The effect of corticosteroids for acute optic neuritis on the subsequent development of multiple sclerosis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group

The controlled high risk Avonex multiple sclerosis trial (CHAMPS Study)

The Controlled High Risk Avonex Multiple Sclerosis Study (CHAMPS) tested whether interferon beta la (Avonex) treatment would benefit patients who had experienced a first acute demyelinating event involving the optic nerve, brain stem/cerebellum, or spinal cord, and who displayed MRI brain signal abnormalities that have previously predicted a high likelihood of future MS-like events. The study randomized 383 patients into an Avonex-treated and a placebo-treated group; both groups received intravenous methylprednisolone 1 gm/d followed by prednisone 1 mg/kg for 11 days. The Avonex-treated group demonstrated a 44% reduction in the 3-year cumulative probability of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis (rate ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.8; P = 0.002). At 18 months, treatment with Avonex was associated with a significant reduction of new T2 lesions, gadolinium enhanced lesions and T2 lesion volume. Among placebo-treated patients, 82% had developed a new subclinical MRI signal abnormality by the eighteenth month after study entry. Treatment benefit was observed irrespective of the qualifying event. The findings of this study support the efficacy of Avonex therapy in significantly reducing the 3-year likelihood of future neurologic events and worsening of the brain MRI in patients with a first acute CNS demyelinating event.

Palliative care in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and can be characterized by acute exacerbations or gradual worsening of neurological function and disability. The course of the disease is highly variable and unpredictable, however, there are short and long-term favorable and unfavorable predictive factors, which may provide some information about the future pattern of the disease. Palliative care in MS is directed at symptom management, psychosocial support, and rehabilitation. The goal in palliative care is to achieve a high quality of life. The disease modifying agents, interferon beta, Glatiramer acetate and Mitoxantrone are the mainstay of treatment in MS. Symptomatic relief and counseling of patients with MS have a strong impact on quality of life.

Interferon beta-1a for optic neuritis patients at high risk for multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of treatment with interferon beta-1a (Avonex) initiated at the time of a first episode of optic neuritis in patients at high risk for multiple sclerosis (MS).

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Prospective.

SETTING

Fifty clinical centers throughout the US and Canada.

STUDY POPULATION

After the onset of a first episode of optic neuritis treated with intravenous and oral corticosteroids, 192 patients with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of subclinical demyelination were randomly assigned to receive weekly intramuscular injections of 30 microg interferon beta-1a or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The study outcomes were the development of clinically definite MS within 3 years of follow-up and brain MRI changes at 6, 12, and 18 months.

RESULTS

The rates of clinically definite MS and of a combined MS/MRI outcome were lower in the interferon beta-1a group than in the placebo group (adjusted rate ratios 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.00; and 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.73, respectively). Compared with the placebo group, on the 18-month brain MRI the interferon beta-1a group had a smaller change from baseline in T2 lesion volume (P =.02), fewer new or enlarging T2 lesions (P <.001), and a lower frequency of Gd-enhancing lesions (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

The clinical and brain MRI results of this trial support initiating interferon beta-1a treatment at the time of a first episode of optic neuritis occurring in patients at high risk for MS based on the presence of subclinical brain MRI lesions.

Immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis: the end of the beginning

Currently available medicines approved for use in Europe and North America reduce the relapse rate in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis by about 30%. These medications may be no more efficacious than intermittent use of corticosteroids at the time of relapse. New directions for therapy of multiple sclerosis include blockade of alpha4 integrin, the use of altered peptide ligands, inhibition of Th1 cytokines, and DNA vaccination.

[Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis and manifestations in children]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is rare in children and occurs exceptionally before ten years. Sex ratio (girl/boy) is around 2.5 to 3, higher than in adults. Brain stem dysfunction and meningeal symptoms are more commonly first manifestations of the disease than in adults. Optic neuritis is also a frequent early manifestation. The etiology of the disease remains unclear and none of the advanced hypotheses (infectious, genetic, environmental) can by themselves explain its occurrence. There is a genetic susceptibility which is probably linked to many genes leading to a low related risk (less than two). A viral trigger mechanism in a person with a genetic predisposition is possible. New therapies result from a better understanding of the closed immune mechanisms of the disease.

Optic Neuritis

Patients with signs and symptoms consistent with acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis should undergo evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the brain and orbits to determine whether or not they are at high risk for the development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). The presence of two or more white matter lesions (3 mm or larger in diameter, at least one lesion periventricular or ovoid) suggests high risk for CDMS, and should prompt immediate treatment as follows: Intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate (1 g intravenously per day for 3 days) followed by oral prednisone (1 mg/kg per day for 11 days) with a 4-day taper (20 mg on day 1, 10 mg on days 2 and 4). Interferon beta 1-a, which has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the 3-year probability of the development of CDMS and the development of clinically silent MRI lesions in high-risk patients with acute optic neuritis, should be considered following IV methylprednisolone treatment (30 &mgr;g intramuscularly weekly). In monosymptomatic patients with fewer than two white matter lesions by MRI, and in patients for whom a diagnosis of CDMS has been established, treatment with IV methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone (as outlined), should be considered on an individual basis and may hasten visual recovery, but has not been demonstrated to affect long-term visual outcome. In all cases of typical acute monosymptomatic demyelinating optic neuritis, oral prednisone alone at a dose of 1 mg/kg per day, without prior treatment with IV methylprednisolone (1 g per day for 3 days), may increase the risk for recurrent optic neuritis, and should be avoided.

The SKILL Card test in optic neuritis: experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance. Optic Neuritis Study Group

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of the Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance (SKILL) Card test, designed to measure vision at reduced contrast and luminance, among patients with previous optic neuritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The SKILL Card test was administered to 295 patients participating in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) follow-up study, concurrent with measurement of visual acuity, visual field, contrast sensitivity, and color vision. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was also assessed in a subset of patients using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and an ONTT-developed questionnaire.

RESULTS

The SKILL Card difference score (high-contrast acuity score minus low-contrast acuity score) was only weakly associated with the other measures of vision function (rs absolute range, 0.05-0.31) and with the HRQL measures (rs absolute range, 0.02-0.15). In contrast, the light and dark component scores of the SKILL Card test had higher associations with the other vision measures (rs absolute range, 0.27-0.54) and with the HRQL measures (rs absolute range, 0.10-0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

The SKILL Card difference score is not a meaningful measure for patients with optic neuritis; however, the test appears to have clinical usefulness as a method to measure high-contrast and low-contrast acuity.

Curative effects of recombinant human Interleukin-6 in DA rats with protracted relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis

We have studied the effects of treatment with recombinant human (rh)IL-6 on clinical, histological and immunological parameters of protracted relapsing (PR) experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) in DA rats. rhIL-6 (50 microg/rat subcutaneously/day) was given under three different regimens, as early prophylaxis, from 1 day prior to 14 days after immunization, in late prophylaxis, from day +7 until day 21 post-immunization (p.i.) and therapeutically to rats with clinical signs of EAE from day 14 to day 28 p.i. Although rhIL-6 failed to modulate the course of PR-EAE when administered as the early prophylactic regimen, it exerted clear-cut favourable effects on the course of the disease if was administered either as later prophylactic or as therapeutic treatment. Under these conditions, rhIL-6 accelerated recovery from EAE attacks and reduced/milded subsequent EAE episodes as compared to either PBS- or heat-inactivated rhIL-6-treated control rats. In agreement with this clinical effect, relative to PBS-treated rats, the animals injected with rhIL-6 exhibited lower numbers of MHC class II(+) and CD4(+) cells in their spinal cords. rhIL-6-treatment also profoundly modulated the endogenous cytokine network, the treated rats displaying increased numbers of spleen cells expressing mRNA transcripts of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-beta along with simultaneously reduced numbers of mRNAs for TNF-alpha. In addition, upon ex vivo exposure to either myelin basic protein peptide 63-88 (MBP63-88) or to phytoaemagglutinin A, the numbers of IFN-gamma secreting splenocytes was also significantly reduced (ELISPOT analysis) in rhIL-6-treated rats as compared to PBS-treated controls.

NK cell-mediated lysis of autologous human oligodendrocytes

Although considered an autoimmune disease, the mechanisms underlying oligodendrocyte (OL)/myelin injury in multiple sclerosis (MS) remain to be established. We utilized in vitro assays to demonstrate that human OLs, as well as other glial elements (astrocytes, microglia), were susceptible to injury mediated by peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cell preparations (MNCs) enriched for natural killer (NK cells) by depleting CD3(+) +/- CD19(+) cells through use of either magnetic beads or cell sorting. Cytotoxic effects of the NK cell-enriched effectors were dependent on pre-exposure of these cells to IL-2. Furthermore, we found that autologous OLs were as susceptible to injury mediated by IL-2 activated NK cells as were heterologous OLs. In context of the tissue injury that occurs in MS, our results suggest that the inflammatory milieu in MS lesions could provide conditions required for NK cell activation and that such effector cells can bypass the putative protective effects of self-MHC class I molecules that may be expressed on OLs.

P0 glycoprotein peptides 56-71 and 180-199 dose-dependently induce acute and chronic experimental autoimmune neuritis in Lewis rats associated with epitope spreading

Two synthetic peripheral nerve myelin P0 protein peptides, an immunodominant (amino acids 180-199) and a cryptic (amino acids 56-71) one, induced an acute or chronic course of experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) in Lewis rats, when given at low dose (50-100 microg/rat) or high dose (250 microg/rat), respectively. Corresponding to the different clinical course, pathological changes and immune responses were found: (1) Onset of clinical signs of P0 peptide 56-71 (P0 56-71) induced EAN was 1-3 days later than in P0 peptide 180-199 (P0 180-199) induced EAN at all immunizing doses, whereas the peak of the disease occurred at a similar time point post immunization (p.i.), i.e. at days 14-16 p.i. in P0 56-71 induced EAN and at day 16 p.i. in P0 180-199 induced EAN. (2) Intramolecular epitope spreading as assessed by delayed type hypersensitivity response occurred in P0 56-71 induced EAN at both low and high antigen doses and in P0 180-199 induced EAN at high antigen dose (250 microg/rat) only. (3) P0 180-199 stimulated higher levels of interferon-gamma production in P0 180-199 induced EAN than in P0 56-71 induced EAN and vice versa. (4) Histopathologic evaluation revealed a similar grade of mononuclear cell infiltration in the sciatic nerves of both types of EAN, but more severe demyelination was found in P0 180-199 induced EAN compared to P0 56-71 induced EAN. The results support the hypothesis that high dose autoantigen immunization induces extensive determinant spreading and chronic course of autoimmune diseases.

Current neuro-ophthalmic therapies

The clinical characteristics, differential diagnosis, and treatment options are presented for five different categories of neuro-ophthalmic disease. Nystagmus, optic neuritis, diplopia, pseudotumor cerebri, and temporal arteritis, are frequently encountered in neuro-ophthalmic practice. This article focuses on current therapies for these neuro-ophthalmic disorders. Potential differences in approach to pediatric versus adult patients are emphasized.

Interferon beta-1b and intravenous methylprednisolone promote lesion recovery in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether lesion evolution in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients is altered by treatment with interferonbeta1b (IFNbeta-1b) or by intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) as measured by magnetization transfer imaging.

METHODS

Magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) of 225 contrast enhancing lesions (CEL), in four RRMS patients were serially determined for 12 months before and 12-18 months after contrast enhancement in a baseline vs treatment trial with IFNbeta-1b. During the baseline period, 185 new CEL were identified: 76 were treated with IVMP (1 g/day x 5 days) and designated steroid CEL (S-CEL); the remaining 109 were considered baseline lesions (BCEL). During IFNbeta-1b treatment, 40 CEL (IFN-CEL) were identified. After image co-registration, regions of interest (ROIs) defining new CEL were transferred to the MTR image set to determine the mean lesion MTR on each monthly exam. The lesion MTR was compared to MTR of normal appearing white matter (NAWM) on the same exam.

RESULTS

As early as 12 months prior to enhancement, the MTR of CEL was reduced compared to NAWM (mean 9.43 +/- 3.2%; P<0.001). The further reduction in MTR (28% +/- 4.0) at the time of contrast enhancement was not significantly different for BCEL, S-CEL or IFN-CEL Following enhancement, lesion recovery for IFN-CEL (P=0.02) and S-CEL (P=0.002) was significantly higher than BCEL CONCLUSION: IFNbeta-1b and IVMP reduce tissue damage and promote lesion recovery in RRMS patients. The additional benefit of IVMP compared to IFNbeta-1b may be related to its inhibitory effect on demyelination.

New therapies for optic neuropathies: development in experimental models

Experimental models of human diseases have affected the design and direction of both basic and clinical research into understanding the pathogenesis and treatments of demyelinating disease, stroke, and hereditary disorders of the central nervous system. However, in spite of major advances in molecular research that have linked Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy to mutations in mitochondrial DNA, there has been relatively little focus in applying basic scientific methodologies to optic neuropathies other than glaucoma. The relative absence of detailed scientific knowledge about the basic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of optic nerve injury has contributed to the use of empiric therapies for neuro-ophthalmic optic neuropathies. Over the past decade major clinical trials, such as the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial and Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial, have proven that currently available treatment options for demyelinating and ischemic optic neuropathies are ineffective and can even be harmful. Although the pathogenesis of visual failure in demyelinating, ischemic, and hereditary optic neuropathies appears diverse, a final common pathway for irreparable optic nerve injury may exist. This article reviews several models of experimental optic neuropathies that may aid in the development of novel treatments for neuro-ophthalmic disorders of the optic nerve during the 21st century.

Acute optic neuritis: association with paranasal sinus inflammatory changes on magnetic resonance imaging

The authors compared the frequency of paranasal sinus inflammatory changes (SIC) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained from 23 patients with new onset acute optic neuritis (ON) and 48 control patients who underwent outpatient MRI of the brain for reasons other than ON. The authors found a higher frequency of paranasal SIC in patients with ON (83%) than in controls (54%) (p = 0.02). The distribution of paranasal SIC (in ON and in controls) was maxillary (83% and 52%), ethmoid (4% and 2%), frontal (9% and 14%), and sphenoid (4% and 10%). Frequency of the maxillary SIC was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in patients with ON than in controls. Further evaluation of maxillary paranasal SIC with a grading system showed the presence of thickened mucosal lining of the sinuses (grade I) in 17% (ON) and 23% (controls), mucous retention cysts within the sinuses (grade II) in 48% (ON) and 25% (controls), and severe mucosal thickening with complete or near-complete filling of the sinus or an air-fluid level within the sinus (grade III) in 17% (ON) and 4% (controls). Combined frequency of grade II and grade III SIC was significantly higher in the ON group than in controls (p = 0.005), as was the frequency of grade III SIC alone (p = 0.02). Grade I SIC did not significantly differ between the groups. There was a trend (p = 0.09) toward a higher prevalence of bilateral sinus inflammatory changes in patients with bilateral ON. These findings suggest that ON may be associated with sinus inflammatory changes.

Perils and pitfalls in the interpretation of clinical trials: a reflection on the recent experience in multiple sclerosis

Therapeutic trials in multiple sclerosis, in part because of the marked intra- and inter-individual variability of its clinical course, are prone to serious flaws in both design and interpretation. As a consequence, it has been a common historical pattern that treatment regimens, which are enthusiastically recommended at one point in time, are later proven to be ineffective by more definitive studies. This review considers several recently published therapeutic trials in order to exemplify some of the difficulties that commonly arise in this area of clinical research.

Ophthalmology update for primary practitioners. Part I. Update on optic neuritis

Optic neuritis is a common cause of acute visual loss. It is typified by sudden onset of visual impairment and pain with eye movements, followed by spontaneous recovery of vision over several months. Pathologically, optic neuritis is an acute demyelinating event affecting the optic nerve. Objective physical findings are typically few, including an afferent pupillary defect or Marcus-Gunn pupil, whereas subjective psychophysical findings abound (ie, diminished central visual acuity, color vision, decreased contrast sensitivity, and visual field abnormalities). These characteristics have made the diagnosis of optic neuritis based solely on clinical grounds disquieting to practitioner and patient alike. In addition, the fact that optic neuritis is often associated with multiple sclerosis as the first clinical manifestation of disease gives further reason for both patient and physician anxiety. The serious nature of visual loss and the consequences of making the diagnosis of optic neuritis has given rise to extensive testing and expensive treatments. This review is intended to explore our current state of knowledge with regard to (1) clinical presentation, (2) ancillary testing, (3) therapeutic intervention, and (4) associated disease, specifically the risk for multiple sclerosis in the patient who presents with an acute optic neuritis. Finally, a suggestion guide for informing the patient and addressing his or her concerns will be presented.

Pulse glucocorticoids

High-dose intravenous (i.v.) methylprednisolone has been used therapeutically in a number of medical fields to avoid the complications and side effects of long-term glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and because of the perception that high-dose i.v. methylprednisolone may have "special" therapeutic effects. It is possible that aggressive early therapy with GCs allows for a more rapid taper of GCs and therefore prevents some of the dose-related side effects associated with long-term use. Some of the neurologic and rheumatologic literature related to multiple sclerosis and lupus nephritis suggest that i.v. methylprednisolone has therapeutic effects that are different from those of conventional doses of oral prednisone. There is still considerable debate about this in nondermatologic fields, and extrapolation of the role of pulse i.v. methylprednisolone to dermatologic disease, where trials are lacking, is difficult. Given this subset of possible candidates of this therapy as suggested by anecdotal reports, there is at least a rationale for considering the use of this modality in a subset of patients.

Why treat early multiple sclerosis patients?

Class 1 clinical trials demonstrated that immunomodulatory treatments (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate) reduce the disease activity and the accumulation of disability in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Moreover interferon beta-1b also had similar positive effects in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The magnitude of these clinical effects was modest, but the reduction of inflammatory activity, as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging, was marked. Converging evidence from new pathological studies and new magnetic resonance techniques, characterized by increased pathological specificity, has shown that already in the early phases of the disease inflammatory activity determines irreversible axonal damage. Moreover, the amount of inflammatory activity at the clinical presentation of the disease has some value in predicting long-term disability. Taken together, these data indicate that patients may benefit from early treatment; the positive results of the Controlled High Risk Subjects Avonex Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study support this conclusion.

Multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and related conditions

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) are conditions whose closely related pathology suggests shared pathophysiological elements, but whose clinical courses are usually, but not always quite dissimilar. The former is largely a disease of adulthood, the latter of childhood. Optic neuritis, demyelinative transverse myelitis, and Devic's syndrome are neurological syndromes that may occur as manifestations of either MS or ADEM. Patients with Miller-Fisher syndrome and encephalomyelradiculoneuropathy usually have features suggesting ADEM in combination with acute demyelinative polyneuropathy. These various conditions and other forms of ADEM share an indistinct border with encephalitides, granulomatous, and vasculitic conditions. MS, ADEM, and the pertinent syndromic subtypes, their differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis are considered in this review. Acute cerebellar ataxia is a syndrome that is likely to be pathophysiologically distinct from ADEM, although its occurrence as a postinfectious illness suggests a distant kinship. It is also reviewed.

New low-contrast vision charts: reliability and test characteristics in patients with multiple sclerosis

The quantitative assessment of visual function in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials has been limited to Snellen visual acuity. The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-rater reliability and test characteristics of a new visual outcome measure, the Low-Contrast Sloan Letter Charts, in patients with MS and visually-asymptomatic volunteers. Contrast letter acuity scores (letter scores) were measured at each of four contrast levels (100, 5, 1.25 and 0.6%) by two independent raters. Inter-rater agreement was described with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and comparison of mean scores. Excellent inter-rater agreement (ICC=0.86 - 0.95) was demonstrated at each contrast level among MS patients (n=100) and visually-asymptomatic volunteers (n=33). Average letter scores at the lowest contrast level (0.6%) were highly variable in the MS group, even among patients with visual acuities of 20/20 or better, and among those who required no assistance for ambulation. Low-Contrast Sloan Letter Chart testing is a highly reliable method of visual assessment, and provides information on an aspect of neurologic impairment in MS which is not captured by Snellen visual acuity or ambulation status. This new method demonstrates excellent potential as a visual function outcome measure for future MS clinical trials.

Therapeutic developments in multiple sclerosis

Recently there have been considerable advances made in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. For the first time since its initial clinical description in the 1800s, there are now available several medications which unequivocally exert favourable clinical effects through the lowering of the biological activity of the human illness. The therapeutic efficacy of IFN-beta preparations seems particularly well established in this regard on the basis of five large, independent, trials of this agent. These trials have demonstrated remarkably consistent reductions in both attack rates and disability levels using a combination of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome measures. The therapeutic benefit of glatiramer acetate also has been well established, although there is less available data on this agent than there is for interferon. It is important to recognise, however, that, although these agents represent an important first step in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis, they are only partial therapies. In order to actually cure the illness or even to substantially improve patient outcome we need considerably better agents than we have currently. Nevertheless, it is likely that, with improved knowledge of the role that interferon beta plays in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and with better understanding of the mechanism by which glatiramer acetate exerts its therapeutic effect, greatly improved therapeutic agents will be available in the future. In addition, it seems likely that, in the future (by analogy to the experience in oncology), we will begin utilising combinations of therapies in order to better control the biological activity of this debilitating disease. Such combination therapy will almost certainly include combinations of partially effective agents as well as combinations of these agents with other medications (e.g., the immunosuppressive drugs) which, by themselves, have only been demonstrated to exert marginal clinical benefits on the course of illness. Moreover, it also seems likely that, increasingly, therapeutic strategies that enhance or promote myelin repair will become a major focus of clinical research in this area.

What is new in the treatment of multiple sclerosis?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered an autoimmune disease associated with immune activity directed against central nervous system antigens. Based on this concept, immunosuppression and immunomodualtion have been the mainstays of therapeutic strategies in MS. During the last decade new therapies have been shown to significantly improve MS disease course. The effective therapies have led to a better understanding of MS pathogenesis and further development of even more efficient therapeutic interventions. Recombinant interferon (IFN)beta represents the first breakthrough in MS therapy. Three large placebo-controlled, double-blind studies and several smaller studies have demonstrated the efficacy of different forms of IFNbeta administrated by either subcutaneous or intramuscular routes and at different doses in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS). The three IFNbeta drugs are IFNbeta-1b and two IFNbeta-1a preparations (Avonex and Rebif). Although each clinical trial had unique features and differences that make direct comparisons difficult, the aggregate results demonstrate a clear benefit of IFNbeta for decreasing relapses and probability of sustained clinical disability progression in patients with RR-MS. All forms of IFNbeta therapy had beneficial effects on the disease process measured by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). IFNbeta-1a (Avonex) also showed benefit in slowing or preventing the development of MS related brain atrophy measured by MRI after 2 years of therapy. Glatiramer acetate, the acetate salt of a mixture synthetic polypeptides thought to mimic the myelin basic protein showed a significant positive results in reducing the relapse rate in patients with RR-MS. Follow up of these patients for approximately 3 years continued to show a beneficial effect on disease relapse rate. Recent MRI data supported the beneficial clinical results seen with glatiramer acetate in patients with RR-MS. Recent studies using intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) suggest that IVIG could be effective to some degree in patients with RR-MS. However, there is not enough evidence that IVIG is equivalent to IFNbeta or glatiramer acetate in the treatment of patients with RR-MS. There have also been recent therapeutical advances in secondary progressive MS (SP-MS). A recent large phase II, placebo-controlled study with IFNbeta-1b in patients with SP-MS convincingly documented that IFNbeta-1b slowed progression of the disease independent of the degree of the clinical disability at the time of treatment initiation and independent of presence of superimposed relapses. Mitoxantrone, an anthracenedione synthetic agent, was also shown to be effective as treatment for active SP-MS. It is well tolerated but the duration of treatment is limited by cumulative cardiotoxicity. There is a growing consensus that disease-modifying therapies should be initiated early in the course of the disease before irreversible clinical disability has developed. Different therapies should be considered and tailored based on patient condition. Combination therapies could be considered as a therapeutic option for patients that failed therapies with IFNbeta and/or glatiramer acetate. Currently, there are new ongoing studies testing safety and/or efficacy of different combination regimens (i.e. azathioprine with IFNbeta, IFNbeta with glatiramer acetate, or pulses of intravenous cyclophosphamide with IFNbeta). Determining the effect of different therapies on the course of the disease within large clinical studies appears easier than determining individual responsiveness. Therefore, standardised methods for evaluating individual patients receiving disease-modifying therapies and development of effective therapeutic algorithms are needed.

The effect of oral and intravenous methylprednisolone treatment on subsequent relapse rate in multiple sclerosis

We investigated the effect of oral and intravenous methylprednisolone treatment on subsequent relapse rate in patients with multiple sclerosis. Following a double blind trial designed to compare the effect of oral and intravenous methylprednisolone treatment on promoting recovery from acute relapses of multiple sclerosis, 80 patients were followed for two years with six-monthly assessments during which all subsequent relapses were recorded. The annual relapse rate was slightly higher in the oral compared with the intravenous methylprednisolone-treated patients (1.06 vs. 0.78), but the adjusted difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (0.18; 95% CI -0.19 to 0.55, P=0.3). The time to onset and the severity of the first relapse after treatment, the number of relapse free patients at the end of the follow-up period, and the severity of the relapses during the follow-up period were similar in the two groups. This trial did not show a statistically significant difference in relapse rate during the first two years following oral compared with intravenous methylprednisolone treatment.

Lack of restriction of T cell receptor beta variable gene usage in cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytes in acute optic neuritis

OBJECTIVES

There have been many studies reporting restricted patterns of T cell receptor usage in established multiple sclerosis and these have led to clinical trials of immunomodulation directed at deleting clonal T cell populations. The present study aims to test the hypothesis that highly restricted T cell populations are also present in the CSF in the earliest clinical stages of acute demyelinating disease of the CNS.

METHODS

T cell receptor Vbeta (TCRBV) gene expression was studied in CSF and blood in nine patients with acute optic neuritis within 7 days of onset of symptoms, six patients with an acute relapse of multiple sclerosis, and 13 control subjects. RNA was extracted and cDNA synthesised from unstimulated CSF and blood lymphocytes, and TCRBV gene segments were amplified from the cDNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using 21 family specific primers. PCR products were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected via a labelled oligonucleotide probe. A semiquantitative analysis of band intensity was performed by laser densitometry.

RESULTS

TCRBV mRNA was detected in the CSF of eight of nine patients with optic neuritis, six of six patients with multiple sclerosis, and five of 13 controls, and was closely correlated with the presence of oligoclonal IgG. Usage of a single TCRBV family was demonstrated in two of nine patients with optic neuritis and two of six patients with multiple sclerosis. The number of TCRBV families expressed in the other patients ranged between 5 and 15 (optic neuritis) and 4 and 17 (multiple sclerosis).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relative lack of restriction of TCRBV usage by CSF lymphocytes in the very earliest stages (<7 days) of acute optic neuritis. This may imply either that multiple sclerosis is not a monoclonal disease even at onset, or that the autoimmune response has widened before the disease becomes clinically evident. This may have important consequences for the design of immune therapies in multiple sclerosis. Further studies are required to determine whether the CSF T cell repertoire at presentation has prognostic importance. Longitudinal studies are required to follow the CSF T cell repertoire from the time of presentation and to determine whether it may have prognostic significance.

Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the optic neuritis treatment trial

PURPOSE

To compare the results of peripheral kinetic visual field testing and central static perimetry for patients enrolled in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial to determine (1) whether loss and recovery of visual field sensitivity in the far periphery was different from that observed in the central visual field and (2) whether the far peripheral visual field provided additional useful information that was not available in the central visual field results.

METHODS

Both affected and fellow eyes of 448 patients with optic neuritis in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial were evaluated according to the trial protocol during the patients' first 3 years in the study. Central static visual field tests were performed with program 30-2 on the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and peripheral kinetic testing consisted of plotting the I3e and II4e isopters on the Goldmann perimeter. Both test procedures were conducted according to the trial protocols, and quality control assessments and clinical evaluations were performed on all the visual fields.

RESULTS

For both affected and fellow eyes at all 11 visits, there was a greater number of abnormal visual fields in the central static perimetry results than in the peripheral kinetic data. Only 2.9% of affected eyes had an abnormal peripheral visual field with a normal Humphrey mean deviation during year 1. At baseline, 97.1% of affected eyes had an abnormal Humphrey mean deviation on central static testing, whereas only 69.9% had abnormal peripheral kinetic visual fields. Approximately 80% of the I3e and II4e isopters for affected eyes that were abnormal at baseline were within normal limits at 30 days, but it took until week 19 for even 70% of the Humphrey mean deviations to return to normal. In addition, the II4e isopters (more peripheral than the I3e isopters) that were abnormal at baseline showed a somewhat greater percentage of improvement from baseline through day 30 than the abnormal I3e isopters. Although this difference is statistically significant, it is probably not clinically significant. For visits after week 19, approximately 25% to 30% of affected eyes had an abnormal Humphrey mean deviation, whereas only 10% to 15% of peripheral kinetic fields were abnormal.

CONCLUSIONS

For the affected eye in optic neuritis, the central visual field shows greater abnormalities than the far peripheral visual field. When the results obtained through Humphrey automated central static visual fields and Goldmann peripheral kinetic isopters are compared, the far periphery appears to recover more rapidly and more completely than the central field, at least in more severe cases of optic neuritis. In most cases, recovery in optic neuritis can probably be monitored effectively with automated perimetry of the central visual field alone. However, in cases of severe loss of the central visual field, a peripheral kinetic visual field obtained with a Goldmann perimeter may provide additional information about the patient's vision in the far periphery.

The impact of the optic neuritis treatment trial on the practices of ophthalmologists and neurologists

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) results have altered the practice patterns of ophthalmologists and neurologists.

DESIGN

Mail survey.

PARTICIPANTS

A random sample of 987 ophthalmologists and 900 neurologists practicing in the United States were mailed a questionnaire that inquired into decision-making with regard to management of optic neuritis before and after the publication of the ONTT results.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Responses received from 202 ophthalmologists and 244 neurologists, a response rate of 47%.

RESULTS

Following the ONTT reports, nearly all ophthalmologists and neurologists have reduced their use of oral prednisone alone, substituting a regimen that includes intravenous methylprednisolone. A large proportion of practitioners in both specialties mistakenly believe that intravenous methylprednisolone treatment improves final visual outcome. Only 7% of neurologists and 36% of ophthalmologists (P = 0.0001) are adhering to the ONTT suggestion to use magnetic resonance imaging as a basis for initiating treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The ONTT has led to a dramatic reduction in the use of oral prednisone without a preceding course of intravenous methylprednisolone in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. Ophthalmologists and neurologists have changed some of their practices without fully understanding the results of the ONTT.

Nuclear magnetic resonance monitoring of treatment and prediction of outcome in multiple sclerosis

Magnetic resonance (MR) techniques provide an objective, sensitive and quantitative assessment of the evolving pathology in multiple sclerosis. There is an increasing definition of the pathological specificity of newer techniques, and more robust correlations with clinical evolution are emerging. As the pathophysiological basis of in vivo nuclear MR signal abnormalities is further elucidated, it is likely that the importance of MR as a tool to monitor new therapies will increase.

Cerebral thrombophlebitis in three patients with probable multiple sclerosis. Role of lumbar puncture or intravenous corticosteroid treatment

We report 3 cases of young patients, 2 women and 1 man, who presented a cerebral venous thrombosis following intravenous treatment with high doses of corticosteroids. All of them presented a probable multiple sclerosis according to clinical, biological (CSF) and MRI criteria and were treated for the first time by a bolus of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone OD during 5 days. All the usual causes of cerebral venous thrombosis were systematically excluded in all of them. The role of corticosteroid treatment in cerebral thrombophlebitis is discussed. All of them underwent a lumbar puncture a few days before corticosteroid treatment and the relationship between lumbar puncture and cerebral thrombophlebitis is also discussed. Cerebral venous thrombosis associated with corticosteroid treatment has rarely been reported. The relationship between corticosteroids and venous thrombosis has already been suggested but has never been clearly understood.

[New therapeutic strategies in multiple sclerosis]

Until a few years ago, the focus of MS therapy was mainly on the symptomatic approach. Several rigorous clinical trials concerning mainly relapsing-remitting forms were conducted recently. As a result of these, therapeutical views have changed. Elevated doses of methylprednisolone, used during a short period have significantly improved the handicap; but impact over a longer time is unknown. It has now been demonstrated that beta interferons reduce the frequency of relapses, modify the handicap favourably and improvements are clearly shown on MRIs. Therefore MRI has become an invaluable tool for the evaluation of the efficacy of new drugs. Recently, there have been positive results made in progressive MS. Two other drugs, Copolymer and Immunoglobulins have also shown encouraging results but other studies are still necessary. The role of some immunosuppressive agents, but mainly the role of mitoxantrone are now better understood. These results are encouraging but they have also raised a lot of questions such as: how can these drugs be used in other forms of MS; what is their long-term impact on the disease; what is the mechanism of their action; what is the etiopathogeny of MS? Clinical trials are being conducted to answer these questions and to study the usefulness of combined therapies. Even though these results have been positive, other therapies which focus on spasticity, fatigue, sphincter, dysfunction and psychosocial problems must not be neglected.

Regression and spreading of self-recognition during the development of autoimmune demyelinating disease

The autoimmune T cell repertoire in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by CD4(+)T cells of the Th1 phenotype that recognize peptide determinants of central nervous system (CNS) myelin proteins in an MHC class II-restricted manner. Our recent studies and those performed by others have shown that progression to chronicity in EAE and MS is accompanied by a broadening of the T cell repertoire with time. This acquired neo-autoreactivity is commonly referred to as epitope spreading and is presumably the result of endogenous priming to new self-determinants during the CNS inflammation that accompanies disease onset and relapse. In the present study we extend our earlier observations by showing that disease progression in both EAE and MS is accompanied by two concurrent events, viz. (1) the spontaneous regression of the primary established autoimmune repertoire associated with disease onset, and (2) the emergence of the epitope spreading cascade associated with disease progression. Our data show that disease initiation and disease progression in both EAE and MS are typically associated with distinctly different autoimmune T cell repertoires. Our data support the view that the natural development of self-recognition during autoimmune disease may best be understood when considered in the temporal context of an 'epitope du jour' and 'moving target' perspective.

Multiple Sclerosis: Immunotherapy

Given our current knowledge, there is a need for the early institution of immunomodulatory therapy, especially for patients with poor prognostic factors (motor and cerebellar symptoms, frequent disease exacerbations, and a high level of activity on magnetic resonance imaging ). Patients who progress despite immunomodulatory therapy should be reevaluated in terms of diagnosis, development of neutralizing antibodies, or compliance. If a patient has a partial response to immunomodulatory therapy but his or her disease, as assessed by clinical and MRI criteria, remains very active, every effort should be made to modify disease progression by searching for an immunosuppressive therapy regimen before irreversible and considerable disability has accumulated. For the majority of patients, multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic condition. Therefore, until a curative treatment has been developed, the available repertoire of immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatments should be assessed with respect to the possibility of long-term use. This is particularly important for new immunosuppressive drugs, such as cladribine or mitoxantrone, or for invasive procedures, such as total lymphoid irradiation or autologous bone marrow transplantation. For the latter treatments, experience with long-term administration is not available or the potential side effects (eg, cardiotoxicity with mitoxantrone) limit the cumulative dose. These considerations may limit long-term administration and thus the general usefulness of some drugs. Even with proven efficacy, we need to define the next step once treatment has to be discontinued. We should also address whether exacerbating disease by discontinuing an effective therapy is a potential hazard. What other therapeutic options remain once the current treatment is discontinued? Answers are not readily available at the moment, but the question should influence our decisions in the selection of traditional, well-studied or new, potentially promising therapies.

A randomized, controlled trial of oral high-dose methylprednisolone in acute optic neuritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of oral high-dose methylprednisolone in acute optic neuritis (ON).

BACKGROUND

It has been determined that oral high-dose methylprednisolone is efficacious in attacks of MS.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients with symptoms and signs of ON with a duration of less than 4 weeks and a visual acuity of 0.7 or less were randomized to treatment with placebo (n = 30) or oral methylprednisolone (n = 30; 500 mg daily for 5 days, with a 10-day tapering period). Visual function was measured and symptoms were scored on a visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment and after 1, 3, and 8 weeks. Primary efficacy measures were spatial vision and VAS scores the first 3 weeks (analysis of variance with baseline values as the covariate), and changes in spatial vision and VAS scores after 8 weeks. A significance level of p < 0.0125 was employed.

RESULTS

The VAS score (p = 0.008) but not the spatial visual function (p = 0.03) differed in methylprednisolone- and placebo-treated patients during the first 3 weeks. After 8 weeks the improvement in VAS scores (p = 0.8) and spatial visual function (p = 0.5) was comparable with methylprednisolone- and placebo-treated patients. A post hoc subgroup analysis suggested that patients with more severe baseline visual deficit and patients treated early after onset of symptoms had a more pronounced response to treatment. The risk of a new demyelinating attack within 1 year was unaffected by treatment. No serious adverse events were seen.

CONCLUSION

Oral high-dose methylprednisolone treatment improves recovery from ON at 1 and 3 weeks, but no effect could be demonstrated at 8 weeks or on subsequent attack frequency.

Spontaneous regression of primary autoreactivity during chronic progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a widely used animal model for multiple sclerosis (MS). EAE is typically initiated by CD4(+) T helper cell type 1 (Th1) autoreactivity directed against a single priming immunodominant myelin peptide determinant. Recent studies have shown that clinical progression of EAE involves the accumulation of neo-autoreactivity, commonly referred to as epitope spreading, directed against peptide determinants not involved in the priming process. This study directly addresses the relative roles of primary autoreactivity and secondary epitope spreading in the progression of both EAE and MS. To this end we serially evaluated the development of several epitope-spreading cascades in SWXJ mice primed with distinctly different encephalitogenic determinants of myelin proteolipid protein. In a series of analogous experiments, we examined the development of epitope spreading in patients with isolated monosymptomatic demyelinating syndrome as their disease progressed to clinically definite MS. Our results indicate that in both EAE and MS, primary proliferative autoreactivity associated with onset of clinical disease invariably regresses with time and is often undetectable during periods of disease progression. In contrast, the emergence of sustained secondary autoreactivity to spreading determinants is consistently associated with disease progression in both EAE and MS. Our results indicate that chronic progression of EAE and MS involves a shifting of autoreactivity from primary initiating self-determinants to defined cascades of secondary determinants that sustain the self-recognition process during disease progression.

Recent developments in drug therapy for multiple sclerosis

Symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) includes a diverse range of drugs intended to relieve the specific symptoms with which a patient may present at a particular point in the progression of the disease. These drugs, not specifically designed for the treatment of MS, may include antispastic agents (e.g. baclofen), drugs to reduce tremor (e.g. clonazepam), anticholinergics (e.g. oxybutynin) which relieve urinary symptoms, anti-epileptics (e.g. carbamazepine) to control neuralgia, stimulants to reduce fatigue (e.g. amantadine), and antidepressants (e.g. fluoxetine) to treat depression. The treatment of acute relapses or exacerbations is dominated by corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone. The most active area of current investigation is the development of drugs which will inhibit the progression of the disease process itself, and in this category the beta- and alpha-interferons are the most effective drugs currently available, although many new treatments are currently in trials, including immunoglobulin, copolymer-1. bovine myelin, T-cell receptor (TCR) peptide vaccines, platelet activating factor (PAF) antagonists, matrix metallo-proteinase inhibitors, campath-1, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF).

Acute Optic Neuritis

In acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis, treatment with oral prednisone alone should be avoided. Therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g/day for 3 days) followed by 11 days of oral prednisone (1 mg/kg with a short taper) should be considered instead. This is particularly true if a patient considers accelerated visual recovery to be particularly urgent or if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates three or more signal abnormalities consistent with demyelination. In patients without a diagnosis of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS), an MRI should be considered to assess the prognosis for developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and to eliminate other causes of optic neuropathy. Foregoing an MRI or steroid treatment is an acceptable option. Chest x-ray, blood tests, and lumbar puncture are not necessary in evaluating patients with typical clinical features of optic neuritis. These tests may be appropriate, however, for patients who are about to undergo corticosteroid therapy, which could complicate or mask an unrecognized condition.

Current status of multiple sclerosis therapy in Germany: a national survey

We conducted a semi-standardized enquiry concerning diagnostic, immunotherapeutic and supportive care strategies for multiple sclerosis (MS). A questionnaire was sent to all German neurological departments in December 1996, with 63% (n = 244) responding before May 1997. As might be expected, MS therapy in Germany is not very standardized. Most clinics use intravenous steroids for treating relapses, although with different dosing regimens. Nevertheless, oral steroids are also used. Interferon-beta and azathioprine are both used for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS at the same frequency. Only 33% of German neurological departments said that they used an immunomodulating agent for chronic-progressive cases, indicating it in about 50% of cases. Azathioprine is the drug of first choice, followed by methotrexate. Regarding supportive care measures, the technique of intermittent self-catheterization is widely under-represented. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence from prospective studies for the value of azathioprine, it is still one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting and chronic-progressive MS. There was no evidence of a consensus on treatment standards for chronic-progressive disease courses.

Pain in central and peripheral demyelinating disorders

Moderate to severe pain is a common feature of central and peripheral demyelinating disorders. Pain in multiple sclerosis tends to occur when the disease is well-established and usually lingers infinitely. Pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome tends to be particularly severe at the time of initial presentation and usually resolves over 8 to 12 weeks. Pain in both conditions is generally caused by either the direct effects of nerve injury or the result of paralysis and prolonged immobilization. Pain syndromes are well-defined in each disorder based on the underlying pathophysiology. Treatment involves a variety of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches individualized for each specific pain syndrome.

[Role of corticosteroid therapy in non-malignant diseases]

INTRODUCTION

As short-term corticosteroid therapy is widely used in clinical practice, it is important to determine its precise indications and limits of use.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Duration of short-term corticosteroid therapy is arbitrarily considered to be up to 21 days. Anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative or analgesic actions represent the main pharmacological features of steroids. They are related to the interactions of steroids with cytokines and immune cells. Results of randomized double-blind and uncontrolled clinical studies were included in this review. Furthermore, clearly demonstrated results that were obtained more particularly in neurology, otorhinolaryngology, pneumology, infectious diseases, rheumatologic and traumatic processes are summarized.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Indications for short-term corticosteroid therapy are well established. However, further clinical studies are required, as current prescription of corticosteroid is still empirical in the management of most diseases.

Glucocorticosteroid therapy for multiple sclerosis: a critical review

Controversy remains as to the efficacy, route of administration and dose of glucocorticosteroid (GCS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) therapy. With the recent approval of new disease modifying treatments and increasing interest in cost-benefit assessments, it is timely to critically consider their role in MS therapeutics. In this paper we review our current understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of GCS as they relate to the postulated pathophysiology of MS. We also critically review the use of glucocorticosteroid therapy to: (1) improve recovery from exacerbations of MS, (2) delay the onset of MS in patients who experience a first episode of monosymptomatic optic neuritis, and (3) delay the time to onset of sustained progression of disability in patients with clinically definite MS.

The epitope spreading cascade during progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis

We have made the following observations regarding self-recognition during the development and progression of murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and human multiple sclerosis (MS): 1) chronic progression of EAE is accompanied by a sequential, predictable cascade of neo-autoreactivity, commonly referred to as epitope spreading, presumably caused by endogenous self-priming during autoimmune-mediated tissue damage; 2) there is an invariant relationship between the progression of EAE and the emergence of epitope spreading; 3) progression of EAE can be inhibited by the induction of antigen-specific tolerance to spreading determinants after onset of initial neurologic symptoms; 4) CD4+ Th 1 cells responding to spreading determinants are autonomously encephalitogenic; 5) epitope spreading occurs during the development of MS and in some cases involves HLA-DP class II-restricted self-recognition; and 6) progression of both EAE and MS is accompanied by the decline of primary T-cell autoreactivity associated with disease onset and by the concurrent emergence of the epitope spreading cascade. Our studies directly challenge the traditional view that EAE and MS are initiated and maintained by autoreactivity directed against a single predominant myelin protein or determinant. Our results indicate that progression of EAE and MS involves a shifting of T-cell autoreactivity from primary initiating self-determinants to defined cascades of secondary determinants that sustain the inflammatory self-recognition process during disease progression.

Cost analysis of methylprednisolone treatment of multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) is the treatment of choice for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients undergoing acute exacerbation of disease symptoms and yet its cost has not been accurately determined. Determination of this cost in different settings is also pertinent to consideration of cost-saving alternatives to in-patient treatment.

METHODS

Cost analysis from the point of view of the health care system of IVMP treatment of MS patients receiving treatment in association with a selected Toronto teaching hospital in fiscal year 1994/95 was carried out. Costs of any concurrent treatments were excluded.

RESULTS

Total cost for 92 patients, based on a 4 dose regime, was estimated to be $78,527. The the cost per patient was $1,1181.84 for in-patients (IP), $714.64 for out-patients of the MS Clinic (OP) and $774.21 for patients whose treatment was initiated in the Clinic, but completed in the home (HC). Sensitivity analyses indicated: 1) IP treatment was in all cases more expensive than that of OP or HC; 2) the cost savings of OP vs. HC was sensitive to assumptions made regarding Clinic overhead, Clinic nursing costs and Home Care Program overhead.

CONCLUSION

Alternatives to in-patient care must be considered carefully. In this study, both out-patient and in-home treatment were cost-saving alternatives to in-patient treatment, but large differences in the cost of hospital out-patient vs. in-home care could not be demonstrated.