Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis

Venous Thrombosis and Stenosis After Implantation of Pacemakers and Defibrillators

Venous complications of pacemaker/ implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system implantation rarely cause immediate clinical problems. The challenge starts when patients come for system revision or upgrade. Numerous reports of venous complications such as stenosis, occlusions, and superior vena cava syndrome have been published. We reviewed current knowledge of these complications, management, and their impact on upgrade/revision procedures. One study has suggested that intravenous lead infection promotes local vein stenosis. Another found that the presence of a temporary wire before implantation is associated with an increased risk of stenosis. Although data for ICD leads is based only on three studies-it suggests that the rate of venous complications is very similar to that of pacing systems, and probably data from pacing leads can be extrapolated to ICD leads. Despite 40 years of experience with transcutaneous implanted intravenous pacing systems and dozens of studies, we were unable to identify clear risk factors (confirmed by independent studies) that lead to venous stenosis. Neither the hardware (lead size, number and material) nor the access site choice (cephalic cut down, subclavian or axillary puncture) appears to affect rate of venous complications. A few factors were proposed as predictors of severe venous stenosis/occlusion: presence of multiple pacemaker leads (compared to a single lead), use of hormone therapy, personal history of venous thrombosis, the presence of temporary wire before implantation, previous presence of a pacemaker (ICD as an upgrade) and the use of dual-coil leads. Anticoagulant therapy (for other reasons than pacemaker lead) seemed to have protective antithrombotic effect.

Sonographic evaluation of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this presentation is to review the techniques of performing an upper extremity Doppler examination, in addition to illustrating the sonographic appearances of acute and chronic upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT).

METHODS

The risk factors and complications of UEDVT are discussed, and the anatomy of the upper extremity deep venous system as well as examination techniques are described. Cases of acute and chronic deep venous thrombosis were also chosen to illustrate the spectrum of sonographic appearances.

RESULTS

Color Doppler sonography is accurate in the diagnosis of UEDVT. However, in cases of equivocal Doppler findings, or when the sonographic findings are normal but clinical suspicion for central venous thrombosis is high, magnetic resonance or contrast venography is necessary for further evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Color Doppler sonography is a rapid and noninvasive technique in the evaluation of venous disease in the upper extremity and is the modality of choice in screening for UEDVT.

[Upper limb deep venous thrombosis. Risk factors, outcome, and posthrombotic syndrome]

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was that of describing a series of episodes of upper limb deep venous thrombosis, with special emphasis on the incidence of posthrombotic syndrome and its impact in the quality of life of the patients.

METHODS

33 episodes (29 patients) of upper limb deep venous thrombosis were studied, between January 1995 and January 2002; episodes until September 1999 (18 episodes) were considered retrospectively while those which took place starting in this date (15 episodes) were considered prospectively. In all, 24 patients were cared in hospital clinic. It was possible to obtain complete data in 16 cases, in which evolution toward posthrombotic syndrome, venous revascularization, and impact of the pathological process in the global quality of life of patients were studied.

RESULTS

Average age of patients was 58.9 years. In 25 episodes (75.8%) some risk factor for venous thrombosis existed, the presence of a venous catheter being the most frequent. Subclavian axillary affectation was predominant (18 episodes, 55%) and in the left side (25 episodes, 76%). Twenty-eight episodes were diagnosed with echography (84.8%). Mean D-dimers concentration (N = 16) was 1,046 ng/ml (standard deviation [SD]: 826.9). One of the episodes (3%) was associated to lung thromboembolism. Treatment consisted on the administration of low molecular weight heparin during the acute phase in 70% of the cases. In 13 episodes (39%) additional treatment of thrombosis (endovascular in most) was carried out. In 29 episodes (88%) chronic treatment was administered with acenocoumarol, while in 4 episodes (12%) the administration of low molecular weight heparin was kept. No patient died during hospitalization. In 15 patients (52%) control of revascularizacion was performed. We detected complete revascularization in 6 patients (40%), revascularization with collateral circulation in 4 patients (27%), partial revascularization in other 4 patients (27%) and presence of permeability but with expansion and tortuosity of deep venous system in 1 case (6%). Posthrombotic syndrome was considered mild or nonexistent in 10 patients (62.5%) and moderate in 6 patients (37.5%). Quality of life of patients with moderate posthrombotic syndrome was significantly worse than that of patients with mild posthrombotic syndrome (73 vs 90, p < 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of upper limb deep venous thrombosis are associated to the use of intravenous catheters. Echography is the primary diagnostic technique. At the time of the diagnosis, patients tend to show elevation in D-dimers levels. Evolution toward posthrombotic syndrome is frequent; this syndrome does not use to be serious but indeed influences the quality of life of patients.

Thromboembolism in Plastic Surgery

Thromboembolism is a dreaded complication of surgery in multiple disciplines, including plastic surgery, and deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus cause significant morbidity, even death. This article provides methods for understanding and preventing deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus in plastic surgery.

Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: a prospective registry of 592 patients

BACKGROUND

Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) occurs spontaneously or sometimes develops as a complication of pacemaker use, long-term use of a central venous catheter (CVC), or cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To improve our understanding of UEDVT, we compared the demographics, symptoms, risk factors, prophylaxis, and initial management of 324 (6%) patients with central venous catheter (CVC)-associated UEDVT, 268 (5%) patients with non-CVC-associated UEDVT, and 4796 (89%) patients with lower-extremity DVT from a prospective US multicenter DVT registry. The non-CVC-associated UEDVT patients were younger (59.2+/-18.2 versus 64.2+/-16.9 years old; P<0.0001), less often white (65% versus 73%; P<0.01), leaner (body mass index [BMI] 26.8+/-7.1 versus 28.5+/-7.3 kg/m2; P<0.001), and more likely to smoke (19% versus 13%; P=0.02) than the lower-extremity DVT patients. By way of propensity analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis, we determined that an indwelling CVC was the strongest independent predictor of UEDVT (odds ratio [OR], 7.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8 to 9.2). An age of <67 years, a BMI of <25 kg/m2, and hospitalization were the independent predictors of non-CVC-associated UEDVT. Most (68%) UEDVT patients were evaluated while they were inpatients. Only 20% of the 378 UEDVT patients who did not have an obvious contraindication to anticoagulation received prophylaxis at the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

UEDVT risk factors differ from the conventional risk factors for lower-extremity DVT. Our findings identify deficiencies in our current understanding and the prophylaxis of UEDVT and generate hypotheses for future research efforts.

Risk Factors and Recurrence Rate of Primary Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities

BACKGROUND

One third of cases of upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are primary, ie, they occur in the absence of central venous catheters or cancer. Risk factors for primary upper-extremity DVT are not well established, and the recurrence rate is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 115 primary upper-extremity DVT patients and 797 healthy controls for the presence of thrombophilia due to factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, antithrombin, protein C, protein S deficiency, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Transient risk factors for venous thromboembolism were recorded. Recurrent upper-extremity DVT was evaluated prospectively over a median of 5.1 years of follow-up. The adjusted odds ratio for upper-extremity DVT was 6.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 15.7) for factor V Leiden, 5.0 (95% CI 2.0 to 12.2) for prothrombin G20210A, and 4.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 22.0) for the anticoagulant protein deficiencies. Hyperhomocysteinemia and oral contraceptives were not associated with upper-extremity DVT. However, in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A who were taking oral contraceptives, the odds ratio for upper-extremity DVT was increased up to 13.6 (95% CI 2.7 to 67.3). The recurrence rate was 4.4% patient-years in patients with thrombophilia and 1.6% patient-years in those without thrombophilia. The hazard ratio for recurrent upper-extremity DVT in patients with thrombophilia compared with those without was 2.7 (95% CI 0.7 to 9.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Inherited thrombophilia is associated with an increased risk of upper-extremity DVT. Oral contraceptives increase the risk only when combined with inherited thrombophilia. The recurrence rate of primary upper-extremity DVT is low but tends to be higher in patients with thrombophilia than in those without.

Current DVT imaging

Accurate diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is very difficult, and imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis or exclusion of DVT. The initial test of choice for diagnosis of acute thigh as well as upper extremity DVT is ultrasound, because of its high accuracy, relatively low cost, portability, and lack of ionizing radiation. In patients who are undergoing CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism, CT venography can be performed as part of the examination, for comprehensive evaluation of the venous system in the legs, abdomen, and pelvis. MR has a problem-solving role, and conventional venography is now limited to specific scenarios including evaluation of central DVT in the upper extremities, as a prelude to intervention for thrombolysis/thrombectomy, and prior to placement of an inferior vena cava filter. This article discusses the imaging findings of DVT, and the role of these imaging examinations in the evaluation of patients with suspected DVT.

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis: interventional management

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis, previously thought to be a relatively innocuous disorder in comparison to lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, has recently begun to receive the attention it merits. Its optimal management remains controversial despite the development of several new techniques and devices which allow more rapid removal of thrombus and treatment of underlying venous stenotic disease. The following article provides a framework to discuss its treatment, with the emphasis on endovascular management.

Pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common illness that can cause death and disability. It is difficult to detect because patients present with a wide array of symptoms and signs. The clinical setting can raise suspicion, and certain inherited and acquired risk factors predispose susceptible individuals. D-dimer concentration in blood is the best laboratory screening test, and chest CT has become the most widespread imaging test. Treatment requires rapid and accurate risk stratification before haemodynamic decompensation and the development of cardiogenic shock. Anticoagulation is the foundation of therapy. Right-ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography and higher than normal concentrations of troponin identify high-risk patients who might need escalation of therapy with thrombolysis or embolectomy even if the blood pressure is normal on presentation. When patients are admitted to medical wards or when patients undergo surgery, their physicians should prescribe prophylactic measures to prevent PE. After hospital discharge, prophylaxis should continue for about a month for patients at high risk of thromboembolism.

Venous Thrombolysis: Current Perspectives

Venous thromboembolism is a common problem in hospital and community patients and is associated with longer hospital stays, significant morbidity, and mortality. It is the third most common cardiovascular disease after ischemic coronary artery disease and stroke. A quarter of patients with acute myocardial infarction and more than half of patients with acute ischemic stroke may develop venous thromboembolism. The traditional treatment of venous thrombosis has been with anticoagulation, initially with heparin, followed by warfarin long term. The concept of thrombolysis for venous thrombosis is relatively new, but its exact role remains unsettled and largely unexplored. Reports of catheter fragmentation with systemic thrombolysis as well as catheter-directed thrombolysis are promising, and groups of patients who would benefit from thrombolytic therapy as the primary treatment are now being identified.

Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis complicating whole-blood donation

BACKGROUND

Up to 36 percent of blood donors may experience a donation-related complication. Fatigue, bruises, hematomas, and vasovagal reactions comprise the great majority of donor reactions and injuries. Serious complications are rare.

CASE REPORT

A 20-year-old female taking the third-generation oral contraceptive desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol and ethinyl estradiol (Mircette) developed bruising and increased pain and swelling of her right arm over a 5-day period after whole-blood donation. She was a first-time donor and the venipuncture was reported as being mildly traumatic. There was no personal or family history of thrombosis.

RESULTS

Ultrasound examination of her upper extremity revealed the presence of a deep venous thrombosis that required treatment with enoxaparin sodium for 5 days and warfarin for 6 months. Evaluation for thrombophilia was negative. The only risk factor for thrombosis was use of oral contraceptives.

CONCLUSION

Although serious complications from whole-blood donation are rare, they may occur. Deep venous thrombosis should be considered in a donor presenting with increasing pain and swelling after blood donation.

Thromboembolic complications related to indwelling central venous catheters in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Thrombosis is one of the most frequent complications of indwelling central venous catheters. During the past year, new information has emerged regarding the incidence and predisposing factors of thromboembolic complications of indwelling central venous catheters. Because indwelling central venous catheters are widely used, it is important to be aware of new information regarding thromboembolic complications of these devices.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have better defined the risks of thromboembolic complications in patients with cancer with indwelling central venous catheters. Acquired hypercoagulable disorders such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, antiphospholipid syndrome, and therapy with asparaginase are associated with thromboembolic disorders in patients with indwelling central venous catheters. Studies analyzing the association between inherited hypercoagulable disorders and thrombosis have shown conflicting results. Preliminary studies suggest that low molecular weight heparins could have a role in the prevention of catheter-related thromboembolic disorders. Nevertheless, larger prospective studies will be necessary to determine the role of anticoagulants in the prevention of thromboembolic disorders in patients with cancer with indwelling central venous catheters.

SUMMARY

Recent reports will facilitate the evaluation and risk assessment of children with cancer who have indwelling central venous catheters. Despite these advances, large, controlled studies focusing on specific populations of patients, such as children, should be undertaken to determine the true performance and optimal use of indwelling central venous catheters. Future studies should also address better ways to prevent catheter-related thrombosis and infection.