A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer

Induction chemotherapy prior to surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy for oral cavity cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Locoregionally advanced oral cavity cancers are aggressive tumours with high risk of relapse after definitive treatment. This study was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of induction chemotherapy prior to surgery for untreated oral cavity cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Only prospective phase III randomised studies comparing induction chemotherapy followed by surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy (Chemo Group) compared with surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy (Control Group) were eligible. Two of the authors independently selected and assessed the studies regarding eligibility criteria and risk of bias.

RESULTS

Two studies were selected. A total of 451 patients were randomly assigned to Chemo Group (n=226) versus Control Group (n=225). Most patients had tumours at clinical stages III/IV (89.1%). Both trials were classified as having low risk of bias. No significant overall benefit in favour of induction chemotherapy was found regarding loco-regional recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival. A subgroup analysis of individual data from cN2 patients showed statistically significant overall survival benefit in favour of induction chemotherapy. The included studies did not directly compare toxicity between the groups and no statistical analysis was performed regarding safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available studies, induction chemotherapy when administered before surgery with curative intent did not improve clinical outcomes in locoregionally advanced oral cavity cancer patients. Clinically assessed N2 patients might benefit from induction chemotherapy.

Effect of taxanes-based induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A large scale propensity-matched study

OBJECTIVES

The effect of taxanes-based induction chemotherapy (IC) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) was quite contradictory in two phase II randomized controlled trials with small sample size. We aimed to investigate it in this large scale propensity-matched study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Totally, 779 LA-NPC patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy with or without taxanes-based IC were included. Patients in both treatment arms were matched using propensity score matching method at the ratio of 1:1. Failure-free survival (FFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

After matching, 534 patients were identified for analysis. In univariate analysis, both treatment arms resulted in parallel survival (4-years FFS 78.0% vs 74.1%, P = 0.304; OS 87.5% vs 87.3%, P = 0.595; DMFS 88.2% vs 84.4%, P = 0.154; and LRFS 91.2% vs 90.1%, P = 0.960). In multivariate analysis, taxanes-based IC did not improve any survival (P ⩾ 0.139). And this association remained unchanged in subgroup analysis by age, sex and histology, and among patients with stage III and T4N0M0. But among patients with T4N1-2M0 and stage IVb, taxanes-based IC significantly prolonged the 4-year DMFS by 11.2% (86.1% vs 74.9%, P = 0.034), and marginally improved FFS (P = 0.133) and OS (P = 0.215) in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large scale propensity-matched study, LA-NPC patients could not benefit from taxanes-based IC on the whole. But the risk of distant metastasis significantly decreased by above 10% for patients with T4N1-2M0 and stage IVb.

Efficacy and safety of a cisplatin and paclitaxel induction regimen followed by chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a non-5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Sixty patients with stage III to IV HNSCC were treated with induction paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP; paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) , 3 cycles) followed by CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) ; D1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (93.3%) completed 3 cycles of induction TP (no treatment-related deaths), 52 (86.7%) completed definitive CRT per protocol (adverse event [AE] grade ≥2 in 53.3%). The overall response rate after induction TP was 82.5% for patients with resectable disease and 55.5% for unresectable disease (p = .023), and complete response (CR) rate after CRT was 70.0% for patients with resectable disease and 30.0% for unresectable disease (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

Induction TP followed by cisplatin based-CRT was well-tolerated, safe, and had high overall response rate in selected patients with locally advanced HNSCC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E970-E980, 2016.

[Radioresistance parameters in head and neck cancers and methods to radiosensitize]

Head and neck cancers have been widely studied concerning their sensitivity to radiation therapy. Several parameters affect tumour response to radiation therapy. Some parameters are linked to the tumour. Large or invasive tumours, localization, such as oral cavity or adenopathy, are factors of radioresistance. Others parameters are linked to the patients themselves. Tobacco intoxication during radiotherapy and a low hemoglobin level contribute to radioresistance. More recently, a positive human papilloma virus (HPV) status has been reported to positively affect radiosensitivity. Finally, other parameters are related to tumour biology. Hypoxia, intrinsic radiosensitivity of tumour cells, tumour differentiation and repopulation (provided by Ki-67 index or EGFR level) are components of radiosensitivity. Currently, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is one of the gold standard treatments to overcome clinical outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancer. This combination increases locoregional control and survival. Taxane-based induction chemotherapy can also be an alternative. Another validated approach is the association of radiotherapy with cetuximab (EGFR targeting) but only one randomized study has been published. Fractionation modifications, especially hyperfractionation, have given positive results on both tumour control and survival. Strategies targeting hypoxia improve locoregional control but have less clinical impact.

Effect of induction chemotherapy on survival in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: Single center experience

BACKGROUND

Although induction chemotherapy can reduce distant metastases in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), overall survival (OS) improvement because of induction chemotherapy has not been confirmed.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 224 patients diagnosed with locally advanced HNSCC who were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT; induction chemotherapy/CRT; N = 144) and CRT alone (N = 80) from 2005 to 2013. We analyzed OS and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The 3-year OS rate was significantly higher in the induction chemotherapy/CRT group compared to the CRT group (74.0% vs 62.7%; p = .045). The 3-year PFS rate was 64.6% in the induction chemotherapy/CRT group and 54.1% in the CRT group (p = .060). Subgroup analysis showed patients with high N classification (N2 or N3) oropharyngeal cancer had greater benefits when treated with induction chemotherapy/CRT.

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy plus CRT improved OS, compared to CRT alone in locally advanced HNSCC, especially with high N classification.

Induction chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: a meta-analysis

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been considered to be the standard of care for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (LA-SCCHN). Whether induction chemotherapy (IC) with CCRT will further improve the clinical outcomes or not is still unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the two regimens for LA-SCCHN. Literature searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biology Medicine from inception to November 2014. Five prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 922 patients were included in meta-analysis. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Compared with CCRT, IC with CCRT showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) or locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), but could increase risks of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia (P = 0.0009) and leukopenia (P = 0.04). In contrast, distant metastasis rate (DMR) decreased (P = 0.006) and complete response rate (CR) improved (P = 0.010) for IC with CCRT. In conclusion, the current studies do not support the use of IC with CCRT over CCRT, and the further positioning of IC with CCRT as standard treatment for LA-SCCHN will come from more RCTs directly comparing IC followed by CCRT with CCRT.

Taxane-cisplatin-fluorouracil as induction chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis of the 5-year efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel), cisplatin, and fluorouracil (Tax-PF) with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (PF) regimen by a meta-analysis of data retrieved from the literature.

METHODS

Seven randomized clinical trials were identified, which included patients with advanced head and neck cancer who underwent induction chemotherapy with either a Tax-PF or PF protocol. The outcomes included the 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and different types of adverse events.

RESULTS

The 3-year OS rate (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.25; P = 0.008), 3-year PFS rate (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.43; P = 0.002), 5-year OS rate (HR: 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.55;P = 0.003), 5-year PFS rate (HR: 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.70; P = 0.001) and ORR to chemotherapy (OR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.35 to 2.05; P < 0.001) of the patients in the Tax-PF group were statistically superior to those in the PF group. In terms of toxicities, the incidence of febrile neutropenia (OR 2.36; 95% CI, 1.62 to 3.46; P < 0.001), alopecia (OR 8.22; 95% CI, 3.99 to 16.92; P < 0.001), diarrhea (OR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.36; P = 0.03) and leukopenia (OR 2.79; 95% CI, 1.86 to 4.21; P < 0.001) was higher in the Tax-PF group.

CONCLUSION

The Tax-PF induction chemotherapy improved PFS and OS, and the ORR was better as compared to PF-based therapy regimens at the cost of a higher incidence of adverse events.

Induction therapy with cetuximab plus docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ETPF) in patients with resectable nonmetastatic stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. A GERCOR phase II ECHO-07 study

Induction TPF regimen is a standard treatment option for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx. The efficacy and safety of adding cetuximab to induction TPF (ETPF) therapy was evaluated. Patients with nonmetastatic resectable stage III/IV SCC of the oropharynx were treated with weekly cetuximab followed the same day by docetaxel and cisplatin and by a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil on days 1-5 (every 3 weeks, 3 cycles). The primary endpoint was clinical and radiological complete response (crCR) of primary tumor at 3 onths. Secondary endpoints were crCR rates, overall response, pathological CR, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Forty-two patients were enrolled, and 41 received ETPF. The all nine planned cetuximab doses and the full three doses of planned chemotherapy were completed in 31 (76%) and 36 (88%) patients, respectively. Twelve (29%) patients required dose reduction. The crCR of primary tumor at the completion of therapy was observed in nine (22%) patients. ETPF was associated with a tumor objective response rate (ORR) of 58%. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: nonfebrile neutropenia (39%), febrile neutropenia (19%), diarrhea (10%), and stomatitis (12%). Eighteen (44%) patients experienced acne-like skin reactions of any grade. One toxic death occurred secondary to chemotherapy-induced colitis with colonic perforation. This phase II study reports an interesting response rate for ETPF in patients with moderately advanced SCC of the oropharynx. The schedule of ETPF evaluated in this study cannot be recommended at this dosage.

Summary of major radiation fractionation and chemotherapy trials for organ preservation therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To review radiation fractionation and chemotherapy trials for patients undergoing organ preservation therapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiation therapy fractionation and chemotherapy trial results as well as historical evidence are systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Trial results, which involve nearly 30,000 patients, have been interpreted, compared, and presented in a structured manner to demonstrate the changing approaches in treatment over the years from the 1960s to the present. The review includes data from the split-course radiation therapy era, meta-analyses of chemotherapy and radiation therapy fractionation trials, cetuximab trials, "triple-drug trials," and modern trials of induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This summary will be useful to clinicians making treatment decisions today and to investigators designing trials in the future.

Concurrent chemo-radiation with or without induction gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel: a randomized, phase 2/3 trial in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare survival, tumor control, toxicities, and quality of life of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemo-radiation (CCRT), against CCRT alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were stratified by N stage and randomized to induction GCP (3 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), carboplatin area under the concentration-time-curve 2.5, and paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2) given days 1 and 8 every 21 days) followed by CCRT (radiation therapy 69.96 Gy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2)), or CCRT alone. The accrual of 172 was planned to detect a 15% difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) with a 5% significance level and 80% power.

RESULTS

Between September 2004 and August 2012, 180 patients were accrued, and 172 (GCP 86, control 86) were analyzed by intention to treat. There was no significant difference in OS (3-year OS 94.3% [GCP] vs 92.3% [control]; hazard ratio 1.05; 1-sided P=.494]), disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.44-1.35, P=.362), and distant metastases-free survival (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.38-1.67, P=.547) between the 2 arms. Treatment compliance in the induction phase was good, but the relative dose intensity for concurrent cisplatin was significantly lower in the GCP arm. Overall, the GCP arm had higher rates of grades 3 and 4 leukopenia (52% vs 37%) and neutropenia (24% vs 12%), but grade 3 and 4 acute radiation toxicities were not statistically different between the 2 arms. The global quality of life scores were comparable in both arms.

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy with GCP before concurrent chemo-irradiation did not improve survival in locally advanced NPC.

Helical tomotherapy in head and neck cancer: a European single-center experience

BACKGROUND

We report on a retrospective analysis of 147 patients with early and locoregionally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (SCCHN) treated with helical tomotherapy (HT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Included were patients with SCCHN of the oral cavity (OC), oropharynx (OP), hypopharynx (HP), or larynx (L) consecutively treated in one radiotherapy center in 2008 and 2009. The prescribed HT dose was 60-66 Gy in the postoperative setting (group A) and 66-70 Gy when given as primary treatment (group B). HT was given alone, concurrent with systemic therapy (ST), that is, chemotherapy, biotherapy, or both, and with or without induction therapy (IT). Acute and late toxicities are reported using standard criteria; locoregional failure/progression (LRF), distant metastases (DM), and second primary tumors (SPT) were documented, and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of HT.

RESULTS

Group A patients received HT alone in 22 cases and HT + ST in 20 cases; group B patients received HT alone in 17 cases and HT + ST in 88 cases. Severe (grade ≥ 3) acute mucosal toxicity and swallowing problems increased with more additional ST. After a median follow-up of 44 months, grade ≥2 late toxicity after HT + ST was approximately twice that of HT alone for skin, subcutis, pharynx, and larynx. Forty percent had grade ≥2 late xerostomia, and 29% had mucosal toxicity. At 3 years, LRF/DM/SPT occurred in 7%/7%/17% and 25%/13%/5% in groups A and B, respectively, leading to a 3-year EFS/OS of 64%/74% and 56%/63% in groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of HT alone or in combination with ST is feasible and promising and has a low late fatality rate. However, late toxicity is nearly twice as high when ST is added to HT.

Racial disparities in laryngeal cancer treatment and outcome: A population-based analysis of 24,069 patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of race on laryngeal preservation strategies and overall survival (OS) for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, national cancer database analysis.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression models were employed in SPSS 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) for data analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 24,069 patients with laryngeal SCC were identified. Of these, 18,166 (75.5%) patients were white, 3,475 (14.4%) were black, 1,608 (6.7%) were Hispanic, and 820 (3.4%) were Asian. Compared with other races, black patients were more likely to be diagnosed at a younger age (P < 0.001), undergo lymph node dissection (P < 0.001), have nodal metastasis (P < 0.001), be with advanced stage disease (P < 0.001), and be unmarried (P < 0.001). Black patients with T1 to T2 and T3 disease were more likely to undergo total laryngectomy as compared with white patients (T1-2: 8.2% vs. 4.3%; P < 0.001; T3: 28.4% vs. 24.3%; P = 0.023). For patients with T4 disease, however, rates of primary radiotherapy among black patients were higher (40.5% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.015). The 5-year OS for white, black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were 60.6%, 52.7%, 59.5% and 65.7% (P < 0.001). This significant 5-year OS difference by race persisted regardless of age, gender, year of diagnosis, primary treatment, nodal status, or tumor grade. On multivariate analysis, race remained an independent prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Race is an independent prognostic factor for OS. Further studies are warranted to evaluate causes for racial disparities and discrepancies in OS and laryngeal preservation strategies.

Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative treatment in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (ACTS-HNC)

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase III study to evaluate S-1 as compared with UFT as control in patients after curative therapy for stage III, IVA, or IVB squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to the UFT group (300 or 400 mg day-1 for 1 year) or the S-1 group (80, 100, or 120 mg day-1 for 1 year). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points were relapse-free survival, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 526 patients were enrolled, and 505 were eligible for analysis. The 3-year DFS rate was 60.0% in the UFT group and 64.1% in the S-1 group (HR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.66-1.16; p = 0.34). The 3-year OS rate was 75.8% and 82.9%, respectively (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94; p = 0.022). Among grade 3 or higher adverse events, the incidences of leukopenia (5.2%), neutropenia (3.6%), thrombocytopenia (2.0%), and mucositis/stomatitis (2.4%) were significantly higher in the S-1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although DFS did not differ significantly between the groups, OS was significantly better in the S-1 group than in the UFT group. S-1 is considered a treatment option after curative therapy for stage III, IVA, IVB SCCHN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00336947 http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00336947.

The current role of systemic chemotherapy in the primary treatment of head and neck cancer

The treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is still evolving into the perfect combination of the different multidisciplinary approaches. Induction chemotherapy (ICT) prior to planned definitive local therapy is widely used in this patient population for over 30 years but it is still unclear how to incorporate ICT into multimodality treatment the best. It appears to have a role in selected clinical situations especially for those patients with high risk for distant metastasis. However, since ICT protocols in different studies varies a lot, a comparative and consistent statement of benefits is difficult. We show the recent developments including randomized trials comparing radiochemotherapy (RCT) and ICT followed by definitive RCT here. This review summarizes how ICT has developed over the years, provides critical remarks of recent developments, and discusses how clinical trials including ICT should be conducted in the future.

Role of induction chemotherapy for N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with N3 (>6cm) lymph nodes remains difficult, and the best treatment strategy has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various treatment modalities.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with HNSCC and N3 neck disease treated with definitive therapy in our institute between 1987 and 2013 were included in the analysis. We compared the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery with or without induction chemotherapy (ICT).

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) at three years for the patients with N3 neck disease was 41%. The three-year OS rates of patients treated with definitive surgery and definitive CRT were 41% and 48%, respectively. There were no significant differences between these two treatments (P=0.82). The OS of patients who received ICT followed by definitive therapy was significantly better than that of patients who did not (P<0.001). The most common recurrence pattern was distant metastases. The rate of distant metastases was 61% of all treatment failures (20/33).

CONCLUSION

The high rate of distant metastases in patients with N3 neck disease suggests that prevention of distant metastases can improve survival. Based on this study, we consider that ICT may play an important role in the treatment of N3 neck disease.

A phase II trial of induction chemotherapy and chemo-IMRT for head and neck squamous cell cancers at risk of bilateral nodal spread: the application of a bilateral superficial lobe parotid-sparing IMRT technique and treatment outcomes

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of induction chemotherapy and chemo-IMRT in head and neck squamous cell cancers at risk of bilateral nodal spread (midline tumours) and to evaluate whether bilateral superficial lobe parotid-sparing IMRT can reduce the incidence of ⩾G2 subjective xerostomia.

METHODS

Patients with midline tumours were enrolled to a phase II trial to receive induction platinum/5-fluorouracil and concomitant platinum with combined superficial lobe parotid-sparing IMRT. The primary site and involved nodal levels received 65 Gy in 30 fractions (f) and at risk nodal levels, 54 Gy/30f. Incidence of ⩾G2 subjective xerostomia was defined as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included incidences of acute and late toxicities and survival outcomes dependent on human papilloma virus (HPV) status.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients with midline cancers completed treatment between December 2005 and May 2010 with median follow-up of 50 months. Incidences of ⩾G2 acute toxicities were: dysphagia 75%; xerostomia 65%; mucositis 86%; pain 83%; and fatigue 64%. At 12 months, ⩾G2 subjective xerostomia was observed in 21% (17% in HPV +ve). Two-year loco-regional progression-free survival (PFS) was 90.7% (95% CI: 85.2-96.2). According to HPV status, there was a significant difference for 2-year loco-regional PFS, 76.8% (HPV-negative) vs 98.6% (HPV-positive), P=0.001. 2-year overall survival was 93% for HPV-positive compared with 52% for HPV-negative cases, P<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential chemotherapy/chemo-IMRT for midline tumours is feasible, with excellent survival outcomes. At 1 year, 21% experience ⩾G2 subjective xerostomia. Two-year survival outcomes differ significantly between HPV-positive and HPV-negative disease, suggesting development of different treatment schedules for the different disease entities.

Current management of locally advanced head and neck cancer: the combination of chemotherapy with locoregional treatments

This review will discuss the evolution of the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), over the last few decades. Studies were identified by searching PubMed electronic databases. Surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) or definitive RT are potentially curative approaches for locally advanced HNC. While chemotherapy itself is not curative, it can improve cure rates when given as an adjunct to RT. The benefit of combining chemotherapy with RT is related to the timing of the chemotherapy. Several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that concurrent delivery of chemotherapy and RT (CRT) is the most promising approach, given that locoregional recurrence is the leading pattern of failure for patients with locally advanced HNC. Induction chemotherapy before CRT has not been shown to be superior to CRT alone and the added toxicity may negatively impact the compliance with CRT. Sequential chemotherapy administration, in the form of induction chemotherapy followed by RT or CRT, has been successful as a strategy for organ preservation in patients with potentially resectable laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Systemic chemotherapy delivered concurrently with RT is used as a standard treatment for locally advanced HNC.

[Main results of studies on primary therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : highlights of the ASCO Meeting 2014]

The two available options for primary radiochemotherapy (RCT) of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are discussed in the current study: concomitant and sequential RCT. At the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2014, results of current trials on the primary nonsurgical therapy of locally advanced head and neck tumors were presented. A selection of the most important trials will be summarized in this article. Studies including cisplatin-based RCT as standard therapy for locally advanced head and neck tumors, alternatives for cisplatin, combination with targeted therapy, application of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab and the comparison of concomitant and sequential RCT are discussed. The first completely recruited phase III trial comparing concomitant and sequential RCT will also be presented.

Efficacy and feasibility of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma classified as clinical nodal stage N2c, N3, or N2b with supraclavicular lymph node metastases

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with a high risk of distant metastases compared with CRT alone.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 29 HNSCC patients with clinical nodal stage N2c, N3, or N2b disease and supraclavicular lymph node metastases receiving CRT alone (CRT group; n = 16) or TPF induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (TPF group; n = 13) between April 2008 and May 2012.

RESULTS

The median follow-up periods were 14.5 (range 5.0-65.0) and 25.0 (range 14.0-32.0) months for CRT and TPF groups, respectively. A greater proportion of patient characteristics in the CRT group had advanced T and N stages. The overall response rate to induction TPF was 50.0%; grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anorexia, and hyponatremia. Complete response rates after CRT completion were 55.5% in the TPF and 42.9% in the CRT group; median overall survival was not reached in the TPF group and was 14.0 months in the CRT group (p = 0.037). Multivariate analysis revealed that induction TPF and T stage were independent prognostic factors [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.196; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.043-0.898; p = 0.036, HR = 9.966; 95% CI 2.270-43.75; p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

TPF followed by CRT is tolerated and may be an option for the treatment of locally advanced stage N2c, N3, or N2b HNSCC.

The nodal response to chemoselection predicts the risk of recurrence following definitive chemoradiotherapy for pharyngeal cancer

CONCLUSIONS

The poor response of neck tumors to induction chemotherapy (ICT) as chemoselection is related to a significantly worse prognosis, including higher risks of local recurrence and/or distant metastasis, after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

OBJECTIVES

Neck dissection is frequently performed to treat residual lymph nodes after CRT for the purpose of locoregional control; however, the prognosis of patients with pathologically proven residual neck tumors is poor, and no methods for predicting unfavorable results before CRT have been established. Therefore, in the present study, we focused on the response of lymph nodes to ICT and its relationship with the prognosis among patients treated with chemoselection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a total of 27 oropharyngeal and 24 hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma stage III/IV consecutive patients with cervical lymph node metastasis who exhibited a response of >50% in the primary tumor to ICT followed by concurrent definitive CRT.

RESULTS

The relapse-free survival of the patients who responded (partial response/complete response, PR/CR) to ICT was significantly superior to that of the patients who did not respond (stable disease, SD) to ICT (p = 0.008).

[Squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx and larynx: evidence-based care]

Squamous cell carcinomas of larynx and hypopharynx can be treated by surgery and/or radiotherapy according to tumor size. For small tumors, the results are similar. For locally advanced tumors, the surgical approach is mutilating and requires a total (pharyngo)laryngectomy. Exclusive chemoradiotherapy has shown its interest at the cost of late sequelae. In order to reduce these effects and mutilation, induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, docetaxel and 5FU for organ preservation becomes the standard treatment but there are no solid studies comparing this approach with the exclusive chemoradiotherapy. And it is not possible to conclude as to the superiority of a scheme in terms of overall survival. When chemotherapy is chosen, the modalities of any potentiation of radiation have not been yet established.

Advances in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. The main risk factors for cancers of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx are alcohol and tobacco use. In addition, the human papillomavirus (HPV) is an established cause of oropharyngeal cancer. An experienced multidisciplinary team is necessary for adequate management and optimal outcome. The treatment of locally advanced disease generally requires various combinations of radiotherapy, surgery, and systemic therapy, but despite this aggressive multimodal treatment, 40% to 60% of the patients will relapse. In this report, we will discuss recent advances in the management of SCCHN, including new developments in molecular biology, imaging, and treatment.

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treatment: current standards and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the changing landscape and significant developments in the diagnosis and management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

High-risk human papilloma viruses (HPVs) have been recognized as important causative factors for oropharyngeal cancer. The diagnosis is established with type-specific and broad-spectrum in-situ hybridization probes and/or p16 immunohistochemistry assays on fresh frozen paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. HPV-associated tumors have superior response and outcomes compared with HPV-unrelated tumors. Retrospective studies have been able to stratify oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma based on HPV status, tumor stage, nodal stage, and smoking history into risk groups with differing risks of death or distant disease. Selected patients, nonsmokers with less advanced nodal stage, may be overtreated with current treatment paradigms, and deintensification of curative therapy is a current research focus for these patients. Smokers, patients with advanced nodal or tumor stage, and those with HPV-unrelated cancers have a less favorable prognosis and the search for novel targets is particularly important for these patients.

SUMMARY

The present review will highlight the current standards and the future direction of novel therapies in both HPV-associated and HPV-unrelated cancers.