A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study)

Experience with belatacept rescue therapy in kidney transplant recipients

In kidney transplant recipients with chronic graft dysfunction, long-term immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) or mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) can be challenging due to adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity and proteinuria. Seventy-nine kidney transplant recipients treated with CNI-based or mTORi-based maintenance immunosuppression who had CNI-induced nephrotoxicity or severe adverse events were switched to belatacept. Mean time from transplantation to belatacept conversion was 69.0 months. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ± standard deviation at baseline was 26.1 ± 15.0 ml/min/1.73 m² , increasing to 34.0 ± 15.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months postconversion (P < 0.0005). Renal function improvements were also seen in patients with low eGFR (<25 ml/min/1.73 m² ) or high proteinuria (>500 mg/l) at conversion. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for patient and graft survival at 12 months were 95.0% and 85.6%, respectively. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 7.9%. One case of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred at 17 months postconversion. For comparison, a historical control group of 41 patients converted to mTORi-based immunosuppression because of biopsy-confirmed CNI-induced toxicity was examined; eGFR increased from 27.6 ± 7.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at baseline to 31.1 ± 11.9 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months (P = 0.018). Belatacept-based immunosuppression may be an alternative regimen for kidney transplant recipients with CNI- or mTORi-induced toxicity.

Prediction, prevention, and management of delayed graft function: where are we now?

Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a major barrier to improved outcomes after kidney transplantation. High-risk transplant recipients can be identified, but no definitive prediction model exists. Novel biomarkers to predict DGF in the first hours post-transplant, such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), are under investigation. Donor management to minimize the profound physiological consequences of brain death is highly complex. A hormonal resuscitation package to manage the catecholamine "storm" that follows brain death is recommended. Donor pretreatment with dopamine prior to procurement lowers the rate of DGF. Hypothermic machine perfusion may offer a significant reduction in the rate of DGF vs simple cold storage, but costs need to be evaluated. Surgically, reducing warm ischemia time may be advantageous. Research into recipient preconditioning options has so far not generated clinically helpful interventions. Diagnostic criteria for DGF vary, but requirement for dialysis and/or persistent high serum creatinine is likely to remain key to diagnosis until current work on early biomarkers has progressed further. Management centers on close monitoring of graft (non)function and physiological parameters. With so many unanswered questions, substantial reductions in the toll of DGF in the near future seem unlikely but concentrated research on many levels offers long-term promise.

De Novo Belatacept in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Kidney Transplant Recipient

Benefits of belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimens in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive renal transplant recipients include avoidance of drug interactions between calcineurin inhibitors and highly active antiretroviral agents and decreased likelihood or severity of nonimmune toxicities such as new-onset diabetes after transplant, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. We report a successful case of de novo belatacept at >18 mo from transplant in an HIV-positive black man aged 50 years who received his first transplant from a living related kidney donor. To our knowledge, this case is the first reported of belatacept use in an HIV-positive renal transplant recipient.

Costimulatory Blockade and Use of mTOR Inhibitors: Avoiding Injury Part 2

Kidney transplantation immunosuppression relies on a calcineurin inhibitor backbone. Calcineurin inhibitors have reduced early-acute rejection rates but failed to improve long-term allograft survival. Their nephrotoxicity has shifted the focus of investigation to calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens. Costimulation blockade with belatacept, a second generation, higher avidity variant of CTLA4-Ig, has emerged as part of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen. Belatacept has demonstrated superior glomerular filtration rate compared with calcineurin inhibitors albeit with an increased risk of early and histologically severe rejection. Focus on optimizing the belatacept regimen to reduce the acute rejection rate while maintaining superior renal function is underway. Belatacept has also been utilized as part of a calcineurin inhibitor-free conversion strategy in stable renal transplant recipients and has demonstrated superior improvement in glomerular filtration rate with conversion vs calcineurin inhibitor continuation. Additional work is underway to better define the role of belatacept in patients on calcineurin inhibitors with allograft dysfunction not due to rejection.

Effect of an Early Switch to Belatacept Among Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Graft Recipients of Kidneys From Extended-Criteria Donors

Transplant recipients receiving a kidney from an extended-criteria donor (ECD) are exposed to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, as demonstrated by severe delayed graft function and/or a low GFR. Belatacept is a nonnephrotoxic drug that is indicated as an alternative to CNIs. We reported 25 cases of conversion from a CNI to belatacept due to CNI intolerance within the first 6 mo after transplantation. The mean age of the recipients was 59 years, and 24 of 25 patients received ECD kidneys. At the date of the medication switch, 12 of 25 patients displayed a calculated GFR (cGFR) <15 mL/min, six patients remained on dialysis, and the biopsies showed evidence of acute tubular damage associated with severe vascular or tubulointerstitial chronic lesions. Three patients did not recover renal function, and three patients died during the follow-up period. Among the remaining patients, renal function improved: The cGFR was 18.28 ± 12.3 mL/min before the medication switch compared with 34.9 ± 14.5 mL/min at 1 year after conversion to belatacept (p = 0.002). Tolerance of and compliance with belatacept were good, and only one patient experienced acute rejection. Belatacept is an effective therapy that preserves renal function in kidney transplant patients who are intolerant of CNIs.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization, Conversion, Withdrawal, and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite their clinical efficacy, concerns about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity make alternative regimens that reduce CNI exposure attractive for renal transplant recipients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed four CNI immunosuppression strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) designed to reduce CNI exposure and assessed the impact of each on patient and allograft survival, acute rejection and renal function. We evaluated 92 comparisons from 88 randomized controlled trials and found moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting that minimization strategies result in better clinical outcomes compared with standard-dose regimens; moderate-strength evidence indicating that conversion to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or belatacept was associated with improved renal function but increased rejection risk; and moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting planned CNI withdrawal could result in improved renal function despite an association with increased rejection risk. The evidence base for avoidance studies was insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions. The applicability of the review is limited by the large number of studies examining cyclosporine-based strategies and low-risk populations. Additional research is needed with tacrolimus-based regimens and higher risk populations. Moreover, research is necessary to clarify the effect of induction and adjunctive agents in alternative immunosuppression strategies and should include more comprehensive and consistent reporting of patient-centered outcomes.

A safety evaluation of belatacept for the treatment of kidney transplant

INTRODUCTION

Improving long-term survival in kidney transplantation is one of the main goals in modern immunosuppressive research. Current standard immunosuppression based in a combination of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and antiproliferatives, with or without steroids, has improved short-term graft survival. In the last decade, belatacept has been evaluated as a CNI free option regimen addressing better kidney transplant outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviewed the indications, mechanisms of action, pharmacology and published trials using belatacept in different clinical situations. The main objective was to evaluate the safety of this immunosuppressive drug.

EXPERT OPINION

Kidney transplant patients receiving belatacept demonstrated improvement in renal function, less chronic allograft nephropathy, a more favorable metabolic profile and lower donor-specific antibody formation compared with cyclosporine. Based on the published data and on our personal experience, we have good expectations on belatacept use in the future. If these characteristics will translate in sustained better renal function, less chronic kidney disease-related complications and lower cardiovascular risk, improving patient and graft survival and quality of life, is still to be assessed with longer term follow-up and a larger number of exposed patients.

Indirect treatment comparison of belatacept versus tacrolimus from a systematic review of immunosuppressive therapies for kidney transplant patients

OBJECTIVE

End-stage renal disease is the final and irreversible stage in chronic kidney disease, leading to patient mortality, unless managed by dialysis or transplantation (the treatment of choice). This study aimed to compare a currently recommended immunosuppressive treatment, tacrolimus, against a newer treatment, belatacept, using indirect treatment comparison (ITC) techniques since no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tacrolimus against belatacept currently exist.

METHODS

ITC was employed to calculate estimates for the relative risks and mean difference of tacrolimus against belatacept. The choice of the Bucher ITC model was driven by the available data and the simple indirect treatment comparison involving three treatments was considered appropriate.

RESULTS

The results of the indirect analysis showed no significant differences between belatacept and tacrolimus treatments for mortality and graft loss. The acute rejection rate was significantly lower with tacrolimus (Prograf* and Advagraf (*) ) compared with belatacept (0.22 [0.13, 0.39] to 0.44 [0.20, 0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that tacrolimus is significantly superior to belatacept in terms of acute rejection outcomes but comparable for graft and patient survival. Further research should include a properly designed clinical trial comparing tacrolimus against belatacept directly.

LIMITATIONS

These include variations in terms of clinical and design differences among the trials, weaknesses in the Bucher method and the lack of long-term clinical trial data with tacrolimus to compare with the recent long-term (7 years) belatacept trial data.

Belatacept for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney transplant patients: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy

BACKGROUND

Belatacept is a novel immunosuppressive therapy designed to improve clinical outcomes associated with kidney transplant recipients while minimizing use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs).

METHODS

We searched for clinical trials related to administration of belatacept to kidney transplant patients compared to various immunosuppression regimens, as well as for studies that utilized data from belatacept trials to validate new surrogate measures. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of belatacept's effectiveness and safety in renal transplant recipients to better elucidate its place in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Analysis of the results from the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Effi-cacy as First-Line Immunosuppressive Trial (BENEFIT) study, a de novo trial that compared cyclosporine (CsA)-based therapy to belatacept-based therapy in standard criteria donors, found a significant difference in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 13-15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 23-27 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year and 7 years, respectively. The BENEFIT-EXT study was similarly designed with the exception that it included extended criteria donors. Renal function improved significantly for the more intensive belatacept group in all years of the BENEFIT-EXT study; however, it was not significant in the less intensive group until 5 years after transplant. Belatacept regimens resulted in lower blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant compared to CsA-based regimens. Results from conversion of CNIs to belatacept therapy, dual therapy of belatacept with sirolimus, and belatacept with corticosteroid avoidance therapy are also included in this article.

CONCLUSION

The evidence reviewed in this article suggests that belatacept is an effective alternative in kidney transplant recipients. Compared to CNI-based therapy, belatacept-based therapy results in superior renal function and similar rates of allograft survival. In terms of safety, belatacept was shown to have lower incidence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes; however, incidence of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder and the cost of belatacept may hinder use of this medication.

Anti-Leukocyte Function-Associated Antigen 1 Therapy in a Nonhuman Primate Renal Transplant Model of Costimulation Blockade-Resistant Rejection

Costimulation blockade with the fusion protein belatacept provides a desirable side effect profile and improvement in renal function compared with calcineurin inhibition in renal transplantation. This comes at the cost of increased rates of early acute rejection. Blockade of the integrin molecule leukocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) has been shown to be an effective adjuvant to costimulation blockade in a rigorous nonhuman primate (NHP) model of islet transplantation; therefore, we sought to test this combination in an NHP renal transplant model. Rhesus macaques received belatacept maintenance therapy with or without the addition of LFA-1 blockade, which was achieved using a murine-derived LFA-1-specific antibody TS1/22. Additional experiments were performed using chimeric rhesus IgG1 (TS1/22R1) or IgG4 (TS1/22R4) variants, each engineered to limit antibody clearance. Despite evidence of proper binding to the target molecule and impaired cellular egress from the intravascular space indicative of a therapeutic effect similar to prior islet studies, LFA-1 blockade failed to significantly prolong graft survival. Furthermore, evidence of impaired protective immunity against cytomegalovirus was observed. These data highlight the difficulties in translating treatment regimens between organ models and suggest that the primarily vascularized renal model is more robust with regard to belatacept-resistant rejection than the islet model.

CTLA4Fcε, a novel soluble fusion protein that binds B7 molecules and the IgE receptors, and reduces human in vitro soluble CD23 production and lymphocyte proliferation

Immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy and certain autoimmune diseases are characterized by the presence of a T helper type 2 (Th2) immune response and allergen-specific or self-reactive IgE. Soluble CD23 (sCD23) is a B-cell factor that fosters IgE class-switching and synthesis, suggesting that sCD23 may be a therapeutic target for these pathologies. We produced a recombinant protein, CTLA4Fcε, by fusing the ectodomain of the immunoregulatory molecule cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) with a fragment of the IgE H-chain constant region. In SDS-PAGE/inmunoblot analyses, CTLA4Fcε appeared as a 70,000 MW polypeptide that forms homodimers. Flow cytometry showed that CTLA4Fcε binds to IgE receptors FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23, as well as to CTLA-4 counter-receptors CD80 and CD86. Binding of CTLA4Fcε to FcεRII/CD23 appeared stronger than that of IgE. Since the cells used to study CD23 binding express CD80 and CD86, simultaneous binding of CTLA4Fcε to CD23 and CD80/CD86 seems to occur and would explain this difference. As measured by a human CD23-specific ELISA, CTLA4Fcε - but not IgE - induced a concentration-dependent reduction of sCD23 in culture supernatants of RPMI-8866 cells. Our results suggest that the simultaneous binding of CTLA4Fcɛ to CD23-CD80/CD86 may cause the formation of multi-molecular complexes that are either internalized or pose a steric hindrance to enzymatic proteolysis, so blocking sCD23 generation. CTLA4Fcε caused a concentration-dependent reduction of lymphocyte proliferation in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples stimulated in vitro with concanavalin A. The ability to bind IgE receptors on effector cells, to regulate the production of sCD23 and to inhibit lymphocyte proliferation suggests that CTLA4Fcɛ has immunomodulatory properties on human Th2 responses.

The Influence of Immunosuppressive Agents on the Risk of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibody Production in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Production of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) is a major risk factor for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss after all solid organ transplantation. In this article, we review the data available on the risk of individual immunosuppressive agents and their ability to prevent dnDSA production. Induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin may achieve a short-term decrease in dnDSA production in moderately sensitized patients. Rituximab induction may be beneficial in sensitized patients, and in abrogating rebound antibody response in patients undergoing desensitization or treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. Use of bortezomib for induction therapy in at-risk patients is of interest, but the benefits are unproven. In maintenance regimens, nonadherent and previously sensitized patients are not suitable for aggressive weaning protocols, particularly early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal without lymphocyte-depleting induction. Early conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor monotherapy has been reported to increase the risk of dnDSA formation, but a combination of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor does not appear to alter the risk. Early steroid therapy withdrawal in standard-risk patients after induction has no known dnDSA penalty. The available data do not demonstrate a consistent effect of mycophenolic acid on dnDSA production. Risk minimization for dnDSA requires monitoring of adherence, appropriate risk stratification, risk-based immunosuppression intensity, and prospective DSA surveillance.

Immunological risk assessment: The key to individualized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation

The wide range of immunosuppressive therapies and protocols permits tailored planning of the initial regimen according to the immunological risk status of individual patients. Pre-transplant risk assessment can include many factors, but there is no clear consensus on which parameters to take into account, and their relative importance. In general younger patients are known to be at higher risk for acute rejection, compounded by higher rates of non-adherence in adolescents. Donor age and recipient gender do not appear to exert a meaningful effect on risk of rejection per se, but black recipient ethnicity remains a well-established risk factor even under modern immunosuppression regimens. Little difference in risk is now observed between deceased- and living-donor recipients. Immunological risk assessment has developed substantially in recent years. Cross-match testing with cytotoxic analysis has long been supplemented by flow cytometry, but development of solid-phase single-bead antigen testing of solubilized human leukocyte antigens (HLA) to detect donor-specific antibodies (DSA) permits a far more nuanced stratification of immunological risk status, including the different classes and intensities of HLA antibodies Class I and/or II, including HLA-DSA. Immunologic risk evaluation is now often based on a combination of these tests, but other assessments are becoming more widely introduced, such as measurement of non-HLA antibodies against angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors or T-cell ELISPOT assay of alloantigen-specific donor. Targeted densensitization protocols can improve immunological risk, notably for DSA-positive patients with negative cytotoxicity and flow cross-match. HLA mismatch remains an important and undisputed risk factor for rejection. Delayed graft function also increases the risk of subsequent acute rejection, and the early regimen can be modified in such cases. Overall, there is a shift towards planning the immunosuppressive regimen based on pre-transplant immunology testing although certain conventional risk factors retain their importance.

Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: Which is the optimal immunosuppression?

The growing gap between demand and supply for kidney transplants has led to renewed interest in the use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys in an effort to increase the donor pool. Although most studies of ECD kidney transplantation confirm lower allograft survival rates and, generally, worse outcomes than standard criteria donor kidneys, recipients of ECD kidneys generally have improved survival compared with wait-listed dialysis patients, thus encouraging the pursuit of this type of kidney transplantation. The relative benefits of transplantation using kidneys from ECDs are dependent on patient characteristics and the waiting time on dialysis. Because of the increased risk of poor graft function, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-induced nephrotoxicity, increased incidence of infections, cardiovascular risk, and malignancies, elderly recipients of an ECD kidney transplant are a special population that requires a tailored immunosuppressive regimen. Recipients of ECD kidneys often are excluded from transplant trials and, therefore, the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for them is not known. Approaches are largely center specific and based upon expert opinion. Some data suggest that antithymocyte globulin might be the preferred induction agent for elderly recipients of ECD kidneys. Maintenance regimens that spare CNIs have been advocated, especially for older recipients of ECD kidneys. CNI-free regimens are not universally accepted due to occasionally high rejection rates. However, reduced CNI exposure and CNI-free regimens based on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have shown acceptable outcomes in appropriately selected ECD transplant recipients.

Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In previous analyses of BENEFIT, a phase 3 study, belatacept-based immunosuppression, as compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, was associated with similar patient and graft survival and significantly improved renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Here we present the final results from this study.

METHODS

We randomly assigned kidney-transplant recipients to a more-intensive belatacept regimen, a less-intensive belatacept regimen, or a cyclosporine regimen. Efficacy and safety outcomes for all patients who underwent randomization and transplantation were analyzed at year 7 (month 84).

RESULTS

A total of 666 participants were randomly assigned to a study group and underwent transplantation. Of the 660 patients who were treated, 153 of the 219 patients treated with the more-intensive belatacept regimen, 163 of the 226 treated with the less-intensive belatacept regimen, and 131 of the 215 treated with the cyclosporine regimen were followed for the full 84-month period; all available data were used in the analysis. A 43% reduction in the risk of death or graft loss was observed for both the more-intensive and the less-intensive belatacept regimens as compared with the cyclosporine regimen (hazard ratio with the more-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.95; P=0.02; hazard ratio with the less-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P=0.02), with equal contributions from the lower rates of death and graft loss. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased over the 7-year period with both belatacept regimens but declined with the cyclosporine regimen. The cumulative frequencies of serious adverse events at month 84 were similar across treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven years after transplantation, patient and graft survival and the mean eGFR were significantly higher with belatacept (both the more-intensive regimen and the less-intensive regimen) than with cyclosporine. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256750.).

Belatacept prophylaxis against organ rejection in adult kidney-transplant recipients

End-stage renal disease is a major health problem worldwide, with kidney transplantation being the treatment of choice. Calcineurin inhibitors are still the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy. However, they have well-known nephrotoxic affects and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer. In contrast, belatacept is a biological immunosuppressive agent that inhibits the T-cell co-stimulation. It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency for use in adult kidney-transplant recipients to prevent acute rejection. Developmental studies show that belatacept is as efficient as calcineurin inhibitors at preventing acute rejection. In addition, kidney function is better and cardiovascular risk factors are reduced in patients given belatacept. Herein, the authors review the published evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of belatacept and discuss its potential specific indications.

Tacrolimus-Induced Cardiomyopathy in an Adult Renal Transplant Recipient

Tacrolimus-induced cardiomyopathy (TICM) is a rare but serious adverse effect of tacrolimus, which has been described primarily in pediatric non-renal transplant recipients. We describe a case of TICM in an adult renal transplant recipient that resulted in allograft dysfunction and multiple hospital admissions for heart failure exacerbation. Prompt and complete reversal of TICM occurred after tacrolimus discontinuation. Although tacrolimus-induced cardiomyopathy is reversible, availability of alternative immunosuppressants is limited, particularly in the setting of renal dysfunction. Available studies and patient-specific factors must be considered when determining an alternative maintenance immunosuppression regimen. We chose to use belatacept as alternative immunosuppression in this patient with TICM. Over the next 3 years, the patient remained free of hospital admissions and acute rejection, and demonstrated superior renal allograft function than was observed before her first heart failure admission. We believe that belatacept is an acceptable alternative to tacrolimus therapy for resolution of TICM.

Post-transplantation malignancies: here today, gone tomorrow?

From the early days of transplantation onwards, increased cancer development in transplant recipients, who require immunosuppression to avoid graft rejection, has been recognized. Registry data indicate that approximately 10-30% of deaths are attributed to post-transplant malignancy, with an upward trend in this incidence as more patients have been exposed to chronic lifelong immunosuppression. In this Review, the overall incidence and most frequent types of cancer encountered are summarized, along with information about which transplant recipients are at the greatest risk of malignancy. Reasons for why differences exist in susceptibility to cancer in this patient population are examined, and approaches that might improve our understanding of the options available for reducing the incidence of this adverse effect of immunosuppression are described. Whether anti-rejection drugs have been successful in diminishing overall immunosuppressive burden, and consequently show any promise for decreasing post-transplant malignancies is also discussed. The topic shifts to one class of conventional anti-rejection drugs, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, which paradoxically have both immunosuppressive and anti-neoplastic properties. The complex activities of mTOR are reviewed in order to provide context for how these seemingly opposing effects are possible, and the latest clinical data on use of mTOR inhibitors in the clinic are discussed. The current and future perspectives on how best to normalize these unacceptably high rates of post-transplantation malignancies are highlighted.

Understanding alterations in drug handling with aging: a focus on the pharmacokinetics of maintenance immunosuppressants in the elderly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review presents current knowledge of the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of maintenance immunosuppressants.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decade, there has been a steady increase in older patients on organ transplant waiting lists. As a result, the average age of transplant recipients has significantly increased. The survival and quality-of-life benefits of transplantation in the elderly population have been demonstrated. Advancing age is associated with changes in immune responses, as well as changes in drug handling. Immunosenescence is a physiological part of aging and is linked to reduced rejection rates, but also higher rates of diabetes, infections and malignancies. Physiologic changes associated with age can have a significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of the maintenance immunosuppressive agents. Taken together, these age-related changes impact older transplant candidates and may have significant implications for managing immunosuppression in the elderly.

SUMMARY

Despite the lack of formal efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic studies of individual immunosuppressants in the elderly transplant population, there are enough data available for practitioners to be able to adequately manage their older patients. A proficient understanding of the factors that impact the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressants in the elderly is essential to managing these patients successfully.

Safe Conversion From Tacrolimus to Belatacept in High Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients With Allograft Dysfunction

There is no literature on the use of belatacept for sensitized patients or regrafts in kidney transplantation. We present our initial experience in high immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients who were converted from tacrolimus to belatacept for presumed acute calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and/or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. Six (mean age = 40 years) patients were switched from tacrolimus to belatacept at a median of 4 months posttransplant. Renal function improved significantly from a peak mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 23.8 ± 12.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) prior to the switch to an eGFR of 42 ± 12.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.03) at a mean follow-up of 16.5 months postconversion. No new rejection episodes were diagnosed despite a prior history of rejection in 2/6 (33%) patients. Surveillance biopsies performed in 5/6 patients did not show subclinical rejection. No development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) was noted. In this preliminary investigation, we report improved kidney function without a concurrent increase in risk of rejection and DSA in six sensitized patients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept. Improvement in renal function was noted even in patients with chronic allograft fibrosis without evidence of acute CNI toxicity. Further studies with protocol biopsies are needed to ensure safety and wider applicability of this approach.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies in renal transplant: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are several monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies used in renal transplantation today, this article will discuss several agents, their updates and newer agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antithymocyte globulin and interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor blocker continue to be used as induction agents. The risk of acute rejection was higher in IL-2 receptor blockers mainly in the first year, but graft survivals were similar in both groups long term. Belatacept is the only approved intravenous maintenance immunosuppressive therapy which provides the benefit of glomerular filtration rate preservation, but it was associated with a higher risk of acute rejection and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Bortezomib may help decrease donor-specific antibody levels, but there are limited data to support its use for desensitization or rejection. Eculizumab may help in antibody-mediated rejection in some cases but has not shown promising long-term effects in high-risk individuals. Newer agents have been continuously tested for improved efficacy and safety.

SUMMARY

Transplantation is the standard of care for end-stage renal disease patients, but we still have a long way to go, as we need to improve long-term outcomes. The manipulation of the immune system is a delicate undertaking, with risks of adverse events; therefore, risk versus benefit needs to be carefully evaluated and treatment needs to be individualized.

What immunosuppression should be used for old-to-old recipients?

Elderly patients receiving a kidney from old donors (old-to-old) are a growing population of transplant recipients. This population cumulates risks of complications due to the co-morbidities and the immunodeficiency state and the frailty of the recipients together with the kidney senescence of the donors. In this context, the choice of immunosuppression is complicated and must take into account some contradictory principles explaining why no consensus exists today.

Hyperuricemia and gout in solid-organ transplant: update in pharmacological management

Hyperuricemia is a common comorbid condition experienced by up to 28% of kidney transplant recipients. These patients are at elevated risk of acute flare-ups of gout because of transplant-specific risk factors such as impaired renal function, chronic contributing pharmacotherapy (eg, calcineurin inhibitors, diuretics), and associated comorbid conditions. After transplant, treatment is often complicated by drug-drug interactions, renal impairment, and toxic effects of drugs with the use of first-line recommended agents. A number of therapeutic options remain available for transplant recipients, including dose modifications of historic agents and newer pharmacotherapeutic options. Notably, the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines address the management of hyperuricemia and gout, but these guidelines were last published in 2009, and new data and treatment options have emerged since then. The management of hyperuricemia and acute and chronic gout is described, including the use of novel agents including urate oxidases, interleukin 1 inhibitors, and human urate transporter 1 inhibitors and alternative immunosuppressive therapy strategies.

Dysglycemia after renal transplantation: Definition, pathogenesis, outcomes and implications for management

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is major complication following renal transplantation. It commonly develops within 3-6 mo post-transplantation. The development of NODAT is associated with significant increase in risk of major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death. Other dysglycemic states, such as impaired glucose tolerance are also associated with increasing risk of cardiovascular events. The pathogenesis of these dysglycemic states is complex. Older recipient age is a consistent major risk factor and the impact of calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids has been well described. Glucocorticoids likely cause insulin resistance and calcineurin inhibitors likely cause β-cell toxicity. The impact of transplantation in incretin hormones remains to be clarified. The oral glucose tolerance test remains the best diagnostic test but other tests may be validated as screening tests. Possibly, NODAT can be prevented by administering insulin early in patients identified as high risk for NODAT. Once NODAT has been diagnosed altering immunosuppression may be acceptable, but creates the difficulty of balancing immunological with metabolic risk. With regard to hypoglycemic use, metformin may be the best option. Further research is needed to better understand the pathogenesis, identify high risk patients and to improve management options given the significant increased risk of major cardiovascular events and death.

Novel Immune Check-Point Regulators in Tolerance Maintenance

The great success of anti-cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and anti-programed cell death protein 1 (PD1) in cancer treatment has encouraged more effort in harnessing the immune response through immunomodulatory molecules in various diseases. The immunoglobulin (Ig) super family comprises the majority of immunomodulatory molecules. Discovery of novel Ig super family members has brought novel insights into the function of different immune cells in tolerance maintenance. In this review, we discuss the function of newly identified B7 family molecules, B7-H4 and V-domain Ig Suppressor of T cell Activation (VISTA), and the butyrophilin/butyrophilin-like family members. We discuss the current stages of immunomodulatory molecules in clinical trials of organ transplantation. The potential of engaging the novel Ig superfamily members in tolerance maintenance is also discussed. We conclude with the challenges remaining to manipulate these molecules in the immune response.

Does belatacept improve outcomes for kidney transplant recipients? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Belatacept was intended to provide better outcomes for kidney transplant (KT) recipients by allowing minimization/withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adult KT comparing belatacept with CNIs. Methodological quality was assessed. Meta-analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD).

RESULTS

Six RCTs were included. Pooled analyses found no differences for acute rejection at any time point. Renal function [Calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR)] was better with belatacept at 12 and 24 months (MD = 11.7 and 13.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2) ). New onset diabetes after transplantation was lower with belatacept at 12 months (OR = 0.43). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower at 12 months (MD -7.2 and -3.1 mmHg) as were triglycerides at 12 and 24 months (MD = -32.9 and -41.7 mg/dl). Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were lower with belatacept at 24 months (MD = -19.8 and -10.6 mg/dl). There were no differences for other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Limited available data suggest a potential benefit for belatacept by reducing the risk of CNI toxicity, especially renal function, without evidence of increased acute rejection. There were no safety issues apart from a possible risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in Epstein-barr virus-seronegative recipients. Further studies are required to confirm this benefit.

The Cost of Transplant Immunosuppressant Therapy: Is This Sustainable?

A solid organ transplant is life-saving therapy that engenders the use of immunosuppressive medications for the lifetime of the transplanted organ and its recipient. Conventional therapy includes both induction therapy (a biologic that is infused peri-operatively) followed by maintenance therapy. The cost of these medications is a constant concern and the advent of generics has brought this cost down modestly. For those lacking long term insurance coverage, this may be a significant out of pocket expense that is not affordable. Moreover, transplant Centers are managing higher risk transplant recipients that require more complex induction regimens and longer term use of such biologic agents in the context of desensitization or abrogation of de novo antibody mediated injury. While in kidney transplantation, Medicare part B covers three years of medication, there is frequent non-adherence due to cost after that time-point. The impact of the Affordable Care Act remains uncertain at this time. Finally the pipeline of new therapies is limited due to the cost of development of a drug, the inherent cost of clinical studies, and lack of defined endpoints for newer therapies in high risk patients. These new therapies are of high value to the community but will contribute additional burden to current drug costs.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive drugs in elderly kidney transplant recipients

Elderly patients are a fast growing population among transplant recipients over the past decades. Both the innate and adaptive immune reactivity decrease with age, which is believed to contribute to the decreased incidence of acute rejection and increased infectious death rate in elderly transplant recipients. In contrast to recipient age, donor age is associated with a higher incidence of acute rejection. Pharmacokinetic studies in renal transplant recipients show that CNI troughs are >5% higher in elderly compared to younger patients given the same dose normalized by body weight. This may impact the starting dose of tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Possibly in elderly patients the intracellular (in lymphocyte) concentrations are relatively high in relation to the whole blood concentration, resulting in a stronger pharmacodynamic effect at the same whole blood trough concentration. For cyclosporine this has been shown, but it is not clear if the same is true for other immunosuppressive drugs. Pharmacodynamic studies have compared the inhibition of target enzymes, or more downstream effects of immunosuppressive drugs, in younger and older patients. Measurement of nuclear factor of activated T-cell (NFAT)-regulated gene expression (RGE), a pharmacodynamic read-out of CNI, is a promising biomarker of immunosuppression. Low levels of NFAT RGE are associated with increased risk of infection and non-melanoma skin cancer in elderly patients. Clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression regimens in this specific patient population, which is underrepresented in published trials, are lacking. More studies in elderly patients are needed to investigate the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive drugs, and to decide on the optimal regimen and target levels for elderly transplant recipients.

Belatacept in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) play a major role in long-term renal allograft dysfunction because of their nephrotoxic side-effects. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blockade agent, is the first biological agent approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have shown better preservation of glomerular filtration rate and improved metabolic end points with belatacept when compared with CNIs. More recent studies have shown that belatacept can be an effective first-line immunosuppressive agent with complete avoidance of CNIs and corticosteroids.

SUMMARY

Newer biological agents like belatacept may replace CNIs/corticosteroids in renal transplant recipients, with a benefit of better short-term and long-term renal function, better compliance, and ultimately a possible improvement in long-term renal allograft survival.

The need for minimization strategies: current problems of immunosuppression

New immunosuppressants and the better use of immunosuppressant combination therapy have led to significant improvements in renal allograft outcomes over the last decades. Yet, despite dramatic reduction in rejection rates and improvement in 1-year graft survival, long-term graft attrition rates remained rather constant. Current immunosuppressant combinations are frequently leading to overimmunosuppression and are increasing cardiovascular risk. Importantly, calcineurin inhibitors are nephrotoxic, contribute to cardiovascular risk and chronic allograft dysfunction. Furthermore, immunosuppressant-associated toxicities aggravate immune-mediated nephron injury and side effects lead to nonadherence, an identified important reason for late acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejections. The frequent development of a chronic humoral response indicates rather insufficient immunosuppression of current combinations than simple under-immunosuppression. While there is no evidence that increasing immunosuppressive doses will improve outcomes or reduce de novo HLA-antibody formation, there is clear evidence that adequate minimization strategies will reduce side effect burden. Because of low rejection risk, but frequent side effects, drug minimization is particularly relevant for the many maintenance patients. In summary, new therapeutic strategies need to be developed from adequately powered clinical trials for reduction of the many side effects of immunosuppressants. Such evidence-based and time-dependent immunosuppressive minimization strategies are needed to achieve better long-term outcomes in the future.

Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly incorporated in drug evaluation trials. Whether new immunosuppressive drugs result in an improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a reduced side effect experiences remains unknown. Moreover, the relationship between HRQoL and kidney function has never been investigated in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Using the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials, we investigated the following: (a) evolution of HRQoL, assessed by the Medical Outcomes Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in the first 3 years (baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months) after kidney transplantation; (b) association among kidney function (chronic kidney disease stage), HRQoL, and patient-reported side effects (Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale-59R; BENEFIT trial only); and (c) impact of belatacept and cyclosporine on side effect experience and HRQoL.

RESULTS

In the BENEFIT trial, all subjects reported clinically meaningful improvements compared with baseline and returned to general population scores, both for physical composite score (PCS) and mental composite score Short Form (36) Health Survey at 12 to 36 months after transplantation. In the BENEFIT-EXT trial, this was observed for PCS only. Belatacept-treated patients reported better absolute PCSs compared with cyclosporine-treated patients. The differences were small but statistically significant at all times. Belatacept-treated patients tended to experience less side effects compared with cyclosporine-treated patients, except for dry skin. Worsening kidney function was associated with a significant decrease in HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Worsening in kidney function was associated with lower HRQoL. Compared with cyclosporine, belatacept was associated with improved HRQoL, suggesting that use of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressants may affect the patient's side effect experience and improve their HRQoL.

Long-term outcome of belatacept therapy in de novo kidney transplant recipients - a case-match analysis

While belatacept has shown favorable short- and midterm results in kidney transplant recipients, only projections exist regarding its potential impact on long-term outcome. Therefore, we performed a retrospective case-match analysis of the 14 belatacept patients originally enrolled in the phase II multicenter trial at our center. Fifty six cyclosporine (CyA)-treated patients were matched according to age at transplantation, first/retransplant, and donor type. Ten years after kidney transplantation, kidney function remained superior in belatacept-treated patients compared with the CyA control group. Moreover, none of the belatacept-treated patients had donor-specific antibodies ≥10 years post-transplantation compared with 38.5% of tested CyA-treated subject (0/10 vs. 5/13; P = 0.045). Notably, however, patient and graft survival was virtually identical in both groups (71.4% vs. 71.3%; P = 0.976). In the present single-center study population, patients treated with belatacept demonstrated a patient and graft survival at 10 years post-transplant which was comparable to that of similarly selected CNI-treated patients. Larger studies with sufficient statistical power are necessary to definitively determine long-term graft survival with belatacept.

Recent trials in immunosuppression and their consequences for current therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the scarcity of clinical trials with de-novo immunosuppression has been typical over the last 2 years, several attempts have been made in drug conversion, dosing optimization, and bioequivalence. On the basis of recent clinical and animal studies, future directions of management and treatment are outlined.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies with new tacrolimus formulations showed better bioavailability and lower doses, which might translate into less toxicity. The long-term results of studies with costimulation blockade confirmed their safety and efficacy. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimens based on mTOR inhibitors were shown to be associated with increased risk of the humoral response. Therefore, ongoing trials are predominantly designed to minimize calcineurin inhibitor dose only. Biologics, such as B-cell-specific agents (bortezomib and rituximab) and complement inhibitors (eculizumab) used to treat antibody-mediated rejection, recurrence of glomerulonephritis, are shifted to more preventive applications. The pretransplant quantification of alloreactive memory/effector T cell response may help to better stratify a patient's immunologic risk and allow for drug minimization.

SUMMARY

Despite clinical trials with innovative protocols with already established agents, tacrolimus-based and induction-based protocols have been shown to be the mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens. In the future, research aims to focus on biomarker-driven immunosuppression and cell therapy approaches.

FR104, an antagonist anti-CD28 monovalent fab' antibody, prevents alloimmunization and allows calcineurin inhibitor minimization in nonhuman primate renal allograft

Selective targeting of CD28 might represent an effective immunomodulation strategy by preventing T cell costimulation, while favoring coinhibition since inhibitory signals transmitted through CTLA-4; PD-L1 and B7 would not be affected. We previously showed in vitro and in vivo that anti-CD28 antagonists suppress effector T cells while enhancing regulatory T cell (Treg) suppression and immune tolerance. Here, we evaluate FR104, a novel antagonist pegylated anti-CD28 Fab' antibody fragment, in nonhuman primate renal allotransplantation. FR104, in association with low doses of tacrolimus or with rapamycin in a steroid-free therapy, prevents acute rejection and alloantibody development and prolongs allograft survival. However, when FR104 was associated with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids, half of the recipients rejected their grafts prematurely. Finally, we observed an accumulation of Helios-negative Tregs in the blood and within the graft after FR104 therapy, confirmed by Treg-specific demethylated region DNA analysis. In conclusion, FR104 reinforces immunosuppression in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-low or CNI-free protocols, without the need of steroids. Accumulation of intragraft Tregs suggested the promotion of immunoregulatory mechanisms. Selective CD28 antagonists might become an alternative CNI-sparing strategy to B7 antagonists for kidney transplant recipients.

Belatacept treatment for two yr after liver transplantation is not associated with operational tolerance

Belatacept was recently evaluated in liver transplantation (LT) in a phase II multicenter trial, which was terminated prematurely. Patients were more than two yr post-LT at the time. As high rates of spontaneous tolerance after LT have been reported and as belatacept has marked immunomodulatory effects, we decided to maintain the belatacept patients enrolled at our center (n = 4) on MMF monotherapy. All belatacept patients on MMF monotherapy developed graft dysfunction consistent with acute rejection after a mean period of 10.3 (7-14) wk. Patients were therefore switched to triple therapy with CNI, MMF, and corticosteroids. Graft dysfunction resolved within 1-3 wk after switch. At the time of belatacept discontinuation, mean eGFR was 105.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (92.1-118.9) in belatacept patients compared to 58 mL/min/1.73 m² (36.1-98.2) in controls (p = 0.022). One yr after the switch to CNI therapy, eGFR had declined by 27.4 mL (19.2-39.3; p = 0.008). Thus, LT patients treated with belatacept show superior kidney function that declines upon institution of CNIs. MMF monotherapy following withdrawal of belatacept is associated with a high incidence of graft dysfunction. Belatacept has no obvious immunomodulatory effects in LT recipients that would be sufficient to allow drug withdrawal with a high rate of success.