In vitro comparison of the adsorption of inflammatory mediators by blood purification devices

Cytokine adsorption is a promising tool in the therapy of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a life-threatening clinical syndrome caused by severe hypercytokinemia brought on by a highly stimulated but ineffective immune response. Animal studies and case series have demonstrated that a reduction in blood cytokine levels achieved with an extracorporeal adsorption cartridge that contains blood-compatible porous polymer beads (CytoSorb^®) can effectively attenuate the inflammatory response during sepsis and possibly improve outcomes. We report a case series of two patients in which three episodes of severe hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis triggered by infections with herpesviridae were treated successfully with cytokine adsorption. A marked decrease in interleukin-6 plasma levels and a stable or decreasing need of vasopressor therapy were the most significant results of this treatment. Importantly, treatment was safe and well-tolerated, without any adverse events.

Cytokine clearance with CytoSorb® during cardiac surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Background

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is often associated with degrees of complex inflammatory response mediated by various cytokines. This response can, in severe cases, lead to systemic hypotension and organ dysfunction. Cytokine removal might therefore improve outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. CytoSorb® (Cytosorbents, NJ, USA) is a recent device designed to remove cytokine from the blood using haemoadsorption (HA). This trial aims to evaluate the potential of CytoSorb® to decrease peri-operative cytokine levels in cardiac surgery.

Methods

We have conducted a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial in 30 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery and deemed at risk of complications. Patients were randomly allocated to either standard of care (n = 15) or CytoSorb® HA (n = 15) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Our primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in cytokines levels (IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, MCP-1) measured at anaesthesia induction, at the end of CPB, as well as 6 and 24 h post-CPB initiation. In a consecutive subgroup of patients (10 in HA group, 11 in control group), we performed cross-adsorber as well as serial measurements of coagulation factors’ activity (antithrombin, von Willebrand factor, factor II, V, VIII, IX, XI, and XII).

Results

Both groups were similar in terms of baseline and peri-operative characteristics. CytoSorb® HA during CPB was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse event. The procedure did not result in significant coagulation factors’ adsorption but only some signs of coagulation activation. However, the intervention was associated neither with a decrease in pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokine levels nor with any improvement in relevant clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

CytoSorb® HA during CPB was not associated with a decrease in pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines nor with an improvement in relevant clinical outcomes. The procedure was feasible and safe. Further studies should evaluate the efficacy of CytoSorb® HA in other clinical contexts.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02775123. Registered 17 May 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2399-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clindamycin clearance during Cytosorb® hemoadsorption: A case report and pharmacokinetic study

Panton-Valentine leucocidin producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections are rare but associated with very high mortality rates. We report the case of a 14-year-old patient with Panton-Valentine leucocidin producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and Influenza B pneumonia requiring veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator for refractory shock. In the absence of response to conventional therapy, we have inserted a Cytosorb® cartridge within the extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator circuit. A spectacular decrease in vasopressor requirements followed. Since clindamycin, a key component of Panton-Valentine leucocidin producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment, might be removed by Cytosorb® hemoadsorption, we have performed serial plasma concentrations measurements of the drug. Based on these measurements, we were able to develop a pharmacokinetic model incorporating variable plasma clearance. Patient's exposure was estimated before, during and after Cytosorb® hemoadsorption. According to this model, Cytosorb® hemoadsorption did not seem to result in significant clindamycin removal. Cytosorb® hemoadsorption during Panton-Valentine leucocidin producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection appears safe and feasible and no adaptation of clindamycin dosage seems necessary.

Hemoadsorption does not Have Influence on Hemolysis During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces hemolysis, which manifests as plasma free hemoglobin. We investigated in a post hoc analysis of a single-center, blinded, controlled study whether the use of a novel hemoadsorption device (CytoSorb, CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) affects hemolysis during CPB. A total of 35 patients undergoing elective CPB surgery with an expected CPB duration of more than 120 min were included in the analysis. The hemoadsorption device was used in 17 patients (intervention group) and not used in 18 patients (control group). The primary outcome was differences of postoperative free hemoglobin and haptoglobin levels. As secondary outcomes, we investigated differences in postoperative lactate dehydrogenase and bilirubin levels. Postoperative free hemoglobin levels were not significantly different between the groups. However, there were statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in the median levels of haptoglobin (58.4 vs. 17.9 mg/dL, respectively; P < 0.01) and lactate dehydrogenase (353.0 vs. 432.0 U/L, respectively; P < 0.05) on postoperative day 1. Thus, in this study, we did not find an effect on hemolysis in patients treated with hemoadsorption, though lower haptoglobin level and higher secondary hemolysis markers on postoperative day 1 in patients not treated with the hemoadsorber may be an indication of some moderate effect of the device. Studies with larger samples are needed to clarify the significance of the small differences detected in this study.