Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments

Kinematically aligned TKA can align knee joint line to horizontal

PURPOSE

The joint line of the native knee is horizontal to the floor and perpendicular to the vertical weight-bearing axis of the patient in a bipedal stance. The purposes of this study were as follows: (1) to find out the distribution of the native joint line in a population of normal patients with normal knees; (2) to compare the native joint line orientation between patients receiving conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), navigated mechanically aligned TKA, and kinematically aligned TKA; and (3) to determine which of the three TKA methods aligns the postoperative knee joint perpendicular to the weight-bearing axis of the limb in bipedal stance.

METHODS

To determine the joint line orientation of a native knee, 50 full-length standing hip-to-ankle digital radiographs were obtained in 50 young, healthy individuals. The angle between knee joint line and the line parallel to the floor was measured and defined as joint line orientation angle (JLOA). JLOA was also measured prior to and after conventional mechanically aligned TKA (65 knees), mechanically aligned TKA using imageless navigation (65 knees), and kinematically aligned TKA (65 knees). The proportion of the knees similar to the native joint line was calculated for each group.

RESULTS

The mean JLOA in healthy individuals was parallel to the floor (0.2° ± 1.1°). The pre-operative JLOA of all treatment groups slanted down to the lateral side. Postoperative JLOA slanted down to the lateral side in conventional mechanically aligned TKA (-3.3° ± 2.2°) and in navigation mechanically aligned TKA (-2.6° ± 1.8°), while it was horizontal to the floor in kinematically aligned TKA (0.6° ± 1.7°). Only 6.9 % of the conventional mechanically aligned TKA and 16.9 % of the navigation mechanically aligned TKA were within one SD of the mean JLOA of the native knee, while the proportion was significantly higher (50.8 %) in kinematically aligned TKA. The portion was statistically greater in mechanically aligned TKA group than the other two.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative joint line orientation after kinematically aligned TKA was more similar to that of native knees than that of mechanically aligned TKA and horizontal to the floor. Kinematically aligned TKA can restore pre-arthritic knee joint line orientation, while mechanically aligned TKA is inefficient in achieving the purpose even if navigation TKA is employed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Does malalignment affect patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

Background

Total knee replacement is an effective treatment for knee arthritis. While the majority of TKAs have demonstrated promising long-term results, up to 20 % of patients remain dissatisfied with the outcome of surgery at 1 year. Implant malalignment has been implicated as a contributing factor to less successful outcomes. Recent evidence has challenged the relationship between alignment and patient reported outcome measures. Given the number of procedures per year, clarity on this integral aspect of the procedure is necessary.

Objective

To investigate the association between malalignment and PROMS following primary TKA.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE, CINHAL, and EMBASE was carried out to identify studies published from 2000 onwards. The study protocol including search strategy can be found on the PROSPERO database for systematic reviews.

Results

From a total of 2107 citations, 18 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising of 2214 patients. Overall 41 comparisons were made between a malalignment parameter and a PROM, with 30 comparisons (73 %) demonstrating no association. However, 50 % (n = 9) of the studies with ‘Low risk’ radiological assessment methods have reported a statistically significant association between one or more parameter of malalignment and PROMS.

Conculsion

When considering malalignment in an individual parameter, there is an inconsistent relationship with PROMs scores. Malalignment may be related to worse PROMs scores, but if that relationship exists it is weak and of dubious clinical significance. However, this evidence is subject to limitations mainly related to the methods of assessing alignment post operatively and by the possibility that the premise of traditional mechanical alignment is erroneous. Larger longitudinal studies with a standardised, timely, and robust method for assessing alignment outcomes are required.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2790-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Innovations in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Improved Technical Precision, But Unclear Clinical Benefits

Total knee arthroplasty has been an effective treatment for advanced degenerative joint disease. Traditional knee designs and surgical approaches have resulted in consistently high performance, but some patients may remain dissatisfied after their surgery. Several surgical innovations, including accelerometer-based navigation, patient-specific instrumentation, and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, have been developed to improve the accuracy and precision of total knee arthroplasty surgery, with anticipated secondary benefits of improved functional outcomes and implant survivorship. This article reviews the current status of these technologies as reported in contemporary orthopedic literature. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):217-220.].

What are the bias, imprecision, and limits of agreement for finding the flexion-extension plane of the knee with five tibial reference lines?

BACKGROUND

Internal-external (I-E) malrotation of the tibial component is associated with poor function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA uses a functionally defined flexion-extension (F-E) tibial reference line, which is parallel to the F-E plane of the extended knee, to set I-E rotation of the tibial component.

METHODS

Sixty-two, three-dimensional bone models of normal knees were analyzed. We computed the bias (mean), imprecision (±standard deviation), and limits of agreement (mean±2 standard deviations) of the angle between five anatomically defined tibial reference lines used in mechanically aligned (MA) TKA and the F-E tibial reference line (+external).

RESULTS

The following are the bias, imprecision, and limits of agreement of the angle between the F-E tibial reference line and 1) the tibial reference lines connecting the medial border (-2°±6°, -14° to 10°), medial 1/3 (6°±6°, -6° to 18°), and the most anterior point of the tibial tubercle (9°±4°, -1° to 17°) with the center of the posterior cruciate ligament, and 2) the tibial reference lines perpendicular to the posterior condylar axis of the tibia (-3°±4°, -11° to 5°), and a line connecting the centers of the tibial condyles (1°±4°, -7° to 9°).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on these in vitro findings, it might be prudent to reconsider setting the I-E rotation of the tibial component to tibial reference lines that have bias, imprecision, and limits of agreement that fall outside the -7° to 10° range associated with high function after KA TKA.

Selective Medial Release Technique Using the Pie-Crusting Method for Medial Tightness During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The pie-crusting method is popular in releasing lateral tightness during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but is not well described for medial release. We established a selective medial release technique using the pie-crusting technique and investigated the effectiveness and safety of the technique during primary TKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 729 primary TKAs with varus deformity between October 2009 and June 2012. Medial tightness in flexion was released by traditional subperiosteal stripping for the anterior portion of the medial collateral ligament (aMCL). Medial tightness in extension was released by the pie crusting for the tight fibers in the posterior portion of the MCL and/or posteromedial corner structures (pMCL/PMCS). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Knee Society (KS) scores and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Any complications, including late medial instability that may be related to our surgical technique, were carefully inspected.

RESULTS

Among the 729 knees, 170 (23.3%) required subperiosteal stripping for balancing in flexion only, 186 (25.5%) required the pie-crusting for balancing in extension only and 142 (19.5%) required subperiosteal stripping and the pie-crusting for balancing in flexion and extension. The KS knee score was improved from 52.5 to 83.4, KS function score from 58.2 to 91.9, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index from 42.7 to 21.8 (P < .001, all). No specific complications related to our technique were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The selective medial release technique appears to be an effective and safe method to obtain a balanced mediolateral gap in primary TKA.

Changes in sagittal component alignment alters patellar kinematics in TKA: an in vitro study

PURPOSE

Patellar maltracking due to incorrect component alignment is considered as a main reason for anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In contrast to coronal and axial component placement, the influence of sagittal component alignment on patellar kinematics has not been investigated so far.

METHODS

In ten lower cadaveric limbs, TKAs were implanted using a commercial computer navigation system. In six knees, the femoral component was aligned in 5° and in four knees in 0° of flexion, respectively. Patellar kinematics were registered by means of a computer navigation system using an additional patella tracking array and correlated with femoral and tibial sagittal component alignment.

RESULTS

Sagittal component alignment significantly altered patellar mediolateral shift (p < 0.05). In contrast, patellar epicondylar distance, rotation and tilt were not significantly influenced.

CONCLUSIONS

Sagittal component alignment in TKA has a major impact on patellar kinematics and should therefore be considered while addressing tibiofemoral kinematics intraoperatively.

Kinematic TKA using navigation: Surgical technique and initial results

BACKGROUND

Kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be one way of improving outcomes. Previous studies have either used patient-specific instrumentation, which adds cost, or standard instrumentation, which provides no intraoperative feedback on resection alignment.

HYPOTHESIS

To determine if computer navigation could reproduce native patient anatomy and simplify ligament balance during TKA whilst giving satisfactory improvements in functional scores at early follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computer navigation was used for kinematic distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts in 100 consecutive and unselected TKAs. Resections were modified only if measured angles fell outside a pre-defined safe range of combined coronal orientation within±3 degrees of neutral and/or independent femoral or tibial cuts within±5 degrees. Pre- and postoperative measurements of the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were taken using long-leg standing radiographs. Clinical evaluation was with the WOMAC and KOOS scales.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 2.4 years (range 1.0-3.7, SD 0.8). The mean pre-op LDFA was 2.1 degrees valgus (9.2 valgus to 3.7 varus, SD 2.5) and 1.8 degrees valgus post-op (5.7 valgus to 4.2 varus, SD 2.0) (P=0.41). The mean pre-op MPTA was 3.0 degrees varus (10.6 valgus to 10.2 varus, SD 3.2) and 2.4 degrees varus post-op (4.0 valgus to 6.8 varus, SD 2.2) (P=0.03). The mean WOMAC score improved from 49.4 (29-85, SD 12.8) to 24.7 (0-73, SD 16.5) (P<0.001) and the mean KOOS score from 37.1 (7.2-77.2, SD 13.0) to 65.1 (26.8-100, SD 16) (P<0.001). Five knees (5%) required additional ligament release, four with valgus OA and one with varus OA. Two knees (2%) required lateral retinacular release for patellar tracking.

DISCUSSION

Computer navigation for kinematic TKA provides the operating surgeon with full control and feedback at each step, whilst also allowing partial correction of more extreme anatomy that might be unsuitable for recreation during TKA. This technique helps to preserve ligament isometry and produces satisfactory improvements in functional scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective case series review).

Does Malrotation of the Tibial and Femoral Components Compromise Function in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Internal and external malrotation of the femoral and tibial components is associated with poor function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We determined the degree of malrotation for both components in kinematically aligned TKA and whether this malrotation compromised function. Seventy-one patients (mean age 68 years) were followed after TKA. Malrotation was measured. Simple regression determined the association between malrotation and function. Even though the range of malrotation of the tibial component can be greater than that of the femoral component, the malrotation of the femoral and tibial components bounded by the ranges reported in this study is compatible with a well-functioning TKA.

Deviations From Optimal Alignment in TKA: Is There a Biomechanical Difference Between Femoral or Tibial Component Alignment?

Restoration of neutral mechanical alignment is one of the prerequisites for long-term TKA survival. This study aimed to investigate the effect of deviations from neutral alignment on bone and implant stress and on ligament strain. Using a previously validated finite element model, a neutrally aligned TKA model was compared to 3 different varus and valgus configurations induced by tibial or by femoral component only and by both component simultaneously. Each model underwent a 2500 N vertical load simulating the peak walking force. Varus and valgus alignment increased polyethylene and bone stress, and altered ligament strains, as compared to the neutral aligned model. Changes in alignment of the tibial component were always associated with more detrimental effects compared to the one of the femoral component.

Does malalignment affect revision rate in total knee replacements: a systematic review of the literature

To ensure implant durability following Modern total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, one long held principle in condylar total knee arthroplasty is positioning the components in alignment with the mechanical axis and restoring the overall limb alignment to 180° ± 3°. However, this view has been challenged recently. Given the high number of TKR performed, clarity on this integral aspect of the procedure is necessary. To investigate the association between malalignment following primary TKR and revision rates. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using a computerised literature search of Medline, CINHAL, and EMBASE to identify English-language studies published from 2000 through to 2014. Studies with adequate information on the correlation between malalignment and revision rate with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were considered for inclusion. A study protocol, including the detailed search strategy was published on the PROSPERO database for systematic reviews. From an initial 2107 citations, eight studies, with variable methodological qualities, were eligible for inclusion. Collectively, nine parameters of alignment were studied, and 20 assessments were made between an alignment parameter and revision rate. Four out of eight studies demonstrated an association between a malalignment parameter and increased revision rates. In the coronal plane, only three studies assessed the mechanical axis. None of these studies found an association with revision rates, whereas four of the five studies investigating the anatomical axis found an association between malalignment and increased revision rate. This study demonstrates the effect of malalignment on revision rates is likely to be modest. Interestingly, studies that used mechanical alignment in the coronal plane demonstrated no association with revision rates. This questions the premise of patient specific instrumentation devices based on the mechanically aligned knee when considering revision as the endpoint.

Native Knee Laxities at 0°, 45°, and 90° of Flexion and Their Relationship to the Goal of the Gap-Balancing Alignment Method of Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Gap-balancing is an alignment method for total knee arthroplasty with the goal of creating uniform tension in the periarticular soft-tissue restraints and equal laxities throughout the arc of flexion. However, there is little evidence that achieving equal laxities prevents either overly tight or overly loose soft-tissue restraints after total knee arthroplasty. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether the laxities at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion are equal in the native knee.

METHODS

Seven different laxities were measured at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion in ten fresh-frozen native cadaveric knees (with intact menisci, cartilage, and ligaments) by applying loads of ±5 Nm in varus-valgus rotation, ±3 Nm in internal-external rotation, 100 N in distraction, and ±45 N in anterior-posterior translation with use of a six-degrees-of-freedom load application system.

RESULTS

The mean laxities (and standard deviations) at 45° of flexion were 1.7° ± 0.6° greater in varus, 0.9° ± 0.4° greater in valgus, 10.2° ± 2.7° greater in internal rotation, 10.1° ± 2.0° greater in external rotation, 1.7 ± 1.0 mm greater in distraction translation, and 3.3 ± 1.5 mm greater in anterior translation than those at 0° of flexion. The mean laxities at 90° of flexion were 2.5° ± 0.8° greater in varus, 1.0° ± 0.5° greater in valgus, 10.0° ± 4.6° greater in internal rotation, 10.1° ± 4.5° greater in external rotation, 1.8 ± 0.7 mm greater in distraction, and 1.6 ± 1.2 mm greater in anterior translation than those at 0° of flexion. The mean anterior translation at 90° of flexion was 1.7 ± 0.9 mm less than that at 45° of flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Because five of the seven laxities were at least 1.7° or 1.6 mm greater at both 45° and 90° of flexion than those at 0° of flexion, the laxities of the native knee measured in this study are unequal at these flexion angles and therefore do not support the goal of gap-balancing in total knee arthroplasty.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

One possible disadvantage of changing the native laxities at 45° and 90° of flexion to match those at 0° of flexion in a total knee arthroplasty is the overly tight soft-tissue restraints relative to those of the native knee, which patients may perceive as pain, stiffness, and/or limited flexion.

Is a shortened length of stay and increased rate of discharge to home associated with a low readmission rate and cost-effectiveness after primary total knee arthroplasty?

Background

It is controversial whether shortening the average length of hospital stay and increasing discharge from a rehabilitation facility to home with either health care or outpatient physical therapy is safe and cost-effective.

Methods

We computed the average length of hospital stay; the rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility, home with health care, or home with outpatient physical therapy; the all-cause readmission rate within 30 days of discharge per year; and cost savings for 2328 consecutive patients treated with a unilateral primary total knee replacement between 2009 and 2014.

Results

The average length of hospital stay per year shortened from 2.0 to 1.3 days (P < .0001); the rate of discharge per year to a rehabilitation facility decreased from 41% to 1% and increased from 9% to 53% to home with outpatient physical therapy (P < .0001); and the rate of readmission within 30 days per year did not change (P = .38). The cost savings averaged $3245 per patient.

Conclusions

A shorter length of hospital stay and an increased rate of discharge to home was not associated with an increased rate of readmission within 30 days and was cost-effective.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic study

Alignment and fixation in total knee arthroplasty

Many aspects of total knee arthroplasty have changed since its inception. Modern prosthetic design, better fixation techniques, improved polyethylene wear characteristics and rehabilitation, have all contributed to a large change in revision rates. Arthroplasty patients now expect longevity of their prostheses and demand functional improvement to match. This has led to a re-examination of the long-held belief that mechanical alignment is instrumental to a successful outcome and a focus on restoring healthy joint kinematics. A combination of kinematic restoration and uncemented, adaptable fixation may hold the key to future advances.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(10 Suppl A):16–19.

Ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty-Medial stabilizing technique

Ligament balancing is one of the most important surgical techniques for successful total knee arthroplasty. It has traditionally been recommended that medial and lateral as well as flexion and extension gaps are equal. This article reviews the relevant literature and discusses the clinical importance of the aforementioned gaps. Current evidence indicates that achieving medial stability throughout the range of motion should be a high priority in ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Finally, the medial stabilising surgical technique, which aims to achieve good medial stability in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty, is introduced.

Restoration of constitutional alignment in TKA leads to more physiological strains in the collateral ligaments

PURPOSE

Currently, controversy exists whether restoration of neutral mechanical alignment should be attempted in all patients undergoing TKA. Our hypothesis was that restoration of constitutional rather than neutral mechanical alignment may in theory lead to a more physiological strain pattern in the collateral ligaments; therefore, it could potentially be beneficial to patients. Thus, the aim of this study was to measure collateral ligament strains during three motor tasks in the native knee and compare them with the strains noted after TKA in different post-operative alignment conditions.

METHODS

Six cadaver specimens (approval number ML4190 from the Research Ethics Committee of University of Leuven, Belgium) were examined using a validated knee kinematics rig under physiological loading conditions. The effect of coronal malalignment was evaluated by using custom-made tibial implant inserts that induced different alignment conditions. The study of six specimens allows us to show that a difference in the mean strains in MCL and LCL of 3.6 and 5.8 %, respectively, was statistically significant with a probability (power) of 0.8.

RESULTS

The results indicated that after TKA insertion, the strains in the collateral ligaments closely resembled the pre-operative pattern of the native knee specimens when constitutional alignment was restored. Restoration to neutral mechanical alignment was associated with greater collateral strain deviations from the native knee.

CONCLUSION

Based upon this study, it was concluded that restoration of constitutional alignment within a "safe zone" of ±2° during TKA leads to more physiological peri-articular soft tissue strains during loaded as well as unloaded motor tasks.

No demonstrable benefit for coronal alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies assessing alignment outcomes in patient-specific instrumented (PSI) knee arthroplasty was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PRISMA compliant data was extracted from literature databases up to January 2014.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 1792 knees. Twenty-three studies reported alignment outcomes in the coronal plane, 11 in the sagittal plane. In all but three series, MRI was the preoperative imaging modality. Range of mean postoperative alignment (hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle) was 176.5 to 181.70. The proportion of three degrees of outliers showed an overall mean of 18.6%. In total, fifteen studies compared alignment outcomes between standard and PSI. From these, four studies showed significantly higher accuracy of coronal plane alignment with PSI (HKA angle). Meta-analysis of seven high-quality comparative studies demonstrated no significant increased accuracy in postoperative mechanical axis (HKA angle) with PSI. Subgroup meta-analysis of both femoral and tibial rotation was not feasible due to a low number of inclusive high-quality series.

CONCLUSIONS

PSI knee arthroplasty is shown not to confer increased accuracy in reconstituting the postoperative mechanical axis. Further studies are required to demonstrate both clinical and radiological alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty with focus upon tibial and femoral rotation.

Different femorotibial contact on the weight-bearing: midflexion between normal and varus aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The influence of residual malalignment on biomechanical analysis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently uncertain. The hypothesis is that postoperative alignment would influence the in vivo kinematics after TKA, under weight-bearing conditions but not under non-weight-bearing condition. The purpose of the present study was to compare weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions and to evaluate the effect of the postoperative alignment on the in vivo kinematics after posterior cruciate ligament-retaining TKA during midflexion using 2-dimensional/3-dimensional registration.

METHODS

Thirty knees of 30 patients with pre-operative varus deformity were divided into 2 groups according to their postoperative alignment: the normal alignment group (N = 21) and the varus alignment group (N = 9).

RESULTS

Under weight-bearing conditions, the varus alignment group showed a significant posterior displacement of the medial femoral condyle (flexion: 80°, 90° P < 0.05) and a significant anterior displacement of the lateral femoral condyle (flexion: 10° P < 0.01, 20° P < 0.05, and extension: 10°, 20° P < 0.01, 30°, 40° P < 0.05) as compared with the normal alignment group. In contrast, no significant difference in the medial and lateral femoral condyle positions under non-weight-bearing conditions was observed between the normal and varus alignment groups.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative alignment influenced knee kinematics under weight-bearing conditions. The weight load influenced knee kinematics through posterior tibial slope and induced greater lateral femoral condyle mobility, which might explain the better clinical and functional outcome. These findings contribute to gaining a proper understanding of the in vivo kinematics of the postoperative varus alignment and might be useful for orthopaedic surgeons in the achievement of patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Kinematic alignment produces near-normal knee motion but increases contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: A case study on a single implant design

BACKGROUND

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is of increasing interest because this method might improve postoperative patient satisfaction. In kinematic alignment the femoral component is implanted in a slightly more valgus and internally rotated position, and the tibial component is implanted in a slightly more varus and internally rotated position, than in mechanical alignment. However, the biomechanics of kinematically aligned TKA remain largely unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the kinematics and contact stresses of mechanically and kinematically aligned TKAs.

METHODS

A musculoskeletal computer simulation was used to determine the effects of mechanically or kinematically aligned TKA. Knee kinematics were examined for mechanically aligned, kinematically aligned, and kinematically aligned outlier models. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral contact forces were measured using finite element analysis.

RESULTS

Greater femoral rollback and more external rotation of the femoral component were observed with kinematically aligned TKA than mechanically aligned TKA. However, patellofemoral and tibiofemoral contact stresses were increased in kinematically aligned TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that kinematically aligned TKA produces near-normal knee kinematics, but that concerns for long-term outcome might arise because of high contact stresses.

Distal femoral condyle is more internally rotated to the patellar tendon at 90° of flexion in normal knees

Background

The configuration of the distal surface of the femur would be more important in terms of the patellofemoral (PF) joint contact because the patella generally contacts with the distal surface of the femur in knee flexion. Some total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs configurate medially prominent asymmetric femoral condyles. This difference in the design of distal femoral condyle may affect the PF joint congruity in knee flexion. Furthermore, some surgeons advocate a concept aligning the symmetric components parallel to the native joint inclination, not perpendicular to the mechanical axis. This concept would also make a difference on the PF joint congruity at the distal femur in knee flexion. However, no fundamental study has been reported on the PF congruity at the distal femur to discuss the theoretical priority of these concepts.

The current study investigated the angular relationship between the tibial attachment of the patellar tendon and the distal surface of the femur at 90° of flexion in normal knees.

Methods

The open magnetic resonance images of 45 normal knees at 90° of flexion were used to measure the angles between the tibial attachment of the patellar tendon, the equatorial line of the patella, and the distal surface of femoral condyles.

Results

The distal surface of femoral condyles was internally rotated relative to the tibial attachment of the patellar tendon and the equatorial line of the patella in all the knees (8.2° ± 3.5° and 5.8° ± 2.5°, respectively), not parallel.

Conclusions

Distal femoral condyle is internally rotated to the patellar tendon at 90° of flexion in normal knees. When the symmetric femoral component is aligned perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis, the patellar tendon would be possibly more twisted than the condition in normal knees, and the deviation of the PF contact force on the patellar component might be caused. The configuration and alignment of the distal condyle of the femoral component can affect the PF joint congruity in knee flexion. In this respect, our results provide important information in considering designs and alignment in the distal femur of TKA and the PF joint congruity in knee flexion.

Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

We report the six year implant survivorship, tibial component alignment and knee and limb function measured by the Oxford Knee Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ((WOMAC) score after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and tested the hypothesis that varus alignment of the tibial component, knee, or limb does not adversely affect implant survival and function.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 214 consecutive patients (219 knees) treated with a kinematically aligned TKA in 2007. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and revision rate per 100 component years determined implant failure. The Oxford Knee Score (0 worst, 48 best) and WOMAC score (0 worst, 100 best) were used to measure function. We categorised tibial component alignment as in-range (≤ 0°) or varus (>0°), knee alignment as in-range (between -2.5° and -7.4°), varus (>-2.5°), or valgus (<-7.4°), and limb alignment as in-range (0° ± 3°), varus (>3°) or valgus (<-3°).

RESULTS

At a mean of 6.3 years (range, 5.8-7.2), implant survivorship was 97.5 % and revision-rate per 100 component years 0.40. Three implants had been revised (deep infection one, loose tibial component one and patella instability [1); two loose patella components were pending revision and considered failures. The average Oxford Knee Score was 43 and WOMAC 91. Function of tibial components (80 %), knees (31 %) and limbs (7 %) that were aligned in varus was similar to patients aligned in-range.

CONCLUSIONS

At a mean of 6.3 years after kinematically aligned TKA, varus alignment of the tibial component, knee and limb did not adversely affect implant survival or function, which supports the consideration of kinematic alignment as an alternative to mechanical alignment for performing primary TKA. Level of evidence, III; therapeutic study.

Relationship of the posterior femoral axis of the "kinematically aligned" total knee arthroplasty to the posterior condylar, transepicondylar, and anteroposterior femoral axes

BACKGROUND

A recent proposed modification in surgical technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been the introduction of the "kinematically aligned" TKA, in which the angle and level of the posterior joint line of the femoral component and joint line of the tibial component are aligned to those of the "normal," pre-arthritic knee. The purpose of this study was to establish the relationship of the posterior femoral axis of the "kinematically aligned" total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to the traditional axes used to set femoral component rotation.

METHODS

One hundred and fourteen consecutive, unselected patients with preoperative MRI images undergoing TKA were retrospectively reviewed. The transepicondylar axis (TEA), posterior condylar axis (PCA), antero-posterior axis (APA) of the trochlear groove, and posterior femoral axis of the kinematically aligned TKA (KAA) were templated on axial MRI images by two independent observers. The relationships between the KAA, TEA, APA, and PCA were determined, with a negative value indicating relative internal rotation of the axis.

RESULTS

On average, the KAA was 0.5° externally rotated relative to the PCA (minimum of -3.6°, maximum of 5.8°), -4.0° internally rotated relative to the TEA (minimum of -10.5°, maximum of 2.3°), and -96.4° internally rotated relative to the APA (minimum of -104.5°, maximum of -88.5°). Each of these relationships exhibited a wide range of potential values.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a kinematically aligned surgical technique internally rotates the posterior femoral axis relative to the transepicondylar axis, which significantly differs from current alignment instrument targets.

Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) may facilitate better positioning of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) along the coronal and lateral axes; however, there are doubts as to its usefulness in the rotational plane.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 95 TKAs comparing two groups: the CAS group and the standard equipment group. The series comprises 95 cases. A radiography of the lower limb and computer tomographies (CTs) of the femoral condylar region, the proximal end of the tibia and the ankle were performed to measure rotational angulation. A month after TKA surgery, the radiography and the CTs were repeated to analyze the position of the prosthetic components in the rotational plane.

RESULTS

In the coronal axis, both CAS and mechanical technique improved femoro-tibial alignment, but when there are preexisting deformities ≥4°, CAS obtains better results. A strong correlation (R = 0.94, p = 0.001) was observed between the mean rotational axis measured with CT in the tibial plateau and that measured from the axis of the ankle. The mean initial femoral rotation of the complete series was 6.7° and 2.7° at 1-month follow-up (p < 0.001). In the standard instrumentation group, the femoral rotation went from 6.8° to 2.3°, whereas in the CAS group the femoral rotation went from 6.5° to 3.1° (p = 0.039), which is very close to the ideal 3° angle of external rotation. Tibial rotation changed by 5.28° for the entire patient population, but no differences were found when comparing CAS and standard instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

CAS improves frontal alignment in TKA, especially in the presence of preoperative deformities. In the femoral component, navigation most closely replicated the ideal 3° external rotation of the femoral component, but tibial rotation did not differ when comparing CAS to standard instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) positions the femoral component at the natural angle and level of the distal (0°) and posterior (90°) joint line. This technique applies referencing guides at 0° and 90° that are adjusted to compensate for wear and kerf and perform resections equal in thickness to the femoral component. Knowing whether femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable would assist in establishing general guidelines for adjusting the resection level of these two referencing guides. This study tests the hypothesis that femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the varus and valgus osteoarthritic knee treated with TKA.

METHODS

The study consists of 205 patients and 208 knees with Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 or 4 osteoarthritis and treated with a TKA. Each knee had a narrow slice (2 mm) preoperative 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance image in the sagittal plane. Femoral bone and cartilage wear at 0° and 90° was computed from best-fit circles superimposed on the peripheral boundary of the subchondral bone on the medial and lateral femoral condyles.

RESULTS

Overall, 99.5% of knees had minimal bone wear (<1 mm) at 0° and 90°. In the 74% (154 of 208) of knees with a varus deformity, 92% at 0° and 2 % at 90° had >1 mm cartilage wear on the medial femoral condyle. In the 26% (54 of 208) of knees with a valgus deformity, 78% at 0° and 55% at 90° had ≥1 mm cartilage wear on the lateral femoral condyle.

CONCLUSIONS

As a general guideline, adjustment for femoral bone wear is rarely required when performing kinematically aligned TKA. Most osteoarthritic knees require adjustment of the distal referencing guide to compensate for cartilage wear on the medial femoral condyle in the varus knee and the lateral femoral condyle in the valgus knee. Adjustment of the posterior referencing guide is required in about half of valgus osteoarthritic knees to compensate for lateral cartilage wear at 90°. Knowing that bone wear is rare and cartilage wear is predictable in varus and valgus Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 or 4 osteoarthritic knees helps establish general guidelines for adjusting the distal and posterior femoral referencing guides to restore the natural angle and level of the femoral joint lines when performing kinematically aligned TKA with generic instruments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement

A national, multi-centre study was designed in which a questionnaire quantifying the degree of patient satisfaction and residual symptoms in patients following total knee replacement (TKR) was administered by an independent, blinded third party survey centre. A total of 90% of patients reported satisfaction with the overall functioning of their knee, but 66% felt their knee to be ‘normal’, with the reported incidence of residual symptoms and functional problems ranging from 33% to 54%. Female patients and patients from low-income households had increased odds of reporting dissatisfaction. Neither the use of contemporary implant designs (gender-specific, high-flex, rotating platform) or custom cutting guides (CCG) with a neutral mechanical axis target improved patient-perceived outcomes. However, use of a CCG to perform a so-called kinematically aligned TKR showed a trend towards more patients reporting their knee to feel ‘normal’ when compared with a so called mechanically aligned TKR

This data shows a degree of dissatisfaction and residual symptoms following TKR, and that several recent modifications in implant design and surgical technique have not improved the current situation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):96–100.

A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results

We have previously reported the short-term radiological results of a randomised controlled trial comparing kinematically aligned total knee replacement (TKR) and mechanically aligned TKR, along with early pain and function scores. In this study we report the two-year clinical results from this trial. A total of 88 patients (88 knees) were randomly allocated to undergo either kinematically aligned TKR using patient-specific guides, or mechanically aligned TKR using conventional instruments. They were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded to the method of alignment. At a minimum of two years, all outcomes were better for the kinematically aligned group, as determined by the mean Oxford knee score (40 (15 to 48) versus 33 (13 to 48); p = 0.005), the mean Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis index (WOMAC) (15 (0 to 63) versus 26 (0 to 73); p = 0.005), mean combined Knee Society score (160 (93 to 200) versus 137 (64 to 200); p= 0.005) and mean flexion of 121° (100 to 150) versus 113° (80 to 130) (p = 0.002). The odds ratio of having a pain-free knee at two years with the kinematically aligned technique (Oxford and WOMAC pain scores) was 3.2 (p = 0.020) and 4.9 (p = 0.001), respectively, compared with the mechanically aligned technique. Patients in the kinematically aligned group walked a mean of 50 feet further in hospital prior to discharge compared with the mechanically aligned group (p = 0.044). In this study, the use of a kinematic alignment technique performed with patient-specific guides provided better pain relief and restored better function and range of movement than the mechanical alignment technique performed with conventional instruments.

What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment are thought to play a significant role in outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exact definitions and references for optimal alignment are, however, still being debated. This overview of the literature describes different definitions of component alignment following primary TKA for (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane, (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane, (3) tibial and femoral component placement in the sagittal plane, and (4) rotational alignment of tibial and femoral components and their role in outcome and implant survival.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for original and review articles on implant positioning following primary TKA. Definitions for coronal, sagittal, and rotational placement of femoral and tibial components were summarized and the influence of positioning on survival and functional outcome was considered.

RESULTS

Many definitions exist when evaluating placement of femoral and tibial components. Implant alignment plays a role in both survival and functional outcome following primary TKA, as component malalignment can lead to increased failure rates, maltracking, and knee pain.

INTERPRETATION

Based on currently available evidence, surgeons should aim for optimal alignment of tibial and femoral components when performing TKA.

Coronal alignment in total knee replacement

Substantial healthcare resources have been devoted to computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation systems that improve the reproducibility with which neutral mechanical alignment can be achieved following total knee replacement (TKR). This choice of alignment is based on the long-held tenet that the alignment of the limb post-operatively should be within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis. Several recent studies have demonstrated no significant difference in survivorship when comparing well aligned versus malaligned TKRs. Our aim was to review the anatomical alignment of the knee, the historical and contemporary data on a neutral mechanical axis in TKR, and the feasibility of kinematically-aligned TKRs.

Review of the literature suggests that a neutral mechanical axis remains the optimal guide to alignment.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:857–62.