Combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin is an effective second-line therapy for patients with relapsed testicular germ cell tumors

Salvage therapy in patients with germ cell tumors

Testicular cancer is the most curable metastatic solid tumor. Initial chemotherapy is evidence based with risk stratification into three prognostic categories: good, intermediate, and advanced disease. Guidelines for disease management following progression after initial cisplatin combination chemotherapy are less clear. Options include salvage surgery for patients with anatomically confined relapse, standard-dose cisplatin combination chemotherapy, or high-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Proper interpretation of a presumed relapse can be complicated. Growing masses on imaging studies might reflect a growing teratoma. Persistent elevations of serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or alpha fetoprotein (AFP) are only an indication for salvage therapy if there is a definitive rise in the tumor marker. Elevated and rising serum hCG as the only evidence of recurrence can be because of cross reactivity with luteinizing hormone or usage of marijuana rather than progressive cancer. Elevated liver function tests can cause rising serum AFP.

Intensive chemotherapy as salvage treatment for solid tumors: focus on germ cell cancer

Germ cell tumors present contrasting biological and molecular features compared to many solid tumors, which may partially explain their unusual sensitivity to chemotherapy. Reduced DNA repair capacity and enhanced induction of apoptosis appear to be key factors in the sensitivity of germ cell tumors to cisplatin. Despite substantial cure rates, some patients relapse and subsequently die of their disease. Intensive doses of chemotherapy are used to counter mechanisms of drug resistance. So far, high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors is used only in the setting of testicular germ cell tumors. In that indication, high-dose chemotherapy is given as the first or late salvage treatment for patients with either relapsed or progressive tumors after initial conventional salvage chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy is usually given as two or three sequential cycles using carboplatin and etoposide with or without ifosfamide. The administration of intensive therapy carries significant side effects and can only be efficiently and safely conducted in specialized referral centers to assure optimum patient care outcomes. In breast and ovarian cancer, most studies have demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), but overall survival remained unchanged. Therefore, most of these approaches have been dropped. In germ cell tumors, clinical trials are currently investigating novel therapeutic combinations and active treatments. In particular, the integration of targeted therapies constitutes an important area of research for patients with a poor prognosis.

Efficacy and tolerability of TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin) incorporated into induction chemotherapy for patients with intermediate- or poor-risk metastatic germ cell tumors

The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin) incorporated into induction chemotherapy for patients with metastatic germ cell tumor (GCT) characterized by unfavorable clinical features. This study included 37 patients, who were categorized into intermediate- or poor-risk GCT according to the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC). All 37 patients received two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) followed by several cycles of TIP. Following treatment with TIP, 25 patients achieved the normalization of serum tumor markers. In addition, surgical resection of the residual tumors following TIP was performed in 17 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with no viable cancer cells. At a median follow-up of 36 months, 31 patients were alive, including 27 with no evidence of disease, whereas the remaining six died of disease progression. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in these 37 patients were 72.9 and 85.3%, respectively. Despite the lack of a significant predictor of OS, univariate analysis identified the presence of a choriocarcinoma element and IGCCC as significant predictors of DFS, of which only the presence of a choriocarcinoma element appeared to be independently associated with DFS. In this series, treatment-related death did not occur, although 27 patients had at least one adverse event corresponding to grade 3 ≤. Collectively, it would be of worth to pursue the significance of the early incorporation of TIP into induction chemotherapy for patients with intermediate- or poor-risk metastatic GCT in the future.

Current chemotherapeutic approaches for recurrent or refractory germ cell tumors

INTRODUCTION

Up to 25% of patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) are not cured by first line therapy and require treatment for refractory or relapsed disease.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE from January 1950 to April 2014 for articles relating to trials of chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumours. Relevant review papers and conference proceedings were hand searched for additional references.

RESULTS

A range of conventional dose chemotherapy (CDCT) regimens can provide durable remissions in 20-30% of patients at first or subsequent salvage.

CONCLUSIONS

This article reviews the evidence underlying commonly used salvage CDCT based on ifosfamide and cisplatin such as TIP, VIP and VeIP; other active combinations; and single agent salvage regimens. The treatment of growing teratoma syndrome and malignant transformation of teratoma will also be discussed. Companion articles will explore the role of high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and novel targeted agents.

High-dose chemotherapy for germ cell tumors: do we have a model?

INTRODUCTION

Since the late nineties, the intensification of chemotherapy doses with hematopoietic stem cell rescue held promise for patients with advanced and poor prognosis germ cell tumors (GCTs). High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has, nowadays, a recognized indication in the salvage setting of advanced GCTs and is steadily utilized worldwide.

AREAS COVERED

We evaluated the available data with the use of HDCT in these patients. In addition, we provided an original perspective on several issues as experts on behalf of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and IGG, including peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and the use of HDCT in special subpopulations of GCT, with the aim to help clarify critical issues in the absence of available clear-cut information.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite HDCT being currently considered a therapeutic option in the salvage setting, critical questions regarding patient selection are still unanswered. Eligibility of patients with a chemoresistant disease, the use of available prognostic factors as well as tumor marker decline in clinical practice are pending issues. Moving forward, these are critical arguments in favor of further clinical research in the field of advanced GCTs.

A phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) supported by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy: the Multicentric TAXIF II study

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is an effective salvage treatment of germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients. In the first salvage setting, 30%-70% of patients may achieve durable remissions. Even when HDCT is administered as subsequent salvage treatment, up to 20% of patients may still be definitively cured. However, patients with refractory/relapsed disease still have a very poor long-term prognosis, requiring earlier intervention of HDCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial was addressed to nonrefractory patients failing Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria included seminomatous GCT in relapse after two lines of chemotherapy, nonseminomatous GCT in relapse after first or second lines, partial remission after first line, primary mediastinal GCT in first relapse. Patients received two cycles combining Epirubicin and Paclitaxel (Epi-Tax), followed by three consecutive HDCT, one using a Paclitaxel/Thiotepa (Thio-Tax) association and two using the 5-day Ifosfamide-Carboplatin-Etoposide regimen. The main objective was to determine the complete response rate.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included between September 2004 and December 2007: 44 received the first HDCT cycle, 39 two HDCT cycles, 29 could receive the whole protocol. Sixteen patients did not receive the entire protocol, including eight (17.7%) for toxic side-effects. Two patients (4.4%) died of toxicities, and 17 (37.7%) of disease progression. With a median follow-up time of 26 months (range, 4-51), the final overall response rate was 48.8% (including a complete response rate of 15.5% and a partial response/negative serum markers rate of 26.6%) in an intent-to-treat analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 22 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2-not reached] and 32 months (95% CI 4-49), respectively. The 2-year PFS was a plateau setup at 50% (95% CI 32-67) and the 2-year OS was 66% (95% CI 44-81).

CONCLUSION

The TAXIF II protocol was effective in nonrefractory GCT patients failing Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The toxic death rate remained acceptable in the field of HDCT regimens.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00231582.

Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) as salvage and consolidation chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumor

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of TIP as salvage chemotherapy for germ cell tumor (GCT) patients with relapsed disease or cisplatin (CDDP)-refractory disease and consolidation chemotherapy for patients who responded unfavorably to first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

Forty-three patients with advanced GCT were treated with TIP. Eleven with relapsed disease and five with CDDP-refractory disease received TIP as salvage chemotherapy. The remaining 27 received TIP as consolidation chemotherapy following initial induction chemotherapy. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Results

In total, 116 cycles of TIP were administered with a median of three cycles (range 1–4 cycles) per patient. Before TIP, 33 patients showed elevated tumor marker and 23 patients (70 %) achieved marker normalization with the chemotherapy. One of six (17 %) patients with refractory disease and 5 of 10 (50 %) patients with relapsed disease achieved durable complete response (CR) after TIP with or without surgery. Eighteen of 27 (67 %) patients receiving TIP as consolidation chemotherapy achieved durable CR. Five additional patients were given further chemotherapy and achieved durable CR. Grade 4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 91 and 42 % of patients, respectively; all were managed with routine supportive care. Grade 2 and grade 3 sensory neuropathy was observed in 37 and 2 % of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

The TIP was effective for relapsed patients with favorable risk features and selected CDDP-refractory GCT patients. Results of TIP as consolidation for patients with unfavorable response to the initial chemotherapy were also encouraging. The toxicities were mainly myelosuppression and sensory neuropathy.

Salvage therapy for refractory or recurrent pediatric germ cell tumors: the French SFCE experience

PURPOSE

Some children with extracranial germ cell tumors (GCT) relapse after or do not respond to first-line treatment combining chemotherapy and surgery, of whom very few experience long-term survival despite multimodal salvage treatment.

METHODS

This prospective study, part of the French TGM95 Protocol for non-seminomatous GCT (NSGCT), included 19 (7%) children with malignant refractory or recurrent extracranial NSGCT who were studied to identify prognostic factors and determine the best salvage treatment.

RESULTS

At the end of the first-line treatment, 10 and 9 children were in complete and incomplete remission, respectively. Events occurred within 2 years (5-23 months) after initial diagnosis. A progression was observed in 13 patients at least in one site initially involved. Two patients had a purely biological relapse (increase in isolated markers), and four patients had a purely metastatic relapse (brain location in three cases). After salvage treatment combining surgery and various types of chemotherapy (including high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in 10 cases), the 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates were of 26% (95%CI: 9.6-46.8%) and 32% (95%CI: 12.9-52.2%), respectively. Patients who underwent complete surgery (or without any detectable tumor) had higher survival rate than patients who underwent partial surgery or for whom surgery was not feasible (P = 0.0003) at first relapse while this rate was similar between patients treated or not with HDCT.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric recurrent or refractory NSGCT, complete excision of the tumor appears essential. The role of HDCT remains debated.

Beyond stage I germ cell tumors: current status regarding treatment and long-term toxicities

Approximately 20% to 40% of patients with germ-cell tumors (GCT) will need advanced medical treatment because of relapse or initial metastatic disease. The survival and recommended treatment for men with metastatic disease varies according to histology, primary and metastatic sites, and the level of prechemotherapy tumor markers. For patients with a good prognosis, three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) or four cycles of etoposide, and cisplatin are recommended. For patients with intermediate- and poor prognosis, four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin remains the preferred treatment option, although a switch to a more intensive regimen can be considered a new alternative. A major advance in salvage therapy for GCT in the last 5 years was the development of a new risk classification system. Initial salvage treatment includes both high-dose chemotherapy and standard-dose chemotherapy. There is clear consensus that patients with residual masses larger than 1 cm should undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND); however, the role of PC-RPLND in patients with serologic and radiographic complete response to first-line chemotherapy is controversial. The rationale for PC-RPLND in patients with small residual masses is discussed, and only a small minority of advanced nonseminoma GCT (NSGCT) patients are suitable candidates for observation after first-line chemotherapy. Post-treatment long-term toxicity has emerged as an important issue for GCT survivors. Examples of late effects are secondary nongerm-cell cancers and cardiovascular disease, which represent the most severe and potentially life-threatening effects of cancer treatment. Follow-up of cancer survivors should include recommendations for maintaining a healthy lifestyle to reduce the risk of serious long-term and late effects of treatment.

Solid tumors after chemotherapy or surgery for testicular nonseminoma: a population-based study

PURPOSE

Increased risks of solid tumors after older radiotherapy strategies for testicular cancer (TC) are well established. Few population-based studies, however, focus on solid cancer risk among survivors of TC managed with nonradiotherapy approaches. We quantified the site-specific risk of solid cancers among testicular nonseminoma patients treated in the modern era of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, without radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for solid tumors were calculated for 12,691 patients with testicular nonseminoma reported to the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1980 to 2008) and treated initially with either chemotherapy (n = 6,013) or surgery (n = 6,678) without radiotherapy. Patients accrued 116,073 person-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten second solid cancers were observed. No increased risk followed surgery alone (SIR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.14; n = 99 solid cancers), whereas significantly increased 40% excesses (SIR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.73; n = 111 solid cancers) occurred after chemotherapy. Increased risks of solid cancers after chemotherapy were observed in most follow-up periods (median latency, 12.5 years), including more than 20 years after treatment (SIR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.96 to 2.33); significantly increased three- to seven-fold risks occurred for cancers of the kidney (SIR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.79 to 5.77), thyroid (SIR, 4.40; 95% CI, 2.19 to 7.88), and soft tissue (SIR, 7.49; 95% CI, 3.59 to 13.78).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first large population-based series reporting significantly increased risks of solid cancers among patients with testicular nonseminoma treated in the modern era of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Subsequent analytic studies should focus on the evaluation of dose-response relationships, types of solid cancers, latency patterns, and interactions with other possible factors, including genetic susceptibility.

Transplantation for refractory germ cell tumors: does it really make a difference?

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) has been used over the past 25 years for germ-cell tumors in a variety of clinical scenarios. There is consensus at this point that its use as part of first-line treatment does not benefit patients with high-risk tumors. Long-term results of prospective trials in patients with relapsed or with refractory disease indicate that a fraction of them achieve long-term remissions consistent with cures. While HDC constitutes for many oncologists in the US an accepted treatment modality for relapsed or refractory GCT, controversy surrounds its use in those settings. Prognostic models have been developed that allow to prospectively identify poor prognosis patients that might benefit from novel HDC-based approaches.

PARP expression in germ cell tumours

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represent a new class of promising drugs in anticancer therapy.

AIMS

To evaluate PARP expression in testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) and to correlate expression patterns with clinicopathological variables.

METHODS

In this translational study, tumour specimens from 124 patients with GCTs (114 patients with testicular primary tumours and 10 with extragonadal GCTs) were identified. PARP expression was detected by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies, scored by the multiplicative quickscore (QS) method and compared to PARP expression in normal testicular tissue.

RESULTS

We observed higher expression of PARP in testicular tumours compared to normal testicular tissue (mean QS=10.04 vs 3.31, p<0.0000001). Mean QS±SD for each histological subtype was as follows: intratubular germ cell neoplasia unclassified (IGCNU)=18.00±0.00, embryonal carcinoma=9.62±5.64, seminoma=9.74±6.51, yolk sac tumour=7.8±7.20, teratoma=5.87±5.34, and choriocarcinoma=4.50±8.33. The PARP overexpression (QS>9) was most often detected in IGCNU (100% of specimen with PARP overexpression), seminona (52.6%), embryonal carcinoma (47.0%), yolk sac tumour (33.3%), teratoma (26.7%) and choriocarcinoma (25.0%), compared to 1.9% of normal testicular tissue specimens. There was no association between PARP expression and clinical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, we showed for the first time, that PARP is overexpressed in testicular germ cell tumours compared to normal testis.

Tumor marker kinetics predict outcome in patients with relapsed disseminated non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors

BACKGROUND

An early serum tumor marker (TM) decline during chemotherapy was shown to independently predict survival in patients with poor-prognosis disseminated non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCTs). The aim of this study was to assess whether a TM decline (TMD) also correlates with the outcome in the salvage setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data regarding 400 patients with progressive or relapsed disseminated NSGCTs after first-line chemotherapy prospectively accrued onto two phase III clinical trials were obtained. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and/or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks of chemotherapy. A total of 297 patients, 185 and 112 in the training and validation sets, with initially abnormal TMs for whom a change from baseline could be established were used for this analysis.

RESULTS

An unfavorable decline in either AFP or hCG was predictive of progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio, HR = 2.15, (95% CI 1.48-3.11); P < 0.001; 2-year PFS rate: 50% versus 26%] as was the Lorch prognostic score (LPS). In the multivariate analysis, an unfavorable TMD, stratified based on the LPS, was an independent adverse prognostic factor for PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

An unfavorable TMD during the first 6 weeks after chemotherapy is associated with a poorer outcome in patients with relapsed disseminated NSGCTs.

Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer

In November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377-1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497-513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, ∼50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.

Transferrin-cisplatin specifically deliver cisplatin to HepG2 cells in vitro and enhance cisplatin cytotoxicity

Cisplatin is a major broad-spectrum chemotherapeutic agent, however, its dose-dependent side effects limit the administration of large doses. Presently, developing a drug targeted delivery system is suggested as one of the most promising approaches to minimize the side effects of cisplatin. Here, we found that each human serum transferrin (HTf) has the potential to bind with over 22 cisplatins, and the complex of apo-HTf-cisplatin can specifically deliver cisplatin to HepG2 cells (human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line) in vitro, and facilitate HepG2 cells to apoptosis. Moreover, proteomics methods revealed that the abundances of 23 proteins in HepG2 cells were remarkably altered in response to cisplatin/apo-HTf-cisplatin exposure, and Realtime-PCR revealed that a number of important genes related to chemotherapeutic cytotoxicity and chemotherapeutic resistance are differentially transcribed between the HepG2 cells of cisplatin exposed and HTf-cisplatin exposed. The pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins and gene transcriptions indicated that those regulated proteins and gene transcriptions are involved in apoptosis regulation, transcription, cell cycle control, protein biosynthesis, energy metabolism, signal transduction, protein binding and other functions. It indicated that the cisplatin toxicity in HepG2 cell is diverse, the transport process has an effect on the cisplatin cytotoxicity, and the mechanism of the apoptosis of HepG2 cells induced by apo-HTf-cisplatin is different from that of cisplatin.

Contemporary management of postchemotherapy testis cancer

CONTEXT

Some controversy still exists regarding the management of testis cancer following chemotherapy for disseminated disease.

OBJECTIVE

To review the available literature concerning the management of postchemotherapy testis cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A Medline search was conducted to identify original and review articles, as well as guidelines addressing the management of testis cancer following first-line chemotherapy. Keywords included germ cell tumor, testis cancer, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and chemotherapy. The most relevant articles were critically reviewed with the consensus of all the collaborative authors, who have expertise in the management of germ cell tumors (GCTs).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Approximately one-third of patients who undergo chemotherapy for metastatic GCTs have residual retroperitoneal disease. All patients with residual masses ≥1cm after chemotherapy for nonseminomatous GCTs should undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) because of the risk of mature teratoma in 40-45% of cases and of viable GCT in 10-15% of cases. Patients who obtain a complete serologic remission and radiographic residual <1 cm after chemotherapy have a 6-9% risk of relapse. Patients with a completely resected teratoma in only the PC-RPLND specimen have a >90% chance of cure, while patients with viable GCTs should be considered for additional therapy, depending on the percentage of viable tumor. In patients with disseminated seminoma, postchemotherapy masses <3cm may be safely observed, while patients with masses >3 cm should be evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography 2 mo after completion of chemotherapy, with very selective administration of PC-RPLND. Late relapse occurring >2 yr after chemotherapy is rare, and surgery remains the mainstay of therapy in cases of resectable masses independent of tumor markers. There is still controversy on whether high-dose chemotherapy confers a survival benefit compared with conventional-dose chemotherapy in the salvage setting. Surgery should always be considered for resectable masses following salvage therapies or in chemoresistant disease to maximize chance of cure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced GCTs can achieve long-term disease-free survival when chemotherapy is combined with expert and judicious resection of residual disease. PC-RPLND is recommended for residual masses >1cm identified on postchemotherapy imaging in nonseminomatous GCT and possibly for PET-positive residual disease ≥3cm in treated seminomas.

[Ovarian yolk sac tumour: general review]

Ovarian yolk sac tumour (OYST) is a very rare malignancy arising most often in young women. Preoperative clinical, biological (alpha-foetoprotein) and radiological findings should help to establish the diagnosis of OYST, in order to propose adequate surgical treatment. The aim of surgery is to remove the primary tumour, to obtain an accurate histological diagnosis and to assess the disease extent. In young women, fertility-sparing surgery should be performed, in order to preserve the possibility of pregnancy later on. Chemotherapy has substantially modified the prognosis of these tumours, and practically all patients will be cured. The overall 5-year survival rate is 94% when patients are treated with BEP chemotherapy. Depending on the clinical situation, two to four cycles of the BEP regimen should be administered after surgery. Identification of prognostic factors may help to propose risk-adapted treatment in order to increase the cure rate in patients with a poor prognosis and to decrease toxicity in patients with a low risk of relapse. Fertility preservation represents a major objective in women treated for OYSTs.

Late relapse of germ cell tumors

This article highlights relevant aspects of the rare late relapses of malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs), which by definition occur at least 2 years after successful treatment. In most reports, 1% to 6% of patients with MGCT experience a late relapse. Surgery is the most important part in the treatment of late relapses. Viable MGCT or teratoma with malignant transformation may require multimodal treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery. Salvage chemotherapy should be based on a representative biopsy. Referring patients with late relapse to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables multimodal treatment.

Intensified chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue in germ-cell tumors

BACKGROUND

Based on the high chemosensitivity of germ-cell tumors (GCTs), the concept of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has been developed worldwide and investigated through many clinical trials. It has been carried out in different clinical settings, ranging from resistant or absolute refractory disease to chemosensitive relapse. HDCT with stem-cell support has been also explored as a part of first-line strategy for poor-prognosis patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our review summarized results from clinical trials evaluating the role of HDCT in patients with advanced GCTs. So far available data were obtained through a Medline search of English-language literature.

RESULTS

Several phase II trials and retrospective series have shown a possible benefit for GCT patients with recurrent disease as well as in first-line setting. Despite these results, data derived from randomized phase III studies failed to demonstrate any survival advantage for HDCT over conventional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of HDCT in GCTs remains controversial. We need new prospective studies based on prognostic factors with multiple transplants of carboplatin and etoposide as the preferred high dose regimen. At present, based mainly on retrospective and phase II studies, HDCT may represent a therapeutic option for patients with primary refractory disease or for those with a second or further relapse.

Salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) in relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

In relapsed germ cell tumors, salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) is a well-established regimen for patients with favorable features such as a primary testicular tumor and prior complete remission (CR) after the initial chemotherapy. We reviewed patients who had received salvage TIP chemotherapy, and evaluated the efficacy of TIP, linking it to patient characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 1998 and May 2009, a total of 14 patients were treated with salvage TIP chemotherapy. 10 of 14 had cisplatin-refractory disease, and none of the patients were expected to show a favorable outcome to conventional-dose salvage chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the 14 patients, 5 (37.5%) showed a favorable response (CR in 1 patient, partial response (PR) in 4 patients) to TIP alone, and 1 had CR with subsequent surgery after TIP. 2 patients with CR and another 2 patients who attained disease stabilization are still alive at 81.3, 25.4, 69.3, and 27.4 months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 41.0 months (range 11.1-137.6), the median overall survival time for all patients was 21.1 (range 5.0-112.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the presence of poor prognostic features, salvage TIP chemotherapy can be an active regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors.

[High-dose chemotherapy and residual tumor resection in male germ cell tumors]

As a consequence of the unsatisfactory results of conventional dose salvage regimens, in particular for patients with poor prognostic features at the time of relapse or in patients with refractory disease, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) was introduced into clinical practice in the late 1980s. The combination of carboplatin and etoposide (CE) still remains the backbone of most high-dose regimens. Multiple modifications with more dose escalations or addition of further drugs have been explored, most often with increased toxicity. With improved expertise in supportive care and the use of peripheral blood stem cells, hematopoetic recovery has been significantly shortened and the initial high treatment-related mortality reduced from more than 10% to about 3%. Since the incorporation of HDCT, even patients with unfavorable prognostic features or patients with second or subsequent relapses can achieve long-term remission. Following HDCT residual tumor resection plays a major role in achieving these long-term results. The proportion of vital residual tumor after HDCT is much higher than in patients after conventional chemotherapy. The role of HDCT remains controversial particularly as a first-line treatment and less so in the first salvage setting. As these patients are rare HDCT and residual tumor resection should only be be provided by high-volume centers with sufficient expertise in performing these complex procedures.

[High dose chemotherapy and germ cell tumor]

Germ cell tumors are cured by cisplatin-based chemotherapy and secondary surgery. Patients with initial poor response to chemotherapy and relapsed disease patients have poor prognosis. Among different therapeutic approaches high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support has been studied. Despite the existence of a number of phase II trials and several well-conducted phase III trials, this approach is neither a standard nor an option in the setting of first line and first salvage treatment. A randomized phase III trial has recently been initiated and patients with relapsed disease should be offered to participate in the trial. Several selected indications could be discussed in further lines of treatment.