HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer

Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests

The relative accuracy of two binary screening tests can be quantified by estimating the relative true positive rate (rTPR) and relative false positive rate (rFPR) between the two tests. Ideally all study subjects are administered both screening tests as well as a gold standard to determine disease status. In practice, however, often the gold standard is so invasive or costly that only a percentage of study subjects receive disease verification and the percentage differs depending on the results of the two screening tests. This is known as verification-biased sampling and may be by design or due to differential patient dropout or refusal to have the gold standard test administered. In this paper, maximum likelihood estimators of rTPR and rFPR and corresponding confidence intervals are developed for studies with verification-biased sampling assuming that disease status is missing at random (MAR). Simulation studies are used to show that if the MAR assumption holds, then the verification bias-corrected point estimators have little small sample bias and the confidence intervals have good coverage probabilities. Simulation studies also demonstrate that the verification bias-corrected point estimators may not be robust to violation of the MAR assumption. The proposed methods are illustrated using data from a study comparing the accuracy of Papanicolaou and human papillomavirus tests for detecting cervical cancer.

Comparison of type-specific human papillomavirus data from self and clinician directed sampling

OBJECTIVE(S)

To compare the type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) recovery from physician and patient-collected samples.

METHODS

Three hundred thirty-four (334) women attending colposcopy clinics in three countries were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Cervicovaginal samples were collected by patients and physicians and processed with polymerase chain reaction and reverse line blot genotyping. McNemar's Chi-squared tests and Kappa statistics were utilized to determine statistical associations between physician- versus patient-collected samples.

RESULTS

Oncogenic HPV infection was identified in 23.2% of patient-collected specimens compared to 34.9% of physician-collected specimens. Physician sampling detected significantly more infections with type 16 and 52 than did self-sampling and significantly more oncogenic HPV infection overall. For non-oncogenic HPV detection, there was no statistical difference between physician- and patient-collected samples.

CONCLUSION(S)

Patient sampling for HPV using a single vaginal brush does not identify all oncogenic HPV subtypes.

Screening for cervical cancer in the developing world

Cervical cancer remains the most common malignancy amongst females in countries of low income, mainly due to a lack of screening. Responsible factors are centred around inadequacies of the Pap smear: high cost; low sensitivity; the need of a laboratory with high human expertise; and a demanding logistic system for mass screening. No alternative screening method seems to be clearly advantageous. Although combinations of tests have higher sensitivities, they are complex, costly and associated with low specificities. Adding the problem of effective treatment, it seems that mass screening with adequate coverage of the population is an unreachable goal for many developing countries. The most promising development in the control of cervical cancer seems to be vaccination against the human papillomavirus, either as a preventative measure or for stimulating immunity in infected women.

Human papillomavirus testing and screening

Cervical cancer is a largely preventable disease through the detection, treatment and follow-up of its precursors. Traditionally, this has been accomplished through screening women with cervical cytology, and referring women with abnormal cytology for colposcopy, histological sampling and treatment. In organized programmes that achieve wide coverage of the target population at frequent intervals, this approach has resulted in a considerable reduction in cervical cancer. Recently, however, the development of reliable and reproducible tests for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the cervix (which is now accepted to be causally associated with the development of almost all cervical cancers) has led to the evaluation of HPV de-oxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing as either an alternative or adjunctive test to cytology for the detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. There is now a large body of data supporting the clinical utility of HPV DNA testing for the prevention of cervical cancer, particularly in the settings of primary screening of women older than 30 years, in the triage of women with equivocal cytology and for the follow-up of women post-treatment.

The laboratory diagnosis of genital human papillomavirus infections

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the etiological agents of several genital cancers, including cancer of the uterine cervix. The detection of HPV infection in genital samples may increase the sensitivity of primary and secondary screenings of cervical cancer. HPV testing may also improve the specificity of screening programs, resulting in the avoidance of overtreatment and cost savings for confirmatory procedures. The major determinants of clinical progression of HPV infection include persistence of HPV infection, involvement of high-risk HPV types, high HPV viral load, integration of viral DNA and presence of several potential cofactors. Signal amplification HPV-DNA detection techniques (Hybrid Capture II, Digene Corporation, USA) are standardized, commercially available, and capable of detecting several high-risk HPV types. They also increase the sensitivity of screening for high-grade lesions in combination with cytology. The sensitivity of these techniques to detect high-grade lesions is higher than that of cytology, but the referral rate for colposcopy is greater. These techniques are approved for the triage to colposcopy of women with cervical smears interpreted as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Triage and screening for cervical cancer using HPV will probably be restricted to women aged 30 years or older because of the high prevalence of infection in younger women. Amplification techniques are ideal for epidemiological studies because they minimize the misclassification of HPV infection status. These techniques can detect low HPV burden infections. Consensus primers amplify most genital types in one reaction, and the reverse hybridization of amplicons with type-specific probes allows for the typing of HPV-positive samples. Consensus PCR assays are currently under evaluation for diagnostic purposes. HPV testing is currently implemented for the clinical management of women.

Immunocytochemical staining of p16INK4a protein from conventional Pap test and its association with human papillomavirus infection

The p16INK4a protein is immunocytochemically detected in liquid-based (LB) specimens as a diagnostic marker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia. Its up-regulation is promoted by high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. We aimed to detect p16INK4a on conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) test (CPT) slides and to determine the relationship between its overexpression and HR-HPV infection. CPT and LB Pap test (LBPT) slides (165 samples of each) were examined by immunocytochemical staining for p16INK4a. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR), HPV-DNA was genotyped by dot blot hybridization. The CPT slides displayed more numerous dispersed squamous cells and LBPT slides had a clearer background. Positive p16INK4a on CPT occurred in 0% (0/30), 52.5% (21/40), 54.3% (19/35), 100% (30/30), and 100% (30/30) in normal, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), high-grade SILs (HSILs), and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) cases, respectively. LBPT slides showed comparable results but were less sensitive. HPV-DNA was detected in 86.7, 70, 45, 57.14, and 10% in SCCs, HSILs, ASCUS, LSILs, and normal cervical cells, respectively. Because HR-HPV was identified in all HPV+ samples of high-grade dysplasia (HSILs and SCCs) and all positive p16INK4a samples infected with HR-HPV, the association of p16INK4a overexpression with HR-HPV infection was confirmed. This study suggests that immunocytochemical staining of p16INK4a on CPT slides is convenient and cost-effective for cervical cancer screening by the detection of dysplastic cells infected with HR-HPV.

Urine nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections in clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the advent of highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid amplification assays, this report will demonstrate that self-collected genital specimens, such as urine or even vaginal swabs can be accurately used to diagnose sexually transmitted infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of self collected samples can eliminate the necessity of a clinician to perform a pelvic examination for women or collect a urethral swab for men, thus extending the diagnostic capability for sexually transmitted infections to non-clinic screening venues. As many sexually transmitted infections are asymptomatic, this ability to use self-sampling greatly increases the numbers of patients that can be screened, and has the potential to augment public health programs designed to control the epidemic of sexually transmitted infections in the community. Patient collected samples are highly acceptable, highly accurate, and are becoming widely used. Self-sampling also allows clinicians to easily screen patients in the clinic, who are not presenting for pelvic or urogenital examinations, for sexually transmitted infections.

SUMMARY

Highly accurate molecular tests and easily obtained self-collected urogenital samples represent the ideal combination for obtaining the public health goal of decreasing the sexually transmitted infection epidemic among sexually active persons in the United States today.

Cumulative 5-year diagnoses of CIN2, CIN3 or cervical cancer after concurrent high-risk HPV and cytology testing in a primary screening setting

The aim of our study was to assess the cumulative 5-year diagnoses of CIN2, CIN3 or invasive cervical cancer (CIN2+) after concurrent screening by high-risk HPV test and Pap smear in a primary screening setting. Four thousand thirty-four women from Eastern Thuringia/Germany were recruited from 1996 to 1998 for baseline screening that included routine cytology, high-risk HPV testing by consensus primer PCR GP5+/6+ and routine colposcopy. After a median of 59 months 3,153 women participated in final screening using identical methods. Women with abnormal cytology or colposcopy or a positive high-risk HPV test at any time during the study period were recalled for expert colposcopy and histologic verification. CIN2+ was detected in 160 women resulting in a cumulative 5-year proportion of 4.4% (95% CI: 3.7-5.0%). Of 3,702 women who were high-risk HPV negative at baseline, 34 (1.1-95% CI: 0.7-1.4%) had either prevalent CIN2+ or developed CIN2+ within the observation period. HPV/cytology double negatives at baseline were at lowest risk for CIN2+ (1.0-95% CI: 0.7-1.4%) compared to screening positives (16.8-100% depending on combined test results). The 5-year negative predictive value in HPV-/Cyto- women was 99.0% (95% CI: 98.6-99.3%). This suggests that a prolongation of the screening intervals in this group is feasible. However, it should be noted that 1 woman developed a microinvasive carcinoma within the observation period. Moreover, 2 women with prevalent cancer were missed by both tests. The prognostic relevance of concurrent high-risk HPV/cytology screening needs to be verified further by randomized trials.

A longitudinal study of genital human papillomavirus infection in a cohort of closely followed adolescent women

BACKGROUND

We performed a study to better characterize the natural history of genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in a cohort of closely followed adolescent women.

METHODS

A cohort of 60 adolescent women was followed over a 2.2-year period, on average. A median of 41.5 self-collected vaginal and clinician-obtained cervical swabs were obtained from each subject.

RESULTS

HPV was detected in 45.3% of all adequate specimens, by use of a polymerase chain reaction/reverse blot strip assay. Oncogenic--or high-risk (HR)--HPV types were detected in 38.6% of specimens, and nononcogenic--or low-risk (LR)--types were detected in 19.6% of specimens. During the entire study period, 49 of 60 subjects tested positive for HPV (cumulative prevalence, 81.7%). The most frequently detected HR types were HPV types 52, 16, and 59. Infections with multiple HPV types were common. The median duration of persistence of a specific HPV type was 168 days, and HR types were more persistent than LR types. Abnormal cervical cytological results occurred in 37% of the adolescent women and were significantly associated with HR HPV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative prevalence of HPV infection in sexually active adolescent women is extremely high, involves numerous HPV types, and frequently results in cervical dysplasia.

Crossing the quality chasm: a requirement for successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries

Disease prevention requires sociopolitical change, which in turn requires the participation of those for whom the change is intended, including demographic groups at high risk for disease, appropriate governmental authorities, and essential health care personnel. Multiparous women of lowest socioeconomic status, the demographic group at highest risk for the development of cervical cancer, lack sociopolitical leverage almost by definition. Pap screening in developing countries is an idea whose time has come, but it is also an ethical imperative currently lacking a substantial sociopolitical constituency. Noncytologic screening methods currently benefit from sponsorship by corporate manufacturers and by donor organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Pap screening efforts in developing countries will benefit from the involvement of cytology organizations based in developed countries. Future assessments of the progress of cervical cancer prevention efforts in developing countries will benefit from additional examination of the interactions between quality and sociopolitical obstacles to change. Many of these obstacles will be elucidated by following the money, as well as the science, involved in cervical screening activities.

Screening for cervical cancer in developing countries

Cervical cancer is the most common malignancy amongst females in developing countries, mainly due to a lack of precursor screening. This absence of screening is the result of inherent disadvantages of the Pap smear: high cost, low sensitivity, the need for a laboratory with high human expertise and a complex screening program logistic system. The prerequisites for screening in a developing country include a screening method that is affordable, which can be effectively applied once in a lifetime at the age of 30-35 years, provide an immediate result and thereby allowing for on-site treatment of positive cases. None of the current screening methods comply with these prerequisites. More research is necessary into different combinations of tests, which improve sensitivity. On-site human papillomavirus (HPV) identification, alone or in combination with other tests, is promising. Another promising development is immunization against HPV infection, either as a preventative measure or for stimulating immunity in infected women.

[Human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening]

Virtually all cases of cervical cancer are caused by one of the 18 oncogenic types of human papillomavirus (HPV). It is estimated that 80% of all women will be infected by HPV in a lifetime, and the prevalence of HPV is highest among young, sexually active women and declines with increasing age. The risk of developing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions depends on the actual HPV type,the duration of infection, and the viral load. Due to the high prevalence of HPV infection, HPV testing in young women is of little value. The high negative predictive value of this test, combined with nor-mal Papanicolaou smear results, almost ensures that the patient is or will be free of a cancer precursor at the time of testing or in the immediate future. Hence, HPV testing combined with cytology is a reasonable approach in elderly women in order to increase the screening interval to 3-5 years. HPV testing is established for triage of borderline cytology findings of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance if colposcopy is not performed immediately and if HPV-negative women are rescheduled within 12 months. HPV testing 6 months after cone biopsy allows increasing the follow-up interval due to its high negative predictive value. In atypical glandular lesions not otherwise specified, HPV testing may identify patients requiring immediate treatment. In immunocompromised patients with borderline cytology due to persistent HPV infection, HPV test-ing identifies patients with a low risk of cancer precursors not requiring treatment.

[Epidemiology of HPV infection]

HPV DNA testing using Hybrid Capture 2 (Digene) was added to a program of liquid based (Thinprep, Cytyc) cervical cancer screening in a population of sexually active women aged from 20 to 62 years, without the history of uterine cervix pathology. 14.32% of 3832 women in this population were HPV positive. Positivity peaked in women aged 25-29 (19.4%) and gradually decreased, with 8% of positivity after 60 years. Positivity was independently related to parity, tobacco use and was correlated to cervical pathology. The rate of positivity in this population seems to preclude the use of HPV testing as a primary screening tool.

Primary cervical cancer screening by self-sampling of human papillomavirus DNA in internal medicine outpatient clinics

BACKGROUND

We determined whether testing of self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA can be used to screen for cervical disease within internal medicine outpatient clinics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 560 patients visiting two referral outpatient clinics for internal medicine were asked to take an HPV self-sample. Acceptability of self sampling, HPV prevalence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

435 women (78%) performed HPV self-sampling; 1.5% considered self-sampling to be difficult. 134 women (31%) tested positive for high-risk type of HPV. There were significant differences between HPV-positive and -negative women with respect to the following: mean age (42 versus 46 years), number of women aged <16 years at first coitus (35% versus 23%) and history of drug abuse (8.3% versus 2.6%). Colposcopy could be performed for 70 HPV positive women: CIN 1-3 was identified in 24%. Two of 52 women with HPV-negative results undergoing colposcopy had biopsy-confirmed CIN 1. Test performance for detection of CIN 2-3 after correction for verification bias: sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 71%; negative predictive value, 100%; positive predictive value, 10%. HPV persistence was associated with a 5.7-fold risk of CIN 2-3 detection at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-assessment for HPV DNA is an easy, feasible and well-accepted method for HPV testing and for cervical cancer screening in internal medicine outpatient clinics.

Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as a primary screening test in combination with cervical cytology in women aged 30 years or more.

METHODS

A state-transition mathematical model was used to simulate the natural history of HPV and cervical cancer in a cohort of U.S. women. Strategies included no screening and screening at different frequencies with conventional cytology, liquid-based cytology with HPV testing used for triage of equivocal results, and HPV DNA testing and cytology in combination after women had reached the age of 30. Outcomes measured included cancer incidence, life expectancy, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

The estimated reduction in lifetime risk of cervical cancer varies from 81% to 93% depending on the screening frequency, type of cytology, and test strategy. Every 3-year screening with liquid-based cytology administered to women at all ages and every 3-year screening using HPV DNA testing and cytology in combination administered to women aged 30 years or more provide equivalent or greater benefits than those provided by annual conventional cytology and have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US dollars 95300 and US dollars 228700 per year of life gained, respectively. In comparison, annual screening with HPV DNA testing and cytology in combination provides only a few hours of additional life expectancy and has a cost-effectiveness ratio of more than Us dollars 2000000 per year of life gained.

CONCLUSIONS

For women aged 30 years and more, every 2- or 3-year screening strategy that uses either HPV DNA testing in combination with cytology for primary screening or cytology with reflex HPV DNA testing for equivocal results will provide a greater reduction in cancer and be less costly than annual conventional cytology.

Comparison of Adolescent and Young Adult Self-Collected and Clinician-Collected Samples for Human Papillomavirus

OBJECTIVE

To examine the concordance between self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA.

METHODS

Sexually active adolescent and young adult women aged 14-21 years (N = 101) were enrolled in a prospective cohort study of HPV testing. Participants self-collected vaginal samples for HPV DNA, and clinicians collected cervicovaginal samples for HPV DNA and a cervical cytology specimen. We determined concordance between the results of self- and clinician-collected specimens using a kappa statistic and McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Of the 51% of participants who were HPV positive, 53% had 1 type, 25% had 2 types, and 22% had 3 types or more; 25 different HPV types were identified. Self-collected samples detected more participants with HPV than clinician-collected samples (45% versus 42%, P =.65). When results were categorized into presence or absence of high-risk HPV types, agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimens was high (kappa 0.72) and the difference between test results was not significant (McNemar's P =.41). However, when all HPV types detected were considered, agreement was perfect in only 51% of those with 1 or more types of high-risk HPV type. There was no association between agreement and age or HPV type.

CONCLUSION

Self testing for HPV DNA may be sufficiently sensitive for the detection of high-risk HPV DNA among adolescent and young adult women in clinical settings.

Projected Clinical Benefits and Cost-effectiveness of a Human Papillomavirus 16/18 Vaccine

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine may be commercially available in a few years. We explored the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of introducing an HPV16/18 vaccine in a population with an organized cervical cancer screening program.

METHODS

A computer-based model of the natural history of HPV and cervical cancer was used to project cancer incidence and mortality, life expectancy (adjusted and unadjusted for quality of life), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (i.e., the additional cost of a strategy divided by its additional clinical benefit compared with the next most expensive strategy) associated with different cancer prevention policies, including vaccination (initiated at age 12 years), cytologic screening (initiated at 18, 21, 25, 30, or 35 years), and combined vaccination and screening strategies. We assumed that vaccination was 90% effective in reducing the risk of persistent HPV16/18 infections and evaluated alternative assumptions about vaccine efficacy, waning immunity, and risk of replacement with non-16/18 HPV types.

RESULTS

Our model showed that the most effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than 60 dollars-000 per quality-adjusted life year is one combining vaccination at age 12 years with triennial conventional cytologic screening beginning at age 25 years, compared with the next best strategy of vaccination and cytologic screening every 5 years beginning at age 21 years. This triennial strategy would reduce the absolute lifetime risk of cervical cancer by 94% compared with no intervention. These results were sensitive to alternative assumptions about the underlying patterns of cervical cancer screening, duration of vaccine efficacy, and natural history of HPV infection in older women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model predicts that a vaccine that prevents persistent HPV16/18 infection will reduce the incidence of HPV16/18-associated cervical cancer, even in a setting of cytologic screening. A program of vaccination that permits a later age of screening initiation and a less frequent screening interval is likely to be a cost-effective use of health care resources.

Diagnostic and prognostic use of DNA image cytometry in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma

In the fight against cervical malignancy and its precursors, several adjuvant diagnostic methods have been proposed to increase the accuracy of cytologic and histologic diagnoses. Because chromosomal aneuploidy has been accepted as an early key event in tumorigenesis caused by genetic instability, the cytometric equivalent of chromosomal aneuploidy detected by DNA image cytometry (DNA-ICM) may serve as a marker of neoplasia. During the last decade, the appearance of a new generation of hardware with high processing and storage capacities, together with the development of appropriate software, has facilitated the development of high-performance DNA-ICM systems. International consensus on the clinical application of DNA-ICM has been reached. According to the statements of Task Force 8 of the International Consensus Conference on the Fight Against Cervical Cancer, indications for DNA-ICM include the identification of prospectively malignant cells in squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). The European Society of Analytical Cellular Pathology consensus reports on DNA-ICM have provided standardized technical details on performance, terms, and algorithms for diagnostic data interpretation and quality-assurance procedures. Increasing biologic evidence and clinical data have confirmed the utility of DNA-ICM as an adjuvant method suitable for determining the diagnosis and prognosis of cervical intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma. Patients with ASCUS and low-grade SIL diagnoses that reveal DNA euploidy may return for normal screening intervals, whereas the detection of DNA aneuploidy indicates that these lesions should be removed. Formerly a research tool, today, standardized DNA-ICM has become a useful and low-cost laboratory method to establish objectively and reproducibly an early diagnosis of prospectively progressive cervical intraepithelial lesions at a high-quality level. DNA-ICM may further contribute to the monitoring of treatment in patients with invasive cervical malignancies.

Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an adjunct to cytology for cervical cancer screening. To help provide guidance to clinicians and patients when using HPV DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening, a workshop was cosponsored by the National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute, American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Cancer Society. Consensus was reached based on a literature review, expert opinion, and unpublished results from large ongoing screening studies. The conclusions of the workshop were that HPV DNA testing may be added to cervical cytology for screening in women aged 30 years or more. Women whose results are negative by both HPV DNA testing and cytology should not be rescreened before 3 years. Women whose results are negative by cytology, but are high-risk HPV DNA positive, are at a relatively low risk of having high-grade cervical neoplasia, and colposcopy should not be performed routinely in this setting. Instead, HPV DNA testing along with cervical cytology should be repeated in these women at 6 to 12 months. If test results of either are abnormal, colposcopy should then be performed. This guidance should assist clinicians in utilizing HPV DNA testing in an effective manner, while minimizing unnecessary evaluations and treatments.

Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography for detecting and typing genital human papillomavirus

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are important in the development of human cancers, including cervical and oral tumors. However, most existing methods for HPV typing cannot routinely distinguish among the more than 100 distinct types of HPV or the natural HPV intratypic variants that have also been documented. To address this problem, we developed a novel method, general primer-denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (GP-dHPLC), for the detection and typing of genital HPV using an automated 96-well plate format. GP-dHPLC uses general primer PCR (GP-PCR) to amplify the viral DNA and then analyzes the GP-PCR products by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC). A number of different primer pairs with homology to most known genital HPV types were tested, and the L1C1-L1C2M pair specific for the L1 region of the viral genome was chosen. A set of HPV standard control patterns, consisting of those for HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 6, and 11, was established for genital HPV typing. One hundred eighty-six frozen and formalin-fixed cervical cancer tissue samples were analyzed for the presence of HPV and the HPV type by this method, and 95.8% of them were found to contain HPV DNA. GP-dHPLC accurately discriminated among HPV variants that differed by as little as one nucleotide. Several new variants of HPV types 16, 18, 39, 45, 52, and 59 were identified. Moreover, multiple HPV infections were detected in 26.6% of the samples. Our results indicate that HPV typing by GP-dHPLC permits discrimination of common genital HPV types, detection of multiple HPV infections, and identification of HPV variants in clinical samples.

[Contribution of high risk human papillomavirus testing to the management of premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPV) are consistently associated with premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix. Thus, the use of molecular techniques to detect HPV has been proposed to improve the results of conventional diagnostic strategies. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of the detection of HR-HPV in a cervical pathology unit.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

1005 women (mean age [SD], 38.4 [12.3]; range, 16-83) were referred for a cytology of atypical cells of unknown origin (ASCUS), squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) or carcinoma in the six months previous to the admission. All patients underwent a colposcopy, Pap test and/or histological study as well as HR-HPV detection using the Hybrid Capture II test.

RESULTS

HR-HPV was detected in 96% high grade-SIL, 86% carcinomas of the uterine cervix and 86% low grade-SIL, but only in 25% women with no cervical lesions and 0% women with metastatic carcinomas to the cervix (p<0.001). The sensitivity of this test for high grade-SIL or higher was 90.2% and the negative predictive value was 96.5% (odds ratio=18.9; 95% confidence interval, 10.9-33.1). In patients with ASCUS, a negative result for HR-HPV nearly excluded the presence of a cervical lesion (negative predictive value, 98.52%).

CONCLUSIONS

HR-HPV detection using Hybrid Capture II is useful in the study of lesions of the uterine cervix. It displays a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinomas and a high usefulness in the management of ASCUS cases.

Toward a reduction of the global burden of cervical cancer

Of the 190,000 deaths from cervical cancer that occur annually worldwide, the majority take place in developing countries. Recent advances in our understanding of the causes and natural history of cervical neoplasia and, in particular, the establishment of the central role of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection have created opportunities for the primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer. In the future, prevention efforts will include the incorporation of HPV testing as an adjunct to or replacement for cytology-based screening programs and the use of recombinant DNA technologies for the development of prophylactic vaccines.

Women's desired information about human papillomavirus

BACKGROUND

As human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is incorporated into cervical carcinoma screening programs, educational messages must be developed to inform women's screening choices and manage psychosocial responses to HPV DNA test results. However, little is known about women's questions and concerns about HPV or their attitudes toward HPV testing.

METHODS

Eight focus groups with 48 ethnically diverse, low-income women were conducted at community centers, family planning and primary care clinics, and substance abuse rehabilitation facilities in Massachusetts.

RESULTS

The participants' comments and questions about HPV revealed five major themes. First, most women overestimated the likelihood that women with HPV would develop cancer. Second, women struggled to balance the anxiety of knowing that HPV infection causes cervical carcinoma with the information that HPV infection often regresses without treatment. Third, many women were confused that Papanicolaou smear results could be normal when HPV infection is present. Fourth, women preferred to receive a personalized risk profile to assess their own likelihood of contracting HPV infection and cervical carcinoma. Fifth, younger women focused on the sexual transmission of HPV infection, rather than on its potential to cause cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective HPV education must include information about transmission, prevention, treatment, and cervical carcinoma risk; tailor messages to describe HPV susceptibility according to age and risk profile; present clarification regarding HPV strains and their consequences; offer explanations of different types of tests and their results; and provide a balance between accurate discussion of cancer risk and reassurance that following recommended screening practices will reduce risk to negligible levels.

News media coverage of human papillomavirus

BACKGROUND

Now that human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is being incorporated into cervical cancer screening programs, salient and accurate media information about HPV will be crucial to inform women's screening choices and to manage psychosocial responses to HPV DNA test results.

METHODS

The authors conducted a content analysis of 111 news stories about HPV from the 10 most circulated newspapers and from 3 major television networks for the period from January 1995 through July 2002. Stories were assessed for predominant theme (STD, cancer, or new tests); information about symptoms, transmission, prevention, and cancer-causing properties of HPV; screening test descriptions; and recommended screening guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-six percent of stories primarily were about new tests for HPV or cervical cancer, 30% of stories focused on cervical cancer or its link to HPV, and 27% of stories emphasized sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) or genital warts. Seventy-nine percent of stories mentioned that HPV is an STD, and 50% of stories reported that HPV is very common. Twenty-six percent of stories reported that most women with HPV will not develop cervical carcinoma. Of 81 stories that mentioned a screening test for HPV or cervical carcinoma, 38% reported the sensitivity of the test; 30% mentioned wrong, uncertain, or unnecessary test results; and 25% mentioned consequences of such results.

CONCLUSIONS

Media coverage of HPV could better fulfill women's educational needs by including information about low-risk and high-risk types of HPV and their differing links to cervical cancer; describing HPV prevention, transmission, and symptoms; explaining the benefits and consequences of HPV testing; and outlining the latest screening guidelines in every story.

Optimal Cutoff of the Hybrid Capture II Human Papillomavirus Test for Self-Collected Vaginal, Vulvar, and Urine Specimens in a Colposcopy Referral Population

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the optimal relative light unit ratio, as a measure of viral load, of the Hybrid Capture II human papillomavirus (HPV) test in self-collected specimens for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

METHODS

Two hundred women referred for colposcopy with abnormal cytologic, self-collected vaginal and vulvar swabs and urine for HPV testing. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method was used to estimate optimal cutoffs for the Hybrid Capture II test. The reference standard was colposcopy, with directed biopsy as required.

RESULTS

The estimated optimal cutoffs of the relative light unit ratio for detecting CIN 2 or higher for urine, vulvar, and vaginal samples gave sensitivities of 72.4%, 82.8%, and 89.0% and specificities of 57.0%, 52.1%, and 55.9%, respectively. At the manufacturer's recommended 1.0 cutoff, sensitivities were 44.8%, 62.1%, and 86.2% for urine, vulvar, and vaginal samples, with specificities of 69.7%, 62.7%, and 53.5%, respectively. The likelihood ratios (likelihood of being truly positive after a positive test result) were similar for the optimal and the 1.0 cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

The ROC curve methods did not improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of the Hybrid Capture II test compared with the 1.0 relative light unit ratio cutoff.

Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening of cervical neoplasia: Results from a multicenter study in India

The knowledge that cervical neoplasia are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has led to the evaluation of its role in screening. We evaluated the accuracy of HPV testing by Hybrid capture II (HC II) method in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 (CIN 2 and 3) lesions in 4 cross-sectional studies with common protocol and questionnaire in 3 different locations (Kolkata, Mumbai and Trivandrum) in India. These studies involved 18,085 women aged 25-65 years. The reference standard for final diagnosis was a combination of colposcopy/biopsy. All women were investigated with colposcopy and 3,116 received directed biopsy. The sensitivity of HPV testing for detecting CIN 2-3 lesions varied from 45.7% to 80.9% across the study sites; the specificity varied from 91.7% to 94.6% and the positive predictive value from 6.7% to 13.7%. Retesting of 298 randomly chosen denatured samples in France revealed an agreement rate of 85.9% and a kappa-value of 0.72. Although HPV testing seems to be a promising approach for cervical cancer prevention, a large range in sensitivity was observed in our study, possibly due to variations in the quality of specimen collection and reference standards. A higher sensitivity was associated with the center performing the test well. Further developments in terms of more reproducible, less expensive and less sophisticated testing are essential to make the test feasible and effective in low-resource settings.

Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections

BACKGROUND

Use of self-administered vaginal swabs (SAS) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests simplifies specimen collection and transport, especially for women in nonclinical settings.

GOAL

We investigated the preference and comfort level of military women for the collection of SAS, compared with urine, for the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infections.

STUDY DESIGN

During March through August 1999, female Army recruits in basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, were invited to participate in the study. Participants were requested to complete a questionnaire after providing both first-void urine (FVU) and SAS specimens. Participant characteristics, preferences, and comfort levels were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

From 4496 eligible female recruits, 1403 (31%) completed questionnaires and 1382 provided both specimens; 11.8% (166 of 1403) of participants were infected with chlamydia. The relative sensitivity and specificity of the C. trachomatis Ligase Chain Reaction test on SAS in 1382 matched pairs was 81.1% and 98.6%, respectively, using the test result on urine specimens as the comparison standard. Most of the participants (90.8%) reported that they felt comfortable collecting the FVU specimen, and 69.6% indicated that they felt comfortable collecting SAS. Either specimen collection type received high acceptability at home and in the field, and more women reported that they would collect FVU than reported they would collect SAS in the future (in the field: FVU: 79.4%, SAS: 68.8%, P <0.001); at home: FVU: 90.9%, SAS: 82.9%, P <0.001). When questioned about ease of use, 60.4% of women reported that urine was the easier method. Preferences for SAS were associated with being white and having had sexual risk behaviors in the past 3 months.

CONCLUSION

A study of preferences for urine versus self-administered vaginal swabs for the detection of C. trachomatis in military women showed that women generally found SAS acceptable. SAS should be a feasible alternative to urine collection in situations in which specimen storage or transport is an issue.

Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study

BACKGROUND

Certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are the primary cause of almost all cervical cancers. HPV testing of cervical smears is more sensitive but less specific than cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). HPV testing as a primary screening approach requires efficient management of HPV-positive women with negative or borderline cytology. We aimed to compare the detection rate and positive predictive values of HPV assay with cytology and to determine the best management strategy for HPV-positive women.

METHODS

We did a multicentre screening study of 11085 women aged 30-60 years. Women with borderline cytology and women positive for high-risk HPV with negative cytology were randomised to immediate colposcopy or to surveillance by repeat HPV testing, cytology, and colposcopy at 12 months.

FINDINGS

HPV testing was more sensitive than borderline or worse cytology (97.1% vs 76.6%, p=0.002) but less specific (93.3% vs 95.8%, p<0.0001) for detecting CIN2+. Of 825 randomised women, surveillance at 12 months was as effective as immediate colposcopy. In women positive for HPV at baseline, who had surveillance, 73 (45%) of 164 women with negative cytology and eight (35%) of 23 women with borderline cytology were HPV negative at 6-12 months. No CIN2+ was found in these women, nor in women with an initial negative HPV test with borderline (n=211) or mild (32) cytology.

INTERPRETATION

HPV testing could be used for primary screening in women older than 30 years, with cytology used to triage HPV-positive women. HPV-positive women with normal or borderline cytology (about 6% of screened women) could be managed by repeat testing after 12 months. This approach could potentially improve detection rates of CIN2+ without increasing the colposcopy referral rate.

An Alpha Helix Conformationally Restricted Peptide Is Recognized by Cervical Carcinoma Patients' Sera

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) represents the major cervical carcinoma associated virus among women, especially in Colombia. It has thus become important to develop reliable inexpensive tests for detecting the presence of this virus. It has been shown that HPV16-E7 oncoprotein structural features have three alpha-helical structures and a loop-like structure. The hydrazone link approach was used to mimic helix secondary substructures. Sera from women with invasive cervical carcinoma were tested against conformationally restricted peptides and their respective linear peptides to identify conformational epitopes. One peptide that was conformationally restricted to an alpha-helix showed very strong positive reaction with sera from women having invasive cervical carcinoma; there was no reaction with sera from patients with other carcinomas, children, or healthy women. NMR studies confirmed this peptide's alpha-helical structure. The observation that constrained protein substructure peptidomimetics can identify new conformationally sensitive antibodies in cervical carcinoma patients' sera is very important, since these antibodies are almost all generated by native proteins, providing a new selection of antibodies for diagnostic and vaccine studies.

Shanxi Province cervical cancer screening study II: Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus compared to direct sampling for human papillomavirus and liquid based cervical cytology

The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of a new method for self-sampling for high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) with direct sampling and liquid based cervical cytology. In Shanxi Province, China, 8,497 women (ages 27-56) underwent a self-sample for HPV using a conical-shaped brush placed into the upper vagina and rotated. Three to sixteen months later the women were screened with liquid-based cytology and direct HPV tests. Subjects with any abnormal test underwent colposcopy and multiple biopsies. Mean age was 40.9 years. 4.4 percent of subjects had >or=CIN II, 26% a positive self-sample and 24% a positive direct test for HPV. The sensitivity for detection of >or=CIN II was 87.5% for self-sampling, and 96.8% for the direct test (P < 0.001). The specificity was 77.2% for the self-sample and 79.7% for the direct test. With an abnormal Pap defined as ASCUS or greater the sensitivity of the Pap for the detection of >CIN II was 88.3% and the specificity was 81.2%. We conclude that self-sampling for HPV is less sensitive for >CIN II than the direct test, but similar to liquid based cytology.

Factors affecting the detection rate of human papillomavirus

BACKGROUND

Maximizing the accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) detection from a single sample is important for clinical and research purposes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cyclic hormonal variation, recent sexual intercourse, interval between samplings, and the technique used to sample affect the detection of HPV.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial. Three techniques for self-sampling (2 consecutive synthetic polyester fiber [Dacron] swabs, a single Dacron swab, and a tampon) were repeated at 3 different sampling times during a period of 4 to 6 weeks in addition to 1 clinician-directed sampling of the ectocervix and endocervix at the first sampling time. All self-samplings were taken in a proscribed randomized order. Women (aged 18 to 68 years) attending a colposcopy clinic for abnormal cytology or abnormal cervical appearance participated in the study. The outcome measure was the detection of HPV by polymerase chain reaction amplification.

RESULTS

The 103 participants provided 1,189 cervicovaginal samplings. Logistic regression indicated that intercourse within 48 hours of sampling did not result in a greater detection of high-risk or any HPV type (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.69; OR = 1.08, 95% CI, 0.73-1.60, respectively). Among those women who have regular menstrual cycles, there was no cyclic effect on HPV detection for high-risk and any HPV types. Time from previous sampling did not affect HPV detection. Among the self-sampling techniques, using a single self-swab and the tampon resulted in the detection of HPV between 10% and 35% less often than using 2 consecutive swabs (P < .025). Self-sampling with 2 swabs was not significantly different from clinician sampling for detecting high-risk HPV types (OR for self-sampling = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.13)).

CONCLUSIONS

HPV detection is not dependent on menstrual cycle timings, the recency of intercourse, or the time between samplings, but it is dependent on the sampling technique.

Chapter 13: Primary screening of cervical cancer with human papillomavirus tests

Despite its history of success in cancer screening, Pap cytology has important limitations, particularly its high false-negative rate, which carries important public health implications. Since the mid-1990s, there has been substantial interest in the use of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing in cervical cancer screening under the premise that the testing of cervical cells for the causative agent of cervical cancer could have acceptable screening performance, while being more reproducible in clinical practice than Pap cytology. There have been several studies assessing the utility of HPV testing compared with the Pap test as a screening tool. These studies varied widely in lesion-outcome definition and in methodology. No studies were based on cervical cancer incidence or mortality. No randomized controlled trials have yet been published; all of the studies were based on concomitant testing for HPV and cytology or additional tests. HPV testing has greater sensitivity (average, 27%) but somewhat lower specificity (average, 8%) than Pap cytology for detecting high-grade lesions. Screening of women aged 30 years or older tends to improve test specificity, but it also does so for cytology. The combination of cytology and HPV attained high-negative predictive values, which suggests that their joint use could allow screening intervals to be safely increased, thus lowering costs. Although evidence is yet to come from long-term studies and from randomized controlled trials with high-grade lesions and invasive cancer as outcomes, HPV testing is clearly one of the most promising new technologies and has the potential to improve cervical cancer-screening effectiveness in many settings.

Chapter 14: Role of triage testing in cervical cancer screening

The classic model of cervical cancer prevention-primary screening with cytology, followed by diagnostic colposcopically directed biopsy, and finally treatment of cancer precursors-is undergoing dynamic change. The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and other new modalities provides more options but increases complexity in the sequence of screening, triage, diagnosis, and patient management. This chapter will focus on the role of triage and risk stratification in management. The utility of HPV testing has been established for triage of cytologic findings of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance but not for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse. Countries without established cytology services may consider alternative screening, triage, and treatment programs that may be more readily implemented than a resource-rich "cytology followed by colposcopy" paradigm requiring an infrastructure of highly trained personnel. The diagnostic step of colposcopy and directed biopsy is not completely sensitive in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3 as is sometimes assumed. The partial insensitivity of this diagnostic step results in a population of women with negative colposcopically directed-biopsy findings but at increased risk for missed prevalent disease: these women may require additional triage rather than resumption of routine screening. As more efficient screening, triage, and diagnosis increase the sensitivity of detection of even very small CIN2 or CIN3, overtreatment of lesions that might otherwise regress becomes a concern and highlights the need to identify accurate markers of risk of progression to cancer. Markers of molecular events further along the pathway from HPV infection to development of cancer may ultimately provide more specificity in triage and diagnosis.

Chapter 11: Future directions in cervical pathology

Technologic innovations, including the development of improved sampling devices, liquid-based collection systems, and computer-assisted screening, have revolutionized cervical cytology. Biologic discoveries in upcoming years promise to transform our understanding of the pathogenesis of cervical neoplasia, leading to another quantum leap in our approach to screening and prevention. This review summarizes the opportunities and challenges that recent and anticipated advances in pathology present for epidemiologic research.

Chapter 12: Human papillomavirus technologies

Currently, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA tests validated in large trials and epidemiological studies are the hybrid capture second-generation (HC2) HPV DNA assay and a variety of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols employing degenerate or consensus primers. This article describes the currently available technology for HPV detection and discusses novel technologies and their potential for large-scale screening. Ideally, an HPV test should allow detection of multiple HPV types, identify individual types, and provide quantitative information about the viral load of each individual type found. Moreover, it should be easy to perform, be highly reproducible, with a high specificity and sensitivity, and amenable for high throughput analysis and automation. Because we do not yet fully understand the true value of viral load and the biological relevance of the different HPV types, any HPV test should be able to detect the clinically relevant high-risk types with a sufficient sensitivity of at least 10 000 genome copies per sample. To validate the different current and future test systems and to compare inter-laboratory performance we urgently need reference samples, validated reagents, and standardized protocols.

Role of HPV DNA testing in predicting cervical intraepithelial lesions: comparison of HC HPV and ISH HPV

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is widely accepted as the primary agent involved in the development of squamous intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma. Several commercial tests are available for detecting HPV DNA. This study compares the efficacy of INFORM HPV (in situ hybridization [ISH] HPV) and HCII (HC HPV) in predicting cervical lesions. A total of 762 sequential Papanicolaou (Pap) smears determined by cytologic examination to be either atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) were tested by both Hybrid Capture (HC) HPV and ISH HPV; 250 follow-up biopsies were reviewed as the reference standard for presence or absence of a lesion. ISH HPV and HC HPV differed significantly in accurately predicting biopsy findings from ASC-US and LSIL cases. The overall sensitivity and specificity of ISH HPV were 97% (28/29) and 86% (191/221); and HC HPV was 79% (23/29) and 56% (123/221). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ISH HPV was 48% (28/58) vs HC HPV value of 19% (23/121). Negative predictive value (NPV) was also better with ISH HPV at 99% (191/192) and HC HPV at 95% (123/129). Of equal importance, ISH HPV demonstrated a lower false-positive rate compared to HC HPV, 12% (30/250) vs 39% (98/250), as well as having a slightly lower false-negative rate 0.4% (1/250) vs 2.4% (6/250). ISH HPV is more predictive of biopsy histopathology in patients with detectable cervical lesions than is HC HPV. Effective triage of patients by HPV analysis using ISH HPV as compared to HC HPV has the potential of significant public health impact by reducing unnecessary colposcopies, as well as adverse medical, social, and psychological patient consequences.

Human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cytology in cervical screening programs

Our objective was to review current large studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as an adjunct to the Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer screening programs. We analyzed 10 large screening studies that used the Hybrid Capture 2 test and 3 studies that used the polymerase chain reaction test in a manner that enabled reliable estimates of accuracy for detecting or predicting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Most studies allowed comparison of HPV DNA and Papanicolaou testing and estimates of the performance of Papanicolaou and HPV DNA as combined tests. The studies were selected on the basis of a sufficient number of cases of high-grade CIN and cancer to provide meaningful statistical values. Investigators had to demonstrate the ability to generate reasonably reliable Hybrid Capture 2 or polymerase chain reaction data that were either minimally biased by nature of study design or that permitted analytical techniques for addressing issues of study bias to be applied. Studies had to provide data for the calculation of test sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, odds ratios, relative risks, confidence intervals, and other relevant measures. Final data were abstracted directly from published articles or estimated from descriptive statistics presented in the articles. In some studies, new analyses were performed from raw data supplied by the principal investigators. We concluded that HPV DNA testing was a more sensitive indicator for prevalent high-grade CIN than either conventional or liquid cytology. A combination of HPV DNA and Papanicolaou testing had almost 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. The specificity of the combined tests was slightly lower than the specificity of the Papanicolaou test alone, but this decrease could potentially be offset by greater protection from neoplastic progression and cost savings available from extended screening intervals. One "double-negative" HPV DNA and Papanicolaou test indicated better prognostic assurance against risk of future CIN 3 than 3 subsequent negative conventional Papanicolaou tests and may safely allow 3-year screening intervals for such low-risk women.

p16(INK4a) expression correlates with degree of cervical neoplasia: a comparison with Ki-67 expression and detection of high-risk HPV types

Although recent studies have suggested that p16(INK4a) may be a useful surrogate biomarker of cervical neoplasia, Ki-67 and human papillomavirus testing have also been shown to be useful in detecting neoplasia. To help delineate the utility of p16(INK4a), biopsy samples (n = 569: negative, 133; reactive, 75; atypical, 39; low grade, 76; moderate, 80; and severe intraepithelial neoplasia, 113; also, squamous cell carcinoma, 46; adenocarcinoma, 7) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 (n = 432), as well as by in situ hybridization for human papillomavirus Type 16 (n = 219). Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus types by polymerase chain reaction and HybridCapture2 was performed on concurrent cervical swab specimens. Recuts of the original blocks were reexamined (n = 198). Endometrial biopsies (n = 10) were also analyzed for p16(INK4a) expression. Degree of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 expression correlated with degree of cervical neoplasia (P <.001) and with presence of high-risk human papillomavirus types (P <.001). There was no relationship between p16(INK4a) overexpression and inflammation or hormonal status. Ki-67 expression correlated with inflammation (P = 0.003) and was expressed in more reactive and atypical lesions than p16(INK4a) (P = 0.008). Probes for human papillomavirus 16 stained 54% of cervical neoplastic lesions; the degree of staining correlated significantly with degree of neoplasia (P <.001) and p16(INK4a) staining (P <.001). Interobserver reproducibility was substantial for p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 interpretation (weighted kappa: 0.74 and 0.70, respectively). Expression of p16(INK4a) was observed in all endometrial biopsies. Compared with Ki-67 expression and detection of high-risk human papillomavirus, p16(INK4a) was less likely to be positive in samples from women with negative, reactive, and atypical biopsies. Although expression of p16(INK4a) in endometrial epithelium may be problematic in terms of screening, the potential of p16(INK4a) as a screening test warrants investigation.

Patient Acceptance of Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus in Rural China

OBJECTIVE.: To test a new survey instrument and determine the acceptance and potential barriers of cervicovaginal self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus in rural Chinese women. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: Data from thirteen survey questions assessed acceptance of the self-sampling procedure. Pain, comprehension, and cultural beliefs were potential barriers evaluated by the survey. RESULTS.: A total of 1,560 women were surveyed. The average and mode number of steps of the self-sampling procedure recalled was 5 (out of 7). Ninety-one percent preferred performing the test at a clinic versus their home. The major barrier encountered was related to the educational level of the women. CONCLUSIONS.: The measure performed well in this population. The self-collection brush was well accepted by these women. Education is the largest hurdle to overcome in implementing a self-sampling screening program.

Translational approaches to improving cervical screening

Screening programmes for cervical cancer using the current test--the Pap smear--have markedly reduced the incidence of the disease. However, an individual Pap test is of limited sensitivity and is difficult and expensive to perform. Increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cervical cancer indicates that new approaches to screening might offer increased accuracy, affordability and the potential for automation. Such approaches exemplify how improved understanding of the biology of neoplasia might be translated into clinical benefit.