Maintenance olaparib rechallenge in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer previously treated with a PARP inhibitor (OReO/ENGOT-ov38): a phase IIIb trial

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is the standard of care for some patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor rechallenge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (NCT03106987) enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received one prior PARP inhibitor therapy for ≥18 and ≥12 months in the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, respectively, following first-line chemotherapy or for ≥12 and ≥6 months, respectively, following a second or subsequent line of chemotherapy. Patients were in response following their last platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and were randomized 2 : 1 to maintenance olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily or placebo. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Seventy four patients in the BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 38 to placebo, and 72 patients in the non-BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 36 to placebo; >85% of patients in both cohorts had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy. In the BRCA-mutated cohort, the median PFS was 4.3 months with olaparib versus 2.8 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.87; P = 0.022]; 1-year PFS rates were 19% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). In the non-BRCA-mutated cohort, median PFS was 5.3 months for olaparib versus 2.8 months for placebo (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.71; P = 0.0023); 1-year PFS rates were 14% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). No new safety signals were identified with olaparib rechallenge.

CONCLUSIONS

In ovarian cancer patients previously treated with one prior PARP inhibitor and at least two lines of platinum-based chemotherapy, maintenance olaparib rechallenge provided a statistically significant, albeit modest, PFS improvement over placebo in both the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, with a proportion of patients in the maintenance olaparib rechallenge arm of both cohorts remaining progression free at 1 year.

Olaparib plus bevacizumab first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

BACKGROUND

In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 primary analysis, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients in clinical response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, irrespective of surgical status. Prespecified, exploratory analyses by molecular biomarker status showed substantial benefit in patients with a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD; BRCAm and/or genomic instability). We report the prespecified final overall survival (OS) analysis, including analyses by HRD status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to olaparib (300 mg bid; up to 24 months) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w; 15 months total) or placebo plus bevacizumab. Analysis of OS, a key secondary endpoint in hierarchical testing, was planned for ∼60% maturity or 3 years after the primary analysis.

RESULTS

After median follow-up of 61.7 and 61.9 months in the olaparib and placebo arms, respectively, median OS was 56.5 versus 51.6 months in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR]=0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.12; P=0.4118). Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy was received by 105 (19.6%) olaparib patients versus 123 (45.7%) placebo patients. In the HRD-positive population, OS was longer with olaparib plus bevacizumab (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.85; 5-year OS rate, 65.5% versus 48.4%); at 5 years, updated PFS also showed a higher proportion of olaparib plus bevacizumab patients without relapse (HR=0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.54; 5-year PFS rate, 46.1% versus 19.2%). Myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, aplastic anemia, and new primary malignancy incidence remained low and balanced between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Olaparib plus bevacizumab provided clinically meaningful OS improvement for first-line patients with HRD-positive ovarian cancer. These prespecified exploratory analyses demonstrated improvement despite a high proportion of patients in the placebo arm receiving PARP inhibitors post-progression, confirming the combination as one of the standards of care in this setting with the potential to enhance cure.

Abstract PD2-03: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTC) predictive value in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab: Results of a prospective cohort from the French Breast Cancer InterGroup Unicancer (UCBG): COMET study

Background: Increased levels of CTC and a persistent elevated level after just one cycle of chemotherapy are very strong and independent markers of worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (Bidard et al, Lancet Oncol 2014). ctDNA can be used to detect mutation associated with resistance to treatment. It has also been shown that dynamic changes in ctDNA levels closely reflect changes in tumor burden. We prospectively monitored CTC and ctDNA early variations during first line chemotherapy for MBC.

Patients & methods: The French cohort COMET is a prospective study including first line HER2 negative patients (pts) receiving weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab according to EMA approved combination. The aim of this cohort is to evaluate clinical, biological and radiological parameters associated with pts outcome (CTC, serum markers, ctDNA, pharmacogenomic polymorphisms, metabolomic parameters, visceral fat, serum estradiol level and quality of life). We present here the first planned analysis on pts evaluated for CTC (CellSearch) and ctDNA using targeted sequencing (Roche SeqCap technology) of a panel of 46 genes and 8 promoters, using unique molecular identifiers to increase ctDNA detection sensitivity. Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL) and before the second cycle of chemotherapy (C2).

Results: From 09/2012 to 5/2014, 218 pts were included in this substudy. Median age was 55 years and 22% of pts had triple negative BC. At BL, 70% of pts had ≥1 detectable CTC per 7.5 ml of blood (median 4 CTC, range 1- 30,000) and 37% at C2. With a threshold of ≥5 CTC, 47% of pts were positive at BL and 22% at C2. For ctDNA, out of the first 141 pts analyzed, 105 had at least one somatic mutation detected in plasma (74%). The average number of mutations per pt was 2.7 and most commonly mutated genes were TP53 and PIK3CA. ESR1 was found mutated in 9% of all cases and restricted to the ER+ subgroup. Median Allelic Frequency was 10% (range 0.6-83%). Only 33% of pts had detectable ctDNA at C2. At BL, CTC and ctDNA levels were correlated (r=0.46, p<0.0001). Despite no complete overlap, 11% of pts had no CTC nor ctDNA detected. Median follow-up was 53 months and median OS was 32 months. Increased level of CTC and ctDNA were significantly associated with decreased PFS and OS. At C2, ≥5 CTC or still detectable ctDNA were strong markers of reduced OS: HR 4.6 (CI95 3.1-7) and HR 3.2 (CI95 1.8 – 5.5), respectively (both p< 0.0001). At multivariate analysis for PFS, detectable ctDNA at C2 and triple negative status were the only significant prognostic factors. None of serum marker level at BL or their early variations had prognostic value.

Conclusion: This is the largest prospective cohort assessing the respective prognostic values of early CTC and ctDNA changes in homogenously treated first line MBC patients. Analysis of mutations profile variations and comparison with primary tumor and metastasis biopsies are ongoing and may reveal early mechanisms of resistance.

Citation Format: Pierga J-Y, Silveira A, Lorgis V, Tanguy M-L, Tredan O, Dubot C, Jacot W, Goncalves A, Debled M, Levy C, Ferrero J-M, Jouannaud C, Luporsi E, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Dalenc F, Lemonnier J, Berger F, Proudon C, Bidard F-C. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTC) predictive value in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab: Results of a prospective cohort from the French Breast Cancer InterGroup Unicancer (UCBG): COMET study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.

Abstract P2-01-02: Heterogeneity and variability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression on circulating tumor cells (CTC) in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab in a prospective cohort from the French Breast Cancer InterGroup Unicancer (UCBG): COMET study

Background: It has been reported in women with advanced estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive/(HER2)-negative breast cancer the acquisition of a HER2-positive CTC subpopulation during therapy (Jordan NV Nature 2016). The clinical significance of acquired HER2 heterogeneity during the evolution of metastatic breast cancer is unknown. We report here the analysis of HER2 status of CTC before and after one cycle of treatment in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

Patients & methods:The French cohort COMET is a prospective study including first line HER2 negative patients (pts) receiving weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab according to EMA approved combination. The aim of this cohort is to evaluate clinical, biological and radiological parameters associated with pts outcome. We confirmed previously the outcome of patients with high CTC count at base line and after one cycle of treatment (Bidard et al, Lancet Oncol 2014). We present here the analysis on 203 pts evaluated for the expression of HER2 on CTC using the FDA cleared CellSearch method. The HER2 expression of CTCs (CB11 clone) was categorized (class 0–3) as described by Riethdorf et al.CCR2010.

Results: At base line, 144 out of 203 pts had at least one detectable CTC (71%), (median 4, and range 1- 30,000). Among them, 104 (72%) had one or more HER2 positive CTC (1-21,484). In 25 patients with HER2 2+ primary tumor with FISH or CISH non amplified, the incidence of CTC HER2+ cases (13/25, 52%) was similar than in pts with HER2 0 or HER2 1+ (51%) primary tumor. In each case, 3 to 100% of detectable CTC could be HER2+ stained (median 50% of CTC). Only 12 cases (8% of all CTC cases) had 2+ HER2 staining score on CTC and none 3+. After one cycle of treatment, the number of pts with detectable CTC dropped to 64, including 42 with HER2+ CTC (65%). Out of these cases, 14 were 3+ or 2+ HER2 score (22% of CTC+ cases). This was a significant increase compared to baseline (8%) (p<0.001), including 6 cases with 100% of HER2+ CTC. To note, 7 patients without HER2+ CTC at baseline, had detectable HER2+ CTC after one cycle of treatment. With a median follow-up of 2 years, correlation of CTC variations with pts outcome is planned.

Conclusion: HER2 staining on CTC was heterogeneous with HER2 positive and negative subpopulations in the same patient with primary HER2 negative breast cancer. We observe a variability of HER2 CTC status with an increased intensity or appearance of immunostaining in few cases during treatment. We hypothesize that these phenotypes changes within patient-derived circulating tumor cells could contribute to progression of breast cancer and acquisition of drug resistance.

Citation Format: Pierga J-Y, Proudon C, Tredan O, Decraene C, Dubot C, Lorgis V, Jacot W, Goncalves A, Debled M, Levy C, Ferrero J-M, Jouannaud C, Luporsi E, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Dalenc F, Lemonnier J, Berger F, Bidard F-C. Heterogeneity and variability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression on circulating tumor cells (CTC) in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab in a prospective cohort from the French Breast Cancer InterGroup Unicancer (UCBG): COMET study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-02.

Abstract P6-08-10: Impact of age at diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer on overall survival in the real-life "ESME" cohort

Background

Young age is a known poor prognosis factor in early stage breast cancer (BC). Its value is less documented for metastatic BC (MBC). Guidelines state that age should not guide the treatment strategy. We used the ESME database to evaluate the impact of age at MBC diagnosis on overall survival (OS).

Patients and Methods

ESME is a unique national cohort, collecting retrospective data using clinical trial-like methodology. It included all consecutive MBC patients (pts) who initiated at least 1 treatment in one of the 18 participating French cancer centers between 01/01/2008 and 12/31/2014. The database was locked on 12/8/2016. Primary objective were the comparisons of MBC characteristics between age groups (<40, 40 to 60 and >60 years (y)) and the evaluation of the impact of age at MBC diagnosis on OS.

Interaction between age and tumor subtype was tested using a Cox regression model.

ResultsAmong 16 703 included pts, 1539 had no information on tumor receptors (ER/PR/HER2) and 682 had an exclusion criteria (unknown age, men or other cancer in the last 5y), leaving 14 482 for analysis. At the onset of MBC, 902 pts (6.2%), 6269 (43.3%) and 7311 (50.5%) were <40y, 40y to 60y and older than 60y respectively. Median follow-up was 54.8 months.

Pts <40 had significantly more aggressive presentations than other age groups: more HER2+ (26.5%), and triple negative (26.4%) subtypes, more visceral involvement (57.1%), and shorter time to metastasis (26.9% between 6 to 24 months) (all p-value vs other age groups <0.0001).

MBC characteristics according to age groups Age at MBC diagnosis (years)p-value <4040-60>60 Tumor subtype   <0.0001HR+/HER2-425 (47.12)3816 (60.87)5262 (71.97) HR-/HER2-238 (26.39)1126 (17.96)884 (12.09) HER2+239 (26.5)1327 (21.17)1165 (15.93) Type of metastasis, N(%)   <0.0001Bone only219 (24.31)1832 (29.23)2367 (32.41) Non visceral168 (18.65)1046 (16.69)1314 (17.99) Visceral514 (57.05)3389 (54.08)3623 (49.6) Time to first metastasis (months), N(%)   <0.0001< 6304 (33.74)1882 (30.1)2107 (28.9) [6-12[65 (7.21)241 (3.85)209 (2.9) [12-24[177 (19.64)760 (12.15)564 (7.7) ≥24355 (39.4)3370 (53.89)4416 (60.53) Number of metastatic sites, N(%)   0.51 site709(78.6)4948 (78.93)5805 (79.4) 2 sites163(18.07)1130 (18.03)1313(17.96) ≥3 sites30(3.33)191 (3.05)193 (2.64) 

Overall, median OS was identical in the different age groups: 39.1, 41.1 and 39.8 months for pts <40, 40-60 and >60, respectively (p=0.2).

Tumor subtype and age showed a significant interaction on OS (p<0.0001), especially among HER2+ MBC

Overall survival (months) according to tumor subtypes and age groups Age groups (years)p-value (log-rank)Tumor subtype<4040-60>60 HR+/HER2-46,4 (CI 95% 40.5-55.4)47,8 (CI 95% 46-50)44,2 (CI 95% 42.1-46.3)0.0023HER2+60,7 (CI 95% 45.6-76.4)50,4 (CI 95% 46.3-56.3)44 (CI 95% 38.8-48.9)<0.0001Triple negative14 (CI 95% 11.5-16.5)14,7 (CI 95% 13.7-15.9)15,7 (CI 95% 14.6-17.1)0.01

. Anti-HER2 with first-line treatment was given preferentially to young pts: 86.6, 81.9 and 74.9%for pts <40, 40-60 and >60, respectively (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

At onset of MBC, young age was associated with more aggressive presentations, however with no global impact on OS. Pts <40 with HER2+ disease carried a better prognosis, maybe related to therapy.

Citation Format: Frank S, Tchokothe C, Carton M, Mouret-Fourme E, Dubot C, Campone M, Pistilli B, Dalenc F, Mailliez A, Levy C, D'Hondt V, Debled M, Leheurteur M, Coudert B, Perrin C, Gonçalves A, Uwer L, Ferrero J-M, Eymard J-C, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Guesmia T, Bachelot T, Robain M, Cottu P. Impact of age at diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer on overall survival in the real-life "ESME" cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-10.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals FGFR1 amplifications and tumour genomic alterations burden as prognostic biomarkers of survival

BACKGROUND

We aimed at identifying deleterious genomic alterations from untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, and assessing their prognostic value.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrieved 122 HNSCC patients who underwent primary surgery. Targeted NGS was used to analyse a panel of 100 genes selected among the most frequently altered genes in HNSCC and potential therapeutic targets. We selected only deleterious (activating or inactivating) single nucleotide variations, and copy number variations for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the prognostic value of altered genes.

RESULTS

A median of 2 (range: 0-10) genomic alterations per sample was observed. Most frequently altered genes involved the cell cycle pathway (TP53 [60%], CCND1 [30%], CDKN2A [25%]), the PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway (PIK3CA [12%]), tyrosine kinase receptors (EGFR [9%], FGFR1 [5%]) and cell differentiation (FAT1 [7%], NOTCH1 [4%]). TP53 mutations (p = 0.003), CCND1 amplifications (p = 0.04), CDKN2A alterations (p = 0.02) and FGFR1 amplifications (p = 0.003), correlated with shorter overall survival (OS). The number of genomic alterations was significantly higher in the HPV-negative population (p = 0.029) and correlated with a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). Only TP53 mutation and FGFR1 amplification status remained statistically significant in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that genomic alterations involving the cell cycle (TP53, CCND1, CDKN2A), as well as FGFR1 amplifications and tumour genomic alterations burden are prognostic biomarkers and might be therapeutic targets for patients with HNSCC.

Abstract P1-01-02: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) and endothelial cells (CEC) prognostic value in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab: First results of a prospective cohort from the French Breast Cancer InterGroup Unicancer (UCBG): COMET study

Background: increased levels of circulating tumor cells (CTC) are associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It has been hypothesized that bevacizumab could modify CTC prognostic value. CEC variations to predict benefit of anti-angiogenic treatment is still controversial. Predictive markers for response to bevacizumab combined to chemotherapy in MBC remains a clinical unmet need.

Patients & methods: The French cohort COMET is a prospective study including first line HER2 negative patients (pts) receiving weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab according to EMA approved combination. The aim of this cohort is to evaluate clinical, biological and radiological parameters associated with pts outcome (CTC, CEC, serum markers, ctDNA, pharmacogenomic polymorphisms, metabolomic parameters, visceral fat assessed by initial CTscan, serum estradiol level, and quality of life). We present here the first planned analysis on 203 pts evaluated for CTC and CEC using the FDA cleared CellSearch method.

Results: For CTC substudy, 211 patients were included from 09/2012 to 5/2014. Median follow-up is 24 months. Median PFS was 10 months (CI95 9-12) and response rate was 57%. Median OS was not reached. 203 patients were evaluable for both CTC and CEC at baseline and first day of second cycle of CT (D1C2). At baseline, 97/203 (48%) pts had ≥ 5 CTC (median 4 (range 0-30,000). Median number CEC was 21 (0-2231) at baseline and 22 (1-881) at D1C2. LDH, CEA, CA15.3 and CYFRA 21 were above normal at baseline in 44%, 46%, 73% and 71% of the cases respectively. CTC level was not correlated with any patients' characteristics except a number of metastatic site &gt;3. After one cycle of chemotherapy (D1C2) 37 pts (22%) had still ≥ 5 CTC: 36 pts with initial high level and only one patient with low CTC at baseline had increased CTC above 5. Prognostic factors for PFS at univariate analysis were visceral disease, number of metastatic sites (&gt; 3), triple negative status, LDH, CTC level at baseline and CTC level after one cycle of chemotherapy (D1C2). None of serum marker nor CEC level at baseline or any variations had prognostic value. In multivariate analysis for PFS, CTC level after one cyle of chemotherapy predicts poor outcome

Table 1 Multivariate analysis for PFSPts' characteristicsnRRCI 95%p-valueNumber of metastatic sites    &lt;3 sites971  &gt;=3 sites1001.65[1.13 ; 2.41]0.010CTC D1C2    &lt; 51321  &gt;= 5372.17[1.43 ; 3.29]&lt;0.001Hormonal status    Luminal (HR+)1531  Triple negative372.86[1.85 ; 4.54]&lt;0.001

Conclusion: We confirm in a large prospective series the lack of clinical validity of CEC to predict response to an antiangiogenic based treatment in MBC. A persistent elevated level of CTC after just one cycle of chemotherapy is a very strong and independent marker of poor outcome in a homogeneously bevacizumab-treated cohort of MBC patients. This marker could be used to stopped earlier an inefficient and costly treatment.

Citation Format: Pierga J-Y, Tredant O, Chevrier M, Dubot C, Lorgis V, Romieu G, Goncalves A, Debled M, Levy C, Ferrero J-M, Jouannaud C, Luporsi E, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Dalenc F, Berger F, Lemonnier J, Proudhon C, Bidard F-C. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) and endothelial cells (CEC) prognostic value in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab: First results of a prospective cohort from the French Breast Cancer InterGroup Unicancer (UCBG): COMET study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-02.

Abstract P2-05-04: Evaluation of intra-tumor heterogeneity, test reproducibility and their impact in breast cancer samples assessed by Prosigna™: Results from a decision impact prospective study and a matched case-control study

Background: Recent molecular biology technologies reveals insight into tumor heterogeneity but quantification and impact on reproducibility of tests is not well known. The objective of this study was to assess the extent to which tumor heterogeneity may affect the prognosis of patients assessed by Prosigna™ (PAM50) gene signature assay compared to test reproducibility.

Methods: Reproducibility was measured by testing replicate tissue sections from 186 FFPE breast tumor blocks across 2 sites (Institut Curie, Centre Jean Perrin) following independent pathology review at each site. Consecutive slides came from blocks of patients included in the Decision Impact prospective study which examined whether the Prosigna™ test influences adjuvant treatment decision (Clinical trial information: NCT02395575). To evaluate heterogeneity and its impact in terms of outcome, we selected among T1N0 patients treated in Institut Curie between 2003 and 2008, 32 patients who did recur and 28 matched control group who did not (2 'controls' recurred during the study). Analyses were performed on two parts of each tumor. NanoString's Prosigna™ outputs (risk of recurrence (ROR) score, 10 year probability of distant recurrence, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like)) were measured and compared to evaluate heterogeneity (defined as difference in terms of subtype and/or risk category between the two parts) and reproducibility. Correlation between heterogeneity and outcome was performed. Impact was assessed by tumor board analysis.

Results: Pearson correlation coefficients for ROR score and probability of distant recurrence predicted were .95 and .97, respectively in the reproducibility study and .82 and .86, in the tumor heterogeneity study. The measured standard deviation (SD) was 5.4 and 8.1 ROR units corresponding to 1.6% and 2.8% in terms of risk of distant metastasis free survival within the reproducibility study and the tumor heterogeneity study, respectively. Kappa coefficients for intrinsic subtype and risk category agreement were 0.88 and 0.87 in the reproducibility study, and 0.67 and 0.58 in the tumor heterogeneity study. Tumor board analysis of discordant cases showed that the impact, in terms of decision of chemotherapy administration, concerns 3% of patients because of reproducibility and 8% because of tumor heterogeneity, comparing favorably with the discordance between Prosigna™ and immunohistochemistry (27%). Probability of distant recurrence was higher in the cases (15%) compared to control (9%) (p=.001) in the tumor heterogeneity study confirming the performance of the Prosigna™ test.

Conclusion: We validated in the prospective Decision Impact study the analytical performance of NanoString's Prosigna™ assay across multiple clinical testing laboratories. We showed in these two studies that tumor heterogeneity has more impact than reproducibility performance. The clinical impact on the decision making based on tumor heterogeneity is however limited, since it does not correlate to outcomes, whereas the Prosigna™ ROR score has been shown to correlate very well to outcomes.

Citation Format: Rouzier R, Bonneau C, Cayre A, Hequet D, Gentien D, Bonhomme A, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Dubot C, Cottu P, Roulot A, Morel P, Salomon A, Callens C, Guinebretiere J-M, Penault-Llorca F. Evaluation of intra-tumor heterogeneity, test reproducibility and their impact in breast cancer samples assessed by Prosigna™: Results from a decision impact prospective study and a matched case-control study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-04.

Abstract OT1-02-03: Phase I multicenter clinical trial evaluating the combination of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (MEDOPP038 study)

BACKGROUND:

Clinical efficacy and safety of T-DM1 for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC has been assessed in several phase II and III trials and is now considered the standard of care in taxane-and trastuzumab-progressing patients. However, although T-DM1 has shown encouraging antitumor activity in the advanced setting, several strategies to improve T-DM1 efficacy are currently evaluated, including the combination with non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD), considering that: i) doxorubicin is one of the most active chemotherapeutic agents against HER2-positive breast cancer; ii) the combination of doxorubicin and trastuzumab induces synergistic antitumor activity in HER2-overexpressing preclinical models; and iii) liposomal formulations of doxorubicin have a reduced risk of developing cardiac toxicity.

OBJECTIVES:

The primary objective of this trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of T-DM1 and NPLD in patients with HER2-positive MBC naïve of anthracyclines and previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. The secondary objectives include 1) safety, with special emphasis on cardiac safety evaluated by left ventricular ejection fraction, high-sensitivity troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, 2) pharmacokinetics, 3) antitumor activity, and the 4) role of single nucleotide polymorphisms of HER2 gene for developing cardiotoxicity.

TRIAL DESIGN:

This is a dose-finding, open-label, non-randomized and multicenter phase I clinical trial of T-DM1 at a fixed dose of 3.6 mg/kg IV in combination with three different dose levels (DL) of NPLD (45, 50, and 60 mg/m2) IV administered on Day 1 every three weeks. The trial follows a modified dose escalation scheme with a 3+3 design.A total of three patients will be included in the first cohort and observed for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first two cycles of treatment. If none of these patients experiences a DLT, three other patients will be treated at the next DL. However, in case of at least one patient experiences a DLT, three more patients will be treated at the same DL. The MTD will be defined as the highest DL at which ≤1 of six patients experiences a DLT during the first two cycles of treatment. An expansion cohort of six additional patients at the MTD will be included.

ELIGIBILITY:

Anthracycline-naïve patients with HER2-positive MBC and up to two prior chemotherapy regimens in the advanced setting who previously were treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. ECOG performance status of 0-1. Adequate organ and cardiovascular function with LVEF ≥ 55%. RECIST v1.1 evaluable disease.

ACCRUAL:

A total of 12-24 patients will be enrolled at four sites in Spain and France. Recruitment was opened on September 2015. To date, four patients (three at DL1 and one at DL2) have been recruited.

Citation Format: López-Miranda E, Brain E, Saura C, Gligorov J, Dubot C, Dieras V, Suter TM, Aguirre E, Perez-García JM, Llombart A, Cortés J. Phase I multicenter clinical trial evaluating the combination of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (MEDOPP038 study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-02-03.

Abstract OT2-03-02: DI study: Decision impact of the NanoString® Technologies Prosigna™ in early breast cancers

Backgrounds: More than a decade of research, clinical studies, and peer reviewed publications support the value of molecular subtyping based on gene expression analyses to assess prognosis and treatment options for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Therefore, genomic assays are now being introduced to supplement the conventional diagnostic tools. Prosigna is a standardized test that measures the expression levels of 50 classifier genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tumor tissue samples and provide a subtype classification based on the fundamental biology of individual patient's tumor (referred to as molecular subtyping), as well as a prognostic score (referred to as risk of recurrence (ROR) score) that predicts the probability of cancer recurrence over 10 years.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the extent to which Prosigna affects the medical oncologist's treatment recommendations regarding adjuvant chemotherapy and actual treatments received for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Changes will include hormonal therapy alone, hormonal therapy plus chemotherapy, and changes in types of chemotherapy if chemotherapy was recommended before and after the test. Secondary objectives will be to elicit information on investigators' confidence in the recommendations before and after the test, and by cancer recurrence risk groups, rate of chemotherapy related adverse events stratified by administration of chemotherapy, and patients' decisional conflict status, anxiety levels, and functional status before and after Prosigna results.

Multicentric prospective study. Prosigna will be performed on operative piece for all consecutively postmenopausal women matching the inclusion criteria and having signed an informed consent. Data on patient demographics, disease status, intended cancer-specific postoperative management before and after the test, tests results, investigators and patients' confidence in the treatment and in the test, will be recorded in the inclusion visit, after the tests results and 6 month post-assay.

Inclusion criteria: Postmenopausal patients with resected node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative (by the local laboratory) early-stage invasive breast cancer (T1-T2, N0, pN0 (i+), pN1 (micrometastatic), M0), able to give consent, eligible for treatment of breast cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy and with ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.

Statistical methods: The clinical and demographic characteristics of the study sample will be described using mean, median, standard deviation, and range for continuous/ordinal variables and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. Bivariate plots and crosstabs will be performed to inspect bivariate associations between variables. The proportion of patients for whom the physicians' choice of treatment changed from baseline to follow-up will be calculated along with the 95% confidence interval. The change in investigator confidence in treatment recommendations before and after Prosigna results were known will be analyzed by calculating the mean and 95% CI for the question regarding whether a physician is more confidence in treatment recommendation after ordering Prosigna.

47 patients have been included on 200 scheduled.

Citation Format: Lerebours F, Hequet D, Guinebretière J-M, Roulot A, Callens C, Gentien D, Penault-LLorca F, Zilberman S, Salmon R, Foa C, Berseneff H, Huchon C, Katz G, MacDonald M, Morel P, Bieche I, Dubot C, Rouzier R. DI study: Decision impact of the NanoString® Technologies Prosigna™ in early breast cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-03-02.

A phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) supported by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy: the Multicentric TAXIF II study

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is an effective salvage treatment of germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients. In the first salvage setting, 30%-70% of patients may achieve durable remissions. Even when HDCT is administered as subsequent salvage treatment, up to 20% of patients may still be definitively cured. However, patients with refractory/relapsed disease still have a very poor long-term prognosis, requiring earlier intervention of HDCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial was addressed to nonrefractory patients failing Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria included seminomatous GCT in relapse after two lines of chemotherapy, nonseminomatous GCT in relapse after first or second lines, partial remission after first line, primary mediastinal GCT in first relapse. Patients received two cycles combining Epirubicin and Paclitaxel (Epi-Tax), followed by three consecutive HDCT, one using a Paclitaxel/Thiotepa (Thio-Tax) association and two using the 5-day Ifosfamide-Carboplatin-Etoposide regimen. The main objective was to determine the complete response rate.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included between September 2004 and December 2007: 44 received the first HDCT cycle, 39 two HDCT cycles, 29 could receive the whole protocol. Sixteen patients did not receive the entire protocol, including eight (17.7%) for toxic side-effects. Two patients (4.4%) died of toxicities, and 17 (37.7%) of disease progression. With a median follow-up time of 26 months (range, 4-51), the final overall response rate was 48.8% (including a complete response rate of 15.5% and a partial response/negative serum markers rate of 26.6%) in an intent-to-treat analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 22 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2-not reached] and 32 months (95% CI 4-49), respectively. The 2-year PFS was a plateau setup at 50% (95% CI 32-67) and the 2-year OS was 66% (95% CI 44-81).

CONCLUSION

The TAXIF II protocol was effective in nonrefractory GCT patients failing Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The toxic death rate remained acceptable in the field of HDCT regimens.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00231582.

Abstract OT3-1-10: ASTER 70s (UNICANCER phase III trial): Is personalized adjuvant treatment for women over 70 with luminal breast cancer the way to go?

Background

The question of the additional benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) compared to hormonal therapy alone (HT) for women &gt;70 with ER+ / HER2- breast cancer (BC) and aggressive characteristics is still unsolved. This trial compares the impact of both strategies on overall survival (OS).

Trial design

Following surgery, ∼2,000 patients will have a Genomic Grade (GG) centrally performed on FFPE specimens. Those with a high or equivocal GG will be randomized HT alone vs HT+CT. Patients with low GG will be followed as an observational cohort. The study, on-going in France since April 2012, has been recently activated in Belgium.

Eligibility criteria

Any ER+ HER2- BC after complete surgery, M0, any pT or pN. Normal organ functions. No specific BC treatment before surgery. Contralateral BC, invasive BC after ductal carcinoma in situ and isolated local invasive relapse when adjuvant systemic treatment is considered are all eligible. Multifocal or bilateral are eligible according to focus with worst GG. The G8 screening tool is used as stratification criteria for randomization.

Specific aims

OS (all deaths) is the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives include competing events, cost-effectiveness and Q-TWiST analysis, geriatric dimension, acceptability/willingness and health-related quality of life including specific ELD15. The Lee's 4-year mortality score is calculated. Translational research will focus on prognostic biomarkers and pharmacogenetic, investigating also the impact of treatments on putative ageing biomarkers as CRAMP, stathmin, EF-1α and chitinase and telomeres length.

Statistical methods

Sample size based on 4-year OS (87.5 vs 80%), bilateral test, α = 0.05, β = 0.20 and HR = 0.60.

In total, 129 events are expected, requiring 340 patients/arm. Considering those lost to follow-up, ∼700 patients in total should be included (5 extra patients/year).

Present accrual and target accrual

As of May 2013, 43 centres have included 406 Patients aged 70-88.

Only 14 GG evaluations were not performed for the following reasons: Patients consent withdrawal (n = 3), tumour block not available for the GG test (n = 5), CT not a treatment option anymore (patients or investigator's decision) (n = 2) or tumour status (ER+/HER2-) not confirmed by central review (n = 4). 8 GG evaluations are on-going.

Of 384 cases with GG report, 160 (42%), 151 (39%) and 65 (17%) were respectively GG-1 (low risk), GG-3 (high risk) and GG-EQ (equivocal); 8 (2%) tests failed for technical reasons. The proportion of high GG in the study (53%) is similar to those observed in previous studies in general BC populations (40% to 60%).

Of 216 GG-3/-EQ cases, 4 were not randomized because of distant metastases detected during extensive work-up (n = 3) and Patient refusal of CT treatment before randomization (n = 1). Five randomizations are on-going.

GG determination was obtained in 384 leading to randomization in 207, totalizing so far 30% of the projected recruitment for the primary objective. This confirms the feasibility of such multicentre strategic program with an innovative prognostic signature in the elderly BC population.

Contact information

c-orsini@unicancer.fr.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT3-1-10.