2351
|
Jackisch C, Kim SB, Semiglazov V, Melichar B, Pivot X, Hillenbach C, Stroyakovskiy D, Lum BL, Elliott R, Weber HA, Ismael G. Subcutaneous versus intravenous formulation of trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer: updated results from the phase III HannaH study. Ann Oncol 2014; 26:320-5. [PMID: 25403587 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HannaH (NCT00950300) was a phase III, randomized, international, open-label study that compared pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of two different trastuzumab formulations [subcutaneous (s.c.) and intravenous (i.v.)] in HER2-positive, operable, locally advanced, or inflammatory breast cancer in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting. The co-primary end points, to show noninferiority of s.c. versus i.v. trastuzumab in terms of serum concentration (Ctrough) and pathologic complete response (pCR) were met; safety profiles were comparable at 12 months' median follow-up. Secondary end points included safety and tolerability, PK profile, immunogenicity, and event-free survival (EFS). We now report updated safety and efficacy data after a median follow-up of 20 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (N = 596) were treated with eight cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered concurrently with 3-weekly s.c. trastuzumab (fixed dose of 600 mg) or the standard weight-based i.v. method. Following surgery, patients continued trastuzumab treatment to complete 1 year of therapy. Updated analyses of PK, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity data were carried out. RESULTS s.c. trastuzumab was generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including grade 3 or 4 AEs, between treatment groups was comparable. A slightly higher incidence of serious AEs (SAEs), mainly due to infections, was reported with s.c. treatment {64 [21.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.0%-26.7%] versus 42 (14.1%; 95% CI 10.4%-18.6%) in the i.v. group}; however, the differences were small and often based on rare events, with no observable pattern across reported events. An early analysis of EFS showed rates of 95% in both groups 1 year postrandomization. Exploratory analyses did not reveal an association between toxicity and body weight or exposure. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the safety profile of s.c. trastuzumab was consistent with the previously published data from HannaH and the known safety profile of i.v. trastuzumab. EFS rates were comparable between the i.v. and s.c. groups. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT00950300.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Breast Cancer and Gynecology Cancer Center, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - S-B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - V Semiglazov
- Department of Surgery, NN Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - B Melichar
- Department of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - X Pivot
- Chemotherapy-Oncology, CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - C Hillenbach
- Department of Biopharmaceuticals, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - D Stroyakovskiy
- Chemotherapeutic Department, City Clinical Oncology Hospital 62, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - R Elliott
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, South San Francisco, USA
| | - H A Weber
- Department of Biopharmaceuticals, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G Ismael
- Hospital Amaral Carvalho, Jaú, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2352
|
Pathological non-response to chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer: an inter-institutional study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 148:511-23. [PMID: 25395316 PMCID: PMC4243004 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3192-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2014] [Accepted: 10/31/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To identify markers of non-response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) that could be used in the adjuvant setting. Sixteen pathologists of the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology reviewed the core biopsies of breast cancers treated with NAC and recorded the clinico-pathological findings (histological type and grade; estrogen, progesterone receptors, and HER2 status; Ki67; mitotic count; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; necrosis) and data regarding the pathological response in corresponding surgical resection specimens. Analyses were carried out in a cohort of 490 cases by comparing the groups of patients showing pathological complete response (pCR) and partial response (pPR) with the group of non-responders (pathological non-response: pNR). Among other parameters, the lobular histotype and the absence of inflammation were significantly more common in pNR (p < 0.001). By ROC curve analyses, cut-off values of 9 mitosis/2 mm(2) and 18% of Ki67-positive cells best discriminated the pNR and pCR + pPR categories (p = 0.018 and < 0.001, respectively). By multivariable analysis, only the cut-off value of 9 mitosis discriminated the different response categories (p = 0.036) in the entire cohort. In the Luminal B/HER2- subgroup, a mitotic count <9, although not statistically significant, showed an OR of 2.7 of pNR. A lobular histotype and the absence of inflammation were independent predictors of pNR (p = 0.024 and <0.001, respectively). Classical morphological parameters, such as lobular histotype and inflammation, confirmed their predictive value in response to NAC, particularly in the Luminal B/HER2- subgroup, which is a challenging breast cancer subtype from a therapeutic point of view. Mitotic count could represent an additional marker but has a poor positive predictive value.
Collapse
|
2353
|
Miyashita M, Sasano H, Tamaki K, Chan M, Hirakawa H, Suzuki A, Tada H, Watanabe G, Nemoto N, Nakagawa S, Ishida T, Ohuchi N. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and FOXP3+ lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: its correlation with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 148:525-34. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3197-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2014] [Accepted: 11/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
2354
|
Organic anion transporting polypeptide 2B1 expression correlates with uptake of estrone-3-sulfate and cell proliferation in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2014; 30:133-41. [PMID: 25857231 DOI: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2014.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Estrone-3-sulfate (E1S) is thought to be a major estrogen precursor in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Since E1S is a hydrophilic compound, the uptake of E1S into cancer cells is probably mediated by transporters, such as organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP, SLCO) family. In this study, we investigated the relationship between expression of OATP2B1 and cell proliferation in ER-positive breast cancer. Cell-based assays were carried out in MCF-7 cells both with and without overexpression of OATP2B1. Normal breast and tumor tissues were collected and used in this study. Cell proliferation, ER-mediated transcriptional activities and estradiol secretion were stimulated by addition of E1S to the culture medium of MCF-7 cells. These stimulatory effects were significantly greater in MCF-7 cells overexpressing OATP2B1 than in control cells. The expression level of SLCO2B1 mRNA was significantly correlated with histological grade, Ki-67 labelling index and mRNA expression of steroid sulfatase. The expression level of SLCO2B1 mRNA in luminal B-like cancers was higher than that in luminal A-like cancers. Uptake of E1S resulted in down-regulation of ERα protein and induction of Ki-67 in MCF-7 cells. The present study suggests that OATP2B1 is involved in cell proliferation by increasing the amount of estrogen in ER-positive breast cancer cells.
Collapse
|
2355
|
Hanna WM, Barnes PJ, Chang MC, Gilks CB, Magliocco AM, Rees H, Quenneville L, Robertson SJ, SenGupta SK, Nofech-Mozes S. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in primary breast cancer in the era of standardized testing: a Canadian prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3967-73. [PMID: 25385731 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.55.6092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Therapies that target overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) rely on accurate and timely assessment of all patients with new diagnoses. This study examines HER2 testing of primary breast cancer tissue when performed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and additional in situ hybridization (ISH) for negative cases (IHC 0/1+). The analysis focuses on the rate of false-negative HER2 tests, defined as IHC 0/1+ with an ISH ratio ≥ 2.0, in eight pathology centers across Canada. PATIENTS AND METHODS Whole sections of surgical resections or tissue microarrays (TMAs) from invasive breast carcinoma tissue were tested by both IHC and ISH using standardized local methods. Samples were scored by the local breast pathologist, and consecutive HER2-negative IHC results (IHC 0/1+) were compared with the corresponding fluorescence or silver ISH result. RESULTS Overall, 711 surgical excisions of primary breast cancer were analyzed by IHC and ISH; HER2 and chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) counts were available in all cases. The overall rate of false-negative samples was 0.84% (six of 711 samples). Interpretable IHC and ISH scores were available in 1,212 cases from TMAs, and the overall rate of false-negative cases was 1.6% (16 of 978 cases). CONCLUSION Our observation confirms that IHC is an adequate test to predict negative HER2 status in primary breast cancer in surgical excision specimens, even when different antibodies and IHC platforms are used. The study supports the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists and Canadian testing algorithms of using IHC followed by ISH for equivocal cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wedad M Hanna
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
| | - Penny J Barnes
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Martin C Chang
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Anthony M Magliocco
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Henrike Rees
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Louise Quenneville
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Susan J Robertson
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Sandip K SenGupta
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Wedad M. Hanna and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; Wedad M. Hanna, Martin C. Chang, and Sharon Nofech-Mozes, University of Toronto; Martin C. Chang, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto; Susan J. Robertson, Ottawa General Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Sandip K. SenGupta, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Penny J. Barnes, Capital Health District Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; C. Blake Gilks, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Henrike Rees and Louise Quenneville, Saskatoon City Hospital and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Anthony M. Magliocco, Esoteric Laboratory Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2356
|
Prognostic significance of the progesterone receptor status in Ki67-high and -low Luminal B-like HER2-negative breast cancers. Breast Cancer 2014; 23:310-7. [PMID: 25380989 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-014-0575-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and immunohistochemical evaluation is a surrogate marker that is widely used in clinical settings to identify the intrinsic subtypes. The definition of the Luminal B-like breast cancer was changed at the 2013 St. Gallen meeting; therefore, we investigated the clinicopathological features of the new Luminal B-like breast cancer categorized in the latest definition. We also compared the conventional PgR-high Luminal B-like breast cancer with the conventional PgR-low or -negative Luminal B-like breast cancer. PATIENTS We investigated 118 Luminal HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were operated in 2005-2008 at a single institution. Data on each patient's medical history were retrieved. RESULTS A subset of patients (14.4 %) was categorized as the new Luminal B-like due to low or negative PgR: 58.8 % were histological grade I, 65 % were T1 in tumor size, and half had node involvement. Chemotherapy was performed in half of the cases. Breast cancer-related events were more frequent for the new Luminal B-like breast cancer than for the Luminal A-like breast cancer and were less frequent than for the conventional Luminal B-like breast cancer. Based on multivariate analysis, low or negative expression of PgR and the absence of hormonal therapy were worse prognostic factors. When categorized into two groups by the PgR status, 48.1 % of the conventional Luminal B-like breast cancer was PgR-high; tumor size was smaller, and nodal involvement was less in this group. The rate of adjuvant chemotherapy of the conventional PgR-high Luminal B-like breast cancer was less than that of the conventional PgR-low or -negative Luminal B-like breast cancer. Breast cancer-related events were significantly lower in the conventional PgR-high Luminal B-like breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS Our results show the possibility that PgR status has some influence on the prognosis for Luminal HER2-negative breast cancers. Therefore, attention should be paid to the PgR status as well as Ki-67.
Collapse
|
2357
|
Evaluation of Ki67 expression across distinct categories of breast cancer specimens: a population-based study of matched surgical specimens, core needle biopsies and tissue microarrays. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112121. [PMID: 25375149 PMCID: PMC4223011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tumor cell proliferation in breast cancer is strongly prognostic and may also predict response to chemotherapy. However, there is no consensus on counting areas or cut-off values for patient stratification. Our aim was to assess the matched level of proliferation by Ki67 when using different tissue categories (whole sections, WS; core needle biopsies, CNB; tissue microarrays, TMA), and the corresponding prognostic value. Methods We examined a retrospective, population-based series of breast cancer (n = 534) from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. The percentage of Ki67 positive nuclei was evaluated by visual counting on WS (n = 534), CNB (n = 154) and TMA (n = 459). Results The median percentage of Ki67 expression was 18% on WS (hot-spot areas), 13% on CNB, and 7% on TMA, and this difference was statistically significant in paired cases. Increased Ki67 expression by all evaluation methods was associated with aggressive tumor features (large tumor diameter, high histologic grade, ER negativity) and reduced patient survival. Conclusion There is a significant difference in tumor cell proliferation by Ki67 across different sample categories. Ki67 is prognostic over a wide range of cut-off points and for different sample types, although Ki67 results derived from TMA sections are lower compared with those obtained using specimens from a clinical setting. Our findings indicate that specimen specific cut-off values should be applied for practical use.
Collapse
|
2358
|
Mori R, Nagao Y. Efficacy of chemotherapy after hormone therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. SAGE Open Med 2014; 2:2050312114557376. [PMID: 26770749 PMCID: PMC4607235 DOI: 10.1177/2050312114557376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE According to the guidelines for metastatic breast cancer, hormone therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer without life-threatening metastasis should be received prior to chemotherapy. Previous trials have investigated the sensitivity of chemotherapy for preoperative breast cancer based on the efficacy of neoadjuvant hormone therapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the efficacy of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in hormone therapy-effective and hormone therapy-ineffective cases. METHODS Patients who received chemotherapy after hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer between 2006 and 2013 at our institution were investigated. RESULTS A total of 32 patients received chemotherapy after hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer. The median patient age was 59 years, and most of the primary tumors exhibited a T2 status. A total of 26 patients had an N(+) status, while 7 patients had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumors. A total of 13 patients received clinical benefits from hormone therapy, with a rate of clinical benefit of subsequent chemotherapy of 30.8%, which was not significantly different from that observed in the hormone therapy-ineffective patients (52.6%). A total of 13 patients were able to continue the hormone therapy for more than 1 year, with a rate of clinical benefit of chemotherapy of 38.5%, which was not significantly different from that observed in the short-term hormone therapy patients (47.4%). The luminal A patients were able to continue hormone therapy for a significantly longer period than the non-luminal A patients (median survival time: 17.8 months vs 6.35 months, p = 0.0085). However, there were no significant differences in the response to or duration of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION The efficacy of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer cannot be predicted based on the efficacy of prior hormone therapy or tumor subtype, and clinicians should administer chemotherapy in all cases of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, if needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryutaro Mori
- Department of Breast Surgery, Gifu Prefectural GeneralMedicalCenter, Gifu, Japan
| | - Yasuko Nagao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Gifu Prefectural GeneralMedicalCenter, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2359
|
Effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in daily clinical practice. Radiol Oncol 2014; 48:403-7. [PMID: 25435855 PMCID: PMC4230562 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2013-0081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2013] [Accepted: 10/14/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer is an entity with aggressive behaviour. One year of adjuvant trastuzumab significantly improves the disease free survival in the range of 40–50% and reduces the risk of dying from HER2 positive breast cancer by one third. Adjuvant treatment with trastuzumab became available in Slovenia in 2005 and the aim of this study is to explore, if the exceptional results reported in adjuvant clinical trials are achieved also in daily clinical practice. Patients and methods. An analysis of tumour and patient characteristics, type of treatment and outcome (relapse free and overall survival) of 313 patients (median age 52 years) treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana in years 2005–2009 was performed. Results Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Sixty-one patients relapsed and 24 died. Three and four years relapse free survival was 84.2% and 80.8% and the overall survival was 94.4% and 92.5%, respectively. Independent prognostic factors for relapse were tumour grade (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.07–4.14; p = 0.031) and nodal stage (HR 1.35; 1.16–1.56; p < 0.0001) and for the overall survival nodal stage only (HR 1.36; 1.05–1.78; p = 0.021). Conclusions The outcome in patients with adjuvant trastuzumab in daily clinical practice, treated by medical oncologists, is comparable to results obtained in international adjuvant studies.
Collapse
|
2360
|
|
2361
|
Association between insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) negativity and poor prognosis in a cohort of women with primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:794. [PMID: 25362932 PMCID: PMC4232733 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 10/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Resistance towards endocrine therapy is a great concern in breast cancer treatment and may partly be explained by the activation of compensatory signaling pathways. The aim of the present study was to investigate if the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) signaling pathway was activated or deregulated in breast cancer patients and to explore if any of the markers were prognostic, with or without adjuvant tamoxifen. This signaling pathway has been suggested to cause estrogen independent cell growth and thus contribute to resistance to endocrine treatment in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Methods The protein expression of IGF1R, phosphorylated Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (p-mTOR) and phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein (p-S6rp) were investigated by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays in two patient cohorts. Cohort I (N = 264) consisted of mainly postmenopausal women with stage II breast cancer treated with tamoxifen for 2 years irrespective of ER status. Cohort II (N = 206) consisted of mainly medically untreated, premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) at 5 years was used as end-point for survival analyses. Results We found that lower IGF1R expression was associated with worse prognosis for tamoxifen treated, postmenopausal women (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 – 0.94, p = 0.016). The effect was seen mainly in ER-negative patients where the prognostic effect was retained after adjustment for other prognostic markers (adjusted HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.29 – 0.82, p = 0.007). Expression of IGF1R was associated with ER positivity (p < 0.001) in the same patient cohort. Conclusions Our results support previous studies indicating that IGF1R positivity reflects a well differentiated tumor with low metastatic capacity. An association between lack of IGF1R expression and worse prognosis was mainly seen in the ER-negative part of Cohort I. The lack of co-activation of downstream markers (p-mTOR and p-S6rp) in the IGF1R pathway suggested that the prognostic effect was not due to complete activation of this pathway. Thus, no evidence could be found for a compensatory function of IGF1R signaling in the investigated cohorts. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-794) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
2362
|
Naume B, Synnestvedt M, Falk RS, Wiedswang G, Weyde K, Risberg T, Kersten C, Mjaaland I, Vindi L, Sommer HH, Sætersdal AB, Rypdal MC, Bendigtsen Schirmer C, Wist EA, Borgen E. Clinical outcome with correlation to disseminated tumor cell (DTC) status after DTC-guided secondary adjuvant treatment with docetaxel in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3848-57. [PMID: 25366688 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.56.9327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow (BM) predicts survival in early breast cancer. This study explores the use of DTCs for identification of patients insufficiently treated with adjuvant therapy so they can be offered secondary adjuvant treatment and the subsequent surrogate marker potential of DTCs for outcome determination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with early breast cancer who had completed six cycles of adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy underwent BM aspiration 2 to 3 months (BM1) and 8 to 9 months (BM2) after FEC. Presence of DTCs in BM was determined by immunocytochemistry using pan-cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies. If one or more DTCs were present at BM2, six cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), once every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by DTC analysis 1 and 13 months after the last docetaxel infusion (after treatment). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate disease-free interval (DFI). RESULTS Of 1,066 patients with a DTC result at BM2 and available follow-up information (median follow-up, 71.9 months from the time of BM2), 7.2% were DTC positive. Of 72 docetaxel-treated patients analyzed for DTCs after treatment, 15 (20.8%) had persistent DTCs. Patients with remaining DTCs had markedly reduced DFI (46.7% experienced relapse) compared with patients with no DTCs after treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 7.58; 95% CI, 2.3 to 24.7). The docetaxel-treated patients with no DTCs after treatment had comparable DFI (8.8% experienced relapse) compared with those with no DTCs both at BM1 and BM2 (12.7% experienced relapse; P = .377, log-rank test). CONCLUSION DTC status identifies high-risk patients after FEC chemotherapy, and DTC monitoring status after secondary treatment with docetaxel correlated strongly with survival. This emphasizes the potential for DTC analysis as a surrogate marker for adjuvant treatment effect in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjørn Naume
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.
| | - Marit Synnestvedt
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Sørum Falk
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Gro Wiedswang
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Kjetil Weyde
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Terje Risberg
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Christian Kersten
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Ingvil Mjaaland
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Lise Vindi
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Hilde H Sommer
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Anna Barbro Sætersdal
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Maria Christine Rypdal
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Erik Andreas Wist
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Elin Borgen
- Bjørn Naume, Marit Synnestvedt, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Gro Wiedswang, Hilde H. Sommer, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Maria Christine Rypdal, Cecilie Bendigtsen Schirmer, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, Oslo University Hospital; Bjørn Naume, Erik Andreas Wist, and Elin Borgen, K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Kjetil Weyde, Sykehuset Innlandet Trust, Gjøvik; Terje Risberg, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Christian Kersten, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand; Ingvil Mjaaland, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; and Lise Vindi, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2363
|
Lintermans A, Vanderschueren D, Verhaeghe J, Van Asten K, Jans I, Van Herck E, Laenen A, Paridaens R, Billen J, Pauwels S, Vermeersch P, Wildiers H, Christiaens MR, Neven P. Arthralgia induced by endocrine treatment for breast cancer: A prospective study of serum levels of insulin like growth factor-I, its binding protein and oestrogens. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2925-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Revised: 08/06/2014] [Accepted: 08/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
2364
|
Sapino A, Maletta F, Verdun di Cantogno L, Macrì L, Botta C, Gugliotta P, Scalzo MS, Annaratone L, Balmativola D, Pietribiasi F, Bernardi P, Arisio R, Viberti L, Guzzetti S, Orlassino R, Ercolani C, Mottolese M, Viale G, Marchiò C. Gene status in HER2 equivocal breast carcinomas: impact of distinct recommendations and contribution of a polymerase chain reaction-based method. Oncologist 2014; 19:1118-26. [PMID: 25323485 PMCID: PMC4221371 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary objectives of this study on carcinomas with equivocal HER2 expression were to assess the impact of distinct recommendations with regard to identifying patients eligible for anti-HER2 agents by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and to elucidate whether multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) may be of support in assessing HER2 gene status. METHODS A cohort of 957 immunohistochemistry-evaluated HER2-equivocal cases was analyzed by dual-color FISH. The results were assessed according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2007 and 2013 guidelines for dual- and single-signal in situ hybridization (ISH) assays. A subgroup of 112 cases was subjected to MLPA. RESULTS HER2 amplification varied from 15% (ASCO/CAP 2007 HER2/CEP17 ratio) to 29.5% (FDA/EMA HER2 copy number). According to the ASCO/CAP 2013 interpretation of the dual-signal HER2 assay, ISH-positive carcinomas accounted for 19.7%. In contrast with the ASCO/CAP 2007 ratio, this approach labeled as positive all 32 cases (3.34%) with a HER2/CEP17 ratio <2 and an average HER2 copy number ≥6.0 signals per cell. In contrast, only one case showing a HER2 copy number <4 but a ratio ≥2 was diagnosed as positive. MLPA data correlated poorly with FISH results because of the presence of heterogeneous HER2 amplification in 33.9% of all amplified carcinomas; however, MLPA ruled out HER2 amplification in 75% of ISH-evaluated HER2-equivocal carcinomas. CONCLUSION The ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines seem to improve the identification of HER2-positive carcinomas. Polymerase chain reaction-based methods such as MLPA can be of help, provided that heterogeneous amplification has been ruled out by ISH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sapino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Maletta
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Ludovica Verdun di Cantogno
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigia Macrì
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Botta
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Gugliotta
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Stella Scalzo
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Annaratone
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Balmativola
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Pietribiasi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Bernardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Arisio
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Viberti
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Guzzetti
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Renzo Orlassino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Ercolani
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcella Mottolese
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Caterina Marchiò
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Santa Croce Hospital, Moncalieri, Italy; Pathology Division, Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy; Pathology Division, Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy; Pathology Division, ASL 9, Civile Hospital, Ivrea, Italy; Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2365
|
Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Its relation with molecular subtypes. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2014.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
2366
|
Belkacemi Y, Bigorie V, Pan Q, Bouaita R, Pigneur F, Itti E, Badaoui H, Assaf E, Caillet P, Calitchi E, Bosc R. Breast radiotherapy (RT) using tangential fields (TgF): a prospective evaluation of the dose distribution in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) area as determined intraoperatively by clip placement. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:3758-65. [PMID: 25096388 PMCID: PMC4189004 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3966-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials have established that patients with limited involvement of sentinel lymph node (SLN) do not require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The similar outcome in patients with ≤2 positive SLN with or without additional ALND is attributed, in part, to tangential fields (TgF) RT. We evaluated the dose distribution in the SLN biopsy area (SLNBa) as determined intraoperatively by clips placement for radiotherapy (RT) optimization. METHODS This prospective study included 25 patients who had breast conservation. Titanium clips were used intraoperatively to mark the SLNBa. All patients had 3D-conformal RT using standard (STgF) or high tangential fields (HTgF). Axillary levels, SLNBa, and organs at risk were contoured on a CT scan. Dose distribution and overlap between TgF and target volumes were analyzed. RESULTS The average doses delivered to axilla levels I-III and SLNBa were 25, 5, 2, and 33 Gy, respectively. The average dose delivered to SLNBa was higher using HTgF with better coverage of the axilla. Only 12 of 25 patients (48 %) had their SLNBa completely covered by the TgF. There was no impact of TgF size on ipsilateral lung dose. The mean heart dose delivered using STgF was lower than HTgF. CONCLUSIONS In the era of SLNB, axilla and SNLBa RT technique has to be standardized to deliver adequate dose. We recommend the use of HTgF or direct axillary RT techniques (such as in AMAROS trial) in patients with metastases in SLN without ALND completion, when only TgF are expected to cure potential residual disease in the axilla.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Axilla
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Lymph Nodes/pathology
- Lymph Nodes/radiation effects
- Lymph Nodes/surgery
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Staging
- Organs at Risk
- Prognosis
- Prospective Studies
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy, Conformal
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
- Surgical Instruments
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazid Belkacemi
- AP-HP, GH Henri Mondor. Service d'Oncologie-Radiothérapie et Centre Sein Henri Mondor. Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2367
|
Christgen M, Winkens W, Kreipe HH. [Determination of proliferation in breast cancer by immunohistochemical detection of Ki-67]. DER PATHOLOGE 2014; 35:54-60. [PMID: 24414612 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-013-1843-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Gene expression profiling has demonstrated the prognostic relevance of genes associated with proliferation in breast cancer. The immunohistochemical marker Ki-67 enables routine assessment of proliferation activity in pathology. In a number of retrospective but only few prospective studies the prognostic relevance of Ki-67 in breast cancer could be shown. Although there is no standardized approach with regard to which area of a histological section and how many cells should be counted in a quantitative or semiquantitative fashion as well as to the threshold, Ki-67 is broadly applied in breast pathology. This can be explained by the good reproducibility of the degree of proliferation assessed by Ki-67, at least in the low and high ranges, the possibility to substantiate grading and better practicability in core biopsies in comparison to mitotic counting. In neoadjuvant therapy of hormone receptor positive breast cancer, Ki-67 can probably predict the efficacy of pure hormone receptor blockade without chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Christgen
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2368
|
Tibau A, López-Vilaró L, Pérez-Olabarria M, Vázquez T, Pons C, Gich I, Alonso C, Ojeda B, Ramón y Cajal T, Lerma E, Barnadas A, Escuin D. Chromosome 17 centromere duplication and responsiveness to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Neoplasia 2014; 16:861-7. [PMID: 25379022 PMCID: PMC4212250 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Revised: 08/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) genes have been proposed as predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to anthracycline chemotherapy. Recently, chromosome 17 centromere enumeration probe (CEP17) duplication has also been associated with increased responsiveness to anthracyclines. However, reports are conflicting and none of these tumor markers can yet be considered a clinically reliable predictor of response to anthracyclines. We studied the association of TOP2A gene alterations, HER2 gene amplification, and CEP17 duplication with response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 140 patients with operable or locally advanced breast cancer. HER2 was tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization and TOP2A and CEP17 by chromogenic in situ hybridization. Thirteen patients (9.3%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). HER2 amplification was present in 24 (17.5%) of the tumors. TOP2A amplification occurred in seven tumors (5.1%). CEP17 duplication was detected in 13 patients (9.5%). CEP17 duplication correlated with a higher rate of pCR [odds ratio (OR) 6.55, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.25-34.29, P = .026], and analysis of TOP2A amplification showed a trend bordering on statistical significance (OR 6.97, 95% CI 0.96-50.12, P = .054). TOP2A amplification and CEP17 duplication combined were strongly associated with pCR (OR 6.71, 95% CI 1.66-27.01, P = .007). HER2 amplification did not correlate with pCR. Our results suggest that CEP17 duplication predicts pCR to primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy. CEP17 duplication, TOP2A amplifications, and HER2 amplifications were not associated with prognosis.
Collapse
Key Words
- CEP17, chromosome 17 centromere enumeration probe
- CI, confidence interval
- CISH, chromogenic in situ hybridization
- DFS, disease-free survival
- EC-D, epirubicin (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2)
- ER, estrogen receptor
- FEC75, fluorouracil (600 mg/m2), epirubicin (75 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2)
- FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization
- HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
- HR, hazard ratio
- OR, odds ratio
- OS, overall survival
- PR, progesterone receptor
- TOP2A, topoisomerase II alpha
- pCR, pathologic complete response
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariadna Tibau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura López-Vilaró
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Pathology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Tania Vázquez
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Pons
- Department of Pathology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignasi Gich
- Department of Epidemiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Alonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Belén Ojeda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Teresa Ramón y Cajal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Lerma
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Pathology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain ; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Agustí Barnadas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain ; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Daniel Escuin
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2369
|
Circulating MicroRNAs as easy-to-measure aging biomarkers in older breast cancer patients: correlation with chronological age but not with fitness/frailty status. PLoS One 2014; 9:e110644. [PMID: 25333486 PMCID: PMC4204997 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) hold great promise as easily accessible biomarkers for diverse (patho)physiological processes, including aging. We have compared miRNA expression profiles in cell-free blood from older versus young breast cancer patients, in order to identify “aging miRNAs” that can be used in the future to monitor the impact of chemotherapy on the patient’s biological age. First, we assessed 175 miRNAs that may possibly be present in serum/plasma in an exploratory screening in 10 young and 10 older patients. The top-15 ranking miRNAs showing differential expression between young and older subjects were further investigated in an independent cohort consisting of another 10 young and 20 older subjects. Plasma levels of miR-20a-3p, miR-30b-5p, miR106b, miR191 and miR-301a were confirmed to show significant age-related decreases (all p≤0.004). The remaining miRNAs included in the validation study (miR-21, miR-210, miR-320b, miR-378, miR-423-5p, let-7d, miR-140-5p, miR-200c, miR-374a, miR376a) all showed similar trends as observed in the exploratory screening but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Interestingly, the age-associated miRNAs did not show differential expression between fit/healthy and non-fit/frail subjects within the older breast cancer cohort of the validation study and thus merit further investigation as true aging markers that not merely reflect frailty.
Collapse
|
2370
|
Breast cancer therapy planning - a novel support concept for a sequential decision making problem. Health Care Manag Sci 2014; 18:389-405. [PMID: 25315184 DOI: 10.1007/s10729-014-9302-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2013] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common carcinosis with the largest number of mortalities in women. Its therapy comprises a wide spectrum of different treatment modalities a breast oncologist decides about for the individual patient case. These decisions happen according to medical guide lines, current scientific publications and experiences acquired in former cases. Clinical decision making therefore involves the time-consuming search for possible therapy options and their thorough testing for applicability to the current patient case.This research work addresses breast cancer therapy planning as a multi-criteria sequential decision making problem. The approach is based on a data model for patient cases with therapy descriptions and a mathematical notion for therapeutic relevance of medical information. This formulation allows for a novel decision support concept, which targets at eliminating observed weaknesses in clinical routine of breast cancer therapy planning.
Collapse
|
2371
|
Grimm LJ, Johnson KS, Marcom PK, Baker JA, Soo MS. Can breast cancer molecular subtype help to select patients for preoperative MR imaging? Radiology 2014; 274:352-8. [PMID: 25325325 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether breast cancer molecular subtype classified by surrogate markers can be used to predict the extent of clinically relevant disease with preoperative breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, informed consent was waived. Preoperative breast MR imaging reports from 441 patients were reviewed for multicentric and/or multifocal disease, lymph node involvement, skin and/or nipple invasion, chest wall and/or pectoralis muscle invasion, or contralateral disease. Pathologic reports were reviewed to confirm the MR imaging findings and for hormone receptors (estrogen and progesterone subtypes), human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2 subtype), tumor size, and tumor grade. Surrogates were used to categorize tumors by molecular subtype: hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative (luminal A subtype); hormone receptor positive and HER2 positive (luminal B subtype); hormone receptor negative and HER2 positive (HER2 subtype); hormone receptor negative and HER2 negative (basal subtype). All patients included in the study had a histologic correlation with MR imaging findings or they were excluded. χ(2) analysis was used to compare differences between subtypes, with multivariate logistic regression analysis used to assess for variable independence. RESULTS Identified were 289 (65.5%) luminal A, 45 (10.2%) luminal B, 26 (5.9%) HER2, and 81 (18.4%) basal subtypes. Among subtypes, significant differences were found in the frequency of multicentric and/or multifocal disease (luminal A, 27.3% [79 of 289]; luminal B, 53.3% [24 of 45]; HER2, 65.4% [17 of 26]; basal, 27.2% [22 of 81]; P < .001) and lymph node involvement (luminal A, 17.3% [50 of 289]; luminal B, 35.6% [26 of 45]; HER2, 34.6% [nine of 26]; basal 24.7% [20 of 81]; P = .014). Multivariate analysis showed that molecular subtype was independently predictive of multifocal and/or multicentric disease. CONCLUSION Preoperative breast MR imaging is significantly more likely to help detect multifocal and/or multicentric disease and lymph node involvement in luminal B and HER2 molecular subtype breast cancers. Molecular subtype may help to select patients for preoperative breast MR imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars J Grimm
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G., K.S.J., J.A.B., M.S.S.) and Medicine-Oncology (P.K.M.), Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2372
|
Bargallo JE, Lara F, Shaw‐Dulin R, Perez‐Sánchez V, Villarreal‐Garza C, Maldonado‐Martinez H, Mohar‐Betancourt A, Yoshizawa C, Burke E, Decker T, Chao C. A study of the impact of the 21‐gene breast cancer assay on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer in a Mexican public hospital. J Surg Oncol 2014; 111:203-7. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.23794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
2373
|
Nardone L, Diletto B, De Santis MC, D' Agostino GR, Belli P, Bufi E, Franceschini G, Mulé A, Sapino A, Terribile D, Valentini V. Primary systemic treatment and concomitant low dose radiotherapy for breast cancer: Final results of a prospective phase II study. Breast 2014; 23:597-602. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2014] [Revised: 05/14/2014] [Accepted: 06/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
2374
|
Postoperative Bestrahlung von Thoraxwand und Lymphabflusswegen nach Mastektomie bei Patientinnen mit bis zu 3 befallenen axillären Lymphknoten. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190:967-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0717-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
2375
|
Differential patterns of recurrence and specific survival between luminal A and luminal B breast cancer according to recent changes in the 2013 St Gallen immunohistochemical classification. Clin Transl Oncol 2014; 17:238-46. [PMID: 25270605 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1220-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 08/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2011, the St Gallen panel introduced several changes in breast cancer classification, thereby creating the luminal B Her2- subtype. In 2013, the panel also included Ki67 overexpression and PR <20 % as risk factors, while excluding GH3 in the absence of increased Ki67. We compared the classification of 2011 modified with the new 2013 St Gallen classification. PATIENTS AND METHOD Consecutive breast cancer patients referred to the Breast Unit of the University Hospital Mútua Terrassa and Hospital of Terrassa for surgical treatment of either primary or recurrent tumors were prospectively included between 1997 and 2014. Eventually, 1,874 cases were included for the four-subtype analysis. The median follow-up was of 66 months. RESULTS Using the 2013 St Gallen classification no significant differences were found in specific mortality rates between luminal A and B subtypes. There were significant differences at 5, 10, and, 15 years if we excluded luminal A GH3 patients in the absence of increased Ki67 (p = 0.004, 0.005, and 0.007). Luminal A sub-type patients showed significantly less distant metastases than the rest, including luminal B Her2- patients (p < 0.001). Also, luminal B patients showed significantly less distant metastases than pure Her2 (0.05) and triple negative (TN) (p < 0.001). There were no differences between pure Her2 and TN patients (0.055), neither among the different luminal B sub-types. CONCLUSION GH3, PR, and Ki67 may all be discriminatory factors for metastasis and specific mortality. Therefore, we suggest including GH3 in the luminal B subtype in the absence of Ki67.
Collapse
|
2376
|
A study comparing two consecutive historical periods in breast cancer with a focus on surgical treatment, loco-regional recurrence, distant metastases and mortality. Clin Transl Oncol 2014; 17:296-305. [PMID: 25270606 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1227-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2014] [Accepted: 09/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Recent introduction of breast units, mass-screening programmes (SP) and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has impacted on the clinical care of breast cancer patients (BC), resulting in a significant increase of breast-conserving surgery with the goal of achieving completely free margins and good cosmetic outcome, along with significantly less axillary morbidity. In order to ascertain the combined impact of SP and SNB on BC patients, we have reviewed the primary therapeutic approach of patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma in our centre, both before and after implementation of the two new procedures. METHODS 1,942 patients operated for BC between 1997 and 2013 in two clinical centres. Two historical periods were considered: before and after the advent of the Breast Unit in our institutions and the concurrent implementation of SP and SNB (September 2002). RESULTS Rates of breast-conserving surgery and re-operations improved in the second period. Intraoperative margin re-excision increased in the second period. Breast-conserving surgery decreased in parallel to stage: from 79 % for stage I to 31 % for stage III. The Cox analysis, including stage as adjusted for all significant variables, showed statistically significant differences in favour of the initial stages but only for specific mortality, not overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS Combined implementation of breast units, SP, and SNB have resulted in a significant improvement of BC treatment leading to increased rates of breast-conserving surgery and decreased disease recurrence and mortality.
Collapse
|
2377
|
Connor CS, Kimler BF, Mammen JMV, McGinness MK, Wagner JL, Alsop SM, Ward C, Fabian CJ, Khan QJ, Sharma P. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on axillary nodal involvement in patients with clinically node negative triple negative breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2014; 111:198-202. [PMID: 25266871 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Accepted: 08/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) versus primary surgery (PS) on axillary disease burden/surgery in clinically node negative Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). METHODS Two hundred forty-three Stage I-III TNBC patients have enrolled on an IRB approved multisite prospective registry. Clinical and treatment information was collected. RESULTS One hundred fifty-five patients with clinically node negative TNBC were identified. 47%, 49%, and 4% of patients had T1, T2, and T3 disease, respectively. Patients underwent PS (103/155, 66%) or NAC (52/155, 34%) at the discretion of treating physicians. 17% of PS and 0% of NAC patients were node positive at surgery (P=0.006). For T2 disease, 32% of PS and 0% of NAC patients were node positive at surgery (P=0.001). NAC patients had a lower chance of positive SLNB (0% vs. 12%, P=0.004) and undergoing ALND (2% vs. 22%, P=0.001) than PS patients. CONCLUSION In this clinically node negative TNBC cohort, all NAC-treated patients were node negative at surgery, whereas 17% of PS patients had involved axillary nodes. NAC should be considered for clinically node negative TNBC to reduce the extent of axillary surgery even if breast conservation is not planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol S Connor
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2378
|
Ki67 as a Biomarker of Prognosis and Prediction: Is it Ready for Use in Routine Pathology Practice? CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-014-0163-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
2379
|
Pooled analysis of the prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor status in five German cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 148:143-51. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3130-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
2380
|
Panis C, Pizzatti L, Herrera AC, Corrêa S, Binato R, Abdelhay E. Label-Free Proteomic Analysis of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes. J Proteome Res 2014; 13:4752-72. [DOI: 10.1021/pr500676x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Panis
- Laboratório
de Células Tronco, Instituto Nacional do Câncer, INCA, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil
- Laboratório
de Mediadores Inflamatórios, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, UNIOESTE, Campus Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Luciana Pizzatti
- Laboratório
de Células Tronco, Instituto Nacional do Câncer, INCA, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil
- Departamento
de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ana Cristina Herrera
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, PUC−PR, Campus Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Stephany Corrêa
- Laboratório
de Células Tronco, Instituto Nacional do Câncer, INCA, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Renata Binato
- Laboratório
de Células Tronco, Instituto Nacional do Câncer, INCA, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Eliana Abdelhay
- Laboratório
de Células Tronco, Instituto Nacional do Câncer, INCA, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2381
|
Chen XS, Yuan Y, Garfield DH, Wu JY, Huang O, Shen KW. Both carboplatin and bevacizumab improve pathological complete remission rate in neoadjuvant treatment of triple negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e108405. [PMID: 25247558 PMCID: PMC4172579 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2014] [Accepted: 08/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with high pathological complete remission (pCR) rate in neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). TNBC patients who achieve pCR have superior outcome than those without pCR. A meta-analysis was done to evaluate whether integrating novel approaches into NAT can improve the pCR rate in TNBC. Medical subject heading terms (Breast Neoplasm) and key words (triple negative OR estrogen receptor (ER) negative OR HER2 negative) AND (primary systemic OR neoadjuvant OR preoperative) were used to select eligible studies. Experimental arm in each study was considered as the testing regimen, and control arm was defined as the standard regimen in this meta-analysis. A total of 11 studies with 14 paired regimens were included in the final analysis. Aggregate pCR rate was 37.3% and 44.6% in the standard and testing group, respectively. Novel approaches in the testing regimen significantly improved the pCR rate in NAT of TNBC patients compared with the standard regimen, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.62, P = 0.002). Considering specific regimens, we demonstrated the pCR rate to be much higher in the carboplatin-containing (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.39-2.32, P<0.001) or bevacizumab-containing regimens (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.66, P = 0.003) than in the control regimens. The addition of carboplatin in NAT had a pCR rate as high as 51.2% in TNBC patients, with an absolute pCR difference of 13.8% as compared with control regimens. No significant heterogeneity was identified among studies evaluating the addition of carboplatin or bevacizumab efficacy in NAT. This meta-analysis indicates that these novel NAT regimens have achieved a significant pCR improvement in TNBC patients, especially among patients treated with carboplatin-containing or bevacizumab-containing regimen. This can help us design appropriate trials in the adjuvant setting and guide clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-song Chen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - David H. Garfield
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Jia-yi Wu
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ou Huang
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun-wei Shen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2382
|
Besic N, Besic H, Peric B, Pilko G, Petric R, Zmuc J, Dzodic R, Perhavec A. Surgical treatment of breast cancer in patients aged 80 years or older--how much is enough? BMC Cancer 2014; 14:700. [PMID: 25249067 PMCID: PMC4189151 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The population of elderly people is increasing and so is the population of breast cancer patients aged ≥80 years. The aim of our retrospective study was to identify independent prognostic factors for the duration of breast cancer-specific survival of surgically treated patients aged ≥80 years. The secondary aim was to determine the appropriate surgical treatment of breast cancer in patients aged ≥80 years. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 154 patients aged ≥80 years with early-stage breast cancer (mean age 83 years) who underwent surgery at the tertiary cancer center in the period from 2000 to 2008. Tumor stage was pT1/pT2 and pT3/pT4 in 75% and 25%, respectively. Surgical treatment comprised: quadrantectomy (in 27%), mastectomy (in 73%), axillary dissection (in 57%), and sentinel lymph node biopsy (in 18%), while 25% of patients had no axillary surgery. Results During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 31% of patients died of breast cancer, while 28% of patients died of other causes. Half of our patients with poorly differentiated breast cancer or estrogen receptor-negative tumor died of breast cancer. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that the pathological T-stage, pathological N-stage and estrogen receptors were independent prognostic factors for the duration of breast cancer-specific survival of patients. Conclusion Short breast cancer-specific survival indicates that, in patients aged ≥80 years, breast cancer with metastases in axillary lymph nodes can be an aggressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikola Besic
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Zaloska 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2383
|
Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H. Adjuvant systemic treatment for elderly breast cancer patients; addressing safety concerns. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2014; 13:1443-67. [PMID: 25244502 DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2014.955848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The issue of systemic treatment for early breast cancer in the elderly has always been challenging and in spite of the clear evidence of the potential benefits of adjuvant treatment in older women, they are usually undertreated with the potential consequence of worse outcomes. AREAS COVERED This article will review the evidence surrounding the various systemic options in the treatment armamentarium of early-stage breast cancer in elderly patients. The risks and benefits, with particular attention to a number of newly introduced targeted agents, along with the potential role of incorporating a combined geriatric/oncologic assessment as a routine part of the management of elderly patients with breast cancer are considered. EXPERT OPINION Administration of available options for (neo)adjuvant endocrine, chemo, as well as targeted therapeutics in fit elderly patients is feasible and tolerable; however, a routine input from geriatric medicine and psycho-oncology experts as well as the training of specialized oncology staff with special interest in geriatric oncology are believed to improve the outcome of elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Ain Shams University, Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine , Lotfy Elsayed street, Cairo, Postal code: 11665 , Egypt +20 33028656 ;
| | | |
Collapse
|
2384
|
Pathological examination of breast cancer biomarkers: current status in Japan. Breast Cancer 2014; 23:546-51. [PMID: 25239167 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-014-0566-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the current status of pathological evaluation for biomarkers in Japan. The introduced issues are the international trends for estimation of biomarkers considering diagnosis and treatment decision, and pathological issues under discussion, and how Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) members have addressed issues related to pathology and biomarkers evaluation. As topics of immunohistochemical study, (1) ASCO/CAP guidelines, (2) Ki67 and other markers, (3) quantification and image analysis, (4) application of cytologic samples, (5) pre-analytical process, and (6) Japan Pathology Quality Assurance System are introduced. Various phases of concepts, guidelines, and methodologies are co-existed in today's clinical practice. It is expected in near future that conventional methods and molecular procedures will be emerged, and Japanese Quality assurance/Quality control (QA/QC) system will work practically. What we have to do in the next generation are to validate novel procedures, to evaluate the relationship between traditional concepts and newly proposed ideas, to establish a well organized QA/QC system, and to standardize pre-analytical process that are the basis of all procedures using pathological tissues.
Collapse
|
2385
|
Si C, Jin Y, Wang H, Zou Q. Association between molecular subtypes and lymph node status in invasive breast cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY 2014; 7:6800-6806. [PMID: 25400761 PMCID: PMC4230091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The predictors for the involvement of lymph node (LN) have been widely studied. But the implication of the molecular type has not been well studied. Using the database of our institution, we investigated this relation. METHODS Patients with T1 and T2 primary breast cancer without distant metastasis were included in our study from 2012 Jan to 2013 Dec. All patients undertook the resection of the primary and the axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). We collected the clinical data including age at diagnosis, the status of ER, PR and HER2, tumor size, nodal status, and histological type. The relationship between demographic, tumor characteristics and lymph node status was evaluated. RESULTS 814 patients were included in our study. The number and the percentage (in parentheses) of each type of breast cancer is as follows: Luminal A 230 (28.3%), Luminal Her2- 284 (34.9%), Luminal Her2+ 104 (12.8%), HER2+ 72 (8.8%), TNBC 124 (15.2%). On univariate and multivariate analysis, tumor size and tumor subtype show statistical significance with LN involvement. Using TNBC as a reference, both Luminal B type (Luminal HER2-, Luminal HER2+) shows significant higher probability of LN involvement. CONCLUSIONS LN involvement is an intrinsic characteristic for molecular subtype of breast cancer. Triple positive and triple negative breast cancer accounts the most and least possibility of LN involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengshuai Si
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University 12 Wulumuqizhong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiting Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University 12 Wulumuqizhong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongying Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University 12 Wulumuqizhong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Zou
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University 12 Wulumuqizhong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2386
|
Castellano I, Deambrogio C, Muscarà F, Chiusa L, Mariscotti G, Bussone R, Gazzetta G, Macrì L, Cassoni P, Sapino A. Efficiency of a preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology to detect patients with extensive axillary lymph node involvement. PLoS One 2014; 9:e106640. [PMID: 25207643 PMCID: PMC4160163 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent studies have demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) does not affect patient survival, even in those with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). On the other hand, patients with 3 or more metastatic lymph nodes are eligible for chemotherapy. Therefore, it is crucial to identify a priori patients at risk of having a high number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes for their surgical and/or clinical management. Ultrasound (US) guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) has been proven to be a useful and highly specific method for detecting metastatic axillary lymph nodes. However, only one recent study has evaluated the efficiency of this method in identifying patients with high metastatic nodal involvement. Our aim was to validate US-guided FNA as a reliable method to discriminate a priori patients with >3 metastatic lymph nodes. Methods A retrospective series of 1287 breast cancer patients who underwent a simultaneous preoperative breast and axillary US to stage their axilla was collected. A total of 365 patients, with either positive SLNs (278) or positive axillary lymph nodes detected via US-guided FNA (87), underwent ALND. In these two subgroups, we compared the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla. Results The number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients who underwent US-guided FNA was significantly higher (63% had >3 metastatic lymph nodes) than that in patients with SLNs positive for micro- or macrometastases (3% and 27%, respectively) (P<0.001, χ2 = 117.897). Conclusions Preoperative axillary US-guided FNA could act as a reliable tool in identifying breast cancer patients with extensive nodal involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Luigi Chiusa
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mariscotti
- Istituto di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, University of Turin, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bussone
- Breast Surgery Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Sant’Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Gazzetta
- Breast Surgery Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Sant’Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luigia Macrì
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2387
|
Bertucci F, Finetti P, Viens P, Birnbaum D. EndoPredict predicts for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2014; 355:70-5. [PMID: 25218596 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2014] [Revised: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The EndoPredict (EP) signature is a prognostic 11-gene expression signature specifically developed in ER+/HER2- node-negative/positive breast cancer. It is associated with relapse-free survival in patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy, suggesting that EP low-risk patients could be treated with adjuvant hormone therapy alone whereas high-risk patients would deserve addition of adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, it is important to determine whether EP high-risk patients are or are not more sensitive to chemotherapy than low-risk patients. Here, we have assessed the EP predictive value for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2- breast cancer. We gathered gene expression and histoclinical data of 553 pre-treatment ER+/HER2- breast carcinomas treated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We searched for correlation between the pathological complete response (pCR) and the EP score-based classification. The overall pCR rate was 12%. Fifty-one percent of samples were classified as low-risk according to the EP score and 49% as high-risk. EP classification was associated with a pCR rate of 7% in the low-risk group and 17% in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the EP score remained significantly associated with pCR. Many genes upregulated in the high-risk tumours were involved in cell proliferation, whereas many genes upregulated in the low-risk tumours were involved in ER-signalling and stroma. Despite higher chemosensitivity, the high-risk group was associated with worse disease-free survival. In conclusion, EP high-risk ER+/HER2- breast cancers are more likely to respond to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Bertucci
- Département d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), UMR1068 Inserm, 13009 Marseille, France; Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 13001 Marseille, France.
| | - Pascal Finetti
- Département d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), UMR1068 Inserm, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Patrice Viens
- Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 13001 Marseille, France; Département d'Oncologie Médicale, CRCM, IPC; UMR1068 Inserm, France
| | - Daniel Birnbaum
- Département d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), UMR1068 Inserm, 13009 Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2388
|
De Felice F, Musio D, Bulzonetti N, Raffetto N, Tombolini V. Relationship of clinical and pathologic nodal staging in locally advanced breast cancer: current controversies in daily practice? J Clin Med Res 2014; 6:409-13. [PMID: 25247013 PMCID: PMC4169081 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr1908w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Systemic neo-adjuvant therapy plays a primary role in the management of locally advanced breast cancer. Without having any negative effect in overall survival, induction chemotherapy potentially assures a surgery approach in unresectable disease or a conservative treatment in technically resectable disease and acts on a well-vascularized tumor bed, without the modifications induced by surgery. A specific issue has a central function in the neo-adjuvant setting: lymph nodes status. It still represents one of the strongest predictors of long-term prognosis in breast cancer. The discussion of regional radiation therapy should be a matter of debate, especially in a pathological complete response. Currently, the indication for radiotherapy is based on the clinical stage before the surgery, even for the irradiation of the loco-regional lymph nodes. Regardless of pathological down-staging, radiation therapy is accepted as standard adjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Felice
- Cattedra di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche Oncologiche e Anatomo-Patologiche, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Musio
- Cattedra di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche Oncologiche e Anatomo-Patologiche, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nadia Bulzonetti
- Cattedra di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche Oncologiche e Anatomo-Patologiche, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Raffetto
- Cattedra di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche Oncologiche e Anatomo-Patologiche, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Cattedra di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche Oncologiche e Anatomo-Patologiche, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy ; Fondazione Spencer-Lorillard, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2389
|
Takei H, Yanagihara K, Kurita T, Iwamoto M, Seki N, Hoshina H, Yokoyama T, Yamashita K, Iida S, Uchida E. Immunohistochemical analyses of cytokeratin in breast cancers from old and new eras. J NIPPON MED SCH 2014; 81:192-3. [PMID: 25186572 DOI: 10.1272/jnms.81.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
2390
|
Mori N, Ota H, Mugikura S, Takasawa C, Ishida T, Watanabe G, Tada H, Watanabe M, Takase K, Takahashi S. Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index. Radiology 2014; 274:66-73. [PMID: 25203132 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient ( ADC apparent diffusion coefficient ) values and the Ki-67 labeling index for luminal-type (estrogen receptor-positive) breast cancer not otherwise specified ( NOS not otherwise specified ) diagnosed by means of biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between December 2009 and December 2012, 86 patients with 86 lesions with luminal-type invasive breast cancer NOS not otherwise specified underwent magnetic resonance imaging, including dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging with b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2). Conventional measurement of the minimum and mean ADC apparent diffusion coefficient s by placing regions of interest and histogram analysis of pixel-based ADC apparent diffusion coefficient data of the entire tumor were performed by two observers independently and correlated with the Ki-67 labeling index of surgical specimens. RESULTS For the interobserver reliability, interclass correlation coefficients for all parameters with the exception of the minimum ADC apparent diffusion coefficient exceeded 0.8, indicating almost perfect agreement. The minimum ADC apparent diffusion coefficient and mean ADC apparent diffusion coefficient and the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the histograms showed negative correlations with the Ki-67 labeling index (r = -0.49, -0.55, -0.54, -0.53, and -0.48, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the differential diagnosis between the high-proliferation (Ki-67 ≥ 14; n = 44) and low-proliferation (Ki-67 < 14; n = 42) groups revealed that the most effective threshold for the mean ADC apparent diffusion coefficient was lower than 1097 × 10(-6) mm(2)/sec, with sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 71%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.81 for the mean ADC apparent diffusion coefficient . There were no significant differences in the AUC among the parameters. CONCLUSION Considering convenience for routine practice, the authors suggest that the mean ADC apparent diffusion coefficient of the conventional method would be practical to use for estimating the Ki-67 labeling index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Mori
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (N.M., H.O., S.M., C.T., K.T., S.T.), Surgical Oncology (T.I., G.W., H.T.), and Pathology (M.W.), Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Seiryo 1-1, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2391
|
Loibl S, von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Denkert C. Predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Oncol Res Treat 2014; 37:563-8. [PMID: 25486071 DOI: 10.1159/000367643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Within 2 decades, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become a standard treatment option in breast cancer. The advantage of NAT is the ability to monitor the treatment effect. Pathological complete response (pCR) after NAT is a very good predictor for long-term outcome. Clinical factors, such as age and body mass index, as well as recently identified biomarkers can predict the chance of achieving a pCR. Hormone-receptor status, proliferation markers, immune infiltrates and genetic alterations, such as germline BRCA and PIK3CA, can now be measured almost on a routine basis due to the decreased analysis costs.
Collapse
|
2392
|
Abstract
The efficacy of chemotherapy depends on the level of risk of the individual patient. Because of this, careful estimation of the risk level is mandatory. In addition to well-established clinicopathological factors, validated gene expression signatures might be useful in selected patients if all other criteria are inconclusive for therapeutic decision-making. If indicated, chemotherapy can be used either after surgery (adjuvant) or before surgery (neoadjuvant). Both approaches lead to comparable long-term survival. The neoadjuvant setting offers the additional opportunity for elaborate translational studies to develop and validate predictive biomarkers and to discover mechanisms of resistance to therapy. If possible, chemotherapy regimens should include both anthracyclines and taxanes. Docetaxel should be used every 3 weeks; better tolerability with equivalent efficacy favors the concurrent over the sequential approach. Paclitaxel, on the other hand, should be administered sequentially, either weekly or every 2 weeks. Especially, intense dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support is very effective in high-risk breast cancer patients. In order to decrease toxicities, anthracycline-free regimens or a shortening of the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy are potential options that should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2393
|
Sabatier R, Gonçalves A, Bertucci F. Personalized medicine: Present and future of breast cancer management. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2014; 91:223-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2013] [Revised: 02/13/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
2394
|
Fontein DBY, Charehbili A, Nortier JWR, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Kroep JR, Putter H, van Riet Y, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, de Valk B, Terwogt JMM, Algie GD, Liefers GJ, Linn S, van de Velde CJH. Efficacy of six month neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients--a phase II trial. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2190-200. [PMID: 24970786 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2014] [Revised: 03/24/2014] [Accepted: 05/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) is playing an increasing role in the clinical management of breast cancer (BC) and may improve surgical outcomes for postmenopausal, oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC patients. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal duration of NHT before surgery. Here, we present the outcomes of the TEAM IIA trial, a multicentre, phase II trial investigating the efficacy of six months of neoadjuvant exemestane in postmenopausal, strong ER-positive (ER+, ⩾50%) BC patients. METHODS 102 patients (stage T2-T4ac) were included in the study after exclusion of ineligible patients. Primary end-point was clinical response at 3 and 6 months as measured by palpation. Secondary end-point was radiological response as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography and/or ultrasound. Linear mixed models (95% confidence interval (CI)) were used to compare changes in mean tumour size (in mm) between baseline, 3 and 6 months after the start of endocrine therapy. Conversion rates from mastectomy to breast conserving surgery (BCS) were evaluated. RESULTS Median age of all patients was 72 years (range 53-88). Overall response rate by clinical palpation was 64.5% in all patients with a final palpation measurement. Four patients had clinically progressive disease. 63 patients had both 3-month and >3-month palpation measurements. Overall response was 58.7% at 3 months and 68.3% at final palpation (>3 months). Mean tumour size by clinical palpation at T=0 was 39.1mm (95% CI 34.8-43.4mm), and decreased to 23.0mm (95% CI 18.7-27.2mm) and 16.7 mm (95% CI 12.6-20.8) at T=3 and T>3 months, respectively (p=0.001). Final radiological response rates at the end of treatment for MRI (n=37), ultrasound (n=77) and mammography (n=56) were 70.3%, 41.6% and 48.2%, respectively. Feasibility of BCS improved from 61.8% to 70.6% (McNemar p=0.012). CONCLUSION 6 months of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy helps reduce mean tumour size further in strongly ER-positive BC patients without significant side-effects compared to 3 months. Nevertheless, some patients still experience disease progression under exemestane. Feasibility of breast conservation rates improved by almost 10%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duveken B Y Fontein
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ayoub Charehbili
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johan W R Nortier
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne van Riet
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart de Valk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijs D Algie
- Department of Surgery, MC Zuiderzee, Lelystad, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit-Jan Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2395
|
Zong Y, Zhu L, Wu J, Chen X, Huang O, Fei X, He J, Chen W, Li Y, Shen K. Progesterone receptor status and Ki-67 index may predict early relapse in luminal B/HER2 negative breast cancer patients: a retrospective study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e95629. [PMID: 25170613 PMCID: PMC4149365 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Few studies has documented early relapse in luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer. We examined prognostic factors for early relapse among these patients to improve treatment decision-making. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total 398 patients with luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were applied to estimate disease-free survival and Cox regression to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS Progesterone receptor (PR) negative expression was associated with higher tumor grade (p<.001) and higher Ki-67 index (p = .010). PR-negative patients received more chemotherapy than the PR-positive group (p = .009). After a median follow-up of 28 months, 17 patients (4.3%) had early relapses and 8 patients (2.0%) died of breast cancer. The 2-year disease-free survival was 97.7% in the PR-positive and 90.4% in the PR-negative groups (Log-rank p = .002). Also, patients with a high Ki-67 index (defined as >30%) had a reduced disease-free survival (DFS) when compared with low Ki-67 index group (≤30%) (98.0% vs 92.4%, respectively, Log-rank p = .013). In multivariate analysis, PR negativity was significantly associated with a reduced DFS (HR = 3.91, 95% CI 1.29-11.88, p = .016). CONCLUSION In this study, PR negativity was a prognostic factor for early relapse in luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer, while a high Ki-67 index suggested a higher risk of early relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zong
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Zhu
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiayi Wu
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaosong Chen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ou Huang
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaochun Fei
- Pathology Department, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianrong He
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiguo Chen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yafen Li
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kunwei Shen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2396
|
Vulsteke C, Pfeil AM, Schwenkglenks M, Pettengell R, Szucs TD, Lambrechts D, Peeters M, van Dam P, Dieudonné AS, Hatse S, Neven P, Paridaens R, Wildiers H. Impact of genetic variability and treatment-related factors on outcome in early breast cancer patients receiving (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, and docetaxel. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 147:557-70. [PMID: 25168315 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3105-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
To assess the impact of patient-related factors, including genetic variability in genes involved in the metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents, on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI). We selected early breast cancer patients treated between 2000 and 2010 with 4-6 cycles of (neo-)adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or 3 cycles FEC followed by 3 cycles docetaxel. Tumor stage/subtype; febrile neutropenia and patient-related factors such as selected single nucleotide polymorphisms and baseline laboratory parameters were evaluated. Multivariable Cox regression was performed. Of 991 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.2 years, 152 (15.3 %) patients relapsed and 63 (6.4 %) patients died. Advanced stage and more aggressive subtype were associated with poorer BCSS and RFI in multivariable analysis (p < 0.0001). Associations with worse BCSS in multivariable analysis were: homozygous carriers of the rs1057910 variant C-allele in CYP2C9 (hazard ratio [HR] 30.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 6.1-151.5; p < 0.001) and higher white blood cell count (WBC) (HR 1.2; 95 % CI 1.0-1.3; p = 0.014). The GT genotype of the ABCB1 variant rs2032582 was associated with better BCSS (HR 0.5; 95 % CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.021). Following associations with worse RFI were observed: higher WBC (HR 1.1; 95 % CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.026), homozygous carriers of the rs1057910 variant C-allele in CYP2C9 (HR 10.9; 95 % CI 2.5-47.9; p = 0.002), CT genotype of the CYBA variant rs4673 (HR 1.8; 95 % CI 1.2-2.7; p = 0.006), and G-allele homozygosity for the UGT2B7 variant rs3924194 (HR 3.4; 95 % CI 1.2-9.7, p = 0.023). Patient-related factors including genetic variability and baseline white blood cell count, impacted on outcome in early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Vulsteke
- Integrated Cancer Center Ghent, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2397
|
Ahn SG, Lee M, Jeon TJ, Han K, Lee HM, Lee SA, Ryu YH, Son EJ, Jeong J. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography can contribute to discriminate patients with poor prognosis in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105905. [PMID: 25167062 PMCID: PMC4148332 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer typically show favorable survival. However, identifying individuals at high risk of recurrence among these patients is a crucial issue. We tested the hypothesis that [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans can help predict prognosis in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. METHODS Between April 2004 and December 2008, 305 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who underwent FGD-PET were enrolled. Patients with luminal B subtype were identified by positivity for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) or high Ki67 (≥14%) according to criteria recently recommended by the St. Gallen panelists. The cut-off value of SUVmax was defined using the time-dependent receiver operator characteristic curve for recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS At a median follow up of 6.23 years, continuous SUVmax was a significant prognostic factor with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.21 (p = 0.021). The cut-off value of SUVmax was defined as 4. Patients with luminal B subtype (n = 82) or high SUVmax (n = 107) showed a reduced RFS (p = 0.031 and 0.002, respectively). In multivariate analysis for RFS, SUVmax carried independent prognostic significance (p = 0.012) whereas classification with immunohistochemical markers did not (p = 0.274). The Harell c-index was 0.729. High SUVmax was significantly associated with larger tumor size, positive nodes, HER2 positivity, high Ki67 (≥14%), high tumor grade, and luminal B subtype. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, FDG-PET can help discriminate patients at high risk of tumor relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Gwe Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minkyung Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Joo Jeon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- Biostatistics collaboration unit, Gangnam Medical Research Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hak Min Lee
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Ah Lee
- Department of Surgery, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Hoon Ryu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Ju Son
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2398
|
Prat A, Carey LA, Adamo B, Vidal M, Tabernero J, Cortés J, Parker JS, Perou CM, Baselga J. Molecular features and survival outcomes of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju152. [PMID: 25139534 PMCID: PMC4151853 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical impact of the biological heterogeneity within HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is not fully understood. Here, we evaluated the molecular features and survival outcomes of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2+ breast cancer. Methods We interrogated The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 495) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) datasets (n = 1730) of primary breast cancers for molecular data derived from DNA, RNA and protein, and determined intrinsic subtype. Clinical HER2 status was defined according to American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines or DNA copy-number aberration by single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cox models tested the prognostic significance of each variable in patients not treated with trastuzumab (n = 1711). Results Compared with clinically HER2 (cHER2)-negative breast cancer, cHER2+ breast cancer had a higher frequency of the HER2-enriched (HER2E) subtype (47.0% vs 7.1%) and a lower frequency of Luminal A (10.7% vs 39.0%) and Basal-like (14.1% vs 23.4%) subtypes. The likelihood of cHER2-positivity in HER2E, Luminal B, Basal-like and Luminal A subtypes was 64.6%, 20.0%, 14.4% and 7.3%, respectively. Within each subtype, only 0.3% to 3.9% of genes were found differentially expressed between cHER2+ and cHER2-negative tumors. Within cHER2+ tumors, HER2 gene and protein expression was statistically significantly higher in the HER2E and Basal-like subtypes than either luminal subtype. Neither cHER2 status nor the new 10-subtype copy number-based classification system (IntClust) added independent prognostic value to intrinsic subtype. Conclusions When the intrinsic subtypes are taken into account, cHER2-positivity does not translate into large changes in the expression of downstream signaling pathways, nor does it affect patient survival in the absence of HER2 targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleix Prat
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB).
| | - Lisa A Carey
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| | - Barbara Adamo
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| | - Maria Vidal
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| | - Josep Tabernero
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| | - Javier Cortés
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| | - Joel S Parker
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| | - Charles M Perou
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| | - José Baselga
- : Breast Cancer Unit (AP, BA, MV, JC), Department of Medical Oncology (AP, BA, MV, JC, JT), and Translational Genomics Group (AP, MV), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LAC, JSP, CMP), Department of Genetics (CMP), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (CMP), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (JB)
| |
Collapse
|
2399
|
Cobellis L, Castaldi MA, Colacurci N. What if axillary lymph node dissection became less fashionable? Cancer 2014; 120:2535. [PMID: 24845236 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Cobellis
- Department of the Woman, the Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2400
|
Moffat R, Güth U. Preserving fertility in patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer: current perspectives. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2014; 6:93-101. [PMID: 25114587 PMCID: PMC4108258 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s47234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Invasive breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer of young women. Considering the trend toward postponing childbearing until the later reproductive years, the number of childless women at diagnosis of BC will continue to increase. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine have recommended that the impact of cancer treatments on fertility should be addressed with all cancer patients of reproductive age and that options for fertility preservation, such as cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes, ovarian tissue, in vitro maturation of immature oocytes, and ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, should be discussed routinely. To optimally counsel patients on how to best weigh the risks and benefits of fertility preservation, both the health care provider and the patient must know about the options, their risks, and their likelihood of success. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on fertility preservation options for young BC patients, surrogates of ovarian function, psychosocial aspects of infertility after cancer treatment, women’s attitudes towards childbearing after cancer treatment, and health care providers’ attitudes towards fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Moffat
- Women's Hospital, Clinic for Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Uwe Güth
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, SenoSuisse, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|