Identification of causative foods in children with eosinophilic esophagitis treated with an elimination diet

Inflammation-associated microbiota in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergic disorder characterized by eosinophil-predominant esophageal inflammation, which can be ameliorated by food antigen restriction. Though recent studies suggest that changes in dietary composition may alter the distal gut microbiome, little is currently known about the impact of a restricted diet upon microbial communities of the oral and esophageal microenvironments in the context of EoE. We hypothesize that the oral and esophageal microbiomes of EoE patients are distinct from non-EoE controls, that these differences correspond to changes in esophageal inflammation, and that targeted therapeutic dietary intervention may influence community structure. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized the bacterial composition of the oral and esophageal microenvironments using oral swabs and esophageal biopsies from 35 non-EoE pediatric controls and compared this cohort to samples from 33 pediatric EoE subjects studied in a longitudinal fashion before and after defined dietary changes.

RESULTS

Firmicutes were more abundant in esophageal samples compared to oral. Proportions of bacterial communities were significantly different comparing all EoE esophageal microbiota to non-EoE controls, with enrichment of Proteobacteria, including Neisseria and Corynebacterium in the EoE cohort, and predominance of the Firmicutes in non-EoE control subjects. We detected a statistically significant difference between actively inflamed EoE biopsies and non-EoE controls. Overall, though targeted dietary intervention did not lead to significant differences in either oral or esophageal microbiota, reintroduction of highly allergenic foods led to enrichment in Ganulicatella and Campylobacter genera in the esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the esophageal microbiome in EoE is distinct from that of non-EoE controls, with maximal differences observed during active allergic inflammation.

Review article: the diagnosis and management of food allergy and food intolerances

BACKGROUND

Adverse reactions to food include immune mediated food allergies and non-immune mediated food intolerances. Food allergies and intolerances are often confused by health professionals, patients and the public.

AIM

To critically review the data relating to diagnosis and management of food allergy and food intolerance in adults and children.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database were searched up until May 2014, using search terms related to food allergy and intolerance.

RESULTS

An estimated one-fifth of the population believe that they have adverse reactions to food. Estimates of true IgE-mediated food allergy vary, but in some countries it may be as prevalent as 4-7% of preschool children. The most common food allergens are cow's milk, egg, peanut, tree nuts, soy, shellfish and finned fish. Reactions vary from urticaria to anaphylaxis and death. Tolerance for many foods including milk and egg develops with age, but is far less likely with peanut allergy. Estimates of IgE-mediated food allergy in adults are closer to 1-2%. Non-IgE-mediated food allergies such as Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome are rarer and predominantly recognised in childhood. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders including eosinophilic oesophagitis are mixed IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergic conditions, and are improved by dietary exclusions. By contrast food intolerances are nonspecific, and the resultant symptoms resemble other common medically unexplained complaints, often overlapping with symptoms found in functional disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome. Improved dietary treatments for the irritable bowel syndrome have recently been described.

CONCLUSIONS

Food allergies are more common in children, can be life-threatening and are distinct from food intolerances. Food intolerances may pose little risk but since functional disorders are so prevalent, greater efforts to understand adverse effects of foods in functional disorders are warranted.

Value of microarray allergen assay in the management of eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a disorder characterised by oesophageal dysfunction and, histologically, by eosinophilic inflammation. Although treatment, which includes dilatations, oral corticosteroids and restrictive diets, is often effective, choosing the foods to be eliminated from the diet is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

Component resolved diagnostic by microarray allergen assay may be useful in detecting allergens that might be involved in the inflammatory process.

METHODS

We studied 67 patients with EoE, diagnosed clinically and histologically by endoscopic biopsy. CRD analysis with microarray technology was carried out in the 67 EoE patients, 50 patients with pollen allergy without digestive symptoms, and 50 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Allergies were not detected by microarray in only seven of the 67 patients with EoE. Controls with pollen allergy showed sensitisation to different groups of pollen proteins without significant differences. In EoE patients with response to some allergens, the predominant allergens were grasses group 1 and, in particular, nCyn d 1 (Cynodon dactylon) or Bermuda grass pollen in 59.5%, followed by lipid transfer proteins (LTP) of peach (19.40%), hazelnut (17.91%) and Artemisia (19.40%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EoE, sensitisation to plant foods and pollen is important. The proteins most frequently involved are nCyn d 1 and lipid transfer proteins, hazelnuts and walnuts. After one year of an array-guided exclusion diet and pollen-specific immunotherapy in the case of high levels of response, patients with EoE showed preliminary significant improvements.

Practical approach to implementing dietary therapy in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis: the Chicago experience

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune/antigen-mediated esophageal disease characterized by esophageal dysfunction and esophageal mucosal eosinophilia. Diet therapy is effective in the treatment of EoE in both children and adults. The role of food allergens is well established in the pathogenesis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Empiric elimination with a six-food elimination diet (avoiding milk, wheat, egg, soy, peanuts/tree nuts, and fish/shellfish) demonstrates remission in over 70% of adults with this disease. Dietary therapy in adult EoE is becoming more accepted by both patients and clinicians. Dietary therapy can be effectively implemented in clinical practice with appropriate dietary education, patient resources, and close communication with physician and clinical staff. The ability to identify specific food triggers to help tailor dietary therapy for long-term management allows for a return to consumption of most table foods. Furthermore, the diet approach avoids the need for chronic topical corticosteroid use and possible long-term side effects of these medications. The decision to proceed with dietary therapy should be decided by patient preference and available resources. A collaborative and multidisciplinary approach including gastroenterologists, allergists, nurses, and dietitians is essential in the success of this approach.

BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of cow's milk allergy

This guideline advises on the management of patients with cow's milk allergy. Cow's milk allergy presents in the first year of life with estimated population prevalence between 2% and 3%. The clinical manifestations of cow's milk allergy are very variable in type and severity making it the most difficult food allergy to diagnose. A careful age- and disease-specific history with relevant allergy tests including detection of milk-specific IgE (by skin prick test or serum assay), diagnostic elimination diet, and oral challenge will aid in diagnosis in most cases. Treatment is advice on cow's milk avoidance and suitable substitute milks. Cow's milk allergy often resolves. Reintroduction can be achieved by the graded exposure, either at home or supervised in hospital depending on severity, using a milk ladder. Where cow's milk allergy persists, novel treatment options may include oral tolerance induction, although most authors do not currently recommend it for routine clinical practice. Cow's milk allergy must be distinguished from primary lactose intolerance. This guideline was prepared by the Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) and is intended for clinicians in secondary and tertiary care. The recommendations are evidence based, but where evidence is lacking the panel of experts in the committee reached consensus. Grades of recommendation are shown throughout. The document encompasses epidemiology, natural history, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: an emerging disease in childhood - review of diagnostic and management strategies

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune/antigen mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus. It comprises a separate entity of increasing incidence and prevalence in children and adults. The disease is characterized by histological evidence of dense esophageal tissue eosinophilia in the presence of a variety of upper GI symptoms including vomiting, dysphagia, food impaction, and odynophagia. Cornerstone of treatment is dietary intervention and/or the off-label use of swallowed topical corticosteroids. New drug therapies are under investigation. In this review, we focus on the diagnostic approach and the currently available treatment strategies.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: a practical approach to diagnosis and management

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has emerged as a common cause of dysphagia and food impaction in children and adults. A trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is a mandatory diagnostic first step, given that at least one third of patients with suspected EoE will have PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. Once EoE is diagnosed, short-and long-term therapeutic decision making may rely on patient symptoms, phenotype (inflammatory vs fibrostenotic) and preferences. Currently, the most reliable therapeutic targets are mucosal healing and caliber abnormalities resolution. Topical steroids followed by endoscopic dilation are recommended in symptomatic narrow caliber esophagus/strictures, whereas either topical steroids or dietary therapy are good short-term options for mucosal inflammation. Maintenance anti-inflammatory therapy is necessary to prevent esophageal fibrotic remodeling and stricture formation.

Age-based differences in the diagnosis and management of esophageal eosinophilia

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is hallmarked by esophageal eosinophilia, >15 eosinophils(eos)/high-powered field (hpf), unresponsive to acid inhibition, and varied symptomatology. EoE consensus guidelines do not discriminate based on age for initiating treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if age-related differences exist in managing esophageal eosinophilia and EoE within a university population.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study from a referral center, the medical records of 426 pediatric and adult patients with at least 1 presenting symptom of esophagitis, reflux, or upper gastrointestinal dysfunction, who underwent esophageal biopsy between 2009 and 2011 were analyzed for age-based differences in care in diagnosing and managing esophageal eosinophilia.

RESULTS

For these patients, 79.6% (336/426) had ≥15 eos/hpf in biopsy specimens, which was not associated with age. Significantly fewer adults than children with ≥15 eos/hpf were diagnosed with EoE (P < .001), referred for allergy evaluation (P < .001), started on swallowed steroid therapy (P < .001), or underwent repeated biopsy (P < .001). Increasing age, atopy, and increasing biopsy peak eos count moderated these effects, but the adjusted predicted probabilities for these outcomes were significantly lower among adults. Restriction for an 8-week prebiopsy proton-pump inhibitor trial did not alter the age-based relationships for an allergy referral or repeated biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous age-based differences in the management of symptomatic patients with esophageal eosinophilia existed in this cohort. Adults were significantly less likely than children to receive a clinical diagnosis of EoE, allergy referral, or steroid treatment, or to have a repeated biopsy. Even when stratified for an 8-week prebiopsy proton-pump inhibitor trial, advancing age was associated with lower odds of referral or repeated biopsy. Further study is necessary to better understand why discrepancies exist and their potential ramifications.

Dietary elimination of children with food protein induced gastrointestinal allergy - micronutrient adequacy with and without a hypoallergenic formula?

Background

The cornerstone for management of Food protein-induced gastrointestinal allergy (FPGIA) is dietary exclusion; however the micronutrient intake of this population has been poorly studied. We set out to determine the dietary intake of children on an elimination diet for this food allergy and hypothesised that the type of elimination diet and the presence of a hypoallergenic formula (HF) significantly impacts on micronutrient intake.

Method

A prospective observational study was conducted on children diagnosed with FPIGA on an exclusion diet who completed a 3 day semi-quantitative food diary 4 weeks after commencing the diet. Nutritional intake where HF was used was compared to those without HF, with or without a vitamin and mineral supplement (VMS).

Results

One-hundred-and-five food diaries were included in the data analysis: 70 boys (66.7%) with median age of 21.8 months [IQR: 10 - 67.7]. Fifty-three children (50.5%) consumed a HF and the volume of consumption was correlated to micronutrient intake. Significantly (p <0.05) more children reached their micronutrient requirements if a HF was consumed. In those without a HF, some continued not to achieve requirements in particular for vitamin D and zinc, in spite of VMS.

Conclusion

This study points towards the important micronutrient contribution of a HF in children with FPIGA. Children, who are not on a HF and without a VMS, are at increased risk of low intakes in particular vitamin D and zinc. Further studies need to be performed, to assess whether dietary intake translates into actual biological deficiencies.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: a clinicopathological review

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is considered to be a chronic antigen-driven disease whereby food and/or aeroallergens induce a chronic inflammatory infiltrate in the esophagus, resulting in pathological hyperplasia of the epithelia and muscular layers, and fibrosis of the lamina propria (referred to collectively as remodelling) and the symptoms of dysphagia and food impaction. EoE shares features with other atopic conditions of asthma and atopic dermatitis, such as a TH2 cytokine milieu and a mixed inflammatory infiltrate of eosinophils, mast cells and lymphocytes. Relatively distinct features include the strong male predominance amongst adult patients, and the expression of the eosinophil chemokine eotaxin 3. Current first line treatments such as strict dietary modification and corticosteroids fail many patients. Looking forward, clarification of distinct genotype/phenotype associations, determining the reversibility of remodelling following treatment, and the development of new pharmacotherapies that target fibrotic pathways (as opposed to eosinophilic inflammation per se) or specifically improve barrier integrity appear relevant.

Health-related quality of life over time in children with eosinophilic esophagitis and their families

OBJECTIVES

Existing treatments for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) effectively reduce inflammation. The impact of treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time for pediatric patients with EoE and their families, however, has not been systematically assessed. We hypothesized that individualized multidisciplinary treatment would improve both child and family HRQoL over time, with improvements associated with decreased symptom severity.

METHODS

Children with EoE treated in 4 tertiary care centers were enrolled. Baseline assessments occurred at the time of patients' first evaluation; follow-up assessments occurred at 2 and 6 months after baseline. Presence and severity of 8 EoE symptoms were measured. HRQoL was measured with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory parent proxy report, child self-report (CR), and Family Impact Module (FIM). Statistical analyses used mixed-effects modeling to test changes over time for child and family HRQoL.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven children were enrolled (ages 2-18 years, mean age 7.7 years ± 4.8, 78% boys, 80% white). Baseline mean symptom number was 3.5 (standard deviation 2.3), and symptom severity was 5.5 (standard deviation, 4.5). HRQoL scores were significantly related to symptom scores (P < 0.001). EoE symptom severity decreased during the study (P = 0.03). Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory parent proxy Total and FIM Total scores improved from baseline to 6 months (respectively, adjusted means 78.4 vs 81.0, P = 0.0006; 68.9 vs 70.1, P = 0.03). Interactions with baseline symptom severity revealed that subjects with lowest symptom severity showed the most improved HRQoL scores (P = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL improved during the course of evaluation and treatment, with positive changes being strongest for patients with less symptom severity at baseline.

Comparison of atopic features between children and adults with eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathological diagnosis seen in children as well as adults. Growing evidence suggests that EoE is strongly associated with atopic disorders. Presenting symptoms differ in children and adults and it is not known whether atopic features vary by age. This study was designed to compare atopic features and allergic sensitization between children and adults with EoE. We conducted a retrospective analysis of demographic and clinical data from 50 children (aged 2-18 years) and 50 adults (aged 21-75 years) with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of EoE referred to our allergy clinic. Data regarding patient characteristics, history of atopic diseases, and allergy test results were collected for analysis. The majority of children and adults were white and male patients. When compared with adults, a higher percentage of children had a history of asthma (52% versus 24%; p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between adults and children regarding history of allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy, and family history of atopy. There was no statistically significant difference between children and adults regarding immediate-type sensitization to foods and aeroallergens. Compared with adults, a higher percentage of children showed a positive reaction to one or more foods on patch testing (62% versus 31%; p = 0.01). A high prevalence of comorbid atopic diseases and sensitizations to food and environmental allergens was seen in both children and adults. Children had a significantly higher rate of asthma and positive patch test to foods compared with adults.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults is associated with IgG4 and not mediated by IgE

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Eosinophilic esophagitis is usually triggered by foods, by unclear mechanisms. We evaluated the roles of IgE and IgG4 in the development of eosinophilic esophagitis.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis given an antibody against IgE (omalizumab, n = 16) or placebo (n = 14) every 2-4 weeks for 16 weeks, based on weight and serum level of IgE. Endoscopy was performed, esophageal biopsy specimens were collected, and symptoms were assessed at baseline and at 16 weeks. Maximum numbers of eosinophils/high-power field were determined. Homogenates of esophageal biopsy specimens from 11 subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis and 8 without (controls) were assessed for IgM, IgA, and IgG subclasses. In a retrospective analysis, we performed immunofluorescence analysis of IgG4 in fixed esophageal tissues from 2 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis who underwent esophagectomy and 47 consecutive autopsies (controls). We also performed immunofluorescence analysis of IgG4 in esophageal mucosal biopsy specimens from 24 subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis and 9 without (controls). Finally, sera were collected from 15 subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis and from 41 without (controls), and assayed for total and food-reactive IgG4.

RESULTS

Omalizumab did not alter symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis or eosinophil counts in biopsy samples compared with placebo. Homogenates of esophageal tissues from patients with eosinophilic esophagitis had a 45-fold increase in IgG4 compared with controls (P < 3 × 10(-5)), but no significant increases in other IgG subclasses, IgM, or IgA. Sparse stromal deposits resembling immune complexes were found in 2 of 5 eosinophilic esophagitis biopsy specimens based on ultrastructural analysis. Esophagectomy samples from 2 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis contained 180 and 300 IgG4 plasma cells/maximal high-power field, mainly in the deep lamina propria; these levels were greater than in tissues from controls. Fibrosis essentially was exclusive to the lamina propria. Granular extracellular IgG4 was detected in biopsy specimens from 21 of 24 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, but in none of the specimens from 9 controls (P = 6 × 10(-6)). The total serum level of IgG4 increased only slightly in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, compared with controls. Subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis had increased serum levels of IgG4 that reacted with milk, wheat, egg, and nuts-the 4 foods that most commonly trigger this condition (P ≤ 3 × 10(-4) for each food).

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective trial, omalizumab did not reduce symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis or tissue eosinophil counts compared with placebo. This finding, along with observed granular deposits of IgG4, abundant IgG4-containing plasma cells, and serum levels of IgG4 reactive to specific foods, indicate that, in adults, eosinophilic esophagitis is IgG4-associated, and not an IgE-induced allergy. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT 00123630.

Four-food group elimination diet for adult eosinophilic esophagitis: A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an esophageal disorder predominantly triggered by food antigens. A six-food group elimination diet (SFGED) achieves remission in more than 70% of adult patients with EoE. After individual food reintroduction, just 1 or 2 food triggers for EoE can be identified in 65% to 85% of the patients, so some dietary restrictions and endoscopies after food challenge may be unnecessary.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a four-food group elimination diet (FFGED) (dairy products, wheat, egg, and legumes) for adult patients with EoE.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter study. All patients were reevaluated after 6 weeks on an FFGED. Response to the FFGED was defined by clinical and histologic (<15 eos/hpf) remission. Responders underwent reintroduction of each individual food over 6 weeks followed by endoscopy and esophageal biopsies. Nonresponders were offered a rescue SFGED.

RESULTS

A total of 52 adult patients were included, of whom 12 patients (23%) had previous failure to topical steroid therapy. Twenty-eight of the 52 patients (54%) achieved clinicopathologic remission on the FFGED and 6 of the 19 (31%) nonresponders to the FFGED were successfully rescued with the SFGED. Twenty-two of 28 responders to the FFGED (78%) finished the individual food reintroduction challenge. Milk was identified as an EoE trigger in 11 patients (50%), egg in 8 (36%), wheat in 7 (31%), and legumes in 4 (18%). All patients had just 1 or 2 food triggers, with milk being the only causative food in 27% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

An FFGED achieved clinicopathologic remission in 54% of adult patients with EoE. An SFGED was effective in almost a third of FFGED nonresponders, resulting in a combined efficacy of 72% of both strategies.

Food allergy: a practice parameter update-2014

This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (JCAAI). The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Food Allergy: A practice parameter update-2014." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing one, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, ACAAI, and JCAAI. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion.

Pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis: the Vanderbilt experience

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic disease of the esophagus unresponsive to treatment with proton pump inhibitors. A combination of immediate, IgE-mediated and delayed, and non-IgE-mediated immune reactions to foods and aeroallergens is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis. Optimal methods to assess for food allergen sensitization have been debated. Patients with EoE often have comorbid atopic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize pediatric patients diagnosed with EoE at a single institution within the southeastern United States.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate 211 pediatric patients with EoE at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Aeroallergen and food sensitization profiles obtained by skin prick testing (SPT), atopy patch testing (APT), and history of associated atopic diseases were analyzed.

RESULTS

Older patients with EoE showed greater aeroallergen sensitization; the most common allergens were pollens and dust mite. Younger patients showed greater sensitization to foods by SPT and APT. The most common foods identified by SPT were peanut, egg, and soy. The most common foods identified by APT were potato, pork, and wheat. Comorbid atopic disease was common. Patients with atopic dermatitis did not show significantly greater sensitization to foods by SPT or APT compared with patients without atopic dermatitis.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric patients with EoE, sensitization to aeroallergens increases with age, whereas sensitization to foods decreases with age. Concomitant atopic disease is common. APT is useful to identify additional food allergens not detected by SPT. A history of atopic dermatitis does not appear to be associated with nonspecific positivity by SPT or APT.

Which patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) should receive elemental diets versus other therapies?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has increasingly been identified in both children and adults. The aim of therapies is to alleviate symptoms while reducing the esophageal inflammation. Mechanical dilation is effective at relieving symptoms, but without the benefit of controlling disease inflammation. Topical steroids appear to be effective at controlling both symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia. Recurrence rates are high once steroids are discontinued. For dietary modification, both the elimination of select, specific foods and the complete elimination of food proteins via amino acid formulas have been looked at. Both forms of dietary modification are effective. Elemental diet, although not an ideal first-line therapy for EoE, provides insight into the etiology of unusual or refractory EoE. The contribution of unusual food antigens to EoE may be determined via the use of amino-acid-based formulas in patients with EoE.

Food allergy testing in eosinophilic esophagitis: what the gastroenterologist needs to know

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic disease of increasing prevalence in children and adults. The triggering antigen in EoE is often a food that initiates a cascade of Th2-associated interleukins such as interleukin-5 and interleukin-13 and chemokines such as eotaxin-3 as well as esophageal eosinophilia and mastocytosis. Amino acid-based formulas have high efficacy rates in EoE and constitute the first evidence for food-triggered esophageal eosinophilia. Animal models have demonstrated the sufficiency of food antigens in triggering both the inflammatory and remodeling complications of EoE. Food elimination diets that are followed by single food introduction with repeat biopsy have proven the efficacy of empiric and allergy testing based elimination diets in children and adults. Although the ideal allergy test for identifying food antigens in EoE remains to be elucidated, the utility of food skin prick combined with atopy patch testing has been shown in large pediatric cohorts. By comparison, smaller, non-U.S. adult cohorts have not had similar results. Currently, a positive test on food allergy evaluation suggests a food trigger for EoE but does not substitute for biopsy-based tissue evaluation after food removal and reintroduction. The higher rates of food anaphylaxis in children with EoE, potential loss of tolerance to immunoglobulin E-positive foods that can occur with food avoidance, and the high rates of other atopic diatheses in EoE subjects all support the evaluation of EoE subject by an allergist, consideration for allergy testing, and an integrated approach by allergists, gastroenterologists, and pathologists in EoE management.

Steroids versus dietary therapy for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a condition characterized by dense mucosal eosinophilia in conjunction with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Since both the incidence and prevalence of EoE are on the rise in both children and adults, understanding the various treatment options available is imperative in choosing the proper treatment for each patient. This article will highlight the major strides in both medical and dietary treatment of EoE in the past year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Whereas prior studies have shown that medical therapy with topical corticosteroids is effective in treating EoE, this more recent literature highlights some of the limitations of this approach, raising awareness that development of better drug delivery models is greatly needed. The review also describes the recent advances in the field of dietary therapy for this disease, particularly in adults, and further supports the notion that the pathophysiology of this disease in children and adults is similar, with food antigens driving this disease.

SUMMARY

Both medical and dietary therapy are effective for treating adults and children with EoE. Choosing the optimal treatment approach should be individualized based both on patient goals and on available local resources. Future prospective clinical trials comparing these two treatment modalities are needed to help understand comparable effectiveness as well as to help understand potential predictors of response to treatment and identify optimal therapeutic endpoints.

Efficacy of IgE-targeted vs empiric six-food elimination diets for adult eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Skin testing-guided elimination diet has proved unsuccessful for adult eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), whereas empiric six-food elimination diet (SFED) achieves an efficacy of 70%.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of food-specific serum IgE-targeted elimination diet (sIgE-ED) and SFED.

METHODS

Prospective study in adult patients with EoE. Food-specific serum IgE, skin prick test (SPT) and atopy patch test (APT) to foods included in SFED were performed. Those with ≥1 positive IgE test, defined by ≥0.1 kU/l, followed a 6-week sIgE-ED, whereas non-IgE-sensitized patients underwent a 6-week SFED. Responders to diet (<15 eos/HPF) underwent individual reintroduction of foods followed by histological assessment.

RESULTS

Forty-three EoE patients were included (26 sIgE-ED and 17 SFED). Regarding sIgE-ED, the mean number of eliminated foods per patient was significantly lower than in SFED (3.81 vs 6; P < 0.001), being wheat (85%), nuts (73%) and cow's milk (61%) the most commonly foods withdrawn. No difference in histological response was observed between sIgE-ED and SFED (73% vs 53%, P = 0.17). Causative foods identified by food challenge were cow's milk (64%), wheat (28%), egg (21%) and legumes (7%), with a single food trigger in 71% of patients. sIgE exhibited the higher accuracy to predict offending foods in IgE-sensitized patients (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 68% (κ = 0.43)), with k values of 1 for cow's milk. APT results were all negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Histological remission was accomplished in 73% of patients undergoing sIgE-ED, which was nonsignificantly superior to SFED. sIgE effectively identified cow's milk as a food trigger in IgE-sensitized patients.

Dietary treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis

Emerging evidence supports impaired epithelial barrier function as the key initial event in the development of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and other allergic diseases. Symptom resolution, histologic remission, and prevention of both disease and treatment-related complications are the goals of treatment. Successful dietary treatments include elemental, empirical elimination and allergy test directed diets. Dietary therapy with exclusive elemental diet offers the best response. Cow's milk, wheat, egg, soy, peanut/tree nut, and fish/shellfish are the 6 food antigens most likely to induce esophageal inflammation.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: clinical presentation in children

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasing in western nations. Symptoms in infants and young children include feeding difficulties, failure to thrive, and gastroesophageal reflux. School-aged children may present with vomiting, abdominal pain, and regurgitation; adolescents and adults with dysphagia and food impaction. Delayed diagnosis increases risk of stricture formation. Children with untreated EoE have tissue changes resembling airway remodeling. Endoscopy does not always correlate. Management centers on food elimination. Approaches include skin prick and patch testing, removal of foods, or an amino acid formula diet. Long-term elimination diets can produce nutritional deficiencies and have poor adherence.

Efficacy of dietary interventions for inducing histologic remission in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Various dietary interventions have been used to treat patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), yielding varied results. This systematic review assesses the efficacy of different dietary therapies in inducing disease remission.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases for studies investigating the efficacy of dietary interventions (reducing infiltration by immune cells <15 eosinophils/high-power field in esophageal biopsies) for pediatric and adult patients with EoE. Summary estimates, including 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated for exclusive feeding with amino acid-based elemental formulas, allergy test result-directed food elimination diets, and 6-food elimination diets (SFED). A fixed- or random-effects model was used depending on heterogeneity (I(2)); publication bias risks were assessed by means of funnel plot analysis.

RESULTS

The search yielded 581 references; of these, 33 were included in the quantitative summary. We analyzed data on a total of 1317 patients with EoE (1128 children and 189 adults) who received different dietary treatments. Elemental diets were effective for 90.8% of cases (95% CI, 84.7%-95.5%; I(2) = 52.3%), SFED for 72.1% (95% CI, 65.8%-78.1%; I(2) = 0), and allergy test result-directed food elimination for 45.5% of cases (95% CI, 35.4%-55.7%; I(2) = 75.1%). Additional strategies (elimination of cow's milk, gluten-free diets, and 4-food elimination diet) were also evaluated. Adults vs children had no significant differences in remission after dietary interventions (67.2% vs 63.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary interventions are effective in producing histologic remission in patients with EoE. Elemental diets and SFEDs were the most effective, achieving <15 eosinophils/high-power field in 90.8% and 72.1% of patients, respectively.

Elimination diets in the management of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis, an increasingly recognized chronic inflammatory disorder isolated to the esophagus, is triggered by an abnormal allergic response to dietary antigens. Current treatment includes swallowed topical steroids and dietary modification, which aim to resolve symptoms and prevent long-term complications such as formation of strictures. The dietary approach has become more widely accepted because long-term steroid therapy is associated with potential risks. Dietary treatment includes elemental and elimination diets. An exclusive elemental diet, which requires replacement of all intact protein with amino acid-based formula, offers the best response of all available therapies, with remission in up to 96% of subjects proving it to be superior to all other available therapies including topical steroids. However, compliance with this approach is challenging because of poor taste and monotony. The high cost of formula and the associated psychosocial problems are additional drawbacks of this approach. Empiric and allergy test-directed elimination diets have gained popularity given that elimination of a limited number of foods is much easier and as such is more readily acceptable. There is a growing body of literature supporting this type of therapy in both children and adults. This paper reviews the evidence for all types of dietary therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Atopy and the gastrointestinal tract--a review of a common association in unexplained gastrointestinal disease

In addition to diseases conventionally associated with atopy there is increasing recognition that atopy is also linked to a spectrum of gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations, including food allergy, primary eosinophilic GI disease, functional gastrointestinal disorders, gluten interactions, gastroesophageal reflux disease and inflammatory bowel disease. These associations may be underpinned by shared genetic susceptibilities, initiation of related immune pathways and common patterns of exposure to environmental cues, including allergen/pathogen encounters and variations in the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Further scrutiny of GI diseases with prominent allergic-type immune responses may yet redefine treatment paradigms for these common and important atopy-associated diseases. Looking forward, interventions by manipulation of the microbiota or host immune responses hold promise, but there is still room for further exploration of this novel field of host susceptibility, host-microbe interactions and atopy-associated GI diseases.

Value of allergy tests for the diagnosis of food allergy

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic T helper 2-type inflammatory disorder. Concurrent allergic diseases have been observed in EoE cases at a high prevalence. The observation that EoE responds to dietary treatment suggests that EoE is an antigen-driven process. However, the pathogenesis by which allergens mediate the eosinophilic disease in the esophagus needs further clarification. In immediate-type food allergy, diagnosis is based on a careful case history followed by a search for food-specific IgE either by skin testing [skin prick test (SPT)] or in vitro (e.g. ImmunoCAP). In children with atopic dermatitis and a food allergy to milk, eggs, peanuts, fish or wheat, the SPT and in vitro determination of specific IgE show excellent sensitivity and negative predictive values, whereas the positive predictive values are low. In pollen-related secondary food allergy, sensitivity and negative predictive values of IgE testing is much lower. Consequently, oral food provocation is the gold standard for the diagnosis of food allergy. Similarly, in EoE patients, SPT, atopy patch test and in vitro determination of IgE to foods do not reliably predict food allergy, and the average positive predictive values of these allergy tests are below 50%. In conclusion, the value of allergy tests to identify triggering foods are limited, and triggering foods have to be identified by an elimination diet and consequent reintroduction of single foods under biopsy control. However, due to the high prevalence of concurrent allergic diseases among EoE patients, an allergy work-up is urgently indicated in each patient with EoE.

Historical aspects of eosinophilic esophagitis: from case reports to clinical trials

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathological condition characterized clinically by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction in the absence of acid reflux, with typical endoscopic findings and eosinophilia on biopsy. This article looks into the historical clinical recognition and description of EoE, in particular clinical manifestations, natural history, and epidemiology. Additionally, the evolution of endoscopic recognition and development of clinical trials are described: EoE is an isolated disease of the esophagus, although it is associated with other antigen-driven diseases such as asthma, rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. After initial case reports which were mostly not typical of the disease state now described, the first case series were described in 1993 and 1994 in adults, and 1995 in children. Although rarely seen before 2000, the disease is now commonly recognized. Randomized clinical trials have now been performed on topical steroids, and on biological agents targeted against IL-5, IL-13, and other mediators. Therapy with dilatation may be best guided by measures of compliance and distensibility. Work is needed on biomarkers of the disease's severity and progression, and predictive indexes of complications. EoE is a relatively new disease of increasing importance. It represents an important diagnosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and must be considered in all patients with dysphagia where the diagnosis is not certain and in all patients who have an assumed diagnosis of reflux but are not responding to standard reflux therapy.

Dietary treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis in children

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus that, in a genetically susceptible host, is triggered by a food antigen. Emerging evidence supports impaired epithelia barrier function as the key initial event in the development of EoE and other allergic diseases. Symptom resolution, histologic remission, and prevention of both disease and treatment-related complications are the goals of treatment. Successful dietary treatments include elemental and elimination diets, both empiric and allergy test directed. These treatments are dietary approaches to inducing clinical and histologic remission. Dietary therapy with an exclusive elemental diet offers the best response with a remission rate of more than 96%. Empiric elimination diets and allergy-directed diets offer similar response with remission induced in 3 of 4 subjects (75%). Cow's milk, wheat, egg and soy are the four common food antigens most likely to induce esophageal inflammation.

Treatment of adult eosinophilic esophagitis with diet

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A growing body of research indicates that dietary therapy is an effective treatment option for children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Its ability to achieve sustained symptomatic and histological responses is comparable to that of topical steroids, but avoids their use and side effects. Recent studies also support dietary therapy as a preferred treatment option for adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was carried out to assess the efficacy of the most commonly used dietary interventions in inducing and maintaining disease remission in adult EoE patients as compared with results from pediatric studies.

RESULTS

The only available study assessing exclusive feeding with an elemental diet carried out in adults demonstrated a 94% disease remission rate, comparable to the high efficacy reported in pediatric studies. The major drawbacks of this therapy are poor adherence and a rapid disease recurrence after resumption of a normal diet. Although there is limited data on skin allergy testing-directed food elimination in adult patients, the highest efficacy rates observed do not exceed 26% histological remission. Prospective studies on empirical six-food elimination diets in adults provided efficacy rates comparable to those reported in children, achieving disease remission in approximately 75% of patients. However, specific food triggers can only be identified after documented recurrence of eosinophilic inflammation as determined with repeated endoscopic biopsies. Prolonged avoidance of the offending food(s) produces sustained remission of adult EoE.

CONCLUSIONS

Diet is a feasible therapeutic option for adult EoE patients, providing them with the same effective drug-free alternative as in pediatric patients.

Epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergy-associated disease defined clinically by esophagus-related symptoms in combination with a dense esophageal eosinophilia, both of which are unresponsive to prolonged acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors. Over the last two decades EoE has increasingly been recognized in various geographical areas (mostly industrialized countries) with high socioeconomic development. The prevalence rate is increasing and reaches up to 50 patients per 100,000 inhabitants in some indicator regions. Whether this increased prevalence is due to a real increase in incidence, a result of increased awareness by health care providers or because of the nonfatal nature of EoE adding more and more cases to the patient pool is still a matter of controversy. Several studies have consistently demonstrated a male predominance in EoE, with a male-to-female risk ratio of 3:1. The average age at diagnosis ranges between 30 and 50 years and suggests that EoE is a disease of the middle-aged man. It can affect patients of every race, but the disease is more common among Caucasians. In both children and adults, EoE has been clearly associated with allergies to food and aeroallergens, and most EoE patients present with a personal allergic background (e.g. asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis or oral allergy syndrome). In conclusion, knowledge of epidemiologic parameters of EoE is crucial for identifying risk factors as well as pathogenic mechanisms, planning preventive measures and determining optimal treatment strategies.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

To review the understanding of the pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and the role of the immune system in the disease process.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed articles on EoE from PubMed searching for "Eosinophilic Esophagitis and fibrosis" in the period of 1995 to 2013.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Studies on the clinical and immunologic features, pathogenesis, and management of EoE.

RESULTS

Recent work has revealed that thymic stromal lymphopoietin and basophil have an increased role in the pathogenesis of disease. Additional understanding on the role of fibrosis in EoE is emerging.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of EoE is increasing like most atopic disease. Similar to other allergic diseases, EoE is treated with topical steroids and/or allergen avoidance.

Emerging therapeutic strategies for eosinophilic esophagitis

OPINION STATEMENT

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is recognized as an increasingly common cause of chronic and recurrent esophageal symptoms that significantly impact quality of life and may occasionally result in severe complications in both pediatric and adult patients. The disease is triggered and maintained by exposure to food antigens in most patients, with an additional role proposed for airborne allergens. Different diet-based approaches focused on restricting potentially offending foods have proven to be effective long-term therapies for EoE. Dietary therapy is thus an attractive, yet challenging treatment option that should be considered for all pediatric and adult EoE patients. However, limitations related to food restriction, patient willingness to undergo repeated endoscopies and biopsies, and the variable results of allergy testing imply that dietary management is for the most part currently restricted to highly motivated healthcare providers treating highly motivated patients reluctant to utilize drug-based therapy on a chronic basis. Pharmacological therapies for EoE mainly comprise swallowed topical steroids, especially fluticasone propionate and budesonide, which were originally developed to treat bronchial asthma and are now extensively used "off label" in EoE patients. In fact, topical steroids currently constitute the prevailing therapeutic option and will probably continue to do so in the near future; indeed, several randomized clinical trials are currently underway to test these drugs for approval as the first pharmacological agents for EoE patients. Immunomodulators and several anti-allergic agents must be further assessed as therapeutic alternatives for refractory cases or patients with complications. Endoscopic dilation represents the third pillar in the therapeutic management of EoE patients, since they frequently present reductions in the esophageal caliber as a result of collagen deposition and a progressive fibrous remodeling process promoted by chronic eosinophilic infiltration. Dilation provides at least temporary symptom relief with similar complication rates to esophageal strictures from a different origin. However, although repeated endoscopic dilation has sometimes been used as the sole therapy for EoE, it best constitutes an adjuvant therapy along with dietary or pharmacological-based interventions, especially since dilation has no effect on the underlying esophageal inflammation. Current therapeutic management of EoE varies widely, with physician experience being a major explanatory factor. New evidence from ongoing research on EoE should thus seek to define a common treatment algorithm to optimize EoE patient management.

Unmet therapeutic needs in eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic disease of increasing prevalence in children and adults worldwide. EoE is defined by a robust, acid-resistant, often panesophageal eosinophilia. Disease complications include food impactions and strictures. While much has been learned since it was first described in the late 1970s, there are still a number of unmet clinical needs. This review provides an overview of these and addresses our current state of progress in meeting these challenges. The best diagnostic criteria, the least invasive mechanisms for procuring tissue, the best therapeutic intervention, and an understanding of how therapies affect EoE natural history remain to be systematically addressed. In addition, the classification of EoE subjects by phenotype, genotype, and/or endotype is required but dependent upon further large-scale systematic studies.

Management guidelines of eosinophilic esophagitis in childhood

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) represents a chronic, immune/antigen-mediated esophageal disease characterized clinically by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and histologically by eosinophil-predominant inflammation. With few exceptions, 15 eosinophils per high-power field (peak value) in ≥1 biopsy specimens are considered a minimum threshold for a diagnosis of EoE. The disease is restricted to the esophagus, and other causes of esophageal eosinophilia should be excluded, specifically proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. This position paper aims at providing practical guidelines for the management of children and adolescents with EoE.

METHODS

Relevant literature from searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and recent guidelines was reviewed. In the absence of an evidence base, recommendations reflect the expert opinion of the authors. Final consensus was obtained during 3 face-to-face meetings of the Gastroenterology Committee and 1 teleconference.

RESULTS

The cornerstone of treatment is an elimination diet (targeted or empiric elimination diet, amino acid-based formula) and/or swallowed, topical corticosteroids. Systemic corticosteroids are reserved for severe symptoms requiring rapid relief or where other treatments have failed. Esophageal dilatation is an option in children with EoE who have esophageal stenosis unresponsive to drug therapy. Maintenance treatment may be required in case of frequent relapse, although an optimal regimen still needs to be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

EoE is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disease with largely unquantified long-term consequences. Investigations and treatment are tailored to the individual and must not create more morbidity for the patient and family than the disease itself. Better maintenance treatment as well as biomarkers for assessing treatment response and predicting long-term complications is urgently needed.

Food allergy: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

This review focuses on advances and updates in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of food allergy over the past 3 years since our last comprehensive review. On the basis of numerous studies, food allergy likely affects nearly 5% of adults and 8% of children, with growing evidence of an increase in prevalence. Potentially rectifiable risk factors include vitamin D insufficiency, unhealthful dietary fat, obesity, increased hygiene, and the timing of exposure to foods, but genetics and other lifestyle issues play a role as well. Interesting clinical insights into pathogenesis include discoveries regarding gene-environment interactions and an increasing understanding of the role of nonoral sensitizing exposures causing food allergy, such as delayed allergic reactions to carbohydrate moieties in mammalian meats caused by sensitization from homologous substances transferred during tick bites. Component-resolved diagnosis is being rapidly incorporated into clinical use, and sophisticated diagnostic tests that indicate severity and prognosis are on the horizon. Current management relies heavily on avoidance and emergency preparedness, and recent studies, guidelines, and resources provide insight into improving the safety and well-being of patients and their families. Incorporation of extensively heated (heat-denatured) forms of milk and egg into the diets of children who tolerate these foods, rather than strict avoidance, represents a significant shift in clinical approach. Recommendations about the prevention of food allergy and atopic disease through diet have changed radically, with rescinding of many recommendations about extensive and prolonged allergen avoidance. Numerous therapies have reached clinical trials, with some showing promise to dramatically alter treatment. Ongoing studies will elucidate improved prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Dietary therapies for eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) represents a prevalent chronic esophageal disorder. Since the condition was first described, its pathophysiology has been known to have an immune-allergic origin, but the high response rate to dietary therapies based on feeding patients exclusively with amino acid-based elemental formulas (with complete elimination of table foods) has clearly established EoE as a particular form of food allergy. Nevertheless, the management of EoE in clinical practice remains widely heterogeneous, with topical steroids being a therapeutic mainstay. However, a growing body of evidence points to dietary therapy as an effective treatment option for both children and adults with EoE, as this approach is capable of achieving a sustained symptomatic and histological response without resorting to drugs. This article reviews the available data on the major types of dietary therapy for EoE, including elemental formula diets, skin allergy testing-directed elimination diets and empirical elimination diets based on common food allergens.

Emerging antigens involved in allergic responses

New allergic diseases can 'emerge' because of exposure to a novel antigen, because the immune responsiveness of the subject changes, or because of a change in the behavior of the population. Novel antigens have entered the environment as new pests in the home (e.g., Asian lady beetle or stink bugs), in the diet (e.g., prebiotics or wheat isolates), or because of the spread of a biting arthropod (e.g., ticks). Over the last few years, a significant new disease has been identified, which has changed the paradigm for food allergy. Bites of the tick, Amblyomma americanum, are capable of inducing IgE antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose, which is associated with two novel forms of anaphylaxis. In a large area of the southeastern United States, the disease of delayed anaphylaxis to mammalian meat is now common. This disease challenges many previous rules about food allergy and provides a striking model of an emerging allergic disease.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in children with esophageal atresia

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has only rarely been reported in esophageal atresia (EA) patients. A retrospective case analysis of all EA patients born at our center between January 1999 and April 2012 was performed. A total of 113 of patients were identified; 10 patients were excluded as a result of inadequate data. Eighteen patients (17%) were diagnosed with EoE. The average number of eosinophilis was 30/high-power field (HPF) (19/HPF-80/HPF). The median age for diagnosis of EoE was 1 year and 6 months (8 months-8 years and 7 months). Children with EoE had a significantly greater incidence of reflux symptoms, dysphagia, tracheomalacia, and 'hypoxic spells' (P < 0.05). EoE patients also underwent significantly more surgery including fundoplication and aortopexy when compared with those without EoE (P < 0.0001). Although the incidence of gastrostomy was greater in the EoE group (33% vs. 13%), this was not statistically significant. Half of the EoE patients had a coexisting atopic condition at time of diagnosis. The commonest condition was asthma 7/18 (38%) followed by specific food allergy 6/18 (33%). EoE was treated in 11 patients with either swallowed fluticasone or budesonide slurry. All improved clinically. Histologically, five had complete resolution and six had partial improvement. Six children with EoE were treated with acid suppression alone. All improved clinically, and 5/6 had subsequent histological resolution. One child who received acid suppression and an exclusion diet also improved. Seven patients (38%) had an esophageal stricture at time of EoE diagnosis. Five were dilated at time of the initial endoscopy, prior to the diagnosis of EoE being available. Two patients had resolution of their strictures on medical treatment of their EoE alone and did not require further dilatation. EoE was seen in 17% of children with EA in this study. EoE should be considered in EA patients with persistent symptoms on standard reflux treatment, increasing dysphagia, and recurrent strictures.

Tolerance of a cow's milk-based hydrolyzed formula in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis triggered by milk

BACKGROUND

Cow's milk protein, a major food trigger for EoE in both children and adults, should be continuously avoided once identified as such. This study evaluates tolerance of a cow's milk-based extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) with regard to disease remission maintenance in adult patients with milk-triggered EoE.

METHODS

Seventeen adult patients in whom cow's milk was consecutively demonstrated to trigger EoE after an empiric six-food elimination diet-based study protocol and who subsequently maintained disease remission were prospectively recruited. They were given 400 ml of a cow's milk-based eHF daily for 8 weeks. Intraepithelial peak eosinophil and blood eosinophil counts, esophageal-related symptoms, serum total and specific IgE to major milk proteins, and eosinophil cationic protein were monitored before and after eHF intake.

RESULTS

Thirteen male and four female patients aged 17-56 completed the study protocol. 15 patients (88.24%) achieved and maintained EoE remission, while an infiltration of ≥15 eosinophils/hpf reappeared in the remaining two patients. No differences in age, gender, symptoms, and endoscopic appearance at baseline conditions or personal/family allergic background were observed between those patients who tolerated the eHF and those who did not. Symptom scores did not significantly change after eHF intake and were significantly lower than those documented at baseline conditions or after cow's milk challenge. No differences were documented in blood eosinophil counts or serum markers after eHF intake.

CONCLUSION

Most adult patients with EoE triggered by cow's milk tolerate a cow's milk-based eHF, thus providing them with a safe, economical alternative to cow's milk.