Docetaxel administered on a weekly basis for metastatic breast cancer

A phase II study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES

Docetaxel is an inhibitor of microtubule depolymerization and has demonstrated activity in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer and gynecologic cancer. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma to determine its activity, and nature and degree of toxicity, in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

Patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma, defined as progression while on or within 6 months of therapy, were eligible if they had measurable disease and had not received more than one chemotherapy regimen. Docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) was administered iv over 1 h every 21 days. A prophylactic regimen of oral dexamethasone 8 mg bid was begun 24 h before docetaxel administration and continued for 48 h thereafter. Hepatic function was strictly monitored.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were entered and treated with a total of 256 courses, with all 60 evaluable for toxicity and 58 evaluable for response. Responses were observed in 22.4% of patients, with 5.2% achieving complete response and 17.2% achieving partial response (95% CI, 12.5-35.3%). The median duration of response was 2.5 months. The likelihood of observing a response did not appear to be related to the length of the prior paclitaxel-free interval or duration of prior paclitaxel infusions. The principal adverse effect of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 75% of patients. There was one treatment-related death. Dose reductions were required in 36% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel is active in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal cancer but, in view of significant hematologic toxicity, further study is warranted to ascertain its optimal dose and schedule.

Taxane-induced nail changes: incidence, clinical presentation and outcome

The clinical characteristics of nail changes in seven patients receiving taxane-containing chemotherapy are described. They include nail pigmentation, subungual hematoma, Beau's lines and onycholysis and subungual suppuration. The incidence of such changes (ranging from 0% to 44%) is reviewed from a Medline search of the literature.

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with refractory malignancies

BACKGROUND

A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination.

METHODS

Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0-1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3-4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Phase I-II parallel study of docetaxel on a bimonthly schedule in refractory metastatic breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The 3-week schedule with docetaxel (DTC) 75-100 mg/2 is associated with severe neutropenia, gastro-intestinal side-effects and fluid retention in a significant proportion of patients, which may be of concern in more elderly or poor performance status patients. A phase I-II trial was carried out to test the feasibility and the activity of a new bimonthly schedule of DCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The trial included a phase I study which aimed at the identification of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of DCT on a bimonthly schedule. The first group of three patients received DCT 40 mg/m2, and in absence of DLT, DCT dosage was escalated by 10 mg/m2/cycle until DLT was reached. In the phase II study, patients were randomized to receive: (a) standard 3-weekly DCT at the dose of 75 mg/m2 (calibration arm); or (b) bimonthly schedule with DCT at the dose recommended in the phase I study. All patients were pretreated with chemotherapy, mostly anthracycline-based regimens, for advanced/metastatic disease. Analysis of response rates, toxicity, and dose-intensity were the main aims of the study.

RESULTS

The DLT was represented by severe myelosuppression which was recorded in all patients treated at 70 mg/m2 dose level. Therefore, the MTD was 60 mg/m2 on a bimonthly schedule. However, the dose recommended for the phase II trial was 50 mg/m2, because no difference in delivered dose-intesity was seen between the 50 and 60 mg/m2 dose levels, and the latter dosage was still associated with grade 3 neutropenia in most patients. The parallel phase II study showed that the bimonthly schedule of DCT (50 mg/m2) allows to deliver the same dose-intensity of DCT 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Grade 3-4 side-effects were rather infrequent in patients treated with the bimonthly schedule. Overall response rate (ORR) was 41 and 44% for the DCT 50 mg/m2 bimonthly and the DCT 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Data achieved in the phase I part of the study showed that DCT 50 mg/m2 every 15 days is the recommended dose for phase II studies, while results achieved in the phase II trial suggest that DCT 50 mg/m2 in a bimonthly schedule is active as second-line chemotherapy for MBC being able to induce an ORR in the range reported for DCT 75-100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The bimonthly schedule is, however, associated with relatively low toxicity. This characteristic may render the bimonthly schedule particularly attractive for future phase II trials of DCT in combination with other antineoplastic agents.

A phase I study of weekly docetaxel, 24-hour infusion of high-dose fluorouracil/leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of both docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered weekly in a regimen of docetaxel, 5-FU/leucovorin and cisplatin (DFLP) for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 31 patients with chemo-naive, advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were enrolled in the study. Cisplatin and leucovorin dosages were fixed throughout the study at 30 and 300 mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU dosage was fixed at 1,600 mg/m2 while docetaxel was evaluated at weekly 1-hour infusion dosages of 30, 40 and 50 mg/m2 to determine the MTD. Cisplatin, 5-FU and leucovorin were administered together as a 24-hour continuous infusion following docetaxel. Weekly 5-FU dosages of 1,600, 2,000 and 2,400 mg/m2 were then evaluated after setting the docetaxel dosage at the MTD.

RESULTS

A total of 95 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of three cycles per patient. The MTD of docetaxel was defined at 40 mg/m2. At a docetaxel dosage of 50 mg/m2 per week, the dose-limiting events of grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 hypomagnesemia occurred. With fixation of docetaxel to 40 mg/m2, the DLT for 5-FU was found at 2,400 mg/m2 per week. This incurred grade 4 neutropenia such that the MTD of 5-FU was defined at 2,000 mg/m2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (45%), with 2 patients developing febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 and 3 hypomagnesemia and hypokalemia occurred in 9 (41%) and 4 (18%) patients, respectively, of the first 22 patients treated with a 24-hour infusion of cisplatin and 5-FU/leucovorin immediately following docetaxel. Following a change in the cisplatin administration schedule to a 3-hour infusion after 5-FU/leucovorin infusion, no such complications were observed in 9 subsequently treated patients. Grade 2 diarrhea was recorded in 11 patients (35%). Grade 2/3 asthenia occurred in 9 patients (30%), which resolved after correction of electrolyte disorders. Twenty-six patients were assessable for response analysis. There were 2 (7.8%) complete and 14 (53.8%) partial responses, with the overall response rate being 61.5% (95% confidence interval, 41.5-81.6%). Responses were observed at all dose levels.

CONCLUSION

Two consecutive weeks of DFLP infusions every 3 weeks appear to be an active regimen with a tolerable toxicity profile in advanced gastric cancer. For further phase II studies, the recommended dose for this combination is 40 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 2,000 mg/m2 of 5-FU per week.

Critical review of current treatment strategies for advanced hormone insensitive breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis in American women. Over the past several decades, there has been a steady increase in the incidence of this disease. Fortunately, the death rates in the last decade has showed a decrease. Patients with breast cancer now have more treatment options and a better chance of long term survival than ever before. Patients with metastatic disease are considered candidates for chemotherapy if they are symptomatic, have rapidly progressing or bulky disease, or if they are inappropriate candidates for hormonal therapy either because of negative hormonal receptor status or progression of disease on hormonal therapies. Patients are often treated with a chemotherapy regimen until progression of disease, or prohibitive toxicity, at which time the therapy is changed to a second or a third line therapy. This manuscript will provide a review of the current treatment strategies for advanced hormone insensitive breast cancer.

Weekly docetaxel/paclitaxel in pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of weekly docetaxel/paclitaxel in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. Twenty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer were included in this study. Three different schedules of treatment were administered. The starting schedule, A1, consisted of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 plus paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 over 1 hour, weekly for 18 weeks; this schedule was considered feasible if at least 70% of the planned doses were given on time and without reduction. Schedule A2 consisted of the same doses administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and schedule B consisted of docetaxel 25 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 for 1 hour on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a total of 6 cycles. All patients had received prior anthracyclines, and 19 patients were pretreated with taxanes. Seventy-seven percent of patients had received at least 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients are assessable for toxicity and efficacy. A total of 109 cycles of chemotherapy have been administered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1-8 cycles). The median delivered dose intensity was 27 mg/m2/week for paclitaxel (range, 18-50 mg/m2/week) and 17 mg/m2/week (range, 12-39 mg/m2/week) for docetaxel. Six patients received schedule A1. This schedule was considered not feasible due to neutropenia grade > 2, mucositis, and diarrhea grade 2, which required dose reduction/omission in 33% of administrations. For this reason, treatment in the following 5 patients was omitted on day 15 (schedule A2). Schedule B was found to be more feasible with 16% of dose reductions/omissions. The overall response rate was 68% (95% CI, 50%-86%) with a median duration of response of 10 months (range, 2-18+ months). Treatment was well tolerated; myelosuppression was rare and grade 3 cutaneous toxicity was observed in only 2 patients. In conclusion, weekly docetaxel/paclitaxel is active at low dosages and was well tolerated as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. This regimen represents a valid option as a salvage treatment in taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated patients.

Ongoing US cooperative group trials using taxanes in the adjuvant setting

The use of systemic adjuvant therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer has been demonstrated to have a profound impact on survival. The role of paclitaxel and docetaxel in the adjuvant setting has attracted a great deal of attention. Both of these agents are highly active in patients with advanced breast cancer. In addition, they can be utilized in combination with anthracyclines, which have been shown to provide a slightly better outcome in patients with early-stage breast cancer compared to non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Randomized trials have demonstrated a potential role for paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy. In the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344 trial, which explored the use of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with or without paclitaxel, the initial analysis demonstrated a 22% reduction in the relative risk of relapse and a 26% reduction in the relative risk of death in the paclitaxel group. However, a clear role for the use of paclitaxel in adjuvant therapy remains to be defined. The Breast Cancer International Research Group trial 001 compared the combination of docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide to 5-fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. This trial demonstrated a promising reduction in the relative risk of recurrence of 32% for the docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide group. Ongoing trials will help to further define the role of taxanes in the adjuvant setting for patients with operable breast cancer.

Angiogenesis as a target for cancer therapy

Antiangiogenic drugs are unique for having highly specific targets while carrying the potential to be effective against a wide variety of tumors. Moreover, some of the major limitations of cytotoxic therapies likely will be avoided by this entirely new class of anticancer weapons. After the realization of the potential advantages of antiangiogenic therapy, the field of angiogenesis research is growing exponentially. Still, there is much to learn about the machinery that tumors use to recruit new blood vessels, and the results of the clinical trials will show the best way to apply that knowledge for cancer therapy.

Which dosing scheme is suitable for the taxanes? An in vitro model

The discovery and development of the taxane class of antitumor compounds represent significant advances in the treatment of patients with a variety of malignancies. These drugs are effectively used in the treatment of breast cancer. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of fractionated usage of both paclitaxel and docetaxel as a single agent in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7. It has been shown that the cytotoxic effect of paclitaxel was increased when the divided IC50 concentrations were used sequentially and in contrast to paclitaxel, cytotoxic effect of docetaxel was decreased with the same schema and the single dose of IC50 concentration was optimal. The cause of the difference between the cytotoxic effects of two agents with this schedule is obscure. Demonstrating mechanisms, which are responsible for these differences, will be important for more rational use of taxoids and to provide basis for the following clinical trials.

End points for new agents in induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancers

More than 60% of patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck present at a locally advanced stage. Although multimodality therapy has improved locoregional control, the 5-year survival rate of this population rarely exceeds 30%. In this review, we analyzed the impact of chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced head and neck cancer and we underline the potential benefit of induction chemotherapy. The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer collaborative group has suggested a survival advantage of 5% at 5 years for platin-5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy. We have analyzed cofactors that may affect the survival of head and neck patients and propose new end points for assessment of the efficacy of induction chemotherapy. The detrimental effect of second primary tumors on long-term results is stressed and we have suggested the use of overall 2-year survival as a surrogate end point for induction chemotherapy efficacy. Finally, we have examined the impact of new cytotoxic agents and present the promising results of new taxane-based combinations.

Canalicular stenosis secondary to weekly versus every-3-weeks docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the frequency of canalicular stenosis as a side effect of weekly versus every-3-weeks docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective nonrandomized comparative trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients enrolled in a phase II study of weekly docetaxel plus trastuzumab and 18 patients enrolled in a phase II study of every-3-weeks docetaxel plus doxorubicin were evaluated. Each patient underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal duct, and, in some instances, a nuclear lacrimal scan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

If epiphora (excessive tearing) was reported by the patient, its time of onset was documented. In patients with epiphora, presence or absence of canalicular stenosis was evaluated on the basis of the findings on probing and irrigation. The duration of treatment with docetaxel, the dose frequency, and the cumulative dose of docetaxel were recorded in each case.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (77%) receiving weekly docetaxel plus trastuzumab had epiphora. Nine of these patients had significant anatomic narrowing of the canaliculi. Bicanalicular silicone intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy was recommended in all nine patients. Eight patients underwent surgery and experienced complete or near complete resolution of epiphora. Although two patients (11%) receiving every-3-weeks docetaxel plus doxorubicin reported transient symptoms of epiphora, neither patient was found to have narrowing of the canaliculi, and the epiphora was not severe enough to justify surgical intervention. The mean duration of docetaxel therapy for the patients in this study was 19 weeks. The mean cumulative dose of docetaxel was higher in patients with canalicular stenosis than in patients without this side effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Canalicular stenosis was more common in patients receiving weekly docetaxel than in those receiving every-3-weeks docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. Bicanalicular silicone intubation early in the course of weekly docetaxel therapy should be considered, because this intervention can prevent complete closure of the canaliculi. Once complete or near complete stenosis of the canaliculi occurs, placement of a permanent Pyrex glass tube may become necessary to overcome the blockage of tear outflow.

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab for patients with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel plus trastuzumab in women with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Efficacy was correlated with serum HER-2 extracellular domain (ECD) levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty women with metastatic breast cancer were treated with weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab as first- or second-line therapy. Both docetaxel 35 mg/m(2)/wk and trastuzumab 2 mg/kg/wk were delivered in 4-week cycles consisting of three weekly treatments followed by 1 week of rest. A loading dose of trastuzumab 4 mg/kg was administered 1 day before the start of the first cycle.

RESULTS

The median delivered dose-intensity of docetaxel was 24 mg/m(2)/wk (range, 18 to 27 mg/m(2)/wk). The intent-to-treat overall response rate (ORR) was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44% to 80%). The ORR in patients whose tumors were HER-2-positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization was 67% (16 of 24 patients; 95% CI, 45% to 84%). In patients with elevated serum HER-2 ECD at baseline, the ORR was 76% (95% CI, 53% to 92%), compared with 33% (95% CI, 7% to 70%) in patients with low HER-2 ECD levels (P =.04). Variations in HER-2 ECD concentrations during treatment correlated with response to treatment. Median time to progression was 9 months. Acute toxicity, including myelosuppression, was mild. Fatigue, fluid retention, and excessive tearing became more common with repetitive dosing.

CONCLUSION

Weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab is an active combination for treating patients with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Serum HER-2 ECD testing may be a promising method for monitoring patients on trastuzumab-based therapy.

Combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Despite more than four decades of effort, the improvement in survival in metastatic breast cancer has been modest. Recently, however, new drugs such as the taxanes have emerged as pivotal agents in the treatment of metastatic disease and they are now being investigated in the adjuvant setting. In addition, the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies such as trastuzumab provides a new paradigm for the development of biologic treatments. The incorporation of trastuzumab into new combination regimens based on potential molecular synergies is a focus of current research.

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven women were treated with 1 h infusions of docetaxel at 40 mg/m2/week after pre-medication with 8 mg dexamethazone. Each cycle consisted of three consecutive weekly treatments followed by a 1 week rest. All patients were assessed for toxicity; five patients were not assessable for clinical response, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) because of early treatment failure, but they were included in intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of four cycles (range, 1-9), with a median dose intensity of 28 mg/m2/week (range 22-30) and a median relative dose intensity of 0.95 (range 0.73-1.0). No patients showed complete response, whereas 14 had partial response, which accounted for 38% of objective response rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 53%]. In addition, three patients (8%, 95% CI 0% to 17%) had stable disease over 6 months. Clinical responses were achieved at a median of three cycles (range 1-4 cycles). The median TTP and OS were 5 and 12 months, respectively. The weekly docetaxel regimen was generally well tolerated. About half of the patients experienced grade > or = 1 neutropenia; only 19% had grade 3/4 neutropenia, including one case of grade 4. No febrile neutropenia was observed and fluid retention syndrome was uncommon. Non-hematologic toxicity, however, such as asthenia/fatigue, nail damage, tearing or hearing disorders, was seen with successive treatment cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly docetaxel at 40 mg/m2/week is an active and feasible regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Canalicular stenosis secondary to weekly docetaxel: a potentially preventable side effect

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to describe canalicular stenosis as a mechanism for epiphora (excessive tearing) secondary to weekly docetaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with metastatic breast cancer who developed epiphora during weekly docetaxel therapy underwent an ophthalmologic examination, and probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal ducts. The total duration of docetaxel therapy, the duration of treatment at the time of onset of epiphora, the number of infusions, the cumulative dose of docetaxel and the severity of canalicular stenosis were recorded.

RESULTS

All 14 patients had anatomic narrowing of the canaliculi as the underlying mechanism for epiphora. Bicanalicular silicone intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) was recommended for all 14 patients. Eleven patients underwent surgery and experienced resolution of their symptoms. The three patients who declined surgery continue to have epiphora at the time of this report.

CONCLUSIONS

Canalicular stenosis is an underlying mechanism for epiphora in patients receiving weekly docetaxel. Bicanalicular silicone intubation should be considered early in the course of weekly docetaxel therapy to prevent complete closure of the canaliculi. Once complete or near complete stenosis of the canaliculi occurs, DCR with a permanent pyrex glass tube placement may become necessary to overcome the blockage of tear outflow.

Weekly platinum chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer

British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 2–4. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600062www.bjcancer.com

© 2002 The Cancer Research Campaign

Taxanes and capecitabine in combination: rationale and clinical results

The clinical utility of capecitabine as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer has been demonstrated with significant responses seen in women already treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. A phase II study in older women with metastatic breast cancer demonstrated capecitabine to be an effective front-line therapeutic agent. Clinical trials of capecitabine in combination with the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have been based on the observed upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in preclinical studies. This taxane-mediated upregulation is synergistic, time dependent, and persists for up to 10 days. Studies of taxanes administered every 3 weeks with capecitabine have shown favorable antitumor responses and the combination of a taxane with capecitabine was favored over a taxane alone. The day-to-day administration of taxanes and capecitabine led to toxicity concerns, which have hindered their daily use. The administration of taxanes on a weekly schedule has demonstrated a more favorable toxicity profile (i.e., less myelosuppression), and initial studies in combination with capecitabine have demonstrated their utility in various solid tumors. Schedule optimization based on the upregulation of TP may result in a greater therapeutic index, thus allowing for the determination of the most advantageous way of combining these agents.

Weekly docetaxel with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: Phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of weekly docetaxel when paired with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as the second-line treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with progressive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after one previous chemotherapeutic regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and measurable lesions were eligible for treatment in these Phase II trials. Patients who had not received gemcitabine previously were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and gemcitabine, 800 mg/m(2), both of which were administered intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. If the patients had received gemcitabine as part of first-line therapy, they were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m(2) i.v., on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were reevaluated after two courses of treatment, and responding patients continued treatment for six courses or until disease progression.

RESULTS

Forty patients were treated with a combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine, and 23 patients received docetaxel and vinorelbine. The docetaxel/gemcitabine combination was reasonably well tolerated, with moderate myelosuppression and a few nonhematologic toxicities reported. The objective response rate was 10%, with a 1-year survival rate of 20%. The docetaxel/vinorelbine combination was found to be poorly tolerated, with Grade 3/4 leukopenia reported in 71% of patients and neutropenic fever reported in 70% of patients despite frequent dose reductions and omission of the Day 15 doses. Enrollment onto this regimen was stopped prematurely due to toxicity, and after no major responses were observed in the first 20 evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine appears to be feasible and relatively well tolerated as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, whereas a weekly combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine did not appear to be tolerable at the doses and schedule used in the current study. Neither regimen showed a level of activity that suggested any advantage compared with the results obtained with single-agent docetaxel in this setting.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel in second-line therapy for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a Phase II study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of weekly docetaxel in second-line therapy for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with documented recurrent or refractory NSCLC, previously treated with no more than one chemotherapy regimen, were eligible if they had a performance status (PS) of 0-2, measurable or evaluable disease, and adequate organ function. Patients were treated with docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)/week for 6 consecutive weeks, administered intravenously with dexamethasone premedication. Cycles were repeated every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled. One patient was ineligible because of uncontrolled brain metastases. Hematologic toxicity was minimal. Nonhematologic toxicities were modest except for diarrhea and cumulative fatigue. There were no treatment-related deaths. The overall response rate was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-29%). The median survival time (MST) was 8.0 months. and the 1-year survival rate was 31% (95% CI, 17- 58%). Patients with PS 0-1 had a MST of 11.9 months with 1-year survival of 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly docetaxel is very well tolerated as second-line therapy for NSCLC. The activity of this regimen appears to be comparable to the standard 3-week schedule. This regimen offers new opportunities for combination regimens, both as first- and second-line therapy for NSCLC.

A phase II trial of docetaxel for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for patients with breast cancer and ovarian cancer

As docetaxel is known to have significant antineoplastic activity against breast and ovarian cancer, we explored its application as a peripheral blood stem cell mobilizing agent in 33 women with stage lll-IV ovarian carcinoma (n = 10) or stage ll-lV breast cancer (n = 23) who were in preparation for high-dose chemotherapy. Eleven patients had bone and/or bone marrow involvement with their disease. The median number of prior regimens received before mobilization was two (range 1-3). The three dose levels administered were 100 mg/m(2), 110 mg/m(2) and 120 mg/m(2). Patients received one dose of docetaxel in the outpatient setting followed by G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) starting 4 days after docetaxel administration. Leukapheresis commenced when WBC >1.0 x 10(9)/l or when the WBC began to rise after reaching a nadir. Ninety-seven percent of patients began leukapheresis within 7-9 days after receiving docetaxel (range 7-10 days). The collection goal was >/=2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Twenty-seven (82%) patients reached this goal in a median of 2 leukapheresis days (range 1-3). No grade 2-4 nonhematologic toxicities were noted. Thirteen patients (55%) showed a WBC nadir >1.0 x 10(9)/l. None of the patients experienced neutropenic fever or required blood or platelet transfusion support. In conclusion, docetaxel + G-CSF is an effective, well-tolerated regimen for PBPC mobilization which can be safely administered in the outpatient setting with minimal toxicity.

Weekly docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel (Taxotere) has demonstrated high antitumour activity in first- and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This study analysed the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel given weekly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer received docetaxel, 35 mg/m2 weekly for six weeks, followed by two weeks without treatment. Additional cycles (three weeks' treatment, two weeks' rest) were given until disease progression. All patients had received prior chemotherapy: 32 and 5 patients had received prior anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing regimens, respectively. Docetaxel was administered for a total of 359 doses (median 9. range 6-22).

RESULTS

There was one complete response (3%), 11 partial responses (31%), 17 patients with stable disease (49%) and six with disease progression (17%). Overall response rate was 34% (95% confidential interval (95% CI): 18%-51). Median survival was 307 days; median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (range 1.5 to > or = 5.5 months). Three patients showed grade 3 neutropenia. 14 showed grade 3 alopecia, and various grade 1-2 non-haematological toxicities were observed. Treatment was delayed in two patients due to haematotoxicity. and stopped in one patient due to painful nail toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Weekly administration of docetaxel at a dose of 35 mg/m2 is effective and of low toxicity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Docetaxel as rescue medication in anthracycline- and ifosfamide-resistant locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma not amenable to curative surgery has a dismal prognosis. Aggressive treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide represents the current therapeutic mainstay in these patients, most of whom succumb to relapses. Thus, the efficacy of subsequent therapeutic approaches has to be weighed against toxicity caused by palliative treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma refractory to treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide were enrolled into the present phase II study. Patients were assigned to receive docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 every three weeks. In case of severe toxicity, patients were switched to a weekly schedule of docetaxel (40 mg/m2).

RESULTS

A total of 106 cycles (80% at the scheduled 100 mg/m2 dose level) were administered in 27 patients. Partial response was observed in 4 (15%) patients and 4 (15%) patients experienced disease stabilization. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 2.4 (range: 0.9-23.9) and 7.7 (range: 1.0-44.3) months, respectively. Upon renewed progression, three patients initially responsive to treatment with docetaxel were successfully reinduced by treatment with docetaxel. The safety profile of docetaxel was tolerable and the administration mostly manageable on an outpatient basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that docetaxel represents an efficacious and tolerable treatment in a minority of patients refractory to standard treatment. There is a need for better identification of patients most likely to benefit from salvage treatment with docetaxel.

Monthly docetaxel and weekly gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active against breast cancer. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monthly docetaxel combined with weekly gemcitabine in patients with chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom thirty had received prior chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting, seven for metastatic disease, and two for both, including prior anthracycline in 33 patients. Treatment was gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 and docetaxel 100 mg/M2 on day 1, with cycles repeated every four weeks.

RESULTS

Response rate was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI): 63%-91%), with 2 complete and 29 partial responses. Twenty-five of the responders remained progression-free for more than six months. Median survival was 24.5 months. Delivered dose intensity of gemcitabine was lower than expected (63% of planned). The predominant hematologic toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia in 36 patients, complicated by fever in three patients. With the exception of asthenia, severe non-hematological toxicities were infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Monthly docetaxel, combined with weekly gemcitabine, has significant but manageable hematologic toxicity. Despite frequent dose adjustments, this doublet is very active in metastatic breast cancer, producing a high proportion of durable responses associated with favorable survival.

Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced breast cancer: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel administered weekly to elderly or poor-performance status patients with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with advanced breast cancer who were either over the age of 65 or considered to be poor candidates for combination chemotherapy received docetaxel 36 mg/m2 weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. The median age of patients in this trial was 74 years, and 73% of patients had one or more visceral sites of metastases. Seventy-five percent of patients received weekly docetaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer, and the other 25% received it as second-line treatment. Thirty-six patients were assessable for efficacy, and all patients were assessed for toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 448 doses of weekly docetaxel were administered to 41 patients. Thirteen patients (36%) had objective responses to treatment, and an additional 13 patients (36%) had stable disease or minor response. Median time to progression for responding and stable patients was 7 months (range, 3 to 27 months). Median survival for the entire group was 13 months, with 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates of 61% and 29%, respectively. Severe neutropenia occurred in only 0.4% of courses, and no other hematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3/4 fatigue was the most common toxicity, occurring in 20% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Weekly docetaxel therapy is active and well tolerated by elderly and/or poor-performance status patients with advanced breast cancer. This treatment can be administered with minimal myelosuppression. Weekly docetaxel provides an additional option for treatment in this difficult subgroup of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Well-tolerated combination regimens containing weekly docetaxel merit evaluation for this patient population.

Weekly docetaxel in breast cancer: applying clinical data to patient therapy

The use of weekly 35-40 mg/m2 docetaxel, typically on a schedule of 6 weeks of therapy followed by a 2-week break, has produced response rates ranging from 33%-50% in patients with advanced breast cancer, the majority of whom have already received chemotherapy. These encouraging levels of response are seen across disease sites and in patients with prior anthracycline exposure. Importantly, the weekly administration of docetaxel allows prolonged treatment to a high cumulative dose: the weekly regimen is minimally myelotoxic, and neuropathy and other adverse events are infrequent. Weekly single-agent docetaxel may be a useful therapy in particular groups of patients such as those with reduced bone marrow reserve. It may also be a helpful means of delivering a highly active cytotoxic drug in combination with radiation therapy, other proven chemotherapy agents such as doxorubicin, and new, highly promising biological agents such as HERCEPTIN:

Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: what to expect in 2001 and beyond

Chemotherapy plays an important role in the management of metastatic breast cancer. The anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin) and the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) are considered the most active agents for patients with advanced breast cancer. Traditionally, the anthracyclines have been used in combination with cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC, FEC). The taxanes have single-agent activity similar to older combination chemotherapy treatments. There is great interest in developing anthracycline/taxane combinations. Capecitabine is indicated for patients who progress after anthracycline and taxane therapy. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine have activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer and are commonly used as third- and fourth-line palliative therapy. The role of high-dose chemotherapy is not well-defined and remains experimental. Novel cytotoxic therapy strategies include the development of anthracycline, taxane, and oral fluoropyrimidine analogues; antifolates; topoisomerase I inhibitors, and multidrug resistance inhibitors. A better understanding of the biology of breast cancer is providing novel treatment approaches. Oncogenes and tumor-supressor genes are emerging as important targets for therapy. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the Her-2/neu protein, has been shown to prolong survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Other novel biologic therapies interfere with signal transduction pathways and angiogenesis. The challenge for the next decade will be to integrate these promising agents in the management of metastatic and primary breast cancer.

Canalicular stenosis secondary to docetaxel (taxotere): a newly recognized side effect

OBJECTIVE

To report a newly recognized side effect of a commonly used antineoplastic agent, docetaxel, in three patients with metastatic breast cancer.

DESIGN

Observational case reports.

PARTICIPANTS

Three patients with metastatic breast cancer who received weekly docetaxel chemotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Occurrence of epiphora and severity of punctal and canalicular fibrosis secondary to docetaxel.

RESULTS

In three patients receiving weekly docetaxel, canalicular stenosis and resultant epiphora developed shortly after start of their treatment. Discontinuation of drug several months after initiation of therapy did not lead to resolution of symptoms in two of the three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Epiphora is a newly recognized side effect of docetaxel and may occur more frequently with weekly cycles of this drug. The mechanism for epiphora seems to be punctal and canalicular stenosis. This side effect, in advanced cases, is not reversible with discontinuation of the drug. Patients being administered weekly cycles of docetaxel should be screened for epiphora and canalicular stenosis, and treatment in the form of silicone intubation or punctoplasty should be considered in early stages to prevent the need for conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy.

HER-2 expression is a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with a combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, paclitaxel and autologous blood stem cell support

The expression levels of a circulating extracellular domain of HER-2 can be detected in the plasma and serum of patients with metastatic breast cancer using an enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) method. In this study, we evaluated the clinical significance of high and low levels of HER-2 in the plasma of 46 patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled in a clinical trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) using cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and paclitaxel with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Using 2500 U/ml as the cut-point, 20 patients (46%) had elevated HER-2 levels (HER-2 positive). Our results suggest that patients with metastatic breast cancer and high soluble plasma HER-2 have a significantly poorer overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following high-dose chemotherapy with paclitaxel and ASCT. The median OS of patients with low levels of HER-2 was significantly longer (P < 0.01) than the median OS of patients with high levels of HER-2 (29.8 months vs 15.9 months). PFS was also significantly longer (P < 0.01) for patients who were HER-2-negative, than for patients who were HER-2-positive (13.0 vs 8.6 months). Univariate analysis showed that patients with liver or lung metastases had significantly reduced OS and PFS. Patients with metastases to two or more sites also had a significantly reduced time to disease progression, but not OS. In multivariable analysis, lung metastases contributed along with HER-2-positive status to determine a group of patients with significantly poorer OS. However, HER-2-positive status remained the only independent predictor of PFS.

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine and docetaxel with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

PURPOSE

A multicenter phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of docetaxel, vinorelbine with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1998 and March 1999, 57 patients participated in this trial. Forty-two patients received this combination as first-line and 15 patients as second-line chemotherapy, including 10 patients who had failed anthracyclines. Therapy consisted of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d was given.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 64.3% (95% confidence interval, 48.1% to 78.4%) in patients receiving docetaxel plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy, including eight complete (19%) and 19 partial remissions (45.3%); 11 patients (26.2%) had disease stabilization, and only four (9.5%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in eight (53.3%) of 15 objective responses, four had stable disease, and three had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 12 months in the first-line and 9.8 months in the second-line setting, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 18 months, 38 patients (65%) were still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed; World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 neutropenia both occurred in 18 patients (32%) and was complicated by septicemia in four cases; grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in two patients (4%), and grade 3 anemia was seen in only one patient (2%). Severe (grade 3) nonhematologic toxicity, except for alopecia, was rarely observed and included nausea/vomiting in two patients (4%), and stomatitis, peripheral neuropathy, and skin toxicity each in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that docetaxel and vinorelbine with or without G-CSF is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It might be particularly useful in patients previously exposed to adjuvant or palliative anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents.

New horizons in treating metastatic disease

The management of metastatic breast cancer is changing as a consequence of extraordinary discoveries in cancer research and the development of more advanced diagnostic technologies. Although traditional chemotherapeutics such as anthracyclines and taxanes still represent the mainstay of treatment for this disease, new drugs are demonstrating significant clinical activity and sometimes a better toxicity profile. Furthermore, the successful introduction into clinical practice of biological agents, in particular the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, offers a key to the future of managing metastatic breast cancer. A therapeutic approach based on modifications of a specific molecular target (e.g., gene therapy, vaccines, and antiangiogenesis) alone or combined with the traditional chemotherapeutic drugs is expected to be used more commonly and will, we hope, bring significant improvement in the clinical response and quality of care of our patients.

Systemic therapy

Our knowledge base on systemic therapy for breast cancer continues to expand, including further information regarding hormonal prevention in high-risk women, beneficial effects of tamoxifen in noninvasive disease, an update on primary systemic therapy, and optimization of adjuvant strategies, including data on adjuvant chemoendocrine regimens. The proper evaluation of high-dose strategies has been jeopardized by a serious episode of scientific misconduct. New data are also available on palliative options, bisphosphonates, antibody therapies, and novel targets. Data continue to evolve on the role and optimal schedules of taxanes in early-stage and advanced breast cancer. These and other important recent findings are discussed in this review article.