Antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, an I(f) inhibitor, in stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, multicentered, placebo-controlled trial

Heart rate-lowering efficacy and respiratory safety of ivabradine in patients with obstructive airway disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

BACKGROUND

There is substantial evidence that heart rate (HR) is a powerful predictor of mortality in both normal individuals and in patients with cardiovascular disease. The use of β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers) has confirmed the importance of lowering elevated HR in a patient's prognosis. However, these agents can have undesirable adverse effects (AEs) and due to the risk of bronchoconstriction are contraindicated in patients with obstructive airway disease. A selective bradycardic agent, without such undesirable effects, could be of therapeutic interest. Ivabradine, a new I(f) inhibitor that acts specifically on the sino-atrial node, is a pure HR-lowering agent.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess HR-lowering efficacy and respiratory safety of ivabradine in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

This was a randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Enrolment began in May 2009, and the last patient completed the study in January 2011. The study was conducted in an ambulatory setting. A total of 40 patients completed the study (20 asthmatic patients and 20 COPD patients). Inclusion criteria were: documented diagnosis of asthma or COPD according to international guidelines, age 18-75 years, and mean HR on Holter ECG recording of ≥60 beats/min. Exclusion criteria included disease exacerbation in a previous month or inability to understand instructions on the study procedures. All patients received ivabradine 7.5 mg twice daily for 5 days and placebo twice daily for 5 days in a crossover manner, in one of the two arms of the study, with at least 2 days of washout between treatments. The main outcome measures included the difference in HR between ivabradine and placebo treatment and change in HR in comparison with baseline. Other evaluated outcomes were differences in the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), the daily symptom score, rescue medication consumption, and AEs.

RESULTS

Ivabradine produced significantly lower mean HR than placebo in both groups of patients: asthma 67.4 ± 8.38 versus 82.85 ± 11.19 beats/min (p < 0.001) and COPD 69.75 ± 8.9 versus 81.05 ± 9.75 beats/min (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed for the minimal HR as well as for the maximal noted HR. In comparision with baseline, ivabradine significantly reduced HR in both groups of studied patients (all p < 0.05), whereas placebo did not have such an effect. No significant difference, in either the asthma or the COPD group, was found between ivabradine and placebo in morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate, peak expiratory flow diurnal variability, daily symptom scores, and rescue medication usage (all p > 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated. The incidence of AEs was low and generally similar in both periods of treatment, except for visual symptoms during treatment with ivabradine, which was reported by 5% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that selective HR reduction with ivabradine is effective in patients with asthma and COPD, with no alteration in respiratory function or symptoms over the duration of the study. Ivabradine offers an interesting alternative, as an HR-lowering agent, in patients with respiratory disease and contraindications to β-blockers.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01365286).

Novel blockers of hyperpolarization-activated current with isoform selectivity in recombinant cells and native tissue

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Selective hyperpolarization activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (HCN) blockers represent an important therapeutic goal due to the wide distribution and multiple functions of these proteins, representing the molecular correlate of f- and h-current (I(f) or I(h) ). Recently, new compounds able to block differentially the homomeric HCN isoforms expressed in HEK293 have been synthesized. In the present work, the electrophysiological and pharmacological properties of these new HCN blockers were characterized and their activities evaluated on native channels. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH HEK293 cells expressing mHCN1, mHCN2 and hHCN4 isoforms were used to verify channel blockade. Selected compounds were tested on native guinea pig sinoatrial node cells and neurons from mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) by patch-clamp recordings and on dog Purkinje fibres by intracellular recordings. KEY RESULTS In HEK293 cells, EC18 was found to be significantly selective for HCN4 and MEL57A for HCN1 at physiological membrane potential. When tested on guinea pig sinoatrial node cells, EC18 (10 µM) maintained its activity, reducing I(f) by 67% at -120 mV, while MEL57A (3 µM) reduced I(f) by 18%. In contrast, in mouse DRG neurons, only MEL57A (30 and 100 µM) significantly reduced I(h) by 60% at -80 mV. In dog cardiac Purkinje fibres, EC18, but not MEL57A, reduced the amplitude and slowed the slope of the spontaneous diastolic depolarization. CONCLUSIONS Our results have identified novel and highly selective HCN isoform blockers, EC18 and MEL57A; the selectivity found in recombinant system was maintained in various tissues expressing different HCN isoforms.

Recurrent angina after coronary angioplasty: mechanisms, diagnostic and therapeutic options

Recurrent angina in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention is defined as recurrence of chest pain or chest discomfort. Careful assessment is recommended to differentiate between non-cardiac and cardiac causes. In the case of the latter, recurrent angina occurrence can be related to structural ('stretch pain', in-stent restenosis, in-stent thrombosis, incomplete revascularization, progression of coronary atherosclerosis) or functional (coronary micro-vascular dysfunction, epicardial coronary spasm) causes. Even though a complete diagnostic algorithm has not been validated, ECG exercise testing, stress imaging and invasive assessment of coronary blood flow and coronary vaso-motion (i.e. coronary flow reserve, provocation testing for coronary spasm) may be required. When repeated coronary revascularization is not indicated, therapeutic approaches should aim at targeting the underlying mechanism for the patient's symptoms using a variety of drugs currently available such as beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, ivabradine or ranolazine.

[Heart rate and rate control : Prognostic value in cardiovascular diseases]

Resting heart rate represents a cardiovascular risk indicator and an important target of therapy in chronic heart failure and potentially in coronary artery disease. Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that sustained elevation of heart rate - independent of the underlying trigger - plays a causal role in the pathogenesis of vascular disease. Results of the SHIFT trial support the importance of heart-rate reduction with ivabradine for improvement of clinical outcomes in heart failure and confirm the role of heart rate as a risk factor for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Results of the BEAUTIFUL trial show that patients with ischemic heart disease and a heart rate above 70 bpm exhibit an adverse prognosis concerning coronary events.

Stable angina pectoris: the medical management of symptomatic myocardial ischemia

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality and is a serious public health problem. Over the last 4 decades there have been dramatic advances in the both the prevention and treatment of CAD. The management of CAD was revolutionized by the development of effective surgical and percutaneous revascularization techniques. In this review we discuss the importance of the medical management of symptomatic, stable angina. Medical management approaches to both the treatment and prevention of symptomatic myocardial ischemia are summarized. In Canada, organic nitrates, β-adrenergic blocking agents, and calcium channel antagonists have been available for the therapy of angina for more than 25 years. All 3 classes are of proven benefit in the improvement of symptoms and exercise capacity in patients with stable angina. Although there is no clear first choice within these classes of anti-anginal agents, the presence of prior or concurrent conditions (for example, prior myocardial infarction and/or hypertension) plays an important role in the choice of anti-anginal class in individual patients. For some patients, combinations of different anti-anginal agents can be effective; however it is recommended that this approach be individualized. Although not currently available in Canada, other classes of anti-anginal agents have been developed; their mechanism of action and clinical efficacy is discussed. Patients with stable angina have an excellent prognosis. Patients in this category who obtain relief from symptomatic myocardial ischemia may do well without invasive intervention.

Heart rate and use of beta-blockers in stable outpatients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Heart rate (HR) is an emerging risk factor in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is little contemporary data regarding HR and the use of HR-lowering medications, particularly beta-blockers, among patients with stable CAD in routine clinical practice. The goal of the present analysis was to describe HR in such patients, overall and in relation to beta-blocker use, and to describe the determinants of HR.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

CLARIFY is an international, prospective, observational, longitudinal registry of outpatients with stable CAD, defined as prior myocardial infarction or revascularization procedure, evidence of coronary stenosis of >50%, or chest pain associated with proven myocardial ischemia. A total of 33,438 patients from 45 countries in Europe, the Americas, Africa, Middle East, and Asia/Pacific were enrolled between November 2009 and July 2010. Most of the 33,177 patients included in this analysis were men (77.5%). Mean (SD) age was 64.2 (10.5) years, HR by pulse was 68.3 (10.6) bpm, and by electrocardiogram was 67.2 (11.4) bpm. Overall, 44.0% had HR ≥ 70 bpm. Beta-blockers were used in 75.1% of patients and another 14.4% had intolerance or contraindications to beta-blocker therapy. Among 24,910 patients on beta-blockers, 41.1% had HR ≥ 70 bpm. HR ≥ 70 bpm was independently associated with higher prevalence and severity of angina, more frequent evidence of myocardial ischemia, and lack of use of HR-lowering agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high rate of use of beta-blockers, stable CAD patients often have resting HR ≥ 70 bpm, which was associated with an overall worse health status, more frequent angina and ischemia. Further HR lowering is possible in many patients with CAD. Whether it will improve symptoms and outcomes is being tested.

Ivabradine prevents heart rate acceleration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary heart disease after salbutamol inhalation

Accelerated sinus rhythm is an important side effect of inhaled salbutamol which is especially harmful in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronary heart disease (CHD). Cross-over, randomized, open label study design. 20 patients (18 males and two females) with COPD stage II-IV and comorbide CHD NYHA class I-III were included. Spirometry with 400 mg salbutamol inhalation was performed at two consecutive days of the study. Patients in group I were prescribed 5 mg ivabradine per os 3 h before salbutamol inhalation solely on the first day of the study and patients of group II received 5 mg ivabradine only on the second day of the study. Salbutamol caused a significant increase of HR by 5.5 bpm (95% CI 0.8; 10.2, p < 0.03). After ivabradine ingestion salbutamol did not change HR significantly by -2.4 bpm (-7.0; 2.3, p = 0.33). The attenuation of HR elevation by ivabradine was significant, p < 0.01. Salbutamol alone increased FEV1 by 6.0% (2.7; 9.3, p < 0.01). This effect was not impaired by ivabradine (FEV1 increase by 7.7% (2.8; 12.6, p < 0.01 versus baseline, p = 0.5 versus no ivabradine). Ivabradine 5 mg per os prevents heart rate acceleration after inhalation of 400 mg salbutamol. Ivabradine has no impact on lung function in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD and CHD comorbidity.

Efficacy of ivabradine in combination with Beta-blocker versus uptitration of Beta-blocker in patients with stable angina

PURPOSE

The antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy of the selective I (f) inhibitor ivabradine is established in patients with stable angina in monotherapy and in combination with other antianginals, including beta-blocker. This pilot study compared the antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy and hemodynamic profile of ivabradine plus 5 mg bisoprolol versus those of 10 mg bisoprolol in patients with stable angina.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with stable angina and moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction already on bisoprolol 5 mg od were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 17) received ivabradine (5-7.5 mg bid) in addition to bisoprolol 5 mg od, while in group 2 (n = 12) bisoprolol was uptitrated first to 7.5 mg and then 10 mg od. Patients underwent a treadmill test, 6-minute walking test, and echocardiography at baseline and after 2 months.

RESULTS

Mean resting heart rate decreased in both groups, from 76.6 ± 4.6 bpm to 59.3 ± 2.5 bpm (P < 0.001) in group 1 and from 75.9 ± 3.0 bpm to 60.5 ± 2.3 bpm (P = 0.002) in group 2. The effect on resting heart rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, more patients became asymptomatic in group 1 than in group 2. Addition of ivabradine also improved exercise capacity, as shown by the results of the 6-minute walking and exercise tolerance tests, whereas in group 2 neither parameter was significantly affected. Chronotropic reserve significantly improved with ivabradine, but not with bisoprolol 10 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that combining ivabradine with low dose bisoprolol in stable angina patients produces additional antianginal and anti-ischemic benefits and improves chronotropic reserve.

The new oral adenosine A1 receptor agonist capadenoson in male patients with stable angina

BACKGROUND

Anti-ischaemic effect of A1 adenosine receptor agonists was shown in animal and preclinical studies. The present proof-of-concept study aimed at evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new adenosine A1 receptor agonist capadenoson in patients with stable angina.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single dose-escalating, multicenter trial comparing the effect of capadenoson at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg versus placebo. For each dose step patients were randomized to receive single doses of either capadenoson or matching placebo in a 5:1 ratio. The primary efficacy variable was the absolute difference in heart rate (HR) at maximum comparable level of workload between baseline and post dose exercise tolerance test at maximum concentration of capadenoson. Capadenoson effect on total exercise time and time to 1-mm ST-segment depression were also measured.

RESULTS

Sixty-two male patients with stable angina were enrolled in the study. There was a consistent trend for HR reduction at comparable maximum work load in active treatment groups, with significant differences against placebo for 10 and 20 mg (HR reduction by 12.2 and 6.8 beats per min, p = 0.0002 and p = 0.032, respectively). A statistically significant trend (p = 0.0003) for a reduction in HR with increasing doses of capadenoson was shown. Increases in total exercise time and time to 1-mm ST-segment depression were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable angina capadenoson lowers exercise HR at comparable maximum workload, which is associated with improved total exercise time and prolongation of time to ischaemia.

Treatment of stable angina pectoris

Management of stable angina pectoris includes antianginal medications, medications to prevent progression of atherosclerosis, and aggressive treatment of causative risk factors. Antianginal medications commonly used include nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and ranolazine. Antiplatelet agents, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are used in patients with these problems to prevent progression of atherosclerosis and/or premature cardiovascular death. Aggressive risk factor control with diet; exercise; treatment of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; and strategies to stop smoking and reduce weight should be a part of treatment strategy in all patients. Patients with stable angina who have symptoms refractory to medical treatment usually require coronary angiography, followed by either percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Recent mechanical techniques for the treatment of refractory angina include transmyocardial laser revascularization, enhanced external counterpulsation, and spinal cord stimulation.

Cardioprotection by Ivabradine Through Heart Rate Reduction and Beyond

The present review summarizes the experimental and clinical evidence for the anti-ischemic action of the selective bradycardic agent ivabradine. Improvements in myocardial blood flow and contractile function during experimental myocardial ischemia and the clinical anti-anginal effect are largely mediated by heart rate reduction. However, a significant reduction in infarct size by ivabradine persists in the absence of heart rate reduction, and such protection can also be recruited when ivabradine is given only during early reperfusion. The mechanisms for such pleiotropic action of ivabradine remain to be resolved.

Stable angina pectoris: antianginal therapies and future directions

Advances in pharmacotherapy for stable angina have produced a wide choice of drugs with various mechanisms of action, potentially enabling individualized, patient-specific treatment strategies to be developed. In this Review, the various treatment options for patients with stable angina are discussed. Data from randomized, clinical trials of established and novel drugs are reviewed, with particular emphasis on the proposed mechanisms of action, benefits of therapy, and adverse-effect profiles. The role of coronary revascularization in conjunction with optimal medical therapy as a treatment strategy is discussed, although drug therapy might reduce the need for prompt revascularization if the procedure is being considered solely for the purpose of alleviating angina. Finally, trials to investigate stimulation of angiogenesis using growth-factor, gene, and cell therapy are used to illustrate the challenges of chemically inducing the growth of adequate, durable blood vessels.

Medical therapy versus myocardial revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome and stable angina

Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of death in the United States. Angina is encountered frequently in clinical practice. Effective management of patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina should consist of therapy aimed at symptom control and reduction of adverse clinical outcomes. Therapeutic options for angina include antianginal drugs: nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ranolazine, and myocardial revascularization. Recent trials have shown that although revascularization is slightly better in controlling symptoms, optimal medical therapy that includes aggressive risk factor modification is equally effective in reducing the risk of future coronary events and death. On the basis of the available data, it seems appropriate to prescribe optimal medical therapy in most patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina, and reserve myocardial revascularization for selected patients with disabling symptoms despite optimal medical therapy.

Innovation in coronary artery disease and heart failure: clinical benefits of pure heart rate reduction with ivabradine

The link between elevated heart rate and cardiovascular events is established in healthy individuals and in patients with cardiovascular disease. The new agent, ivabradine, specifically and selectively inhibits the I(f) current, with the sole action of heart rate reduction, with no impact on any other cardiac parameters. The benefits of "pure" heart rate reduction with ivabradine have been the focus of one of the largest clinical development programs ever performed, involving >20,000 individuals. Ivabradine has anti-ischemic and antianginal efficacy in monotherapy, as well as in combination with other antianginals, such as beta-blockers, and is safe and well tolerated. Two major morbidity-mortality trials, BEAUTIFUL and SHIFT, showed that heart rate reduction with ivabradine dramatically improves prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, symptomatic angina, or chronic heart failure. The development of ivabradine represents a clear innovation in the management of cardiovascular disease.

Heart rate: a forgotten link in coronary artery disease?

A considerable body of evidence indicates that elevated resting heart rate is an independent, modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Elevated heart rate can produce adverse effects in several ways. Firstly, myocardial oxygen consumption is increased at high heart rates, but the time available for myocardial perfusion is reduced, increasing the likelihood of myocardial ischemia. Secondly, exposure of the large elastic arteries to cyclical stretch is increased at high heart rates. This effect can increase the rate at which components of the arterial wall deteriorate. Elastin fibers, which have an extremely slow rate of turnover in adult life, might be particularly vulnerable. Thirdly, elevated heart rate can predispose the myocardium to arrhythmias, and favor the development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis, by adversely affecting the balance between systolic and diastolic flow. Comparisons of the effects of the specific heart-rate-lowering drug ivabradine with those of β-blockers could help clarify the pathophysiological effects of elevated heart rate. Effective heart rate control among patients with coronary artery disease is uncommon in clinical practice, representing a missed therapeutic opportunity.

Increased heart rate and atherosclerosis: potential implications of ivabradine therapy

Despite all the therapeutic advances in the field of cardiology, cardiovascular diseases, and in particular coronary artery disease, remain the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, thereby underlining the importance of acquiring new therapeutic options in this field. A reduction in elevated resting heart rate (HR) has long been postulated as a therapeutic approach in the management of cardiovascular disease. An increased HR has been shown to be associated with increased progression of coronary atherosclerosis in animal models and patients. A high HR has also been associated with a greatly increased risk of plaque rupture in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. Endothelial function may be an important link between HR and atherosclerosis. An increased HR has been shown experimentally to cause endothelial dysfunction. Inflammation plays a significant role in the pathogenesis and progression of atherosclerosis. In the literature, there is data that shows an association between HR and circulating markers of vascular inflammation. In addition, HR reduction by pharmacological intervention with ivabradine (a selective HR-lowering agent that acts by inhibiting the pacemaker ionic current I(f) in sinoatrial node cells) reduces the formation of atherosclerotic plaques in animal models of lipid-induced atherosclerosis. The aim of this editorial is to review the possible role of ivabradine on atherosclerosis.

Safety of ivabradine in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (from the BEAUTIFUL Holter Substudy)

The BEAUTIFUL Holter substudy explored the cardiac safety of the I(f) inhibitor ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction receiving optimal background therapy. The Holter substudy included 840 patients (ivabradine 5 or 7.5 mg/day, n = 421; placebo, n = 419), and the safety set consisted of 807 patients (ivabradine, n = 408; placebo, n = 399). Ambulatory 24-hour electrocardiographic Holter monitoring was performed at baseline and after 1 month and 6 months. There were no relevant between-group differences in baseline characteristics; 93% were receiving concomitant β blocker. Treatment with ivabradine was associated with a decrease in 24-hour heart rate of 6.3 ± 9.5 beats/min at last assessment versus no change with placebo (0.4 ± 7.2 beats/min, p <0.001, between-group difference), with a greater decrease in waking heart rate with ivabradine than during sleep (6.8 ± 10.4 vs 5.2 ± 8.9 beats/min, respectively, at last visit). Incidence of episodes of heart rate <30 beats/min during waking hours or during sleep was ≤1% in the 2 groups. Although there were more patients with heart rates <40 or <50 beats/min with ivabradine than with placebo (awake 12% vs 4% for <40 beats/min and 68% vs 36% for <50 beats/min, respectively; asleep 22% vs 5% for <40 beats/min and 77% vs 50% for <50 beats/min, respectively), there was no between-group difference in episode severity. There was no increase in incidence of conduction and rhythm disturbances. In conclusion, our results confirm that ivabradine significantly lowers heart rate without raising concern for cardiac safety. Our observations strongly support the safety of combining ivabradine with β blockers in patients with coronary artery disease.

Conventional and novel drug therapeutics to relief myocardial ischemia

Effective management of stable angina usually includes drug therapy. There are several agents that are considered vasculoprotective such as aspirin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins. Conventional anti ischemic therapy includes nitrates, beta-blockers and calcium-channel blockers. In recent years, several other drugs with novel anti ischemic mechanisms have become available including ranolazine, ivabradine, nicorandil and many others. This article reviews drugs that alleviate the symptoms of chronic angina with emphasis on several novel pharmacological agents.

Heart rate reduction with ivabradine prevents the global phenotype of left ventricular remodeling

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chronic heart rate (HR) reduction with the hyperpolarization-activated current inhibitor ivabradine on the global phenotype of left ventricular (LV) remodeling in a ligated rat model. Seven days after coronary artery ligation, Wistar rats received ivabradine (10 mg·kg−1·day−1 administered in drinking water) [myocardial infarction + ivabradine (MI+IVA), n = 22] or vehicle only (drinking water) (MI, n = 20) for 90 days. A sham group ( n = 20) was included for model validation. MI+IVA rats had 12% lower HR ( P < 0.01), improved LV volumes, 15% higher LV ejection fraction (LVEF, P < 0.01) than MI rats, and 33% reductions in both plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP, P = 0.052) and cardiac hydroxyproline. Using patch-clamp, action potential duration was reduced and transient outward current density increased ( P < 0.05). Cardiac energy metabolism was also improved (+33% creatine phosphate, P < 0.001; +15% ATP; and +9% energy charge, P < 0.05). Significant correlations were found between HR and parameters of cardiac metabolism, ANP, and LVEF (all P < 0.05). The HR-reducing properties of ivabradine prevent changes in the global phenotype of LV remodeling in the rat, optimize energy consumption, and avoid electrophysiological and structural remodeling.

Evaluation of aggressive heart rate reduction in patients with stable angina

BACKGROUND

There is a strong correlation between heart rate and myocardial ischemia, cardiovascular diseases, and life expectancy in general; however, heart rate has been neglected as an important risk factor as well as a therapeutic opportunity.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of aggressive heart rate reduction (50 ⩽ HR ⩽ 60 bpm) on anti-ischemic and anti-anginal efficacy, left ventricular function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with stable coronary artery disease with or without left ventricular dysfunction during 4 months.

METHODS

A total of 159 patients presented with stable CAD without clinical heart failure symptoms were included in a open-label, non-comparative, prospective clinical study between June 2009 to February 2010 in King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA, Al Hayah National Hospital, Khamis Mushyt, KSA and Critical care department, Cairo University, Egypt. All included patients were, in addition to the ant ischemic treatment, subjected to aggressive heart rate control starting by beta blocker titrated to the maximum dose as tolerated, then Ivabradine added if the target heart rate is not achieved or rate control started by Ivabradine if beta blockers are contraindicated. Exercise treadmill test (ETT) to assess exercise capacity using time to 1 mm ST-segment depression in milliseconds, ejection fraction (EF) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and frequency of angina attacks and the use of sublingual nitroglycerin per week during the last week were evaluated during a follow-up for 4 months. The patients were divided into two groups, group-I (patients achieved a resting heart rate between 50 and 60 bpm with heart rate reduction treatment) and group-II (patients with resting HR >60 bpm in spite of maximum treatment for heart rate reduction).

RESULTS

The resting heart rate was significantly reduced from 77.98 ± 8.7 at baseline to 60.68 ± 4.34 bpm after 4 months of treatment, P < 0.001. The frequency of angina pectoris attacks had been significantly reduced from 2.14 ± 1.27 to 0.48 ± 0.58 attacks per week, P < 0.001 and the highest significant reduction was observed with group-I. Also, the frequency of use sublingual nitrate therapy was significantly reduced from 1.38 ± 1.1 tablet per week at the last week before the study to 0.12 ± 0.33 tablet per week during the last week after 4 months of treatment, P < 0.001 and the reduction was more significantly with group-I. Exercise treadmill test demonstrated statistically significant increase in the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression from 357.36 ± 66.73 at baseline to 387.96 ± 65.19 ms. after 4 months with P < 0.001. The degree of improvement was significantly higher for group-I (from 358.06 ± 68.81 at baseline to 391.71 ± 69.01 after 4 months with P < 0.001) than that of group-II (from 356.11 ± 64.8 at baseline to 381.27 ± 59.08 after 4 months with P < 0.001). Ejection fraction showed a statistically significant increase from 59.76 ± 6.86 at baseline to 61.04 ± 5.35 after 4 months with P < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that heart rate reduction has been associated with an improvement in quality of life in patients with stable coronary artery disease, presenting new opportunities for treatment.

[Ivabradine in coronary heart disease: experimental and clinical pharmacology]

The present paper reviews clinical evidence underlining the role of ivabradine in the management of patient with ischemic heart disease. Reduction in heart rate mediated by this selective I(f) current inhibitor has been associated with anti-ischemic efficacy without any effect on haemodynamic or myocardial contractility. The antianginal efficacy of ivabradine is similar or superior to that of conventional anti-ischemic agents. Moreover combination therapy with ivabradine provides substantial benefit in patients already receiving beta-blocker. Prognostic efficacy of ivabradine is evaluated in a large program of studies, among which BEAUTIFUL in coronary patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The SIGNIFY study is ongoing in stable coronary patients without ventricular dysfunction. Furthermore the SHIFT trial will evaluate ivabradine benefits in heart failure patients, whatever the origin, ischemic or not.

Ivabradine reduces chemokine-induced CD4-positive lymphocyte migration

AIMS

Migration of CD4-positive lymphocytes into the vessel wall is a critical step in atherogenesis. Recent data suggest that ivabradine, a selective I(f)-channel blocker, reduces atherosclerotic plaque formation in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, hitherto nothing is known about the mechanism by which ivabradine modulates plaque formation. Therefore, the present study investigated whether ivabradine regulates chemokine-induced migration of lymphocytes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Stimulation of CD4-positive lymphocytes with SDF-1 leads to a 2.0 ± 0.1 fold increase in cell migration (P < .01; n = 7). Pretreatment of cells with ivabradine reduces this effect to a maximal 1.2 ± 0.1 fold induction at 0.1 µmol/L ivabradine (P < .01 compared to SDF-1-treated cells, n = 7). The effect of ivabradine on CD4-positive lymphocyte migration was mediated through an early inhibition of chemokine-induced PI-3 kinase activity as determined by PI-3 kinase activity assays. Downstream, ivabradine inhibits activation of the small GTPase Rac and phosphorylation of the Myosin Light Chain (MLC). Moreover, ivabradine treatment reduces f-actin formation as well as ICAM3 translocation to the uropod of the cell, thus interfering with two important steps in T cell migration.

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine inhibits chemokine-induced migration of CD4-positive lymphocytes. Given the crucial importance of chemokine-induced T-cell migration in early atherogenesis, ivabradine may be a promising tool to modulate this effect.

Incremental value and safety of oral ivabradine for heart rate reduction in computed tomography coronary angiography

BACKGROUND

Heart rate (HR) reduction is essential to achieve optimal image quality and diagnostic accuracy with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). Administration of ivabradine could be an attractive alternative to beta-blockade to reduce HR.

METHODS

One-hundred-twenty-three patients referred for CTCA were prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided in two groups depending on the absence or presence of chronic beta-blockade treatment. Within the two groups patients were randomized to either no additional premedication or oral ivabradine for 5 days prior to CTCA. In presence of chronic beta-blockade therapy it was shifted to atenolol 50mg twice a day for 5 days prior to CTCA. HR and blood pressure were assessed at admission (T0), immediately before CTCA (T1) and during CTCA (T2). The target HR was <65 bpm.

RESULTS

Ivabradine significantly reduced HR during CTCA. Mean relative HR reduction was 15% for controls, 12% for chronic beta-blockade, 19% for ivabradine and 24% for both chronic beta-blockade and ivabradine at T2 (p for trend <0.001). The rate of patients who reached the target HR at T2 was 83% in controls, 71% with chronic beta-blockade, 97% with ivabradine and 97% with both (p for trend <0.05). The percentage of patients that needed additional IV beta-blockade at T1 decreased from 69% to 40% with ivabradine and 30% with both (p for trend <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ivabradine is safe and effective in increasing the rate of patients at target HR and in reducing the need for additional IV beta-blockade in patients referred for CTCA.

The anatomy and physiology of the sinoatrial node--a contemporary review

The sinoatrial node is the primary pacemaker of the heart. Nodal dysfunction with aging, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and even endurance athletic training can lead to a wide variety of pathological clinical syndromes. Recent work utilizing molecular markers to map the extent of the node, along with the delineation of a novel paranodal area intermediate in characteristics between the node and the surrounding atrial muscle, has shown that pacemaker tissue is more widely spread in the right atrium than previously appreciated. This can explain the phenomenon of a "wandering pacemaker" and concomitant changes in the P-wave morphology. Extensive knowledge now exists regarding the molecular architecture of the node (in particular, the expression of ion channels) and how this relates to pacemaking. This review is an up-to-date summary of the current state of our appreciation of the above topics.

Impact of ‘‘Off-Label’’ Use of Ivabradine on Exercise Capacity, Gas Exchange, Functional Class, Quality of Life, and Neurohormonal Modulation in Patients With Ischemic Chronic Heart Failure

Background: Epidemiologic studies indicate that elevated heart rate (HR) is an independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity in patients (pts) with chronic heart failure (CHF). Clinical trials with β-blockers suggest that HR reduction is an important mechanism of their benefit in pts with stable CHF. Pharmacologic inhibition of the If current now provides the opportunity of pure HR reduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ‘‘Off-Label’’ use of ivabradine on exercise capacity, gas exchange, functional class, quality of life, and neurohormonal modulation in pts with ischemic CHF. Methods: Between January 2008 and June 2008, a graded maximal exercise test with respiratory gas analysis and an endurance test with constant workload corresponding to 85% of the peak VO2 at the baseline and after 3 months were performed, and at the same times, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were also measured, in 60 pts (45 M, 15 F, mean age 52.7 ± 5.3 years), with stable ischemic CHF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes II (n = 35)—III (n = 25), with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, randomized to a ‘‘off-label’’ ivabradine use (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). Results: The exercise capacity increased from 14.8 ± 2.5 to 28.2 ± 3.5 min (P < .0001) and the peak oxygen consumption tended to improve from 13.5 ± 1.3 to 17.9 ± 2.4 mL/kg per minute (P < .0001) in ivabradine group. Oxygen consumption at the anaerobic threshold (AT) increased from 11.9 ± 1.4 to 15.3 ± 1.4 mL/kg per minute (P < .0001). NTproBNP levels decreased from 2356 ± 2113 pg/mL to 1434 ± 1273 pg/mL (P = .045). No significant differences were found in control group at 3 months. The positive ivabradine effects were also associated with an improvement in the NYHA functional class and quality of life. Conclusion: The ‘‘Off-Label’’ use of ivabradine significantly improves the exercise capacity, gas exchange, functional heart failure class, quality of life, and neurohormonal modulation in pts with ischemic CHF.

Recent advances in the management of chronic stable angina II. Anti-ischemic therapy, options for refractory angina, risk factor reduction, and revascularization

The objectives in treating angina are relief of pain and prevention of disease progression through risk reduction. Mechanisms, indications, clinical forms, doses, and side effects of the traditional antianginal agents - nitrates, β-blockers, and calcium channel blockers - are reviewed. A number of patients have contraindications or remain unrelieved from anginal discomfort with these drugs. Among newer alternatives, ranolazine, recently approved in the United States, indirectly prevents the intracellular calcium overload involved in cardiac ischemia and is a welcome addition to available treatments. None, however, are disease-modifying agents. Two options for refractory angina, enhanced external counterpulsation and spinal cord stimulation (SCS), are presented in detail. They are both well-studied and are effective means of treating at least some patients with this perplexing form of angina. Traditional modifiable risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) - smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and obesity - account for most of the population-attributable risk. Individual therapy of high-risk patients differs from population-wide efforts to prevent risk factors from appearing or reducing their severity, in order to lower the national burden of disease. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines to lower risk in patients with chronic angina are reviewed. The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial showed that in patients with stable angina, optimal medical therapy alone and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with medical therapy were equal in preventing myocardial infarction and death. The integration of COURAGE results into current practice is discussed. For patients who are unstable, with very high risk, with left main coronary artery lesions, in whom medical therapy fails, and in those with acute coronary syndromes, PCI is indicated. Asymptomatic patients with CAD and those with stable angina may defer intervention without additional risk to see if they will improve on optimum medical therapy. For many patients, coronary artery bypass surgery offers the best opportunity for relieving angina, reducing the need for additional revascularization procedures and improving survival. Optimal medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, and surgery are not competing therapies, but are complementary and form a continuum, each filling an important evidence-based need in modern comprehensive management.