POS0839 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SC ABATACEPT IN ADULTS WITH ACTIVE IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHY

Background

Limited therapies are available for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), a heterogenous group of chronic, systemic, autoimmune inflammatory diseases characterized by progressive muscle weakness and/or distinct skin rashes.1 Abatacept, a selective co-stimulation modulator, may be a useful treatment option.2

Objectives

To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of abatacept + standard of care (SOC) in patients with IIM compared with SOC alone (placebo).

Methods

A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of SC abatacept (125 mg weekly) + SOC (corticosteroids and immunosuppressants alone or combined; NCT02971683) in patients with active, treatment-refractory IIM (Manual Muscle Testing-8 [MMT-8] ≤ 135) was performed. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients meeting International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement (IMACS DOI) at week 24. Change from baseline in myositis Functional Index-2 (FI-2), HAQ-DI, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT), and Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) were secondary endpoints with safety. Post hoc analyses by disease subtype were performed.

Results

Overall, 148 patients were randomized (75 abatacept; 73 placebo); IIM subtypes were dermatomyositis (DM; 53.3% vs 57.5%), polymyositis (PM; 25.3% vs 34.2%), and autoimmune necrotizing myopathy (ANM; 21.3% vs 8.2%). Mean baseline MMT-8 and HAQ-DI scores were 112.7 and 1.5, respectively. Approximately 90% of patients completed week 24. Week 24 IMACS DOI rates were abatacept 56.0% vs placebo 42.5% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.9–3.5]; P = 0.083). Pre-specified IMACS DOI analysis showed no differences for patients with DM but notable benefit for those with non-DM subtypes, PM and ANM (Table 1). Secondary endpoints showed similar differences (Table 1). MRC at day 169 by category is shown in Figure 1. Proportion of AEs (69.3% and 75.3%) and serious AEs (5.3% and 5.5%) were similar in the abatacept and placebo arms.

Table 1.

Primary and secondary (mean change from baseline at week 24) endpoints

OutcomeIIMAbataceptPlaceboNominal P value (abatacept vs placebo) or adjusted mean difference from placebo (95% CI)IMACS DOI,a n/N (%)All42/75 (56.0)31/73 (42.5)P = 0.083DM22/40 (55.0)21/42 (50.0)P = 0.679Non-DM20/35 (57.1)10/31 (32.3)P = 0.040FI-2All4.1 (1.3)1.2 (1.4)2.9 (0 to 5.8)DM2.3 (1.6)0.3 (1.4)1.9 (−2.3 to 6.2)Non-DM3.2 (1.4)−0.6 (1.5)3.7 (−0.3 to 7.8)HAQ-DIAll−0.31 (0.07)0.20 (0.07)−0.12 (−0.28 to 0.04)DM−0.31 (0.08)−0.19 (0.07)−0.11 (−0.32 to 0.10)Non-DM−0.25 (0.09)−0.07 (0.09)−0.18 (−0.44 to 0.07)MDAAT, Extramuscular Global Activity, (95% CI)bAll−1.56 (−1.96 to −1.16)−1.40 (−1.81 to −0.99)−0.16 (−0.63 to 0.30)DM−1.90 (−2.43 to −1.37)−1.85 (−2.35 to 1.36)−0.05 (−0.77 to 0.68)Non-DM−1.09 (−1.46 to −0.72)−0.85 (−1.27 to −0.43)−0.24 (−0.80 to 0.32)MMT-8All12.9 (1.9)11.0 (2.0)1.8 (−2.7 to 6.4)DM14.4 (2.2)14.0 (2.2)0.4 (−5.7 to 6.4)Non-DM12.1 (2.5)7.8 (2.7)4.3 (−3.0 to 11.7)Physician Global AssessmentbAll−2.89 (0.30)−2.69 (0.30)−0.20 (−0.92 to 0.52)DM−2.78 (0.29)−2.43 (0.28)−0.35 (−1.15 to 0.46)Non-DM−2.35 (0.43)−2.21 (0.48)−0.14 (−1.43 to 1.15)Patient Global AssessmentbAll−1.4 (0.31)−0.98 (0.32)−0.38 (−1.11 to 0.35)DM−1.4 (0.33)−1.4 (0.31)−0.00 (−0.91 to 0.90)Non-DM−1.2 (0.41)−0.3 (0.44)−0.93 (−2.14 to 0.29)

Data are adjusted mean change from baseline score (SE) unless stated.

aDefined as improvement of ≥ 20% in 3 IMACS core measures, worsening by ≥ 25% in ≤ 2 IMACS core measure scores, and a reduction of < 25% in MMT-8; b100 mm visual analog scale.

Conclusion

In this double-blind trial of SC abatacept vs placebo, abatacept failed to meet primary or secondary endpoints. Post hoc analyses suggest a treatment benefit in patients with PM and ANM (not DM) when treated with abatacept. Abatacept use was well tolerated.

References

[1]Dalakas MC, Hohlfeld R. Lancet 2003;362:971–82.

[2]Tjärnlund A, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:55–62.

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Fiona Boswell, PhD, of Caudex and were funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Study execution was by Sandra Overfield and Robin Scully.

Disclosure of Interests

Rohit Aggarwal Consultant of: AbbVie, Alexion, Argenx, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corbus, CSL Behring, EMD Serono, Janssen, Jubilant, Kezar, Kyverna, Mallinckrodt, Octapharma, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Q32, Roivant (personal fees), Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Mallinckrodt, Pfizer, Q32, Ingrid E. Lundberg Shareholder of: Novartis, Roche, Consultant of: Argenx, AstraZeneca, Corbus, EMD Serono, Janssen, Kezar, Octapharma, Orphazyme (personal fees), Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Yeong Wook Song: None declared, Aziz Shaibani: None declared, Victoria P Werth Consultant of: AbbVie, Akari, Amgen, Argenx, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beacon Bioscience, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corcept, Crisalis, CSL Behring, Cugene, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Horizon, Idera, Incyte, Janssen, Kezar, Kwoya Kirin, Lilly, Medimmune, Medscape, Merck, Nektar, Octapharma, Pfizer, Principia, Regeneron, Resolve, Rome Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, UCB, Viela Bio, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Argenx, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, q32 Bio, Regeneron, Syntimmune, Ventus, Viela, Michael A Maldonado Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb

LB0004 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DEUCRAVACITINIB, AN ORAL, SELECTIVE, ALLOSTERIC TYK2 INHIBITOR, IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY

Background

Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) mediates signaling of Type I interferons, IL-23, and IL-12, key cytokines involved in lupus pathogenesis. Deucravacitinib (DEUC) is an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor with a unique mechanism of action, distinct from Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2/3 inhibitors, and has shown efficacy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Objectives

Assess efficacy and safety of DEUC in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

This was a 48-week (wk), randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase 2 trial (NCT03252587). Eligible patients met SLICC criteria, were seropositive (ANA/anti-dsDNA/anti-Sm), and had a SLEDAI-2K score ≥6 and ≥1 BILAG index A or >2 BILAG B manifestations from the musculoskeletal or mucocutaneous domain. Patients on standard background medications were randomized 1:1:1:1 to PBO or DEUC (3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, 12 mg QD). Oral corticosteroid tapering to 7.5 mg/day was required from wks 8-20; further tapering was optional from wks 32-40. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving SRI(4) at wk 32. Key secondary endpoints at wk 48 included SRI(4), BICLA, LLDAS, CLASI-50, and change from baseline in active (tender and swollen) joint count.

Results

A total of 363 patients were randomized, with baseline demographic and disease characteristics similar across treatment groups. Of randomized patients, 275 (76%) completed 48 wks of treatment. The primary endpoint at wk 32 was met, with significantly greater proportion of patients in DEUC 3 mg BID and 6 mg BID groups vs PBO achieving SRI(4) responses (PBO: 34.4%; DEUC 3 mg BID: 58.2%, P=0.0006; DEUC 6 mg BID: 49.5%, P=0.021; DEUC 12 mg QD: 44.9%, P=0.078). SRI(4) response was sustained across all DEUC groups up to 48 wks (Figure 1). At wk 48, the DEUC 3 mg BID group demonstrated statistical significance in BICLA, LLDAS, CLASI-50, and active joint count, and the two other DEUC groups demonstrated clinically meaningful differences vs PBO (Figure 1). Rates of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs of interest were similar between DEUC and PBO groups (Table 1). Most common AEs (≥10%) with DEUC were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, headache, and urinary tract infection. No deaths, major cardiac events, thrombotic events, systemic opportunistic infections, or active tuberculosis occurred. Malignancies were rare with similar rates across all groups. No meaningful abnormalities in mean levels of hematology and chemistry laboratory parameters were observed.

Table 1.

Summary of Adverse Events Through Week 48

AE, na(%)Placebo n = 90DEUC 3 mg BID n = 91DEUC 6 mg BID n = 93DEUC 12 mg QD n = 89AE79 (87.8)85 (93.4)81 (87.1)75 (84.3)SAE11 (12.2)7 (7.7)8 (8.6)7 (7.9)AEs leading to treatment discontinuation3 (3.3)8 (8.8)6 (6.5)11 (12.4)Skin-related AEsb12 (13.3)15 (16.5)32 (34.4)30 (33.7)Overall infections/infestations48 (53.3)60 (65.9)60 (64.5)45 (50.6)Serious infections/infestations1 (1.1)1 (1.1)2 (2.2)1 (1.1)Infections of interest Tuberculosis0000 Herpes zosterc4 (4.4)3 (3.3)3 (3.2)2 (2.2) Influenza1 (1.1)3 (3.3)1 (1.1)3 (3.4) COVID-193 (3.3)3 (3.3)5 (5.4)3 (3.4)Malignancy events1 (1.1)d1 (1.1)e01 (1.1)fMACE0000Thrombotic events0000

an is the number of patients who experienced an event. bIncludes (≤8.6% in any arm) acne, rash, dermatitis acneiform, pruritus, skin lesion, urticaria. cIncludes herpes zoster, herpes ophthalmic, genital herpes zoster. dBasal cell carcinoma. eBreast carcinoma. fVaginal squamous cell carcinoma.

AE, adverse event; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; DEUC, deucravacitinib; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; SAE, serious adverse event.

Conclusion

In patients with active SLE, DEUC showed statistically significant and sustained clinical efficacy in SRI(4), improvement across multiple composite and organ-specific measures up to 48 wks, and was well tolerated. DEUC shows promise as a novel therapy for SLE and warrants further investigation in phase 3 trials.

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Professional medical writing assistance was provided by Julianne Hatfield, PhD at Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, Parsippany, NJ, USA, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. The authors acknowledge Christina Crater, MD, who was employed by Bristol Myers Squibb at the time the study was conducted, for contributions to study conduct.

Disclosure of Interests

Eric Morand Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Servier, and Novartis , Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Janssen, and UCB , Marilyn Pike Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer, Joan T. Merrill Consultant of: UCB, GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, EMD Serono, Remegen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, Genentech, Aurinia, Astellas, Alexion, Sanofi, Zenas, and Provention , Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca , Ronald van Vollenhoven Consultant of: UCB, Pfizer, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Biotest, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Servier, Paid instructor for: Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: UCB, Pfizer, AbbVie, Galapagos, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, UCB, , Victoria P. Werth Consultant of: Celgene, Medimmune, Resolve, Genentech, Idera, Janssen, Lilly, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Amgen, Medscape, Nektar, Incyte, EMD Serono, CSL Behring, Principia, Crisalis, Viela Bio, Argenx, Kirin, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, GSK, AstraZeneca, Cugene, UCB, Corcept, Beacon Bioscience , Grant/research support from: Celgene, Janssen, Biogen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Viela, Amgen, Lupus Research Alliance/BMS , Coburn Hobar Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Nikolay Delev Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Vaishali Shah Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Brian Sharkey Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Thomas Wegman Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ian Catlett Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Subhashis Banerjee Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Shalabh Singhal Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb

Cross-Sectional Characteristics of Pediatric-Onset Discoid Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

• Discoid lupus may be associated with SLE. In this study, most children with discoid lupus did not have systemic disease. Concurrent SLE was highest in female adolescents (>10 years of age) with generalized discoid lupus, who had clinically aggressive disease. • Discoid lupus in adolescence should prompt thorough evaluation for SLE.

Proof of concept for the clinical effects of oral rilzabrutinib, the first Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor for pemphigus vulgaris: the phase II BELIEVE study

Background

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition targets B‐cell and other non‐T‐cell immune cells implicated in the pathophysiology of pemphigus, an autoimmune disease driven by anti‐desmoglein autoantibodies. Rilzabrutinib is a new reversible, covalent BTK inhibitor demonstrating preclinical efficacy as monotherapy in canine pemphigus foliaceus.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral rilzabrutinib in patients with pemphigus vulgaris in a multicentre, proof‐of‐concept, phase II trial.

Methods

Patients with Pemphigus Disease Area Index severity scores 8–45 received 12 weeks of oral rilzabrutinib 400–600 mg twice daily and 12 weeks of follow‐up. Patients initially received between 0 and ≤ 0·5 mg kg⁻¹ prednisone‐equivalent corticosteroid (CS; i.e. ‘low dose’), tapered after control of disease activity (CDA; no new lesions, existing lesions healing). The primary endpoints were CDA within 4 weeks on zero‐to‐low‐dose CS and safety.

Results

In total, 27 patients with pemphigus vulgaris were included: nine newly diagnosed (33%) and 18 relapsing (67%); 11 had moderate disease (41%) and 16 moderate to severe (59%). The primary endpoint, CDA, was achieved in 14 patients (52%, 95% confidence interval 32–71): 11 using low‐dose CS and three using no CS. Over 12 weeks of treatment, mean CS doses reduced from 20·0 to 11·8 mg per day for newly diagnosed patients and from 10·3 to 7·8 mg per day for relapsing patients. Six patients (22%) achieved complete response by week 24, including four (15%) by week 12. Treatment‐related adverse events were mostly mild (grade 1 or 2); one patient experienced grade 3 cellulitis.

Conclusions

Rilzabrutinib alone, or with much lower CS doses than usual, was safe, with rapid clinical activity in pemphigus vulgaris. These data suggest that BTK inhibition may be a promising treatment strategy and support further investigation of rilzabrutinib for the treatment of pemphigus.

What is already known about this topic?

Standard pemphigus treatment relies on systemic high‐dose corticosteroids (CS), rituximab and/or immunosuppressives, which are limited by delayed onset of action and potential toxicities.

Immune‐mediated mechanisms that are fast acting on both the innate and adaptive immune systems, are steroid sparing, and have safety profiles well suited for chronic administration are greatly needed for patients with pemphigus.

What does this study add?

Rilzabrutinib is an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor targeting B‐cell and other non‐T‐cell immune cells implicated in pemphigus pathophysiology.

Treatment with rilzabrutinib (with or without low‐dose CS) demonstrated rapid disease control and a well‐tolerated safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsing pemphigus vulgaris.

BELIEVE provides evidence for a promising treatment strategy via BTK inhibition, supporting further investigation of rilzabrutinib in other immune‐mediated diseases.

Linked Comment: A.M. Drucker and N.H. Shear. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:691–692.

Plain language summary available online

Developing classification criteria for skin-predominant dermatomyositis: the Delphi process

BACKGROUND

The European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies are able to classify patients with skin-predominant dermatomyositis (DM). However, approximately 25% of patients with skin-predominant DM do not meet two of the three hallmark skin signs and fail to meet the criteria.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a set of skin-focused classification criteria that will distinguish cutaneous DM from mimickers and allow a more inclusive definition of skin-predominant disease.

METHODS

An extensive literature review was done to generate items for the Delphi process. Items were grouped into categories of distribution, morphology, symptoms, antibodies, histology and contextual factors. Using REDCap™, participants rated these items in terms of appropriateness and distinguishing ability from mimickers. The relevance score ranged from 1 to 100, and the median score determined a rank-ordered list. A prespecified median score cut-off was decided by the steering committee and the participants. There was a pre-Delphi and two rounds of actual Delphi.

RESULTS

There were 50 participating dermatologists and rheumatologists from North America, South America, Europe and Asia. After a cut-off score of 70 during the first round, 37 of the initial 54 items were retained and carried over to the next round. The cut-off was raised to 80 during round two and a list of 25 items was generated.

CONCLUSIONS

This project is a key step in the development of prospectively validated classification criteria that will create a more inclusive population of patients with DM for clinical research. What's already known about this topic? Proper classification of patients with skin-predominant dermatomyositis (DM) is indispensable in the appropriate conduct of clinical/translational research in the field. The only validated European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are able to classify skin-predominant DM. However, a quarter of amyopathic patients still fail the criteria and does not meet the disease classification. What does this study add? A list of 25 potential criteria divided into categories of distribution, morphology, symptomatology, pathology and contextual factors has been generated after several rounds of consensus exercise among experts in the field of DM. This Delphi project is a prerequisite to the development of a validated classification criteria set for skin-predominant DM.

Evaluating important change in cutaneous disease activity as an efficacy measure for clinical trials in dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

Patients may experience improved quality of life (QoL) without complete clearance of skin disease. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CDASI-A) score correlates with the Symptoms and Emotions subscales of Skindex-29, a measure of QoL, down to CDASI-A scores of 7 points (for Symptoms) and 10 points (for Emotions).

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to define an important change in disease activity, as measured by the CDASI-A, that results in a meaningful change in QoL in patients with dermatomyositis.

METHODS

In 103 patients, we assessed the percentage change and actual change in CDASI-A scores needed to achieve a meaningful improvement in QoL, using linear regression models.

RESULTS

We found that meaningful improvement correlates with 7·86 points (P < 0·001) in Symptoms, and 10·29 points (P < 0·001) in Emotions, after correlating Skindex-29 to an established definition of meaningful change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). For patients with initial CDASI-A scores > 14 points, a 40% change in CDASI-A between the first two visits suggests a meaningful change in Skindex-29. In patients with moderate initial CDASI-A (15-26 points), the changes in CDASI-A resulting in meaningful changes in Symptoms and Emotions were 6 points (P < 0·001) and 7 points (P < 0·001), respectively. For initial CDASI-A scores in the severe range (27-35 points), an improvement in CDASI-A by 11 points (P = 0·030) and 9 points (P = 0·021) leads to a meaningful change in Symptoms and Emotions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an initial CDASI-A score > 14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score can be used to indicate a meaningful change in QoL in future dermatomyositis trials. What's already known about this topic? The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) is a validated disease assessment tool used to capture the extent of cutaneous activity and damage. The Skindex-29 and Dermatology Life Quality Index are standardized and validated measures of quality of life (QoL) for clinical trials and correlate with CDASI Activity (CDASI-A) scores. What does this study add? We identified what change in Skindex-29 scores over two consecutive visits would indicate an important change (a minimal clinically important difference) in QoL. We determined which change in CDASI-A scores over two consecutive visits would lead to a meaningful change in QoL. For patients with an initial CDASI-A score > 14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score over two visits is associated with a meaningful change in QoL. What are the clinical implications of this work? Clinical trials can consider using a 40% change in the CDASI-A score as an end point when assessing the clinical efficacy of drugs.

The diagnosis and classification of amyopathic dermatomyositis: a historical review and assessment of existing criteria

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic criteria are used to identify a patient having a disease in a clinical setting, whereas classification criteria create a well-defined population for research purposes. The diagnosis and classification of amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) have not been recognized by most existing criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). To address this, several criteria were proposed to define ADM either as a distinct disease entity or as a subset of the spectrum of IIMs.

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the diagnosis and classification of ADM and to assesses the available criteria in identifying cases of ADM and/or distinguishing it from dermatological mimickers such as lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive literature search using the PubMed database from June 2016 to August 2018, using the search terms 'amyopathic dermatomyositis', 'diagnosis' and 'classification'.

RESULTS

The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, which are the only validated classification criteria for adult and juvenile IIM and their major subgroups, include three cutaneous items (Göttron sign, Göttron papules, heliotrope rash) to be able to classify ADM. This international and multispecialty effort is a huge step forward in the classification of skin-predominant disease in dermatomyositis. However, about 25% of the population with ADM do not meet two out of the three skin features and are misdiagnosed or classified as having a different disease entity, most commonly lupus erythematosus.

CONCLUSIONS

These gaps rationalize the continuous assessment and improvement of existing criteria and/or the development of validated, separate and skin-focused criteria for DM.

Practice-based differences in paediatric discoid lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Children with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are at risk for disfigurement and progression to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Consensus is lacking regarding optimal care for children with DLE.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare practice patterns among paediatric dermatologists/rheumatologists treating paediatric DLE.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to 292 paediatric rheumatologists in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance and 200 paediatric dermatologists in the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement.

RESULTS

Survey response rates were 38% (76 of 200) for dermatology and 21% (60 of 292) for rheumatology. Both specialties agreed that screening labs should include complete blood counts with differential, urinalysis, complement levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, antinuclear antibody and other autoantibodies, hepatic function and renal function/electrolytes. Both specialties agreed that arthritis or nephritis should prompt intensified evaluation for SLE. No other patient features achieved consensus as disease-modifying risk factors. Hydroxychloroquine was agreed upon as first-line systemic therapy, but consensus was lacking for second- or third-line treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We found few areas of consensus and significant practice differences between paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists treating DLE. Knowledge gaps include risk factors for SLE, optimal screening and treatment of refractory skin disease.

Fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune skin diseases

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is a well-established symptom in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but has not been well characterized in other skin-limited autoimmune diseases such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) or autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD).

OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective study, we compared fatigue in controls (n = 84) with that in patients enrolled in prospective longitudinal databases with SLE (n = 165), CLE (n = 226), ADM (n = 136) and AIBD (n = 79).

METHODS

We used the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) vitality scale to analyse median scores and the percentages of patients with clinically significant fatigue (defined as a score ≤ 35) between experimental groups and controls.

RESULTS

Median and interquartile range (IQR) vitality scores demonstrated greater fatigue in the experimental groups (SLE 35, IQR 20-55; CLE 50, IQR 30-70; ADM 50, IQR 30-65; AIBD 55, IQR 35-70) than in controls (73, IQR 65-85) (P < 0·05 for each experimental group vs. control). The SLE group had worse fatigue than all of the other groups (P < 0·05 SLE vs. each group), but there was no difference between the CLE, ADM or AIBD groups (all P > 0·05). In addition, the experimental groups had more clinically significant fatigue (score ≤ 35) (SLE 44·2%, CLE 25·2%, ADM 31·6%, AIBD 24·1%) than controls (2%) (P < 0·01 for each experimental group vs. control). The SLE group had more clinically significant fatigue than the CLE group (P < 0·01); however, there was no difference in clinically significant fatigue between SLE and either ADM (P = 0·17) or AIBD (P = 0·055).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that patients with skin-limited autoimmune disease experience more fatigue than controls. Fatigue is an important symptom that negatively affects quality of life for patients. It should be addressed by clinicians and measured in future clinical trials.

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) in paediatric cutaneous lupus among paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists

BACKGROUND

The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) is a reliable outcome measure for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in adults used in clinical trials. However, it has not been validated in children, limiting clinical trials for paediatric CLE.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to validate the CLASI in paediatrics.

METHODS

Eleven paediatric patients with CLE, six dermatologists and six rheumatologists participated. The physicians were trained to use the CLASI and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and individually rated all patients using both tools. Each physician reassessed two randomly selected patients. Within each physician group, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the reliability of each measure.

RESULTS

CLASI activity scores demonstrated excellent inter- and intrarater reliability (ICC > 0·90), while the PGA activity scores had good inter-rater reliability (ICC 0·73-0·77) among both specialties. PGA activity scores showed excellent (ICC 0·89) and good intrarater reliability (ICC 0·76) for dermatologists and rheumatologists, respectively. Limitations of this study include the small sample size of patients and potential recall bias during the physician rerating session.

CONCLUSIONS

CLASI activity measurement showed excellent inter- and intrarater reliability in paediatric CLE and superiority over the PGA. These results demonstrate that the CLASI is a reliable and valid outcome instrument for paediatric CLE.

Itch in dermatomyositis: the role of increased skin interleukin-31

BACKGROUND

Interleukin (IL)-31 is implicated in pruritus associated with pruritic skin diseases like atopic dermatitis. Although pruritus is a prominent feature in dermatomyositis (DM), few studies have evaluated the pathogenesis of DM-associated itch.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the prevalence of itch in DM, and to investigate the role of IL-31 in DM-related itch.

METHODS

Pruritus and disease activity of DM were evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Cutaneous Disease and Activity Severity Index (CDASI), respectively. Expression of IL-31 and IL-31 receptor alpha (IL-31RA) in lesional DM, nonlesional DM and healthy control skin was evaluated by quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence. Flow cytometry was performed on skin cells isolated from lesional DM skin to identify cellular sources of IL-31 in DM.

RESULTS

Among 191 patients with DM, 50·8% had moderate-to-severe itch, and itch was correlated with increased cutaneous severity (r = 0·34). In patients with itchy DM, gene expression of IL31 and IL31RA in lesional skin was upregulated compared with nonlesional skin and healthy control skin. IL31 mRNA expression positively correlated with VAS itch score (r = 0·67). On immunofluorescence, immunoreactivity for IL-31 and IL-31RA was stronger in lesional skin. Flow cytometry showed that lesional DM skin contained significantly more IL-31-producing cells, and CD4⁺ cells were the most common cell type. Lenabasum, an emerging treatment for DM, significantly downregulated IL-31 from CpG-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased skin IL-31 may play a role in DM-associated itch, and ongoing trials will evaluate the effects of systemic treatment on IL-31 and itch in DM.

Computerized planimetry to assess clinical responsiveness in a phase II randomized trial of topical R333 for discoid lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

R333 is a topical janus kinase and spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor being evaluated for discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) treatment. There is no validated measure to assess the area of active DLE lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate R333 efficacy and assess a technique to measure responsiveness.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with DLE were randomized in a double-blind design to R333 or placebo. Primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% decrease in erythema and scale based on lesional Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index^TM for all treated lesions at week 4. Two-dimensional (2D) area measurements for each lesion were recorded at baseline and weeks 1-6. Eighty-eight photographs (44 pre- and 44 post-treatment) were obtained from the trial and change in size of active areas was analysed by computerized planimetry and physician-assessed area change (PAAC).

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were randomized to R333 and 18 patients were randomized to placebo. Primary end point was not achieved. There was a strong association between lesion activity and physician global assessment (P < 0·001). Photos of 42 patients assessed by computerized planimetry demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability. Area change by computerized planimetry showed a strong correlation with PAAC (Spearman r = 0·72). Area change by 2D measurements showed a weak correlation with PAAC (Spearman r = 0·29).

CONCLUSIONS

Four weeks of R333 treatment did not result in significant improvement in lesion activity. Lesion activity and area change using computerized planimetry are better determinants of responsiveness than area change using 2D measurements.

Evaluation of the reliability of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index and the Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Method in juvenile dermatomyositis among paediatric dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists

BACKGROUND

The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) and Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Method (CAT-BM) have been shown to be reliable and valid outcome measures to assess cutaneous disease in adult dermatomyositis (DM) and juvenile DM (JDM), respectively.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the CDASI and CAT-BM for use by paediatric dermatologists, paediatric rheumatologists and paediatric neurologists in patients with JDM.

METHODS

Five paediatric dermatologists, five paediatric rheumatologists and five paediatric neurologists each evaluated 14 patients with JDM using the CDASI, CAT-BM, and skin Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scales. Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability, construct validity and completion time were compared.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability for CDASI activity and damage scores was good to moderate for paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists, but poor for paediatric neurologists. The inter-rater reliability for CAT-BM activity scores was moderate for paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists, but poor for paediatric neurologists and poor across all specialties for damage scores. Intra-rater reliability for the CDASI and CAT-BM activity and damage scores was moderate to excellent for paediatric dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists. Strong associations were found between skin PGA activity and damage scores and CDASI or CAT-BM activity and damage scores, respectively (P < 0·002). The CDASI had a mean completion time of 5·4 min compared with that for the CAT-BM of 3·1 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the reliability of the CDASI activity and damage scores and the CAT-BM activity scores when used by paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists in assessing JDM. Significant variation existed in the paediatric neurologists' scores.

The systemic management of cutaneous dermatomyositis: Results of a stepwise strategy

Treatment of dermatomyositis (DM) is often achieved with a stepwise algorithm. However, the literature lacks quality evidence to support the use of this therapeutic strategy. The result of a stepwise therapeutic strategy in the management of skin-only DM is presented to better understand the clinical outcomes and allow for future studies. A cohort of 102 patients with DM, 41 of whom had skin-only disease, were seen between July 2009 and April 2013 at a referral-based connective tissue disease clinic. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index was used to prospectively assess disease severity and the outcomes in 41 adult patients with skin-only DM were analyzed. Of the 41 patients with skin-only DM, 23 patients (56.1%) received antimalarial medications alone and 18 patients (43.9%) received second- or third-line agents. Ten patients (24.4%) remained at the first level of the treatment algorithm and received only hydroxychloroquine. Prednisone was included in the treatment regimen for 11 patients with skin-only disease (26.8%). The results show that management of cutaneous DM often requires second-line agents because antimalarial medications alone are insufficient to treat most patients with skin-only disease.

Trigger factors of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a review of current literature

It is currently believed that autoimmune conditions are triggered and aggravated by a variety of environmental factors such as cigarette smoking, infections, ultraviolet light or chemicals, as well as certain medications and vaccines in genetically susceptible individuals. Recent scientific data have suggested a relevant role of these factors not only in systemic lupus erythematosus, but also in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). A variety of environmental factors have been proposed as initiators and exacerbators of this disease. In this review we focused on those with the most convincing evidence, emphasizing the role of drugs in CLE. Using a combined search strategy of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases the following trigger factors and/or exacerbators of CLE have been identified and described: drugs, smoking, neoplasms, ultraviolet radiation and radiotherapy. In order to give a practical insight we emphasized the role of drugs from various groups and classes in CLE. We also aimed to present a short clinical profile of patients with lesions induced by various drug classes.

The reliability of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) among dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that skin disease in dermatomyositis (DM) is best assessed using the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI). Although the CDASI has been validated for use by dermatologists, it has not been validated for use by other physicians such as rheumatologists and neurologists, who also manage patients with DM and assess skin activity in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability of the CDASI among dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with cutaneous DM were assessed using the CDASI and the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) by five dermatologists, five rheumatologists and five neurologists.

RESULTS

The mean CDASI activity scores for dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists were 21·0, 21·8 and 20·8, respectively. These mean scores were not different among the specialists. The CDASI damage score means for dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists were 5·3, 7·0 and 4·8, respectively. The mean scores between dermatologists and rheumatologists were significantly different, but the means between dermatologists and neurologists were not. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interrater reliability for CDASI activity and damage were good to excellent for dermatologists and rheumatologists, and moderate to excellent for neurologists. The ICCs for intrarater reliability for CDASI activity and damage were excellent for dermatologists and rheumatologists and moderate to excellent for neurologists. The PGA displayed lower interrater and intrarater reliability relative to the CDASI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the reliability of the CDASI when used by dermatologists and rheumatologists. The data for its use by neurologists were not as robust.

Biological therapies in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune skin disease occurring in association with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although antimalarials are widely used as the first-line systemic agent, refractory cases may benefit from additional immunomodulators, immunosuppressives, and biologics. An interest in biological therapies for CLE has emerged in recent years due to novel insight into the pathogenesis of CLE. These targets include B cells, T cells, and cytokines that are involved in immune system pathways. Currently belimumab is the only biological therapy approved for SLE and no biologic has been approved for CLE. While there is a paucity of high quality evidence with regard to biologics in CLE management, trials are currently being performed to determine their role.

Treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: current practice variations

The treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematous (CLE) remains a challenge. Most of the therapeutic options used in CLE have not been tested in randomized controlled studies and to date no agent has been approved. Therefore, CLE treatment is mostly based on personal experience. To better characterize therapeutic habits among physicians treating CLE patients, a questionnaire-based study about various aspects of topical and systemic treatment for CLE has been performed. The questionnaire was distributed among CLE experts, mostly from Japan, the USA, and Europe. A total of 82 completed questionnaires were assessed. High-potent and potent corticosteroids as well as calcineurin inhibitors were the most often recommended topical treatment for all CLE subtypes. The most relevant factors for initiation of systemic therapy were severity of skin lesions, concomitant involvement of internal organs, CLE subtype and lack of response to topical therapies. Corticosteroids and antimalarials were considered as the most suitable and effective systemic drugs for CLE patients. However, significant differences were observed between various CLE subtypes and between different countries regarding the assessment of various topical and systemic treatment options. In conclusion, great variability of obtained answers underlines the need of development of CLE treatment guidelines suitable for different disease subtypes.

Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change

BACKGROUND

The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed for use in clinical trials and longitudinal patient assessment.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize disease severity using the CDASI and assess the responsiveness of this instrument to clinically meaningful changes in disease activity.

METHODS

Patients with cutaneous dermatomyositis at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn, n = 93) and Stanford University (Stanford, n = 106) were prospectively evaluated using the CDASI, physician global assessment (PGA) Likert scales and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data was analysed using logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves to select cut-offs.

RESULTS

Baseline CDASI activity scores for the patients evaluated at UPenn ranged from 0 to 47 (median 17), and baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·6 (median 1·1). At UPenn a CDASI activity score of 19 differentiated mild from moderate and severe disease. At Stanford baseline CDASI scores ranged from 0 to 48 (median 21), baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·7 (median 4·2) and CDASI activity scores of 14 or less characterized mild disease. When a 2-cm change in the PGA VAS was regarded as a clinically significant improvement, a 4-point (UPenn) or 5-point (Stanford) change in CDASI reflected a minimal clinically significant response.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDASI is a valid and responsive measure that can be used to characterize cutaneous dermatomyositis severity and detect improvement in disease activity. Variations in cut-offs may be due to differences in disease severity between the two populations or inter-rater variations in the use of the external gold measures.

Redefining cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a proposed international consensus approach and results of a preliminary questionnaire

There is currently no uniform definition of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) upon which to base a study population for observational and interventional trials. A preliminary questionnaire was derived from and sent to a panel of CLE experts which demonstrated consensus agreement that (1) there is a need for new definitions for CLE (2) CLE is distinct from systemic lupus erythematosus and that a CLE grouping scheme should remain apart from current systemic lupus erythematosus schema (3) current CLE grouping schemes are inadequate around communication, prognostic information and to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians, patients and payers.

A multicentre randomized trial of the treatment of patients with pemphigus vulgaris with infliximab and prednisone compared with prednisone alone

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a blistering disease and tumour necrosis factor-α has a role in its pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of infliximab (IFX) with prednisone compared with prednisone alone in the treatment of PV. In addition, treatment response was assessed and mechanistic studies were performed.

METHODS

Subjects with PV who had ongoing disease activity while being maintained on prednisone were randomized to receive either IFX or placebo in addition to prednisone. Response status and immunoglobulin (Ig) G anti-desmoglein (Dsg)1 and Dsg3 antibodies were assessed at 18 and 26 weeks.

RESULTS

Ten subjects were randomized to each group. There were no safety signals during the course of the study. At week 18, one subject in each group had responded. At week 26, three IFX-treated subjects vs. none in the placebo group had responded (P = 0·21). At weeks 18 and 26, the median IgG anti-Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 levels were lower in the IFX-treated patients [IgG anti-Dsg-1 (week 18, P = 0·035; week 26, P = 0·022); IgG anti-Dsg3 (week 18, P = 0·035; week, 26 P = 0·05)].

CONCLUSIONS

This study is limited by the relatively small sample size. There was no significant difference between study arms in the proportion of subjects with treatment-related adverse events > grade 3. IFX therapy was not shown to be effective for the treatment of patients with PV in this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, although IFX treatment may be associated with a decrease in anti-Dsg1 and Dsg3 antibodies.

Improvement in the cutaneous disease activity of patients with dermatomyositis is associated with a better quality of life

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM) disease activity is associated with decreased quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if an improvement in quality of life, as measured by the Skindex-29 and patient-reported itch and pain on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), correlated with an improvement in cutaneous DM disease activity.

METHODS

Patients with a completed cutaneous DM disease area and severity index [Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI)] at two visits separated by at least 2 months were classified into responder (n = 15) and nonresponder (n = 30) groups according to the point change in the CDASI activity scores between visits. Responders had at least a four-point improvement in CDASI activity, indicating clinically relevant improvement.

RESULTS

The change from baseline to the follow-up visit of the Skindex-29 subscale scores for the responders vs. the nonresponders were significantly different for emotions (P < 0·01), functioning (P < 0·01) and symptoms (P < 0·01). The change in VAS score between responders and nonresponders was also significant for itch (P = 0·01) and pain (P = 0·04). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of disease subtype, sex, race, age, treatment for DM, smoking history or a history of malignancy within 5 years of a diagnosis of DM.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate that the quality of life of patients with DM improved as their cutaneous disease activity decreased.

The impact of skin damage due to cutaneous lupus on quality of life

BACKGROUND

Patients with more severe cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) have a poorer quality of life (QoL). Racial and ethnic disparities have been reported in disease activity and outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus, but similar information is not available for CLE.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of lupus-related skin damage on skin-specific QoL, and to analyse differences stratified by ethnic background.

METHODS

Data collected included sex, race, diagnosis and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) and Skindex-29 scores. These parameters were analysed at the initial and last visits. CLASI damage scores (dyspigmentation and scarring) and activity scores were collected, grouped by ethnicity, and correlated with Skindex-29. Overall, 223 patients were analysed at baseline, with 141 completing more than one study visit.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were white (63·7%), followed by African American (29·1%) and Asian American (4·0%). African American patients accounted for a disproportionate percentage of both localized (50%) and generalized discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) (49%). Median CLASI damage scores differed significantly between the African American, white and Asian American patients, at both the first (8·5, 4·0, 7·0, respectively; P < 0·0001) and last visit (10·0, 6·0, 8·5, respectively; P < 0·01). CLASI damage scores in African Americans correlated with CLASI activity scores (Spearman r = 0·45, P = 0·0003).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant correlation between CLASI damage scores and Skindex domains overall. Individually, dyspigmentation and scarring also did not have a significant effect on QoL. Ethnic differences in patients with CLE were found: African American patients exhibited a high rate of DLE and experienced damage early in their disease course, frequently in conjunction with disease activity.

Anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Anti-C1q has been associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis in previous studies. We studied anti-C1q specificity for SLE (vs rheumatic disease controls) and the association with SLE manifestations in an international multicenter study.

METHODS

Information and blood samples were obtained in a cross-sectional study from patients with SLE (n = 308) and other rheumatologic diseases (n = 389) from 25 clinical sites (84% female, 68% Caucasian, 17% African descent, 8% Asian, 7% other). IgG anti-C1q against the collagen-like region was measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

Prevalence of anti-C1q was 28% (86/308) in patients with SLE and 13% (49/389) in controls (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.8-4, p < 0.001). Anti-C1q was associated with proteinuria (OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.7-5.1, p < 0.001), red cell casts (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2-5.4, p = 0.015), anti-dsDNA (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.9-6.1, p < 0.001) and anti-Smith (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.5-5.0, p = 0.01). Anti-C1q was independently associated with renal involvement after adjustment for demographics, ANA, anti-dsDNA and low complement (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3-4.2, p < 0.01). Simultaneously positive anti-C1q, anti-dsDNA and low complement was strongly associated with renal involvement (OR = 14.9, 95% CI: 5.8-38.4, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-C1q was more common in patients with SLE and those of Asian race/ethnicity. We confirmed a significant association of anti-C1q with renal involvement, independent of demographics and other serologies. Anti-C1q in combination with anti-dsDNA and low complement was the strongest serological association with renal involvement. These data support the usefulness of anti-C1q in SLE, especially in lupus nephritis.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and treatment

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) encompasses a wide range of dermatologic manifestations, which may or may not be associated with the development of systemic disease. Cutaneous lupus is divided into several sub-types, including acute CLE (ACLE), sub-acute CLE (SCLE) and chronic CLE (CCLE). CCLE includes discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), LE profundus (LEP), chilblain cutaneous lupus and lupus tumidus. The diagnosis of these diseases requires proper classification of the sub-type, through a combination of physical examination, laboratory studies, histology, antibody serology and occasionally direct immunofluorescence, while ensuring to exclude systemic disease. The treatment of cutaneous lupus consists of patient education on proper sun protection along with appropriate topical and systemic agents. Systemic agents are indicated in cases of widespread, scarring or treatment-refractory disease. In this chapter, we discuss issues in classification and diagnosis of the various sub-types of CLE, as well as provide an update on therapeutic management.

A multicentre, cross-sectional study on quality of life in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

 A study at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) Medical Center demonstrated that quality of life in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is negatively impacted. Whether patients with CLE in other geographic locations have similar quality of life is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

 We sought to compare quality of life indicators between patients with CLE at the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center at Dallas and those at UPenn.

METHODS

  Patients with CLE (total n=248) at UTSW (n=91) and UPenn (n=157) completed the Skindex-29 +3 and Short Form-36 (SF-36) surveys related to quality of life. Additional information, including demographics, presence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and disease severity, was collected from UTSW patients with CLE.

RESULTS

  Most Skindex-29 + 3 and SF-36 subdomain scores between UTSW and UPenn patients with CLE were similar. However, UTSW patients with CLE were significantly more affected in the functioning and lupus-specific Skindex-29 + 3 domains, and physical functioning, role-physical and general health SF-36 subscales than UPenn patients with CLE (P<0·05). Factors related to poor quality of life in UTSW patients with CLE include sex, income, education, presence of SLE, and skin disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

  Most quality of life indicators were similar between the two CLE populations. Differences in psychosocial behaviour, and a larger proportion of patients with SLE and females in the UTSW group likely attributed to differences in a minority of Skindex-29+3 and SF-36 subdomains. Capturing data from CLE populations in different locations provides a more thorough picture of the quality of life that patients with CLE experience on a daily basis with special attention to quality of life issues in select patients with CLE.

The interferon-regulated gene signature is elevated in subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and discoid lupus erythematosus and correlates with the cutaneous lupus area and severity index score

BACKGROUND

There is increased expression of type I interferon (IFN)-regulated proteins in the blood and target tissues of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients with SLE have increased IFN-regulated gene expression pointing towards a possible underlying genetic defect.

OBJECTIVES

To determine expression levels of five type I IFN-regulated genes that are highly expressed in SLE in the peripheral blood of patients with CLE and to correlate the expression levels with cutaneous disease activity.

METHODS

Peripheral blood was obtained from 10 healthy controls and 30 patients with CLE, including eight with concomitant SLE. Total RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into complementary DNA. Gene expression levels were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH, standardized to healthy controls and then summed to calculate an IFN score for each patient. Disease activity was assessed with the Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index (CLASI).

RESULTS

Patients with subacute CLE (SCLE) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) had elevated IFN scores compared with healthy controls regardless of concomitant SLE (P < 0·01 with SLE and P < 0·05 without SLE). There was no difference between patients with tumid lupus erythematosus (TLE) and healthy controls. The IFN score correlated with CLASI scores (Spearman's rho = 0·55, P = 0·0017).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SCLE and DLE have an IFN signature, as seen in SLE. The level of gene expression correlates with cutaneous disease activity. These findings support a shared pathogenesis between SLE and some subtypes of CLE.

Development of quality indicators to evaluate the monitoring of SLE patients in routine clinical practice

The assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in routine clinical practice is mainly based on the experience of the treating physician. This carries the risk of unwanted variability. Variability may have an impact on the quality of care offered to SLE patients, thereby affecting outcomes. Recommendations represent systematically developed statements to help practitioners in reducing variability. However, major difficulties arise in the application of recommendations into clinical practice. In this respect, the use of quality indicators may raise the awareness among rheumatologists regarding potential deficiencies in services and improve the quality of health care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of quality indicators (QI) for SLE by translating into QIs the recently developed EULAR Recommendations for monitoring SLE patients in routine clinical practice and observational studies. Eleven QIs have been developed referring to the use of validated activity and damage indices in routine clinical practice, general evaluation of drug toxicity, evaluation of comorbidities, eye evaluation, laboratory assessment, evaluation of the presence of chronic viral infections, documentation of vaccination and of antibody testing at baseline. A disease specific set of quality assessment tools should help physicians deliver high quality of care across populations. Routine updates will be needed.

International consensus for a definition of disease flare in lupus

The Lupus Foundation of America (LFA) convened an international working group to obtain a consensus definition of disease flare in lupus. With help from the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO), two web-based Delphi surveys of physicians were conducted. Subsequently, the LFA held a second consensus conference followed by a third Delphi survey to reach a community-wide agreement for flare definition. Sixty-nine of the 120 (57.5%) polled physicians responded to the first survey. Fifty-nine of the responses were available to draft 12 preliminary statements, which were circulated in the second survey. Eighty-seven of 118 (74%) physicians completed the second survey, with an agreement of 70% for 9/12 (75%) statements. During the second conference, three alternative flare definitions were consolidated and sent back to the international community. One hundred and sixteen of 146 (79.5%) responded, with agreement by 71/116 (61%) for the following definition: "A flare is a measurable increase in disease activity in one or more organ systems involving new or worse clinical signs and symptoms and/or laboratory measurements. It must be considered clinically significant by the assessor and usually there would be at least consideration of a change or an increase in treatment." The LFA proposes this definition for lupus flare on the basis of its high face validity.

European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for monitoring patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in clinical practice and in observational studies

OBJECTIVES

To develop recommendations for monitoring patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in clinical practice and observational studies and to develop a standardised core set of variables to monitor SLE.

METHODS

We followed the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) standardised procedures for guideline development. The following techniques were applied: nominal groups, Delphi surveys for prioritisation, small group discussion, systematic literature review and two Delphi rounds to obtain agreement. The panel included rheumatologists, internists, dermatologists, a nephrologist and an expert related to national research agencies. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were determined according to the Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendations of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

A total of 10 recommendations have been developed, covering the following aspects: patient assessment, cardiovascular risk factors, other risk factors (osteoporosis, cancer), infection risk (screening, vaccination, monitoring), frequency of assessments, laboratory tests, mucocutaneous involvement, kidney monitoring, neuropsychological manifestations and ophthalmology assessment. A 'core set' of minimal variables for the assessment and monitoring of patients with SLE in clinical practice was developed that included some of the recommendations. In addition to the recommendations, indications for specific organ assessments that were viewed as part of good clinical practice were discussed and included in the flow chart.

CONCLUSIONS

A set of recommendations for monitoring patients with SLE in routine clinical practice has been developed. The use of a standardised core set to monitor patients with SLE should facilitate clinical practice, as well as the quality control of care for patients with SLE, and the collection and comparison of data in observational studies.

Modification of the cutaneous dermatomyositis disease area and severity index, an outcome instrument

BACKGROUND

Validated outcome measures in dermatology help standardize and improve patient care. A scoring system of skin disease severity in dermatomyositis known as the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) has been developed.

OBJECTIVES

To simplify and improve the tool for clinical research and care, we modified the CDASI and validated the new version, v2.

METHODS

The original CDASI has four activity and two damage measures. The modified CDASI has three activity and two damage measures. The skin disease of 20 patients with dermatomyositis was evaluated by the same dermatologist using both the original and the modified CDASI. Global validation measures were implemented to assess overall skin disease state, skin disease activity and skin damage. Spearman's rho (r(sp)), adjusted for multiple observations on subjects, was used to determine the relationship between the two versions of the CDASI and their correlation with the physician global measures (PGMs).

RESULTS

The total score and activity and damage subscores of the original and the modified CDASI correlated perfectly with each other (r(sp) = 0.99, 1.00, 1.00). The PGM-overall skin scale correlated with the total scores (r(sp) = 0.72, r(sp) = 0.76) and activity subscores (r(sp) = 0.68, r(sp) = 0.63) but not with the damage subscores (r(sp) = 0.14, r(sp) = 0.15) of the original and the modified CDASI, respectively. However, the PGM-activity and PGM-damage scales correlated with the activity (r(sp) = 0.76, r(sp) = 0.75) and damage subscores (r(sp) = 0.90, r(sp) = 0.90), respectively, of the original and the modified CDASI.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified CDASI is perfectly correlated with the original CDASI. It has equally good concurrent validity with the PGM-overall skin and PGM-activity scales. The CDASI subscores have equally good concurrent validity with the PGM-activity and PGM-damage scales. We suggest that PGMs of skin disease activity and damage should be assessed separately for greater specificity. The modified CDASI is a refined and equally as useful outcome measure.

Comparison of the reliability and validity of outcome instruments for cutaneous dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

Reliable and validated measures of skin disease severity are needed for cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM). Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI) and Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) skin indices have been developed as outcome instruments.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to demonstrate reliability and validity of the CDASI, and to compare the CDASI with other potential tools for use in measuring disease severity in cutaneous dermatomyositis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CDASI has four activity and two damage measures, with scores from 0 to 148. DSSI assesses activity based on body surface area and severity on a scale of 0-72. CAT uses 21 activity and damage items, for a range of 0-175 for activity and 0-33 for damage. Ten dermatologists used the instruments to score the same 12-16 patients in one session. Global validation measures were administered to physicians and patients.

RESULTS

Global validation measures correlated with the three outcome instruments (P < 0.0001). CAT displayed lower inter- and intrarater reliability relative to the CDASI. All scales correlate better with physician than patient global skin measures.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the CDASI may be a useful outcome measure for studies of cutaneous DM. Further testing to compare responsiveness of all three measures is necessary.