Causes and consequences of duration of untreated psychosis in schizophrenia

A 20-year follow-up study on schizophrenia in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome and predictors of patients with schizophrenia 20 years later.

METHOD

The patients, aged 15-39 years, with diagnosis of schizophrenia and first admitted to a national mental hospital in Singapore in 1975 were included. In 1980, 1985, 1990 and 1995, their hospital records were examined and the patients were interviewed to determine their working and treatment status. Possible predictors of good outcome and suicide data were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 402 patients were included. Over 20 years, there was lower percentage of patients working full time and proportionately more patients were receiving out-patient treatment. Overall, about two-third of the patients had a good/fair outcome. Shorter illness duration before admission was significantly associated with a good outcome. The suicide rate was the highest in the first 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with schizophrenia had a good/fair outcome at 20 years.

A Canadian programme for early intervention in non-affective psychotic disorders

OBJECTIVES

To provide a brief overview of the development of clinical services and research for early intervention in psychotic disorders in Canada; to describe components of a comprehensive clinical/research programme for nonaffective psychotic disorders; and to present a summary of results of clinical and social outcomes achieved.

METHOD

This is a descriptive paper providing some details of how clinical services are being developed in Canada and concentrating on one particular early intervention programme, Prevention and Early intervention Programme for Psychoses (PEPP) London, Ontario, which is using a historical control design to evaluate the impact of an assertive approach to community case detection. Components of a phase-specific treatment programme and early case detection are described followed by results based on clinical and psychosocial data collected according to a defined protocol.

RESULTS

One year outcome for patients treated in PEPP shows use of low dose, pre-dominantly novel antipsychotics and high (81.5%) retention and remission (75%) rates. Highly significant improvements were also reported for self-rated quality of life and cognition. Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and premorbid adjustment were associated with improvement in positive and negative symptoms, respectively. Systemic changes to improve access to the service resulted in substantial increases in number of cases treated and a> 50% decline in DUP.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase-specific treatment approach and case identification strategies to reduce delay in treatment are likely to substantially improve outcome in nonaffective psychotic disorders compared with what has been reported with traditional approaches.

The impact of the duration of untreated psychosis prior to first psychiatric admission on the 15-year outcome in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

There is a large amount of evidence to support the hypothesis that the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) prior to first psychiatric admission adversely affects acute treatment response and short-term outcome in schizophrenia. However, only few prospective studies have attempted to address a possible association between DUP and long-term outcome.

METHOD

Fifty-eight DSM-III-R schizophrenic patients were assessed at their first psychiatric admission and after a 15-year course of the illness. The 15-year outcome in different domains was compared between patients with different DUPs prior to the first psychiatric admission.

RESULTS

A longer DUP was associated with more pronounced negative, positive and general psychopathological symptoms as well as a lower global functioning 15 years after the first psychiatric admission, even after effects of other factors, possibly related to the long-term outcome, were controlled for.

CONCLUSIONS

The DUP prior to first psychiatric admission adversely affects the long-term outcome in schizophrenia. The findings underline the importance of establishing health service programs for early detection and treatment of schizophrenic patients with the aim to shorten the DUP and to consequently improve the course and outcome of schizophrenic patients.

Is earlier better? At the beginning of schizophrenia: timing and opportunities for early intervention

The fundamental tenet is treating psychotic patients as quickly and as effectively as possible. Few would oppose this idea. Increasing community awareness of the services, enhancing accessibility, optimizing the treatment approaches, improving compliance, and addressing substance misuse should hopefully translate into improved outcomes for the patients and their families and are extremely encouraging and welcome developments. However, the field urgently needs properly designed randomized controlled trials to definitively determine their efficacy. If they are shown to be efficacious the emphasis should then shift to randomized controlled trials of prodromal intervention. If prodromal intervention is proven to be successful then earlier might indeed be better and primary prevention within reach.

Methodological pitfalls in early detection studies - the NAPE Lecture 2002. Nordic Association for Psychiatric Epidemiology

OBJECTIVE

To identify and discuss methodological pitfalls that may help explain why many questions around early detection (ED) and duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) are still unsolved.

METHOD

This paper concentrates on pitfalls in the following areas: sampling, measurement and data analyses.

RESULTS

The main problems seem to be:

SAMPLING

Referral bias, exclusion of patients, patient refusal, and patients lost to follow-up.

MEASUREMENT

Reliability, which is particularly cogent for multisite investigations, and validity, which includes: Start of illness, start of psychosis, diagnoses, start of treatment, the relationship between ED and DUP and choice of outcome measures. Data Analyses: Overlooking threshold effects of DUP, improper control for baseline scores, and lack of control for confounders.

CONCLUSION

Methodological pitfalls may bias ED studies. Several pitfalls are unavoidable, but proper design and quality assurance can reduce their impact. Researchers ought to identify the pitfalls, and to estimate and discuss their influence.

Pathways to care: help seeking behaviour in first episode psychosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the number of attempts it took before patients with a first episode of psychosis received adequate help, the signs or symptoms that led them to seek help and the people from whom they attempted to seek help.

METHOD

Subjects were 86 individuals with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, mainly schizophrenia, who were attending a comprehensive program for early psychosis treatment.

RESULTS

Help-seeking attempts began in the prodromal phase of the illness and continued into the psychotic phase. Concerning behaviours ranged from more general symptoms to psychotic symptoms. A range of contacts were made early on but emergency services were most often the contact that helped individuals obtain appropriate treatment for psychosis.

CONCLUSION

Improved public education and gatekeeper education might reduce the time required for individuals developing a psychosis to receive timely and adequate care.

Duration of untreated psychosis and its correlates in first-episode psychosis in Finland and Spain

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) with early course characteristics in first-episode psychosis in Finland and Spain.

METHOD

Eighty-six patients from Finland (49) and Spain (37) were evaluated on various early course characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean value of DUP was 4.0 months (median 2 months) for the Finnish patients and 9.9 months (median 2 months) for the Spanish ones. In both groups, long DUP was associated with insidious onset, poor global functioning, and laboral incapability. Among the Finnish patients exclusively, long DUP correlated with a weak earlier social network, instability of professional identity, long duration of prodromal symptoms, psychological dependency on the family, and criticism by the parents of the patient. Among the Spanish patients only, longer DUP was associated with more severe positive symptoms at admission.

CONCLUSION

There are universal psychosocial factors influencing DUP, but also cultural differences may have an impact on the treatment delay.

Early intervention in schizophrenia: a critique

OBJECTIVE

Two forms of early intervention in psychosis are currently being proposed--intervention before the onset of illness with at-risk individuals and intervention after the onset of psychosis.

METHOD

The risks and potential benefits associated with these two approaches were examined using published data and Bayes probability theorem.

RESULTS

Claims for benefits from early intervention in established psychosis go back more than two hundred years to the nineteenth-century advocates for asylum construction. Theoretical support for early intervention in psychosis rests on data suggesting that a longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is associated with poor outcome. The association of DUP with outcome, however, appears to be inseparable from the confounding influence of the good outcome expected in recent-onset psychosis. Although some researchers advocate treating people with premorbid features of psychosis or other high-risk indicators, adequate screening measures and effective interventions are not yet available. The most promising current screening measure, if applied to the general population, would be accurate only two percent of the time. The accuracy of these measures can be improved by screening only those patients who are referred to a clinic, but this strategy will result in many cases in the population-at-large being overlooked.

DISCUSSION

The risks and potential benefits associated with the two early intervention approaches are very different. The provision of optimal treatment early in psychosis could produce benefits, but people with brief, good-prognosis psychotic episodes are likely to receive unnecessary treatment. Screening the general population or patients referred to a clinic will have little public health impact on the incidence of schizophrenia. There is likely to be considerable negative impact on those who are inaccurately labeled as being at imminent risk of psychosis and are treated accordingly.

The role of early warning symptoms in the detection and prevention of relapse in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The capacity of most clinical programs to detect early signs of relapse in schizophrenia and to implement strategies to prevent clinical progression remains unevaluated. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the detection of relapse in schizophrenia and to draw conclusions that may be of use in the implementation of clinical programs.

METHOD

The relevant literature identified by standard search methods is explored and analysed.

RESULTS

Few studies have the capacity to directly address the question as to whether it is possible to predict relapse with a high degree of predictive power. Recently, the implementation of a multifactorial approach to relapse prediction appears to have offered substantial benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction of episodes of psychotic relapse is a realistic goal. Evidence indicates that interventions based upon programs of early detection can reduce rates of illness relapse. Prediction of relapse is most successful when implemented in a multifactorial way that involves specific and non-specific symptoms, structured ratings, clinical judgement, families, patients and clinicians.

The early stages of schizophrenia: speculations on pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches

Schizophrenia is commonly considered a neurodevelopmental disorder that is associated with significant morbidity; however, unlike other neurodevelopmental disorders, the symptoms of schizophrenia often do not manifest for decades. In most patients, the formal onset of schizophrenia is preceded by prodromal symptoms, including positive symptoms, mood symptoms, cognitive symptoms, and social withdrawal. The proximal events that trigger the formal onset of schizophrenia are not clear but may include developmental biological events and environmental interactions or stressors. Treatment with antipsychotic drugs clearly ameliorates psychotic symptoms, and maintenance therapy may prevent the occurrence of relapse. The use of atypical antipsychotic agents may additionally ameliorate the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and prevent disease progression. Moreover, if treated properly early in the course of illness, many patients can experience a significant remission of their symptoms and are capable of a high level of recovery following the initial episode. Because the clinical deterioration that occurs in schizophrenia may actually begin in the prepsychotic phase, early identification and intervention may favorably alter the course and outcome of schizophrenia.

Early detection strategies for untreated first-episode psychosis

Some studies in first-episode schizophrenia correlate shorter duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) with better prognosis, suggesting that timing of treatment may be important. A three-site prospective clinical trial in Norway and Denmark is underway to investigate the effect of the timing of treatment in first-episode psychosis. One health care sector (Rogaland, Norway) is experimental and has developed an early detection (ED) system to reduce DUP. Two other sectors (Ullevål, Norway, and Roskilde, Denmark) are comparison sectors and rely on existing detection and referral systems for first-episode cases. The study ultimately will compare early detected with usual detected patients. This paper describes the study's major independent intervention variable, i.e. a comprehensive education and detection system to change DUP in first onset psychosis. System variables and first results from the four-year inclusion period (1997-2000) are described. It includes targeted information towards the general public, health professionals and schools, and ED teams to recruit appropriate patients into treatment as soon as possible. This plus easy access to psychiatric services via ED teams systematically changed referral patterns of first-episode schizophrenia. DUP was reduced by 1.5 years (mean) from before the time the ED system was instituted (to 0.5 years). The ED strategies appear to be effective and to influence directly the community's help-seeking behaviour.

First-episode psychosis in the military: a comparative study of prodromal symptoms

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to provide a retrospective description of prodromal symptoms of young military servicemen with first-episode psychosis, and a comparison with first-episode non-psychotic disorders.

METHOD

Thirty consecutive servicemen presenting with first-episode psychosis were studied. Thirty-four randomly selected servicemen from 123 with non-psychotic disorders served as comparison. A combination of unstructured and semistructured interviews with the patient and other informants was used to describe the prodromal symptoms.

RESULTS

The most common prodromal psychotic symptoms were social withdrawal (83%); anxiety (77%); sleep disturbance (77%); disturbance in attention, concentration or memory (73%); deterioration in studies in school (70%); depressed mood (63%); odd behaviour (53%); and anger or irritability (53%). Common symptoms found in first-episode psychosis and non-psychotic patients included sleep disturbance, anxiety, depressed mood and anger or irritability. Common symptoms that were associated with the psychotic prodrome were social withdrawal (p < 0.001), deterioration in school results (p < 0.001) and disturbance in attention, concentration or memory (p < 0.001). The psychotic prodrome was also associated with apathy (p < 0.001), odd behaviour (p < 0.001), doing nothing (p = 0.004) and thought blocking (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Cognitive disturbances and attenuated negative symptoms appear to be more specific to the psychotic prodrome in young patients with first-episode psychosis.

Rationale for the study of early intervention

Consistent but relatively weak evidence exists that treating patients with schizophrenia early in the course of their illness can decrease long-term morbidity. Relatedly, it is possible that treating individuals even earlier might produce better results. The findings presented set the stage for early and even earlier formal intervention studies, where the potential benefits are thought to outweigh the potential risks.

Ethics and early intervention in psychosis: keeping up the pace and staying in step

The intense clinical and research interest in early psychosis in recent years has highlighted a range of ethical issues which need to be considered carefully. Our perspective is based on 16 years of clinical and research experience with young people at this phase of illness as well as the research contributions of many others. We discuss the ethical dilemmas in relation to the three key foci, which make up the early psychosis paradigm. These are the pre-psychotic or prodromal phase, the period of untreated psychosis and the first psychotic episode and the critical period of recovery, which follows this. Most attention is devoted to the pre-psychotic period, however ethical considerations related to research in the other two clinical foci are briefly covered as well. Our contention is that the ethical issues are essentially identical to those arising in early intervention research in mainstream medicine. This has been concealed by inconsistency and emotion, which has great potential to confuse, politicize and derail rational debate. The legacy of the isolation of psychiatry from medicine and consequent prejudice and stigma in the professional as well as the public mind seems to be fueling a tendency in some societies to view psychiatric research as qualitatively different from other medical research. Sound clinical research data should be allowed to illuminate the options for potential consumers across all phases of illness. The alternative is research paralysis, which would force clinical practice to expand blindly without an evidence base.