2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel

A randomised pilot Phase II study of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) or epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) given 2 weekly with pegfilgrastim (accelerated) vs 3 weekly (standard) for women with early breast cancer

Accelerated (dose-dense) chemotherapy, in which the frequency of administration is increased without changing total dose or duration, may increase the efficacy of cancer chemotherapy. We performed a randomised Phase II study to assess the safety and relative toxicity of AC (doxorubicin; cyclophosphamide) vs E(epirubicin)C given by conventional or accelerated schedules as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Furthermore, the relative toxicity of doxorubicin and epirubicin remains uncertain. Patients were randomised to one of four arms; four courses of standard 3 weekly cyclophosphamide 600 mg m⁻² in combination with doxorubicin 60 mg m⁻² (AC) vs epirubicin 90 mg m⁻² (EC) 3 weekly vs the same regimens administered every 2 weeks with pegfilgrastim (G-CSF). A total of 126 patients were treated, 42 with standard AC, 42 with accelerated AC, 19 with standard EC and 23 with accelerated EC. Significantly more grade 3/4 day one neutropenia was seen with standard (6/61, 10%) compared to accelerated (0/65,) regimens (P=0.01). A trend towards more neutropenic sepsis was seen in the combined standard and accelerated AC arms (12/84, 14%) compared to the combined EC arms (1/42, 2%), P=0.06. Falls in left ventricular ejection fraction were not increased with accelerated treatment. Accelerated AC and EC with pegfilgrastim are safe and feasible regimens in the treatment of early breast cancer with less neutropenia than conventional 3 weekly schedules.

Phase II study of weekly Kahalalide F in patients with advanced malignant melanoma

This phase II clinical trial evaluated the antitumour response of Kahalalide F (KF) 650 microg/m(2) given as a 1-h weekly infusion in advanced malignant melanoma patients, both untreated and those who relapsed or progressed after one line of systemic therapy. Of 24 enrolled patients (median age, 55 years; range, 28-89), 14 patients had been previously treated with chemotherapy or biological therapy. No RECIST responses occurred; five chemotherapy-naïve patients with cutaneous melanoma had disease stabilisation for > or = 3 months; median progression-free survival was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.2-1.9 months); and median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% CI, 5.0-upper limit not reached). The most common laboratory toxicities were non-cumulative increase of transaminases (ALT/AST) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT). No patients experienced leukopenia and thrombocytopenia during the study. KF was a well-tolerated and safe chemotherapy regimen. Despite a favourable safety profile, this trial was closed after the first stage because of the lack of objective response in patients with malignant melanoma.

Febrile neutropenia

This review summarizes the current status and diagnostic-therapeutic challenges in febrile neutropenia. Patients with neutropenia-associated infections have a poor prognosis. A large meta-analysis of trials assessing prophylactic antibiotics has shown significant survival benefits; clinical significance of resistance is unclear. Administering broad-spectrum antibiotics to established febrile neutropenic patients has become selective, vancomycin is withheld unless absolutely necessary, and low-risk patients are identified with biological markers. Such patients are now managed with oral antibiotics at home or even without antibiotics. Protracted prolonged neutropenia is the setting par excellence for invasive fungal infections. Conventional amphotericin B administered to such risk patients reduces the incidence of fungal infections. New antifungal drugs have heightened efficacy and lowered toxicity. Novel antifungal diagnostic tests include imaging, particularly the CT "halo" sign (aspergillosis), and serology (glucan, galactomannan), and provide earlier diagnosis and treatment and better outcomes. Negative tests may indicate withholding antifungal therapy. High intermittent dosing of liposomal amphotericin B seems as safe and as effective as standard dosing regimens, but at half the drug acquisition cost. The use of nonantibiotic agents has offered alternative management strategies. Recombinant interleukin-11 reduces bacteremia, through a cytoprotective mechanism on the gut. rhIL-11 releases C-reactive protein and causes shedding of soluble TNF receptor-1, modulating the immunological milieu and the systemic inflammatory response. Other candidate molecules include RANTES and long-pentraxin 3. Recombinant growth factors reduce febrile episodes, permitting completion of chemotherapy, increase overall survival, and minimize infection mortality.

Granulopoiesis-stimulating factors to prevent adverse effects in the treatment of malignant lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Granulopoiesis-stimulating factors, such as granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), are being used to prevent febrile neutropenia and infection in patients undergoing treatment for malignant lymphoma. The question of whether G-CSF and GM-CSF improve dose intensity, tumour response, and overall survival in this patient population has not been answered yet. Since the results from single studies are inconclusive, a systematic review was undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of G-CSF and GM-CSF in patients with malignant lymphoma with respect to preventing neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and infection; improving quality of life, adherence to treatment protocol, tumour response, freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival (OS); and adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, and other relevant literature databases; Internet databases of ongoing trials; and conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology (1980 - 2007). We included full-text and abstract publications as well as unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing prophylaxis with G-CSF or GM-CSF versus placebo/no prophylaxis in adult patients with malignant lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy were included for review. Both study arms had to receive identical chemotherapy and supportive care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were done by two reviewers independently. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 eligible randomised controlled trials with 2607 randomised patients. Compared with no prophylaxis, both G-CSF and GM-CSF did not improve overall survival (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09) or FFTF (hazard ratio 1.11; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.35). Prophylaxis significantly reduced the relative risk (RR) for severe neutropenia (RR 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 0.73), febrile neutropenia (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.89) and infection (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). There was no evidence that either G-CSF or GM-CSF reduced the number of patients requiring intravenous antibiotics (RR 0.82; 95%CI 0.57 to 1.18); lowered infection related mortality (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.71); or improved complete tumour response (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.10).One study evaluated quality of life parameters and found no differences between the treatment groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

G-CSF and GM-CSF, when used as a prophylaxis in patients with malignant lymphoma undergoing conventional chemotherapy, reduce the risk of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and infection. However, based on the randomised trials currently available, there is no evidence that either G-CSF or GM-CSF provide a significant advantage in terms of complete tumour response, FFTF or OS.

Phase II study of weekly plitidepsin as second-line therapy for small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the antitumor activity and safety profile of plitidepsin administered as a 1h weekly intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3.2mg/m(2) to patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapsed or progressed after one line of chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, exploratory, phase II clinical trial. Treatment lasted until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal or treatment delay for >2 weeks. Objective response rate (primary efficacy endpoint) was evaluated according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). The rate of stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 6 months and time-to-event variables were secondary endpoints of efficacy. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0.

RESULTS

Twenty pretreated SCLC patients (median age, 60 years) with extensive (n = 13) or limited-stage disease (n = 7) received a total of 24 treatment cycles (median, one cycle per patient; range, 1-2). Objective tumor responses were not observed and only one of the 17 evaluable patients had SD. With a median follow-up of 11.8 months, the progression-free survival and the median overall survival were 1.3 months and 4.8 months, respectively. The most troubling or common toxicities were fatigue, muscle weakness, lymphopenia, anemia (no patients showed neutropenia), and asymptomatic, non-cumulative increase of transaminases levels and alkaline phosphatase.

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial shows that a cycle of 1h weekly i.v. infusion of plitidepsin (3.2mg/m(2)) was generally well tolerated other than fatigue and muscle weakness in patients with pretreated SCLC. One patient died due to multi-organ failure. The absence of antitumor activity found here precludes further studies of this plitidepsin schedule as second-line single-agent treatment of SCLC.

Biological therapy for pediatric malignancy: current perspectives

Biologicals are defined as agents that are either uniquely or partially tumor-specific. Great expectations were raised by the success in agents that target a specific genetic translocation: all-trans retinoic acid, targeting the chronic myeloid leukemia retinoic acid receptor in acute promyelocytic leukemia and imatinib, a small molecule targeting the BCR-ABL translocation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Thus far, the search for similar "druggable" genetic targets in pediatric cancers has not yet resulted in such dramatic results. The rarity of pediatric cancer as well as ethical considerations necessitate that the agents for testing be carefully and rigorously selected. Biologicals present an additional challenge, as they often do not lend themselves to in vitro testing. Early approaches to specific targeting of solid tumors utilized monoclonal antibodies. The microenvironment provides an interesting new biological approach to treating tumors and alteration of the host immune response provides another avenue. Biological agents are a step forward in supportive care to reduce the hematological toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and to manage the frequent infectious complications.

Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies of pemetrexed plus platinum compounds have also shown activity in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This noninferiority, phase III, randomized study compared the overall survival between treatment arms using a fixed margin method (hazard ratio [HR] < 1.176) in 1,725 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (n = 863) or cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 862) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Overall survival for cisplatin/pemetrexed was noninferior to cisplatin/gemcitabine (median survival, 10.3 v 10.3 months, respectively; HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.05). Overall survival was statistically superior for cisplatin/pemetrexed versus cisplatin/gemcitabine in patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 847; 12.6 v 10.9 months, respectively) and large-cell carcinoma histology (n = 153; 10.4 v 6.7 months, respectively). In contrast, in patients with squamous cell histology, there was a significant improvement in survival with cisplatin/gemcitabine versus cisplatin/pemetrexed (n = 473; 10.8 v 9.4 months, respectively). For cisplatin/pemetrexed, rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia (P

CONCLUSION

In advanced NSCLC, cisplatin/pemetrexed provides similar efficacy with better tolerability and more convenient administration than cisplatin/gemcitabine. This is the first prospective phase III study in NSCLC to show survival differences based on histologic type.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Aged
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy
• Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality
• Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology
• Cisplatin/administration & dosage
• Cisplatin/adverse effects
• Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage
• Deoxycytidine/adverse effects
• Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives
• Female
• Glutamates/administration & dosage
• Glutamates/adverse effects
• Guanine/administration & dosage
• Guanine/adverse effects
• Guanine/analogs & derivatives
• Humans
• Kaplan-Meier Estimate
• Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Lung Neoplasms/mortality
• Lung Neoplasms/pathology
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Pemetrexed
• Gemcitabine

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti University of Torino, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, S. Luigi Hospital, Regione Gonzole, 10, Orbassano (Torino), Italy.
Purvish Parikh
Joachim von Pawel
Bonne Biesma
Johan Vansteenkiste
Christian Manegold
Piotr Serwatowski
Ulrich Gatzemeier
Raghunadharao Digumarti
Mauro Zukin
Jin S Lee
Anders Mellemgaard
Keunchil Park
Shehkar Patil
Janusz Rolski
Tuncay Goksel
Filippo de Marinis
Lorinda Simms
Katherine P Sugarman
David Gandara

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines

Standardized criteria for diagnosis and response assessment are needed to interpret and compare clinical trials and for approval of new therapeutic agents by regulatory agencies. Therefore, a National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) published guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials for patients with CLL in 1988, which were updated in 1996. During the past decade, considerable progress has been achieved in defining new prognostic markers, diagnostic parameters, and treatment options. This prompted the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) to provide updated recommendations for the management of CLL in clinical trials and general practice.

The use and effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in primary prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in the outpatient setting

Objectives. To conduct a drug utilization review (DUR) on the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and to study the effectiveness of this agent in preventing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN).

Methods. Outpatients to whom G-CSF was dispensed were identified and their actual medical records were reviewed to verify patients who received G-CSF for primary prophylaxis. Literature was reviewed to determine the expected incidence and risk of FN for chemotherapy regimens used, and the compliance of prescribers with the institutional guidelines was evaluated. After that, the proportion of patients who developed FN was identified and compared to the expected incidence from literature. Data analysis was performed on the outcome of patient-cycle.

Results. Of the 99 patient-cycles, 53 (53%) were compliant with guidelines whereas 46 (47%) were not. FN developed in 12 (12.1%, 95% CI = 5.7, 18.5) while the expected average incidence of FN was 32.7%. Eleven (21%, 95% CI = 10.1, 32.2) of the 53 patient-cycles that were compliant with guidelines developed FN, whereas one patient among the non-compliant group developed FN (2%, 95% CI = 0.0, 6.2). The expected incidence of FN was 42.9 and 21.5%, in the compliant group, and noncompliant group, respectively. Based on expected FN rates, the respective reduction in the incidence of FN was 51, and 90%.

Conclusions. Lack of adherence to institutional guidelines was noticed in G-CSF prescribing. Reasons behind poor compliance with the guidelines must be verified and resolved. Prophylactic G-CSF is effective in reducing the incidence of FN; however, further research in a larger population is warranted to confirm these findings. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2008) 14: 131—138.

Treatment of breast cancer in older women

BACKGROUND

Breast carcinoma management in the elderly often differs from the management in younger women and there is considerable controversy about what constitutes appropriate cancer care for older women. This controversy is reflected in the persistence of age-dependent variations in care over time, with older women being less likely to receive definitive care for breast cancer. There has been a significant increase in the last years in the number of studies conducted in older patients with breast cancer. Although available age-specific clinical trials data demonstrate that treatment efficacy is not modified by age, this evidence is limited by the lack of inclusion of substantial numbers of older women, particularly those of advanced age and those with comorbidities.

METHOD

The literature-based evidence of the last 10 years was extensively reviewed on the main issues concerning the treatment of breast cancer in older women.

RESULTS

Surgical treatment in older patients has evolved from avoidance to mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery, similarly to younger patients. Given its negative effect on the quality of life, in the last few years the role of adjuvant radiotherapy has been questioned in elderly patients with breast cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in older patients applies mainly to Estrogen-receptor-negative patients, while in Estrogen-receptor-positive patients a major role is played by endocrine treatment. New "elderly-friendly" drugs, that can help clinicians to reduce toxicity, are now available for breast cancer.

Advances in antifungal therapy

The prevalence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has increased over the past three decades owing to the increasing numbers of immunocompromised hosts. These infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Recent significant advances in antifungal therapy include the broad-spectrum triazoles (voriconazole and posaconazole) and a new class of antifungals, the echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin). New treatment strategies, such as combination therapy and pre-emptive therapy, are being investigated. There have also been significant improvements in diagnostics; the galactomannan enzyme immunoassay and the beta-glucan test are now part of the EORTC/MSG criteria for diagnosis of IFI. Despite these advances, there remain a number of unanswered questions regarding optimal management of serious fungal infections, and research continues to discover and develop new therapies and evaluate new management strategies.

Phase I trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine in patients with thoracic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Nab-paclitaxel has a different toxicity profile than solvent-based paclitaxel including a lower rate of severe neutropenia. This trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine.

METHODS

Patients were required to have a performance status of 0 to 1, < or = three prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, and preserved renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1, 8 in all cohorts, and nab-paclitaxel at doses of 260, 300, 340 mg/m every 21 days depending on the treatment cohort (1 cycle = 21 days). DLT were assessed after the first cycle, and doses were escalated in cohorts of 3 to 6 patients.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were consented and 15 patients are evaluable [median age 62 years (range, 35-75); median number of prior treatments 3 (range, 1-4); tumor types: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 8), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n = 6), and esophageal cancer (n = 1)]. At a nab-paclitaxel dose of 300 mg/m, 1 of 6 pts experienced a DLT (omission of day 8 gemcitabine due to absolute neutrophil count < 500), and at an nab-paclitaxel dose of 340 mg/m 2 of 3 patients experienced a DLT (1 pt grade 3 rash and pruritus; 1 pt grade 3 fatigue and anorexia). Responses were observed in NSCLC and SCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum tolerated dose of nab-paclitaxel is 300 mg/m in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1, 8 every 21 days. This combination demonstrated activity in previously treated NSCLC and SCLC patients.

Is irinotecan plus docetaxel useful as second-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

INTRODUCTION

The ability of doublet therapy in the second-line setting in patients with platinum-refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not yet been proven. In this setting, docetaxel (D) has shown efficacy and irinotecan (I) has only recently been introduced. This study was initiated to explore the activity and tolerability of three D + I regimens in platinum pretreated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

From March 2003 to June 2006, 65 patients (age range, 39-71 years; 83% male) with relapsed stage III/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either I 160 mg/m(2) plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm A), I 80 mg/m(2) on days 1,8 plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm B), or I 60 mg/m(2) plus D 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 42 days (arm C), for a maximum of 18 weeks.

RESULTS

Per protocol analysis (47 of 65) overall response rates were 5.6% (A), 6.7% (B), and 7.1% (C). Median times to progression were 3.4, 4.0, and 4.3 months, respectively. Overall survival was 8.9 (A), 8.3 (B), and 9.4 (C) months. G3/4 neutropenia was more frequent in arms A (42%) and B (55%) whereas G3/4 nonhematologic toxicity was similarly prevalent in all arms, although diarrhea occurred in 47% of arm C patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent treatment with D or the multitarget antifolate pemetrexed or erlotinib remain the best choices and investigational studies, following first-line therapy, are required.

Phase II multicenter study of larotaxel (XRP9881), a novel taxoid, in patients with metastatic breast cancer who previously received taxane-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Treatment options are limited for patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Larotaxel (XRP9881) is a novel taxoid with preclinical activity against taxane-resistant breast cancer. The current phase II trial of larotaxel was conducted in women with taxane-treated MBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were stratified by response to prior taxane therapy (resistant or nonresistant). Larotaxel 90 mg/m(2) was administered as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for tumor response every two cycles. A blinded external response review committee determined the overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to progression (TtP) of the disease. Median survival time (MST) and safety were also evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients were treated. In the nonresistant group, the ORR was 42%; median DOR 5.3 months; median TtP 5.4 months; and MST 22.6 months. In the resistant group, the ORR was 19%; median DOR 5.0 months; median TtP 1.6 months; and MST 9.8 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (82%), fatigue (15%), diarrhea (12%), febrile neutropenia (9%), neutropenic infection (8%), and sensory neuropathy (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Larotaxel has good activity, manageable toxicity, and a favorable therapeutic index in women with taxane-pretreated MBC.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine for previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy has been reported to be active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and myelosuppression is the most common dose-limiting toxicity. This prospective phase II study was designed to test the hypothesis that better tolerance and increased dose intensity might be achieved if patients are treated with weekly administration schedule. Thirty-five patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and a performance status 0-2 received first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel 35mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks, for up to 4 cycles. In total, 85 chemotherapy cycles were given (median, 2; range, 1-4). Other than the completion of all 4 planned cycles (n=6), the main reasons for treatment discontinuation were toxicity (n=15) and progressive disease (n=14). The most frequently encountered toxic effects were anemia (52% of patients), nausea and vomiting (60%), fatigue (71%) and anorexia (57%). One patient died of bilateral pneumonitis, which developed shortly after the administration of second cycle. Disease control (objective response and stable disease) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was achieved in 60% of patients and the overall response rate was 29% (95% CI, 14-44%). With a median follow-up duration of 13 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 (95% CI, 0.7-4.8) months and 10.6 (95% CI, 7.0-14.3) months, respectively. In conclusion, weekly schedule of docetaxel and gemcitabine has modest activity with acceptable toxicity profile in advanced NSCLC, but as high frequency of early discontinuation occurred does not merit further study with the present regimen.

Cost of neutropenic complications of chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cost of neutropenic complications of myelosuppressive chemotherapy has been reported to be substantial. Prior research, however, has focused on initial hospitalization only and has failed to account for follow-on care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a US health-care claims database, all adult cancer patients who received a course of chemotherapy were identified. For each such patient, each unique cycle of chemotherapy within the course and each occurrence of neutropenic complications within these cycles were characterized. Patients developing neutropenic complications in a given cycle (neutropenia patients), starting with the first, were matched (1:1) to those who did not develop neutropenic complications in that cycle (comparison patients), and health-care costs (i.e. expenditures) were tallied for each matched pair.

RESULTS

Neutropenia patients (n = 373) and comparison patients were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Costs of neutropenia-related care were $12,397 (95% confidence interval $10,274-$14,754) higher for neutropenia versus comparison patients [$14,407 ($12,357-$16,743) versus $2010 ($1490-$2553)]. Among neutropenia patients, mean cost of initial hospitalization for neutropenic complications was $7813 ($6537-$9379); cost of all subsequent neutropenia-related care averaged $6594 ($5217-$8272).

CONCLUSIONS

Neutropenic complications of myelosuppressive chemotherapy are costly. Prior research focusing on initial hospitalization only may have underestimated the cost of these complications by as much as 40%.

Detection and quantification of functionally defined hematopoietic progenitor cells and tissue specific mRNA within the peripheral blood of myeloma patients after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin

OBJECTIVE

Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) as well as tissue committed stem cells expressing mRNA specific to various somatic tissues are thought to be part of the CD34+ bone marrow compartment. In this study, we explore and quantify their mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing chemotherapy upon administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus/minus erythropoietin (EPO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HPC were quantified by flow cytometry and functional assays within the blood of healthy donors and myeloma patients before and after chemotherapy followed by G-CSF or G-CSF + EPO given subcutaneously. The mRNA expression was studied by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cytokines and peripheral blood protease levels were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

EPO did not significantly alter the number of HPC mobilized by G-CSF alone, and mRNA specific for liver, brain, muscle and kidney was detected in both treatment groups. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed a 2.7-fold increased expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein after G-CSF + EPO administration compared to G-CSF alone (P = 0.003). The concentration of G-CSF rose from 62 +/- 22 pg/mL and 48 +/- 10 pg/mL to 28 +/- 9 ng/mL and 85 +/- 10 ng/mL after 10 d of treatment with G-CSF and G-CSF + EPO, respectively. The concentration of neutrophil elastase (NE) rose only in the G-CSF group by a factor 1.5.

CONCLUSION

The alteration of G-CSF and NE levels as well as the expression of tissue committed RNA after the administration of EPO in addition to G-CSF indicate that different growth factors mobilize different stem cells that might potentially be used for the support of tissue repair in future treatment protocols.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor dosing in pegylated interferon alpha-induced neutropenia and its impact on outcome of anti-HCV therapy

Many patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection undergoing treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFN-alpha) and ribavirin develop neutropenia requiring dose reduction or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) supplement. We analysed the database of patients who completed treatment for chronic HCV infection between 2003 and 2006. Patients with absolute neutrophil counts below 1000 cells/microL were initiated on G-CSF (G-CSF group) while a matching group of patients who received anti-HCV treatment without developing neutropenia were used as a control group (non-G-CSF group). Patients on the G-CSF arm were divided into two subgroups based on the timing of G-CSF administration relative to PEG-IFN-alpha administration. Of the 163 patients with HCV infection, 30 patients received G-CSF, most of who were maintained on 300 microg of G-CSF once a week. Administration of G-CSF 2 days before or after each dose of PEG-IFN-alpha did not make a significant difference in the neutrophil counts. In the G-CSF arm, 23 of 30 patients (77%) had undetectable end-of-treatment viral response which was comparable with 27 of 30 in the control group (90%; P = 0.17). There was no statistically significant difference in the sustained viral response between the two groups (61%vs 76%, P = 0.18). In most patients PEG-IFN-alpha induced neutropenia improved with a once-a-week dose of G-CSF with a comparable virological outcome. Timing of G-CSF administration did not make any significant impact on the patient's neutrophil counts but was better tolerated when given 2 days apart from PEG-IFN-alpha.

Docetaxel and exisulind in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a multicenter, phase II clinical trial

PURPOSE

This multicenter, phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the activity of the combination of docetaxel and exisulind in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed a prior platinum-containing regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function received exisulind (250 mg) given orally, twice daily, and docetaxel (36 mg/m) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle for up to six cycles. In the absence of disease progression or intolerable side effects, patients continued taking 250 mg of exisulind orally, twice daily.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (median age 60 years; range 34-77; median performance status 1) were enrolled. There were no objective responses documented. Sixteen patients [48%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 31%-66%] had stable disease after 8 weeks of treatment. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.5-3.2 months); median overall survival time was 8.0 months (range 0.2-25.9 months). Toxicity was moderate, with dose adjustment for adverse event/toxicity required for docetaxel or exisulind in 13 (39.3%) patients. Grade 3/4 lymphopenia, neutropenia, and anemia occurred in 48.5%, 12.1%, and 9.1% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 or greater toxicity was seen in 12.1%, 6.1%, and 3% of patients for nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, and abdominal pain, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with exisulind and weekly docetaxel was not active in NSCLC patients who failed a prior platinum-containing regimen. Further study of this combination does not seem warranted.

[Evaluation of clinical practice in pulmonary oncology: a review of the literature]

INTRODUCTION

Evaluation of clinical practice in pulmonary oncology aims to improve both the quality of care and the control of costs.

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

A Medline search of the literature allowed analysis of the published studies of the evaluation of clinical practice. They showed that though 82-95% of patients with small cell bronchial carcinoma were treated with a combination of etoposide and cisplatin, less than half of the patients with non-small cell cancer received treatment.

VIEWPOINT

Various factors such as age, comorbidity, race, socio-economic status and gender affect the treatment decisions. There is also a discrepancy between the trial data and clinical practice that could be explained by two factors. On one hand advances are not always adopted by doctors and on the other hand the patient populations treated may sometimes be different from those in the trials.

CONCLUSION

Though the number of published studies is still low an increase is to be expected on account of the publication of new regulations concerning the evaluation of clinical practice and the appropriate use of drugs.

Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urological field

For urologists, it is very important to master surgical indications and surgical techniques. On the other hand, the knowledge of the prevention of perioperative infections and the improvement of surgical techniques should always be considered. Although the prevention of perioperative infections in each surgical field is a very important issue, the evidence and the number of guidelines are limited. Among them, the preparation of guidelines has progressed, especially in gastrointestinal surgery. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections, which have been used worldwide. In urology, the original guidelines were different from those of general surgery, due to many endourological procedures and urine exposure in the surgical field. The Japanese Society of UTI Cooperative Study Group has thus framed these guidelines supported by The Japanese Urological Association. The guidelines consist of the following nine techniques: open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureterorenoscope and transurethral lithotripsy, transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate biopsy, cystourethroscope, pediatric surgeries in the urological field, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and febrile neutropenia. These are the first guidelines for the prevention of perioperative infections in the urological field in Japan. Although most of these guidelines were made using reliable evidence, there are parts without enough evidence. Therefore, if new reliable data is reported, it will be necessary for these guidelines to be revised in the future.

Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study

BACKGROUND

TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) is associated with high incidences of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN). This analysis compared the efficacies of four regimens for primary prophylaxis of FN and related toxic effects in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant TAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage T2-T4 primary breast cancer were scheduled to receive 6-8 cycles of TAC. Primary prophylaxis was: ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily on days 5-14 (n = 253 patients; 1478 cycles), daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day or lenograstim 150 microg/m(2)/day) on days 5-10 (n = 377; 2400 cycles), pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2 (n = 305; 1930 cycles), or pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin (n = 321; 1890 cycles).

RESULTS

Pegfilgrastim with/without ciprofloxacin was significantly more effective than daily G-CSF or ciprofloxacin in preventing FN (5% and 7% versus 18% and 22% of patients; all P < 0.001), grade 4 neutropenia, and leukopenia. Pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin completely prevented first cycle FN (P < 0.01 versus pegfilgrastim alone) and fatal neutropenic events.

CONCLUSION

Ciprofloxacin alone, or daily G-CSF from day 5-10 (as in common practice), provided suboptimal protection against FN and related toxic effects in patients receiving TAC. Pegfilgrastim was significantly more effective in this setting, especially if given with ciprofloxacin.

Short Schedule of Cisplatin and Vinorelbine: A Dose-Finding Study in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

A dose-finding study of a new cisplatin/vinorelbine schedule was done to increase activity of the combination, and improve compliance of non-small-cell lung cancer PATIENTS.

METHODS

Beginning with cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 3, increasing dose levels up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were tested in a series of 6-patient cohorts. If 3 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity in the first 3 cycles, the previous dose was considered the recommended dose (RD). Once the MTD was reached, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was prophylactically added to the treatment of a new patient cohort to improve the therapeutic ratio.

RESULTS

We enrolled 35 stage IIIA/B or IV patients between August 2001 and February 2002. The RD was cisplatin 45 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2), with relative dose intensities (RDIs) of 95 and 97%, respectively, and an actual received dose intensity (ARDI) of 28.62 and 16.07 mg/m(2)/week, respectively. Overall grade 3-4 toxicities were: neutropenia (71%), febrile neutropenia (25%), anemia (8%), and constipation (17%). The overall response rate was 64.3% (CI: 44.1-81.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

ARDI and RDI of our modified cisplatin/vinorelbine regimen were not inferior to those of conventional weekly schedules; its acceptable toxicity profile and manageability may justify its use in clinical practice.

Kinetics of peg-filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Peg-filgrastim is a form of G-CSF with a sustained duration of action due to self-limited clearance. We administered 6 mg peg-filgrastim to 18 autograft recipients on day +1 after transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery and clinical outcomes were compared to the historical data of 54 patients not receiving G-CSF. Patients receiving peg-filgrastim achieved a serum level of 115 000 pg/ml on day +2, 24 h after drug administration. Drug level maintained a plateau until day +8 and, after day +10, declined concomitantly with myeloid recovery. Patients experienced prompt neutrophil recovery: days +9 and +10 to 500 and 1000 neutrophils per microliter, and 4 days with an absolute neutrophil count <100 cells per microliter. Duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly shortened, but we did not observe significant differences in other end points. In conclusion, peg-filgrastim was well tolerated and efficacious, and hastened myeloid recovery.

Use of Colony-Stimulating Factors for Chemotherapy-Associated Neutropenia: Review of Current Guidelines

Chemotherapy-associated neutropenia is often dose-limiting and may compromise treatment efficacy. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are increasingly used to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) or to increase dose-density. This review discusses recent changes in treatment guidelines for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia. Primary prophylactic use of CSFs is now recommended as a treatment option at an overall risk of FN of 20%, not taking into account cost-effectiveness. To estimate the risk of FN, patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors predicting an adverse outcome of FN have been determined. Dose-dense chemotherapy has become feasible with the use of CSFs. However, clinical benefit has been shown only for specific chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), for the latter particularly for patients above 60 years of age. Strategies are being developed to tailor the use of CSFs to patients with a high risk of adverse outcome of FN.

Role of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) in solid tumours: Results of an expert panel

Febrile neutropenia is a relatively frequent event in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. A relevant body of scientific evidence has been produced in the last 2 decades, through clinical trials addressing the efficacy of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) in the prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia. The correct use of CSFs needs to be optimized, and several guidelines have been produced and periodically updated, in order to uniform and guide clinical practice. The aim of this review is to synthesize the most relevant clinical trials and the most important existing guidelines about the role of CSFs in solid tumours. Role of CSFs as primary prophylaxis, secondary prophylaxis and treatment of afebrile and febrile neutropenia is discussed. A special focus is dedicated to neutropenia and the use of CSFs in the treatment of the three "big killers" among the solid tumours: breast cancer, lung cancer and colorectal cancer.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: finding the right indication

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neutropenic complications including febrile neutropenia represent major dose-limiting toxicities of cancer chemotherapy. Recommendations for the use of recombinant myeloid growth factors to reduce the risk of neutropenic complications and sustain dose intensity continue to evolve.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that the myeloid growth factors reduce the risk of neutropenic complications and may facilitate delivered dose intensity in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Older age and certain comorbidities significantly increase the risk of febrile neutropenia and its consequences. Three new clinical practice guidelines for the use of the myeloid growth factors have been published by major professional oncology organizations including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The recommendations and evidence basis for these guidelines are presented here. All three new or updated guidelines recommend prophylactic use of the myeloid growth factors in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at 20% or greater risk of febrile neutropenia and in those with important variables that increase individual risk of neutropenic complications.

SUMMARY

Consistent clinical practice guidelines based on multiple randomized control trials and meta-analyses should further guide the appropriate and cost-effective use of these agents.

Wheat Grass Juice May Improve Hematological Toxicity Related to Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study

Myelotoxicity induced by chemotherapy may become life-threatening. Neutropenia may be prevented by granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF), and epoetin may prevent anemia, but both cause substantial side effects and increased costs. According to non-established data, wheat grass juice (WGJ) may prevent myelotoxicity when applied with chemotherapy. In this prospective matched control study, 60 patients with breast carcinoma on chemotherapy were enrolled and assigned to an intervention or control arm. Those in the intervention arm (A) were given 60 cc of WGJ orally daily during the first three cycles of chemotherapy, while those in the control arm (B) received only regular supportive therapy. Premature termination of treatment, dose reduction, and starting GCSF or epoetin were considered as "censoring events." Response rate to chemotherapy was calculated in patients with evaluable disease. Analysis of the results showed that five censoring events occurred in Arm A and 15 in Arm B (P = 0.01). Of the 15 events in Arm B, 11 were related to hematological events. No reduction in response rate was observed in patients who could be assessed for response. Side effects related to WGJ were minimal, including worsening of nausea in six patients, causing cessation of WGJ intake. In conclusion, it was found that WGJ taken during FAC chemotherapy may reduce myelotoxicity, dose reductions, and need for GCSF support, without diminishing efficacy of chemotherapy. These preliminary results need confirmation in a phase III study.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: implications for critical care nurses

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is being used increasingly in the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. The treatment modality has been proven effective but is not without risks. Studies consistently have identified the need for advanced supportive care (e.g., multiple organ dysfunction, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation) as a negative prognostic indicator in patients who have received HSCT. Among patients who have received HSCT, 15%-40% require critical care monitoring or advanced support. Nurses on intensive care units can positively impact outcomes for transplant recipients when they possess the specialized skills to recognize and promptly intervene when transplant-related complications arise. This article will provide a basic overview of the HSCT process and outline the complications that may necessitate transfer to a higher level of care for specialized skills and equipment in the intensive care setting.

Lymphoma in Older Patients

One half of patients newly diagnosed with lymphoma are older than 60 years and a significant proportion of them older than 80 years. Older patients treated for lymphoma may not tolerate the high-dose therapies used in younger patients, usually because of the presence of concomitant diseases. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma represents more than 60% of all lymphomas seen in older patients. Clinical presentation and prognostic parameters are identical to those described in young patients. However, response rate is usually lower in elderly patients compared with young patients, even if the patients are treated with the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen. Therefore, event-free and overall survival rates are shorter in elderly patients, even if disease-free survival rates are not really shorter than in young patients. Rituximab added to the CHOP regimen has recently been shown to dramatically improve the survival of these older patients without increasing the toxicity of the treatment. Patients older than 80 years may also be treated with rituximab plus CHOP, except for those having severe organ failure secondary to other diseases. Very few of these older patients may benefit from a salvage treatment after relapse.

Does granulocyte colony-stimulating factor affect survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard treatment for patients with advanced lung cancer. The common side effect of this therapy is myelosuppression, for which different stimulating factors are used. In this article, the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration on the survival of patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was evaluated.

METHODS

The charts of 127 patients, treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy, were reviewed for histology, stage, performance status, weight loss, treatment regimen, toxicity, and survival. Eighty patients were stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC; 47 were stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV. Eighty-one patients (63%) experienced severe (grades 3 and 4) neutropenia. Forty-two patients received G-CSF, 37 patients for severe neutropenia (14 with febrile neutropenia) and five patients for active infection during chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Preliminary analyses, both unadjusted (median survival, 20 months versus 13.8 months; log-rank test, p = 0.02) and adjusted for covariates of interest (Cox regression, hazard ratio = 0.62, p = 0.03) showed a significant effect of the use of G-CSF on survival, even though the groups were balanced with respect to stage, performance status, weight loss, and dose intensity of chemotherapy. Patients with grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (whether they received G-CSF or not) had a better survival outcome compared to those who did not have neutropenia (median survival, 17.6 months versus 11.9 months, log-rank test, p = 0.04). A landmark analysis showed a marginally significant effect of G-CSF on survival (median survival, 18.6 months versus 15.1 months, log-rank test, p = 0.08), even after adjustment for covariates. The Cox regression with the use of G-CSF defined as a binary time-varying covariate also showed similar results (Cox regression, hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.42-1.04, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the time bias due to the delayed administration of G-CSF contributed to the longer survival of patients receiving G-CSF. Prospective studies are required to determine whether G-CSF has any effect on survival in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Pooled efficacy analysis from a phase I-II study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Development of treatments to improve the outcomes achieved with single-agent gemcitabine therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer remains a research priority. G-FLIP (gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin) is a four-drug regimen designed to maximize sequence-dependent synergy, while attempting to minimize toxicity among the four drugs. The dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan as part of the G-FLIP regimen have been published. For phase II testing, G-FLIP consisted of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m2 at a fixed rate of 10 mg/m2/min, irinotecan 120 mg/m2, bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg, followed by a 24-h 5-fluorouracil infusion of 1500 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 14 days. Thirty-three patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (22 men and 11 women) were treated and 31 were evaluable. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78 years) and median Karnofsky performance status score was 70-80. Estimated median time to disease progression was 171 days (6.1 months) and Kaplan-Meir-estimated median overall survival was 229 days (8.1 months). Twelve- and 18-month survivals were 33 and 21%, respectively. As per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, 13 patients had stable disease, seven (22%) attained a partial response, and 10 (32%) had disease progression. One patient attained a complete response and two were not evaluable (one withdrew consent and one died suddenly, each after cycle 1). Treatment generally was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 toxicities/patient were thrombocytopenia (3.1%), leukopenia (15%), neutropenia (21%), neutropenic fever (3%), fatigue (18%) and thrombosis (12.5%). Common grade 1-2 toxicities per patient included nausea/vomiting (69%), diarrhea (45%), constipation (21%) and fatigue (39%). In conclusion, G-FLIP is a feasible outpatient regimen with acceptable toxicity for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Disease control rate (stable disease rate plus partial or complete responses) and 1-year survival outcomes are encouraging.