortical bone, bone area/tissue area, and cortical thickness was significantly increased in RT legs compared with CON legs in both groups. Cortical porosity was highly observed in OLETF compared with LETO, but RT improved cortical porosity in both groups. Interestingly, trabecular number, trabecular thickness and trabecular space as well as BMD and bone volume/tissue volume in proximal tibial metaphyseal trabecular bone were significantly improved in RT legs compared with CON legs in both groups. In contrast, connectivity density and structural model index were not affected by RT. These results indicate that the 6-week RT regimen effectively increased BMD and improved bone quality in T2DM model rats as well as control rats. Therefore, RT may have the potential to improve bone strength and reduce fracture risk, even in patients with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoi Ikedo
- Faculty of Sport and Health ScienceRitsumeikan UniversityShigaJapan
- Division of Integrative PathophysiologyProteo‐Science CenterEhime UniversityEhimeJapan
| | - Kohei Kido
- Faculty of Sport and Health ScienceRitsumeikan UniversityShigaJapan
- Section of Molecular PhysiologyDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and SportsFaculty of ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Laboratory of Sports and Exercise MedicineGraduate School of Human and Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Satoru Ato
- Faculty of Sport and Health ScienceRitsumeikan UniversityShigaJapan
- Department of Life Science and Applied ChemistryNagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan
| | - Koji Sato
- Graduate School of Human Development and EnvironmentKobe UniversityKobeJapan
| | - Ji‐Won Lee
- Division of Bio‐ImagingProteo‐Science CenterEhime UniversityEhimeJapan
| | - Satoshi Fujita
- Faculty of Sport and Health ScienceRitsumeikan UniversityShigaJapan
| | - Yuuki Imai
- Division of Integrative PathophysiologyProteo‐Science CenterEhime UniversityEhimeJapan
- Department of PathophysiologyGraduate School of MedicineEhime UniversityEhimeJapan
- Division of Laboratory Animal ResearchAdvanced Research Support CenterEhime UniversityEhimeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Lucas RM, Yazar S, Young AR, Norval M, de Gruijl FR, Takizawa Y, Rhodes LE, Sinclair CA, Neale RE. Human health in relation to exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation under changing stratospheric ozone and climate. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2019; 18:641-680. [PMID: 30810559 DOI: 10.1039/c8pp90060d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Montreal Protocol has limited increases in the UV-B (280-315 nm) radiation reaching the Earth's surface as a result of depletion of stratospheric ozone. Nevertheless, the incidence of skin cancers continues to increase in most light-skinned populations, probably due mainly to risky sun exposure behaviour. In locations with strong sun protection programs of long duration, incidence is now reducing in younger age groups. Changes in the epidemiology of UV-induced eye diseases are less clear, due to a lack of data. Exposure to UV radiation plays a role in the development of cataracts, pterygium and possibly age-related macular degeneration; these are major causes of visual impairment world-wide. Photodermatoses and phototoxic reactions to drugs are not uncommon; management of the latter includes recognition of the risks by the prescribing physician. Exposure to UV radiation has benefits for health through the production of vitamin D in the skin and modulation of immune function. The latter has benefits for skin diseases such as psoriasis and possibly for systemic autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis. The health risks of sun exposure can be mitigated through appropriate sun protection, such as clothing with both good UV-blocking characteristics and adequate skin coverage, sunglasses, shade, and sunscreen. New sunscreen preparations provide protection against a broader spectrum of solar radiation, but it is not clear that this has benefits for health. Gaps in knowledge make it difficult to derive evidence-based sun protection advice that balances the risks and benefits of sun exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Lucas
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. and Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - S Yazar
- Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia and MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - M Norval
- Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - F R de Gruijl
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Y Takizawa
- Akita University School of Medicine, National Institute for Minamata Disease, Nakadai, Itabashiku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - L E Rhodes
- Centre for Dermatology Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, The University of Manchester and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - R E Neale
- QIMR Berghofer Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Australia and School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Ioannidis JPA. Unreformed nutritional epidemiology: a lamp post in the dark forest. Eur J Epidemiol 2019; 34:327-331. [DOI: 10.1007/s10654-019-00487-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
160
|
van Meurs JB, Boer CG, Lopez-Delgado L, Riancho JA. Role of Epigenomics in Bone and Cartilage Disease. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34:215-230. [PMID: 30715766 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Phenotypic variation in skeletal traits and diseases is the product of genetic and environmental factors. Epigenetic mechanisms include information-containing factors, other than DNA sequence, that cause stable changes in gene expression and are maintained during cell divisions. They represent a link between environmental influences, genome features, and the resulting phenotype. The main epigenetic factors are DNA methylation, posttranslational changes of histones, and higher-order chromatin structure. Sometimes non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), are also included in the broad term of epigenetic factors. There is rapidly expanding experimental evidence for a role of epigenetic factors in the differentiation of bone cells and the pathogenesis of skeletal disorders, such as osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. However, different from genetic factors, epigenetic signatures are cell- and tissue-specific and can change with time. Thus, elucidating their role has particular difficulties, especially in human studies. Nevertheless, epigenomewide association studies are beginning to disclose some disease-specific patterns that help to understand skeletal cell biology and may lead to development of new epigenetic-based biomarkers, as well as new drug targets useful for treating diffuse and localized disorders. Here we provide an overview and update of recent advances on the role of epigenomics in bone and cartilage diseases. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cindy G Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Lopez-Delgado
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital U M Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Jose A Riancho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital U M Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Pilz S, Zittermann A, Trummer C, Theiler-Schwetz V, Lerchbaum E, Keppel MH, Grübler MR, März W, Pandis M. Vitamin D testing and treatment: a narrative review of current evidence. Endocr Connect 2019; 8:R27-R43. [PMID: 30650061 PMCID: PMC6365669 DOI: 10.1530/ec-18-0432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Vitamin D testing and treatment is a subject of controversial scientific discussions, and it is challenging to navigate through the expanding vitamin D literature with heterogeneous and partially opposed opinions and recommendations. In this narrative review, we aim to provide an update on vitamin D guidelines and the current evidence on the role of vitamin D for human health with its subsequent implications for patient care and public health issues. Vitamin D is critical for bone and mineral metabolism, and it is established that vitamin D deficiency can cause rickets and osteomalacia. While many guidelines recommend target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations of ≥50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL), the minimum consensus in the scientific community is that serum 25(OH)D concentrations below 25-30 nmol/L (10-12 ng/mL) must be prevented and treated. Using this latter threshold of serum 25(OH)D concentrations, it has been documented that there is a high worldwide prevalence of vitamin D deficiency that may require public health actions such as vitamin D food fortification. On the other hand, there is also reason for concern that an exploding rate of vitamin D testing and supplementation increases costs and might potentially be harmful. In the scientific debate on vitamin D, we should consider that nutrient trials differ from drug trials and that apart from the opposed positions regarding indications for vitamin D treatment we still have to better characterize the precise role of vitamin D for human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Pilz
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Armin Zittermann
- Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Christian Trummer
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Verena Theiler-Schwetz
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Lerchbaum
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin H Keppel
- University Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Martin R Grübler
- Department of Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Winfried März
- Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Medical Clinic V (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Synlab Medical Center of Human Genetics Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marlene Pandis
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Katerina Trajanoska
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
163
|
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiro Sugiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, Saitama 350-0495, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Norwitz NG, Mota AS, Misra M, Ackerman KE. LRP5, Bone Density, and Mechanical Stress: A Case Report and Literature Review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:184. [PMID: 30972028 PMCID: PMC6443714 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The Wnt-β-catenin pathway receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5), is a known regulator of bone mineral density. It has been hypothesized that specific human polymorphisms in LRP5 impact bone density, in part, by altering the anabolic response of bone to mechanical loading. Although experiments in animal models support this hypothesis, there is limited evidence that LRP5 polymorphisms can alter the anabolic response of bone to mechanical loading in humans. Herein, we report a young male who harbors a rare LRP5 missense mutation (A745V) and who provides potential proof of principle for this mechanotransduction hypothesis for low bone density. The subject had no history of fractures until age 18, a year into a career in competitive distance running. As he continued to run over the following 2 years, his mileage threshold to fracture steadily and rapidly decreased until he was diagnosed with severe osteoporosis (lumbar spine BMD Z-score of -3.2). By contextualizing this case within the existing LRP5 and mechanical stress literature, we speculate that this represents the first documented case of an individual in whom a genetic mutation altered the anabolic response of bone to mechanical stress in a manner sufficient to contribute to osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G. Norwitz
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Nicholas G. Norwitz
| | - Adrian Soto Mota
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Madhusmita Misra
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kathryn E. Ackerman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Divisions of Sports Medicine and Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Koromani F, Trajanoska K, Rivadeneira F, Oei L. Recent Advances in the Genetics of Fractures in Osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:337. [PMID: 31231309 PMCID: PMC6559287 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic susceptibility, together with old age, female sex, and low bone mineral density (BMD) are amongst the strongest determinants of fracture risk. Tmost recent large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis has yielded fifteen loci. This review focuses on the advances in the research of genetic determinants of fracture risk. We first discuss the genetic architecture of fracture risk, touching upon different methods and overall findings. We then discuss in a second paragraph the most recent advances in the field and focus on the genetics of fracture risk and also of other endophenotypes closely related to fracture risk such as bone mineral density (BMD). Application of state-of-the-art methodology such as Mendelian randzation in fracture GWAS are reviewed. The final part of this review touches upon potential future directions in genetic research of osteoporotic fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fjorda Koromani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Katerina Trajanoska
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ling Oei
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Ling Oei
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Maynard RD, Ackert-Bicknell CL. Mouse Models and Online Resources for Functional Analysis of Osteoporosis Genome-Wide Association Studies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:277. [PMID: 31133984 PMCID: PMC6515928 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a complex genetic disease in which the number of loci associated with the bone mineral density, a clinical risk factor for fracture, has increased at an exponential rate in the last decade. The identification of the causative variants and candidate genes underlying these loci has not been able to keep pace with the rate of locus discovery. A large number of tools and data resources have been built around the use of the mouse as model of human genetic disease. Herein, we describe resources available for functional validation of human Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) loci using mouse models. We specifically focus on large-scale phenotyping efforts focused on bone relevant phenotypes and repositories of genotype-phenotype data that exist for transgenic and mutant mice, which can be readily mined as a first step toward more targeted efforts designed to deeply characterize the role of a gene in bone biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D. Maynard
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes the basic principles of Mendelian randomization (MR) and provides evidence for the causal effect of multiple modifiable factors on bone outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Several studies using MR approach have provided support for the causal effect of obesity on bone mineral density (BMD). Strikingly, studies have failed to prove a causal association between elevated 25(OH) D concentrations and higher BMD in community-dwelling individuals. The MR approach has been successfully used to evaluate multiple factors related to bone mineral density variation and/or fracture risk. The MR approach avoids some of the classical observational study limitations and provides more robust causal evidence, ensuring bigger success of the clinical trials. The selection of interventions based on genetic evidence could have a substantial impact on clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Trajanoska
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|