201
|
Mesti T, Ocvirk J. Malignant gliomas: old and new systemic treatment approaches. Radiol Oncol 2016; 50:129-38. [PMID: 27247544 PMCID: PMC4852970 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2015-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant (high-grade) gliomas are rapidly progressive brain tumours with very high morbidity and mortality. Until recently, treatment options for patients with malignant gliomas were limited and mainly the same for all subtypes of malignant gliomas. The treatment included surgery and radiotherapy. Chemotherapy used as an adjuvant treatment or at recurrence had a marginal role. Conclusions Nowadays, the treatment of malignant gliomas requires a multidisciplinary approach. The treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The chosen approach is more complex and individually adjusted. By that, the effect on the survival and quality of life is notable higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Mesti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
202
|
Buckner JC, Shaw EG, Pugh SL, Chakravarti A, Gilbert MR, Barger GR, Coons S, Ricci P, Bullard D, Brown PD, Stelzer K, Brachman D, Suh JH, Schultz CJ, Bahary JP, Fisher BJ, Kim H, Murtha AD, Bell EH, Won M, Mehta MP, Curran WJ. Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1344-55. [PMID: 27050206 PMCID: PMC5170873 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1500925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 658] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grade 2 gliomas occur most commonly in young adults and cause progressive neurologic deterioration and premature death. Early results of this trial showed that treatment with procarbazine, lomustine (also called CCNU), and vincristine after radiation therapy at the time of initial diagnosis resulted in longer progression-free survival, but not overall survival, than radiation therapy alone. We now report the long-term results. METHODS We included patients with grade 2 astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, or oligodendroglioma who were younger than 40 years of age and had undergone subtotal resection or biopsy or who were 40 years of age or older and had undergone biopsy or resection of any of the tumor. Patients were stratified according to age, histologic findings, Karnofsky performance-status score, and presence or absence of contrast enhancement on preoperative images. Patients were randomly assigned to radiation therapy alone or to radiation therapy followed by six cycles of combination chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 251 eligible patients were enrolled from 1998 through 2002. The median follow-up was 11.9 years; 55% of the patients died. Patients who received radiation therapy plus chemotherapy had longer median overall survival than did those who received radiation therapy alone (13.3 vs. 7.8 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; P=0.003). The rate of progression-free survival at 10 years was 51% in the group that received radiation therapy plus chemotherapy versus 21% in the group that received radiation therapy alone; the corresponding rates of overall survival at 10 years were 60% and 40%. A Cox model identified receipt of radiation therapy plus chemotherapy and histologic findings of oligodendroglioma as favorable prognostic variables for both progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients with grade 2 glioma who were younger than 40 years of age and had undergone subtotal tumor resection or who were 40 years of age or older, progression-free survival and overall survival were longer among those who received combination chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy than among those who received radiation therapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003375.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan C Buckner
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Edward G Shaw
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Geoffrey R Barger
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Stephen Coons
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Peter Ricci
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Dennis Bullard
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Paul D Brown
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Keith Stelzer
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - David Brachman
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - John H Suh
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Christopher J Schultz
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Jean-Paul Bahary
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Barbara J Fisher
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Harold Kim
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Albert D Murtha
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Erica H Bell
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Minhee Won
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| | - Walter J Curran
- From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.C.B.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (E.G.S.), and Triangle Neurosurgeons, Raleigh (D. Bullard) - both in North Carolina; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia (S.L.P., M.W.); Ohio State University, Columbus (A.C., E.H.B.), and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (J.H.S.) - both in Ohio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (M.R.G., P.D.B.); Wayne State University, Detroit (G.R.B., H.K.); Barrow Neurological Institute (S.C.) and Arizona Oncology Services Foundation (D. Brachman) - both in Phoenix; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO (P.R.); Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR (K.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (C.J.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (J.-P.B.), the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (B.J.F.), and the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (A.D.M.) - all in Canada; University of Maryland, Baltimore (M.P.M.); and Emory University, Atlanta (W.J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
203
|
Sathornsumetee S, Cheunsuchon P, Sangruchi T. High Carbonic Anhydrase-9 Expression Identifies a Subset of 1p/19q Co-Deletion and Favorable Prognosis in Oligodendroglioma. World Neurosurg 2016; 91:518-523.e1. [PMID: 26960282 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Revised: 02/14/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between 3 hypoxic markers, carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α, and HIF-2α and the traditional genetic markers, deletions of chromosomes 1p and 19q and Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) R132H mutation in oligodendrogliomas. METHODS Thirty-one oligodendrogliomas (27 World Health Organization Grade [WHO] II and 4 WHO Grade III) were processed into tissue microarray. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was exploited to detect chromosome deletion, whereas immunohistochemistry was performed to assess IDH1R132H mutation, CA-9, HIF-1α, and HIF-2α expression. RESULTS The frequencies of 1p/19q co-deletion and IDH1 R132H mutation were 68% and 71%, respectively. High expression of CA-9 was observed in 42% and was associated with longer survival (P = 0.04) in WHO Grade II oligodendroglioma. High CA-9 expression also identified 62% of 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma (P = 0.001). In addition, all tumors with high CA-9 expression displayed 1p/19q-codeletion. HIF-1α and HIF-2α provided no additional prognostic value for survival. CONCLUSIONS High expression of CA-9, a marker for hypoxia and acidosis, is associated with favorable prognosis in oligodendroglioma. In addition, it may serve as a simple screening test for 1p/19q co-deletion if validated in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sith Sathornsumetee
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; NANOTEC-Mahidol University Center of Excellence in Nanotechnology for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Pornsuk Cheunsuchon
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tumtip Sangruchi
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
204
|
Molecular Diagnostic and Prognostic Subtyping of Gliomas in Tunisian Population. Mol Neurobiol 2016; 54:2381-2394. [PMID: 26957305 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-016-9805-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
It has become increasingly evident that morphologically similar gliomas may have distinct clinical phenotypes arising from diverse genetic signatures. To date, glial tumours from the Tunisian population have not been investigated. To address this, we correlated the clinico-pathology with molecular data of 110 gliomas by a combination of HM450K array, MLPA and TMA-IHC. PTEN loss and EGFR amplification were distributed in different glioma histological groups. However, 1p19q co-deletion and KIAA1549:BRAF fusion were, respectively, restricted to Oligodendroglioma and Pilocytic Astrocytoma. CDKN2A loss and EGFR overexpression were more common within high-grade gliomas. Furthermore, survival statistical correlations led us to identify Glioblastoma (GB) prognosis subtypes. In fact, significant lower overall survival (OS) was detected within GB that overexpressed EGFR and Cox2. In addition, IDH1R132H mutation seemed to provide a markedly survival advantage. Interestingly, the association of IDHR132H mutation and EGFR normal status, as well as the association of differentiation markers, defined GB subtypes with good prognosis. By contrast, poor survival GB subtypes were defined by the combination of PTEN loss with PDGFRa expression and/or EGFR amplification. Additionally, GB presenting p53-negative staining associated with CDKN2A loss or p21 positivity represented a subtype with short survival. Thus, distinct molecular subtypes with individualised prognosis were identified. Interestingly, we found a unique histone mutation in a poor survival young adult GB case. This tumour exceptionally associated the H3F3A G34R mutation and MYCN amplification as well as 1p36 loss and 10q loss. Furthermore, by exhibiting a remarkable methylation profile, it emphasised the oncogenic power of G34R mutation connecting gliomagenesis and chromatin regulation.
Collapse
|
205
|
Prognostic Value of O-(2-[18F]-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging for Histopathologic Characteristics and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Low-Grade Glioma. World Neurosurg 2016; 89:230-9. [PMID: 26855307 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Revised: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ((18)F-FET-PET) imaging is applied for tumor grading, prognostic stratification, and diagnosis of tumor recurrence, especially in high-grade gliomas. Experience with (18)F-FET-PET imaging in low-grade gliomas is limited. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess (18)F-FET-PET tracer uptake in low-grade gliomas and to investigate possible correlations with contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathology. METHODS A total of 65 patients (29 female, 36 male, median age 38 years) with newly diagnosed or recurrent low-grade gliomas for whom preoperative MRI and (18)F-FET-PET imaging were available were included. Tumor entity, tumor location, as well as histopathology (isocitrate dehydrogenase [IDH] 1/2 mutation, Ki67, p53, oligodendroglial differentiation, 1p19q codeletion), and progression-free survival were assessed. (18)F-FET-PET images were acquired and fused to MRI (T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) and tumor volume was measured in areas with a tumor-to-background ratio >1.3, >1.6, and >2.0 and in MRI. RESULTS PET tracer uptake was observed in 78.5% of all World Health Organization Grade I and II tumors. (18)F-FET uptake showed a high negative predictive value for oligodendroglial components and for 1p19q codeletion. No further significant correlation between histologic features, progression-free survival, or IDH1/2 mutation status and tracer uptake was observed. CONCLUSIONS We found that 78.5% of low-grade gliomas do show elevated tracer uptake in (18)F-FET-PET imaging. Low-grade glioma without tracer uptake exclude oligodendroglial differentiation and 1p19q codeletion. Further differentiation between molecular subtypes is not possible with static (18)F-FET-PET. No correlation of progression-free survival to tracer uptake and IDH1/2-mutation status was observed.
Collapse
|
206
|
Jiang T, Mao Y, Ma W, Mao Q, You Y, Yang X, Jiang C, Kang C, Li X, Chen L, Qiu X, Wang W, Li W, Yao Y, Li S, Li S, Wu A, Sai K, Bai H, Li G, Chen B, Yao K, Wei X, Liu X, Zhang Z, Dai Y, Lv S, Wang L, Lin Z, Dong J, Xu G, Ma X, Cai J, Zhang W, Wang H, Chen L, Zhang C, Yang P, Yan W, Liu Z, Hu H, Chen J, Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang Y, You G, Han L, Bao Z, Liu Y, Wang Y, Fan X, Liu S, Liu X, Wang Y, Wang Q. CGCG clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult diffuse gliomas. Cancer Lett 2016; 375:263-273. [PMID: 26966000 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 304] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The Chinese Glioma Cooperative Group (CGCG) Guideline Panel for adult diffuse gliomas provided recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The Panel covered all fields of expertise in neuro-oncology, i.e. neurosurgeons, neurologists, neuropathologists, neuroradiologists, radiation and medical oncologists and clinical trial experts. The task made clearer and more transparent choices about outcomes considered most relevant through searching the references considered most relevant and evaluating their value. The scientific evidence of papers collected from the literature was evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and recommendations were given accordingly. The recommendations will provide a framework and assurance for the strategy of diagnostic and therapeutic measures to reduce complications from unnecessary treatment and cost. The guideline should serve as an application for all professionals involved in the management of patients with adult diffuse glioma and also as a source of knowledge for insurance companies and other institutions involved in the cost regulation of cancer care in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Jiang
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100069, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing 100050, China.
| | - Ying Mao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
| | - Wenbin Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
| | - Qing Mao
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
| | - Yongping You
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
| | - Xuejun Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Key Laboratory of Post-trauma Neuro-repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
| | - Chuanlu Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Chunsheng Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Key Laboratory of Post-trauma Neuro-repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Xuejun Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
| | - Ling Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xiaoguang Qiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Weimin Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510010, China
| | - Wenbin Li
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
| | - Yu Yao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Shaowu Li
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Shouwei Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Anhua Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Ke Sai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Hongmin Bai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510010, China
| | - Guilin Li
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Baoshi Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Kun Yao
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Xinting Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Xianzhi Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Zhiwen Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital Affiliated to the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Yiwu Dai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Military Region General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Shengqing Lv
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China
| | - Zhixiong Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Jun Dong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Guozheng Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Xiaodong Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jinquan Cai
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Hongjun Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Lingchao Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | | | - Pei Yang
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Wei Yan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Zhixiong Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
| | - Huimin Hu
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yuqing Liu
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yuan Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Zhiliang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yongzhi Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Gan You
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Lei Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Key Laboratory of Post-trauma Neuro-repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Zhaoshi Bao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yanwei Liu
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yinyan Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Xing Fan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xing Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Qixue Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Key Laboratory of Post-trauma Neuro-repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
207
|
Saito T, Muragaki Y, Maruyama T, Komori T, Tamura M, Nitta M, Tsuzuki S, Kawamata T. Calcification on CT is a simple and valuable preoperative indicator of 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity in supratentorial brain tumors that are suspected grade II and III gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 2016; 33:175-82. [PMID: 26849373 DOI: 10.1007/s10014-016-0249-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas with 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) are known to be associated with longer patient survival and higher sensitivity to treatment than tumors without 1p/19q LOH. This study was designed to clarify whether the preoperative finding of calcification on CT was correlated with 1p/19q LOH in patients with suspected WHO grade II and III gliomas. This study included 250 adult patients who underwent resection for primary supratentorial tumors at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital. The tumors were suspected, based on MRI findings, to be WHO grade II or III gliomas. The presence of calcification on the patients' CT images was qualitatively evaluated before treatment. After surgery, the resected tumors were examined to determine their 1p/19q status and mutations of IDH1 and p53. The presence of calcification was significantly correlated with 1p/19q LOH (P < 0.0001), with a positive predictive value of 91 %. The tumors of all the 78 patients with calcification were diagnosed as oligodendroglial tumors. Seventy of these patients showed classic oligodendroglial features, while 8 patients showed non-classic features. Calcification on CT is a simple and valuable preoperative indicator of 1p/19q LOH in supratentorial brain tumors that are suspected to be WHO grade II and III gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taiichi Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiro Muragaki
- Faculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Maruyama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Komori
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Neuropathology), Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manabu Tamura
- Faculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Nitta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takakazu Kawamata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
208
|
Abstract
Oligodendroglioma are glial tumours, predominantly occurring in adults. Their hallmark molecular feature is codeletion of the 1p and 19q chromosome arms, which is not only of diagnostic but also of prognostic and predictive relevance. On imaging, these tumours characteristically show calcification, and they have a cortical–subcortical location, most commonly in the frontal lobe. Owing to their superficial location, there may be focal thinning or remodelling of the overlying skull. In contrast to other low-grade gliomas, minimal to moderate enhancement is commonly seen and perfusion may be moderately increased. This complicates differentiation from high-grade, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, in which enhancement and increased perfusion are also common. New enhancement in a previously non-enhancing, untreated tumour, however, is suggestive of malignant transformation, as is high growth rate. MR spectroscopy may further aid in the differentiation between low- and high-grade oligodendroglioma. A relatively common feature of recurrent disease is leptomeningeal dissemination, but extraneural spread is rare. Tumours with the 1p/19q codeletion more commonly show heterogeneous signal intensity, particularly on T2 weighted imaging; calcifications; an indistinct margin; and mildly increased perfusion and metabolism than 1p/19q intact tumours. For the initial diagnosis of oligodendroglioma, MRI and CT are complementary; MRI is superior to CT in assessing tumour extent and cortical involvement, whereas CT is most sensitive to calcification. Advanced and functional imaging techniques may aid in grading and assessing the molecular genotype as well as in differentiating between tumour recurrence and radiation necrosis, but so far no unequivocal method or combination of methods is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Masui K, Mischel PS, Reifenberger G. Molecular classification of gliomas. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2016; 134:97-120. [PMID: 26948350 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802997-8.00006-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The identification of distinct genetic and epigenetic profiles in different types of gliomas has revealed novel diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers for refinement of glioma classification and improved prediction of therapy response and outcome. Therefore, the new (2016) World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system breaks with the traditional principle of diagnosis based on histologic criteria only and incorporates molecular markers. This will involve a multilayered approach combining histologic features and molecular information in an "integrated diagnosis". We review the current state of diagnostic molecular markers for gliomas, focusing on isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/IDH2) gene mutation, α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) gene mutation, 1p/19q co-deletion and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation in adult tumors, as well as v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and H3 histone family 3A (H3F3A) aberrations in pediatric gliomas. We also outline prognostic and predictive molecular markers, including O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, and discuss the potential clinical relevance of biologic glioblastoma subtypes defined by integration of multiomics data. Commonly used methods for individual marker detection as well as novel large-scale DNA methylation profiling and next-generation sequencing approaches are discussed. Finally, we illustrate how advances in molecular diagnostics affect novel strategies of targeted therapy, thereby raising new challenges and identifying new leads for personalized treatment of glioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenta Masui
- Department of Pathology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul S Mischel
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Department of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Field K, Rosenthal M, Khasraw M, Sawkins K, Nowak A. Evolving management of low grade glioma: No consensus amongst treating clinicians. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 23:81-87. [PMID: 26601811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 05/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
211
|
Abstract
Sorting and grading of glial tumors by the WHO classification provide clinicians with guidance as to the predicted course of the disease and choice of treatment. Nonetheless, histologically identical tumors may have very different outcome and response to treatment. Molecular markers that carry both diagnostic and prognostic information add useful tools to traditional classification by redefining tumor subtypes within each WHO category. Therefore, molecular markers have become an integral part of tumor assessment in modern neuro-oncology and biomarker status now guides clinical decisions in some subtypes of gliomas. The routine assessment of IDH status improves histological diagnostic accuracy by differentiating diffuse glioma from reactive gliosis. It carries a favorable prognostic implication for all glial tumors and it is predictive for chemotherapeutic response in anaplastic oligodendrogliomas with codeletion of 1p/19q chromosomes. Glial tumors that contain chromosomal codeletion of 1p/19q are defined as tumors of oligodendroglial lineage and have favorable prognosis. MGMT promoter methylation is a favorable prognostic marker in astrocytic high-grade gliomas and it is predictive for chemotherapeutic response in anaplastic gliomas with wild-type IDH1/2 and in glioblastoma of the elderly. The clinical implication of other molecular markers of gliomas like mutations of EGFR and ATRX genes and BRAF fusion or point mutation is highlighted. The potential of molecular biomarker-based classification to guide future therapeutic approach is discussed and accentuated.
Collapse
|
212
|
Berger MS, Hervey-Jumper S, Wick W. Astrocytic gliomas WHO grades II and III. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2016; 134:345-60. [PMID: 26948365 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802997-8.00021-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
World Health Organization grades II and III lower-grade astrocytomas are a challenging area in neuro-oncology. One the one hand, for proper diagnosis, the analysis of molecular factors, especially mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase and 1p/19q status in the tumor status needs to be done in addition to classical neuropathology. Further, the high clinical and prognostic value of a maximal safe resection requires a profound knowledge of presurgical diagnosis and surgical as well as imaging techniques to ensure optimal outcome for patients. Also medical treatment may be more intensive than previously believed, with randomized trials providing evidence for a benefit in overall survival by combined chemoradiation versus radiation alone. A critical problem concerns the considerable undesirable effects of therapeutic interventions on long-term health-related quality of life, cognitive and functional outcome as well as future developments in this still difficult disease that will need to be addressed in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Taubman Health Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurooncology, University Clinic of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
Van Den Bent MJ, Bromberg JEC, Buckner J. Low-grade and anaplastic oligodendroglioma. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2016; 134:361-80. [PMID: 26948366 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802997-8.00022-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas have long attracted interest because of their sensitivity to chemotherapy, in particular in the subset of 1p/19q co-deleted tumors. Recent molecular studies have shown that all 1p/19q co-deleted tumors have IDH mutations and most of them also have TERT mutations. Because of the presence of similar typical genetic alterations in astrocytoma and glioblastoma, the current trend is to diagnose these tumors on the basis of their molecular profile. Further long-term follow-up analysis of both EORTC and RTOG randomized studies on (neo)adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy indeed improves outcome, and this is now standard of care. It is also equally clear that benefit to PCV chemotherapy is not limited to the 1p/19q co-deleted cases; potential other predictive factors are IDH mutations and MGMT promoter methylation. Moreover, a recent RTOG study on low-grade glioma also noted an improved outcome after adjuvant PCV chemotherapy, thus making (PCV) chemotherapy now standard of care for all 1p/19q co-deleted tumors regardless of grade. It remains unclear whether temozolomide provides the same survival benefit, as no data from well-designed clinical trials on adjuvant temozolomide in this tumor type are available. Another question that remains is whether one can safely leave out radiotherapy as part of initial treatment to avoid cognitive side-effects of radiotherapy. The current data suggest that delaying radiotherapy and treatment with chemotherapy only may be detrimental for overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin J Van Den Bent
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jacolien E C Bromberg
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Buckner
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Cahill DP, Sloan AE, Nahed BV, Aldape KD, Louis DN, Ryken TC, Kalkanis SN, Olson JJ. The role of neuropathology in the management of patients with diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 2015; 125:531-49. [PMID: 26530263 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1909-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 08/29/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION Adult patients (age ≥18 years) who have suspected low-grade diffuse glioma. QUESTION What are the optimal neuropathological techniques to diagnose low-grade diffuse glioma in the adult? RECOMMENDATION LEVEL I: Histopathological analysis of a representative surgical sample of the lesion should be used to provide the diagnosis of low-grade diffuse glioma. LEVEL III Both frozen section and cytopathologic/smear evaluation should be used to aid the intra-operative assessment of low-grade diffuse glioma diagnosis. A resection specimen is preferred over a biopsy specimen, to minimize the potential for sampling error issues. TARGET POPULATION Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION In adult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is testing for IDH1 mutation (R132H and/or others) warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? RECOMMENDATION LEVEL II IDH gene mutation assessment, via IDH1 R132H antibody and/or IDH1/2 mutation hotspot sequencing, is highly-specific for low-grade diffuse glioma, and is recommended as an additional test for classification and prognosis. TARGET POPULATION Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION In adult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is testing for 1p/19q loss warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? RECOMMENDATION LEVEL III 1p/19q loss-of-heterozygosity testing, by FISH, array-CGH or PCR, is recommended as an additional test in oligodendroglial cases for prognosis and potential treatment planning. TARGET POPULATION Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION In adult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is MGMT promoter methylation testing warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? RECOMMENDATION There is insufficient evidence to recommend methyl-guanine methyl-transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation testing as a routine for low-grade diffuse gliomas. It is recommended that patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials to assess the value of this and related markers for this target population. TARGET POPULATION Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION In adult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is Ki-67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry warranted? If so, is there a preferred method to quantitate results? RECOMMENDATION LEVEL III Ki67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry is recommended as an option for prognostic assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 32 Fruit Street, Yankey 9E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | | | | | - Kenneth D Aldape
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David N Louis
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy C Ryken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Steven N Kalkanis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
215
|
Woehrer A, Hainfellner JA. Molecular diagnostics: techniques and recommendations for 1p/19q assessment. CNS Oncol 2015; 4:295-306. [PMID: 26545171 DOI: 10.2217/cns.15.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Several morphology- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for chromosome 1p 19q deletion status assessment are available. Important prerequisites for all molecular techniques concern tissue quality and selection of regions of interest. The most common methods for diagnostic 1p 19q assessment are fluorescence in situ hybridization and PCR-based microsatellite analysis. While the latter requires the use of autologous blood samples, more advanced techniques such as array comparative genomic hybridization, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or real-time PCR are independent from autologous DNA samples. However, due to high technical demand and experience required their applicability as diagnostic tests remains to be shown. On the other hand, chromogenic in situ hybridization evolves as attractive alternative to FISH. Herein, the available test methods are reviewed and outlined, their advantages and drawbacks being discussed in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adelheid Woehrer
- Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes A Hainfellner
- Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
216
|
Second Surgery in Insular Low-Grade Gliomas. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:497610. [PMID: 26539503 PMCID: PMC4619843 DOI: 10.1155/2015/497610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2015] [Revised: 08/15/2015] [Accepted: 08/31/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background. Given the technical difficulties, a limited number of works have been published on insular gliomas surgery and risk factors for tumor recurrence (TR) are poorly documented. Objective. The aim of the study was to determine TR in adult patients with initial diagnosis of insular Low-Grade Gliomas (LGGs) that subsequently underwent second surgery. Methods. A consecutive series of 53 patients with insular LGGs was retrospectively reviewed; 23 patients had two operations for TR. Results. At the time of second surgery, almost half of the patients had experienced progression into high-grade gliomas (HGGs). Univariate analysis showed that TR is influenced by the following: extent of resection (EOR) (P < 0.002), ΔVT2T1 value (P < 0.001), histological diagnosis of oligodendroglioma (P = 0.017), and mutation of IDH1 (P = 0.022). The multivariate analysis showed that EOR at first surgery was the independent predictor for TR (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In patients with insular LGG the EOR at first surgery represents the major predictive factor for TR. At time of TR, more than 50% of cases had progressed in HGG, raising the question of the oncological management after the first surgery.
Collapse
|
217
|
Claus EB, Walsh KM, Wiencke JK, Molinaro AM, Wiemels JL, Schildkraut JM, Bondy ML, Berger M, Jenkins R, Wrensch M. Survival and low-grade glioma: the emergence of genetic information. Neurosurg Focus 2015; 38:E6. [PMID: 25552286 DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.focus12367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 289] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Significant gaps exist in our understanding of the causes and clinical management of glioma. One of the biggest gaps is how best to manage low-grade (World Health Organization [WHO] Grade II) glioma. Low-grade glioma (LGG) is a uniformly fatal disease of young adults (mean age 41 years), with survival averaging approximately 7 years. Although LGG patients have better survival than patients with high-grade (WHO Grade III or IV) glioma, all LGGs eventually progress to high-grade glioma and death. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute suggest that for the majority of LGG patients, overall survival has not significantly improved over the past 3 decades, highlighting the need for intensified study of this tumor. Recently published research suggests that historically used clinical variables are not sufficient (and are likely inferior) prognostic and predictive indicators relative to information provided by recently discovered tumor markers (e.g., 1p/19q deletion and IDH1 or IDH2 mutation status), tumor expression profiles (e.g., the proneural profile) and/or constitutive genotype (e.g., rs55705857 on 8q24.21). Discovery of such tumor and constitutive variation may identify variables needed to improve randomization in clinical trials as well as identify patients more sensitive to current treatments and targets for improved treatment in the future. This article reports on survival trends for patients diagnosed with LGG within the United States from 1973 through 2011 and reviews the emerging role of tumor and constitutive genetics in refining risk stratification, defining targeted therapy, and improving survival for this group of relatively young patients.
Collapse
|
218
|
Padul V, Epari S, Moiyadi A, Shetty P, Shirsat NV. ETV/Pea3 family transcription factor-encoding genes are overexpressed in CIC-mutant oligodendrogliomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2015; 54:725-33. [PMID: 26357005 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Revised: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Oligodendrogliomas with combined loss of chromosome arms 1p and 19q are known to be particularly sensitive to chemotherapy, and the CIC gene located on 19q is known to be mutated in over 50% of the 1p/19q codeleted oligodendrogliomas. However, the role of CIC in the oligodendroglioma pathogenesis is not known. Exome sequencing of 11 oligodendroglial tumors identified 9 tumors with combined loss of 1p and 19q. Somatic mutations were found in the CIC and FUBP1 genes. Recurrent somatic mutations were also identified in the Notch signaling pathway genes NOTCH1 and MAML3, the chromatin modifying gene ARID1A and in KRAS. Comparison of the transcriptome profiles of CIC-mutant and CIC-wild type oligodendrogliomas from the study cohort as well as 65 1p/19q codeleted oligodendrogliomas from the TCGA cohort identified genes encoding the ETV transcription factor family to be significantly upregulated in the CIC-mutant tumors. Upregulation of a number of negative regulators of the receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathway like Sprouty and SPRED family members in the CIC-mutant oligodendrogliomas is likely due to the constitutive activation of the pathway resulting from inactive CIC protein. Higher expression of the oncogenic ETV transcription factors in the CIC-mutant oligodendrogliomas may make these tumors more aggressive than the CIC-wild type tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Padul
- Shirsat Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Epari
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Aliasgar Moiyadi
- Neurosurgery Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Prakash Shetty
- Neurosurgery Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Neelam Vishwanath Shirsat
- Shirsat Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
219
|
Chamberlain MC, Born D. Prognostic significance of relative 1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglial tumors. J Neurooncol 2015; 125:249-51. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1906-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
220
|
Vogelbaum MA, Hu C, Peereboom DM, Macdonald DR, Giannini C, Suh JH, Jenkins RB, Laack NN, Brachman DG, Shrieve DC, Souhami L, Mehta MP. Phase II trial of pre-irradiation and concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytomas: long term results of RTOG BR0131. J Neurooncol 2015; 124:413-20. [PMID: 26088460 PMCID: PMC4584176 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1845-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
We report on the long-term results of a phase II study of pre-irradiation temozolomide followed by concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) and mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytoma. Pre-RT temozolomide was given for up to 6 cycles. RT with concurrent temozolomide was administered to patients with less than a complete radiographic response. Forty eligible patients were entered and 32 completed protocol treatment. With a median follow-up time of 8.7 years (range 1.1-10.1), median progression-free survival (PFS) is 5.8 years (95 % CI 2.0, NR) and median overall survival (OS) has not been reached (5.9, NR). 1p/19q data are available in 37 cases; 23 tumors had codeletion while 14 tumors had no loss or loss of only 1p or 19q (non-codeleted). In codeleted patients, 9 patients have progressed and 4 have died; neither median PFS nor OS have been reached and two patients who received only pre-RT temozolomide and no RT have remained progression-free for over 7 years. 3-year PFS and 6-year OS are 78 % (95 % CI 61-95 %) and 83 % (95 % CI 67-98 %), respectively. Codeleted patients show a trend towards improved 6-year survival when compared to the codeleted procarbazine/CCNU/vincristrine (PCV) and RT cohort in RTOG 9402 (67 %, 95 % CI 55-79 %). For non-codeleted patients, median PFS and OS are 1.3 and 5.8 years, respectively. These updated results suggest that the regimen of dose intense, pre-RT temozolomide followed by concurrent RT/temozolomide has significant activity, particularly in patients with 1p/19q codeleted AOs and MAOs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Vogelbaum
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, ND40, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - Chen Hu
- RTOG Statistical Center, 1818 Market Street, Suite 1600, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA
| | - David M Peereboom
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, ND40, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - David R Macdonald
- University of Western Ontario London Regional Cancer Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | | | - John H Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, ND40, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | | | - Nadia N Laack
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David G Brachman
- Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, PO Box 41700, Phoenix, AZ, 85080, USA
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- University of Utah Health Science Center, 1950 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Luis Souhami
- McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- University of Maryland, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201-1559, USA
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Nauen D, Haley L, Lin MT, Perry A, Giannini C, Burger PC, Rodriguez FJ. Molecular Analysis of Pediatric Oligodendrogliomas Highlights Genetic Differences with Adult Counterparts and Other Pediatric Gliomas. Brain Pathol 2015. [PMID: 26206478 DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Oligodendroglioma represents a distinctive neoplasm in adults but similar neoplasms occur rarely in children. We studied 20 cases of pediatric oligodendroglioma by SNP array (median age 9 years, range 1-19; 15 grade II and 5 grade III). Cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 8 (53%) grade II and all five anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. Most changes were in the form of deletion and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH). The most common abnormality was 1p deletion (n = 5). Whole arm 1p19q co-deletion was present in three cases from adolescent patients and 9p loss in 3, including one low-grade oligodendroglioma with CDKN2A homozygous deletion. Common losses were largely limited to the anaplastic subset (n = 5) and included 3q29 (n = 3), 11p (n = 3), 17q (n = 3), 4q (n = 2), 6p (n = 2), 13q (n = 2), 14q (n = 2), 17p (n = 2) and whole Ch 18 loss (n = 2). Gains were non-recurrent except for whole Ch 7 (n = 2) and gain on 12q (n = 2) including the MDM2 locus. Possible germ line LOH (or uniparental disomy) was present in seven cases (35%), with one focal abnormality (22q13.1-13.2) in two. BRAF-KIAA1549 fusions and BRAF p.V600E mutations were absent (n = 13 and 8). In summary, cytogenetic alterations in pediatric oligodendrogliomas are characterized mostly by genomic losses, particularly in anaplastic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nauen
- Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lisa Haley
- Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ming-Tseh Lin
- Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Arie Perry
- Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Caterina Giannini
- Laboratory of Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - Peter C Burger
- Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Fausto J Rodriguez
- Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Iwadate Y, Matsutani T, Hirono S, Ikegami S, Shinozaki N, Saeki N. IDH1 mutation is prognostic for diffuse astrocytoma but not low-grade oligodendrogliomas in patients not treated with early radiotherapy. J Neurooncol 2015; 124:493-500. [PMID: 26243269 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1863-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Despite accumulating knowledge regarding molecular backgrounds, the optimal management strategy for low-grade gliomas remains controversial. One reason is the marked heterogeneity in the clinical course. To establish an accurate subclassification of low-grade gliomas, we retrospectively evaluated isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutation in clinical specimens of diffuse astrocytomas (DA) and oligodendroglial tumors separately. No patients were treated with early radiotherapy, and modified PCV chemotherapy was used for postoperative residual tumors or recurrence in oligodendroglial tumors. Immunohistochemical evaluation of IDH status, p53 status, O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase expression, and the MIB-1 index were performed. The 1p and 19q status was analyzed with fluorescence in situ hybridization. Ninety-four patients were followed for a median period of 8.5 years. For DAs, p53 was prognostic for progression- free survival (PFS) and IDH1 was significant for overall survival (OS) with multivariate analysis. In contrast, for oligodendroglial tumors, none of the parameters was significant for PFS or OS. Thus, the significance of IDH1 mutation is not clear in oligodendroglial tumors that are homogeneously indolent and chemosensitive. In contrast, DAs are heterogeneous tumors including some potentially malignant tumors that can be predicted by examining the IDH1 mutation status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Iwadate
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
| | - Tomoo Matsutani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Hirono
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Shiro Ikegami
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Natsuki Shinozaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Narita Red-Cross Hospital, 90-1 Iida-cho, Narita, Chiba, 286-8523, Japan
| | - Naokatsu Saeki
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
Pinkham M, Telford N, Whitfield G, Colaco R, O'Neill F, McBain C. FISHing Tips: What Every Clinician Should Know About 1p19q Analysis in Gliomas Using Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27:445-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Revised: 04/01/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
224
|
Drucker KL, Gianinni C, Decker PA, Diamandis EP, Scarisbrick IA. Prognostic significance of multiple kallikreins in high-grade astrocytoma. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:565. [PMID: 26231762 PMCID: PMC4521496 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1566-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kallikreins have clinical value as prognostic markers in a subset of malignancies examined to date, including kallikrein 3 (prostate specific antigen) in prostate cancer. We previously demonstrated that kallikrein 6 is expressed at higher levels in grade IV compared to grade III astrocytoma and is associated with reduced survival of GBM patients. METHODS In this study we determined KLK1, KLK6, KLK7, KLK8, KLK9 and KLK10 protein expression in two independent tissue microarrays containing 60 grade IV and 8 grade III astrocytoma samples. Scores for staining intensity, percent of tumor stained and immunoreactivity scores (IR, product of intensity and percent) were determined and analyzed for correlation with patient survival. RESULTS Grade IV glioma was associated with higher levels of kallikrein-immunostaining compared to grade III specimens. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that elevated KLK6- or KLK7-IR was associated with poor patient prognosis. In addition, an increased percent of tumor immunoreactive for KLK6 or KLK9 was associated with decreased survival in grade IV patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that patients with KLK6-IR < 10, KLK6 percent tumor core stained < 3, or KLK7-IR < 9 had a significantly improved survival. Multivariable analysis indicated that the significance of these parameters was maintained even after adjusting for gender and performance score. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that elevations in glioblastoma KLK6, KLK7 and KLK9 protein have utility as prognostic markers of patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen L Drucker
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Medical and Graduate School, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Caterina Gianinni
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Medical and Graduate School, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Paul A Decker
- Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Medical and Graduate School, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Eleftherios P Diamandis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5T 3 L9, Canada.
| | - Isobel A Scarisbrick
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Medical and Graduate School, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. .,Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Medical and Graduate School, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
225
|
Tanaka K, Sasayama T, Mizukawa K, Takata K, Sulaiman NS, Nishihara M, Kohta M, Sasaki R, Hirose T, Itoh T, Kohmura E. Combined IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status on long-term survival of patients with cerebral low-grade glioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 138:37-44. [PMID: 26276726 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2015] [Revised: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The management of low-grade glioma (LGG) still remains controversial because the effectiveness of early and extensive resection is unclear, and the use of radiation therapy or chemotherapy is not well-defined. In particular, the importance of prognostic factors for survival remains a matter of discussion. The purpose of this study was to validate prognostic factors for survival in patients with LGG. MATERIALS AND METHODS A consecutive series of 55 patients with WHO grade II LGG treated in our institute between 1983 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the prognostic factors for survival. All data were retrospectively analyzed from the aspect of baseline characteristics, pathological findings, genetic change, surgical treatments, adjuvant therapies, and survival time. Cox multivariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS There were 28 patients with diffuse astrocytoma (DA), 21 patients with oligodendroglioma (OG), and 6 patients with oligoastrocytoma (OA) diagnosed on initial surgery. The median overall survival was 193 months and fifteen patients (27.3%) died. A mutation in isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) was found in 72.9% of LGG, and this mutation was positively correlated with methylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) (p=0.02). A better prognosis was significantly associated with combined IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status (both positive vs both negative, HR 0.079 [95% CI 0.008-0.579], p=0.012), as well as histology (OG vs DA and OA, HR 0.158 [95% CI 0.022-0.674], p=0.011) and tumor size (<6 cm vs ≥6 cm, HR 0.120 [95% CI 0.017-0.595], p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS Tumor histology, size and IDH-mutation status are important predictors for prolonged overall survival in patients with LGG and may provide a reliable tool for standardizing future treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Tanaka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
| | - Takashi Sasayama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Katsu Mizukawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kumi Takata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nor Shazrina Sulaiman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masamitsu Nishihara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masaaki Kohta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ryohei Sasaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takanori Hirose
- Department of Pathology for Regional Communication, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tomoo Itoh
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Eiji Kohmura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
Ramakrishna R, Pisapia D. Recent Molecular Advances in Our Understanding of Glioma. Cureus 2015; 7:e287. [PMID: 26244119 PMCID: PMC4523144 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Our molecular understanding of glioma has undergone a sea change over the last decade. In this review, we discuss two recent articles that employed whole genome sequencing to subclassify gliomas vis-à-vis known molecular alterations. We further discuss the relevance of these findings vis-à-vis current treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Ramakrishna
- Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College ; Neurological Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - David Pisapia
- Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College ; Pathology, New York Presbyterian Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Molecularly based management of gliomas in clinical practice. Neurol Sci 2015; 36:1551-7. [PMID: 26194534 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2332-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2014] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Histological subtyping and grading of malignancy are the cornerstone of the present World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of CNS tumors. However, among diffuse gliomas of the adult, patients with histologically identical tumors may have different outcomes. As the genomic analysis of these tumors has progressed, it has become clear that specific molecular features transcend histologically defined variants, and may become markers of prognostic and/or predictive value. At the present time, the number of molecular biomarkers with confirmed clinical relevance (MGMT promoter methylation, 1p/19q codeletion, IDH1/2 mutations) remains limited, but new technologies will hopefully provide new candidates requiring rigorous validation in well-designed clinical trials.
Collapse
|
228
|
Abstract
Newly published studies validate prior reports that specific combinations of genetic alternations in IDH1/2, ATRX, TERT, TP53, and co-deletion of 1p/19q have the ability to reclassify gliomas into rational subsets, defining a glioma's biological and clinical behavior more accurately than stratifications based solely on histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Foote
- The Swim Across America Laboratory at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; The Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutic at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- The Swim Across America Laboratory at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; The Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutic at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Luis A Diaz
- The Swim Across America Laboratory at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; The Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutic at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Abstract
Low-grade diffuse gliomas are a heterogeneous group of primary glial brain tumors with highly variable survival. Currently, patients with low-grade diffuse gliomas are stratified into risk subgroups by subjective histopathologic criteria with significant interobserver variability. Several key molecular signatures have emerged as diagnostic, prognostic, and predictor biomarkers for tumor classification and patient risk stratification. In this review, we discuss the effect of the most critical molecular alterations described in diffuse (IDH1/2, 1p/19q codeletion, ATRX, TERT, CIC, and FUBP1) and circumscribed (BRAF-KIAA1549, BRAF(V600E), and C11orf95-RELA fusion) gliomas. These molecular features reflect tumor heterogeneity and have specific associations with patient outcome that determine appropriate patient management. This has led to an important, fundamental shift toward developing a molecular classification of World Health Organization grade II-III diffuse glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Olar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
230
|
Hayashi S, Sasaki H, Kimura T, Abe T, Nakamura T, Kitamura Y, Miwa T, Kameyama K, Hirose Y, Yoshida K. Molecular-genetic and clinical characteristics of gliomas with astrocytic appearance and total 1p19q loss in a single institutional consecutive cohort. Oncotarget 2015; 6:15871-81. [PMID: 25991674 PMCID: PMC4599243 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognostic significance of 1p19q loss in astrocytic gliomas has been inconclusive.We collected 57 gliomas with total 1p19q loss from among 218 cases of WHO grade-II/III gliomas operated at Keio University Hospital between 1990 and 2010. These tumors were classified as oligodendroglial or "astrocytic" by a WHO-criteria-based institutional diagnosis. Chromosomal copy number aberrations (CNAs), IDH 1/2 mutations, MGMT promoter methylation, and expression of p53 and ATRX were assessed. Survival outcome was compared between the two histological groups.Of the 57 codeleted gliomas, 37, 16, and four were classified as oligodendroglial, "astrocytic", and unclassified, respectively. Comparative genomic hybridization revealed that although chromosome 7q/7 gain was more frequent in "astrocytic" gliomas, other CNAs occurred at a similar frequency in both groups. None of the "astrocytic" gliomas showed p53 accumulation, and ATRX loss was found in three of the 15 "astrocytic" gliomas. The estimated overall survival (OS) curves in the patients with codeleted oligodendroglial and "astrocytic" gliomas overlapped, and the median OS was 187 and 184 months, respectively. Histopathological re-assessment by a single pathologist showed consistent results.Gliomas with total 1p19q loss with "astrocytic" features have molecular and biological characteristics comparable to those of oligodendroglial tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeko Hayashi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hikaru Sasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tokuhiro Kimura
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Present address: Department of Pathology, Yamaguchi University Graduate, School of Medicine, Minami-kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Abe
- Center for Clinical Research, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takumi Nakamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Kitamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Takebayashi, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Tomoru Miwa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaori Kameyama
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hirose
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kazunari Yoshida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
Alentorn A, Duran-Peña A, Pingle SC, Piccioni DE, Idbaih A, Kesari S. Molecular profiling of gliomas: potential therapeutic implications. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015; 15:955-62. [PMID: 26118895 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1062368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumor. Over the last decade, significant advances have been made in the molecular characterization of this tumor group, identifying predictive biomarkers or molecular actionable targets, and paving the way to molecular-based targeted therapies. This personalized therapeutic approach is effective and illustrated in the present review. Among many molecular abnormalities, BRAF mutation and mTOR activation in pilocytic astrocytomas and subependymal giant cell astrocytomas are actionable targets sensitive to vemurafenib and everolimus, respectively. Chromosome arms 1p/19q co-deletion and IDH mutational status are pivotal in driving delivery of early procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine chemotherapy in anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors. Although consensus to assess MGMT promoter methylation is not reached yet, it may be useful in predicting resistance to temozolomide in elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agusti Alentorn
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
232
|
Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM, Walsh KM, Decker PA, Sicotte H, Pekmezci M, Rice T, Kosel ML, Smirnov IV, Sarkar G, Caron AA, Kollmeyer TM, Praska CE, Chada AR, Halder C, Hansen HM, McCoy LS, Bracci PM, Marshall R, Zheng S, Reis GF, Pico AR, O'Neill BP, Buckner JC, Giannini C, Huse JT, Perry A, Tihan T, Berger MS, Chang SM, Prados MD, Wiemels J, Wiencke JK, Wrensch MR, Jenkins RB. Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:2499-508. [PMID: 26061753 PMCID: PMC4489704 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1407279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1396] [Impact Index Per Article: 155.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prediction of clinical behavior, response to therapy, and outcome of infiltrative glioma is challenging. On the basis of previous studies of tumor biology, we defined five glioma molecular groups with the use of three alterations: mutations in the TERT promoter, mutations in IDH, and codeletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q (1p/19q codeletion). We tested the hypothesis that within groups based on these features, tumors would have similar clinical variables, acquired somatic alterations, and germline variants. METHODS We scored tumors as negative or positive for each of these markers in 1087 gliomas and compared acquired alterations and patient characteristics among the five primary molecular groups. Using 11,590 controls, we assessed associations between these groups and known glioma germline variants. RESULTS Among 615 grade II or III gliomas, 29% had all three alterations (i.e., were triple-positive), 5% had TERT and IDH mutations, 45% had only IDH mutations, 7% were triple-negative, and 10% had only TERT mutations; 5% had other combinations. Among 472 grade IV gliomas, less than 1% were triple-positive, 2% had TERT and IDH mutations, 7% had only IDH mutations, 17% were triple-negative, and 74% had only TERT mutations. The mean age at diagnosis was lowest (37 years) among patients who had gliomas with only IDH mutations and was highest (59 years) among patients who had gliomas with only TERT mutations. The molecular groups were independently associated with overall survival among patients with grade II or III gliomas but not among patients with grade IV gliomas. The molecular groups were associated with specific germline variants. CONCLUSIONS Gliomas were classified into five principal groups on the basis of three tumor markers. The groups had different ages at onset, overall survival, and associations with germline variants, which implies that they are characterized by distinct mechanisms of pathogenesis. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette E Eckel-Passow
- From the Departments of Health Sciences Research (J.E.E.-P., P.A.D., H.S., M.L.K.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (D.H.L., G.S., A.A.C., T.M.K., C.E.P., A.R.C., C.H., C.G., R.B.J.), Neurology (D.H.L., B.P.O.), and Oncology (J.C.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; the Departments of Neurological Surgery (A.M.M., K.M.W., T.R., I.V.S., H.M.H., L.S.M., S.Z., A.P., M.S.B., S.M.C., M.D.P., J.K.W., M.R.W.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (A.M.M., P.M.B., J.W., J.K.W., M.R.W.) and Pathology (M.P., R.M., G.F.R., A.P., T.T.) and the Institute of Human Genetics (J.W., J.K.W., M.R.W.), University of California, San Francisco, and the Bioinformatics Core, Gladstone Institutes (A.R.P.) - all in San Francisco; and the Department of Pathology and Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (J.T.H.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
233
|
Tandon A, Schiff D. Therapeutic decision making in patients with newly diagnosed low grade glioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2015; 15:529-38. [PMID: 25139406 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-014-0304-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Low grade gliomas (LGG) encompass primary brain tumors that are typically well-differentiated and do not exhibit frankly malignant histologic features. These tumors can be further classified by their cellular morphology (eg, oligodendroglioma, pilocytic astrocytoma, etc), which does convey prognostic and therapeutic implications. Typically, low grade gliomas convey an overall better prognosis for patients as opposed to the higher grade primary brain tumors. Surgery for low grade gliomas and timing of such intervention remains controversial. Maximal resection of these tumors appears to prolong progression free survival. Advanced surgical techniques, including language mapping and awake craniotomies, have been shown to decrease morbidity associated with resection of lesions in eloquent areas of the brain. Radiation therapy has been proven effective in increasing time to progression in LGG, and emerging data support a role for combined modality therapy incorporating chemotherapy. Postoperative RT has been shown to have significant benefits with regards to progression free survival. Recent advances in molecular genetic markers, including the combined loss of chromosome arms 1p and 19q, and the mutation of the isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH1/IDH2) have allowed for increased accuracy of predicting susceptibility to chemotherapeutic agents, as well as having some role in determining prognosis. PCV and temozolomide chemotherapy have both been studied when assessing progression free survival for LGG patients. Approaching patients with LGGs can be somewhat daunting given the lack of Class I evidence based protocols. However, significant evidence is now mounting to suggest early, maximal surgical excision; followed by fractionated RT will be the mainstays of treatment. Clearly, additional evidence is also mounting for the addition of chemotherapy in the treatment paradigm for patients with LGGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adesh Tandon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
234
|
Applicable advances in the molecular pathology of glioblastoma. Brain Tumor Pathol 2015; 32:153-62. [PMID: 26078107 DOI: 10.1007/s10014-015-0224-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Comprising more than 80% of malignant brain tumors, glioma has proven to be a daunting cause of mortality in a vast majority of the human population. Progressive and extensive research on malignant glioma has substantially enhanced our understanding of glioma cell biology and molecular pathology. Subtypes of glioma such as astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma are currently grouped together into one pathological class, where they show many differences in histology and molecular etiology. This indicates that it may be beneficial to consider a new and radical subclassification. Thus, we summarize recent developments in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) subtypes, immunohistochemical analyses useful for diagnoses and the biological evaluation and therapeutic implications of gliomas in this review.
Collapse
|
235
|
Nauen DW, Guajardo A, Haley L, Powell K, Burger PC, Gocke CD. Chromosomal defects track tumor subpopulations and change in progression in oligodendroglioma. CONVERGENT SCIENCE PHYSICAL ONCOLOGY 2015; 1. [PMID: 31602317 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1739/1/1/015001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
To assess karyotypic changes and tumor subpopulations in progression of oligodendroglioma (ODG) we analyzed histologically diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted cases using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray data. We separated cases according to grade, which was assigned blind to karyotype information beyond 1p/19q status. The 51 WHO grade II (O2) and 18 WHO grade III (O3) specimens showed frequent chromosomal locations and patterns of change including loss of heterozygosity (LOH), often copy-neutral, on 9p and LOH on 4p and 4q together. Analysis of co-occurrence indicated that most defects were independent but also suggested increased likelihood of defects on 11q, 13q, and 14q in the presence of defects on 18, 4, and 9, respectively. We used the relative degree of change in B-allele frequency as an indicator of an abnormality's extent, and we present simulated data to clarify how information on subpopulations was thus inferred. Among 9p defects, 89.3% involved the whole tumor, whereas only 47.6% of 4q defects did so. We modeled extent through the tumor as due to a karyotypic change's likelihood of occurring and the fitness it confers on its subpopulation, and used group data to estimate these values. To assess progression directly, we evaluated specimens from six patients who underwent multiple resections since 1996. Four of these patients had received no chemotherapy or radiation, permitting assessment of the natural history of the tumor karyotype in situ. Defects present throughout a tumor at first resection remained so, whereas among subpopulations, some expanded, some remained constant, and some disappeared. The rate of expansion among subpopulations that did so was not uniform, and estimates of fitness predicted subpopulation composition at recurrence. These results extend prior studies of increased karyotypic abnormality in progression of oligodendroglioma and reveal the complex dynamics of subpopulations in the tumor over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Nauen
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Ross 558, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205, USA
| | - Andrew Guajardo
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Ross 558, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205, USA
| | - Lisa Haley
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Ross 558, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205, USA
| | - Kerry Powell
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Ross 558, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205, USA
| | - Peter C Burger
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Ross 558, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205, USA
| | - Christopher D Gocke
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Ross 558, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
236
|
Brandner S, von Deimling A. Diagnostic, prognostic and predictive relevance of molecular markers in gliomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2015; 41:694-720. [PMID: 25944653 DOI: 10.1111/nan.12246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The advances of genome-wide 'discovery platforms' and the increasing affordability of the analysis of significant sample sizes have led to the identification of novel mutations in brain tumours that became diagnostically and prognostically relevant. The development of mutation-specific antibodies has facilitated the introduction of these convenient biomarkers into most neuropathology laboratories and has changed our approach to brain tumour diagnostics. However, tissue diagnosis will remain an essential first step for the correct stratification for subsequent molecular tests, and the combined interpretation of the molecular and tissue diagnosis ideally remains with the neuropathologist. This overview will help our understanding of the pathobiology of common intrinsic brain tumours in adults and help guiding which molecular tests can supplement and refine the tissue diagnosis of the most common adult intrinsic brain tumours. This article will discuss the relevance of 1p/19q codeletions, IDH1/2 mutations, BRAF V600E and BRAF fusion mutations, more recently discovered mutations in ATRX, H3F3A, TERT, CIC and FUBP1, for diagnosis, prognostication and predictive testing. In a tumour-specific topic, the role of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations in the pathogenesis of pilocytic astrocytomas will be covered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Brandner
- Division of Neuropathology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Neurodegeneration, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ and DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
237
|
Oligodendroglioma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. Acta Neuropathol 2015; 129:809-27. [PMID: 25943885 PMCID: PMC4436696 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1424-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2015] [Revised: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
For nearly a century, the diagnosis and grading of oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas has been based on histopathology alone. Roughly 20 years ago, the first glioma-associated molecular signature was found with complete chromosome 1p and 19q codeletion being particularly common in histologically classic oligodendrogliomas. Subsequently, this codeletion appeared to not only carry diagnostic, but also prognostic and predictive information, the latter aspect only recently resolved after carefully constructed clinical trials with very long follow-up times. More recently described biomarkers, including the non-balanced translocation leading to 1p/19q codeletion, promoter hypermethylation of the MGMT gene, mutations of the IDH1 or IDH2 gene, and mutations of FUBP1 (on 1p) or CIC (on 19q), have greatly enhanced our understanding of oligodendroglioma biology, although their diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive roles are less clear. It has therefore been suggested that complete 1p/19q codeletion be required for the diagnosis of 'canonical oligodendroglioma'. This transition to an integrated morphological and molecular diagnosis may result in the disappearance of oligoastrocytoma as an entity, but brings new challenges as well. For instance it needs to be sorted out how (histopathological) criteria for grading of 'canonical oligodendrogliomas' should be adapted, how pediatric oligodendrogliomas (known to lack codeletions) should be defined, which platforms and cut-off levels should ideally be used for demonstration of particular molecular aberrations, and how the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma should be made in centers/countries where molecular diagnostics is not available. Meanwhile, smart integration of morphological and molecular information will lead to recognition of biologically much more uniform groups within the spectrum of diffuse gliomas and thereby facilitate tailored treatments for individual patients.
Collapse
|
238
|
|
239
|
Idbaih A, Duran-Peña A, Bonnet C, Ducray F. Input of molecular analysis in medical management of primary brain tumor patients. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2015; 171:457-65. [PMID: 26026669 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Primary brain tumors comprise a large group of malignant and non-malignant tumors including heterogeneous entities with various biological and clinical behaviors. Up till recently, diagnosis of brain cancers, that drives treatment decision-making, was based on integration of clinical, radiological and pathological features of patients and tumors. Over the last years, practical neuro-oncology has entered an era of molecular-based personalized medicine. Indeed, molecular features of tumors provide critical information to physicians for daily clinical management of patients and for design of relevant clinical research. Sporadic gliomas or glial tumors are the most common primary brain tumors in adults. Recently, their medical management has been revolutionized by molecular data. Indeed, optimal therapeutic management of grade III glioma patients now requires assessment of chromosome arms 1p/19q copy number and IDH mutational statuses as predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Indeed, two large phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that early chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, versus radiotherapy alone, doubles median overall survival of patients suffering from 1p/19q co-deleted and/or IDH mutated anaplastic oligodendroglial tumor. Interestingly, both biomarkers have been identified in a large proportion of WHO grade II gliomas. Their clinical value, in this population, is under investigation through multiple phase III clinical trials. In sporadic WHO grade I gliomas, and specifically in pilocytic astrocytomas, MAPK signaling pathway activation is a frequent event, mainly due to genetic alterations involving BRAF gene. This characteristic opens new therapeutic perspectives using MAPK signaling pathway inhibitors. Finally, in the most aggressive gliomas, WHO grade IV gliomas, two critical biomarkers have been identified: (i) MGMT promoter methylation associated with longer survival and better response to chemotherapy and (ii) IDH mutations predicting better prognosis. Although, further studies are needed, MGMT promoter methylation will undoubtedly be transferred soon to clinical practice. Molecular characteristics are beginning to be valuable and indispensable in neuro-oncology for better management of brain tumors patients. The near future will be marked by identification of novel molecular biomarkers and their validation for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Idbaih
- AP-HP, Hopital Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de neurologie 2-Mazarin, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UM 75, ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Inserm, U 1127, ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7225, ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - A Duran-Peña
- AP-HP, Hopital Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de neurologie 2-Mazarin, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UM 75, ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Inserm, U 1127, ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7225, ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; ICM, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - C Bonnet
- Service de Neuro-oncologie, Hôpital Neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 3, quai des Célestins, 69002 Lyon, France; Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 43, boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - F Ducray
- Service de Neuro-oncologie, Hôpital Neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 3, quai des Célestins, 69002 Lyon, France; Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 43, boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
Appin CL, Brat DJ. Biomarker-driven diagnosis of diffuse gliomas. Mol Aspects Med 2015; 45:87-96. [PMID: 26004297 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The diffuse gliomas are primary central nervous system tumors that arise most frequently in the cerebral hemispheres of adults. They are currently classified as astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas and range in grade from II to IV. Glioblastoma (GBM), grade IV, is the highest grade and most common form. The diagnosis of diffuse gliomas has historically been based primarily on histopathologic features, yet these tumors have a wide range of biological behaviors that are only partially explained by morphology. Biomarkers have now become an established component of the neuropathologic diagnosis of gliomas, since molecular alterations aid in classification, prognostication and prediction of therapeutic response. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are frequent in grades II and III infiltrating gliomas of adults, as well as secondary GBMs, and are a major discriminate of biologic class. IDH mutant infiltrating astrocytomas (grades II and III), as well as secondary GBMs, are characterized by TP53 and ATRX mutations. Oligodendrogliomas are also IDH mutant, but instead are characterized by 1p/19q co-deletion and mutations of CIC, FUBP1, Notch1 and the TERT promoter. Primary GBMs typically lack IDH mutations and demonstrate EGFR, PTEN, TP53, PDGFRA, NF1 and CDKN2A/B alterations and TERT promoter mutations. Pediatric gliomas differ in their spectrum of disease from those in adults; high grade gliomas occurring in children frequently have mutations in H3F3A, ATRX and DAXX, but not IDH. Circumscribed, low grade gliomas, such as pilocytic astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and ganglioglioma, need to be distinguished from diffuse gliomas in the pediatric population. These gliomas often harbor mutations or activating gene rearrangements in BRAF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L Appin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Daniel J Brat
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
241
|
|
242
|
Abstract
Low-grade gliomas (LGG) constitute grades I and II tumors of astrocytic and grade II tumors of oligodendroglial lineage. Although these tumors are typically slow growing, they may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality because of recurrence and malignant progression, even in the setting of optimal resection. LGG in pediatric and adult age groups are currently classified by morphologic criteria. Recent years have heralded a molecular revolution in understanding brain tumors, including LGG. Next-generation sequencing has definitively demonstrated that pediatric and adult LGG fundamentally differ in their underlying molecular characteristics, despite being histologically similar. Pediatric LGG show alterations in FGFR1 and BRAF in pilocytic astrocytomas and FGFR1 alterations in diffuse astrocytomas, each converging on the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Adult LGG are characterized by IDH1/2 mutations and ATRX mutations in astrocytic tumors and IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q codeletions in oligodendroglial tumors. TERT promoter mutations are also noted in LGG and are mainly associated with oligodendrogliomas. These findings have considerably refined approaches to classifying these tumors. Moreover, many of the molecular alterations identified in LGG directly impact on prognosis, tumor biology, and the development of novel therapies.
Collapse
|
243
|
Schaff LR, Lassman AB. Indications for Treatment: Is Observation or Chemotherapy Alone a Reasonable Approach in the Management of Low-Grade Gliomas? Semin Radiat Oncol 2015; 25:203-9. [PMID: 26050591 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas remains controversial. Recently published results from the long-term follow-up of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 9802 demonstrated medically meaningful and statistically significant survival prolongation by adding chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine after radiotherapy (RT) vs RT alone for "high"-risk patients (median 13.3 vs 7.8 years, hazard ratio = 0.59, P = 0.03). However, in the 17 years since that trial was launched, there have been advances in the understanding of low-grade gliomas biology and patient heterogeneity, an increased recognition of late neurocognitive injury from early RT, and the emergence of temozolomide as an alternative chemotherapy to procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine. These and other changes in the treatment landscape make the applicability of results from RTOG 9802 to all patients less clear. Moreover, in some patients, especially those at the lowest risk for early disease progression, deferred RT in favor of active surveillance or chemotherapy alone may remain a reasonable treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren R Schaff
- Department of Neurology, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
Laack NN, Sarkaria JN, Buckner JC. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9802: Controversy or Consensus in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Low-Grade Glioma? Semin Radiat Oncol 2015; 25:197-202. [PMID: 26050590 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of newly diagnosed or suspected low-grade glioma (LGG) is one of the most controversial areas in neuro-oncology. The heterogeneity of these tumors, concern regarding morbidity of treatment, and absence of proven overall survival benefit from any known treatment have resulted in a lack of consensus regarding the timing and extent of surgery, timing of radiotherapy (RT), and role of chemotherapy. The long-term results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9802, a phase III randomized trial comparing RT alone with RT and 6 cycles of adjuvant procarbazine, CCNU, vincristine (PCV), demonstrated an unprecedented 5.5-year improvement in median overall survival with the addition of PCV chemotherapy in high-risk patients with LGG. These results are practice changing and define a new standard of care for these patients. However, in the intervening decade since the trial was completed, novel molecular markers as well as newer chemotherapy agents such as temozolomide have been developed, which make these results difficult to incorporate into clinical practice. This review summarizes the evidence for and against the role of upfront RT and PCV in newly diagnosed patients with LGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
245
|
Rhun EL, Taillibert S, Chamberlain MC. The future of high-grade glioma: Where we are and where are we going. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6:S9-S44. [PMID: 25722939 PMCID: PMC4338495 DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.151331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 10/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade glioma (HGG) are optimally treated with maximum safe surgery, followed by radiotherapy (RT) and/or systemic chemotherapy (CT). Recently, the treatment of newly diagnosed anaplastic glioma (AG) has changed, particularly in patients with 1p19q codeleted tumors. Results of trials currenlty ongoing are likely to determine the best standard of care for patients with noncodeleted AG tumors. Trials in AG illustrate the importance of molecular characterization, which are germane to both prognosis and treatment. In contrast, efforts to improve the current standard of care of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB) with, for example, the addition of bevacizumab (BEV), have been largely disappointing and furthermore molecular characterization has not changed therapy except in elderly patients. Novel approaches, such as vaccine-based immunotherapy, for newly diagnosed GB are currently being pursued in multiple clinical trials. Recurrent disease, an event inevitable in nearly all patients with HGG, continues to be a challenge. Both recurrent GB and AG are managed in similar manner and when feasible re-resection is often suggested notwithstanding limited data to suggest benefit from repeat surgery. Occassional patients may be candidates for re-irradiation but again there is a paucity of data to commend this therapy and only a minority of selected patients are eligible for this approach. Consequently systemic therapy continues to be the most often utilized treatment in recurrent HGG. Choice of therapy, however, varies and revolves around re-challenge with temozolomide (TMZ), use of a nitrosourea (most often lomustine; CCNU) or BEV, the most frequently used angiogenic inhibitor. Nevertheless, no clear standard recommendation regarding the prefered agent or combination of agents is avaliable. Prognosis after progression of a HGG remains poor, with an unmet need to improve therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neuro-oncology, Roger Salengro Hospital, University Hospital, Lille, and Neurology, Department of Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France, Inserm U-1192, Laboratoire de Protéomique, Réponse Inflammatoire, Spectrométrie de Masse (PRISM), Lille 1 University, Villeneuve D’Ascq, France
| | - Sophie Taillibert
- Neurology, Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France
| | - Marc C. Chamberlain
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
246
|
Abstract
The WHO grading scheme for glial neoplasms assigns Grade II to 5 distinct tumors of astrocytic or oligodendroglial lineage: diffuse astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, oligoastrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, and pilomyxoid astrocytoma. Although commonly referred to collectively as among the "low-grade gliomas," these 5 tumors represent molecularly and clinically unique entities. Each is the subject of active basic research aimed at developing a more complete understanding of its molecular biology, and the pace of such research continues to accelerate. Additionally, because managing and predicting the course of these tumors has historically proven challenging, translational research regarding Grade II gliomas continues in the hopes of identifying novel molecular features that can better inform diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, the basic and translational literature regarding the molecular biology of WHO Grade II gliomas remains nebulous. The authors' goal for this review was to present a comprehensive discussion of current knowledge regarding the molecular characteristics of these 5 WHO Grade II tumors on the chromosomal, genomic, and epigenomic levels. Additionally, they discuss the emerging evidence suggesting molecular differences between adult and pediatric Grade II gliomas. Finally, they present an overview of current strategies for using molecular data to classify low-grade gliomas into clinically relevant categories based on tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas F Marko
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
247
|
Brat DJ, Cagle PT, Dillon DA, Hattab EM, McLendon RE, Miller MA, Buckner JC. Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens From Patients With Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139:1087-93. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0588-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Brat
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Brat); the Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas (Dr Cagle); the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Dillon); the Department of Pathology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
248
|
Killela PJ, Pirozzi CJ, Healy P, Reitman ZJ, Lipp E, Rasheed BA, Yang R, Diplas BH, Wang Z, Greer PK, Zhu H, Wang CY, Carpenter AB, Friedman H, Friedman AH, Keir ST, He J, He Y, McLendon RE, Herndon JE, Yan H, Bigner DD. Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, and in the TERT promoter define clinically distinct subgroups of adult malignant gliomas. Oncotarget 2015; 5:1515-25. [PMID: 24722048 PMCID: PMC4039228 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Frequent mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) and the promoter of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) represent two significant discoveries in glioma genomics. Understanding the degree to which these two mutations co-occur or occur exclusively of one another in glioma subtypes presents a unique opportunity to guide glioma classification and prognosis. We analyzed the relationship between overall survival (OS) and the presence of IDH1/2 and TERT promoter mutations in a panel of 473 adult gliomas. We hypothesized and show that genetic signatures capable of distinguishing among several types of gliomas could be established providing clinically relevant information that can serve as an adjunct to histopathological diagnosis. We found that mutations in the TERT promoter occurred in 74.2% of glioblastomas (GBM), but occurred in a minority of Grade II-III astrocytomas (18.2%). In contrast, IDH1/2 mutations were observed in 78.4% of Grade II-III astrocytomas, but were uncommon in primary GBM. In oligodendrogliomas, TERT promoter and IDH1/2 mutations co-occurred in 79% of cases. Patients whose Grade III-IV gliomas exhibit TERT promoter mutations alone predominately have primary GBMs associated with poor median OS (11.5 months). Patients whose Grade III-IV gliomas exhibit IDH1/2 mutations alone predominately have astrocytic morphologies and exhibit a median OS of 57 months while patients whose tumors exhibit both TERT promoter and IDH1/2 mutations predominately exhibit oligodendroglial morphologies and exhibit median OS of 125 months. Analyzing gliomas based on their genetic signatures allows for the stratification of these patients into distinct cohorts, with unique prognosis and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Killela
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, and Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Institute at Duke, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
249
|
Reuss DE, Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Wiestler B, Capper D, Koelsche C, Schweizer L, Korshunov A, Jones DTW, Hovestadt V, Mittelbronn M, Schittenhelm J, Herold-Mende C, Unterberg A, Platten M, Weller M, Wick W, Pfister SM, von Deimling A. ATRX and IDH1-R132H immunohistochemistry with subsequent copy number analysis and IDH sequencing as a basis for an "integrated" diagnostic approach for adult astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma and glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 2015; 129:133-46. [PMID: 25427834 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1370-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 315] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Revised: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Diffuse gliomas are represented in the 2007 WHO classification as astrocytomas, oligoastrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas of grades II and III and glioblastomas WHO grade IV. Molecular data on these tumors have a major impact on prognosis and therapy of the patients. Consequently, the inclusion of molecular parameters in the WHO definition of brain tumors is being planned and has been forwarded as the "ISN-Haarlem" consensus. We, here, analyze markers of special interest including ATRX, IDH and 1p/19q codeletion in a series of 405 adult patients. Among the WHO 2007 classified tumors were 152 astrocytomas, 61 oligodendrogliomas, 63 oligoastrocytomas and 129 glioblastomas. Following the concepts of the "ISN-Haarlem", we rediagnosed the series to obtain "integrated" diagnoses with 155 tumors being astrocytomas, 100 oligodendrogliomas and 150 glioblastomas. In a subset of 100 diffuse gliomas from the NOA-04 trial with long-term follow-up data available, the "integrated" diagnosis had a significantly greater prognostic power for overall and progression-free survival compared to WHO 2007. Based on the "integrated" diagnoses, loss of ATRX expression was close to being mutually exclusive to 1p/19q codeletion, with only 2 of 167 ATRX-negative tumors exhibiting 1p/19q codeletion. All but 4 of 141 patients with loss of ATRX expression and diffuse glioma carried either IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. Interestingly, the majority of glioblastoma patients with loss of ATRX expression but no IDH mutations exhibited an H3F3A mutation. Further, all patients with 1p/19 codeletion carried a mutation in IDH1 or IDH2. We present an algorithm based on stepwise analysis with initial immunohistochemistry for ATRX and IDH1-R132H followed by 1p/19q analysis followed by IDH sequencing which reduces the number of molecular analyses and which has a far better association with patient outcome than WHO 2007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Reuss
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), CCU Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
250
|
Abstract
The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is essentially a lineage-oriented classification based on a presumable developmental tree of CNS. A four-tiered WHO grading scheme has been successfully applied to a spectrum of diffusely infiltrative astrocytomas, but it is not fully applicable to other gliomas, including oligodendrogliomas and ependymomas. Recent genetic studies have revealed that the major categories of gliomas, such as circumscribe astrocytomas, infiltrating astrocytomas/oligodendrogliomas, and glioblastoma, roughly correspond to major genetic alterations, including isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDHs) 1/2 mutations, TP53 mutations, co-deletion of chromosome arms 1p/19q, and BRAF mutation/fusion. These genetic alterations are clinically significant in terms of the response to treatment(s) and/or the prognosis. It is, thus, rational that future classification of gliomas should be based on genotypes, rather than phenotypes, although the genetic features of each tumor are not sufficiently understood at present to draw a complete map of the gliomas, and genetic testing is not yet available worldwide, particularly in Asian and African countries. This review summarizes the current concepts of the WHO classification, as well as the current understanding of the major genetic alterations in glioma and the potential use of these alterations as diagnostic criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Komori
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Neuropathology), Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital
| |
Collapse
|