A multiinstitutional outcome and prognostic factor analysis of radiosurgery for resectable single brain metastasis

Radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases: Estimation of patient eligibility using three stratification systems

PURPOSE

To compare three patient stratification systems predicting survival: recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), score index for radiosurgery in brain metastases (SIR), and a proposed basic score for brain metastases (BS-BM).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed the outcome of 110 patients treated with Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery between December 1999 and January 2003. The BS-BM was calculated by evaluating three main prognostic factors: Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor control, and presence of extracranial metastases.

RESULTS

The median survival was 27.6 months for RPA Class I, 10.7 months for RPA Class II, and 2.8 months for RPA Class III (p <0.0001). Using the SIR, the median survival was 27.7, 10.8, 4.6, and 2.4 months for a score of 8-10, 5-7, 4, and 0-3, respectively (p <0.0001). The median survival was undefined in patients with a BS-BM of 3 (55% at 32 months) and was 13.1 months for a BS-BM of 2, 3.3 months for a BS-BM of 1, and 1.9 months for a BS-BM of 0 (p <0.0001). The backward elimination model in multivariate Cox analysis identified SIR and BS-BM as the only two variables significantly associated with survival (p = 0.031 and p = 0.043, respectively).

CONCLUSION

SIR and BS-BM were the most accurate for estimating survival. They were specific enough to identify patients with short survival (SIR 0-3 and BS-BM 0). Because of it simplicity, BS-BM is easier to use.

CNS Metastases in Breast Cancer

As systemic therapy of metastatic breast cancer improves, CNS involvement is becoming a more widespread problem. This article summarizes the current knowledge regarding the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer. When available, studies specific to breast cancer are presented; in studies in which many solid tumors were evaluated together, the proportion of patients with breast cancer is noted. On the basis of data from randomized trials and retrospective series, neurosurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may prolong survival in patients with single brain metastases. The treatment of multiple metastases remains controversial, as does the routine use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) after either surgery or SRS. Although it is widely assumed that chemotherapy is of limited benefit, data from case series and case reports suggest otherwise. WBRT, neurosurgery, SRS, and medical therapy each have a role in the treatment of CNS metastases; however, neurologic symptoms frequently are not fully reversible, even with appropriate therapy. Studies specifically targeted toward this group of patients are needed.

Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment in 103 patients for 153 cerebral melanoma metastases

PURPOSE

To report on the outcome of patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred three patients with 153 intracranial melanoma metastases consecutively underwent Linac-based SRS between November 1991 and October 2001. The Kaplan-Meier method, univariate comparisons with log-rank test, and multivariate analyses with classification and regression tree models were performed. Calculations were based on last imaging date rather than the date of the last visit.

RESULTS

Median age was 51 years (range, 18-93 years). Median Karnofsky performance status was 90. Sixty-one patients (59%) had single brain metastasis at presentation. Treatment sequence was SRS alone (61 patients), SRS + whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (12 patients), and salvage SRS after WBRT (30 patients). The median tumor volume was 1.9 cm(3) (range, 0.06-22.3 cm(3)). The median SRS minimum peripheral dose and isodose was 18 Gy (range, 10-24 Gy) and 85% (range, 60%-100%), respectively. The median follow-up was 6 months for all patients and 13 months (range, 2-46 months) for patients alive at the time of analysis. The 1-year local control (LC) for all patients treated with SRS was 49%. Among the patients treated with initial SRS alone, the 1-year LC was better for patients with tumors < or =2 cm(3) than with tumors >2 cm(3): 75.2% vs. 42.3% (p < 0.05). The 1-year distant brain metastasis-free survival incidence was 14.7% for the 73 patients receiving either initial SRS alone or SRS +WBRT. The initial number of brain lesions (single vs. multiple) was the only factor with a significant effect on distant brain metastasis-free survival at 1 year: 23.5% for single metastases and 0% for multiple lesions (p < 0.05). The 1-year overall survival was 25.2%. Stratification by Score Index for Radiosurgery (SIR) revealed a significant effect on survival, which was 29% at 1 year for SIR >6 and 10% for SIR <==6 (relative hazard ratio, 2.1; p < 0.05) in classification and regression-tree multivariate analysis involving age, Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor control, tumor volume, SRS dose, SIR (>6 vs. < or =6), and systemic disease status.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial SRS alone was an effective treatment modality for smaller cerebral melanoma metastases, achieving a 75% incidence of 1-year LC for < or =2 cm(3) single brain metastases and should be considered in patients with SIR >6. The role of WBRT in melanoma brain metastases cannot be addressed, owing to retrospective bias toward administering this treatment to patients with more aggressive disease. A prospective study is needed to assess the role of WBRT in patients with melanoma brain metastasis.

The expanding role of neurosurgeons in the management of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are the most common type of intracranial tumor. Until recently, whole brain fractionated radiation therapy (WBRT) was the mainstay of treatment, thereby confining the role of neurosurgeons to resection of an occasional solitary, accessible, and symptomatic brain metastasis. Median survival after surgery and radiation typically ranged from 5 to 11 months.

METHODS

We analyzed various demographic incidence reports and our series of brain metastasis patients treated with radiosurgery. During a 15-year interval (1987-2002), radiosurgery was performed on 5,032 patients of whom 1,088 (21.6%) had metastatic brain tumors.

RESULTS

In the United States, 266,820 to 533,640 new cases of brain metastases will be diagnosed in the year 2003. Evidence to date demonstrates that radiosurgery provides effective local tumor control for brain metastases. Important prognostic factors affecting patient survival include the absence of active systemic disease, the patient's preoperative performance status, age, and the number of metastases. Survival and local tumor control rates attained with radiosurgery are superior to those of either conventional surgery or WBRT. The morbidity associated with radiosurgery of brain metastasis is very low, and the mortality rate approaches zero.

CONCLUSIONS

Compelling evidence indicates that radiosurgery is an effective neurosurgical management strategy for intracranial brain metastases. Quite often, favorable tumor control and survival can be achieved without WBRT. With radiosurgery as a therapeutic option, neurosurgeons now have a vastly expanded armamentarium for treatment of patients with brain metastases. The large number of patients with brain metastases who require care by a neurosurgeon for optimal treatment has significant implications for both the patterns of neurosurgical training and practice in the United States.

Early metabolic changes in metastatic brain tumors after Gamma Knife radiosurgery:1H-MRS study

Evaluation of early metabolic changes in metastatic brain tumors after Gamma Knife radiosurgery was performed by long-echo (TR, 2000ms; TE, 136ms; 128-236 acquisitions) volume-selected single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Eighty-five brain metastases in 81 patients were investigated before treatment and 16-18h thereafter. Standard metabolic ratios, namely N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr), phosphorylcholine/glycerophosphorylcholine (Cho)/Cr, NAA/Cho, lactate (Lac)/Cr, and mobile lipids (Lip)/Cr, were calculated, and comparison of their values before and after irradiation was done. No volumetric changes of any neoplasm were found in any case on the next day after treatment. At the same time, significant reduction of Cho/Cr (P < 0.001) and NAA/Cr (P < 0.01) ratios on the proton MRS of the tumor was disclosed. Reduction of Cho/Cr ratio was significantly more prominent in neoplasms with higher pretreatment Cho/Cr ratios (P < 0.001) and heterogeneous contrast enhancement (P < 0.01). Reduction of NAA/Cr ratio was predominantly determined by its pretreatment value (P < 0.001). The observed decrease of Cho/Cr ratio probably reflects inhibition of proliferative activity and early apoptotic cell loss, whereas reduction of NAA/Cr may result from radiation-induced modulation of neuronal activity in the peritumoral brain tissue. Serial proton MRS represents a valuable diagnostic tool for evaluation of metabolic changes in intracranial neoplasms after radiosurgical treatment.

Survival following whole brain radiation treatment for cerebral metastases: an audit of 474 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report the outcome of patients with brain metastases from solid tumors treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in a single institution. Given the high proportion of melanoma patients, a secondary aim was to compare our outcomes for patients with melanoma to those with other cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective audit identified 474 patients treated between January 1983 and December 1999. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression modeling was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifty nine patients have died from their disease. The median survival was 4.1 months for the whole group and 3.6 months for the 42% of patients with melanoma. The 1 and 2 year survival was 15 and 5%. Six patients lived beyond 5 years. 105 of 186 patients with a single brain metastasis underwent surgery plus WBRT, and 81 received WBRT alone. Median survival was 8 and 4 months, respectively, (P<0.0001). 30 Gy in 10 fractions was used more commonly in the early part of the study compared to 20 Gy in 5 fractions more recently. There was no difference in survival by time period.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival in this series was comparable to other studies. Performance status, resection, dose, and the presence of extracranial disease appeared to be significant prognostic factors. The survival for the large number of patients with melanoma did not differ from the rest of the cohort.

Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases occur in up to 40% of all patients with systemic cancer. We aimed to assess whether stereotactic radiosurgery provided any therapeutic benefit in a randomised multi-institutional trial directed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG).

METHODS

Patients with one to three newly diagnosed brain metastases were randomly allocated either whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or WBRT followed by stereotactic radiosurgery boost. Patients were stratified by number of metastases and status of extracranial disease. Primary outcome was survival; secondary outcomes were tumour response and local rates, overall intracranial recurrence rates, cause of death, and performance measurements.

FINDINGS

From January, 1996, to June, 2001, we enrolled 333 patients from 55 participating RTOG institutions--167 were assigned WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery and 164 were allocated WBRT alone. Univariate analysis showed that there was a survival advantage in the WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery group for patients with a single brain metastasis (median survival time 6.5 vs 4.9 months, p=0.0393). Patients in the stereotactic surgery group were more likely to have a stable or improved Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score at 6 months' follow-up than were patients allocated WBRT alone (43% vs 27%, respectively; p=0.03). By multivariate analysis, survival improved in patients with an RPA class 1 (p<0.0001) or a favourable histological status (p=0.0121).

INTERPRETATION

WBRT and stereotactic boost treatment improved functional autonomy (KPS) for all patients and survival for patients with a single unresectable brain metastasis. WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery should, therefore, be standard treatment for patients with a single unresectable brain metastasis and considered for patients with two or three brain metastases.

Determinants of outcome in melanoma patients with cerebral metastases

PURPOSE

To analyze prognostic factors, effects of treatment, and survival for patients with cerebral metastases from melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All melanoma patients with cerebral metastases treated at the Sydney Melanoma Unit between 1952 and 2000 were identified. From 1985 to 2000, patients were diagnosed and treated using consistent modern techniques and this cohort was analyzed in detail. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1137 patients with cerebral metastases were identified; 686 were treated between 1985 and 2000. For these 686 patients, the median time from primary diagnosis to cerebral metastasis was 3.1 years (range, 0 to 41 years). A total of 646 patients (94%) have died as a result of melanoma. The median survival from the time of diagnosis of cerebral metastasis was 4.1 months (range, 0 to 17.2 years). Treatment was as follows: surgery and postoperative radiotherapy, 158 patients; surgery alone, 47 patients; radiotherapy alone, 236 patients; and supportive care alone, 210 patients. Median survival according to treatment received for these four groups was 8.9, 8.7, 3.4, and 2.1 months, respectively; the differences between surgery and nonsurgery groups were statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, significant factors associated with improved survival were surgical treatment (P <.0001), no concurrent extracerebral metastases (P <.0001), younger age (P =.0007), and longer disease-free interval (P =.036). Prognostic factors analysis confirmed the important influence of patient selection on treatment received.

CONCLUSION

This large series documents the characteristics of patients who developed cerebral metastases from melanoma. Median survival was dependent on treatment, which in turn was dependent on patient selection.

Metastatic pituitary tumor from renal cell carcinoma treated by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy--case report

A 63-year-old man presented with rapidly progressive visual field deficit and hypopituitarism including diabetes insipidus, 8 years after treatment for a renal cell carcinoma. Neuroimaging studies revealed a dumbbell-shaped pituitary mass that had destroyed the sellar floor and abutted against the optic apparatus. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), employing computer-image integration techniques and a frame that could be relocated to facilitate a fractionated dosing scheme, was carried out under a plan for reducing the treatment risk to the optic apparatus. Three months later, the patient exhibited marked improvement in the visual field deficit and visual acuity concomitant with a reduction in tumor volume. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sellar region confirmed striking shrinkage of the metastasis. His neurological status remained stable at 12 months after the SRT with no complications. Fractionated SRT appears to be effective for preserving or improving the residual vision in patients with visual loss secondary to metastatic tumor of the pituitary gland, and may result in a longer and better quality of life.

Management of brain metastases in patients with melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Melanoma is the third most common metastatic brain tumor in the United States and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The development of more effective therapies for melanoma brain metastases is a major unmet clinical need and is summarized in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Management strategies include symptomatic treatment with corticosteroids and anticonvulsants, and definitive therapy in the form of whole-brain radiation therapy, surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and systemic therapy. The data on whole-brain radiation therapy show little impact on survival, but there is evidence that it may improve neurologic deficits. Surgery may provide a survival advantage in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy in the management of a single brain melanoma metastasis, compared with whole-brain radiation therapy alone. Stereotactic radiosurgery may offer a survival advantage (in a select group of patients with limited disease) when used alone or in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy, compared with whole-brain radiation therapy alone. Fotemustine, temozolomide, and thalidomide are three agents with high central nervous system penetration that are being actively investigated as part of systemic therapy.

SUMMARY

The currently available therapeutic options offer palliative relief of symptoms in most patients and a survival advantage in selected patients with melanoma and brain metastases. An urgent need exists to further define these treatments in the context of randomized trials, several of which are under way in the United States and abroad.

Univariate analysis of factors correlated with tumor control probability of three-dimensional conformal hypofractionated high-dose radiotherapy for small pulmonary or hepatic tumors

PURPOSE

To show the factors correlated with tumor control probability (TCP) after three-dimensional conformal hypofractionated high-dose radiotherapy (3D-CHHRT) for small pulmonary or hepatic tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We enrolled 34 patients with 42 lesions (13 lung carcinomas, 6 hepatocellular carcinomas, and 23 lung or liver metastases) treated with 3D-CHHRT alone, with simple immobilization devices, between July 1997 and January 2002. We prescribed 45 Gy in three fractions at the 90-100% isodose line of the planning target volume. The median follow-up period was 18 months (range, 4-46 months). We calculated the TCP using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analysis for the following factors: age, gender, primary site, histologic type, tumor size, and previous treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, the 2-year TCP of 3D-CHHRT was 83.6%. Local recurrence was observed in 6 lesions within 1 year after treatment. We showed that tumor size was the only significant factor to correlate with the TCP in univariate analysis. The 2-year TCP for tumors <3 cm or > or =3 cm in diameter was 95.0% and 58.3%, respectively (p = 0.0022). No severe adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

The TCP for tumors <3 cm in diameter was excellent for 3D-CHHRT.

Irradiation stéréotaxique de première intention des métastases cérébrales

BACKGROUND

The minimal radiosurgical dose required to control cerebral metastases remains unknown. The aim of this study was to test whether a lower peripheral dose than usually delivered could effectively control these lesions or not.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty patients presenting 356 lesions were give first-line radiosurgery between 1995 and 2001 in Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital using a 10 MV LINAC. Mean age was 59 years, sex-ratio was 1.65, mean KI was 70. The lung was the most frequent primary site (n=85), followed by melanoma (n=29), kidney (n=21), digestive tract (n=14), breast (n=11), and others (n=20). Seventy-six percent of the patients presented 1 or 2 lesions. Mean tumor Volume was 5.5 cm3. Mean peripheral dose was 14.8Gy, mean isocenter dose was 21.6Gy.

RESULTS

Median survival was 7.6 months, local control rate was 90% at 6 months, 76% at 1 Year and 70% at 2 years. Median "neurological disease free" survival was 15 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the influence of two parameters on survival: number of lesions (p=0.001) and KI (p=0.04). The only parameter significantly correlated with disease-free survival was the number of isocenters (p=0.005). Morbidity (grade 2 RTOG) was 7.2% with no perimortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Low peripheral doses delivered by radiosurgery may control brain metastases with the same efficacy and fewer side-effects as the doses usually reported in the literature.

Management Strategies for Patients with Brain Metastases: Has Radiosurgery Made a Difference?

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases develop in up to 50% of all patients with cancer. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes for brain metastases patients treated with adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1995, 86 patients with brain metastases received external beam WBRT with a megavoltage beam at our center. Between January 2000 and July 2001, 48 patients with 84 tumors diagnosed as cerebral metastases were treated with SRS using the Leksell Gamma Knife. A comparative analysis of the outcomes in the two different groups was made to determine a possible statistically significant difference in survival.

RESULTS

In the WBRT group, the median follow-up was 11 months. Thirty-nine patients (45.3%) experienced an improvement in neurologic status. The median overall survival was 5 months (range, 1-40 months). In the SRS group, the median follow-up for this group was 9 months. Thirty-four patients experienced an improvement in their neurologic signs and symptoms. The median survival was 12 months (range, 1-16 months).

CONCLUSION

SRS appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for those patients with a limited number of brain metastases and in patients with controlled or limited systemic disease.

Diagnosis and management of central nervous system metastases from breast cancer

The brain, cranial nerves, leptomeninges, spinal cord, and eye compose the central nervous system (CNS) and are at risk for the development of metastases from breast cancer. Such metastases are diagnosed on the basis of clinical suspicion and substantiated by neuroimaging, resection when indicated, and sampling of cerebrospinal fluid when leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is suspected. Treatment is aimed at palliation of symptoms and preservation of neurologic function. Historically, conventional radiation therapy has been the mainstay of palliative treatment for brain, cranial nerve, spinal cord, and ocular metastases. However, additional treatment options for brain metastases have been brought about by technological advances in surgery to resect brain metastases, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to focally irradiate metastases, both of which have been substantiated by data from randomized trials. Ongoing research is aimed at refining criteria to select which patients with brain metastases should undergo surgery and SRS and how these focal therapies should be optimally integrated with whole-brain radiotherapy. Therapy for LM must carefully balance the potential risks and perceived benefits associated with CNS-directed therapies. Despite advances in neuroimaging, surgery, and radiation therapy, novel treatments are needed to improve the effectiveness of treatments for CNS metastases, especially LM, while reducing attendant neurotoxicity.

Radiosurgery and radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer metastatic to brain

Non-small-cell lung cancer metastatic to brain represents a common problem in oncology. Treatment modalities include stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), surgical resection, supportive care, or a combination of these options. This review outlines therapeutic strategies for treatment with particular attention to the use of SRS. Radiosurgical technique, radiobiology, dose prescription, patient selection, and results of therapy are discussed. The term SRS describes a radiation procedure that utilizes a three-dimensional stereotactic localization system to precisely treat small intracranial targets with a single, large, highly focal radiation dose. Stereotactic radiosurgery is appealing for several reasons; it is minimally invasive, easily tolerated, and highly effective, and patients return to normal baseline function within 24 hours. Stereotactic radiosurgery provides much higher control rates of treated lesions than does WBRT. Randomized trials are underway to ascertain the optimal role and timing of SRS in relation to WBRT in order to maximize control, survival, quality of life, and neuropsychological outcome.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases from breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study analyzed the feasibility and outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of brain metastases from breast carcinoma.

METHODS

During an 8-year period, 151 patients with a combined total of 620 brain metastases from breast carcinoma underwent 197 outpatient SRS procedures. Sixty-three percent of all patients had multiple brain metastases. The median tumor volume was 2.2 cm(3) (range, 0.1-20.9 cm(3)). The mean prescribed tumor dose was 19 +/- 4 grays. Local/distant tumor recurrences were treated with additional radiosurgical therapy for patients with stable systemic disease. All patients were categorized according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group classification. Survival time and freedom from local tumor recurrence were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The overall median survival duration was 10 months after SRS. Ninety-four percent of patients did not experience local brain tumor recurrence after radiosurgery. In addition, 70.2% of patients did not have disease recurrence in the brain. Most patients died of systemically progressing malignancy. A Karnofsky performance score > 70 and recursive partitioning analysis Class I were related to prolonged survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Age, whole-brain radiotherapy, surgery, number of metastases, chemotherapy, and latency period from diagnosis of the primary tumor to the development of brain metastases did not reach prognostic relevance in the multivariate model. Patients with RPA I, II, and III survived 34.9, 9.1, and 7.9 months, respectively. There was no treatment related permanent morbidity and mortality. The transient morbidity rate was 17%. Sixteen patients exhibited symptomatic transient complications related to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that SRS is a feasible treatment concept for selected patients with multiple brain metastases from breast carcinoma.

LINAC radiosurgery for brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of the brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. From 1994 to 2001, 28 patients presenting with 65 metastases of renal cell cancer were treated by radiosurgery. Median age was 55 years (35-75), and median Karnofski performance status ranges between 50 and 100. Seven patients had received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) before radiosurgery. Twelve patients were treated by radiosurgery for 1 metastasis, 5 patients for two metastases and 6 for three, and 5 for more than three metastases. One procedure was performed in 22 patients and, 2 or 3 procedures for 6 patients. Median metastasis diameter was 19 mm (5-55 mm). Median metastasis volume was 1.28 cc (0.02-28 cc). Irradiation was delivered by linear accelerator. Median minimal dose (on the 70% isodose) was 14.7 Gy (10.8 Gy, 19.5 Gy), median maximal dose (at the isocenter) 20.5 Gy (14.3 Gy, 39.6 Gy). Median follow-up was 14 months (1-33). Two metastases progressed (3%), 2 and 12 months after radiosurgery. Overall, crude local control rate was 97% and 3-, 6- and 12-month local control rates were 98% +/- 2%, 98% +/- 2%, and 93% +/- 5%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no prognostic factor of local control was retrieved. Median brain disease-free survival was 25 months after RS. the 3-, 6- and 12-month distant brain control rates were 91% +/- 4%, 91% +/- 4%, and 70% +/- 12%, respectively. Median survival duration was 11 months. The 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month overall survival rates were 82% +/- 7%, 67% +/- 9%, 48% +/- 10%, and 33% +/- 10%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, only site of metastasis was overall survival prognostic factor. Radiosurgery for brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma is an effective and accurate treatment. The use of radiosurgery alone is an appropriate management strategy for many patients with brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. Radiosurgery is efficient even after development of new metastasis appearing after WBRT.

Near simultaneous computed tomography image-guided stereotactic spinal radiotherapy: An emerging paradigm for achieving true stereotaxy

PURPOSE

To report treatment setup data from an emerging technique using near-simultaneous computed tomography (CT) image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of spinal and paraspinal tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A targeting system that integrates a CT-on-rails scanner with a linear accelerator (LINAC) was evaluated in the lead-in portion of a Phase I/II protocol for treating patients with paraspinal metastases. Patients were immobilized in supine position by a moldable body cushion vacuum wrapped with a plastic fixation sheet. Planning CT and immediately repeated CT were performed on the LINAC/CT-on-rails unit to assess respiratory-related vertebral body motion. Coplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using 7-9 beams was used to deliver 30 Gy in five fractions to the target volume, while limiting the spinal cord dose to <10 Gy. Pretreatment CT scans were fused with the planning CT scans to determine the correct target isocenter by accounting for any translational and roll (axial) rotational discrepancies from the planning CT. (Corrections caused by yaw and pitch rotations have not yet been implemented.) The reproducibility of the treatment isocenter as compared with the planned isocenter was measured with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs), portal film imaging, and immediate post-treatment verification CT scans. Phantom measurements were taken for dose verification for each IMRT plan.

RESULTS

Based on a total of 36 CT scans (3 for planning, 3 for respiration study, 15 pretreatment, and 15 post-treatment) from 3 patients, no respiration-associated vertebral body motion was seen. A comparison of the corrected daily anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) digital portal images with the planning AP and LAT DRRs confirmed that the isocenter setup accuracy for the 15 treatments was within 1 mm of the planning isocenter. The results from the immediate post-treatment CT scans reconfirmed the findings from the portal images and verified the absence of spinal movement during the treatment. The ion-chamber measurement for the high-dose region was within 2% of the planning dose for three patient treatment plans. Film dose measurement in an IMRT quality assurance phantom demonstrated good agreement from 90% to 30% isodose lines between the planned and measured results.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary experience suggests that the near-simultaneous CT image-guided verification technique can be used as a new platform technology for extracranial applications of stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery to spinal and paraspinal tumors.

Analysis of tumor control and toxicity in patients who have survived at least one year after radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE

To better evaluate tumor control and toxicity from radiosurgery for brain metastases, we analyzed these outcomes in patients who had survived at least 1 year after radiosurgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluated the results of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for 208 brain metastases in 137 patients who were followed for a median of 18 months (range 12-122) after radiosurgery. The median patient age was 53 years (range 3-83). Ninety-nine patients had solitary metastases. Thirty-eight had multiple tumors. Sixty-nine patients underwent initial SRS with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), 39 had initial SRS alone, and 27 patients had failed prior WBRT. The median treatment volume was 1.9 cm(3) (range 0.05-21.2). The median marginal tumor dose was 16 Gy (range 12-25). The most common histologic types included non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma, which comprised 37.0%, 22.6%, 13.0%, and 9.13% of the lesions, respectively. Forty-five tumors were associated with extensive edema.

RESULTS

At 1 and 5 years, the local tumor control rate was 89.6% +/- 2.1% and 62.8% +/- 6.9%, distal intracranial relapse occurred in 23% +/- 3.6% and 67.1% +/- 8.7%, and postradiosurgical sequelae developed in 2.8% +/- 1.2% and 11.4% +/- 3.5% of patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that local control decreased with tumor volume (p = 0.0002), SRS without WBRT (p = 0.008), and extensive edema (p = 0.024); distal intracranial recurrence correlated with younger patient age (p = 0.0018); and postradiosurgical sequelae increased with increasing tumor volume (p = 0.0085).

CONCLUSION

Long-term control of brain metastases and complication rates in this selective series of patients surviving >or=1 year after radiosurgery were similar to previously reported actuarial estimates. Large metastases and metastases associated with extensive edema can be difficult to control by radiosurgery, particularly without WBRT.

Radiation therapy for brain metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies that metastasize to the brain. Radiation therapy plays a central role in the management of brain metastases.

METHODS

The medical records of 36 patients with brain metastases from breast cancer who underwent whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) at Kyoto University Hospital between 1993 and 2001 were reviewed. The treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median age at the time of diagnosis of brain metastases was 52 years. Only 4 patients (11%) had a single metastasis, while the others had multiple metastases. Uncontrolled extracranial metastases were present in 26 patients at the time of diagnosis of brain metastases. All patients received WBRT at a median dose of 31 Gy. Eight patients received conventional external-beam boost irradiation, and 2 received boost stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The overall median survival time was 7.9 months. Uncontrolled extracranial metastases except for bone metastases and old age were significantly associated with a poor survival rate. Twenty-six patients (82%) showed initial response, but 15 developed CNS failure, including 9 patients whose tumor recurred at the original site, 4 patients who developed tumors elsewhere in the brain and 3 patients who exhibited meningeal spread. The median duration of intracranial failure was 5.0 months. Whole-brain dose, and total tumor dose did not affect intracranial control.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy yielded a high initial response, but the duration of effect was limited with external beam irradiation alone. New treatment strategies such as adding SRS need to be studied further.

Three irradiation treatment options including radiosurgery for brain metastases from primary lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine local control and survival rates in 92 patients with 145 brain metastases treated with three options of radiotherapy including stereotactic radiosurgery (SR).

METHODS

Between July 1994 and August 2002, 92 consecutive patients with 145 metastases were treated with a SR, 34 with initially SR alone, 22 initially with an association of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 36 with SR alone for recurrent new brain metastasis after WBRT. At time of treatment, extracranial disease was controlled in 46 (50%) and uncontrolled in 46 (50%). Pathologies were adenocarcinoma in 54 cases (59%), squamous cell carcinoma in 14 cases (15%), small cell carcinoma in 10 cases (11%) and miscellaneous in 14 cases (15%). All patients underwent only one treatment fraction for 1 or 2 metastases in 73 cases (83%) and for more than 2 metastases for the others.

RESULTS

The characteristics of patients and metastases in the group treated initially with SR alone and in the group treated initially with WBRT+SR were comparable. Median follow-up was 29 months (18-36). Overall, the median and the 1- and 2-year rates of overall survival were, respectively, 9 months, 37 and 20%. A controlled extracranial disease, a high Karnofsky index and a low number of metastasis were independent prognostic factor of overall survival, respectively, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.31-0.90, P=0.01), HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, P=0.0002), and HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.25-0.90, P=0.02). Thirteen metastases were not controlled (9%). Six-month and 1-year local control rate were, respectively, 93 and 86%. High delivered dose was an independent prognostic factor of local control, HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.18-0.95, P=0.03). A controlled extracranial disease was favourable independent prognostic factor of brain free-disease free survival, HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.2-0.98, P=0.04). Although there was a trend of a better local control, overall and brain disease free survivals rates in the WBRT+SR group compared to SR alone one, the difference were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Local control and survival rates are acceptable for a palliative treatment for the three option of treatment. In this series, the number of patients is not enough great to conclude to the necessity of the association of WBRT to SR. Re-irradiation is a safe treatment after new metastases appeared in previously irradiated area.

The role of tumor size in the radiosurgical management of patients with ambiguous brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

To identify a size cutoff below which it is safe to observe obscure brain lesions suspected of being metastases so that treatment of nonmetastases can be avoided.

METHODS

Medical records from patients who underwent linear accelerator-based radiosurgery from August 1991 to October 2001 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were defined as brain metastasis tumor volume less than 5 cm(3) (diameter, thick similar 2.1 cm) treated with a dose of 20 Gy or more. One hundred thirty-five patients had 153 evaluable brain metastases with follow-up imaging that met inclusion criteria. Median age was 54 years (range, 18-79 yr). Lesion primaries were non-small-cell lung (n = 39), melanoma (n = 44), renal (n = 37), breast (n = 18), colon (n = 3), sarcoma (n = 5), other (n = 5), and unknown primary (n = 2). Median tumor volume was 0.67 cm(3) (range, 0.06-4.58 cm(3)). The minimum peripheral dose was 20 Gy (n = 132) or 21 to 24 Gy (n = 21). At the time of analysis, the median follow-up for all patients was 10 months (range, 0.2-99 mo).

RESULTS

The 1- and 2-year actuarial local control rates for all of the lesions were 69 and 46%, respectively. For lesions of 1 cm (0.5 cm(3)) or less, the corresponding local control rates were 86 and 78%, respectively, which was significantly higher than the corresponding rates of 56 and 24%, respectively, for lesions larger than 1 cm (0.5 cm(3)) (P = 0.0016).

CONCLUSION

A convincing brain metastasis measuring less than 1 cm should be pursued aggressively. If the suspected brain metastasis is ambiguous, observation is proposed up to a diameter of 1 cm. This is the first study in the literature to identify a 1-cm cutoff for radiosurgical control of small brain metastases, and validation by additional studies is required.

Safety of multiple stereotactic radiosurgery treatments for multiple brain lesions

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely used therapy for multiple brain lesions, and studies have clearly established the safety and efficacy of single-dose SRS. However, as patient survival has increased, the recurrence of tumors and the development of metastases to new sites within the brain have made it desirable to repeat treatments over time. The cumulative toxicity of multi-isocenter, multiple treatments has not been well defined. We have retrospectively studied 10 patients who received multiple SRS treatments for multiple brain lesions to assess the cumulative toxicity of these treatments.

METHODS

In a retrospective review of all patients treated with SRS using the X-knife (Radionics, Burlington, MA) at Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College between December 1995 and December 2000, 10 patients were identified who received at least two treatments to at least 3 isocenters and had a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Image fusion technique was used to determine cumulative doses to targeted lesions, whole brain and critical brain structures. Toxicities and complications were identified by chart and radiological review.

RESULTS

The average of the maximum doses (cGy) to a point within the whole brain was 2402 (range 1617-3953); to the brainstem, 1059 (range 48-4126); to the right optic nerve, 223 (range 14-1012); to the left optic nerve, 159 (range 17-475); and to the optic chiasm, 219 (range 15-909). There were no focal neurological toxicities, including visual disturbances, cranial nerve palsies, or ataxia in any of the 10 patients. There were also no global toxicities, including cognitive decline or secondary tumors. Only one patient developed seizures that were difficult to control in association with radiation necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple SRS treatments at the cumulative doses used in our study are a safe therapy for patients with multiple brain lesions.

Radiosurgery for brain metastasis: impact of CTV on local control

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present analysis was to assess whether adding a 1 mm margin to the gross tumour volume (GTV) improves the control rate of brain metastasis treated with radiosurgery (RS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All the patients had one or two brain metastases, 30 mm or less in diameter, and only one isocentre was used for RS. There were 23 females and 38 males. The median age was 54 years (34-76). The median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (60-100). At the time of RS, 23 patients had no evidence of extracranial disease and 38 had a progressive systemic disease. Thirty-eight patients were treated up-front with only RS. Twenty-three patients were treated for relapse or progression more than 2 months after whole brain radiotherapy. From January 1994 to July 1995, clinical target volume (CTV) was equal to GTV without any margin (33 metastases). From August 1995 to August 2000, CTV was defined as GTV plus a 1 mm margin (45 metastases). A dose of 20Gy was prescribed to the isocentre and 14Gy at the margin of CTV.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 10.5 months (1-45). The mean minimum dose delivered to GTV was 14.6Gy in the group without a margin and 16.8Gy in the group with a 1 mm margin (P<0.0001). The response of 11 metastases was never assessed because patients died before the first follow-up. Ten metastases recurred, eight in the group treated without a margin and two in the group treated with a 1 mm margin (P=0.01). Two-year local control rates were 50.7+/-12.7% and 89.7+/-7.4% (P=0.008), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the treatment group (P=0.008) and the tumour volume (P=0.009) were prognostic factors for local control. In multivariate analysis, only the treatment group with a 1 mm margin was an independent prognostic factor for local control (P=0.04, RR: 5.8, 95% CI [1.08-31.13]). There were no significant differences, either in overall survival rate or in early and late side effects, between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Adding a 1 mm margin to the GTV in patients treated with RS significantly improves the probability of metastasis control without increasing the side effects.

Brain metastases treated with radiosurgery alone: an alternative to whole brain radiotherapy?

OBJECTIVE

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) provides benefit for patients with brain metastases but may result in neurological toxicity for patients with extended survival times. Stereotactic radiosurgery in combination with WBRT has become an important approach, but the value of WBRT has been questioned. As an alternative to WBRT, we managed patients with stereotactic radiosurgery alone, evaluated patients' outcomes, and assessed prognostic factors for survival and tumor control.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-two patients with brain metastases were managed with radiosurgery alone. One hundred twenty-one patients were evaluable with follow-up imaging after radiosurgery. The median patient age was 60.5 years (age range, 16-86 yr). The mean marginal tumor dose and volume were 18.5 Gy (range, 11-22 Gy) and 4.4 ml (range, 0.1-24.9 ml). Eighty percent of patients had solitary tumors.

RESULTS

The overall median survival time was 8 months. The median survival time in patients with no evidence of primary tumor disease or stable disease was 13 and 11 months. The local tumor control rate was 87%. At 2 years, the rate of local control, remote brain control, and total intracranial control were 75, 41, and 27%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, advanced primary tumor status (P = 0.0003), older age (P = 0.008), lower Karnofsky Performance Scale score (P = 0.01), and malignant melanoma (P = 0.005) were significant for poorer survival. The median survival time was 28 months for patients younger than 60 years of age, with Karnofsky Performance Scale score of at least 90, and whose primary tumor status showed either no evidence of disease or stable disease. Tumor volume (P = 0.02) alone was significant for local tumor control, whereas no factor affected remote or intracranial tumor control. Eleven patients developed complications, six of which were persistent. Nineteen (16.5%) of 116 patients in whom the cause of death was obtained died as a result of causes related to brain metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Brain metastases were controlled well with radiosurgery alone as initial therapy. We advocate that WBRT should not be part of the initial treatment protocol for selected patients with one or two tumors with good control of their primary cancer, better Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and younger age, all of which are predictors of longer survival.

A review of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases

This review addresses the epidemiology, historical reports, current issues, data and controversies involved in the management of brain metastases. The literature regarding surgery, whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or some combination of those treatments is discussed as well as issues of cost-effectiveness. Ongoing prospective randomized trials will further elucidate the optimal management for patients with brain metastases. Until those data are available, clinicians are encouraged to apply the existing data reviewed here in conjunction with best clinical judgment. A brief clinical guide is as follows. Patients with a solitary metastasis in an operable location and symptomatic mass effect should undergo surgery. Patients with poor performance status (KPS < 70) or more than three brain metastases should receive WBRT alone. Patients with 1-3 brain metastases and KPS >or= 70, should receive WBRT + SRS. If the patient refuses WBRT or needs salvage after WBRT, then SRS alone is appropriate. Clinicians should not be too dogmatic and should always apply the best clinical judgment.

Radiosurgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma metastasis to the brain: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors influencing survival and local tumor control

OBJECT

Renal cell carcinoma is a leading cause of death from cancer and its incidence is increasing. In many patients with renal cell cancer, metastasis to the brain develops at some time during the course of the disease. Corticosteroid therapy, radiotherapy, and resection have been the mainstays of treatment. Nonetheless, the median survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma metastasis is approximately 3 to 6 months. In this study the authors examined the efficacy of gamma knife surgery in treating renal cell carcinoma metastases to the brain and evaluated factors affecting long-term survival.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 69 patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery for a total of 146 renal cell cancer metastases. Clinical and radiographic data encompassing a 14-year treatment interval were collected. Multivariate analyses were used to determine significant prognostic factors influencing survival. The overall median length of survival was 15 months (range 1-65 months) from the diagnosis of brain metastasis. After radiosurgery, the median survival was 13 months in patients without and 5 months in those with active extracranial disease. In a multivariate analysis, factors significantly affecting the rate of survival included the following: 1) younger patient age (p = 0.0076); 2) preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score (p = 0.0012); 3) time from initial cancer diagnosis to brain metastasis diagnosis (p = 0.0017); 4) treatment dose to the tumor margin (p = 0.0252); 5) maximal treatment dose (p = 0.0127); and 6) treatment isodose (p = 0.0354). Prior tumor resection, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or whole-brain radiation therapy did not correlate with extended survival. Postradiosurgical imaging of the brain demonstrated that 63% of the metastases had decreased, 33% remained stable, and 4% eventually increased in size. Two patients (2.9%) later underwent a craniotomy and resection for a tumor refractory to radiosurgery or a new symptomatic metastasis. Eighty-three percent of patients died of progression of extracranial disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of renal cell carcinoma metastases to the brain provides effective local tumor control in approximately 96% of patients and a median length of survival of 15 months. Early detection of brain metastases, aggressive treatment of systemic disease, and a therapeutic strategy including radiosurgery can offer patients an extended survival.

Brain metastases

Brain metastases are one of the most feared complications of cancer because even small tumors may cause incapacitating neurologic symptoms. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of brain metastases from system malignancies.

Properly selected patients with multiple brain metastases may benefit from aggressive treatment of their intracranial disease

To determine whether properly selected patients with multiple brain metastases benefit from aggressive treatment of their intracranial disease, we reviewed 52 patients having stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), tumor resection, or both between April 1997 and March 2000. Tumor histology included lung (n = 18, 35%), breast (n = 11, 21%), renal (n = 6, 12%), melanoma (n = 6, 12%), and other (n = 11, 21%). The median patient age was 58 years, the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90, and the median number of tumors was three. Twenty patients (39%) had progressed after prior radiation therapy. Treatment included multiple craniotomies and tumor resection (n = 5, 10%), radiosurgery (n = 31, 60%), or resection and radiosurgery (n= 16, 30%). Median survival was 15.5 months. The one- and two-year actuarial survivals were 63% and 27%, respectively. Multivariate analysis found radiation therapy oncology group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG RPA) Class (1 vs. 2/3) correlated with improved survival (Relative risk = 2.60, 95% CI 1.13-5.97, p = 0.03). Class 1 patients (KPS > or = 70, age < 65 years, and controlled primary with no extracranial metastases) survived a median of 19 months whereas Class 3 patients (KPS < 70) survived 8 months. Class 2 patients (all other patients) survived a median of 13 months. Thirty-five patients (67%) had intracranial progression at a median of 8.0 months. Intracranial progression was local (n = 6), distant (n = 23), or local and distant (n = 6); 26 patients with intracranial progression underwent additional brain tumor treatments. Multivariate analysis found patients with radiosensitive tumors (lung, breast, other) had fewer intracranial recurrences compared to patients with radio-resistant tumors (melanoma, renal, sarcoma) (Relative risk = 2.43, 95% CI 1.13-5.10, p = 0.02). The length of survival in our series is quite comparable to historical reports on the management of brain metastasis patients, and supports aggressive intervention for RTOG RPA Class 1 patients and Class 2 patients with controlled primary disease who have a limited number of brain metastases.

Radiosurgery for non-small cell lung carcinoma metastatic to the brain: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors influencing patient survival time and local tumor control

OBJECT

Lung carcinoma is the leading cause of death from cancer. More than 25% of those patients with lung cancer develop a brain metastasis at some time during the course of their disease. Corticosteroid therapy, radiotherapy, and resection have been the mainstays of treatment. Nonetheless, the median survival for patients with lung carcinoma metastasis is approximately 3 to 6 months. The authors examine the efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for treating non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) metastases to the brain and evaluate factors affecting long-term patient survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 273 patients who had undergone GKS to treat a total of 627 NSCLC metastases was performed. Clinical and neuroimaging data encompassing a 14-year treatment interval were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant prognostic factors influencing patient survival. The overall median patient survival time was 15 months (range 1-116 months) from the diagnosis of brain metastases. The median survival was 10 months from GKS treatment in those patients with adenocarcinoma and 7 months for those with other histological tumor types. In patients with no active extracranial disease at the time of GKS, the median survival time was 16 months. In multivariate analyses, factors significantly affecting survival included: 1) female sex (p = 0.014); 2) preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score (p < 0.0001); 3) adenocarcinoma histological subtype (p = 0.0028); 4) active systemic disease (p = 0.0001); and 5) time from lung cancer diagnosis to the development of brain metastasis (p = 0.0074). Prior tumor resection or whole-brain radiation therapy did not correlate with extended patient survival time. Postradiosurgical imaging of brain metastases revealed that 60% decreased, 24% remained stable, and 16% eventually increased in size. Factors affecting local tumor control included tumor volume (p = 0.042) and treatment isodose (p = 0.015). Fourteen patients (5.1%) later underwent craniotomy and tumor resection for tumor refractory to GKS or a new symptomatic metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma knife surgery for NSCLC metastases affords effective local tumor control in approximately 84% of patients. Early detection of brain metastases, aggressive treatment of systemic disease, and a therapeutic strategy including GKS can afford patients an extended survival time.

[Intracerebral radiotherapy under stereotaxic conditions]

Stereotactic radiosurgery is used for treating several brain diseases. Radiosurgery is a non-invasive alternative to surgery for brain metastases, and randomized trials are on going to assess the role of radiosurgery. Radiosurgery has been advocated for patients with small benign meningioma or with vestibular schwannoma, but there is no proof of efficacy and safety of radiosurgery in comparison with other treatments. Radiosurgery can obliterate 80-90% of small arteriovenous malformations, but no information exists on the survival of treated compared with untreated patients. The limited information available suggests that radiosurgery should be fully evaluated in well-designed prospective studies.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with “Radioresistant” Brain Metastases

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of patients with brain metastases that have been determined to be “radioresistant” on the basis of histological examination.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 41 consecutive patients who presented with 83 brain metastases from radioresistant primaries and subsequently underwent SRS. All patients were followed until death or for a median of 31 months after SRS. Tumor histologies included renal cell carcinoma (16 patients), melanoma (23 patients), and sarcoma (2 patients). Eighteen patients (44%) had a solitary metastasis, and 23 patients (56%) had multiple metastases.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time was 14.2 months after SRS. On the basis of univariate analysis, systemic disease status (P = 0.006) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class (P = 0.005) were associated with survival. The median survival time was 23.5 months for patients in RPA Class I status and 10.5 months for patients in RPA Class II or III status. There was a trend (P = 0.12) toward improved median survival for patients with renal cell carcinoma (17.8 mo) as compared with patients with melanoma (9.7 mo). Multivariate analysis showed RPA class (P = 0.038) and histological diagnosis of primary tumor (P &lt; 0.001) to be independent predictors for overall survival. In the 35 patients who underwent follow-up imaging, 9 (12%) of 73 tumors recurred locally. In 54% of the patients, distant brain failure (DBF) developed. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) improved local control and decreased DBF, according to the univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients who received adjuvant WBRT in addition to SRS had 6-month actuarial local control of 100% as compared with 85% among those who did not receive WBRT (P = 0.018). Patients who received adjuvant WBRT with SRS had a 6-month actuarial DBF rate of 17%, as compared with a rate of 64% among patients who had SRS alone (P = 0.0027).

CONCLUSION

Well-selected patients with brain metastases from radioresistant primary tumors who undergo SRS survive longer than historical controls. RPA Class I status and primary renal cell carcinoma predict longer survival. Adjuvant WBRT improves local control and decreases DBF but does not affect overall survival. Further studies are needed to determine which patients should receive WBRT.

Phase II randomized trial of temozolomide and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with brain metastases from solid tumors were randomized to oral temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/d) concurrent with 40-Gy fractionated conventional external-beam radiotherapy (2 Gy, 5 d/wk) for 4 weeks versus 40-Gy radiotherapy alone. The group receiving temozolomide and radiotherapy continued temozolomide therapy (200 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 days every 28 days for an additional six cycles. The primary end points were radiologic response and neurologic symptom evaluation.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was significantly (P =.017) improved in patients receiving temozolomide and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. Among 24 patients assessable for response in the temozolomide group, 23 (96%) of 24 responded, including nine (38%) patients with a complete response and 14 (58%) patients with a partial response. With radiotherapy alone, 14 (67%) of 21 assessable patients responded, including seven (33%) complete responses and seven (33%) partial responses. There was marked neurologic improvement in the group receiving temozolomide, and the proportion of patients requiring corticosteroids 2 months after treatment was lower in the temozolomide group compared with radiotherapy alone (67% v 91%, respectively). Daily temozolomide concurrent with radiotherapy was generally well tolerated; however, grade >or= 2 nausea (48% v 13%, P =.13) and vomiting (32% v 0%, P =.004) were significantly increased in the temozolomide group. Hematologic toxicity was predictable and reversible.

CONCLUSION

Temozolomide is safe, and a significant improvement in response rate was observed when administered in combination with radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated brain metastases. A larger randomized trial is warranted to verify these results.

Brain metastases: treatment options to improve outcomes

In recent years, a broader base of treatment options has evolved to improve the outcome for patients with brain metastases. The selection of the most appropriate intervention for the individual patient is dependent on a careful evaluation of the extent of intracranial tumour, as well as an understanding of patient and tumour characteristics that are important determinants of prognosis. Recent analyses have confirmed good performance status, control of the primary tumour, absence of extracranial metastases and age less than 65 years to be predictors for longer survival. Medical therapy typically includes the use of corticosteroids, and some advances have been made in optimising the use of these agents. Prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs in patients with brain metastases is generally discouraged. Chemotherapy was previously not considered to have a role in treating brain metastases, but has increasingly become an accepted treatment option. Recent clinical studies have evaluated the integration of chemotherapy with conventional treatments such as radiotherapy and the addition of biological response modifiers. In the past, radiotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for brain metastases. A number of randomised controlled trials have explored external beam radiation therapy, radiation sensitisers, postoperative whole brain irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Significant improvements in survival have been demonstrated as a result of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small-cell lung cancer, and improved local control of brain metastases has been achieved with postoperative whole brain irradiation. A number of studies have helped define a more efficient use of external beam irradiation. Radiosurgery in particular has been identified as an important advance in radiation treatment delivery and may provide an acceptable alternative to surgical resection in many patients. Conventional surgery has long had a role to play in establishing the diagnosis, guiding the choice of subsequent therapies and reversing life-threatening complications from brain metastases. The risks of surgery have been reduced with recent improvements in anaesthesia and intraoperative tumour localisation. Recent clinical studies have addressed the role of surgical resection in the management of patients with a single brain metastasis. Survival benefits have been demonstrated in patients undergoing surgical resection in addition to external beam radiation therapy. Despite the improvements achieved in the treatment of patients with brain metastases at first diagnosis, the question of retreatment may arise in due course. The therapeutic options available in this situation include re-operation, radiosurgery and brachytherapy.

Immuno-viral therapy of brain tumors by combination of viral therapy with cancer vaccination using a replication-conditional HSV

Here we developed an effective therapeutic approach using a replication-conditional mutant of herpes simplex virus (HSV), G207, for the treatment of metastatic tumors in the immunologically privileged central nervous system. An experimental model of brain metastasis was developed using BALB/c mice that harbored both intracranial (i.c.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) mouse CT26 colon adenocarcinoma tumors. Intratumoral injections of G207 into s.c. tumors elicited cytotoxic T-cell responses not only to HSV but also to a tumor antigen; however, only a limited antitumor effect was observed on metastatic brain tumors. To improve this antitumor effect, G207 was also injected into the brain tumor. After intratumoral injections of G207 into both i.c. and s.c. CT26 tumors, a significant antitumor effect was observed in the metastatic brain tumors. This therapeutic efficacy was absent in athymic mice, indicating that the antitumor effect could be mediated by T cells. Cytotoxic T-cell responses to HSV and the tumor antigen were induced by injections of G207 into i.c. and s.c. CT26 tumors. These results suggest that HSV-infected brain tumors may be efficiently eliminated by the induced anti-HSV T cells as well as by antitumor T cells. Therefore, this strategy of immuno-viral therapy, involving direct viral oncolytic activities and inducing antitumor and antiviral immune responses, may be useful for the treatment of tumors in the immunologically privileged central nervous system.

Metastatic melanoma to the brain: prognostic factors after gamma knife radiosurgery

PURPOSE

To identify important prognostic factors predictive of survival and tumor control in patients with metastatic melanoma to the brain who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 122 consecutive patients with 332 intracranial melanoma metastases underwent gamma knife radiosurgery over a 5-year period. Of these, 39 (32%) also received whole-brain irradiation (WBI). The median tumor volume was 0.8 cm(3) (range: 0.02-30.20 cm(3)), and the median prescribed dose was 20 Gy (range: 14-24 Gy). Median follow-up was 6.8 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival and freedom from progression were performed using the following parameters: status of systemic disease, intracranial tumor volume, number of lesions, tumor location, Karnofsky performance status, gender, age, and WBI.

RESULTS

Overall median survival was 7.0 months from time of radiosurgery and 9.1 months from the onset of brain metastasis. In multivariate analysis, improved survival was noted in patients with total intracranial tumor volume <3 cm(3) (p = 0.003) and inactive systemic disease (p = 0.0065), whereas other parameters studied were of lesser importance (tumor location, p = 0.056, and Karnofsky performance status, p = 0.086), or of no significance (number of lesions, WBI, age, and gender). Freedom from subsequent brain metastasis depended on intracranial tumor volume (p = 0.0018) and status of systemic disease (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment modality for patients with intracranial metastatic melanoma. Tumor volume and status of systemic disease are good independent predictors of survival and freedom from tumor progression.

Therapy for stage IIIB and stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

The treatment options for unresectable stage III NSCLC include definitive RT, chemotherapy, combined chemoradiotherapy, or supportive care. Compared with radiation alone or chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and standard RT confers a modest survival benefit at the cost of increased toxicity for patients with an excellent performance status. For metastatic disease, combination chemotherapy--in particular, platinum-based regimens--improves symptom control and survival. Newer chemotherapeutic agents with higher response rates and favorable toxicity profiles are improving outcome even for the elderly and debilitated patients and those refractory to first-line chemotherapy. Evolving understanding of the molecular events in tumorigenesis is uncovering a host of promising targets for mechanism-based therapy. Many of these novel target modulators likely will require combination with conventional chemotherapy for optimal results.

Surgical management of cerebral metastases from melanoma: outcome in 147 patients treated at a single institution over two decades

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to review the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for treatment of cerebral metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 147 patients with cerebral metastases from melanoma who were treated surgically at a single institution between 1979 and 1999. Almost all patients underwent postoperative wholebrain radiation therapy. The mean patient age was 53 years (range 17-76 years); 69% of patients were male. A single cerebral metastasis was identified in 84% of patients, although 56% had synchronous extracranial metastases. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2% and neurological symptoms resolved or improved in 78% of patients. Recurrence of intracerebral disease was seen in 55% of patients and 26% died of intracerebral metastases. Twenty-four patients underwent reoperation for recurrent cerebral disease. The median survival duration from the time of surgery for all patients was 8.5 months; the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 9% and 5%, respectively. Factors that significantly influenced survival on univariate analysis were the number of cerebral metastases (p = 0.015), a macroscopically complete excision (p < 0.05), and reoperation for recurrence (p = 0.02). The presence of extracranial metastases did not significantly influence survival. On multivariate analysis only the number of cerebral metastases significantly affected survival (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

For the majority of patients with cerebral metastases from melanoma, surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy is a treatment option that improves neurological symptoms and produces minimal morbidity. Long-term survival (> 3 years) most likely occurs in patients with a single cerebral metastasis and no demonstrable extracranial disease. Reoperation for recurrent cerebral disease may be appropriate in selected cases.

Symptom response after palliative radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases

Whole brain radiotherapy (RT) is frequently used to palliate symptoms in patients with brain metastases, but the palliative benefit to patients has not been well documented. We conducted a longitudinal observational prospective study of patients receiving standard RT (20 Gray (Gy)/5 fractions) for symptomatic brain metastases. End-points were observer rating of neurological symptoms, patient-rated symptoms, performance status, neurological functional status, cognitive function and quality of life (QOL). Median survival for the 75 patients was 86 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 65-101 days). At 1 month, 19% of patients showed an improvement or resolution of presenting symptoms, 23% were stable and 55% had progressed or died. Patient-rated symptoms were increased at 1 month in comparison to baseline data. Only 4 patients had an improved performance status and 22 were stable. Many patients with brain metastases have a short life expectancy and may not benefit from even short duration radiation schedules. Further effort is needed to optimise patient selection and tailor treatment appropriately.

Moving targets and ghosts of the past: outcome measurement in brain tumour therapy

Evaluation of novel therapies for brain tumours should logically consider quality and quantity of patient survival as primary endpoints. The urgency of the problem, however, frequently leads investigators to use surrogate endpoints and historical controls in order to more rapidly evaluate outcome. To examine the impact of the use of surrogate endpoints and historical controls on the evaluation of innovative brain tumour therapy, selective literature review of three content areas (intraarterial chemotherapy for malignant glioma, interstitial brachytherapy for malignant glioma and stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral metastasis and malignant glioma) was carried out. The impact of surrogate outcome measures and use of historical controls was assessed by comparing the results of trials using these methods and randomised clinical trials. In the evaluation of both intraarterial chemotherapy and interstitial brachytherapy, promising results in early phase trials were not confirmed in randomised clinical trials. This result can be explained by selection bias and predicted by the use of controls carefully selected from large treatment data bases. In the evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery, early phase trials are promising, but randomised clinical trials have not yet been done. Prior experience suggests that the early promising results with stereotactic radiosurgery should be subjected to randomised clinical trial validation before being considered proven. Careful selection of controls for early phase trials is necessary if erroneous conclusions are to be avoided.

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: the Tuebingen experience

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the effectiveness of linear accelerator based radiosurgery (RS) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 55 patients with a total of 72 BM, 41 patients had a single brain metastasis and 14 patients had two or three metastases. Median tumour dose of 15Gy (range 8-20Gy) was prescribed to a median isodose surface of 90% (range 70-100%) encompassing the target volume.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) for all 55 patients was 7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-10 months] and 2-year survival is 18%. There was no significant difference between patients who had one brain metastasis and those with either two or three metastases (log rank P=0.7565). Multivariate analysis in patients with a single BM showed that interval between primary diagnosis (PD) to BM, maximum size of metastasis, and histology (renal cell carcinoma and melanoma versus others) were independent prognostic factors influencing survival. Local control was obtained in 66/72 (92%) metastases. Actuarial local control at 24 months was 52%. Only age (<or=50 years vs >50 years) and histology (renal cell versus others) influenced local control in the univariate analysis in patients with a single BM. In multivariate analysis, size, histology (renal cell and melanoma versus others), activity of extracranial metastatic disease, age, interval from PD to BM and location (midline versus other) independently influenced local control, while the dose was not significant for our patient group. Only one patient developed radiographically suspected RS-induced necrosis after previous whole brain RT.

CONCLUSION

RS was effective and little toxic in BM. Identification of prognostic factors must be performed to gain knowledge on patients most likely to benefit from this procedure.

Phase I/II clinical trial of concurrent radiochemotherapy in combination with topotecan for the treatment of brain metastases

The prognosis of patients with brain metastases is very poor. In this phase I/II study we tested the feasibility, dosage, toxicity and tumour efficacy of a concurrent radiochemotherapy regimen including topotecan. Twenty patients were recruited between July 1998 and February 2000 (9 women, 11 men) and treated with a whole-brain irradiation of 40 Gy (some patients were also given a boost) in combination with topotecan given as a 21-day continuous infusion in a dosage of 0.4 to 0.6 mg/m2/day. The median survival was five months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2-8 months). In 13 of 20 patients, it was possible to evaluate the remission with computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance scans. We detected four complete responders (CRs), two partial responders (PRs), and one progressive disease (PD). 6 patients had stable disease (SD). An intracerebral recurrence was experienced in 3 patients, 3 patients experienced spinal lesions. Systemic progression of cancer outside the central nervous system (CNS) was dominant in 9 of 20 patients. A reversible, non-cumulative haematological toxicity mainly occurring from a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day and above was dose-limiting for this type of therapy. Combined concurrent radiochemotherapy with topotecan is feasible in spite of various pretreatments. Myelosuppression was the dominant toxicity, which was reversible and manageable. We recommend a dose of 0.4 mg/m2/day of topotecan as a 21-day continuous infusion therapy in combination with radiotherapy.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for solitary brain metastases

PURPOSE

Surgery is considered to be the treatment of choice for patients with solitary brain metastases. We report a single-centre experience of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT)/radiosurgery as an alternative to surgery and define prognostic parameters that provide for a more rational selection of patients for appropriate treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 1997, 96 patients with 106 brain metastases received SRT to a dose of 20 Gy in two fractions (range 20-30 Gy in 24 fractions) either alone or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy.

RESULTS

After SRT, 51% of patients had improvement in neurological function. The median survival of the 96 patients was 9 months. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prognostic grouping for patients with multiple brain metastases (prognostic factors: age, performance status, systemic metastases, status of primary tumour) was applicable to this cohort, with median survivals of 15, 8 and 2 months for favourable, intermediate and poor prognostic groups respectively.

CONCLUSION

SRT is a non-invasive method of treatment of solitary brain metastases and the outcome is comparable with the results obtained after surgical excision. Prognosis is determined by factors defined for patients with multiple brain metastases, with performance status being the most important. SRT/radiosurgery should be reserved for patients with favourable prognostic factors, with a Karnofsky performance status >70, who have a reasonable chance of good quality prolonged survival. In future trials, radiosurgery should be compared in terms of survival, quality of life and health economics to whole brain radiotherapy and surgery.

Imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery of primary and secondary malignant brain tumors

After radiosurgery of malignant tumors, it can be difficult to discriminate between transient treatment effects, radiation necrosis, and tumor progression on post-treatment imaging. Misinterpretation of an enlarging lesion may lead to inappropriate treatment and contribute to disagreements about treatment efficacy. In an effort to clarify this problem, we reviewed our experience with interpreting post-radiosurgical imaging in patients with malignant primary and secondary brain tumors. We reviewed results of radiosurgery of 30 malignant gliomas and 35 metastatic brain tumors with minimum follow up of 1 year or until death. Of 30 gliomas, 73% were larger a mean of 13 weeks after radiosurgery. Of 35 metatstatic tumors, 22% were larger a mean of 10 weeks after radiosurgery. Eleven had 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) of enlarging lesions. Eight showed increased activity with respect to brain; three decreased activity. Of the eight, six predicted incorrectly based upon the patients' subsequent courses (all alive, mean follow up of 27 months), and two correctly, with the patients dying from the imaged lesions 8 and 13 months later. Of the three with FDG uptake less than brain, one patient was alive with 32 weeks of follow up, and two patients died from the imaged lesion 13 and 21 months later. Radiographic enlargement after radiosurgery is common, especially for gliomas. Physicians caring for these patients should be aware of this phenomenon and be cautious in interpreting post-treatment images. MRI appearance may be useful for metastases. FDG-PET seems unreliable. Further evaluation of Tl-201 and HMPAO SPECT or MRS is warranted.