Understanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution study

Colon cancer

Colon cancer is one of the leading tumours in the world and is considered among the big killers, together with lung, prostate and breast cancer. In the recent years very important advances occurred in the field of treatment of this frequent disease: adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be effective, chiefly in stage III patients, and surgery was optimized in order to achieve the best results with a low morbidity. Several new target-oriented drugs are under evaluation and some of them (cetuximab and bevacizumab) have already exhibited a good activity/efficacy, mainly in combination with chemotherapy. The development of updated recommendations for the best management of these patients is crucial in order to obtain the best results, not only in clinical research but also in everyday practice. This report summarizes the most important achievements in this field and provides the readers useful suggestions for their professional practice.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Clinical trials have demonstrated that fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer can significantly reduce mortality. However, to be deemed a priority from a public health policy perspective, any new program must prove itself to be cost-effective. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer using a fecal occult blood screening test, the Hemoccult-II, in a cohort of 100,000 asymptomatic individuals 50-74 years of age.

METHODS

A decision analysis model using a Markov approach simulates the trajectory of the cohort allocated either to screening or no screening over a 20-year period through several health states. Clinical and economic data used in the model came from the Burgundy trial, French population-based studies, and Registry data.

RESULTS

Modeling biennial screening versus the absence of screening over a 20-year period resulted in a 17.7 percent mortality reduction and a discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 3357 Euro per life-year gained among individuals 50-74 years of age. Sensitivity analyses performed on epidemiological and economic data showed the strong impact on the results of colonoscopy cost, of compliance to screening, and of specificity of the screening test.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost-effectiveness estimates and sensitivity analyses suggest that biennial screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test could be recommended from the age of 50 until 74. Our findings support the attempts to introduce large-scale population screening programs.

Management of colorectal cancers

The management of colorectal cancers, published in a recent issue of Effective Health Care, is reviewed.

EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94--results and commentary

EUROCARE-3 analysed the survival of 1815584 adult cancer patients diagnosed from 1990 to 1994 in 22 European countries. The results are reported in tables, one per cancer site, coded according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 classification. The main findings of the tables are summarised and commented on in this article. For most solid cancers, wide differences in survival between different European populations were found, as also reported by EUROCARE-1 and EUROCARE-2, despite a remarkable (10%) overall increase in cancer survival from 1985 to 1994. Survival was highest in northern Europe (Sweden, Norway, Finland and Iceland), and fairly good in central-southern Europe (France, Switzerland, Austria and Spain). Survival was particularly low in eastern Europe, low in Denmark and the UK, and fairly low in Portugal and Malta. The mix of tumour stage at diagnosis explains much of the survival differences for cancers of the digestive tract, female reproductive system, breast, thyroid, and also skin melanoma. For tumours of the urinary tract and prostate, the differences were explained mainly by differences in diagnostic criteria and procedures. The case mix by anatomic subsite largely explains differences in survival for head and neck cancers. For oesophagus, pancreas, liver and brain cancer, with poor prognoses, survival differences were limited. Tumours, for which highly effective treatments are available, such as testicular cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma and some haematological malignancies, had fairly uniform survival across Europe. Survival for all tumours combined (an indicator of the overall cancer care performance of a nation's health system) was better in young than old patients, and better in women than men. The affluence of countries influenced overall cancer survival through the availability of adequate diagnostic and treatment procedures, and screening programmes.

The influence of training level and surgical experience on survival in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effect of surgical training level, experience, and operation volume on complications and survival in colorectal cancer during a 10-year period in a medium-volume university hospital was retrospectively studied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred and fifty-six patients were resected for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma during the 10-year period of 1981-1990, and of these, 387 patients underwent resection with curative intent. The surgeons were divided into three groups according to training level and volume: group 1, surgeons in training and other surgeons operating annually on only 1-4 patients; group 2, surgeons specializing in gastrointestinal surgery (average annual volume 4-13 operations); group 3, specialists in gastrointestinal surgery (average annual volume 3-8 operations). Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, as well as long-term survival rates, were analysed, and comparisons were made between the patients in the three groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups in postoperative morbidity or mortality. Cancer-specific 5-year survival rate of all patients was 57%, and that of those resected in the aforementioned three groups was 51%, 63%, and 55%, respectively, P=0.087. The 5-year survival rates for colon cancer were 59% (total), 52%, 69%, and 58%, respectively, P=0.067, and for rectal cancer were 51% (total), 42%, 53%, and 52%, respectively, P=0.585.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative mortality, morbidity, and long-term overall survival between the volume groups. However, in patients with colon cancer, there was a trend for better survival for those operated on by the surgeons specializing in gastrointestinal surgery, and in rectal cancer patients, a tendency of fewer local recurrences in those operated on by the specialist surgeons.

Rectal cancer

Rectal cancer is an important tumour from an epidemiological point of view and represents the benchmark for an optimal use of integrated treatments (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) in the oncological practice. Performing radio-chemotherapy (best if preoperatively), medical and radiation oncologists are now able to increase survival, to decrease the occurrence of pelvic recurrence and to ameliorate the quality of life of patients. Updated recommendations for the management of these patients are here reported.

Colon cancer prevalence and estimation of differing care needs of colon cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Cancer prevalence-the proportion of people in a population with a diagnosis of cancer-includes groups with widely differing cancer care needs. We estimated the proportions of the prevalent colon cancer cases requiring initial care, terminal care and follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prevalence by year since diagnosis was estimated from incidence and vital status data on 243,471 colon cancer cases collected by EUROPREVAL from 36 European population-based cancer registries. The proportions of cured and fatal cases were estimated by applying 'cure' survival models to the dataset. The proportion of recurrence-free cases was estimated by analysis of a representative sample of 278 colon cancer patients from the Lombardy Cancer Registry (LCR), northern Italy.

RESULTS

The proportions of total prevalence requiring initial care was estimated at 12% in the LCR and 10% in Italy and Europe. Recurrence-free patients formed 89% of the total prevalence in the LCR and 91% in Italy and Europe. Eleven per cent (LCR) and 9% (Italy, Europe) of the total prevalence had recurred and consisted of patients in the terminal phase of their illness.

CONCLUSIONS

In 1992, 660,000 people were living with a diagnosis of colon cancer in Europe. We have estimated the proportions of this prevalence requiring particular types health care in the years following diagnosis, providing data useful for planning the allocation of health-care resources.

Factors influencing time from presentation to treatment of colorectal and breast cancer in urban and rural areas

Stage at diagnosis and survival from cancer vary according to where people live, suggesting some may have delays in diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine if time from presentation to treatment was longer for colorectal and breast cancer patients living further from cancer centres, and identify other important factors in delay. Data were collected on 1097 patients with breast and 1223 with colorectal cancer in north and northeast Scotland. Women with breast cancer who lived further from cancer centres were treated more quickly than those living closer to cancer centres (P=0.011). Multilevel modelling found that this was largely due to them receiving earlier treatment at hospitals other than cancer centres. Breast lump, change in skin contour, lymphadenopathy, more symptoms and signs, and increasing age predicted faster treatment. Screen detected cancers and private referrals were treated more quickly. For colorectal cancer, time to treatment was similar for people in rural and urban areas. Quicker treatment was associated with palpable rectal or abdominal masses, tenesmus, abdominal pain, frequent GP consultations, age between 50 and 74 years, tumours of the transverse colon, and iron medication at presentation. Delay was associated with past anxiety or depression. There was variation between general practices and treatment appeared quicker at practices with more female general practitioners.

Factors influencing time from presentation to treatment of colorectal and breast cancer in urban and rural areas

Stage at diagnosis and survival from cancer vary according to where people live, suggesting some may have delays in diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine if time from presentation to treatment was longer for colorectal and breast cancer patients living further from cancer centres, and identify other important factors in delay. Data were collected on 1097 patients with breast and 1223 with colorectal cancer in north and northeast Scotland. Women with breast cancer who lived further from cancer centres were treated more quickly than those living closer to cancer centres (P=0.011). Multilevel modelling found that this was largely due to them receiving earlier treatment at hospitals other than cancer centres. Breast lump, change in skin contour, lymphadenopathy, more symptoms and signs, and increasing age predicted faster treatment. Screen detected cancers and private referrals were treated more quickly. For colorectal cancer, time to treatment was similar for people in rural and urban areas. Quicker treatment was associated with palpable rectal or abdominal masses, tenesmus, abdominal pain, frequent GP consultations, age between 50 and 74 years, tumours of the transverse colon, and iron medication at presentation. Delay was associated with past anxiety or depression. There was variation between general practices and treatment appeared quicker at practices with more female general practitioners.

Explaining gastric cancer survival differences among European countries

Wide geographic variability in incidence and mortality rates for gastric cancer exists throughout the world despite persistent decreases over several decades. Variability in survival from gastric cancer is also evident and countries with higher incidence rates of gastric cancer show better survival rates than countries with lower incidence. The aim of this study was to identify reasons for the association between incidence and survival and to obtain survival estimates and differences corrected for this variation, thus facilitating further interpretation by clinical factors such as stage and treatment. Relative survival rates for gastric cancer derived from the EUROCARE-2 database for 47 cancer registries in 17 European countries were analyzed with regression methods to adjust differences by age, sex, period of diagnosis, subsite of the stomach, histologic type and stage at diagnosis. Overall, nearly 60% of the variability in gastric cancer relative survival was explained by differences in these variables. Factors are related to treatment and general management of patients is expected to explain the residual variability in gastric cancer survival between European countries. There is a need to improve completeness and standardization of detailed information collected on gastric cancer patients to allow detailed comparative analyses and interpretation.

Changing practices for diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in calvados: 1990-1999

AIM

Two consensus conferences on management of colorectal cancer were conducted in France during the last ten Years: one regarding rectal cancers in 1994 and the other regarding colonic cancer in 1998. In the present study, we examined data collected in a local gastrointestinal cancer registry to investigate changes in management practices for colorectal cancer in a well-defined population seen between 1990 and 1999.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 3 135 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed in Calvados (an administrative district in northern France) from 1990 to 1999. Two periods were defined: P1=1990-1994 and P2=1995-1999. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

No trends in stage of disease at diagnosis or rate of surgical resection were observed. For patients with cancer of the rectum, the rate of sphincter preservation increased significantly from 65.6% in P1 to 72.3% in P2, in men and in all patients under the age of 75 Years. For patients with cancer of the colon, the number of resection specimens with at least eight examined lymph nodes increased from 50.7% in P1 to 60.2% in P2. This trend predominated in university centers; for rectal cancer patients it was significant only in university centers. Prescription of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colonic cancer increased significantly: 41.4% in P1 and 52.5% in P2. No changes in prescription of adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer were observed, irrespective of the stage at diagnosis. The proportion of patients managed in university centers decreased significantly over time from 30.5% in P1 to 27.6% in P2, with a corresponding increase in private clinics.

CONCLUSION

Most of the trends observed during the study period began before the consensus conference guidelines were Issued. The consensus guidelines appear to have influenced management practices mainly in university centers, while the majority of patients are managed in non-university centers.

Colorectal cancer survival trends in Norway 1958–1997

The purpose of this study was to examine the pattern of survival for colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), and to investigate the prognostic factors for the disease. In the analysis, 50993 cases of CRC aged 40-84 years, diagnosed between 1958 and 1997 in Norway, were included. Esteve's relative survival method was used, together with a time trend analysis, conducted by least-squares linear regression. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to examine cause-specific mortality. Five-year relative CRC survival has increased by an estimated 3% per 5-year diagnostic period. In 1958-1962, relative survival was about 40% for both males and females, and increased to 56 and 60%, respectively, in 1993-1997. Rectal cancer had a higher cause-specific mortality (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.22-1.30) than proximal colon (reference) and distal colon (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.00 cancers), while females had a lower cause-specific mortality than males (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.86-0.90). The increase in the relative survival rate in Norway is probably due to improved treatments and advanced diagnostics. Norway has a higher CRC survival rate than the EUROCARE average.

Lymph node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: evidence from a regional audit

AIMS

To assess the quality of histopathology reporting and accuracy of Dukes's staging of colorectal cancers in the former South Western Health region and to determine the impact of numbers of lymph nodes examined on stage ascription.

METHODS

Histopathology reports of colorectal cancer for 1993-7 were analysed. Completeness was assessed regarding reported numbers of lymph nodes examined, numbers found positive, Dukes's stage, and ICD9 code. Numbers of lymph nodes examined, numbers found positive, and Dukes's stage were recorded. Results from one hospital known to have high standards of reporting were compared with those from elsewhere.

RESULTS

In total, 629 reports were examined from the reference hospital and 918 from elsewhere. Fewer than one in 20 (4.3%) reports from the reference hospital were incomplete, compared with a third (36.1%) elsewhere. The average number of nodes examined for each case at the reference hospital was 18.81 and 6.41 elsewhere. The average number of positive nodes for each case was 2.47 at the reference hospital and 1.15 elsewhere. The proportion of Dukes's stage C cases was significantly higher at the reference hospital than elsewhere. Ascertainment of Dukes's stage C cases was related to number of lymph nodes examined, with optimal ascertainment levels when at least 10 and fewer than 15 nodes were examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Standards of histopathology reporting, and ascertainment of Dukes's stage C, were significantly higher at the reference hospital. Variations in ascertainment levels of Dukes's stage C disease mainly resulted from variations in the numbers of lymph nodes examined.

Review article: balancing the ideal versus the practical-considerations of colorectal cancer prevention and screening

Colorectal cancer is responsible for over 500 000 deaths annually world-wide. Death from colorectal cancer is preventable, primarily through early diagnosis of disease that has not metastasized. The disease itself may be prevented by the detection and removal of colorectal adenomas, from which more than 95% of colorectal cancers arise. Currently there are several screening methods for the disease. These include faecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopy, barium enema and colonscopy as well as emerging methods of virtual colonoscopy and faecal DNA testing. While direct and indirect evidence support the efficacy of these tests they differ from each other in their sensitivity, specificity, cost, and safety. Various professional organizations in different geographical regions of the world have published recommendations on which screening methods to use and when in patients at average- or high-risk. The challenge in reducing the incidence and mortality of this disease lies in increasing accessibility to and compliance with screening and delivery within a quality assured programme.

Differences in colorectal cancer survival between European and US populations: the importance of sub-site and morphology

A previous study has shown a lower survival for colorectal cancer in Europe than in the United States of America (USA). It is of interest to examine the extent to which anatomical location and morphological type influence this difference in colorectal cancer survival. We analysed survival for 151,244 European and 53,884 US patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer aged 15-99 years during the period of 1985-1989, obtained from 40 cancer registries that contribute to the EUROCARE study from 17 countries, and nine Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER) registries in the USA. Cases included in the analysis were first primary malignant tumours (ICD-O behaviour code 3 or higher). Relative survival was estimated to correct for competing causes of mortality. The Hakulinen-Tenkanen multiple regression approach was used to examine the prognostic impact of sub-site and ICD-O histology codes. Relative excess risks (RERs) derived from this approach estimate the extent to which the hazard of death differs from that in a reference region after adjustment for mortality in the general population. In order to explore geographical variation, we defined three groups of European registries within which survival rates were known to be broadly similar. The proportion of cases with unspecified sub-site was higher in Europe than the USA (10% versus 2%), but sub-site distributions were broadly similar in the two populations. With the exception of appendix, 5-year survival was 13-22% higher in the USA than in Europe for each anatomical sub-site. The proportion of non-microscopically-verified cases was higher in Europe than the USA (16 versus 3%). Adenocarcinomas arising in a polyp (ICD-O-2 8210, 8261, 8263) were more frequent in the USA than Europe (13 versus 2%). Five-year survival was higher in the USA than Europe for each morphological group, with the exception of non-microscopically-verified cases. When age, gender and sub-site were considered, RERs ranged from 1.52 to 2.40 for the European populations (with the USA as a reference). After inclusion of morphology codes, the range of RERs fell to between 1.28 and 1.86, mainly because of the high frequency of adenocarcinoma in polyps in the USA. This analysis suggests that the large survival advantage for colorectal cancer patients in the USA can only marginally be explained by differences in the distribution of sub-site and morphology. The main explanatory difference is the proportion of adenocarcinoma in polyps.

European health systems and cancer care

INTRODUCTION

Data on the survival of all incident cases collected by population-based cancer registries make it possible to evaluate the overall performance of diagnostic and therapeutic actions on cancer in those populations. EUROCARE-3 is the third round of the EUROCARE project, the largest cancer registry population based collaborative study on survival in European cancer patients. The EUROCARE-3 study analysed the survival of cancer patients diagnosed from 1990 to 1994 and followed-up to 1999. Sixty-seven cancer registries of 22 European countries characterised by differing health systems participated in the study. This paper includes essays providing brief overviews of the state and evolution of the health systems of the considered countries and comments on the relation between cancer survival in Europe and some European macro-economic and health system indicators, in the 1990s.

OVERVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN HEALTH SYSTEMS

The European health systems underwent a great deal of reorganisation in the last decade; a general tendency being to facilitate expanding involvement of the private sector in health care, a process which occurred mainly in the eastern countries (i.e. the Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia). In contrast, organisational changes in the northern European countries (i.e. Denmark, Iceland, Finland and Sweden) tended to confirm the established public sector systems. Other countries, including the UK and some southern European countries (i.e. England, Scotland, Wales, Malta and Italy) have reduced the public role while the systems remain basically public, at least at present. Our findings clearly suggest that cancer survival (all cancer combined) is related to macro-economic variables such as the gross domestic product (GDP), the total national (public and private) expenditure on health (TNEH) and the total public expenditure on health (TPEH). We found, however, that survival is related to wealth (GDP), but only up to a certain level, after which survival continues to be related to the level of health investment (both TNEH and TPEH). According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the TNEH increased during the 1990s in all EUROCARE-3 countries, while the ratio of TPEH to TNEH reduced in all countries except Portugal.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survival depends on the widespread application of effective diagnosis and treatment modalities, but our enquiry suggests that the availability of these depends on macro-economic determinants, including health and public health investment. Analysis of the relationship between health system organisation and cancer outcome is complicated and requires more information than is at present available. To describe cancer and cancer management in Europe, the European Cancer Health Indicator Project (EUROCHIP) has proposed a list of indicators that have to be adopted to evaluate the effects on outcome of proposed health system modifications.

Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe

We used multiple regression models to assess the influence of disease stage at diagnosis on the 5-year relative survival of 4,478 patients diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990-1992. The cases were representative samples from 17 population-based cancer registries in 6 European countries (Estonia, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and UK) that were combined into 9 regional groups based on similar survival. Five-year relative survival was 79% overall, varying from 98% for early, node-negative (T1N0M0) tumours; 87% for large, node-negative (T2-3N0M0) tumours; 76% for node-positive (T1-3N+M0) tumours and 55% for locally advanced (T4NxM0) tumours to 18% for metastatic (M1) tumours and 69% for tumours of unspecified stage. There was considerable variation across Europe in relative survival within each disease stage, but this was least marked for early node-negative tumours. Overall 5-year relative survival was highest in the French group of Bas-Rhin, Côte d'Or, Hérault and Isère (86%), and lowest in Estonia (66%). These geographic groups were characterised by the highest and lowest percentages of women with early stage disease (T1N0M0: 39% and 9%, respectively). The French, Dutch and Italian groups had the highest percentage of operated cases. The number of axillary nodes examined, a factor influencing nodal status, was highest in Italy and Spain. After adjusting for TNM stage and the number of nodes examined, survival differences were greatly reduced, indicating that for these women, diagnosed with breast cancer in Europe during 1990-1992, the survival differences were mainly due to differences in stage at diagnosis. However, in 3 regional groups, the relative risks of death remained high even after these adjustments, suggesting less than optimal treatment. Screening for breast cancer did not seem to affect the survival patterns once stage had been taken into account.

Fecal primary bile acids and serum cholesterol are associated with colorectal adenomas

In order to identify biomarkers of colorectal tumors, 20 subjects with colorectal adenomas were compared with 20 controls as regards fecal parameters (pH, short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and sterols), blood parameters (bile acids, cholesterol, triglycerides, glycemia and insulinemia), and rectal cell proliferation. Variables were compared by unconditional logistic regression, controlling for gender. There were significant and positive associations between risk of adenoma and total fecal primary bile acids and serum cholesterol, with odds ratios for the third versus first tertile = 9.4 (P for trend = 0.03) and 8.6 (P for trend = 0.04), respectively. There was a trend towards an increased triglycerides level in adenoma subjects compared with controls (P = 0.08). These three parameters correlated with cell proliferation, although cell proliferation itself was not significantly associated with adenomas. In conclusion, these results suggest that fecal primary bile acids and serum cholesterol are markers of early events of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Time trends and regional differences in registration, stage distribution, surgical management and survival of breast cancer in Denmark

The aim of this study was to analyse time trends, stage at diagnosis, survival and registration of population-based cohorts of breast cancer patients in selected Danish counties (in total 2504) in 1986 and 1996-1997. In 1986, no differences in the extent of disease were observed between the counties. Patients from one county (Funen) had centralised surgery, significantly more lymph nodes removed and a better survival in the multivariate analysis. In 1996-1997, mammographical screening had been implemented in Funen, leading to a significantly better stage distribution, whereas stage remained unchanged in the other counties. In Funen, survival was significantly better than in the other counties in univariate, but not in multivariate analysis. Survival increased significantly with time only in Funen. Inclusion in clinical trials increased over time and the coverage of the database in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) was high. However, patients not notified in DBCG had, beside older age, also worse stage of disease distribution and less extensive surgery. A difference in survival was observed between the counties. In 1986, this may be explained by a centralised surgical system in one county, whereas in 1996-1997 improvements could be due to an early diagnosis and other as yet unknown factors. The DBCG database cannot be considered as representative of the Danish population of breast cancer patients.

[Cancer of the rectum: target volumes for preoperative radiotherapy]

Preoperative radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced resectable rectal adenocarcinoma. The total mesorectal excision leads to a dramatic increase of local control rate. Thus, the mesorectal space is the usual field for the spread of rectal cancers cells. It could therefore be considered as the clinical target volume (CTV) in the preoperative conformational radiotherapy. From the anatomical basis and radiological contributions, we propose several CTVs for different locations of rectal carcinoma.

Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research

Ethics committees now require that individuals give informed consent to much health services research, in the same way as for clinical research. This is misguided. Existing ethical guidelines do not help us decide how to seek consent in these cases, and have allowed managerial experimentation to remain largely unchecked. Inappropriate requirements for individual consent can institutionalise health inequalities and reduce access to services for vulnerable groups. This undermines the fundamental purpose of the National Health Service (NHS), and ignores our rights and duties as its members, explored here. Alternative forms of community consent should be actively pursued.

The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology

AIMS

The aims were to review the existing methods of quality assurance in surgical oncology and to determine a relationship between surgery-related factors and the variety in outcomes in the treatment of solid cancers.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed by searching Medline and Cancerlit databases.

RESULTS

Wide variations were found in virtually all tumour types. Clear evidence was found that an improvement in the quality of the surgical procedure could have major implications for the prognosis and quality of life of cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the need for strict quality control procedures in surgical oncology and might imply a considerable change in cancer treatment strategies, because the routine use of adjuvant therapies could be questioned.

Current trends in colorectal cancer: site, incidence, mortality and survival in England and Wales

The objective was to examine trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in England and Wales over the last 30 years. Age-standardized incidence, mortality and survival rates for CRC, based on data from the National Cancer Intelligence Centre at the Office for National Statistics, were calculated and trends assessed. Between 1971 and 1997 the total number of cases of CRC increased by 42%, from 20,400 to 28,900. The site distribution of CRC between 1971 and 1994 was: rectum 38%, sigmoid 29%, caecum 15%, transverse colon and flexures 10%, ascending colon 5%, and descending colon 3%. Between 1971 and 1997 the direct age-standardized incidence increased by 20% in males and by 5% in females. The direct age-standardized mortality fell by 24% in males and by 37% in females. Age-standardized relative 5-year survival in adults improved from 22%-27% for patients diagnosed during 1971-1975 to over 40% for those diagnosed during the period 1991-1993. In conclusion, the incidence of CRC in England and Wales has been steadily rising. It is more common in males and has increased more rapidly in males than in females. The reasons for these trends remain unclear. Five-year survival has improved substantially, but rates are still below those in comparable countries elsewhere in Europe and in the USA.

Colon cancer in France: evidence for improvement in management and survival

BACKGROUND

Cancer registries recording all cases diagnosed in a well defined population represent the only way to assess real changes in the management of colon cancer at the population level.

AIMS

To determine trends over a 23 year period in treatment, stage at diagnosis, and prognosis of colon cancer in the Côte-d'Or region, France.

PATIENTS

A total of 3389 patients with colon cancer diagnosed between 1976 and 1998.

METHODS

Time trends in clinical presentation, surgical treatment, chemotherapy treatment, stage at diagnosis, postoperative mortality, and survival were studied. A non-conditional logistic regression was performed to obtain an odds ratio for each period adjusted for the other variables. To estimate the independent effect of the period on prognosis, a relative survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Between 1976 and 1991, the resection rate increased from 69.3% to 91.9% and then remained stable. This increase was particularly marked in the older age group (56.4% to 90.5%). The proportion of stage III patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy rose from 4.1% for the 1989-1990 period to 45.7% for the 1997-1998 period. Over the 23 years of the study the proportion of stage I and II patients increased from 39.6% to 56.6%, associated with a corresponding decrease in the proportion of patients with advanced stages. Postoperative mortality decreased from 19.5% to 7.3%. This led to an improvement in five year relative survival (from 33.0% for the 1976-1979 period to 55.3% for the 1992-1995 period).

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in the management of colon cancer have resulted in improving the prognosis of this disease. However, progress is still possible, particularly in the older age group.

Are differences in stage at presentation a credible explanation for reported differences in the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in Europe?

Popular reporting of a comparison of cancer survival rates across 17 European countries, based on data collected by national and regional cancer registries, has left an impression of inadequate treatment of patients in the UK. A subsequent study has suggested that the poor survival rates reported for the UK can, in large part, be explained by more advanced stage at presentation. We believe this conclusion to be unsound and use this study as an example to illustrate the methodological difficulties which may arise during such international comparisons. As the NHS cancer plan aspires to achieve for the UK parity with the best cancer care in Europe, careful thought needs to be given to identifying countries with which the UK can usefully compare itself and the most appropriate indicators for this comparison.

Pathology of colorectal cancer

The earliest phases of colorectal tumourigenesis initiate in the normal mucosa, with a generalised disorder of cell replication, and with the appearance of clusters of enlarged crypts (aberrant crypts) showing proliferative, biochemical and biomolecular abnormalities. The large majority of colorectal malignancies develop from adenomatous polyps. These can be defined as well demarcated masses of epithelial dysplasia, with uncontrolled crypt cell division. An adenoma can be considered malignant when neoplastic cells pass through the muscularis mucosae and infiltrate the submucosa. Definitions like "carcinoma in situ" or "intramucosal carcinoma" should be abandoned, since they lead to confusion. Although several lines of evidence indicate that carcinomas usually originate from pre-existing adenomas, this does not imply that all polyps undergo malignant changes, and does not exclude "de novo" carcinogenesis. Besides adenomas, other types of polypoid lesions include hyperplastic polyps (showing elongated crypts often with cystic dilatation), serrated adenomas (with a serrated glandular pattern], flat adenomas (flat lesions which are difficult to detect in routine lower endoscopy, but may possess malignant potential), hamartomatous polyps (which show a complex branching pattern of smooth muscle supporting normal lamina propria and glands), and inflammatory polyps. Colorectal carcinomas are one of the most frequent neoplasms in Western society; the macroscopic appearance of these lesions may be that of a polypoid vegetating mass or of a flat infiltrating lesion. Most of these tumours are adenocarcinomas (96%), that, in some cases, show a mucinous component. More rare malignancies of the large bowel include signet-ring cell carcinoma, squamous carcinoma, undifferentiated neoplasms and medullary type adenocarcinoma (solid carcinoma with minimal glandular differentiation or slight cellular pleomorphism). Colorectal carcinoma can be graded into well, moderately and poorly differentiated lesions; there is little evidence, however, that grading may be of help in evaluating prognosis of affected patients. In conclusion, colorectal tumours cover a wide range of premalignant and malignant lesions, many of which can easily be removed at endoscopy. It follows that colorectal neoplasms might be prevented by interfering with the various steps of carcinogenesis, which begins with uncontrolled epithelial cell replication, continues with the formation of adenomas of various dimensions, and eventually evolves into malignancy.

Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales

BACKGROUND

Cancer survival often has been reported as lower for the poor than the rich, but, to the authors' knowledge, systematic national estimates of deprivation gradients in survival over long periods of time have not been available.

METHODS

The authors estimated national population-based survival rates for almost 3 million people who were diagnosed with 1 of 58 types of cancers (47 in adults, 11 in children) in England and Wales during the 20-year period 1971-1990 and followed through December 31, 1995. Cancer patients were assigned by their address at diagnosis to 1 of 5 categories (quintiles of the national distribution) of material deprivation by using a standard index derived from census data on unemployment, car ownership, household overcrowding, and social class that was available for all 109,000 census tracts in Great Britain. The authors used relative survival rates: the ratio of observed survival among the cancer patients to the survival that would have been expected if they had had the same background mortality as the general population. Background mortality differed widely among socioeconomic categories, and the authors constructed life tables from raw national mortality data by gender, single year of age, calendar period of death, and socioeconomic category to adjust for it. The authors used variance-weighted least squares regression to estimate both time trends in age standardized survival and socioeconomic gradients in survival. The number of avoidable deaths was estimated from the observed mortality excess compared with the expected mortality in each group of patients.

RESULTS

Survival rose steadily for most cancers over 25 years to 1995 in England and Wales, but inequalities in survival between patients living in rich and poor areas were geographically widespread and persistent over this period of time. These patterns existed for 44 of 47 adult cancers examined but not for 11 childhood cancers. These inequalities in survival represented more than 2500 deaths that would have been avoided each year if all cancer patients had had the same chance of surviving up to 5 years after diagnosis as patients in the most affluent group.

CONCLUSIONS

The largest national cancer survival study has provided strong evidence of systematic disadvantage in outcome among patients who lived in poorer districts compared with those who lived in wealthier districts.