ALK rearrangements are mutually exclusive with mutations in EGFR or KRAS: an analysis of 1,683 patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Frontiers of ctDNA, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a main subtype of lung cancer, is one of the most common causes of cancer death in men and women worldwide. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy have revolutionized both our understanding of NSCLC, from its diagnosis to targeted NSCLC therapies, and its treatment. ctDNA quantification confers convenience and precision to clinical decision making. Furthermore, the implementation of TKI-based targeted therapy and immunotherapy has significantly improved NSCLC patient quality of life. This review provides an update on the methods of ctDNA detection and its impact on therapeutic strategies; therapies that target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) using TKIs such as osimertinib and lorlatinib; the rise of various resistant mechanisms; and the control of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in immunotherapy; blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) calculated by ctDNA assay as a novel biomarker for immunotherapy. However, NSCLC patients still face many challenges. Further studies and trials are needed to develop more effective drugs or therapies to treat NSCLC.

Comparison of EML4-ALK fusion gene positive rate in different detection methods and samples of non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: To evaluate differences of EML4-ALK positive rates in tissues samples between immunohistochemistry, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and the next-generation sequencing method. Besides, to compare the differences of EML4-ALK positive rates in blood samples and tissue samples by next-generation sequencing. The results provide a basis for the selection of a suitable EML4-ALK fusion gene detection method. Methods: Immunohistochemistry analysis of EML4-ALK in tumors was performed on samples from 2631 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The mutation of EML4-ALK in the tissue samples of 399 patients with non-small cell lung cancer was detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect the mutation of EML4-ALK in 1505 non-small cell lung cancer patients, including 1208 tissue samples and 297 blood samples. Results: The positive incidence of EML4-ALK by immunohistochemistry was 7.11% (187/2631). Histologically, 9.51% (170/1787) of the samples were lung adenocarcinomas, and 2.01% (17/844) were squamous cell carcinomas. The positive rate of EML4-ALK was 8.52% (34/399) in 399 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, as detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; the mutation rate of adenocarcinoma was 11.62% (33/284), and the mutation rate of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.86% (1/115). In 1208 patients with non-small cell lung cancer with tissue samples, the positive rate of EML4-ALK was 4.88% (59/1208), as determined by next-generation sequencing, the mutation rate of adenocarcinoma was 5.84% (58/994), and the mutation rate of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.47% (1/214). The positive rate of EML4-ALK detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was higher than that detected by immunohistochemistry. Compared with the next-generation sequencing results, the positive rates of EML4-ALK detected by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were higher, and the differences were significant (p<0.05). In blood samples from 297 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the positive rate of EML4-ALK detected by next-generation sequencing was 3.70% (11/297), the mutation rate of adenocarcinoma was 3.82% (10/262), and the mutation rate of squamous cell carcinoma was 2.86% (1/35). The EML4-ALK positive rate of the tissue samples was thus higher than that of the blood biopsy samples. Conclusion: Among the three methods for detecting EML4-ALK, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction has the highest positive rate, followed by immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing has the lowest positive rate. The positive detection rate of EML4-ALK in tissue samples by next-generation sequencing was higher than that in blood samples.

Clinical Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Concomitant EGFR Mutations and ALK Rearrangements: Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Crizotinib

BACKGROUND

Patients harboring concomitant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) arrangements constitute a small subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the ALK-specific TKI crizotinib in these patients has not been well-established.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the efficacy of targeted therapies in these patients compared with patients with EGFR or ALK alterations alone.

METHODS

Patients were screened for EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement at the Shanghai Chest Hospital (2011-2017). Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 5816 patients were screened, and 26 patients were identified as having concomitant EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements; 22 patients were eligible for survival analysis. Additionally, 95 EGFR-mutant patients and 60 ALK-rearranged patients were randomly selected for analysis. The ORR to EGFR TKIs was 63.2% (12/19) for EGFR/ALK co-altered patients and 62.1% (59/95) for EGFR-mutant patients (p = 0.93) with a median PFS of 10.3 and 11.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.57; p = 0.87). The ORR to crizotinib was 66.7% (8/12) for double-positive patients and 65.0% (39/60) for ALK-rearranged patients (p = 1.00), with a median PFS of 11.1 and 12.5 months, respectively (HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.69-2.80; p = 0.28). OS was 27.1, 36.2, and 36.8 months for EGFR-mutant, ALK-rearranged, and EGFR/ALK co-altered patients, respectively, and the EGFR/ALK co-existing subgroup tended to have a longer survival period than EGFR-mutant cohorts, though no statistical difference was found (p = 0.12). The median PFS of crizotinib as a sequential therapy after failure of EGFR TKIs was 15.0 months, which exhibited no statistically significant difference compared with the median PFS of ALK-altered patients who received crizotinib (p = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Both first-generation EGFR TKIs and the ALK TKI crizotinib were effective in these patients. Sequential treatment with EGFR TKIs and crizotinib should be considered as a management option.

RAS and BRAF in the foreground for non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: Similarities and main differences for prognosis and therapies

Lung and colorectal cancer are included in the most tremendously threatening diseases in terms of incidence and death. Although they are located in completely different organs and differ in various characteristics they do share some common features, especially regarding their molecular mutational profile. Among several commonly mutated genes KRAS and BRAF are spotted to be highly associated with patient's poor disease outcome and resistance to targeted therapies mostly in liaison with other mutant activated genes. Many studies have shed light in these mechanisms for disease progression and numerous preclinical models, clinical trials and meta-analysis reports investigate the impact of specific treatments or combination of therapies. The present review is an effort to compare the mutational imprint of these genes between the two diseases and their impact in prognosis, current therapy, mechanisms of therapy resistance and future therapeutic plans and provide a spherical perspective regarding the systemic molecular profile of cancer.

Ultra-deep massively parallel sequencing with unique molecular identifier tagging achieves comparable performance to droplet digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA from lung cancer patients

The identification and quantification of actionable mutations are of critical importance for effective genotype-directed therapies, prognosis and drug response monitoring in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although tumor tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of NSCLC, the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma, known as liquid biopsy, has recently emerged as an alternative and noninvasive approach for exploring tumor genetic constitution. In this study, we developed a protocol for liquid biopsy using ultra-deep massively parallel sequencing (MPS) with unique molecular identifier tagging and evaluated its performance for the identification and quantification of tumor-derived mutations from plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC. Paired plasma and tumor tissue samples were used to evaluate mutation profiles detected by ultra-deep MPS, which showed 87.5% concordance. Cross-platform comparison with droplet digital PCR demonstrated comparable detection performance (91.4% concordance, Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.85 with 95% CI = 0.72-0.97) and great reliability in quantification of mutation allele frequency (Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 with 95% CI = 0.90-0.98). Our results highlight the potential application of liquid biopsy using ultra-deep MPS as a routine assay in clinical practice for both detection and quantification of actionable mutation landscape in NSCLC patients.

Oncogene addiction and tumor mutational burden in non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical significance and limitations

Lung cancer incidence has increased worldwide over the past decades, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the vast majority (85%) of lung cancer specimens. It is estimated that lung cancer causes about 1.7 million global deaths per year worldwide. Multiple trials have been carried out, with the aim of finding new effective treatment options. Lately, special focus has been placed on immune checkpoint (PD1/PD-L1) inhibitors which impact the tumor immune microenvironment. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been found to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conversely, recent studies have weakened the significance of TMB as a predictor of response to therapy and survival. In this review article, we discuss the significance of TMB, as well as possible limitations. Furthermore, we give a concise overview of mutations frequently found in NSCLC, and discuss the significance of oncogene addiction in lung cancer as an essential driver of tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

Metabolic Remodelling: An Accomplice for New Therapeutic Strategies to Fight Lung Cancer

Metabolic remodelling is a hallmark of cancer, however little has been unravelled in its role in chemoresistance, which is a major hurdle to cancer control. Lung cancer is a leading cause of death by cancer, mainly due to the diagnosis at an advanced stage and to the development of resistance to therapy. Targeted therapeutic agents combined with comprehensive drugs are commonly used to treat lung cancer. However, resistance mechanisms are difficult to avoid. In this review, we will address some of those therapeutic regimens, resistance mechanisms that are eventually developed by lung cancer cells, metabolic alterations that have already been described in lung cancer and putative new therapeutic strategies, and the integration of conventional drugs and genetic and metabolic-targeted therapies. The oxidative stress is pivotal in this whole network. A better understanding of cancer cell metabolism and molecular adaptations underlying resistance mechanisms will provide clues to design new therapeutic strategies, including the combination of chemotherapeutic and targeted agents, considering metabolic intervenients. As cancer cells undergo a constant metabolic adaptive drift, therapeutic regimens must constantly adapt.

Sequential EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement in adenocarcinoma lung, with rare metastasis to bilateral breast, ovary and endometrium

With the advent of targeted therapies there was a paradigm shift in the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung. Immuno-histopathology and molecular subtyping in metastatic adenocarcinoma lung have enabled personalized treatment for each patient. Oncogenic driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer are commonly EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) gene mutation and ALK (Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase) gene rearrangement, which are mutually exclusive. Almost 60-64% patients have oncogenic mutation, which are mutually exclusive. Here, we present a case with EGFR mutation and ALK gene rearrangement which was expressed sequentially and with metastasis to rarest sites bilateral breast, ovaries and endometrium. Even though presented with upfront metastatic disease, patient was treated with multiple lines of targeted agents, by which patient survived for 5 years with good quality of life.

Application of radiomics signature captured from pretreatment thoracic CT to predict brain metastases in stage III/IV ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

The purpose of this study is to develop a radiomics approach to predict brain metastasis (BM) for stage III/IV ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

Patients with ALK-positive III/IV NSCLC from 2014 to 2017 were enrolled retrospectively. Their pretreatment thoracic CT images were collected, and the gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined by two experienced radiation oncologists. An in-house feature extraction code-set was performed based on MATLAB 2015b (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) in patients' CT images to extract features. Patients were randomly divided into training set and test set (4:1) by using createDataPartition function in caret package. A test-retest in RIDER NSCLC dataset was performed to identify stable radiomics features. LASSO Cox regression and a leave-one-out cross-validation were conducted to identify optimal features for the logistic regression model to evaluate the predictive value of radiomics feature(s) for BM. Furthermore, extended validation for the radiomics feature(s) and Cox regression analyses which combined radiomics feature(s) and treatment elements were implemented to predict the risk of BM during follow-up.

Results

In total, 132 patients were included, among which 27 patients had pretreatment BM. The median follow-up time was 11.8 (range, 0.1-65.2) months. In the training set, one radiomics feature (W_GLCM_LH_Correlation) showed discrimination ability of BM (P value =0.014, AUC =0.687, 95% CI: 0.551-0.824, specificity =83.5%, sensitivity =57.1%). It also exhibited reposeful performance in the test set (AUC =0.642, 95% CI: 0.501-0.783, specificity =60.0%, sensitivity =83.3%). Those 105 patients without pretreatment BM were divided into stage III (n=57) and stage IV (n=48) groups. The radiomics feature (W_GLCM_LH_Correlation) had moderate performance to predict BM during/after treatment in separate groups (stage III: AUC =0.682, 95% CI: 0.537-0.826, specificity =64.4%, sensitivity =75.0%; stage IV: AUC =0.653, 95% CI: 0.503-0.804, specificity =70.4%, sensitivity =75.0%). Meanwhile, stage III patients could be divided into low risk and high risk groups for BM during surveillance according to Cox regression analysis (log-rank P value =0.021).

Conclusions

We identified one wavelet texture feature derived from pretreatment thoracic CT that presented potential in predicting BM in stage III/IV ALK-positive NSCLC patients. This could be beneficial to risk stratification for such patients. Further investigation is necessary to include expanded sample size investigation and external multicenter validation.

Prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement in patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Reports of the prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in early stage lung adenocarcinoma have been contradictory. This study aimed to identify the associations of ALK rearrangement with clinicopathologic features and prognosis in patients with surgically resected stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Analysis of ALK status was performed by a fully-automated immunochemistry assay (with rabbit monoclonal Ventana D5F3 antibody) in tissue sections of 2,103 patients with surgically-resected stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma. ALK positive patients were matched with negative patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM). Clinical outcomes were assessed by disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery. Initial recurrence pattern was also investigated according to ALK status.

Results

Among 2,103 stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma cases, 81 (3.9%) were ALK positive. ALK positivity was significantly associated with younger age (P<0.001), solid predominant adenocarcinoma (P<0.001), variants of invasive adenocarcinoma (P<0.001), higher frequency of pleura invasion (P=0.040), smaller tumor size (P=0.014), mediastinal lymph node involvement (N2; P<0.001) and later pathologic stage (IIIA; P=0.001). In the match cohort, ALK positivity was not associated with DFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-1.03, P=0.063] or OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.22-1.67, P=0.334). Lymph node involvement (HR: 5.36, 95% CI, 3.01-9.65, P<0.001) and solid predominant adenocarcinoma subtype (HR, 2.02; 95% CI: 1.07-3.79; P=0.029) were the independent prognostic factors of inferior DFS, and lymph node involvement was the independent prognostic factors of worse OS (HR, 6.61; 95% CI: 2.43-17.94; P<0.001). ALK positive patients had a higher risk of developing tumor recurrence in liver (P=0.043).

Conclusions

ALK rearrangement was not an independent prognostic factor in stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma patients but leaded to a higher risk of developing recurrence in liver.

ALK rearrangement: a high-frequency alteration in ovarian metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Ovarian metastatic tumors from lung adenocarcinoma are rare, and a serial study of these tumors is lacking to date. Additionally, a better understanding of the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of metastatic tumors is needed.

Methods

Seven cases of ovarian metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma from 2013 to 2017 at our institute were investigated. The results were combined with those found in literature review. A total of 16 cases were analyzed in the present study. We examined clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics, further detected ALK rearrangement by FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), and assessed EGFR and KRAS mutations using Sanger sequencing or the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS).

Results

The mean age of the patients was 44.6 years (range, 33–56 years). Eleven of sixteen patients developed ovarian tumors within a mean time of 18.5 months (range, 5–48 months) from the initial diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma; 5 patients had lung tumors and ovarian masses simultaneously. Five tumors (5/16, 31%) occurred in the bilateral ovaries, and the others were unilateral ovarian tumors (11/16, 69%). All seven cases from our institute were positive for TTF-1 and Napsin A but negative for PAX8. In four cases, ALK (D5F3) was diffusely and strongly expressed, with ALK rearrangements (4/7, 57%). Overall, ALK rearrangement was found by FISH or immunohistochemistry in 11/16 (69%) cases. In two cases, EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21, respectively, were found. One patient did not detected EGFR or ALK mutation in the metastatic tumor, but the primary lung adenocarcinoma did harbor an EGFR mutation. Two cases had no alterations in three genes above. Although the mean survival time of the patients with ALK rearrangement was longer than those without (mean survival time 25 m vs. 20 m), no statistical significance of the difference was found.

Conclusions

As the largest case series of ovarian metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma, our findings indicate that ALK rearrangement is the most common molecular alteration. Although patients with ALK rearrangement appear to have a better prognosis than do those without ALK rearrangement, more cases with longer follow-up and multivariant analysis are needed to clarify this point.

Drug Discovery Targeting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)

As a receptor tyrosine kinase of insulin receptor (IR) subfamily, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been validated to play important roles in various cancers, especially anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and neuroblastomas. Currently, five small-molecule inhibitors of ALK, including Crizotinib, Ceritinib, Alectinib, Brigatinib, and Lorlatinib, have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) against ALK-positive NSCLCs. Novel type-I¹/₂ and type-II ALK inhibitors with improved kinase selectivity and enhanced capability to combat drug resistance have also been reported. Moreover, the "proteolysis targeting chimera" (PROTAC) technique has been successfully applied in developing ALK degraders, which opened a new avenue for targeted ALK therapies. This review provides an overview of the physiological and biological functions of ALK, the discovery and development of drugs targeting ALK by focusing on their chemotypes, activity, selectivity, and resistance as well as potential therapeutic strategies to overcome drug resistance.

CT Characteristics of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding CT features of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to February 20, 2019. Studies that evaluated CT features of NSCLC with and without ALK rearrangement was included. Methodologic quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. The association between CT features and ALK rearrangement was pooled in the form of the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined using the inconsistency index (I²). Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and Egger tests. RESULTS. Sixteen studies were included, consisting of 3113 patients with NSCLC. The overall prevalence of patients with ALK rearrangement was 17% (528/3113). Compared with NSCLC without ALK rearrangement, on CT images those with ALK rearrangement were more frequently solid (OR = 2.86), central in location (OR = 2.72), and 3 cm or smaller (OR = 0.57); had lower contrast-enhanced CT attenuation (MD = -4.79 HU); more frequently had N2 or N3 disease (OR = 5.63), lymphangitic carcinomatosis (OR = 3.46), pleural effusion (OR = 1.91), or pleural metastasis (OR = 1.81); and less frequently had lung metastasis (OR = 0.66). Heterogeneity varied among CT features (I² = 0-80%). No significant publication bias was seen (p = 0.15). CONCLUSION. NSCLC with ALK rearrangement had several distinctive CT features compared with that without ALK rearrangement. These CT biomarkers may help identify patients likely to have ALK rearrangement.

Chinese perspectives on clinical efficacy and safety of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The incidence of lung cancer is increasing in China, in contrast to trends in Western countries, due to the increasing numbers of smokers and high levels of air pollution. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of lung cancer, accounting for approximately 85% of lung cancers. Better understanding of the pathogenesis of NSCLC has led to the identification of multiple genetic mutations and chromosomal translocations such as those in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. To facilitate the identification of treatment targets, multiple guidelines (European Society for Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Society of Clinical Oncology) now recommend screening for genetic factors to help guide treatment decisions. In recent years, multiple ALK inhibitors have been developed to treat NSCLC, including the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib; second-generation TKIs such as ceritinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, and alectinib; the third-generation TKI lorlatinib; and the fourth-generation TKI repotrectinib. These agents differ in structure, potency, and activity, both systemically and their effects on central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Recently, alectinib was approved in China to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC that were ALK+. Alectinib has demonstrated activity against NSCLC, including metastases within the CNS, with better tolerability than crizotinib. These ALK inhibitors represent significant advances in the treatment of NSCLC and yet patients will likely still exhibit disease progression. Alectinib offers greater potency with greater specificity as well as a better toxicity profile than many other TKIs that are currently available. Here, we review the role of ALK as a therapeutic target in NSCLC, the testing methods for identifying ALK-rearranged NSCLC, and the various TKIs currently being used or explored for treatment in this setting, with a focus on alectinib from a Chinese perspective.

Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) for Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Rearrangement in Lung Cancer: Clinically Relevant Technical Aspects

In 2011, the Vysis Break Apart ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a companion diagnostic for detecting ALK rearrangement in lung cancer patients who may benefit from treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. This assay is the current “gold standard”. According to updated ALK testing guidelines from the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Association for Molecular Pathology published in 2018, ALK immunohistochemistry is formally an alternative to ALK FISH, and simultaneous detection of multiple hot spots, including, at least, ALK, ROS1, RET, MET, ERBB2, BRAF and KRAS genes is also recommended while performing next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing. Therefore, ALK status in a specimen can be tested by different methods and platforms, even in the same institution or laboratory. In this review, we discuss several clinically relevant technical aspects of ALK FISH, including pros and cons of the unique two-step (50- to 100-cell) analysis approach employed in the Vysis Break Apart ALK FISH assay, including: the preset cutoff value of ≥15% for a positive result; technical aspects and biology of discordant results obtained by different methods; and incidental findings, such as ALK copy number gain or amplification and co-existent driver mutations. These issues have practical implications for ALK testing in the clinical laboratory following the updated guidelines.

Impact of crizotinib on long-term survival of ALK-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A Chinese multicenter cohort study

Objective

Crizotinib has demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical trials. We conducted this retrospective multicenter study to assess the outcomes of crizotinib therapy in, to our knowledge, a large sample cohort of patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 484 unselected ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib at 5 cancer centers in China from January 2013 to November 2017. Clinical data were collected from the initiation of crizotinib therapy to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-defined progressive disease (PD).

Results

A total of 428 eligible ALK-positive NSCLC patients were enrolled, 273 (63.8%) of whom received crizotinib as first-line treatment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the initiation of crizotinib treatment were 14.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 12.4−16.4] months and 53.4 (95% CI, 33.7−73.1) months, respectively. In subgroup analyses, patients who received crizotinib as first-line treatment showed a higher disease control rate (DCR) and a longer median OS compared with second-/later-line crizotinib treatment (94.8% and OS not reachedvs. 89.0% and 40.5 months, respectively). For 261 patients with RECIST-defined PD, multivariate Cox analysis revealed that in patients who received first-line crizotinib therapy, continued crizotinib beyond progressive disease (CBPD) and next-generation ALK inhibitors after crizotinib failure were associated with improved survival.

Conclusions

This study has demonstrated the clinically meaningful benefit of crizotinib treatment in a large cohort of Chinese ALK-positive NSCLC patients. CBPD and next-generation ALK inhibitor treatment may provide improved survival after RECIST-defined progression on crizotinib.

Intrinsic resistance to EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Differences and Similarities with Acquired Resistance

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene occur as early cancer-driving clonal events in a subset of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and result in increased sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Despite very frequent and often prolonged clinical response to EGFR-TKIs, virtually all advanced EGFR-mutated (EGFRM+) NSCLCs inevitably acquire resistance mechanisms and progress at some point during treatment. Additionally, 20-30% of patients do not respond or respond for a very short time (<3 months) because of intrinsic resistance. While several mechanisms of acquired EGFR-TKI-resistance have been determined by analyzing tumor specimens obtained at disease progression, the factors causing intrinsic TKI-resistance are less understood. However, recent comprehensive molecular-pathological profiling of advanced EGFRM+ NSCLC at baseline has illustrated the co-existence of multiple genetic, phenotypic, and functional mechanisms that may contribute to tumor progression and cause intrinsic TKI-resistance. Several of these mechanisms have been further corroborated by preclinical experiments. Intrinsic resistance can be caused by mechanisms inherent in EGFR or by EGFR-independent processes, including genetic, phenotypic or functional tumor changes. This comprehensive review describes the identified mechanisms connected with intrinsic EGFR-TKI-resistance and differences and similarities with acquired resistance and among clinically implemented EGFR-TKIs of different generations. Additionally, the review highlights the need for extensive pre-treatment molecular profiling of advanced NSCLC for identifying inherently TKI-resistant cases and designing potential combinatorial targeted strategies to treat them.

EGFR mutant locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is at increased risk of brain metastasis

•

Locally advanced EGFR+ NSCLC patients have a high likelihood of brain metastasis.

•

The high likelihood of EGFR+ brain metastasis is independent of survival duration.

•

Surveillance MRI may allow early identification and treatment of brain metastasis.

Background and purpose

Small studies of primarily metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have suggested an association between EGFR mutation (EGFR+) and likelihood of brain metastasis. However, these studies are confounded by follow-up time bias. We performed a competing risk analysis of brain metastasis in a more uniform locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) cohort with known tumor genotype.

Materials and methods

Between 2002 and 2014, 255 patients with LA-NSCLC underwent tumor genotyping for EGFR, ALK and/or KRAS (180 patients had follow-up brain imaging). Cumulative incidence and Fine-Gray regression were performed on clinical variables including genotype and risk of brain metastasis, with death as a competing event.

Results

The proportion of tumors with aberrations in EGFR, ALK and KRAS were 17%, 4% and 28%, respectively. The median follow-up was 68 months. On multivariate analysis, EGFR+ was significantly associated with risk of brain metastasis in the full patient cohort (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.22–3.39, p = 0.006) as well as in the subset of patients with brain follow-up imaging (HR 1.91. 95% CI 1.17–3.13, p = 0.01). This translated to a higher cumulative incidence of brain metastasis in EGFR+ patients at 3 and 5 years (33.3% vs. 23.2 and 43.8% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Patients with EGFR+ LA-NSCLC have a significantly higher likelihood of developing brain metastasis after standard combined modality therapy, independent of their longer overall survival. This high-risk genotypic subgroup may benefit from routine surveillance with brain MRI to allow early salvage with targeted systemic- and/or radiation-therapies.

Systematic Analysis of Gene Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma with a Case Study of FAM83A and FAM83B

Introduction: In our previous study, we constructed a Lung Cancer Explorer (LCE) database housing lung cancer-specific expression data and clinical data from over 6700 patients in 56 studies. Methods: Using this dataset of the largest collection of lung cancer gene expression along with our meta-analysis method, we systematically interrogated the association between gene expression and overall survival as well as the expression difference between tumor and normal (adjacent non-malignant tissue) samples in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC). A case study for FAM83A and FAM83B was performed as a demonstration for hypothesis testing with our database. Results: We showed that the reproducibility of results across studies varied by histological subtype and analysis type. Genes and pathways unique or common to the two histological subtypes were identified and the results were integrated into LCE to facilitate user exploration. In our case study, we verified the findings from a previous study on FAM83A and FAM83B in non-small cell lung cancer. Conclusions: This study used gene expression data from a large cohort of patients to explore the molecular differences between lung ADC and SQCC.

Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Assay Targeting RNA for the Multiplexed Detection of Fusion Transcripts and Oncogenic Isoforms

CONTEXT.—

Next-generation sequencing is a high-throughput method for detecting genetic abnormalities and providing prognostic and therapeutic information for patients with cancer. Oncogenic fusion transcripts are among the various classifications of genetic abnormalities present in tumors and are typically detected clinically with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH probes only exist for a limited number of targets, do not provide any information about fusion partners, cannot be multiplex, and have been shown to be limited in specificity for common targets such as ALK.

OBJECTIVE.—

To validate an anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based panel for the detection of fusion transcripts in a university hospital-based clinical molecular diagnostics laboratory.

DESIGN.—

We used 109 unique clinical specimens to validate a custom panel targeting 104 exon boundaries from 17 genes involved in fusions in solid tumors. The panel can accept as little as 100 ng of total nucleic acid from PreservCyt-fixed tissue, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens with as little as 10% tumor nuclei.

RESULTS.—

Using FISH as the gold standard, this assay has a sensitivity of 88.46% and a specificity of 95.83% for the detection of fusion transcripts involving ALK, RET, and ROS1 in lung adenocarcinomas. Using a validated next-generation sequencing assay as the orthogonal gold standard for the detection of EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) in glioblastomas, the assay is 92.31% sensitive and 100% specific.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This multiplexed assay is tumor and fusion partner agnostic and will provide clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors.

Activation of IGF-1R pathway and NPM-ALK G1269A mutation confer resistance to crizotinib treatment in NPM-ALK positive lymphoma

ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) represents a subset of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that is treated with crizotinib, a dual ALK/MET inhibitor. Despite the remarkable initial response, ALCLs eventually develop resistance to crizotinib. ALK inhibitor resistance in tumors is a complex and heterogeneous process with multiple underlying mechanisms, including ALK gene amplification, ALK kinase domain mutation, and the activation of various bypass signaling pathways. To overcome resistance, multiple promising next-generation ALK kinase inhibitors and rational combinatorial strategies are being developed. To determine how cancers acquire resistance to ALK inhibitors, we established a model of acquired crizotinib resistance by exposing a highly sensitive NPM-ALK-positive ALCL cell line to increasing doses of crizotinib until resistance emerged. We found that the NPM-ALK mutation was selected under intermediate-concentration drug stress in resistant clones, accompanied by activation of the IGF-1R pathway. In the crizotinib-resistant ALCL cell model, the IGF-1R pathway was activated, and combined ALK/IGF-1R inhibition improved therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, we also detected the NPM-ALK G1269A mutation, which had previously been demonstrated to result in decreased affinity for crizotinib, in the resistant cell model. Although crizotinib was ineffective against cells harboring the NPM-ALK G1269A mutation, five structurally different ALK inhibitors, alectinib, ceritinib, TAE684, ASP3026 and AP26113, maintained activity against the resistant cells. Thus, we have shown that second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors or IGF-1R inhibitors are effective in treating crizotinib-resistant tumors.

Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Tunisian Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma

The identification of the mutations that drive lung cancer have furnished new targets for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and led to the development of targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are used to combat the molecular changes promoting cancer progression. Furthermore, biomarkers identified from gene analysis can be used to detect early lung cancer, determine patient prognosis, and monitor response to therapy. In the present study we analyzed the molecular profile of seventy-three Tunisian patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LAD). Mutational analyses for EGFR and KRAS were performed using direct sequencing, immunohistochemistry or MassARRAY. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using the D5F3 clone, and p53 expression was also assessed. The median age of patients at diagnosis was 61 years (range 23-82 years). Using different methodologies, EGFR mutations were found in 5.47% of patients and only exon 19 deletions "E746-A750 del" were detected. KRAS mutations were present in 9.58% of cases, while only one patient was ALK-positive. Moreover, abnormal immunostaining of p53 was detected in 56.16% of patients. In conclusion, the detected rates of EGFR and KRAS mutation and ALK rearrangement were lower than those found in European and Asian countries, whereas, abnormal p53 expression was slightly more frequent. Furthermore, given the small sample size of this study, a more comprehensive analysis of this patient set is warranted.

Poor prognosis of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma with KRAS mutation and ALK fusion

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subtype of poorly differentiated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and no effective treatment is available in clinical practice currently. In the present report, a 61-year-old male patient was hospitalized due to cough, dyspnea, and right chest pain. Computed tomography (CT) showed spot- and piece-shaped shadows. The patient became very weak and had breathing difficulty after preliminary anti-pneumonia treatment with cefoperazone-sulbactam. Physical examination revealed dull sound by percussion and decreased breath sounds in the right lateral lung areas by auscultation. A second CT scan revealed a large amount of pleural effusion, and the patient was diagnosed with bloody pleural effusion through pleural space puncture. Multiple nodular lesions were found in the right pleural cavity under thoracoscopy. PSC was confirmed by biopsy and histopathology in combination with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Single-photon emission CT (SPECT) scan indicated multiple bone metastases. KRAS exon 2 mutation and EML4-ALK fusion were identified in carcinoma tissue by IHC and amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR. The patient received one cycle of first-line combination chemotherapy of cisplatin and paclitaxel liposomes. However, the patient did not respond to the platinum-based combination chemotherapy within 3 weeks and was thus administered oral crizotinib instead of chemotherapy. Unfortunately, he still had rapid disease progression and died 2 weeks after the initiation of crizotinib treatment. Collectively, our results suggest that a PSC patient with coexistent KRAS mutation and ALK rearrangement would not benefit from chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer

Recent advances in the field of novel anticancer agents prolong patients' survival and show a promising future. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy for lung cancer are the two major areas undergoing rapid development. Although increasing novel anticancer agents were innovated, how to translate and optimize these novel agents into clinical practice remains to be explored. Besides, toxicities and availability of these drugs in specific regions should also be considered during clinical determination. Herein, we summarize emerging agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other potential immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell for non-small cell lung cancer attempting to provide insights and perspectives of the future in anticancer treatment.

Clinical features and therapeutic options in non-small cell lung cancer patients with concomitant mutations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS or BRAF

Background

Although oncogenic driver mutations were thought to be mutually exclusive in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), certain tumors harbor co‐occurring mutations and represent a rare molecular subtype. The evaluation of the clinical features and therapeutic response associated with this NSCLC subtype will be vital for understanding the heterogeneity of treatment response and improving the management of these patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included 3774 samples from patients diagnosed with NSCLC. All samples were screened for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, and BRAF mutation using the amplification‐refractory mutation system. The relationship between concomitant driver mutations and clinicopathologic characteristics, and patient clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Sixty‐three (1.7%) samples had more than one driver gene mutation. Among these, 43 were coalterations with an EGFR mutation, 20 with an ALK rearrangement, and eight with an ROS1 rearrangement. Except for ROS1 concomitant mutations that were more frequent in male patients (87.5%, P = 0.020), the clinicopathological features of the concomitant mutation patients were not significantly different from those harboring a single EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 mutation. Furthermore, first‐line EGFR‐TKI treatment did not significantly improve the progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients harboring EGFR concomitant mutation, compared to patients harboring a single EGFR mutation. However, for EGFR concomitant mutation patients, TKI therapy was more effective than chemotherapy (median PFS of 10.8 vs 5.2 months, P = 0.023). Lastly, KRAS mutations did not influence the EGFR‐TKI therapy treatment effect.

Conclusion

In this study, concomitant mutations were found in 1.7% of the NSCLC. EGFR‐TKI therapy was more effective than chemotherapy for patients harboring EGFR concomitant mutation, and ROS1 concomitant mutations were more frequent in male patients. For patients harboring coalterations with an ALK or ROS1 rearrangement, we should be cautious when considering the therapeutic options.

The incidence of ALK inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the incidence of pneumonitis in clinical trials of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compared the incidence among different cohorts, in order to identify possible predisposing factors for ALK inhibitor-related pneumonitis.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE search up to 1/30/18 using the keywords, "alectinib", "ceritinib", "crizotinib", "brigatinib", and "lung cancer", resulting in a total of 20 eligible cohorts with 2261 patients treated with ALK inhibitor monotherapy for advanced NSCLC. The pooled incidences of all-grade, high-grade, and grade 5 pneumonitis were calculated. Subgroup analyses were conducted with meta-regression using study-level covariates.

RESULTS

The overall pooled incidence of pneumonitis was 2.14% (95% CI: 1.37-3.34) for all grade, 1.33% (95% CI: 0.80-2.21) for high grade, and 0.22% (95% CI: 0.09-0.52) for grade 5 pneumonitis. The incidence was significantly higher in studies from Japan compared to studies of non-Japan origin, for all-grade (6.25% vs 1.14%, p < 0.001) and high-grade pneumonitis (3.31% vs 0.39%, p < 0.001). Multivariate meta-regression demonstrated the cohorts from Japanese studies had significantly higher odds of pneumonitis for all-grade (odds ratio [OR]: 4.329 [95% CI: 1.918, 9.770], p < 0.001) compared to those of non-Japan origin, after adjusting for types of ALK inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of ALK inhibitor pneumonitis was 2.14% in patients with advanced NSCLS. The patients from Japanese cohorts had a higher incidence of ALK-inhibitor pneumonitis, which indicates the need for increased awareness and caution for pneumonitis in Japanese patients treated with ALK inhibitors.

Prognostic Value of BIRC5 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Lacking EGFR, KRAS, and ALK Mutations by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis

Objective

This study was aimed at investigating the prognostic significance of Baculoviral IAP repeat containing 5 (BIRC5) in lung adenocarcinoma (LAD) lacking EGFR, KRAS, and ALK mutations (triple-negative (TN) adenocarcinomas).

Methods

The gene expression profiles were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The identification of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was performed by GeneSpring GX. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to execute gene ontology function and pathway enrichment analysis. The protein interaction network was constructed by Cytoscape. The hub genes were extracted by MCODE and cytoHubba plugin from the network. Then, using BIRC5 as a candidate, the prognostic value in LAD and TN adenocarcinomas was verified by the Kaplan-Meier plotter and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, respectively. Finally, the mechanism of BIRC5 was predicted by a coexpressed network and enrichment analysis.

Results

A total of 38 upregulated genes and 121 downregulated genes were identified. 9 hub genes were extracted. Among them, the mRNA expression of 5 genes, namely, BIRC5, MCM4, CDC20, KIAA0101, and TRIP13, were significantly upregulated among TN adenocarcinomas (all P < 0.05). Notably, only the overexpression of BIRC5 was associated with unfavorable overall survival (OS) in TN adenocarcinomas (log rank P = 0.0037). TN adenocarcinoma patients in the BIRC5 high-expression group suffered from a significantly high risk of distant metastasis (P = 0.046), advanced N stage (P = 0.033), and tumor-bearing (P = 0.031) and deceased status (P = 0.003). The mechanism of BIRC5 and coexpressed genes may be linked closely with the cell cycle.

Conclusion

Overexpressed in tumors, BIRC5 is associated with unfavorable overall survival in TN adenocarcinomas. BIRC5 is a potential predictor and therapeutic target in TN adenocarcinomas.

Radiomics signature: A potential and incremental predictor for EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients, comparison with CT morphology

OBJECTIVES

To compare the predictive performance of radiomics signature and CT morphological features for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status; then further to develop and compare the different predictive models for EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 404 patients with NSCLC (243 cases in the training cohort and 161 cases in the validation cohort). Radiomics features were extracted from preoperative non-contrast CT images of the entire tumor. Correlations between the EGFR mutation status and candidate predictors were assessed using Mann-Whitney U test or Chi-square test. Unsupervised consensus clustering was used to analyze the representativeness and reduce the redundancy of radiomics features. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build radiomics signature and develop predictive models of EGFR mutation. ROC curve analysis and Delong test were used to compare the predictive performance among individual features and models.

RESULTS

Of the 234 radiomics features, 93 radiomics features with high repeatability and high predictive significance were selected. The radiomics signature, which was built with one histogram and two textural features, showed the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.762 and 0.775 in the training and validation cohort) in comparison with all the clinical characteristics and conventional CT morphological features to differentiate EGFR mutation status (P < 0.05). The integrated model was developed with maximum diameter, location, sex and radiomics signature. In the training and validation cohort, the integrated model showed the most optimal predictive performance (AUC = 0.798, 0.818 in the training and validation cohort) compared with the clinical models.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics signature showed better performance for predicting EGFR mutant than all the clinical and morphological features. Moreover, the integrated model built with radiomics signature, clinical and morphological features outperformed the clinical models, which is helpful for physicians to determine the targeted therapy.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor acquired resistance mechanism alternates between EGFR and ALK in a lung adenocarcinoma patient

Drive gene mutation positive non‐small cell lung cancer achieves reliable clinical responses to subsequent target therapy. However, most patients will inevitably develop disease progression with multiple treatment failure. Next generation sequencing can identify clear resistance mechanisms. We report a case of a late stage, non‐smoking, male non‐small cell lung cancer patient that developed dual mutations and our attempts to determine the novel resistance mechanism. After systematic chemotherapy, he was administered multiple target therapy according to different genotypes. Larger panel gene detection was adapted after the failure of different treatments to investigate the resistance mechanism. Re‐biopsy and large panel NGS revealed an EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma with alternating changes in acquired resistance between EGFR and ALK. The total survival time was 73 months. The genotypes and treatments in this patient provide new insight of target therapy resistance mechanisms. Re‐biopsy and large panel gene detection should be performed for each driver gene mutation to provide precision treatment strategies.

Elucidating synergistic dependencies in lung adenocarcinoma by proteome-wide signaling-network analysis

To understand drug combination effect, it is necessary to decipher the interactions between drug targets-many of which are signaling molecules. Previously, such signaling pathway models are largely based on the compilation of literature data from heterogeneous cellular contexts. Indeed, de novo reconstruction of signaling interactions from large-scale molecular profiling is still lagging, compared to similar efforts in transcriptional and protein-protein interaction networks. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel algorithm for the systematic inference of protein kinase pathways, and applied it to published mass spectrometry-based phosphotyrosine profile data from 250 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) samples. The resulting network includes 43 TKs and 415 inferred, LUAD-specific substrates, which were validated at >60% accuracy by SILAC assays, including "novel' substrates of the EGFR and c-MET TKs, which play a critical oncogenic role in lung cancer. This systematic, data-driven model supported drug response prediction on an individual sample basis, including accurate prediction and validation of synergistic EGFR and c-MET inhibitor activity in cells lacking mutations in either gene, thus contributing to current precision oncology efforts.

Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 synergistically suppresses KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Activating KRAS mutations are the most common drivers in the development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, unsuccess of treatment by direct inhibition of KRAS has been proven. Deregulation of PI3K signaling plays an important role in tumorigenesis and drug resistance in NSCLC. The activity of PI3Kα-selective inhibition against KRAS-mutated NSCLC remains largely unknown.

Methods

Cell proliferation was detected by sulforhodamine B assay. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were measured by flow cytometry. Cell signaling was assessed by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. RNA interference was used to down-regulate the expression of cyclin D1. Human NSCLC xenografts were employed to detect therapeutic efficacy in vivo.

Results

CYH33 possessed variable activity against a panel of KRAS-mutated NSCLC cell lines. Although CYH33 blocked AKT phosphorylation in all tested cells, Rb phosphorylation decreased in CYH33-sensitive, but not in CYH33-resistant cells, which was consistent with G1 phase arrest in sensitive cells. Combined treatment with the CDK4/6 inhibitor, PD0332991, and CYH33 displayed synergistic activity against the proliferation of both CYH33-sensitive and CYH33-resistant cells, which was accompanied by enhanced G1-phase arrest. Moreover, down-regulation of cyclin D1 sensitized NSCLC cells to CYH33. Reciprocally, CYH33 abrogated the PD0332991-induced up-regulation of cyclin D1 and phosphorylation of AKT in A549 cells. Co-treatment with these two drugs demonstrated synergistic activity against A549 and H23 xenografts, with enhanced inhibition of Rb phosphorylation.

Conclusions

Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kα and CDK4/6 displayed synergistic activity against KRAS-mutated NSCLC. These data provide a mechanistic rationale for the combination of a PI3Kα inhibitor and a CDK4/6 inhibitor for the treatment of KRAS-mutated NSCLC.

Advance of theragnosis biomarkers in lung cancer: from clinical to molecular pathology and biology

One distinct molecular subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is defined by rearrangement of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). The increasing knowledge over the last years has enabled the continuous improvement of ALK inhibitors; however, resistance in these patients remains a major concern. In this review, we summarize recent findings in ALK+-adenocarcinoma of the lung, highlighting the role of TP53 mutations in this specific cancer type and suggest new diagnostic strategies for the future, in order to improve patient's outcome.

ALK testing methods: is there a winner or loser?

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is one of the most attractive molecular targets for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Treatment with ALK inhibitors is recognized as the standard-of-care for patients with ALK gene rearrangements, but it is important to appropriately select patients who will benefit from such treatment. Areas covered: In this article, we review the evidence regarding ALK testing. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are the representative methods for detecting ALK gene fusions. Among these diagnostic modalities, IHC in particular exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ALK fusions when appropriately applied and interpreted. Expert commentary: Discrepancies have been reported between the results of IHC and FISH. However, it was revealed that patients with IHC-positivity and FISH-negativity may respond to alectinib, indicating that IHC can be used as a stand-alone method from a clinical standpoint for the identification of patients eligible for treatment with ALK inhibitors. In addition, differences between ALK variants have been reported to affect the prognosis and efficacy of ALK inhibitor-based treatments, and RT-PCR will likely increase in importance as a complementary tool.

PD-L1 expression in ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A study using simultaneous genotypic screening of EGFR, ALK, and ROS1

Background

The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence and clinicopathologic characteristics of ROS1‐rearranged non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in routine genotypic screening in conjunction with the study of PD‐L1 expression, a biomarker for first‐line treatment decisions.

Methods

Reflex simultaneous genotypic screening for EGFR by peptide nucleic acid clamping, and ALK and ROS1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on consecutive NSCLC cases at the time of initial pathologic diagnosis. We evaluated genetic aberrations, clinicopathologic characteristics, and PD‐L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) using a PD‐L1 22C3 assay kit.

Results

In 407 consecutive NSCLC patients, simultaneous genotyping identified 14 (3.4%) ROS1 and 19 (4.7%) ALK rearrangements, as well as 106 (26%) EGFR mutations. These mutations were mutually exclusive and were found in patients with similar clinical features, including younger age, a prevalence in women, adenocarcinoma, and advanced stage. The PD‐L1 assay was performed on 130 consecutive NSCLC samples. High PD‐L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%) was observed in 29 (22.3%) tumors. PD‐L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1%) was significantly associated with wild type EGFR, while ROS1 rearrangement was associated with high PD‐L1 expression. Of the 14 cases with ROS1 rearrangement, 12 (85.7%) showed PD‐L1 expression and 5 (35.7%) showed high PD‐L1 expression.

Conclusion

In the largest consecutive routine Asian NSCLC cohort analyzed to date, we found that high PD‐L1 expression frequently overlapped with ROS1 rearrangement, while it negatively correlated with EGFR mutations.

Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, has robust efficacy in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is refractory to crizotinib. The efficacy of brigatinib, as compared with crizotinib, in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who have not previously received an ALK inhibitor is unclear.

METHODS

In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received ALK inhibitors to receive brigatinib at a dose of 180 mg once daily (with a 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg) or crizotinib at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included the objective response rate and intracranial response. The first interim analysis was planned when approximately 50% of 198 expected events of disease progression or death had occurred.

RESULTS

A total of 275 patients underwent randomization; 137 were assigned to brigatinib and 138 to crizotinib. At the first interim analysis (99 events), the median follow-up was 11.0 months in the brigatinib group and 9.3 months in the crizotinib group. The rate of progression-free survival was higher with brigatinib than with crizotinib (estimated 12-month progression-free survival, 67% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 56 to 75] vs. 43% [95% CI, 32 to 53]; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74]; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The confirmed objective response rate was 71% (95% CI, 62 to 78) with brigatinib and 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) with crizotinib; the confirmed rate of intracranial response among patients with measurable lesions was 78% (95% CI, 52 to 94) and 29% (95% CI, 11 to 52), respectively. No new safety concerns were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received an ALK inhibitor, progression-free survival was significantly longer among patients who received brigatinib than among those who received crizotinib. (Funded by Ariad Pharmaceuticals; ALTA-1L ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02737501 .).

Highly sensitive detection of ALK resistance mutations in plasma using droplet digital PCR

Background

On-target resistance mechanisms found in one-third of patients receiving anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are secondary ALK mutations in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are large variations in the resistant mutations, unlike the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790 M seen with the use of EGFR-TKIs. Liquid biopsy approaches using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are used for screening and monitoring of mutations in NSCLC. However, feasible protocol for the simultaneous detection of multiple secondary ALK mutations using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has not been developed. An efficient strategy using cfDNA in cancer diagnostics, the development of more accurate and cost-effective tools to identify informative multiple secondary ALK mutations is clinically required.

Methods

To establish a feasible assay to monitor ALK-TKI resistance mutations, we first evaluated the feasibility of ddPCR-based screening for cfDNA mutation detection of 10 distinct secondary ALK mutations. Positive samples were then re-analyzed using mutation-specific probes to track the growth of mutation clones with a high sensitivity.

Results

Blood samples from seven ALK-positive patients were analyzed using the ddPCR protocol. Secondary G1202R ALK mutations were identified in 2 of 7 patients by the screening assay. Using the mutation-specific probes, monitoring the resistant clone during the clinical course of the disease was well demonstrated in each of the patients.

Conclusion

The protocol for ddPCR-based liquid biopsy has a feasibility for the screening of secondary ALK-TKI resistance mutations and offers a tool for a cost-effective monitoring of progression in NSCLC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5031-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fundamental Concepts in the Application of Plasma Genotyping (Liquid Biopsy) to EGFR Mutation Detection in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Plasma genotyping has rapidly evolved from an investigational technology into a standard-of-care tool used to direct therapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multiple testing platforms exist for plasma genotyping, each with unique test characteristics and scientific validation. The optimal use and interpretation of plasma genotyping requires understanding of cell-free DNA biology, the assay characteristics of the available testing technologies, and the application of testing in each clinical scenario. Current recommendations for plasma genotyping in metastatic NSCLC are limited to patients with newly diagnosed disease and those with acquired resistance to targeted therapy, in particular, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitors. In newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC, under certain circumstances, plasma genotyping is useful for the detection of targetable genomic alterations or nontargetable driver alterations (eg, KRAS) that are mutually exclusive with targetable alterations. In patients with acquired resistance to therapy, such as EGFR T790M-mediated acquired resistance to EGFR kinase inhibitors, plasma genotyping may detect resistance mutations missed by standard tissue genotyping because of tumor heterogeneity. In both scenarios, the high specificity and positive predictive value of validated plasma genotyping assays allow for the reliable selection of therapy on the basis of a positive plasma genotyping result. However, the modest sensitivity of these assays requires that negative results be confirmed by tissue genotyping with repeat biopsy, if necessary. There is considerable potential for plasma genotyping in the detection of early-stage disease, for patients at risk for disease recurrence, and as an integrated biomarker of therapeutic response in clinical trials of novel therapies.

Diagnostic and Predictive Immunohistochemistry for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas

Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounts for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages and managed increasingly with targeted therapies and immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss diagnostic and predictive immunohistochemical markers in NSCLC, one of the most common tumors encountered in surgical pathology. We highlight 2 emerging diagnostic markers: nuclear protein in testis (NUT) for NUT carcinoma; SMARCA4 for SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors. Given their highly aggressive behavior, proper recognition facilitates optimal management. For patients with advanced NSCLCs, we discuss the utility and limitations of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the "must-test" predictive biomarkers: anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ROS1, programmed cell death protein 1, and epidermal growth factor receptor. IHC using mutant-specific BRAF V600E, RET, pan-TRK, and LKB1 antibodies can be orthogonal tools for screening or confirmation of molecular events. ERBB2 and MET alterations include both activating mutations and gene amplifications, detection of which relies on molecular methods with a minimal role for IHC in NSCLC. IHC sits at the intersection of an integrated surgical pathology and molecular diagnostic practice, serves as a powerful functional surrogate for molecular testing, and is an indispensable tool of precision medicine in the care of lung cancer patients.

[Advances in Double Mutations of EGFR and ALK Gene in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Molecular target therapy is one of the most popular field of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatmnet. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearragement are the most important two oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, early studies suggested that EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements are mutually exclusive, but isolated cases or small sample research with concomitant EGFR and ALK alterations have been constantly reported. The co-occurrence of EGFR mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements constitutes a rare molecular, the frequency of EGFR/ALK co-alterations was about 1%, however, little has been known about clinicopathologic feature and treatment. This review summarized published case report, EGFR and ALK alterations are common in female, Asian origin, never smoker, IV stage, and denocarcinomas. First-line treatment can choose EGFR or ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, studies about the origin and resistance mechanism in EGFR/ALK co-alterations are little, require more experimental and clinical research.
.

Lung adenocarcinoma with concurrent ALK and ROS1 rearrangement: A case report and review of the literatures

ALK and ROS1 are prognostic and predictive tumor markers in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), which are more often found in lung adenocarcinomas as with other oncogenes such as EGFR, KRAS, or C-MET. Their positivity is 2.6% and 1.3%, respectively, and patients who have mutations in both genes are extremely rare. Here, we report a 61-year-old male diagnosed with acinar adenocarcinoma, who was shown to have both ALK and ROS1 rearrangements but was EGFR- and C-MET mutation-negative. He was treated surgically and received targeted therapy. Our review of the literature revealed that few such cases of concurrent ALK and ROS1 rearrangements have been reported. This information furthers our understanding of the molecular biology underlying NSCLC which will aid the selection of optimal treatment for patients with more than one driver mutation.

Differential Sensitivity Analysis for Resistant Malignancies (DISARM) Identifies Common Candidate Therapies across Platinum-Resistant Cancers

PURPOSE

Despite a growing arsenal of approved drugs, therapeutic resistance remains a formidable and, often, insurmountable challenge in cancer treatment. The mechanisms underlying therapeutic resistance remain largely unresolved and, thus, examples of effective combinatorial or sequential strategies to combat resistance are rare. Here, we present Differential Sensitivity Analysis for Resistant Malignancies (DISARM), a novel, integrated drug screen analysis tool designed to address this dilemma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

DISARM, a software package and web-based application, analyzes drug response data to prioritize candidate therapies for models with resistance to a reference drug and to assess whether response to a reference drug can be utilized to predict future response to other agents. Using cisplatin as our reference drug, we applied DISARM to models from nine cancers commonly treated with first-line platinum chemotherapy including recalcitrant malignancies such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD).

RESULTS

In cisplatin-resistant models, DISARM identified novel candidates including multiple inhibitors of PI3K, MEK, and BCL-2, among other classes, across unrelated malignancies. Additionally, DISARM facilitated the selection of predictive biomarkers of response and identification of unique molecular subtypes, such as contrasting ASCL1-low/cMYC-high SCLC targetable by AURKA inhibitors and ASCL1-high/cMYC-low SCLC targetable by BCL-2 inhibitors. Utilizing these predictions, we assessed several of DISARM's top candidates, including inhibitors of AURKA, BCL-2, and HSP90, to confirm their activity in cisplatin-resistant SCLC models.

CONCLUSIONS

DISARM represents the first validated tool to analyze large-scale in vitro drug response data to statistically optimize candidate drug and biomarker selection aimed at overcoming candidate drug resistance.

Clinical Validation of Coexisting Activating Mutations Within EGFR, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase, and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathways in Lung Cancers

CONTEXT.—

Mutations within the same signature transduction pathway are redundant and, therefore, most are mutually exclusive. Laboratory errors, however, may introduce unexpected coexisting mutations.

OBJECTIVE.—

To validate coexisting mutations within epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mitogen-activated protein kinase, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways.

DESIGN.—

In this retrospective study for quality assessment of next-generation sequencing in a clinical diagnostics setting, coexisting mutations within EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, AKT1, and PIK3CA genes were examined in 1208 non-small cell lung cancers.

RESULTS.—

EGFR mutations did not coexist with BRAF mutations, neither kinase-activated nor kinase-impaired mutations. There was a low but similar incidence (3.3%-5.1%) of PIK3CA mutations in BRAF-, EGFR-, and KRAS-mutated lung cancers and a rare incidence of coexisting KRAS and EGFR mutations detected in 1 of 1208 lung cancers (0.08%) or 1 of 226 EGFR-mutated lung cancers (0.4%). Coexisting BRAF p.V600E mutation was observed in 3 of 4 AKT1 p.E17K-mutated lung cancers. Mutational profiling of DNA reisolated from subareas with the same or different histomorphology, using an alternative assay, confirmed that coexisting mutations might present within the same (whole or subclonal) population or different populations and clarified that the so-called coexisting activating KRAS and BRAF mutations originally reported in a specimen were indeed present in separate lung nodules submitted in the same block.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The results supported that EGFR and BRAF mutations are early driver mutations in lung cancers. Guidelines from official organizations to establish standard operating procedures are warranted to validate unexpected coexisting mutations and, if clinically indicated, to determine their presence in the same or different tumor populations.

Genetic instability and recurrent MYC amplification in ALK-translocated NSCLC: a central role of TP53 mutations

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement defines a distinct molecular subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the excellent initial efficacy of ALK inhibitors in patients with ALK+ lung cancer, resistance occurs almost inevitably. To date, there is no reliable biomarker allowing the identification of patients at higher risk of relapse. Here, we analysed a subset of 53 ALK+ tumours with and without TP53 mutation and ALK+ NSCLC cell lines by NanoString nCounter technology. We found that the co-occurrence of early TP53 mutations in ALK+ NSCLC can lead to chromosomal instability: 24% of TP53-mutated patients showed amplifications of known cancer genes such as MYC (14%), CCND1 (10%), TERT (5%), BIRC2 (5%), ORAOV1 (5%), and YAP1 (5%). MYC-overexpressing ALK+ TP53-mutated cells had a proliferative advantage compared to wild-type cells. ChIP-Seq data revealed MYC-binding sites within the promoter region of EML4, and MYC overexpression in ALK+ TP53-mutated cells resulted in an upregulation of EML4-ALK, indicating a potential MYC-dependent resistance mechanism in patients with increased MYC copy number. Our study reveals that ALK+ NSCLC represents a more heterogeneous subgroup of tumours than initially thought, and that TP53 mutations in that particular cancer type define a subset of tumours that harbour chromosomal instability, leading to the co-occurrence of pathogenic aberrations. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Molecular testing and treatment patterns for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: PIvOTAL observational study

Background

The goals of this multinational retrospective study were to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes by receipt of molecular testing and molecular status of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

This chart review study, conducted in Italy, Spain, Germany, Australia, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Brazil, included 1440 patients with newly diagnosed advanced (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC initiating systemic therapy from January 2011 through June 2013, with follow-up until July 2016. We evaluated treatment patterns and survival by histology, line of therapy, molecular testing, and test results for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and/or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. Country-specific data were analyzed descriptively and presented as ranges (lowest to highest country). Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Patients with ≥1 molecular test varied from 43% (Brazil) to 85% (Taiwan). Numerically greater proportions of patients who were female, Asian, or never/former-smokers, and those with nonsquamous histology or stage-IV NSCLC, received a test. Testing was common for nonsquamous NSCLC (54%, Brazil, to 91%, Taiwan), with positive EGFR and ALK tests from 17% (Brazil and Spain) to 67% (Taiwan) and from 0% (Brazil) to 60% (Taiwan), respectively. First-line treatment regimens for nonsquamous NSCLC with positive EGFR/ALK tests included targeted therapy for 30% (Germany) to 89% (Japan); with negative/inconclusive test results, platinum-based combinations for 88% (Japan) to 98% (Brazil); and if not tested, platinum-based combinations for 80% (Australia) to 95% (Japan), except in Taiwan, where 44% received single agents. Median OS from first-line therapy initiation was 10.0 (Japan) to 26.7 (Taiwan) months for those tested and 7.6 (Australia/Brazil) to 19.3 (Taiwan) months for those not tested.

Conclusions

We observed substantial variation among countries in testing percentages, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes. Efforts to optimize molecular testing rates should be implemented in the context of each country’s health care scenario.

Spotlight on lorlatinib and its potential in the treatment of NSCLC: the evidence to date

The identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), an oncogenetic driver mutation, in lung cancer has paved the way for a new era in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Targeting ALK using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. However, most patients relapse on ALK-TKI therapy within a few years because of acquired resistance. One mechanism of acquiring resistance is a second mutation on the ALK gene, and the representative mutation is L1996M in the gatekeeper residue. In particular, the solvent-front ALK G1202R mutation is the common cause of resistance against first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs. Another major concern regarding ALK-TKI is metastasis to the central nervous system, commonly observed in patients relapsing after ALK-TKI therapy. The next-generation ALK inhibitor lorlatinib (PF-06463922) has therefore been developed to inhibit resistant ALK mutations, including ALK G1202R, and to penetrate the blood–brain barrier. In a Phase I/II trial, the safety and efficacy of lorlatinib were demonstrated in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, most of whom had central nervous system metastases and had previous ALK-TKI treatment. In this review, we discuss the structure, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib and compare its characteristics with those of other ALK inhibitors. Furthermore, clinical trials for lorlatinib are summarized, and future perspectives in the management of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC are discussed.