Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Once-Weekly Dalbavancin versus Twice-Daily Linezolid Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Novel antibiotics for the management of diabetic foot infections

Foot infections are a major cause of morbidity in diabetic patients. Staphylococcus aureus is the most important pathogen in mild infections; moderate to severe infections are frequently polymicrobial. Multidrug resistance is an increasing problem in isolates from diabetic feet. Worldwide, up to 30% of patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) are colonised with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), whilst extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria are also common in some countries. This emergence of drug resistance has coincided with the launch or imminent availability of many new antibiotics. Most of these were developed to target multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria, although some have a spectrum of activity that includes Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes. There is a variable amount of experience with these agents in treating skin and skin-structure infections (SSSIs), especially for DFI. However, at least some have a spectrum of activity and/or pharmacological properties that suggest that they may be of value in managing DFIs. The aim of this paper is to review evidence for the efficacy of new antibiotics in the management of SSSIs, including any data relating specifically to the diabetic foot, and to consider where they might fit into the therapeutic armory against DFI.

Phase 2 study of ceftaroline versus standard therapy in treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

Ceftaroline, the bioactive metabolite of ceftaroline fosamil (previously PPI-0903, TAK-599), is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive aerobic pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A randomized, observer-blinded study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus standard therapy in treating complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) was performed. Adults with cSSSI, including at least one systemic marker of inflammation, were randomized (2:1) to receive intravenous (i.v.) ceftaroline (600 mg every 12 h) or i.v. vancomycin (1 g every 12 h) with or without adjunctive i.v. aztreonam (1 g every 8 h) for 7 to 14 days. The primary outcome measure was the clinical cure rate at a test-of-cure (TOC) visit 8 to 14 days after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the microbiological success rate (eradication or presumed eradication) at TOC and the clinical relapse rate 21 to 28 days following treatment. Of 100 subjects enrolled, 88 were clinically evaluable; the clinical cure rate was 96.7% (59/61) for ceftaroline versus 88.9% (24/27) for standard therapy. Among the microbiologically evaluable subjects (i.e., clinically evaluable and having had at least one susceptible pathogen isolated at baseline), the microbiological success rate was 95.2% (40/42) for ceftaroline versus 85.7% (18/21) for standard therapy. Relapse occurred in one subject in each group (ceftaroline, 1.8%; standard therapy, 4.3%). Ceftaroline exhibited a very favorable safety and tolerability profile, consistent with that of marketed cephalosporins. Most adverse events from ceftaroline were mild and not related to treatment. Ceftaroline holds promise as a new therapy for treatment of cSSSI and other serious polymicrobial infections.

New drugs to treat skin and soft tissue infections

Due to increasing antimicrobial resistance, a pressing need exists for new antibiotics to treat skin and soft tissue infections. Several newer agents such as tigecycline, daptomycin, and linezolid have been important additions for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens. New drugs in development such as dalbavancin and ceftobiprole will further enhance our ability to treat mixed infections and improve patient compliance. These promising new antimicrobials will likely grow in importance as resistant bacterial strains increase in community-acquired infections.

Alternatives to Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections

Vancomycin remains the reference standard for the treatment of systemic infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, as a result of limited tissue distribution, as well as the emergence of isolates with reduced susceptibility and in vitro resistance to vancomycin, the need for alternative therapies that target MRSA has become apparent. New treatment options for invasive MRSA infections include linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Additionally, a number of new anti-MRSA compounds are in development, including novel glycopeptides (dalbavancin, telavancin, and oritavancin), ceftobiprole, and iclaprim. The present article will review clinical issues surrounding the newly marketed and investigational agents with activity against MRSA.

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment decisions

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections have been reported with increasing frequency from many parts of the world. Most infections involve the skin and soft tissue structures, and CA-MRSA is now the most commonly identifiable cause of purulent skin and soft tissue infections. The spectrum of disease can range from simple cutaneous abscesses to fulminant necrotizing infection. CA-MRSA strains, in contrast to healthcare-associated strains, are generally extra virulent and produce more toxins. Unlike the healthcare-associated strains, they demonstrate variable susceptibility patterns to various classes of antibiotics. Empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with purulent skin and soft tissue infection and for those presenting with severe, life-threatening infections should include an agent active against CA-MRSA.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cephalexin for treatment of uncomplicated skin abscesses in a population at risk for community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection

Empirical use of beta-lactam antibiotics, the preferred agents for treating uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections, may no longer be appropriate for these infections because of the increasing prevalence of community strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Retrospective studies, however, suggest that outcomes are good even when beta-lactams are used. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of 166 outpatient subjects comparing placebo to cephalexin at 500 mg orally four times for 7 days after incision and drainage of skin and soft tissue abscesses. The primary outcome was clinical cure or failure 7 days after incision and drainage. S. aureus was isolated from 70.4% of abscess cultures. Of the isolates tested 87.8% were MRSA, 93% of which were positive for Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes. Clinical cure rates were 90.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 0.96) in the 84 placebo recipients and 84.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.91) in the 82 cephalexin recipients (difference in the two proportions, 0.0006; 95% confidence interval, -0.0461 to 0.0472; P = 0.25). The 90.5% cure rate observed in the placebo arm and 84.1% cure rate observed in the cephalexin arm provide strong evidence that antibiotics may be unnecessary after surgical drainage of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue abscesses caused by community strains of MRSA.

Pharmacokinetics of dalbavancin in plasma and skin blister fluid

OBJECTIVES

Dalbavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide antibiotic in development for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria. The aim of the present study was to assess the penetration of dalbavancin into skin blister fluid.

METHODS

Nine healthy subjects (five males; ranging in age from 26 to 57 years) were administered a single 30 min intravenous infusion of dalbavancin at a dose of 1000 mg. Skin blisters were induced by application of cantharidin ointment. Plasma and blister fluid samples were collected over 7 days post-dose, and concentrations of dalbavancin were assessed by a validated LC/MS/MS assay. Pharmacokinetics were determined by non-compartmental methods, and drug penetration was assessed based on the ratio of area under the curve (AUC) in the blister fluid versus plasma for each subject.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) peak concentration of dalbavancin in plasma and blister fluid was 285 (31.1) and 67.3 (18.2) mg/L, respectively; the corresponding AUC(Day 7) values were 10 806 (1926) and 6438 (1238) mg . h/L, respectively. The mean (SD) penetration of dalbavancin into blister fluid was 59.6% (6.3%). By Day 7, the mean concentration of dalbavancin in plasma and blister fluid was 46.5 and 30.3 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin concentrations in blister fluid remained well above the MIC90 values for pathogens commonly implicated in cSSSIs such as Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MIC90 = 0.06 mg/L) and beta-haemolytic streptococci (MIC90 = 0.03 mg/L) through Day 7. These pharmacokinetic data support the use of dalbavancin in the treatment of cSSSIs caused by susceptible Gram-positive pathogens.

Update on the treatment of diabetic foot infections

This article brings the practicing clinician up to date on the current concepts regarding the medical treatment of diabetic foot infections. Topics include a review of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections and a discussion of newer antibiotics such as linezolid, ertapenem, moxifloxacin, dalbavancin, tigecycline, ceftobiprole and iclaprim.

Distribution of radioactivity in bone and related structures following administration of [14C]dalbavancin to New Zealand white rabbits

Penetration of dalbavancin into noninfected bone and joint tissues was assessed after an intravenous dose of 20 mg/kg (of body weight) [(14)C]dalbavancin given to rabbits. Drug-derived radioactivity, determined over 14 days by either liquid scintillation counting or autoradiography, remained above the MIC for common gram-positive pathogens that cause bone and joint infections.

Point: Vancomycin is not obsolete for the treatment of infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Since the discovery, development, and US Food and Drug Administration approval of vancomycin in the 1950s, this agent has remained a mainstay for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, because of the development of new antistaphylococcal antibiotics and reports of vancomycin failures, the utility of vancomycin has recently been questioned. Although vancomycin did not undergo the strict US Food and Drug Administration approval process that is in place today to demonstrate efficacy, there is considerable information available that sheds light on the role vancomycin has in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy today. In addition, although we look to in vitro susceptibility testing to assess vancomycin activity against S. aureus, we have come to appreciate that resistance of S. aureus to vancomycin can be a continuous--rather than a categorical--phenomenon. This has resulted in clinical microbiology laboratories having difficulty identifying S. aureus that may not respond to conventional doses of vancomycin. A better understanding is needed of the pharmacodynamic relationship between vancomycin and MRSA as relates to optimal dosing strategies, including consideration for loading doses, and development of rational categorical breakpoints for susceptibility based on clinical outcomes. By better understanding these critical issues, it may be possible to optimize the use of vancomycin, resulting in a cost-effective treatment option for many patients infected with MRSA.

Dalbavancin: a novel antimicrobial

The increasing incidence of serious infections because of Gram-positive pathogens and the rising cost in parenteral administration of antimicrobials has inspired the development of a novel antibiotic. Dalbavancin is the first once a week antibiotic with activity against a broad range of Gram-positive pathogens. A large multicentre, pivotal, Phase III clinical trial, which included 854 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections, compared 1-2 doses of dalbavancin vs. linezolid. The results demonstrated non-inferiority and a comparable safety profile. With its unique pharmacokinetic profile, ease of use and excellent safety profile, dalbavancin should provide a valuable addition to the armamentarium used to treat infections because of Gram-positive cocci.

Review of dalbavancin, a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide

Dalbavancin is a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide that is derived from teicoplanin with an extended half-life that enables once-weekly dosing. It has potent in vitro activity against most gram-positive organisms, with lower minimum inhibitory concentration values than vancomycin and other investigational lipoglycopeptides. Dalbavancin is active against multi-drug-resistant pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, except for strains exhibiting vanA resistance. Several Phase II and III trials have established similar efficacy and safety of dalbavancin with comparator agents in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections and in catheter-related bloodstream infections. Dalbavancin may serve as an appealing alternative agent in the treatment of gram-positive infections, especially with its convenient once-weekly regimen.

An infectious disease update on antibiotics: emerging resistance

Podiatric physicians often encounter infectious processes in the lower extremity in inpatient and outpatient settings. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing concern for clinicians treating these infections, especially in complex patients who have immune compromise such as diabetes. Although a number of antibiotic options are available for the treatment of lower-extremity soft tissue and bone infections, a careful examination of bacterial susceptibilities, drug resistance, and treatment efficacy can result in better patient care and limb salvage.

Treatment ofStaphylococcus aureusinfections: new issues, emerging therapies and future directions

Infections due to Staphylococcus aureus are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance in strains of S. aureus is a continually evolving problem, including widespread methicillin resistance in hospitals, increasing methicillin resistance in community strains, and the recent acquisition of glycopeptide resistance. New antimicrobials with activity against S. aureus have recently entered the market or are in the late stages of development. In addition, there has been significant interest in the development of novel and immune-based strategies for prevention or treatment of S. aureus infections. This review describes established and emerging therapies for S. aureus infections, and considers the safety profiles and likely impact on present treatment standards of novel agents either undergoing clinical development or emerging onto the market.

In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of the glycopeptide dalbavancin

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity against gram-positive cocci and a markedly prolonged serum elimination half-life. We used the neutropenic murine thigh and lung infection models to characterize the pharmacodynamics of dalbavancin. Single-dose pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated linear kinetics and a prolonged elimination half-life which ranged from 7.6 to 13.1 h over the dose range of 2.5 to 80 mg/kg of body weight. The level of protein binding in mouse serum was 98.4%. The time course of in vivo activity of dalbavancin over the same dose range was examined in neutropenic ICR Swiss mice infected with a strain of either Streptococcus pneumoniae or Staphylococcus aureus by using the thigh infection model. The burden of organisms for S. pneumoniae was markedly reduced over the initial 24 h of study, and organism regrowth was suppressed in a dose-dependent fashion for up to the entire 96 h of study following dalbavancin doses of 2.5 mg/kg or greater. Dalbavancin doses of 20 mg/kg or greater resulted in less killing of S. aureus but were still followed by a prolonged suppression of regrowth. Multiple-dosing-regimen studies with the same organisms were used to determined which of the pharmacodynamic indices (maximum concentration in serum [C(max)]/MIC, area under the concentration-versus-time curve [AUC]/MIC, or the duration of time that levels in serum exceed the MIC) best correlated with treatment efficacy. These studies used a dose range of 3.8 to 480 mg/kg/6 days fractionated into 2, 4, 6, or 12 doses over the 144-h dosing period. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to examine the data fit with each pharmacodynamic index. Dalbavancin administration by the use of large, widely spaced doses was the most efficacious for both organisms. Both the 24-h AUC/MIC and the C(max)/MIC parameters correlated well with the in vivo efficacy of treatment against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus (for 24-h AUC/MIC, R(2) = 78 and 77%, respectively; for C(max)/MIC, R(2) = 90 and 57%, respectively). The free-drug 24-h AUC/MICs required for a bacteriostatic effect were 17 +/- 7 for five S. pneumoniae isolates. A similar treatment endpoint for the treatment against five strains of S. aureus required a larger dalbavancin exposure, with a mean free-drug 24-h AUC/MIC of 265 +/- 143. Beta-lactam resistance did not affect the pharmacodynamic target. The dose-response curves were relatively steep for both species; thus, the pharmacodynamic target needed to achieve organism reductions of 1 or 2 log(10) in the mice were not appreciably larger (1.3- to 1.6-fold). Treatment was similarly efficacious in neutropenic mice and in the lung infection model. The dose-dependent efficacy and prolonged elimination half-life of dalbavancin support the widely spaced regimens used in clinical trials. The free-drug 24-h AUC/MIC targets identified in these studies should be helpful for discerning rational susceptibility breakpoints. The current MIC(90) for the target gram-positive organisms would fall within this value.

New agents for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as well as newly discovered S. aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin mandates development of new antistaphylococcal agents. This review summarizes currently available and forthcoming antimicrobials for treatment of S. aureus endocarditis.

RECENT FINDINGS

No new antimicrobial has been proven superior to antistaphylococcal penicillins for treatment of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) endocarditis. Vancomycin has become standard treatment for MRSA but poor outcomes have been reported, both with susceptible and intermediately resistant S. aureus strains (VISA). Linezolid has successfully treated individual cases of MRSA endocarditis, but limitations include long-term safety. Daptomycin has recently been proven effective and well tolerated for MSSA and MRSA bacteremia, including right-sided endocarditis. New glycopeptides, including dalbavancin and telavancin, as well as the new cephalosporin ceftobiprole, have not yet been studied for treatment of endocarditis but appear active against MRSA and potentially VISA.

SUMMARY

Antistaphylococcal penicillins remain the treatment of choice for MSSA. Of the currently available newer agents, daptomycin appears to have the most rapid bactericidal activity and provides a much-needed alternative to vancomycin for treatment of MRSA or MSSA bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis.

Emerging Options for Treatment of Invasive, Multidrug-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusInfections

Limited established treatment options exist for the treatment of serious, invasive infections caused by multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, most notably nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Although vancomycin represents the gold standard for therapy of such invasive infections, reports of increasing in vitro resistance to vancomycin, combined with reports of clinical failures (with this and other antistaphylococcal agents), underscore the need for alternative therapies. Older agents with favorable in vitro activity available in both oral and intravenous dose forms include trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin. Limited clinical data exist to support their routine use as initial therapy in the treatment of invasive disease. However, these and other options (e.g., tetracyclines) are being reexplored in the setting of increasing concern over MRSA acquired in the community setting. Newer treatment options for MRSA include linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin, and tigecycline. With the exception of linezolid, these newer agents require intravenous administration. Combination therapy may be considered in select invasive diseases refractory to standard monotherapies. These diseases include infections such as endocarditis, meningitis, and prosthetic device infections. Additional alternatives to vancomycin are under clinical investigation. Those in later stages of development include oritavancin, dalbavancin, telavancin, and ceftobiprole.

Investigational treatments for postoperative surgical site infections

Surgical site infections rank third among nosocomial infections, representing a global threat, associated with the emergence of multi-drug-resistant bacteria. The pharmaceutical industry has recently curtailed developmental programmes; however, the need for new compounds is extremely important. This article reviews new antimicrobials and immunointerventional targets for their potential to treat surgical site infections in comparison with recently licensed compounds. Daptomycin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, telavancin, iclaprim and ranbezolid seem to be promising agents against infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens and effectively address the present problems of multi-resistance in Gram-positive infections. Peptide deformylase inhibitors and immunostimulating agents open new perspectives in this field; however, very few compounds targeting Gram-negative problematic pathogens are in the pipeline of the future. Tigecycline (recently marketed) ceftobiprole, ceftaroline and doripenem seem to possess an extended anti-Gram-positive and -negative spectrum. Among these compounds, only doripenem demonstrates activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, for which there is a clear unmet need for new compounds, focusing on new targets.

Bactericidal activity and resistance development profiling of dalbavancin

Dalbavancin, a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide being developed for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs), has a half-life of 5 to 7 days in humans and offers promise for a convenient weekly dosing regimen. We studied the in vitro bactericidal activity of dalbavancin against target organisms, using the concentrations that are maintained in human blood with the proposed dosage regimen. Dalbavancin minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were<or=0.5 microg/ml for eight staphylococcal isolates; and for six of these strains, including one vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) isolate, the MBCs were equal to or within 1 doubling dilution of the MIC. Dalbavancin MICs for all three Streptococcus pyogenes strains were 0.008 microg/ml, as were the MBCs for two of the isolates. In time-kill studies conducted with a different set of seven strains (two methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates, three methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, one VISA isolate, and one S. pyogenes isolate), all strains exhibited a>or=3-log10 decrease in their viable counts when they were exposed to>or=1 microg/ml of dalbavancin for 24 h. Resistance development studies by both direct selection (resistance frequency, <10(-10)) and serial passage failed to produce stable mutants with decreased susceptibility to dalbavancin. These observations suggest that dalbavancin will be an effective choice for the management of patients with SSSIs.

Activity of dalbavancin tested against Staphylococcus spp. and beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. isolated from 52 geographically diverse medical centers in the United States

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent with a potency significantly better than that of vancomycin when tested against staphylococci and streptococci. These two pathogens are common causes of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs), and dalbavancin has been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe SSSIs. This study generated susceptibility data for staphylococci and beta-hemolytic streptococci from 52 U.S. medical centers that locally tested dalbavancin, vancomycin, and other antimicrobial class representatives to assess the potency of dalbavancin and the overall contemporary activities of commonly prescribed agents. Locally generated data showed that oxacillin-resistant staphylococci (57.0% overall) had slightly higher dalbavancin MIC(90) values (0.19 microg/ml) than oxacillin-susceptible strains (0.125 microg/ml). This potency was 8- to 16-fold greater than that for vancomycin. beta-Hemolytic streptococci had MIC(90) values ranging between <or=0.016 and 0.064 microg/ml (highest for group B isolates). Levofloxacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline were active against oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci (82 to 99% susceptible), with lower susceptibility rates seen for the oxacillin-resistant strains. Linezolid coverage was >98% against staphylococci. Erythromycin resistance was high for staphylococci (30.6 to 94.1%) with inducible clindamycin resistance rates of 26.0% and 55.0% for oxacillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. Beta-hemolytic streptococci had a 20.2% erythromycin resistance rate and a 60% inducible clindamycin resistance rate but were highly susceptible to other tested agents. Etest reading errors were apparent and skewed results towards slightly higher dalbavancin MICs, requiring further education on how to interpret Etest method results for this compound. Current disk diffusion breakpoint criteria for oxacillin susceptibility for S. aureus showed a very-major-error rate of 2.3% and only a 0.9% minor-error rate when cefoxitin was used to predict oxacillin susceptibility. Dalbavancin demonstrated excellent potency and activity (100% susceptibility at proposed breakpoints) against common causes of SSSI pathogens in this U.S. multicenter study sample.

Treatment of infections caused by resistant Staphylococcus aureus

We review data on the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). In this review, we cover findings reported in the English language medical literature up to February 2006. Despite the emergence of resistant and multidrug resistant S. aureus, five effective drugs for which little resistance has been observed are in clinical use: vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, tigecycline, and daptomycin. However, vancomycin is less effective for infections with MRSA isolates that have a high minimum inhibitory concentration in the susceptible range. Linezolid looks promising in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs). Daptomycin displays rapid bactericidal activity in vitro, and it has been shown to be noninferior to comparator agents in the treatment of SSTIs and bacteremia. Tigecycline was also noninferior to comparator drugs in the treatment of SSTIs. Clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, and minocycline are oral antistaphylococcal agents that may have utility in the treatment of SSTIs and osteomyelitis, but the clinical data for their efficacy is limited. There are four drugs with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive organisms at an advanced stage of clinical testing: ceptobiprole and three new glycopeptides with potent bactericidal activity, oritavancin, dalbavancin, and telavancin. Thus, there are currently many effective drugs to treat resistant S. aureus infections and many promising agents in the pipeline. Nevertheless, S. aureus remains a formidable adversary against which there are frequent treatment failures. The next goals are to determine the most appropriate indications and cost-effectiveness of each of these drugs in the treatment strategy against S. aureus.

Comparison of dalbavancin MIC values determined by Etest (AB BIODISK) and reference dilution methods using gram-positive organisms

While standardized microdilution testing methodologies and quality control ranges exist for the novel glycolipopeptide dalbavancin, no testing methods have been described that are immediately available for routine use in clinical laboratories. In this study, we found that the dalbavancin Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) procedure demonstrated a high degree of agreement (100% within +/-2 log(2) dilution steps) with the standardized broth microdilution method, validating the use of the Etest as an alternative test for investigational or clinical purposes following regulatory approval.

Selection of a surrogate agent (vancomycin or teicoplanin) for initial susceptibility testing of dalbavancin: results from an international antimicrobial surveillance program

The immediate lack of market-dominating commercial products (Vitek or MicroScan) for susceptibility testing of the new glycolipopeptide, dalbavancin, requires a surrogate marker agent to assist microbiologists in the correct categorization of potentially indicated species (staphylococci and streptococci). Error-rate analyses for 16,749 isolates using vancomycin or teicoplanin results to categorize dalbavancin susceptibilities demonstrated that both glycopeptide agents were highly predictive of dalbavancin-susceptible results (nearly 100%) with only a rare minor error. Vancomycin test results most reliably predict dalbavancin susceptibility until validated commercial reagents become available for direct testing in clinical practice.

In vitro activities of dalbavancin and 12 other agents against 329 aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive isolates recovered from diabetic foot infections

Tests of dalbavancin's in vitro activity against 209 aerobic and 120 anaerobic isolates from pretreatment diabetic foot infections showed an MIC(90) of < or =0.125 microg/ml against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and 120 anaerobes (Clostridium perfringens, other clostridia, Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus, Finegoldia magna, and Anaerococcus prevotii), compared to respective MIC(90)s for MSSA and MRSA of 0.5 and 1 microg/ml for vancomycin, 4 and 4 microg/ml for linezolid, 0.5 and 0.5 microg/ml for daptomycin, and 0.25 and >8 microg/ml for clindamycin.

Therapies and vaccines for emerging bacterial infections: learning from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an emerging bacterial infection worldwide, and community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infection, which has increased dramatically in frequency in many areas, is of particular clinical and public health concern. CA-MRSA outbreaks and severe infections have been reported more frequently in children, often manifesting in one of two distinct clinical syndromes, furunculosis or necrotizing pneumonia. This article outlines the molecular biology of MRSA, how molecular biology has contributed to the understanding of MRSA infections, current therapy and prevention of MRSA, and the prospects for a vaccine against S aureus.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia in the 21st century: a review of existing treatment options and their impact on patient care

Hospital-acquired pneumonia is a common nosocomial infection, with significant morbidity and mortality, and represents a major therapeutic challenge to clinicians. The therapeutic approach must be patient-oriented and institution-specific. The specific risk factors of each patient, such as previous antibiotic exposure, underlying diseases, length of hospital stay and the local patterns of antimicrobial resistance, should guide physicians in their decision of the initial optimal empirical therapy. Delays in the initiation or inappropriate/inadequate initial therapy are related to increased mortality and worse outcomes. In responding patients, as soon as culture data are available, efforts should be made to change the initial broad spectrum antibiotic regimen to a more targeted one (de-escalation). The optimal duration of treatment is a matter of debate, but courses longer than 1 week are rarely justified.

Dalbavancin: A Novel Lipoglycopeptide Antibacterial

Dalbavancin is a new lipoglycopeptide antibacterial possessing in vitro activity against a variety of gram-positive pathogens. Against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, it has demonstrated favorable minimum inhibitory concentration ranges compared with those of currently available agents. Dalbavancin is highly protein bound (> 90%), which may contribute to its prolonged half-life of 149-300 hours. Because of this long half-life, once-weekly dosing strategies have been used in clinical trials. Efficacy and tolerability have been demonstrated in a wide variety of animal infection models. Clinical success and safety have been shown in phase II and III trials for skin and soft-tissue infections and a phase II trial for catheter-related bloodstream infections. In these trials with vancomycin, linezolid, and various beta-lactams as comparators, comparable results have been reported. The results of further phase III trials are anxiously awaited and will more clearly define the clinical role of this novel agent.

[Staphylococcus aureus infections: new challenges from an old pathogen]

Staphylococcus aureus is a versatile organism with several virulent characteristics and resistance mechanisms at its disposal. It is also a significant cause of a wide range of infectious diseases in humans. S. aureus often causes life-threatening deep seated infections like bacteremia, endocarditis and pneumonia. While traditionally confined mostly to the hospital setting, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is now rapidly becoming rampant in the community. Community-acquired MRSA is particularly significant because of its potential for unchecked spread within households and its propensity for causing serious skin and pulmonary infections. Because of the unfavorable outcome of many MRSA infections with the standard glycopeptide therapy, new antimicrobial agents belonging to various classes have been introduced and have been evaluated in clinical trials for their efficacy in treating resistant staphylococcal infections. A number of preventive strategies have also been suggested to contain the spread of such infections. In this review, we address the recent changes in the epidemiology of S. aureus and their impact on the clinical manifestations and management of serious infections. We also discuss new treatment modalities for MRSA infections and emphasize the importance of preventive approaches.