Effects of inhibition of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 in chronic gastro-intestinal ulcer models in rats

Expression of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 by human gastric endothelial cells

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) and cause gastric ulceration. NSAIDs also impair granulation tissue angiogenesis and healing of established gastric ulcers in humans. The mechanism whereby NSAIDs inhibit granulation tissue angiogenesis is unknown but may involve inhibition of either or both COX isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2).

AIMS

To investigate COX expression by human gastric endothelial (HuGE) cells during angiogenesis in vitro.

METHODS

COX-1 and COX-2 expression by HuGE cells was investigated by western blot analysis, indirect immunofluorescence, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and measurement of prostaglandin E(2) synthesis. Plating onto basement membrane matrix and stimulation by phorbol ester were used as in vitro models of angiogenesis.

RESULTS

Under normal culture conditions (30% serum), HuGE cells expressed COX-1 and low levels of COX-2. COX-2 expression was induced in HuGE cells in both angiogenesis models. Prostaglandin E(2) production and tubular structure formation by HuGE cells on basement membrane matrix was significantly inhibited by a selective COX-2 inhibitor (NS-398).

CONCLUSION

Angiogenesis by HuGE cells in vitro was associated with induction of functional COX-2 expression. A selective COX-2 inhibitor significantly decreased HuGE cell angiogenesis on basement membrane matrix. Extrapolation of these data to human gastric ulcer angiogenesis in vivo suggests that selective COX-2 inhibitors could delay gastric ulcer healing to the same extent as traditional NSAIDs which are non-selective COX inhibitors.

[New nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents: nitric oxide donors and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors]

The use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as analgesic or anti-inflammatory agents is primarily limited by their toxicity to the gastrointestinal tract. Two strategies have been developed recently in order to improve the safety of these drugs. The first approach is the linking of a nitric oxide-releasing moiety to the available compounds. The rationale is that nitric oxide may prevent non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced ulcerations by preventing mucosal ischemia. The second approach is based on the discovery of two isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2) of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme. It was hypothesized that the constitutively expressed COX-1 isoenzyme leads to the synthesis of prostaglandins with homeostatic functions whereas COX-2 is merely responsible for the production of prostaglandins mediating pain, fever and inflammation. Accordingly, selective COX-2 inhibitors have been developed. Clinical trials indicate that these compounds are roughly as effective as the available non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents without causing acute gastrointestinal damage. There is some evidence that both COX-1 and COX-2 isoforms are involved in the production of prostaglandins associated with inflammation and homeostatic functions. Finally, the true benefit/risk ratio of these new non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remains to be assessed.

Prophylaxis and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal disorders

A significant percentage of patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) experience some type of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, lesions of the gastroduodenal tract being clinically the most relevant. NSAIDs cause gastrointestinal damage by 2 independent mechanisms: a topical effect, which is pH and pKa related, and a systemic effect mediated by cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition with a reduction in prostaglandin synthesis. Using endoscopy, gastroduodenal lesions identified include subepithelial haemorrhages, erosions and ulcers. The prevalence of ulceration in NSAID users has been reported as being between 14 and 31% with a 2-fold higher frequency of gastric ulcers compared with duodenal ulcers. Among the strategies used to decrease the risk of ulcer development are: (i) the use of analgesics other than NSAIDs; (ii) use of the lowest possible dosage of NSAID; (iii) the use of a COX-2 selective NSAID; (iv) the use of low doses of corticosteroids instead of NSAIDs; (v) avoidance of concomitant use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids; and (vi) use of preventive therapy. In an attempt to reduce the incidence of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal lesions, the following approaches have been proposed: (i) use of the prostaglandin analogue misoprostol, which is an antiulcer drug which has been proven to be as effective in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers as in the reduction of serious upper gastrointestinal complications; (ii) histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2 antagonists), e.g. ranitidine, cimetidine and famotidine, which are useful in the prevention of NSAID-induced duodenal ulcers during long term treatment, but not in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers; (iii) proton pump inhibitors, e.g omeprazole, and pantoprazole, whose efficacy in preventing NSAID-associated ulcers has been recently demonstrated; and (iv) barrier agents, e.g. sucralfate, which cannot be recommended as prophylactic agents to prevent NSAID-induced gastropathy. The first step in the treatment of NSAID-associated ulcers lies in a reduction in the dosage of the NSAID or discontinuation of the drug. If NSAID treatment cannot be withdrawn, a proton pump inhibitor appears to be the most effective treatment in healing ulcers, accelerating the slow healing observed with H2 antagonists.

Inducible cyclooxygenase may have anti-inflammatory properties

Cyclooxygenase (COX) has two isoforms. Generally, COX 1 is constitutively expressed in most tissues, where it maintains physiological processes; inducible COX 2 is considered a pro-inflammatory enzyme and a chief target for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Here we present evidence that COX 2 may have anti-inflammatory properties. In carrageenin-induced pleurisy in rats, the predominant cells at 2 hours are polymorphonuclear leucocytes, whereas mononuclear cells dominate from 24 hours until resolution at 48 hours. In this model, COX 2 protein expression peaked initially at 2 hours, associated with maximal prostaglandin E2 synthesis. However, at 48 hours there was a second increase in COX 2 expression, 350% greater than that at 2 hours. Paradoxically, this coincided with inflammatory resolution and was associated with minimal prostaglandin E2 synthesis. In contrast, levels of prostaglandin D2, and 15deoxy delta(12-14)prostaglandin J2 were high at 2 hours, decreased as inflammation increased, but were increased again at 48 hours. The selective COX 2 inhibitor NS-398 and the dual COX 1/COX 2 inhibitor indomethacin inhibited inflammation at 2 hours but significantly exacerbated inflammation at 48 hours. This exacerbation was associated with reduced exudate prostaglandin D2 and 15deoxy delta(12-14)prostaglandin J2 concentrations, and was reversed by replacement of these prostaglandins. Thus, COX 2 may be pro-inflammatory during the early phase of a carrageenin-induced pleurisy, dominated by polymorphonuclear leucocytes, but may aid resolution at the later, mononuclear cell-dominated phase by generating an alternative set of anti-inflammatory prostaglandins.

Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

The identification of COX-2 less than a decade ago has been followed by an unprecedented period of discovery and drug development. An awareness of the existence of two COX isoforms has led to potential novel insights into disease pathogenesis (arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, cancer) and the regulation of normal physiology (brain, kidney). The preliminary in vivo experience with COX-2-selective inhibitors has provided evidence for proof of concept for the COX-1 and COX-2 hypothesis, namely that the selective inhibition of COX-2-derived prostaglandins is sufficient to inhibit inflammation and is nonulcerogenic. It may be that we have moved closer to the "better aspirin" envisioned by Sir John Vane for the treatment of degenerative and inflammatory arthritides; however, caution is still warranted. Some toxicities of current NSAIDs may result from COX-2 inhibition, as in the kidney and brain; such side effects may be shared by the selective compounds. In addition, unexpected toxicities may arise simply because new chemical compounds will be widely prescribed. Finally, since the efficacy of traditional NSAIDs derives largely from their capacity to inhibit COX-2, it may be that the COX-2 selective drugs will not prove to be therapeutically superior to available agents. Given the well-recognized toxicity of NSAIDs, however, the availability of COX-2-selective agents promises to provide significant advantage to patients with chronic diseases, such as RA and OA.

Limited anti-inflammatory efficacy of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition in carrageenan-airpouch inflammation

1. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) is expressed at sites of inflammation and is believed to be the major source of inflammation-associated prostaglandin synthesis. Selective inhibition of COX-2 has been suggested to produce anti-inflammatory effects with reduced toxicity in the gastrointestinal tract. We examined the extent to which suppression of COX-2 led to inhibition of various components of inflammation in the carrageenan-airpouch model in the rat. 2. Indomethacin (> or =0.3 mg kg(-1)), nimesulide (> or =3 mg kg(-1)) and the selective COX-2 inhibitor, SC-58125 (> or =0.3 mg kg(-1)), significantly suppressed the production of prostaglandin E2 at the site of inflammation. At higher doses, indomethacin (> or =1 mg kg(-1)) and nimesulide (30 mg kg(-1)), but not SC-58125 (up to 10 mg kg(-1)), significantly inhibited COX-1 activity (as measured by whole blood thromboxane synthesis). 3. All three test drugs significantly reduced the volume of exudate in the airpouch, but only at doses greater than those required for substantial (>90%) suppression of COX-2 activity. Similarly, reduction of leukocyte infiltration was only observed with the doses of indomethacin and nimesulide that caused significant suppression of COX-1 activity. 4. SC-58125 did not significantly affect leukocyte infiltration into the airpouch at any dose tested (up to 10 mg kg(-1)). A second selective COX-2 inhibitor, Dup-697, was also found to suppress exudate PGE2 levels without significant effects on leukocyte infiltration. 5. These results indicate that selective inhibition of COX-2 results in profound suppression of PGE2 synthesis in the carrageenan-airpouch, but does not affect leukocyte infiltration. Exudate volume was only reduced with the highly selective COX-2 inhibitor when a dose far above that necessary for suppression of COX-2 activity was used. Inhibition of leukocyte infiltration was observed with indomethacin and nimesulide, but only at doses that inhibited both COX-1 and COX-2.

COX-2 inhibitors

In the past 100 years aspirin has demonstrated its value as an analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antithrombotic agent. However, by 1938, it was clear that aspirin was gastrotoxic. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), developed since the 1960s, failed to achieve the goal of "a safer aspirin". The demonstration that inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis via a cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzyme was central to both the therapeutic and toxic effects of aspirin and non-aspirin NSAIDs appeared to establish the principle of no gain without pain. This link may have been broken by drugs that selectively inhibit the inducible COX-2 enzyme. The COX enzyme is now a target of drug interventions against the inflammatory process. Might the "safe aspirin" be here at last?

The advent of highly selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase--a review

Cyclooxygenase (COX) exists in two isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, COX-1 is present and is constitutively expressed in most cells and tissues, whereas COX-2 is felt to principally mediate inflammation. However, this distinction appears to be challenged by recent observations. This review addresses the roles of COX-1 and COX-2 isoforms in physiologic and pathophysiologic states and reviews potential therapeutic roles for selective COX inhibitors.

Effects of inhibitors of the activity of cyclo-oxygenase-2 on the hypotension and multiple organ dysfunction caused by endotoxin: a comparison with dexamethasone

1. Endotoxaemia is associated with the expression of the inducible isoform of cyclo-oxygenase, cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2), and an overproduction of arachidonic acid (AA) metabolites. The role of the AA metabolites generated by COX-2 in the circulatory failure and multiple organ dysfunction caused by endotoxin is unclear. Dexamethasone prevents the expression of COX-2 and exerts beneficial effects in animal models of shock. 2. Here we compare the effects of two inhibitors of COX-2 activity, namely NS-398 (5 mg kg(-1), i.p., n=7) and SC-58635 (3 mg kg(-1), i.p., n=9) with those of dexamethasone (3 mg kg(-1), i.p., n=9) on the circulatory failure and organ dysfunction caused by lipopolysaccharide (LPS, E. coli, 6 mg kg(-1), i.v., n=11) in the rat. 3. Endotoxaemia for 6 h caused hypotension, acute renal dysfunction, hepatocellular injury, pancreatic injury and an increase in the plasma levels of 6-keto-PGF1alpha (indicator of the induction of COX-2) and nitrite/nitrate (indicator of the induction of iNOS). 4. Pretreatment of rats with dexamethasone attenuated the hypotension, the renal dysfunction, the hepatocellular and pancreatic injury and the induction of COX-2 and iNOS caused by LPS. In contrast, inhibition of COX-2 activity with SC-58635 or NS-398 neither attenuated the circulatory failure nor the multiple organ failure caused by endotoxin. 5. Thus, the prevention of the circulatory failure and the multiple organ injury/dysfunction caused by dexamethasone in the rat is not due to inhibition of the activity of COX-2. Our results suggest that an enhanced formation of eicosanoids by COX-2 does not contribute to the development of organ injury and/or dysfunction in rats with endotoxaemia.

Peptidergic and cholinergic neurons and mediators in peptone-induced gastroprotection: role of cyclooxygenase-2

This study investigates the neural pathways, mediators, and cyclooxygenase isoenzymes involved in the gastroprotection conferred by peptone in rats. Intragastric perfusion with 8% peptone protected against gross and histological damage induced by subsequent perfusion with 50% ethanol. The gastroprotective effect of peptone was near maximally inhibited by gastrin immunoneutralization, inactivation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoneutralization, blockade of gastrin receptors, CGRP, bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), or somatostatin receptors, and by the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and was partially (46%) counteracted by atropine. Indomethacin and the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors NS-398 and L-745,337 dose dependently (50% inhibitory dose, 4.2, 0.8, and 1.5 mg/kg, respectively) attenuated the peptone-induced protection. Dexamethasone was ineffective. These results indicate that protective effects of peptone involve endogenous gastrin and possibly somatostatin and are mediated by capsaicin-sensitive afferent, cholinergic, and bombesin/GRP neurons. CGRP, NO, and prostaglandins participate as essential mediators. The study provides evidence that prostaglandins derived from a constitutive cyclooxygenase-2 contribute to mucosal defense in the presence of ulcerogens and thus participate in homeostatic functions of the stomach.

Selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and their influence on the protective effect of a mild irritant in the rat stomach

1. The effects of the non-selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitor indomethacin and the selective COX-2 inhibitors, N-[2-(cyclohexyloxy)-4-nitrophenyl] methanesulphonamide (NS-398), 5-methanesulphonamido-6-(2,4-difluorothio-phenyl)-1-indan one (L-745,337) and 5,5-dimethyl-3-(3-fluorophenyl)-4-(4-methylsulphonyl) phenyl-2(5H)-furanone (DFU), on the protection induced by the mild irritant 20% ethanol were investigated in the rat stomach. 2. Instillation of 20% ethanol (1 ml, p.o.) effectively protected against gastric mucosal injury induced by subsequent instillation of 70% or 96% ethanol (1 ml, p.o.). 3. Oral administration of indomethacin (1.25-20 mg kg[-1]) dose-dependently counteracted the protective effect of 20% ethanol (ID50: 3.5 mg kg[-1]). 4. Likewise, NS-398 (0.1-1 mg kg[-1]), L-745,337 (0.2-2 mg kg[-1]) and DFU (0.02-0.2 mg kg[-1]) inhibited the protective effect of 20% ethanol in a dose-dependent manner with ID50 values of 0.3 mg kg(-1), 0.4 mg kg(-1) and 0.06 mg kg(-1), respectively. 5. Inhibition of mild irritant-induced protection was also found when NS-398 (1 mg kg[-1]) was administered s.c. or when 96% ethanol was used to damage the mucosa. 6. Pretreatment with 16,16-dimethyl-prostaglandin (PG)E2 at 4 ng kg(-1), a dose that did not protect against ethanol (70%)-induced mucosal damage when given alone, completely reversed the effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitors on the mild irritant-induced protection. 7. Pretreatment with dexamethasone (3 mg kg(-1), 24 and 2 h before instillation of 20% ethanol) did not affect the protective activity of the mild irritant, indicating that enzyme induction is not involved. 8. Indomethacin (20 mg kg(-1), p.o.) did not prevent the protection conferred by sodium salicylate (100 mg kg[-1]), dimercaprol (30 microg kg[-1]), iodoacetamide (50 mg kg[-1]) and lithium (20 mg kg[-1]). Likewise, the protective effect of these agents was not counteracted by NS-398 (1 mg kg(-1), p.o.). 9. Whereas indomethacin (20 mg kg(-1), p.o.) near-maximally inhibited gastric mucosal formation of PGE2, 6-keto-PGF1alpha and thromboxane (TX) B2 as well as platelet TXB2 release, the selective COX-2 inhibitors were ineffective. 10. The findings show that selective COX-2 inhibitors, although lacking in ulcerogenic activity, prevent the protection conferred by a mild irritant. Prostaglandis generated by a constitutive COX-2 could thus contribute to physiological functions involved in gastric homeostasis, although at present a non-COX-2-related mechanism underlying the effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitors tested on mild irritant-induced protection cannot be completely excluded.

Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in a rat gastric epithelial cell line by epiregulin and basic fibroblast growth factor

Prostaglandins play an important role in maintaining gastric mucosal integrity. Cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and -2) are the key enzymes involved in prostaglandin synthesis. COX-2 expression in gastric epithelial cells remains a subject of controversy, and a possible regulation of gastric COX-2 by growth factors has not been explored. Therefore, we studied the effect of growth factors including epiregulin, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on expression of COX-2 in a gastric epithelial cell line (RGM1) derived from normal rat gastric mucosa. Cells were incubated with 10 or 100 ng/ml of EGF. epiregulin, bFGF, or VEGF for 1, 2, 3, 6, and 24 h. COX-2 mRNA expression was determined by RT-PCR using specific COX-2 primers and COX-2 protein expression was determined by Western blotting. This study showed that COX-2 mRNA and protein are expressed in the gastric epithelial RGM1 cell line and that epiregulin and bFGF (but not VEGF) significantly increase expression of COX-2 mRNA and protein. Because PGs play an important role in mucosal defense, this study suggests that some growth factors contribute to maintaining mucosal integrity via activation of the COX-2 gene.