Valganciclovir results in improved oral absorption of ganciclovir in liver transplant recipients

Management of opportunistic infections in solid-organ transplantation

Solid-organ transplantation is often the last alternative in many patients with end-stage organ disease. Although advances in immunosuppressive regimens, surgical techniques, organ preservation, and overall management of transplant recipients have improved graft and patient survival, infectious complications remain problematic. Bacterial, fungal, viral, and parasitic infections are implicated after transplantation depending on numerous factors, such as degree of immunosuppression, type of organ transplant, host factors, and period after transplantation. Proper prophylactic and treatment strategies are imperative in the face of chronic immunosuppression, nosocomial and community pathogens, emerging drug resistance, drug-drug interactions, and medication toxicities. This review summarizes the pathophysiology, incidence, prevention, and treatment strategies of common posttransplant infections.

Pre-emptive treatment with oral valganciclovir in management of CMV infection after cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has long been recognized as the most common opportunistic pathogen in transplant recipients. The use of post-detection antiviral treatment of CMV as a strategy to prevent disease in cardiac recipients is becoming the standard policy. Valganciclovir is an oral pro-drug of ganciclovir, with a 10-fold greater bioavailability than oral gancyclovir.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reported our first experience with 8 patients (3 female, 45.0 +/- 10.5 years old, non-CMV mismatched) who underwent cardiac transplantation and had positive results of CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within first 6 weeks after transplantation without concomitant CMV disease. These patients received valganciclovir in dosage 450 to 900 mg daily depending on renal function for 3 weeks. Standard immunosuppressive regimen consisted of cyclosporin A, MMF and corticosteroids, and was not changed after detection of CMV infection. In one patient we used sirolimus with respectively reduced dosage of cyclosporin A. Weekly measurements of CMV-PCR were performed to observe results of therapy.

RESULTS

After 1 week of valganciclovir therapy CMV-PCR plasma concentration in all patients decreased significantly (2,105 copies/ml vs 400 copies/ml; p < 0.0001). No relapse of CMV infection has been detected after completing of valganciclovir therapy with follow up duration of 9.0 +/- 0.92 months. The drug was generally well tolerated, and we did not observe any severe drug related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Oral valganciclovir as pre-emptive antiviral therapy administrated after detection of CMV infection seems to be an effective and safe treatment in cardiac transplant recipients.

Following universal prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir and cytomegalovirus immune globulin, valganciclovir is safe and effective for prevention of CMV infection following lung transplantation

We prospectively determined the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in at-risk (donor positive/recipient negative [D+/R-] or R+) lung transplant recipients. We also determined the length of prophylaxis required to significantly decrease both CMV infection and disease. Consecutive lung transplant recipients surviving >30 days (n = 90) received combination prophylaxis with intravenous (i.v.) ganciclovir (GCV) 5 mg/kg/day and cytomegalovirus immune globulin (CMV-IVIG) followed by valganciclovir (450 mg twice-daily) to complete 180, 270 or 365 days of prophylaxis. This group was compared to a historical group (n = 140) who received high-dose oral acyclovir following i.v. GCV and CMV-IVIG. CMV disease was significantly lower in patients receiving valganciclovir compared to acyclovir (2.2% vs. 20%; p < 0.0001). Freedom from CMV infection and disease was significantly greater (p < 0.02) in patients receiving 180, 270 or 365 days of prophylaxis (90%, 95% and 90%, respectively) compared to those receiving 100-179 days (64%) or < 100 days (59%). No patient receiving valganciclovir died during the study. Following prophylaxis with i.v. GCV and CMV-IVIG, valganciclovir is safe and effective for prevention of CMV infection and disease in at-risk lung transplant recipients. The required length of prophylaxis was at least 180 days.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Valganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir 450 mg/day for 6 months for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Urban, academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-eight patients who received de novo renal transplants from August 1, 2001-November 21, 2002.

INTERVENTION

Valganciclovir 450 mg/day was administered to all renal transplant recipients at risk for CMV disease. Therapy was begun postoperatively and was dose adjusted to renal function.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data collected from renal transplant recipients were demographics, immunosuppressive and antiviral drug therapy, and occurrence of CMV disease, acute rejection, allograft loss, and hematologic adverse events. Donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV serostatus was 37.9% D+/R+, 29.3% D-/R+, 17.3% D+/R-, and 15.5% D-/R-. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) was administered to 62.1% of patients. Most of the transplant recipients received triple immunosuppression as maintenance therapy. Median follow-up was 20 months. The frequency of CMV disease was 1.7% within 6 months after transplantation and 5.2% at any point after transplantation. All patients who developed CMV disease were D+/R- and had received ATG. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia associated with valganciclovir were seen in 28% and 24% of patients, respectively. One patient developed acute cellular rejection. No graft losses or deaths occurred. Early discontinuation of valganciclovir occurred in 20% of patients secondary to severe, persistent leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and/or diarrhea. None of these patients developed CMV disease.

CONCLUSION

A high rate of CMV disease was noted among the D+/R- population. Administration of ATG as an induction agent also increased the frequency of CMV disease. Despite the low dosage of valganciclovir, hematologic adverse events were common. However, valganciclovir, administered at 450 mg/day for 6 months, was effective and relatively safe for prophylaxis of CMV disease in renal transplant recipients.

Prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cytomegalovirus remains the single most important pathogen affecting solid organ transplant recipients. Its importance lies both in its effects and as a model for deciphering the clinical impact and management of other agents such as hepatitis C virus and other herpes viruses such as human herpes virus-6 and 7. The effects of cytomegalovirus infection in these patients can be divided into two categories: the direct causation of a wide variety of infectious disease syndromes; and the indirect effects, which include contributing to the net state of immunosuppression, allograft injury, and potentiating posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of valganciclovir, with its excellent oral bioavailability, combined with intravenous ganciclovir have provided powerful tools for controlling the direct effects of cytomegalovirus, particularly with the recognition that the intensity of the antiviral therapy has to be linked to the intensity of the immunosuppression required.Unfortunately, far less is known about the efficacy of antiviral therapy in managing the indirect effects of cytomegalovirus. Preliminary data suggest antiviral prophylaxis protects against acute allograft injury, as well as decreasing the incidence of some opportunistic infection.

SUMMARY

A great deal of progress has been made in the prevention and treatment of the infectious disease syndromes caused by cytomegalovirus, with the development of the concept of the therapeutic prescription. This has two components: an immunosuppressive component to prevent and treat rejection and an antimicrobial component to make it safe. Much more information, however, is required.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in kidney, pancreas-kidney, and pancreas transplantation

Cytomegalovirus, seen in more than 50% of solid organ transplant recipients, is responsible for numerous direct and indirect consequences, including infection with opportunistic pathogens and allograft rejection. Prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir has been the gold standard for prevention; however, intravenous treatment is expensive and carries risks of its own. Oral ganciclovir, to be effective, must be given in large, divided doses. Valganciclovir, the valine ester of ganciclovir, at 900 mg/day, provides oral bioavailability equivalent to that of intravenous ganciclovir and superior to that of oral ganciclovir. This retrospective study assessed the efficacy of 3 months prophylaxis with valganciclovir in kidney, simultaneous pancreas-kidney, and pancreas transplantation. Of 161 patients, all of whom received potent immunosuppressive regimens and were followed for a mean of 440 days, only one developed cytomegalovirus infection, at 120 days post-transplantation. Two patients died, and two others lost their grafts. There were seven incidents of acute rejection. Only seven patients discontinued treatment early, five because of leukopenia. These results suggest that prophylaxis with 900 mg/day of valganciclovir for at least 3 months safely and effectively prevents cytomegalovirus infection in kidney, simultaneous pancreas-kidney and pancreas transplant recipients on highly potent immunosuppression.

Ganciclovir in solid organ transplant recipients: is there a role for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring?

The authors use a previously published decision-making algorithm to address the role of clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring of ganciclovir, the drug of choice for prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant recipients. Ganciclovir pharmacokinetics have been studied in solid organ transplant recipients with a wide range of peak and trough concentrations reported. Numerous assays are available to measure plasma concentrations of ganciclovir, but no clear correlation has been established between peak or trough concentrations and either efficacy or toxicity of the drug. For patients receiving treatment, the pharmacological response of ganciclovir is assessed initially by clinical response. Monitoring prophylactic therapy in asymptomatic patients poses a greater challenge. Although monitoring of antigenemia or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is not yet part of routine clinical practice, studies have shown a role for these techniques in monitoring response to antiviral therapy. Studies of subpopulations of renal failure patients show a prolonged ganciclovir half-life that requires dosage adjustments. However, ganciclovir clearance is closely correlated with creatinine clearance, which is an appropriate approach to adjusting dosages. Studies in pediatric patients also demonstrate a close correlation between dose per kilogram and AUC, suggesting that monitoring of ganciclovir levels may not be necessary. Based on the evidence presented in this review, routine clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring of ganciclovir does not appear to be warranted in solid organ transplant recipients.

Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

We compared the efficacy and safety of valganciclovir with those of oral ganciclovir in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+/R-). In this randomised, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy study, 364 CMV D+/R- patients received valganciclovir 900 mg once daily or oral ganciclovir 1000 mg three times a day (tid) within 10 days of transplant and continued through 100 days. CMV disease, plasma viremia, acute graft rejection, graft loss and safety were analyzed up to 6 and 12 months post-transplant. Endpoint committee-defined CMV disease developed in 12.1% and 15.2% of valganciclovir and ganciclovir patients, respectively, by 6 months, though with a difference in the relative efficacy of valganciclovir and ganciclovir between organs (i.e. an organ type-treatment interaction). By 12 months, respective incidences were 17.2% and 18.4%, and the incidence of investigator-treated CMV disease events was comparable in the valganciclovir (30.5%) and ganciclovir (28.0%) arms. CMV viremia during prophylaxis was significantly lower with valganciclovir (2.9% vs. 10.4%; p=0.001), but was comparable by 12 months (48.5% valganciclovir vs 48.8% ganciclovir). Time-to-onset of CMV disease and to viremia were delayed with valganciclovir; rates of acute allograft rejection were generally lower with valganciclovir. Except for a higher incidence of neutropenia with valganciclovir (8.2%, vs 3.2% ganciclovir) the safety profile was similar for both drugs. Overall, once-daily oral valganciclovir was as clinically effective and well-tolerated as oral ganciclovir tid for CMV prevention in high-risk SOT recipients.

Oral versus intravenous ganciclovir for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic low dose i.v. ganciclovir in patients at risk after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is highly effective in the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and infection.

AIM

In this study, we sought to assess the tolerability of oral ganciclovir in patients after allogeneic BMT.

METHODS

CMV seropositive patients or those with CMV seropositive donors were randomised to be treated with i.v. ganciclovir 5 mg/kg three times weekly or oral ganciclovir 3 g daily from engraftment to day 84. The period of accrual was from May 1997 to October 1998. Patients were monitored for CMV infection by weekly serology. Thirty-one patients received oral ganciclovir and 27 patients received i.v. ganciclovir, the treatment groups being balanced for clinical characteristics and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Renal dysfunction, transfusion requirements and significant nausea and vomiting were not different. There were no documented cases of CMV disease during the study period although three patients developed CMV polymerase chain reaction positivity at various times. One patient treated with i.v. ganciclovir developed non-fatal gastrointestinal CMV disease after the study period on day 108. Eight patients in the oral group failed to complete planned therapy, whereas two patients failed to complete the i.v. course.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that oral ganciclovir is a reasonable, well-tolerated alternative to i.v. ganciclovir for the prophylaxis of CMV disease after allogeneic BMT.

Oral valganciclovir in children: single dose pharmacokinetics in a six-year-old girl

We report a pharmacokinetic study in a 6-year-old girl with congenital human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and cytomegalovirus coinfection maintained on iv ganciclovir for 6 years. Increasing infection and thrombosis caused by her iv device necessitated alternative therapy. Single dose pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir 4.4 mg/kg iv and valganciclovir 13.2 and 26.3 mg/kg po were studied with high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The two oral dosages yielded areas under the concentration curve of 14.3 and 28.7 microg x h/ml, equivalent to 43% bioavailability of ganciclovir from valganciclovir, which exceeded the area under the concentration curve of 11.1 microg x h/ml yielded by ganciclovir 4.4 mg/kg iv. Oral valganciclovir achieved therapeutic and dosage-proportional plasma concentrations in the child we studied.

Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous and oral ganciclovir versus prolonged intravenous ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk cytomegalovirus-seronegative liver transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors have the greatest risk for CMV disease. We performed a randomized, controlled trial comparing sequential intravenous (IV) and oral ganciclovir with prolonged IV ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in these high-risk patients. Patients were initially given IV ganciclovir at a dose of 6 mg/kg per day from days 1 to 14 after transplantation. Patients then either received oral ganciclovir (1 g every 8 hr) or continued IV ganciclovir (6 mg/kg once per day on Monday-Friday of each week) from days 15 to 100 after transplantation. CMV disease occurred in 3 of 32 patients (9.3%) receiving oral ganciclovir and in 4 of 32 patients (12.5%) receiving IV ganciclovir within the first year after transplantation (P>0.2). All cases of CMV disease occurred more than 90 days after transplantation (median time of onset day +137 for oral ganciclovir and day +135 for IV ganciclovir). There were no deaths from CMV in either study group. Both oral and IV ganciclovir were generally well tolerated. These results indicate that, after induction with 14 days of IV ganciclovir, oral ganciclovir can be as effective as IV ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors and eliminates the need for prolonged IV access.

Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current status, known challenges, and future strategies

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significant progress has been made in the prevention of CMV disease over the past decade, but prevention of late CMV disease continues to be a challenge in selected high-risk populations. The pretransplantation CMV serostatus of the donor and/or recipient remains an important risk factor for posttransplantation outcome despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy; CMV-seropositive recipients of T cell-depleted grafts in particular continue to have a survival disadvantage compared with seronegative recipients with seronegative donors. The risk of developing antiviral drug resistance remains low in most patients; however, in a setting of intense immunosuppression (eg, after transplantation from a haploidentical donor), the incidence may be as high as 8%. Primary CMV infection via blood transfusion can be reduced by the provision of seronegative or leukocyte-depleted blood products; however, a small risk of 1% to 2% of CMV disease remains. Surveillance and preemptive therapy are effective in preventing the sequelae of transfusion-related CMV infection. Indirect immunomodulatory effects of CMV are increasingly recognized in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Strategies currently being investigated include long-term suppression of CMV with valganciclovir for the prevention of late CMV infection and disease, adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T cells, and donor and recipient vaccination strategies.

Identification of a human valacyclovirase: biphenyl hydrolase-like protein as valacyclovir hydrolase

Valacyclovir is the 5'-valyl ester prodrug of acyclovir, an effective anti-herpetic drug. Systemic availability of acyclovir in humans is three to five times higher when administered orally as the prodrug. The increased bioavailability of valacyclovir is attributed to carrier-mediated intestinal absorption, via the hPEPT1 peptide transporter, followed by the rapid and complete conversion to acyclovir. The one or more human enzymes responsible for in vivo activation of the prodrug to the active drug and its conversion sites, however, have not been identified. In this report, we describe the purification, identification, and characterization of a human enzyme that activates valacyclovir to acyclovir. A protein with significant hydrolytic activity toward valacyclovir, the 5'-glycyl ester of acyclovir, and the 5'-valyl ester of zidovudine (AZT), was purified from Caco-2 cells derived from human intestine. Using a non-redundant data base search, the N-terminal 19-amino acid sequence of the purified 27-kDa, basic protein revealed a perfect match within the N terminus of a serine hydrolase, Biphenyl hydrolase-like (BPHL, gi:4757862) protein, previously cloned from human breast carcinoma. Recombinant BPHL exhibited significant hydrolytic activity for both valacyclovir and valganciclovir with specificity constants (kcat/Km), 420 and 53.2 mm-1.s-1, respectively. We conclude that BPHL may be an important enzyme activating valacyclovir and valganciclovir in humans and an important new target for prodrug design.

Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpes-virus infections

Human herpesviruses are found worldwide and are among the most frequent causes of viral infections in immunocompetent as well as in immunocompromised patients. During the past decade and a half a better understanding of the replication and disease-causing state of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been achieved due in part to the development of potent antiviral compounds that target these viruses. While some of these antiviral therapies are considered safe and efficacious (acyclovir, penciclovir), some have toxicities associated with them (ganciclovir and foscarnet). In addition, the increased and prolonged use of these compounds in the clinical setting, especially for the treatment of immunocompromised patients, has led to the emergence of viral resistance against most of these drugs. While resistance is not a serious issue for immunocompetent individuals, it is a real concern for immunocompromised patients, especially those with AIDS and the ones that have undergone organ transplantation. All the currently approved treatments target the viral DNA polymerase. It is clear that new drugs that are more efficacious than the present ones, are not toxic, and target a different viral function would be of great use especially for immunocompromised patients. Here, an overview is provided of the diseases caused by the herpesviruses as well as the replication strategy of the better studied members of this family for which treatments are available. We also discuss the various drugs that have been approved for the treatment of some herpesviruses in terms of structure, mechanism of action, and development of resistance. Finally, we present a discussion of viral targets other than the DNA polymerase, for which new antiviral compounds are being considered.

Cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk transplant recipients despite ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis

The clinical patterns and predictors of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in kidney and/or pancreas transplant patients on ganciclovir (1.0 g po t.i.d.) or valganciclovir (450 mg po q.d.) prophylaxis were studied. This is a retrospective analysis of 129 transplant recipients. Median follow up was 12 months (range, 6-18 months). The overall incidence of CMV disease at 1-year post-transplant was 14% (4% tissue-invasive, 10% noninvasive). Seventeen of 18 patients were diagnosed with CMV after completion of 3 months' prophylaxis (median 8 weeks, range, 2-28 weeks). Induction treatment with thymoglobulin, and Donor +/Recipient - CMV status were the strongest predictors for the development of CMV disease. Cytomegalovirus incidence was not different between patients treated with ganciclovir or valganciclovir (15 vs. 17%, respectively). Valganciclovir (450 mg q.d.) is as effective as oral ganciclovir in CMV prophylaxis. High-risk individuals might require higher doses or longer duration of valganciclovir treatment.

Drug delivery to the retina: challenges and opportunities

Retinal drug delivery is a challenging area in the field of ophthalmic drug delivery. An ideal drug delivery system for the retina and vitreous humor has not yet been found, despite extensive research. Drug delivery to retinal tissue and vitreous via systemic administration is constrained due to the presence of a blood-retinal barrier (BRB) which regulates permeation of substances from blood to the retina. Although intravitreal administration overcomes this barrier, it is associated with several other problems. In recent years, transporter targeted drug delivery has become a clinically significant drug delivery approach for enhancing the bioavailabilities of drug molecules with poor membrane permeability characteristics. Various nutrient transporters, which include peptide, amino acid, folate, monocarboxylic acid transporters and so on, have been reported to be expressed on the retina and BRB. Prodrug derivatisation of drug molecules which target these transporters could result in enhanced ocular bioavailability. Highlighted in this review are various strategies currently employed for drug delivery to the posterior chamber, and novel opportunities that can be exploited to enhance ocular bioavailability of drugs.

Gastrointestinal infections in the immunocompromised host

Persons with HIV infection, leukemia, lymphoma, solid organ and bone marrow transplants, and inherited immune deficiencies as well as those on immunosuppressive drugs are at high risk for infections of the gastrointestinal tract. Pathogenic as well as opportunistic viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa cause infections in the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and large intestine. Symptoms may be mild but more often are severe and even life threatening. This article reviews what is new in the field of gastrointestinal infections in the immunocompromised host during the past year. I will place specific emphasis on articles that are most pertinent to clinical care.

Focus on new drugs in development against human cytomegalovirus

The limitations of current therapies for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) coupled with the continued impact of HCMV disease in the immunocompromised host are the driving force for the development of new drugs against HCMV. This review predominantly focuses on new non-DNA polymerase inhibitors of HCMV replication. Drugs such as tomeglovir (BAY-384766), 2-bromo-5,6-dichloro-1beta-D-ribofuranosyl benzimidazole (BDCRB) and GW-275175X act as inhibitors of the terminase complex that is involved in cleavage and packaging of the unit length DNA into the capsids. Although the viral protein kinase UL97 has been exploited as an activator of ganciclovir and its prodrug valganciclovir, a new inhibitor maribavir (benzamidavir) has been shown to be a highly potent inhibitor of this enzyme. Many of these compounds have undergone successful phase I clinical trials. There are other compounds which have been identified through drug-screening but are at the earlier stages of development.

The economic value of valacyclovir prophylaxis in transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease, with its extensive direct and indirect consequences, adds considerably to the cost of patient management in both solid organ and bone marrow transplantation. Antiviral prophylaxis for CMV infection can offer cost advantages over preemptive therapy and "wait-and-treat" approaches. Valacyclovir has demonstrated efficacy for CMV prophylaxis in renal, heart, and bone marrow transplantation and is cost-effective when compared with placebo in renal transplant recipients at high risk of CMV infection. In reducing CMV infection and disease, valacyclovir prophylaxis appears to be associated with reductions in indirect effects of CMV (acute graft rejection, other opportunistic infections) and, if these effects are considered, the potential exists for even greater savings to be made with valacyclovir therapy. Benefits of valacyclovir in transplantation extend beyond CMV to other herpesviruses and may be increased in some clinical situations by prolonging prophylaxis beyond 3 months.

Valacyclovir provides optimum acyclovir exposure for prevention of cytomegalovirus and related outcomes after organ transplantation

A meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials (1574 patients) examined herpesvirus and related outcomes following organ transplantation over a range of acyclovir exposures (including valacyclovir). Overall, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.57; P<.001), CMV disease (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31-0.54; P<.001), death (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.90; P=.01), opportunistic infection (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91; P=.009), acute graft rejection (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.86; P<.001), herpes simplex virus disease (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.12-0.24; P<.001), and varicella-zoster virus disease (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; P<.001) were significantly reduced. Increased acyclovir exposure influenced more end points: Maximum efficacy resulted from valacyclovir (8 g/day). Increasing acyclovir exposure to that achieved with valacyclovir extends benefits of prophylaxis to include impact on graft rejection and opportunistic infections.

Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) generally involves preemptive treatment of recognized infection before the onset of overt CMV-associated disease. The success of this method depends on efficient recognition of infection and intervention before the disease progresses. Reliable tests for such diagnosis include blood culture, antigenemia assays, polymerase chain reaction assays, and other DNA sequence- or RNA sequence-based assays. For selected high-risk patients, such as patients receiving T cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cell transplants, prophylactic use of antiviral agents before the onset of CMV infection is recommended. The ability to monitor the immunological status of the patient relative to CMV-specific immunity is increasing in importance. Ultimately, the solution to the problem of efficient prevention of CMV infection in this population will require combined antiviral chemotherapy and improved reconstitution of CMV immunity.

Infections and solid organ transplant rejection: a cause-and-effect relationship?

Although evidence is far from being conclusive, several studies have suggested that infections could trigger rejection in different transplant settings. In this review we examine the evidence linking cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus, enterovirus, parvovirus, and herpes simplex virus infections to the vasculopathy leading to cardiac allograft rejection, the association between CMV and chronic kidney, lung, and liver graft rejection, and the association of human herpesvirus 6 reactivation with CMV-related disease in kidney and liver transplant recipients. We also review the numerous antiviral prophylactic or pre-emptive treatments in use to control CMV infection, and suggest that they do not limit immune reactions leading to graft rejection or lower the risk of developing post-transplantation atherosclerosis in allograft recipients. Finally, we emphasise the need for prospective, international studies to clarify the role of infections in transplant rejection, to look at virus-to-virus interactions, and to establish specific therapeutic strategies. Such strategies must not rely exclusively on expensive antiviral agents but also on vaccination or other, innovative approaches, such as the use of agents able to inhibit the activity of natural killer cells, which might have an important role in acute allograft rejection.

Valganciclovir: A new oral alternative for cytomegalovirus retinitis in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive individuals

Oral valganciclovir recently was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. We performed MEDLINE (June 1998-May 2002) and AIDSLINE (June 1998-December 2000) searches of available information on valganciclovir, and the drug's prescribing information was used to identify relevant articles. Additional studies, case reports, reviews, and abstracts were identified from references in the reviewed literature. Most of the information was obtained from abstracts or product labeling, since few trials have been published in the medical literature. Valganciclovir is a prodrug of ganciclovir and has been shown to have significantly higher oral absorption than ganciclovir capsules. One short-term study found valganciclovir to be as effective as intravenous ganciclovir in treating CMV retinitis. Recommended dosages for patients with normal renal function are valganciclovir 900 mg twice/day for induction and 900 mg once/day for maintenance. Side effects are similar to those of intravenous ganciclovir and require periodic monitoring of complete blood count and renal function. Given the need for lifelong therapy for CMV retinitis in some human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients, valganciclovir is a welcome alternative to long-term administration of intravenous antivirals.

A safety study of oral valganciclovir maintenance treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis

Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of the anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) agent ganciclovir, was evaluated in a single-arm open-label safety study. AIDS patients (median CD4 lymphocyte count of 140 cells/microL) with treated CMV retinitis (N = 212) received 900-mg once-daily valganciclovir maintenance therapy with courses of 900-mg twice-daily valganciclovir induction therapy as needed to treat progression. After a median treatment duration of 372 days, the adverse event profile was similar to that reported for intravenous (IV) and oral ganciclovir. Adverse event rates of note were diarrhea (35%), nausea (23%), fever (18%), neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/microL) (10%), and anemia (hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL) (12%). Consistent with prior treatment studies of oral ganciclovir, IV catheter-related adverse events were uncommon (6%) and lower than previously reported for IV ganciclovir. The mortality rate was 0.072 deaths per patient-year. Progression of CMV retinitis occurred in 17% of patients during the study treatment period, usually in association with a low CD4 cell count. Other than a higher than expected frequency of oral candidiasis (17%), no clinical toxicities or laboratory abnormalities occurred during treatment with valganciclovir that have not been observed during treatment with ganciclovir.

Home Health Care for the Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipient

Kidney transplantation has been a part of the world medical scene for more than 45 years and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation for more than 20 years. Improvements in medical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy, and expansion of patient eligibility have led to a population more in need of home health services than ever before. The home health needs of the population range from typical chronic health care needs to issues specifically associated with immunosuppression.

A controlled trial of valganciclovir as induction therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir is an orally administered prodrug that is rapidly hydrolyzed to ganciclovir. We compared the effects of oral valganciclovir with those of intravenous ganciclovir as induction therapy for newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis in 160 patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

METHODS

The primary end point was photographically determined progression of cytomegalovirus retinitis within four weeks after the initiation of treatment. Secondary end points included the achievement of a prospectively defined satisfactory response to induction therapy and the time to progression of cytomegalovirus retinitis. After four weeks, all patients received valganciclovir as maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were randomly assigned to each treatment group. Of the patients who could be evaluated, 7 of 70 assigned to intravenous ganciclovir (10.0 percent) and 7 of 71 assigned to oral valganciclovir (9.9 percent) had progression of cytomegalovirus retinitis during the first four weeks (difference in proportions, 0.1 percentage point; 95 percent confidence interval, -9.7 to 10.0). Forty-seven of 61 patients (77.0 percent) assigned to intravenous ganciclovir and 46 of 64 (71.9 percent) assigned to valganciclovir had a satisfactory response to induction therapy (difference in proportions, 5.2 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -20.4 to 10.1). The median times to progression of retinitis were 125 days in the group assigned to intravenous ganciclovir and 160 days in the group assigned to oral valganciclovir. The mean values for the area under the curve for the ganciclovir dosage interval were similar at both induction doses and maintenance doses. The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Orally administered valganciclovir appears to be as effective as intravenous ganciclovir for induction treatment and is convenient and effective for the long-term management of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS.

Valganciclovir

Valganciclovir is a prodrug of ganciclovir which has been developed for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in patients with AIDS. Oral valganciclovir is rapidly absorbed and hydrolysed to ganciclovir. The oral bioavailability of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir administration is high. Oral valganciclovir 900 mg provides a daily exposure of ganciclovir comparable to that of intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg. A single, randomised, nonblind study indicated that oral valganciclovir (900mg twice daily for 3 weeks then 900 mg once daily) and intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice daily for 3 weeks then 5 mg/kg once daily) were equally effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed CMV retinitis in 160 patients with AIDS. Valganciclovir appears to have a similar tolerability profile to intravenous ganciclovir during induction therapy in patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed CMV retinitis. During maintenance therapy with valganciclovir, the most commonly reported adverse events included neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal (including diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain), fever, headache, insomnia, peripheral neuropathy, paraesthesia and retinal detachment.

Gastrointestinal infections in the immunocompromised host

Immunocompromised patients, including patients with AIDS, solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, patients with leukemia and lymphoma, patients with inherited immune deficiencies, and patients on immunosuppressive therapy for a variety of disorders, are at risk for infections-particularly opportunistic infections, which, by definition, do not infect the healthy host. All systems of the body, including the gastrointestinal tract, are susceptible. The esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and large intestine are sites of infection for viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa. Symptoms can range in severity from fevers of unknown etiology to life-threatening hemorrhage and perforation. This review summarizes recent case reports, clinical studies, and reviews pertaining to pathogens that uniquely cause disease, more frequently cause disease, or cause more severe disease in the immunocompromised host than in the immunocompetent host.

Antiviral therapy for cytomegalovirus infections in pediatric patients

Appreciation of the spectrum of illness caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections has increased markedly during the past 2 decades. The number of immunosuppressed patients also has increased during the same time period, reflecting the central tenet that CMV disease is most severe in this patient population. Fortunately, antiviral therapies with activity against CMV also have been identified during this same time course, and they include ganciclovir, foscamet, and cidofovir. Although all 3 of these therapies can have significant toxicities associated with them, nonetheless they are employed with relative frequency to treat potentially life-threatening CMV disease. Ganciclovir is the first-line compound used, followed by foscarnet and cidofovir. This article summarizes those CMV infections that require antiviral therapy and outlines therapeutic options for each.

Risk factors and impact of cytomegalovirus disease in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The relevance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant recipients in the modern era of immunosuppression and antiviral therapeutics is largely unquantified. We sought to determine the risk factors of CMV disease and its impact on SPK transplant outcomes in recipients all receiving a consistent regime of maintenance immunosuppression and CMV prophylaxis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single center study of 100 consecutive SPK transplant recipients. All received maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and prednisone. CMV prophylaxis consisted of a short course of parenteral gancyclovir followed by oral gancyclovir. Recipients at high-risk (D+/R-) for CMV also received CMV hyperimmune globulin. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for CMV disease and risk factors for adverse outcomes in SPK transplantation were determined. The effect of duration of prophylaxis on timing and severity of CMV disease in high-risk (D+/R-) SPK transplant recipients was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The actual 1-year rate of CMV disease was 17.0% (12.0% noninvasive, 5.0% tissue invasive); and according to donor and recipient CMV serological status was: D-/R+: 0%; D-/R-: 2.8%; D+/R+: 25.6%; and D+/R-: 40.6%. Multivariate analysis showed transplantation of organs from a donor with positive CMV serology to be predictive of CMV disease with a relative risk of 63.37 (P=0.0052). In the high-risk (D+/R-) subgroup, the duration of prophylactic therapy delayed onset of CMV disease, but had minimal effect on severity. Invasive CMV disease was an independent predictor of mortality but did not decrease kidney or pancreas allograft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of SPK transplantation have improved in the current era of modern immunosuppression, yet CMV remains an important pathogen. The serological status of the organ donor and the duration of CMV prophylaxis are predictive of who and when CMV disease may occur. Nevertheless, new strategies that reduce risk and severity of CMV disease are still needed.

Cytomegalovirus therapy: current constraints and future opportunities

Articles published in the last year have changed perceptions of cytomegalovirus. It is now recognized as a rapidly replicating virus which develops resistance frequently during chronic administration of ganciclovir. In addition to causing end-organ diseases, it plays a causal role in the multifactorial processes leading to graft rejection after renal transplant and accelerated atherosclerosis after heart transplant. New treatments which are safe and potent are urgently needed and should be highly cost-effective when the full clinical impact of this virus is assessed.

Infections in recipients of kidney transplants

A review of infections in kidney transplant recipients is presented in this article, beginning with a discussion of the pretransplant infectious diseases evaluation and an overview of the timing of infectious posttransplant, and then focusing on individual types of infection.

Cytomegalovirus treatment options in immunocompromised patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was recognised in congenitally infected infants in the first half of the 20th century. Following the increased use of immunosuppressive regimens for bone marrow and solid organ transplantation, various manifestations of CMV disease were recognised. Milder symptoms included fever, anorexia and malaise but severe symptoms included pneumonitis, hepatitis, gastrointestinal ulceration, choreoretinitis and encephalopathy, all with a high morbidity or mortality. With the onset of the AIDS epidemic, manifestations of CMV became evident, predominantly retinitis. Ganciclovir used intravenously has been the principal anti-CMV agent investigated. However, ganciclovir has problems with suboptimal efficacy, toxicity, poor oral bioavailability and evolution of resistant strains. Additional studies have been performed on foscarnet and cidofovir, although the use of both have been limited by their nephrotoxicity. Combination therapy with ganciclovir and foscarnet for resistant strains has been used. There are promising newer drugs like the methylenecyclopropane nucleoside analogues and benzimidazole. The most novel compound is the antisense oligonucleotide fomivirsen that has been evaluated principally in CMV retinitis. The role of immunotherapy with either immunoglobulin prophylaxis or the novel adoptive immunotherapy needs further evaluation.