Clinical and laboratory parameters predicting cancer in dermatomyositis patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies

BACKGROUND

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a chronic acquired autoimmune disorder strongly associated with cancer development. Until now, identifying predictive markers indicating a high risk of cancer has challenged clinicians. Although anti-TIF1γ antibody is a major serological indicator for cancer-associated DM, many anti-TIF1γ antibody-positive DM patients lack malignancy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine clinical and laboratory parameters that support cancer prediction in anti-TIF1γ antibody-positive DM patients.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data were collected from cancer-associated and unassociated DM patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies. Serum cytokine concentrations were measured with a cytokine array assay. The values of inflammatory cytokines in cancer prognosis were determined with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The cancer group had a significantly higher frequency of males, older mean age and higher anti-TIF1γ antibody levels. Some inflammatory cytokines, particularly tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and TNF receptor superfamilies, had increased levels in sera that were correlated with myositis markers, cutaneous severity and DM disease activity. Moreover, these cytokines had an area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.8 and high sensitivity and specificity at their specific cut-off, even higher than anti-TIF1γ levels in cancer prediction in our DM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a close pathophysiological relationship among myositis, cancer and skin involvements in DM patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies and the potential clinical significance of anti-TIF1γ antibody levels in evaluating disease severity and prognosis in DM patients. Some inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies including BAFF, sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2, may support cancer prediction in DM patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies.

The validity and utility of the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) as a clinical outcome instrument in dermatomyositis: A comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Validated outcome measures are paramount in the assessment of disease progression and evaluation of new therapeutics in clinical trials. Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease that is frequently refractory to current therapies and warrants the development of new treatments. The Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed in 2008 in response to a need for a reliable, validated measure of skin disease activity and damage for use in clinical trials and longitudinal monitoring of disease progression.

METHODS

The literature was searched for all studies validating and utilizing the CDASI between 2008 and October 2018 using searches in PubMed. Studies pertaining to validation of the CDASI, correlation with quality of life, use in the evaluation of current therapies and ongoing trials, as well as relationships to biomarkers were included in this review.

RESULTS

The CDASI was found to have intra- and inter-rater reliability, validity, reproducibility, sensitivity to clinical changes, and ease of use. It has been shown to correlate with quality of life as measured by the Skindex-29 outcome measure. The CDASI activity score has additionally been shown to correlate significantly with IFN-β, a key cytokine in DM pathogenesis.

CONCLUSION

The CDASI is a validated measure of dermatomyositis disease and has been shown to be an effective outcome instrument in clinical trials.

The systemic management of cutaneous dermatomyositis: Results of a stepwise strategy

Treatment of dermatomyositis (DM) is often achieved with a stepwise algorithm. However, the literature lacks quality evidence to support the use of this therapeutic strategy. The result of a stepwise therapeutic strategy in the management of skin-only DM is presented to better understand the clinical outcomes and allow for future studies. A cohort of 102 patients with DM, 41 of whom had skin-only disease, were seen between July 2009 and April 2013 at a referral-based connective tissue disease clinic. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index was used to prospectively assess disease severity and the outcomes in 41 adult patients with skin-only DM were analyzed. Of the 41 patients with skin-only DM, 23 patients (56.1%) received antimalarial medications alone and 18 patients (43.9%) received second- or third-line agents. Ten patients (24.4%) remained at the first level of the treatment algorithm and received only hydroxychloroquine. Prednisone was included in the treatment regimen for 11 patients with skin-only disease (26.8%). The results show that management of cutaneous DM often requires second-line agents because antimalarial medications alone are insufficient to treat most patients with skin-only disease.