Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila

Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter

Transcriptional repressors play a key role in establishing localized patterns of gene expression in the early Drosophila embryo. Several different modes of repression have been implicated in previous studies, including competition and direct interference with the transcription complex. Here, we present evidence for "quenching," whereby activators and repressors co-occupy neighboring sites in a target promoter, but the repressor blocks the ability of the activator to contact the transcription complex. This study centers on a zinc finger repressor, snail (sna), which represses the expression of neuroectodermal regulatory genes in the presumptive mesoderm. We show that sna can mediate efficient repression when bound 50-100 bp from upstream activator sites. Repression does not depend on proximity of sna-binding sites to the transcription initiation site. sna is not a dedicated repressor but, instead, appears to block disparate activators. We discuss the importance of quenching as a means of permitting separate enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter.

Transcriptional repression directed by the yeast alpha 2 protein in vitro

The alpha 2 protein, a homeodomain protein involved in specifying cell type in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a transcriptional repressor. alpha 2 binds cooperatively with Mcm1, a serum response factor-related protein, to the a-specific gene operator. The alpha 2-Mcm1 complex in turn recruits Ssn6 and Tup1 to the operator, and we believe that these latter two proteins are responsible for the transcriptional repression. Placement of the a-specific gene operator in any of a variety of positions upstream of a test promoter leads to repression of that promoter in vivo. In this respect, the a-specific gene operator resembles a negatively acting enhancer. Here we describe the in vitro reconstitution of this example of negative control from a distance. We observe repression in vitro in the absence of exogenously added activator protein and on templates that lack binding sites for known activator proteins, and we infer that alpha 2-directed repression acts on the general transcription machinery.

Recognition of regulatory regions in genomic sequences

For the functional interpretation of genomic sequences, effective algorithms have to be developed that will recognize regions of specific function and thus will suggest experiments for their verification. As a first step, relevant data have to be collected in an appropriate database from which suitable training sets can be extracted. In this paper, I discuss the requirements for a database that collects information about regulatory DNA sequences and describe the structure and contents of such a database (TRANSFAC). This compiled information will serve as a basis for comprehensive analysis of sites that regulate transcription, e.g., by statistical methods. It will thus facilitate the recognition of regulatory genomic sequence information and the assignment of the corresponding regulators. Moreover, it will provide all relevant data about the regulating proteins which will allow to trace back transcriptional control cascades to their origin.

Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein

We previously demonstrated that the Drosophila Krüppel protein is a transcriptional repressor with separable DNA-binding and transcriptional repression activities. In this study, the minimal amino (N)-terminal repression region of the Krüppel protein was defined by transferring regions of the Krüppel protein to a heterologous DNA-binding protein, the lacI protein. Fusion of a predicted alpha-helical region from amino acids 62 to 92 in the N terminus of the Krüppel protein was sufficient to transfer repression activity. This putative alpha-helix has several hydrophobic surfaces, as well as a glutamine-rich surface. Mutants containing multiple amino acid substitutions of the glutamine residues demonstrated that this putative alpha-helical region is essential for repression activity of a Krüppel protein containing the entire N-terminal and DNA-binding regions. Furthermore, one point mutant with only a single glutamine on this surface altered to lysine abolished the ability of the Krüppel protein to repress, indicating the importance of the amino acid at residue 86 for repression. The N terminus also contained an adjacent activation region localized between amino acids 86 and 117. Finally, in accordance with predictions from primary amino acid sequence similarity, a repression region from the Drosophila even-skipped protein, which was six times more potent than that of the Krüppel protein in the mammalian cells, was characterized. This segment included a hydrophobic stretch of 11 consecutive alanine residues and a proline-rich region.

A model for reading morphogenetic gradients: autocatalysis and competition at the gene level

How are morphogenetic gradients interpreted in terms of embryonic gene transcription patterns within a syncytium such as the Drosophila blastoderm? We propose a hypothetical model based on recent findings in the molecular biology of transcription factors. The model postulates a morphogen which is itself a spatially distributed transcription factor M or which generates a distribution of such a factor. We posit the existence of an additional, zygotically transcribed "vernier" factor V. M and V form all possible dimers: MM, MV, and VV. These are differentially translocated to the nuclei and bind with various affinities to responsive elements in the V promoter, thereby contributing to activation/inactivation of V transcription. We find four generic regimes. In order of complexity, they are as follows: (i) MM activates V; the M gradient gives rise to a sharp transcriptional boundary for V and to a secondary gradient in the concentration of protein V; (ii) MV activates V; a sharp boundary in transcription and distribution of V arises; (iii) MM and MV compete for binding; a stationary stripe of active V transcription is generated; (iv) MM and VV are in competition; a stripe of V transcription moves from one end of the embryo toward the other and may stop and/or dwindle at an intermediate position. Tentative interpretations in terms of Drosophila genes such as bicoid and hunchback are presented.

Gap gene properties of the pair-rule gene runt during Drosophila segmentation

The Drosophila Runt protein is a member of a new family of transcriptional regulators that have important roles in processes extending from pattern formation in insect embryos to leukemogenesis in humans. We used ectopic expression to investigate runt's function in the pathway of Drosophila segmentation. Transient over-expression of runt under the control of a Drosophila heat-shock promoter caused stripe-specific defects in the expression patterns of the pair-rule genes hairy and even-skipped but had a more uniform effect on the secondary pair-rule gene fushi tarazu. Surprisingly, the expression of the gap segmentation genes, which are upstream of runt in the segmentation hierarchy was also altered in hs/runt embryos. A subset of these effects were interpreted as due to an antagonistic effect of runt on transcriptional activation by the maternal morphogen bicoid. In support of this, expression of synthetic reporter gene constructs containing oligomerized binding sites for the Bicoid protein was reduced in hs/runt embryos. Finally, genetic experiments demonstrated that regulation of gap gene expression by runt is a normal component of the regulatory program that generates the segmented body pattern of the Drosophila embryo.

Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein

We previously demonstrated that the Drosophila Krüppel protein is a transcriptional repressor with separable DNA-binding and transcriptional repression activities. In this study, the minimal amino (N)-terminal repression region of the Krüppel protein was defined by transferring regions of the Krüppel protein to a heterologous DNA-binding protein, the lacI protein. Fusion of a predicted alpha-helical region from amino acids 62 to 92 in the N terminus of the Krüppel protein was sufficient to transfer repression activity. This putative alpha-helix has several hydrophobic surfaces, as well as a glutamine-rich surface. Mutants containing multiple amino acid substitutions of the glutamine residues demonstrated that this putative alpha-helical region is essential for repression activity of a Krüppel protein containing the entire N-terminal and DNA-binding regions. Furthermore, one point mutant with only a single glutamine on this surface altered to lysine abolished the ability of the Krüppel protein to repress, indicating the importance of the amino acid at residue 86 for repression. The N terminus also contained an adjacent activation region localized between amino acids 86 and 117. Finally, in accordance with predictions from primary amino acid sequence similarity, a repression region from the Drosophila even-skipped protein, which was six times more potent than that of the Krüppel protein in the mammalian cells, was characterized. This segment included a hydrophobic stretch of 11 consecutive alanine residues and a proline-rich region.

Specific DNA recognition and intersite spacing are critical for action of the bicoid morphogen

We examined DNA site recognition by Bicoid and its importance for pattern formation in developing Drosophila embryos. Using altered DNA specificity Bicoid mutants and appropriate reporter genes, we show that Bicoid distinguishes among related DNA-binding sites in vivo by a specific contact between amino acid 9 of its recognition alpha-helix (lysine 50 of the homeodomain) and bp 7 of the site. This result is consistent with our earlier results using Saccharomyces cerevisiae but differs from that predicted by crystallographic analysis of another homeodomain-DNA interaction. Our results also demonstrate that Bicoid binds directly to those genes whose transcription it regulates and that the amino acid 9 contact is necessary for Bicoid to direct anterior pattern formation. In both Drosophila embryos and yeast cells, Bicoid requires multiple binding sites to activate transcription of target genes. We find that the distance between binding sites is critical for Bicoid activation but that, unexpectedly, this critical distance differs between Drosophila and S. cerevisiae. This result suggests that Bicoid activation in Drosophila might require an ancillary protein(s) not present in S. cerevisiae.

Specific DNA recognition and intersite spacing are critical for action of the bicoid morphogen

We examined DNA site recognition by Bicoid and its importance for pattern formation in developing Drosophila embryos. Using altered DNA specificity Bicoid mutants and appropriate reporter genes, we show that Bicoid distinguishes among related DNA-binding sites in vivo by a specific contact between amino acid 9 of its recognition alpha-helix (lysine 50 of the homeodomain) and bp 7 of the site. This result is consistent with our earlier results using Saccharomyces cerevisiae but differs from that predicted by crystallographic analysis of another homeodomain-DNA interaction. Our results also demonstrate that Bicoid binds directly to those genes whose transcription it regulates and that the amino acid 9 contact is necessary for Bicoid to direct anterior pattern formation. In both Drosophila embryos and yeast cells, Bicoid requires multiple binding sites to activate transcription of target genes. We find that the distance between binding sites is critical for Bicoid activation but that, unexpectedly, this critical distance differs between Drosophila and S. cerevisiae. This result suggests that Bicoid activation in Drosophila might require an ancillary protein(s) not present in S. cerevisiae.

Position-reading and the emergence of sense organ precursors in Drosophila

Genetic analysis of development in Drosophila melanogaster has advanced our understanding of "position reading", where the expression of particular genes informs a cell of its position in the developing animal. The first step in localization of fly sense organs is the local expression of a gene conferring neural competence on epidermal cells. The four genes of the achaete-scute (AS-C) complex play crucial roles in the localization of sense organs. The resolution of local expression of AS-C genes along one dimension is about 10%; accuracy is improved by the balancing local expression of AS-C antagonist genes such as extramacrochaete. Position reading seems to depend primarily on such patterns of gene expression, and not upon the compartmental identity of the cells. No evidence has been found for differing roles of the four AS-C genes in the generation of sense organ progenitor cells or in the specification of neuronal properties of innervating neurons. The formation of each sense organ may be a unique case where the different proneural and neurogenic gene products have varying importance, and fortuitous local effects acting on this complex combination of factors have come to be important. The fly may be evolving from a flexible regular pattern to an inflexible irregular pattern strongly dependent on local factors, turning the fly into a crystallized system. (Written by R. Wayne Davies.).

Stripe-specific regulation of pair-rule genes by hopscotch, a putative Jak family tyrosine kinase in Drosophila

We describe the characterization of the Drosophila gene, hopscotch (hop), which is required maternally for the establishment of the normal array of embryonic segments. In hop embryos, although expression of the gap genes appears normal, there are defects in the expression patterns of the pair-rule genes even-skipped, runt, and fushi tarazu, as well as the segment-polarity genes engrailed and wingless. We demonstrate that the effect of hop on the expression of these genes is stripe-specific. The hop gene encodes a putative nonreceptor tyrosine kinase of the Janus kinase family, based on an internal duplication of the catalytic domain. We present a model in which the Hop tyrosine kinase is involved in the control of pair-rule gene transcription in a stripe-specific manner. Our results provide the first evidence for stripe-specific regulation of pair-rule genes by a tyrosine kinase.

A two-step mode of stripe formation in the Drosophila blastoderm requires interactions among primary pair rule genes

The stripe pattern of pair rule gene expression along the anterior-posterior axis of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo represents the first sign of periodicity during the process of segmentation. Striped gene expression can be mediated by distinct cis-acting elements that give rise to individual stripe expression domains in direct response to maternal and first zygotic factors. Here we show that the expression of stripes can also be generated by a different, two-step mode which involves regulatory interactions among the primary pair rule genes hairy (h) and runt (run). Expression of h stripes 3 and 4 is directed by a common cis-acting element that results in an initial broad band of gene expression covering three stripe equivalents. Subsequently, this expression domain is split by repression in the forthcoming interstripe region, a process mediated by a separate cis-acting element that responds to run activity. This second mode of pair rule stripe formation may have evolutionary implications.

Selective repression of transcriptional activators at a distance by the Drosophila Krüppel protein

The Krüppel (Kr) protein, bound at kilobase distances from the start site of transcription, represses transcription by RNA polymerase II in mammalian cells. Repression is monotonically dependent on the dose of Kr protein and the presence of Kr binding site(s) on the DNA. These data suggest an inhibitory protein-protein interaction between the Kr protein and proximal transcription factors. Repression by Kr depends on the specific activator protein driving transcription. In particular, Kr protein selectively represses transcription mediated by the Sp1 glutamine-rich activation domain, tethered to the promoter by a GAL4 DNA-binding domain, but does not repress transcription stimulated by the acidic GAL4 activator. We believe this represents repression by a quenching interaction between DNA-bound Kr protein and the activation region of Sp1, rather than competition between Sp1 and Kr for a limiting transcriptional component. Selective, context-related repression affords an added layer of combinatorial control of gene expression by sequence-specific transcription factors.

Expression of Drosophila glass protein and evidence for negative regulation of its activity in non-neuronal cells by another DNA-binding protein

The glass gene encodes a DNA-binding zinc-finger protein required for the development of Drosophila photoreceptor cells and which appears to regulate a number of genes specifically expressed in photoreceptors. We have generated monoclonal antibodies to Glass and used them to examine Glass distribution during development. Glass is expressed in all cell types of the developing eye and in all other organs that contain photoreceptor cells in Drosophila, including a small number of cells in the brain. We altered the normal pattern of glass expression by placing the gene under the control of the hsp70 promoter. Our results suggest that nonphotoreceptor cells are restricted in their response to Glass expression. In an effort to discover the mechanism of this restriction, we examined the expression of a number of reporter gene constructs. Our results suggest that nonsensory cells are unable to express certain reporter constructs in response to Glass expression because another DNA-binding factor represses Glass activity in nonsensory cells.

Regulation of runt transcription by Drosophila segmentation genes

The runt gene plays an important role in the genetic hierarchy that generates the segmented body pattern during the early stages of Drosophila embryogenesis. We studied mRNA expression in mutant embryos in order to investigate the regulation of runt transcription during these stages. We used sensitive whole-mount in situ hybridization procedures to identify the earliest, and therefore most likely direct regulatory effects. There are several distinct phases of runt expression in the early embryo. We find that each phase depends on a different set of regulators. The first phase of expression is a broad-field of mRNA accumulation in the central regions of syncytial blastoderm stage embryos. This pattern is due to terminal repression by the anterior and terminal maternal systems. The effect of the terminal system, even at this early stage, is mediated by two zygotic gap genes, tailless and huckebein. A 7 stripe pattern of runt mRNA accumulation emerges during the process of cellularization. The initial formation of this pattern depends on position-specific repression by zygotic gap genes. Examination of the early RNA patterns of the pair-rule genes even-skipped, hairy, and fushi tarazu indicate that they are also regulated in a similar manner. Three pair-rule genes, hairy, even-skipped, and runt itself, also affect runt's 7 stripe pattern. The effects of runt are stripe specific; the effects of hairy are more uniform; and the patterns obtained in even-skipped mutant embryos show a combination of both stripe specific and uniform regulatory effects. A third distinct phase of expression occurs at the onset of gastrulation when runt becomes expressed in 14 stripes. fushi tarazu plays a negative regulatory role in generating this pattern, whereas the pair-rule genes paired and odd-paired are required for activating or maintaining runt expression during these stages.

The regulation and function of the helix-loop-helix gene, asense, in Drosophila neural precursors

asense is a member of the achaete-scute complex (AS-C) of helix-loop-helix genes involved in Drosophila neurogenesis. Unlike the other AS-C members, which are expressed in subsets of the ectodermal areas (proneural clusters) that give rise to neural precursors, asense is one of a number of genes that are specifically expressed in the neural precursors themselves (neural precursor genes). We have identified a mutant asense phenotype that may reflect this later expression pattern. As a step in understanding the determination of neural precursors from the proneural clusters, we have investigated the potential role of the AS-C products as direct transcriptional activators of neural precursor genes by analysing the regulation of asense. Using genomic rescues and asense-lacZ fusion genes, the neural precursor regulatory element has been identified. We show that this element contains binding sites for AS-C/daughterless heterodimers. Delection of these sites reduces the expression from the fusion gene, but significant expression is still achieved, pointing to the existence of other regulators of asense in addition to the AS-C. asense differs from the other AS-C members in its expression pattern, regulation, mutant phenotype and some DNA-binding properities.

Transcriptional regulation and spatial patterning in Drosophila

Pattern formation in Drosophila is initiated by a small set of asymmetrically distributed maternal transcription factors that act as graded morphogens along the anterior-posterior and the dorsal-ventral axes of the embryo. Recent progress in the field provides first insight into the molecular mechanisms by which long-range positional information in the egg causes a series of localized zygotic transcription factors to position the developmental fate along the blastoderm.

Dimerization and the control of transcription by Krüppel

Krüppel (KR), a Drosophila zinc finger-type transcription factor, can both activate and repress gene expression through interaction with a single DNA-binding site. The opposite regulatory effects of KR are concentration-dependent, and they require distinct portions of KR such as the N-terminal region for activation and the C-terminal region for repression. Here we show that KR is able to form homodimers through sequences located within the C terminus. When these sequences were fused to separated functional parts of the yeast transcription factor GAL4, they reconstituted a functional transcriptional activator on dimerization in vivo. Our results suggest that the KR monomer is a transcriptional activator. At higher concentration KR forms a homodimer and becomes a repressor that functions through the same target sequences as the activator.

Functional domains of the Drosophila Engrailed protein

We have studied the transcriptional activity of the Drosophila homeodomain protein Engrailed (En) by using a transient expression assay employing Schneider L2 cells. En was found to very strongly repress promoters activated by a variety of different activator proteins. However, unlike another Drosophila homeodomain-containing repressor, Even-skipped (Eve), En was unable to repress the activity of several basal promoters in the absence of activator expression. These findings indicate that En is a specific repressor of activated transcription, and suggest that En may repress transcription by a different mechanism than Eve, perhaps by interfering with interactions between transcriptional activators and the general transcription machinery. By analyzing the properties of a variety of En mutants, we identified a minimal repression domain composed of 55 residues, which can function when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain. Like repression domains identified in the Drosophila repressors Eve and Krüppel, the En repression domain is rich in alanine residues (26%), but unlike these other domains, is moderately charged (six arginine and three glutamic acid residues). Separate regions of En that may in some circumstances function in transcriptional activation were also identified.

Transcriptional cascades in Drosophila

Genetics and molecular analyses have combined to yield insights into a functional cascade of transcription factors necessary to establish the molecular blueprint of the Drosophila body pattern in response to positional information in the egg. Recent progress in this field raises exciting questions regarding the molecular mechanisms involved, and their conservation in biological pattern-forming processes.

Drosophila hairy pair-rule gene regulates embryonic patterning outside its apparent stripe domains

The hairy (h) segmentation gene of Drosophila regulates segmental patterning of the early embryo, and is expressed in a set of anteroposterior stripes during the blastoderm stage. We have used a set of h gene deletions to study the h promoter and the developmental requirements for individual h stripes. The results confirm upstream regulation of h striping but indicate that expression in the anterodorsal head domain depends on sequences downstream of the two transcription initiation sites. Surprisingly, the two anterior-most h domains appear to be dispensable for head development and embryonic viability. One partial promoter deletion expresses ectopic h, leading to misexpression of other segmentation genes and embryonic pattern defects. We demonstrate that h affects patterning outside its apparent stripe domains, supporting a model in which primary pair-rule genes act as concentration-dependent transcriptional regulators, i.e. as local morphogens.

Is segmentation generic?

When two populations of cells within a tissue mass differ from one another in magnitude or type of intercellular adhesions, a boundary can form within the tissue, across which cells will fail to mix. This phenomenon may occur regardless of the identity of the molecules that mediate cell adhesion. If, in addition, a choice between the two adhesive states is regulated by a molecule the concentration of which is periodic in space, or in time, then alternating bands of non-mixing tissue, or segments, can form. But temporal or spatial periodicities in concentration will tend to arise for any molecule that is positively autoregulatory. It is therefore proposed that segmentation is a 'generic' property of metazoan organisms, and that metamerism would be expected to have emerged numerous times during evolution. A simple model of segmentation, based solely on differential adhesion and periodic regulation of adhesion, can account for segment properties as disparate as those seen in long and short germ band insects, and for diverse experimental results on boundary regeneration in the chick hind brain and the insect cuticle. It is suggested that the complex, multicomponent segment-forming systems found in contemporary organisms (e.g., Drosophila) are the products of evolutionary recruitment of molecular cues such as homeobox gene products, that increase the reliability and stability of metameric patterns originally templated by generic self-organizing properties of tissues.

The interplay between multiple enhancer and silencer elements defines the pattern of decapentaplegic expression

The product of the zygotically active decapentaplegic (dpp) gene appears to function as a morphogen that specifies positional information in the dorsal half of the Drosophila embryo. The dorsal-specific transcription of dpp is the key step in establishing a morphogen gradient. We demonstrate here that multiple regions within the second intron of the gene cooperate with one another to generate the wild-type level and pattern of dpp transcription. These regions contain both generalized enhancer elements as well as ventral-specific repressor elements. Placed within the context of heterologous promoters, the intron retains its ability to direct general activation and ventral repression. The ventral specific repression of dpp transcription is directly mediated by binding sites for the dorsal (dl) morphogen in the repressor elements. In contrast with the zerknüllt (zen) ventral repressor element, which contains a few high-affinity dl-binding sites, dpp contains multiple relatively low-affinity sites that function together to bring about complete ventral repression. Because dpp and zen have nearly coincident early expression domains, these results indicate that the same boundary of repression can be specified by dl-binding sites of different affinity. We discuss the possibility that unknown factors interact with dl protein to determine the domain of dl-mediated repression.

Complex regulation of early paired expression: initial activation by gap genes and pattern modulation by pair-rule genes

The paired gene is one of approximately 30 zygotic segmentation genes responsible for establishing the segmented body plan of Drosophila melanogaster. To gain insight into the mechanism by which the paired gene is expressed in a complex temporal and spatial pattern, we have examined paired protein expression in wild-type and mutant embryos. In wild-type embryos, paired protein is expressed in several phases. Initial expression in broad domains evolves into a pair-rule pattern of eight stripes during cellularization. Subsequently, a segment-polarity-like pattern of fourteen stripes emerges. Later, at mid-embryogenesis, paired is expressed in specific regions of the head and in specific cells of the central nervous system. Analysis of the initial paired expression in the primary pair-rule mutants even-skipped, runt and hairy, and in all gap mutants suggests that the products of the gap genes hunchback, Kruppel, knirps and giant activate paired expression in stripes. With the exception of stripe 1, which is activated by even-skipped, and stripe 8, which depends upon runt, the primary pair-rule proteins are required for subsequent modulation rather than activation of the paired stripes. The factors activating paired expression in the pair-rule mode appear to interact with those activating it along the dorsoventral axis.

Conservation of regulatory elements controlling hairy pair-rule stripe formation

The hairy (h) gene is one of two pair-rule loci whose striped expression is directly regulated by combinations of gap proteins acting through discrete upstream regulatory fragments, which span several kilobases. We have undertaken a comparative study of the molecular biology of h pair-rule expression in order to identify conserved elements in this complex regulatory system, which should provide important clues concerning the mechanism of stripe formation. A molecular comparison of the h locus in Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster reveals a conserved overall arrangement of the upstream regulatory elements that control individual pair-rule stripes. We demonstrate that upstream fragments from D. virilis will direct the proper expression of stripes in D. melanogaster, indicating that these are true functional homologs of the stripe-producing D. melanogaster regulatory elements, and that the network of trans-acting proteins that act upon these regulatory elements is highly conserved. We also demonstrate that the spatial relationships between specific h stripes and selected gap proteins are highly conserved. We find several tracts of extensive nucleotide sequence conservation within homologous stripe-specific regulatory fragments, which have facilitated the identification of functional subelements within the D. melanogaster regulatory fragment for h stripe 5. Some of the conserved nucleotide tracts within this regulatory fragment contain consensus binding sites for potential trans-regulatory (gap and other) proteins, while many appear devoid of known binding sites. This comparative approach, coupled with the analysis of reporter gene expression in gap mutant embryos suggests that the Kr and gt proteins establish the anterior and posterior borders of h stripe 5, respectively, through spatial repression. Other, as yet unidentified, proteins are certain to play a role in stripe activation, presumably acting through other conserved sequence tracts.

Control of tailless expression by bicoid, dorsal and synergistically interacting terminal system regulatory elements

Three different maternal morphogen gradients regulate expression of the gap gene tailless (tll), which is required to establish the acron and telson of the Drosophila embryo. To identify elements in the tll promoter that respond to these different maternal systems, we have generated promoter-lacZ fusions and transformed them into the germline. Expression of these constructs in both wild type and mutant embryos revealed the presence of at least two separate but synergistically interacting regions that mediate tll expression by the terminal system. This functional synergism between regulatory elements may play a role in the translation of the torso (tor) morphogen gradient into the sharp boundary of tll gene activity. In addition to regions mediating activation by the terminal system, regions mediating both activation and repression by bicoid (bcd), and repression by dorsal (dl) were identified. Binding sites of bcd protein in a 0.5 kb region, revealed by DNaseI footprinting, could be crucial for the bcd-dependent activation of tll expression in the anterior stripe.

Formation of the Drosophila larval photoreceptor organ and its neuronal differentiation require continuous Krüppel gene activity

The Drosophila segmentation gene Krüppel (Kr) is redeployed to play a critical role for the establishment of the larval visual system. Using reporter gene expression conducted by a specific Kr cis-acting element, we were able to trace back the origin of the larval photoreceptor organ, the Bolwig organ, to a single progenitor neuron and to examine Kr function in Bolwig organ development when Kr+ activity is absent from embryos due to specific mutations or reduced by neuron-specific and temporally restricted Kr antisense RNA expression. Our results show that Kr is required for neurons to differentiate into Bolwig organs, for fasciculation of the Bolwig nerve, and for this nerve to follow a specific pathway toward the synaptic targets in the larval brain. The transcription factor encoded by Kr is likely to regulate surface molecules necessary for neuronal cell adhesion and recognition in the developing larval visual system.

The Drosophila segmentation gene runt has an extended cis-regulatory region that is required for vital expression at other stages of development

The Drosophila runt gene functions in several developmental pathways during embryogenesis. This gene was initially characterized due to the pivotal role that it plays in the genetic regulatory network that establishes the segmented body pattern. Recently it was found that this X-chromosome-linked gene is one of several dosage-sensitive, X-linked components that is involved in activating the Sex-lethal gene in blastoderm stage female embryos. Finally, this gene is also extensively re-expressed in later stages of embryogenesis in the developing nervous system where it plays an important role in the development of specific neural lineages. We have initiated an analysis of the runt cis-regulatory region in order to investigate runt's roles in these (and other) developmental pathways. Analysis of both the function and the expression patterns of runt genes with truncated cis-regulatory regions indicates that there are multiple elements that make quantitative contributions to runt regulation during segmentation. We find that sequences that are more than 8.5 kb upstream of the runt promoter are necessary for normal expression during the post-blastoderm stages of embryogenesis. Genetic experiments indicate that the post-blastoderm expression of runt is vital to the organism.

deadpan, an essential pan-neural gene in Drosophila, encodes a helix-loop-helix protein similar to the hairy gene product

Neural precursor cells in Drosophila acquire their identity early during their formation. In an attempt to determine whether all neural precursors share a set of genetic machinery, perhaps to control properties of differentiation common to all neurons, we used the enhancer-trap method to identify several genes (pan-neural genes) that are expressed in all neurons and/or their precursors. One of the pan-neural genes is deadpan, which encodes a helix-loop-helix protein closely related to the product of the segmentation gene hairy. The function of deadpan is essential for viability and is likely to be involved in the functional rather than the morphological differentiation of neurons.

The dorsal gradient morphogen regulates stripes of rhomboid expression in the presumptive neuroectoderm of the Drosophila embryo

rhomboid (rho) encodes a putative transmembrane receptor that is required for the differentiation of the ventral epidermis. It is initially expressed before the completion of cellularization in lateral stripes within the presumptive neuroectoderm. Here, we present evidence that the maternal morphogen dorsal (dl) acts in concert with basic helix-loop-helix (b-HLH) proteins, possibly including twist (twi), to activate rho in both lateral and ventral regions. Expression is blocked in ventral regions (the presumptive mesoderm) by snail (sna), which is also a direct target of the dl morphogen. A 300-bp region of the rho promoter (the NEE), which is sufficient for neuroectoderm expression, contains a cluster of dl and b-HLH activator sites that are closely linked to sna repressor sites. Mutations in these binding sites cause genetically predicted changes in the levels and limits of rho expression. In particular, the disruption of sna-binding sites causes a derepression of the pattern throughout ventral regions, providing evidence that sna is directly responsible for establishing the mesoderm/neuroectoderm boundary before gastrulation. The tight linkage of activator and repressor sites in the rho NEE is similar to the arrangement of binding sites observed in the even-skipped stripe 2 element, which is regulated by bicoid (bcd). This suggests that the dl and bcd morphogens use a similar mechanism to make stripes in the Drosophila embryo.

Control of Drosophila body pattern by the hunchback morphogen gradient

Most of the thoracic and abdominal segments of Drosophila are specified early in embryogenesis by the overlapping activities of the hunchback (hb), Krüppel, knirps, and giant gap genes. The orderly expression of these genes depends on two maternal determinants: bicoid, which activates hb transcription anteriorly, and nanos, which blocks translation of hb transcripts posteriorly. Here we provide evidence that the resulting gradient of hb protein dictates where the Krüppel, knirps, and giant genes are expressed by providing a series of concentration thresholds that regulate each gene independently. Thus, hb protein functions as a classical morphogen, triggering several distinct responses as a function of its graded distribution.

Competition for overlapping sites in the regulatory region of the Drosophila gene Kruppel

A 730-base pair element regulates expression of the Drosophila gap gene Krüppel (Kr) in response to the fly anterior morphogen bicoid (bcd). Two hormone receptor-like proteins, encoded by the genes knirps (kni) and tailless (tll), bind specifically to the element. In vitro, kni protein competes with the homeodomain-containing bcd protein in binding to a 16-base pair target sequence. In vivo experiments suggest that both kni and tll act as competitive repressors of bcd-mediated activation of Kr. These results suggest a mechanism by which developmental genes can be regulated in response to an activating morphogen gradient antagonized by repressors.

A conserved regulatory unit implicated in tissue-specific gene expression in Drosophila and man

The Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene is expressed in a specific set of tissues during larval development and in adults. Expression in the adult fat body is controlled by the Adh adult enhancer (AAE). Previous studies identified a negative regulatory element in the AAE and a protein that binds specifically to this sequence [adult enhancer factor-1 (AEF-1)]. Here, we show that the AEF-1-binding site in the AAE and in two other Drosophila fat body enhancers overlaps a sequence recognized by the mammalian transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP). Remarkably, these two proteins also bind specifically to overlapping sites in a liver-specific regulatory element of the human Adh gene. Cotransfection experiments in mammalian cells reveal that C/EBP stimulates the activity of the AAE by 50-fold, and this activity can be suppressed by AEF-1. In addition, AEF-1 prevents C/EBP binding in vitro, and displaces prebound C/EBP. Thus, a tissue-specific regulatory unit consisting of one positive and one negative regulatory element has been conserved between Drosophila and man.

Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo

Gene expression stripes in Drosophila melanogaster embryos provide a model for how eukaryotic promoters are turned on and off in response to combinations of transcriptional regulators. Genetic studies suggested that even-skipped (eve) stripe 2 is controlled by three gap genes, hunchback (hb), Kruppel (Kr), and giant (gt), and by the maternal morphogen bicoid (bcd). A direct link is established between binding sites for these regulatory proteins in the stripe 2 promoter element and the expression of the stripe during early embryogenesis. The bcd and hb protein binding sites mediate activation, whereas neighboring gt and Kr protein sites repress expression and establish the stripe borders. The stripe 2 element has the properties of a genetic on-off switch.

The initiation of pair-rule stripes in the Drosophila blastoderm

The interactions between the products of gap genes and pair-rule promoters results in the single most dramatic increase in the spatial complexity of gene expression during the segmentation process. We attempt to relate recent findings on the regulation of striped patterns of gene expression in the early Drosophila embryo to general strategies of gene expression and development employed by higher organisms.