Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications

Is real time 3D transesophageal echocardiography a feasible approach to detect coronary ostium during transapical aortic valve implantation?

OBJECTIVE

Transapical aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to obstruction of coronary arteries during deployment. To prevent this, it is essential to determine the distance of the coronary ostium to the aortic annulus prior to valve placement. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) commonly is used to determine these measurements, but even marginal exposure to contrast agents can result in acute kidney injury in this high-risk group of multi-morbid patients. The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography (RT 3D TEE) as the first-choice technique for noninvasive evaluation of the coronary ostium during TAVI.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

Fifty patients underwent MDCT the evening before surgery. RT 3D TEE was performed intraoperatively before valve deployment. The dataset from both of these examinations was digitally stored and evaluated. MDCT was performed in nonanesthetized patients; however, in the RT 3D TEE group, general anesthesia was established.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The distances from the right coronary artery and the left coronary artery ostium were measured retrospectively. Bland-Altman Plots and linear regression analysis showed excellent correlation between the 2 methodologies; intraobserver and interobserver variance were calculated using analysis of variance. Krippendorff's α indicated excellent agreement between the 2 observers (0.96 and 0.98) as well as between RT 3D TEE and MDCT (0.97 and 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The observations showed that RT 3D TEE reliably can measure the coronary ostium distance from the aortic annulus. It is feasible and an alternative method for evaluating these measurements and thereby preventing contrast exposure during MDCT, which may jeopardize the safety of patients with pre-existing renal disease.

Aortic valve bypass: experience from Denmark

OBJECTIVES

In aortic valve bypass (AVB) a valve-containing conduit is connecting the apex of the left ventricle to the descending aorta. Candidates are patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis rejected for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). During the last one and a half year, 10 patients otherwise left for medical therapy have been offered this procedure. We present the Danish experiences with the AVB procedure with a focus on patient selection, operative procedure and short-term results.

METHODS

AVB is performed through a left thoracotomy. A 19-mm Freestyle(®) valve (Medtronic) is anastomosed to a vascular graft and an apex conduit. The anastomosis to the descending aorta is made prior to connecting the conduit to the apex. In 1 patient, we used an automated coring and apical connector insertion device (Correx(®)). The device results in a simultaneous coring and insertion of an 18-mm left ventricle connector in the apical myocardium. AVB is routinely performed without circulatory assistance.

RESULTS

Ten patients have been operated on since April 2011: eight females and 2 males with a median age of 76 (65-91) years. Seven patients had a severely calcified ascending aorta. Three of these had previously had a sternotomy, but did not have an AVR because of porcelain aorta. Six patients had a very small left ventricle outflow tract (<18 mm). The median additive EuroSCORE was 12 (10-15). Seven patients were operated on without circulatory assistance. Two patients had a re-exploration for bleeding and 1 developed a ventricle septum defect 1 month postoperatively and was treated with surgical closure. The median follow-up was 7 (2-15) months and was without mortality. New York Heart Association class was reduced from 2.5 to 2 at the follow-up, but some patients were still in the recovery period. The total valve area (native plus conduit) was 2.2 (1.9-2.5) cm(2) and 1.34 (1.03-1.46) cm(2)/m(2), indexed to the body surface area. There was no AV block or stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

AVB can be performed with low mortality and acceptable results in selected patients. The procedure can be offered to patients rejected for conventional aortic valve replacement and TAVI and results in a larger total valve area than by insertion of standard bioprosthesis.

The transaortic approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a valid alternative to the transapical access in patients with no peripheral vascular option. A single center experience

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with poor peripheral vessels still remains problematic, as the transapical approach is not always feasible and is sometimes associated with myocardial damage, bleeding, post-procedural chest pain and pleural effusion. In order to address these issues, we adopted the recently introduced transaortic (TAo) approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the TAo-TAVI approach using both the Sapien XT and the CoreValve according to VARC criteria.

METHODS

Of 492 patients (October 2006 to February 2012), TAo-TAVI was performed in 94 consecutive patients with unfavourable peripheral access between January 2011 and February 2012. Aortic root condition, valve anatomy and annulus size were carefully assessed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for possible TAo-TAVI. The aorta was exposed through an inverted 'T' manubriotomy. After retrograde guidewire crossing of the aortic valve, sheath insertion allowed device positioning and deployment subsequent to balloon valvuloplasty.

RESULTS

Mean age was 84.1 ± 5.4 years (67-96) and logistic EuroSCORE 17.6 ± 10.2%. The Sapien XT was used in 88.3% and the CoreValve in 11.7% of patients. Full sternotomy allowed concomitant complete off-pump revascularization (2-4 grafts) in 11 patients. Device success rate was 92.6%. Paravalvular leak ≥2/4 was observed in 7.4%. Conversion to open chest surgery was required in 5.3% (3 aortic dissections, 1 valve migration and 1 left main occlusion). Three cerebrovascular accidents (2 transient ischaemia and 1 delayed stroke) were noted. Transfusion ≥4 units was performed in 12 patients (12.8%). Intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital stay were 4.9 ± 5.0 and 12.2 ± 6.2 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality and combined safety endpoint were reported in 7.4 and 16.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAo approach for both Sapien XT and CoreValve implantation can be used with satisfactory clinical outcome and an acceptable risk. This access route could prove a valid alternative to the transapical approach.

Necropsy findings early after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis

Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been available for 10 years, reports of cardiovascular morphologic studies after the procedure are virtually nonexistent. The investigators describe such findings in 2 patients, both 86 years of age, who died early (hours or several days) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Although the prosthesis in each was seated well, and each of the 3 calcified cusps of the native aortic valves was well compressed to the wall of the aorta, thus providing a good bioprosthetic orifice, the ostium of the dominant right coronary artery in each was obliterated by the native right aortic valve cusp. Atherosclerotic plaques in the common iliac artery led to a major complication in 1 patient, who later died of hemorrhagic stroke. The other patient developed fatal cardiac tamponade secondary to perforation of the right ventricular wall by a pacemaker catheter.

Severe Valvular Regurgitation: An Unexpected Complication During Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation Treated Successfully with the "Valve-in-Valve" Procedure

Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) in a multimorbid 77 year old female was treated with transapical aortic valve implantation with a 23 mm Edwards Sapien valve. Severe valvular regurgitation following implantation, probably due to structural valve failure, was treated successfully with a second valve-in-valve implantation. During a follow-up time of 2,5 years no further problems occurred.

Acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, predictors and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on renal complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) within a comprehensive program using different valves with transfemoral, transapical, and trans-subclavian approach.

METHODS

Prospective single-center registry of 102 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI using both approved bioprostheses and different access routes. The main objective was to assess the incidence, predictors and the clinical impact of acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI was defined according to the valve academic research consortium (VARC) indications.

RESULTS

Mean age was 83.7 ± 5.3 years, logistic EuroSCORE 22.6 ± 12.4%, and STS score 8.2 ± 4.1%. Chronic kidney disease at baseline was present in 87.3%. Periprocedural AKI developed in 42 patients (41.7%): 32.4% stage 1, 4.9% stage 2 and 3.9% stage 3. The incidence of AKI was 66.7% in transapical, 30.3% in transfemoral, and 50% in trans-subclavian procedures. The only independent predictor of AKI was transapical access, with a hazard ratio (HR) between 4.57 and 5.18 based on the model used. Cumulative 1-year survival was 88.2%. At Cox regression analysis, the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality was diabetes mellitus (HR 7.05, 95% CI 1.07-46.32; p=0.042), whilst the independent predictors of 1-year death were baseline glomerular filtration rate<30 mL/min (HR 5.74, 95% CI 1.42-23.26; p=0.014) and post-procedural AKI 3 (HR 8.59, 95% CI 1.61-45.86, p=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI is associated with a high incidence of AKI. Although in the majority of the cases AKI is of mild entity and reversible, AKI 3 holds a strong negative impact on 1-year survival. The incidence of AKI is higher with transapical access.

SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Computed tomography (CT) plays an important role in the workup of patients who are candidates for implantation of a catheter-based aortic valve, a procedure referred to as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Contrast-enhanced CT imaging provides information on the suitability of the peripheral access vessels to accommodate the relatively large sheaths necessary to introduce the prosthesis. CT imaging also provides accurate dimensions of the ascending aorta, aortic root, and aortic annulus which are of importance for prosthesis sizing, and initial data indicate that compared with echocardiographic sizing, CT-based sizing of the prosthesis may lead to better results for postprocedural aortic valve regurgitation. Finally, CT permits one to predict appropriate fluoroscopic projections which are oriented orthogonal to the aortic valve plane. This consensus document provides recommendations about the use of CT imaging in patients scheduled for TAVR/TAVI, including data acquisition, interpretation, and reporting.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of surgical valve dysfunction ("valve-in-valve"): assessing the risk of coronary obstruction

Acute coronary obstruction is one of the most feared complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. Strategies for assessing the risk of coronary occlusion during these procedures as well as preventive measures are discussed.

A practical guide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement

The advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is one of the most widely anticipated advances in the care of patients with severe aortic stenosis. This procedure is unique in many ways, one of which is the need for a multimodality imaging team-based approach throughout the continuum of the care of TAVR patients. Pre-procedural planning, intra-procedural implantation optimization, and long-term follow-up of patients undergoing TAVR require the expert use of various imaging modalities, each of which has its own strengths and limitations. Divided into 3 sections (pre-procedural, intraprocedural, and long-term follow-up), this review offers a single source for expert opinion and evidence-based guidance on how to incorporate the various modalities at each step in the care of a TAVR patient. Although much has been learned in the short span of time since TAVR was introduced, recommendations are offered for clinically relevant research that will lead to refinement of best practice strategies for incorporating multimodality imaging into TAVR patient care.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 10-year anniversary part II: clinical implications

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been increasingly recognized as a curative treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Despite important improvements in current device technology and implantation techniques, specific complications still remain and warrant consideration. Vascular complications and peri-procedural neurological events were the first concerns to emerge with this new technology. Recently, significant post procedural para-valvular leak has been shown to be more frequent after TAVI than after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), and its potential association with worse long-term prognostic has raised concerns. In moving toward treatment of lower risk populations, structural integrity and long-term durability of heat valve prosthesis are becoming of central importance. Emerging technologies and newer generations of devices seem promising in dealing with these matters.

Transcatheter versus surgical treatment for aortic stenosis: patient selection and early outcome

OBJECTIVES

To describe short-term clinical and echocardiography outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). To explore patient selection criteria for treatment with TAVI.

DESIGN

TAVI patients (n = 45) were matched to SAVR patients (n = 45) with respect to age within ± 10 years, sex and systolic left ventricular function.

RESULTS

TAVI patients were older, 82 ± 8 versus 78 ± 5 years (p = 0.005) and they had higher logEuroSCORE, 16 ± 11% versus 8 ± 4% (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in 30 days mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction. TAVI patients received less erythrocyte (53% vs. 78%, p = 0.03) and thrombocyte (7% vs. 27%, p = 0.02) transfusions. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was less common (18% vs. 60%, p = 0.001) in the TAVI group. Paravalvular regurgitation was more common in TAVI patients (87% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and 27% had access site complications. Aortic transvalvular velocity was 2.3 ± 0.4 m/s versus 2.6 ± 0.5 m/s (p = 0.002) and mean valve pressure gradient was 12 ± 4 mmHg versus 15 ± 5 mmHg (p = 0.01) in the TAVI and SAVR groups, respectively. Twenty-nine (64%) of the TAVI patients had logEuroSCORE = 15%.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TAVI and SAVR have good short term clinical outcome with excellent hemodynamic result. In clinical practice, factors other than high logEuroSCORE play an important role in patient selection for TAVI.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the slow balloon inflation technique: making balloon-expandable valves partially repositionable

In transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures using balloon-expandable valves, the valve is deployed by rapid balloon inflation within a short period of rapid ventricular pacing. This system and deployment technique is generally considered to be nonrepositionable. We illustrate with two cases (transapical and transfemoral) the possibility to partially reposition the valve during its deployment if a slow balloon inflation technique were employed-a technique that may minimize the risk of valve mal-positioning and its attendant complications.

The impact of peripheral arterial disease on early outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions Registry

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have concomitant peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which plays a crucial role in the preinterventional selection process of determining an optimal vascular access site. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of PAD on clinical outcome after TAVI in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A total of 1,315 patients (mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation 20.6% ± 13.7%) underwent TAVI in 27 centers and were included in the prospective German TAVI Registry.

RESULTS

Of the 1,315 patients with TAVI, 330 (25.1%) had PAD. These patients had a higher logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (27.7% ± 16.0% vs 18.3% ± 12.0%, P < .0001), mainly attributed to more frequent and severe comorbidities. Compared with patients without PAD, patients with PAD had a higher rate of vascular complications (28.5% vs 20.7%, P < .01), dialysis-dependent renal failure (11.2% vs 5.4%, P < .001), myocardial infarction (1.2% vs 0.3%, P < .05), and, subsequently, 30-day mortality (12.7% vs 6.9%, P < .001). Choosing a surgical approach, for example, transapical access, did not reduce the periprocedural risk associated with PAD; in-hospital mortality was 15.7% for surgical and 10.5% for percutaneous patients with TAVI having PAD (P < .001). In a multivariate regression analysis, PAD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7, P = .004) after TAVI.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world TAVI Registry, PAD was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with percutaneous and surgical TAVI, including vascular complications. Assessment of PAD should play a crucial role in the preinterventional selection process, regardless of the access strategy.

Late contained aortic root rupture and ventricular septal defect after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a highly specialized technique offering a new therapeutic option to patients at high risk for conventional surgery. However, despite continuous improvements in operators' expertise and device technology, complications associated with this catheter procedure are not uncommon. We report an unusual case of late contained rupture of the aortic annulus, combining a para-aortic false aneurysm and a ventricular septal defect, after the placement of an Edwards Sapien prosthesis.

Management of a Protruding Right Coronary Artery Stent during Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

We describe the successful management of a stent protruding from the right coronary ostium into the aortic root in the setting of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Due to advances in medical care more elderly patients present for aortic valve surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention. Therefore, with an aging population due to advances in medical care, more patients will present for aortic valve surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention. We suggest a degree of caution before valve deployment in transcatheter aortic valve intervention or during annular manipulation in patients undergoing traditional aortic valve replacement with coexisting patent proximal stents.

Minimally invasive surgery for aortic stenosis in the geriatric patient: where are we now?

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery has evolved with time and become the routine approach for aortic surgery in select surgical centers. The success of these procedures in the nonelderly has led some to embark on using minimal access techniques in the geriatric population as well. With the geriatric community often inflicted with the greatest disease burden, suffering not only from a valvular process but also cumulative comorbidities, geriatric patients may be the patients most likely to derive benefit from a minimally invasive approach. Alternative therapies for symptomatic aortic stenosis include conventional full-sternotomy aortic valve replacement in addition to transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Each option has its advantages and disadvantages. The role of minimal access aortic valve surgery and its impact on the progressively aging population in the face of conventional surgery and transcatheter technology is discussed.

Intracardiac echocardiography: a new guiding tool for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Echocardiography has been debated as an adjunct for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this prospective study was to comparatively evaluate intraprocedural guidance using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

METHODS

Fifty high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVR were randomized to either guidance using ICE (group 1; n = 25) or monitoring using TEE (group 2; n = 25).

RESULTS

In contrast to TEE, ICE allowed continuous monitoring. The need for probe repositioning during the procedure was much lower in group 1 (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 5.7 ± 0.7 maneuvers, P < .001). Compared with TEE, the transcaval intracardiac echocardiographic view provided higher coaxiality with the ascending aorta expressed as the length of ascending aorta depicted (4.9 ± 1.2 vs 6.1 ± 1.2 cm, P = .003). Both coronary ostia were more frequently visualized in group 1 (18 vs 2 cases, P < .001). ICE-derived annular measurements were correlated closely with preinterventional readings on TEE (n = 25, r(2) = 0.90, P < .001). TEE underestimated intraprocedural pressure gradients in comparison with preinterventional measurements (mean difference, -10.2 ± 11.1 mm Hg; n = 11, P = .012), but ICE did not (mean difference, -0.3 ± 14.1 mm Hg; n = 25, P = .913). ICE and TEE detected newly grown thrombi (2 vs 1 case). Severe complications (e.g., annular dissection, pericardial effusion) were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE, which is compatible with sedation and local anesthesia, can be considered an alternative to TEE for intraprocedural guidance during TAVR. It also seems to match the required work flow during TAVR better than TEE.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Experience with the Edwards SAPIEN Device

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Edwards SAPIEN valve has been shown to be highly beneficial to patients at high risk or with contraindications to surgical aortic valve replacement. The availability of both transfemoral and transapical approaches allows the technique to be applied in most patients. Optimal screening and technical proficiency are crucial for a successful and safe procedure. The technique poses many technical challenges in sick and fragile elderly patients. Thus, TAVI should remain confined to formally trained and proctored experienced physicians, in centers of expertise offering an optimal multidisciplinary collaboration.

Computed tomography in the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

If left untreated, symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a dismal prognosis. Open-heart surgical valve replacement is the treatment of choice and is associated with excellent short and long-term outcome. However, many older patients with multiple co-morbidities and anticipated increased surgical risk are excluded from surgical intervention. For these patients, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is emerging as a viable treatment alternative. Transcatheter valvular heart procedures are characterized by lack of exposure and visualization of the operative field, therefore relying on image guidance, both for patient selection and preparation and the implantation procedure itself. This article describes the role of multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for detailed assessment of the aortic valve, aortic root, and iliac arteries in the context of TAVI.