Effect of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) in major depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial

Extracts of St. John's wort and various constituents affect beta-adrenergic binding in rat frontal cortex

The present study was designed to get further insight into the mode of antidepressant action of extracts prepared from St. John's wort (SJW) and relevant active constituents. Down-regulation of central beta-adrenergic receptors (beta-AR's) has been widely considered a common biochemical marker of antidepressant efficacy. Although previous studies have reported a beta-AR down-regulation for SJW extracts, in vivo studies that compare the effects of SJW extracts with those of relevant active constituents on beta-AR density have not been done yet. We used quantitative radioligand receptor-binding-studies to examine in rats the effects of short-term (2 wks) and long-term (8 wks) administration of different SJW extracts and constituents on beta-AR binding in rat frontal cortex. The effects were compared to those of the standard antidepressants imipramine and fluoxetine. [125I]CYP binding to beta-AR was found to be decreased after short as well as after long-term treatment with imipramine (36%, 40%). Short-term treatment with fluoxetine decreased the number of beta-adrenergic receptors (17%) while long-term treatment with fluoxetine elicited an increase (14%) in beta-AR-binding. This effect was comparable to that of the lipophilic CO2 extract which decreased beta-AR-binding (13%) after two weeks and slightly increased the number of beta-AR's after 8 weeks (9%). Short-term treatment with the methanolic SJW extract decreased beta-AR-binding (14%), no effects for this extract were observed after 8 weeks. Treatment with hypericin led to a significant down-regulation (13%) of beta-AR's in the frontal cortex after 8-weeks, but not after 2 weeks, while hyperforin (used as trimethoxybenzoate, TMB), and hyperoside were ineffective in both treatment paradigms. Compared to the SJW extracts and single compounds the effect of imipramine on beta-AR-binding was more pronounced in both treatment paradigms.

Implementing A Research Agenda for Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) consists of diverse clinical interventions that are practiced because of their popularity rather than the prior demonstration of safety and efficacy required for conventional agents. CAM therapies can be grouped into five categories: biologically based therapies, manipulative and body-based interventions, mind-body interventions, "energy" therapies, and alternative medical systems. The present evidence that individual CAM interventions are efficacious is largely anecdotal, but hundreds of small trials have yielded positive results. For a few modalities, existing data are either very encouraging or else sufficient to conclude that they are ineffective. CAM interventions are presumed to be safe, yet they may not be, particularly in the case of botanical agents with inherent toxicities, significant drug interactions, or potent adulterants. The public health questions regarding CAM can only be addressed through a research agenda that defines which interventions have favorable therapeutic indices. Implementation of this agenda involves adequate characterization and standardization of the product or practice, with rigorous investigation to demonstrate its safety, mechanism of action, and efficacy.

The effects of St. John's wort extract and amitriptyline on autonomic responses of blood vessels and sweat glands in healthy volunteers

St. John's wort extract is widely used and advertised as a "natural antidepressant" lacking autonomic side effects. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the effects of St. John's wort extract on autonomic responses of blood vessels and sweat glands with those of amitriptyline and placebo. A randomized, double-blind, crossover study was performed in healthy male volunteers aged 22 to 31 years (25 +/- 3 years; mean +/- SD) years. Subjects orally received capsules with 255 to 285 mg St. John's wort extract (900 microg hypericin content), 25 mg amitriptyline, and placebo 3 times daily for periods of 14 days each with at least 14 days between. Vasoconstrictory response of cutaneous blood flow (VR) and skin conductance response (SR) following a single deep inspiration were employed as parameters of autonomic function. St. John's wort extract had no effect on VR and SR. In contrast, SR was diminished and the dilation phase of VR was prolonged following multiple dosing with amitriptyline (P < 0.05). Decreased electrodermal reactivity observed with amitriptyline reflects inhibition of acetylcholine at peripheral m3-cholinoreceptors, whereas prolongation of VR induced by the tricyclic drug may be due to sustained activation of central and/or peripheral sympathetic neurons.

St John's wort, conventional medication, and placebo: an egregious double standard

The efficacy of antidepressant medication is generally thought to be well established, whereas that of hypericum (St John's wort) is considered doubtful. The data fail to support these discrepant conclusions. Instead they show that hypericum and conventional antidepressants are equally effective (or ineffective). This suggests that different standards are being used to evaluate the two types of treatment.

Treatment options for real-life patients

Our current models of depression and clinical trials data provide inadequate and relatively meaningless clinical information. They do not take into account the multiple phenotypes of depression and often do not include patients with "real-life" clinical depression. Psychiatry is called an evidence-based specialty, and this is supported by the wealth of evidence provided by the antidepressant drug trials. However, if the evidence demonstrated by these trials is not accurate, then psychiatry may fail to provide satisfactory treatment for patients with depression. Trial data commonly show the effect of antidepressant treatment to be indistinguishable from placebo. On first examination it could be said that antidepressant drugs act mainly as placebos, or, even worse, that antidepressant drugs are no better than placebos in effect. However, this view is at odds with the observations of clinicians in everyday practice, and the impact of this perception is worrying, with the pharmaceutical companies, patients and practitioners all being adversely affected. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide limited data about the true effectiveness of an antidepressant. However, such RCTs are required by regulatory authorities for drug approval. Antidepressant effects in "real-life" depression need further investigation. When efficacy data for drug and non-drug treatments for major depression are compared, there are very few differences. This lack of differentiation across treatments allows every therapy to be perceived as efficacious, but also non-specific. This leads to patients being fitted to their therapist's preferred treatment, and not vice versa. This "all roads lead to rome" model is contrary to the rest of medicine, where differential treatment effects are to be expected. Why, therefore, is there confusion? A dimensional model for depression homogenises the multiple underlying subtypes of depression. This leads to treatments being tested as having universal application instead of targeting the specific depressive subtypes. This largely underpins the lack of specificity in RCT evidence. These trials involve patients who bear little resemblance to those who clinicians see in everyday practice. These trials also select and favour natural and rapid responders. Therefore the failure to differentiate between drug and placebo is unsurprising in the RCTs. Our spectrum model seeks to identify clinically meaningful expressions of depression, allowing drugs to be targeted to separate depressive conditions and their underlying cause. This allows a rational model for prevention and long-term management. For example, when treating depression associated with anxiety, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) produce a high response in patients with internalised anxious worrying or externalised irritability. Not only do they treat the depression but also the fundamental cause. In summary, efficacy data will continue to provide little meaningful clinical information while treatments are tested as "universal" in reference to non-specific conditions such as "major depression". Through use of the spectrum model, therapy can be better fitted to depression subtype, through identification of clinical phenotypes and their causes.

The biochemical bases of the placebo effect

A great variety of medical conditions are subject to the placebo effect. Although there is mounting evidence to suggest that the placebo effect is related to the expectation of clinical benefit, little is still known about the biochemical bases underlying placebo responses. Positron emission tomography studies have recently shown that the placebo effect in Parkinson's disease, pain, and depression is related to the activation of the limbic circuitry. The observation that placebo administration induces the release of dopamine in the ventral striatum of patients with Parkinson's disease suggests a link between the placebo effect and reward mechanisms. In addition to Parkinson's disease, the placebo-reward model may also apply to other disorders. However, the relative contribution of the different neurotransmitters and neuropeptides that are known to be involved in modulating the activity of the limbic system may be disease-specific. Thus, while the placebo-induced clinical benefit observed in Parkinson's disease would mostly reflect the release of dopamine in the dorsal striatum, the activation of opioid and serotonin pathways could be particularly implicated in mediating placebo responses encountered in pain and depression, respectively.

Homeopathic remedies as placebo alternatives--verification on the example of treatment of menopause-related vegetative and emotional disturbances

With the example of treatment of menopause-related vegetative and emotional disturbances, the author verifies the effectiveness of the use of Ignatia amara containing complex homeopathic remedies (IACCHR) as an alternative to placebo. Substantial improvement in psychological and psychosomatic symptoms was observed. Climacteric complaints diminished or disappeared completely in the majority of women (95.7% by patient evaluation and 96.2% by physician evaluation). Compared to standard pharmaceuticals, IACCHR treatment was tolerated better and lower risk of side effects was observed. The results obtained in this work indicate the significant therapeutic potential of this group of treatments, which is in line with the therapeutic effect of the placebo. Nevertheless, the showing of specific effects in pharmacological tests disqualifies the investigated treatments from use in a clinical trial in place of a placebo.

Commercially available Hypericum perforatum extracts do not decrease immobility of rats in the forced swimming test

There are controversial results of clinical trials on the antidepressant effects of Hypericum perforatum, while several preclinical studies describe antidepressant properties for Hypericum extracts. This study evaluates the antidepressant effect of two commercially available hydroalcoholic extracts of H. perforatum standardized to contain 0.3% hypericin in comparison to imipramine (IMI), in the forced swimming test (FST). Wistar rats were treated with different doses of two Hypericum extracts, of hypericin or of IMI and submitted to the FST. The experiments were videotape recorded to detail immobile and active behaviors of rats during the procedures. The imported extract tested and hypericin did not modify rats' behaviors in the test, while IMI, a classical antidepressant, significantly shortened immobility and prolonged climbing behavior during forced swimming. The locally produced Hypericum extract significantly increased immobility duration as compared to the controls at the same time as climbing efforts were decreased. Therefore, the two different commercially available Brazilian hydroalcoholic H. perforatum extracts did not show the expected effects in a screening test for antidepressant agents, on the contrary, one of the extracts promoted a depressant-like effect in rats. Therefore, these extracts available to the population differ from other Hypericum extracts. At which step of the production or commercialization chain these extracts probably lost their therapeutic potential remains to be evaluated.

Use of resampling to select among alternative error structure specifications for GLMM analyses of repeated measurements

Autocorrelated error and missing data due to dropouts have fostered interest in the flexible general linear mixed model (GLMM) procedures for analysis of data from controlled clinical trials. The user of these adaptable statistical tools must, however, choose among alternative structural models to represent the correlated repeated measurements. The fit of the error structure model specification is important for validity of tests for differences in patterns of treatment effects across time, particularly when maximum likelihood procedures are relied upon. Results can be affected significantly by the error specification that is selected, so a principled basis for selecting the specification is important. As no theoretical grounds are usually available to guide this decision, empirical criteria have been developed that focus on mode fit. The current report proposes alternative empirical criteria that focus on bootstrap estimates of actual type I error an power of tests for treatment effects. Results for model selection before and after the blind is broken are compared. Goodness-of-fit statistics also compare favourably for models fitted to the blinded or unblinded data, although the correspondence to actual type I error and power depends on the particular fit statistic that is considered.

Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects

RATIONALE

Research subjects who are unable to provide informed consent must be protected from exploitation. The federal regulations governing human subjects research mandate additional protections for "mentally disabled" subjects but include neither a definition of this "vulnerable" population nor any guidance on what safeguards should be employed or how they should be implemented.

OBJECTIVES

This article begins with a definition of vulnerability due to a mental disorder in the context of the clinical research setting. It is organized along the following sequential phases of psychopharmacological research: study design and methodology; protocol review; subject recruitment and enrollment; conduct and monitoring of the study; and manuscript preparation and publication. Practical recommendations are then offered to clinical researchers and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) for implementing additional protections for decisionally impaired subjects at each phase of the psychopharmacological research process.

METHODS

A computer-assisted literature review was performed to identify descriptions of safeguards for decisionally impaired subjects. Recommendations for additional protections were also drawn from the authors' experiences with the IRB review process and the conduct and monitoring of clinical research with decisionally impaired subjects.

RESULTS

The use of informed consent monitoring and the independent assessment of decision-making capacity are two feasible safeguards that IRBs can mandate for research with decisionally impaired subjects. There has been little systematic implementation of other safeguards such as research advance directives or prospective authorization for research participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical investigators and IRBs are under considerable scrutiny with respect to the protection of decisionally impaired research subjects. There is a pressing need for data-driven strategies for the optimal protection of decisionally impaired research subjects.

AAPS/RAPS/CAPRA collaborative program: exploring the challenges of drug regulation in a global environment: clinical concerns

Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry has led to a need to harmonize the regulatory requirements governing the marketing of medicinal products. To minimize the barriers impeding global drug product registration, the International Conference on the Harmonization of Technical Requirements of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) was established in 1990. The ICH has developed a series of guidelines that reflect agreements reached by participating nations on aspects of the chemistry and clinical technical sections that will fulfill the regulatory requirements of these various jurisdications. Nevertheless, there continue to be points of divergent perspectives and barriers that can impede the use of foreign clinical data. Given the importance of these issues, the Regulatory Science (RS) section of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), in conjunction with the Regulatory Affairs Professional Society (RAPS) and the Canadian Association of Professional Regulatory Affairs (CAPRA) cosponsored a public forum on this topic. This manuscript provides a summary of the speaker presentations and audience discussions regarding the design of clinical trials and the extrapolation of results from these trials to support international drug registration.

Complementary and alternative therapeutics: rigorous research is needed to support claims

The establishment of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) in 1998 as a part of the National Institutes of Health was catalyzed by the increasing interest and use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) modalities by the public. This article presents an overview of CAM, summarizes similarities and differences between the regulatory requirements for drugs and CAM/botanical products, identifies several challenges and opportunities for conducting research to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of CAM therapeutics, and highlights the role of NCCAM in supporting and stimulating research in this area.

An open-label pilot study of St. John's wort in juvenile depression

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study examined the effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort) in the treatment of youths diagnosed with major depressive disorder.

METHOD

Youths 6 to 16 years of age meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder with depressive symptoms of at least moderate severity were eligible to enroll between January 1999 and January 2001 in this 8-week, prospective, open-label, outpatient study. Outcome measures included the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. A priori criteria for response consisted of a CDRS-R score of </=28 and a CGI severity score </=2. Patients were initially prescribed 150 mg St. John's wort three times daily. If at the end of week 4 the patient did not meet a priori response criteria, the dose was increased to 300 mg three times daily.

RESULTS

Thirty-three youths with a mean (SD) age of 10.5 (2.9) years were enrolled. After 4 weeks of St. John's wort therapy, 22 youths had their dose increased to 900 mg/day. Twenty-five of the patients met response criteria after 8 weeks of treatment. Overall, St. John's wort was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

St. John's wort may be an effective treatment for youths diagnosed with major depressive disorder. Placebo controlled trials seem indicated.

Clinical trials of antidepressant medications are producing meaningless results

A recent alert from the UK Committee on Safety of Medicines stated that the dangers of treatment of depression with paroxetine outweigh the benefits in those under 18. Such a warning should focus our minds on the evidence on which clinical practice is based. Antidepressant treatment of depression in the under-18s has been thought to be justified because clinical trials show that it works so well in over-18s. But is that a reasonable assessment of the evidence? Kirsch et al (2002) use the analogy of ‘The Emperor's New Clothes' to describe the findings from their meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants. They conclude that antidepressant medication appears to have only a small effect on outcome over and above placebo. In this analogy psychiatry is the emperor, drug trials are the fraudsters and the deception is being revealed by a growing body of critical opinion proposing that, once methodological problems with clinical trials are taken into account, antidepressants either do not work at all or have an effect that is so small as to be clinically unimportant (Andrews, 2001; Moncrieff, 2002). A large number of randomised placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants have been carried out over the past decades, mostly funded by the pharmaceutical industry, and it is now recognised that about 50% of negative trials go unpublished (Thase, 1999). Meanwhile, unipolar depression has jumped into the top five of the world's total burden of disease, and there is an imperative need for effective and safe treatments. Do we need more randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressant medications, or has that research paradigm outlived its usefulness? In this month's debate, Professor Gordon Parker, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Australia, and Drs Ian Anderson and Peter Haddad from the University of Manchester discuss whether clinical trials for antidepressant medication produce meaningless results.

Mechanism of action of St John's wort in depression : what is known?

Extracts of Hypericum perforatum L. (St John's wort) are now successfully competing for status as a standard antidepressant therapy. Because of this, great effort has been devoted to identifying the active antidepressant compounds in the extract. From a phytochemical point of view, St John's wort is one of the best-investigated medicinal plants. A series of bioactive compounds has been detected in the crude material, namely flavonol derivatives, biflavones, proanthocyanidines, xanthones, phloroglucinols and naphthodianthrones. Although St John's wort has been subjected to extensive scientific studies in the last decade, there are still many open questions about its pharmacology and mechanism of action. Initial biochemical studies reported that St John's wort is only a weak inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-A and -B activity but that it inhibits the synaptosomal uptake of serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline (norepinephrine) with approximately equal affinity. However, other in vitro binding assays carried out using St John's wort extract demonstrated significant affinity for adenosine, GABA(A), GABA(B) and glutamate receptors. In vivo St John's wort extract leads to a downregulation of beta-adrenergic receptors and an upregulation of serotonin 5-HT(2) receptors in the rat frontal cortex and causes changes in neurotransmitter concentrations in brain areas that are implicated in depression. In studies using the rat forced swimming test, an animal model of depression, St John's wort extracts induced a significant reduction of immobility. In other experimental models of depression, including acute and chronic forms of escape deficit induced by stressors, St John's wort extract was shown to protect rats from the consequences of unavoidable stress. Recent neuroendocrine studies suggest that St John's wort is involved in the regulation of genes that control hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function. With regard to the antidepressant effects of St John's wort extract, many of the pharmacological activities appear to be attributable to the naphthodianthrone hypericin, the phloroglucinol derivative hyperforin and several flavonoids. This review integrates new findings of possible mechanisms that may underlie the antidepressant action of St John's wort and its active constituents with a large body of existing literature.

St John's wort: a systematic review of adverse effects and drug interactions for the consultation psychiatrist

St. John's wort is an herb commonly used in Europe for decades and more recently the topic of scientific investigation in this country. St. John's wort has been found more effective than placebo and equally as effective as tricyclic antidepressants in the short-term management of mild-to-moderate depression. Comparisons to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have provided equivocal data. While it is generally well tolerated in clinical use, there is accumulating evidence of significant interactions with drugs. This evidence-based presentation of the literature includes a brief description of pharmacodynamics and clinical applications, followed by a systematic review of adverse effects, toxicity, and drug interactions.

Plant derivatives in the treatment of alcohol dependency

The present review summarizes the findings of the effects of extracts of purified compounds from several plants on alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats. These include St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum, HPE), kudzu (Pueraria lobata) and ibogaine (Tabernanthe iboga). Alcohol-preferring (P), Marchigian Sardinian (msP), high-alcohol-drinking (HAD), Fawn-Hooded (FH) rats were allowed to drink alcohol or water voluntarily to establish baseline levels. Pure compounds (puerarin, daidzin, daidzein or analogs) isolated from kudzu, extracts from HPE or ibogaine and its analog were given by either intraperitoneal or oral administration. After acute administration, all agents dose-dependently reduced alcohol intake with minimal effects on food intake. Puerarin and HPE were also effective following chronic treatment. Overall, it is clear that pure compounds (daidzin, puerarin), extracts from St. John's wort, ibogaine and an ibogaine analog suppress alcohol intake in animal models of excessive drinking with minimal effects on other appetitive behaviors. Although the true mechanisms of action of these compounds on alcohol intake are not fully understood, with the current information, it appears that these compounds exert their effects by modulating several neuronal systems implicated in drinking behavior. However, their role in the future of pharmacotherapy for alcoholism will depend upon the outcome of carefully conducted clinical trials.

Quality, efficacy and safety of complementary medicines: fashions, facts and the future. Part II: Efficacy and safety

This is the second of two papers which review issues concerning complementary medicines. The first reviewed the extent of use of complementary medicines, and issues related to the regulation and pharmaceutical quality of these products; the second considers evidence for the efficacy of several well-known complementary medicines, and discusses complementary-medicines pharmacovigilance. The term complementary medicines describes a range of pharmaceutical-type preparations, including herbal medicines, homoeopathic remedies, essential oils and dietary supplements, which mainly sit outside conventional medicine. The use of complementary medicines is a popular healthcare approach in the UK, and there are signs that the use of such products is continuing to increase. Patients and the public use complementary medicines for health maintenance, for the treatment or prevention of minor ailments, and also for serious, chronic illnesses. There is a growing body of evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to support the efficacy of certain herbal extracts and dietary supplements in particular conditions. However, many other preparations remain untested. Strictly speaking, evidence of efficacy (and safety) for herbal medicines should be considered to be extract specific. Pharmacovigilance for complementary medicines is in its infancy. Data are lacking in several areas relevant to safety. Standard pharmacovigilance tools have additional limitations when applied to investigating safety concerns with complementary medicines.

Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo

In non-inferiority trials, where non-inferiority of a new experimental drug compared to an active control has to be shown, it may be advisable to use an additional placebo group for internal validation if ethically justifiable. The focus of this paper is on such designs. Assuming normality and homogeneity of variances we will derive a statistical test procedure which turns out to be equivalent to the assessment based on Fieller's confidence interval. Based on the power function of this test, sample size calculations are carried out to achieve a given power. Additionally, the optimal allocation of the total sample size is derived. As an alternative to this parametric procedure, the bootstrap percentile interval is discussed and finally compared with Fieller's confidence interval in a study on mildly asthmatic patients.

Depression in late life: review and commentary

Depression is perhaps the most frequent cause of emotional suffering in later life and significantly decreases quality of life in older adults. In recent years, the literature on late-life depression has exploded. Many gaps in our understanding of the outcome of late-life depression have been filled. Intriguing findings have emerged regarding the etiology of late-onset depression. The number of studies documenting the evidence base for therapy has increased dramatically. Here, I first address case definition, and then I review the current community- and clinic-based epidemiological studies. Next I address the outcome of late-life depression, including morbidity and mortality studies. Then I present the extant evidence regarding the etiology of depression in late life from a biopsychosocial perspective. Finally, I present evidence for the current therapies prescribed for depressed elders, ranging from medications to group therapy.

Herbal remedies for alcoholism: promises and possible pitfalls

This review summarizes the findings of the effects on alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats of extracts or purified compounds from two of the most promising herbs: kudzu (Pueraria lobata) and St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum). It is a summary of a symposium presented at the 2002 RSA meeting in San Francisco. The meeting organizers/co-chairs were David Overstreet and Wing-Ming Keung. The presentations were (1) Introduction to the symposium, by David Y. W. Lee and David H. Overstreet; (2) Effects of daidzin on alcohol intake-search for mechanisms of action, by Wing-Ming Keung; (3) Long-term suppressive effects of puerarin on alcohol drinking in rats, by David Overstreet and David Y. W. Lee; (4) St. John's Wort extract reduces alcohol intake in FH and P rats, by Amir Rezvani and David Overstreet; and (5) extracts reduce alcohol intake in Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats, by Maurizio Massi.

Antagonist effect of pseudohypericin at CRF1 receptors

St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) is widely used for the treatment of mild to moderately severe depression. However, the nature of its active principles and the exact mode of antidepressant action are still unknown. It has been suggested repeatedly in preclinical and clinical studies that the content of the acylphloroglucinol hyperforin decisively contributes to the antidepressant efficacy of St. John's wort extracts. Experimental studies in vivo also indicate that the naphthodianthrone hypericin may reduce the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Exacerbated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity has often been associated with depressive states in patients. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) seems to be a major determinant in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity via activation of CRF(1) receptors. In the present study, we investigated the CRF(1) receptor antagonist activity of three main constituents of St. John's wort (hypericin, pseudohypericin and hyperforin) by measuring their effect on CRF-stimulated cAMP formation in recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. As a selectivity test, the compounds were also tested against calcitonin in the same cells. Of the three compounds tested, only pseudohypericin selectively antagonised CRF (K(B) 0.76 microM). Hypericin and hyperforin affected both CRF and calcitonin with similar potencies and the same type of behaviour (competitive antagonism for hypericin, noncompetitive for hyperforin). It is concluded that pseudohypericin is the only real CRF(1) receptor antagonist of the three constituents tested. In addition, evidence is provided that beside hyperforin, both pseudohypericin and hypericin are implicated in the antidepressant efficacy of St. John's wort.

Recent developments in the psychobiology and pharmacotherapy of depression: optimising existing treatments and novel approaches for the future

Effective antidepressants include monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and novel agents, including serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors. Although effective, current treatments most often produce partial symptomatic improvement (response) rather than symptom resolution and optimal functioning (remission). While current pharmacotherapies target monoaminergic systems, different symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) may have distinct neurobiological underpinnings and other neurobiological systems are likely involved in the pathogenesis of MDD. In this article a review of current pharmacotherapeutic options for MDD, current understanding of the neurobiology and pathogenesis of MDD and a review of new and promising directions in pharmacological research will be provided. It is generally accepted that no single neurotransmitter or system is responsible for the dysregulation found in MDD. While agents that affect monoaminergic systems will likely continue to be first-line treatments for MDD for the foreseeable future, a number of new and novel agents, including corticotropin-releasing factor antagonists, substance P antagonists and antiglucocorticoids show considerable promise for refining treatment options. In order to better understand the neurobiology and treatment response of MDD, it is probable that more sophisticated theory-driven typologies of MDD will have to be developed.

Complementary and Alternative Medicines in the Treatment of Dementia

Alternative medicines may have potential beneficial results in treating certain forms of dementia and related symptoms, as well as slowing disease progression. Alternative medicines may ameliorate disturbances in cognition, mood, sleep and activities of daily living. Primary mechanisms of action include modifications in neurotransmitter synthesis, inhibition of neurotransmitter reuptake and enzyme-induced neurotransmitter breakdown, antioxidant and anti-platelet activity, enhanced blood flow and glucose metabolism. Adverse events can include cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, mood, autonomic and dermatologic effects. However, adverse events, when reported represent, a small percentage of treated groups and direct links between adverse events and alternative therapies are tenuous. Many studies of alternative medicines in dementia are inconclusive and characterised by methodological deficiencies such as small sample sizes and inadequate controls. If alternative medicines can be shown to be efficacious using more rigorous experimental designs, both consumers and clinicians could avail themselves of a wider range of pharmacological substances that may offer the advantage of being better tolerated and exhibiting safer therapeutic margins than some allopathic medicines. While a number of complementary interventions have shown both strengths and weaknesses, huperzine A, levacecarnine and EGB 761, based on the overall quality of the studies, identified mechanisms of activity and safety profiles merit further examination in controlled clinical outcome studies.

Complementary and alternative medicine in neurology: hype, hope and hazards

More and more neurological patients use some form of complementary and alternative medicine. Contrary to what many sceptics believe, not all of these approaches are useless. Contrary to what many proponents think, not all treatments are harmless. Neurologists should know more about complementary and alternative medicine and should advise their patients responsibly.

The meaning response and the ethics of avoiding placebos

Because the "placebo effect" seems to result from "deception," it is often disparaged and despised. Rethinking this and realizing that these benefits flow largely from the meaning of medical encounters (and are far better understood as "meaning responses"); realizing that there need be no deception to elicit them and that they are often very desirable, engaging fundamental human biological pathways, puts the ethical dilemma in a new light. It seems unethical to avoid--to evade--coming to a full understanding of how meaning can so profoundly improve human well-being.

Clinical practice guidelines for depression in young people: are the treatment recommendations outdated?

The 1997 NHMRC clinical practice guidelines for depression in young people included recommendations for treatment that need to be modified in light of more recent research. Changes to the guidelines should include the findings that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and some forms of psychotherapy are effective in treating adolescent depression. It is increasingly recognised that depression in adolescents often recurs and that prevention of recurrences should be a priority for research and practice.

Implications of self-administered St. John's wort for depression symptom management

PURPOSE

To provide nurse practitioners (NPs) with a greater understanding of the complex issues surrounding St. John's wort as a self-treatment for depression; to review laws regulating the production and sale of herbal products in the United States (U.S.); and to review clinical and practice implications for the self-administration of St. John's wort and herbal treatments.

DATA SOURCES

Federal regulations pertaining to herbal products, current research literature, and anecdotal and consumer reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Current research findings suggest that St. John's wort may be an effective treatment for mild depression; however, evidence of significant adverse drug interactions with St. John's wort should not be overlooked.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical assessment of the mildly depressed patient wishing to self-administer St. John's wort requires basic knowledge of this herbal supplement including regulation and risk information. An open NP-patient relationship helps to ensure patient disclosure of self-administered St. John's wort.

Challenges and opportunities confronting the botanical dietary supplement industry

The intent of this review is to identify and characterize the scientific challenges confronting the botanical dietary supplements industry, explore opposing sides of some controversial issues, and outline an agenda for addressing the more acute problems. The issues posing the greatest challenge to the industry center on quality, safety, and benefit. A key conclusion is that development of the scientific base of the industry has not kept pace with the rapid expansion of the manufacturing and marketing components. Recommendations for addressing the existing challenges are offered.

Clinical trials with hypericum extracts in patients with depression--results, comparisons, conclusions for therapy with antidepressant drugs

By the spring of 2002, results from 34 controlled, double-blind trials of Hypericum extracts in some 3000 patients, predominantly with mild to moderate forms of depression, had been published. An overview is given of the studies conducted since 1990. In the majority of them, the efficacy criterion (primary endpoint) was the score and/or response rate on the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HAMD). In ten studies, based on extracts prepared with 50% or 60% ethanol in water (V/V), the dosages ranged from 300 mg to 1050 mg of extract per day. Five of the ten studies were placebo-controlled and in all five cases, the Hypericum extract was shown to be significantly superior. Results with Hypericum were as good or even better than with imipramine or fluoxetine. In the period since 1990, a total of twelve controlled trials have been published with one particular extract prepared with 80% methanol in water (V/V), of which six were placebo-controlled, two compared Hypericum with imipramine and one each with maprotiline, amitriptyline, sertraline or light therapy. Dosages ranged from 450-1200 mg extract per day. Statistical analysis of the total Hamilton scores showed significant differences between Hypericum extract and placebo in four of the six placebo-controlled studies and a trend in favour of the active treatment in the other two. Of the five comparative trials against four different synthetic antidepressants, amitriptyline was significantly superior to Hypericum after six weeks of therapy, whilst there were no significant differences in treatment outcome between Hypericum and the other synthetics in the remaining four studies. The results of the trials conducted to date show no major differences in efficacy of the alcoholic extracts. Taking all the results into account, it can be assumed that the threshold dose for efficacy against individual symptoms and complaints that occur in the course of the depressive illness could be about 300 mg of extract per day. In the medically supervised treatment of mild to moderate depression, doses of approximately 500-1000 mg of extract per day of these preparations of St. John's Wort are of comparable efficacy to synthetic antidepressants in their normally prescribed dosages.

Thrombocytopenia Caused by a Protein Pump Inhibitor; Hepatic Failure Associated with the Benzodiazepine Triazolam; Three Cases of Transient Encephalopathy with Paclitaxel; Thalidomide Problems: Hypothyroidism and Venous Thrombosis; Hypertensive Crisis with St. John's Wort

The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), to discuss methods of prevention, and to promote reporting of ADRs to the FDA's medWatch program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting preventable ADR to medWatch, please consider sharing the account with our readers.