BMPs as mediators of roof plate repulsion of commissural neurons

Axon guidance at the midline of the developing CNS

Bilaterally symmetric animals must be capable of transmitting information between the left and right sides of their body to integrate sensory input and to coordinate motor control. Thus, many neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) of a wide variety of higher organisms project so-called commissural axons across the midline. Interestingly, these axons are never observed to re-cross the midline. On the other hand, some neurons project axons that remain on their own (ipsilateral) side of the CNS, without ever crossing the midline. Recent studies demonstrate that specialized cells which reside at the ventral midline of the developing vertebrate spinal cord and Drosophila ventral nerve cord play critical roles in regulating the guidance of both crossing and non-crossing axons. For example, these cells secrete positively-acting guidance cues that attract commissural axons over long distances to the midline of the CNS. Furthermore, short-range interactions between guidance cues present on the surfaces of midline cells, and their receptors expressed on the surfaces of pathfinding axons, allow commissural axons to cross the midline and prevent ipsilaterally projecting axons from entering the midline. Remarkably, as commissural axons cross over to the opposite side of the CNS, the molecular composition of their surfaces is dynamically altered so that they become responsive to repulsive midline guidance cues that they had previously ignored. Thus, this exquisitely controlled guidance system prevents commissural axons from crossing the midline more than once. Strikingly, many of the molecular mechanisms that control midline guidance appear to be evolutionarily conserved.

The forkhead transcription factor UNC-130 is required for the graded spatial expression of the UNC-129 TGF-beta guidance factor in C. elegans

Secreted proteins required for cellular movements along the circumference of the body wall in Caenorhabditis elegans include UNC-6/netrin and the novel TGF-beta UNC-129. Expression of these proteins is graded along the dorsoventral (D/V) axis, providing polarity information to guide migrations. Here we show that the graded expression of UNC-129 in dorsal but not ventral body muscles depends on unc-130, which encodes a Forkhead transcription factor. The phenotype of unc-130 mutants closely mimics the reported effects of ectopically expressing unc-129 in both dorsal and ventral body muscles (). This fits our present finding that unc-130 cell autonomously represses unc-129 expression in the ventral body muscles. Thus the cell-specific effects of unc-130 on ventral, but not dorsal, body muscle expression of unc-129 accounts for the D/V polarity information required for UNC-129-mediated guidance. Genetic interactions between unc-130 and other guidance genes show that several molecular pathways function in parallel to guide the ventral to dorsal migration of distal tip cells (DTCs) and axonal growth cones in C. elegans. Genetic interactions confirm that UNC-129 does not require the only known type II TGF-beta receptor in C. elegans (DAF-4) for its guidance functions. Also, unc-130 is partially required for male tail morphogenesis and for embryogenesis.

Squeezing axons out of the gray matter: a role for slit and semaphorin proteins from midline and ventral spinal cord

Commissural axons cross the nervous system midline and then turn to grow alongside it, neither recrossing nor projecting back into ventral regions. In Drosophila, the midline repellent Slit prevents recrossing: axons cross once because they are initially unresponsive to Slit, becoming responsive only upon crossing. We show that commissural axons in mammals similarly acquire responsiveness to a midline repellent activity upon crossing. Remarkably, they also become responsive to a repellent activity from ventral spinal cord, helping explain why they never reenter that region. Several Slit and Semaphorin proteins, expressed in midline and/or ventral tissues, mimic these repellent activities, and midline guidance defects are observed in mice lacking neuropilin-2, a Semaphorin receptor. Thus, Slit and Semaphorin repellents from midline and nonmidline tissues may help prevent crossing axons from reentering gray matter, squeezing them into surrounding fiber tracts.

Dorsal patterning defects in the hindbrain, roof plate and skeleton in the dreher (dr(J)) mouse mutant

dreher is a spontaneous mouse mutation in which adult animals display a complex phenotype associated with hearing loss, neurological, pigmentation and skeletal abnormalities. During early embryogenesis, the neural tube of dreher mutants is abnormally shaped in the region of the rhomboencephalon, due to problems in the formation of a proper roof plate over the otic hindbrain. We have studied the expression of Hox/lacZ transgenic mouse strains in the dreher background and shown that primary segmentation of the neural tube is not altered in these mutants, although correct morphogenesis is affected resulting in misshapen rhombomeres. Neural crest derivatives from rhombomere 6, such as the glossopharyngeal ganglion, are defective, and the dorsal neural tube marker Wnt1 is absent from this segment. Selected trunk neural crest populations are also altered, as there is a lack of pigmentation in the thoracic region of mutant mice. Skeletal defects include abnormal cranial bones of neural crest origin, and improper fusion of the dorsal aspects of cervical and thoracic vertebrae. Taken together, the gene affected in the dreher mutant is responsible for correct patterning of the dorsal-most cell types of the neural tube, that is, the neural crest and the roof plate, in the hindbrain region. Axial skeletal defects could reflect inductive influence of the dorsal neural tube on proper fusion of the neural arches. It is possible that a common precursor population for both neural crest and roof plate is the cellular target of the dreher mutation.

The branchial arches and HGF are growth-promoting and chemoattractant for cranial motor axons

During development, cranial motor neurons extend their axons along distinct pathways into the periphery. For example, branchiomotor axons extend dorsally to leave the hindbrain via large dorsal exit points. They then grow in association with sensory ganglia, to their targets, the muscles of the branchial arches. We have investigated the possibility that pathway tissues might secrete diffusible chemorepellents or chemoattractants that guide cranial motor axons, using co-cultures in collagen gels. We found that explants of dorsal neural tube or hindbrain roof plate chemorepelled cranial motor axons, while explants of cranial sensory ganglia were weakly chemoattractive. Explants of branchial arch mesenchyme were strongly growth-promoting and chemoattractive for cranial motor axons. Enhanced and oriented axon outgrowth was also elicited by beads loaded with Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF); antibodies to this protein largely blocked the outgrowth and orientation effects of the branchial arch on motor axons. HGF was expressed in the branchial arches, whilst Met, which encodes an HGF receptor, was expressed by subpopulations of cranial motor neurons. Mice with targetted disruptions of HGF or Met showed defects in the navigation of hypoglossal motor axons into the branchial region. Branchial arch tissue may thus act as a target-derived factor that guides motor axons during development. This influence is likely to be mediated partly by Hepatocyte Growth Factor, although a component of branchial arch-mediated growth promotion and chemoattraction was not blocked by anti-HGF antibodies.

Neuropilin-2 is required in vivo for selective axon guidance responses to secreted semaphorins

Neuropilins are receptors for class 3 secreted semaphorins, most of which can function as potent repulsive axon guidance cues. We have generated mice with a targeted deletion in the neuropilin-2 (Npn-2) locus. Many Npn-2 mutant mice are viable into adulthood, allowing us to assess the role of Npn-2 in axon guidance events throughout neural development. Npn-2 is required for the organization and fasciculation of several cranial nerves and spinal nerves. In addition, several major fiber tracts in the brains of adult mutant mice are either severely disorganized or missing. Our results show that Npn-2 is a selective receptor for class 3 semaphorins in vivo and that Npn-1 and Npn-2 are required for development of an overlapping but distinct set of CNS and PNS projections.