Recommendations for the Establishment of Stroke Systems of Care: A 2019 Update

Regionalization of Critical Care in the United States: Current State and Proposed Framework From the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine

OBJECTIVES

The Society of Critical Care Medicine convened its Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine taskforce on February 22, 2016, during the 45th Critical Care Congress to develop a series of consensus papers with toolkits for advancing critical care organizations in North America. The goal of this article is to propose a framework based on the expert opinions of critical care organization leaders and their responses to a survey, for current and future critical care organizations, and their leadership in the health system to design and implement successful regionalization for critical care in their regions.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Members of the workgroup convened monthly via teleconference with the following objectives: to 1) develop and analyze a regionalization survey tool for 23 identified critical care organizations in the United States, 2) assemble relevant medical literature accessed using Medline search, 3) use a consensus of expert opinions to propose the framework, and 4) create groups to write the subsections and assemble the final product.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The most prevalent challenges for regionalization in critical care organizations remain a lack of a strong central authority to regulate and manage the system as well as a lack of necessary infrastructure, as described more than a decade ago. We provide a framework and outline a nontechnical approach that the health system and their critical care medicine leadership can adopt after considering their own structure, complexity, business operations, culture, and the relationships among their individual hospitals. Transforming the current state of regionalization into a coordinated, accountable system requires a critical assessment of administrative and clinical challenges and barriers. Systems thinking, business planning and control, and essential infrastructure development are critical for assisting critical care organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the value-based paradigm, the goals are operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Health systems that can align strategy and operations to assist the referral hospitals with implementing regionalization will be better positioned to regionalize critical care effectively.

Central Triage of Acute Stroke Patients Across a Distributive Stroke Network Is Safe and Reduces Transfer Denials

[Figure: see text].

Geographic Access to Stroke Care Services in Rural Communities in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Optimal stroke care requires access to resources such as neuroimaging, acute revascularization, rehabilitation, and stroke prevention services, which may not be available in rural areas. We aimed to determine geographic access to stroke care for residents of rural communities in the province of Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

We used the Ontario Road Network File database linked with the 2016 Ontario Acute Stroke Care Resource Inventory to estimate the proportion of people in rural communities, defined as those with a population size <10,000, who were within 30, 60, and 240 minutes of travel time by car from stroke care services, including brain imaging, thrombolysis treatment centers, stroke units, stroke prevention clinics, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and endovascular treatment centers.

RESULTS

Of the 1,496,262 people residing in rural communities, the majority resided within 60 minutes of driving time to a center with computed tomography (85%), thrombolysis (81%), a stroke unit (68%), a stroke prevention clinic (74%), or inpatient rehabilitation (77.0%), but a much lower proportion (32%) were within 60 minutes of driving time to a center capable of providing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

CONCLUSIONS

Most rural Ontario residents have appropriate geographic access to stroke services, with the exception of EVT. This information may be useful for jurisdictions seeking to optimize the regional organization of stroke care services.

Time Is Brain: Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Response Times for Suspected Stroke and Effects of Prehospital Interventions

OBJECTIVES

To compare prehospital time for patients with suspected stroke in Florida with the American Stroke Association (ASA) time benchmarks, and to investigate the effects of dispatch notification and stroke assessment scales on prehospital time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using data from Florida's Emergency Medical Services Tracking and Reporting System database. All patients with suspected stroke transported to a treatment center from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018, were analyzed. Time intervals from 911 call to hospital arrival were evaluated and compared with ASA benchmarks.

RESULTS

In 2018, 11,577 patients with suspected stroke were transported to a hospital (mean age, 71.5±15.7 years; 51.5% women). The median alarm-to-hospital time was 33.98 minutes (27.8 to 41.4), with a total emergency medical services (EMS) time of 32.30 minutes (26.5 to 39.478). The on-scene time was the largest time interval with a median of 13.28 minutes (10.0 to 17.4). Emergency medical services encounters met the ASA benchmarks for time in 58% to 62% of the EMS encounters in Florida (recommended 90%; P<.001). The total EMS time was reduced when a stroke notification was reported by the dispatch center (32.00 minutes vs 32.62 minutes; P=.006) or when a stroke assessment scale was used by the EMS personnel (31.88 minutes vs 32.96 minutes; P=.005).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a substantial opportunity for improvement in stroke care in Florida. Two prehospital EMS stroke interventions seem to reduce prehospital time for patients with suspected stroke. Adoption of these interventions might improve the stroke systems of care.

Role of Telemedicine in Prehospital Stroke Care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize evidence for the feasibility and the efficacy of mobile stroke units (MSUs) and telemedicine in the field to reduce time delays in offering acute stroke interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

A mobile stroke unit is a modified ambulance and includes sophisticated equipment, either trained personnel on board, or connection with skilled physicians via telemedicine. Stroke assessment and treatment agreeability between the on board and remote neurologist is high in MSUs. MSUs are the promising option to reduce stroke symptom onset to treatment time; telemedicine platform has a satisfactory audiovisual quality, high inter-rater reliability for remote stroke symptom assessment, diagnosis, and decision to treat. Use of MSU also avoids the need for inter-hospital transfers. MSUs improve prehospital stroke care and reduce delays in access to intravenous thrombolytic and mechanical thrombectomy in selective markets. Advancement in telecommunication and modern technology has the potential to make MSU telemedicine-aided management more cost-effective. Further research is needed before its widespread implementation.

Reperfusion Treatment and Stroke Outcomes in Hospitals With Telestroke Capacity

Importance

Telestroke is increasingly used in hospital emergency departments, but there has been limited research on its impact on treatment and outcomes.

Objective

To describe differences in care patterns and outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke who present to hospitals with and without telestroke capacity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients with acute ischemic stroke who first presented to hospitals with telestroke capacity were matched with patients who presented to control hospitals without telestroke capacity. All traditional Medicare beneficiaries with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (approximately 2.5 million) who presented to a hospital between January 2008 and June 2017 were considered. Matching was based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospital characteristics, and month and year of admission. Hospitals included short-term acute care and critical access hospitals in the US without local stroke expertise. In 643 hospitals with telestroke capacity, there were 76 636 patients with stroke who were matched 1:1 to patients at similar hospitals without telestroke capacity. Data were analyzed in July 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Receipt of reperfusion treatment through thrombolysis with alteplase or thrombectomy, mortality at 30 days from admission, spending through 90 days from admission, and functional status as measured by days spent living in the community after discharge.

Results

In the final sample of 153 272 patients, 88 386 (57.7%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 78.8 (10.4) years. Patients cared for at telestroke hospitals had higher rates of reperfusion treatment compared with those cared for at control hospitals (6.8% vs 6.0%; difference, 0.78 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.54-1.03; P < .001) and lower 30-day mortality (13.1% vs 13.6%; difference, 0.50 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.17-0.83, P = .003). There were no differences in days spent living in the community following discharge or in spending. Increases in reperfusion treatment were largest in the lowest-volume hospitals, among rural residents, and among patients 85 years and older.

Conclusions and Relevance

Patients with ischemic stroke treated at hospitals with telestroke capacity were more likely to receive reperfusion treatment and have lower 30-day mortality.

An update on hyper-acute management of ischaemic stroke

This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of key advances on various aspects of hyper-acute management of acute ischaemic stroke. These include neuroimaging, acute stroke unit care, management of blood pressure, reperfusion therapy including intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy and decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant stroke syndrome. The challenge ahead is to ensure these evidence-based treatments are now being delivered and implemented to maximise the benefits across the population.

"Thrombectomy and Back:" A Novel Approach for Treating Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia

Background:

Timely access to comprehensive stroke centers for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a commonly encountered obstacle worldwide, especially in areas with no comprehensive stroke or thrombectomy-capable stroke centers.

Objective:

To present our novel experience with a “thrombectomy-and-back” model implemented in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

Methods:

King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU), a 600-bed hospital located in Al Khobar with an open-access emergency department, was designated as a comprehensive stroke center in the Eastern Province. “Thrombectomy-and-back” was designed such that the neurologist in the referring hospital directly communicates with the attending neurovascular team at KFHU for their anticipation of the case, and subsequently confirms LVO presence through urgent acquisition of a CT and a CT angiogram. Once LVO was confirmed, the patients were timely transferred to KFHU for mechanical thrombectomy. Upon procedure completion, the patients returned to the referring hospital with the same medical and EMS team. The safety of transfer and peri-procedural complications were analyzed.

Results:

From December 2017 to December 2019, 20 thrombectomy-and-back codes were activated, of which 10 were deactivated on negative LVO and 10 remained activated. Of these 10 patients, 2 required admission to our hospital's Neuro-ICU: one was because the middle cerebral artery reoccluded during the procedure and the other was due to hemodynamic instability upon arrival; this first patient passed away 2 months later due to the complications of the malignant left middle cerebral artery stroke.

Conclusions:

The novel Thrombectomy-and-Back model in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia has proved to be a safe and efficient approach for patients presenting with LVO to receive timely interventional therapy and minimizing futile transfers.

Establishing a Baseline: Evidence-Supported State Laws to Advance Stroke Care

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 800 000 strokes occur annually in the United States. Stroke systems of care policies addressing prehospital and in-hospital care have been proposed to improve access to time-sensitive, lifesaving treatments for stroke. Policy surveillance of stroke systems of care laws supported by best available evidence could reveal potential strengths and weaknesses in how stroke care delivery is regulated across the nation.

DESIGN

This study linked the results of an early evidence assessment of 15 stroke systems of care policy interventions supported by best available evidence to a legal data set of the body of law in effect on January 1, 2018, for the 50 states and Washington, District of Columbia.

RESULTS

As of January 1, 2018, 39 states addressed 1 or more aspects of prehospital or in-hospital stroke care in law; 36 recognized at least 1 type of stroke center. Thirty states recognizing stroke centers also had evidence-supported prehospital policy interventions authorized in law. Four states authorized 10 or more of 15 evidence-supported policy interventions. Some combinations of prehospital and in-hospital policy interventions were more prevalent than other combinations.

CONCLUSION

The analysis revealed that many states had a stroke regulatory infrastructure for in-hospital care that is supported by best available evidence. However, there are gaps in how state law integrates evidence-supported prehospital and in-hospital care that warrant further study. This study provides a baseline for ongoing policy surveillance and serves as a basis for subsequent stroke systems of care policy implementation and policy impact studies.

Changes in Patient Volumes and Outcomes After Adding Thrombectomy Capability

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With the rising demand for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and introduction of thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSC), there is interest among existing stroke hospitals to add EVT capability to attract and retain stroke patient referrals. In this work, we quantify changes in patient volumes and outcomes when adding EVT capability to an existing stroke center.

METHODS

In MATLAB 2017a Simulink, we simulate a 3-center system comprising an EVT-capable comprehensive stroke center, an EVT-incapable primary stroke center, and an EVT-incapable primary stroke center that gains EVT capability (TSC). We model these changes in 2 geographic settings (urban and rural) using 2 routing paradigms (Nearest Center and Bypass). In Nearest Center, patients are sent to the nearest center regardless of EVT capability. In Bypass, patients with severe strokes are sent to the nearest EVT-capable center, and all others are sent to the nearest center. Probability of good clinical outcome is determined by type and timing of treatment using outcomes reported in clinical trials.

RESULTS

Adding EVT capability in the Bypass model produced an absolute increase of 40.1% in total volume of patients with stroke and 31.2% to 31.9% in total volume of acute stroke treatments at the TSC. In the Nearest Center model, the total volume of patients with stroke did not change, but total volume of acute stroke treatment at the TSC had an absolute increase of 9.3% to 9.5%. Good clinical outcomes saw an absolute increase of 0.2% to 0.6% in the whole population and 0.3% to 1.8% in the TSC population.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding EVT capability shifts patient and treatment volume to the TSC. However, these changes produce modest improvement in overall population health. Health systems should weigh relative hospital and patient benefits when considering adding EVT capability.

Coronavirus disease 2019 is threatening stroke care systems: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the stroke care systems have been seriously affected because of social restrictions and other reasons. As the pandemic continues to spread globally, it is of great significance to understand how COVID-19 affects the stroke care systems in mainland China.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the real-world data of one comprehensive stroke center in mainland China from January to February 2020 and compared it with the data collected during the same period in 2019. We analyzed DTN time, onset-to-door time, severity, effects after treatment, the hospital length of stays, costs of hospitalization, etc., and the correlation between medical burden and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 pandemic was most severe in mainland China in January and February 2020. During the pandemic, there were no differences in pre-hospital or in-hospital workflow metrics (all p>0.05), while the degree of neurological deficit on admission and at discharge, the effects after treatment, and the long-term prognosis were all worse (all p<0.05). The severity and prognosis of AIS patients were positively correlated with the hospital length of stays and total costs of hospitalization (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 pandemic is threatening the stroke care systems. Measures must be taken to minimize the collateral damage caused by COVID-19.

Better nurse work environments associated with fewer readmissions and shorter length of stay among adults with ischemic stroke: A cross-sectional analysis of United States hospitals

Stroke is among the most common reasons for disability and death. Avoiding readmissions and long lengths of stay among ischemic stroke patients has benefits for patients and health care systems alike. Although reduced readmission rates among a variety of medical patients have been associated with better nurse work environments, it is unknown how the work environment might influence readmissions and length of stay for ischemic stroke patients. Using linked data sources, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 543 hospitals to evaluate the association between the nurse work environment and readmissions and length of stay for 175,467 hospitalized adult ischemic stroke patients. We utilized logistic regression models for readmission to estimate odds ratios (OR) and zero-truncated negative binomial models for length of stay to estimate the incident-rate ratio (IRR). Final models accounted for hospital and patient characteristics. Seven and 30-day readmission rates were 3.9% and 10.1% respectively and the average length of stay was 4.9 days. In hospitals with better nurse work environments ischemic stroke patients experienced lower odds of 7- and 30-day readmission (7-day OR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-0.99 and 30-day OR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99) and lower length of stay (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.99). The work environment is a modifiable feature of hospitals that should be considered when providing comprehensive stroke care and improving post-stroke outcomes.

Silver Jubilee of Stroke Thrombolysis With Alteplase: Evolution of the Therapeutic Window

In 1995, the results of a landmark clinical trial by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) made a paradigm shift in managing acute cerebral ischemic stroke (AIS) patients at critical care centers. The study demonstrated the efficacy of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), alteplase in improving neurological and functional outcome in AIS patients when administered within 3 h of stroke onset. After about 12 years of efforts and the results of the ECASS-III trial, it was possible to expand the therapeutic window to 4.5 h, which still represents a major logistic issue, depriving many AIS patients from the benefits of tPA therapy. Constant efforts in this regards are directed toward either speeding up the patient recruitment for tPA therapy or expanding the current tPA window. Efficient protocols to reduce the door-to-needle time and advanced technologies like telestroke services and mobile stroke units are being deployed for early management of AIS patients. Studies have demonstrated benefit of thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging in AIS patients at up to 9 h of stroke onset, signifying “tissue window.” Several promising pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches are being explored to mitigate the adverse effects of delayed tPA therapy, thus hoping to further expand the current tPA therapeutic window without compromising safety. With accumulation of scientific data, stroke organizations across the world are amending/updating the clinical recommendations of tPA, the only US-FDA approved drug for managing AIS patients. Alteplase has been a part of our neurocritical care and we intend to celebrate its silver jubilee by dedicating this review article discussing its journey so far and possible future evolution.

Mapping access to endovascular stroke care in the USA and implications for transport models

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the percentage of the US population with 60 min ground or air access to accredited or state-designated endovascular-capable stroke centers (ECCs) and non-endovascular capable stroke centers (NECCs) and the percentage of NECCs with an ECC within a 30 min drive.

METHODS

Stroke centers were identified and classified broadly as ECCs or NECCs. Geographic mapping of stroke centers was performed. The population was divided into census blocks, and their centroids were calculated. Fastest air and ground travel times from centroid to nearest ECC and NECC were estimated.

RESULTS

Overall, 49.6% of US residents had 60 min ground access to ECCs. Approximately 37.7% (113 million) lack 60 min ground or air access to ECCs. Approximately 84.4% have 60 min access to NECCs. Ground-only access was available to 77.9%. Approximately 738 NECCs (45.4%) had an ECC within a 30 min drive.

CONCLUSION

Nearly one-third of the US population lacks 60 min access to endovascular stroke care, but this is highly variable. Transport models and planning of additional centers should be tailored to each state depending on location and proximity of existing facilities.

Community Rehabilitation Outcomes for Different Stroke Diagnoses: An Observational Cohort Study

Objective

To determine the differences in functional and cognitive rehabilitation gains made in community-based rehabilitation following a stroke based on stroke diagnosis (left or right hemisphere, hemorrhagic, or ischemic).

Design

A 12-month follow-up observational retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation.

Participants

Clients (N=61) with hemorrhagic left brain stroke (n=10), hemorrhagic right brain stroke (n=8), ischemic left brain stroke (n=27), or ischemic right brain stroke (n=16) participating in rehabilitation for at least 12 months.

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) was completed at admission and 12 months post admission to staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation by consensus of a multidisciplinary team.

Results

After 12 months in staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation, the study population made significant gains in Total (P<.001) and across Ability (P<.001) and Participation (P<.001) subscales of the MPAI-4. All diagnostic groups made significant gains in Participation T-scores, and no groups made significant gains in Adjustment. The ischemic left and right hemisphere stroke groups also made significant gains in Ability and Total T-scores from admission to 12 months. Clients with ischemic left hemisphere stroke had more severe limitations in motor speech (P<.05) than clients with right hemisphere stroke at admission and/or review and were also more impaired in verbal communication (P<.01) than the hemorrhagic right hemisphere group at admission.

Conclusions

There are some differences in outcomes on presentation to rehabilitation based on type of stroke; there are also differences in rehabilitation gains. Improvement in physical ability does not always translate to improvement in social participation and independence; those with right brain stroke need further assistance to translate physical gains into participatory outcomes.

Reimagining Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery Across the Care Continuum: Results From a Design-Thinking Workshop to Identify Challenges and Propose Solutions

Systems for stroke rehabilitation and recovery are variable and fragmented; stroke survivors often experience gaps in care with detrimental effects on their recovery. We designed and hosted a multidisciplinary and interactive workshop to discuss challenges facing patients recovering from stroke and to brainstorm solutions. Forty-one participants including clinicians, researchers, and stroke survivors attended the workshop. Participants were surveyed beforehand about challenges facing stroke recovery and results were tabulated as a word cloud. An interactive, design-thinking exercise was conducted that involved completing workbooks, hands-on prototype designing, and presentations, which were then analyzed through qualitative content analysis using an inductive approach. High frequency words in the word cloud of survey responses included access, fragmented, and uncertainty. Qualitative analysis revealed 6 major challenge themes including poor (1) transitions in and (2) access to care; (3) barriers to health insurance; (4) lack of patient support; (5) knowledge gaps; and (6) lack of standardized outcomes. Eleven unique solutions were proposed that centered around new technologies, health care system changes, and the creation of new support roles. Analysis of the alignment between the challenges and solutions revealed that the single proposed solution that solved the most identified challenges was a "comprehensive stroke clinic with follow-up programs, cutting edge treatments, patient advocation and research." Through our interactive design-thinking workshop process and inductive thematic analysis, we identified major challenges facing patients recovering from stroke, collaboratively proposed solutions, and analyzed their alignment. This process offers an innovative approach to reaching consensus among interdisciplinary stakeholders.

CTA Protocols in a Telestroke Network Improve Efficiency for Both Spoke and Hub Hospitals

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Telestroke networks support screening for patients with emergent large-vessel occlusions who are eligible for endovascular thrombectomy. Ideal triage processes within telestroke networks remain uncertain. We characterize the impact of implementing a routine spoke hospital CTA protocol in our integrated telestroke network on transfer and thrombectomy patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A protocol-driven CTA process was introduced at 22 spoke hospitals in November 2017. We retrospectively identified prospectively collected patients who presented to a spoke hospital with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores ≥6 between March 1, 2016 and March 1, 2017 (pre-CTA), and March 1, 2018 and March 1, 2019 (post-CTA). We describe the demographics, CTA utilization, spoke hospital retention rates, emergent large-vessel occlusion identification, and rates of endovascular thrombectomy.

RESULTS

There were 167 patients pre-CTA and 207 post-CTA. The rate of CTA at spoke hospitals increased from 15% to 70% (P < .001). Despite increased endovascular thrombectomy screening in the extended window, the overall rates of transfer out of spoke hospitals remained similar (56% versus 54%; P = .83). There was a nonsignificant increase in transfers to our hub hospital for endovascular thrombectomy (26% versus 35%; P = .12), but patients transferred >4.5 hours from last known well increased nearly 5-fold (7% versus 34%; P < .001). The rate of endovascular thrombectomy performed on patients transferred for possible endovascular thrombectomy more than doubled (22% versus 47%; P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of CTA at spoke hospitals in our telestroke network was feasible and improved the efficiency of stroke triage. Rates of patients retained at spoke hospitals remained stable despite higher numbers of patients screened. Emergent large-vessel occlusion confirmation at the spoke hospital lead to a more than 2-fold increase in thrombectomy rates among transferred patients at the hub.

Efficacy and Safety of the Telestroke Drip-And-Stay Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes between two models of acute ischemic stroke care. Namely 1) "drip-and-stay", i.e. IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administered at a spoke hospital in a telestroke network, with the patient remaining at the spoke, versus 2) "drip-and-ship", i.e. tPA administered at a spoke hospital with subsequent patient transfer to a hub hospital, and 3) "hub", i.e. tPA and subsequent treatment at a hub hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane from inception-October 2019 included randomized control trials and observational cohort studies comparing the drip-and-stay model to hub and drip-and-ship models. Outcomes of interest were functional independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and length of stay. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects meta-analysis and random-effects Bayesian meta-analysis. Non-inferiority was calculated using a fixed-margin method.

RESULTS

Of 2806 unique records identified, 10 studies, totaling 4,164 patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis found no significant difference in functional outcomes (mRS0-1) (6 studies, RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.98-1.22, p=0.123), sICH (8 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.64-1.51, p=0.942), or 90-day mortality (5 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.73-1.32, p=0.911, respectively) between patients treated in a drip-and-stay model compared to patients treated in drip-and-ship or hub models. There was no significant heterogeneity in these outcomes. Drip-and-stay outcomes (mRS 0-1, sICH) were non-inferior when compared to the combined group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that drip-and-stay is non-inferior to current models of drip-and-ship or hub stroke care, and may be as safe and as effective as either.

Acute stroke treatment during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a major impact on stroke care. This review synthesizes the available data and provides a framework for optimal management of stroke patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection and eligible to reperfusion treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Reorganization of health services has led to the conversion of stroke units and relocation of stroke staff to COVID units. During the pandemic surge, there has been a general decline of stroke presentations, increased time delays, and reduced activity across all areas of stroke care, specifically the delivery of acute treatment. Moreover, COVID-19 patients seem to have a worse outcome despite prompt recanalization. Periprocedural monitoring studies are needed in these patients to target a more adequate therapy.

SUMMARY

The COVID-19 pandemic has jeopardized the ability of stroke centers to provide timely assessment and acute therapies such as reperfusive treatments. Yet, as stroke remains a medical emergency, efforts to maintain stroke teams and safe provision of highly effective stroke treatments should be prioritized despite healthcare systems reorganization. This can be accomplished through the activation of telestroke networks, protected stroke pathways, 24/7 open-access high-quality stroke centers, and stroke awareness programs.

Prehospital EMS Triage for Acute Stroke Care

Acute stroke has had major advances over the last two decades due to the introduction of pharmacologic and endovascular revascularization, which can improve functional outcome. Stroke systems of care have been developed to provide faster, more efficient care for stroke patients. A major part of these care pathways is prehospital care, when patients are triaged to appropriate levels of care. It is essential that prehospital scales are used accurately and effectively by emergency medical services to assist them with the triage process. New technologies including mobile stroke units, telemedicine, and wearable technology have been introduced as options for optimization of this emergent process.

Effect of stroke early supported discharge on length of hospital stay: analysis from a national stroke registry

OBJECTIVE

The first observational study to investigate the impact of early supported discharge (ESD) on length of hospital stay in real-world conditions.

DESIGN

Using historical prospective Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data (1 January 2013-31 December 2016) and multilevel modelling, cross-sectional (2015-2016; 30 791 patients nested within 55 hospitals) and repeated cross-sectional (2013-2014 vs 2015-2016; 49 266 patients nested within 41 hospitals) analyses were undertaken.

SETTING

Hospitals were sampled across a large geographical area of England covering the West and East Midlands, the East of England and the North of England.

PARTICIPANTS

Stroke patients whose data were entered into the SSNAP database by hospital teams.

INTERVENTIONS

Receiving ESD along the patient care pathway.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

When adjusted for important case-mix variables, patients who received ESD on their stroke care pathway spent longer in hospital, compared with those who did not receive ESD. The percentage increase was 15.8% (95% CI 12.3% to 19.4%) for the 2015-2016 cross-sectional analysis and 18.8% (95% CI 13.9% to 24.0%) for the 2013-2014 versus 2015-2016 repeated cross-sectional analysis. On average, the increased length of hospital stay was approximately 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that by comparing ESD and non-ESD patient groups matched for important patient characteristics, receiving ESD resulted in a 1-day increase in length of hospital stay. The large reduction in length of hospital stay overall, since original trials were conducted, may explain why a reduction was not observed. The longer term benefits of accessing ESD need to be investigated further.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15568163.

Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion: Where We Are and What Comes Next?

In the past 5 years, the success of multiple randomized controlled trials of recanalization therapy with endovascular thrombectomy has transformed the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. The evidence from these trials has now established endovascular thrombectomy as standard of care. This review will discuss the chronological evolution of large vessel occlusion treatment from early medical therapy with tissue plasminogen activator to the latest mechanical thrombectomy. Additionally, it will highlight the potential areas in endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke open to exploration and further progress in the next decade.

Exploring the perspectives of people post-stroke, carers and healthcare professionals to inform the development of an intervention to improve cognitive impairment post-stroke

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Cognitive impairment is common post-stroke and can result in negative sequalae such as a lower quality of life, increased carer burden and increased healthcare costs. Despite the prevalence and associated burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment, there is uncertainty regarding the optimum intervention to improve cognitive function post-stroke. By exploring the perspectives of people post-stroke, carers and healthcare professionals on cognitive impairment, this qualitative study aims to inform the design and development of an intervention to rehabilitate cognitive impairment post-stroke. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach will be applied, using semi-structured interviews with people post-stroke, carers and healthcare professionals. People post-stroke will be recruited via gatekeepers from a local stroke support group and Headway, a brain injury support service. Carers will be recruited via a gatekeeper from a local carers branch. Healthcare professionals will be recruited via gatekeepers from relevant neurological sites and via Twitter. The final number of participants recruited will be guided by information power. Data will be collectively analysed and synthesised using thematic analysis. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) guidelines will be used to standardize the conduct and reporting of the research. Conclusions: It is anticipated that exploring the perspectives of people post-stroke, carers and healthcare professionals on cognitive impairment post-stroke will inform the development of an evidence-based optimal intervention to rehabilitate cognitive deficits post-stroke. This study was granted ethical approval from the Faculty of Education and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee at the University of Limerick. Study findings will be disseminated locally through presentations at stroke support groups, as well as internationally through academic conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

Comprehensive Stroke Care and Outcomes: Time for a Paradigm Shift

Worldwide, stroke is prevalent, costly, and disabling in >80 million survivors. The burden of stroke is increasing despite incredible progress and advancements in evidence-based acute care therapies and despite the substantial changes being made in acute care stroke systems, processes, and quality metrics. Although there has been increased global emphasis on the importance of postacute stroke care, stroke system changes have not expanded to include postacute care and outcome follow-up. Our objectives are to describe the gaps and challenges in postacute stroke care and suboptimal stroke outcomes; to report on stroke survivors' and caregivers' perceptions of current postacute stroke care and their call for improvements in follow-up services for recovery and secondary prevention; and, ultimately, to make the case that a paradigm shift is needed in the definition of comprehensive stroke care and the designation of Comprehensive Stroke Center. Three recommendations are made for a paradigm shift in comprehensive stroke care: (1) criteria should be established for designation of rehabilitation readiness for Comprehensive Stroke Centers, (2) The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association implement an expanded Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program and criteria for comprehensive stroke centers to be inclusive of rehabilitation readiness and measure outcomes at 90 days, and (3) a public health campaign should be launched to offer hopeful and actionable messaging for secondary prevention and recovery of function and health. Now is the time to honor the patients' and caregivers' strongest ask: better access and improved secondary prevention, stroke rehabilitation, and personalized care.

Community care coordination for stroke survivors: results of a complex intervention study

BACKGROUND

Outpatient follow-up care for stroke survivors is often inadequate and mostly self-organized by the patients themselves. In the German health care system, there are no standard care programs for patients after they are discharged from the hospital to support them with their multifaceted and heterogeneous health care needs. The objective of this complex intervention study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a post-stroke care coordination program in comparison to standard care in the first year after a stroke.

METHODS

Patients aged 55 and older who had survived a stroke or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the last 6 months before enrollment were included. Participants received care coordination either by telephone or face-to-face for up to 1 year. Patients' health insurance claims data were used to measure outcomes. The control group consisted of stroke survivors receiving standard care and was constructed by exact matching based on six criteria. Outcome measures were health services utilization, rate of recurrent events, readmissions and accompanying costs, and mortality. Outcomes were tested using different multiple models.

RESULTS

In total, N = 361 patients were included in the analyses. Intervention participants had seen an outpatient neurologist more often (OR = 4.75; 95% CI: 2.71-8.31) and were readmitted to a hospital less frequently (IRR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.29-0.61), resulting in lower hospital costs (IQR = €0-1910 in the intervention group, IQR = €0-4375 in the control group). There were no substantial group differences in the rate of recurrent events and mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study showed the beneficial potential of care coordination for a vulnerable patient population: the utilization rate of important health services was increased, and the rate of hospital readmissions decreased as a result. Future research should focus on the risk of recurrent strokes and the long-term effects of improved care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00017526 on DRKS - German Clinical Trials Register (retrospectively registered: 21 June 2019).

Mobile Interventional Stroke Team Model Improves Early Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Background and Purpose:

Triage of patients with emergent large vessel occlusion stroke to primary stroke centers followed by transfer to comprehensive stroke centers leads to increased time to endovascular therapy. A Mobile Interventional Stroke Team (MIST) provides an alternative model by transferring a MIST to a Thrombectomy Capable Stroke Center (TSC) to perform endovascular therapy. Our aim is to determine whether the MIST model is more time-efficient and leads to improved clinical outcomes compared with standard drip-and-ship (DS) and mothership models.

Methods:

This is a prospective observational cohort study with 3-month follow-up between June 2016 and December 2018 at a multicenter health system, consisting of one comprehensive stroke center, 4 TSCs, and several primary stroke centers. A total of 228 of 373 patients received endovascular therapy via 1 of 4 models: mothership with patient presentation to a comprehensive stroke center, DS with patient transfer from primary stroke center or TSC to comprehensive stroke center, MIST with patient presentation to TSC and MIST transfer, or a combination of DS with patient transfer from primary stroke center to TSC and MIST. The prespecified primary end point was initial door-to-recanalization time and secondary end points measured additional time intervals and clinical outcomes at discharge and 3 months.

Results:

MIST had a faster mean initial door-to-recanalization time than DS by 83 minutes ( P <0.01). MIST and mothership had similar median door-to-recanalization times of 192 minutes and 179 minutes, respectively ( P =0.83). A greater proportion had a complete recovery (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 0 or 1) at discharge in MIST compared with DS (37.9% versus 16.7%; P <0.01). MIST had 52.8% of patients with modified Rankin Scale of ≤2 at 3 months compared with 38.9% in DS ( P =0.10).

Conclusions:

MIST led to significantly faster initial door-to-recanalization times compared with DS, which was comparable to mothership. This decrease in time has translated into improved short-term outcomes and a trend towards improved long-term outcomes.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03048292.

Defect-free care trends in the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program, 2008-2018

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve stroke quality of care and patient outcomes, quality of care metrics are monitored to assess utilization of evidence-based stroke care processes as part of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP). We aimed to assess temporal trends in defect-free care (DFC) received by stroke patients in the PCNASP between 2008 and 2018.

METHODS

Quality of care data for 10 performance measures were available for 849,793 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to a participating hospital with a clinical diagnosis of stroke between 2008 and 2018. A patient who receives care according to all performance measures for which they are eligible, receives "defect-free care" (DFC) (eg, appropriate medications, assessments, and education). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the factors associated with receipt of DFC.

RESULTS

DFC among ischemic stroke patients increased from 38.0% in 2008 to 80.8% in 2018 (P < .0001), with the largest improvement seen in receipt of stroke education (relative percent change, RPC = 64%). Similarly, DFC for hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients increased from 46.7% to 82.6% (RPC = 76.9%) and 39.9% to 85.0% (RPC = 113.0%) (P < .001), respectively. Among ischemic stroke patients, the adjusted odds for receiving DFC were lower for women, patients aged 18 to 54 years, Medicaid or Medicare participants, and patients with atrial fibrillation (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2008 to 2018, receipt of DFC by ischemic stroke patients significantly increased in the PCNASP; however certain subgroups were less likely to receive this level of care. Targeted quality improvement initiatives could result in even further improvements among all stroke patients and help reduce disparities in care.

Provider Communication and Telepresence Enhance Veteran Satisfaction With Telestroke Consultations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Telestroke has been demonstrated to be a cost-effective means to expand access to care and improve outcomes in stroke; however, information on patient perceptions of this system of care delivery are limited. This study seeks to examine patient feedback of a national telestroke system within the Veterans Health Administration.

METHODS

Patients who received a telestroke consultation were eligible for a phone interview 2 weeks later, including questions about technology quality, telepresence, and telestroke provider communication. Satisfaction scores ranged from 1 to 7 (higher=more satisfied) and for analyses were dichotomized as 6 to 7 indicating high satisfaction versus <6. Patient variables including stroke severity (measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) were obtained from study records. Generalized estimating equation models were used to determine what factors were associated with patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Over 18 months, 186 interviews were completed, and 142 (76%) reported high satisfaction with telestroke. Patients with more severe stroke were less likely to recall the consultation. Factors significantly associated with patient satisfaction were higher ratings of the technology (P<0.0001), telepresence (P<0.0001), provider communication ratings (P<0.0001), and overall Veterans Affairs satisfaction (P=0.02). In the multivariate model, telepresence (odds ratio, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.81-5.31]) and provider ratings (odds ratio, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.20-4.68]) were independently associated with satisfaction. Veterans who were satisfied were more likely to recommend the technology (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Provider qualities, including telepresence and provider ratings, were associated with overall Veteran satisfaction with the telestroke consultation. Technology quality may be necessary but not sufficient to impact patient experience. Training providers to improve telepresence could improve patient experience with telestroke consultation.

Multimodal Neuroimaging Using Concurrent EEG/fNIRS for Poststroke Recovery Assessment: An Exploratory Study

Background

Persistent motor deficits are very common in poststroke survivors and often lead to disability. Current clinical measures for profiling motor impairment and assessing poststroke recovery are largely subjective and lack precision.

Objective

A multimodal neuroimaging approach was developed based on concurrent functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to identify biomarkers associated with motor function recovery and document the poststroke cortical reorganization.

Methods

EEG and fNIRS data were simultaneously recorded from 9 healthy controls and 18 stroke patients during a hand-clenching task. A novel fNIRS-informed EEG source imaging approach was developed to estimate cortical activity and functional connectivity. Subsequently, graph theory analysis was performed to identify network features for monitoring and predicting motor function recovery during a 4-week intervention.

Results

The task-evoked strength at ipsilesional primary somatosensory cortex was significantly lower in stroke patients compared with healthy controls ( P < .001). In addition, across the 4-week rehabilitation intervention, the strength at ipsilesional premotor cortex (PMC) ( R = 0.895, P = .006) and the connectivity between bilateral primary motor cortices (M1) ( R = 0.9, P = .007) increased in parallel with the improvement of motor function. Furthermore, a higher baseline strength at ipsilesional PMC was associated with a better motor function recovery ( R = 0.768, P = .007), while a higher baseline connectivity between ipsilesional supplementary motor cortex (SMA)–M1 implied a worse motor function recovery ( R = −0.745, P = .009).

Conclusion

The proposed multimodal EEG/fNIRS technique demonstrates a preliminary potential for monitoring and predicting poststroke motor recovery. We expect such findings can be further validated in future study.

Currently Available Options for Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex condition with a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices were developed to support patients with CS in cases refractory to treatment with vasoactive medications. Current devices include intra-aortic balloon pumps, intravascular microaxial pumps, percutaneous LVAD, percutaneous RVAD, and VA ECMO. Data from limited observational studies and clinical trials show a clear difference in the level of hemodynamic support offered by each device. However, at this point, there are insufficient clinical trial data to guide MCS selection and, until ongoing clinical trials are completed, use of the right device for the right patient depends largely on clinical judgment.

Value Utilization of Emergency Medical Services Air Transport in Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Determining whether a patient has a time-critical medical condition requiring helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) transportation is a challenge with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although HEMS is largely accepted as improving outcomes in time-sensitive conditions, overtriage of patients ineligible for acute stroke therapies places patients and providers at unnecessary risk and wastes limited health care resources.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify how accurate our triage system was at identifying high-yield EMS transfers. A better triage system would decrease the volume of low flight value HEMS transfers.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study during a 1-year period. Low flight value was defined by acute therapy eligibility and presenting medical status.

RESULTS

Of 141 AIS patients transferred by HEMS, 23 (16%) were deemed of low flight value; 14 (61%) were outside the acute treatment time window for either intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or endovascular therapy (EVT); 5 patients (22%) were ineligible for EVT (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale < 6); 2 patients (9%) were ineligible for EVT (Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3); and 2 patients (9%) were flown despite negative angiographic studies performed at transferring institution. Thirteen (57%) of the patients were interfacility transfers as opposed to direct HEMS transport from the field.

CONCLUSIONS

HEMS transport for AIS patients plays a crucial role in delivering the best evidence-based care. However, a significant percent of patients did not meet criteria for its optimal utilization, most commonly due to expired treatment windows. Furthermore, low flight value transfers were initiated in spite of physician evaluation > 50% of the time. These results represent a unique opportunity to coordinate education and build effective triage paradigms across a system of stroke care.

What Drives Greater Assimilation of Telestroke in Emergency Departments?

OBJECTIVE

Although many emergency departments (EDs) have telestroke capacity, it is unclear why some EDs consistently use telestroke and others do not. We compared the characteristics and practices of EDs with robust and low assimilation of telestroke.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives of EDs that received telestroke services from 10 different networks and had used telestroke for a minimum of two years. We used maximum diversity sampling to select EDs for inclusion and applied a positive deviance approach, comparing programs with robust and low assimilation. Data collection was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. For the qualitative analysis, we created site summaries and conducted a supplemental matrix analysis to identify themes.

RESULTS

Representatives from 21 EDs with telestroke, including 11 with robust assimilation and 10 with low assimilation, participated. In EDs with robust assimilation, telestroke workflow was highly protocolized, programs had the support of leadership, telestroke use and outcomes were measured, and individual providers received feedback about their telestroke use. In EDs with low assimilation, telestroke was perceived to increase complexity, and ED physicians felt telestroke did not add value or had little value beyond a telephone consult. EDs with robust assimilation identified four sets of strategies to improve assimilation: strengthening relationships between stroke experts and ED providers, improving and standardizing processes, addressing resistant providers, and expanding the goals and role of the program.

CONCLUSION

Greater assimilation of telestroke is observed in EDs with standardized workflow, leadership support, ongoing evaluation and quality improvement efforts, and mechanisms to address resistant providers.

Initial Experience of Challenge-Free MRI-Based Oxygen Extraction Fraction Mapping of Ischemic Stroke at Various Stages: Comparison With Perfusion and Diffusion Mapping

MRI-based oxygen extraction fraction imaging has a great potential benefit in the selection of clinical strategies for ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a challenge-free oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) mapping in a cohort of acute and subacute ischemic stroke patients. Consecutive ischemic stroke patients (a total of 30 with 5 in the acute stage, 19 in the early subacute stage, and 6 in the late subacute stage) were recruited. All subjects underwent MRI including multi-echo gradient echo (mGRE), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and 3D-arterial spin labeling (ASL). OEF maps were generated from mGRE phase + magnitude data, which were processed using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) + quantitative blood oxygen level-dependent (qBOLD) imaging with cluster analysis of time evolution. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were reconstructed from 3D-ASL and DWI, respectively. Further, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) was calculated as the product of CBF and OEF. OEF, CMRO2, CBF, and ADC values in the ischemic cores (absolute values) and their contrasts to the contralateral regions (relative values) were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare OEF, CMRO2, CBF, and ADC values and their relative values among different stroke stages. The OEF value of infarct core showed a trend of decrease from acute, to early subacute, and to late subacute stages of ischemic stroke. Significant differences among the three stroke stages were only observed in the absolute OEF (F = 6.046, p = 0.005) and relative OEF (F = 5.699, p = 0.009) values of the ischemic core, but not in other measurements (absolute and relative CMRO2, CBF, ADC values, all values of p > 0.05). In conclusion, the challenge-free QSM + qBOLD-generated OEF mapping can be performed on stroke patients. It can provide more information on tissue viability that was not available with CBF and ADC and, thus, may help to better manage ischemic stroke patients.

Clinical Outcomes of On-Site Versus Off-Site Endovascular Stroke Interventions

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess whether offering local endovascular stroke therapy (EST) rather than transferring patients off-site to receive EST would improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND

There are limited data to determine whether offering EST on-site rather than transferring patients to receive EST off-site improves clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A large academic consortium database was queried to identify patients with acute ischemic stroke who received EST between October 2015 and September 2019. Primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes. Secondary endpoints were major complications, length of stay, and cost. Baseline characteristics were adjusted for using propensity score matching and multivariate risk adjustment.

RESULTS

A total of 22,193 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent EST (50.8% on-site, 49.2% off-site) were included. Mean ages were 67.9 ± 15.5 years and 68.4 ± 15.5 years, respectively (p = 0.03). In the propensity score matching analysis, mortality and poor functional outcomes were higher in the off-site EST group (14.7% vs. 11.2% and 40.7% vs. 35.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the risk-adjusted analyses with different models, in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes remained significantly higher in the off-site EST group. In the most comprehensive model (adjusting for age, sex, demographics, risk factors, tissue plasminogen activator use, and institutional EST volume), in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes were significantly higher in the off-site EST group, with odds ratios of 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 1.26 to 1.51) and 1.26 (95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 1.34), respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and mechanical ventilation was higher in the off-site group, but cost was higher in the on-site group in both the propensity score matching and risk-adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary U.S. practice, patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with EST on-site had lower in-hospital mortality and better functional outcomes compared with those transferred off-site for EST.

Artificial intelligence for decision support in acute stroke - current roles and potential

The identification and treatment of patients with stroke is becoming increasingly complex as more treatment options become available and new relationships between disease features and treatment response are continually discovered. Consequently, clinicians must constantly learn new skills (such as clinical evaluations or image interpretation), stay up to date with the literature and incorporate advances into everyday practice. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to support clinical decision making could reduce inter-rater variation in routine clinical practice and facilitate the extraction of vital information that could improve identification of patients with stroke, prediction of treatment responses and patient outcomes. Such support systems would be ideal for centres that deal with few patients with stroke or for regional hubs, and could assist informed discussions with the patients and their families. Moreover, the use of AI for image processing and interpretation in stroke could provide any clinician with an imaging assessment equivalent to that of an expert. However, any AI-based decision support system should allow for expert clinician interaction to enable identification of errors (for example, in automated image processing). In this Review, we discuss the increasing importance of imaging in stroke management before exploring the potential and pitfalls of AI-assisted treatment decision support in acute stroke.

Mixed Lineage Leukemia 1 Promoted Neuron Apoptosis in Ischemic Penumbra via Regulating ASK-1/TNF-α Complex

Neuron apoptosis in ischemic penumbra was proved to be involved in ischemic stroke (IS) development and contributed to the poor prognosis of IS. Recent studies showed that aberrant trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) level was associated with cell apoptosis. This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism of neuron apoptosis in ischemic penumbra via histone methyltransferase (HMT) mixed lineage leukemia 1 (MLL1) mediated epigenetic pathway. Mouse IS model was established by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Mouse primary cortical mixed cells were cultured and treated with oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD) to simulate IS process. The expressions of apoptosis signal regulating kinase-1 (ASK-1), pASK-1, cleaved caspase-3, ASK-1/serine–threonine kinase receptor-associated protein (STRAP)/14-3-3 complex, ASK-1/tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) complex, and MLL1 in mouse brain tissue and mouse primary cortical mixed cells were analyzed. The function of MLL1 was investigated using small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting MLL1 and vector overexpressing MLL1. In vivo inhibition of MLL1 was conducted to explore its value as a therapeutic target. The prognostic value of MLL1 was investigated in IS patients. Results showed that the expressions of ASK-1, pASK-1, cleaved caspase-3, ASK-1/TNF-α complex, and MLL1 increased significantly in ischemic penumbra compared to brain tissue from the control group (P < 0.05). MCAO and OGD significantly upregulated the H3K4me3 level in ASK-1 promoter region and promoted the recruitment of MLL1 to this region (P < 0.05). siMLL1 significantly reversed the proapoptosis effects of OGD in primary cortical mixed cells, while MLL1 overexpression induced apoptosis of cells (P < 0.05). In vivo inhibition of MLL1 significantly reduced the infarct volume and the neurological score of MCAO mice (P < 0.05). Serum MLL1 level had a positive association with that in ischemic core and penumbra in mouse model and was positively correlated with the infarct volume and neurological score (P < 0.05). Besides, serum MLL1 level was also significantly correlated with the severity of IS (P < 0.05), and high serum MLL1 level indicated poor prognosis of IS patients (P < 0.05). These results revealed that MLL1 contributed to neuron cell apoptosis in ischemic penumbra after IS onset by promoting the formation of ASK-1/TNF-α complex, and its serum level was associated with poor prognosis of IS.

Determining the Need for Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centers Based on Travel Time to the Nearest Comprehensive Stroke Center

BACKGROUND

In January 2018 The Joint Commission introduced its Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Center (TSC) certification program to recognize hospitals capable of performing endovascular thrombectomy for patients with ischemic strokes due to large vessel occlusions, intended for hospitals not in close geographic proximity to Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs). This study was conducted to determine (1) the travel times between current and potential TSCs and the nearest CSC and (2) the proportion of TSCs that were in areas of high need.

METHODS

The locations of current and applicant TSCs (N = 44) were mapped and paired with the closest CSCs. Google Maps estimated travel times for each pair at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 a.m., and 5:00 p.m. on Wednesdays, providing the minimum, maximum, and midpoint for each period. The area served by each TSC was classified based on the number of time periods with drive times > 30 or > 60 minutes to the closest CSC ("very low need" [0 of 3], "low need" [1 of 3], "high need" [2 of 3], or "very high need" [3 of 3]).

RESULTS

Using minimum drive times and the > 30 minute to the nearest CSC threshold, 68.2% of the 44 TSCs were in very low need areas, and 29.5% were in very high need areas. Using maximum drive times, 31.8% were in high need areas, and 31.8% were in very high need areas. With a 60-minute threshold, 25.0% were still in very high need areas.

CONCLUSION

Many TSCs were in very low need areas using a 30-minute threshold. This methodology may help regional authorities determine how a TSC should be included in stroke systems of care prehospital destination protocols.

Simplified Prehospital Prediction Rule to Estimate the Likelihood of 4 Types of Stroke: The 7-Item Japan Urgent Stroke Triage (JUST-7) Score

OBJECTIVE

Prehospital prediction models to estimate the likelihood of several types of stroke (large vessel occlusion [LVO], intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], and subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH], and other types of stroke) should be useful to transfer those with suspected stroke to appropriate facilities. We recently reported Japan Urgent Stroke Triage (JUST) score with 21 items had excellent predictive abilities, and we further tried to simplify the score with parsimonious items and comparable predictive abilities.

METHODS

We conducted historical and prospective multicenter cohort studies at 8 centers from June 2015 to March 2018. We developed the prediction rules with select variables from JUST score for LVO, ICH, SAH and other types of stroke in 2236 patients with suspected stroke in historical derivation cohort. We validated the developed prediction rules in 964 patients in prospective validation cohort.

RESULTS

There were 1150 stroke, including 235 LVO, 352 ICH, 107 SAH and 456 other types of stroke in the derivation cohort. We developed the scores with 7 items (high blood pressure, arrhythmia, conjugate deviation, headache, dysarthria, disturbance of consciousness, paralysis of upper limbs) and the developed scores had area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) of 0.84 for any type of stroke, 0.89 for LVO, 0.79 for ICH, and 0.90 for SAH in the derivation cohort. There were 490 stroke, including 102 LVO, 138 ICH, 28 SAH and 222 other types of stroke in the validation cohort. The scores well discriminated these strokes in the validation cohort (AUC of 0.76 for any type of stroke; 0.81 for LVO, 0.73 for ICH, and 0.85 for SAH).

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified 7-item JUST (JUST-7) score had good predictive ability and can help healthcare providers to estimate the likelihood of different types of stroke and decide the referral hospital.

Effectiveness of Stroke Early Supported Discharge: Analysis From a National Stroke Registry

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Implementation of stroke early supported discharge (ESD) services has been recommended in many countries’ clinical guidelines, based on clinical trial evidence. This is the first observational study to investigate the effectiveness of ESD service models operating in real-world conditions, at scale.

Methods and Results:

Using historical prospective data from the United Kingdom Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (January 1, 2016–December 31, 2016), measures of ESD effectiveness were “days to ESD” (number of days from hospital discharge to first ESD contact; n=6222), “rehabilitation intensity” (total number of treatment days/total days with ESD; n=5891), and stroke survivor outcome (modified Rankin scale at ESD discharge; n=6222). ESD service models (derived from Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme postacute organizational audit data) were categorized with a 17-item score, reflecting adoption of ESD consensus core components (evidence-based criteria). Multilevel modeling analysis was undertaken as patients were clustered within ESD teams across the Midlands, East, and North of England (n=31). A variety of ESD service models had been adopted, as reflected by variability in the ESD consensus score. Controlling for patient characteristics and Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme hospital score, a 1-unit increase in ESD consensus score was significantly associated with a more responsive ESD service (reduced odds of patient being seen after ≥1 day of 29% [95% CI, 1%–49%] and increased treatment intensity by 2% [95% CI, 0.3%–4%]). There was no association with stroke survivor outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale.

Conclusions:

This study has shown that adopting defined core components of ESD is associated with providing a more responsive and intensive ESD service. This shows that adherence to evidence-based criteria is likely to result in a more effective ESD service as defined by process measures.

Registration:

URL: http://www.isrctn.com/; Unique identifier: ISRCTN15568163.

Rapid Implementation of Outpatient Teleneurology in Rural Appalachia: Barriers and Disparities

Objective

To describe rapid implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess for disparities in video visit implementation in the Appalachian region of the United States.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients seen in the first 4 weeks of telehealth implementation was identified from the Neurology Ambulatory Practice at a large academic medical center. Telehealth visits defaulted to video, and when unable, phone-only visits were scheduled. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the telehealth visit type: video or phone only. Clinical variables were collected from the electronic medical record including age, sex, race, insurance status, indication for visit, and rural-urban status. Barriers to scheduling video visits were collected at the time of scheduling. Patient satisfaction was obtained by structured postvisit telephone call.

Results

Of 1,011 telehealth patient visits, 44% were video and 56% phone only. Patients who completed a video visit were younger (39.7 vs 48.4 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (63% vs 55%, p < 0.007), be White or Caucasian (p = 0.024), and not have Medicare or Medicaid insurance (p < 0.001). The most common barrier to scheduling video visits was technology limitations (46%). Although patients from rural and urban communities were equally likely to be scheduled for video visits, patients from rural communities were more likely to consider future telehealth visits (55% vs 42%, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Rapid implementation of ambulatory telemedicine defaulting to video visits successfully expanded video telehealth. Emerging disparities were revealed, as older, male, Black patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance were less likely to complete video visits.

Delayed presentation of acute ischemic strokes during the COVID-19 crisis

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted established care paths worldwide. Patient awareness of the pandemic and executive limitations imposed on public life have changed the perception of when to seek care for acute conditions in some cases. We sought to study whether there is a delay in presentation for acute ischemic stroke patients in the first month of the pandemic in the US.

METHODS

The interval between last-known-well (LKW) time and presentation of 710 consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes to 12 stroke centers across the US were extracted from a prospectively maintained quality database. We analyzed the timing and severity of the presentation in the baseline period from February to March 2019 and compared results with the timeframe of February and March 2020.

RESULTS

There were 320 patients in the 2-month baseline period in 2019, there was a marked decrease in patients from February to March of 2020 (227 patients in February, and 163 patients in March). There was no difference in the severity of the presentation between groups and no difference in age between the baseline and the COVID period. The mean interval from LKW to the presentation was significantly longer in the COVID period (603±1035 min) compared with the baseline period (442±435 min, P<0.02).

CONCLUSION

We present data supporting an association between public awareness and limitations imposed on public life during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US and a delay in presentation for acute ischemic stroke patients to a stroke center.

Telemedicine for Outpatient Neurosurgical Oncology Care: Lessons Learned for the Future During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus 2019 (COVD-19) pandemic has drastically disrupted the delivery of neurosurgical care, especially for the already at-risk neuro-oncology population. The sudden change to clinic visits has rapidly spurned the implementation of telemedicine. A recommendation care paradigm of neuro-oncologic patients limited by telemedicine has not been reported.

METHODS

A summary of a multi-institution experience detailing the potential benefits, pitfalls, and the necessary considerations to outpatient care of neurosurgical oncology patients.

RESULTS

There are limitations and advantages to incorporating telemedicine into the outpatient care of neuro-oncology patients. Telemedicine-specific considerations for each step and stakeholder of the appointment (physician, patient, scheduling, previsit, imaging, and physical examination) are examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine, pushed to prominence during this COVID-19 pandemic, is a powerful and possibly preferential tool for the future of outpatient neuro-oncologic care.