151
|
Tang X, Li X, Ding Y, Song M, Bu Y. The pace of artificial intelligence innovations: Speed, talent, and trial-and-error. J Informetr 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
152
|
Guo S, Yu X, Okan O. Moving Health Literacy Research and Practice towards a Vision of Equity, Precision and Transparency. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E7650. [PMID: 33092206 PMCID: PMC7589069 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, health literacy research has gained increasing attention in global health initiatives to reduce health disparities. While it is well-documented that health literacy is associated with health outcomes, most findings are generated from cross-sectional data. Along with the increasing importance of health literacy in policy, there is a lack of specificity and transparency about how to improve health literacy in practice. In this study, we are calling for a shift of current research paradigms from judging health literacy levels towards observing how health literacy skills are developed over the life course and practised in the real world. This includes using a life-course approach, integrating the rationale of precision public health, applying open science practice, and promoting actionable knowledge translation strategies. We show how a greater appreciation for these paradigms promises to advance health literacy research and practice towards an equitable, precise, transparent, and actionable vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuaijun Guo
- Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Xiaoming Yu
- Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
| | - Orkan Okan
- Centre for Prevention and Intervention in Childhood and Adolescence (CPI), Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Valdez D, Vorland CJ, Brown AW, Mayo-Wilson E, Otten J, Ball R, Grant S, Levy R, Svetina Valdivia D, Allison DB. Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research. F1000Res 2020; 9:1235. [PMID: 33628434 PMCID: PMC7898357 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.26594.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: As part of a coordinated effort to expand research activity around rigor, reproducibility, and transparency (RRT) across scientific disciplines, a team of investigators at the Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington hosted a workshop in October 2019 with international leaders to discuss key opportunities for RRT research. Objective: The workshop aimed to identify research priorities and opportunities related to RRT. Design: Over two-days, workshop attendees gave presentations and participated in three working groups: (1) Improving Education & Training in RRT, (2) Reducing Statistical Errors and Increasing Analytic Transparency, and (3) Looking Outward: Increasing Truthfulness and Accuracy of Research Communications. Following small-group discussions, the working groups presented their findings, and participants discussed the research opportunities identified. The investigators compiled a list of research priorities, which were circulated to all participants for feedback. Results: Participants identified the following priority research questions: (1) Can RRT-focused statistics and mathematical modeling courses improve statistics practice?; (2) Can specialized training in scientific writing improve transparency?; (3) Does modality (e.g. face to face, online) affect the efficacy RRT-related education?; (4) How can automated programs help identify errors more efficiently?; (5) What is the prevalence and impact of errors in scientific publications (e.g., analytic inconsistencies, statistical errors, and other objective errors)?; (6) Do error prevention workflows reduce errors?; (7) How do we encourage post-publication error correction?; (8) How does 'spin' in research communication affect stakeholder understanding and use of research evidence?; (9) Do tools to aid writing research reports increase comprehensiveness and clarity of research reports?; and (10) Is it possible to inculcate scientific values and norms related to truthful, rigorous, accurate, and comprehensive scientific reporting? Conclusion: Participants identified important and relatively unexplored questions related to improving RRT. This list may be useful to the scientific community and investigators seeking to advance meta-science (i.e. research on research).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny Valdez
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, 47403, USA
| | - Colby J. Vorland
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, 47403, USA
| | - Andrew W. Brown
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, 47403, USA
| | - Evan Mayo-Wilson
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, 47403, USA
| | - Justin Otten
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, 47403, USA
| | - Richard Ball
- Project TIER, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania, 19041, USA
| | - Sean Grant
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, 46223, USA
| | - Rachel Levy
- Rachel Levy, Mathematical Association of America, 1529 18th St. NW, Washington, DC, 20036, USA
| | | | - David B. Allison
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, 47403, USA
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Haddaway NR, Akl EA, Page MJ, Welch VA, Keenan C, Lotfi T. Open synthesis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 126:184-191. [PMID: 32621854 PMCID: PMC7328560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
•Open Science principles are vital for ensuring reproducibility, trust, and legacy. •Evidence synthesis is a vital means of summarizing research for decision-making. •Open Synthesis is the application of Open Science principles to evidence synthesis. •Open approaches to planning, conducting, and reporting synthesis have many benefits. •We call on the evidence synthesis community to embrace Open Synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal R Haddaway
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, Stockholm, Sweden; African Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; The SEI Centre of the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence, Stockholm, Sweden; Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HE&I), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; The Global Evidence Synthesis Initiative (GESI) Secretariat, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Matthew J Page
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vivian A Welch
- Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Campbell Collaboration, Oslo, Norway; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa
| | - Ciara Keenan
- Campbell UK and Ireland, Belfast, UK; Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Tamara Lotfi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HE&I), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; The Global Evidence Synthesis Initiative (GESI) Secretariat, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Bouter LM, Riet GT. Replication Research Series-Paper 2 : Empirical research must be replicated before its findings can be trusted. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 129:188-190. [PMID: 32987164 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lex M Bouter
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Gerben Ter Riet
- Urban Vitality Centre of Expertise, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Tafelbergweg 51, 1105 BD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Zečević K, Houghton C, Noone C, Lee H, Matvienko-Sikar K, Toomey E. Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study. HRB Open Res 2020; 3:56. [PMID: 33537552 PMCID: PMC7836032 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13119.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: There is a growing global movement towards open science and ensuring that health research is more transparent. It is vital that the researchers are adequately prepared for this research environment from early in their careers. However, the barriers and enablers to practicing open science for early career researchers (ECRs) have been explored to a limited extent. This study aimed to explore the views, experiences and factors influencing open science practices amongst ECRs working in health research. Methods: Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of ECRs working in health research. Participants also completed surveys regarding the factors influencing open science practices. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data and descriptive statistical analyses were used to analyse survey data. Results: 14 ECRs participated. Two main themes were identified from interview data; Valuing Open Science and Creating a Culture for Open Science. Within 'Valuing Open Science', participants spoke about the conceptualisation of open science to be open across the entire research cycle, and important for producing better and more impactful research for patients and the public. Within 'Creating a Culture of Open Science' participants spoke about a number of factors influencing their practice of open science. These included cultural and academic pressures, the positives and negatives of increased accountability and transparency, and the need for more training and supporting resources to facilitate open science practices. Conclusion: ECRs see the importance of open science for beneficially impacting patient and public health but many feel that they are not fully supported to practice open science. Resources and supports including education and training are needed, as are better incentives for open science activities. Crucially, tangible engagement from institutions, funders and researchers is needed to facilitate the development of an open science culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ksenija Zečević
- Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Chris Noone
- School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Hopin Lee
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | - Elaine Toomey
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Bielczyk NZ, Ando A, Badhwar A, Caldinelli C, Gao M, Haugg A, Hernandez LM, Ito KL, Kessler D, Lurie D, Makary MM, Nikolaidis A, Veldsman M, Allen C, Bankston A, Bottenhorn KL, Braukmann R, Calhoun V, Cheplygina V, Boffino CC, Ercan E, Finc K, Foo H, Khatibi A, La C, Mehler DMA, Narayanan S, Poldrack RA, Raamana PR, Salo T, Godard-Sebillotte C, Uddin LQ, Valeriani D, Valk SL, Walton CC, Ward PGD, Yanes JA, Zhou X. Effective Self-Management for Early Career Researchers in the Natural and Life Sciences. Neuron 2020; 106:212-217. [PMID: 32325057 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Early career researchers (ECRs) are faced with a range of competing pressures in academia, making self-management key to building a successful career. The Organization for Human Brain Mapping undertook a group effort to gather helpful advice for ECRs in self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Z Bielczyk
- Stichting Solaris Onderzoek en Ontwikkeling, Veldstraat 48, 6533 CD Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Welcome Solutions, Veldstraat 48, 6533 CD Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Ayaka Ando
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Blumenstrasse 8, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - AmanPreet Badhwar
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), 4545 Queen Mary Rd, Quebec H3W 1W6, Canada; Université de Montréal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Chiara Caldinelli
- Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Mengxia Gao
- The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, The Hong Kong Jockey Club Building for Interdisciplinary Research, 5 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong
| | - Amelie Haugg
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Lenggstrasse 31, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland; Zurich Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leanna M Hernandez
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 660 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Kaori L Ito
- Neural Plasticity and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar Street, CSC 133, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Dan Kessler
- Departments of Statistics and Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Dan Lurie
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94702, USA
| | - Meena M Makary
- Systems and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - Aki Nikolaidis
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY 10022, USA
| | - Michele Veldsman
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 30 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3052, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher Allen
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Maindy Road, CUBRIC, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, UK
| | - Adriana Bankston
- Future of Research, 82 Wendell Avenue, STE 100, Pittsfield, MA 01201, USA
| | - Katherine L Bottenhorn
- Department of Psychology, Florida International University, 8th Street, DM 256 Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | | | - Vince Calhoun
- Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, 55 Park Pl, 18th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Veronika Cheplygina
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Postbus 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Catarina Costa Boffino
- Institute of Psychiatry & Department of Radiology, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785 - Cerqueira César - CEP: 01060-970 São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ece Ercan
- C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, C3Q, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Karolina Finc
- Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Wileńska 4, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
| | - Heidi Foo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA) School of Psychiatry Level 1, AGSM (G27) Gate 11, Botany Street UNSW NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ali Khatibi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Christian La
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, 780 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - David M A Mehler
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A9, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Sridar Narayanan
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Russell A Poldrack
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Pradeep Reddy Raamana
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, 3560 Bathurst St., Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Taylor Salo
- Department of Psychology, Florida International University, 8th Street, DM 256 Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Claire Godard-Sebillotte
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montreal, Quebec H3S 1Z1, Canada
| | - Lucina Q Uddin
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Davide Valeriani
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Sofie L Valk
- Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Wilhelm-Johnen Strasse, 52425 Juelich, Germany; Otto Hahn group Cognitive Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science, Juelich, Germany
| | - Courtney C Walton
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Sir Fred Schonell Dr, St Lucia QLD 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Phillip G D Ward
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, 770 Blackburn Rd, Monash University, 3800, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julio A Yanes
- Department of Psychology, Auburn University, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Xinqi Zhou
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 2006, Xiyuan Ave, West Hi-Tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | | |
Collapse
|
158
|
The motivation for citizens' involvement in life sciences research is predicted by age and gender. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0237140. [PMID: 32745131 PMCID: PMC7398498 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Open Science is an umbrella term encompassing multiple concepts as open access to publications, open data, open education and citizen science that aim to make science more open and transparent. Citizen science, an important facet of Open Science, actively involves non-scientists in the research process, and can potentially be beneficial for multiple actors, such as scientists, citizens, policymakers and society in general. However, the reasons that motivate different segments of the public to participate in research are still understudied. Therefore, based on data gathered from a survey conducted in Czechia, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK (N = 5,870), this study explores five types of incentives that can motivate individuals to become involved in life sciences research. The results demonstrate that men and younger individuals are more persuaded by extrinsic motives (external benefits or rewards), as compared with women and older people, who are driven by intrinsic motives (that originates from within an individual). This paper shows that specific strata of the population are differentially motivated to engage in research, thereby providing relevant knowledge for effectively designing public involvement activities that target various groups of the public in research projects.
Collapse
|
159
|
Culina A, van den Berg I, Evans S, Sánchez-Tójar A. Low availability of code in ecology: A call for urgent action. PLoS Biol 2020; 18:e3000763. [PMID: 32722681 PMCID: PMC7386629 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Access to analytical code is essential for transparent and reproducible research. We review the state of code availability in ecology using a random sample of 346 nonmolecular articles published between 2015 and 2019 under mandatory or encouraged code-sharing policies. Our results call for urgent action to increase code availability: only 27% of eligible articles were accompanied by code. In contrast, data were available for 79% of eligible articles, highlighting that code availability is an important limiting factor for computational reproducibility in ecology. Although the percentage of ecological journals with mandatory or encouraged code-sharing policies has increased considerably, from 15% in 2015 to 75% in 2020, our results show that code-sharing policies are not adhered to by most authors. We hope these results will encourage journals, institutions, funding agencies, and researchers to address this alarming situation. Publication of the analytical code underlying a scientific study is increasingly expected or even mandated by journals, allowing others to reproduce the results. However, a survey of more than 300 recently published ecology papers finds the majority have no code publicly available, handicapping efforts to improve scientific transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antica Culina
- Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, NIOO-KNAW, Wageningen, the Netherlands
- * E-mail: (AC); (AST)
| | - Ilona van den Berg
- Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, NIOO-KNAW, Wageningen, the Netherlands
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Evans
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- * E-mail: (AC); (AST)
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Kohl SH, Mehler DMA, Lührs M, Thibault RT, Konrad K, Sorger B. The Potential of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Neurofeedback-A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Best Practice. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:594. [PMID: 32848528 PMCID: PMC7396619 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The effects of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-neurofeedback on brain activation and behaviors have been studied extensively in the past. More recently, researchers have begun to investigate the effects of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback (fNIRS-neurofeedback). FNIRS is a functional neuroimaging technique based on brain hemodynamics, which is easy to use, portable, inexpensive, and has reduced sensitivity to movement artifacts. Method: We provide the first systematic review and database of fNIRS-neurofeedback studies, synthesizing findings from 22 peer-reviewed studies (including a total of N = 441 participants; 337 healthy, 104 patients). We (1) give a comprehensive overview of how fNIRS-neurofeedback training protocols were implemented, (2) review the online signal-processing methods used, (3) evaluate the quality of studies using pre-set methodological and reporting quality criteria and also present statistical sensitivity/power analyses, (4) investigate the effectiveness of fNIRS-neurofeedback in modulating brain activation, and (5) review its effectiveness in changing behavior in healthy and pathological populations. Results and discussion: (1–2) Published studies are heterogeneous (e.g., neurofeedback targets, investigated populations, applied training protocols, and methods). (3) Large randomized controlled trials are still lacking. In view of the novelty of the field, the quality of the published studies is moderate. We identified room for improvement in reporting important information and statistical power to detect realistic effects. (4) Several studies show that people can regulate hemodynamic signals from cortical brain regions with fNIRS-neurofeedback and (5) these studies indicate the feasibility of modulating motor control and prefrontal brain functioning in healthy participants and ameliorating symptoms in clinical populations (stroke, ADHD, autism, and social anxiety). However, valid conclusions about specificity or potential clinical utility are premature. Conclusion: Due to the advantages of practicability and relatively low cost, fNIRS-neurofeedback might provide a suitable and powerful alternative to EEG and fMRI neurofeedback and has great potential for clinical translation of neurofeedback. Together with more rigorous research and reporting practices, further methodological improvements may lead to a more solid understanding of fNIRS-neurofeedback. Future research will benefit from exploiting the advantages of fNIRS, which offers unique opportunities for neurofeedback research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon H Kohl
- JARA-Institute Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.,Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - David M A Mehler
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Lührs
- Brain Innovation B.V., Research Department, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Robert T Thibault
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.,MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kerstin Konrad
- JARA-Institute Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.,Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Bettina Sorger
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Beck MW, O’Hara C, Stewart Lowndes JS, D. Mazor R, Theroux S, J. Gillett D, Lane B, Gearheart G. The importance of open science for biological assessment of aquatic environments. PeerJ 2020; 8:e9539. [PMID: 32742805 PMCID: PMC7377246 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Open science principles that seek to improve science can effectively bridge the gap between researchers and environmental managers. However, widespread adoption has yet to gain traction for the development and application of bioassessment products. At the core of this philosophy is the concept that research should be reproducible and transparent, in addition to having long-term value through effective data preservation and sharing. In this article, we review core open science concepts that have recently been adopted in the ecological sciences and emphasize how adoption can benefit the field of bioassessment for both prescriptive condition assessments and proactive applications that inform environmental management. An example from the state of California demonstrates effective adoption of open science principles through data stewardship, reproducible research, and engagement of stakeholders with multimedia applications. We also discuss technical, sociocultural, and institutional challenges for adopting open science, including practical approaches for overcoming these hurdles in bioassessment applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus W. Beck
- Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA, USA
- Tampa Bay Estuary Program, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
| | - Casey O’Hara
- Bren School of Environmental Sciences & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | | | - Raphael D. Mazor
- Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA, USA
| | - Susanna Theroux
- Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA, USA
| | - David J. Gillett
- Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA, USA
| | - Belize Lane
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
162
|
Kimathi E, Tonnang HEZ, Subramanian S, Cressman K, Abdel-Rahman EM, Tesfayohannes M, Niassy S, Torto B, Dubois T, Tanga CM, Kassie M, Ekesi S, Mwangi D, Kelemu S. Prediction of breeding regions for the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria in East Africa. Sci Rep 2020; 10:11937. [PMID: 32686749 PMCID: PMC7371632 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68895-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Desert locust outbreak in East Africa is threatening livelihoods, food security, environment, and economic development in the region. The current magnitude of the desert locust invasion in East Africa is unprecedented and has not been witnessed for more than 70 years. Identifying the potential breeding sites of the pest is essential to carry out cost-effective and timely preventive measures before it inflicts significant damage. We accessed 9,134 desert locust occurrence records and applied a machine-learning algorithm to predict potential desert locust breeding sites in East Africa using key bio-climatic (temperature and rainfall) and edaphic (sand and moisture contents) factors. Ten days greenness maps from February 2020 to April 2020 were overlaid in model outputs to illustrate the temporal evolution of breeding site locations. This study demonstrated that vast areas of Kenya and Sudan, north eastern regions of Uganda, and south eastern and northern regions of South Sudan are at high risk of providing a conducive breeding environment for the desert locust. Our prediction results suggest that there is need to target these high-risk areas and strengthen ground surveillance to manage the pest in a timely, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kimathi
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Henri E Z Tonnang
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Sevgan Subramanian
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Keith Cressman
- Food and Agricultural Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153, Rome, Italy
| | - Elfatih M Abdel-Rahman
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mehari Tesfayohannes
- Desert Locust Control Organization for Eastern Africa, P.O. Box 30023-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Saliou Niassy
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Baldwyn Torto
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Thomas Dubois
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Chrysantus M Tanga
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Menale Kassie
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sunday Ekesi
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - David Mwangi
- Plant Protection Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, P.O. Box 34188-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Segenet Kelemu
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Spitschan M, Schmidt MH, Blume C. Transparency and open science principles in reporting guidelines in sleep research and chronobiology journals. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5:172. [PMID: 33748432 PMCID: PMC7941095 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16111.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: "Open science" is an umbrella term describing various aspects of transparent and open science practices. The adoption of practices at different levels of the scientific process (e.g., individual researchers, laboratories, institutions) has been rapidly changing the scientific research landscape in the past years, but their uptake differs from discipline to discipline. Here, we asked to what extent journals in the field of sleep research and chronobiology encourage or even require following transparent and open science principles in their author guidelines. Methods: We scored the author guidelines of a comprehensive set of 28 sleep and chronobiology journals, including the major outlets in the field, using the standardised Transparency and Openness (TOP) Factor. This instrument rates the extent to which journals encourage or require following various aspects of open science, including data citation, data transparency, analysis code transparency, materials transparency, design and analysis guidelines, study pre-registration, analysis plan pre-registration, replication, registered reports, and the use of open science badges. Results: Across the 28 journals, we find low values on the TOP Factor (median [25 th, 75 th percentile] 2.5 [1, 3], min. 0, max. 9, out of a total possible score of 28) in sleep research and chronobiology journals. Conclusions: Our findings suggest an opportunity for sleep research and chronobiology journals to further support the recent developments in transparent and open science by implementing transparency and openness principles in their guidelines and making adherence to them mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Spitschan
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel (UPK), Basel, Switzerland
- Transfaculty Research Platform Molecular and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marlene H. Schmidt
- Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel (UPK), Basel, Switzerland
- Transfaculty Research Platform Molecular and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christine Blume
- Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel (UPK), Basel, Switzerland
- Transfaculty Research Platform Molecular and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Mehler DMA, Williams AN, Whittaker JR, Krause F, Lührs M, Kunas S, Wise RG, Shetty HGM, Turner DL, Linden DEJ. Graded fMRI Neurofeedback Training of Motor Imagery in Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Patients: A Preregistered Proof-of-Concept Study. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:226. [PMID: 32760259 PMCID: PMC7373077 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), a major brain vessel that supplies the primary motor and premotor cortex, is one of the most common causes for severe upper limb impairment. Currently available motor rehabilitation training largely lacks satisfying efficacy with over 70% of stroke survivors showing residual upper limb dysfunction. Motor imagery-based functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (fMRI-NF) has been suggested as a potential therapeutic technique to improve motor impairment in stroke survivors. In this preregistered proof-of-concept study (https://osf.io/y69jc/), we translated graded fMRI-NF training, a new paradigm that we have previously studied in healthy participants, to first-time MCA stroke survivors with residual mild to severe impairment of upper limb motor function. Neurofeedback was provided from the supplementary motor area (SMA) targeting two different neurofeedback target levels (low and high). We hypothesized that MCA stroke survivors will show (1) sustained SMA-region of interest (ROI) activation and (2) a difference in SMA-ROI activation between low and high neurofeedback conditions during graded fMRI-NF training. At the group level, we found only anecdotal evidence for these preregistered hypotheses. At the individual level, we found anecdotal to moderate evidence for the absence of the hypothesized graded effect for most subjects. These null findings are relevant for future attempts to employ fMRI-NF training in stroke survivors. The study introduces a Bayesian sequential sampling plan, which incorporates prior knowledge, yielding higher sensitivity. The sampling plan was preregistered together with a priori hypotheses and all planned analysis before data collection to address potential publication/researcher biases. Unforeseen difficulties in the translation of our paradigm to a clinical setting required some deviations from the preregistered protocol. We explicitly detail these changes, discuss the accompanied additional challenges that can arise in clinical neurofeedback studies, and formulate recommendations for how these can be addressed. Taken together, this work provides new insights about the feasibility of motor imagery-based graded fMRI-NF training in MCA stroke survivors and serves as a first example for comprehensive study preregistration of an (fMRI) neurofeedback experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. A. Mehler
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Angharad N. Williams
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Max Planck Adaptive Memory Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Joseph R. Whittaker
- School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Florian Krause
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Michael Lührs
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Research Department, Brain Innovation B.V., Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Kunas
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Richard G. Wise
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, D'Annunzio University of Chieti–Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Duncan L. Turner
- School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David E. J. Linden
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, Coriat AM, Foeger N, Dirnagl U. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol 2020; 18:e3000737. [PMID: 32673304 DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/m9abx] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
For knowledge to benefit research and society, it must be trustworthy. Trustworthy research is robust, rigorous, and transparent at all stages of design, execution, and reporting. Assessment of researchers still rarely includes considerations related to trustworthiness, rigor, and transparency. We have developed the Hong Kong Principles (HKPs) as part of the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity with a specific focus on the need to drive research improvement through ensuring that researchers are explicitly recognized and rewarded for behaviors that strengthen research integrity. We present five principles: responsible research practices; transparent reporting; open science (open research); valuing a diversity of types of research; and recognizing all contributions to research and scholarly activity. For each principle, we provide a rationale for its inclusion and provide examples where these principles are already being adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lex Bouter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Glasziou
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mai Har Sham
- School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | | | - Nicole Foeger
- Austrian Agency for Research Integrity, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrich Dirnagl
- Berlin Institute of Health, QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, Coriat AM, Foeger N, Dirnagl U. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol 2020; 18:e3000737. [PMID: 32673304 PMCID: PMC7365391 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
For knowledge to benefit research and society, it must be trustworthy. Trustworthy research is robust, rigorous, and transparent at all stages of design, execution, and reporting. Assessment of researchers still rarely includes considerations related to trustworthiness, rigor, and transparency. We have developed the Hong Kong Principles (HKPs) as part of the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity with a specific focus on the need to drive research improvement through ensuring that researchers are explicitly recognized and rewarded for behaviors that strengthen research integrity. We present five principles: responsible research practices; transparent reporting; open science (open research); valuing a diversity of types of research; and recognizing all contributions to research and scholarly activity. For each principle, we provide a rationale for its inclusion and provide examples where these principles are already being adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lex Bouter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Glasziou
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mai Har Sham
- School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | | | - Nicole Foeger
- Austrian Agency for Research Integrity, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrich Dirnagl
- Berlin Institute of Health, QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Wyatt TD. Reproducible research into human chemical communication by cues and pheromones: learning from psychology's renaissance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2020; 375:20190262. [PMID: 32306877 PMCID: PMC7209928 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the lack of evidence that the 'putative human pheromones' androstadienone and estratetraenol ever were pheromones, almost 60 studies have claimed 'significant' results. These are quite possibly false positives and can be best seen as potential examples of the 'reproducibility crisis', sadly common in the rest of the life and biomedical sciences, which has many instances of whole fields based on false positives. Experiments on the effects of olfactory cues on human behaviour are also at risk of false positives because they look for subtle effects but use small sample sizes. Research on human chemical communication, much of it falling within psychology, would benefit from vigorously adopting the proposals made by psychologists to enable better, more reliable science, with an emphasis on enhancing reproducibility. A key change is the adoption of study pre-registration and/or Registered Reports which will also reduce publication bias. As we are mammals, and chemical communication is important to other mammals, it is likely that chemical cues are important in our behaviour and that humans may have pheromones, but new approaches will be needed to reliably demonstrate them. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Olfactory communication in humans'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristram D Wyatt
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Nicholas D, Herman E, Jamali HR, Abrizah A, Boukacem-Zeghmouri C, Xu J, Rodríguez-Bravo B, Watkinson A, Polezhaeva T, Świgon M. Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world: An international study. RESEARCH EVALUATION 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvaa004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The study Investigates the attitudes and practices of early career researchers (ECRs) in regard to citation-based metrics and altmetrics, providing the findings in the light of what might be expected of the millennial generation and in the context of what we already know about researchers in today’s ‘culture of counting’ governed scholarly world. The data were gathered by means of an international survey, informed by a preceding, 3-year qualitative study of 120 ECRs from 7 countries, which obtained 1,600 responses. The main conclusions are: 1, citation indicators play a central and multi-purpose role in scholarly communications; 2, altmetrics are not so popular or widely used, but ECRs are waking up to some of their merits, most notably, discovering the extent to which their papers obtain traction and monitoring impact; 3, there is a strong likelihood that ECRs are going to have to grapple with both citation-based metrics and altmetrics, mainly in order to demonstrate research impact; 4, the Chinese are the most metric using nation, largely because of governmental regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eti Herman
- CIBER Research Ltd, Newbury, Berkshire RG147RU, UK
| | - Hamid R Jamali
- School of Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
| | - Abdullah Abrizah
- Department of Library & Information Science, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | | | - Jie Xu
- School of Information Management, Wuhan, University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
| | - Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo
- Biblioteconomía y Documentación, Universidad de León, León, 24071 Castilla y León, Spain
| | | | - Tatiana Polezhaeva
- Tomsk State University, Laboratory for Library and Communication Studies, Tomsk, Russia
| | - Marzena Świgon
- Wydział Humanistyczny, Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Borg DN, Bon JJ, Sainani KL, Baguley BJ, Tierney NJ, Drovandi C. Comment on: 'Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices'. Sports Med 2020; 50:1551-1553. [PMID: 32447716 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01298-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David N Borg
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Joshua J Bon
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Australian Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kristin L Sainani
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brenton J Baguley
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Tierney
- Australian Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher Drovandi
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Australian Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
|
171
|
|
172
|
Larson MJ. Improving the Rigor and Replicability of Applied Psychophysiology Research: Sample Size, Standardization, Transparency, and Preregistration. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.5298/1081-5937-48.1.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Scientific research across a number of areas, including applied psychophysiology, biofeedback, and neurofeedback, is facing considerable scrutiny for poor replication rates, high numbers of false-positive findings, and insufficient scientific rigor. There are many factors underlying this replication crisis in scientific research; yet incentives for more rigorous research practices at the institutional and editorial levels lag behind the need for improvement. The author provides examples of replication and rigor difficulties in scientific research with an eye toward psychophysiological research, including researcher flexibility in data analysis, “p-hacking,” insufficient sample sizes, and lack of availability and implementation of rigorous methodological and publication guidelines. Subsequently, the author highlights examples and opportunities for improvement, including decreasing researcher flexibility, reporting sample size information, increasing sample sizes through collaboration, improving reporting standards/following established guidelines for reporting psychophysiological data, and increasing adoption of preregistration and registered reports. The author concludes that the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (AAPB) can improve clinical practice and perception of public and scientific credibility by implementing rigorous and transparent research practices with a focus on replicability and clear methodological and reporting techniques and standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Larson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Clarke P, Buckell J, Barnett A. Registered Reports: Time to Radically Rethink Peer Review in Health Economics. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2020; 4:1-4. [PMID: 31975349 PMCID: PMC7018878 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-00190-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Clarke
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
| | - John Buckell
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Adrian Barnett
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Angeler DG, Allen CR, Carnaval A. Convergence science in the Anthropocene: Navigating the known and unknown. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David G. Angeler
- Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
- School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska – Lincoln Lincoln NE USA
| | - Craig R. Allen
- Center for Resilience in Working Agricultural Landscapes University of Nebraska – Lincoln Lincoln NE USA
| | - Ana Carnaval
- Department of Biology The City College of New York New York NY USA
- The Graduate Center of the City University of New York New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Nicholas D, Jamali HR, Herman E, Watkinson A, Abrizah A, Rodríguez‐Bravo B, Boukacem‐Zeghmouri C, Xu J, Świgoń M, Polezhaeva T. A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers. LEARNED PUBLISHING 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/leap.1286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Nicholas
- Laboratory for Library and Communication Studies Tomsk State University Tomsk Russia
| | - Hamid R. Jamali
- School of Information Studies Charles Sturt University Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga NSW 2678 Australia
| | - Eti Herman
- CIBER Research Ltd. Newbury, Berkshire RG147RU UK
| | | | - Abdullah Abrizah
- Department of Library and Information Science University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur 50603 Malaysia
| | | | | | - Jie Xu
- School of Information Management Wuhan, University Wuhan Hubei 430072 China
| | - Marzena Świgoń
- Instytut Dziennikarstwa i Komunikacji Społecznej, Wydział Humanistyczny Uniwersytet Warmińsko‐Mazurski 10‐719, Olsztyn Poland
| | - Tatiana Polezhaeva
- Laboratory for Library and Communication Studies Tomsk State University Tomsk Russia
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Morrison AB, Richmond LL. Offloading items from memory: individual differences in cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS 2020; 5:1. [PMID: 31900685 PMCID: PMC6942100 DOI: 10.1186/s41235-019-0201-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive offloading refers to the act of reducing the mental processing requirements of a task through physical actions like writing down information or storing information on a cell phone or computer. Offloading can lead to improved performance on ongoing tasks with high cognitive demand, such as tasks where multiple pieces of information must be simultaneously maintained. However, less is known about why some individuals choose to engage in offloading and under what conditions they might choose to do so. In the present study, offloading behavior is investigated in a short-term memory task requiring memory for letters. The present study is a replication and extension of a previous study conducted by Risko and Dunn, and tests the new prediction that individuals with lower working memory capacity will be more likely to offload. Here, we find that offloading information confers a performance advantage over relying on internal memory stores, particularly at higher memory loads. However, we fail to observe that those with poorer memory abilities have a greater propensity for offloading or benefit more from it. Instead, our findings suggest that cognitive offloading may be a valid compensatory strategy to improve performance of memory-based tasks for individuals with a wide range of memory ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra B Morrison
- Department of Psychology, California State University, Sacramento, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA, USA.
| | - Lauren L Richmond
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Psychology B Building, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Nicholas D, Watkinson A, Abrizah A, Rodríguez‐Bravo B, Boukacem‐Zeghmouri C, Xu J, Świgoń M, Herman E. Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research. LEARNED PUBLISHING 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/leap.1284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Nicholas
- School of Information ManagementWuhan, University Wuhan Hubei 430072 China
| | | | - Abdullah Abrizah
- Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversity of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
| | | | | | - Jie Xu
- School of Information ManagementWuhan, University Wuhan Hubei 430072 China
| | - Marzena Świgoń
- University of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynInstitute of Journalism and Social Communication, K. Obitza Str., 110‐725 Olsztyn Poland
| | - Eti Herman
- CIBER Research Ltd Newbury, Berkshire, RG147RU UK
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Van Zyl LE. Enhancing scientific credibility: An open science strategy for the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology. SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Orientation: The purpose of this editorial was to provide an introduction and a general overview of the special issue on Open Science Practices: A Vision for the Future of SAJIP, as hosted in the 45th edition of the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology (SAJIP). Specifically, the aim was to provide a viable, practical and implementable strategy for enhancing the scientific credibility, transparency and international stature of SAJIP.
Collapse
|
179
|
Allen C, Mehler DMA. Correction: Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLoS Biol 2019; 17:e3000587. [PMID: 31809497 PMCID: PMC6897396 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246.].
Collapse
|
180
|
Chin JM. Forensic science needs registered reports. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2019; 2:41-45. [PMID: 32411997 PMCID: PMC7219172 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The registered report (RR) format is rapidly being adopted by scientific researchers and journals. RRs flip the peer review process, with reviewers evaluating proposed methods, rather than the data and findings. Editors then accept or reject articles largely based on the pre-data collection review. Accordingly, RRs reduce the incentive for researchers to exaggerate their findings, and they make any data-driven changes to the methods and analysis more conspicuous. They also reduce publication bias, ensuring studies with null or otherwise unfavorable results are published. RRs are being used in many fields to improve research practices and increase confidence in study findings. The authors suggest RRs ought to be the default way in which validation studies are conducted and reported in the forensic sciences. They produce more reliable findings, advance criminal justice values, and will lead to several efficiencies in the research process.
Collapse
|
181
|
Carlson JJ, Walton SM, Basu A, Chapman RH, Campbell JD, McQueen RB, Pearson SD, Touchette DR, Veenstra D, Whittington MD, Ollendorf DA. Achieving Appropriate Model Transparency: Challenges and Potential Solutions for Making Value-Based Decisions in the United States. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:1321-1327. [PMID: 31485925 PMCID: PMC6860462 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00832-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Transparency in decision modeling remains a topic of rigorous debate among healthcare stakeholders, given tensions between the potential benefits of external access during model development and the need to protect intellectual property and reward research investments. Strategies to increase decision model transparency by allowing direct external access to a model's structure, source code, and data can take on many forms but are bounded between the status quo and free publicly available open-source models. Importantly, some level of transparency already exists in terms of methods and other technical specifications for published models. The purpose of this paper is to delineate pertinent issues surrounding efforts to increase transparency via direct access to models and to offer key considerations for the field of health economics and outcomes research moving forward from a US academic perspective. Given the current environment faced by modelers in academic settings, expected benefits and challenges of allowing direct model access are discussed. The paper also includes suggestions for pathways toward increased transparency as well as an illustrative real-world example used in work with the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review to support assessments of the value of new health interventions. Potential options to increase transparency via direct model access during model development include adequate funding to support the additional effort required and mechanisms to maintain security of the underlying intellectual property. Ultimately, the appropriate level of transparency requires balancing the interests of several groups but, if done right, has the potential to improve models and better integrate them into healthcare priority setting and decision making in the US context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh J Carlson
- Department of Pharmacy, Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Surrey M Walton
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- Department of Pharmacy, Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Steven D Pearson
- Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel R Touchette
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Veenstra
- University of Washington, Box 357630, H375 Health Science Building, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Bert B, Heinl C, Chmielewska J, Schwarz F, Grune B, Hensel A, Greiner M, Schönfelder G. Refining animal research: The Animal Study Registry. PLoS Biol 2019; 17:e3000463. [PMID: 31613875 PMCID: PMC6793840 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Animal Study Registry (ASR; www.animalstudyregistry.org) was launched in January 2019 for preregistration of animal studies in order to increase transparency and reproducibility of bioscience research and to promote animal welfare. The registry is free of charge and is designed for exploratory and confirmatory studies within applied science as well as basic and preclinical research. The registration form helps scientists plan their study thoroughly by asking detailed questions concerning study design, methods, and statistics. With registration, the study automatically receives a digital object identifier (DOI) that marks it as intellectual property of the researcher. To accommodate the researchers concerns about theft of ideas, users can restrict the visibility of their registered studies for up to 5 years. The full content of the study becomes publicly accessible at the end of the embargo period. Because the platform is embedded in the infrastructure of the German Federal Government, continuity and data security are provided. By registering a study in the ASR, researchers can show their commitment to transparency and data quality to reviewers and editors, to third-party donors, and to the general public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Bert
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany
| | - Céline Heinl
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany
| | - Justyna Chmielewska
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Schwarz
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany
| | - Barbara Grune
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Hensel
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Greiner
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department Exposure, Berlin, Germany
- University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gilbert Schönfelder
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Mertens G, Krypotos AM. Preregistration of Analyses of Preexisting Data. Psychol Belg 2019; 59:338-352. [PMID: 31497308 PMCID: PMC6706998 DOI: 10.5334/pb.493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The preregistration of a study's hypotheses, methods, and data-analyses steps is becoming a popular psychological research practice. To date, most of the discussion on study preregistration has focused on the preregistration of studies that include the collection of original data. However, much of the research in psychology relies on the (re-)analysis of preexisting data. Importantly, this type of studies is different from original studies as researchers cannot change major aspects of the study (e.g., experimental manipulations, sample size). Here, we provide arguments as to why it is useful to preregister analyses of preexisting data, discuss practical considerations, consider potential concerns, and introduce a preregistration template tailored for studies focused on the analyses of preexisting data. We argue that the preregistration of hypotheses and data-analyses for analyses of preexisting data is an important step towards more transparent psychological research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëtan Mertens
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL
| | - Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL
- Leuven Research Group on Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BE
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Reimer CB, Chen Z, Bundt C, Eben C, London RE, Vardanian S. Open Up - the Mission Statement of the Control of Impulsive Action (Ctrl-ImpAct) Lab on Open Science. Psychol Belg 2019; 59:321-337. [PMID: 31497307 PMCID: PMC6707000 DOI: 10.5334/pb.494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The present paper is the mission statement of the Control of Impulsive Action (Ctrl-ImpAct) Lab regarding Open Science. As early-career researchers (ECRs) in the lab, we first state our personal motivation to conduct research based on the principles of Open Science. We then describe how we incorporate four specific Open Science practices (i.e., Open Methodology, Open Data, Open Source, and Open Access) into our scientific workflow. In more detail, we explain how Open Science practices are embedded into the so-called 'co-pilot' system in our lab. The 'co-pilot' researcher is involved in all tasks of the 'pilot' researcher, that is designing a study, double-checking experimental and data analysis scripts, as well as writing the manuscript. The lab has set up this co-pilot system to increase transparency, reduce potential errors that could occur during the entire workflow, and to intensify collaborations between lab members. Finally, we discuss potential solutions for general problems that could arise when practicing Open Science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhang Chen
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, BE
| | - Carsten Bundt
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, BE
| | - Charlotte Eben
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, BE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
185
|
Foster KR, Simkó M, Verschaeve L. Confronting Risk of Bias in RF Bioeffects Research. Comments on Two Papers by Vijayalaxmi and Prihoda. Radiat Res 2019; 192:363-366. [PMID: 31393822 DOI: 10.1667/rr15478.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth R Foster
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Myrtill Simkó
- SciProof-International AB, Vaktpoststigen, 831 32 Östersund, Sweden
| | - Luc Verschaeve
- Service Risk and Health Impact Assessment, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Smaldino PE, Turner MA, Contreras Kallens PA. Correction to 'Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science'. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2019; 6:191249. [PMID: 31543978 PMCID: PMC6731693 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190194.].
Collapse
|
187
|
Weeks KL, Henstridge DC, Salim A, Shaw JE, Marwick TH, McMullen JR. CORP: Practical tools for improving experimental design and reporting of laboratory studies of cardiovascular physiology and metabolism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2019; 317:H627-H639. [PMID: 31347916 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00327.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The exercise consisted of: 1) a short survey to acquire baseline data on current practices regarding the conduct of animal studies, 2) a series of presentations for promoting awareness and providing advice and practical tools for improving experimental design, and 3) a follow-up survey 12 mo later to assess whether practices had changed. The surveys were compulsory for responsible investigators (n = 16; paired data presented). Other investigators named on animal ethics applications were encouraged to participate (2017, total of 36 investigators; 2018, 37 investigators). The major findings to come from the exercise included 1) a willingness of investigators to make changes when provided with knowledge/tools and solutions that were relatively simple to implement (e.g., proportion of responsible investigators showing improved practices using a structured method for randomization was 0.44, 95% CI (0.19; 0.70), P = 0.003, and deidentifying drugs/interventions was 0.40, 95% CI (0.12; 0.68), P = 0.010); 2) resistance to change if this involved more personnel and time (e.g., as required for allocation concealment); and 3) evidence that changes to long-term practices ("habits") require time and follow-up. Improved practices could be verified based on changes in reporting within publications or documented evidence provided during laboratory visits. In summary, this exercise resulted in changed attitudes, practices, and reporting, but continued follow-up, monitoring, and incentives are required. Efforts to improve experimental rigor will reduce bias and will lead to findings with the greatest translational potential.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The goal of this exercise was to encourage preclinical researchers to improve the quality of their cardiac and metabolic animal studies by 1) increasing awareness of concerns, which can arise from suboptimal experimental designs; 2) providing knowledge, tools, and templates to overcome bias; and 3) conducting two short surveys over 12 mo to monitor change. Improved practices were identified for the uptake of structured methods for randomization, and de-identifying interventions/drugs.Listen to this article's corresponding podcast at https://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/experimental-design-survey-training-practical-tools/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate L Weeks
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Agus Salim
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Julie R McMullen
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Chambers
- Professor of cognitive neuroscience at Cardiff University and co‐founder of registered reports. He is the author of The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice, and currently serves as the registered reports editor at BMJ Open Science, Collabra: Psychology, Cortex, European Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage, and Royal Society Open Science
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Smaldino PE, Turner MA, Contreras Kallens PA. Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2019; 6:190194. [PMID: 31417725 PMCID: PMC6689639 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Assessing scientists using exploitable metrics can lead to the degradation of research methods even without any strategic behaviour on the part of individuals, via 'the natural selection of bad science.' Institutional incentives to maximize metrics like publication quantity and impact drive this dynamic. Removing these incentives is necessary, but institutional change is slow. However, recent developments suggest possible solutions with more rapid onsets. These include what we call open science improvements, which can reduce publication bias and improve the efficacy of peer review. In addition, there have been increasing calls for funders to move away from prestige- or innovation-based approaches in favour of lotteries. We investigated whether such changes are likely to improve the reproducibility of science even in the presence of persistent incentives for publication quantity through computational modelling. We found that modified lotteries, which allocate funding randomly among proposals that pass a threshold for methodological rigour, effectively reduce the rate of false discoveries, particularly when paired with open science improvements that increase the publication of negative results and improve the quality of peer review. In the absence of funding that targets rigour, open science improvements can still reduce false discoveries in the published literature but are less likely to improve the overall culture of research practices that underlie those publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul E. Smaldino
- Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, USA
| | - Matthew A. Turner
- Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
190
|
Abstract
The movement towards open science is a consequence of seemingly pervasive failures to replicate previous research. This transition comes with great benefits but also significant challenges that are likely to affect those who carry out the research, usually early career researchers (ECRs). Here, we describe key benefits, including reputational gains, increased chances of publication, and a broader increase in the reliability of research. The increased chances of publication are supported by exploratory analyses indicating null findings are substantially more likely to be published via open registered reports in comparison to more conventional methods. These benefits are balanced by challenges that we have encountered and that involve increased costs in terms of flexibility, time, and issues with the current incentive structure, all of which seem to affect ECRs acutely. Although there are major obstacles to the early adoption of open science, overall open science practices should benefit both the ECR and improve the quality of research. We review 3 benefits and 3 challenges and provide suggestions from the perspective of ECRs for moving towards open science practices, which we believe scientists and institutions at all levels would do well to consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Allen
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Wales, United Kingdom
| | - David M. A. Mehler
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Wales, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
König IR. Presidential address: Six open questions to genetic epidemiologists. Genet Epidemiol 2019; 43:242-249. [PMID: 30659680 PMCID: PMC6590280 DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Given the rapid pace with which genomics and other ‐omics disciplines are evolving, it is sometimes necessary to shift down a gear to consider more general scientific questions. In this line, in my presidential address I formulate six questions for genetic epidemiologists to ponder on. These cover the areas of reproducibility, statistical significance, chance findings, precision medicine and related fields such as bioinformatics and data science. Possible hints at responses are presented to foster our further discussion of these topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inke R König
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|